WO2012136978A1 - An aircraft landing gear - Google Patents

An aircraft landing gear Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2012136978A1
WO2012136978A1 PCT/GB2012/050622 GB2012050622W WO2012136978A1 WO 2012136978 A1 WO2012136978 A1 WO 2012136978A1 GB 2012050622 W GB2012050622 W GB 2012050622W WO 2012136978 A1 WO2012136978 A1 WO 2012136978A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
landing gear
disruption element
noise
airflow
airflow disruption
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB2012/050622
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Stuart Lacy
Geoff CUMNER
Original Assignee
Messier-Dowty Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Messier-Dowty Limited filed Critical Messier-Dowty Limited
Publication of WO2012136978A1 publication Critical patent/WO2012136978A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C25/00Alighting gear
    • B64C25/001Devices not provided for in the groups B64C25/02 - B64C25/68
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C25/00Alighting gear
    • B64C25/02Undercarriages
    • B64C25/08Undercarriages non-fixed, e.g. jettisonable
    • B64C25/10Undercarriages non-fixed, e.g. jettisonable retractable, foldable, or the like
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C25/00Alighting gear
    • B64C25/02Undercarriages
    • B64C25/08Undercarriages non-fixed, e.g. jettisonable
    • B64C25/10Undercarriages non-fixed, e.g. jettisonable retractable, foldable, or the like
    • B64C25/16Fairings movable in conjunction with undercarriage elements
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C25/00Alighting gear
    • B64C25/001Devices not provided for in the groups B64C25/02 - B64C25/68
    • B64C2025/003Means for reducing landing gear noise, or turbulent flow around it, e.g. landing gear doors used as deflectors

Definitions

  • Aircraft can generate considerable noise during a landing approach. Some of this noise is caused by air flowing around the deployed landing gear. Although the aircraft may be travelling at around 80 metres per second, the localised air flow around a noise-inducing component of the landing gear may reach speeds of around 300 metres per second, thereby generating considerable noise. Such noise is particularly undesirable because of the fact that airports are often located close to cities or other densely populated areas.
  • Fairings are basically covers, usually made from metal or composite materials, arranged to shield a noise-inducing component of the landing gear from air flow during landing.
  • fairings can considerably increase the total envelope of the landing gear and/or affect articulation of the landing gear for stowage and/or affect the kinematics of the landing gear during landing and ground operation including inspection because they are each designed to shield a noise-inducing component. Also, fairings may increase the total weight of the landing gear by an undesirable amount.
  • an aircraft landing gear comprising a noise-inducing component region and an airflow disruption element having a first configuration in which it is spaced from, and arranged in an upstream relationship with respect to, the noise-inducing component region such that, in use with the landing gear deployed, the airflow disruption element faces, and at least partially disrupts, an airflow moving towards the noise-inducing component region, wherein the cross-sectional area of the airflow disruption element is less than the cross- sectional area of the noise-inducing component region.
  • the relatively small airflow disruption element is provided upstream from the noise- inducing component region and is spaced from it.
  • the airflow disruption element generates downstream turbulence that may reduce the noise generated by the noise- inducing component region relative to the noise that would otherwise be generated by a generally laminar airflow negotiating the noise-inducing component region.
  • the airflow disruption element is thus arranged to reduce the noise created by the noise-inducing component region. This advantage may be provided for relatively little additional weight and size because of the fact that the airflow disruption element is spaced from, and thus can be smaller than, rather than being designed to shield, the noise-inducing component region.
  • the airflow disruption element may have a second configuration in which it is located closer to the landing gear than in the first configuration, the landing gear including an actuator arranged to move the airflow disruption element between the first and second configurations.
  • the actuator may be arranged to move the airflow disruption element between the first and second configurations in a pivotal or linear manner.
  • the airflow disruption element may be movable to a second configuration that is more suitable for stowing the landing gear.
  • the airflow disruption element may be spaced at an optimum disruption, or noise-reducing, distance from the noise-inducing component region irrespective of whether such a spacing is suitable for stowing the landing gear.
  • the airflow disruption element may be mounted on an elongate arm that is coupled to the landing gear.
  • the mounting arm may be a tube or the like.
  • the airflow disruption element may be mounted on thin, elongate arm such as a low-weight tube made from composite material.
  • the airflow disruption element may be operable to increase or decrease its cross-sectional area in response to a control signal.
  • the airflow disruption element may include one or more vanes pivo tally movable so as to increase or decrease the cross-sectional area of the airflow disruption element.
  • the cross-sectional area of the airflow disruption element may be enlarged for use and decreased for stowing. Enlargement of the cross-sectional area of the airflow disruption element may increase the downstream turbulence generated by the airflow disruption element.
  • the airflow disruption element may be arranged to vibrate and/or rotate.
  • the downstream turbulence generated by the airflow disruption element may be increased relative to a non- vibrating and/or non-rotating airflow disruption element.
  • the airflow disruption element may be arranged to articulate in a generally lateral plane and/or in a generally vertical plane.
  • the articulation of the airflow disruption element may improve airflow disruption over the noise-inducing component in a crosswind approach and/or improve airflow disruption over the noise-inducing component for varying vertical descent velocity of the aircraft, respectively.
  • the airflow disruption element may, when in the first configuration, be spaced from the noise-inducing component region by a distance determined in a wind tunnel test, or computer fluid dynamic analysis, for specific configurations of airflow disruption element and noise-inducing component.
  • the spacing may be at least 3mm, at least 5mm, at least 10mm, at least 15mm, at least 20mm, at least 25mm, at least 30mm, at least 40mm, at least 50mm, at least 60mm, at least 70mm, at least 80mm, at least 90mm, at least 100mm, at least 110mm, at least 120mm, at least 130mm, at least 140mm, or at least 150mm.
  • the cross sectional area of the airflow disruption element may smaller than the cross sectional area of the noise-inducing component region that the airflow disruption element is arranged to affect by an amount determined in a wind tunnel test, or computer fluid dynamic analysis, for specific configurations of airflow disruption element and noise- inducing component.
  • the airflow disruption element may be at least 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 100%, 125%, 150%, 175%, 200%, 250%, 300%, 400% or 500% smaller than the cross sectional area of the noise-inducing component region 12 that the airflow disruption element is arranged to affect.
  • the noise-inducing component region may comprise a component of the aircraft landing gear such as a main fitting, strut, stay, spar, lock link, axle, bogie, torque link, pin assembly, actuator, valve, manifold, dressing, brake component or the like.
  • the aircraft landing gear may comprise a plurality of noise-inducing regions and a plurality of airflow disruption elements, each airflow disruption element having a first configuration in which it is spaced from, and arranged in an upstream relationship with respect to, a respective one of the noise-inducing component regions such that, in use with the landing gear deployed, the airflow disruption element faces, and at least partially disrupts, an airflow moving towards the noise-inducing component region, wherein the cross-sectional area of the airflow disruption element is less than the cross-sectional area of the noise- inducing component region.
  • a plurality of the airflow disruption element may include one or more of the optional features described above with reference to the first aspect.
  • an airflow disruption element specially adapted for use with an aircraft landing gear according to the first aspect.
  • an aircraft including an aircraft landing gear according to the first aspect.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic, side view of an aircraft landing gear according to a first embodiment of the present invention
  • Figure 2 is a schematic, side view of the aircraft landing gear of Figure 1, showing the airflow disruption element in a retracted configuration
  • Figure 3 is a schematic, side view of an aircraft landing gear according to a second embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 4 is a schematic, side view of an aircraft landing gear according to a third embodiment of the present invention, showing the airflow disruption element with an enlarged cross sectional area;
  • Figure 5 is a schematic, side view of the aircraft landing gear of Figure 4, showing the airflow disruption element with an reduced cross sectional area;
  • Figure 6 is a schematic, side view of an aircraft landing gear according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention, including a plurality of airflow disruption elements.
  • FIGS 1 and 2 show a schematic side view of a landing gear 10 according to a first embodiment of the present invention.
  • the landing gear 10 is shown in a deployed configuration, suitable for takeoff and landing. Due to the motion of the aircraft to which it is coupled, the landing gear moves generally in the direction of arrow M, which will be referred to as the landing gear motion direction M. Consequently, airflow moves relative to the landing gear 10 generally in the direction of arrow A, which will be referred to as airflow A.
  • Airflow A can be considered to be a primary or resultant airflow from both the aircrafts forward and vertical velocity and will usually also include a crosswind component.
  • the landing gear 10 comprises a noise-inducing component region 12 that, due to its configuration, would generate noise as airflow A negotiates it i.e. moves around and beyond the noise-inducing component region 12.
  • the landing gear 10 further comprises and an airflow disruption element 16.
  • the airflow disruption element 16 has a first configuration in which it is spaced from the noise- inducing component 12.
  • the airflow disruption element 16 is arranged in an upstream relationship with respect to noise-inducing component region 12.
  • the airflow disruption element 16 faces, and at least partially disrupts, the airflow A moving towards the noise-inducing component region 12.
  • the cross-sectional area of the airflow disruption element 16 is less than the cross-sectional area of the noise-inducing component region 12.
  • cross sectional area when used in conjunction with the airflow disruption element 16 means the area of a cross section through the airflow disruption element 16 that is generally orthogonal with respect to the landing gear motion direction M.
  • the landing gear motion direction M will be generally parallel with respect to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft (not shown).
  • the cross sectional area may be the largest cross sectional area of the airflow disruption element 16 that is generally orthogonal to the landing gear motion direction M, which in the illustrated embodiment would be the rear or downstream face of the airflow disruption element 16, or the mean cross sectional area.
  • cross sectional area when used in conjunction with the noise-inducing component region 12 means a cross section through the noise-inducing component region 12 that is generally orthogonal to the landing gear motion direction M.
  • the cross sectional area may be the largest cross sectional area of the noise-inducing component or component region 12 that is generally orthogonal to the landing gear motion direction M, or the mean cross sectional area.
  • the relatively small airflow disruption element 16 is provided upstream from the noise-inducing component region 12 and is spaced from it.
  • the airflow disruption element 16 generates downstream turbulence that may reduce the noise generated by the noise-inducing component region 12 relative to the noise that would otherwise be generated by generally laminar airflow negotiating the noise-inducing component region 12.
  • This advantage may be provided for relatively little additional weight and size because of the fact that the airflow disruption element 16 is spaced upstream from, and thus may be smaller than, rather than being designed to shield, the noise-inducing component region 12.
  • the airflow disruption element 16 is mounted on an elongate arm 18, the other end of which is coupled to a part of the landing gear, such as a strut.
  • the mounting arm 18 may be a tube or the like formed from any suitable material, such as aluminium or composites. It should however be noted that the airflow disruption element 16 may be mounted in any suitable manner.
  • the arm 18 is longitudinally extendable and thus may increase and decrease in length.
  • the arm 18 may comprise a rod and piston actuator.
  • the airflow disruption element 16 When the arm 18 is relatively long, the airflow disruption element 16 is in the first configuration in which it is spaced from the noise-inducing component 12.
  • the airflow disruption element 16 When the arm 18 is relatively short, the airflow disruption element 16 is in a second configuration in which it is located closer to the centre of the landing gear 10 than in the first configuration.
  • the arm 18 is thus arranged to move the airflow disruption element 16 between the first and second configurations in a linear manner, with a displacement E.
  • the arm 18 may be controlled in any conventional manner, such as by a control system arranged to automatically deploy the disruption element 16 to the first configuration once the landing gear 10 is fully deployed, and to automatically retract the disruption element 16 as the landing gear 10 begins to move towards a stowed configuration.
  • the airflow disruption element 16 may be movable to a second configuration that is more suitable for stowing the landing gear. This means that in the first configuration the airflow disruption element 16 may be spaced at an optimum disruption or noise-reducing distance from the noise-inducing component region 12 without consideration as to whether such spacing is suitable for stowing.
  • the airflow disruption element 16 faces, and at least partially disrupts, the airflow A moving towards the noise-inducing component region 12. Consequently, the airflow A is manipulated by the airflow disruption element 16 i.e. the airflow disruption element 16 pushes at least some of the airflow out of the way of the noise-inducing component region 12, as schematically illustrated by airflow disruption line T.
  • the airflow disruption element 16 can be considered to act as an aero acoustic spike.
  • FIG. 3 a schematic side view of a landing gear 20 according to a second embodiment of the present invention is shown.
  • the landing gear 20 is similar to landing gear 10 of the first embodiment except that the arm 18 is a rigid linkage pivotally movable by an actuator 24.
  • the arm 20 is thus arranged to move the airflow disruption element 16 between the first and second configurations in an arc.
  • FIGs 4 and 5 a schematic side view of a landing gear 30 according to a third embodiment of the present invention is shown.
  • the landing gear 30 is similar to landing gear 10 of the first embodiment except that, in the third embodiment, the airflow disruption element 16 is operable to increase and decrease its cross-sectional area in response to a control signal.
  • Many suitable control systems will be apparent to a skilled person for generating the control signal.
  • the increase and decrease in cross-sectional area may be achieved by any suitable means, such as the airflow disruption element 16 including one or more vanes 32 pivotally movable so as to increase or decrease the cross- sectional area of the airflow disruption element 16.
  • the airflow disruption element 16 including one or more vanes 32 pivotally movable so as to increase or decrease the cross- sectional area of the airflow disruption element 16.
  • the cross-sectional area of the airflow disruption element 16 may be enlarged for use and decrease for stowing.
  • FIG 6 a schematic side view of a landing gear 40 according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention is shown.
  • the landing gear 40 comprises a plurality of noise-inducing regions and a plurality of airflow disruption elements 42.
  • Each airflow disruption element 42 has a first configuration in which it is spaced from, and arranged in an upstream relationship with respect to, a respective one of the noise-inducing component regions 12 such that, in use with the landing gear deployed, the respective airflow disruption element 42 faces, and at least partially disrupts, an airflow A moving towards the respective noise-inducing component region 12.
  • the airflow disruption elements 42 each have a maximum cross sectional area that is smaller than the maximum cross sectional area of the airflow disruption element 16 described above and consequently are mounted closer to the noise-inducing component regions 12. Due to this, the airflow disruption elements 42 may be permanently maintained in the first configuration, such as by being rigidly mounted.
  • a plurality of the airflow disruption elements 42 of the landing gear 40 according to the fourth embodiment of the present invention may include one or more of the features described above with reference to the first, second or third embodiments of the invention.
  • the airflow disruption element may, when in the first configuration, be spaced from the noise-inducing component region by a distance determined in a wind tunnel test, or computer fluid dynamic analysis, for specific configurations of airflow disruption element and noise-inducing component.
  • the spacing may be at least 3mm, at least 5mm, at least 10mm, at least 15mm, at least 20mm, at least 25mm, at least 30mm, at least 40mm, at least 50mm, at least 60mm, at least 70mm, at least 80mm, at least 90mm, at least 100mm, at least 110mm, at least 120mm, at least 130mm, at least 140mm, or at least 150mm.
  • the cross sectional area of the airflow disruption element may be smaller than the cross sectional area of the noise-inducing component region that the airflow disruption element is arranged to affect by an amount determined in a wind tunnel test, or computer fluid dynamic analysis, for specific configurations of airflow disruption element and noise-inducing component.
  • the airflow disruption element may be at least 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%>, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 100%, 125%, 150%, 175%, 200%, 250%, 300%, 400% or 500% smaller than the cross sectional area of the noise-inducing component region 12 that the airflow disruption element is arranged to affect i.e. reduce the noise.
  • the noise-inducing component region 12 may comprise a component of the aircraft landing gear such as a main fitting, strut, stay, spar, lock link, axle, bogie, torque link, pin assembly, valve, actuator, manifold, dressing, brake component or the like.
  • the airflow disruption element(s) 16, 42 may be arranged to vibrate, expand and/or rotate. Thus, in such a case, the downstream turbulence generated by the airflow disruption element(s) 16, 42 may be increased relative to a non-vibrating airflow disruption element.
  • vibrations means will be apparent to a skilled person, such as providing a resiliently flexible property to at least some of the arm 18, 22 or providing an eccentric, rotatably actuated mass in the airflow disruption element(s) 16, 42, and any suitable means may be provided to cause the airflow disruption element(s) 16, 42 to vibrate.
  • the airflow disruption element(s) 16, 42 may be arranged to articulate in a lateral plane and/or in a vertical plane. Many suitable mechanisms and control systems for achieving this will be apparent to a skilled person, such as through pivotal movement of the arm 20.
  • the articulation of the airflow disruption element(s) 16, 42 may improve airflow disruption over the noise-inducing component region(s) 12 in a crosswind approach and/or improve airflow disruption over the noise- inducing component region(s) 12 for varying vertical descent velocity of the aircraft, respectively.
  • the landing gear according to embodiments of the invention may be a main landing gear assembly.
  • the airflow disruption element(s) 16, 42 may be a provided exclusively for the purpose of at least partially disrupting the airflow A moving towards the noise-inducing component region 12.
  • the airflow disruption element(s) 16, 42 may be implemented at the micro scale, mounted on multiple hair-like spikes, rather than the macro scale as described in at least some of the embodiments above.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Gear Transmission (AREA)

Abstract

An aircraft landing gear (10) comprising a noise-inducing component region (12) and an airflow disruption element (16) having a first configuration in which it is spaced from, and arranged in an upstream relationship with respect to, the noise-inducing component region such that, in use with the landing gear deployed, the airflow disruption element faces, and at least partially disrupts, an airflow(A) moving towards the noise-inducing component region, wherein the cross-sectional area of the airflow disruption element is less than the cross-sectional area of the noise-inducing component region.

Description

An Aircraft Landing Gear
Background
Aircraft can generate considerable noise during a landing approach. Some of this noise is caused by air flowing around the deployed landing gear. Although the aircraft may be travelling at around 80 metres per second, the localised air flow around a noise-inducing component of the landing gear may reach speeds of around 300 metres per second, thereby generating considerable noise. Such noise is particularly undesirable because of the fact that airports are often located close to cities or other densely populated areas.
In an attempt to address such noise problems, it is known to provide an aircraft landing gear with fairings. Fairings are basically covers, usually made from metal or composite materials, arranged to shield a noise-inducing component of the landing gear from air flow during landing.
However, the present inventors have identified that fairings can considerably increase the total envelope of the landing gear and/or affect articulation of the landing gear for stowage and/or affect the kinematics of the landing gear during landing and ground operation including inspection because they are each designed to shield a noise-inducing component. Also, fairings may increase the total weight of the landing gear by an undesirable amount.
Summary
In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided an aircraft landing gear comprising a noise-inducing component region and an airflow disruption element having a first configuration in which it is spaced from, and arranged in an upstream relationship with respect to, the noise-inducing component region such that, in use with the landing gear deployed, the airflow disruption element faces, and at least partially disrupts, an airflow moving towards the noise-inducing component region, wherein the cross-sectional area of the airflow disruption element is less than the cross- sectional area of the noise-inducing component region. Thus, the relatively small airflow disruption element is provided upstream from the noise- inducing component region and is spaced from it. As such, the airflow disruption element generates downstream turbulence that may reduce the noise generated by the noise- inducing component region relative to the noise that would otherwise be generated by a generally laminar airflow negotiating the noise-inducing component region. The airflow disruption element is thus arranged to reduce the noise created by the noise-inducing component region. This advantage may be provided for relatively little additional weight and size because of the fact that the airflow disruption element is spaced from, and thus can be smaller than, rather than being designed to shield, the noise-inducing component region.
The airflow disruption element may have a second configuration in which it is located closer to the landing gear than in the first configuration, the landing gear including an actuator arranged to move the airflow disruption element between the first and second configurations. The actuator may be arranged to move the airflow disruption element between the first and second configurations in a pivotal or linear manner.
Thus, in such a case, the airflow disruption element may be movable to a second configuration that is more suitable for stowing the landing gear. This means that in the first configuration the airflow disruption element may be spaced at an optimum disruption, or noise-reducing, distance from the noise-inducing component region irrespective of whether such a spacing is suitable for stowing the landing gear.
The airflow disruption element may be mounted on an elongate arm that is coupled to the landing gear. The mounting arm may be a tube or the like.
Thus, in such a case, the airflow disruption element may be mounted on thin, elongate arm such as a low-weight tube made from composite material. The airflow disruption element may be operable to increase or decrease its cross-sectional area in response to a control signal. The airflow disruption element may include one or more vanes pivo tally movable so as to increase or decrease the cross-sectional area of the airflow disruption element. Thus, in such a case, the cross-sectional area of the airflow disruption element may be enlarged for use and decreased for stowing. Enlargement of the cross-sectional area of the airflow disruption element may increase the downstream turbulence generated by the airflow disruption element.
The airflow disruption element may be arranged to vibrate and/or rotate.
Thus, in such a case, the downstream turbulence generated by the airflow disruption element may be increased relative to a non- vibrating and/or non-rotating airflow disruption element.
The airflow disruption element may be arranged to articulate in a generally lateral plane and/or in a generally vertical plane.
Thus, in such a case, the articulation of the airflow disruption element may improve airflow disruption over the noise-inducing component in a crosswind approach and/or improve airflow disruption over the noise-inducing component for varying vertical descent velocity of the aircraft, respectively.
The airflow disruption element may, when in the first configuration, be spaced from the noise-inducing component region by a distance determined in a wind tunnel test, or computer fluid dynamic analysis, for specific configurations of airflow disruption element and noise-inducing component. In some embodiments the spacing may be at least 3mm, at least 5mm, at least 10mm, at least 15mm, at least 20mm, at least 25mm, at least 30mm, at least 40mm, at least 50mm, at least 60mm, at least 70mm, at least 80mm, at least 90mm, at least 100mm, at least 110mm, at least 120mm, at least 130mm, at least 140mm, or at least 150mm. The cross sectional area of the airflow disruption element may smaller than the cross sectional area of the noise-inducing component region that the airflow disruption element is arranged to affect by an amount determined in a wind tunnel test, or computer fluid dynamic analysis, for specific configurations of airflow disruption element and noise- inducing component. In some embodiments the airflow disruption element may be at least 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 100%, 125%, 150%, 175%, 200%, 250%, 300%, 400% or 500% smaller than the cross sectional area of the noise-inducing component region 12 that the airflow disruption element is arranged to affect.
The noise-inducing component region may comprise a component of the aircraft landing gear such as a main fitting, strut, stay, spar, lock link, axle, bogie, torque link, pin assembly, actuator, valve, manifold, dressing, brake component or the like.
The aircraft landing gear may comprise a plurality of noise-inducing regions and a plurality of airflow disruption elements, each airflow disruption element having a first configuration in which it is spaced from, and arranged in an upstream relationship with respect to, a respective one of the noise-inducing component regions such that, in use with the landing gear deployed, the airflow disruption element faces, and at least partially disrupts, an airflow moving towards the noise-inducing component region, wherein the cross-sectional area of the airflow disruption element is less than the cross-sectional area of the noise- inducing component region. A plurality of the airflow disruption element may include one or more of the optional features described above with reference to the first aspect.
In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided an airflow disruption element specially adapted for use with an aircraft landing gear according to the first aspect. In accordance with a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided an aircraft including an aircraft landing gear according to the first aspect.
Brief Description of the Drawings By way of example only, certain embodiments of the invention will now be described by reference to the accompanying drawings, in which; Figure 1 is a schematic, side view of an aircraft landing gear according to a first embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 2 is a schematic, side view of the aircraft landing gear of Figure 1, showing the airflow disruption element in a retracted configuration;
Figure 3 is a schematic, side view of an aircraft landing gear according to a second embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 4 is a schematic, side view of an aircraft landing gear according to a third embodiment of the present invention, showing the airflow disruption element with an enlarged cross sectional area;
Figure 5 is a schematic, side view of the aircraft landing gear of Figure 4, showing the airflow disruption element with an reduced cross sectional area; and
Figure 6 is a schematic, side view of an aircraft landing gear according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention, including a plurality of airflow disruption elements. Detailed Description
Figures 1 and 2 show a schematic side view of a landing gear 10 according to a first embodiment of the present invention. The landing gear 10 is shown in a deployed configuration, suitable for takeoff and landing. Due to the motion of the aircraft to which it is coupled, the landing gear moves generally in the direction of arrow M, which will be referred to as the landing gear motion direction M. Consequently, airflow moves relative to the landing gear 10 generally in the direction of arrow A, which will be referred to as airflow A. Airflow A can be considered to be a primary or resultant airflow from both the aircrafts forward and vertical velocity and will usually also include a crosswind component.
The landing gear 10 comprises a noise-inducing component region 12 that, due to its configuration, would generate noise as airflow A negotiates it i.e. moves around and beyond the noise-inducing component region 12.
The landing gear 10 further comprises and an airflow disruption element 16. The airflow disruption element 16 has a first configuration in which it is spaced from the noise- inducing component 12. The airflow disruption element 16 is arranged in an upstream relationship with respect to noise-inducing component region 12. Thus, in use with the landing gear 10 deployed, the airflow disruption element 16 faces, and at least partially disrupts, the airflow A moving towards the noise-inducing component region 12. The cross-sectional area of the airflow disruption element 16 is less than the cross-sectional area of the noise-inducing component region 12.
The term "cross sectional area" when used in conjunction with the airflow disruption element 16 means the area of a cross section through the airflow disruption element 16 that is generally orthogonal with respect to the landing gear motion direction M. As will be appreciated, the landing gear motion direction M will be generally parallel with respect to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft (not shown). In some embodiments of the invention, the cross sectional area may be the largest cross sectional area of the airflow disruption element 16 that is generally orthogonal to the landing gear motion direction M, which in the illustrated embodiment would be the rear or downstream face of the airflow disruption element 16, or the mean cross sectional area.
The term "cross sectional area" when used in conjunction with the noise-inducing component region 12 means a cross section through the noise-inducing component region 12 that is generally orthogonal to the landing gear motion direction M. In some embodiments of the invention, the cross sectional area may be the largest cross sectional area of the noise-inducing component or component region 12 that is generally orthogonal to the landing gear motion direction M, or the mean cross sectional area. Thus, in terms of the airflow A, the relatively small airflow disruption element 16 is provided upstream from the noise-inducing component region 12 and is spaced from it. As such, the airflow disruption element 16 generates downstream turbulence that may reduce the noise generated by the noise-inducing component region 12 relative to the noise that would otherwise be generated by generally laminar airflow negotiating the noise-inducing component region 12. This advantage may be provided for relatively little additional weight and size because of the fact that the airflow disruption element 16 is spaced upstream from, and thus may be smaller than, rather than being designed to shield, the noise-inducing component region 12. In the illustrated embodiment, the airflow disruption element 16 is mounted on an elongate arm 18, the other end of which is coupled to a part of the landing gear, such as a strut. The mounting arm 18 may be a tube or the like formed from any suitable material, such as aluminium or composites. It should however be noted that the airflow disruption element 16 may be mounted in any suitable manner.
In the illustrated embodiment, the arm 18 is longitudinally extendable and thus may increase and decrease in length. The arm 18 may comprise a rod and piston actuator. When the arm 18 is relatively long, the airflow disruption element 16 is in the first configuration in which it is spaced from the noise-inducing component 12. When the arm 18 is relatively short, the airflow disruption element 16 is in a second configuration in which it is located closer to the centre of the landing gear 10 than in the first configuration. The arm 18 is thus arranged to move the airflow disruption element 16 between the first and second configurations in a linear manner, with a displacement E. The arm 18 may be controlled in any conventional manner, such as by a control system arranged to automatically deploy the disruption element 16 to the first configuration once the landing gear 10 is fully deployed, and to automatically retract the disruption element 16 as the landing gear 10 begins to move towards a stowed configuration. Thus, in such embodiments, the airflow disruption element 16 may be movable to a second configuration that is more suitable for stowing the landing gear. This means that in the first configuration the airflow disruption element 16 may be spaced at an optimum disruption or noise-reducing distance from the noise-inducing component region 12 without consideration as to whether such spacing is suitable for stowing.
As noted above, in use, with the landing gear 10 deployed, the airflow disruption element 16 faces, and at least partially disrupts, the airflow A moving towards the noise-inducing component region 12. Consequently, the airflow A is manipulated by the airflow disruption element 16 i.e. the airflow disruption element 16 pushes at least some of the airflow out of the way of the noise-inducing component region 12, as schematically illustrated by airflow disruption line T. This creates turbulent airflow downstream of he airflow disruption element 16, the turbulent airflow generally causing less noise as it negotiates the noise-inducing component region 12 than would be the case for an undisrupted airflow. Thus, in some embodiments, the airflow disruption element 16 can be considered to act as an aero acoustic spike.
Referring to Figure 3, a schematic side view of a landing gear 20 according to a second embodiment of the present invention is shown. The landing gear 20 is similar to landing gear 10 of the first embodiment except that the arm 18 is a rigid linkage pivotally movable by an actuator 24. The arm 20 is thus arranged to move the airflow disruption element 16 between the first and second configurations in an arc. Referring to Figures 4 and 5, a schematic side view of a landing gear 30 according to a third embodiment of the present invention is shown. The landing gear 30 is similar to landing gear 10 of the first embodiment except that, in the third embodiment, the airflow disruption element 16 is operable to increase and decrease its cross-sectional area in response to a control signal. Many suitable control systems will be apparent to a skilled person for generating the control signal. The increase and decrease in cross-sectional area may be achieved by any suitable means, such as the airflow disruption element 16 including one or more vanes 32 pivotally movable so as to increase or decrease the cross- sectional area of the airflow disruption element 16. As shown in Figure 4, with the vanes 32 deployed the cross sectional area through a part of the airflow disruption element 16 in the region of the vanes 32 is larger than the cross sectional area of the airflow disruption element 16 when the vanes are retracted, as shown in Figure 5. Thus, in the illustrated embodiment the cross-sectional area of the airflow disruption element 16 may be enlarged for use and decrease for stowing. Referring to Figure 6, a schematic side view of a landing gear 40 according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention is shown. The landing gear 40 comprises a plurality of noise-inducing regions and a plurality of airflow disruption elements 42. Each airflow disruption element 42 has a first configuration in which it is spaced from, and arranged in an upstream relationship with respect to, a respective one of the noise-inducing component regions 12 such that, in use with the landing gear deployed, the respective airflow disruption element 42 faces, and at least partially disrupts, an airflow A moving towards the respective noise-inducing component region 12. The airflow disruption elements 42 each have a maximum cross sectional area that is smaller than the maximum cross sectional area of the airflow disruption element 16 described above and consequently are mounted closer to the noise-inducing component regions 12. Due to this, the airflow disruption elements 42 may be permanently maintained in the first configuration, such as by being rigidly mounted.
A plurality of the airflow disruption elements 42 of the landing gear 40 according to the fourth embodiment of the present invention may include one or more of the features described above with reference to the first, second or third embodiments of the invention. In any of the embodiments of the invention, the airflow disruption element may, when in the first configuration, be spaced from the noise-inducing component region by a distance determined in a wind tunnel test, or computer fluid dynamic analysis, for specific configurations of airflow disruption element and noise-inducing component. In some embodiments the spacing may be at least 3mm, at least 5mm, at least 10mm, at least 15mm, at least 20mm, at least 25mm, at least 30mm, at least 40mm, at least 50mm, at least 60mm, at least 70mm, at least 80mm, at least 90mm, at least 100mm, at least 110mm, at least 120mm, at least 130mm, at least 140mm, or at least 150mm.
In any of the embodiments of the invention, the cross sectional area of the airflow disruption element may be smaller than the cross sectional area of the noise-inducing component region that the airflow disruption element is arranged to affect by an amount determined in a wind tunnel test, or computer fluid dynamic analysis, for specific configurations of airflow disruption element and noise-inducing component. In some embodiments the airflow disruption element may be at least 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%>, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 100%, 125%, 150%, 175%, 200%, 250%, 300%, 400% or 500% smaller than the cross sectional area of the noise-inducing component region 12 that the airflow disruption element is arranged to affect i.e. reduce the noise. In any of the embodiments of the invention, the noise-inducing component region 12 may comprise a component of the aircraft landing gear such as a main fitting, strut, stay, spar, lock link, axle, bogie, torque link, pin assembly, valve, actuator, manifold, dressing, brake component or the like. In any of the embodiments of the invention, the airflow disruption element(s) 16, 42 may be arranged to vibrate, expand and/or rotate. Thus, in such a case, the downstream turbulence generated by the airflow disruption element(s) 16, 42 may be increased relative to a non-vibrating airflow disruption element. Many suitable vibrations means will be apparent to a skilled person, such as providing a resiliently flexible property to at least some of the arm 18, 22 or providing an eccentric, rotatably actuated mass in the airflow disruption element(s) 16, 42, and any suitable means may be provided to cause the airflow disruption element(s) 16, 42 to vibrate.
In any of the embodiments of the invention, the airflow disruption element(s) 16, 42 may be arranged to articulate in a lateral plane and/or in a vertical plane. Many suitable mechanisms and control systems for achieving this will be apparent to a skilled person, such as through pivotal movement of the arm 20. The articulation of the airflow disruption element(s) 16, 42 may improve airflow disruption over the noise-inducing component region(s) 12 in a crosswind approach and/or improve airflow disruption over the noise- inducing component region(s) 12 for varying vertical descent velocity of the aircraft, respectively. In any of the embodiments of the invention, the landing gear according to embodiments of the invention may be a main landing gear assembly.
In any of the embodiments of the invention, the airflow disruption element(s) 16, 42 may be a provided exclusively for the purpose of at least partially disrupting the airflow A moving towards the noise-inducing component region 12.
In any of the embodiments of the invention, the airflow disruption element(s) 16, 42 may be implemented at the micro scale, mounted on multiple hair-like spikes, rather than the macro scale as described in at least some of the embodiments above.
It should be noted that the above-mentioned embodiments illustrate rather than limit the invention, and that those skilled in the art will be capable of designing many alternative embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. In the claims, any reference signs placed in parenthesis shall not be construed as limiting the claims. The word "comprising" can mean "including" or "consisting of and therefore does not exclude the presence of elements or steps other than those listed in any claim or the specification as a whole. The singular reference of an element does not exclude the plural reference of such elements and vice- versa. Parts of the invention may be implemented by means of hardware comprising several distinct elements, and/or by means of a suitably programmed computer. In a device claim enumerating several parts, several of these parts may be embodied by one and the same item of hardware. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage.

Claims

Claims
1. An aircraft landing gear comprising a noise-inducing component region and an airflow disruption element having a first configuration in which it is spaced from, and arranged in an upstream relationship with respect to, the noise-inducing component region such that, in use with the landing gear deployed, the airflow disruption element faces, and at least partially disrupts, an airflow moving towards the noise-inducing component region, wherein the cross-sectional area of the airflow disruption element is less than the cross- sectional area of the noise-inducing component region.
2. An aircraft landing gear according to claim 1, wherein the airflow disruption element has a second configuration in which it is located closer to the landing gear than in the first configuration, the landing gear including an actuator arranged to move the airflow disruption element between the first and second configurations.
3. An aircraft landing gear according to claim 2, wherein the actuator is arranged to move the airflow disruption element between the first and second configurations in a pivotal or linear manner.
4. An aircraft landing gear according to any preceding claim, wherein the airflow disruption element is mounted on an elongate arm that is coupled to the landing gear.
5. An aircraft landing gear according to any preceding claim, wherein the airflow disruption element is arranged so as to be operable to increase or decrease its cross- sectional area in response to a control signal.
6. An aircraft landing gear according to claim 5, wherein the airflow disruption element includes one or more vanes pivotally movable so as to increase or decrease the cross-sectional area of the airflow disruption element.
7. An aircraft landing gear according to any preceding claim, wherein the airflow disruption element is arranged to vibrate and/or rotate.
8. An aircraft landing gear according to any preceding claim, wherein the airflow disruption element is, when in the first configuration, spaced from the noise-inducing component region by one or more of the following: at least 3mm, at least 5mm, at least 10mm, at least 15mm, at least 20mm, at least 25mm, at least 30mm, at least 40mm, at least 50mm, at least 60mm, at least 70mm, at least 80mm, at least 90mm, at least 100mm, at least 110mm, at least 120mm, at least 130mm, at least 140mm, at least 150mm.
9. An aircraft landing gear according to any preceding claim, wherein cross sectional area of the airflow disruption element is at least 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 100%, 125%, 150%, 175%, 200%, 250%, 300%, 400% or 500% smaller than the cross sectional area of the noise-inducing component region 12 that the airflow disruption element is arranged to affect.
10. An aircraft landing gear according to any preceding claim, wherein the noise- inducing component region comprises a component of the aircraft landing gear such as a main fitting, strut, stay, spar, lock link, axle, bogie, torque link, pin assembly, actuator, valve, manifold, dressing, brake component or the like.
11. An aircraft landing gear according to any preceding claim comprising a plurality of noise-inducing regions and a plurality of airflow disruption elements, each airflow disruption element having a first configuration in which it is spaced from, and arranged in an upstream relationship with respect to, a respective one of the noise-inducing component regions such that, in use with the landing gear deployed, the airflow disruption element faces, and at least partially disrupts, an airflow moving towards the noise-inducing component region, wherein the cross-sectional area of the airflow disruption element is less than the cross-sectional area of the noise-inducing component region.
12. An aircraft landing gear according to any preceding claim, wherein the airflow disruption element is arranged to articulate in a generally lateral plane and/or in a generally vertical plane.
13. An aircraft landing gear substantially as herein described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
14. An airflow disruption element specially adapted for use with an aircraft landing gear according to any of claims 1 to 13.
15. An aircraft including an aircraft landing gear according to any of claims 1 to 13.
PCT/GB2012/050622 2011-04-05 2012-03-22 An aircraft landing gear WO2012136978A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB1105766.8A GB2489715A (en) 2011-04-05 2011-04-05 Aircraft landing gear having an airflow disruption element to reduce noise
GB1105766.8 2011-04-05

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2012136978A1 true WO2012136978A1 (en) 2012-10-11

Family

ID=44071995

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2012/050622 WO2012136978A1 (en) 2011-04-05 2012-03-22 An aircraft landing gear

Country Status (2)

Country Link
GB (1) GB2489715A (en)
WO (1) WO2012136978A1 (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999044887A1 (en) * 1998-03-06 1999-09-10 Batcho Paul F Method and apparatus for mitigating junction flows
US20100006696A1 (en) * 2008-07-09 2010-01-14 Airbus Operations Ltd. Landing gear noise reduction assembly
WO2010116658A1 (en) * 2009-03-30 2010-10-14 社団法人日本航空宇宙工業会 Method of reducing noise of air vehicle, leg structure of air vehicle and air vehicle

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NL1021077C2 (en) * 2002-07-15 2004-01-16 Sp Aerospace And Vehicle Syste Aircraft equipped with noise-reducing means, as well as landing gear and blowing equipment.
GB0812588D0 (en) * 2008-07-10 2008-08-20 Airbus Uk Ltd Torque link set

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999044887A1 (en) * 1998-03-06 1999-09-10 Batcho Paul F Method and apparatus for mitigating junction flows
US20100006696A1 (en) * 2008-07-09 2010-01-14 Airbus Operations Ltd. Landing gear noise reduction assembly
WO2010116658A1 (en) * 2009-03-30 2010-10-14 社団法人日本航空宇宙工業会 Method of reducing noise of air vehicle, leg structure of air vehicle and air vehicle

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB201105766D0 (en) 2011-05-18
GB2489715A (en) 2012-10-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6619587B1 (en) Aircraft noise reduction apparatus
US10889365B2 (en) Auxiliary support system for a flap of an aircraft wing
US8490914B2 (en) Landing gear with noise reduction fairing
US20090236872A1 (en) Outboard wake stabilization device and method for reducing the aerodynamic drag of ground vehicles
JP6254437B2 (en) Variable width aerodynamic device
EP2415670B1 (en) Method of attenuating noise in aircraft, landing gear structure of aircraft, and aircraft
JP2009516615A5 (en)
US20100108805A1 (en) Aircraft Landing Gear Provided With At Least One Noise Reducing Means
US8371524B2 (en) Torque link set
US8231079B2 (en) Aerodynamic braking device for aircraft
US3438599A (en) Flap track roller support
EP0375382B1 (en) Wing flap aerodynamic noise suppression
US8016248B2 (en) Aircraft wing spoiler arrangement
EP1067045A1 (en) Aircraft noise reduction apparatus
CA2767990C (en) High-lift-device, wing, and noise reduction device for high-lift-device
WO2012136978A1 (en) An aircraft landing gear
US2357680A (en) Shock wave air brake
EP2711290B1 (en) Aircraft flap system and associated method
JP2011519782A (en) Aircraft fillet fairing with fixed and moving parts, and related systems and methods
US20140076419A1 (en) Self adjusting deturbulator enhanced flap and wind deflector
EP2239196A2 (en) Landing gear
EP4186789A1 (en) An aircraft landing gear
US8640989B2 (en) Speed brake for aircraft
JP2021011258A (en) Trip device for enhancing performance and handling quality of aircraft
JP2010228598A (en) Fuselage-wing connection part noise reduction device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 12712712

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 12712712

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1