WO2012159899A1 - Vorrichtung und verfahren zur ultraschallprüfung eines werkstücks - Google Patents
Vorrichtung und verfahren zur ultraschallprüfung eines werkstücks Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2012159899A1 WO2012159899A1 PCT/EP2012/058723 EP2012058723W WO2012159899A1 WO 2012159899 A1 WO2012159899 A1 WO 2012159899A1 EP 2012058723 W EP2012058723 W EP 2012058723W WO 2012159899 A1 WO2012159899 A1 WO 2012159899A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- workpiece
- active zone
- linearprüfköpfs
- ultrasonic
- active
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
- G01N29/22—Details, e.g. general constructional or apparatus details
- G01N29/26—Arrangements for orientation or scanning by relative movement of the head and the sensor
- G01N29/262—Arrangements for orientation or scanning by relative movement of the head and the sensor by electronic orientation or focusing, e.g. with phased arrays
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
- G01N2291/10—Number of transducers
- G01N2291/106—Number of transducers one or more transducer arrays
Definitions
- the invention relates to a device and a method for ultrasonic testing of a workpiece.
- workpieces are subjected to an ultrasonic test to assess the quality of the workpieces or their wear or their operational stresses.
- probes are provided with which ultrasound can be coupled into the workpiece and detected by exiting from the workpiece ultrasound.
- one or two test heads are placed in the region of an expected defect on the surface of the workpiece and brought into position with respect to each other and relative to the workpiece, that ultrasound emitted by the one probe is reflected at the defect and the reflected ultrasound strikes the other test head and thus detected.
- the resulting positions of the probes, together with the detected ultrasonic signal allow conclusions to be drawn about the position, orientation and size of the defect in the interior of the workpiece.
- Defects with a direction perpendicular to the surface of the workpiece orientation are preferably detectable with the tandem technique.
- the two probes on a Vorsatzkeil are emitted with the transverse waves at certain Einschallwinkeln in the workpiece.
- 45 ° is selected as the insonification angle, but techniques are always known in which other insonification angles are selected.
- the probe is designed conventionally as a single oscillator, whereby the probes in the ultra sound testing ⁇ be manually moved along the surface of the workpiece until a defect is detected.
- the probes are for example arranged on one and the same upper ⁇ surface of the workpiece and are so positioned that the light emitted by the a probe Ultra ⁇ sound beam is reflected at a flaw in the workpiece.
- the reflected ultrasound beam then impinges on that surface of the workpiece which is arranged opposite the surface with the probes, and is likewise reflected there. If the two surfaces are arranged parallel to one another and the extent of the defect is substantially perpendicular to the surfaces, this becomes
- the ultrasonic beam is deflected by about 180 ° and hits the second probe when it is in the appropriate position on the one surface.
- This procedure is known as tandem technique.
- the second test head can be arranged on the second surface. This halves the sound path of the ultrasound beam through the workpiece, since the ultrasound beam is reflected only once at the fault ⁇ site.
- This procedure is known as the pitch-catching technique. Both in the tandem technique and in the pitch-catch technique, the test zone in the workpiece results from the distance of the two test heads from one another.
- the object of the invention is to provide an apparatus for ultrasonic testing of a workpiece and a method for ultrasonic testing of the workpiece, wherein the ultra ⁇ noise test is easy to handle at a high inspection accuracy.
- the inventive device for ultrasonic testing of a workpiece has at least one elongated Linearprüf ⁇ head and a control device for driving the Linearprüfköpfs, which has a plurality of oscillator elements, which are angeord ⁇ net in series along the longitudinal direction of the Linearprüfköpf and individually and / or in groups of the Control unit under an emission or for the detection of ultrasound can be activated and thereby form at least one active zone of Linearprüfköpfs, wherein by means of the control of the individual oscillator elements by the control unit, the minimum at least one active zone along the longitudinal direction of the Linearprüf ⁇ head is movable.
- the Linearprüfköpf has a leading sawtooth profile, the saw teeth are seen as pre-wedge of the vibrator elements ⁇ before. In this case, it is preferable for the saw teeth to have asymmetrical flanks, wherein the pitch angle of the flatter of the flanks preferably corresponds to an insonification angle . Furthermore, the oscillator elements preferably produce an insonification angle of 45 °.
- the linear test head preferably has more than 100 transducer elements, the active zone being formed by 10 to 20 transducer elements.
- the inventive method for the ultrasonic testing of a workpiece comprises the steps of: providing at least one of the Minim ⁇ Linearprüfköpfe; one after the other applying the linear probes to the surface of the workpiece; Driving the first Linearprüfköpfs with the controller for forming the active zone for ultrasonic emission into the workpiece; Driving the second linear test head with the control unit to form the active zone for detecting ultrasound emitted from the active zone of the first linear probe and exiting the workpiece; Shifting the active zone of the two linear probes until ultrasound is detected by the second linear probe; Determining the position of a defect in the workpiece as a function of the distance of the active zones from each other in the detection and the position of the active zones relative to the workpiece.
- the method comprises the steps: provision of two of the linear probes; Applying the probes on two opposite surfaces of the workpiece, wherein the Linearprüfköpfe are arranged substantially at the same height; Driving the first Linearprüfköpfs with the control unit for forming the active zone for Ultraschallemis ⁇ sion in the workpiece; Actuating the second linear test head with the control device for forming the active zone for the detection of ultrasound of the active zone of the first linear test head was emitted and emerges from the workpiece; Ver ⁇ the active zones of the two push Linearprüfköpfe such is detected from the second to Linearprüfköpf ultrasound; Determining the location of a defect in the workpiece as a function of the distance of the active zones from each other in the detection and the position of the active zones relative to the workpiece.
- the insonification angle of the oscillator elements is varied.
- the angle of incidence of the ultrasonic units is before Trains t ⁇ varied such that the ultrasonic fields are focused in the workpiece.
- the linear test heads are controlled with the control unit such that the
- the Linearprüfkexcellent need to be applied only on the surface of the work ⁇ piece, taking elaborate precautions for the mechanical displacement of the Linearprüfkexcellent need not be taken care of.
- the A ⁇ guideline time and the test time is advantageously reduced in the practice of Ultra ⁇ noise test.
- the leading saw tooth profile of the linear test heads By providing the leading saw tooth profile of the linear test heads, they can be made narrow and slim. As a result, any interference caused by multiple reflections, such as occur in large flow wedges in probes with a high height prevented.
- the Vorlaufsäge leopardprofils caused by the provision of the Vorlaufsäge leopardprofils the damping capacity of the Linearprüfköpfs low, whereby the ultrasonic ⁇ detection capability of the device according to the invention is high.
- the method is suitable for ultrasonic testing in the examination of narrow gap welding workpieces with large wall thicknesses and large forgings.
- the linear test head is advantageously designed as a phased array, whereby a variation of the insonification angle and a focusing of the sound fields in the workpiece is made possible and thus an improvement of the error detection capability is achieved.
- the two linear probes can be aligned with each other using their direct ultrasound because they are placed directly opposite each other.
- Figure 1 is a schematic cross-sectional view of a
- Figure 2 is a schematic cross-sectional view of a
- the leading sawtooth profile 23 is formed by a plurality of adjacent sawteeth 24, which are each associated with a vibrator element 25, so that for each of the oscillator elements 25 of the saw teeth 24 forms a feed wedge.
- the linear probes 1, 2 are designed such that in the workpiece 19 ultrasonic longitudinal waves and / or ultrasonic transverse waves can be sounded.
- the proportion of the ultrasonic longitudinal waves and / or the ultrasonic transverse waves is determined by the angle of the advance wedges.
- the apparatus for ultrasonic testing includes the first Linearprüfkopf 1, the second 2 and a Linearprüfköpf Steuerge ⁇ advises 9.
- the control unit 9 is coupled via a control line 10 both with the first linear test head 1 and with the two ⁇ th Linearprüfköpf 2, whereby the individual Schwin ⁇ gerieri 25 of Linearprüfkexcellent 1, 2 individually controlled are bar.
- the control unit 9 is set up the vibrator ⁇ elements 25 to control such that the first Linearprüfköpf 1 is a group of radiators 3, 5, 7 and in the second Linearprüfköpf 2 is a sensor array 4, 6, 8 may be formed as the active zones, respectively.
- the Linearprüfkexcellent 1, 2 are formed elongated, where ⁇ is shown in its longitudinal direction in Figs. 1 and 2 with an arrow, which is designated by the reference numeral 11.
- the Linearprüfkexcellent 1, 2 are so ⁇ controlled that both the radiator group 3 in the positions of the radiator groups 5 and 7 and the sensor group 4 in the positions of the sensor groups 6 and 9 along the longitudinal direction 11 are displaced.
- a workpiece 19 is tested with the Linearprüfköpfen 1 and 2 in tandem.
- the probes are linear ⁇ 1, 2 arranged on a first surface of the workpiece 20 in its longitudinal direction 11 in alignment one behind the other reasonable.
- the first radiator group 3 is acti ⁇ fourth.
- an ultrasonic beam 12 is transmitted to the workpiece 19 at an insonification angle 13 of 45 ° in the direction of an error expected region 14.
- the position of the first emitter group 3 is such that the ultrasound beam 12 strikes a fault location 15 which is located in the error servicing area 14.
- the fault location 15 tends to have an extension direction which runs perpendicular to the longitudinal direction 11.
- the incidence angle 13 is determined by the angle of the flow ⁇ wedges and the sound velocities at the interfaces between the transducer elements 25 and the workpiece 19th
- the ultrasound beam 12 is reflected and finally strikes a second workpiece surface 21 arranged facing away from the first workpiece surface 20.
- the two workpiece surfaces 20, 21 are arranged parallel to one another.
- the ultrasonic beam 12 is on a surface reflection point 17 at a surface reflection angle 18 at the second workpiece surface 21 re flexes and finally hits the first sensor group 4 of the second Linearprüfköpfs 2.
- the relative distance of the first radiator group 3 to the first sensor group 4 is set such that the fault point 15 in their flaws ⁇ deep 16 is hit by the ultrasonic beam 12.
- the second fault location 15 is used to detect the fault location 15
- the position of the second radiator group 5 and the second sensor group 6 is selected such that the fault location 15 is hit in its error spot depth 16 of the ultrasonic beam 12.
- the linear probes 1, 2 are designed such that both radiator groups and sensor groups can be activated by the control unit 9 in the first linear test head 1.
- the second linear test head 2 can be omitted if in the first linear test head 1 both the radiator groups 3, 5 and the sensor groups 4, 6 are activated by the control unit 9.
- Fig. 2 the workpiece is tested with the Linearprüfköpfen 1, 2 in the pitch-catch technique.
- the second Linearprüfköpf 2 is not arranged opposite to the first workpiece upper ⁇ surface 20 but on the second surface of the workpiece 21 to the first Linearprüfköpf 1.
- the reflection of the ultrasound beam 12 on the Oberflä ⁇ chenreflexionsstelle 17 is not of importance, so that the re ⁇ Levante acoustic path of the ultrasonic beam substantially halved in the workpiece 19 12th
- the first radiator group 3 and the first sensor group 4 and the second radiator group 5 and the second sensor group 6 are each activated to corresponding to find fault location 15.
- the pitch is at ⁇ the error location in the vicinity of the second work piece surface ⁇ 21, the third antenna element group is 7 to activate together ⁇ men with the third sensor group. 8
- the defect locations 15 are distributed in the defect expectation area 14 over different defect depths 16.
- the individual oscillator elements 25 of the linear probes 1 and 2 are to be actuated by the control device 9 so that the first radiator group 3 is active together with the first sensor group 4, whereby the fault location 15 in the vicinity of the first workpiece surface 20 is detected.
- the radiator group and the sensor group is then displaced to the position of the second radiator group 4 and the second sensor group 6, whereby the flaw 15 is detected in the central region of the workpiece 19 within the defect expectation area 14.
- the activity of the radiator group is shifted to the position of the third radiator group 7 and the activity of the sensor group is moved to the position of the third sensor group 8, whereby the fault 15 in the vicinity of the second workpiece surface 21 in the error expected area 14 is detected.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP12726365.5A EP2689243B1 (de) | 2011-05-24 | 2012-05-11 | Vorrichtung und verfahren zur ultraschallprüfung eines werkstücks |
CN201280025412.XA CN103582811B (zh) | 2011-05-24 | 2012-05-11 | 用于对工件进行超声波检查的设备和方法 |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP11167291.1 | 2011-05-24 | ||
EP11167291A EP2527829A1 (de) | 2011-05-24 | 2011-05-24 | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Ultraschallprüfung eines Werkstücks |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2012159899A1 true WO2012159899A1 (de) | 2012-11-29 |
Family
ID=44741145
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2012/058723 WO2012159899A1 (de) | 2011-05-24 | 2012-05-11 | Vorrichtung und verfahren zur ultraschallprüfung eines werkstücks |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (2) | EP2527829A1 (zh) |
CN (1) | CN103582811B (zh) |
WO (1) | WO2012159899A1 (zh) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102013211304A1 (de) | 2013-06-17 | 2014-12-18 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Phasengesteuerter Gruppenschwinger zur verbesserten Ultraschallprüfung |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2027817A1 (de) * | 1970-06-05 | 1971-12-09 | Nippon Kokan Kk | Ultraschall-Prüfgerät |
DE3241200A1 (de) * | 1982-11-08 | 1984-05-10 | Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München | Ultraschallwandleranordnung |
US20040050166A1 (en) * | 2002-09-16 | 2004-03-18 | Batzinger Thomas James | Phased array ultrasonic inspection method for industrial applications |
US6792808B1 (en) * | 2003-04-30 | 2004-09-21 | General Electric Company | Ultrasonic inspection method |
EP1693668A1 (de) * | 2005-01-27 | 2006-08-23 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren und Einrichtung zum Ermitteln von Defekten an einem Bauelement einer Turbine |
-
2011
- 2011-05-24 EP EP11167291A patent/EP2527829A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2012
- 2012-05-11 CN CN201280025412.XA patent/CN103582811B/zh not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2012-05-11 WO PCT/EP2012/058723 patent/WO2012159899A1/de active Application Filing
- 2012-05-11 EP EP12726365.5A patent/EP2689243B1/de not_active Not-in-force
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2027817A1 (de) * | 1970-06-05 | 1971-12-09 | Nippon Kokan Kk | Ultraschall-Prüfgerät |
DE3241200A1 (de) * | 1982-11-08 | 1984-05-10 | Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München | Ultraschallwandleranordnung |
US20040050166A1 (en) * | 2002-09-16 | 2004-03-18 | Batzinger Thomas James | Phased array ultrasonic inspection method for industrial applications |
US6792808B1 (en) * | 2003-04-30 | 2004-09-21 | General Electric Company | Ultrasonic inspection method |
EP1693668A1 (de) * | 2005-01-27 | 2006-08-23 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren und Einrichtung zum Ermitteln von Defekten an einem Bauelement einer Turbine |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102013211304A1 (de) | 2013-06-17 | 2014-12-18 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Phasengesteuerter Gruppenschwinger zur verbesserten Ultraschallprüfung |
WO2014202237A1 (de) * | 2013-06-17 | 2014-12-24 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Phasengesteuerter gruppenschwinger mit unterschiedlich grossen schwingerelementen zur verbesserten ultraschallprüfung |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2689243A1 (de) | 2014-01-29 |
EP2527829A1 (de) | 2012-11-28 |
CN103582811B (zh) | 2016-04-27 |
CN103582811A (zh) | 2014-02-12 |
EP2689243B1 (de) | 2015-06-24 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2032978B1 (de) | Ultraschall-prüfgerät mit array-prüfköpfen | |
EP0685068B1 (de) | Ultraschall-prüfvorrichtung für schweissnähte bei rohren, blechen und behältern | |
DE102008027228B4 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur zerstörungsfreien Ultraschalluntersuchung eines Prüfstücks mit zueinander gewinkelten, ebenen Oberflächen | |
DE4109625A1 (de) | Ultraschall-messverfahren fuer den wanddickenverlauf einer schweissnaht eines rohres | |
DE1648637A1 (de) | Ultraschall-Pruefeinrichtung fuer Schweissnaehte od.dgl. | |
WO1982000893A1 (fr) | Procede et dispositif de localisation et d'analyse d'emissions sonores | |
EP1762841B1 (de) | Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Ultraschallprüfung eines Werkstückes mit einer unebenen Oberfläche | |
AT391210B (de) | Verfahren zur bestimmung der art von punktfoermigen und laengserstreckten einzelfehlern in werkstuecken mittels ultraschall | |
EP1890140A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Prüfen der Gefügestruktur einer Schweissverbindung | |
WO2001098769A1 (de) | Vorrichtung und verfahren zur prüfung eines eisenbahnrades | |
EP2689243B1 (de) | Vorrichtung und verfahren zur ultraschallprüfung eines werkstücks | |
DE102011050051B4 (de) | Transmissionsprüfvorrichtung und Transmissionsprüfverfahren zum Prüfen von Werkstücken | |
EP1576363B1 (de) | Ultraschallprüfgerät und verfahren zur auswertung von ultraschallsignalen | |
WO2004057326A1 (de) | Verfahren zur auswertung von ultraschallsignalen eines fehlers in einem werkstück | |
DE10052045C2 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Prüfung eines Eisenbahnrades | |
DE102016110044A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Ultraschallprüfung von langgestreckten Hohlprofilen | |
WO2008119748A1 (de) | Verfahren zur ansteuerung eines array-prüfkopfs einer vorrichtung zur ultraschallprüfung eines belebten oder unbelebten prüflings sowie vorrichtung zur ausführung des verfahrens | |
DE2840456A1 (de) | Ultraschall-pruefvorrichtung zum zerstoerungsfreien pruefen von schweissnaehten | |
DE10258336B3 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur zerstörungsfreien Werkstoffprüfung mittels Ultraschall | |
EP3114473B1 (de) | Verfahren zur prüfung eines werkstücks mittels ultraschall | |
DE102019116142A1 (de) | Vorrichtung zur tomografischen Ultraschallprüfung einer Innenstruktur einer Metallbramme und Verfahren zur in-situ Qualitätsprüfung von Metallbrammen | |
DE602005002534T2 (de) | Bestimmung der Fläche einer lateralen Schattenzone in einem Ultraschallprüfungsverfahren | |
DE102004011566B3 (de) | Verfahren zur zerstörungsfreien Fehlerdiagnose an Verbundbauteilen mit einem Kern aus einem Metall- oder Keramikschaum | |
DE102009040748A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur zerstörungsfreien Prüfung von Schweißnähten in Werkstücken mittels Ultraschall | |
WO2014090446A1 (de) | Manipulation grosser array-prüfköpfe in paar (pitch-catch) anordnung |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 201280025412.X Country of ref document: CN |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 12726365 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
DPE1 | Request for preliminary examination filed after expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101) | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2012726365 Country of ref document: EP |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |