WO2012047657A2 - Ceramic-ceramic composites and process therefor, nuclear fuels formed thereby, and nuclear reactor systems and processes operated therewith - Google Patents

Ceramic-ceramic composites and process therefor, nuclear fuels formed thereby, and nuclear reactor systems and processes operated therewith Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2012047657A2
WO2012047657A2 PCT/US2011/053473 US2011053473W WO2012047657A2 WO 2012047657 A2 WO2012047657 A2 WO 2012047657A2 US 2011053473 W US2011053473 W US 2011053473W WO 2012047657 A2 WO2012047657 A2 WO 2012047657A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
ceramic material
particles
ceramic
process according
beo
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2011/053473
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2012047657A3 (en
Inventor
Alvin A. Solomon
Huthavahana S. Kuchibhotla
Shripad T. Revankar
Sean Marshall Mcdeavitt
Jean Concetto Ragusa
Original Assignee
Purdue Research Foundation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Purdue Research Foundation filed Critical Purdue Research Foundation
Priority to KR1020137010808A priority Critical patent/KR20130079565A/en
Priority to EP11831301.4A priority patent/EP2622607A4/en
Priority to CN2011800462679A priority patent/CN103299375A/en
Publication of WO2012047657A2 publication Critical patent/WO2012047657A2/en
Publication of WO2012047657A3 publication Critical patent/WO2012047657A3/en
Priority to US13/849,117 priority patent/US9466398B2/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G21NUCLEAR PHYSICS; NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
    • G21CNUCLEAR REACTORS
    • G21C3/00Reactor fuel elements and their assemblies; Selection of substances for use as reactor fuel elements
    • G21C3/42Selection of substances for use as reactor fuel
    • G21C3/58Solid reactor fuel Pellets made of fissile material
    • G21C3/62Ceramic fuel
    • G21C3/64Ceramic dispersion fuel, e.g. cermet
    • GPHYSICS
    • G21NUCLEAR PHYSICS; NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
    • G21FPROTECTION AGAINST X-RADIATION, GAMMA RADIATION, CORPUSCULAR RADIATION OR PARTICLE BOMBARDMENT; TREATING RADIOACTIVELY CONTAMINATED MATERIAL; DECONTAMINATION ARRANGEMENTS THEREFOR
    • G21F1/00Shielding characterised by the composition of the materials
    • G21F1/02Selection of uniform shielding materials
    • G21F1/06Ceramics; Glasses; Refractories
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B35/00Shaped ceramic products characterised by their composition; Ceramics compositions; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products
    • C04B35/51Shaped ceramic products characterised by their composition; Ceramics compositions; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products based on compounds of actinides
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B35/00Shaped ceramic products characterised by their composition; Ceramics compositions; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products
    • C04B35/622Forming processes; Processing powders of inorganic compounds preparatory to the manufacturing of ceramic products
    • C04B35/626Preparing or treating the powders individually or as batches ; preparing or treating macroscopic reinforcing agents for ceramic products, e.g. fibres; mechanical aspects section B
    • C04B35/62605Treating the starting powders individually or as mixtures
    • C04B35/6261Milling
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B38/00Porous mortars, concrete, artificial stone or ceramic ware; Preparation thereof
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B2111/00Mortars, concrete or artificial stone or mixtures to prepare them, characterised by specific function, property or use
    • C04B2111/00474Uses not provided for elsewhere in C04B2111/00
    • C04B2111/00862Uses not provided for elsewhere in C04B2111/00 for nuclear applications, e.g. ray-absorbing concrete
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B2235/00Aspects relating to ceramic starting mixtures or sintered ceramic products
    • C04B2235/02Composition of constituents of the starting material or of secondary phases of the final product
    • C04B2235/30Constituents and secondary phases not being of a fibrous nature
    • C04B2235/32Metal oxides, mixed metal oxides, or oxide-forming salts thereof, e.g. carbonates, nitrates, (oxy)hydroxides, chlorides
    • C04B2235/3205Alkaline earth oxides or oxide forming salts thereof, e.g. beryllium oxide
    • GPHYSICS
    • G21NUCLEAR PHYSICS; NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
    • G21CNUCLEAR REACTORS
    • G21C21/00Apparatus or processes specially adapted to the manufacture of reactors or parts thereof
    • G21C21/02Manufacture of fuel elements or breeder elements contained in non-active casings
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E30/00Energy generation of nuclear origin
    • Y02E30/30Nuclear fission reactors

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to nuclear power generation materials, systems and processes, and more particularly to the modification of uranium dioxide (UO 2 ) nuclear fuels to increase their thermal conductivity.
  • UO 2 uranium dioxide
  • uranium dioxide has demonstrated many desirable characteristics, it has a relatively low thermal conductivity that leads to the development of a large temperature gradient across the fuel pellet. This temperature gradient and the consequent high centerline temperatures limit the operational performance of a nuclear reactor due to overheating, melting, and effects such as thermal stresses that cause pellet cladding interaction and the release of fission product gases.
  • High fuel temperatures can be decreased and reactor performance improved by developing nuclear fuels having enhanced thermal conductivities.
  • a high thermal conductivity nuclear fuel would decrease fuel temperatures and facilitate a reduction in pellet/cladding interaction through lessening thermal stresses that result in fuel cracking, relocation, and swelling. Additionally, fission gas release could be decreased allowing for higher fuel burn-up, and reactor safety could be improved as a result of faster thermal responses and less stored energy in the fuel pins. Ultimately, higher conductivity may also permit more energy to be generated in the reactor.
  • Ceramic-ceramic (cer-cer) nuclear fuels based on uranium dioxide are also capable of having increased effective thermal conductivities.
  • the additive ceramic In addition to having a higherthermal conductivity than uranium dioxide, the additive ceramic must also be chemically compatible with uranium dioxide and have a comparable melting point.
  • Silicon carbide (SiC) and beryllium oxide (BeO; beryllia) are two high melting point and high conductivity ceramics that have been considered as additives to UO 2 fuels.
  • SiC and UO 2 exhibit chemical interactions at temperatures as low as 1200°C, and rapid reactions occur at about 1400°C.
  • the UO 2 - BeO phase diagram shows that these two ceramic materials exist as solid equilibrium phases below about 2100°C. As such, UO 2 and BeO have been considered to be excellent candidates for fabricating two-phase ceramic nuclear fuels based on U0 2 .
  • BeO has been reported to have thermal conductivities as high as 13.7 kW/m-K (at 45K) and about 370 to about 297 W/m-K (at 300K), which is about 93% that of copper at these temperatures.
  • a high K value coupled with a high melting point and low thermal neutron absorption cross-section suggest that BeO would be an ideal material for the high conductivity phase in a nuclear fuel.
  • BeO is close to being isotopically pure since the only naturally occurring Be isotope is Be- 9 and natural oxygen is 99.8% O 16 .
  • BeO has also been reported to have excellent fission product retention capabilities, and irradiation performance up to certain fast neutron and fission fragment dose or micro-cracking, when used as a ceramic matrix material.
  • a fine particle size in fabricated fuel pellets is desirable in order to avoid micro-cracking as a result of anisotropic radiation-induced swelling that has been reported to occur in BeO ceramics.
  • a discontinuous BeO phase can yield conductivities that are lower by a factor of about two.
  • this prior work required heating the UO 2 fuel above its eutectic temperature of 2100°C, which is a process step that presents many practical problems on an industrial scale.
  • the present invention provides a process for producing ceramic-ceramic composites, including nuclear fuels, and particularly to a process for increasing the thermal conductivity of a nuclear fuel through additions of a second material that exhibits a higher thermal conductivity than the base material of the nuclearfuel.
  • the invention is particularly directed to increasing the thermal conductivity of uranium dioxide-based nuclear fuels through additions of BeO using a process that yields a controlled microstructure in the final multi-phase composite.
  • the process produces a ceramic-ceramic composite and comprises milling a first ceramic material to produce a powder of spheroidized particles of the first ceramic material, and then co-milling particles of a second ceramic material with the spheroidized particles of the first ceramic material to cause the particles of the second ceramic material to form a coating on the spheroidized particles of the first material.
  • the spheroidized particles coated with the particles of the second ceramic material are then compacted and sintered to form the ceramic-ceramic composite in which the second ceramic material forms a continuous phase completely surrounding the spheroidized particles of the first ceramic material.
  • Another aspect of the invention is a nuclear fuel formed by a process comprising the steps described above.
  • a technical effect of the invention is the ability to enhance the thermal conductivity of ceramic nuclear fuels through advances in the science and processing of a ceramic fuel to have a controlled multi-phase microstructure.
  • the present invention is capable of achieving higher thermal conductivities by obtaining microstructures that exhibit high purities in separate U0 2 and BeO phases, as well as a desirable interface structure and contact between the phases. Controlled microstructures in the nuclear fuel are also capable of providing improved fission gas retention and resistance to radiation damage.
  • FIG. 1 is a flow chart describing a UO 2 -BeO matrix fuel fabrication process in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 schematically represents a ball-milling apparatus of a type suitable for performing a self-milling process in accordance with a preferred aspect of the invention.
  • FIG. 3 represents a three-dimensional geometry finite element model (FEM) suitable for performing FEM analysis of UO 2 -BeO nuclear fuels in accordance with a preferred aspect of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a graph that compares results of FEM thermal modeling and actual measured thermal conductivities of U0 2 /BeO nuclear fuels containing about 13.6 wt% BeO.
  • FIG. 5 contains microphotographs of self-milled and sieved U0 2 "green” particles (top image), and the same particles mixed with about 10.8 vol.% of a BeO powder (bottom image).
  • FIG. 6 contains an SEM image of a thermally-etched high density UO 2 - BeO pellet showing an apparently continuous BeO phase surrounding UO 2 particles.
  • FIG. 7 contains an optical microphotograph of a thermally-etched, high density UO 2 -BeO pellet fabricated to contain green UO 2 particles and a continuous BeO phase that is similar to FIG. 6, but further contains UO 2 fragments.
  • the present invention provides advancements in the science and process of producing ceramic nuclearfuels that exhibit relatively high thermal conductivities.
  • the invention involves a process for producing multiphase ceramic-ceramic nuclear fuels, and particularly UO 2 -based nuclear fuels in which BeO is an additive ceramic phase that increases the effective thermal conductivity of the nuclear fuel.
  • Preferred aspects of the invention make use of a three-dimensional (3-D) finite element method (FEM) to thermally model the fuel, by which thermal conductivities can be predicted as a guide to subsequent process optimization.
  • FEM finite element method
  • Other preferred aspects of the invention include a practical fabrication process for producing pellets of the ceramic-ceramic fuel, by which the microstructure of the fuel is produced to have controlled particle size distributions and controlled volume fractions for the different ceramic phases. Compaction and sintering parameters used in the fabrication process can also be optimized using 3- D FEM analysis to control the microstructure of the fuel in order to obtain robust pellets having high thermal conductivities.
  • Sarma et al. considered various variables relating to the production of ceramic-ceramic UO 2 -based nuclearfuels, including material variables such as volume fractions and particle sizes and process variables such as sintering temperatures, pellet pressing pressures for granulation and sintering, granulation and sieving methods, and the use of binders and pore formers.
  • material variables such as volume fractions and particle sizes
  • process variables such as sintering temperatures, pellet pressing pressures for granulation and sintering, granulation and sieving methods, and the use of binders and pore formers.
  • nuclear fuel pellets reported by Sarma et al.
  • the present technology is capable of reducing cross-contamination by controlling the particle size distributions of the primary and additive phases, yielding controlled microstructures that were determined to be key for enhancement of thermal conductivity, as well as material characteristics that promote fission gas retention and resistance to radiation damage.
  • a particular aspect of the invention involves promoting the density of the nuclear fuel material (typically pellets) through the use of a co-sintering process in which sintering or shrinkage rates for the primary and additive phases are substantially equal. From prior sintering experiments performed on BeO and UO 2 powders, it has been observed that when compacted BeO-UO 2 pellets are sintered from the green stage there is a linear shrinkage of about 15.7% and about 18.8% in the BeO and UO 2 particles, respectively, which may lead to cracking and porosity development in the final fuel product.
  • FIG. 1 A preferred process is represented in FIG. 1 for fabricating high density nuclear fuels with desirable microstructures as described above.
  • the process represented in FIG. 1 utilizes self-milling to spheroidize and smooth UO 2 particles and control their particle size distribution, and then subsequently co-milling BeO particles with the spheroidized UO 2 particles prior to compacting (pelletizing) and sintering the mixture in a reducing atmosphere.
  • Spheroidizing of the UO 2 particles is believed to be a key to obtaining a highly sinterable UO 2 powder, and co-milling of the BeO particles and the spheroidized UO 2 particles is believed to be another key for achieving substantially equal sintering or shrinkage rates in BeO-UO 2 composites produced with the BeO and UO 2 particles.
  • the preferred co-milling processes can also be referred to as self-milling processes, in that milling is performed without the use of any extraneous grinding media.
  • parameters that are desired to be controlled include the volume fraction of the BeO particles, the size and size distribution of the UO 2 particles, the uniform coating of the UO 2 particles with the BeO particles, and the time and temperature profiles used during compaction and sintering. Even so, the process is sufficiently uncomplicated to enable scaling up for large-scale commercial systems.
  • FIG. 1 indicates that the UO 2 particles may first be pre-slugged (pelletized (e.g., punch and die compaction) and granulated (e.g., mortar and pestle granulation)) to achieve a desired particle size.
  • This step can be achieved with the aforementioned self-milling process, such as represented in FIG. 2.
  • self- milling refers to the fact that the process is performed without any extraneous grinding media to obtain UO 2 particles with a high degree of smoothness and sphericity.
  • the rotational speed of the mill and time for self-milling is determined based on the desired particle size, smoothness and sphericity.
  • the self-milling process enables the UO 2 particles to be sufficiently spheroidized to a desired size range that can be uniformly coated with a BeO powder, which is believed to be essential to yield a continuous BeO additive phase capable of increasing the thermal conductivity of the UO 2 -based nuclear fuel.
  • Typical self-milling durations are believed to be about six to twelve hours, depending on the particle requirements. Shorter and longer durations are also foreseeable. Suitable rotational speeds for the mill are believed to be about ten to about forty rpm, though higher and lower speeds are foreseeable.
  • Preferred particle sizes for the UO 2 particles are in a range of about 25 to about 500 ⁇ . Notably, smaller grain sizes for the UO 2 particles promotes cross-contamination with the BeO phase. Consequently, the U0 2 particles can be sieved to remove fines, as well as to limit the maximum particle size of the resulting U0 2 powder.
  • a highly pure and sinterable BeO powder having a limited particle size relative to the U0 2 particles is also necessary to achieve a sintering compatibility between the U0 2 and BeO phases that is capable of achieving high densities and reducing cross-contamination.
  • a BeO volume fraction of at least 10 volume percent is believed to be necessary to obtain a continuous BeO phase surrounding all of the UO 2 particles.
  • 3-D FEM analysis indicated that more than 10% volume percent gives better results on continuous BeO phase.
  • Preferred volume fractions for BeO will depend on the level of thermal conductivity desired and neutronic considerations.
  • FIG. 3 represents a three-dimensional finite element method that was employed to model a UO 2 -BeO fuel comprising self-milled UO 2 particles mixed with BeO particles.
  • the three-dimensional model is represented as comprising UO 2 particles with hexagonal shapes, though both hexagonal and octagonal shapes were used to model the UO 2 particles.
  • Octagonal shapes closely approximate the spherical shape of the UO 2 particles produced by a self-milling process.
  • FIG. 4 is a graph that compares results of FEM thermal modeling and actual measured thermal conductivities of UO 2 -BeO nuclear fuels containing about 13.6 wt% BeO. The data plots evidence that 2-D and 3-D models of the UO 2 -BeO material compared well with experimental data.
  • the purity, volume percentage and distribution of the BeO particles in the U0 2 phase are major influences for achieving a uniform and continuous BeO coating capable of obtaining suitable thermal conductivities for the UO 2 -BeOfuel. Finer BeO particles lead to lower open porosity, whereas lower sintered densities and larger open porosities were indicated for presintered particles.
  • an iterative process was employed with 3-D FEM thermal modeling. Volume percentages of BeO were cross-checked with desired neutronic properties for the UO 2 -BeO fuel, as well as actual thermal conductivity measurements and microstructure examinations. Results of thermal property measurements and microstructure analysis were used to refine the thermal models and identify microstructures capable of optimizing the thermal, mechanical, and neutronic properties of a UO 2 -BeO nuclear fuel.
  • a volume fraction of BeO particles identified by the FEM thermal model is then combined with self-milled UO 2 particles, after which the mixture is milled, for example, for a duration of about twenty to about forty minutes, though shorter and longer durations are foreseeable.
  • the resultant mixture can be sieved to remove fines, and then pelletized at pressures preferably within a range of about 150 to about 240MPa. Thereafter, the compacted pellets are sintered, for example, at temperatures ranging from about 1400°C to about 1700°C for time periods varying from about four to about twelve hours in a reducing gas environment.
  • Pellets fabricated in this manner exhibit high sintered densities, preferably in the range of about 93% to about 97% of theoretical and with low open porosities typically in the range of about 3% to about 5% by volume.
  • the volume of the interstitial spaces between UO 2 particles that are filled with BeO particles and the thickness of the continuous BeO phase will depend on the UO 2 particle size and the volume percent and size of the BeO particles.
  • FIG. 5 contains microphotographs of self-milled and sieved UO 2 "green" particles (top image) and the same particles mixed with about 10.8 vol.% of a BeO powder (bottom image).
  • FIG. 5 indicates that the BeO powder coated the UO 2 particles to form a continuous BeO phase.
  • the particles of BeO powder were capable of uniformly coating the UO 2 particles, resulting in a uniform coating that completely coats each of the UO 2 particles, resulting in a continuous minor phase of BeO surrounding a primary UO 2 phase in the sintered pellets.
  • FIG. 6 contains an SEM image of a thermally-etched high density UO 2 -BeO composite showing an apparently continuous BeO phase surrounding UO 2 particles.
  • the BeO phase is essentially entirely BeO.
  • FIG. 7 is an optical microphotograph of a thermally-etched, high density UO 2 -BeO composite fabricated to contain green UO 2 particles and a continuous BeO phase, similar to FIG. 6. However, the BeO phase in FIG. 7 also contains particles of UO 2 .
  • the darker regions in FIG. 7 are the BeO phase, and the lighter regions are the UO 2 phase.
  • the relative sizes of the UO 2 and BeO particles is also significant from the standpoint that the UO 2 powder has the desirable effect of reducing the BeO sintered particle size, which can affect the BeO stability under irradiation.
  • excessively large UO 2 particles may adversely affect the thermal conductivity of the UO 2 -BeO material. Consequently, the ratio of the UO 2 and BeO particle sizes is preferably controlled.
  • UO 2 -BeO pellets containing about 5 to about 10 volume percent of the continuous BeO phase, and/or UO 2 particles having sizes of about 50 to about 500 micrometers, and/or UO 2 particles and BeO particles having a size ratio of at least 50:1 .
  • the particles of BeO and UO 2 are preferably limited to relatively narrow size ranges of about 0.1 to about 10 micrometers (for example, the UO 2 particles might range in size from 50 to 60 micrometers, corresponding to a size range of 10 micrometers).
  • the UO 2 -BeO pellets consist entirely of particles consisting of UO 2 in a continuous phase consisting of BeO, optionally allowing for incidental impurities in each of the UO 2 and BeO phases.
  • the continuous phase may further contain UO 2 , in which case the continuous phase preferably contains at least one volume percent BeO.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Ceramic Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
  • High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Inorganic Compounds Of Heavy Metals (AREA)
  • Compositions Of Oxide Ceramics (AREA)

Abstract

A process of producing ceramic-ceramic composites, including but not limited to nuclear fuels, and composites capable of exhibiting increased thermal conductivities. The process includes milling a first ceramic material to produce a powder of spheroidized particles of the first ceramic material, and then co-milling particles of a second ceramic material with the spheroidized particles of the first ceramic material to cause the particles of the second ceramic material to form a coating on the spheroidized particles of the first material. The spheroidized particles coated with the particles of the second ceramic material are then compacted and sintered to form the ceramic-ceramic composite, in which the second ceramic material forms a continuous phase completely surrounding the spheroidized particles of the first ceramic material.

Description

CERAMIC-CERAMIC COMPOSITES AND PROCESS THEREFOR, NUCLEAR FUELS FORMED THEREBY, AND NUCLEAR REACTOR
SYSTEMS AND PROCESSES OPERATED THEREWITH
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/386/848, filed September 27, 2010, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention generally relates to nuclear power generation materials, systems and processes, and more particularly to the modification of uranium dioxide (UO2) nuclear fuels to increase their thermal conductivity.
[0003] Commercial light-water reactors currently use pellets of pure or burnable poison-doped uranium dioxide (UO2) as a nuclearfuel. Though uranium dioxide has demonstrated many desirable characteristics, it has a relatively low thermal conductivity that leads to the development of a large temperature gradient across the fuel pellet. This temperature gradient and the consequent high centerline temperatures limit the operational performance of a nuclear reactor due to overheating, melting, and effects such as thermal stresses that cause pellet cladding interaction and the release of fission product gases.
[0004] High fuel temperatures can be decreased and reactor performance improved by developing nuclear fuels having enhanced thermal conductivities. A high thermal conductivity nuclear fuel would decrease fuel temperatures and facilitate a reduction in pellet/cladding interaction through lessening thermal stresses that result in fuel cracking, relocation, and swelling. Additionally, fission gas release could be decreased allowing for higher fuel burn-up, and reactor safety could be improved as a result of faster thermal responses and less stored energy in the fuel pins. Ultimately, higher conductivity may also permit more energy to be generated in the reactor.
[0005] The development of enhanced thermal conductivity two-phase ceramic- metallic (cermet) nuclear fuels has been explored in the past. Such efforts have included the examination of nuclear fuels in which UO2, UO2-ThO2 or UO2-PuO2 ceramic particles are dispersed in a stainless steel or zirconium alloy matrix. Other investigated fuel forms have included aligned metal fibers dispersed in a ceramic fuel matrix. While these fuels have mainly focused on cermets that may not be chemically stable in UO2 fuels that oxidize with burnup, other options have included the development of more stable ceramic-ceramic composites.
[0006] Ceramic-ceramic (cer-cer) nuclear fuels based on uranium dioxide are also capable of having increased effective thermal conductivities. In addition to having a higherthermal conductivity than uranium dioxide, the additive ceramic must also be chemically compatible with uranium dioxide and have a comparable melting point. Silicon carbide (SiC) and beryllium oxide (BeO; beryllia) are two high melting point and high conductivity ceramics that have been considered as additives to UO2 fuels. However, SiC and UO2 exhibit chemical interactions at temperatures as low as 1200°C, and rapid reactions occur at about 1400°C. On the other hand, the UO2- BeO phase diagram shows that these two ceramic materials exist as solid equilibrium phases below about 2100°C. As such, UO2 and BeO have been considered to be excellent candidates for fabricating two-phase ceramic nuclear fuels based on U02.
[0007] BeO has been reported to have thermal conductivities as high as 13.7 kW/m-K (at 45K) and about 370 to about 297 W/m-K (at 300K), which is about 93% that of copper at these temperatures. A high K value coupled with a high melting point and low thermal neutron absorption cross-section suggest that BeO would be an ideal material for the high conductivity phase in a nuclear fuel. In addition, BeO is close to being isotopically pure since the only naturally occurring Be isotope is Be- 9 and natural oxygen is 99.8% O16. BeO has also been reported to have excellent fission product retention capabilities, and irradiation performance up to certain fast neutron and fission fragment dose or micro-cracking, when used as a ceramic matrix material. A fine particle size in fabricated fuel pellets is desirable in order to avoid micro-cracking as a result of anisotropic radiation-induced swelling that has been reported to occur in BeO ceramics.
[0008] In view of the above, the use of BeO to enhance the thermal conductivity of UO2 has been previously examined. For example, U.S. patents 5,180,527, 5,255,299, 5,362,426 and 5,429,775 to Hirai et al. and a technical paper authored by Ishimoto et al., Thermal Conductivity of UO2-BeO Pellet, Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol. 33, No. 2, 1996, p134-140, presented results evidencing a net increase in thermal conductivity with BeO in a UO2-based nuclear fuel. The research appeared to demonstrate that a continuous BeO phase along UO2 boundaries can yield high thermal conductivities. On the other hand, a discontinuous BeO phase can yield conductivities that are lower by a factor of about two. To achieve a continuous BeO phase, this prior work required heating the UO2 fuel above its eutectic temperature of 2100°C, which is a process step that presents many practical problems on an industrial scale. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0009] The present invention provides a process for producing ceramic-ceramic composites, including nuclear fuels, and particularly to a process for increasing the thermal conductivity of a nuclear fuel through additions of a second material that exhibits a higher thermal conductivity than the base material of the nuclearfuel. The invention is particularly directed to increasing the thermal conductivity of uranium dioxide-based nuclear fuels through additions of BeO using a process that yields a controlled microstructure in the final multi-phase composite.
[0010] According to a first aspect of the invention, the process produces a ceramic-ceramic composite and comprises milling a first ceramic material to produce a powder of spheroidized particles of the first ceramic material, and then co-milling particles of a second ceramic material with the spheroidized particles of the first ceramic material to cause the particles of the second ceramic material to form a coating on the spheroidized particles of the first material. The spheroidized particles coated with the particles of the second ceramic material are then compacted and sintered to form the ceramic-ceramic composite in which the second ceramic material forms a continuous phase completely surrounding the spheroidized particles of the first ceramic material.
[0011] Another aspect of the invention is a nuclear fuel formed by a process comprising the steps described above.
[0012] Other aspects of the invention include nuclear reactor systems and processes that operate with the nuclear fuel. [0013] A technical effect of the invention is the ability to enhance the thermal conductivity of ceramic nuclear fuels through advances in the science and processing of a ceramic fuel to have a controlled multi-phase microstructure. Though prior efforts involving the development of U02-BeO ceramic-ceramic nuclear fuels had yielded some success in enhanced thermal conductivity, the present invention is capable of achieving higher thermal conductivities by obtaining microstructures that exhibit high purities in separate U02 and BeO phases, as well as a desirable interface structure and contact between the phases. Controlled microstructures in the nuclear fuel are also capable of providing improved fission gas retention and resistance to radiation damage.
[0014] Other aspects and advantages of this invention will be better appreciated from the following detailed description.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0015] FIG. 1 is a flow chart describing a UO2-BeO matrix fuel fabrication process in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
[0016] FIG. 2 schematically represents a ball-milling apparatus of a type suitable for performing a self-milling process in accordance with a preferred aspect of the invention.
[0017] FIG. 3 represents a three-dimensional geometry finite element model (FEM) suitable for performing FEM analysis of UO2-BeO nuclear fuels in accordance with a preferred aspect of the invention. [0018] FIG. 4 is a graph that compares results of FEM thermal modeling and actual measured thermal conductivities of U02/BeO nuclear fuels containing about 13.6 wt% BeO.
[0019] FIG. 5 contains microphotographs of self-milled and sieved U02 "green" particles (top image), and the same particles mixed with about 10.8 vol.% of a BeO powder (bottom image).
[0020] FIG. 6 contains an SEM image of a thermally-etched high density UO2- BeO pellet showing an apparently continuous BeO phase surrounding UO2 particles.
[0021] FIG. 7 contains an optical microphotograph of a thermally-etched, high density UO2-BeO pellet fabricated to contain green UO2 particles and a continuous BeO phase that is similar to FIG. 6, but further contains UO2 fragments.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0022] The present invention provides advancements in the science and process of producing ceramic nuclearfuels that exhibit relatively high thermal conductivities. As will be discussed below, the invention involves a process for producing multiphase ceramic-ceramic nuclear fuels, and particularly UO2-based nuclear fuels in which BeO is an additive ceramic phase that increases the effective thermal conductivity of the nuclear fuel. Preferred aspects of the invention make use of a three-dimensional (3-D) finite element method (FEM) to thermally model the fuel, by which thermal conductivities can be predicted as a guide to subsequent process optimization. Other preferred aspects of the invention include a practical fabrication process for producing pellets of the ceramic-ceramic fuel, by which the microstructure of the fuel is produced to have controlled particle size distributions and controlled volume fractions for the different ceramic phases. Compaction and sintering parameters used in the fabrication process can also be optimized using 3- D FEM analysis to control the microstructure of the fuel in order to obtain robust pellets having high thermal conductivities.
[0023] The invention builds on prior work reported by Sarma et al. in "New Processing Methods to Produce Silicon Carbide and Beryllium Oxide Inert Matrix and Enhanced Thermal Conductivity Oxide Fuels," Journal of Nuclear Materials, 352, 324-333 (2006). Sarma et al. considered various variables relating to the production of ceramic-ceramic UO2-based nuclearfuels, including material variables such as volume fractions and particle sizes and process variables such as sintering temperatures, pellet pressing pressures for granulation and sintering, granulation and sieving methods, and the use of binders and pore formers. However, nuclear fuel pellets reported by Sarma et al. exhibited significant cross-contamination between the primary phase formed by UO2 particles and the additive (BeO) phase intended to improve the thermal conductivity of the UO2 particles, resulting in thermal conductivities that were significantly lower than had been analytically predicted. The present technology is capable of reducing cross-contamination by controlling the particle size distributions of the primary and additive phases, yielding controlled microstructures that were determined to be key for enhancement of thermal conductivity, as well as material characteristics that promote fission gas retention and resistance to radiation damage.
[0024] A particular aspect of the invention involves promoting the density of the nuclear fuel material (typically pellets) through the use of a co-sintering process in which sintering or shrinkage rates for the primary and additive phases are substantially equal. From prior sintering experiments performed on BeO and UO2 powders, it has been observed that when compacted BeO-UO2 pellets are sintered from the green stage there is a linear shrinkage of about 15.7% and about 18.8% in the BeO and UO2 particles, respectively, which may lead to cracking and porosity development in the final fuel product. Consequently, one problem that must be overcome to achieve substantially equal sintering or shrinkage rates in BeO-UO2 pellets is to obtain highly sinterable starting powders that exhibit sintering compatibilities that will result in both phases sintering to high densities. High densities in the primary UO2 phase promote high fissile atom densities, and high densities in the additive BeO phase promote high thermal conductivities. Such compatibilities can be realized with nearly identical sintering curves (density vs. time) for the different phases.
[0025] A preferred process is represented in FIG. 1 for fabricating high density nuclear fuels with desirable microstructures as described above. The process represented in FIG. 1 utilizes self-milling to spheroidize and smooth UO2 particles and control their particle size distribution, and then subsequently co-milling BeO particles with the spheroidized UO2 particles prior to compacting (pelletizing) and sintering the mixture in a reducing atmosphere. Spheroidizing of the UO2 particles is believed to be a key to obtaining a highly sinterable UO2 powder, and co-milling of the BeO particles and the spheroidized UO2 particles is believed to be another key for achieving substantially equal sintering or shrinkage rates in BeO-UO2 composites produced with the BeO and UO2 particles. As with the milling step used to spheroidize the UO2 particles, the preferred co-milling processes can also be referred to as self-milling processes, in that milling is performed without the use of any extraneous grinding media. [0026] FIG. 1 evidences that parameters that are desired to be controlled include the volume fraction of the BeO particles, the size and size distribution of the UO2 particles, the uniform coating of the UO2 particles with the BeO particles, and the time and temperature profiles used during compaction and sintering. Even so, the process is sufficiently uncomplicated to enable scaling up for large-scale commercial systems.
[0027] FIG. 1 indicates that the UO2 particles may first be pre-slugged (pelletized (e.g., punch and die compaction) and granulated (e.g., mortar and pestle granulation)) to achieve a desired particle size. This step can be achieved with the aforementioned self-milling process, such as represented in FIG. 2. The term "self- milling" refers to the fact that the process is performed without any extraneous grinding media to obtain UO2 particles with a high degree of smoothness and sphericity. The rotational speed of the mill and time for self-milling is determined based on the desired particle size, smoothness and sphericity. According to a preferred aspect of the invention, the self-milling process enables the UO2 particles to be sufficiently spheroidized to a desired size range that can be uniformly coated with a BeO powder, which is believed to be essential to yield a continuous BeO additive phase capable of increasing the thermal conductivity of the UO2-based nuclear fuel.
[0028] Typical self-milling durations are believed to be about six to twelve hours, depending on the particle requirements. Shorter and longer durations are also foreseeable. Suitable rotational speeds for the mill are believed to be about ten to about forty rpm, though higher and lower speeds are foreseeable. Preferred particle sizes for the UO2 particles are in a range of about 25 to about 500 μιτι. Notably, smaller grain sizes for the UO2 particles promotes cross-contamination with the BeO phase. Consequently, the U02 particles can be sieved to remove fines, as well as to limit the maximum particle size of the resulting U02 powder.
[0029] A highly pure and sinterable BeO powder having a limited particle size relative to the U02 particles is also necessary to achieve a sintering compatibility between the U02 and BeO phases that is capable of achieving high densities and reducing cross-contamination. Although virtually all volume percentages between about 5 to 100% were evaluated, a BeO volume fraction of at least 10 volume percent is believed to be necessary to obtain a continuous BeO phase surrounding all of the UO2 particles. In particular, 3-D FEM analysis indicated that more than 10% volume percent gives better results on continuous BeO phase. Preferred volume fractions for BeO will depend on the level of thermal conductivity desired and neutronic considerations.
[0030] FEM analysis was also used to predict theoretical thermal conductivities of UO2-BeO fuels as a function of BeO volume fraction and its distribution. FIG. 3 represents a three-dimensional finite element method that was employed to model a UO2-BeO fuel comprising self-milled UO2 particles mixed with BeO particles. The three-dimensional model is represented as comprising UO2 particles with hexagonal shapes, though both hexagonal and octagonal shapes were used to model the UO2 particles. Octagonal shapes closely approximate the spherical shape of the UO2 particles produced by a self-milling process. In the model, the borders of the hexagonal-shaped UO2 particles are surrounded by BeO particles, and gaps between the hexagonal shapes determine the volume percent of the BeO particles in the matrix. FIG. 4 is a graph that compares results of FEM thermal modeling and actual measured thermal conductivities of UO2-BeO nuclear fuels containing about 13.6 wt% BeO. The data plots evidence that 2-D and 3-D models of the UO2-BeO material compared well with experimental data.
[0031] The purity, volume percentage and distribution of the BeO particles in the U02 phase are major influences for achieving a uniform and continuous BeO coating capable of obtaining suitable thermal conductivities for the UO2-BeOfuel. Finer BeO particles lead to lower open porosity, whereas lower sintered densities and larger open porosities were indicated for presintered particles. To obtain a more optimal microstructure in a UO2-BeO fuel, and in particular an appropriate volume percent and distribution of the BeO particles in the UO2 matrix, an iterative process was employed with 3-D FEM thermal modeling. Volume percentages of BeO were cross-checked with desired neutronic properties for the UO2-BeO fuel, as well as actual thermal conductivity measurements and microstructure examinations. Results of thermal property measurements and microstructure analysis were used to refine the thermal models and identify microstructures capable of optimizing the thermal, mechanical, and neutronic properties of a UO2-BeO nuclear fuel.
[0032] A volume fraction of BeO particles identified by the FEM thermal model is then combined with self-milled UO2 particles, after which the mixture is milled, for example, for a duration of about twenty to about forty minutes, though shorter and longer durations are foreseeable. The resultant mixture can be sieved to remove fines, and then pelletized at pressures preferably within a range of about 150 to about 240MPa. Thereafter, the compacted pellets are sintered, for example, at temperatures ranging from about 1400°C to about 1700°C for time periods varying from about four to about twelve hours in a reducing gas environment. Pellets fabricated in this manner exhibit high sintered densities, preferably in the range of about 93% to about 97% of theoretical and with low open porosities typically in the range of about 3% to about 5% by volume. The volume of the interstitial spaces between UO2 particles that are filled with BeO particles and the thickness of the continuous BeO phase will depend on the UO2 particle size and the volume percent and size of the BeO particles.
[0033] FIG. 5 contains microphotographs of self-milled and sieved UO2 "green" particles (top image) and the same particles mixed with about 10.8 vol.% of a BeO powder (bottom image). FIG. 5 indicates that the BeO powder coated the UO2 particles to form a continuous BeO phase. In accordance with the foregoing discussion, the particles of BeO powder were capable of uniformly coating the UO2 particles, resulting in a uniform coating that completely coats each of the UO2 particles, resulting in a continuous minor phase of BeO surrounding a primary UO2 phase in the sintered pellets.
[0034] As previously noted, cross-contamination of uranium dioxide in the BeO phase is detrimental. FIG. 6 contains an SEM image of a thermally-etched high density UO2-BeO composite showing an apparently continuous BeO phase surrounding UO2 particles. The BeO phase is essentially entirely BeO. FIG. 7 is an optical microphotograph of a thermally-etched, high density UO2-BeO composite fabricated to contain green UO2 particles and a continuous BeO phase, similar to FIG. 6. However, the BeO phase in FIG. 7 also contains particles of UO2. The darker regions in FIG. 7 are the BeO phase, and the lighter regions are the UO2 phase. The BeO phase seen in FIG. 7 was believed to be cross-contaminated with small UO2 fragments as a result of the BeO-UO2 milling-coating process, during which the UO2 powder particles were abraded. Controlling self-milling rotational speeds and times and greater mechanical strength of the UO2 particles can reduce the amount of UO2 fragments in the BeO phase, which is desirable if thermal conductivity is adversely affected by the presence of UO2 fragments in an otherwise optimized microstructure. Alternatively or in addition, a light presintering of the U02 particles can be performed to minimize abrasion of the U02 particles during self- milling, as was done with the U02 particles used to produce the composite shown in FIG. 6. In doing so, fewer U02 fines resulted that would have eventually appeared as a contaminant in the BeO phase in FIG. 6.
[0035] The relative sizes of the UO2 and BeO particles is also significant from the standpoint that the UO2 powder has the desirable effect of reducing the BeO sintered particle size, which can affect the BeO stability under irradiation. On the other hand, excessively large UO2 particles may adversely affect the thermal conductivity of the UO2-BeO material. Consequently, the ratio of the UO2 and BeO particle sizes is preferably controlled. From investigations carried out in accordance with the above, it was concluded that particularly good results can be obtained with UO2-BeO pellets containing about 5 to about 10 volume percent of the continuous BeO phase, and/or UO2 particles having sizes of about 50 to about 500 micrometers, and/or UO2 particles and BeO particles having a size ratio of at least 50:1 . Furthermore, the particles of BeO and UO2 are preferably limited to relatively narrow size ranges of about 0.1 to about 10 micrometers (for example, the UO2 particles might range in size from 50 to 60 micrometers, corresponding to a size range of 10 micrometers). In some embodiments, the UO2-BeO pellets consist entirely of particles consisting of UO2 in a continuous phase consisting of BeO, optionally allowing for incidental impurities in each of the UO2 and BeO phases. In other embodiments, the continuous phase may further contain UO2, in which case the continuous phase preferably contains at least one volume percent BeO.
[0036] While the invention has been described in terms of specific embodiments, it is apparent that other forms could be adopted by one skilled in the art. Accordingly, it should be understood that the invention is not limited to the specific embodiments illustrated in the Figures. For example, nuclear target materials for actinide "burning" or "inert matrix fuels" could also be fabricated as described above. Furthermore, the invention is not limited to the fabrication of nuclear fuels. For example, composites containing two continuous interconnected phases produced as described above may allow one phase to be chemically removed to produce a highly porous body that can be, for example, used as a substrate for catalysis. This capability would allow the U02 constituent of nuclear fuel pellets to be recycled into new fuel. Therefore, the scope of the invention is to be limited only by the following claims.

Claims

CLAIMS:
1 . A process of producing a ceramic-ceramic composite, the process comprising:
milling a first ceramic material to produce a powder of spheroidized particles of the first ceramic material;
co-milling particles of a second ceramic material with the spheroidized particles of the first ceramic material to cause the particles of the second ceramic material to form a coating on the spheroidized particles of the first material; and then compacting and sintering the spheroidized particles coated with the particles of the second ceramic material to form the ceramic-ceramic composite in which the second ceramic material forms a continuous phase completely surrounding the spheroidized particles of the first ceramic material.
2. The process according to claim 1 , wherein the first ceramic material is self-milled during the milling step.
3. The process according to claim 1 , wherein the particles of the second ceramic material and the spheroidized particles of the first ceramic material are self- milled together during the milling step.
4. The process according to claim 1 , wherein the first ceramic material is uranium dioxide.
5. The process according to claim 1 , wherein the second ceramic material is beryllium oxide.
6. The process according to claim 1 , wherein the first ceramic material is uranium dioxide, the second ceramic material is beryllium oxide, and the composite contains about 5 to about 10 volume percent of beryllium oxide.
7. The process according to claim 6, wherein the balance of the composite consists of impurities.
8. The process according to claim 1 , wherein the spheroidized particles of the first ceramic material have particle sizes of about 50 to about 500 micrometers.
9. The process according to claim 1 , wherein the spheroidized particles of the first ceramic material and the particles of the second ceramic material have a particle size ratio of at least 50:1 .
10. The process according to claim 1 , wherein the spheroidized particles of the first ceramic material and the particles of the second ceramic material are each limited to a size range of about 0.1 to about 10 micrometers.
1 1 . The process according to claim 1 , wherein the continuous phase formed by the second ceramic material does not contain fragments of the first ceramic material.
12. The process according to claim 1 , wherein the sintering step is performed at a temperature within a range of about 1400°C to about 1700°C.
13. The process according to claim 1 , wherein the composite has a density of about 93% to about 97% of theoretical and has open porosity in the range of about 3% to about 5% by volume.
14. The process according to claim 1 , wherein the ceramic-ceramic composite is a nuclear fuel.
15. The nuclear fuel produced by the process of claim 14.
16. The process according to claim 14, wherein the first ceramic material is uranium dioxide.
17. The process according to claim 14, wherein the second ceramic material is beryllium oxide.
18. The process according to claim 14, wherein the first ceramic material is uranium dioxide, the second ceramic material is beryllium oxide, and the composite contains about 5 to about 10 volume percent of beryllium oxide.
19. The process according to claim 14, further comprising installing the nuclear fuel in a nuclear reactor and generating power with the nuclear reactor using the nuclear fuel.
20. The process according to claim 19, further comprising chemically removing the continuous phase of the second ceramic material from the nuclear fuel, and then recycling the first ceramic material into a second nuclear fuel.
PCT/US2011/053473 2010-09-27 2011-09-27 Ceramic-ceramic composites and process therefor, nuclear fuels formed thereby, and nuclear reactor systems and processes operated therewith WO2012047657A2 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020137010808A KR20130079565A (en) 2010-09-27 2011-09-27 Ceramic-ceramic composites and process therefor, nuclear fuels formed thereby, and nuclear reactor systems and processes operated therewith
EP11831301.4A EP2622607A4 (en) 2010-09-27 2011-09-27 Ceramic-ceramic composites and process therefor, nuclear fuels formed thereby, and nuclear reactor systems and processes operated therewith
CN2011800462679A CN103299375A (en) 2010-09-27 2011-09-27 Ceramic-ceramic composites and process therefor, nuclear fuels formed thereby, and nuclear reactor systems and processes operated therewith
US13/849,117 US9466398B2 (en) 2010-09-27 2013-03-22 Ceramic-ceramic composites and process therefor, nuclear fuels formed thereby, and nuclear reactor systems and processes operated therewith

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US38684810P 2010-09-27 2010-09-27
US61/386,848 2010-09-27

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/849,117 Continuation US9466398B2 (en) 2010-09-27 2013-03-22 Ceramic-ceramic composites and process therefor, nuclear fuels formed thereby, and nuclear reactor systems and processes operated therewith

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2012047657A2 true WO2012047657A2 (en) 2012-04-12
WO2012047657A3 WO2012047657A3 (en) 2012-07-05

Family

ID=45928322

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2011/053473 WO2012047657A2 (en) 2010-09-27 2011-09-27 Ceramic-ceramic composites and process therefor, nuclear fuels formed thereby, and nuclear reactor systems and processes operated therewith

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2622607A4 (en)
KR (1) KR20130079565A (en)
CN (1) CN103299375A (en)
WO (1) WO2012047657A2 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3437108A4 (en) * 2016-03-29 2020-02-26 Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation PROCESS FOR RAPID PROCESSING OF SiC AND GRAPHITIC MATRIX TRISO-BEARING PEBBLE FUELS
WO2021142220A1 (en) * 2020-01-09 2021-07-15 Westinghouse Electric Company Llc A nuclear fuel assembly and a method of manufacture thereof
US11101048B2 (en) 2016-03-29 2021-08-24 Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation Fully ceramic microencapsulated fuel fabricated with burnable poison as sintering aid
CN113399093A (en) * 2021-07-30 2021-09-17 深圳陶陶科技有限公司 Method for preparing spheroidal powder by mechanical crushing method and spheroidal powder
CN116041052A (en) * 2023-01-10 2023-05-02 成都大学 Ceramic pellet with lithium orthosilicate-lithium titanate core-shell structure for tritium proliferation and preparation method thereof

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
BR112016004477B1 (en) * 2013-11-26 2022-03-03 Joint Stock Company Akme Engineering NUCLEAR FUEL TABLET WITH ENRICHED THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY AND ITS PREPARATION METHOD
KR101677175B1 (en) 2015-08-07 2016-11-21 서울시립대학교 산학협력단 Composition of fully ceramic microencapsulated fuels containing tristructural-isotropic particles with a coating layer having higher shrinkage than matrix, material and manufacturing method of the same
CN107170486B (en) * 2017-05-27 2018-11-27 中国工程物理研究院材料研究所 A kind of UO2And U3Si2Hybrid fuel pellet and its preparation method and application
CN107221359B (en) * 2017-07-03 2019-04-30 中国工程物理研究院材料研究所 A kind of preparation method of beryllium oxide modified uranium dioxide nuclear fuel
CN107274936B (en) * 2017-07-03 2019-03-29 中国工程物理研究院材料研究所 A kind of fast preparation method of the enhanced uranium dioxide nuclear fuel of beryllium oxide
CN107256726B (en) * 2017-07-03 2019-04-30 中国工程物理研究院材料研究所 A kind of preparation method of metal reinforced uranium dioxide fuel ball
CN108461162B (en) * 2018-02-11 2019-10-25 中国工程物理研究院材料研究所 A kind of uranium dioxide/molybdenum Ceramic Composite fuel and preparation method thereof
CN114787101B (en) * 2019-12-13 2024-04-09 奥卢大学 Electroceramic composite and method for producing same
CN112487691B (en) * 2020-12-14 2023-07-25 东北大学 Microscopic modeling method for particle random distribution reinforced composite material inserted into core unit
CN113724906A (en) * 2021-09-03 2021-11-30 中国工程物理研究院材料研究所 Semi-continuous structure reinforced uranium dioxide core block and preparation method and application thereof
CN114477964B (en) * 2022-01-28 2023-03-14 中国科学院近代物理研究所 High-wear-resistance beryllium oxide-zirconium oxide core-shell structure ceramic ball and preparation method and application thereof

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4383953A (en) * 1980-01-21 1983-05-17 General Electric Company Method of improving the green strength of nuclear fuel pellets
US5255299A (en) * 1990-04-03 1993-10-19 Nippon Nuclear Fuel Development Co., Ltd. Method of manufacturing nuclear fuel pellets
US5762831A (en) * 1996-02-07 1998-06-09 Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Composite nuclear fuel material and method of manufacture of the material
JP2007101425A (en) * 2005-10-06 2007-04-19 Nuclear Fuel Ind Ltd Method for manufacturing fuel compact for high-temperature gas-cooled reactor

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
BE571086A (en) * 1957-10-14
US3865746A (en) * 1959-07-16 1975-02-11 Atomic Energy Commission UO{HD 2{B BeO fuel process
JPS5527942A (en) * 1978-08-21 1980-02-28 Tokyo Shibaura Electric Co Nuclear fuel element
US5180527A (en) * 1990-04-03 1993-01-19 Nippon Nuclear Fuel Development Co., Ltd. Nuclear fuel pellets
JPH05196770A (en) * 1991-11-21 1993-08-06 Nippon Nuclear Fuel Dev Co Ltd Nuclear fuel pellet

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4383953A (en) * 1980-01-21 1983-05-17 General Electric Company Method of improving the green strength of nuclear fuel pellets
US5255299A (en) * 1990-04-03 1993-10-19 Nippon Nuclear Fuel Development Co., Ltd. Method of manufacturing nuclear fuel pellets
US5762831A (en) * 1996-02-07 1998-06-09 Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Composite nuclear fuel material and method of manufacture of the material
JP2007101425A (en) * 2005-10-06 2007-04-19 Nuclear Fuel Ind Ltd Method for manufacturing fuel compact for high-temperature gas-cooled reactor

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
AKISHIN, G.P. ET AL.: 'Thermal Conductivity of Beryllium Oxide Ceramic' REFRACTORIES & INDUSTRIAL CERAMICS vol. 50, no. 6, 31 December 2009, pages 465 - 468, XP055119236 *

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3437108A4 (en) * 2016-03-29 2020-02-26 Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation PROCESS FOR RAPID PROCESSING OF SiC AND GRAPHITIC MATRIX TRISO-BEARING PEBBLE FUELS
US10878971B2 (en) 2016-03-29 2020-12-29 Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation Process for rapid processing of SiC and graphitic matrix TRISO-bearing pebble fuels
US11101048B2 (en) 2016-03-29 2021-08-24 Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation Fully ceramic microencapsulated fuel fabricated with burnable poison as sintering aid
US11557403B2 (en) 2016-03-29 2023-01-17 Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation Process for rapid processing of SiC and graphitic matrix triso-bearing pebble fuels
US11984232B2 (en) 2016-03-29 2024-05-14 Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation Process for rapid processing of SiC and graphitic matrix TRISO-bearing pebble fuels
WO2021142220A1 (en) * 2020-01-09 2021-07-15 Westinghouse Electric Company Llc A nuclear fuel assembly and a method of manufacture thereof
TWI813929B (en) * 2020-01-09 2023-09-01 美商西屋電器公司 A nuclear fuel assembly and a method of manufacture thereof
CN113399093A (en) * 2021-07-30 2021-09-17 深圳陶陶科技有限公司 Method for preparing spheroidal powder by mechanical crushing method and spheroidal powder
CN113399093B (en) * 2021-07-30 2023-08-11 深圳陶陶科技有限公司 Method for preparing spheroidic powder by mechanical crushing method and spheroidic powder
CN116041052A (en) * 2023-01-10 2023-05-02 成都大学 Ceramic pellet with lithium orthosilicate-lithium titanate core-shell structure for tritium proliferation and preparation method thereof
CN116041052B (en) * 2023-01-10 2023-11-28 成都大学 Ceramic pellet with lithium orthosilicate-lithium titanate core-shell structure for tritium proliferation and preparation method thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR20130079565A (en) 2013-07-10
EP2622607A2 (en) 2013-08-07
WO2012047657A3 (en) 2012-07-05
CN103299375A (en) 2013-09-11
EP2622607A4 (en) 2017-01-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2622607A2 (en) Ceramic-ceramic composites and process therefor, nuclear fuels formed thereby, and nuclear reactor systems and processes operated therewith
Zhou et al. Enhanced thermal conductivity accident tolerant fuels for improved reactor safety–A comprehensive review
US11264141B2 (en) Composite moderator for nuclear reactor systems
US9466398B2 (en) Ceramic-ceramic composites and process therefor, nuclear fuels formed thereby, and nuclear reactor systems and processes operated therewith
US10689776B2 (en) Preparation method of monocrystal uranium dioxide nuclear fuel pellets
CA2993794C (en) Method for fabrication of fully ceramic microencapsulated nuclear fuel
CA2661603C (en) Spherical fuel element and production thereof for gas-cooled high temperature pebble bed nuclear reactors (htr)
KR101638351B1 (en) Preparation method of nuclear fuel pellet including thermal conductive metal, and the nuclear fuel pellet thereby
CN108039210A (en) Fuel pellet and its manufacture method
Burkes et al. A US perspective on fast reactor fuel fabrication technology and experience. Part II: Ceramic fuels
US3270098A (en) Method of making hollow, spherical uo2 particles
Brett et al. THE SINTERING BEHAVIOUR AND STABILITY OF (PuU) O $ sub 2$ SOLID SOLUTIONS
RU2467411C1 (en) Nanostructured nuclear fuel pellet (versions) and nuclear reactor fuel element (versions)
KR100812952B1 (en) Zirconia added neutron absorbing pellets and their fabrication methods
Vasudevamurthy et al. Production of high-density uranium carbide compacts for use in composite nuclear fuels
EP3743926A2 (en) Composite moderator for nuclear reactor systems
US20230368932A1 (en) Fuel structures comprising uranium dioxide and uranium diboride, and related fuel rod assemblies and methods
Carmack et al. AECL/US INERI-Development of Inert Matrix Fuels for Plutonium and Minor Actinide Management in Power Reactors--Fuel Requirements and Down-Select Report
KR101586877B1 (en) The particle type metallic fuel pellet and a method of manufacture thereof
Mills et al. Irradiation effects on dispersion type BeO-UO2 fuels for ebor
KR100465742B1 (en) Composite nuclear fuel material and method of manufacture of the material
Karpyuk et al. Investigation of the Properties of Uranium-Molybdenum Pellet Fuel for VVER.
ROLEČEK DESIGN OF NUCLEAR CERAMIC MATERIALS WITH ENHANCED THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY
Prasad Characterization of spark plasma sintered nuclear fuel materials
McDeavitt et al. Zirconium matrix cermet for a mixed uranium-thorium oxide fuel in an SBWR

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 11831301

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2011831301

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 20137010808

Country of ref document: KR

Kind code of ref document: A