WO2011158064A1 - Entrée de texte à ambiguïté mixte - Google Patents

Entrée de texte à ambiguïté mixte Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2011158064A1
WO2011158064A1 PCT/IB2010/052705 IB2010052705W WO2011158064A1 WO 2011158064 A1 WO2011158064 A1 WO 2011158064A1 IB 2010052705 W IB2010052705 W IB 2010052705W WO 2011158064 A1 WO2011158064 A1 WO 2011158064A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
user
input
text entry
key
characters
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/IB2010/052705
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Ashley Colley
Petri Juhani Luomala
Original Assignee
Nokia Corporation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nokia Corporation filed Critical Nokia Corporation
Priority to PCT/IB2010/052705 priority Critical patent/WO2011158064A1/fr
Publication of WO2011158064A1 publication Critical patent/WO2011158064A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/01—Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
    • G06F3/048—Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI]
    • G06F3/0487—Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI] using specific features provided by the input device, e.g. functions controlled by the rotation of a mouse with dual sensing arrangements, or of the nature of the input device, e.g. tap gestures based on pressure sensed by a digitiser
    • G06F3/0488—Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI] using specific features provided by the input device, e.g. functions controlled by the rotation of a mouse with dual sensing arrangements, or of the nature of the input device, e.g. tap gestures based on pressure sensed by a digitiser using a touch-screen or digitiser, e.g. input of commands through traced gestures
    • G06F3/04886—Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI] using specific features provided by the input device, e.g. functions controlled by the rotation of a mouse with dual sensing arrangements, or of the nature of the input device, e.g. tap gestures based on pressure sensed by a digitiser using a touch-screen or digitiser, e.g. input of commands through traced gestures by partitioning the display area of the touch-screen or the surface of the digitising tablet into independently controllable areas, e.g. virtual keyboards or menus
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/01—Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
    • G06F3/02—Input arrangements using manually operated switches, e.g. using keyboards or dials
    • G06F3/023—Arrangements for converting discrete items of information into a coded form, e.g. arrangements for interpreting keyboard generated codes as alphanumeric codes, operand codes or instruction codes
    • G06F3/0233—Character input methods
    • G06F3/0237—Character input methods using prediction or retrieval techniques
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/01—Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
    • G06F3/048—Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI]
    • G06F3/0487—Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI] using specific features provided by the input device, e.g. functions controlled by the rotation of a mouse with dual sensing arrangements, or of the nature of the input device, e.g. tap gestures based on pressure sensed by a digitiser
    • G06F3/0488—Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI] using specific features provided by the input device, e.g. functions controlled by the rotation of a mouse with dual sensing arrangements, or of the nature of the input device, e.g. tap gestures based on pressure sensed by a digitiser using a touch-screen or digitiser, e.g. input of commands through traced gestures
    • G06F3/04883—Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI] using specific features provided by the input device, e.g. functions controlled by the rotation of a mouse with dual sensing arrangements, or of the nature of the input device, e.g. tap gestures based on pressure sensed by a digitiser using a touch-screen or digitiser, e.g. input of commands through traced gestures for inputting data by handwriting, e.g. gesture or text

Definitions

  • Embodiments of the invention relate to an apparatus, method and/or computer readable medium for improving text entry for electronic devices, such as a terminal or wireless communications device, or any other electronic device with multiple characters per key.
  • Electronic communications devices can include a user interface that facilitates text entry for instant messages or text messages, such as short message service (SMS) or multimedia message service (MMS).
  • SMS short message service
  • MMS multimedia message service
  • the text entry interface may support an explicit input mode (also known as an "unambiguous" input mode) and/or an ambiguous input mode.
  • Multi-tap is generally used in devices with a keypad, such as a standard E.161 telephone keypad that defines the assignment of the 26 letter English alphabet (a to z) to a 12-key telephone keypad.
  • the keypad may be such that the alphabet is printed under each number key, beginning with "2,” in a three or four letter sequence as follows: “ABC” under “2" key, "DEF” under “3” key, “GHI” under “4" key, “JKL” under "5" key, “MNO” under “6” key, “PQ S” under “7” key, "TUV” under “8” key, and “WXYZ” under “9” key.
  • the user selects the exact letter to be input by repeatedly pressing the same key to cycle through the letters for that key. For example, pressing the "5" key twice would input the letter "k” since that is the second letter listed under "5.”
  • Other examples of an explicit input mode include a full "qwerty" keyboard where there is one dedicated key for each character.
  • an ambiguous input mode Under an ambiguous input mode, on the other hand, the user's character selection is not explicit.
  • An example of an ambiguous input mode is T9 (Text on 9 keys), provided by Nuance of Burlington Massachusetts. T9 allows text to be entered by a single key press of each character or letter. The device then utilizes an algorithm and accesses a dictionary to look up all words corresponding to the sequence of key presses entered by the user. If there is more than one word that corresponds to the sequence of key presses, then the device may provide the user with a list of those words to select from. The words may be ordered by frequency of use in an effort to accurately predict the intended word. Additionally, the user may be able to add new words to the dictionary.
  • One embodiment of the invention is a method for text entry in a device.
  • the method includes detecting an input from a user, the input including a selection of a key representing a plurality of characters from a keypad of the device.
  • the method further includes determining whether the user has selected explicit text entry or ambiguous text entry of one of the characters based on a type of the input, and, based on the result of the determining, activating one of the explicit text entry or the ambiguous text entry for the one of the characters.
  • the apparatus includes at least one processor, and at least one memory including computer program code.
  • the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured, with the at least one processor, to cause the apparatus at least to detect an input from a user.
  • the input may include a selection of a key representing a plurality of characters from a keypad of a device.
  • the at least one memory and the computer program code are further configured, with the at least one processor, to cause the apparatus to determine whether the user has selected explicit text entry or ambiguous text entry of one of the characters based on the input type, and, based on the result of the determining, activate one of the explicit text entry or the ambiguous text entry for the one of the characters.
  • a computer program embodied on a computer readable storage medium.
  • the computer program is configured to control a processor to perform a process, which includes detecting an input from a user, the input including a selection of a key representing a plurality of characters from a keypad of a device.
  • the computer program is configured to control the processor to determine whether the user has selected explicit text entry or ambiguous text entry of one of the characters based on a type of the input, and, based on the result of the determining, to activate one of the explicit text entry or the ambiguous text entry for the one of the characters.
  • Another embodiment of the invention includes an apparatus configured for text entry.
  • the apparatus includes detecting means for detecting an input from a user, the input including a selection of a key representing a plurality of characters from a keypad of the device.
  • the apparatus further includes determining means for determining whether the user has selected explicit text entry or ambiguous text entry of one of the characters based on a type of the input, and, based on the result of the determining means, activating means for activating one of the explicit text entry or the ambiguous text entry for the one of the characters.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of an apparatus according to one embodiment
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary implementation of a keypad according to an embodiment
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an example of a text string inputted in accordance with one embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 4a illustrates an example of text input according to an embodiment
  • FIG. 4b illustrates an example of text input according to an embodiment
  • Fig. 4c illustrates an example of text input according to an embodiment
  • FIG. 5a illustrates another example of text input according to one embodiment
  • Fig. 5b illustrates an example of text input according to one embodiment
  • Fig. 5c illustrates an example of text input according to one embodiment
  • Fig. 5d illustrates an example of text input according to one embodiment
  • Fig. 5e illustrates an example of text input according to one embodiment
  • FIG. 6 illustrates a method in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • text input in portable devices is either explicit, such as multi-tap text entry, or ambiguous, as in T9 text entry.
  • Ambiguous text entry tends to provide a faster and easier method of entering text because it does not involve multiple taps or selection from a list.
  • ambiguous text entry utilizes tools like dictionaries, algorithms, and/or known probabilities of certain character combinations (n-grams) in order to provide relatively accurate estimates of what text the user intended to enter. Such an approach may work well when the user is inputting common, standard words. However, when a user desires to use words or spellings that may not be found within a standard dictionary, ambiguous text input alone will not result in accurate text entry.
  • a user may want to use a proper noun, non-standard abbreviation, or shorthand in their text messages.
  • the user will need to enter the text using ambiguous mode and then make a laborious correction since the device will not match the correct word, or the user will need to change the text entry mode to an explicit mode and then change it back once he has completed the word. Both of these options prove to be tiresome and time consuming.
  • embodiments of the invention provide a text input method, apparatus and/or computer program that mixes ambiguous and explicit input methods into a single mode within a device.
  • the user will not need to toggle between explicit and ambiguous text entry modes. Rather, the user can select explicit or ambiguous text entry as they provide an input to the keypad. In other words, the user can at any point choose to enter a character explicitly or ambiguously without needing to have previously toggled between modes. This provides users of the device with a faster, easier, and more accurate text input method.
  • Fig. 1 illustrates a text input apparatus 10 with combined explicit and ambiguous text entry capability, according to one embodiment.
  • text input apparatus 10 is implemented in an electronic device, such as a terminal or wireless communications device, including a mobile telephone, portable computer, Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), portable game console, or any other electronic device with multiple characters per key.
  • PDA Personal Digital Assistant
  • Apparatus 10 may include an interface 12, such as a bus or other communications mechanism, for communicating information between components of apparatus 10. Alternatively, the components of apparatus 10 may communicate directly with each other, without use of interface 12.
  • interface 12 such as a bus or other communications mechanism
  • Apparatus 10 also includes a processor 22, coupled to interface 12, for receiving, managing, and/or processing user input or information, and for executing instructions or operations.
  • processor 22 may be any type of general or specific purpose processor.
  • Apparatus 10 further includes a memory 14 for storing information and instructions to be executed by processor 22.
  • Memory 14 can be comprised of any combination of random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), static storage such as a magnetic or optical disk, or any other type of machine or computer readable media.
  • Computer readable media may be any available media that can be accessed by processor 22 and could include volatile or nonvolatile media, removable or non-removable media, and communication media.
  • Communication media may include computer program code or instructions, data structures, program modules or other data, and includes any information delivery media.
  • Processor 22 can further be coupled, via interface 12 or directly, to a graphical user interface or display 24, such as a thin film transistor (TFT) liquid crystal display (LCD), for displaying information to a user.
  • display 24 can be a touchscreen display that allows a user to interact directly with what is presented on display 24 by using their finger, hand, stylus, or another passive object.
  • a keypad 26 can further be coupled to interface 12 to enable a user to interface with apparatus 10.
  • keypad 26 is a touchscreen keypad displayed on display 24 where each of the keys can be activated by touching that portion of display 24.
  • keypad 26 may be a physical keypad.
  • keypad 26 may be a standard E.161 12-key keypad.
  • keypad 26 may include a different number of keys - for example less than 12 keys, as will be discussed in further detail below.
  • Apparatus 10 can further include a sensor or detector 20 for detecting some action taken, for example, by a user by means of display 24 or keypad 26.
  • Detector 20 can be a separate component of apparatus 10 or, alternatively, detector 20 can be included as a function of processor 22.
  • memory 14 stores software modules or applications that provide functionality when executed by processor 22.
  • the modules may include an operating system 15 that provides operating system functionality for apparatus 10.
  • the memory 14 may also store applications 16, such as text editing or messaging applications, games, web browsers, etc.
  • Apparatus 10 may also store a dictionary 18 to provide a library of words for the text editing or messaging applications.
  • Apparatus 10 is configured to provide an improved text inputting and editing method by mixing ambiguous and explicit input methods into a single mode within the device.
  • explicitly chosen characters can be mixed with ambiguously chosen characters in a text input string displayed to the user during text entry.
  • embodiments of the invention provide keys that can be activated in at least two ways. A first type of activation of a key will result in explicit text entry, and another type of activation of the key will result in ambiguous text entry.
  • the "2" button is assigned to the characters “2,” “A,” “B,” and “C.”
  • a single short press on the key will enter the character as an ambiguous entry of one of "2,” “A,” “B,” or “C.”
  • the device can then decide which of the characters the user intended based on an algorithm that may include a dictionary comparison.
  • the device will recognize that the user desires explicit text entry and will provide the user with a pop-menu or list of the four options so that the user can unambiguously select their choice of character (for example using subsequent presses of the same key, or navigating the menu using cursor keys). The same can apply for any of the other character keys in the 12-key keypad.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates an exemplary implementation of keypad 26, according to another embodiment of the invention.
  • the first key 200 may include the characters “Q,” “W,” “A,” “S,” “Z,” and “X” in the format shown.
  • the second key 210 may include the characters “E,” “ ,” “D,” “F,” “C,” and “V” as illustrated.
  • the third key 220 may include the characters “T,” “Y,” “G,” “H,” “B,” and “N.”
  • the fourth key 230 may include the characters “U,” “I,” “J,” “K,” “M,” and “,” as shown.
  • the fifth key 240 may include the characters "O,” "P,” “L,” “.” and “-” as illustrated. As a result, when viewed together, the five keys mimic a qwerty keyboard.
  • Keypad 26, as illustrated in Fig. 2, may also include a shift key 250, a space key 260, and a delete key 270.
  • swiping or stroking the keypad from the center of a key in the direction of one of the characters will result in explicit input of that character.
  • swiping key 200 toward the bottom left of the key, as illustrated by the arrow will result in the explicit selection of letter "Z.”
  • any key swiping in the direction of any of the characters on that key will result in an explicit selection of that character.
  • a user may swipe in any of the six directions corresponding to the six characters on each of the keys
  • detector 20 and/or processor 22 will detect that the user has swiped a key of keypad 26 in the direction of a character and, determine, based on the type of input (in this case a swipe), that the user intended to explicitly select that character.
  • Processor 22 determines the character that the user wants to explicitly select based on the key swiped and the direction of the swipe.
  • Processor 22 may then cause display 24 to display the character explicitly selected by the user, or cause the character to be used in another way (e.g. saved to a location in the memory 14).
  • the swipe can be started anywhere within the area of the key and the direction of the swipe (rather than position) will be used to determine which character the user intended to explicitly select.
  • a user interface of a device can detect that a user has touched, swiped, or stroked the touchscreen of the device.
  • resistive, capacitive, surface acoustic wave, or optical imaging systems may be used to recognize a touch gesture made on the touchscreen.
  • Embodiments of the invention can be applied to any touchscreen implementation, including those not yet developed. Embodiments may also be suitable for implementations that use a touch sensitive device other than touchscreen, for example a fixed keyboard layout that is touch sensitive but does not include a screen.
  • the user may simply tap any portion of a key. For instance, tapping key 230, as illustrated by the circle thereon in Fig.
  • detector 20 and/or processor 22 will detect that the user has tapped a key of keypad 26 and, determine, based on the type of input (in this case a tap), that the user intended to ambiguously select a character.
  • the processor 22 can cause apparatus 10 to estimate the character intended by the user based, for example, on any previous characters entered and/or by consulting dictionary 18. Similarly, tapping any of the other keys will result in an ambiguous selection from amongst the characters of that key.
  • the configuration described above with mixed explicit and ambiguous text entry capability can allow for a reduction in the number of keys required for the device.
  • Ambiguous text entry normally needs a certain number of keys to work effectively (e.g., 12 keys are used in T9) because when the number of keys is reduced to six, for example, the level of ambiguity becomes too high for an algorithm to reliably find the required word within a dictionary and therefore necessitates frequent corrections to be made by the user.
  • Examples of the invention can result in a significant reduction in the number of keys required by simultaneously providing both explicit and ambiguous text entry capabilities. Since the number of keys is reduced, a device can be made significantly smaller and more space efficient. In other words, the size of the device is not increased due to the need for numerous keys.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates five keys
  • any number of keys may be used without departing from the scope of the invention. Additional keys may be added or removed without affecting the functionality of the keypad 26 or text input method. Additionally, the qwerty keypad configuration is not necessary for operation of the invention; the characters may be configured in any order.
  • Fig. 3 illustrates an example of a text string inputted according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • the first character “S” and the last character “r” have been entered explicitly in the manner described above.
  • the middle three letters, which are underlined, have been entered ambiguously, and a dictionary based algorithm has defined them as “u,” "p,” and "e.”
  • the user has been able to enter a single word, "Super,” using both explicit and ambiguous text entry methods.
  • processor 22 is configured, along with memory 14 that includes computer program code, to cause the apparatus 10 to detect an input from a user.
  • the input may be a selection of a key representing at least one character from keypad 26 of the device.
  • the input may take the form of a directional swipe indicating that the user intends to explicitly input a specific letter.
  • the input may also be a tap of a key indicating that the user intends to ambiguously input one of the characters on that key.
  • the processor 22 and memory 14 are further configured to cause apparatus 10 to determine whether the user has selected explicit text entry or ambiguous text entry of the at least one character based on the input type. In other words, according to one embodiment, apparatus 10 determines whether the user wants to activate explicit text input or ambiguous text input for that character based, for example, on whether the user has swiped or tapped the key. Then, based on the result of the determination as to whether the user selected explicit or ambiguous text input, the processor 22 and memory 14 are configured to cause apparatus 10 to activate one of the explicit text entry or the ambiguous text entry for that character.
  • Figs. 4a-4c illustrate an example of text input using explicit and ambiguous text entry methods within a single character string or word.
  • a user may explicitly select letter "C" for entry by swiping key 210 in the direction of "C” as shown by the circle and directional arrow on key 210.
  • the letter "C” is displayed in text input area 400.
  • text input area 400 is a text input area within a text messaging application, text editing application, or any application running on the device that accepts text as input.
  • Fig. 4b the user ambiguously enters one of the characters of key 200 by tapping key 200.
  • Apparatus 10 interprets this ambiguous entry as the entry of the letter "a” by consulting an algorithm which may use a dictionary 18 stored in memory 14. As a result, the letter "a” is displayed in text input area 400 after the letter "C.”
  • apparatus 10 utilizes an algorithm and may also use a dictionary 18 stored in memory 14 to interpret this ambiguous entry as the letter "p."
  • the letter "p” is now displayed in text input area 400 following the letters "C” and "a.” Accordingly, the user has now formed the word "Cap” using a combination of explicit text entry and ambiguous text entry.
  • the interpretation of ambiguous entries may be revised in light of subsequent ambiguous and/or explicit entries. For example, suppose that the word "Cap” is further extended by the explicit entry of the letter "1".
  • Figs. 5a-5e illustrate another example of text input using explicit and ambiguous text entry methods within a single character string or word.
  • the user explicitly selects the letter "B” with a swipe of key 220 in the direction of "B” as shown by the circle and directional arrow on key 220.
  • the letter "B” is displayed in text input area 500.
  • apparatus 10 determines that the letter intended by the user when tapping key 230 could be any of the letters “u,” “i,” “j,” “k,” or “m.” In one embodiment, apparatus 10 may select on of those letters to at least temporarily display in the text input area 500.
  • the letter "i” is selected for display following "B” because, for example, dictionary 18 contains more letters that begin with "Bi” than any of the other possibilities.
  • apparatus 10 has determined that the user has historically used more words that begin with "Bi” than any of the other possibilities.
  • "Bi" is temporarily displayed in text input area 500.
  • the user ambiguously selects one of the characters on key 210 by, for example, tapping key 210.
  • Apparatus 10 interprets this ambiguous entry as the entry of the letter "d" by consulting an algorithm and dictionary 18 stored in memory 14.
  • apparatus 10 knows that the first letter is "B" based on the user's explicit entry and has determined that the final letter is a "d” based on dictionary matching.
  • the second letter might be an "i” to spell the letter "Bid,” or might be a "u” to spell the letter "Bud.”
  • apparatus 10 may prompt the user to confirm which word they intended to enter. In order to do so, apparatus 10 can request that the user clarify only the key letters that will resolve the ambiguity. In the example of Fig. 5d, therefore, apparatus 10 will only need to request that the user clarify the second letter of the word. As illustrated in Fig. 5e, the user may then explicitly identify the letter "i" as the desired input for the second letter by, for example, swiping key 230 in the direction of "i.” As a result, the letter "i" is now displayed in text input area 500 to complete the word "Bid," as intended by the user.
  • apparatus 10 when there is ambiguity regarding the desired word, apparatus 10 will prompt the user to clarify only the ambiguously entered characters required to resolve the word. In other words, the user modifies ambiguously inputted characters, making them explicit, until the word can be predicted based on dictionary matching, for example. [00053] In alternative embodiments, other techniques may be used to select between alternative candidates for a word. For example, the user may be prompted to select between a plurality of candidate words, rather than individual letters.
  • the best candidate is selected based on usage information - for example, an algorithm may be used to select a most frequently used candidate word, or a candidate word that is used most frequently in a particular context (for example, "bid” may be used more frequently than "bud” in sentences that also include the word “auction”).
  • an algorithm may be used to select a most frequently used candidate word, or a candidate word that is used most frequently in a particular context (for example, "bid” may be used more frequently than "bud” in sentences that also include the word “auction”).
  • Fig. 6 illustrates a flow diagram of a method for receiving text input by a device according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • the method includes detecting an input from a user at 600.
  • the input is a selection of a key representing at least one character on the device.
  • the method may include determining, at 610, whether the input is for explicit text entry or ambiguous text entry based on the type of input. For example, if the input is a tap of the key, the method may determine that the input type is ambiguous. Whereas, if the input is a directional swipe of the key, the method may determine that the input type is explicit.
  • the method After determining the type of input, the method includes activating, at 620, explicit or ambiguous text entry for the inputted character(s) based on the result of the determining step. In other words, when the method determines, at 610, that the desired input type is explicit, the method will activate explicit text entry for that input and will display the explicitly chosen character. When the method determines, at 610, that the desired input type is ambiguous, the method will activate ambiguous text entry for that input and display one of the characters from the selected key.
  • the method includes repeating the steps of detecting the input, determining the input type, and activating explicit or ambiguous text entry until the user has completed a character string or word.
  • the method recognizes that the user has completed entering a character string or word when the user inputs a space or some type of punctuation, such as a period, question mark, etc.
  • the method includes determining, at 640, whether more than word matches the character string entered by the user meaning that there is ambiguity regarding the character string the user intended to input. If there is such an ambiguity, the method includes prompting, at 650, the user to clarify the character that will resolve the ambiguity. If, however, it is determined that there is no ambiguity, the method ends at 660.
  • the method described above can be stored as instructions on a computer readable medium and executed by a processor.
  • the computer-readable medium may be a non-transitory medium that can be encoded with information that, when executed in hardware, performs a process corresponding to the process disclosed in Fig. 6, or any other process discussed herein.
  • Examples of non-transitory mediums include a computer-readable medium, a computer distribution medium, a computer-readable storage medium, and a computer program product.
  • the computer readable medium mentioned above may be at least partially embodied by a transmission line, a compact disk, digital- video disk, a magnetic tape, a Bernoulli drive, a magnetic disk, holographic disk or tape, flash memory, magnetoresistive memory, integrated circuits, or any other digital processing apparatus memory device.
  • a keypad with fewer keys than currently available with T-9 text entry may be provided. Therefore, a device utilizing combined explicit and ambiguous text entry can dedicate less space for a physical keypad or less space for the keypad to be displayed in the touchscreen user interface. Similarly, the device is able to display or otherwise include larger keys, e.g. five large keys rather than twelve small keys, thereby improving the text input experience for visually impaired users or for users utilizing in-motion text input.
  • explicit and ambiguous inputs using a physical key may be distinguished based on whether a long or short keypress is used, they may be similarly distinguished based on whether the keypress is hard or soft (e.g. by using a pressure-sensitive key), or any other characteristic of the input.
  • touch gestures are also suitable for making explicit and ambiguous entries and for distinguishing between them - for example an explicit input may require the user to draw a circle around an input letter, whereas any other gesture within a key may be interpreted as an ambiguous gesture.
  • a pressure-sensitive touch surface may be used to distinguish between a hard gesture for an explicit entry and a soft gesture for an ambiguous entry, or any other suitable characteristic of the input may be used.
  • determinations between input types may be based upon a user input action that is performed simultaneously to the selection of a character key.
  • a device may include a touchscreen or hardware button that can be held down whilst a key is activated in order to indicate that the activation is explicit or ambiguous.
  • a tilt sensor or accelerometer may be used to detect a change in orientation of the device as the key is activated, or voice detection used to recognize an audio input made at the time of the key activation (e.g. the user speaks the word "explicit", to indicate that the key is being used explicitly). In this manner, each key activation can be made explicitly or ambiguously at the time of the activation - i.e. without needing to pre-configure the device to an explicit or ambiguous mode of input.
  • modules may be implemented as a hardware circuit comprising custom VLSI circuits or gate arrays, off-the-shelf semiconductors such as logic chips, transistors, or other discrete components.
  • a module may also be implemented in programmable hardware devices such as field programmable gate arrays, programmable array logic, programmable logic devices or the like.
  • Modules may also be partially implemented in software for execution by various types of processors.
  • An identified module of executable code may, for instance, comprise one or more physical or logical blocks of computer instructions which may, for instance, be organized as an object, procedure, or function. Nevertheless, the executables of an identified module need not be physically located together, but may comprise disparate instructions stored in different locations which, when joined logically together, comprise the module and achieve its stated purpose.
  • a module of executable code could be a single instruction, or many instructions, and may even be distributed over several different code segments, among different programs, and across several memory devices.
  • operational data may be identified and illustrated herein within modules, and may be embodied in any suitable form and organized within any suitable type of data structure. The operational data may be collected as a single data set, or may be distributed over different locations including over different storage devices, and may exist, at least partially, merely as electronic signals on a system or network.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Input From Keyboards Or The Like (AREA)

Abstract

Conformément à des modes de réalisation, l'invention porte sur un procédé, un appareil et/ou un support lisible par un ordinateur pour une entrée de texte dans un dispositif. Le procédé, selon un mode de réalisation, comprend la détection d'une entrée par un utilisateur, l'entrée comprenant une sélection d'une touche représentant une pluralité de caractères à partir d'un clavier du dispositif. Le procédé comprend en outre la détermination, sur la base d'un type de l'entrée, si l'utilisateur a sélectionné une entrée de texte explicite ou une entrée de texte ambiguë de l'un des caractères sur la touche et, sur la base du résultat de la détermination, l'activation de l'une de l'entrée de texte explicite ou de l'entrée de texte ambiguë pour le caractère.
PCT/IB2010/052705 2010-06-16 2010-06-16 Entrée de texte à ambiguïté mixte WO2011158064A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/IB2010/052705 WO2011158064A1 (fr) 2010-06-16 2010-06-16 Entrée de texte à ambiguïté mixte

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/IB2010/052705 WO2011158064A1 (fr) 2010-06-16 2010-06-16 Entrée de texte à ambiguïté mixte

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2011158064A1 true WO2011158064A1 (fr) 2011-12-22

Family

ID=45347692

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IB2010/052705 WO2011158064A1 (fr) 2010-06-16 2010-06-16 Entrée de texte à ambiguïté mixte

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2011158064A1 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014127337A3 (fr) * 2013-02-17 2014-11-20 Keyless Systems Ltd. Systèmes améliorés d'entrée de données
CN104898969A (zh) * 2014-03-04 2015-09-09 欧姆龙株式会社 字符输入装置以及信息处理装置

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020196163A1 (en) * 1998-12-04 2002-12-26 Bradford Ethan Robert Explicit character filtering of ambiguous text entry
WO2008114086A2 (fr) * 2006-06-23 2008-09-25 Firooz Ghassabian Systèmes d'entrée de données combinés
US20100088626A1 (en) * 2008-10-07 2010-04-08 Dan Rubanovich Dynamic Alteration of Input Mode on Touch Screen Device

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020196163A1 (en) * 1998-12-04 2002-12-26 Bradford Ethan Robert Explicit character filtering of ambiguous text entry
WO2008114086A2 (fr) * 2006-06-23 2008-09-25 Firooz Ghassabian Systèmes d'entrée de données combinés
US20100088626A1 (en) * 2008-10-07 2010-04-08 Dan Rubanovich Dynamic Alteration of Input Mode on Touch Screen Device

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014127337A3 (fr) * 2013-02-17 2014-11-20 Keyless Systems Ltd. Systèmes améliorés d'entrée de données
CN104898969A (zh) * 2014-03-04 2015-09-09 欧姆龙株式会社 字符输入装置以及信息处理装置
EP2916212A1 (fr) * 2014-03-04 2015-09-09 Omron Corporation Dispositif de saisie de caractères et dispositif de traitement d'informations
US10303359B2 (en) 2014-03-04 2019-05-28 Omron Corporation Character input device and information processing device
CN104898969B (zh) * 2014-03-04 2019-08-27 欧姆龙株式会社 字符输入装置以及信息处理装置

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11416141B2 (en) Method, system, and graphical user interface for providing word recommendations
CN110083254B (zh) 多手势文本输入预测
US8599139B2 (en) Electronic device system utilizing a character input method
CA2803192C (fr) Affichage de clavier virtuel ayant un telescripteur a proximite du clavier virtuel
US7574672B2 (en) Text entry interface for a portable communication device
US8918736B2 (en) Replay recommendations in a text entry interface
US10747334B2 (en) Reduced keyboard disambiguating system and method thereof
EP3005066B1 (fr) Claviers graphiques pour saisie gestuelle ininterrompue
US20130002553A1 (en) Character entry apparatus and associated methods
US20090073136A1 (en) Inputting commands using relative coordinate-based touch input
CN102902471B (zh) 一种输入界面的切换方法以及装置
KR20120006503A (ko) 개선된 텍스트 입력
KR20090053419A (ko) 터치 스크린을 가지는 휴대 단말기의 문자 입력 방법 및장치
KR20110082532A (ko) 다단계 가상 키보드를 가진 통신 디바이스
WO2011158064A1 (fr) Entrée de texte à ambiguïté mixte
US9996213B2 (en) Apparatus for a user interface and associated methods
US20080010055A1 (en) Handheld Electronic Device and Associated Method Employing a Multiple-Axis Input Device and Providing a Prior Variant List When Employing a Disambiguation Routine and Reinitiating a Text Entry Session on a Word
US9261973B2 (en) Method and system for previewing characters based on finger position on keyboard
EP2811371B1 (fr) Procédé et système permettant de prévisualiser des caractères en fonction de la position du doigt sur un clavier

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 10853161

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 10853161

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1