WO2012082848A1 - Crack diversion planes in ceramic feedthroughs - Google Patents

Crack diversion planes in ceramic feedthroughs Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2012082848A1
WO2012082848A1 PCT/US2011/064821 US2011064821W WO2012082848A1 WO 2012082848 A1 WO2012082848 A1 WO 2012082848A1 US 2011064821 W US2011064821 W US 2011064821W WO 2012082848 A1 WO2012082848 A1 WO 2012082848A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
ceramic
crack
diversion
feedthrough
plane
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2011/064821
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Kurt J. Koester
Original Assignee
Advanced Bionics Ag
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Advanced Bionics Ag filed Critical Advanced Bionics Ag
Publication of WO2012082848A1 publication Critical patent/WO2012082848A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61NELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N1/00Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
    • A61N1/18Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
    • A61N1/32Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
    • A61N1/36Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
    • A61N1/372Arrangements in connection with the implantation of stimulators
    • A61N1/375Constructional arrangements, e.g. casings
    • A61N1/3752Details of casing-lead connections
    • A61N1/3754Feedthroughs

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Prostheses (AREA)

Abstract

A hermetic feedthrough assembly including a ceramic body having an exterior surface and an interior surface and being joined around a perimeter surface to a hermetic case. The ceramic body includes a ceramic matrix and a diversion plane disposed within the ceramic matrix, the orientation of the diversion plane being selected to increase resistance of the ceramic matrix to crack propagation from the exterior surface to the interior surface and vice versa. A plurality of electrical conductors passes through the ceramic body from the exterior surface to the interior surface.

Description

CRACK DIVERSION PLANES IN CERAMIC FEEDTHROUGHS
RELATED DOCUMENTS
[0001] The present application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 1 19(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/423,337, entitled "Crack Diversion Planes in Ceramic Feedthroughs" to Kurt J. Koester, filed December 15, 2010, which application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
BACKGROUND
[0002] Hermetically sealed cases can be used to isolate electronic devices from environmental contamination. To form electrical connections between the interior and the exterior of a hermetically sealed case, a hermetic feedthrough can be used. Ideally this hermetic feedthrough would maintain the integrity of the hermetic sealed case, while allowing electrical signals to pass through. Ceramic can be used to form the body of the feedthrough, with a number of electrically conductive pins passing through the ceramic. Ceramic has a number of benefits, including resistance to chemical corrosion, high strength, and fluid and vapor impermeability. However, crack propagation through the ceramic can reduce the reliability of the hermetic feedthrough.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0003] The accompanying drawings illustrate various embodiments of the principles described herein and are a part of the specification. The illustrated embodiments are merely examples and do not limit the scope of the claims. [0004] Fig. 1 is a diagram showing an illustrative hermetically sealed case, according to one example of principles described herein.
[0005] Fig. 2 is a cross sectional diagram of an illustrative electrical feedthrough that includes a ceramic body with conductive pins passing through the body, according to one example of principles described herein.
[0006] Fig. 3 is a perspective view of the illustrative feedthrough shown in Fig. 2, according to one example of principles described herein.
[0007] Figs. 4A-4F are diagrams showing illustrative crack diversion planes in ceramic bodies, according to one example of principles described herein.
[0008] Figs. 5A and 5B show illustrative steps in creating crack diversion planes in ceramic bodies, according to one example of principles described herein.
[0009] Throughout the drawings, identical reference numbers designate similar, but not necessarily identical, elements.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0010] Human implant technologies often make use of implanted electronic devices. Hermetically sealed cases are used to protect electronic components in the implanted devices from bodily fluids and various mechanical forces. As mentioned above, a feedthrough is often used to form an electrical or physical connection between the interior and the exterior of a sealed case. An electrical feedthrough maintains the integrity of the hermetically sealed case, while allowing electrical signals to pass through.
[0011] The electrical feedthrough is often constructed as a separate element and then sealed into an aperture in a wall of an implant housing. One of the determining factors for the impact resistance of the implant is the toughness of the feedthrough. For example, an implanted processor of a cochlear implant is typically located above and behind the external ear. Impacts to the head of the user can create significant loads on the implanted processor and the feedthroughs. [0012] As used in the specification and appended claims, the term "ceramic" is used broadly and does not distinguish between glass, glass ceramic, ceramic composites and other types of ceramic materials. Ceramic can form the body of the feedthrough, with a number of electrically conductive pins passing through the ceramic. The ceramic has a number of benefits, including resistance to chemical corrosion, high strength, fluid and vapor impermeability, and other advantages. However, ceramic can exhibit low fracture toughness. This can lead to failures of the ceramic from crack propagation. Toughening the ceramic by including engineered microstructures can significantly reduce failure of the feedthrough.
[0013] In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present systems and methods. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the present apparatus, systems, and methods may be practiced without these specific details. Reference in the specification to "an embodiment," "an example," or similar language means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment or example is included in at least that one embodiment, but not necessarily in other embodiments. The various instances of the phrase "in one embodiment" or similar phrases in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
[0014] Fig. 1 is an exploded view of an illustrative hermetic enclosure (100) that houses cochlear implant electronics. In this particular example, the hermetic enclosure (100) includes a case (1 10) and a case top (115). The case (110) and the case top (1 15) may be formed from a variety of biocompatible materials. For example, the case (1 10) and case top (1 15) may be formed from metals, ceramics, crystalline structures, composites, or other suitable materials. The outer case (1 10) may be formed from a single piece of material or may include multiple elements. The multiple pieces may be connected through a variety of methods including, but not limited to, brazing, laser welding, or bonding. [0015] According to one illustrative example, the case (1 10) and the case top (1 15) are formed from titanium. Titanium has a number of desirable characteristics, including high strength, resiliency, biocompatibility, low density, and low permeability. The case (1 10) shown in Fig. 1 is a closed-bottom cylinder that is machined, stamped, or otherwise formed from a single piece of titanium. In this example, the case (1 10) includes two apertures (1 1 1 , 1 12) that are configured to receive hermetic electrical feedthroughs (101 , 120). The case top (115) is also made from titanium and can be placed onto a ledge (1 16) machined into the upper rim of the case (1 10). The case top (1 15) can then be laser welded or brazed onto the case (1 10). Once the case top (1 15) and hermetic electrical feedthroughs (101 , 120) are in place, the hermetic enclosure (100) prevents liquids or gasses from entering the interior of the enclosure (100). As discussed above, this prevents damage to electronics or other components housed in the interior of the hermetic enclosure (100).
[0016] The electrical feedthroughs (101 , 120) may be formed from a variety of materials and have a number of different configurations. According to one illustrative example, the electrical feedthroughs (101 , 120) include a set of conductors (108, 109) that are imbedded in ceramic bodies (104, 105). The conductors (108, 109) pass through and are sealed in the ceramic body. The sealing of the conductors to the ceramic body may take place in a variety of ways, including gold brazing or partial transient liquid phase (pTLP) bonding.
[0017] The ceramic body (104, 105) is then joined to the appropriate aperture (11 1 , 1 12) in the case (1 10). A variety of techniques, including gold brazing, can be used to join the ceramic body to the case (1 10). In this illustrative example, the hermetic feedthroughs (101 , 120) are on the perimeter of the case (1 10). Although the feedthroughs (101 , 120) are illustrated as being located in the perimeter of the case (1 10), feedthroughs could additionally or alternatively be located at other sites on the case (1 10) or the case top (1 15).
[0018] Figs. 2 and 3 illustrate a feedthrough (101 ) that includes cylindrical pins (200) that are sealed into the ceramic body (104) using a gold braze joint (202). Fig. 2 is a cross-sectional view of a portion of the case (1 10) that includes the feedthrough (101 ). The left side of the pin (200) is connected to components that are internal to the case (110) and the right side of the pin (200) is connected to components that are external to the case (1 10). As discussed above, the pin (200) may have a variety of geometries and may be formed from a variety of materials. In this example, the pins (200) are cylindrical and formed from platinum or a platinum alloy such as platinum iridium.
[0019] Fig. 3 is a perspective view of a portion of the hermetic case (110) that includes part of the hermetic feedthrough (101 ). As discussed above, the ceramic body (104) surrounds the pins (200) that are sealed with a gold joint (202). The braze joint (202) may be formed in a variety of ways. For example, the gold braze joint (202) may be formed by placing the platinum pins through holes in a fully densified ceramic body (104). The platinum pins (200) and ceramic body (104) are heated and melted gold or gold alloy is drawn by capillary action into the gap between the platinum pin (200) and the ceramic body (104).
[0020] In an alternative example, two or more green ceramic layers are used to form the ceramic body. These green ceramic layers could be formed in a variety of ways, including, but not limited to, tape casting, ceramic injection molding, or die pressed ceramic. The pins (200) are coated with a layer of gold around their circumference and laid on a bottom green ceramic layer. An upper green ceramic layer is laid over the pins (200) and the bottom layer. This sandwiches the gold coated pins between two layers of green ceramic. The green ceramic is then densified by the application of heat and pressure. During this process, the upper and lower layers are joined and the gold forms a seal between the ceramic (104) and the pins (200). The ceramic body (104) can be joined to the case (1 10) in a number of ways, including brazing, active metal brazing, ceramic/metal joining, transient liquid phase bonding, or other suitable techniques.
[0021] Ceramic is typically considered a brittle material. Brittle materials exhibit very little plastic deformation prior to failure. Cracks tend to propagate long distances through brittle materials with little warning. Further, predicting where and when brittle materials will fail is difficult. As discussed above, the reliability of the ceramic body can become a limiting factor in some implant designs. For example, the ceramic body can be fractured through its thickness. This can destroy the hermetic seal and create an opening for the passage of fluids and/or gasses into the case. There are a number of mechanisms through which cracks can propagate in a ceramic. A first crack propagation mechanism results from the application of forces that exceed the local yield strength of the ceramic material. For example, these forces may be generated by mechanical impact or temperature changes that cause differential expansion of components in the device.
[0022] Crack propagation typically begins at a flaw or discontinuity in the ceramic. The flaw or discontinuity may be a scratch, indentation, inclusion, devitrified region, bubble, edge, corner, grain boundary, or other discontinuity in the ceramic. The flaw or discontinuity creates stress concentrations when the ceramic is subject to mechanical stress. These stress concentrations create situations where the ceramic body fails at stresses that are far below levels predicted by the ceramic's theoretical strength.
[0023] When the stresses concentrated by the flaw exceed the local yield strength of the ceramic material, the crack forms at the flaw and begins to propagate through the ceramic. The crack tip then concentrates the stress. Continued application of stresses that cause forces greater than the fracture strength of the material at the crack tip results in propagation of the crack. Large cracks in the ceramic can compromise the sealing, electrical, and mechanical properties of the feedthrough. The fracture toughness of a ceramic material is a measure of its resistance to facture when forces are applied.
[0024] A number of illustrative examples of structures and methods for toughening ceramic bodies used in feedthroughs are described below. These methods include the creation of crack diversion planes in a ceramic material. The principles described below with respect to crack diversion planes are broadly applicable to ceramics. However, for purposes of illustration, the crack diversion planes are discussed in the context of ceramic feedthrough bodies.
[0025] Intrinsic toughening mechanisms are typically active in ductile materials and are damage mechanisms that primarily occur ahead of the crack tip and increase the material's resistance to fracture, e.g., plasticity. Extrinsic toughening mechanisms are active in brittle materials and are principally present in the wake of a crack and reduce the driving force for crack extension at the tip of the crack, e.g., bridging, deflection, twist, microcracking, etc. Ceramics can be extrinsically toughened materials and their fracture resistance and stress corrosion crack-growth resistance can be improved by enhancing these extrinsic toughening mechanisms or introducing new toughening mechanisms.
[0026] According to one illustrative example, the ceramic feedthrough bodies can be toughened by providing extrinsic toughening mechanisms that mitigate crack propagation through the ceramic. As used in the specification and appended claims the term "mitigate" or "mitigating" crack propagation refers to inhibiting, deflecting, arresting, or otherwise reducing crack propagation through the ceramic.
[0027] Figs. 4A and 4B show structures that exhibit increased toughness by diverting and arresting cracks. Fig. 4A shows a multilayer ceramic structure that includes matrix layers (405) and a number of microstructural diversion planes (410). In general, any material can be used that creates an interface that is stronger or weaker than adjacent matrix material. In some embodiments, the planes could be formed from insulating, conductive, or semiconducting materials in a matrix of insulating or semiconducting materials. For example, silicon nitride planes in an alumina matrix could be used. The plane of maximum driving force (415) is shown by a chevron shaped line (415) that enters multilayer structure (400) from the left. The diversion planes (410) are oriented out of the plane of crack propagation.
[0028] As used in the specification and appended claims, the term "plane of maximum driving force" is used to describe a plane with a location and orientation defined by the maxima of forces applied to the ceramic body that tend to encourage crack initiation and propagation. The location and orientation of the plane of maximum driving force varies with the loading. For example, the plane of maximum driving force could be different in between successive impact events. For the feedthrough configurations shown, the plane of maximum driving force may be on one of the two free surfaces of the feedthrough— the other faces are protected, bonded to, and supported by the surrounding case. Consequently, the bonded ceramic faces may not experience as high of forces as the two free faces and the likelihood of a crack beginning at these bonded ceramic faces is low.
[0029] There is a significant advantage in deflecting the crack propagation direction away from the plane of maximum driving force. The amount of driving force available to drive the crack through the ceramic can be dramatically lower when the crack direction is different than the plane of maximum driving force. Consequently, when cracks are deflected away from the plane of maximum driving force, the ceramic body is "tougher" because it can withstand higher applied loads without failure of the hermetic seal. The deflection mechanism achieves this toughening even when the crack diversion planes are weaker than the ceramic matrix.
[0030] Fig. 4B shows a multilayer feedthrough (420) that has been formed from alternating layers of ceramic matrix (405) and diversion planes (410). The multilayer feedthrough (420) has been joined to a hermetic case (425) by a braze joint (430). The multilayer feedthrough (420) has a first free face (403) on the left side of the feedthrough and a second free face (404) on the right side of the feedthrough. When a crack propagates from the first free face (403) to the second free face (404) or vice versa, the hermetic seal is compromised. For example, the first free face (403) may be an exterior surface on the tissue side of the hermetic case and the second free face (404) may be an interior surface on the component side of the hermetic case.
[0031] In this example, a crack (415) has formed in the leftmost layer of the feedthrough (420). As the crack (415) propagated through the multilayer feedthrough (420) it encountered several diversion planes (410). These diversion planes (410) are configured to divert the crack. After passing through two of the matrix layers (405), the crack (415) is diverted by a diversion plane (410) to the ductile braze joint (430). The ductile braze joint (430) plastically deforms and diffuses the force at the crack tip. This prevents further propagation of the crack (415). In this case, although a crack (415) formed in the feedthrough (420), the crack (415) was diverted so that it did not pass through the thickness of the feedthrough (420) and did not compromise the hermetic seal.
[0032] Fig. 4C shows a number of diversion planes (411 ) placed at an angle to the front surface of the feedthrough. These diversion planes (412) are more likely to divert a crack (416) that is advancing from the exterior of the feedthrough (421 ) because the angle of the diversion plane is closer to the plane of maximum driving force. Further, because the diversion planes are oriented at an angle, the cracks are diverted away from the conductor (435). In some configurations, the interface between the conductor and ceramic matrix may be relatively weak compared to the ceramic matrix and allow for preferential crack growth. Diverting cracks away from the conductor (435) can be advantageous to preserve the function of the conductor and to prevent crack propagation along the interface between the conductor and ceramic matrix.
[0033] Fig. 4D shows a feedthrough (422) that uses a combination of dispersed particles (440) and diversion planes to prevent crack growth from compromising the hermetic integrity of the feedthrough (422). In this example, the dispersed particles (440) are concentrated in an area immediately adjacent to the conductor. These dispersed particles (440) are formed from a ductile material and provide both intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms that reduce the likelihood that a crack will encounter the conductor (435). The dispersed particles intrinsically strengthen the ceramic by reducing the stress concentration at a crack tip and extrinsically strength the ceramic by bridging the crack behind the crack tip. The use of particulates to strengthen ceramic bodies is described in U.S. Prov. Pat. App. No. 61/423,337, filed December 15, 2010, entitled "Particulate Toughened Ceramic Feedthrough," to Kurt J. Koester, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The dispersed particles (440) help prevent the crack from propagating along the interface between the conductor (435) and the surrounding ceramic. In some examples, techniques such as partially transient liquid phase bonding and fully transient liquid phase bonding can be used to create strong bonds between the dispersed particles and the ceramic. In some examples, the particles may also employ or activate self-healing chemistry to mitigate crack propagation.
[0034] One example of partially transient liquid phase bonding is the use of platinum particles coated with niobium embedded in the ceramic matrix. The platinum has a high melting point and the niobium has a lower melting point. During processing, the niobium melts and forms a liquid phase of a niobium/platinum alloy on the surface of the platinum. This liquid phase wets the ceramic and creates a strong bond between the ceramic and the platinum particle. The niobium then rapidly diffuses from the surface of the platinum into the platinum particle. This changes the composition of the liquid phase and raises its melting point. Consequently, the liquid phase solidifies after a short period of time. Niobium is just one example of an additive that can be used at grain boundaries between the ductile particles and the ceramic matrix. A variety of other additives could be used.
[0035] Fig. 4D shows diversion planes (413) that are parallel to the interior and exterior surfaces of the feedthrough and perpendicular to the conductor (435). When a crack encounters a diversion plane (413) that is perpendicular to its propagation direction, the crack can propagate in either direction along the diversion plane. Two cracks (417, 418) are illustrated in the ceramic feedthrough (422). The trajectories of both cracks (417, 418) are altered by the diversion planes (413). A first crack (417) enters the ceramic body (405) from the left and is diverted into the braze joint (430). A second crack (418) enters the ceramic body (405) from the right surface and propagates toward the conductor (435). However, it may not be desirable for the crack (418) to actually encounter the conductor (435). To prevent this, a concentration of ductile particulates (440) is formed around the conductor (435). As discussed above, the dispersed particles can strengthen the ceramic by reducing the stress concentration at a crack tip and extrinsically strengthen the ceramic by bridging the crack behind the crack tip. Consequently, the growth of the crack (418) can be arrested by the particles (440) before encountering the conductor (435). [0036] Fig. 4E is a perspective view of a portion of a feedthrough (470) with a number of parallel diversion planes (410) that are configured as a crack divider. Crack dividers increase the toughness of a ceramic or glass material by incorporating a number of diversion planes that divide the crack and energy driving the crack. Orienting the diversion planes out of the plane of maximum driving force (415) causes an increase in the toughness of the material even if the diversion planes are weaker than the ceramic matrix. In this example, the diversion planes are oriented substantially perpendicular to a free face of the feedthrough If the crack rotates and is deflected into a diversion plane then it must grow with diminished driving force. Because the crack is propagating outside of the plane of maximum driving force for crack propagation, only a fraction of the total driving force is then available to further the crack growth. If the crack does not deflect then it must continue to grow on the higher toughness path where it is divided into multiple sub-cracks (472) by the parallel diversion planes (410). As the crack (415) is divided into many separate sub-cracks (472), the amount of driving force available to advance a given sub-crack (472) is substantially diminished. The smaller driving forces significantly reduce the likelihood that any sub-crack (472) will continue to advance. Consequently, a crack divider can significantly increase the fracture toughness of the feedthrough (470).
[0037] According to one illustrative example, the diversion planes (410) are oriented in the X-Z plane while the plane of maximum driving force is oriented in the X-Y plane. As discussed above, the diversion planes (410) tend to rotate portions of a crack from the X-Y plane to the X-Z plane and/or divide the crack front.
[0038] Fig. 4F shows a portion of a feedthrough (480) that has a number of diversion planes (410) in a crack arrestor configuration. In a crack arrestor configuration, the diversion planes (410) are oriented orthogonally to the plane of maximum driving force (415). As the crack (482) generated by the driving force (415) moves through the ceramic matrix, (405) it repeatedly encounters perpendicular diversion planes. The crack has a tendency to be diverted either up or down by the perpendicular diversion planes. This impedes the crack grown and toughens the feedthrough.
[0039] To most effectively use crack dividers and diversion planes, they should be placed within the ceramic matrix at appropriate locations and orientations. Determining the most effective placement of crack dividers and diversion planes can be difficult for a number of reasons. In many ceramic applications, any type or orientation of cracking can result in failure. For example, a crack propagating in any direction through a ceramic turbine blade can compromises the function of the blade, the turbine, and the aircraft. Similarly, a crack through a ceramic bone prosthesis in any direction could compromise the health and function of the user of the prosthesis.
[0040] Additionally, the orientation of the plane of maximum driving force is not typically known in advance. For example, the plane of maximum driving force created by an impact event is not known until the impact event occurs. The plane of maximum driving force would typically vary from event to event. Consequently, prior knowledge of the plane of maximum driving force cannot typically be relied on to determine the most advantageous configuration of the diversion planes or crack divider.
[0041] The inventor has recognized several characteristics of ceramic feedthroughs that can be used to help determine locations and orientations of diversion planes and crack dividers that provide an advantage in reducing crack propagation. First, the ceramic feedthroughs maintain their hermetic integrity as long as a crack does not propagate from an exterior side of the feedthrough to the interior side of the feedthrough or vice versa. Further, ceramic feedthroughs are typically bounded around a perimeter by a much more crack resistant body. As discussed above, a ceramic feedthrough may be brazed into an aperture of a titanium case. The braze material and titanium surround the ceramic feedthrough around a perimeter surface of the ceramic feedthrough. The sides of the ceramic that are bonded to the titanium case are typically much less prone to cracking. Consequently, one crack propagation direction between the interior and exterior surfaces can be more important to guard against than other directions. [0042] The analysis given above is only an example of principles that may be used to select orientation, location, and configuration of diversion planes in ceramic feedthroughs. A variety of other configurations, principles, and methods can be used to determine the most advantageous configuration for a given ceramic body. For example, if a critical plane of maximum driving force can be estimated from the operating environment, the configuration of the diversion planes can be readily determined. Additionally, numerical modeling, such as finite element analysis and Monte Carlo simulations could be used to fine tune the designs.
[0043] The diversion planes can be any plane of differential toughness. For example, the principle of diverting crack propagation works both with "planes of weakness" as well as "planes of strength." Planes of weakness may be formed in a number of ways, including forming a plane of weaker material within a stronger material or forming an interface between two materials that has is relatively weak compared to the surrounding materials. For example, an interface may be formed with a controlled number of defects. These planes of weakness actually increase the overall toughness of the feedthrough because they deflect the trajectory of the crack propagation. When a crack is deflected, the driving force is decreased and the crack is directed toward an edge of the feedthrough where the crack can be terminated by the surrounding metal.
[0044] A plane of strength may be a strong material or a strong interface that is relatively resistant to crack propagation. As a crack approaches the plane of strength, it can either penetrate the plane or be deflected. In either case, the crack propagation is mitigated. For example, silicon nitride planes may be formed in an alumina matrix. Because silicon nitride is approximately 50% tougher than alumina, the silicon nitride forms planes of strength that can be used to preferentially direct crack trajectories.
[0045] In some examples, the orientation of the diversion planes may be selected based on the relative strength or weakness of the diversion plane. For example, a plane of weakness may be perpendicular to a preferred crack propagation direction. For crack to have the same propensity to travel along the perpendicular plane of weakness as to continue through the ceramic matrix, the plane of weakness will have a fracture toughness that is approximately half the fracture toughness of the matrix. For angles that are closer to the preferred crack propagation direction, the plane of weakness can have higher fracture toughness while still influencing the crack propagation trajectory.
[0046] Figs. 5A and 5B show illustrative steps for forming a multilayer ceramic feedthrough with enhanced toughness. In a first step, a green ceramic body (502) is formed (step 500). The green ceramic body (502) may be a ceramic tape and may be deposited in a number of ways. For example, casting, extrusion, stamping, rolling, or other processes could be used to form the ceramic tape.
[0047] A second layer or coating (507) is deposited over the green ceramic body (502) (step 505). The coating can be deposited using a variety of coating techniques, including gravure, flexographic, screen printing, knife, roll, curtain, spray, brush, dip, or other suitable coating technique. The resulting green body (502, 507) is then diced as shown by dotted lines (513) (step 510). The diced sections are then stacked into a multilayer assembly (517) (step 515). The conductors (524) are then sandwiched between the multilayer assemblies to form electrical feedthrough assemblies (521 , 522) (step 520). The electrical assemblies (521 , 522) are fired to densify the green ceramic layers and produce electrical feedthroughs (526, 527) with enhanced toughness (step 525).
[0048] Figs. 5A and 5B show only one illustrative method for producing electrical feedthroughs with enhanced toughness. A variety of other methods could be used. For example, a multilayer green ceramic structure could be built and then diced into the desired segments. The dicing could occur before or after firing the multilayer structure. Additionally, the layers could be oriented in a number of different ways. It should be noted that it is possible to build a multilayer structure and then dice it into the desired size. It is possible to orient the multilayered structure in a number of ways to obtain the desired geometry. In Fig. 5A, only two orientations are shown, but it is possible to have a combination of these orientations or intermediate orientations. Further, the multilayers may be "capped" with a desired material by using or skipping a final coating process. [0049] In sum, the toughness of ceramic materials used for feedthroughs can be improved by creating functional microstructures. These microstructures can include multiple layers to influence the direction of crack propagation and suppress hermetic failures. The individual layers in the multilayer stacks will have different fracture resistances and the resulting diversion planes can be oriented advantageously to deflect cracks and prevent hermetic failures.
[0050] The preceding description has been presented only to illustrate and describe embodiments and examples of the principles described. This description is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit these principles to any precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching.

Claims

CLAIMS WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1 . A hermetic feedthrough assembly comprising:
a ceramic body having an exterior surface and an interior surface and being joined around a perimeter surface to a hermetic case, the ceramic body comprising:
a ceramic matrix; and
a diversion plane disposed within the ceramic matrix, the orientation of the diversion plane being selected to increase resistance of the ceramic matrix to crack propagation from the exterior surface to the interior surface and vice versa; and
a plurality of electrical conductors passing through the ceramic body from the exterior surface to the interior surface.
2. The assembly of claim 1 , in which the diversion plane is configured to influence the trajectory of a crack passing through the ceramic body.
3. The assembly according to any of the above claims, in which the diversion plane is not substantially parallel to the path of the electrical conductors passing through the ceramic body.
4. The assembly according to any of the above claims, in which the diversion plane is angularly oriented within the ceramic matrix to direct a crack away from the electrical conductors.
5. The assembly according to any of the above claims, in which the ceramic body is brazed into an aperture in the hermetic case with a ductile braze material, the diversion plane being angularly oriented to direct a crack to the ductile braze material.
6. The assembly according to any of the above claims, in which the diversion plane is a plane of weakness which strengthens the ceramic by diverting the crack away from a plane of maximum driving force.
7. The assembly according to any of the above claims, further comprising a plurality of diversion planes configured as a crack divider that divides a propagating crack into multiple cracks and reorients the multiple cracks out of a plane of maximum driving force.
8. The assembly of claim 7, in which the diversion planes are oriented substantially parallel to a free face of the feedthrough.
9. The assembly of claim 7, in which the diversion planes are oriented substantially perpendicular to a free face of the feedthrough.
10. The assembly according to any of the above claims, in which a portion of the ceramic matrix comprises ductile particulates.
1 1. The assembly of claim 10, in which the ductile particulates comprise platinum with a niobium coating.
12. The assembly of claim 1 1 , in which the ductile particulates are bonded to the ceramic matrix by a partially transient liquid phase bond.
13. The assembly according to any of the above claims, in which the diversion planes have greater fracture toughness than the matrix.
14. A feedthrough for an implanted electronic device comprising a ceramic body hermetically joined to a metallic case around a perimeter of the ceramic body, the ceramic body comprising a ceramic matrix with diversion planes oriented to selectively direct crack propagation trajectories toward the perimeter of the ceramic body.
15. A method for forming a multilayer ceramic feedthrough with enhanced toughness comprising:
forming a green ceramic body;
depositing a coating over the green ceramic body;
dicing the green ceramic body and coating to form diced sections;
stacking the diced sections to form a multilayer assembly;
sandwiching the conductors between the multilayer assemblies to form the multilayer ceramic feedthrough; and
firing the multilayer ceramic feedthrough.
PCT/US2011/064821 2010-12-15 2011-12-14 Crack diversion planes in ceramic feedthroughs WO2012082848A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US42333710P 2010-12-15 2010-12-15
US61/423,337 2010-12-15

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2012082848A1 true WO2012082848A1 (en) 2012-06-21

Family

ID=45446227

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2011/064821 WO2012082848A1 (en) 2010-12-15 2011-12-14 Crack diversion planes in ceramic feedthroughs

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2012082848A1 (en)

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4816621A (en) * 1986-11-28 1989-03-28 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Ceramic-metal feedthrough lead assembly and method for making same
WO1989008088A1 (en) * 1988-02-26 1989-09-08 Allied-Signal Inc. Fully dense alumina ceramic composite reinforced by surface-zirconated alumina fibers
US6414835B1 (en) * 2000-03-01 2002-07-02 Medtronic, Inc. Capacitive filtered feedthrough array for an implantable medical device
US20030062111A1 (en) * 2001-09-28 2003-04-03 Yoichi Moriya Method of manufacturing glass ceramic multilayer substrate
US20050097892A1 (en) * 2003-11-07 2005-05-12 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for arresting a crack within a body

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4816621A (en) * 1986-11-28 1989-03-28 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Ceramic-metal feedthrough lead assembly and method for making same
WO1989008088A1 (en) * 1988-02-26 1989-09-08 Allied-Signal Inc. Fully dense alumina ceramic composite reinforced by surface-zirconated alumina fibers
US6414835B1 (en) * 2000-03-01 2002-07-02 Medtronic, Inc. Capacitive filtered feedthrough array for an implantable medical device
US20030062111A1 (en) * 2001-09-28 2003-04-03 Yoichi Moriya Method of manufacturing glass ceramic multilayer substrate
US20050097892A1 (en) * 2003-11-07 2005-05-12 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for arresting a crack within a body

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9289616B2 (en) Particulate toughened ceramic feedthrough
US10500402B2 (en) Hermetically sealed feedthrough with co-fired filled via and conductive insert for an active implantable medical device
US10418798B2 (en) Welded feedthrough
EP2739420B1 (en) Hermetic feedthrough
US8763245B1 (en) Hermetic feedthrough assembly for ceramic body
US10559409B2 (en) Process for manufacturing a leadless feedthrough for an active implantable medical device
EP2739349B1 (en) Insulator for a feedthrough
US11344734B2 (en) Filtered feedthrough assembly having a capacitor ground metallization electrically connected to the gold braze portion sealing a ferrule peninsula to a matching insulator cutout
US20130230424A1 (en) Injection molded ferrule for cofired feedthroughs
EP2739348B1 (en) Feedthrough configured for interconnect
EP2617461A1 (en) Co-fired hermetically sealed feedthrough with alumina substrate and platinum filled via for an active implantable medical device
US20070060970A1 (en) Miniaturized co-fired electrical interconnects for implantable medical devices
US8872035B2 (en) Hermetic feedthrough
US20140151114A1 (en) Insulator for a feedthrough
US11351387B2 (en) Method of manufacturing a singulated feedthrough insulator for a hermetic seal of an active implantable medical device incorporating a post conductive paste filled pressing step
US20200121935A1 (en) Method for providing a hermetically sealed feedthrough with co-fired filled via for an active implantable medical device
WO2012082848A1 (en) Crack diversion planes in ceramic feedthroughs
WO2012082901A2 (en) Structured interfaces in electrical feedthroughs
US10010396B2 (en) Multilayer composite materials vias
EP3449973B1 (en) Hermetically sealed filtered feedthrough assembly
New Method for Fabrication of High-Density Hermetic
EP3069759A1 (en) Implantable electromedical device with a feedthrough having a single piece polymeric base body

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 11805331

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 11805331

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1