WO2013101583A1 - Digital filter, partial response equalizer, and digital coherent receiver device and method - Google Patents

Digital filter, partial response equalizer, and digital coherent receiver device and method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2013101583A1
WO2013101583A1 PCT/US2012/070533 US2012070533W WO2013101583A1 WO 2013101583 A1 WO2013101583 A1 WO 2013101583A1 US 2012070533 W US2012070533 W US 2012070533W WO 2013101583 A1 WO2013101583 A1 WO 2013101583A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
signal
response
carrier recovery
partial response
post
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2012/070533
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Jianjun Yu
Jianqiang Li
Original Assignee
Zte (Usa) Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Zte (Usa) Inc. filed Critical Zte (Usa) Inc.
Priority to US14/369,886 priority Critical patent/US20140369398A1/en
Priority to EP12862591.0A priority patent/EP2798805A4/en
Priority to CN201280065631.0A priority patent/CN104025527A/en
Priority to JP2014550345A priority patent/JP5913632B2/en
Publication of WO2013101583A1 publication Critical patent/WO2013101583A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L25/00Baseband systems
    • H04L25/02Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
    • H04L25/03Shaping networks in transmitter or receiver, e.g. adaptive shaping networks
    • H04L25/03006Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference
    • H04L25/03012Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference operating in the time domain
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L27/00Modulated-carrier systems
    • H04L27/32Carrier systems characterised by combinations of two or more of the types covered by groups H04L27/02, H04L27/10, H04L27/18 or H04L27/26
    • H04L27/34Amplitude- and phase-modulated carrier systems, e.g. quadrature-amplitude modulated carrier systems
    • H04L27/38Demodulator circuits; Receiver circuits
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L27/00Modulated-carrier systems
    • H04L27/32Carrier systems characterised by combinations of two or more of the types covered by groups H04L27/02, H04L27/10, H04L27/18 or H04L27/26
    • H04L27/34Amplitude- and phase-modulated carrier systems, e.g. quadrature-amplitude modulated carrier systems
    • H04L27/38Demodulator circuits; Receiver circuits
    • H04L27/3818Demodulator circuits; Receiver circuits using coherent demodulation, i.e. using one or more nominally phase synchronous carriers
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L25/00Baseband systems
    • H04L25/02Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
    • H04L25/03Shaping networks in transmitter or receiver, e.g. adaptive shaping networks
    • H04L25/03006Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference
    • H04L25/03178Arrangements involving sequence estimation techniques

Definitions

  • DIGITAL FILTER DIGITAL FILTER, PARTIAL RESPONSE EQUALIZER, AND DIGITAL COHERENT RECEIVER DEVICE AND METHOD
  • the field of the present invention is communication systems, and particularly, digital filters, partial response equalizers, and coherent receiver devices and methods.
  • Partial-response equalization may be a good solution for this kind of system.
  • a partial-response equalizer is capable of shaping the unknown channel Impulse response into a known partial- response class (e.g, duobinary). Slight performance loss may occur as long as the channel response is similar to the target partial-response ⁇ D. D. Falconer and F. R. Magee, Jr., "Adaptive channel memory truncation for maximum-likelihood sequence estimation," Bell System Tech. J,, vol. 52, no. 9, pp, 1541-1562, Nov, 1973.).
  • the reported partial- response equalizers are almost in the decision-directed or decision-feedback modes.
  • the devise of feedforward partial-response equalizers may be desirable In particular for coherent optical communication systems. Fields of the present Invention are riot limited to optical communication systems.
  • DSP digital signal processing
  • the linear equalizers can provide a convenient and low-complexity way to perform polarization demultiplexing and to compensate for several time-varying impairments in an adaptive manner, as described by S.J, Savory in "Digital Coherent Optical Receivers: Algorithms and Subsystems," IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., vol. 16, no. 5, pp.
  • duobinary is attractive because it can in theory tailor the spectrum into a Nyquist band with one-symbol memory
  • Duobinay response is described here and in other parts as an example for convenience of understanding.
  • Any other partial response classes can also be used, for example, class 2, class 3, modified duobinary, extended class 4, and class 5 etc, according to the specific channel impulse responses in the systems to be investigated.
  • the MLSD complexity is cframafically reduced with respect to "Transmission of 96 x 100-Gb/s bandwidth-constrained PDM-RZ-QPSK channels with 300% spectral efficiency over 10610km and 400% spectral efficiency over 4370 km," J. Lightw, Techno!., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 491-498, Feb. 20 1 by J.-X. Cai, C. R. Davidson, D.G. Foursa, A.J. Lucero, O. V. Sinkin, W. W. Patterson, A. N. Pilipetskii, G. Mohs, and N.S.
  • a partial response equalizer includes a full response linear equalizing device for equalizing a received signal; and a partial response post filter for post filtering the equalized signal.
  • a receiver front end converts a received partial response optical signal to a partial response digital signal.
  • An equalizing device equalizes the pre-filtered full response digital signal.
  • a full response carrier recovery device performs carrier recovery of the signal equalized by the equalizing device.
  • a post-filter filters the signal having undergone carrier recovery by the full response carrier recovery device.
  • Fig. 1 illustrates a schematic diagram of a partial response equalizer
  • Fig. 2 illustrates an example of a filter model used for implementation.
  • Fig. 3 illustrates a schematic diagram of a partial-response equalizer with a carrier recovering device.
  • FIG. 4 Illustrates a schematic diagram illustrating a complete receiving method for optical communication systems.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a model of a spectrally-shaped QAM system.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates a simplified model of a duobinary channel.
  • aspects of the present invention relate to digital filters, partial response equalization, digital coherent receiver devices, and digital coherent receiver methods. They protect coherent receiving methods for polarization-multiplexed systems, mode-multiplexed systems, space-multiplexed systems, and the lil ⁇ e. These aspects decrease complexity from existing technologies while providing the same, or better, level of performance. Aspects allow for the use of conventional DSP algorithms originally developed for full-response signals. Also, aspects of the Invention provide a simple but high-sensitivity coherent receiving method for bandwidth-constraint signals. Further, aspects of the invention are powerful In spectrally-efficient WDM optical communication systems.
  • Fig, 1 illustrates a schematic diagram of a partial response equalizer 10.
  • a post filter 13 is digital, and is placed after a full response linear equalizer 1 in a feedforward manner. The combination of these two devices performs the function of partial response equalization.
  • the full response linear equalizer 1 1 may be any type that can equalize the input signal with ISI into an ISI-free signal.
  • the frequency response of the partial response post-filter is expected to be similar to the channel response with respect to its shape.
  • the impulse response of the partial response post-filter is expected to be a known response and its length N should be finite.
  • Figure 2 illustrates an example of a filter model used for implementation. The structure In Figure 2 determines the target partial response type.
  • the tap coefficients can be arbitrary, and meanwhile the tap number can be arbitrary. Duobinary is a special example when there are two taps In Fig.2. The corresponding tap coefficients are both ones.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of the second case illustrating a partial- response equalizer 30 with a carrier recovering device 33.
  • the feedforward structure of this equalizer allows It to easily use full-response carrier recovery methods.
  • the carrier recovering device may be placed between the full response linear equalizer 35 and the post-filter 37.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of the third case illustrating a coherent digital receiver 40, which includes front-end imperfection compensation 41 , a full response linear equalizer 43, a full response carrier recovering device 45, a partial response post-fiiter 47, and a partial response data detection device 49.
  • the data detection device 49 can be any type of known detector for partial-response signals, By way of non-limiting example only, the detector may be a symbol-by- symbol detector or a maximum-likelihood sequence detector as known in the art.
  • One specific realization relates to improving spectral-efficiency in wavelength-division multiplexing systems by using low-complexity duobinary shaping and detection, as described and incorporated by reference in "Approaching Nyquist Limit in Wavelength-Division Multiplexing Systems by Low- Complexity Duobinary Shaping and Detection” by Jianjun Yu and Jianqiang Li.
  • Fig. 5 illustrates a model of a spectrally-shaped QAM system.
  • the spectral shaping can be performed by either two narrowband low-pass filters (LPFs) on the two signal quadratures or a band-pass filter (BPF) in the frequency band.
  • LPFs narrowband low-pass filters
  • BPF band-pass filter
  • MLSD makes use of the known memory and minimizes the probability of error.
  • the complexity of MLSD Is associated with the involved memory length. For example, if the channel response is shaped to a duobinary pattern that contains a one- symbol memory, the use of MLSD does not impose much computational effort. However if the channel response is shaped to a different pattern that contains a two-symbol memory, for example, then the use of MLSD may Impose more computational effort.
  • the MLSD can be implemented on the in-phase and quadrature paths of a QAM signal on each of which the signal has an M-ary pulse amplitude modulation (PA ) format.
  • PA pulse amplitude modulation
  • the duo- binary shaped channel can be modeled as a finite-state machine that can be represented by a state transition diagram (i.e. a trellis).
  • the trellises shown are for the duobinary case, however, any class of partial response can be used,
  • the trellis of a duobinary channel containing M states begins with an initial state s 0 .
  • x3 ⁇ 4 can be used to represent the state for uniformity thereafter.
  • Fig. 7 illustrates a simplified model of a duobinary channel corresponding to the trellises of Figs. 6(a) and (b), where Z is the received signal sample In the k th time slot.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Cable Transmission Systems, Equalization Of Radio And Reduction Of Echo (AREA)
  • Optical Communication System (AREA)
  • Dc Digital Transmission (AREA)

Abstract

Aspects of the present Invention include devices and methods for receiving signals in communication systems. A partial response equalizer includes a full response linear equalizing device for equalizing a received signal; and a partial response post filter for post filtering the equalized signal. Aspects of the present invention devices and methods for coherently receiving signals in an optical communication system. A receiver front end converts a received partial response optical signal to a partial response digital signal. An equalizing device equalizes the pre-flltered full response digital signal. A full response carrier recovery device performs carrier recovery of the signal equalized by the equalizing device. A post-filter filters the signal having undergone carrier recovery by the full response carrier recovery device.

Description

DIGITAL FILTER, PARTIAL RESPONSE EQUALIZER, AND DIGITAL COHERENT RECEIVER DEVICE AND METHOD
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[01] The field of the present invention is communication systems, and particularly, digital filters, partial response equalizers, and coherent receiver devices and methods.
[02] The ever increasing bandwidth demand has been driving communication systems to higher capacities. Therefore, there is a strong motivation to enhance spectral efficiency to increase the total capacity. From a spectral-multiplexing point of view, there are several approaches for improving the spectral efficiency given a specified modulation format. One straightforward approach is to realize bandwidth-constraint on individual multiplexed channels by narrowband filtering. By this means, the spectrum is squeezed and high spectral-efficiency can be achieved. However, the inter-symbol interference (ISI)-free condition cannot be maintained since the equivalent channel In the presence of narrowband filtering would have strong ISI with a long memory. Moreover, the ISI pattern (I.e. the channel impulse response) is commonly unknown and unconditioned, which necessitates complicated channel estimations, Partial-response equalization may be a good solution for this kind of system. A partial-response equalizer is capable of shaping the unknown channel Impulse response into a known partial- response class (e.g, duobinary). Slight performance loss may occur as long as the channel response is similar to the target partial-response {D. D. Falconer and F. R. Magee, Jr., "Adaptive channel memory truncation for maximum-likelihood sequence estimation," Bell System Tech. J,, vol. 52, no. 9, pp, 1541-1562, Nov, 1973.). Unlike the widely-studied full-response equalizers, the reported partial- response equalizers are almost in the decision-directed or decision-feedback modes. The devise of feedforward partial-response equalizers may be desirable In particular for coherent optical communication systems. Fields of the present Invention are riot limited to optical communication systems. [03] Recently, the coherent defection coupled with digital signal processing (DSP) has been well recognized as the crucial technologies for 00G and beyond optical communication systems, as described by P.J. Winzer in "Beyond 100G Ethernet," IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 26-30, 2010, and S. J, Savory in "Digital Coherent Optical Receivers: Algorithms and Subsystems," IEEE J, Sel. Top, Quantum Electron., vol. 16, no, 5, pp. 64-1 179, Sep./Oct. 20 0. In a digital optical coherent receiver, most of the linear transmission impairments can be compensated for by the digital linear equalizers. The linear equalizers can provide a convenient and low-complexity way to perform polarization demultiplexing and to compensate for several time-varying impairments in an adaptive manner, as described by S.J, Savory in "Digital Coherent Optical Receivers: Algorithms and Subsystems," IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1164-1179, Sep./Oct. 2010. The ever- reported diverse linear equalizers are almost full-response ones that are suitable to smalMSI channels. A linear equalizer yields good performance on the channels with well-behaved spectral characteristics (i.e. small I SI), whereas it may not be a desirable option in the presence of severe ISI due to the noise enhancement effect as described by J. G. Proakis in "Digital Communications, Fourth Edition", New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001, In addition, a number of other full- response DSPs have also been developed in the optical communication community, It is strongly desired to preserve these full-response equalizers and other corresponding DSPs without modifications. The present invention can address the above issues.
[04] Another concern is about the implementation complexity in practice, Among various partial response classes, duobinary is attractive because it can in theory tailor the spectrum into a Nyquist band with one-symbol memory, Duobinay response is described here and in other parts as an example for convenience of understanding. Any other partial response classes can also be used, for example, class 2, class 3, modified duobinary, extended class 4, and class 5 etc, according to the specific channel impulse responses in the systems to be investigated. Due to the short memory of the target duobinary response, the MLSD complexity is cframafically reduced with respect to "Transmission of 96 x 100-Gb/s bandwidth-constrained PDM-RZ-QPSK channels with 300% spectral efficiency over 10610km and 400% spectral efficiency over 4370 km," J. Lightw, Techno!., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 491-498, Feb. 20 1 by J.-X. Cai, C. R. Davidson, D.G. Foursa, A.J. Lucero, O. V. Sinkin, W. W. Patterson, A. N. Pilipetskii, G. Mohs, and N.S. Bergano, "20 Tbit s capacity transmission over 6,860 km," in Proc. OFC2011, Mar, 201 , Paper PDPB4" by J.-X. Cal, Y. Cal, C. R. Davidson, A. Lucero, H. Zhang, D. G. Foursa, O. V. Sinkin, W. W. Patterson, A. Pilipetskii, G. Mohs, and N. S. Bergano, and "Spectrum-narrowing tolerant 171-Gbit s PDM- 16QA transmission over 1 ,200 km using maximum likelihood sequence estimation," In Proc. ECOC 2011, Sep. 2011 , Paper We. 10. P1.73.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
105] Aspects of the present invention Include devices and methods for receiving signals in communication systems. In one aspect, a partial response equalizer includes a full response linear equalizing device for equalizing a received signal; and a partial response post filter for post filtering the equalized signal.
[06] In another aspect of the present Invention, a receiver front end converts a received partial response optical signal to a partial response digital signal. An equalizing device equalizes the pre-filtered full response digital signal. A full response carrier recovery device performs carrier recovery of the signal equalized by the equalizing device. A post-filter filters the signal having undergone carrier recovery by the full response carrier recovery device.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[07] Fig. 1 illustrates a schematic diagram of a partial response equalizer,
[08] Fig. 2 illustrates an example of a filter model used for implementation. [09] Fig. 3 illustrates a schematic diagram of a partial-response equalizer with a carrier recovering device.
[10] Fig. 4 Illustrates a schematic diagram illustrating a complete receiving method for optical communication systems.
[11] Fig. 5 illustrates a model of a spectrally-shaped QAM system.
[12] Figs. 6(a) and (b) are illustrations of trellises for M-ary PAM for =2 and 4.
[ 3] Fig. 7 illustrates a simplified model of a duobinary channel.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
[14] Aspects of the present invention relate to digital filters, partial response equalization, digital coherent receiver devices, and digital coherent receiver methods. They protect coherent receiving methods for polarization-multiplexed systems, mode-multiplexed systems, space-multiplexed systems, and the lil<e. These aspects decrease complexity from existing technologies while providing the same, or better, level of performance. Aspects allow for the use of conventional DSP algorithms originally developed for full-response signals. Also, aspects of the Invention provide a simple but high-sensitivity coherent receiving method for bandwidth-constraint signals. Further, aspects of the invention are powerful In spectrally-efficient WDM optical communication systems.
[15] Aspects of the present invention may be implemented in various scenarios, three of which are:
1) general synchronous communication systems where full-response linear equalizers introduce strong noise or linear crosstalk enhancement;
2) communication systems where phase noise is a problem to be taken into account; and
3) coherent receiving methods for optical communication systems including several conventional DSP devices. [16] Fig, 1 illustrates a schematic diagram of a partial response equalizer 10. A post filter 13 is digital, and is placed after a full response linear equalizer 1 in a feedforward manner. The combination of these two devices performs the function of partial response equalization. The full response linear equalizer 1 1 may be any type that can equalize the input signal with ISI into an ISI-free signal. The frequency response of the partial response post-filter is expected to be similar to the channel response with respect to its shape. Furthermore, the impulse response of the partial response post-filter is expected to be a known response and its length N should be finite. Figure 2 illustrates an example of a filter model used for implementation. The structure In Figure 2 determines the target partial response type. The tap coefficients can be arbitrary, and meanwhile the tap number can be arbitrary. Duobinary is a special example when there are two taps In Fig.2. The corresponding tap coefficients are both ones.
[17] Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of the second case illustrating a partial- response equalizer 30 with a carrier recovering device 33. The feedforward structure of this equalizer allows It to easily use full-response carrier recovery methods. The carrier recovering device may be placed between the full response linear equalizer 35 and the post-filter 37.
[ 8] Fig, 4 is a schematic diagram of the third case illustrating a coherent digital receiver 40, which includes front-end imperfection compensation 41 , a full response linear equalizer 43, a full response carrier recovering device 45, a partial response post-fiiter 47, and a partial response data detection device 49. Because the signal will be equalized into a signal with a partial response, the data detection device 49 can be any type of known detector for partial-response signals, By way of non-limiting example only, the detector may be a symbol-by- symbol detector or a maximum-likelihood sequence detector as known in the art.
[ 9] One specific realization relates to improving spectral-efficiency in wavelength-division multiplexing systems by using low-complexity duobinary shaping and detection, as described and incorporated by reference in "Approaching Nyquist Limit in Wavelength-Division Multiplexing Systems by Low- Complexity Duobinary Shaping and Detection" by Jianjun Yu and Jianqiang Li.
[20] Fig. 5 illustrates a model of a spectrally-shaped QAM system. The spectral shaping can be performed by either two narrowband low-pass filters (LPFs) on the two signal quadratures or a band-pass filter (BPF) in the frequency band. In the context of optical communication systems, the above two approaches correspond to two implementing domains: the electrical domain prior to optical modulation (by either digital or analog means) and the optical domain after optical modulation.
[21] There are a few techniques for detecting an Information signal with controlled ISI or a known memory as described by J. G. Proakis in "Digital Communications, Fourth Edition". One is the symbol-by-symbol suboptimum detector that is relatively simple to implement. This method ignores the inherent memory, thereby suffering from a degraded SNR sensitivity. Another method is MLSD which bases its decisions on the observation of a symbol sequence over multiple successive time intervals as described by J.G. Proakis in "Digital Communications, Fourth Edition", H. Kobayashi in "Correlative level coding and maximum likelihood decoding," IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, vol. IT-17, no. 5, pp. 586-94, Sep. 1971 , and G.D. Forney, Jr., in "Maximum likelihood sequence estimation of digital sequences in the presence of intersymbol interference," IEEE Trans. Info, Theory, vol. IT-18, no. 3, pp. 363-378, May 1972. MLSD makes use of the known memory and minimizes the probability of error. The complexity of MLSD Is associated with the involved memory length. For example, if the channel response is shaped to a duobinary pattern that contains a one- symbol memory, the use of MLSD does not impose much computational effort. However if the channel response is shaped to a different pattern that contains a two-symbol memory, for example, then the use of MLSD may Impose more computational effort.
[22] The MLSD can be implemented on the in-phase and quadrature paths of a QAM signal on each of which the signal has an M-ary pulse amplitude modulation (PA ) format. As one type of the channels with memory, the duo- binary shaped channel can be modeled as a finite-state machine that can be represented by a state transition diagram (i.e. a trellis). Figs. 6(a) and (b) are illustrations of trellises for M-ary PAM for M=2 and 4. The trellises shown are for the duobinary case, however, any class of partial response can be used, The trellis of a duobinary channel containing M states begins with an initial state s0. SK denotes the state in the k,h time slot. Because the memory length Is one symbol for duobinary, the state Sk is directly given by the original input Xk that takes values Xm from an alphabet of M PAM levels (m = 1 , 2 M). Because
Xk and S are exchangeable, x¾ can be used to represent the state for uniformity thereafter. The duobinary-shaped level yk = k + is attached to each branch in the trellis. In general, each state has M possible transition paths, and accepts M incoming paths since the time k = 2.
[23] Fig. 7 illustrates a simplified model of a duobinary channel corresponding to the trellises of Figs. 6(a) and (b), where Z is the received signal sample In the kth time slot.
[24] It should be understood that the methods and devices of the present invention may be executed employing machines and apparatus including simple and complex computers. Moreover, the architecture and methods described above can be stored, in part or In full, on forms of machine-readable media. For example, the operations of the present invention could be stored on machine- readable media, such as magnetic disks or optical disks, which are accessible via a disk drive (or computer-readable medium drive). Alternatively, the logic to perform the operations as discussed above, couid be implemented in additional computer and/or machine readable media, such as discrete hardware
components as large-scale integrated circuits (LSPs), application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC's), firmware such as electrically erasable programmable read-only only memory (EEPROM's); and the like. Implementations of certain embodiments may further take the form of machine-implemented, including web- implemented, computer software. [25] While aspects of this invention have been shown and described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The invention, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the following claims.

Claims

What is claimed is;
1. A partial response equalizer comprising:
a full response linear equalizing device for equalizing a received signal; and
a partial response post filter for post filtering the equalized signal.
2. The partial response equalizer of claim 1 further comprising a full response carrier recovery device for performing carrier recovery of the signal equalized by the equalizing device.
3. The partial response equalizer of claim 2, wherein the full response carrier recovery device is between the full response linear equalizing device and the partial response post filter.
4. A coherent receiver, comprising:
a receiver front end for converting a received partial response optical signal Into a partial response digital signal;
an equalizing device for equalizing the pre-filtered full response digital signal;
a full response carrier recovery device for performing carrier recovery of the signal equalized by the equalizing device; and
a post-filter for post-filtering the signal having undergone carrier recovery by the full response carrier recovery device.
5. The coherent receiver of claim 4 further comprising:
a partial response data detection device for detecting the post-filtered signal.
6. The coherent receiver of claim 5, wherein the partial response data detection device is a symbol-by-symbol detector.
7. The coherent receiver of claim 5, wherein the partial response data detection device is a maximum-likelihood sequence detector.
8. A method comprising:
equalizing a received signal; and
post-filtering the equalized signal.
9. The method of claim 8, further comprising:
performing carrier recovery of the signal. 0. A method for receiving signals in an optical communication system comprising:
converting a received partial response optical signal into a partial response digital signal;
equalizing the pre-filtered full response digital signal;
performing carrier recovery of the signal equalized by the equalizing device; and
post-fiitering the signal having undergone carrier recovery by the full response carrier recovery device.
11. The method of claim 10 further comprising detecting the post-filtered signal.
12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the detecting comprises symbol-by- symbol detecting,
13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the detecting comprises maximum- likelihood sequence detecting.
14. An article of manufacture including a computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon, comprising:
instructions for equalizing a received signal; and
Instructions for post-filtering the equalized signal. 15, The article of manufacture of claim 14, further comprising instructions for Instructions for performing carrier recovery of the signal.
16, An article of manufacture including a computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon, comprising:
instructions for converting a received partial response optical signal into a partial response digital signal;
instructions for equalizing the pre-filtered full response digital signal; instructions for performing carrier recovery of the signal equalized by the equalizing device; and
instructions for post-filtering the signal having undergone carrier recovery by the full response carrier recovery device,
7, The article of manufacture of claim 16 further comprising:
instructions for detecting the post-filtered signal.
18, The article of manufacture of claim 17 wherein the detecting comprises symbol-by-symbol detecting.
9, The article of manufacture of claim 17 wherein the detecting comprises maximum-likelihood sequence detecting.
PCT/US2012/070533 2011-12-30 2012-12-19 Digital filter, partial response equalizer, and digital coherent receiver device and method WO2013101583A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/369,886 US20140369398A1 (en) 2011-12-30 2012-12-19 Digital filter, partial response equalizer, and digital coherent receiver device and method
EP12862591.0A EP2798805A4 (en) 2011-12-30 2012-12-19 Digital filter, partial response equalizer, and digital coherent receiver device and method
CN201280065631.0A CN104025527A (en) 2011-12-30 2012-12-19 Digital filter, partial response equalizer, and digital coherent receiver device and method
JP2014550345A JP5913632B2 (en) 2011-12-30 2012-12-19 Digital filter, partial response equalizer, and coherent receiver and method

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201161581946P 2011-12-30 2011-12-30
US61/581,946 2011-12-30

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2013101583A1 true WO2013101583A1 (en) 2013-07-04

Family

ID=48698534

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2012/070533 WO2013101583A1 (en) 2011-12-30 2012-12-19 Digital filter, partial response equalizer, and digital coherent receiver device and method

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US20140369398A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2798805A4 (en)
JP (1) JP5913632B2 (en)
CN (1) CN104025527A (en)
WO (1) WO2013101583A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10020912B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2018-07-10 Sans R&D, Llc Method and a system for a receiver design in bandwidth constrained communication systems
EP3637711A4 (en) * 2017-06-30 2020-05-13 Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. Communication method and device, and storage medium

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3373536A4 (en) 2015-11-30 2018-11-21 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Signal processing system, method and device
KR20220099251A (en) 2021-01-06 2022-07-13 삼성전자주식회사 Receiver for receiving multi-level signal and memory device including the same and method of receiving data using the same

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040203559A1 (en) * 2003-04-09 2004-10-14 Stojanovic Vladimir M. Partial response receiver
US7139337B2 (en) * 1999-02-13 2006-11-21 Broadcom Corporation Efficient partial response equalization
US7286595B2 (en) * 2003-10-10 2007-10-23 Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Netherlands B.V. Apparatus using a lengthened equalization target filter with a matched filter metric in a viterbi detector
US20110243561A1 (en) 2010-04-02 2011-10-06 Fujitsu Limited Filter, coherent receiver device and coherent receiving method
WO2011133333A2 (en) * 2010-04-23 2011-10-27 Rambus Inc. Partial response decision feedback equalizer with distributed control

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3492578A (en) * 1967-05-19 1970-01-27 Bell Telephone Labor Inc Multilevel partial-response data transmission
US3679977A (en) * 1969-06-24 1972-07-25 Bell Telephone Labor Inc Precoded ternary data transmission
US4355397A (en) * 1980-10-15 1982-10-19 Rixon, Inc. Full duplex communication system for voice grade channels
JPH03166839A (en) * 1989-11-27 1991-07-18 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Digital information detecting device
JPH04183042A (en) * 1990-11-16 1992-06-30 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Digital information detector
JPH0738614A (en) * 1993-07-23 1995-02-07 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Digital information detector and magnetic reproducing device
EP1384361A4 (en) * 2001-03-28 2009-12-16 Broadcom Corp System and method for terrestrial high-definition television reception
JP4386196B2 (en) * 2005-08-05 2009-12-16 日本電気株式会社 Partial response transmission system and its equalization circuit
US8761311B2 (en) * 2008-01-14 2014-06-24 Thomson Licensing Data-aided symbol timing recovery loop decoupled from carrier phase offset
TWI383599B (en) * 2008-06-02 2013-01-21 Univ Nat Taiwan Duobinary transceiver

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7139337B2 (en) * 1999-02-13 2006-11-21 Broadcom Corporation Efficient partial response equalization
US20040203559A1 (en) * 2003-04-09 2004-10-14 Stojanovic Vladimir M. Partial response receiver
US7286595B2 (en) * 2003-10-10 2007-10-23 Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Netherlands B.V. Apparatus using a lengthened equalization target filter with a matched filter metric in a viterbi detector
US20110243561A1 (en) 2010-04-02 2011-10-06 Fujitsu Limited Filter, coherent receiver device and coherent receiving method
WO2011133333A2 (en) * 2010-04-23 2011-10-27 Rambus Inc. Partial response decision feedback equalizer with distributed control

Non-Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"Spectrum-narrowing tolerant 171-Gbit/s PDM-16QAM transmission over 1,200 km using maximum likelihood sequence estimation", PROC. ECOC 2011, September 2011 (2011-09-01)
D. D. FALCONER; F. R. MAGEE, JR.: "Adaptive channel memory truncation for maximum-likelihood sequence estimation", BELL SYSTEM TECH. J., vol. 52, no. 9, November 1973 (1973-11-01), pages 1541 - 1562, XP011629355, DOI: doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1973.tb02032.x
J.-X. CAI; C. R. DAVIDSON; D.G. FOURSA; A.J. LUCERO; 0. V. SINKIN; W. W. PATTERSON; A. N. PILIPETSKII; G. MOHS; N.S. BERGANO: "Transmission of 96 x 100-Gb/s bandwidth-constrained PDM-RZ-QPSK channels with 300% spectral efficiency over 10610km and 400% spectral efficiency over 4370 km", J. LIGHTW. TECHNOL., vol. 29, no. 4, February 2011 (2011-02-01), pages 491 - 498, XP011382032, DOI: doi:10.1109/JLT.2010.2093931
J.-X. CAI; Y. CAI; C. R. DAVIDSON; A. LUCERO; H. ZHANG; D.G. FOURSA; 0. V. SINKIN; W. W. PATTERSON; A. PILIPETSKII; G. MOHS: "20 Tbit/s capacity transmission over 6,860 km", PROC. OFC2011, March 2011 (2011-03-01)
See also references of EP2798805A4

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10020912B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2018-07-10 Sans R&D, Llc Method and a system for a receiver design in bandwidth constrained communication systems
US10243690B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2019-03-26 Sans R&D, Llc Method and a system for a receiver design in bandwidth constrained communication systems
EP3637711A4 (en) * 2017-06-30 2020-05-13 Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. Communication method and device, and storage medium
US11258650B2 (en) 2017-06-30 2022-02-22 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Communication method, communications apparatus, and storage medium

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN104025527A (en) 2014-09-03
JP5913632B2 (en) 2016-04-27
JP2015507411A (en) 2015-03-05
EP2798805A1 (en) 2014-11-05
US20140369398A1 (en) 2014-12-18
EP2798805A4 (en) 2015-08-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10003390B2 (en) System and method for precoded Faster than Nyquist signaling
EP2514093B1 (en) Method and system for coherent equalization of chromatic dispersion of optical signals in a fiber
US9912414B2 (en) Iterative post-equalization for coherent optical receivers
US20130148712A1 (en) Conditional adaptation of linear filters in a system having nonlinearity
Li et al. Spectrally efficient quadrature duobinary coherent systems with symbol-rate digital signal processing
JPH11512579A (en) Adaptive equalizer for digital communication equipment
Baek et al. Novel interference cancellation technique based on matrix computation for FTN communication system
US20140369398A1 (en) Digital filter, partial response equalizer, and digital coherent receiver device and method
KR20200132497A (en) OPTICAL TRANSMISSION aPPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING SIGNAL BASED ON DIRECT-DETECTION
JP7200363B2 (en) Efficient Implementation of Post-Noise Whitening Compensation for Narrowband Filtered Signals
TW432843B (en) Receiver for a digital transmission system
Falconer History of equalization 1860-1980
Modenini et al. Adaptive rate-maximizing channel-shortening for ISI channels
Gorshtein et al. Symbol spaced adaptive MIMO equalization for ultrahigh bit rate metro coherent optical links
CN111869157B (en) Timing recovery apparatus and timing recovery method for use in data transmission system
Guenach et al. Performance analysis of pre-equalized multilevel partial response modulation for high-speed electrical interconnects
Li et al. Enhanced digital coherent receiver for high spectral-efficiency dual-polarization quadrature duobinary systems
Fatadin et al. DSP techniques for 16-QAM coherent optical systems
Peng et al. PN-PAM scheme for short range optical transmission over SI-POF—an alternative to Discrete Multi-Tone (DMT) scheme
Proakis et al. Adaptive equalization algorithms for high rate underwater acoustic communications
WO2023011294A1 (en) Signal processing method and apparatus, and processing chip and signal transmission system
Karout et al. CMA misconvergence in coherent optical communication for signals generated from a single PRBS
Hu et al. Beating bandwidth limitation for high-speed PAM-4 transmission based on turbo equalizer
Polprasert et al. Performance of the bit-interleaved frequency domain turbo equalization over experimental underwater acoustic channels
Hauske et al. Reduced complexity Rx concepts for optical multilevel transmission

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 12862591

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2014550345

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 14369886

Country of ref document: US

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2012862591

Country of ref document: EP