WO2013112719A1 - Method and system for displaying microseismic event locations - Google Patents

Method and system for displaying microseismic event locations Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2013112719A1
WO2013112719A1 PCT/US2013/022950 US2013022950W WO2013112719A1 WO 2013112719 A1 WO2013112719 A1 WO 2013112719A1 US 2013022950 W US2013022950 W US 2013022950W WO 2013112719 A1 WO2013112719 A1 WO 2013112719A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
events
event
estimate
localized
plotted
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2013/022950
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Sean COFFIN
Jonathan S. Abel
Original Assignee
Octave Reservoir Technologies, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Octave Reservoir Technologies, Inc. filed Critical Octave Reservoir Technologies, Inc.
Publication of WO2013112719A1 publication Critical patent/WO2013112719A1/en
Priority to US17/158,881 priority Critical patent/US11774616B2/en

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
    • G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. for interpretation or for event detection
    • G01V1/288—Event detection in seismic signals, e.g. microseismics
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
    • G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. for interpretation or for event detection
    • G01V1/34—Displaying seismic recordings or visualisation of seismic data or attributes
    • G01V1/345—Visualisation of seismic data or attributes, e.g. in 3D cubes

Definitions

  • event location estimates are displayed as spheres, centered on the estimated locations.
  • the spheres are sized to indicate event energy. In this way, more energetic events are plotted as large spheres, whereas weak events are plotted as small spheres,
  • all position estimates are plotted as points, with the shade or color indicating localization accuracy and/or energy. For instance, on a white background, more accurately localized events could be plotted using darker colors.
  • the volume is divided into voxels, preferably no larger than the greatest possible localization accuracy.
  • each voxel is adjusted (e.g., darkened) according to the probability that it contained the event. This can be done, for instance, by assuming that the estimate errors are Gaussian and unbiased, and by using the information inequality or other means to infer the covariance of the estimate. In this way, an estimate with high variance will slightly darken a region in the space, whereas an accurately localized event will noticeably darken just a few voxels. The benefit is that the fine structure of the fracture is not obscured.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Geophysics (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Emergency Management (AREA)
  • Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)

Abstract

A problem with current approaches to displaying microseismic events is that the greater the event energy, the more accurately the event can be localized— it has greater amplitude, and can better overcome the background noise, As a result, it is misleading to plot energetic events with markers that span larger volumes, Aspects of the invention account for the statistics of the event location estimates, so that poorly localized events occupy a large area (say plotted with a light shade), and accurately localized events appear only in a small area about the estimate (say, plotted in a dark shade).

Description

Docket No: 071850-0420277
OTI-007 PCT
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DISPLAYING MICROSEISMIC EVENT LOCATIONS
[0001] Passive localization of microseismic events is commonly used to monitor resource extraction processes such as hydraulic fracture stimulation, or 'Tracking." In a typical scenario, geophones in a monitor will record seismic energy released impulsively from failure events as the fracture forms. The relative arrival times and amplitudes of P-waves and S-waves among other features are used to estimate the location of each detected event. Inaccuracies in event location estimates result from seismic background noise and uncertainties in seismic wave propagation, and are related to the array and fracture geometry.
[0002] In the current art, event location estimates are displayed as spheres, centered on the estimated locations. Conventionally, the spheres are sized to indicate event energy. In this way, more energetic events are plotted as large spheres, whereas weak events are plotted as small spheres,
[0003] The problem with the current approach is that the greater the event energy, the more accurately the event can be localized— it has greater amplitude, and can better overcome the background noise. As a result, it is misleading to plot energetic events with markers that span larger volumes. In the present invention, we account for the statistics of the event location estimates, so that poorly localized events occupy a large area (say plotted with a light shade), and accurately localized events appear only in a small area about the estimate (say, plotted in a dark shade). Docket No: 071850-0420277
OTI-007 PCT
[0004] In one embodiment, all position estimates are plotted as points, with the shade or color indicating localization accuracy and/or energy. For instance, on a white background, more accurately localized events could be plotted using darker colors.
[0005] In another embodiment, the volume is divided into voxels, preferably no larger than the greatest possible localization accuracy. For each event, each voxel is adjusted (e.g., darkened) according to the probability that it contained the event. This can be done, for instance, by assuming that the estimate errors are Gaussian and unbiased, and by using the information inequality or other means to infer the covariance of the estimate. In this way, an estimate with high variance will slightly darken a region in the space, whereas an accurately localized event will noticeably darken just a few voxels. The benefit is that the fine structure of the fracture is not obscured.
[0006] This could be done for instance by, for each event, drawing a semi-transparent ellipsoid, centered on the estimated location and sized according to the estimate standard deviation. The transparency of the ellipsoid would be inversely related to its volume: the smaller the ellipse the less transparent it would be. The transparencies could be nonlinearly combined such that a number of nearby inaccurately localized events could produce a relatively small opaque region. Furthermore, erosion and dilation operations could be applied to bridge small gaps in the estimated fracture structure resulting from undetected events, and the like,

Claims

Docket No: 071850-0420277 OTI-007 PCT WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A method for displaying microseismic events, comprising:
obtaining location estimates of a plurality of microseismic events;
obtaining statistics of the event location estimates; and
based on the statistics, displaying the events such that poorly localized events occupy a large area of the display, and accurately localized events appear only in a relatively small area around the estimate.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein all location estimates are plotted as points, with a shade or color indicating localization accuracy and/or energy.
3. A method according to claim 2, wherein on a white background, more accurately localized events are plotted using darker colors.
4. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising:
dividing a display volume into voxels, each preferably no larger than the greatest possible localization accuracy; and
for each event location estimate, adjusting each voxel according to the probability that it contained the event.
5. A method according to claim 4, wherein adjusting includes assuming that the estimate errors are Gaussian and unbiased, and using the information inequality or other means to infer the covariance of the estimate, Docket No: 071850-0420277
OTI-007 PCT
6. A method according to claim 5, wherein an estimate with high variance will slightly darken a region in the space, whereas an accurately localized event will noticeably darken just a few voxels.
7. A method according to claim 6, wherein the fine structure of the fracture is not obscured.
8. A method according to claim 6, wherein adjusting includes, for each event, drawing a semi- transparent ellipsoid, centered on the estimated location and sized according to the estimate standard deviation.
9. A method according to claim 8, wherein a transparency of the ellipsoid is inversely related to its volume, such that the smaller the ellipse the less transparent it would be.
10. A method according to claim 9, wherein the transparencies are nonlinearly combined such that a number of nearby inaccurately localized events produce a relatively small opaque region,
1 1. A method according to claim 9, further comprising performing erosion and dilation operations to bridge small gaps in an estimated fracture structure resulting from undetected events.
PCT/US2013/022950 2011-08-29 2013-01-24 Method and system for displaying microseismic event locations WO2013112719A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US17/158,881 US11774616B2 (en) 2011-08-29 2021-01-26 Method and system for microseismic event location error analysis and display

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201261590189P 2012-01-24 2012-01-24
US61/590,189 2012-01-24

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/598,580 Continuation-In-Part US9945970B1 (en) 2011-08-29 2012-08-29 Method and apparatus for modeling microseismic event location estimate accuracy

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/340,356 Continuation-In-Part US20140334261A1 (en) 2011-08-29 2014-07-24 Method and system for microseismic event location error analysis and display

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2013112719A1 true WO2013112719A1 (en) 2013-08-01

Family

ID=48873907

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2013/022950 WO2013112719A1 (en) 2011-08-29 2013-01-24 Method and system for displaying microseismic event locations

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2013112719A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103913772A (en) * 2014-04-02 2014-07-09 西南石油大学 Microseism event forward modeling method based on reservoir geomechanical parameters
CN103913774A (en) * 2014-04-02 2014-07-09 西南石油大学 Reservoir stratum geological mechanics parameter retrieval method based on micro seismic event

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090125240A1 (en) * 2006-02-09 2009-05-14 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Using microseismic data to characterize hydraulic fractures
US20100262373A1 (en) * 2009-04-08 2010-10-14 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods and systems for microseismic mapping
US20110120702A1 (en) * 2009-11-25 2011-05-26 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Generating probabilistic information on subterranean fractures
WO2011077227A2 (en) * 2009-12-21 2011-06-30 Schlumberger Technology B.V. Identification of reservoir geometry from microseismic event clouds
WO2011077223A2 (en) * 2009-12-21 2011-06-30 Schlumberger Technology B.V. System and method for microseismic analysis

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090125240A1 (en) * 2006-02-09 2009-05-14 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Using microseismic data to characterize hydraulic fractures
US20100262373A1 (en) * 2009-04-08 2010-10-14 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods and systems for microseismic mapping
US20110120702A1 (en) * 2009-11-25 2011-05-26 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Generating probabilistic information on subterranean fractures
WO2011077227A2 (en) * 2009-12-21 2011-06-30 Schlumberger Technology B.V. Identification of reservoir geometry from microseismic event clouds
WO2011077223A2 (en) * 2009-12-21 2011-06-30 Schlumberger Technology B.V. System and method for microseismic analysis

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103913772A (en) * 2014-04-02 2014-07-09 西南石油大学 Microseism event forward modeling method based on reservoir geomechanical parameters
CN103913774A (en) * 2014-04-02 2014-07-09 西南石油大学 Reservoir stratum geological mechanics parameter retrieval method based on micro seismic event
CN103913774B (en) * 2014-04-02 2017-03-01 西南石油大学 Reservoir geology mechanics parameter inversion method based on micro-seismic event

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Duputel et al. Long-period analysis of the 2016 Kaikoura earthquake
Wang et al. The 2010 Qinghai, China, earthquake: A moderate earthquake with supershear rupture
Schurr et al. Gradual unlocking of plate boundary controlled initiation of the 2014 Iquique earthquake
Fletcher et al. Rupture propagation of the 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake from observations at the UPSAR
Olive et al. Pronounced zonation of seismic anisotropy in the Western Hellenic subduction zone and its geodynamic significance
De Matteis et al. Fault delineation and regional stress direction from the analysis of background microseismicity in the southern Apennines, Italy
WO2013052855A3 (en) Wearable computer with nearby object response
EP2856183B1 (en) Systems and methods for detecting transient acoustic signals
EP2811322A3 (en) System and method of displaying convective weather on a weather radar display
Gallovič Modeling velocity recordings of the M w 6.0 South Napa, California, earthquake: Unilateral event with weak high‐frequency directivity
WO2017134416A3 (en) Touchscreen panel signal processing
US10345463B2 (en) Methods and systems for using known source events in seismic data processing
Yamamoto et al. Geometry and segmentation of the North Anatolian fault beneath the Marmara Sea, Turkey, deduced from long‐term ocean bottom seismographic observations
Kufner et al. Seismic anisotropy beneath the Pamir and the Hindu Kush: Evidence for contributions from crust, mantle lithosphere, and asthenosphere
Naoi et al. Twenty thousand aftershocks of a very small (M 2) earthquake and their relation to the mainshock rupture and geological structures
WO2019118162A8 (en) Generating a velocity model for a subsurface structure using refraction traveltime tomography
Eken et al. Crustal anisotropy in the Eastern Sea of Marmara region in northwestern Turkey
EA201490595A1 (en) METHOD AND SYSTEM OF IDENTIFICATION OF GEOLOGICAL HORIZONS
Lin Seismic investigation of magmatic unrest beneath Mammoth Mountain, California, USA
Sweet et al. Variations in Cascadia low‐frequency earthquake behavior with downdip distance
WO2013112719A1 (en) Method and system for displaying microseismic event locations
Palgunadi et al. Dynamic Fault Interaction during a Fluid‐Injection‐Induced Earthquake: The 2017 M w 5.5 Pohang Event
WO2015145195A1 (en) Determining location and depth of subsurface magnetic sources
US10545250B2 (en) Microseismic event localization using both direct-path and head-wave arrivals
CN109061723B (en) High-precision positioning method and system for micro seismic source in tunnel rock burst inoculation process

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 13740623

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 13740623

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1