WO2013180786A1 - Method of repairing transparent substrates and repaired substrates - Google Patents

Method of repairing transparent substrates and repaired substrates Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2013180786A1
WO2013180786A1 PCT/US2013/030113 US2013030113W WO2013180786A1 WO 2013180786 A1 WO2013180786 A1 WO 2013180786A1 US 2013030113 W US2013030113 W US 2013030113W WO 2013180786 A1 WO2013180786 A1 WO 2013180786A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
polymerizable resin
light
transmissive
cover film
meth
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2013/030113
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Sonja S. Mackey
Steven R. Anderson
Barry S. GILBERT
James P. Dizio
Christopher L. Thomas
Anthony M. Renstrom
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
3M Innovative Properties Co
Original Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 3M Innovative Properties Co filed Critical 3M Innovative Properties Co
Publication of WO2013180786A1 publication Critical patent/WO2013180786A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B29WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
    • B29CSHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING
    • B29C73/00Repairing of articles made from plastics or substances in a plastic state, e.g. of articles shaped or produced by using techniques covered by this subclass or subclass B29D
    • B29C73/02Repairing of articles made from plastics or substances in a plastic state, e.g. of articles shaped or produced by using techniques covered by this subclass or subclass B29D using liquid or paste-like material
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B29WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
    • B29CSHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING
    • B29C35/00Heating, cooling or curing, e.g. crosslinking or vulcanising; Apparatus therefor
    • B29C35/02Heating or curing, e.g. crosslinking or vulcanizing during moulding, e.g. in a mould
    • B29C35/08Heating or curing, e.g. crosslinking or vulcanizing during moulding, e.g. in a mould by wave energy or particle radiation
    • B29C35/0805Heating or curing, e.g. crosslinking or vulcanizing during moulding, e.g. in a mould by wave energy or particle radiation using electromagnetic radiation
    • B29C2035/0827Heating or curing, e.g. crosslinking or vulcanizing during moulding, e.g. in a mould by wave energy or particle radiation using electromagnetic radiation using UV radiation

Definitions

  • a method of repairing a light-transmissive substrate comprising: providing a polymeric light-transmissive substrate comprising at least one surface defect; filling the surface defect with a polymerizable resin composition having a viscosity ranging from 25 cps to 50,000 at 25°C; applying a pressure sensitive adhesive coated light-transmissive polymeric cover film to at least the filled surface defect; and curing the polymerizable resin composition before or after applying the pressure sensitive adhesive coated film.
  • FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional showing a (e.g. scratch) surface defect in a light-transmissive substrate
  • FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of an over-filled scratch
  • FIG. 3 is cross-sectional view showing the spreading and optional partial removal of the excess polymerizable resin
  • FIG. 4 is a cross-section showing the surface defect of FIG. 1 after the surface defect has been filled with polymerizable resin
  • FIG. 5 is a planar view of a filled scratch
  • FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional showing the filled surface defects after application of a pressure sensitive adhesive coated cover film.
  • the method described herein is generally useful for repairing surface defects 206 of polymeric light transmissive substrates 200 comprised of thermosetting or thermoplastic polymeric materials.
  • Typical surface defects 206 include scratches, chips, punctures, and cracks.
  • the method is particularly useful for repairing light transmissive substrates that comprise a low surface energy surface coating.
  • a method of repairing a light-transmissive substrate comprises providing a light-transmissive substrate comprising at least one surface defect, filling the surface defect with a polymerizable resin composition, applying a pressure sensitive adhesive coated light-transmissive polymeric cover film to at least the filled surface defect; and curing the polymerizable resin composition before or after applying the adhesive coated film.
  • the light-transmissive substrate for repair should be relatively clean before repair. If it is not relatively clean, visible debris could become trapped in the repaired article and thus compromise the quality of the repaired surface defect.
  • the light-transmissive substrate is typically cleaned with a lint free wipe comprising a suitable solvent, such as isopropanol, that will not mar the surface.
  • the surface defect is filled with the polymerizable resin composition (also referred to herein as the "repair liquid") using a suitably sized applicator, such as a cotton swab, syringe, pipette, or dental pick.
  • a suitably sized applicator such as a cotton swab, syringe, pipette, or dental pick.
  • the polymerizable resin 207 is applied into and around the surface defect (e.g. scratch) such that the surface area of the light-transmissive substrate that is covered by the repair liquid is typically significantly greater than the surface area of the defect.
  • the ratio of surface area of light-transmissive substrate that is covered by the polymerizable resin to the surface area of the defect is typically at least 15: 1 or 20: 1 and may range up to 600: 1, 700: 1, 800: 1, 900: 1 , or 1000: 1. In the case of a typical scratch having a width of about 25 microns the polymerizable resin typically covers an area at least 1 ⁇ 4 inch (6 mm) greater than the width of the scratch. In typical embodiments, the ratio of surface area of the light-transmissive substrate that is covered by the polymerizable resin repair liquid to the surface area of the defect ranges from about 50: 1 to about 300: 1.
  • One advantage of the present invention is that the polymerizable resin repair liquid need not be precisely applied, which improves efficiency. Further, the excess layer of polymerizable resin on the light- transmissive substrate surrounding the filled defect is surmised to reinforce the repair.
  • excess polymerizable resin is typically spread and optionally partially removed from the surface of the polymeric light-transmissive substrate for example by dragging a planar edge of for example a razor blade 208 across the surface with minimal pressure and at a low angle (e.g. no greater than about 45 degrees). This can also aid in forcing the repair liquid into the surface defect such that the defect is entirely filled with the polymerizable resin.
  • a low angle e.g. no greater than about 45 degrees
  • the excess polymerizable resin on the polymeric light-transmissive substrate is sufficiently thin when applied (e.g. less than 10- 12 microns), such as depicted in FIG. 4. Regardless of the viscosity, the application of the adhesive coated cover film can further spread the polymerizable resin when the cover film is applied prior to curing of the polymerizable resin.
  • the process of applying the polymerizable resin and then spreading an optionally removing the excess resin may be repeated.
  • the edges 209 of FIGS 2 and 4 of the applied polymerizable resin can be further thinned out and blended by application of a suitable solvent.
  • edge thinning is also typically not needed when the viscosity of the polymerizable resin is sufficiently low at 25°C.
  • the ratio of surface area of light-transmissive substrate that is covered by the polymerizable resin to the surface area of the defect is generally about the same or greater than when the polymerizable resin is first applied, yet typically still within the ranges previously described.
  • the polymerizable resin is cured prior to application of the pressure sensitive adhesive coated light-transmissive polymeric cover film.
  • the polymerizable resin utilized to fill the surface defect is typically not a pressure sensitive adhesive.
  • the cured polymerizable resin utilized to fill the surface defect is non-tacky after curing. This combination of attributes can be amenable to being able to replace the pressure sensitive adhesive coated light- transmissive polymeric cover film without removal of the cured repair liquid.
  • the polymerizable resin of the filled surface defect can be cured after applying the pressure sensitive adhesive coated light-transmissive polymeric cover film.
  • such later technique can prevent oxygen inhibition during curing of the polymerizable resin. Further, it is surmised that this later technique can also improve the bonding force between the cured polymerizable resin of the repair and the pressure-sensitive adhesive of the cover film.
  • the thickness of the excess cured polymerizable resin disposed on the light-transmissive substrate is preferably no greater than 10-12 microns. When the height is too high, the cured
  • the polymerizable resin creates surface topography that can be visible when viewed off angle (an angle other than 90 degrees relative to the surface).
  • the thickness of the excess cured polymerizable resin disposed on the light-transmissive substrate is no greater than 9, 8, 7, 6, or 5 microns.
  • Various light-transmissive substrates can be repaired as described herein such as light- transmissive optical films that are utilized in illuminated display devices.
  • Illustrative optical films include but are not limited to, multilayer optical films, (e.g. the planar surface of) microstructured films such as retroreflective sheeting and brightness enhancing films, (e.g. reflective or absorbing) polarizing films, diffusive films, as well as (e.g. biaxial) retarder films and compensator films such as described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0184150.
  • the light transmissive optical substrates are multilayer reflective polarizing films, such as described is U.S. Patent Application
  • optical films are utilized in a variety of portable and non-portable illuminated display articles. These articles include PDAs, cell phones (including combination PDA/cell phones), LCD televisions (direct lit and edge lit), touch sensitive screens, wrist watches, car navigation systems, global positioning systems, depth finders, calculators, electronic books, computer monitors, and notebook computer displays.
  • the viewing surfaces can have any conventional size and shape and can be planar or non-planar, although flat panel displays are most typical.
  • the light transmissive substrate being repaired comprises a polymeric material such as polycarbonate, acrylic (e.g., polymethyl methacrylate or
  • PMMA polymethyl methacrylate
  • polyolefins e.g., polypropylene or "PP”
  • polyurethane e.g., polyethylene terephthalate or "PET”
  • PET polyethylene terephthalate
  • polyamides e.g., polyimides, phenolic resins, cellulose diacetate, cellulose triacetate, polystyrene.
  • polymeric materials such as plastics generally have a surface energy of less than 100 dynes/cm 2 , 75 dynes/cm 2 , or 50 dynes/cm 2 .
  • polyester is reported to have surface energy of 43 dynes/cm 2 ; polycarbonate 42 dynes/cm 2 ; polyvinyl chloride 39 dynes/cm 2 ; and acrylic 38 dynes/cm 2 .
  • Even lower surface energy materials have a surface energy of less than 37 dynes/cm 2 . These include for example polyvinyl acetate, polystyrene, acetal, ethylene vinyl acetate, and polyethylene reported to have a surface energy of 31 dynes/cm 2 .
  • Light transmissive films that are typically exposed to the outdoor environment during use often comprise a low surface energy coating that typically comprises fluorinated or silicone additives.
  • a substrate with a low surface energy coating exhibits an advancing contact angle with water of at least 80, 90, or 100 degrees.
  • Low surface energy materials can complicate the repair process. For example, it has been found that when one attempts to fill a surface defect, such as a scratch, with a low viscosity material, the material tends to bead up rather than fill the surface defect.
  • one favored characteristic of the present invention is to utilize a polymerizable resin having a sufficiently high viscosity to overcome the repellency of the low surface energy surface.
  • the viscosity of the polymerizable resin is at least 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, or 60 cps at 25°C (e.g. for a surface having a surface energy of 36-38 dynes/cm). It is surmised that for even lower surface energy surfaces, the minimum viscosity may be even higher. In some embodiments, the viscosity is at least 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200 or 225 cps at 25°C.
  • the viscosity of the polymerizable resin can range up to 50,000 cps at 25°C, yet is typically no greater than 25,000; 20,000; 15,000; or 10,000 cps at 25°C. When the viscosity is too high, it can be difficult to spread the polymerizable resin such that the thickness is below 10- 12 microns, as previously described. In some favored embodiments, the polymerizable resin has a viscosity no greater than 5,000; 4,000; 3,000; or 2,000 cps or 1,000 at 25°C.
  • the refractive index of the polymerizable resin generally ranges from about 1.4 to 1.6 for common polymeric light-transmissive substrates. To minimize the visibility of a repaired scratch, it is preferred that the kinds and amounts of components of the polymerizable resin are selected such that the refractive index of the polymerizable resin is sufficiently matched to the refractive index of the light- transmissive substrate.
  • the difference in refractive index is typically no greater than 0.05.
  • the polymerizable resin composition is a substantially solvent free polymerizable composition.
  • substantially solvent free refer to the polymerizable composition having less than 5 wt-%, 4 wt-%, 3 wt-%, 2 wt-%, 1 wt-%, and 0.5 wt-% of (e.g. organic) solvent.
  • concentration of solvent can be determined by known methods, such as gas chromatography. Solvent concentrations of less than 0.5 wt-% are preferred.
  • the polymerizable resin comprises high solvent concentrations, the surface defect can be less than 100% filled after evaporation of the solvent.
  • substantially solvent free polymerizable compositions are amenable to sufficiently filling the surface defects in a single application.
  • the polymerizable resin composition is combined with an organic solvent.
  • the polymerizable resin in combination with the solvent has a viscosity ranging from 25 to 50,000 cps at 25°C.
  • the concentration of solvent may be at least 5 wt-%, 6 wt-%, 7 wt-%, 8 wt-%, 9 wt-%, or 10 wt-% of the total composition.
  • the solvent concentration is typically no greater than 50 wt-% and in some embodiments no greater than 45 wt-%, 40 wt-%, 35 wt-%, 30 wt-%, 25 wt-%, 20 wt- %, or 15 wt-%.
  • Various organic solvent may be utilized such as alcohols (e.g. IP A).
  • the polymerizable resin composition comprises one or more ethylenically unsaturated monomers or oligomers.
  • the polymerizable resin composition may comprise a (meth)acrylated urethane monomer or oligomer, a (meth)acrylated polyester monomer or oligomer, a (meth)acrylated phenolic monomer or oligomer, a (meth)acrylated acrylic monomer or oligomer, and mixtures thereof.
  • the polymerizable composition and thus components thereof comprises solely acrylate functionality and thus is substantially free of methacrylate functional groups.
  • the polymerizable resin and thus components thereof are non-halogenated (e.g. non-brominated). Suitable aromatic (e.g.
  • epoxy (meth)acrylates are commercially available from Sartomer under the trade designations "CN104" and “CN120".
  • the aromatic epoxy acrylate is derived from bisphenol A.
  • a suitable urethane (meth)acrylate is commercially available from UCB under the trade designations "Ebecryl 4883”.
  • Suitable phenolic (meth)acrylates are commercially available from Sartomer under the trade designation “SR601 " and “SR602”.
  • Suitable polyester (meth)acrylates are commercially available from Sartomer under the trade designation "CN2297A” and "CN2261”.
  • Various bisphenol A and biphenyl di(meth) acrylate monomers and polymerizable resins comprising such are described in PCT Publication WO2008/1 12451 ; incorporated herein by reference
  • the polymerizable composition may comprise a single di(meth)acrylate ethylenically unsaturated monomer having a number average molecular weight of greater than 450 g/mole.
  • the polymerizable composition may comprise a single (e.g. lower molecular weight) crosslinker having at least two and preferably at least three (meth)acrylate functional groups.
  • the polymerizable composition comprise at least one di(meth)acrylate ethylenically unsaturated monomer having a number average molecular weight of greater than 450 g/mole in combination with a (e.g. lower molecular weight) crosslinking agent.
  • the crosslinking agent comprises at least two and preferably at least three (meth)acrylate functional groups.
  • Crosslinking agents include hexanediol diacrylate (HDDA), pentaerythritol tri(meth) aery late, pentaerythritol tetra(meth)acrylate, dipentaerythritol penta(meth)acrylate,
  • HDDA hexanediol diacrylate
  • pentaerythritol tri(meth) aery late pentaerythritol tetra(meth)acrylate
  • dipentaerythritol penta(meth)acrylate dipentaerythritol penta(meth)acrylate
  • Pentaerythritol triacrylate (PET A) and dipentaerythritol pentaacrylate are commercially available from
  • the crosslinking agent When utilized in a mixture with at least one di(meth)acrylate ethylenically unsaturated monomer having a number average molecular weight of greater than 450 g/mole, the crosslinking agent may be present in the polymerizable composition in an amount of at least about 5 or 10 wt-%. Typically, the amount of crosslinking agent is not greater than about 95 wt-%. In some favored embodiments, the crosslinking agent may be present in an amount ranging from about 20 wt-% to no greater than 75, 70, or 65 wt-%.
  • the polymerizable resin may comprise monofunctional diluents.
  • Diluents having a refractive index greater than 1.50 can be utilized to increase the refractive index of the polymerizable resin.
  • Such reactive diluents may contain aromatic groups and/or sulfur atoms and/or be halogenated.
  • Diluents typically have a number average molecular weight no greater than 450 g/mole include
  • Suitable reactive diluents include for example phenoxy ethyl (meth)acrylate; phenoxy-2- methylethyl (meth)acrylate; phenoxyethoxyethyl (meth)acrylate, 3-hydroxy-2-hydroxypropyl
  • high refractive index monomers include pentabromobenzyl acrylate and pentabromophenyl acrylate.
  • the polymerizable resin composition further comprises nanoparticles.
  • the inclusion of silica nanoparticles can improve the durability of the cured polymerizable resin composition.
  • the inclusion of high refractive index particles, such as zirconia can increase the refractive index for the purpose of index matching the polymerizable resin to the substrate being repaired, as previously described.
  • Polymerizable resins that comprise zirconia nanoparticles and monofunctional diluents that may be suitable for use in repairing (high refractive index) light transmissive substrate are described for example in WO 2008/121465; incorporated herein by reference.
  • the nanoparticles typically comprise a surface treatment agent.
  • a surface treatment agent has a first end that will attach to the particle surface (covalently, ionically or through strong physisorption) and a second end that imparts compatibility of the particle with the resin and/or reacts with resin during curing.
  • surface treatment agents include alcohols, amines, carboxylic acids, sulfonic acids, phosphonic acids, silanes and titanates.
  • the preferred type of treatment agent is determined, in part, by the chemical nature of the metal oxide surface. Silanes are preferred for silica and other for siliceous fillers. Silanes and carboxylic acids are preferred for metal oxides such as zirconia.
  • the surface modification can be done either subsequent to mixing with the monomers or after mixing. It is preferred in the case of silanes to react the silanes with the particle or nanoparticle surface before incorporation into the resin.
  • the required amount of surface modifier is dependent upon several factors such as particle size, particle type, modifier molecular wt, and modifier type. In general it is preferred that approximately a monolayer of modifier is attached to the surface of the particle. The attachment procedure or reaction conditions required also depend on the surface modifier used. For silanes it is preferred to surface treat at elevated temperatures under acidic or basic conditions for from 1 -24 hr approximately. Surface treatment agents such as carboxylic acids may not require elevated temperatures or extended time.
  • the surface modified colloidal nanoparticles can be oxide particles having a primary particle size or associated particle size of greater than 1 nm or 5 nm and less than 100 nm, 75 nm or 50 nm. It is preferred that the nanoparticles are unassociated. Their measurements can be based on transmission electron microscopy (TEM).
  • the nanoparticles can include metal oxides such as, for example, alumina, tin oxides, antimony oxides, silica, zirconia, titania, mixtures thereof, or mixed oxides thereof.
  • Surface modified colloidal nanoparticles can be substantially fully condensed.
  • Silica nanoparticles can be present in the durable article or optical element in an amount from 10 to 60 wt-%, or 10 to 40 wt-%.
  • Silicas for use in the polymerizable resins are commercially available from Nalco Chemical Co., Naperville, IL under the trade designation "Nalco Collodial Silicas” such as products 1040, 1042, 1050, 1060, 2327 and 2329.
  • Suitable fumed silicas include for example, products commercially available from DeGussa AG, (Hanau, Germany) under the trade designation, "Aerosil series OX-50", as well as product numbers -130, -150, and -200.
  • the UV curable polymerizable compositions comprise at least one photoinitiator.
  • a single photoinitiator or blends thereof may be employed in the polymerizable resin.
  • the photoinitiator(s) are at least partially soluble (e.g. at the processing temperature of the resin) and substantially colorless after being polymerized.
  • the photoinitiator may be (e.g. yellow) colored, provided that the photoinitiator is rendered substantially colorless after exposure to the UV light source.
  • Suitable photoinitiators include monoacylphosphine oxide and bisacylphosphine oxide.
  • mono or bisacylphosphine oxide photoinitiators include 2,4,6- trimethylbenzoydiphenylphosphine oxide, commercially available from BASF (Charlotte, NC) under the trade designation "Lucirin TPO"; ethyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphenyl phosphinate, also commercially available from BASF under the trade designation "Lucirin TPO-L”; and bis (2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)- phenylphosphine oxide commercially available from Ciba Specialty Chemicals under the trade designation "Irgacure 819".
  • photoinitiators include 2-hydroxy-2-methyl- 1 -phenyl-propan- 1 -one, commercially available from Ciba Specialty Chemicals under the trade designation “Darocur 1 173" as well as other photoinitiators commercially available from Ciba Specialty Chemicals under the trade designations "Darocur 4265", “Irgacure 651 “, “Irgacure 1800”, “Irgacure 369", “Irgacure 1700”, and "Irgacure 907".
  • the photoinitiator can be used at a concentration of about 0.1 to about 10 weight percent. More preferably, the photoinitiator is used at a concentration of about 0.5 to about 5 wt-%.
  • the polymerizable resin can optionally further comprise one or more additives including but not limited to those selected from the group consisting of flame retardants, ultraviolet light absorbers, antioxidants, and hindered amine stabilizers.
  • a pressure sensitive adhesive coated light-transmissive cover film is applied to at least the filled surface defect and typically to the entire surface of the substrate being repaired.
  • the pressure sensitive adhesive of the cover film is contacted with the polymerizable resin of the filled defect and the surface of the repaired light- transmissive substrate.
  • a major portion (i.e. at least 50%) of the light-transmissive substrate surface lacks polymerizable resin of the filled surface defects and directly contacts the pressure sensitive adhesive of the cover film.
  • the repaired polymeric light transmissive substrate comprises at least one surface defect filled with cured
  • the purpose of the cover film is to provide a new undamaged surface in place of the damaged substrate surface.
  • the cover film may also provide protection of the repaired substrate.
  • the cover film is transparent such that it does not detract from the observer's ability to distinguish (e.g. illuminated) images underlying the cover film.
  • the cover film is not applied as a gel or a flowable liquid but is rather a "solid" preformed film.
  • the "solid" nature of the cover film facilitates and expedites application thereof. Uniformity of the cover film is helpful in providing a final laminate article in which the underlying filled surface defects (e.g. repaired scratch) are not apparent.
  • the cover film is typically comprised of a polymeric material, such as the previously described light transmissive substrate polymeric material.
  • the thickness of the cover film is typically at least about 1, 1.5 or 2 mils and generally no greater than about 10 mils.
  • the cover film When the cover film is applied such that it covers substantially the entire repaired substrate, the cover film typically has substantially the same length and width as the repaired substrate.
  • the transmission of both the light- transmissive substrate and the cover film is typically at least about 90%.
  • the cover film is a light transmissive film in the optical path of the display that substantially alters at least one optical property as compared to viewing the display in the absence of the over film.
  • the cover film may be an antiglare film, an antireflective film, as well as certain films having a coating that reduces the visibility of fingerprints such as described in U.S.
  • Films that reduce the visibility of fingerprints exhibit a ratio of initial simulated fingerprint visibility to simulated fingerprint visibility at 20 minutes of less than 0.80, 0.70, 0.60, or 0.50.
  • matte antireflective films typically have lower transmission and higher haze values than equivalent gloss films.
  • the haze is generally at least 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, or 10% as measured according to ASTM D1003.
  • Further gloss surfaces typically have a gloss of at least 130 as measured according to ASTM D 2457-03 at 60°; whereas matte surfaces have a gloss of less than 120.
  • Gloss film also typically have a haze of less than 4%, 3% or 2%.
  • matte coating can be prepared by adding matte particles, such as described in U.S. 6,778,240.
  • the surface of an antiglare film can be roughened or textured to provide a matte surface.
  • the textured surface of the anti-reflective film may be imparted by any of numerous texturing materials, surfaces, or methods.
  • Non- limiting examples of texturing materials or surfaces include: films or liners having a matte finish, microembossed films, a microrep Heated tool containing a desirable texturing pattern or template, a sleeve or belt, rolls such as metal or rubber rolls, or rubber-coated rolls.”
  • the antiglare film may have certain microstructure characteristics that can be obtained by microreplication, such as described in WO2010/141345;
  • antireflective film refers to a film that provides an average reflectance of no greater than about 2% or about 1.5% at 550 nm as measured with a spectrophotometer.
  • Antireflective films generally comprise at least two layers having differing refractive indices. Some illustrated antireflective films are described in U.S. Patent Publication No. US2010/0232021 and PCT Publication No. WO201 1/140018; incorporated herein by reference.
  • the cover film may optionally further comprise additives such as, for example, flame retardants, ultraviolet light absorbers, antioxidants, and hindered amine stabilizers, and combinations thereof.
  • the cover film may optionally further comprise an abrasion resistant coating (e.g. hardcoat) on the exposed surface (i.e. that is not in contact with the repaired substrate surface). Further, the cover film may comprise a (e.g. fluorinated or silicone-containing) low surface energy coating.
  • an abrasion resistant coating e.g. hardcoat
  • the cover film may comprise a (e.g. fluorinated or silicone-containing) low surface energy coating.
  • the cover film may optionally be primed to enhance adhesion with the applied pressure sensitive adhesive.
  • the primers may include, for example, surface treatments such as corona treatments or flame treatments.
  • Suitable adhesive compositions include (e.g. hydrogenated) block copolymers such as those commercially available from Kraton Polymers of Westhollow, Texas under the trade designation "Kraton G-1657", as well as other (e.g. similar) thermoplastic rubbers.
  • Other exemplary adhesives include acrylic -based, urethane -based, silicone -based, and epoxy-based adhesives.
  • Preferred adhesives are of sufficient optical quality and light stability such that the adhesive does not yellow with time or upon weather exposure so as to degrade the viewing quality of the optical display.
  • the adhesive can be applied using a variety of known coating techniques such as transfer coating, knife coating, spin coating, die coating and the like. Exemplary adhesives are described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0012936. Several of such adhesives are commercially available from 3M Company, St. Paul, MN under the trade designations 8141, 8142, and 8161. Other exemplary adhesives include urea-based and urethane-based "self wetting adhesives", such as described in WO2009/085662 and WO2010/132176; incorporated herein by reference.
  • the pressure sensitive adhesive of the cover film is chosen such that the peel force to the repaired surface of the light-transmissive substrate is at least 5, 10, or 15 g/ inch. If the peel force is too low, the pressure sensitive adhesive can "release" from the repair light-transmissive, allowing air bubbles to form along the edge of the repair causing the repair to become visible. In some embodiments, the peel force is no greater than about 3,000 or 2,000 g/inch (or sufficiently low such that the light-transmissive substrate is not damaged upon removal of the cover film) to facilitate subsequent replacement of the pressure- sensitive adhesive coated cover film.
  • the thickness of the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer is typically at least 0.5 or 1 mil to about 2 mils. The thickness of the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer is generally greater than the thickness of the excess cure polymerizable resin of the repaired substrate surface.
  • a release liner Prior to application a release liner protects the surface of the pressure sensitive adhesive layer of the cove film.
  • Useful release liners include, for example, polyester or polyolefin films. These films may be coated with silicone or fluorinated release surfaces to facilitate release from the bonding layer.
  • the release liner may comprise a film and paper laminate.
  • Suitable (e.g. polyester) cover films that comprise a pre-applied pressure sensitive adhesive include for example "ARMR220 NC Protection Film”, “Natural View Antiglare Protection Film”, and “Smooth Cling Films 7717SW, 7718SW, and 7719SW”; all available from 3M, St. Paul, MN.
  • a scratched LCD display panel (model B141EW05 V3 14.1" WXGA Color TFT-LCD with LED Backlight design, by AU Optronics Corporation of Hsinchu Taiwan, manufactured in China) having a TAC polarizer as the outer surface was obtained.
  • the scratches were examined with a high resolution optical microscope and found to have widths varying from about 8 microns to about 150 microns and lengths varying from about 1 mm to about 30 mm.
  • a cotton swab was dipped into the polymerizable resin described in the table below and then wiped across a scratch, overfilling the scratch with the polymerizable resin.
  • a cover film (GLR310 cover film for Examples 1-8 and ARMR220 cover film for Examples 9-14 and Comparative Example CI) was applied over the filled scratch and a hand roller was used to flatten the film against the display. This caused the resin to spread out well beyond the edges of the scratch.
  • a razor blade was used to spread out the polymerizable resin prior to applying the cover film.
  • the polymerizable resin was cured.
  • the solution was UV cured by passing the filled screen under H and D bulbs at 12.8 m/min (42 ft/min).
  • the UV dose (in the UVA, UVB, UVC and UVV wavelength bands) was measured by a UV Power Puck (available from EIT Inc., Sterling VA) and found to be UVA: 1.568 J/cm 2 , UVB: 0.443 J/cm 2 , UVC: 0.105 J/cm 2 , and UVV: 0.901 J/cm 2 .
  • the epoxy formulation was not UV cured but cured upon standing at 25 °C.
  • a UV cure was performed by placing the samples 5 cm (2 inches) from the bulb of a Spectroline SB- 100P UV Lamp (Spectronics Corporation, Westbury, NY) for 1 minute.
  • Example 11 shows that using polymerizable resins with viscosities less than about 200 cps can result in an invisible repaired scratch.
  • the scratch was visible because air was entrapped in the scratches surmised to be created by repellency of the low viscosity polymerizable resin. This illustrates that it is more difficult to achieve an invisible scratch using polymerizable resins with viscosities less than about 200 cps than it is when higher viscosity solutions are used.
  • Using an even lower viscosity as in Comparative Example CI resulted in both the scratch being visible and the edge of the applied solution being visible.
  • Examples 9 and 12 show that using higher viscosity polymerizable resins can result in an invisible repaired scratch.
  • Example 11 For Comparative Example C2, a sample was prepared as in Example 11 except that the polymerizable resin was not cured. Initially the scratch was not visible, but after 24 hours the scratch became visible. In Example 11, the scratch was still invisible after 24 hours.
  • a polymerizable resin was prepared by blending 18.35 grams of SR238B, which has a manufacturer specified viscosity of 9 cps at 25°C, with 0.14 grams of DAROCUR 4265.
  • the polymerizable resin was applied to an LCD panel and laminated with a cover film as described in Example 1. Within 2 minutes of laminating and before curing the sample, the filled scratch was visible.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Laminated Bodies (AREA)

Description

METHOD OF REPAIRING TRANSPARENT SUBSTRATES AND REPAIRED SUBSTRATES
SUMMARY
In one embodiment a method of repairing a light-transmissive substrate is described comprising: providing a polymeric light-transmissive substrate comprising at least one surface defect; filling the surface defect with a polymerizable resin composition having a viscosity ranging from 25 cps to 50,000 at 25°C; applying a pressure sensitive adhesive coated light-transmissive polymeric cover film to at least the filled surface defect; and curing the polymerizable resin composition before or after applying the pressure sensitive adhesive coated film.
Also described are repaired polymeric light-transmissive substrates.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional showing a (e.g. scratch) surface defect in a light-transmissive substrate;
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of an over-filled scratch;
FIG. 3 is cross-sectional view showing the spreading and optional partial removal of the excess polymerizable resin;
FIG. 4 is a cross-section showing the surface defect of FIG. 1 after the surface defect has been filled with polymerizable resin;
FIG. 5 is a planar view of a filled scratch;
FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional showing the filled surface defects after application of a pressure sensitive adhesive coated cover film.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
With reference to FIG. 1 , the method described herein is generally useful for repairing surface defects 206 of polymeric light transmissive substrates 200 comprised of thermosetting or thermoplastic polymeric materials. Typical surface defects 206 include scratches, chips, punctures, and cracks. The method is particularly useful for repairing light transmissive substrates that comprise a low surface energy surface coating.
In one embodiment, a method of repairing a light-transmissive substrate is described. The method comprises providing a light-transmissive substrate comprising at least one surface defect, filling the surface defect with a polymerizable resin composition, applying a pressure sensitive adhesive coated light-transmissive polymeric cover film to at least the filled surface defect; and curing the polymerizable resin composition before or after applying the adhesive coated film.
The light-transmissive substrate for repair should be relatively clean before repair. If it is not relatively clean, visible debris could become trapped in the repaired article and thus compromise the quality of the repaired surface defect. The light-transmissive substrate is typically cleaned with a lint free wipe comprising a suitable solvent, such as isopropanol, that will not mar the surface.
The surface defect is filled with the polymerizable resin composition (also referred to herein as the "repair liquid") using a suitably sized applicator, such as a cotton swab, syringe, pipette, or dental pick. With reference to FIG. 2, the polymerizable resin 207 is applied into and around the surface defect (e.g. scratch) such that the surface area of the light-transmissive substrate that is covered by the repair liquid is typically significantly greater than the surface area of the defect.
The ratio of surface area of light-transmissive substrate that is covered by the polymerizable resin to the surface area of the defect is typically at least 15: 1 or 20: 1 and may range up to 600: 1, 700: 1, 800: 1, 900: 1 , or 1000: 1. In the case of a typical scratch having a width of about 25 microns the polymerizable resin typically covers an area at least ¼ inch (6 mm) greater than the width of the scratch. In typical embodiments, the ratio of surface area of the light-transmissive substrate that is covered by the polymerizable resin repair liquid to the surface area of the defect ranges from about 50: 1 to about 300: 1. One advantage of the present invention is that the polymerizable resin repair liquid need not be precisely applied, which improves efficiency. Further, the excess layer of polymerizable resin on the light- transmissive substrate surrounding the filled defect is surmised to reinforce the repair.
With reference to FIG. 3, in some embodiments, excess polymerizable resin is typically spread and optionally partially removed from the surface of the polymeric light-transmissive substrate for example by dragging a planar edge of for example a razor blade 208 across the surface with minimal pressure and at a low angle (e.g. no greater than about 45 degrees). This can also aid in forcing the repair liquid into the surface defect such that the defect is entirely filled with the polymerizable resin. However, such spreading may not be needed when the viscosity of the polymerizable resin is sufficiently low at 25°C. In this embodiment, the excess polymerizable resin on the polymeric light-transmissive substrate is sufficiently thin when applied (e.g. less than 10- 12 microns), such as depicted in FIG. 4. Regardless of the viscosity, the application of the adhesive coated cover film can further spread the polymerizable resin when the cover film is applied prior to curing of the polymerizable resin.
For deep defects, the process of applying the polymerizable resin and then spreading an optionally removing the excess resin may be repeated.
In some embodiments, the edges 209 of FIGS 2 and 4 of the applied polymerizable resin can be further thinned out and blended by application of a suitable solvent. However, such edge thinning is also typically not needed when the viscosity of the polymerizable resin is sufficiently low at 25°C. The excess polymerizable resin 207 on the polymeric light-transmissive substrate 200 after application of the resin and optional spreading illustrated in FIGS. 4 and 5. The ratio of surface area of light-transmissive substrate that is covered by the polymerizable resin to the surface area of the defect is generally about the same or greater than when the polymerizable resin is first applied, yet typically still within the ranges previously described.
In some embodiments, the polymerizable resin is cured prior to application of the pressure sensitive adhesive coated light-transmissive polymeric cover film. Further, the polymerizable resin utilized to fill the surface defect is typically not a pressure sensitive adhesive. Thus, the cured polymerizable resin utilized to fill the surface defect is non-tacky after curing. This combination of attributes can be amenable to being able to replace the pressure sensitive adhesive coated light- transmissive polymeric cover film without removal of the cured repair liquid. Alternatively, the polymerizable resin of the filled surface defect can be cured after applying the pressure sensitive adhesive coated light-transmissive polymeric cover film. In some embodiments, such later technique can prevent oxygen inhibition during curing of the polymerizable resin. Further, it is surmised that this later technique can also improve the bonding force between the cured polymerizable resin of the repair and the pressure-sensitive adhesive of the cover film.
The thickness of the excess cured polymerizable resin disposed on the light-transmissive substrate is preferably no greater than 10-12 microns. When the height is too high, the cured
polymerizable resin creates surface topography that can be visible when viewed off angle (an angle other than 90 degrees relative to the surface). In some embodiments, the thickness of the excess cured polymerizable resin disposed on the light-transmissive substrate is no greater than 9, 8, 7, 6, or 5 microns.
Various light-transmissive substrates can be repaired as described herein such as light- transmissive optical films that are utilized in illuminated display devices. Illustrative optical films include but are not limited to, multilayer optical films, (e.g. the planar surface of) microstructured films such as retroreflective sheeting and brightness enhancing films, (e.g. reflective or absorbing) polarizing films, diffusive films, as well as (e.g. biaxial) retarder films and compensator films such as described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0184150. In some embodiments, the light transmissive optical substrates are multilayer reflective polarizing films, such as described is U.S. Patent Application
Publication 2003/0217806; U.S. Pat. No. 5,882,774 (Jonza et al.), and PCT Publications WO 95/17303 (Ouderkirk et al.) and WO 99/39224 (Ouderkirk et al.).
Such optical films are utilized in a variety of portable and non-portable illuminated display articles. These articles include PDAs, cell phones (including combination PDA/cell phones), LCD televisions (direct lit and edge lit), touch sensitive screens, wrist watches, car navigation systems, global positioning systems, depth finders, calculators, electronic books, computer monitors, and notebook computer displays. The viewing surfaces can have any conventional size and shape and can be planar or non-planar, although flat panel displays are most typical. In some embodiments, the light transmissive substrate being repaired (inclusive of optical films) comprises a polymeric material such as polycarbonate, acrylic (e.g., polymethyl methacrylate or
"PMMA"), polyolefins (e.g., polypropylene or "PP"), polyurethane, polyesters (e.g., polyethylene terephthalate or "PET"), polyamides, polyimides, phenolic resins, cellulose diacetate, cellulose triacetate, polystyrene.
In contrast to glass, reported to have a surface energy of about 250-500 dynes/cm2, polymeric materials such as plastics generally have a surface energy of less than 100 dynes/cm2, 75 dynes/cm2, or 50 dynes/cm2. For example, polyester is reported to have surface energy of 43 dynes/cm2; polycarbonate 42 dynes/cm2; polyvinyl chloride 39 dynes/cm2; and acrylic 38 dynes/cm2. Even lower surface energy materials have a surface energy of less than 37 dynes/cm2. These include for example polyvinyl acetate, polystyrene, acetal, ethylene vinyl acetate, and polyethylene reported to have a surface energy of 31 dynes/cm2.
Light transmissive films that are typically exposed to the outdoor environment during use often comprise a low surface energy coating that typically comprises fluorinated or silicone additives. In some embodiments, a substrate with a low surface energy coating exhibits an advancing contact angle with water of at least 80, 90, or 100 degrees. Low surface energy materials can complicate the repair process. For example, it has been found that when one attempts to fill a surface defect, such as a scratch, with a low viscosity material, the material tends to bead up rather than fill the surface defect.
Thus one favored characteristic of the present invention is to utilize a polymerizable resin having a sufficiently high viscosity to overcome the repellency of the low surface energy surface. The viscosity of the polymerizable resin is at least 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, or 60 cps at 25°C (e.g. for a surface having a surface energy of 36-38 dynes/cm). It is surmised that for even lower surface energy surfaces, the minimum viscosity may be even higher. In some embodiments, the viscosity is at least 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200 or 225 cps at 25°C. The viscosity of the polymerizable resin can range up to 50,000 cps at 25°C, yet is typically no greater than 25,000; 20,000; 15,000; or 10,000 cps at 25°C. When the viscosity is too high, it can be difficult to spread the polymerizable resin such that the thickness is below 10- 12 microns, as previously described. In some favored embodiments, the polymerizable resin has a viscosity no greater than 5,000; 4,000; 3,000; or 2,000 cps or 1,000 at 25°C.
The refractive index of the polymerizable resin generally ranges from about 1.4 to 1.6 for common polymeric light-transmissive substrates. To minimize the visibility of a repaired scratch, it is preferred that the kinds and amounts of components of the polymerizable resin are selected such that the refractive index of the polymerizable resin is sufficiently matched to the refractive index of the light- transmissive substrate. The difference in refractive index is typically no greater than 0.05.
In some embodiments, the polymerizable resin composition is a substantially solvent free polymerizable composition. "Substantially solvent free" refer to the polymerizable composition having less than 5 wt-%, 4 wt-%, 3 wt-%, 2 wt-%, 1 wt-%, and 0.5 wt-% of (e.g. organic) solvent. The concentration of solvent can be determined by known methods, such as gas chromatography. Solvent concentrations of less than 0.5 wt-% are preferred. When the polymerizable resin comprises high solvent concentrations, the surface defect can be less than 100% filled after evaporation of the solvent. Thus, substantially solvent free polymerizable compositions are amenable to sufficiently filling the surface defects in a single application.
In other embodiments, the polymerizable resin composition is combined with an organic solvent. In this embodiment, the polymerizable resin in combination with the solvent has a viscosity ranging from 25 to 50,000 cps at 25°C. The concentration of solvent may be at least 5 wt-%, 6 wt-%, 7 wt-%, 8 wt-%, 9 wt-%, or 10 wt-% of the total composition. The solvent concentration is typically no greater than 50 wt-% and in some embodiments no greater than 45 wt-%, 40 wt-%, 35 wt-%, 30 wt-%, 25 wt-%, 20 wt- %, or 15 wt-%. Various organic solvent may be utilized such as alcohols (e.g. IP A).
The polymerizable resin composition comprises one or more ethylenically unsaturated monomers or oligomers. The polymerizable resin composition may comprise a (meth)acrylated urethane monomer or oligomer, a (meth)acrylated polyester monomer or oligomer, a (meth)acrylated phenolic monomer or oligomer, a (meth)acrylated acrylic monomer or oligomer, and mixtures thereof. In typical embodiments the polymerizable composition and thus components thereof comprises solely acrylate functionality and thus is substantially free of methacrylate functional groups. In some embodiments, the polymerizable resin and thus components thereof are non-halogenated (e.g. non-brominated). Suitable aromatic (e.g. epoxy) (meth)acrylates are commercially available from Sartomer under the trade designations "CN104" and "CN120". In some embodiments, the aromatic epoxy acrylate is derived from bisphenol A. A suitable urethane (meth)acrylate is commercially available from UCB under the trade designations "Ebecryl 4883". Suitable phenolic (meth)acrylates are commercially available from Sartomer under the trade designation "SR601 " and "SR602". Suitable polyester (meth)acrylates are commercially available from Sartomer under the trade designation "CN2297A" and "CN2261". Various bisphenol A and biphenyl di(meth) acrylate monomers and polymerizable resins comprising such are described in PCT Publication WO2008/1 12451 ; incorporated herein by reference
In some embodiments, the polymerizable composition may comprise a single di(meth)acrylate ethylenically unsaturated monomer having a number average molecular weight of greater than 450 g/mole. In other embodiments, the polymerizable composition may comprise a single (e.g. lower molecular weight) crosslinker having at least two and preferably at least three (meth)acrylate functional groups. In some embodiments, the polymerizable composition comprise at least one di(meth)acrylate ethylenically unsaturated monomer having a number average molecular weight of greater than 450 g/mole in combination with a (e.g. lower molecular weight) crosslinking agent. The crosslinking agent comprises at least two and preferably at least three (meth)acrylate functional groups. Crosslinking agents include hexanediol diacrylate (HDDA), pentaerythritol tri(meth) aery late, pentaerythritol tetra(meth)acrylate, dipentaerythritol penta(meth)acrylate,
trimethylolpropane tri(meth)acrylate, ditrimethylolpropane tetra(meth)acrylate, and mixtures thereof. Pentaerythritol triacrylate (PET A) and dipentaerythritol pentaacrylate are commercially available from
Sartomer Company, Exton, PA under the trade designations "SR444" and "SR399LV" respectively; from Osaka Organic Chemical Industry, Ltd. Osaka, Japan under the trade designation "Viscoat #300"; from Toagosei Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan under the trade designation "Aronix M-305"; and from Eternal Chemical Co., Ltd., Kaohsiung, Taiwan under the trade designation "Etermer 235". Trimethylol propane triacrylate (TMPTA) and ditrimethylol propane tetraacrylate (di-TMPTA) are commercially available from Sartomer Company under the trade designations "SR351 " and "SR355". TMPTA is also available from Toagosei Co. Ltd. under the trade designation "Aronix M-309". Further, ethoxylated trimethylolpropane triacrylate and ethoxylated pentaerythritol triacrylate are commercially available from Sartomer under the trade designations "SR454" and "SR494" respectively. When utilized in a mixture with at least one di(meth)acrylate ethylenically unsaturated monomer having a number average molecular weight of greater than 450 g/mole, the crosslinking agent may be present in the polymerizable composition in an amount of at least about 5 or 10 wt-%. Typically, the amount of crosslinking agent is not greater than about 95 wt-%. In some favored embodiments, the crosslinking agent may be present in an amount ranging from about 20 wt-% to no greater than 75, 70, or 65 wt-%.
In some embodiments, the polymerizable resin may comprise monofunctional diluents. Diluents having a refractive index greater than 1.50 (e.g. greater than 1.55) can be utilized to increase the refractive index of the polymerizable resin. Such reactive diluents may contain aromatic groups and/or sulfur atoms and/or be halogenated. Diluents typically have a number average molecular weight no greater than 450 g/mole include
Suitable reactive diluents include for example phenoxy ethyl (meth)acrylate; phenoxy-2- methylethyl (meth)acrylate; phenoxyethoxyethyl (meth)acrylate, 3-hydroxy-2-hydroxypropyl
(meth)acrylate; benzyl (meth)acrylate, 4- (1 -methyl- l-phenethyl)phenoxy ethyl (meth)acrylate; phenylthio ethyl acrylate; 2-naphthylthio ethyl acrylate; 1 -naphthylthio ethyl acrylate; 2,4,6-tribromophenoxy ethyl acrylate; 2,4-dibromophenoxy ethyl acrylate; 2-bromophenoxy ethyl acrylate; 1 -naphthyloxy ethyl acrylate; 2-naphthyloxy ethyl acrylate; phenoxy 2-methylethyl acrylate; phenoxyethoxyethyl acrylate; 3- phenoxy-2-hydroxy propyl acrylate; biphenyl monomers such as 2-phenylphenoxy ethyl acrylate and 4- phenylphenoxy ethyl acrylate; 2,4-dibromo-6-sec-butylphenyl acrylate; 2,4-dibromo-6-isopropylphenyl acrylate; benzyl acrylate; phenyl acrylate; 2,4,6-tribromophenyl acrylate. Other high refractive index monomers include pentabromobenzyl acrylate and pentabromophenyl acrylate. In some embodiments, the polymerizable resin composition further comprises nanoparticles. The inclusion of silica nanoparticles can improve the durability of the cured polymerizable resin composition. The inclusion of high refractive index particles, such as zirconia, can increase the refractive index for the purpose of index matching the polymerizable resin to the substrate being repaired, as previously described. Polymerizable resins that comprise zirconia nanoparticles and monofunctional diluents that may be suitable for use in repairing (high refractive index) light transmissive substrate are described for example in WO 2008/121465; incorporated herein by reference.
The nanoparticles typically comprise a surface treatment agent. In general a surface treatment agent has a first end that will attach to the particle surface (covalently, ionically or through strong physisorption) and a second end that imparts compatibility of the particle with the resin and/or reacts with resin during curing. Examples of surface treatment agents include alcohols, amines, carboxylic acids, sulfonic acids, phosphonic acids, silanes and titanates. The preferred type of treatment agent is determined, in part, by the chemical nature of the metal oxide surface. Silanes are preferred for silica and other for siliceous fillers. Silanes and carboxylic acids are preferred for metal oxides such as zirconia. The surface modification can be done either subsequent to mixing with the monomers or after mixing. It is preferred in the case of silanes to react the silanes with the particle or nanoparticle surface before incorporation into the resin. The required amount of surface modifier is dependent upon several factors such as particle size, particle type, modifier molecular wt, and modifier type. In general it is preferred that approximately a monolayer of modifier is attached to the surface of the particle. The attachment procedure or reaction conditions required also depend on the surface modifier used. For silanes it is preferred to surface treat at elevated temperatures under acidic or basic conditions for from 1 -24 hr approximately. Surface treatment agents such as carboxylic acids may not require elevated temperatures or extended time.
The surface modified colloidal nanoparticles can be oxide particles having a primary particle size or associated particle size of greater than 1 nm or 5 nm and less than 100 nm, 75 nm or 50 nm. It is preferred that the nanoparticles are unassociated. Their measurements can be based on transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The nanoparticles can include metal oxides such as, for example, alumina, tin oxides, antimony oxides, silica, zirconia, titania, mixtures thereof, or mixed oxides thereof. Surface modified colloidal nanoparticles can be substantially fully condensed.
Silica nanoparticles can be present in the durable article or optical element in an amount from 10 to 60 wt-%, or 10 to 40 wt-%. Silicas for use in the polymerizable resins are commercially available from Nalco Chemical Co., Naperville, IL under the trade designation "Nalco Collodial Silicas" such as products 1040, 1042, 1050, 1060, 2327 and 2329. Suitable fumed silicas include for example, products commercially available from DeGussa AG, (Hanau, Germany) under the trade designation, "Aerosil series OX-50", as well as product numbers -130, -150, and -200. Fumed silicas are also commercially available from Cabot Corp., Tuscola, I, under the trade designations CAB-O-SPERSE 2095", "CAB-O- SPERSE A105", and "CAB-O-SIL M5". The UV curable polymerizable compositions comprise at least one photoinitiator. A single photoinitiator or blends thereof may be employed in the polymerizable resin. In general the photoinitiator(s) are at least partially soluble (e.g. at the processing temperature of the resin) and substantially colorless after being polymerized. The photoinitiator may be (e.g. yellow) colored, provided that the photoinitiator is rendered substantially colorless after exposure to the UV light source.
Suitable photoinitiators include monoacylphosphine oxide and bisacylphosphine oxide.
Commercially available mono or bisacylphosphine oxide photoinitiators include 2,4,6- trimethylbenzoydiphenylphosphine oxide, commercially available from BASF (Charlotte, NC) under the trade designation "Lucirin TPO"; ethyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphenyl phosphinate, also commercially available from BASF under the trade designation "Lucirin TPO-L"; and bis (2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)- phenylphosphine oxide commercially available from Ciba Specialty Chemicals under the trade designation "Irgacure 819". Other suitable photoinitiators include 2-hydroxy-2-methyl- 1 -phenyl-propan- 1 -one, commercially available from Ciba Specialty Chemicals under the trade designation "Darocur 1 173" as well as other photoinitiators commercially available from Ciba Specialty Chemicals under the trade designations "Darocur 4265", "Irgacure 651 ", "Irgacure 1800", "Irgacure 369", "Irgacure 1700", and "Irgacure 907".
The photoinitiator can be used at a concentration of about 0.1 to about 10 weight percent. More preferably, the photoinitiator is used at a concentration of about 0.5 to about 5 wt-%.
The polymerizable resin can optionally further comprise one or more additives including but not limited to those selected from the group consisting of flame retardants, ultraviolet light absorbers, antioxidants, and hindered amine stabilizers.
After the surface defect is filled with polymerizable resin, a pressure sensitive adhesive coated light-transmissive cover film is applied to at least the filled surface defect and typically to the entire surface of the substrate being repaired. Thus, the pressure sensitive adhesive of the cover film is contacted with the polymerizable resin of the filled defect and the surface of the repaired light- transmissive substrate. In some embodiments, a major portion (i.e. at least 50%) of the light-transmissive substrate surface lacks polymerizable resin of the filled surface defects and directly contacts the pressure sensitive adhesive of the cover film.
Although the polymerizable resin utilized to fill the defect(s) can be cured or uncured when the cover film is applied, the polymerizable resin is cured during the repair process. Thus, the repaired polymeric light transmissive substrate comprises at least one surface defect filled with cured
polymerizable resin.
The purpose of the cover film is to provide a new undamaged surface in place of the damaged substrate surface. The cover film may also provide protection of the repaired substrate. The cover film is transparent such that it does not detract from the observer's ability to distinguish (e.g. illuminated) images underlying the cover film. The cover film is not applied as a gel or a flowable liquid but is rather a "solid" preformed film. The "solid" nature of the cover film facilitates and expedites application thereof. Uniformity of the cover film is helpful in providing a final laminate article in which the underlying filled surface defects (e.g. repaired scratch) are not apparent.
The cover film is typically comprised of a polymeric material, such as the previously described light transmissive substrate polymeric material. The thickness of the cover film (inclusive of the pressure sensitive adhesive) is typically at least about 1, 1.5 or 2 mils and generally no greater than about 10 mils. When the cover film is applied such that it covers substantially the entire repaired substrate, the cover film typically has substantially the same length and width as the repaired substrate.
The transmission of both the light- transmissive substrate and the cover film is typically at least about 90%. In some embodiments, the cover film is a light transmissive film in the optical path of the display that substantially alters at least one optical property as compared to viewing the display in the absence of the over film. Thus the cover film may be an antiglare film, an antireflective film, as well as certain films having a coating that reduces the visibility of fingerprints such as described in U.S.
Application Serial No. 13/307,137, filed 30 November 201 1 ; incorporated herein by reference. Films that reduce the visibility of fingerprints exhibit a ratio of initial simulated fingerprint visibility to simulated fingerprint visibility at 20 minutes of less than 0.80, 0.70, 0.60, or 0.50.
Various antiglare films have been described in the art. As described at paragraph 0039 of U.S. Publication No. 2007/0286994, matte antireflective films typically have lower transmission and higher haze values than equivalent gloss films. For examples the haze is generally at least 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, or 10% as measured according to ASTM D1003. Further gloss surfaces typically have a gloss of at least 130 as measured according to ASTM D 2457-03 at 60°; whereas matte surfaces have a gloss of less than 120. Gloss film also typically have a haze of less than 4%, 3% or 2%.
There are several approaches for obtaining matte films. For example, matte coating can be prepared by adding matte particles, such as described in U.S. 6,778,240. In yet another approach, the surface of an antiglare film can be roughened or textured to provide a matte surface. According to U.S. Patent No. 5,820,957; "the textured surface of the anti-reflective film may be imparted by any of numerous texturing materials, surfaces, or methods. Non- limiting examples of texturing materials or surfaces include: films or liners having a matte finish, microembossed films, a microrep Heated tool containing a desirable texturing pattern or template, a sleeve or belt, rolls such as metal or rubber rolls, or rubber-coated rolls." In some embodiments, the antiglare film may have certain microstructure characteristics that can be obtained by microreplication, such as described in WO2010/141345;
incorporated herein by reference.
Various antireflective films have also been described in the art. As used herein, antireflective film refers to a film that provides an average reflectance of no greater than about 2% or about 1.5% at 550 nm as measured with a spectrophotometer. Antireflective films generally comprise at least two layers having differing refractive indices. Some illustrated antireflective films are described in U.S. Patent Publication No. US2010/0232021 and PCT Publication No. WO201 1/140018; incorporated herein by reference. The cover film may optionally further comprise additives such as, for example, flame retardants, ultraviolet light absorbers, antioxidants, and hindered amine stabilizers, and combinations thereof. The cover film may optionally further comprise an abrasion resistant coating (e.g. hardcoat) on the exposed surface (i.e. that is not in contact with the repaired substrate surface). Further, the cover film may comprise a (e.g. fluorinated or silicone-containing) low surface energy coating.
The cover film may optionally be primed to enhance adhesion with the applied pressure sensitive adhesive. The primers may include, for example, surface treatments such as corona treatments or flame treatments.
Various permanent and removable grade pressure sensitive adhesive compositions may be coated on the cover film. The pressure sensitive adhesive is generally self-adherent to the light transmissive substrate being repaired, compliant, and at least somewhat tacky. Suitable adhesive compositions include (e.g. hydrogenated) block copolymers such as those commercially available from Kraton Polymers of Westhollow, Texas under the trade designation "Kraton G-1657", as well as other (e.g. similar) thermoplastic rubbers. Other exemplary adhesives include acrylic -based, urethane -based, silicone -based, and epoxy-based adhesives. Preferred adhesives are of sufficient optical quality and light stability such that the adhesive does not yellow with time or upon weather exposure so as to degrade the viewing quality of the optical display. The adhesive can be applied using a variety of known coating techniques such as transfer coating, knife coating, spin coating, die coating and the like. Exemplary adhesives are described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0012936. Several of such adhesives are commercially available from 3M Company, St. Paul, MN under the trade designations 8141, 8142, and 8161. Other exemplary adhesives include urea-based and urethane-based "self wetting adhesives", such as described in WO2009/085662 and WO2010/132176; incorporated herein by reference.
The pressure sensitive adhesive of the cover film is chosen such that the peel force to the repaired surface of the light-transmissive substrate is at least 5, 10, or 15 g/ inch. If the peel force is too low, the pressure sensitive adhesive can "release" from the repair light-transmissive, allowing air bubbles to form along the edge of the repair causing the repair to become visible. In some embodiments, the peel force is no greater than about 3,000 or 2,000 g/inch (or sufficiently low such that the light-transmissive substrate is not damaged upon removal of the cover film) to facilitate subsequent replacement of the pressure- sensitive adhesive coated cover film. The thickness of the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer is typically at least 0.5 or 1 mil to about 2 mils. The thickness of the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer is generally greater than the thickness of the excess cure polymerizable resin of the repaired substrate surface.
Prior to application a release liner protects the surface of the pressure sensitive adhesive layer of the cove film. Useful release liners include, for example, polyester or polyolefin films. These films may be coated with silicone or fluorinated release surfaces to facilitate release from the bonding layer. For added dimensional stability, the release liner may comprise a film and paper laminate.
Suitable (e.g. polyester) cover films that comprise a pre-applied pressure sensitive adhesive include for example "ARMR220 NC Protection Film", "Natural View Antiglare Protection Film", and "Smooth Cling Films 7717SW, 7718SW, and 7719SW"; all available from 3M, St. Paul, MN.
Examples
All parts, percentages, ratios, etc. in the examples are by weight, unless noted otherwise.
Materials
Figure imgf000012_0001
Examples 1-14 and Comparative Example CI
A scratched LCD display panel (model B141EW05 V3 14.1" WXGA Color TFT-LCD with LED Backlight design, by AU Optronics Corporation of Hsinchu Taiwan, manufactured in China) having a TAC polarizer as the outer surface was obtained. The scratches were examined with a high resolution optical microscope and found to have widths varying from about 8 microns to about 150 microns and lengths varying from about 1 mm to about 30 mm.
Mixtures were prepared according to the table below. The viscosities for Examples 2-7 were estimated by interpolating based on weight percent between the values specified by the manufacturer for SR602 and SR351LV. Viscosities for Examples 9, 12-14 and Comparative Example CI were measured with a Brookfield model DV-E viscometer (available from
Brookfield Engineering Laboratories, Inc., Middleboro, MA) at 25°C. For the other Examples the viscosities are as specified by the manufacturer.
A cotton swab was dipped into the polymerizable resin described in the table below and then wiped across a scratch, overfilling the scratch with the polymerizable resin. A cover film (GLR310 cover film for Examples 1-8 and ARMR220 cover film for Examples 9-14 and Comparative Example CI) was applied over the filled scratch and a hand roller was used to flatten the film against the display. This caused the resin to spread out well beyond the edges of the scratch. For Example 13, a razor blade was used to spread out the polymerizable resin prior to applying the cover film.
After the cover film was applied, the polymerizable resin was cured. For Examples 1-8, the solution was UV cured by passing the filled screen under H and D bulbs at 12.8 m/min (42 ft/min). The UV dose (in the UVA, UVB, UVC and UVV wavelength bands) was measured by a UV Power Puck (available from EIT Inc., Sterling VA) and found to be UVA: 1.568 J/cm2, UVB: 0.443 J/cm2, UVC: 0.105 J/cm2, and UVV: 0.901 J/cm2. For Example 14, the epoxy formulation was not UV cured but cured upon standing at 25 °C. For all other Examples, a UV cure was performed by placing the samples 5 cm (2 inches) from the bulb of a Spectroline SB- 100P UV Lamp (Spectronics Corporation, Westbury, NY) for 1 minute.
The repaired area was inspected to determine the visibility of the scratch and the visibility of the edge of the cured polymerizable resin on the substrate surface typically caused from the cover film lifting off the repaired substrate. The results are provided in the table below. Viscosity Repaired Repair
at 25 °C scratch edge
Ex. Resin (cps) visible? visible?
100:0.5 w/w SR351LV and DAROCUR
1 4265 65 Yes No
7:93:0.5 w/w SR602, SR351LV and
2 DAROCUR 4265 103 Yes No
25:75:0.5 w/w SR602, SR351LV and
3 DAROCUR 4265 201 Yes No
35:65:0.5 w/w SR602, SR351LV and
4 DAROCUR 4265 256 No No
44:56:0.5 w/w SR602, SR351LV and
5 DAROCUR 4265 305 No No
62:38:0.5 w/w SR602, SR351LV and
6 DAROCUR 4265 403 No No
80:20:0.5 w/w SR602, SR351LV and
7 DAROCUR 4265 501 No No
8 100:0.5 w/w SR602 and DAROCUR 4265 610 No No
9 100: 1 w/w CN104A60 and DAROCUR 4265 3450 No No
10 100: 1 w/w SR415 and DAROCUR 4265 225 No No
1 1 100: 1 w/w SR494 and DAROCUR 4265 150 No No
12 100: 1 w/w CN2297A and DAROCUR 4265 6430 No No
30:70: 1 w/w MFSP, SR444 and DAROCUR
13 4265 778 No No
2: 1 w/w EPONEX 1510 and JEFF AMINE T-
14 403 750 No No
CI 100: 1 w/w TRPGDA and DAROCUR 4265 19 Yes Yes
Example 11 shows that using polymerizable resins with viscosities less than about 200 cps can result in an invisible repaired scratch. In Examples 1-3 the scratch was visible because air was entrapped in the scratches surmised to be created by repellency of the low viscosity polymerizable resin. This illustrates that it is more difficult to achieve an invisible scratch using polymerizable resins with viscosities less than about 200 cps than it is when higher viscosity solutions are used. Using an even lower viscosity as in Comparative Example CI resulted in both the scratch being visible and the edge of the applied solution being visible. Examples 9 and 12 show that using higher viscosity polymerizable resins can result in an invisible repaired scratch. However, it is increasingly difficult to flatten the deposited polymerizable resin when the cover film is laminated as the viscosity of the polymerizable resin increases.
Comparative Example C2
For Comparative Example C2, a sample was prepared as in Example 11 except that the polymerizable resin was not cured. Initially the scratch was not visible, but after 24 hours the scratch became visible. In Example 11, the scratch was still invisible after 24 hours.
Comparative Example C3
A polymerizable resin was prepared by blending 18.35 grams of SR238B, which has a manufacturer specified viscosity of 9 cps at 25°C, with 0.14 grams of DAROCUR 4265. The polymerizable resin was applied to an LCD panel and laminated with a cover film as described in Example 1. Within 2 minutes of laminating and before curing the sample, the filled scratch was visible.

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. A method of repairing a light-transmissive substrate comprising:
providing a polymeric light-transmissive substrate comprising at least one surface defect;
filling the surface defect with a polymerizable resin composition having a viscosity ranging from 25 cps to 50,000 at 25°C;
applying a pressure sensitive adhesive coated light-transmissive polymeric cover film to at least the filled surface defect; and
curing the polymerizable resin composition before or after applying the adhesive coated film.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the light-transmissive substrate comprises a low surface energy coating comprising silicone or fluorine.
3. The method of claims 1-2 wherein the surface defect is filled with an excess of polymerizable resin such that a ratio of the surface defect surface area to area of substrate covered by the polymerizable resin is at least about 1 to 15.
4. The method of claims 1-3 wherein the polymerizable resin has a viscosity ranging from 100 cps to 1,000 at 25°C.
5. The method of claims 1-4 wherein the polymerizable resin is non- tacky after curing.
6. The method of claims 1-5 wherein the polymeric light-transmissive substrate is selected from polycarbonate, acrylic, polyolefin, polyurethane, polyesters, polyamides, polyimides, phenolic resins, cellulose diacetate, cellulose triacetate, polystyrene.
7. The method of claims 1-6 wherein the polymerizable resin is substantially solvent free.
8. The method of claim 1-6 wherein the polymerizable resin in combination with a solvent has a viscosity ranging from 25 cps to 50,000 at 25°C.
9. The method of claims 1-8 wherein the polymerizable resin comprises at least one di(meth)acrylate monomer or oligomer.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein the di(meth)acrylate monomer or oligomer is a bisphenol A or biphenyl di (meth)acrylate.
1 1. The method of claim 10 wherein the di(meth)acrylate monomer or oligomer is an ethoxylated or propoxylated (meth)acrylate monomer.
12. The method of claims 1-1 1 wherein the di(meth)acrylate monomer or oligomer is an epoxy or urethane.
13. The method of claims 1- 12 wherein the polymerizable resin comprises at least one crosslinker comprising at least three (meth)acrylate groups.
14. The method of claims 1- 13 wherein the polymerizable resin comprising comprises at least one di(meth)acrylate monomer and at least one crosslinker comprising at least three (meth)acrylate groups.
15. The method of claims 1- 14 wherein the pressure sensitive adhesive coated cover film has a peel force to the polymeric light-transmissive of at least 5 g/inch.
16. The method of claims 1- 15 wherein the surface defect is filled with an excess of polymerizable resin and the excess resin is spread and partially removed from the light transmissive substrate surface.
17. The method of claims 1- 16 wherein the surface defect is filled with an excess of polymerizable resin and solvent is applied to edges of the excess polymerizable resin to thin edges.
18. The method of claims 1- 17 wherein the polymerizable resin is cured after applying a pressure sensitive adhesive coated light-transmissive polymeric cover film.
19. The method of claims 1- 18 wherein the pressure sensitive adhesive coated light-transmissive polymeric cover film is applied such that it covers an entire surface of the light-transmissive substrate.
20. The method of claim 19 wherein a major portion of the light-transmissive surface lacks cured polymerizable resin of the filled surface defects and directly contacts the pressure sensitive adhesive of the cover film.
21. The method of claims 1 -20 wherein the light-transmissive cover film is a matte or gloss film.
22. A repaired light-transmissive substrate comprising:
a polymeric light-transmissive substrate comprising a low surface energy coating and at least one surface defect filled with a cured polymerizable resin composition having a viscosity ranging from 25 cps to 50,000 at 25°C prior to curing; and a pressure sensitive adhesive coated light-transmissive polymeric cover film disposed upon the light- transmissive substrate such that it cover the filled surface defect.
23. A repaired light-transmissive substrate comprising:
a polymeric light-transmissive substrate comprising at least one surface defect filled with a cured non- tacky polymerizable resin composition having a viscosity ranging from 25 cps to 50,000 at 25°C prior to curing; and
a pressure sensitive adhesive coated light-transmissive polymeric cover film disposed upon the light- transmissive substrate such that it cover the filled surface defect.
24. The repaired light-transmissive substrate of claims 22-23 wherein the substrate, polymerizable resin, or cover film are further characterized by any one or combination of features of claims 1-21.
PCT/US2013/030113 2012-06-01 2013-03-11 Method of repairing transparent substrates and repaired substrates Ceased WO2013180786A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201261654199P 2012-06-01 2012-06-01
US61/654,199 2012-06-01

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2013180786A1 true WO2013180786A1 (en) 2013-12-05

Family

ID=49673794

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2013/030113 Ceased WO2013180786A1 (en) 2012-06-01 2013-03-11 Method of repairing transparent substrates and repaired substrates

Country Status (2)

Country Link
TW (1) TW201350456A (en)
WO (1) WO2013180786A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR3046954A1 (en) * 2016-01-25 2017-07-28 G S D I METHOD FOR FILLING OR MASKING SCRATCH ON SURFACE

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05150205A (en) * 1991-11-27 1993-06-18 Sharp Corp Method for repairing flaw of display panel surface
JPH06280400A (en) * 1993-03-30 1994-10-04 Natl House Ind Co Ltd Repairing structure of alc decorative panel
JPH10426A (en) * 1996-06-19 1998-01-06 Kansai Paint Co Ltd Repairing coating method
JP2006336188A (en) * 2005-05-31 2006-12-14 Konishi Co Ltd How to repair cracks
US20070014984A1 (en) * 2005-07-15 2007-01-18 3M Innovative Properties Company Automobile panel repair laminate
US20070139607A1 (en) * 2005-12-20 2007-06-21 Nam Seung-Hee Method of repairing flat panel display device

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05150205A (en) * 1991-11-27 1993-06-18 Sharp Corp Method for repairing flaw of display panel surface
JPH06280400A (en) * 1993-03-30 1994-10-04 Natl House Ind Co Ltd Repairing structure of alc decorative panel
JPH10426A (en) * 1996-06-19 1998-01-06 Kansai Paint Co Ltd Repairing coating method
JP2006336188A (en) * 2005-05-31 2006-12-14 Konishi Co Ltd How to repair cracks
US20070014984A1 (en) * 2005-07-15 2007-01-18 3M Innovative Properties Company Automobile panel repair laminate
US20070139607A1 (en) * 2005-12-20 2007-06-21 Nam Seung-Hee Method of repairing flat panel display device

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR3046954A1 (en) * 2016-01-25 2017-07-28 G S D I METHOD FOR FILLING OR MASKING SCRATCH ON SURFACE

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TW201350456A (en) 2013-12-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104640911B (en) Hard coating
CN101370857B (en) Light-collimating film
KR101871551B1 (en) Adhesive film, optical member comprising the same and optical display apparatus comprising the same
KR101814249B1 (en) Adhesive film, optical member comprising the same and optical display apparatus comprising the same
JP6194354B2 (en) Method for producing hard coating film
US9056935B2 (en) Photocurable resin composition, method of fabricating optical film using the same, and optical film including the same
KR101716543B1 (en) Adhesive film and optical display comprising the same
KR101955755B1 (en) Adhesive film, adhesive composition for the same, optical member comprising the same and optical display apparatus comprising the same
JP2016155992A (en) Resin film, optical member and polarizing member
JP4816972B2 (en) Antiglare hard coat film or sheet
CN101120269A (en) Brightness enhancing film comprising a low glass transition temperature polymeric organic phase
CN104508057A (en) Hard coating film
JP2010163535A (en) Antiblocking curable resin composition, antiblocking hard coat film, antiblocking layered structure, display including the antiblocking layered structure, and production method thereof
WO2013005769A1 (en) Article having fine concavo-convex structure on surface, and image display device provided therewith
TWI780268B (en) Antiglare film, method for producing the same and use thereof
KR20140147857A (en) Article and method of making the same
KR101908182B1 (en) Adhesive film, optical member comprising the same and optical display apparatus comprising the same
KR20140130040A (en) Resin laminate
JP4266623B2 (en) Hard coat film
JP4211088B2 (en) Antiglare hard coat film or sheet
CN111448487A (en) Anti-glare film, and its manufacturing method and use
TW201438909A (en) Resin laminate and a forming method using the resin laminate
TWI901582B (en) Lamination film for molding
TW202307157A (en) Radiation curable (meth)acrylic adhesive composition
JP2013209483A (en) High-refractive index antiblocking layer-forming composition

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 13798051

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 13798051

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1