WO2012061701A4 - Spell-check for a keyboard system with automatic correction - Google Patents

Spell-check for a keyboard system with automatic correction Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2012061701A4
WO2012061701A4 PCT/US2011/059319 US2011059319W WO2012061701A4 WO 2012061701 A4 WO2012061701 A4 WO 2012061701A4 US 2011059319 W US2011059319 W US 2011059319W WO 2012061701 A4 WO2012061701 A4 WO 2012061701A4
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
keys
key
edit
candidate
penalty
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2011/059319
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2012061701A8 (en
WO2012061701A1 (en
Inventor
Erland Unruh
Original Assignee
Nuance Communications, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US12/939,918 external-priority patent/US8225203B2/en
Application filed by Nuance Communications, Inc. filed Critical Nuance Communications, Inc.
Priority to EP11838871.9A priority Critical patent/EP2636149A4/en
Priority to CN201180064099.6A priority patent/CN103299550B/en
Priority to KR1020137014217A priority patent/KR101520455B1/en
Publication of WO2012061701A1 publication Critical patent/WO2012061701A1/en
Publication of WO2012061701A4 publication Critical patent/WO2012061701A4/en
Publication of WO2012061701A8 publication Critical patent/WO2012061701A8/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/01Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
    • G06F3/02Input arrangements using manually operated switches, e.g. using keyboards or dials
    • G06F3/023Arrangements for converting discrete items of information into a coded form, e.g. arrangements for interpreting keyboard generated codes as alphanumeric codes, operand codes or instruction codes
    • G06F3/0233Character input methods
    • G06F3/0237Character input methods using prediction or retrieval techniques
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/01Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
    • G06F3/03Arrangements for converting the position or the displacement of a member into a coded form
    • G06F3/041Digitisers, e.g. for touch screens or touch pads, characterised by the transducing means
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/01Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
    • G06F3/048Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI]
    • G06F3/0487Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI] using specific features provided by the input device, e.g. functions controlled by the rotation of a mouse with dual sensing arrangements, or of the nature of the input device, e.g. tap gestures based on pressure sensed by a digitiser
    • G06F3/0488Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI] using specific features provided by the input device, e.g. functions controlled by the rotation of a mouse with dual sensing arrangements, or of the nature of the input device, e.g. tap gestures based on pressure sensed by a digitiser using a touch-screen or digitiser, e.g. input of commands through traced gestures
    • G06F3/04886Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI] using specific features provided by the input device, e.g. functions controlled by the rotation of a mouse with dual sensing arrangements, or of the nature of the input device, e.g. tap gestures based on pressure sensed by a digitiser using a touch-screen or digitiser, e.g. input of commands through traced gestures by partitioning the display area of the touch-screen or the surface of the digitising tablet into independently controllable areas, e.g. virtual keyboards or menus
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F40/00Handling natural language data
    • G06F40/20Natural language analysis
    • G06F40/232Orthographic correction, e.g. spell checking or vowelisation

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Machine Translation (AREA)
  • Document Processing Apparatus (AREA)
  • Input From Keyboards Or The Like (AREA)

Abstract

User input is received, specifying a continuous traced path across a keyboard presented on a touch sensitive display. An input sequence is resolved. Including traced keys and auxiliary keys proximate to the traced keys by prescribed criteria. For each of one or more candidate entries of a prescribed vocabulary, a set-edit-dlstance metric is computed between said input sequence and the candidate entry. Various rules specify when penalties are imposed, or not, in computing the set-edit-distance metric. Candidate entries are ranked and displayed according to the computed metric.

Claims

AMENDED CLAIMS
received by the International Bureau on 17 May 2012 (17.05.2012)
1 . A text input apparatus, comprising:
a display including a touch sensitive display surface;
digital data storage containing a vocabulary database including multiple
vocabulary entries; and
coupled to the display and the storage, a processor programmed to perform operations comprising:
directing the display to show an arrangement of keys, each key
representing one or more characters;
via the display surface, receiving user input from a single touch to said display surface, said user input comprising a single continuous trace contacting multiple of the keys in an order, including a start key, an end key, and any intervening keys between the start key and the end key, where the single continuous trace disappears when the single touch is lifted;
defining an input sequence including the contacted keys and also
including any auxiliary keys comprising keys exhibiting prescribed proximity to the contacted keys;
comparing the input sequence to candidate entries from the vocabulary, including the following operations for each candidate entry:
computing a set-edit-distance metric to calculate a matching metric between said input sequence and the candidate entry; where:
the set-edit-distance computation imposes a penalty for omitting from the candidate word all keys from a first group comprising the start key and auxiliary keys to the start key; the set-edit-distance computation imposes a penalty for omitting from the candidate word all keys from a second group comprising the end key and auxiliary keys to the end key; the set-edit-distance computation imposes a penalty for omitting from the candidate word all keys from a third group
58 comprising any contacted keys and their auxiliaries where at least a prescribed minimum change in direction of the trace occurs;
the set-edit-distance computation does not impose any penalty for omitting from the candidate word any key of the input sequence outside all of the first, second, and third groups; and
the set-edit-distance computation does not impose any penalty for using any key in the input sequence twice or more in succession in the candidate word; and
ranking the candidate words according to criteria including at least the computed set-edit-distance metric, and providing an output of at least some of the ranked candidate words.
The apparatus of claim 1 , where:
the set-edit-distance computation does not impose any penalty for a
candidate word including characters of a prescribed group comprising any of: punctuation, digits, and symbols.
The apparatus of claim 1 , where:
the operations further include computing a keyboard-geometry-based probability in association with each computed set-edit-distance metric;
using the computed probability to break ties between similarly ranked candidate words.
4. The apparatus of claim 3 , where:
for each of the intervening keys, the keyboard-geometry-based probability is reduced according to speed at which the traced passed over the intervening key.
59 The apparatus of claim 3 , where:
the keyboard-geometry-based probability of a given key varies with radius of the key from a point on the trace.
The apparatus of claim 3 , where:
the keyboard-geometry-based probability of a given key varies according to area of the given key intersecting a prescribed rectangular touch area centered upon a contacted key nearest to the given key.
The apparatus of claim l , where:
the ranking operation is conducted so as to rank candidate words
according criteria including the set-edit-distance metric and a language-model-based probability.
The apparatus of claim l , where the operations further include:
tracking free cost adds and deletes and using the tracked free cost adds and deletes to break ties between similarly ranked candidate words.
The apparatus of claim l , where the operations further include:
computing stem-edit-distance and using the computed stem-edit-distance to break ties between similarly ranked candidate words.
10. A method, comprising operations of:
directing a display to show an arrangement of keys, each key representing one or more characters, where the display includes a touch sensitive surface; via the display surface, receiving user input from a single touch to said display surface, said user input comprising a single continuous trace contacting multiple of the keys in an order, including a start key, an end key, and any intervening keys between the start key and the end key, where the single continuous trace disappears when the single touch is lifted;
60 defining an input sequence including the contacted keys and also including any auxiliary keys comprising keys exhibiting prescribed proximity to the contacted keys;
comparing the input sequence to candidate entries from a vocabulary containing multiple vocabulary entries, the comparing operation including the following operations for each candidate entry: computing a set-edit- distance metric to calculate a matching metric between said input sequence and the candidate entry;
where:
the set-edit-distance computation imposes a penalty for omitting from the candidate word all keys from a first group comprising the start key and auxiliary keys to the start key;
the set-edit-distance computation imposes a penalty for omitting from the candidate word all keys from a second group comprising the end key and auxiliary keys to the end key;
the set-edit-distance computation imposes a penalty for omitting from the candidate word all keys from a third group comprising any contacted keys and their auxiliaries where at least a prescribed minimum change in direction of the trace occurs;
the set-edit-distance computation does not impose any penalty for
omitting from the candidate word any key of the input sequence outside all of the first, second, and third groups; and the set-edit-distance computation does not impose any penalty for using any key in the input sequence twice or more in succession in the candidate word; and
ranking the candidate words according to criteria including at least the computed set-edit-distance metric, and providing an output of at least some of the ranked candidate words;
where at least one of the operations is performed by a processor.
1 1 . The method of claim 10, where: the set-edit-distance computation does not impose any penalty for a candidate word including characters of a prescribed group comprising any of: punctuation, digits, and symbols.
12. The method of claim 10, where:
the operations further include computing a keyboard-geometry-based probability in association with each computed set-edit-distance metric;
using the computed probability to break ties between similarly ranked candidate words.
13. The method of claim 12, where:
for each of the intervening keys, the keyboard-geometry-based probability is reduced according to speed at which the trace passed over the intervening key.
14. The method of claim 12, where:
the keyboard-geometry-based probability of a given key varies with radius of the key from a point on the trace.
15. The method of claim 12, where:
the keyboard-geometry-based probability of a given key varies according to area of the given key intersecting a prescribed rectangular touch area centered upon a contacted key nearest to the given key.
16. The method of claim 10, where:
the ranking operation is conducted so as to rank candidate words
according to criteria including set-edit-distance metric and a language-model-based probability.
17. The method of claim 10, where the operations further include: tracking free cost adds and deletes and using the tracked free cost adds and deletes to break ties between similarly ranked candidate words.
18. The method of claim 10, where the operations further include:
computing stem-edit-distance and using the computed stem-edit-distance to break ties between similarly ranked candidate words.
19. An article of manufacture comprising at least one medium of digital data storage containing non-transitory storage of a program executable by a processor to perform the operations of claim 10.
20. A method, comprising operations of:
receiving user input from a single touch to said display surface, said user input, said user input specifying a continuous traced path across a keyboard presented on a touch sensitive display, where the continuous traced path disappears when the single touch is lifted;
resolving an input sequence of traced keys and auxiliary keys proximate to the traced keys by prescribed criteria;
for each of one or more candidate entries of a prescribed vocabulary, computing a set-edit-distance metric between said input sequence and the candidate entry;
where:
the set-edit-distance computation imposes a penalty for omitting from the candidate entry all keys from a first group comprising a start key of the path and auxiliary keys to the start key;
the set-edit-distance computation imposes a penalty for omitting from the candidate entry all keys from a second group comprising an end key of the path and auxiliary keys to the end key;
the set-edit-distance computation imposes a penalty for omitting from the candidate entry all keys from a third group comprising any traced
63 keys and their auxiliaries where at least a prescribed minimum change in direction of the path occurs;
the set-edit-distance computation does not impose any penalty for
omitting from the candidate entry any key of the input sequence outside all of the first, second, and third groups; and
the set-edit-distance computation does not impose any penalty the
candidate entry using any key in the input sequence twice or more in succession; and
ranking candidate entries according to the computed set-edit-distance metrics, and displaying an output of some or all of the ranked candidate entries; where at least one of the operations is performed by a processor.
21 . An apparatus comprising a touch sensitive display coupled to a processor, the processor programmed to perform operations of claim 20.
22. An article of manufacture comprising at least one medium of digital data storage containing non-transitory storage of a program executable by a processor to perform the operations of claim 20.
23. An apparatus, comprising:
a display;
a user input device comprising a keypad of multiple keys, or a touch
sensitive display surface;
digital data storage containing a vocabulary database including multiple vocabulary entries; and
coupled to the display, the user input, and the storage, a processor
programmed to perform operations comprising:
via the user input device, receiving user input from a single touch to said display surface, said user input comprising a sequence of keys comprising one of the following: keys contacted and proximate to a continuous trace entered via touch sensitive
64 display surface, where the continuous trace disappears when the single touch is lifted, or pressed keypad keys where one or more of the pressed keypad keys concurrently represents multiple characters;
identifying different candidate words each representing a
combination of characters potentially represented by the sequence of keys;
comparing the candidate words to entries of the vocabu lary to score the compared vocabulary entries accordingly to likelihood of representing the user input; and
where the comparing operation avoids penalizing any vocabulary entry that includes any of the following that is not present in the input sequence: punctuation, symbols, digits, repetition of any character represented on a key of the user input, use of multiple characters represented together on one key of the user input.
65
PCT/US2011/059319 2010-11-04 2011-11-04 Spell-check for a keyboard system with automatic correction WO2012061701A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP11838871.9A EP2636149A4 (en) 2010-11-04 2011-11-04 Spell-check for a keyboard system with automatic correction
CN201180064099.6A CN103299550B (en) 2010-11-04 2011-11-04 For having the spell check of the keyboard system of automatic calibration
KR1020137014217A KR101520455B1 (en) 2010-11-04 2011-11-04 Spell-check for a keyboard system with automatic correction

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/939,916 2010-11-04
US12/939,918 US8225203B2 (en) 2007-02-01 2010-11-04 Spell-check for a keyboard system with automatic correction
US12/939,918 2010-11-04

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2012061701A1 WO2012061701A1 (en) 2012-05-10
WO2012061701A4 true WO2012061701A4 (en) 2012-07-05
WO2012061701A8 WO2012061701A8 (en) 2013-06-06

Family

ID=46024844

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2011/059319 WO2012061701A1 (en) 2010-11-04 2011-11-04 Spell-check for a keyboard system with automatic correction

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2636149A4 (en)
KR (1) KR101520455B1 (en)
CN (1) CN103299550B (en)
WO (1) WO2012061701A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU2013204311B2 (en) 2012-05-30 2016-09-29 Chomley Consulting Pty. Ltd Methods, Controllers and Devices for Assembling a Word
US8843845B2 (en) 2012-10-16 2014-09-23 Google Inc. Multi-gesture text input prediction
US8832589B2 (en) 2013-01-15 2014-09-09 Google Inc. Touch keyboard using language and spatial models
JP6548358B2 (en) 2014-04-04 2019-07-24 タッチタイプ リミテッド System and method for inputting one or more inputs associated with a multi-input target
US11762989B2 (en) 2015-06-05 2023-09-19 Bottomline Technologies Inc. Securing electronic data by automatically destroying misdirected transmissions
US20170163664A1 (en) 2015-12-04 2017-06-08 Bottomline Technologies (De) Inc. Method to secure protected content on a mobile device
US10235356B2 (en) * 2016-06-03 2019-03-19 Bottomline Technologies (De), Inc. Dual authentication method for identifying non-exactly matching text
US11163955B2 (en) 2016-06-03 2021-11-02 Bottomline Technologies, Inc. Identifying non-exactly matching text
KR101858999B1 (en) * 2016-11-28 2018-05-17 (주)헤르메시스 Apparatus for correcting input of virtual keyboard, and method thereof
CN109725737B (en) * 2017-10-31 2022-10-25 北京金山安全软件有限公司 Information display method, device and system
CN109033065A (en) * 2018-06-01 2018-12-18 昆明理工大学 A kind of English- word spelling inspection method
US10955934B2 (en) * 2018-09-05 2021-03-23 Apple Inc. Remote capacitive interface
US11416713B1 (en) 2019-03-18 2022-08-16 Bottomline Technologies, Inc. Distributed predictive analytics data set
US11042555B1 (en) 2019-06-28 2021-06-22 Bottomline Technologies, Inc. Two step algorithm for non-exact matching of large datasets
US11269841B1 (en) 2019-10-17 2022-03-08 Bottomline Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for non-exact matching of addresses
US11763278B2 (en) 2020-03-13 2023-09-19 Bottomline Technologies, Inc. Deposit token service system, apparatus and method
US11449870B2 (en) 2020-08-05 2022-09-20 Bottomline Technologies Ltd. Fraud detection rule optimization
US11694276B1 (en) 2021-08-27 2023-07-04 Bottomline Technologies, Inc. Process for automatically matching datasets
US11544798B1 (en) 2021-08-27 2023-01-03 Bottomline Technologies, Inc. Interactive animated user interface of a step-wise visual path of circles across a line for invoice management

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050120870A1 (en) * 1998-05-15 2005-06-09 Ludwig Lester F. Envelope-controlled dynamic layering of audio signal processing and synthesis for music applications
CA2392446C (en) * 1999-05-27 2009-07-14 America Online Incorporated Keyboard system with automatic correction
US7030863B2 (en) * 2000-05-26 2006-04-18 America Online, Incorporated Virtual keyboard system with automatic correction
US7382358B2 (en) * 2003-01-16 2008-06-03 Forword Input, Inc. System and method for continuous stroke word-based text input
US7098896B2 (en) * 2003-01-16 2006-08-29 Forword Input Inc. System and method for continuous stroke word-based text input
US8201087B2 (en) * 2007-02-01 2012-06-12 Tegic Communications, Inc. Spell-check for a keyboard system with automatic correction
US7911944B2 (en) * 2007-12-26 2011-03-22 Nortel Networks Limited Tie-breaking in shortest path determination
GB0905457D0 (en) * 2009-03-30 2009-05-13 Touchtype Ltd System and method for inputting text into electronic devices

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN103299550B (en) 2015-12-09
KR20130107325A (en) 2013-10-01
KR101520455B1 (en) 2015-05-21
WO2012061701A8 (en) 2013-06-06
EP2636149A4 (en) 2016-10-05
CN103299550A (en) 2013-09-11
EP2636149A1 (en) 2013-09-11
WO2012061701A1 (en) 2012-05-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2012061701A4 (en) Spell-check for a keyboard system with automatic correction
US9785630B2 (en) Text prediction using combined word N-gram and unigram language models
US11334717B2 (en) Touch keyboard using a trained model
Arif et al. Analysis of text entry performance metrics
US10489508B2 (en) Incremental multi-word recognition
CN103649876B (en) Performing actions on a computing device using a contextual keyboard
US9552080B2 (en) Incremental feature-based gesture-keyboard decoding
KR102078785B1 (en) Virtual keyboard input for international languages
US8713464B2 (en) System and method for text input with a multi-touch screen
US20110201387A1 (en) Real-time typing assistance
US20120324391A1 (en) Predictive word completion
US20130046777A1 (en) Enhanced query suggestions in autosuggest with corresponding relevant data
US9342565B1 (en) Variable query generation
US9547639B2 (en) Typing error correction method and device implementing the same method
US9009624B2 (en) Keyboard gestures for character string replacement
JP6507541B2 (en) INFORMATION DISPLAY DEVICE, INFORMATION DISPLAY PROGRAM, AND INFORMATION DISPLAY METHOD
Alnfiai et al. An evaluation of the brailleenter keyboard: an input method based on braille patterns for touchscreen devices
CN105095924A (en) Handwriting recognition method and device
US8639494B1 (en) Technique for correcting user-interface shift errors
Alharbi et al. The effects of predictive features of mobile keyboards on text entry speed and errors
CN105807939A (en) Electronic equipment and method for improving keyboard input rate
CN111665956B (en) Candidate character string processing method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
WO2012159245A1 (en) Displaying key pinyins
CN112882680A (en) Voice recognition method and device
Sandnes Directional bias in scrolling tasks: A study of users' scrolling behaviour using a mobile text-entry strategy

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 11838871

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2011838871

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase in:

Ref country code: DE

ENP Entry into the national phase in:

Ref document number: 20137014217

Country of ref document: KR

Kind code of ref document: A