WO2012110096A1 - Marine exploration vehicle - Google Patents

Marine exploration vehicle Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2012110096A1
WO2012110096A1 PCT/EP2011/052426 EP2011052426W WO2012110096A1 WO 2012110096 A1 WO2012110096 A1 WO 2012110096A1 EP 2011052426 W EP2011052426 W EP 2011052426W WO 2012110096 A1 WO2012110096 A1 WO 2012110096A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
vehicle
seabed
marine exploration
cable
anchor
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2011/052426
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Eiliv SKOMEDAL
Original Assignee
Statoil Petroleum As
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Statoil Petroleum As filed Critical Statoil Petroleum As
Priority to PCT/EP2011/052426 priority Critical patent/WO2012110096A1/en
Publication of WO2012110096A1 publication Critical patent/WO2012110096A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01VGEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
    • G01V1/00Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/38Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting specially adapted for water-covered areas
    • G01V1/3843Deployment of seismic devices, e.g. of streamers
    • G01V1/3852Deployment of seismic devices, e.g. of streamers to the seabed
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63BSHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING 
    • B63B21/00Tying-up; Shifting, towing, or pushing equipment; Anchoring
    • B63B21/24Anchors
    • B63B21/26Anchors securing to bed
    • B63B21/27Anchors securing to bed by suction

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a marine exploration vehicle, and a method of exploring a marine environment.
  • the invention is suitable for the use of shear waves and multi component seismic for the investigation of shallow sediments with respect to imaging and characterization of mechanical properties.
  • Typical applications are (1 ) geotechnical investigation for offshore wind parks, jack up foundations, pipelines and other seabed structures, (2) drilling geohazards such as shallow gas and shallow water flow and (3) investigation and monitoring of sites for injection of drill cuttings and other waste, produced water, C02 or other fluids or gases.
  • shallow means in the approximate depth range 0-1000 m below the seabed.
  • US Patent No. 6,694,261 "Method for identification of shallow water flow hazards using marine seismic data" goes beyond established practice for seismic investigation for shallow water flow zones by introducing shear waves in addition to the conventional use of compressional waves.
  • US patent 6694261 is based on compressional waves converted to shear waves in the formation.
  • a suction anchor is described in US Patent No. 4,432,671 (Shell Oil Company).
  • Multicomponent seismic or shear wave seismic is only possible by using receivers on the seabed. This makes shear wave seismic much more costly to perform than conventional seismic.
  • Existing multicomponent technology uses normally distributed nodes or a seabed cable with a number of sensors. Placement and possible movement of such systems are time consuming. In practice muliticomponent seismic is thereby almost never used in for shallow applications even if the need for such data is increasing.
  • WO 2009/023071 describes a remotely operated vehicle for acquiring seismic data in icy waters.
  • WO 03/005062 (Fu-Gro-Udi Limited) describes a remotely operated vehicle for deploying survey apparatus at underwater locations. Summary of the invention
  • Figure 1 shows a marine exploration vehicle with a suction anchor in a raised position
  • Figure 2 shows the vehicle of Figure 1 , with the suction anchor in a lowered position.
  • Figure 1 shows a marine exploration vehicle in the form of a pulling unit or marine tractor 2 provided with two caterpillar tracks 4 (one of which is visible in Figure 1 ), each arranged to move around two wheels 6.
  • the tractor 2 incorporates a suction anchor 8, in the form of a, preferably cylindrical, bucket which is open at its bottom 10, but otherwise completely closed.
  • Two airguns 12 are provided on the tractor 2, together with a winch (13) which is adapted to winch a receiver cable 14.
  • the receiver cable 14 may be provided with seismic and/or electromagnetic sensors (not shown).
  • a preferred method described here uses a vehicle on the seabed for investigation of the sediments with active shear wave seismic. It can be used for either P waves converted to S or pure S waves or both. Also surface waves may be used.
  • the method consists of two main parts: (1 ) One or more cables with receiver nodes placed on the seabed connected to (2) a pulling device or a tractor 2.
  • the pulling unit 2 may also carry one or more seismic sources, generating P waves and/or S waves.
  • the pulling unit 2 is remotely operated from the surface, or remotely operated from any place via telecommunication, or autonomous.
  • the pulling unit 2 is moved by the caterpillar tracks 4.
  • the caterpillar tracks 4 will have the capacity to move the unit but in many cases it will have too little pulling force to move the connected cable(s). This can be illustrated by a seabed consisting of normally consolidated and thereby soft clay. This would be the most likely environment for deep water. In this case the force equilibrium may be estimated by use of an undrained total stress analysis.
  • the resistance from the cable(s) is equal the average undrained shear strength on seabed times the contact area.
  • the pulling force from the tracks is equal their contact area times about the same average undrained shear strength.
  • For reasonable cable length (some hundred meters) and diameters (some centimetres) the contact area of a cable may be about 50-100 square metres.
  • a reasonable contact area for the caterpillar track is about 2-5 square metres. Thus a seabed tractor with caterpillar tracks may be unable to pull the cable.
  • a suction anchor 8 is installed on the pulling unit 2.
  • the suction anchor 8 is a bucket with an opening downwards, which penetrates the seabed hydraulically by lowering the pressure inside the bucket relative to the water pressure, and is lifted up by increasing the inside water pressure in excess of the outside pressure.
  • Suction anchors are used elsewhere for anchoring and foundation purposes.
  • the suction anchor 8 and pulling unit 2 act as an integrated anchor to pull the cable(s) 14.
  • the anchor unit i.e. suction anchor 8 and/or pulling unit 2
  • the pulling force is generated by a cable winch or similar on the pulling unit 2.
  • the seismic cable(s) 14 and the pulling unit 2 may be connected to each other by a cable part which can be winched into or out from the pulling unit 2 according to the following cycle of movement:
  • the cable(s) 14 is resting on the seabed.
  • the suction anchor 8 is lifted free from the seabed, the tractor 2 is moves along the seabed, and the connection cable is running out from the tractor 2, so that the cable remains in the same position.
  • the suction anchor 8 penetrates the seabed, first by its own weight, possibly in combination with some pushing mechanism until a sufficient seal is formed with the seabed, then hydraulically. Both tractor 2 and cable(s) 14 are at rest.
  • Seismic signals are sent either from one or more airguns 12, placed in water or on the tractor 2, or by the suction anchor 8 serving as a shear source. Any combination of these signals may be applied.
  • the cable 14 is in receiver mode, lying still on seabed. The tractor 2 is not moving.
  • the tractor 2 and the penetrated bucket are serving as an anchor and the connection cable is winched into the tractor 2 in order to move the cable 14 towards the tractor 2.
  • the tractor 2 may then be moved again, and phases 1 to 4 above may be repeated as many times as necessary. Sub cycles repeating phases 3 and 4 may be applied. A full cycle is achieved when phase 4 is finished.
  • the system may travel in a large variety of patterns on the seabed to cover the investigation area effectively. Normally a 3 D seismic survey would be desirable. The main limitation of the pattern is possible obstacles on the seabed. The turning radius of the tractor-cable system is very small due to the suction anchor 8 and cable winch utility. Video or sonar equipment may be used for navigation. Acoustic transponders may be placed on the seabed to aid the navigation. A pre-survey of the seabed may have been performed and a pattern may have been programmed in advance. Alternatively the unit 2 is remotely controlled in real time or the unit may run by an auto pilot system to run within certain boundaries and guidelines.
  • Energy and communication is provided by a floating vessel (not shown) of moderate size connected to the unit by an umbilical 16.
  • the floating vessel may be manned or unmanned.
  • Shear waves are important to the current method.
  • the current method may use a dedicated shear source on the seabed.
  • the tractor may be equipped by remotely operated CPT equipment with a seismic cone (not shown).
  • Cone penetration testing involves a small cone (typically 10 to 15 square centimeters) which penetrates soil or the seabed in order to allow measurement of the resistance to penetration, and usually also measurement of the pore pressure.
  • CPT may use a seismic cone which measures the shear wave velocity of the soil / seabed.
  • Such equipment will give both a continuous strength profile and a direct measurement of the interval velocities of compression waves (P) and shear waves (S).
  • P compression waves
  • S shear waves
  • the collection of this information gives a more or less complete set of calibration data for the multi component seismic from the cable at the points along the line at which CPT is performed, resulting in a continuous 2D profile of engineering parameters directly applicable to foundation design. Note this can be obtained in a single operation.
  • the conventional alternative would be to drag and move a cable on seabed by a vessel and then deploy a geotechnical survey with a seabed frame with CPT. The cost of this combination is so high that it is seldom used.
  • the benefit of the proposed combination of multi component seismic and seismic cone is especially important for large offshore wind power developments such as the Doggerbank project due to the high number of foundation locations.
  • the system may be used for electromagnetic surveying in combination with or instead of seismic surveying. With electromagnetic surveying a source may be placed on the tractor and receivers on the cable.
  • the seabed tractor may serve as a platform for other types of data collection in addition to the seismic surveying and thus serve as a seabed laboratory.
  • additional types are:
  • Sampling of seabed material by an automatic or remotely operated piston sampler or similar With a penetrated anchor the system will have sufficient reaction force to allow significant penetration of a sampling device.
  • the samples may be used for a variety of purposes: geotechnical, petrological, chemical, biological.
  • a large number of sample cylinders may be managed by a revolver system or similar.
  • CPT applications are dependent on a fixed platform to obtain sufficient penetration.
  • a fixed platform is provided by the tractor 2 with penetrated bucket.
  • the tractor 2 On a strong seabed with limited cable length the tractor 2 may function with no bucket. In stead the weight may be adjusted to a suitable level.
  • the bucket can be used to generate mainly horizontally polarized shear waves.
  • the connection between the tractor 2 and the tracks 4 may be made such that vertical vibration can also be made. This would be beneficial for use of surface waves to characterize the seabed
  • the system provides the combination of a suction anchor 8 and a tractor 2 to enable autonomous movement of a seabed seismic system. Without a penetrating bucket the capacity to pull a seismic cable would be very limited.
  • Another new element is the combination of multi component seismic and seismic cone penetration testing (seismic CPT) providing profiles of velocity data and strength data at certain points to improve analysis of the seismic data and to calibrate the results.
  • seismic CPT seismic cone penetration testing
  • the existing seismic systems with receivers on the seabed have too high cost and are thereby rarely used.
  • the benefit of shear wave seismic is thereby too often lost.
  • the high cost is a result of complex and time consuming marine operations involving costly floating vessels to manage equipment on the seabed, especially if a large area needs to be covered.
  • seabed seismic with shear waves will be affordable and available to the oil industry and other activity in need of knowledge of the seabed properties.
  • the system can provide seismic investigations without the use of an air gun in the water. This may allow access to, and/or increase operational time in, sensitive areas.
  • the pulling unit 2 may be provided with propellers for moving the pulling unit 2 through the water, either instead of or in addition to said caterpillar tracks 4, and the pulling unit need not necessarily move by contact with the seabed. Also in some embodiments an anchor may not be required.

Abstract

A marine exploration vehicle (2) is provided for use in exploring the seabed of a marine environment, the vehicle comprising: driving means (4) arranged to drive said vehicle from position to position relative to the seabed; a receiver cable (14); and a winch (13) arranged to move said receiver cable.

Description

MARINE EXPLORATION VEHICLE
Field of the invention The invention relates to a marine exploration vehicle, and a method of exploring a marine environment.
Background of the invention The invention is suitable for the use of shear waves and multi component seismic for the investigation of shallow sediments with respect to imaging and characterization of mechanical properties. Typical applications are (1 ) geotechnical investigation for offshore wind parks, jack up foundations, pipelines and other seabed structures, (2) drilling geohazards such as shallow gas and shallow water flow and (3) investigation and monitoring of sites for injection of drill cuttings and other waste, produced water, C02 or other fluids or gases. In this context shallow means in the approximate depth range 0-1000 m below the seabed.
The conventional technology for seismic seabed investigation is P waves generated and received in water. The potential for better investigation of shallow sediments by the use of shear waves has been documented both theoretically and by field work on land and offshore. Existing systems generate and receive shear waves on the seabed and utilize both P waves converted to S and pure S waves. The July 2002 issue of The Leading Edge contains a series of papers on the current and future technology for identification of shallow water flow. The most important papers from this issue are:
Dealing with shallow-water flow in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico, Ostermeier R M et al Well planning for SWF and overpressures at the Kestrel well, Bruce B et al
Shallow hazard detection in the near surface - a coherence cube processing application, Rader B et al
Shallow water flow prediction using prestack waveform inversion of conventional 3D seismic data and rock modelling, Mallick S et al
Geohazard detection and other applications of chimney cubes, Aminzadeh F et al Prasad, M., 2002, Acoustic measurements in unconsolidated sands at low effective pressure and overpressure detection, Geophysics, 67, no. 2, 405-412.
Western Geco/Schlumberger brochure: Enhanced shallow hazard assessment.
Western Geco/Schlumberger brochure: Europa field, Gulf of Mexico, A shallow water- flow study.
Huffman, A.R. and Castagna, J. P., 2001 , The petrophysical basis for shallow-water flow prediction using multicomponent seismic data: The Leading Edge, 20, no. 9, 1030- 1052.
The Leading Edge, August 2010, Volume 29:
• Application of shallow shear-wave seismic reflection methods in earthquake hazards studies, James B. Harris, pp. 960-963
· Near-surface geophysical techniques for geohazards investigations: Some
Canadian examples, J. A. Hunter, R. A. Burns, R. L. Good, S. E. Pullan, A. Pugin, and H. Crow, pp. 964-977
US Patent No. 6,694,261 - "Method for identification of shallow water flow hazards using marine seismic data" goes beyond established practice for seismic investigation for shallow water flow zones by introducing shear waves in addition to the conventional use of compressional waves. US patent 6694261 is based on compressional waves converted to shear waves in the formation. We also mention US Patent No. 6,374,186, and the following web link:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-
Parser?Sect1 =PT01 &Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1 &u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrc hnum.htm&r=1 & =G&l=50&s1 =6,374,186.PN.&OS=PN/6,374,186& S=PN/6,374,186 A sheer wave generator is described in US Patent No. 6,612,397.
A suction anchor is described in US Patent No. 4,432,671 (Shell Oil Company).
Multicomponent seismic or shear wave seismic is only possible by using receivers on the seabed. This makes shear wave seismic much more costly to perform than conventional seismic. Existing multicomponent technology uses normally distributed nodes or a seabed cable with a number of sensors. Placement and possible movement of such systems are time consuming. In practice muliticomponent seismic is thereby almost never used in for shallow applications even if the need for such data is increasing.
An example of the increased need is large offshore wind farm developments. Due to the size, geotechnical borings and in situ testing (typically Cone penetration testing- CPT) cannot be done at each location and the design must rely on seismic information to a larger degree. Thereby the shortcomings of P wave seismic to describe mechanical properties is a severe problem. This problem may be reduced with effective collection of muliticomponent seismic data.
WO 2009/023071 describes a remotely operated vehicle for acquiring seismic data in icy waters.
WO 03/005062 (Fu-Gro-Udi Limited) describes a remotely operated vehicle for deploying survey apparatus at underwater locations. Summary of the invention
The invention provides a marine exploration vehicle and method as set out in the accompanying claims. Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Brief description of the figures Figure 1 shows a marine exploration vehicle with a suction anchor in a raised position; and
Figure 2 shows the vehicle of Figure 1 , with the suction anchor in a lowered position.
Description of preferred embodiments Figure 1 shows a marine exploration vehicle in the form of a pulling unit or marine tractor 2 provided with two caterpillar tracks 4 (one of which is visible in Figure 1 ), each arranged to move around two wheels 6. The tractor 2 incorporates a suction anchor 8, in the form of a, preferably cylindrical, bucket which is open at its bottom 10, but otherwise completely closed.
Two airguns 12 are provided on the tractor 2, together with a winch (13) which is adapted to winch a receiver cable 14. The receiver cable 14 may be provided with seismic and/or electromagnetic sensors (not shown).
A preferred method described here uses a vehicle on the seabed for investigation of the sediments with active shear wave seismic. It can be used for either P waves converted to S or pure S waves or both. Also surface waves may be used. The method consists of two main parts: (1 ) One or more cables with receiver nodes placed on the seabed connected to (2) a pulling device or a tractor 2. The pulling unit 2 may also carry one or more seismic sources, generating P waves and/or S waves. The pulling unit 2 is remotely operated from the surface, or remotely operated from any place via telecommunication, or autonomous.
The pulling unit 2 is moved by the caterpillar tracks 4. The caterpillar tracks 4 will have the capacity to move the unit but in many cases it will have too little pulling force to move the connected cable(s). This can be illustrated by a seabed consisting of normally consolidated and thereby soft clay. This would be the most likely environment for deep water. In this case the force equilibrium may be estimated by use of an undrained total stress analysis. The resistance from the cable(s) is equal the average undrained shear strength on seabed times the contact area. The pulling force from the tracks is equal their contact area times about the same average undrained shear strength. For reasonable cable length (some hundred meters) and diameters (some centimetres) the contact area of a cable may be about 50-100 square metres. A reasonable contact area for the caterpillar track is about 2-5 square metres. Thus a seabed tractor with caterpillar tracks may be unable to pull the cable.
For this reason a suction anchor 8 is installed on the pulling unit 2. The suction anchor 8 is a bucket with an opening downwards, which penetrates the seabed hydraulically by lowering the pressure inside the bucket relative to the water pressure, and is lifted up by increasing the inside water pressure in excess of the outside pressure. Suction anchors are used elsewhere for anchoring and foundation purposes. When penetrating the seabed the suction anchor 8 and pulling unit 2 act as an integrated anchor to pull the cable(s) 14. In this position the anchor unit (i.e. suction anchor 8 and/or pulling unit 2) can also serve as an efficient shear wave generator. The pulling force is generated by a cable winch or similar on the pulling unit 2. The seismic cable(s) 14 and the pulling unit 2 may be connected to each other by a cable part which can be winched into or out from the pulling unit 2 according to the following cycle of movement:
Phase 1 , Tractor moving
The cable(s) 14 is resting on the seabed. The suction anchor 8 is lifted free from the seabed, the tractor 2 is moves along the seabed, and the connection cable is running out from the tractor 2, so that the cable remains in the same position.
Phase 2, Anchor penetration
The suction anchor 8 penetrates the seabed, first by its own weight, possibly in combination with some pushing mechanism until a sufficient seal is formed with the seabed, then hydraulically. Both tractor 2 and cable(s) 14 are at rest.
Phase 3, Seismic surveying
Seismic signals are sent either from one or more airguns 12, placed in water or on the tractor 2, or by the suction anchor 8 serving as a shear source. Any combination of these signals may be applied. The cable 14 is in receiver mode, lying still on seabed. The tractor 2 is not moving.
Phase 4, Cable moving
The tractor 2 and the penetrated bucket are serving as an anchor and the connection cable is winched into the tractor 2 in order to move the cable 14 towards the tractor 2.
The tractor 2 may then be moved again, and phases 1 to 4 above may be repeated as many times as necessary. Sub cycles repeating phases 3 and 4 may be applied. A full cycle is achieved when phase 4 is finished.
The system may travel in a large variety of patterns on the seabed to cover the investigation area effectively. Normally a 3 D seismic survey would be desirable. The main limitation of the pattern is possible obstacles on the seabed. The turning radius of the tractor-cable system is very small due to the suction anchor 8 and cable winch utility. Video or sonar equipment may be used for navigation. Acoustic transponders may be placed on the seabed to aid the navigation. A pre-survey of the seabed may have been performed and a pattern may have been programmed in advance. Alternatively the unit 2 is remotely controlled in real time or the unit may run by an auto pilot system to run within certain boundaries and guidelines.
Energy and communication is provided by a floating vessel (not shown) of moderate size connected to the unit by an umbilical 16. The floating vessel may be manned or unmanned. Shear waves are important to the current method. The current method may use a dedicated shear source on the seabed.
It can also be difficult to analyse muliticomponent seismic due to the large variation of the shear velocity near the seabed. To have control of the shear wave velocity and strength near the surface and thereby enable calibration of the results, the tractor may be equipped by remotely operated CPT equipment with a seismic cone (not shown). Cone penetration testing involves a small cone (typically 10 to 15 square centimeters) which penetrates soil or the seabed in order to allow measurement of the resistance to penetration, and usually also measurement of the pore pressure.
CPT may use a seismic cone which measures the shear wave velocity of the soil / seabed. Such equipment will give both a continuous strength profile and a direct measurement of the interval velocities of compression waves (P) and shear waves (S). The collection of this information gives a more or less complete set of calibration data for the multi component seismic from the cable at the points along the line at which CPT is performed, resulting in a continuous 2D profile of engineering parameters directly applicable to foundation design. Note this can be obtained in a single operation. The conventional alternative would be to drag and move a cable on seabed by a vessel and then deploy a geotechnical survey with a seabed frame with CPT. The cost of this combination is so high that it is seldom used. The benefit of the proposed combination of multi component seismic and seismic cone is especially important for large offshore wind power developments such as the Doggerbank project due to the high number of foundation locations. The system may be used for electromagnetic surveying in combination with or instead of seismic surveying. With electromagnetic surveying a source may be placed on the tractor and receivers on the cable.
The seabed tractor may serve as a platform for other types of data collection in addition to the seismic surveying and thus serve as a seabed laboratory. Such additional types are:
Geotechnical data collection by automized or remotely operated Cone Penetration Testing, CPT. With the suction anchor 8 penetrating the seabed the system will have sufficient reaction force to allow significant penetration of a CPT.
CPT with SEISMIC CONE
Sampling of seabed material by an automatic or remotely operated piston sampler or similar. With a penetrated anchor the system will have sufficient reaction force to allow significant penetration of a sampling device. The samples may be used for a variety of purposes: geotechnical, petrological, chemical, biological. A large number of sample cylinders may be managed by a revolver system or similar.
Mapping of the seabed topography by for instance multibeam ecco sounder.
Visual observation of the seabed to describe biology.
Metocean observations (temperature, current, salinity, density etc)
Chemical observations (C02, hydrocarbons etc.)
CPT applications are dependent on a fixed platform to obtain sufficient penetration. Such a fixed platform is provided by the tractor 2 with penetrated bucket. On a strong seabed with limited cable length the tractor 2 may function with no bucket. In stead the weight may be adjusted to a suitable level.
The bucket can be used to generate mainly horizontally polarized shear waves. The connection between the tractor 2 and the tracks 4 may be made such that vertical vibration can also be made. This would be beneficial for use of surface waves to characterize the seabed
The system provides the combination of a suction anchor 8 and a tractor 2 to enable autonomous movement of a seabed seismic system. Without a penetrating bucket the capacity to pull a seismic cable would be very limited.
Another new element is the combination of multi component seismic and seismic cone penetration testing (seismic CPT) providing profiles of velocity data and strength data at certain points to improve analysis of the seismic data and to calibrate the results.
The existing seismic systems with receivers on the seabed have too high cost and are thereby rarely used. The benefit of shear wave seismic is thereby too often lost. The high cost is a result of complex and time consuming marine operations involving costly floating vessels to manage equipment on the seabed, especially if a large area needs to be covered.
With a vehicle system on the seabed the requirement to support from the surface is significantly reduced. A small boat with a small crew will be sufficient, or alternatively an unmanned or partly unmanned floating unit. This means that seabed seismic with shear waves will be affordable and available to the oil industry and other activity in need of knowledge of the seabed properties.
As a result of the complex operation of existing systems, they are dependent on calm weather and very moderate wave conditions. Time used for waiting for weather conditions is thereby often high and this adds to the cost of the operation. The system is much less dependent on weather conditions and the time spent waiting for the weather will be very low. This adds to the cost efficiency. Due to the low cost to operate, a long duration of the investigation may be allowed, giving an area cover and resolution which is unknown today. In combination with the optional data types described above the seabed tractor may introduce a new area of seabed investigation.
The system can provide seismic investigations without the use of an air gun in the water. This may allow access to, and/or increase operational time in, sensitive areas.
Other embodiments are possible. For example the pulling unit 2 may be provided with propellers for moving the pulling unit 2 through the water, either instead of or in addition to said caterpillar tracks 4, and the pulling unit need not necessarily move by contact with the seabed. Also in some embodiments an anchor may not be required.

Claims

CLAIMS:
1 . A marine exploration vehicle for use in exploring the seabed of a marine environment, the vehicle comprising:
driving means arranged to drive said vehicle from position to position relative to the seabed;
a receiver cable; and
a winch arranged to move said receiver cable.
2. A marine exploration vehicle as claimed in claim 1 , which further comprises anchor means for anchoring the vehicle to a location on the seabed.
3. A marine exploration vehicle as claimed in claim 2, wherein the anchor means is a suction anchor which is arranged to penetrate the seabed as a result of pressure within the suction anchor being lower than the pressure of the surrounding water.
4. A marine exploration vehicle as claimed in claim 3, which comprises pressure reducing means for reducing the pressure within the suction anchor.
5. A marine exploration vehicle as claimed in claim 3 or 4, wherein said suction anchor has the shape of a receptacle which is open at a lower surface.
6. A marine exploration vehicle as claimed in claim 5, which is shaped as an upside-down bucket.
7. A marine exploration vehicle as claimed in claim 6, wherein said bucket has a generally circular cross-section.
8. A marine exploration vehicle as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein said driving means is arranged to contact the seabed and drive the vehicle along the seabed.
9. A marine exploration vehicle as claimed in claim 8, wherein said driving means comprises at least one caterpillar track.
10. A marine exploration vehicle as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein said cable is provided with seismic sensors.
1 1 . A marine exploration vehicle as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein said cable is provided with electromagnetic sensors.
12. A marine exploration vehicle as claimed in any preceding claim, which is provided with Cone Penetration Testing equipment.
13. A marine exploration vehicle as claimed in claim 12, wherein said equipment includes a seismic cone.
14. A marine exploration vehicle as claimed in any preceding claim, which is provided with at least one airgun.
15. A method of performing marine exploration comprising the steps of: a) placing a remotely operated or autonomous vehicle at a first vehicle position, and a receiver cable at a first receiver cable position, with said receiver cable being connected to said vehicle; b) moving said vehicle to a second vehicle position; c) moving said receiver cable, by means of a winch provided on said vehicle, from said first receiver cable position to a second receiver cable position; d) either before or after step c), activating a source and recording the energy received by said receiver cable from said source; and e) repeating steps b) to d) as required.
16. A method as claimed in claim 15, which further comprises, after step b) and before step c), anchoring said vehicle relative to the seabed;
17 A method as claimed in any one of claims 17 to 19, wherein said anchoring step is performed by a suction anchor which is arranged to penetrate the seabed as a result of pressure within the suction anchor being lower than the pressure of the surrounding water.
18. A method as claimed in claim 17, which further comprises using said suction anchor as a shear wave source.
19. A method as claimed in any one of claims 15 to 18, wherein said step of moving said vehicle includes driving said vehicle along the seabed using driving means which contact the seabed.
20. A method as claimed in any one of claims 16 to 19, wherein said vehicle includes anchor means for performing said anchoring step, and wherein said method further comprises transmitting seismic energy to the seabed using said anchor means.
21 . A method as claimed in any one of claims 15 to 20, wherein said vehicle includes driving means for moving said vehicle, and wherein said method further comprises transmitting seismic energy to the seabed using said driving means.
22. A method as claimed in any one of claims 15 to 21 , which further comprises using said vehicle as a shear wave source.
23. A method as claimed in any one of claims 15 to 22, wherein said vehicle is a marine exploration vehicle as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 14.
PCT/EP2011/052426 2011-02-18 2011-02-18 Marine exploration vehicle WO2012110096A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/EP2011/052426 WO2012110096A1 (en) 2011-02-18 2011-02-18 Marine exploration vehicle

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/EP2011/052426 WO2012110096A1 (en) 2011-02-18 2011-02-18 Marine exploration vehicle

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2012110096A1 true WO2012110096A1 (en) 2012-08-23

Family

ID=44625281

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2011/052426 WO2012110096A1 (en) 2011-02-18 2011-02-18 Marine exploration vehicle

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2012110096A1 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014116776A1 (en) * 2013-01-23 2014-07-31 Westerngeco Llc Seismic data acquisition using water vehicles
CN106770559A (en) * 2017-01-18 2017-05-31 青岛海洋地质研究所 A kind of quiet spy combined type geochemistry microelectrode probe system
WO2021021875A1 (en) * 2019-07-30 2021-02-04 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Autonomous underwater vehicle to generate seismic waves
CN113240250A (en) * 2021-04-26 2021-08-10 深圳亚纳海洋科技有限公司 Novel accurate marine prospecting system
US11237287B2 (en) 2018-05-23 2022-02-01 Blue Ocean Seismic Services Limited Autonomous data acquisition system and method

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1217163A (en) * 1967-04-22 1970-12-31 Cammell Laird & Company Shipbu Improvements in or relating to underwater vehicles
US4432671A (en) 1981-04-02 1984-02-21 Shell Oil Company Suction anchor and method of installing a suction anchor
US4730692A (en) * 1980-12-12 1988-03-15 Conoco Inc. Apparatus for marine shear wave prospecting
WO2001084184A2 (en) * 2000-05-03 2001-11-08 Geco As Marine seismic surveying
US6374186B1 (en) 2000-03-24 2002-04-16 Petrophysical Consulting, Inc. Method for overpressure detection from compressional-and- shear-wave data
WO2003005062A1 (en) 2001-06-30 2003-01-16 Fugro-Udi Limited Underwater survey apparatus and method
US6612397B2 (en) 1999-12-10 2003-09-02 Norges Geotekniske Institutt Shear wave generator
US6694261B1 (en) 1999-06-07 2004-02-17 Conoco Inc. Method for identification of shallow water flow hazards using marine seismic data
WO2005071442A2 (en) * 2004-01-21 2005-08-04 Compagnie Generale De Geophysique System for seismic exploration of a submerged subsurface including implanted bases
WO2009023071A1 (en) 2007-08-10 2009-02-19 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Underseas seismic acquisition

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1217163A (en) * 1967-04-22 1970-12-31 Cammell Laird & Company Shipbu Improvements in or relating to underwater vehicles
US4730692A (en) * 1980-12-12 1988-03-15 Conoco Inc. Apparatus for marine shear wave prospecting
US4432671A (en) 1981-04-02 1984-02-21 Shell Oil Company Suction anchor and method of installing a suction anchor
US6694261B1 (en) 1999-06-07 2004-02-17 Conoco Inc. Method for identification of shallow water flow hazards using marine seismic data
US6612397B2 (en) 1999-12-10 2003-09-02 Norges Geotekniske Institutt Shear wave generator
US6374186B1 (en) 2000-03-24 2002-04-16 Petrophysical Consulting, Inc. Method for overpressure detection from compressional-and- shear-wave data
WO2001084184A2 (en) * 2000-05-03 2001-11-08 Geco As Marine seismic surveying
WO2003005062A1 (en) 2001-06-30 2003-01-16 Fugro-Udi Limited Underwater survey apparatus and method
WO2005071442A2 (en) * 2004-01-21 2005-08-04 Compagnie Generale De Geophysique System for seismic exploration of a submerged subsurface including implanted bases
WO2009023071A1 (en) 2007-08-10 2009-02-19 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Underseas seismic acquisition

Non-Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
HUFFMAN, A.R.; CASTAGNA, J.P: "The petrophysical basis for shallow-water flow prediction using multicomponent seismic data", THE LEADING EDGE, vol. 20, no. 9, 2001, pages 1030 - 1052
J. A. HUNTER; R. A. BURNS; R. L. GOOD; S. E. PULLAN; A. PUGIN; H. CROW: "Near-surface geophysical techniques for geohazards investigations", SOME CANADIAN EXAMPLES, pages 964 - 977
JAMES B. HARRIS: "Application of shallow shear-wave seismic reflection methods", EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS STUDIES, pages 960 - 963
PRASAD, M.: "Acoustic measurements in unconsolidated sands at low effective pressure and overpressure detection", GEOPHYSICS, vol. 67, no. 2, 2002, pages 405 - 412
THE LEADING EDGE, vol. 29, August 2010 (2010-08-01)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014116776A1 (en) * 2013-01-23 2014-07-31 Westerngeco Llc Seismic data acquisition using water vehicles
US10191170B2 (en) 2013-01-23 2019-01-29 Westerngeco L.L.C. Seismic data acquisition using water vehicles
CN106770559A (en) * 2017-01-18 2017-05-31 青岛海洋地质研究所 A kind of quiet spy combined type geochemistry microelectrode probe system
US11237287B2 (en) 2018-05-23 2022-02-01 Blue Ocean Seismic Services Limited Autonomous data acquisition system and method
US11269103B2 (en) 2018-05-23 2022-03-08 Blue Ocean Seismic Services Limited Autonomous data acquisition system and method
US11906681B2 (en) 2018-05-23 2024-02-20 Blue Ocean Seismic Services Limited Autonomous data acquisition system and method
WO2021021875A1 (en) * 2019-07-30 2021-02-04 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Autonomous underwater vehicle to generate seismic waves
US11603175B2 (en) 2019-07-30 2023-03-14 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Autonomous underwater vehicle to generate seismic waves
CN113240250A (en) * 2021-04-26 2021-08-10 深圳亚纳海洋科技有限公司 Novel accurate marine prospecting system
CN113240250B (en) * 2021-04-26 2024-04-05 深圳亚纳海洋科技有限公司 Accurate ocean topography system

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3351973B1 (en) Long-term seabed-based multi-point in-situ observation system
Weaver et al. Current methods for obtaining, logging and splitting marine sediment cores
AU2009334456B2 (en) Enhanced method and device for aquatic seismic prospecting
Judd et al. The evidence of shallow gas in marine sediments
US11313207B2 (en) Deep-sea submarine gas hydrate collecting method and production house
Trabant Applied high-resolution geophysical methods: offshore geoengineering hazards
JP6941907B1 (en) Long-term observation equipment and observation method for submarine sand waves used in internal wave development areas
Parker et al. Geophysics and the search of freshwater bodies: a review
WO2012110096A1 (en) Marine exploration vehicle
US20050169713A1 (en) Method for deploying seafloor equipment
Long et al. Multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) for offshore geotechnical investigations
US20070187170A1 (en) Method for collection and registration seismic data
CA2920447A1 (en) Apparatus and method for surveying
Noorany Underwater soil sampling and testing—a state-of-the-art review
CN203428001U (en) Multifunctional installation and exploration ship
Gay et al. Repeated fluid expulsions during events of rapid sea-level rise in the Gulf of Lion, western Mediterranean Sea
WO2003005062A1 (en) Underwater survey apparatus and method
McGuinness et al. The application of various geophysical techniques to specialized engineering projects
Dayal Recent trends in underwater in-situ soil testing
Matsubara et al. Development of offshore microtremor array exploration
Nicholson et al. Browse Basin 2014 Marine Survey: Investigating containment for potential Late Cretaceous CO2 storage plays
Kaszubowski Seismic profiling of the sea-bottom in recognition of geotechnical condition
Sullivan North sea foundation investigation techniques
Peng et al. Research and Application of Comprehensive Survey Technology for Transmission Engineering in Shallow Sea Area
Ling State-of-the-art of marine soil mechanics and foundation engineering

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 11706505

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 11706505

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1