WO2012145608A1 - Systèmes et procédés pour l'atterrissage autonome d'un avion - Google Patents

Systèmes et procédés pour l'atterrissage autonome d'un avion Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2012145608A1
WO2012145608A1 PCT/US2012/034422 US2012034422W WO2012145608A1 WO 2012145608 A1 WO2012145608 A1 WO 2012145608A1 US 2012034422 W US2012034422 W US 2012034422W WO 2012145608 A1 WO2012145608 A1 WO 2012145608A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
aircraft
landing
control
controller
flight
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2012/034422
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
David W. Vos
Damien B. JOURDAN
Original Assignee
Vos David W
Jourdan Damien B
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Vos David W, Jourdan Damien B filed Critical Vos David W
Publication of WO2012145608A1 publication Critical patent/WO2012145608A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
    • G05D1/00—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
    • G05D1/04—Control of altitude or depth
    • G05D1/06—Rate of change of altitude or depth
    • G05D1/0607—Rate of change of altitude or depth specially adapted for aircraft
    • G05D1/0653—Rate of change of altitude or depth specially adapted for aircraft during a phase of take-off or landing
    • G05D1/0676—Rate of change of altitude or depth specially adapted for aircraft during a phase of take-off or landing specially adapted for landing
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64U—UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES [UAV]; EQUIPMENT THEREFOR
    • B64U70/00—Launching, take-off or landing arrangements
    • B64U70/40—Landing characterised by flight manoeuvres, e.g. deep stall
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64U—UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES [UAV]; EQUIPMENT THEREFOR
    • B64U70/00—Launching, take-off or landing arrangements
    • B64U70/60—Take-off or landing of UAVs from a runway using their own power
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
    • G08G5/0004—Transmission of traffic-related information to or from an aircraft
    • G08G5/0013—Transmission of traffic-related information to or from an aircraft with a ground station
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
    • G08G5/0017—Arrangements for implementing traffic-related aircraft activities, e.g. arrangements for generating, displaying, acquiring or managing traffic information
    • G08G5/0021—Arrangements for implementing traffic-related aircraft activities, e.g. arrangements for generating, displaying, acquiring or managing traffic information located in the aircraft
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
    • G08G5/0047—Navigation or guidance aids for a single aircraft
    • G08G5/0056—Navigation or guidance aids for a single aircraft in an emergency situation, e.g. hijacking
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
    • G08G5/0047—Navigation or guidance aids for a single aircraft
    • G08G5/006—Navigation or guidance aids for a single aircraft in accordance with predefined flight zones, e.g. to avoid prohibited zones
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
    • G08G5/0047—Navigation or guidance aids for a single aircraft
    • G08G5/0069—Navigation or guidance aids for a single aircraft specially adapted for an unmanned aircraft
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
    • G08G5/0073—Surveillance aids
    • G08G5/0086—Surveillance aids for monitoring terrain
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
    • G08G5/0073—Surveillance aids
    • G08G5/0091—Surveillance aids for monitoring atmospheric conditions
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
    • G08G5/02—Automatic approach or landing aids, i.e. systems in which flight data of incoming planes are processed to provide landing data
    • G08G5/025—Navigation or guidance aids
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64U—UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES [UAV]; EQUIPMENT THEREFOR
    • B64U2201/00—UAVs characterised by their flight controls
    • B64U2201/10—UAVs characterised by their flight controls autonomous, i.e. by navigating independently from ground or air stations, e.g. by using inertial navigation systems [INS]

Definitions

  • This description relates to systems and methods for autonomously controlling an aircraft.
  • this description relates to systems and methods for autonomously landing an aircraft without the assistance of a pilot, for example, when the aircraft is unmanned, the pilot becomes unable to control the aircraft, or the aircraft experiences a technical problem that compromises normal operation of its control systems.
  • an aircraft there are many situations in which it would be desirable for an aircraft to have a system that would automatically control the aircraft upon a lapse of control. For example, it would be desirable for an aircraft to have a system that would automatically take control and/or land the aircraft without the assistance of a pilot. For example, if the pilot is operating an unmanned aircraft remotely, the remote signal to control the aircraft may not reach the aircraft or the aircraft may be damaged or malfunctioning in a manner that prevents its remote control. In addition, it would be desirable to automatically control and land an aircraft when a pilot becomes incapable of landing the aircraft, for example, due to a medical emergency or interference from someone aboard the aircraft.
  • Yet another situation in which it would be desirable to automatically control an aircraft is when in general aviation, a pilot flying alone becomes incapacitated and unable to pilot the aircraft. In such a situation, it would be desirable to automatically land the aircraft at an appropriate airport without the assistance of the incapacitated pilot.
  • Another situation in which it would be desirable to automatically control and land an aircraft is when the aircraft's control system suffers damage or a malfunction. In such a situation, control of the aircraft may be compromised to the extent that the manner by which the aircraft is controlled must account for the damage or malfunction.
  • a control surface such as a flap, aileron, wing, rudder, or tail
  • Such situations may occur, for example, when an aircraft collides with another aircraft, when one or more engines cut-out, when an engine ingests birds or debris, or when an engine breaks apart, sending pieces of the engine into the aircraft, which may lead to damage of control surfaces and/or systems.
  • a system for autonomously landing an aircraft may include a controller configured to automatically control the aircraft, identify a landing destination for landing the aircraft, and land the aircraft at the landing destination.
  • a computer-implemented method for autonomously landing an aircraft may include automatically controlling the aircraft via a processor, identifying a landing destination for landing the aircraft via the processor, and landing the aircraft at the landing destination via the processor.
  • an aircraft may include a system for autonomously landing the aircraft, the system comprising a controller configured to automatically control the aircraft, identify a landing destination for landing the aircraft, and land the aircraft at the landing destination.
  • the system may be configured to be activated by at least one of a switch (e.g., a pushbutton) for activating the system and signals received from a location remote from the aircraft.
  • the controller may be configured to automatically send signals alerting at least one of air traffic control, airports in the vicinity of the aircraft, and airplanes in the vicinity of the aircraft of an emergency landing of the aircraft.
  • the controller may be configured to automatically return the aircraft to stable flight following loss of control of the aircraft.
  • the controller may be configured to automatically control the aircraft such that the aircraft loiters for a period of time prior to landing.
  • the controller may be configured to automatically control the aircraft based on
  • the controller may be configured to determine a sequence of maneuvers for landing the aircraft and executing the sequence of maneuvers.
  • the sequence of maneuvers may include a plurality of flight trajectories.
  • the flight trajectories may include at least one of an arc, a straight portion, a spiral, and flaring for landing.
  • the controller may be configured to automatically reduce airspeed of the aircraft prior to landing by inducing yaw and roll.
  • the controller may be configured to land the aircraft without power from an engine.
  • the controller may be configured to diagnose damage or a malfunction related to at least one of control surfaces and control systems of the aircraft.
  • the controller may be configured to alter flight dynamic constraints of the aircraft based on the diagnosis.
  • the controller may be configured to alter the flight dynamic constraints by reducing a flight envelope of the aircraft based on the diagnosis. Reducing the flight envelope may include at least one of increasing a minimum turn radius of the aircraft, restricting direction of turns of the aircraft, reducing a maximum bank angle of the aircraft, increasing minimum airspeed of the aircraft, and increasing landing speed of the aircraft.
  • the controller may be configured to control an aircraft with an aileron frozen in a neutral position, with an aileron free- floating, with an aileron detached from the aircraft, with between about 40 percent and about 80 percent of a wing area moment missing and with an associated aileron missing, and/or with a stabilator and associated rudder frozen in a neutral position.
  • the aircraft may be a manned or unmanned aircraft.
  • FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an exemplary embodiment of an aircraft.
  • FIG. 2 is pictorial representation of an exemplary embodiment of a cockpit instrument panel.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a control architecture according to an exemplary embodiment of a control system for autonomously controlling and/or landing an aircraft.
  • Fig. 4 is a three-dimensional graphical representation of a flight path following an exemplary automatic recovery of control of an aircraft following an upset of control.
  • Fig. 5 is a two-dimensional graphical representation of a flight path following an exemplary automatic recovery of control of an aircraft following an upset of control.
  • Fig. 6 is a graphical representation of a flight path following an exemplary automatic recovery of control of an aircraft following damage to the aircraft.
  • Fig. 7 is a graphical representation of an exemplary adjustment to increase autopilot gain following damage to the aircraft to regain flight control.
  • Fig. 8A is a graphical representation of roll tracking during an exemplary recovery of stable flight following damage to the aircraft.
  • Fig. 8B is a graphical representation of effective aileron command during an exemplary recovery of stable flight following damage-induced roll.
  • Fig. 9A is a three-dimensional graphical representation of a flight path according to an exemplary autonomous landing sequence.
  • Fig. 9B is a two-dimensional graphical representation of a flight path according to the exemplary autonomous landing sequence shown in Fig. 9A.
  • Fig. 10A is a two-dimensional graphical representation of North-East position tracking during an exemplary engine-out autonomous landing sequence.
  • Fig. 10B is a two-dimensional graphical representation of altitude tracking during the exemplary engine-out autonomous landing sequence shown in Fig. 10A.
  • Fig. 10C is a two-dimensional graphical representation of beta tracking during the exemplary engine-out autonomous landing sequence shown in Fig. 10A.
  • Fig. 1 shows an exemplary embodiment of an aircraft 10 that may include a system that, according to some embodiments, may automatically land the aircraft 10 by taking over control of aircraft 10, automatically stabilizing its flight, and automatically and safely landing the aircraft 10 at a suitable landing destination.
  • the aircraft 10 shown in Fig. 1 is exemplary only, and the systems and methods described herein may be incorporated into any type of manned or unmanned aircraft known to those skilled in the art.
  • the exemplary aircraft 10 includes a fuselage 12, including a cockpit 14 for a pilot and passengers, and a tail section 16.
  • the aircraft 10 includes wings 18 attached to the fuselage 12, and a horizontal stabilizer 20 and a vertical stabilizer 22 located at the tail section 16.
  • the wings 18 include ailerons 24.
  • the horizontal stabilizer 20 includes a pair of elevators 26, and the vertical stabilizer 22 includes a rudder 28.
  • the aircraft 10 may be controlled to rotate with respect to three axes X, Y, and Z by operation of the ailerons 24, elevators 26, and rudder 28.
  • movement of the ailerons 24 may result in rotation with respect to the X-axis (i.e., roll), movement of the elevators 26 may result in rotation with respect to the Y-axis (i.e., pitch), and movement of the rudder 28 may result in rotation with respect to the Z-axis (i.e., yaw). It is contemplated that some aircraft may use fewer, additional, or different control surfaces to control rotation of the aircraft with respect to the X, Y, and Z axes.
  • the exemplary aircraft 10 may include a system for autonomously or automatically landing an aircraft.
  • the system may include an automatic flight control system or "autopilot system” including a controller 30 (see Fig. 1) configured to take over control of a manned or unmanned aircraft, automatically stabilize flight, and automatically and safely land the aircraft.
  • the autopilot system may include any system that is configured to control both vertical- and horizontal-axis flight, such as airspeed, altitude, and glide slope in the vertical axis, and bank angle, side-slip, and heading in the horizontal axis.
  • the autopilot system is configured to control the aircraft using cross-axis control, as explained in more detail below.
  • the system is capable of automatically controlling and landing an aircraft that has suffered structural damage and/or damage or malfunction to its control systems.
  • the autopilot system may be capable of using roll/yaw/side-slip control to manipulate the aircraft's attitude, angle of attack, and side-slip, with respect to incoming airflow so that control of the aircraft is maintained in all of the X, Y, and Z axes (i.e., in roll, pitch, and yaw, respectively).
  • Such a system may be used with military and civilian aircraft, and could be used by a pilot or passenger by activating a switch (e.g., by pushing a pushbutton 32 in cockpit 14 (see, e.g., Fig. 2)) to activate the system in case of emergency or appropriate situation.
  • the system may be activated remotely (i.e., from outside the aircraft at, for example, an airport control tower or air traffic control facility) upon determination that it would be advisable to take over control of the aircraft and safely land it from a remote location.
  • the system may be configured to be activated via radio or other signals received from the remote location.
  • some embodiments of the system may be used with other technologies, for example, sense and avoidance technologies, to provide safe operation of manned and unmanned aircraft in common airspace.
  • some embodiments may be activated in order to take over control of the aircraft and safely land the aircraft at the closest suitable landing destination, such as, for example, an airport, airfield, or other suitable location to conduct an emergency landing.
  • the closest suitable landing destination such as, for example, an airport, airfield, or other suitable location to conduct an emergency landing.
  • some embodiments of the system may be configured to automatically control the flight of the aircraft as outlined below.
  • the system may be activated by, for example, activation of a switch in the cockpit or remotely.
  • a problem may be, for example, an inability of the pilot to control the aircraft due to health or other reasons, or a technical problem with the aircraft that compromises normal operation of its control systems.
  • some embodiments of the system may automatically send radio transmissions alerting air traffic control and airports and pilots of other aircraft in the vicinity of the aircraft in which the system has been activated.
  • Such radio transmissions may be transmitted according to predetermined local protocols relating to appropriate radio frequencies and messages.
  • the system may automatically squawk, alerting the airspace in the vicinity that the aircraft is experiencing an emergency, including using air traffic towers and other aircraft in the vicinity.
  • some embodiments of the system may automatically recover control of the aircraft and return it to stable controlled flight. For example, if the aircraft loses control due to pilot error or a technical problem, the system will automatically recover control and return the aircraft to stable controlled flight.
  • the system may automatically compensate for the damage and recover control of the aircraft.
  • some embodiments of the system may automatically control the aircraft so that it loiters for a period of time (e.g., one to five minutes, depending on the circumstances) before automatically landing at a suitable landing destination such as an airport or landing strip.
  • a suitable landing destination such as an airport or landing strip.
  • This loitering permits other aircraft in the vicinity to clear the area and the airport to clear a runway for an emergency landing of the aircraft experiencing the problem.
  • the system may cause the aircraft to operate according to a predetermined flight path, such as, for example, a circling pattern or racetrack pattern.
  • the system may also take into account other factors that might affect the flight path, such as, for example, terrain features such as mountains, approaching weather, and/or the presence of prohibited airspace.
  • the system may continuously or intermittently receive information from outside sources and/or internal calculations, and update information relating to the closest suitable airport, terrain features, weather, and/or prohibited airspace. According to some embodiments, this information may be available to the pilot without activation of the system for autonomously controlling the aircraft.
  • the system may automatically determine a flight path for execution between the time of activation of the system and landing of the aircraft. This may include the above-mentioned loitering and
  • This may include automatically determining a trajectory and flight path for landing at the nearest suitable airport or otherwise suitable landing area.
  • the system Upon determination of a flight path, the system according to some embodiments automatically controls flight of the aircraft and executes the flight path until a safe landing is achieved.
  • the system uses the automatic flight control system, suitable navigation aids, such as, for example, a global positioning system (GPS) and/or an inertial navigation system (INS), and air data such as wind velocity including speed and direction, to fly the aircraft according to the determined flight path and land the aircraft.
  • suitable navigation aids such as, for example, a global positioning system (GPS) and/or an inertial navigation system (INS), and air data such as wind velocity including speed and direction, to fly the aircraft according to the determined flight path and land the aircraft.
  • the wind velocity may be obtained from a service such as XM radio and/or the system may determine wind velocity internally by determining the difference between the ground speed and air speed of the aircraft using known methods.
  • the system may maintain the descent profile of the flight path using cross-axis flight control, which may result in reducing the speed of the aircraft by inducing yaw and roll to create more drag.
  • the induced yaw causes the aircraft to rotate slightly about its Z-axis
  • the induced roll causes the aircraft to rotate slightly about its X-axis.
  • the induced yaw causes the aircraft to crab such that the vertical stabilizer is not aligned with the forward direction of travel, and the induced roll counteracts the tendency of the aircraft to change course due to the induced yaw.
  • the system may use a combination of GPS, INS, and air data such as the wind velocity to control the aircraft during cross-axis flight control. Such control may permit a quicker descent to the elevation of the airport during an emergency situation.
  • the system may control the aircraft to flare out and touchdown on the runway. Following touchdown, the system may control the travel of the aircraft on the ground so that it follows the runway in a generally straight path and causes the brakes to be applied until the aircraft comes to a controlled stop.
  • the system may include a controller including an autopilot system that includes a computing system that may include one or more hardware and/or software components such as, for example, a central processing unit; a computer- readable storage medium, such as a random access memory module, a read-only memory module, storage, a database; one or more input/output devices; and an operator interface.
  • the CPU may include one or more processors, each configured to execute instructions and process data to perform functions associated with the system.
  • the CPU may be connected to the RAM, ROM, storage, database, input/output devices, and the operator interface.
  • the CPU may be configured to execute computer program instructions stored on the computer-readable storage medium to perform various processes and methods consistent with certain disclosed embodiments.
  • the computer program instructions may be loaded into the RAM for execution by the CPU or processed by other data processing units in communication with the CPU.
  • An input/output device may include autopilot control inputs and aircraft sensors.
  • the operator interface may be a cockpit display or a remote display.
  • the exemplary controller 30 shown in Fig. 1 is depicted as a single controller located at a single position in aircraft 10, according to some embodiments, the controller may include a number of controllers that operate in a coordinated manner, and which may be located at different positions in the aircraft.
  • the system 40 may include, for example, four damage tolerant control (DTC) modules that enable operation of the exemplary system: an all-attitude control (AAC) module 42, a model reference adaptive control (MRAC) module 44, an automatic supervisory adaptive control (ASAC) module 46, and an emergency mission management system (EMMS) module 48.
  • DTC damage tolerant control
  • Each of the modules shown in Fig. 3 may be implemented with a distinct processing module having a processing unit (such as a CPU or
  • microcontroller coupled to memory, input/output devices, and an interface.
  • Other embodiments may implement each module in a software code module stored on a memory where the system operates or a single CPU with interacting software modules having the functionality as described herein.
  • Those skilled in the art will also appreciate that additional embodiments implementing principles of the present invention may be a combination of hardware and software, depending on the operating environment for such an embodiment (e.g., a large aircraft, a micro-sized unmanned aircraft, etc.).
  • the EMMS 48 may diagnose airframe damage and/or control system malfunction, define maneuverability and flight envelope restrictions based on the airframe damage, and select an emergency landing profile (e.g., for an engine out landing).
  • the ASAC 46 may provide automatic recovery from airframe damage and returns the aircraft to trimmed flight.
  • the MRAC 44 may adjust autopilot gains to compensate for reduction in physical control authority of the aircraft.
  • the AAC 42 controllers may track commands at any vehicle attitude, provide automatic recovery from attitude upsets, and maintain flight envelope limits.
  • the EMMS 48 uses the output of the MRAC 44 and ASAC 46 as an indicator of damage to the aircraft. Using this information, the EMMS 48 updates the performance constraints or operating envelope of the aircraft. In particular, the damage to the aircraft may reduce its agility, and the EMMS 48 may reduce the maneuverability based on this information to account for any reduced agility. For example, the EMMS 48 may specify a greater turn radius, restrict turn direction, and/or specify maximum bank angle. The EMMS 48 may also reduce the flight envelope, for example, to increase the minimum airspeed and increase landing speed. The EMMS 48 may further search for feasible landing trajectories.
  • the AAC 42 converts Euler angle commands to body attitude errors.
  • Outer-loop controllers operate in the Euler referential, and they generate Euler attitude commands ( ⁇ p C md, 0 cmd , ⁇ ⁇ ) to track the trajectory of the aircraft.
  • the AAC 42 converts the Euler attitude commands into the body referential ( ⁇ ⁇ , ⁇ ⁇ , ⁇ ⁇ ).
  • Inner-loop controllers operate in the body referential to generate control surface commands (e.g., commands for movement of an aileron, an elevator, and a rudder) (5 a , 5 e , ⁇ ⁇ ).
  • the ACC 42 may enable the aircraft to track any kinematically-feasible trajectory.
  • the following examples highlight the automatic control provided by the ACC 42.
  • an aircraft experienced an attitude upset of -60 degrees pitch and 45 degrees roll, while satisfying flow angle and load limitations.
  • the AAC 42 took control of the aircraft and provided automatic recovery from the attitude upset, returning the aircraft to controlled, level flight.
  • the AAC 42 continuously tracked airspeed and altitude during aerobatic maneuvers including an aileron roll, split-S, and rolling circle.
  • the AAC 42 tracked airspeed and altitude with the aircraft navigating at a commanded loiter according to a circling pattern prior to landing on a runway 50.
  • the MRAC 44 and ASAC 46 may provide resiliency to damage to the aircraft, such as, for example, airframe damage.
  • the ASAC 46 upon damage to the aircraft, the ASAC 46 functions to return the aircraft to trimmed and controlled flight.
  • the ASAC 46 uses autopilot commands to monitor "trim margin.”
  • the ASAC 46 adjusts trim surfaces and mission commands to unwind saturated actuators.
  • the MRAC 44 functions to recover the aircraft to baseline performance by, for example, comparing the observed performance of the aircraft to a reference model, and adjusting the autopilot gains according to the comparison. Thereafter, the system may operate to autonomously and safely land the damaged aircraft.
  • the right stabilator and right rudder were simultaneously frozen at neutral.
  • the MRAC 44 was demonstrated on the roll, pitch, and yaw channels of the aircraft, as shown in Fig. 7. As shown in Fig. 7, the MRAC 44 adjusted the autopilot to account for the damage by raising the elevator and rudder loop gains by a factor of about 2.
  • the ASAC 46 automatically adjusted the roll command in response to the damaged aircraft's recovery. As shown in Fig. 8B, the ASAC 46 automatically adjusted the effective aileron command to compensate for the damage-induced roll. As the damaged aircraft recovered, the ASAC 46 adjusted the effective aileron command to help maintain stabilized flight.
  • the EMMS 48 uses the output of the MRAC 44 and ASAC 46 as an indicator of damage to the aircraft. Using this information, the EMMS 48 updates the flight dynamics constraints of the aircraft. In particular, the damage to the aircraft may reduce its agility, and the EMMS 48 reduces the maneuverability based on this information to account for any reduced agility. For example, the EMMS 48 may specify a greater turn radius, restrict turn direction, for example, so as to execute only slip inside turns, and/or specify a smaller maximum bank angle. The EMMS 48 may also reduce the flight envelope, for example, to increase the minimum airspeed and increase landing speed.
  • the EMMS 48 may also search for emergency landing profiles.
  • the EMMS 48 may continuously or intermittently search for feasible landing trajectories, for example, regardless of whether the aircraft is functioning properly (e.g., regardless of whether the engines are functioning properly, or with the engines not operating). For example, as shown in Figs. 9A and 9B, if the engine(s) of the aircraft cease functioning, the EMMS 48 may automatically identify a suitable airport (e.g., from information available from a suitable database, either stored aboard the aircraft or obtained from a remote location), automatically take control of the aircraft, and perform an autonomous landing according a sequence of trajectory elements.
  • a suitable airport e.g., from information available from a suitable database, either stored aboard the aircraft or obtained from a remote location
  • the EMMS 48 selects a trajectory composed of six components for autonomously landing the aircraft. First the EMMS 48 controls the aircraft through an arc (A1), followed in sequence by a first straight segment (D1), a second arc (A2), a spiral (S), a second straight segment (D2), and finally, a flare (F) for landing on a runway 50.
  • Figs. 10A-10C respectively show North-East position, altitude, and beta tracking during a test of an engine-out, automatic landing on a runway 50 according to exemplary operation of the EMMS 48 system.
  • the EMMS 48 controls the aircraft through an autonomous landing trajectory, including in sequence, a first arc, a straight segment, a second arc, a spiral, a final straight segment and flare, at which point the aircraft lands.
  • the system tracks the altitude and beta, permitting the system to provide appropriate AGL and beta commands for control of the aircraft.
  • the EMMS 48 diagnoses the damage using the MRAC 44 and ASAC 46, updates the flight dynamics constraints based on the diagnosis, and performs an autonomous emergency landing by determining an emergency landing profile according to the damage and real-time attitude, position, and heading of the aircraft from various inputs.
  • the exemplary systems and methods described herein may be used in either manned or unmanned aircraft, and in either military or civilian aircraft. In such environments, the systems and methods may be able to reduce the loss of unmanned and manned aircraft. Moreover, when used in combination with flight control redundancy, reliability and safety of flight may be dramatically increased. Furthermore, the described systems and methods may be used in manned and unmanned aircraft with fault-tolerant control, for example, when control surfaces and/or control systems of the aircraft are damaged or malfunction, to provide control which compensates for the damage or malfunction. In addition, the systems and methods may be used in manned aircraft to regain control following an upset to the flight of the aircraft.
  • a pilot following an unexpected loss of control, may activate the system, for example, by activating a switch (e.g., a pushbutton) so that control is automatically regained.
  • a switch e.g., a pushbutton
  • a person not trained to control the aircraft, or not aboard the aircraft could activate the system (e.g., via a pushbutton or signals from a remote source), thereby initiating the system to take control of the aircraft and autonomously land it at a suitable airport.
  • the systems and methods may facilitate safe convergence of manned and unmanned aviation in common airspace.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Atmospheric Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Emergency Management (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
  • Control Of Position, Course, Altitude, Or Attitude Of Moving Bodies (AREA)

Abstract

Un système pour l'atterrissage autonome d'un avion peut comprendre un contrôleur conçu pour commander ledit avion, identifier une destination d'atterrissage pour poser l'avion, et poser l'avion à l'emplacement de la destination d'atterrissage. Un procédé mis en œuvre par ordinateur destiné à l'atterrissage autonome d'un avion peut consister à contrôler ledit avion par le biais d'un processeur, à identifier une destination d'atterrissage pour poser l'avion par l'intermédiaire dudit processeur, et à poser l'avion à l'emplacement de la destination d'atterrissage grâce audit processeur. Un avion peut comporter un système destiné à son atterrissage autonome, qui est doté d'un contrôleur conçu pour commander ledit avion, identifier une destination d'atterrissage pour poser l'avion, et poser l'avion à l'emplacement de la destination d'atterrissage.
PCT/US2012/034422 2011-04-20 2012-04-20 Systèmes et procédés pour l'atterrissage autonome d'un avion WO2012145608A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201161477459P 2011-04-20 2011-04-20
US61/477,459 2011-04-20

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2012145608A1 true WO2012145608A1 (fr) 2012-10-26

Family

ID=47041934

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2012/034422 WO2012145608A1 (fr) 2011-04-20 2012-04-20 Systèmes et procédés pour l'atterrissage autonome d'un avion

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2012145608A1 (fr)

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2015101978A1 (fr) * 2013-12-31 2015-07-09 Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd. Descente et atterrissage d'urgence autonomes d'aéronefs
CN105717937A (zh) * 2014-12-23 2016-06-29 通用电气航空系统有限责任公司 用飞行器航空电子设备自动控制飞行器的下降阶段的方法
CN106292294A (zh) * 2016-10-20 2017-01-04 南京航空航天大学 基于模型参考自适应控制的舰载无人机自动着舰控制装置
EP3208787A3 (fr) * 2016-02-18 2017-12-06 Honeywell International Inc. Procédés et systèmes facilitant la descente stabilisée vers un aéroport de dégagement
US10096253B2 (en) 2015-11-30 2018-10-09 Honeywell International Inc. Methods and systems for presenting diversion destinations
US10109203B2 (en) 2016-09-07 2018-10-23 Honeywell International Inc. Methods and systems for presenting en route diversion destinations
US10304344B2 (en) 2016-02-09 2019-05-28 Honeywell International Inc. Methods and systems for safe landing at a diversion airport
US20210088356A1 (en) * 2019-09-25 2021-03-25 Honeywell International Inc. All-engine-out aircraft guidance to runway
CN116382335A (zh) * 2023-03-27 2023-07-04 成都飞机工业（集团）有限责任公司 一种无人机半滚倒转机动控制方法
EP4325316A2 (fr) 2022-08-17 2024-02-21 Airbus Operations Limited Procédé et appareil de commande de manoeuvres au sol d'un aéronef
FR3142825A1 (fr) * 2022-12-06 2024-06-07 Thales Méthode pour contrôler à distance le vol d’un aéronef et module de communication associé
US12020583B2 (en) 2020-03-10 2024-06-25 Honeywell International Inc. Systems and methods providing assist-to-land and emergency land functions

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2263992A (en) * 1939-03-16 1941-11-25 Zap Dev Corp Control system for airplanes
US4139172A (en) * 1977-03-03 1979-02-13 Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation Staggerwing aircraft
US20050033487A1 (en) * 2001-11-06 2005-02-10 Marc Esculier Method for preventing hijackers from taking control of an aircraft
US20050051666A1 (en) * 2003-09-04 2005-03-10 Supersonic Aerospace International, Llc Aircraft with active center of gravity control
US20060058928A1 (en) * 2004-09-14 2006-03-16 Beard Randal W Programmable autopilot system for autonomous flight of unmanned aerial vehicles
US7225976B1 (en) * 2002-06-28 2007-06-05 David Moberg Aircraft anti-theft and safety system

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2263992A (en) * 1939-03-16 1941-11-25 Zap Dev Corp Control system for airplanes
US4139172A (en) * 1977-03-03 1979-02-13 Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation Staggerwing aircraft
US20050033487A1 (en) * 2001-11-06 2005-02-10 Marc Esculier Method for preventing hijackers from taking control of an aircraft
US7225976B1 (en) * 2002-06-28 2007-06-05 David Moberg Aircraft anti-theft and safety system
US20050051666A1 (en) * 2003-09-04 2005-03-10 Supersonic Aerospace International, Llc Aircraft with active center of gravity control
US20060058928A1 (en) * 2004-09-14 2006-03-16 Beard Randal W Programmable autopilot system for autonomous flight of unmanned aerial vehicles

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2015101978A1 (fr) * 2013-12-31 2015-07-09 Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd. Descente et atterrissage d'urgence autonomes d'aéronefs
CN105717937A (zh) * 2014-12-23 2016-06-29 通用电气航空系统有限责任公司 用飞行器航空电子设备自动控制飞行器的下降阶段的方法
JP2016164060A (ja) * 2014-12-23 2016-09-08 ジーイー・アビエイション・システムズ・エルエルシー 下降アルゴリズムを実行する航空機電子機器を使用して航空機の下降段階を自動的に制御する方法
US9646505B2 (en) 2014-12-23 2017-05-09 Ge Aviation Systems Llc Method of automatically controlling the descent phase of an aircraft using aircraft avionics executing a descent algorithm
US10096253B2 (en) 2015-11-30 2018-10-09 Honeywell International Inc. Methods and systems for presenting diversion destinations
US10304344B2 (en) 2016-02-09 2019-05-28 Honeywell International Inc. Methods and systems for safe landing at a diversion airport
US10134289B2 (en) 2016-02-18 2018-11-20 Honeywell International Inc. Methods and systems facilitating stabilized descent to a diversion airport
EP3208787A3 (fr) * 2016-02-18 2017-12-06 Honeywell International Inc. Procédés et systèmes facilitant la descente stabilisée vers un aéroport de dégagement
US10109203B2 (en) 2016-09-07 2018-10-23 Honeywell International Inc. Methods and systems for presenting en route diversion destinations
CN106292294A (zh) * 2016-10-20 2017-01-04 南京航空航天大学 基于模型参考自适应控制的舰载无人机自动着舰控制装置
US20210088356A1 (en) * 2019-09-25 2021-03-25 Honeywell International Inc. All-engine-out aircraft guidance to runway
US11959773B2 (en) * 2019-09-25 2024-04-16 Honeywell International Inc. All-engine-out aircraft guidance to runway
US12020583B2 (en) 2020-03-10 2024-06-25 Honeywell International Inc. Systems and methods providing assist-to-land and emergency land functions
EP4325316A2 (fr) 2022-08-17 2024-02-21 Airbus Operations Limited Procédé et appareil de commande de manoeuvres au sol d'un aéronef
FR3142825A1 (fr) * 2022-12-06 2024-06-07 Thales Méthode pour contrôler à distance le vol d’un aéronef et module de communication associé
CN116382335A (zh) * 2023-03-27 2023-07-04 成都飞机工业（集团）有限责任公司 一种无人机半滚倒转机动控制方法

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2012145608A1 (fr) Systèmes et procédés pour l'atterrissage autonome d'un avion
US11360491B2 (en) Loss-of-control prevention and recovery flight controller
EP2681635B1 (fr) Ordinateur de commande pour véhicule sans pilote
EP2710439B1 (fr) Lois de commandes de vol pour maintien automatique en vol stationnaire
EP2687438B1 (fr) Système de commande d'aéronef, aéronef, programme de commande d'aéronef et procédé de commande d'aéronef
JP2020203676A (ja) 無人航空機システム（ｕａｓ）操縦の制御および制限のための監視安全システム
JP4141860B2 (ja) 小型無人ヘリコプタの自律制御装置及びプログラム
Jourdan et al. Enhancing UAV survivability through damage tolerant control
JP2020520501A (ja) 航空機の外部物体を検知し回避するためのシステムおよび方法
WO2011132291A1 (fr) Dispositif de commande des conditions de vol pour un objet volant
EP3037345B1 (fr) Procédé de contrôle automatique de la phase de descente d'un avion à l'aide d'une avionique exécutant un algorithme de descente
Kang et al. Development of flight control system and troubleshooting on flight test of a tilt-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle
CN111752287A (zh) 无人航空载具场外着陆系统
Logan et al. Failure mode effects analysis and flight testing for small unmanned aerial systems
Masuko et al. Autonomous takeoff and landing of an unmanned aerial vehicle
Garcia et al. Autonomous helicopter navigation during a tail rotor failure utilizing fuzzy logic
Liu et al. Path following control of unmanned quadrotor helicopter with obstacle avoidance capability
Kasnakoglu et al. Automatic recovery and autonomous navigation of disabled aircraft after control surface actuator jam
Rajendran et al. Fault tolerant control of a small helicopter with Tail Rotor Failures in hovering mode
Stojcsics Flight safety improvements for small size unmanned aerial vehicles
Burken et al. Flight test of a propulsion-based emergency control system on the MD-11 airplane with emphasis on the lateral axis
US20230205204A1 (en) Method for controlling a robot-aircraft and corresponding control system
US10558209B1 (en) System and method for cooperative operation of piloted and optionally piloted aircraft
Kim et al. Automatic landing control law for unmanned helicopter using Lyapunov approach
Raj et al. Design and simulation of flight path control systems for CHARLIE aircraft

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 12774328

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 12774328

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1