WO2013184156A1 - Gestion de données d'entraînement et système associé - Google Patents

Gestion de données d'entraînement et système associé Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2013184156A1
WO2013184156A1 PCT/US2012/054809 US2012054809W WO2013184156A1 WO 2013184156 A1 WO2013184156 A1 WO 2013184156A1 US 2012054809 W US2012054809 W US 2012054809W WO 2013184156 A1 WO2013184156 A1 WO 2013184156A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
data
network
training
onboard
training data
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2012/054809
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Jason C. Wenger
Jaclyn A. HOKE
Brian R. WOLFORD
Alex Postnikov
James N. POTTS
Alex W. HALFPENNY
Original Assignee
Rockwell Collins, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US13/608,367 external-priority patent/US9836989B2/en
Application filed by Rockwell Collins, Inc. filed Critical Rockwell Collins, Inc.
Priority to CN201280073785.4A priority Critical patent/CN104603857B/zh
Publication of WO2013184156A1 publication Critical patent/WO2013184156A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B9/00—Simulators for teaching or training purposes
    • G09B9/02—Simulators for teaching or training purposes for teaching control of vehicles or other craft
    • G09B9/04—Simulators for teaching or training purposes for teaching control of vehicles or other craft for teaching control of land vehicles
    • G09B9/042—Simulators for teaching or training purposes for teaching control of vehicles or other craft for teaching control of land vehicles providing simulation in a real vehicle
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B9/00—Simulators for teaching or training purposes
    • G09B9/02—Simulators for teaching or training purposes for teaching control of vehicles or other craft
    • G09B9/08—Simulators for teaching or training purposes for teaching control of vehicles or other craft for teaching control of aircraft, e.g. Link trainer

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to management of training data presented to a trainee. More particularly, embodiments of the present invention relate to a computerized method and system for selectively determining a data set to present to a trainee ensuring a safe and effective training scenario.
  • Training may be the basis upon which desired performance may depend. Enhancement of a training scenario may be a constant and desired goal of a training entity. A trainee may perform better in a future encounter with a scenario if the trainee has had previous experience with a similar scenario. Creation of a particular scenario may be difficult and expensive. For example, in training a Captain of a ship, the trainee/Captain may benefit from experience with a scenario involving a second ship from which the trainee/Captain must maneuver to avoid. To create a scenario involving two actual ships on a collision course may be prohibitively expensive as well as unsafe for the training entity charged with education of the trainee/Captain.
  • Many platforms may communicate information to an operator via a data display or other visual or aural indicator.
  • the Captain of the ship may reference a radar display from which he may determine a possible course of action to take to avoid a collision.
  • Each user interface may communicate with the user in a specific way offering data to the user beneficial to operation of the platform.
  • the Captain may visually reference a radar display, the Captain may aurally perceive a collision warning, and the Captain may visually perceive a flashing beacon on the horizon. All of these queues may provide an input to the decision the Captain may make.
  • Live training scenarios may provide the best possible training environment for a trainee.
  • a trainee who has experienced an event in a real world training environment may subsequently perform more productively than if the trainee had not experienced the training event.
  • Actual presence in the aircraft, flying through airspace, may add an increased aspect of positive stress to the training environment.
  • a wingman may practice a maneuver to position his aircraft for weapons employment as the flight lead aircraft makes a visual identification of a target. Having performed this maneuver numerous times in an actual fighter aircraft, the wingman may perform more productively in a combat scenario than if the wingman had not previously practiced the maneuver.
  • Simulation has found success in a variety of training scenarios.
  • the cost of simulating a scenario may be a fraction of the cost of actually creating the same Live training scenario.
  • Quality of simulation has been enhanced with computer generated graphics, computer generated threats, and integrated simulations.
  • Simulation of information communicated to an operator may be presented to the operator via the various indicators.
  • the training entity may present the ship's Captain a simulation of a radar display on which the Captain may base a decision. This simulation may be accomplished without the use of an actual ship. Radar displays, communications heard by the trainee, threats posed to the trainee, and consequences for each action taken by the trainee may all be generated by a computer device.
  • LVC Live Virtual Constructive
  • LVC may include Live assets (such as an actual aircraft flying on a weapons range), Virtual assets (such as a pilot operating a simulator at a ground-based location), and Constructive assets (those objects generated and operated by an algorithm on a computer device).
  • a datalink capable of multi-platform and multi mission connectivity may include such factors as Quality of service (QQS), number of participants, bandwidth allocation per participant, available spectrum, and usefulness in consideration of the rules of the geographic area in which an entity may operate.
  • QQS Quality of service
  • number of participants number of participants
  • bandwidth allocation per participant bandwidth allocation per participant
  • available spectrum available spectrum
  • Training situations may require accurate presentations to an operator to retain training value.
  • training data may be displayed alongside actual data. Uncorrelated simulated data presented alongside actual data may create an unintentional presentation. Correlation of the training data and the actual data to create a presentation as intended by a training entity may add value to the training environment.
  • Simulation may be one valuable tool usable by an instructor to cost effectively train a student.
  • simulation data displacing actual critical data may diminish student situational awareness and lead to diminishing levels of safety.
  • An operator confused about which data may be simulated and which data corresponds to actual events may adversely affect the level of safety of the operator and those in proximity with the operator.
  • Safety may be one goal of the training entity.
  • a training entity may offer training in a dangerous activity.
  • the trainee may base decisions on the information provided, the trainee may be placed in a situation where an incorrect decision may lead to an unrecoverable situation.
  • an instructor may desire to observe the same display that the trainee is referencing.
  • an instructor may be physically present in the same location as the trainee, the instructor able to observe the same or a similar display and add input to the training scenario.
  • an instructor may be located remotely, able to observe the trainee through a datalink capable of providing a display similar to the display referenced by the trainee.
  • Simulation technology and the integration of simulation with live training may be a means to increase training opportunities and thereby increase crew readiness. While integration of virtual and constructive elements into live training may open up new training avenues, it also raises concerns about operational safety.
  • Security of information contemporaneously presented to multiple operators may be a further goal of the training entity.
  • information presented to a trainee may be of sensitive nature where the training entity may desire only certain trainees receive the information.
  • Separate platforms may be of separate classification. For example, in a multi-national large force exercise with participants from a variety of countries and security clearance levels, the training entity may desire limited information delivery to some, or a majority of, participants.
  • the training entity may desire a functional enhancement to current methods and systems for training data management.
  • a method and related system offering precise management of training scenarios by efficient transmission and reception of training data to and from a remote instructor where reproduction of an accurate data set at a remote location may more efficiently train a student. Further, determining a training safety event requiring intervention then actually intervening in the scenario to maintain a level of safety while selectively determining a data set to present to a trainee may be of particular importance to the training entity.
  • a preferred embodiment of the present invention is directed to a training data network comprising: an onboard data network configured for reception and presentation of primary operational data and selective presentation of training data, an off-board data network configured for at least one of: reception and presentation of the primary operational data, generation of the training data, transmission of a signal to determine the selective presentation of the training data, and transmission of the training data, a datalink operably coupling the onboard data network with the off-board data network, the datalink configured for at least one of: receiving the primary operational data, transmitting the primary operational data to the off-board data network, receiving the training data, transmitting the signal to determine the selective presentation of the training data, and transmitting the training data to the onboard network.
  • a further embodiment of the present invention is directed to a method for providing training data comprising: receiving simulated training data, presenting the simulated training data to an onboard data network, receiving a notification of a safety event, preempting, with no action by an onboard operator, presentation of the simulated training data in response to the receiving.
  • a further embodiment of the present invention is directed to a system for providing training data comprising: a training data generation system, a training data presentation system, an onboard object tracking sensor, an object tracking network, a data guard operably coupling the training data generation system and the object tracking network, the data guard configured for preventing at least partial transmission and reception of at least one of: training data to the object tracking network, object tracking data to the training data generation system and the training data presentation system, and data from a first network to a second network.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram of a training data network in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram of an onboard and off -board monitor in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram of a system for providing training data in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram of an operational configuration of a training data network, an off-board monitor, and remote instructor operating an off-board network representative of a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of a method for providing training data in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • embodiments of the present invention may relate to aircraft training in an airborne scenario. It is contemplated an aircraft may be one of many platforms on which the systems and methods described herein may be configured to operate.
  • the current disclosure may be tailored to operate on any moving or stationary platform or object presentation device for which simulation may be desired.
  • Criticality of data may provide a simulator instructor with needed tools for training.
  • Hierarchy of data may allow a simulator to selectively display data for a productive simulation experience.
  • a training data network may comprise onboard hardware coupled with off-board hardware via a datalink 140.
  • the training data network 100 may provide a mechanism for transmission and reception of primary operational data (or a defined subset thereof) over datalink 140 to and from an off-board data network 122 located at a remote station.
  • a training data network may comprise a remote instructor at the remote station able to view an exact presentation of the view a student may see while operating the onboard data network 102.
  • An onboard data network 102 may be configured to transmit and receive data via a datalink 140 and present data to an onboard operator via a display 110.
  • the onboard data network may preferably comprise an antenna 114 configured to receive data from a datalink 140, transmitter receiver 112 for configuring data for the onboard data network 102, mission processor 106, an onboard data source 104, and a display 110.
  • the remote instructor may operate the off-board data network 122 with software having identical formats as those on the onboard data network 102.
  • an instructor operating an off-board data network 122 on the ground may see the exact picture a student operating onboard data network 102 may experience while flying an actual aircraft.
  • the primary operational data may be in an ARINC 661 format in operation on the aircraft.
  • an ARINC Graphics Server AGS may be processing the ARINC 661 data onboard the aircraft
  • software in the off-board data network 122 may provide the exact display as onboard.
  • the off-board data network 122 may be configured to transmit and receive data via the datalink 1 0 with the onboard data network 102.
  • Hardware comprising an off-board data network 122 may preferably include an antenna 134, transmitter receiver 132, processor 126, off-board data source 124, and display 130.
  • the onboard data network 102 may transmit the primary operational data to the remote station operating the off-board data network 122
  • the datalink 140 connecting two networks may comprise a plurality of forms.
  • the present invention may be configured for datalink agility. It is contemplated the present invention may integrate multiple types of datalink systems, operating on diverse radios, alternative waveforms and bandwidths, and within multiple frequency bands, with link capabilities varying from full TCP/IP connectivity to narrowband, time-slice allocated, fixed-sized packets. These various types of datalink may be integrated through a plurality of installation systems.
  • a first installation system may include Ethernet and power connections brought to an access cover location on a platform 210, allowing for installation of various datalink required hardware and associated antenna requirements, each system may be preferably pre- mounted on one of a set of interchangeable cover plates allowing for ease of change to an additional requirement.
  • a connectivity node for a datalink may be incorporated into a well-known external pod configured for attachment to an existing weapons station.
  • One attachment method may include a set of engineered launcher rail adaptors fitted for either single or paired training pods conforming to the AIM-9 form factor on an aircraft's original wing pylons.
  • the primary operational data set transmitted by the onboard data network 102 may be a subset of the entire primary operational data used by the onboard data network 102. Such subset may comprise data necessary for an operator to effectively operate a vehicle and be less burdensome on the datalink 140 requirements for transmission and reception.
  • a subset of data configured for transmission may include such parameters such as airspeed, altitude, heading, attitude, and position.
  • the subset of data sent to the off-board data network 122 may be dynamic as well.
  • training data network 100 may be configured for transmission of simulated training data from the off-board data network 122 to the onboard data network 102.
  • simulated training data may include a simulated threat external or internal to the aircraft.
  • An exemplary internal threat may be a simulated oil pressure malfunction requiring specific action taken by the operator.
  • An exemplary external threat may include a hostile target against which the operator may be required to take specific action within a set of training rules or within a set of rules of engagement.
  • a remote instructor may employ the training data network to create an ARINC 661 event at the remote station operating the off-board data network 122.
  • the training data network 100 may then transmit the ARINC 661 event to the onboard data network 102 via the datalink 140 to allow a level of control of the aircraft displays 110 from the ground.
  • This remote instructor may be particularly relevant to single seat aircraft where there is not instructor station onboard the aircraft for the instructor to accompany the trainee.
  • the training data network 100 may allow earlier trainee entry into a live training session while allowing the instructor to closely monitor the exercise and mitigate risks.
  • Method 200 may operate upon training data network 100.
  • Method 200 may include an onboard monitor 202 and an off-board monitor 204.
  • Onboard and off-board monitors may function to preclude display of simulated training data should a safety event occur.
  • the onboard monitor 202 may preferably function to monitor onboard systems for a malfunction or critical parameter designated as a safety event.
  • An onboard system requiring constant monitoring may include systems for which safety of operation is critical.
  • an engine fire onboard an aircraft may be a critical safety event during which a training entity may desire all simulated training data be removed from an onboard display 110.
  • a loss of control of the aircraft may be a situation requiring immediate operational attention from the pilot to input proper controls to regain controlled flight.
  • the training entity may desire (and an operator may require) the simulated training data be precluded from trainee perception.
  • the onboard monitor 202 may send a notification of a safety event to the operator. It is contemplated the notification of a safety event may be sent via the datalink 140 142 to additional stations for additional assistance.
  • the notification of a safety event may be in the form of a visual alert on a display 110 indicating a commonly used phrase such as Knock-lt-Off (KIO), a lighted warning such as a master caution or master warning light, and an aural indication of well-known voice prompt system in use on many aircraft.
  • KIO Knock-lt-Off
  • the off-board monitor 204 may preferably communicate with the onboard data network 102 via datalink 142. It is contemplated the off-board monitor 204 may comprise an entity solely charged with operational safety.
  • an off-board monitor 204 may be a Range Control Office (RCO) located at a remote ground station.
  • the RCO may exist solely for safety of the participants operating in designated airspace or an air-to-ground range. The RCO may visually perceive an imminent collision between two aircraft and send a timely notification of a safety event to each of the aircraft. Further, in training many training entities publish a set of training rules, violation of which may result in a removal of the violator from the exercise.
  • a remote RCO at an off-board monitor 204 may perceive a violation of the training rules and thus, send the notification of a safety event to each violator along with an order to return to base.
  • An instructor operating off-board data network 122 may also be a source of a notification of a safety event. Such instructor may perceive a safety event long before student perception and thus, alert the student to the event. For example, and instructor operating off-board data network 122 may perceive an aircraft in a nose low situation in mountainous terrain. Once the instructor perceives the situation, the instructor may send the notification of a safety event via datalink 140 to the student operating the onboard data network 102. The student may then perceive the KIO signal and react accordingly.
  • the preferred notification of a safety event may include, but is not limited to, any individual or combination of: visual alerts, auditory alerts, an exit from a training mode, and removal of any training data from the displays.
  • Visual and/or auditory alerts may further increase in frequency, duration, volume, etc. and if necessary even inhibit training modes as long as unsafe conditions persist.
  • the notification of a safety event is time-critical, is may be assigned the highest priority by the datalink and datalink infrastructure. For example, routine positioning data currently being transmitted via the datalink 140 may be inhibited during transmission of a notification of a safety event.
  • a system for providing training data may be comprised of data guard 310 incorporated as hardware or software within onboard data network 102.
  • the system 300 may function to bi-directionally monitor all communications and block a specific data set from transmission and reception between onboard data network 102 and all off-board data networks.
  • training data such as simulated radar tracks
  • training datalink 340 may be shared between onboard data network 102 and a training entity 350.
  • Such training data may be merged onto a live aircraft display 110 (MFD).
  • MFD live aircraft display 110
  • classified Link16 data could cross over to a training network monitored by coalition forces maintaining a lesser level of security clearance.
  • Training data including radar tracks, may inadvertently cross over and be broadcast via Link16 342 to tactical elements 352.
  • data guard 310 may allow only one-way traffic from the onboard data network 102 to an off-board network.
  • data guard 310 may be configured to allow only tactical data to pass through.
  • data guard 310 may use a signature-based system to ensure that only valid live entities are transmitted to the tactical network 342.
  • Onboard data network 102 operational aboard platform 410 may connect with off-board data network 122 via datalink 140 as well as off-board monitor 204 via datalink 142.
  • Onboard data network 102 may comprise data guard 310 as well as onboard monitor 202 to enhance safety and security.
  • Method 500 may, at step 502, receive simulated training data and, at step 504, present the simulated training data to an onboard data network.
  • Method 500 may continue at step 506 with receiving a notification of a safety event and, at step 508, preempt, with no action by an onboard operator, presentation of the simulated training data in response to the receiving.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Educational Technology (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé de gestion de données d'entraînement et un système associé comprenant trois éléments intégrés. Un réseau de données d'entraînement peut fournir un réseau reliant un instructeur à distance utilisant un réseau de données non embarqué à un élève utilisant un réseau de données embarqué. L'instructeur à distance peut, par l'intermédiaire de la connexion de liaison de données, maintenir un niveau de commande de l'ensemble de données accessible à l'élève. Un procédé de fourniture de données d'entraînement peut comprendre un dispositif de surveillance de sécurité embarqué et non embarqué configuré pour percevoir un événement de sécurité et envoyer une notification de celui-ci à un participant impliqué. Un système de fourniture de données d'entraînement peut comprendre un dispositif de protection de données configuré pour surveiller toutes les communications entre deux réseaux et bloquer des informations sensibles, des données d'entraînement et des communications classifiées entre les réseaux.
PCT/US2012/054809 2012-06-05 2012-09-12 Gestion de données d'entraînement et système associé WO2013184156A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201280073785.4A CN104603857B (zh) 2012-06-05 2012-09-12 训练数据管理方法及相关系统

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201261655917P 2012-06-05 2012-06-05
US61/655,917 2012-06-05
US13/608,367 2012-09-10
US13/608,367 US9836989B2 (en) 2012-06-05 2012-09-10 Training data management method and related system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2013184156A1 true WO2013184156A1 (fr) 2013-12-12

Family

ID=49712410

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2012/054809 WO2013184156A1 (fr) 2012-06-05 2012-09-12 Gestion de données d'entraînement et système associé

Country Status (2)

Country Link
CN (1) CN104603857B (fr)
WO (1) WO2013184156A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111610745A (zh) * 2020-05-08 2020-09-01 中国人民解放军海军潜艇学院 一种载人潜水器模拟训练平台控制方法及模拟训练平台

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5807109A (en) * 1995-03-16 1998-09-15 B.V.R. Technologies Ltd. Airborne avionics simulator system
US20030215771A1 (en) * 2002-04-15 2003-11-20 Bartoldus Klaus H. Autonomous weapons system simulation system for generating and displaying virtual scenarios on board and in flight
US7779449B2 (en) * 2005-04-13 2010-08-17 The Boeing Company Secured network processor
US20120036445A1 (en) * 2010-08-06 2012-02-09 Thales Secured Client-Server Computer System for Interactive Applications
US8140611B1 (en) * 2006-06-07 2012-03-20 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Method and representations for exporting tactical data link information as a web service

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4057913A (en) * 1976-03-26 1977-11-15 The Singer Company Simulated training system that utilizes operational equipment
US8484576B2 (en) * 2003-04-17 2013-07-09 Supersonic Aerospace International, Llc System and method for customizing multiple windows of information on a display
US20070264617A1 (en) * 2006-05-12 2007-11-15 Mark Richardson Reconfigurable non-pilot aircrew training system
CN100495275C (zh) * 2006-11-24 2009-06-03 中国科学院沈阳自动化研究所 小型无人直升机自主飞行控制系统
WO2010105638A1 (fr) * 2009-03-17 2010-09-23 MAX-PLANCK-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V. Procédé de téléopération et interface de robot humain pour la télécommande d'une machine par un opérateur humain

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5807109A (en) * 1995-03-16 1998-09-15 B.V.R. Technologies Ltd. Airborne avionics simulator system
US20030215771A1 (en) * 2002-04-15 2003-11-20 Bartoldus Klaus H. Autonomous weapons system simulation system for generating and displaying virtual scenarios on board and in flight
US7779449B2 (en) * 2005-04-13 2010-08-17 The Boeing Company Secured network processor
US8140611B1 (en) * 2006-06-07 2012-03-20 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Method and representations for exporting tactical data link information as a web service
US20120036445A1 (en) * 2010-08-06 2012-02-09 Thales Secured Client-Server Computer System for Interactive Applications

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111610745A (zh) * 2020-05-08 2020-09-01 中国人民解放军海军潜艇学院 一种载人潜水器模拟训练平台控制方法及模拟训练平台
CN111610745B (zh) * 2020-05-08 2023-03-21 中国人民解放军海军潜艇学院 一种载人潜水器模拟训练平台控制方法及模拟训练平台

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN104603857A (zh) 2015-05-06
CN104603857B (zh) 2018-01-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9836989B2 (en) Training data management method and related system
US9754507B1 (en) Virtual/live hybrid behavior to mitigate range and behavior constraints
US8368584B2 (en) Airspace risk mitigation system
WO2012082242A2 (fr) Système de commande de simulation pour environnement intégré réel et de simulation pour avion
WO2013184155A1 (fr) Procédé de simulateur incorporé et système associé
Denney et al. Safety considerations for UAS ground-based detect and avoid
Homola et al. Technical capability level 2 unmanned aircraft system traffic management (UTM) flight demonstration: Description and analysis
WO2013184156A1 (fr) Gestion de données d'entraînement et système associé
Vidal-Franco et al. Robust uas communications and loss of link operational impact
Korn et al. Stepwise integration of UAS in non-segregated airspace-The potential of tailored uas atm procedures
Martin et al. TCL3 UTM (UAS Traffic Management) Flight Tests, Airspace Operations Laboratory (AOL) Report
Barhydt et al. ADS-B within a multi-aircraft simulation for distributed air-ground traffic management
Richardson et al. Formation flight system design concept
Žentek et al. European air C2 system national requirements: Case study of the Slovak Republic
Coldsnow et al. Safety Case for Small Uncrewed Aircraft Systems (sUAS) Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) Operations at NASA Langley Research Center
Simpson et al. Safety challenges in flying UAVS (unmanned aerial vehicles) in non segregated airspace
Surakitbanharn Evaluating intensity as a controller function for NextGen scenarios with increased capacity
Stevenson Assessment of the equivalent level of safety requirements for small unmanned aerial vehicles
Pasciuto et al. MedALE RTS campaign: data analysis and reporting
Firdaus et al. The importance of understanding technical terminology in coordination between ATC and the engineer
Chen et al. Development and Testing of a Ground Control Station for Multi-UAV Operation using NASA’s WorldWind API
Carvalho The use of Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) in a mid-air collision to improve the safety and resilience of the air traffic management system
Underwood et al. Proof-of-Concept Demonstrations of a Flight Adjustment Logging and Communication Network
Teller et al. November 2014 proof-of-concept ACAS-Xu flight test
Simpson et al. UAS Safety in Non-segregated Airspace

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 12878318

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 12878318

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1