WO2011145185A1 - Bill prediction system for invitation notice to general meeting of shareholders - Google Patents

Bill prediction system for invitation notice to general meeting of shareholders Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2011145185A1
WO2011145185A1 PCT/JP2010/058425 JP2010058425W WO2011145185A1 WO 2011145185 A1 WO2011145185 A1 WO 2011145185A1 JP 2010058425 W JP2010058425 W JP 2010058425W WO 2011145185 A1 WO2011145185 A1 WO 2011145185A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
proposal
general meeting
report
unit
shareholders
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2010/058425
Other languages
French (fr)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
孝哉 関
Original Assignee
コーポレート・プラクティス・パートナーズ株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by コーポレート・プラクティス・パートナーズ株式会社 filed Critical コーポレート・プラクティス・パートナーズ株式会社
Priority to JP2011554339A priority Critical patent/JP4972232B2/en
Priority to PCT/JP2010/058425 priority patent/WO2011145185A1/en
Publication of WO2011145185A1 publication Critical patent/WO2011145185A1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a proposal prediction system for a notice of convocation of a general meeting of shareholders.
  • a proposal that is expected to be taken up at a general meeting of shareholders is submitted to the agenda (for example, a few weeks ago) before the issuer publishes a notice of convocation of a general meeting of shareholders.
  • the present invention relates to an agenda prediction system in a notice of a general meeting of shareholders that can predict the presence or absence.
  • the present invention relates to a proposal prediction system that can indicate a vote on voting rights (pros and cons) with respect to a predicted proposal and can support the voting rights of shareholders.
  • Patent Document 1 As a computerized management of voting rights and exercise procedures for shareholders at a conventional general meeting of shareholders, JP-A-2002-49742 (Patent Document 1), JP-A-2003-16254 (Patent Document 2), JP-A-2003 There is JP-A-85355 (Patent Document 3).
  • Patent Document 1 As a computerized management of voting rights and exercise procedures for shareholders at a conventional general meeting of shareholders, JP-A-2002-49742 (Patent Document 1), JP-A-2003-16254 (Patent Document 2), JP-A-2003 There is JP-A-85355 (Patent Document 3).
  • Patent Document 3 As a computerized management of voting rights and exercise procedures for shareholders at a conventional general meeting of shareholders, JP-A-2002-49742 (Patent Document 1), JP-A-2003-16254 (Patent Document 2), JP-A-2003 There is JP-A-85355 (Patent Document 3).
  • these conventional technologies are related to the procedures
  • the proposal information necessary for institutional investors and shareholders to exercise voting rights is forecasted before the issuance company, the investee, issues a convocation notice (for example, about three weeks ago) Providing to shareholders will improve and resolve the situation. Furthermore, it is required to create and support the exercise of voting rights (pros and cons) based on the voting rights exercise guidelines prepared in advance so that shareholders can exercise their best voting rights based on the predicted contents of the proposals.
  • the present invention has been made under the circumstances as described above, and the object of the present invention is to predict proposal information necessary for shareholders to exercise voting rights at a general meeting of shareholders before issuing a convocation notice for the general meeting of shareholders.
  • a notice of convocation of a general meeting of shareholders that can be prepared and provided based on voting rights exercise guidelines prepared in advance so that the best voting rights can be exercised based on the contents of the forecasted proposals. It is to provide an agenda forecasting system.
  • the present invention relates to a bill prediction system in a notice of convocation of a general meeting of shareholders, and the object of the present invention is to provide an input unit, a calculation processing unit having a storage unit, and an output unit, wherein the calculation processing unit is a digitization unit.
  • a data extraction unit, a shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation data list generation unit, a data rearrangement unit, a proposal content prediction unit, and a shareholder general meeting plan prediction report generation unit which are input from the input unit From the data of the published securities report, corporate governance report, financial report, timely information disclosure report, independent officer report, articles of association and past convocation notice documents, Each data is converted into a numerical value, and the data rearrangement unit rearranges the data so that the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list creation unit predicts the shareholder general meeting draft.
  • the data extraction unit extracts items necessary for the proposal from the shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation data list, and the proposal content prediction unit Calculates the sum of numerical values of the extracted items, compares the sum and the reference value A of the bill, determines the presence or absence of the bill, and the shareholder meeting draft forecast report preparation unit This is achieved by preparing a shareholder general meeting draft forecast report based on the result of the determination of the presence or absence of the bill.
  • the contents of the proposal in the general meeting of shareholders can be predicted before the issuing company discloses the notice of convocation of the general meeting of shareholders (for example, a few weeks before). It is possible, and for institutional investors and foreign investors who have to make decisions on the agenda of the investee in a short period of time, the contents of the agenda can be fully examined, and the utility value is very large.
  • the overall configuration of the present invention is as shown in FIG. 1, and includes a CPU 10 that executes overall control and arithmetic processing, a ROM 11 that stores control programs, parameters, and the like, and a RAM 12 that forms a working memory. And a database (DB) 20 for storing input processed information, data, and parameters, a display unit 14 for displaying necessary data, tables, operation guides, etc. via the display control unit 13, and calculation processing results, etc. An output unit 15 that outputs data and a print format and an input unit 16 that inputs necessary information, data, commands, and the like are provided, and these units are connected to each other.
  • DB database
  • system main body is connected to an external terminal (for example, a personal computer) 30 and can be connected to the Internet 31 to transmit / receive data to / from the user's external terminal.
  • An interface (I / F) unit 32 for that purpose is provided with the CPU 10 and the like. It is connected to the.
  • the data and information of the independent officer report 45, the articles of association printed on the paper and the document 46 of the past general meeting of shareholders general meeting, and the news report and coverage information 47 printed on the paper are input.
  • electronic data it can also be input via the Internet 31.
  • the securities report 41, the corporate governance report 42, the financial report 43, and the timely disclosure information report 44 may be data printed on paper.
  • the articles of incorporation and the document 46 of the past general meeting of shareholders, the news report, and the coverage information 47 may be electronic data.
  • FIG. 2 shows a functional block example of the arithmetic processing unit 100 composed of the CPU 10, the ROM 11, the RAM 12, and the database 20, and the arithmetic processing unit 100 digitizes data such as agenda items with a predetermined algorithm.
  • 110 a data extraction unit 120 that extracts agenda items
  • a shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation data list creation unit 130 that creates a shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51
  • data rearrangement A data rearrangement unit 140 a proposal content prediction unit 150 that predicts a proposal at the general meeting of shareholders, and a shareholder meeting proposal that creates a shareholder meeting proposal prediction report 60 based on the prediction plan predicted by the proposal contents prediction unit 150
  • Data on the forecast report creation section 160 and the voting rights exercise guidelines 200 separately prepared by shareholders Consists of a bill decision unit 170 that determines whether or not the predicted bill is accepted or not as a quasi-value, and a shareholder meeting draft decision report preparation unit 180 that creates a shareholder meeting draft decision report 52 based on a result determined by the
  • the securities report (Japanese version) 41 is, for example, as shown in FIG. 3, and the format is defined in the “Cabinet Office Ordinance on Disclosure of Corporate Content”. From the securities report 41, which is electronic data, the status of each stock owner and the data related to the officers are input from the input unit 16 and imported. Data input of the securities report 41 is performed by downloading the data from the website of the issuing company on the Internet that publishes the securities report 41, and then assigning corresponding values to each item according to the classification of the securities report 41. Input from the keyboard.
  • XBRL eXtensible Business Reporting Language
  • XML eXtensible Markup Language
  • Fig. 3 shows a part of the securities report 41.
  • the “5th Accounting Status” includes consolidated financial statements, financial statements, etc., “Sixth Outline of Submitting Company's Stock Affairs” and “7th Submitting Company Reference Information”.
  • Part 3 Guarantee Company Information includes “First Guarantee Company Information”, “Second Guidance Company Information” and “Third Index Information”, etc.
  • Part IV Special Information includes “First Recent Financial Statements” and “Second Recent Financial Statements or Financial Documents of Guarantor Companies and Subsidiaries”.
  • the Corporate governance Report (Japanese version) 42 is, for example, as shown in FIG. 4, and “Basic Concept and Capital Structure, Corporate Attributes and Other Basic Information on Corporate governance” further includes corporate attributes, Listed exchanges and market classifications, closing date, industry, (consolidated) number of employees, (consolidated) sales, parent company presence, number of consolidated subsidiaries, and other special circumstances that may have a significant impact on corporate governance Shown in The status of the business management organization and other corporate governance systems related to management decision-making, execution and supervision includes the organizational structure, the chairman of the board of directors, the number of directors, the status of appointment of outside directors, the Existence of establishment, number of corporate auditors, status of coordination between corporate auditors and accounting auditors, status of coordination between corporate auditors and internal audit departments, status of appointment of external corporate auditors, executive officer relationship, audit system incentive relationship, disclosure status regarding director compensation There are other support systems for outside directors.
  • “Implementation Status of Measures Related to Shareholders and Other Stakeholders” includes the status of efforts to revitalize the general meeting of shareholders and facilitate the exercise of voting rights, the status of activities related to IR, and the status of respect for stakeholder positions.
  • “Basic Ideas on Internal Control Systems and their Development Status” includes basic ideas on internal control systems, the status of internal control systems, and basic ideas for eliminating anti-social forces. , The status of preparations to eliminate anti-social forces, attachment of schematic diagrams, and other matters related to takeover defense.
  • Corporate Governance Report 42 which describes this content, the company's basic concept, capital structure, corporate attributes, information on directors and corporate auditors, information on outside directors and corporate auditors, and compensation
  • the information about the shareholder and other interested parties, the internal control, and the information regarding takeover defense are inputted from the input unit 16 and taken in.
  • Data input at the input unit 16 of the corporate governance report 42 is performed by downloading data from a website such as an issuing company on the Internet that publishes the data, and then, according to the classification of the corporate governance report 42, for each item. Enter the corresponding value using the keyboard.
  • XBRL XML-based language that is standardized so that the financial information of the Corporate Governance Report 42 can be created, distributed, and reused, it is possible to save labor in keyboard input operations. Therefore, if the corporate governance report 42 is disclosed by XBRL, it is used.
  • the financial statement report (Japanese version) 43 is, for example, as shown in FIG. 5, and the format of the financial statement report 43 is for companies that prepare consolidated financial statements and for companies that do not prepare consolidated financial statements.
  • summary information includes consolidated performance, dividend status, consolidated performance forecast, and others.
  • Qualitative and financial statements include business results, corporate group status, management policy, consolidated financial statements, There are individual financial statements and others.
  • summary information includes performance, dividends, performance forecasts, and others.
  • Qualitative and financial statements include business results, corporate group status, management policies, financial statements. There are others.
  • Data input by the input unit 16 of the financial report 43 is performed by downloading data from a website of an issuing company on the Internet that publishes the report, and then assigning a value to each item according to the classification of the financial report 43. Input is performed using the keyboard of the input unit 16.
  • XBRL an XML-based language that is standardized so that the financial information of the financial report 43 can be created, distributed, and reused, it is possible to save labor in keyboard input operations. Therefore, when the financial report 43 is disclosed by XBRL, this is used.
  • Timely Disclosure Information Report 44 does not have a specific format, but it is an input section for timely disclosure information report 44, which is electronic data, to transfer officers, policy on takeover defense measures, information on corporate reorganization, information on executive compensation, etc. Input from 16 and import.
  • the data input by the input unit 16 of the timely disclosure report 44 corresponds to each item according to the classification of the timely disclosure information report 44 after downloading the data from the website of the issuing company on the Internet that publishes the data. Is input using the keyboard of the input unit 16.
  • the independent officer report 45 which is electronic data, enter the data of the attributes of individual outside directors and outside corporate auditors according to other company graduates, lawyers, certified public accountants, tax accountants, academics, and other categories. In addition, enter the reason for appointment regarding the relevance of the expertise of the outside directors and outside corporate auditors to be disclosed.
  • Data input by the input unit 16 of the independent officer report 45 which is electronic data, is performed by downloading the data from the website of the issuing company on the Internet that publishes the data, and then according to the classification of the independent officer report 45. The corresponding value is input using the keyboard of the input unit 16 or the like.
  • XBRL XML-based language that is standardized so that the financial information of the independent officer report 45 can be created, distributed, and reused, it is possible to save labor for keyboard input work. Therefore, when the independent officer report 45 is disclosed by XBRL, this is used. The items disclosed in the independent officer report 45 are in line with the corporate governance report 42.
  • the format of the Notice of Convocation of the General Meeting of Shareholders is stipulated in the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Companies Act, and includes the agenda, the reason for the proposal, the results of the investigation that should be reported to the General Meeting of Shareholders, and an outline of the results. .
  • the data entered in the Articles of Incorporation includes stock status, matters relating to the general meeting of shareholders, the operations of the Board of Directors and the Board of Corporate Auditors, the terms of office of Directors and Corporate Auditors, and the matters relating to the authority to determine dividends.
  • Information entered from previous notices of the general meeting of shareholders is the proposals subject to resolution at the general meeting of shareholders, the biography and attributes of directors and corporate auditors presented as reference materials, attributes, details of director compensation, takeover defense measures, and corporate reorganization. Things.
  • the display unit 14 ⁇ / b> A and the display unit 14 are illustrated as separate hardware, but can be displayed in a superimposed format on the same screen.
  • the news report and news gathering information 47 is generally stored as scrap and is in the form of paper, and these scraped items are input by using the keyboard of the input unit 16 or the like.
  • the information and data of each company input as described above are stored in the database 20 by being partitioned for each company as shown in FIG. 7, and thereafter, the data rearrangement unit 140 displays the information for each input type (disclosure document).
  • the data in the database 20 is rearranged by grouping them into serial numbers, and the shareholder general meeting draft forecasting system collection data list 50 as shown in FIGS. 8 and 9 is displayed as serial numbers, disclosure documents, etc. Create a set of documents and other items for at least two years.
  • the shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation data list creation unit 130 divides the data into groups for each agenda item. The data is rearranged by assigning numbers, and the digitizing unit 120 digitizes each item to create a shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51 as shown in FIGS.
  • the data extraction unit 120 uses the aggregated data as the shareholder general meeting proposal prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51 shown in FIG. 10 to FIG. Division change, appointment of directors, appointment of corporate auditors, appointment of substitute corporate auditors, payment of directors 'bonuses, payment of retirement benefits, revision of directors' compensation, granting of stock acquisition rights, acquisition of treasury stock, appointment of accounting auditors, business restructuring, takeover defense measures
  • the items required for introduction, shareholder proposals, and other proposals are extracted for each proposal, and the proposal content forecasting unit 150 predicts the proposal content of the general meeting of shareholders to be convened from the extracted items. Then, based on the prediction result, the shareholder general meeting plan prediction report creating unit 160 creates the shareholder general meeting plan prediction report 60.
  • the proposal judging unit 170 judges the pros and cons of the forecasted proposal predicted by the proposal content forecasting unit 150 by referring to, for example, the voting right exercise guideline 200 as shown in FIG.
  • the agenda decision report preparation part 180 prepares the judgment result from the agenda judgment part 170 as a shareholder general meeting proposal determination report 52.
  • the shareholder general meeting draft decision report 52 may be included in the shareholder general meeting draft forecast report 60. That is, the presence / absence of a predicted bill and the approval / disapproval of the predicted bill predicted to be present may be written together.
  • the Shareholders General Meeting Proposal Decision Report 52 will be held when the Shareholders Meeting Convocation Notice is actually released.
  • e-mail to shareholders such as the two weeks before the prospect of, FAX, provided by mail or the like. This is to notify again of the portion that could not be covered by the shareholder general meeting draft forecast report 60.
  • the issuing company may replace candidates immediately before the notice of the general meeting of shareholders is prepared, and forecasts and actual convocations for customers (institutional investors, etc.) who use this system. This is because it is necessary to notify the coincidence and difference of the notification.
  • the data regarding the power of dividend resolution input from the Articles of Incorporation and the previous notice of convocation of the general meeting of shareholders 46 is combined with the data of dividends input from the financial report 43, and the authority to determine the dividend is at the general meeting of shareholders.
  • the authority to determine the dividend is at the general meeting of shareholders.
  • the director has the authority to approve dividends, it is predicted that there will be no surplus distribution proposal. If it is predicted that there will be a surplus distribution proposal, it will further decide whether to approve or reject it.
  • the bill content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the bill.
  • the data extraction unit 120 reads the serial numbers ST8 (current year: final dividend), ST9 (current year: dividend payout ratio), ST16 (previous year: dividend payout ratio), ST17 (previous year: ROE) from the shareholder general meeting draft forecast system algorithm calculation data list 51. ), DT8 (dividend authority) and ST49 (details when there is surplus disposal) are extracted (step S11), and the agenda content prediction unit 150 calculates the sum of the values of the extracted items. (Step S12).
  • the digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51.
  • the shareholder general meeting plan prediction report creation unit 160 creates a prediction result of the presence / absence of the determined surplus distribution plan as a shareholder general meeting plan prediction report 60.
  • the bill determination unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for determination of the generated surplus distribution prediction plan (step S16), the calculated minimum value and the serial numbers ST8 (current year: final dividend), ST9 (current year: dividend payout ratio), ST16 (previous year: dividend payout ratio), ST17 (previous year) : ROE), DT8 (dividend authority), and ST49 (details when there is surplus disposal) are compared with the reference value # 1B, which is the sum of the values (step S17), and the pros and cons of the forecast for surplus distribution Judging.
  • the general meeting draft decision report preparation section 180 creates a decision result of voting rights exercise as a shareholder general meeting draft decision report 52.
  • the existence of an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation is predicted based on the data relating to the amendment to the Articles of Incorporation input from the Timely Disclosure Report 44 or the press and interview information 47. If it is predicted that there will be a proposal for partial amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, the pros and cons of the forecast will be further determined. That is, in the algorithm example for determining whether or not there is a partial amendment to the Articles of Incorporation shown in FIG. 19, the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines whether or not there is a proposal.
  • the data extraction unit 120 reads the serial number DT6 (director term), DT7 (auditor term), DT8 (dividend authority), ST27 (regulations regarding the operation of the general meeting of shareholders) from the shareholder general meeting draft forecast system algorithm calculation data list 51,
  • DT6 directory term
  • DT7 auditor term
  • DT8 dividend authority
  • ST27 regulations regarding the operation of the general meeting of shareholders
  • step S21 Each item of ST28 (stock status) and ST50 (details when there is a partial amendment to the Articles of Incorporation) is extracted (step S21), and the agenda content prediction unit 150 calculates the sum of the values of the extracted items.
  • the digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51.
  • step S23 a determination is made to compare the preset reference value # 2A for partial change of the Articles of Incorporation with the calculated total value (step S23). If the total value is equal to or greater than the reference value # 2A It is determined that the articles of incorporation partial change proposal is “present” (step S24). If the total value is smaller than the reference value # 2A, it is determined that there is no articles of incorporation partial change proposal (step S25).
  • the shareholder general meeting draft forecast report creation unit 160 creates a forecast result of the presence or absence of the determined partial amendment of the articles of incorporation as a shareholder general meeting draft forecast report 60.
  • the bill judgment unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the determination of the proposed proposal for partial change of the Articles of Incorporation ( Step S26), the calculated minimum value, and the serial numbers DT6 (director term), DT7 (auditor term), DT8 (dividend power), ST27 (operating the general meeting of shareholders) defined by the guidelines for exercising voting rights separately prepared by shareholders Regulations), ST28 (status of stock), ST50 (details if there is a partial change in the Articles of Incorporation) and the reference value # 2B, which is the sum of the values (step S27) Judgment for or against.
  • the general meeting draft decision report preparation section 180 creates a decision result (promotion) of voting rights exercise as a shareholder general meeting draft decision report 52.
  • the presence or absence of proposals is predicted based on the data on director personnel input from the Timely Disclosure Information Report 44, the Securities Report 41, the corporate governance Report 42, the Articles of Incorporation and the past general meeting of shareholders. Combining the data of individual directors entered from the convocation notice document 46, the directors that will be presented at the general meeting of shareholders are identified, and their attributes are presented as a list to predict whether directors will be appointed. To do. If it is predicted that there will be a proposal for the appointment of a director, the decision on exercising the voting rights is further prepared as a shareholder meeting proposal decision report 52.
  • the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the proposal.
  • the data extraction unit 120 uses the serial number DT1 (name of director or corporate auditor), DT2 (title), DT3 (year of birth), DT4 (year of office), DT5 (name of director) from the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51.
  • the sum of the numerical values of the items is calculated (step S32).
  • the digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51.
  • the shareholder general meeting draft prediction report creating section 160 creates a prediction result of the presence or absence of the determined director appointment proposal as a shareholder general meeting draft prediction report 60.
  • the proposal determination unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the determination of the prepared director appointment prediction proposal (step S37), This calculated minimum value and the serial numbers DT1 (name of director or corporate auditor), DT2 (title), DT3 (year of birth), DT4 (year of office), DT5 (history) determined by guidelines for exercising voting rights separately prepared by shareholders ), DT6 (Executive term), DT9 (External officer), DT10 (External officer attribute), DT11 (Information on change of officer), DT12 (Executive candidate name), DT13 (Executive candidate title), DT14 Executive candidate attributes), DT15 (executive candidate year of birth), DT16 (executive candidate year), ST22 (Board of Directors), ST23 (total number of directors), ST24 (external directors), T25 (auditor number) , ST26 (the number of outside corporate auditors), ST27 (regulation
  • the general meeting draft decision report preparation section 180 creates a decision result of voting rights exercise as a shareholder general meeting draft decision report 52.
  • the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the proposal.
  • the data extraction unit 120 reads the serial number DT1 (name of director or corporate auditor), DT2 (title), DT3 (year of birth), DT4 (year of office), DT5 (name of director) from the shareholder general meeting proposal prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51.
  • Step S41 the bill content prediction unit 150 calculates the sum of value of each item extracted (step S42).
  • the digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51.
  • the shareholder general meeting draft prediction report creation unit 160 creates a prediction result of the presence / absence of the determined audit & supervisory board appointment proposal as a shareholder general meeting draft prediction report 60.
  • the proposal judgment unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the judgment of the prepared corporate auditor appointment prediction proposal (step S47). ), The calculated minimum value, and the serial numbers DT1 (name of director or corporate auditor), DT2 (title), DT3 (year of birth), DT4 (year of office), and DT5, which are determined by the guidelines for exercising voting rights separately prepared by shareholders (Career), DT7 (Audit term), DT9 (External officer), DT10 (External officer attribute), DT11 (Information on change of officer), DT12 (Executive candidate name), DT13 (Executive candidate title) , DT14 (executive candidate attribute), DT15 (executive candidate year of birth), DT16 (executive candidate year), ST22 (form of board of directors), ST23 (total number of directors), ST24 (number of outside directors) Comparison with ST25 (number of outside corporate auditors
  • the general meeting draft decision report preparation section 180 creates a decision result (promotion) of voting rights exercise as a shareholder general meeting draft decision report 52.
  • the presence or absence of proposals is predicted based on the data on personnel of substitute corporate auditors entered from the timely disclosure information report 44, and the securities report 41, corporate governance report 42, articles of incorporation and Combining the data of individual substitute corporate auditors entered from the document 46 of the past shareholders meeting convocation notice, the substitute corporate auditors who will be presented at the general meeting of shareholders are identified and their attributes are presented as a list. Predict whether or not there is a proposal to appoint a substitute corporate auditor. If it is predicted that there will be a proposal to appoint a substitute corporate auditor, the decision on exercising the voting rights is further prepared as a draft decision report 52 for the general meeting of shareholders.
  • the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the proposal.
  • the data extraction unit 120 extracts items of serial numbers ST72 (details when there is other information) and ST53 (details when a substitute auditor is appointed) from the data list 51 for shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation.
  • the proposal content prediction unit 150 sets the extracted numerical values of the items as a total value (Step S52).
  • the quantification of the item is performed by the quantification unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51.
  • step S53 a determination is made to compare the size of the preset reference value # 5A for selecting the substitute corporate auditor and the calculated total value (step S53). If the total value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 5A, It is determined that the substitute auditor appointment proposal is “present” (step S54), and if the combined value is smaller than the reference value # 5A, it is determined that there is no substitute auditor appointment proposal (step S55).
  • the shareholder general meeting plan prediction report preparation unit 160 prepares the predicted result of the presence / absence of the determined substitute corporate auditor appointment proposal as a shareholder general meeting plan prediction report 60.
  • the proposal judgment unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the determination of the predicted proposal for the appointment of the substitute corporate auditor (step S56). Then, the calculated minimum value is compared with the reference value # 5B, which is the sum of the values of serial numbers ST72 and ST53 defined by the separate voting rights exercise guidelines prepared by shareholders (step S57), and the proposal for the appointment of a substitute corporate auditor Judgment for or against. That is, if the calculated minimum value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 5B, it agrees with the prediction proposal (step S58), and if the calculated minimum value is smaller than the reference value # 5B, it is opposed to the prediction proposal (step S59).
  • the general meeting draft decision report preparation section 180 creates a decision result (promotion) of voting rights exercise as a shareholder general meeting draft decision report 52.
  • the presence or absence of the proposal is predicted based on the data related to remuneration input from the Timely Disclosure Information Report 44, the Securities Report 41, the Corporate Governance Report 42, the Articles of Incorporation and the past general meeting of shareholders.
  • the individual data input from the convocation notice document 46 are combined to predict whether there will be a director bonus payment proposal that will be presented to the general meeting of shareholders. If it is predicted that there will be a director bonus payment proposal, the decision on exercising voting rights is further prepared as a shareholder meeting proposal decision report 52.
  • the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the proposal.
  • the data extraction unit 120 reads the serial number ST36 (information relating to remuneration), ST44 (incidents such as scandals), ST54 (details when there are bonus payments for officers), ST64 from the shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51.
  • Each item (characteristics of the person to whom the bonus is paid) is extracted (step S61), and the agenda content prediction unit 150 calculates the total value of the extracted items (step S62).
  • the digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51.
  • step S63 a determination is made to compare the reference value # 6A of the executive bonus payment set in advance with the calculated sum value. If the sum is equal to or greater than the reference value # 6A, the officer It is determined that the bonus payment proposal is “present” (step S64), and if the total value is smaller than the reference value # 6A, it is determined that there is no executive bonus payment proposal (step S65).
  • the shareholder general meeting plan prediction report creation unit 160 creates a prediction result of the presence / absence of the determined officer bonus payment plan as a shareholder general meeting plan prediction report 60.
  • the bill judgment unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the determination of the created officer bonus payment forecast bill (step S66). ), The calculated minimum value, serial number ST36 (information on remuneration), ST44 (incidents such as scandals), ST54 (details when there are bonus payments for officers), as determined by the separate guidelines for exercising voting rights prepared by shareholders.
  • the standard value # 6B which is the combined value of ST64 (characteristics of officer bonus payment target person), is compared (step S67), and the pros and cons of the forecast proposal for officer bonus payment are determined.
  • the general meeting draft decision report preparation section 180 creates a decision result (promotion) of voting rights exercise as a shareholder general meeting draft decision report 52.
  • the retirement allowance payment proposal based on the data on remuneration input from the timely disclosure information report 44, the presence or absence of the proposal is predicted, the securities report 41, the corporate governance report 42, the articles of incorporation and the past The individual data input from the shareholders meeting convocation notice document 46 are combined to predict whether or not there will be a proposal for retirement benefits to be presented at the shareholders meeting. If it is predicted that there will be a proposal for retirement benefits payment, the decision on exercising voting rights will be prepared as a shareholder general meeting proposal decision report 52.
  • the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the proposal.
  • the data extraction unit 120 has the serial numbers ST36 (information relating to remuneration), ST44 (incidents such as scandals), ST55 (details when retirement benefits are provided) from the data list 51 for calculating the shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm.
  • ST65 characteristics of the person who receives retirement benefits
  • ST70 policy for executive compensation
  • the digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51.
  • the shareholder general meeting plan prediction report creation unit 160 creates a prediction result of the presence / absence of the determined retirement allowance payment plan as a shareholder general meeting plan prediction report 60.
  • the bill decision unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the determination of the created retirement benefit payment prediction bill ( Step S76), the calculated minimum value, and the serial numbers ST36 (information on remuneration), ST44 (incidents such as scandals) and ST55 (if retirement benefits are provided) determined by the separate voting rights exercise guidelines prepared by shareholders Details), ST65 (Characteristics of persons eligible for retirement bonus payments), ST70 (Policy on compensation for officers) and the standard value # 7B, which is the sum of the values (Step S77) Judge the pros and cons.
  • the agenda decision report preparation unit 180 prepares the decision result (promotion) of the exercise of voting rights as a general shareholders meeting proposal determination report 52.
  • the executive remuneration revision proposal based on the data on remuneration input from the Timely Disclosure Information Report 44, the presence or absence of the proposal is predicted, the Securities Report 41, the Corporate Governance Report 42, the Articles of Incorporation and the past The individual data input from the document 46 of the shareholders meeting convocation notice are combined to predict whether or not there will be a proposal for revising the executive compensation amount that will be presented to the shareholders meeting. If it is predicted that there will be a proposal for revising the amount of executive remuneration, the decision on exercising the voting rights is further prepared as a shareholder meeting proposal decision report 52.
  • the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the proposal.
  • the data extraction unit 120 has the serial numbers ST36 (information relating to remuneration), ST44 (incidents such as scandals), ST56 (details when there is an officer remuneration revision) from the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51,
  • ST66 level after officer compensation revision
  • ST70 policy regarding officer compensation
  • the digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51.
  • the shareholder general meeting plan prediction report creation unit 160 creates a prediction result of the presence / absence of the determined officer remuneration revision proposal as a shareholder general meeting plan prediction report 60.
  • the proposal judgment unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the judgment of the created executive compensation amount revision forecast proposal ( Step S86), this calculated minimum value, and the serial numbers ST36 (information relating to remuneration), ST44 (incidents such as scandals), ST56 (executive remuneration revisions) determined by the separate voting rights exercise guidelines prepared by shareholders Details), ST66 (level after officer compensation revision), ST70 (policy on officer compensation) are compared with the standard value # 8B, which is the combined value (step S87), and the pros and cons of the forecast proposal for officer compensation revision are compared. to decide.
  • the agenda decision report preparation unit 180 prepares the decision result (promotion) of the exercise of voting rights as a general shareholders meeting proposal determination report 52.
  • the existence of a proposal is predicted based on the data on remuneration input from the timely disclosure information report 44, the securities report 41, the corporate governance report 42, the articles of incorporation and the past
  • the individual data input from the shareholders meeting convocation notice 46 are combined to predict whether there will be a proposal for granting stock acquisition rights that will be presented to the shareholders meeting. If it is predicted that there will be a proposal for granting stock acquisition rights, the decision result of exercising the voting rights is further prepared as a shareholder meeting proposal decision report 52.
  • the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the proposal.
  • the data extraction unit 120 reads the serial number ST36 (information relating to remuneration), ST44 (incidents such as scandals), ST57 (details when there is a stock acquisition right), ST67 from the data list 51 for calculating the shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm.
  • ST36 serial number relating to remuneration
  • ST44 incidents such as scandals
  • ST57 details when there is a stock acquisition right
  • ST67 from the data list 51 for calculating the shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm.
  • the agenda content prediction unit 150 calculates the sum of the values of the extracted items (step S91). S92).
  • the digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51.
  • the shareholder general meeting plan forecast report creating unit 160 creates a predicted result of the presence or absence of the judged stock acquisition right issuance plan as a shareholder general meeting plan forecast report 60.
  • the bill judgment unit 170 obtains the minimum value among the items used for the judgment of the prepared stock acquisition right issuance prediction bill (step S96). ), The calculated minimum value, serial number ST36 (information relating to remuneration), ST44 (incidents such as scandals), ST57 (details if there is a stock acquisition right), as determined by separate guidelines for exercising voting rights prepared by shareholders, Compare the standard value # 9B, which is the combined value of ST67 (characteristics of those to whom stock acquisition rights are granted) and ST70 (policy for executive remuneration) (step S97), and determine whether or not to agree with the forecast proposal for issuance of stock acquisition rights To do.
  • the agenda decision report preparation unit 180 prepares the decision result (promotion) of the exercise of voting rights as a general shareholders meeting proposal determination report 52.
  • the existence of the proposal is predicted based on the data related to treasury stock input from the timely disclosure information report 44, and individual data input based on the news report and interview information information 47 Combine and predict whether there will be a share repurchase proposal that will be presented at the general meeting of shareholders.
  • the judgment result of the exercise of voting rights is further prepared as a shareholder meeting proposal decision report 52.
  • the data extraction unit 120 extracts each item of the serial number ST45 (presence of the general meeting plan last year) and ST72 (details when there is other information) from the shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51 (step) S101), the bill content prediction unit 150 calculates the sum of the numerical values of the extracted items (step S102).
  • the digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51.
  • a determination is made to compare the magnitude of the preset reference value # 10A for the acquisition of treasury stock with the calculated total value (step S103).
  • the shareholder general meeting plan prediction report creation unit 160 creates a prediction result of the presence / absence of the determined treasury stock acquisition plan as a shareholder general meeting plan prediction report 60.
  • the bill determination unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the determination of the prepared treasury stock acquisition prediction bill (step S106). ), The calculated minimum value, and the sum of the values of serial numbers ST45 (with the last year's regular general meeting draft) and ST72 (details when other information is available) defined by separate guidelines for exercising voting rights prepared by shareholders The reference value # 10B is compared (step S107), and whether or not the forecast proposal for the acquisition of treasury stock is approved is determined.
  • the agenda decision report preparation unit 180 prepares the decision result (promotion) of the exercise of voting rights as a general shareholders meeting proposal determination report 52.
  • the existence of the proposal is predicted based on the data on the appointment of the accounting auditor entered from the timely disclosure information report 44, and the accounting entered from the past general meeting of shareholders general meeting notice (Document 47). Combine the data related to auditors, present their attributes as a list, and predict whether there will be a proposal to appoint auditors. If it is predicted that there will be a proposal for the appointment of an accounting auditor, the decision on exercising voting rights is further prepared as a shareholder meeting proposal decision report 52. That is, in the algorithm example of the presence / absence determination regarding the bill for appointment of the accounting auditor shown in FIG. 28, the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the proposal.
  • the data extraction unit 120 extracts the items of serial numbers ST72 (details when there is other information) and ST59 (details when there is an accounting auditor appointment) from the data list 51 for shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation.
  • the agenda content prediction unit 150 sets the extracted value of the item as a total value (Step S112).
  • the quantification of the item is performed by the quantification unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51.
  • a determination is made to compare the preset reference value # 11A for accounting auditor appointment with the calculated sum (step S113). If the sum is greater than or equal to the reference value # 11A, It is determined that the accounting auditor appointment proposal is “present” (step S114).
  • the shareholder general meeting draft forecast report creating section 160 creates a forecast result of whether or not the determined accounting auditor appointment proposal is present as a shareholder general meeting draft forecast report 60.
  • the bill judgment unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the judgment of the prepared accounting auditor appointment prediction bill ( In step S116), the calculated minimum value is compared with the reference value # 11B, which is the sum of the numbers of the serial numbers ST72 and ST59 determined by the separate voting rights exercise guidelines prepared by the shareholders (step S117), and the accounting auditor Decide whether or not to accept the election proposal. That is, if the calculated minimum value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 11B, it agrees with the prediction proposal (step S118), and if the calculated minimum value is less than the reference value # 11B, it is opposed to the prediction proposal (step S119).
  • the agenda decision report preparation unit 180 prepares the decision result (promotion) of the exercise of voting rights as a general shareholders meeting proposal determination report 52.
  • the presence or absence of the proposal is predicted based on the data on the takeover defense measure input from the timely disclosure information report 44, and the report and interview information 47, the securities report 41, the corporate governance report Combining the individual data input from the document 42, the articles of incorporation and the document 46 of the past general meeting of shareholders, the presence or absence of a takeover defense measure introduction proposal that will be presented to the general meeting of shareholders is predicted. If it is determined that there is a forecast proposal for the introduction of takeover defense measures, the decision result of exercising the voting rights is further prepared as a shareholder general meeting proposal decision report 52.
  • the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the proposal.
  • the data extraction unit 120 extracts each item of serial number ST39 (policy regarding takeover defense measures) and ST68 (policy concerning takeover defense measures) from the data list 51 for calculating the shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm (step S121).
  • the content prediction unit 150 calculates the sum of the values of the extracted items (step S122).
  • the digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51.
  • a determination is made to compare the magnitude of the preset reference value # 12A for introducing takeover defense measures with the calculated total value (step S123).
  • the shareholder general meeting draft forecast report creating section 160 creates a prediction result of the presence / absence of the determined takeover defense measure introduction bill as a shareholder general meeting draft forecast report 60.
  • the bill judging unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the items used for the determination of the prepared takeover defense measure introduction predictive bill (step). S126), the reference value # that is the sum of the calculated minimum value and the values of serial numbers ST39 (policy on takeover defense measures) and ST68 (policy on takeover defense measures) established by the separate voting rights exercise guidelines prepared by shareholders 12B is compared (step S127), and the approval or disapproval of the anticipation proposal for introducing the takeover defense measure is determined.
  • the agenda decision report preparation unit 180 prepares the decision result (promotion) of the exercise of voting rights as a general shareholders meeting proposal determination report 52.
  • proposals related to business restructuring the existence of proposals is predicted based on data related to business restructuring input from the timely disclosure information report 44, and individual data input based on news reports and interview information 47 are combined to Presence of business restructuring related proposals to be presented at the general meeting. If it is predicted that there will be a business reorganization-related forecast proposal, the decision on exercising voting rights is further prepared as a shareholder meeting proposal decision report 52.
  • the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the proposal.
  • the data extraction unit 120 extracts each item of serial number ST44 (incidents such as scandals) and ST69 (policy regarding corporate reorganization) from the shareholder general meeting proposal prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51 (step S131), and predicts the contents of the proposal.
  • the unit 150 calculates the sum of the numerical values of the extracted items (step S132).
  • the digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51.
  • a determination is made to compare the preset reference value # 13A related to business restructuring with the calculated sum (step S133).
  • the shareholder general meeting plan prediction report creation unit 160 creates a prediction result of the presence / absence of the determined business reorganization related plan as a shareholder general meeting plan prediction report 60.
  • the bill judgment unit 170 obtains a minimum value among the numerical values of the items used for the determination of the prepared business restructuring-related forecast bill (step S136), the reference value # 13B, which is the sum of the calculated minimum value and the values of serial number ST44 (case for scandals) and ST69 (policy on corporate restructuring) established by the separate voting guidelines for voting rights created by shareholders Are compared (step S137), and the pros and cons of the prediction proposal related to the business reorganization are determined.
  • the agenda decision report preparation part 180 prepares the decision result (approval) of the exercise of the voting right as the general shareholders meeting proposal determination report 52 (step S136).
  • the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines whether or not there is a proposal.
  • the data extraction unit 120 extracts the items of the basic numbers ST44 (incidents such as scandals) and ST71 (information regarding shareholder proposals) from the shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51 (step S141), and predicts the contents of the proposal.
  • the unit 150 calculates the sum of the numerical values of the extracted items (step S142).
  • the digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51.
  • a determination is made to compare the size of the other company proposal standard value # 14A set in advance with the calculated total value (step S143).
  • the shareholder general meeting plan forecast report creation unit 160 creates a predicted result of the presence / absence of the determined other company proposal plan as a shareholder general meeting plan forecast report 60.
  • the bill judgment unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the determination of the created other company proposal forecast bill (step S146). Compare this calculated minimum value with reference value # 14B, which is the combined value of the numbers ST44 (incidents of scandals) and ST71 (information on shareholder proposals) defined by the separate voting rights exercise guidelines prepared by shareholders (Step S147), it is determined whether or not the other company proposal prediction proposal. In other words, if the calculated minimum value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 14B, it agrees with the prediction proposal (step S148), and if the calculated minimum value is less than the reference value # 14B, it is opposed to the prediction proposal (step S149).
  • the agenda decision report preparation part 180 prepares the decision result (promotion) of the exercise of the voting right as the general shareholders meeting proposal determination report 52 (step S146).
  • the presence or absence of the proposal is predicted based on the data related to the shareholder proposal input from the timely disclosure information report 44, and individual data collected based on news reports and news gathering information 47 are combined. Presence or absence of shareholder proposals that will be presented in When it is predicted that there is a proposal for shareholder proposal, the decision result of exercising the voting right is further prepared as a shareholder meeting proposal decision report 52.
  • the bill content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the bill.
  • the data extraction unit 120 extracts each item of serial number ST44 (incidents such as scandals) and ST71 (information regarding shareholder proposals) from the data list 51 for shareholder general meeting proposal prediction system algorithm calculation (step S151), and predicts the contents of the proposal.
  • the unit 150 calculates the sum of the numerical values of the extracted items (step S152).
  • the digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51.
  • a determination is made to compare the preset reference value # 15A of the shareholder proposal with the calculated total value (step S153).
  • the shareholder proposal It is determined that the proposal is “present” (step S154), and if the sum is smaller than the reference value # 15A, it is determined that there is no shareholder proposal (step S155).
  • the shareholder general meeting draft prediction report creating section 160 creates a prediction result of the presence / absence of the determined shareholder proposal bill as a shareholder general meeting draft prediction report 60.
  • the proposal determination unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the determination of the prepared shareholder proposal prediction proposal (step S156).
  • the calculated minimum value is compared with the sum of the values of serial numbers ST44 (incidents such as scandals) and ST71 (information on shareholder proposals) established by separate guidelines for exercising voting rights prepared by shareholders (step S157), and the shareholder proposal Pros and cons of the forecast proposal. That is, if the calculated minimum value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 15B, it agrees with the prediction proposal (step S158), and if the calculated minimum value is less than the reference value # 15B, it is opposed to the prediction proposal (step S159).
  • the agenda decision report preparation unit 180 prepares the decision result (promotion) of the exercise of voting rights as a general shareholders meeting proposal determination report 52.
  • the system of the present invention predicts the proposals of the general meeting of shareholders, and predicts the outline of the general meeting of shareholders so that the contents of the prediction can make a comprehensive judgment when the shareholders exercise their voting rights.
  • Comprehensive Judgment Report on General Meeting of Shareholders and provide useful information for decision making and exercising voting rights in shareholder general meeting proposals.
  • the proposal forecasting system in the notice of the general meeting of shareholders of the present invention it is possible to predict the contents of the proposal in the general meeting of shareholders a few weeks earlier than the issuing company publishes the notice of convocation of the general meeting of shareholders. For institutional investors who have to make decisions on the agenda of the investee in the meantime, the content of the agenda can be fully examined.
  • the “presence” of a proposal is predicted, information on the pros and cons of each proposal can be obtained, so that valuable support can be obtained upon exercising voting rights.

Abstract

Disclosed is a bill prediction system for an invitation notice to a general meeting of shareholders which is capable of predicting and creating bill information required when a shareholder exercises a proxy vote at the general meeting before issuance of the invitation notice to the general meeting, and which, from the predicted bill contents, determines proxy voting results on the basis of proxy voting guidelines which have been pre-created so as to carry out the best proxy voting. From such data as a security report, a corporate governance report, and a short note on settlement report which have been input from an input unit, quantization is performed for each bill item, and by reordering data, a general meeting of shareholders prediction system algorithm calculation-use data list is created. For each bill of the general meeting, items that are required for the bill are extracted from the list, the sum of the number of extracted items is calculated, and by comparing the sum with a reference value A of the bill, the presence or absence of the bill is assessed. On the basis of the assessment results, a general meeting of shareholders bill prediction report is created.

Description

株主総会招集通知における議案予測システムAgenda forecast system for notice of convocation of shareholders meeting
 本発明は株主総会招集通知における議案予測システムに関し、特に株主総会で取り上げられると予想される議案を、発行会社が株主総会招集通知を公開するよりも前(例えば2,3週間前)に議案の有無を予測することができる株主総会招集通知における議案予測システムに関する。また、予測された議案に対する議決権行使の判断(賛否)を示し、株主の議決権行使の支援を行い得る議案予測システムに関する。 The present invention relates to a proposal prediction system for a notice of convocation of a general meeting of shareholders. In particular, a proposal that is expected to be taken up at a general meeting of shareholders is submitted to the agenda (for example, a few weeks ago) before the issuer publishes a notice of convocation of a general meeting of shareholders. The present invention relates to an agenda prediction system in a notice of a general meeting of shareholders that can predict the presence or absence. In addition, the present invention relates to a proposal prediction system that can indicate a vote on voting rights (pros and cons) with respect to a predicted proposal and can support the voting rights of shareholders.
 現在、株式上場会社は株主総会招集通知を株主総会開催日より2週間前(会社法による発送期限)に発送することとされている。株主総会招集通知は従来郵便で発送されているので、株主総会開催日より2週間前の発送であっても、株主の受領はそれよりも少し遅れることになる。特に遠隔地であれば、その遅れも大きなものとなってしまう。その場合、多くの投資先を保有する機関投資家や、翻訳等に時間を必要とする外国人投資家にとって、2週間という日程は議案内容を吟味した上での議決権行使を行うためには不十分である。そのため、機関投資家や外国人投資家は、早めに株主総会招集通知を発送することを要望しているが、決算準備や監査の日程等から改善されていないのが実情である。 Currently, stock-listed companies are expected to send a notice of convocation of a general meeting of shareholders two weeks before the date of the general meeting of shareholders (the deadline for shipping under the Companies Act). Since the notice of convocation of a general meeting of shareholders is conventionally sent by mail, even if it is sent two weeks before the date of the general meeting of shareholders, the receipt of shareholders will be a little later than that. Especially in remote areas, the delay will be significant. In that case, in order to exercise voting rights after examining the contents of the agenda for two weeks, institutional investors who have many investment destinations and foreign investors who need time for translation etc. It is insufficient. For this reason, institutional investors and foreign investors are requesting that the notice of convocation of the general meeting of shareholders be sent out as soon as possible, but in reality the situation has not improved due to the preparation of financial statements and the schedule of audits.
 従来株主総会での株主の議決権の管理や行使手続きを電子化したものとして、特開2002-49742号公報(特許文献1)、特開2003-16254号公報(特許文献2)、特開2003-85355号公報(特許文献3)がある。しかしながら、これら従来技術は株主総会における議決権の行使手続きや管理に関するものであり、株主総会招集通知に関するものでもなく、また、株主総会招集通知の発送前に議案がどのようなものであるかを予測するものでもない。 As a computerized management of voting rights and exercise procedures for shareholders at a conventional general meeting of shareholders, JP-A-2002-49742 (Patent Document 1), JP-A-2003-16254 (Patent Document 2), JP-A-2003 There is JP-A-85355 (Patent Document 3). However, these conventional technologies are related to the procedures and management of voting rights at the General Meeting of Shareholders, not related to the Notice of Convocation of the General Meeting of Shareholders, and what the proposal will be like before the notice of convocation of the General Meeting of Shareholders is sent out. Nor is it predictable.
特開2002-49742号公報JP 2002-49742 A 特開2003-16254号公報JP 2003-16254 A 特開2003-85355号公報JP 2003-85355 A
 このため、機関投資家や株主が議決権行使を行う際に必要となる議案情報を、投資先である発行会社が株主総会招集通知を発行する前(例えば3週間ほど前)に予測作成し、株主に提供することが事態の改善および解決になる。更に、この予測された議案内容から、株主が最善の議決権行使を行えるよう予め作成された議決権行使ガイドラインを基に議決権行使結果(賛否)を作成して支援することが求められる。 For this reason, the proposal information necessary for institutional investors and shareholders to exercise voting rights is forecasted before the issuance company, the investee, issues a convocation notice (for example, about three weeks ago) Providing to shareholders will improve and resolve the situation. Furthermore, it is required to create and support the exercise of voting rights (pros and cons) based on the voting rights exercise guidelines prepared in advance so that shareholders can exercise their best voting rights based on the predicted contents of the proposals.
 本発明は上述のような事情よりなされたものであり、本発明の目的は、株主が株主総会で議決権行使を行う際に必要となる議案情報を株主総会招集通知の発行前に予測して作成し、更にこの予測された議案内容から、最善の議決権行使を行えるよう予め作成された議決権行使ガイドラインを基に議決権行使の賛否を判断して提供することが可能な株主総会招集通知における議案予測システムを提供することにある。 The present invention has been made under the circumstances as described above, and the object of the present invention is to predict proposal information necessary for shareholders to exercise voting rights at a general meeting of shareholders before issuing a convocation notice for the general meeting of shareholders. A notice of convocation of a general meeting of shareholders that can be prepared and provided based on voting rights exercise guidelines prepared in advance so that the best voting rights can be exercised based on the contents of the forecasted proposals. It is to provide an agenda forecasting system.
本発明は株主総会招集通知における議案予測システムに関し、本発明の上記目的は、入力部と、記憶部を具備した演算処理部と、出力部とを具え、前記演算処理部が、数値化部と、データ抽出部と、株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表作成部と、データ並び替え部と、議案内容予測部と、株主総会議案予測報告書作成部とを具え、前記入力部より入力された有価証券報告書、コーポレート・ガバナンス報告書、決算短信報告書、適時情報開示報告書、独立役員報告書、定款および過去の株主総会招集通知の書類のデータより、前記数値化部は議案項目毎に数値化し、前記データ並び替え部はデータの並び替えを行うことにより前記株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表作成部は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表を作成し、株主総会議案毎に、前記データ抽出部は当該議案に必要な項目を前記株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表から抽出し、前記議案内容予測部は前記抽出された項目の数値の合算値を算出し、前記合算値と前記当該議案の基準値Aとを比較することによって当該議案の有無を判定し、前記株主総会議案予測報告書作成部は前記当該議案の有無の判定結果に基づいて株主総会議案予測報告書を作成することにより達成される。 The present invention relates to a bill prediction system in a notice of convocation of a general meeting of shareholders, and the object of the present invention is to provide an input unit, a calculation processing unit having a storage unit, and an output unit, wherein the calculation processing unit is a digitization unit. A data extraction unit, a shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation data list generation unit, a data rearrangement unit, a proposal content prediction unit, and a shareholder general meeting plan prediction report generation unit, which are input from the input unit From the data of the published securities report, corporate governance report, financial report, timely information disclosure report, independent officer report, articles of association and past convocation notice documents, Each data is converted into a numerical value, and the data rearrangement unit rearranges the data so that the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list creation unit predicts the shareholder general meeting draft. For each shareholder general meeting plan, the data extraction unit extracts items necessary for the proposal from the shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation data list, and the proposal content prediction unit Calculates the sum of numerical values of the extracted items, compares the sum and the reference value A of the bill, determines the presence or absence of the bill, and the shareholder meeting draft forecast report preparation unit This is achieved by preparing a shareholder general meeting draft forecast report based on the result of the determination of the presence or absence of the bill.
 本発明の株主総会招集通知における議案予測システムによれば、株主総会における議案を、発行会社が株主総会招集通知を公開するよりも前(例えば2,3週間前)にその内容を予測することが可能であり、短期間に投資先の議案に対する意思決定を行わなければならない機関投資家や外国人投資家にとって、議案内容の十分な吟味が可能となり、利用価値が非常に大きいものである。 According to the proposal forecasting system in the notice of convocation of the general meeting of shareholders of the present invention, the contents of the proposal in the general meeting of shareholders can be predicted before the issuing company discloses the notice of convocation of the general meeting of shareholders (for example, a few weeks before). It is possible, and for institutional investors and foreign investors who have to make decisions on the agenda of the investee in a short period of time, the contents of the agenda can be fully examined, and the utility value is very large.
 また、発行会社と株主の間の理解を促進し、相互にとって円滑かつ有益な意思疎通を実現することが可能となり、産業上の利用価値は甚大である。 In addition, understanding between issuers and shareholders can be promoted and smooth and useful communication can be realized for each other, and the industrial utility value is enormous.
本発明の全体構成の一例を示すブロック構成図である。It is a block block diagram which shows an example of the whole structure of this invention. 本発明の演算処理部の構成例を示す機能ブロック図である。It is a functional block diagram which shows the structural example of the arithmetic processing part of this invention. 有価証券報告書(日本語版)の一例の一部を示す図である。It is a figure which shows a part of example of a securities report (Japanese version). コーポレート・ガバナンス報告書(日本語版)の一例の一部を示す図である。It is a figure which shows a part of example of a corporate governance report (Japanese version). 決算短信報告書の一例の一部を示す図である。It is a figure which shows a part of example of a financial statement brief report. 定款および過去の株主総会招集通知のデータ入力を説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating the data input of the articles of incorporation and the notice of the past general meeting of shareholders. 入力されたデータ、情報のデータベース内の配置例を模式的に示す図である。It is a figure which shows typically the example of arrangement | positioning in the database of the input data and information. 株主総会議案予測システム収集データ一覧表の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of a shareholder general meeting plan prediction system collection data list. 株主総会議案予測システム収集データ一覧表の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of a shareholder general meeting plan prediction system collection data list. 株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the data list for shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation. 株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the data list for shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation. 株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the data list for shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation. 株主総会議案予測報告書(英語版)の一例を示す部分図である。It is a partial figure which shows an example of a shareholder general meeting plan forecast report (English version). 株主総会議案予測報告書(英語版)の一例を示す部分図である。It is a partial figure which shows an example of a shareholder general meeting plan forecast report (English version). 株主総会議案予測報告書(英語版)の一例を示す部分図である。It is a partial figure which shows an example of a shareholder general meeting plan forecast report (English version). 株主総会議案予測報告書(英語版)の一例を示す部分図である。It is a partial figure which shows an example of a shareholder general meeting plan forecast report (English version). 議決権行使ガイドラインの一例を示す部分図である。It is a partial diagram showing an example of voting rights exercise guidelines. 剰余金分配議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the example of an algorithm of the presence determination regarding a surplus distribution proposal. 定款一部変更議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the example of an algorithm of the presence determination regarding the articles of incorporation partial change proposal. 取締役選任議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the example of an algorithm of the presence determination regarding a director appointment proposal. 監査役選任議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the example of an algorithm of the presence determination regarding a corporate auditor election proposal. 補欠監査役選任議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the example of an algorithm of the presence determination regarding a substitute corporate auditor election proposal. 役員賞与支給議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the example of an algorithm of the presence determination regarding an executive bonus payment proposal. 退職慰労金支給議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the example of an algorithm of the presence determination regarding the retirement allowance payment proposal. 役員報酬額改定議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the example of an algorithm of the presence determination regarding the executive compensation amount revision proposal. 新株予約権付与議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the example of an algorithm of the presence determination regarding a stock acquisition right grant proposal. 自己株式取得議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the example of an algorithm of the presence determination regarding a treasury stock acquisition proposal. 会計監査人選任議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the example of an algorithm of the presence determination regarding an accounting auditor appointment proposal. 買収防衛策導入議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the example of an algorithm of the presence determination regarding the acquisition defense measure introduction proposal. 事業再編議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the example of an algorithm of the presence determination regarding a business reorganization proposal. その他会社提案議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the example of an algorithm of the presence determination regarding another company proposal proposal. 株主提案議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the example of an algorithm of the presence determination regarding a shareholder proposal proposal.
 本発明の全体構成は図1に示すような構成になっており、全体の制御や演算処理等を実行するCPU10と、制御プログラムやパラメータ等を格納しているROM11と、作業メモリを形成するRAM12と、入力処理された情報やデータ、パラメータを記憶するデータベース(DB)20と、表示制御部13を経て必要なデータ、表、操作案内等を表示する表示部14と、演算処理結果等を電子データや印字形式で出力する出力部15と、必要な情報やデータ、コマンド等を入力する入力部16とを具備し、これら各部が相互に接続されている。また、システム本体は外部の端末(例えばパソコン)30に接続されると共に、インターネット31に接続されて利用者の外部端末と送受信することができ、そのためのインタフェース(I/F)部32がCPU10等に接続されている。 The overall configuration of the present invention is as shown in FIG. 1, and includes a CPU 10 that executes overall control and arithmetic processing, a ROM 11 that stores control programs, parameters, and the like, and a RAM 12 that forms a working memory. And a database (DB) 20 for storing input processed information, data, and parameters, a display unit 14 for displaying necessary data, tables, operation guides, etc. via the display control unit 13, and calculation processing results, etc. An output unit 15 that outputs data and a print format and an input unit 16 that inputs necessary information, data, commands, and the like are provided, and these units are connected to each other. Further, the system main body is connected to an external terminal (for example, a personal computer) 30 and can be connected to the Internet 31 to transmit / receive data to / from the user's external terminal. An interface (I / F) unit 32 for that purpose is provided with the CPU 10 and the like. It is connected to the.
 入力部16からは、電子データである有価証券報告書41、電子データであるコーポレート・ガバナンス報告書42、電子データである決算短信報告書43、電子データである適時開示情報報告書44、電子データである独立役員報告書45、ペーパーに印字されている定款および過去の株主総会招集通知の書類46、ペーパーに印字されている報道および取材情報47のデータや情報が入力される。また、電子データの場合には、インターネット31を経由して入力することも可能である。なお、有価証券報告書41、コーポレート・ガバナンス報告書42、決算短信報告書43、適時開示情報報告書44はペーパーに印字されているデータであっても構わない。逆に、定款および過去の株主総会招集通知の書類46、報道および取材情報47が電子データであっても構わない。 From the input unit 16, a securities report 41 that is electronic data, a corporate governance report 42 that is electronic data, a financial report 43 that is electronic data, a timely disclosure information report 44 that is electronic data, an electronic data The data and information of the independent officer report 45, the articles of association printed on the paper and the document 46 of the past general meeting of shareholders general meeting, and the news report and coverage information 47 printed on the paper are input. In the case of electronic data, it can also be input via the Internet 31. The securities report 41, the corporate governance report 42, the financial report 43, and the timely disclosure information report 44 may be data printed on paper. On the contrary, the articles of incorporation and the document 46 of the past general meeting of shareholders, the news report, and the coverage information 47 may be electronic data.
 図2は、CPU10、ROM11、RAM12、データベース20で構成される演算処
理部100の機能ブロック例を示しており、演算処理部100は議案項目等のデータを所定のアルゴリズムで数値化する数値化部110と、議案項目の抽出を行うデータ抽出部120と、株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51を作成する株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表作成部130と、データの並び替えを行うデータ並び替え部140と、株主総会における議案を予測する議案内容予測部150と、議案内容予測部150で予測された予測議案に基づいて株主総会議案予測報告書60を作成する株主総会議案予測報告書作成部160と、別途株主が作成する議決権行使ガイドライン200のデータを基準値として予測議案に対する賛否を判断する議案判断部170と、議案判断部170で判断された結果に基づいて株主総会議案決定報告書52を作成する株主総会議案決定報告書作成部180とで構成されている。
FIG. 2 shows a functional block example of the arithmetic processing unit 100 composed of the CPU 10, the ROM 11, the RAM 12, and the database 20, and the arithmetic processing unit 100 digitizes data such as agenda items with a predetermined algorithm. 110, a data extraction unit 120 that extracts agenda items, a shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation data list creation unit 130 that creates a shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51, and data rearrangement A data rearrangement unit 140, a proposal content prediction unit 150 that predicts a proposal at the general meeting of shareholders, and a shareholder meeting proposal that creates a shareholder meeting proposal prediction report 60 based on the prediction plan predicted by the proposal contents prediction unit 150 Data on the forecast report creation section 160 and the voting rights exercise guidelines 200 separately prepared by shareholders Consists of a bill decision unit 170 that determines whether or not the predicted bill is accepted or not as a quasi-value, and a shareholder meeting draft decision report preparation unit 180 that creates a shareholder meeting draft decision report 52 based on a result determined by the bill judgment unit 170 Has been.
 有価証券報告書(日本語版)41は例えば図3に示すようになっており、様式は「企業内容等の開示に関する内閣府令」に定められている。電子データである有価証券報告書41より、株式の所有者別状況、役員に関するデータを入力部16より入力して取り込む。有価証券報告書41のデータ入力は、これを掲載するインターネット上の発行会社等のウェブサイトからデータをダウンロードした後、有価証券報告書41の分類に従って、各々の項目に該当値を入力部16のキーボードより入力する。なお、有価証券報告書41の財務情報が作成、流通、再利用できるように標準化されたXML(eXtensible Markup Language)ベースの言語であるXBRL(eXtensible Business Reporting Language)を利用することで、キーボードによる入力作業の省力化を図ることが可能であるため、有価証券報告書41がXBRLにより開示される場合は、これを利用する。株式の所有者別状況における入力対象は金融機関その他の法人、外国法人、個人の区分などである。役員に関するデータにおける入力対象は、役員氏名、生年月日、会社入社年月、役員就任年月、略歴、社内・社外役員の区分などである。図3は有価証券報告書41の一部を示しており、「第一部 証券情報」の「第1 募集要項」として、新規発行社債、社債の引受けおよび社債管理の委託、新規発行コマーシャル・ペーパー、新規発行カバードワラント、新規発行預託証券、新規発行による手取金の使途、会社設立の場合の特記事項があり、「第2 売出要領」として、売出有価証券、売出しの条件がある。また、「第二部 企業情報」には、「第1 企業の概況」として、主要な経営指標等の推移、沿革、事業の内容、関係会社の状況、従業員の状況があり、「第2 事業の状況」として、業績等の概要、生産、受注および販売の状況、対処すべき課題、経営上の重要な契約等、研究開発活動があり、「第3 設備の状況」として、設備投資等の概要、主要な設備の状況、設備の新設、除却等の計画があり、「第4 提出会社の状況」として、株式等の状況、自己株式の取得等の状況、配当政策、株価の推移があり、「第5 経理の状況」として、連結財務諸表等、財務諸表等があり、「第6 提出会社の株式事務の概要」、「第7 提出会社の参考情報」がある。更に、「第三部 提出会社の保証会社等の情報」には、「第1 保証会社情報」、「第2 保証会社以外の会社の情報」、「第3 指数等の情報」があり、「第四部 特別情報」には、「第1 最近の財務諸表」、「第2 保証会社および連動子会社の最近の財務諸表または財務書類」がある。 The securities report (Japanese version) 41 is, for example, as shown in FIG. 3, and the format is defined in the “Cabinet Office Ordinance on Disclosure of Corporate Content”. From the securities report 41, which is electronic data, the status of each stock owner and the data related to the officers are input from the input unit 16 and imported. Data input of the securities report 41 is performed by downloading the data from the website of the issuing company on the Internet that publishes the securities report 41, and then assigning corresponding values to each item according to the classification of the securities report 41. Input from the keyboard. By using XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language), which is a standardized XML (eXtensible Markup Language) language so that the financial information of the securities report 41 can be created, distributed and reused Since it is possible to save labor, it is utilized when the securities report 41 is disclosed by XBRL. The target of entry in the situation by shareholder is the classification of financial institutions and other corporations, foreign corporations, and individuals. The data to be entered for officer data includes the officer's name, date of birth, company entry date, officer appointment date, career history, internal / external officer classification, etc. Fig. 3 shows a part of the securities report 41. As "First Application Guidelines" of "Part I Securities Information", newly issued bonds, underwriting of bonds and management of bond management, newly issued commercial paper New issue covered warrants, new issue deposit securities, use of proceeds from new issue, special notes in case of company establishment. “Second sale guidelines” include marketable securities and conditions for sale. In “Part 2 Corporate Information”, “First Corporate Overview” includes changes in key management indicators, history, business details, affiliated companies, and employee status. “Business status” includes R & D activities such as business performance overview, production, orders and sales status, issues to be addressed, important management contracts, etc. “3rd equipment status” is capital investment, etc. There are plans for the outline of the main equipment, the status of major equipment, the establishment of new equipment, retirement, etc., and the status of shares, the status of acquisition of treasury stock, etc. Yes, the “5th Accounting Status” includes consolidated financial statements, financial statements, etc., “Sixth Outline of Submitting Company's Stock Affairs” and “7th Submitting Company Reference Information”. Furthermore, “Part 3 Guarantee Company Information” includes “First Guarantee Company Information”, “Second Guidance Company Information” and “Third Index Information”, etc. Part IV Special Information includes “First Recent Financial Statements” and “Second Recent Financial Statements or Financial Documents of Guarantor Companies and Subsidiaries”.
 コーポレート・ガバナンス報告書(日本語版)42は例えば図4に示すようになっており、「コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する基本的な考え方および資本構成、企業属性その他の基本情報」には更に、企業属性、上場取引所および市場区分、決算期、業種、(連結)従業員数、(連結)売上高、親会社の有無、連結子会社数、その他コーポレート・ガバナンスに重要な影響を与えうる特別な事情その他が一般的に示される。また、「経営上の意思決定、執行および監督に係る経営管理組織その他のコーポレート・ガバナンス体制の状況」として、組織形態、取締役会の議長、取締役の人数、社外取締役の選任状況、監査役会の設置の有無、監査役の人数、監査役と会計監査人の連携状況、監査役と内部監査部門の連携状況、社外監査役の選任状況、執行役関係、監査体制インセンティブ関係、取締役報酬に関する開示状況、社外取締役のサポート体制その他がある。更に、「株主その他の利害関係者に関する施策の実施状況」には、株主総会の活性化および議決権行使の円滑化に向けての取組み状況、IRに関する活動状況、ステークホルダーの立場の尊重に係る取組み状況があり、「内部統制システムに関する基本的な考え方およびその整備状況」には、内部統制システムについての基本的な考え方、内部統制システムの整備状況、反社会的勢力排除に向けた基本的な考え方、反社会的勢力排除に向けた整備状況、模式図の添付があり、その他買収防衛に関する事項等がある。このような内容が記述されている電子データのコーポレート・ガバナンス報告書42より、当該会社の基本的考え方、資本構成、企業属性、取締役および監査役に関する情報、社外取締役および社外監査役に関する情報、報酬に関する情報、株主その他利害関係者に関する施策、内部統制、買収防衛に関する情報を入力部16より入力して取り込む。コーポレート・ガバナンス報告書42の入力部16でのデータ入力は、これを掲載するインターネット上の発行会社等のウェブサイトからデータをダウンロードした後、コーポレート・ガバナンス報告書42の分類に従って、各々の項目に該当値をキーボードにより入力する。なお、コーポレート・ガバナンス報告書42の財務情報が作成、流通、再利用できるように標準化されたXMLベースの言語であるXBRLを利用することで、キーボードによる入力作業の省力化を図ることが可能であるため、コーポレート・ガバナンス報告書42がXBRLにより開示される場合は、これを利用する。 The Corporate Governance Report (Japanese version) 42 is, for example, as shown in FIG. 4, and “Basic Concept and Capital Structure, Corporate Attributes and Other Basic Information on Corporate Governance” further includes corporate attributes, Listed exchanges and market classifications, closing date, industry, (consolidated) number of employees, (consolidated) sales, parent company presence, number of consolidated subsidiaries, and other special circumstances that may have a significant impact on corporate governance Shown in The status of the business management organization and other corporate governance systems related to management decision-making, execution and supervision includes the organizational structure, the chairman of the board of directors, the number of directors, the status of appointment of outside directors, the Existence of establishment, number of corporate auditors, status of coordination between corporate auditors and accounting auditors, status of coordination between corporate auditors and internal audit departments, status of appointment of external corporate auditors, executive officer relationship, audit system incentive relationship, disclosure status regarding director compensation There are other support systems for outside directors. Furthermore, “Implementation Status of Measures Related to Shareholders and Other Stakeholders” includes the status of efforts to revitalize the general meeting of shareholders and facilitate the exercise of voting rights, the status of activities related to IR, and the status of respect for stakeholder positions. There are situations, and the “Basic Ideas on Internal Control Systems and their Development Status” includes basic ideas on internal control systems, the status of internal control systems, and basic ideas for eliminating anti-social forces. , The status of preparations to eliminate anti-social forces, attachment of schematic diagrams, and other matters related to takeover defense. Based on the electronic data Corporate Governance Report 42, which describes this content, the company's basic concept, capital structure, corporate attributes, information on directors and corporate auditors, information on outside directors and corporate auditors, and compensation The information about the shareholder and other interested parties, the internal control, and the information regarding takeover defense are inputted from the input unit 16 and taken in. Data input at the input unit 16 of the corporate governance report 42 is performed by downloading data from a website such as an issuing company on the Internet that publishes the data, and then, according to the classification of the corporate governance report 42, for each item. Enter the corresponding value using the keyboard. By using XBRL, an XML-based language that is standardized so that the financial information of the Corporate Governance Report 42 can be created, distributed, and reused, it is possible to save labor in keyboard input operations. Therefore, if the corporate governance report 42 is disclosed by XBRL, it is used.
 決算短信報告書(日本語版)43は例えば図5に示すようになっており、決算短信報告書43の様式には連結財務諸表作成会社用と連結財務諸表非作成会社用とがあり、連結財務諸表作成会社用様式では、サマリー情報として、連結業績、配当の状況、連結業績予想、その他があり、定性的・財務諸表等として、経営成績、企業集団の状況、経営方針、連結財務諸表、個別財務諸表、その他がある。また、連結財務諸表非作成会社用様式では、サマリー情報として、業績、配当の状況、業績予想、その他があり、定性的・財務諸表等として、経営成績、企業集団の状況、経営方針、財務諸表、その他がある。このような内容を記述している電子データの決算短信報告書43より、当期利益、配当額、発行済株式数といった企業業績および決算発表日時、株主総会開催日などのデータを入力部16より入力して取り込む。決算短信報告書43の入力部16によるデータ入力は、これを掲載するインターネット上の発行会社等のウェブサイトからデータをダウンロードした後、決算短信報告書43の分類に従って、各々の項目に該当値を入力部16のキーボードにより入力する。なお、決算短信報告書43の財務情報が作成、流通、再利用できるように標準化されたXMLベースの言語であるXBRLを利用することで、キーボードによる入力作業の省力化を図ることが可能であるため、決算短信報告書43がXBRLにより開示される場合は、これを利用する。 The financial statement report (Japanese version) 43 is, for example, as shown in FIG. 5, and the format of the financial statement report 43 is for companies that prepare consolidated financial statements and for companies that do not prepare consolidated financial statements. In the format for financial statement preparation companies, summary information includes consolidated performance, dividend status, consolidated performance forecast, and others. Qualitative and financial statements include business results, corporate group status, management policy, consolidated financial statements, There are individual financial statements and others. In the non-consolidated financial statements format, summary information includes performance, dividends, performance forecasts, and others. Qualitative and financial statements include business results, corporate group status, management policies, financial statements. There are others. From the brief financial report 43 of the electronic data describing such contents, enter the data such as profits, dividends, number of shares issued, company performance, date of financial results announcement, date of general meeting of shareholders, etc. from the input unit 16 And capture. Data input by the input unit 16 of the financial report 43 is performed by downloading data from a website of an issuing company on the Internet that publishes the report, and then assigning a value to each item according to the classification of the financial report 43. Input is performed using the keyboard of the input unit 16. By using XBRL, an XML-based language that is standardized so that the financial information of the financial report 43 can be created, distributed, and reused, it is possible to save labor in keyboard input operations. Therefore, when the financial report 43 is disclosed by XBRL, this is used.
 適時開示情報報告書44には定められた様式はないが、電子データである適時開示情報報告書44より役員の異動、買収防衛策に関する方針、企業再編に関する情報、役員報酬に関する情報等を入力部16より入力して取り込む。適時開示報告書44の入力部16によるデータ入力は、これを掲載するインターネット上の発行会社等のウェブサイトからデータをダウンロードした後、適時開示情報報告書44の分類に従って、各々の項目に該当値を入力部16のキーボードにより入力する。 Timely Disclosure Information Report 44 does not have a specific format, but it is an input section for timely disclosure information report 44, which is electronic data, to transfer officers, policy on takeover defense measures, information on corporate reorganization, information on executive compensation, etc. Input from 16 and import. The data input by the input unit 16 of the timely disclosure report 44 corresponds to each item according to the classification of the timely disclosure information report 44 after downloading the data from the website of the issuing company on the Internet that publishes the data. Is input using the keyboard of the input unit 16.
 電子データである独立役員報告書45より、個々の社外取締役および社外監査役の属性について、他の会社の出身者、弁護士、公認会計士、税理士、学者、その他の区分に従ってデータを入力する。併せて、開示される当該社外取締役および社外監査役の専門性と業務との関連性に係る選任理由を入力する。電子データである独立役員報告書45の入力部16によるデータ入力は、これを掲載するインターネット上の発行会社等のウェブサイトからデータをダウンロードした後、独立役員報告書45の分類に従って、各々の項目に該当値を入力部16のキーボード等により入力する。なお、独立役員報告書45の財務情報が作成、流通、再利用できるように標準化されたXMLベースの言語であるXBRLを利用することで、キーボードによる入力作業の省力化を図ることが可能であるため、独立役員報告書45がXBRLにより開示される場合は、これを利用する。なお、独立役員報告書45の開示項目はコーポレート・ガバナンス報告書42に沿ったものである。 From the independent officer report 45, which is electronic data, enter the data of the attributes of individual outside directors and outside corporate auditors according to other company graduates, lawyers, certified public accountants, tax accountants, academics, and other categories. In addition, enter the reason for appointment regarding the relevance of the expertise of the outside directors and outside corporate auditors to be disclosed. Data input by the input unit 16 of the independent officer report 45, which is electronic data, is performed by downloading the data from the website of the issuing company on the Internet that publishes the data, and then according to the classification of the independent officer report 45. The corresponding value is input using the keyboard of the input unit 16 or the like. By using XBRL, an XML-based language that is standardized so that the financial information of the independent officer report 45 can be created, distributed, and reused, it is possible to save labor for keyboard input work. Therefore, when the independent officer report 45 is disclosed by XBRL, this is used. The items disclosed in the independent officer report 45 are in line with the corporate governance report 42.
 各会社が開示する定款および過去の株主総会招集通知の書類46より、株主総会議案を作成するに当たり必要となる情報を入力する。ペーパーに印字されている定款および株主総会招集通知46の入力部16によるデータ入力は、図6に示すように、当該会社(本例では「AA株式会社」)が定款および過去の株主総会招集通知の書類46を掲載するインターネット上の発行会社等のウェブサイトからデータをダウンロードして表示部14Aに表示した後、表示部14の所定部に入力部16のキーボー等で行う。株主総会招集通知の様式は会社法施行規則において定められており、議案、提案の理由、議案につき株主総会に報告すべき調査の結果があるときは、その結果の概要、その他が挙げられている。定款において入力するデータは、株式の状況、株主総会、取締役会および監査役会の運営に関する事項、取締役および監査役の任期、配当金決議の権限に関する事項などである。過去の株主総会招集通知より入力する情報は、株主総会における決議事項の対象となる議案、参考資料として提示される取締役および監査役の略歴、属性、役員報酬の内容、買収防衛策、企業再編に関するもの等である。なお、図6では表示部14Aと表示部14を別のハードとして示しているが、同一画面上に重畳形式で表示することも可能である。 よ り Enter the information necessary to prepare the General Meeting of Shareholders from the articles of incorporation disclosed by each company and the document 46 of the previous General Meeting of Shareholders. As shown in FIG. 6, the company (in this example, “AA Co., Ltd.”) is responsible for entering the Articles of Incorporation and past General Meetings of Shareholders, as shown in FIG. The data is downloaded from a website such as an issuing company on the Internet on which the document 46 is posted and displayed on the display unit 14A, and then the predetermined part of the display unit 14 is performed by the keyboard of the input unit 16 or the like. The format of the Notice of Convocation of the General Meeting of Shareholders is stipulated in the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Companies Act, and includes the agenda, the reason for the proposal, the results of the investigation that should be reported to the General Meeting of Shareholders, and an outline of the results. . The data entered in the Articles of Incorporation includes stock status, matters relating to the general meeting of shareholders, the operations of the Board of Directors and the Board of Corporate Auditors, the terms of office of Directors and Corporate Auditors, and the matters relating to the authority to determine dividends. Information entered from previous notices of the general meeting of shareholders is the proposals subject to resolution at the general meeting of shareholders, the biography and attributes of directors and corporate auditors presented as reference materials, attributes, details of director compensation, takeover defense measures, and corporate reorganization. Things. In FIG. 6, the display unit 14 </ b> A and the display unit 14 are illustrated as separate hardware, but can be displayed in a superimposed format on the same screen.
 更に、メディアによる報道や記者の取材などを基に、会社の株主総会に有用と思われる事項や情報をスクラップ等として蓄積しておき、本システムの利用時に報道および取材情報47として入力する。入力する情報は、分析対象期間において発生した当該企業が関わる事件、不祥事等である。報道および取材情報47は一般的にはスクラップとして蓄積されるのでペーパー形式であり、これらスクラップされた事項を入力部16のキーボード等により入力して行う。 Furthermore, based on media reports and reporter interviews, information and information that may be useful for the company's shareholders' meeting are accumulated as scraps, etc., and input as report and interview information 47 when using this system. The information to be input includes incidents, scandals, etc. involving the company that occurred during the analysis period. The news report and news gathering information 47 is generally stored as scrap and is in the form of paper, and these scraped items are input by using the keyboard of the input unit 16 or the like.
 上述のようにして入力された各会社の情報、データはデータベース20に図7に示すように各会社毎に区画されて格納され、その後、データ並び替え部140は、入力種別(開示書類)毎にグループ分けして記番号を付してデータベース20のデータの並び替えを行い、図8および図9に示すような株主総会議案予測システム収集データ一覧表50として、記番号、開示書類等および開示書類等の項目の組で、少なくとも2年度分作成する。 The information and data of each company input as described above are stored in the database 20 by being partitioned for each company as shown in FIG. 7, and thereafter, the data rearrangement unit 140 displays the information for each input type (disclosure document). The data in the database 20 is rearranged by grouping them into serial numbers, and the shareholder general meeting draft forecasting system collection data list 50 as shown in FIGS. 8 and 9 is displayed as serial numbers, disclosure documents, etc. Create a set of documents and other items for at least two years.
 次に、上述のように作成された株主総会議案予測システム収集データ一覧表50のデータから、株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表作成部130は議案項目毎にグループ分けして別の記番号を付してデータを並び替え、数値化部120は各項目の数値化を行い、図10~図12に示すような株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51を作成する。 Next, from the data of the shareholder general meeting plan prediction system collection data list 50 created as described above, the shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation data list creation unit 130 divides the data into groups for each agenda item. The data is rearranged by assigning numbers, and the digitizing unit 120 digitizes each item to create a shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51 as shown in FIGS.
 データ抽出部120は、図10~図12に示す株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51として集約されたデータから、一般的な株主総会招集通知の議案分類である剰余金分配、定款一部変更、取締役選任、監査役選任、補欠監査役選任、役員賞与金支給、退職慰労金支給、役員報酬額改定、新株予約権付与、自己株式取得、会計監査人選任、事業再編、買収防衛策導入、株主提案、その他の議案に必要な項目を各議案毎に抽出し、その抽出された項目から議案内容予測部150は、当該会社が作成するであろう株主総会招集通知の議案内容を予測し、この予測結果に基づいて株主総会議案予測報告書作成部160は株主総会議案予測報告書60を作成する。このようにして作成された株主総会議案予測報告書60を、株主総会開催の5週間前をめどに機関投資家等の株主に電子メール、FAX、郵便等で提供する。株主総会議案予測報告書(英語版)60の一例(”Typical Company, Limited”)を図13~図16に示す。”Proxy
Advance Japan”は、本システム名を示している。
The data extraction unit 120 uses the aggregated data as the shareholder general meeting proposal prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51 shown in FIG. 10 to FIG. Division change, appointment of directors, appointment of corporate auditors, appointment of substitute corporate auditors, payment of directors 'bonuses, payment of retirement benefits, revision of directors' compensation, granting of stock acquisition rights, acquisition of treasury stock, appointment of accounting auditors, business restructuring, takeover defense measures The items required for introduction, shareholder proposals, and other proposals are extracted for each proposal, and the proposal content forecasting unit 150 predicts the proposal content of the general meeting of shareholders to be convened from the extracted items. Then, based on the prediction result, the shareholder general meeting plan prediction report creating unit 160 creates the shareholder general meeting plan prediction report 60. In this way, the shareholders' meeting agenda prediction report 60 that was created, the shareholders in the e-mail, such as five weeks before prospect to institutional investors and the general meeting of shareholders held, FAX, provided by mail or the like. An example (“Typical Company, Limited”) 60 of the shareholder general meeting draft forecast report (English version) is shown in FIGS. ”Proxy
“Advance Japan” indicates the system name.
 また、議案判断部170は、議案内容予測部150で予測された予測議案について、例えば図17に示されるような議決権行使ガイドライン200を参照することにより当該予測議案の賛否を判断し、株主総会議案決定報告書作成部180は議案判断部170からの判断結果を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。なお、株主総会議案決定報告書52は株主総会議案予測報告書60に含めても良い。つまり、予測議案の有無と、議案が有ると予測された予測議案に対する賛否とを併記して作成するようにしても良い。 Further, the proposal judging unit 170 judges the pros and cons of the forecasted proposal predicted by the proposal content forecasting unit 150 by referring to, for example, the voting right exercise guideline 200 as shown in FIG. The agenda decision report preparation part 180 prepares the judgment result from the agenda judgment part 170 as a shareholder general meeting proposal determination report 52. The shareholder general meeting draft decision report 52 may be included in the shareholder general meeting draft forecast report 60. That is, the presence / absence of a predicted bill and the approval / disapproval of the predicted bill predicted to be present may be written together.
 株主総会議案決定報告書52と株主総会議案予測報告書60が別の場合には、実際に株主総会招集通知が公開された時点において、判断結果を含む株主総会議案決定報告書52を株主総会開催の2週間前をめどに株主等に電子メール、FAX、郵便等で提供する。これは、株主総会議案予測報告書60ではカバーしきれなかった部分を改めて通知するためのものである。例えば取締役の人事について、発行会社は株主総会招集通知作成の直前で候補者を差し替えるといったことを行う可能性があり、本システムを使用する顧客(機関投資家等)に対し、予測と実際の招集通知の一致点および相違点を通知する必要があるからである。 If the General Shareholders Meeting Proposal Decision Report 52 and the Shareholders General Meeting Proposal Prediction Report 60 are different, the Shareholders General Meeting Proposal Decision Report 52, including the judgment results, will be held when the Shareholders Meeting Convocation Notice is actually released. e-mail to shareholders, such as the two weeks before the prospect of, FAX, provided by mail or the like. This is to notify again of the portion that could not be covered by the shareholder general meeting draft forecast report 60. For example, with regard to directors' HR, the issuing company may replace candidates immediately before the notice of the general meeting of shareholders is prepared, and forecasts and actual convocations for customers (institutional investors, etc.) who use this system. This is because it is necessary to notify the coincidence and difference of the notification.
 以下に、各議案の有無の予測と予測議案に対する賛否の決定について説明する。 The following explains the prediction of the existence of each proposal and the decision to approve or reject the proposal.
 剰余金分配においては、定款および過去の株主総会招集通知46より入力された配当決議の権限に関するデータと決算短信報告書43より入力された配当金データとを組み合わせ、配当決議権限が株主総会にある場合および配当金が支給される場合はいずれも剰余金分配議案が「有る」と予測する。また、配当決議権限が取締役に有る場合においては、剰余金分配議案が「無い」と予測する。剰余金分配議案が有ると予測された場合には、更にその予測議案に対する賛否を判断する。 In the distribution of surplus, the data regarding the power of dividend resolution input from the Articles of Incorporation and the previous notice of convocation of the general meeting of shareholders 46 is combined with the data of dividends input from the financial report 43, and the authority to determine the dividend is at the general meeting of shareholders. In both cases and when dividends are paid, it is predicted that there will be a surplus distribution proposal. In addition, if the director has the authority to approve dividends, it is predicted that there will be no surplus distribution proposal. If it is predicted that there will be a surplus distribution proposal, it will further decide whether to approve or reject it.
 即ち、図18に示す剰余金分配議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例では、議案内容予測部150が議案の有無を判定する。先ずデータ抽出部120は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51から記番号ST8(当年:最終配当)、ST9(当年:配当性向)、ST16(前年:配当性向)、ST17(前年:ROE)、DT8(配当権限)、ST49(剰余金処分がある場合にその詳細)の各項目を抽出し(ステップS11)、議案内容予測部150は抽出された各項目の数値の合算値を算出する(ステップS12)。各項目の数値化は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51を作成する段階で、数値化部120によって行われている。次に、予め設定されている剰余金分配の基準値#1Aと、算出された合算値との大小を比較する判定を行い(ステップS13)、合算値が基準値#1A以上の場合には剰余金分配議案が「有る」と判定し(ステップS14)、合算値が基準値#1Aより小さい場合には剰余金分配議案が「無い」と判定する(ステップS15)。株主総会議案予測報告書作成部160は、判定された剰余金分配議案の有無の予測結果を株主総会議案予測報告書60として作成する。 That is, in the algorithm example of the presence / absence determination regarding the surplus distribution bill shown in FIG. 18, the bill content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the bill. First, the data extraction unit 120 reads the serial numbers ST8 (current year: final dividend), ST9 (current year: dividend payout ratio), ST16 (previous year: dividend payout ratio), ST17 (previous year: ROE) from the shareholder general meeting draft forecast system algorithm calculation data list 51. ), DT8 (dividend authority) and ST49 (details when there is surplus disposal) are extracted (step S11), and the agenda content prediction unit 150 calculates the sum of the values of the extracted items. (Step S12). The digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51. Next, a determination is made to compare the preset reference value # 1A of surplus distribution with the calculated sum (step S13). If the sum is greater than or equal to the reference value # 1A, the surplus is determined. It is determined that the money distribution bill is “present” (step S14). If the sum is smaller than the reference value # 1A, it is determined that there is no surplus distribution bill (step S15). The shareholder general meeting plan prediction report creation unit 160 creates a prediction result of the presence / absence of the determined surplus distribution plan as a shareholder general meeting plan prediction report 60.
 さらに、剰余金分配の予測議案が有ると予測された場合には、議案判断部170は、作成された剰余金分配予測議案の判定に用いた項目の数値の中での最低値を求め(ステップS16)、この算出最低値と、別途株主が作成する議決権行使ガイドラインが定めた記番号ST8(当年:最終配当)、ST9(当年:配当性向)、ST16(前年:配当性向)、ST17(前年:ROE)、DT8(配当権限)、ST49(剰余金処分がある場合にその詳細)の数値の合算値である基準値#1Bとを比較し(ステップS17)、剰余金分配の予測議案に対する賛否を判断する。つまり、算出最低値が基準値#1B以上の場合には予測議案に賛成し(ステップS18)、算出最低値が基準値#1Bよりも小さい場合には予測議案に反対し(ステップS19)、株主総会議案決定報告書作成部180はその議決権行使の判断結果を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 Further, if it is predicted that there is a surplus distribution prediction plan, the bill determination unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for determination of the generated surplus distribution prediction plan (step S16), the calculated minimum value and the serial numbers ST8 (current year: final dividend), ST9 (current year: dividend payout ratio), ST16 (previous year: dividend payout ratio), ST17 (previous year) : ROE), DT8 (dividend authority), and ST49 (details when there is surplus disposal) are compared with the reference value # 1B, which is the sum of the values (step S17), and the pros and cons of the forecast for surplus distribution Judging. In other words, if the calculated minimum value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 1B, it agrees with the prediction proposal (step S18), and if the calculated minimum value is smaller than the reference value # 1B, it opposes the prediction proposal (step S19). The general meeting draft decision report preparation section 180 creates a decision result of voting rights exercise as a shareholder general meeting draft decision report 52.
 定款一部変更議案においては、適時開示報告書44または報道および取材情報47により入力された定款変更に関するデータを基に、定款一部変更議案の有無を予測する。定款一部変更の議案が有ると予測された場合には、更にその予測議案に対する賛否を判断する。
即ち、図19に示す定款一部変更議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例では、議案内容予測部150が議案の有無を判定する。先ずデータ抽出部120は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51から記番号DT6(取締役任期)、DT7(監査役任期)、DT8(配当権限)、ST27(株主総会の運営に関する規定)、ST28(株式の状況)、ST50(定款一部変更がある場合にその詳細)の各項目を抽出し(ステップS21)、議案内容予測部150は抽出された各項目の数値の合算値を算出する(ステップS22)。各項目の数値化は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51を作成する段階で、数値化部120によって行われている。次に、予め設定されている定款一部変更の基準値#2Aと、算出された合算値との大小を比較する判定を行い(ステップS23)、合算値が基準値#2A以上の場合には定款一部変更議案が「有る」と判定し(ステップS24)、合算値が基準値#2Aより小さい場合には定款一部変更議案が「無い」と判定する(ステップS25)。株主総会議案予測報告書作成部160は、判定された定款一部変更議案の有無の予測結果を株主総会議案予測報告書60として作成する。
In the Articles of Incorporation Partial Amendment, the existence of an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation is predicted based on the data relating to the amendment to the Articles of Incorporation input from the Timely Disclosure Report 44 or the press and interview information 47. If it is predicted that there will be a proposal for partial amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, the pros and cons of the forecast will be further determined.
That is, in the algorithm example for determining whether or not there is a partial amendment to the Articles of Incorporation shown in FIG. 19, the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines whether or not there is a proposal. First, the data extraction unit 120 reads the serial number DT6 (director term), DT7 (auditor term), DT8 (dividend authority), ST27 (regulations regarding the operation of the general meeting of shareholders) from the shareholder general meeting draft forecast system algorithm calculation data list 51, Each item of ST28 (stock status) and ST50 (details when there is a partial amendment to the Articles of Incorporation) is extracted (step S21), and the agenda content prediction unit 150 calculates the sum of the values of the extracted items. (Step S22). The digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51. Next, a determination is made to compare the preset reference value # 2A for partial change of the Articles of Incorporation with the calculated total value (step S23). If the total value is equal to or greater than the reference value # 2A It is determined that the articles of incorporation partial change proposal is “present” (step S24). If the total value is smaller than the reference value # 2A, it is determined that there is no articles of incorporation partial change proposal (step S25). The shareholder general meeting draft forecast report creation unit 160 creates a forecast result of the presence or absence of the determined partial amendment of the articles of incorporation as a shareholder general meeting draft forecast report 60.
 さらに、定款一部変更の議案があると予測された場合には、議案判断部170は、作成された定款一部変更予測議案の判定に用いた項目の数値の中での最低値を求め(ステップS26)、この算出最低値と、別途株主が作成する議決権行使ガイドラインが定めた記番号DT6(取締役任期)、DT7(監査役任期)、DT8(配当権限)、ST27(株主総会の運営に関する規定)、ST28(株式の状況)、ST50(定款一部変更がある場合にその詳細)の数値の合算値である基準値#2Bとを比較し(ステップS27)、定款一部変更の予測議案に対する賛否を判断する。つまり、算出最低値が基準値#2B以上の場合には予測議案に賛成し(ステップS28)、算出最低値が基準値#2Bよりも小さい場合には予測議案に反対し(ステップS29)、株主総会議案決定報告書作成部180はその議決権行使の判断結果(賛否)を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 Further, when it is predicted that there is a proposal for partial amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, the bill judgment unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the determination of the proposed proposal for partial change of the Articles of Incorporation ( Step S26), the calculated minimum value, and the serial numbers DT6 (director term), DT7 (auditor term), DT8 (dividend power), ST27 (operating the general meeting of shareholders) defined by the guidelines for exercising voting rights separately prepared by shareholders Regulations), ST28 (status of stock), ST50 (details if there is a partial change in the Articles of Incorporation) and the reference value # 2B, which is the sum of the values (step S27) Judgment for or against. In other words, if the calculated minimum value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 2B, it agrees with the prediction proposal (step S28), and if the calculated minimum value is smaller than the reference value # 2B, it is opposed to the prediction proposal (step S29). The general meeting draft decision report preparation section 180 creates a decision result (promotion) of voting rights exercise as a shareholder general meeting draft decision report 52.
 取締役選任議案においては、適時開示情報報告書44より入力された取締役人事に関するデータを基に議案の有無を予測すると共に、有価証券報告書41、コーポレート・ガバナンス報告書42、定款および過去の株主総会招集通知の書類46より入力された個々の取締役のデータを組み合わせ、株主総会に提示されるであろう取締役の特定を行うと共に、その属性を一覧表として提示した上で取締役選任議案の有無を予測する。取締役選任の議案が有ると予測された場合には、更にその議決権行使の判断結果を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 In the proposal for appointment of directors, the presence or absence of proposals is predicted based on the data on director personnel input from the Timely Disclosure Information Report 44, the Securities Report 41, the Corporate Governance Report 42, the Articles of Incorporation and the past general meeting of shareholders. Combining the data of individual directors entered from the convocation notice document 46, the directors that will be presented at the general meeting of shareholders are identified, and their attributes are presented as a list to predict whether directors will be appointed. To do. If it is predicted that there will be a proposal for the appointment of a director, the decision on exercising the voting rights is further prepared as a shareholder meeting proposal decision report 52.
 即ち、図20に示す取締役選任議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例では、議案内容予測部150が議案の有無を判定する。先ずデータ抽出部120は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51から記番号DT1(取締役または監査役の氏名)、DT2(役職名)、DT3(生年)、DT4(就任年)、DT5(経歴)、DT6(取締役任期)、DT9(社外役員)、DT10(社外役員の属性)、DT11(役員の異動に関する情報)、DT12(役員候補者氏名)、DT13(役員候補者役職名)、DT14(役員候補者属性)、DT15(役員候補者生年)、DT16(役員候補者就任年)、ST22(取締役会形態)、ST23(取締役総数)、ST24(社外取締役数)、ST25(監査役数)
、ST26(社外監査役数)、ST27(株主総会の運営に関する規定)、ST51(取締役選任がある場合にその詳細) の各項目を抽出し(ステップS31)、議案内容予測部150は抽出された各項目の数値の合算値を算出する(ステップS32)。各項目の数値化は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51を作成する段階で、数値化部120によって行われている。次に、予め設定されている取締役選任の基準値#3Aと、算出された合算値との大小を比較する判定を行い(ステップS33)、合算値が基準値#3A以上の場合には取締役選任議案が「有る」と判定し(ステップS34)、合算値が基準値#3Aより小さい場合には取締役選任議案が「無い」と判定する(ステップS35)。株主総会議案予測報告書作成部160は、判定された取締役選任議案の有無の予測結果を株主総会議案予測報告書60として作成する。
That is, in the algorithm example of the presence / absence determination regarding the director appointment proposal shown in FIG. 20, the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the proposal. First, the data extraction unit 120 uses the serial number DT1 (name of director or corporate auditor), DT2 (title), DT3 (year of birth), DT4 (year of office), DT5 (name of director) from the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51. Career), DT6 (Director term), DT9 (External officer), DT10 (External officer attribute), DT11 (Executive officer change information), DT12 (Executive candidate name), DT13 (Executive candidate title), DT14 (Executive candidate attribute), DT15 (Executive candidate year of birth), DT16 (Executive candidate year), ST22 (Board of directors), ST23 (Total number of directors), ST24 (Number of outside directors), ST25 (Number of corporate auditors)
, ST26 (the number of outside corporate auditors), ST27 (rules regarding the operation of the general meeting of shareholders), ST51 (details when there is a director appointment) are extracted (step S31), and the agenda content prediction unit 150 is extracted. The sum of the numerical values of the items is calculated (step S32). The digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51. Next, a determination is made to compare the preset reference value # 3A for director appointment with the calculated sum (step S33). If the sum is greater than or equal to the reference value # 3A, director appointment is performed. It is determined that the proposal is “present” (step S34). If the total value is smaller than the reference value # 3A, it is determined that there is no director appointment proposal (step S35). The shareholder general meeting draft prediction report creating section 160 creates a prediction result of the presence or absence of the determined director appointment proposal as a shareholder general meeting draft prediction report 60.
 さらに、取締役選任の議案があると予測された場合には、議案判断部170は、作成された取締役選任予測議案の判定に用いた項目の数値の中での最低値を求め(ステップS37)、この算出最低値と、別途株主が作成する議決権行使ガイドラインが定めた記番号DT1(取締役または監査役の氏名)、DT2(役職名)、DT3(生年)、DT4(就任年)、DT5(経歴)、DT6(取締役任期)、DT9(社外役員)、DT10(社外役員の属性)、DT11(役員の異動に関する情報)、DT12(役員候補者氏名)、DT13(役員候補者役職名)、DT14(役員候補者属性)、DT15(役員候補者生年)、DT16(役員候補者就任年)、ST22(取締役会形態)、ST23(取締役総数)、ST24(社外取締役数)、ST25(監査役数)
、ST26(社外監査役数)、ST27(株主総会の運営に関する規定)、ST51(取締役選任がある場合にその詳細)の数値の合算値である基準値#3Bとを比較し(ステップS38)、取締役選任の予測議案に対する賛否を判断する。つまり、算出最低値が基準値#3B以上の場合には予測議案に賛成し(ステップS39a)、算出最低値が基準値#3Bよりも小さい場合には予測議案に反対し(ステップS39b)、株主総会議案決定報告書作成部180はその議決権行使の判断結果を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。
Further, when it is predicted that there is a proposal for appointment of directors, the proposal determination unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the determination of the prepared director appointment prediction proposal (step S37), This calculated minimum value and the serial numbers DT1 (name of director or corporate auditor), DT2 (title), DT3 (year of birth), DT4 (year of office), DT5 (history) determined by guidelines for exercising voting rights separately prepared by shareholders ), DT6 (Executive term), DT9 (External officer), DT10 (External officer attribute), DT11 (Information on change of officer), DT12 (Executive candidate name), DT13 (Executive candidate title), DT14 Executive candidate attributes), DT15 (executive candidate year of birth), DT16 (executive candidate year), ST22 (Board of Directors), ST23 (total number of directors), ST24 (external directors), T25 (auditor number)
, ST26 (the number of outside corporate auditors), ST27 (regulations regarding the management of the general meeting of shareholders), ST51 (details when there is a director appointment) and the reference value # 3B, which is the combined value (step S38), Judgment of approval or disapproval of the forecast for the appointment of directors. In other words, if the calculated minimum value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 3B, it agrees with the prediction proposal (step S39a), and if the calculated minimum value is smaller than the reference value # 3B, it is opposed to the prediction proposal (step S39b). The general meeting draft decision report preparation section 180 creates a decision result of voting rights exercise as a shareholder general meeting draft decision report 52.
 監査役選任議案においては、適時開示情報報告書44より入力された監査役人事に関するデータを基に議案の有無を予測すると共に、有価証券報告書41、コーポレート・ガバナンス報告書42、定款および過去の株主総会招集通知の書類46より入力された個々の監査役のデータを組み合わせ、株主総会に提示されるであろう監査役の特定を行うと共に、その属性を一覧表として提示した上で監査役選任議案の有無を予測する。監査役役選任の予測議案が有ると予測された場合には、更にその議決権行使の判断結果(賛否)を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 In the agenda for appointment of Corporate Auditors, the existence of proposals is predicted based on the data on Corporate Auditor personnel input from the Timely Disclosure Information Report 44, and the Securities Report 41, Corporate Governance Report 42, Articles of Incorporation and past Combining the data of individual corporate auditors entered from the document 46 of the shareholders meeting convocation notice, the corporate auditors who will be presented at the general meeting of shareholders are identified and their attributes are presented as a list and appointed as a corporate auditor Predict whether there is a bill. If it is predicted that there is a prospective proposal for the appointment of a corporate auditor, the decision on exercising the voting rights (prospective) will be prepared as a shareholder meeting proposal decision report 52.
 即ち、図21に示す監査役選任議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例では、議案内容予測部150が議案の有無を判定する。先ずデータ抽出部120は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51から記番号DT1(取締役または監査役の氏名)、DT2(役職名)、DT3(生年)、DT4(就任年)、DT5(経歴)、DT7(監査役任期)、DT9(社外役員)、DT10(社外役員の属性)、DT11(役員の異動に関する情報)、DT12(役員候補者氏名)、DT13(役員候補者役職名)、DT14(役員候補者属性)、DT15(役員候補者生年)、DT16(役員候補者就任年)、ST22(取締役会形態)、ST23(取締役総数)、ST24(社外取締役数)、ST25(監査役数)、ST26(社外監査役数)、ST27(株主総会の運営に関する規定)、ST51(取締役選任がある場合にその詳細)の各項目を抽出し(ステップS41)、議案内容予測部150は抽出された各項目の数値の合算値を算出する(ステップS42)。各項目の数値化は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51を作成する段階で、数値化部120によって行われている。次に、予め設定されている監査役選任の基準値#4Aと、算出された合算値との大小を比較する判定を行い(ステップS43)、合算値が基準値#4A以上の場合には監査役選任議案が「有る」と判定し(ステップS44)、合算値が基準値#4Aより小さい場合には監査役選任議案が「無い」と判定する(ステップS45)。株主総会議案予測報告書作成部160は、判定された監査役選任議案の有無の予測結果を株主総会議案予測報告書60として作成する。 That is, in the algorithm example of the presence / absence determination regarding the proposal for appointment of the corporate auditor shown in FIG. 21, the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the proposal. First, the data extraction unit 120 reads the serial number DT1 (name of director or corporate auditor), DT2 (title), DT3 (year of birth), DT4 (year of office), DT5 (name of director) from the shareholder general meeting proposal prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51. Career history), DT7 (auditor term), DT9 (external officer), DT10 (external officer attributes), DT11 (information on officer changes), DT12 (executive candidate name), DT13 (executive candidate title), DT14 (executive candidate attribute), DT15 (executive candidate year of birth), DT16 (executive candidate year), ST22 (form of board of directors), ST23 (total number of directors), ST24 (number of outside directors), ST25 (number of auditors) ), ST26 (the number of outside corporate auditors), ST27 (regulations regarding the operation of the general meeting of shareholders), ST51 (details if there are directors) (Step S41), the bill content prediction unit 150 calculates the sum of value of each item extracted (step S42). The digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51. Next, a determination is made to compare the preset reference value # 4A for selecting an auditor and the calculated sum (step S43). If the sum is greater than or equal to the reference value # 4A, an audit is performed. It is determined that the role selection proposal is “present” (step S44). If the total value is smaller than the reference value # 4A, it is determined that there is no auditor selection proposal (step S45). The shareholder general meeting draft prediction report creation unit 160 creates a prediction result of the presence / absence of the determined audit & supervisory board appointment proposal as a shareholder general meeting draft prediction report 60.
 さらに、監査役選任の議案があると予測された場合には、議案判断部170は、作成された監査役選任予測議案の判定に用いた項目の数値の中での最低値を求め(ステップS47)、この算出最低値と、別途株主が作成する議決権行使ガイドラインが定めた記番号DT1(取締役または監査役の氏名)、DT2(役職名)、DT3(生年)、DT4(就任年)、DT5(経歴)、DT7(監査役任期)、DT9(社外役員)、DT10(社外役員の属性)、DT11(役員の異動に関する情報)、DT12(役員候補者氏名)、DT13(役員候補者役職名)、DT14(役員候補者属性)、DT15(役員候補者生年)、DT16(役員候補者就任年)、ST22(取締役会形態)、ST23(取締役総数)、ST24(社外取締役数)、ST25(監査役数)、ST26(社外監査役数)、ST27(株主総会の運営に関する規定)、ST51(取締役選任がある場合にその詳細)の数値の合算値である基準値#4Bとを比較し(ステップS48)、監査役選任の予測議案に対する賛否を判断する。つまり、算出最低値が基準値#4B以上の場合には予測議案に賛成し(ステップS49a)、算出最低値が基準値#4Bよりも小さい場合には予測議案に反対し(ステップS49b)、株主総会議案決定報告書作成部180はその議決権行使の判断結果(賛否)を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 Further, when it is predicted that there is a proposal for appointment of the corporate auditor, the proposal judgment unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the judgment of the prepared corporate auditor appointment prediction proposal (step S47). ), The calculated minimum value, and the serial numbers DT1 (name of director or corporate auditor), DT2 (title), DT3 (year of birth), DT4 (year of office), and DT5, which are determined by the guidelines for exercising voting rights separately prepared by shareholders (Career), DT7 (Audit term), DT9 (External officer), DT10 (External officer attribute), DT11 (Information on change of officer), DT12 (Executive candidate name), DT13 (Executive candidate title) , DT14 (executive candidate attribute), DT15 (executive candidate year of birth), DT16 (executive candidate year), ST22 (form of board of directors), ST23 (total number of directors), ST24 (number of outside directors) Comparison with ST25 (number of outside corporate auditors), ST26 (number of outside corporate auditors), ST27 (regulations regarding the operation of the general meeting of shareholders) and ST51 (details when there is a director appointment), the reference value # 4B (Step S48), the pros and cons of the prediction proposal for the appointment of the corporate auditor are determined. In other words, if the calculated minimum value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 4B, it agrees with the prediction proposal (step S49a), and if the calculated minimum value is smaller than the reference value # 4B, it is opposed to the prediction proposal (step S49b). The general meeting draft decision report preparation section 180 creates a decision result (promotion) of voting rights exercise as a shareholder general meeting draft decision report 52.
 補欠監査役選任議案においては、適時開示情報報告書44より入力された補欠監査役人事に関するデータを基に議案の有無を予測すると共に、有価証券報告書41、コーポレート・ガバナンス報告書42、定款および過去の株主総会招集通知の書類46より入力された個々の補欠監査役のデータを組み合わせ、株主総会に提示されるであろう補欠監査役の特定を行うと共に、その属性を一覧表として提示した上で補欠監査役選任議案の有無を予測する。補欠監査役役選任の議案が有ると予測された場合には、更にその議決権行使の判断結果を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 In the proposal for appointment of substitute corporate auditors, the presence or absence of proposals is predicted based on the data on personnel of substitute corporate auditors entered from the timely disclosure information report 44, and the securities report 41, corporate governance report 42, articles of incorporation and Combining the data of individual substitute corporate auditors entered from the document 46 of the past shareholders meeting convocation notice, the substitute corporate auditors who will be presented at the general meeting of shareholders are identified and their attributes are presented as a list. Predict whether or not there is a proposal to appoint a substitute corporate auditor. If it is predicted that there will be a proposal to appoint a substitute corporate auditor, the decision on exercising the voting rights is further prepared as a draft decision report 52 for the general meeting of shareholders.
 即ち、図22に示す補欠監査役選任議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例では、議案内容予測部150が議案の有無を判定する。先ずデータ抽出部120は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51から記番号ST72(その他情報はある場合にその詳細)およびST53(補欠監査役選任がある場合にその詳細)の項目を抽出し(ステップS51)、議案内容予測部150は抽出された項目の数値を合算値とする(ステップS52)。当該項目の数値化は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51を作成する段階で、数値化部120によって行われている。次に、予め設定されている補欠監査役選任の基準値#5Aと、算出された合算値との大小を比較する判定を行い(ステップS53)、合算値が基準値#5A以上の場合には補欠監査役選任議案が「有る」と判定し(ステップS54)、合算値が基準値#5Aよりも小さい場合には補欠監査役選任議案が「無い」と判定する(ステップS55)。株主総会議案予測報告書作成部160は、判定された補欠監査役選任議案の有無の予測結果を株主総会議案予測報告書60として作成する。 That is, in the algorithm example of the presence / absence determination regarding the substitute auditor appointment proposal shown in FIG. 22, the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the proposal. First, the data extraction unit 120 extracts items of serial numbers ST72 (details when there is other information) and ST53 (details when a substitute auditor is appointed) from the data list 51 for shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation. (Step S51), the proposal content prediction unit 150 sets the extracted numerical values of the items as a total value (Step S52). The quantification of the item is performed by the quantification unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51. Next, a determination is made to compare the size of the preset reference value # 5A for selecting the substitute corporate auditor and the calculated total value (step S53). If the total value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 5A, It is determined that the substitute auditor appointment proposal is “present” (step S54), and if the combined value is smaller than the reference value # 5A, it is determined that there is no substitute auditor appointment proposal (step S55). The shareholder general meeting plan prediction report preparation unit 160 prepares the predicted result of the presence / absence of the determined substitute corporate auditor appointment proposal as a shareholder general meeting plan prediction report 60.
 さらに、補欠監査役選任の予測議案がある場合には、議案判断部170は、作成された補欠監査役選任予測議案の判定に用いた項目の数値の中での最低値を求め(ステップS56)、この算出最低値と、別途株主が作成する議決権行使ガイドラインが定めた記番号ST72およびST53の数値の合算値である基準値#5Bとを比較し(ステップS57)、補欠監査役選任の議案に対する賛否を判断する。つまり、算出最低値が基準値#5B以上の場合には予測議案に賛成し(ステップS58)、算出最低値が基準値#5Bよりも小さい場合には予測議案に反対し(ステップS59)、株主総会議案決定報告書作成部180はその議決権行使の判断結果(賛否)を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 Further, when there is a predicted proposal for the appointment of the substitute corporate auditor, the proposal judgment unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the determination of the predicted proposal for the appointment of the substitute corporate auditor (step S56). Then, the calculated minimum value is compared with the reference value # 5B, which is the sum of the values of serial numbers ST72 and ST53 defined by the separate voting rights exercise guidelines prepared by shareholders (step S57), and the proposal for the appointment of a substitute corporate auditor Judgment for or against. That is, if the calculated minimum value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 5B, it agrees with the prediction proposal (step S58), and if the calculated minimum value is smaller than the reference value # 5B, it is opposed to the prediction proposal (step S59). The general meeting draft decision report preparation section 180 creates a decision result (promotion) of voting rights exercise as a shareholder general meeting draft decision report 52.
 役員賞与支給議案においては、適時開示情報報告書44より入力された報酬に関するデータを基に議案の有無を予測すると共に、有価証券報告書41、コーポレート・ガバナンス報告書42、定款および過去の株主総会招集通知の書類46より入力された個々のデータを組み合わせ、株主総会に提示されるであろう役員賞与支給議案の有無を予測する。役員賞与支給の議案が有ると予測された場合には、更にその議決権行使の判断結果を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 In the executive bonus payment proposal, the presence or absence of the proposal is predicted based on the data related to remuneration input from the Timely Disclosure Information Report 44, the Securities Report 41, the Corporate Governance Report 42, the Articles of Incorporation and the past general meeting of shareholders. The individual data input from the convocation notice document 46 are combined to predict whether there will be a director bonus payment proposal that will be presented to the general meeting of shareholders. If it is predicted that there will be a director bonus payment proposal, the decision on exercising voting rights is further prepared as a shareholder meeting proposal decision report 52.
 即ち、図23に示す役員賞与支給議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例では、議案内容予測部150が議案の有無を判定する。先ずデータ抽出部120は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51から記番号ST36(報酬に関する情報)、ST44(不祥事等の事件)、ST54(役員賞与支給がある場合にその詳細)、ST64(役員賞与支給対象者の特徴)の各項目を抽出し(ステップS61)、議案内容予測部150は抽出された各項目の数値の合算値を算出する(ステップS62)。各項目の数値化は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51を作成する段階で、数値化部120によって行われている。次に、予め設定されている役員賞与支給の基準値#6Aと、算出された合算値との大小を比較する判定を行い(ステップS63)、合算値が基準値#6A以上の場合には役員賞与支給議案が「有る」と判定し(ステップS64)、合算値が基準値#6Aよりも小さい場合には役員賞与支給議案が「無い」と判定する(ステップS65)。株主総会議案予測報告書作成部160は、判定された役員賞与支給議案の有無の予測結果を株主総会議案予測報告書60として作成する。 That is, in the algorithm example of the presence / absence determination regarding the executive bonus payment proposal shown in FIG. 23, the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the proposal. First, the data extraction unit 120 reads the serial number ST36 (information relating to remuneration), ST44 (incidents such as scandals), ST54 (details when there are bonus payments for officers), ST64 from the shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51. Each item (characteristics of the person to whom the bonus is paid) is extracted (step S61), and the agenda content prediction unit 150 calculates the total value of the extracted items (step S62). The digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51. Next, a determination is made to compare the reference value # 6A of the executive bonus payment set in advance with the calculated sum value (step S63). If the sum is equal to or greater than the reference value # 6A, the officer It is determined that the bonus payment proposal is “present” (step S64), and if the total value is smaller than the reference value # 6A, it is determined that there is no executive bonus payment proposal (step S65). The shareholder general meeting plan prediction report creation unit 160 creates a prediction result of the presence / absence of the determined officer bonus payment plan as a shareholder general meeting plan prediction report 60.
 さらに、役員賞与支給の議案があると予測された場合には、議案判断部170は、作成された役員賞与支給予測議案の判定に用いた項目の数値の中での最低値を求め(ステップS66)、この算出最低値と、別途株主が作成する議決権行使ガイドラインが定めた記番号ST36(報酬に関する情報)、ST44(不祥事等の事件)、ST54(役員賞与支給がある場合にその詳細)、ST64(役員賞与支給対象者の特徴)の数値の合算値である基準値#6Bとを比較し(ステップS67)、役員賞与支給の予測議案に対する賛否を判断する。つまり、算出最低値が基準値#6B以上の場合には予測議案に賛成し(ステップS68)、算出最低値が基準値#6Bよりも小さい場合には予測議案に反対し(ステップS69)、株主総会議案決定報告書作成部180はその議決権行使の判断結果(賛否)を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 Furthermore, when it is predicted that there is a bill for officer bonus payment, the bill judgment unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the determination of the created officer bonus payment forecast bill (step S66). ), The calculated minimum value, serial number ST36 (information on remuneration), ST44 (incidents such as scandals), ST54 (details when there are bonus payments for officers), as determined by the separate guidelines for exercising voting rights prepared by shareholders. The standard value # 6B, which is the combined value of ST64 (characteristics of officer bonus payment target person), is compared (step S67), and the pros and cons of the forecast proposal for officer bonus payment are determined. That is, if the calculated minimum value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 6B, it agrees with the prediction proposal (step S68), and if the calculated minimum value is smaller than the reference value # 6B, it is opposed to the prediction proposal (step S69). The general meeting draft decision report preparation section 180 creates a decision result (promotion) of voting rights exercise as a shareholder general meeting draft decision report 52.
 退職慰労金支給議案においては、適時開示情報報告書44より入力された報酬に関するデータを基に、議案の有無を予測すると共に、有価証券報告書41、コーポレート・ガバナンス報告書42、定款および過去の株主総会招集通知の書類46より入力された個々のデータを組み合わせ、株主総会に提示されるであろう退職慰労金支給議案の有無を予測する。退職慰労金支給の議案が有ると予測された場合には、更にその議決権行使の判断結果を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 In the retirement allowance payment proposal, based on the data on remuneration input from the timely disclosure information report 44, the presence or absence of the proposal is predicted, the securities report 41, the corporate governance report 42, the articles of incorporation and the past The individual data input from the shareholders meeting convocation notice document 46 are combined to predict whether or not there will be a proposal for retirement benefits to be presented at the shareholders meeting. If it is predicted that there will be a proposal for retirement benefits payment, the decision on exercising voting rights will be prepared as a shareholder general meeting proposal decision report 52.
 即ち、図24に示す退職慰労金支給議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例では、議案内容予測部150が議案の有無を判定する。先ずデータ抽出部120は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51から記番号ST36(報酬に関する情報)、ST44(不祥事等の事件)、ST55(退職慰労金支給がある場合にその詳細)、ST65(退職慰労金支給対象者の特徴)、ST70(役員報酬に関する方針)の各項目を抽出し(ステップS71)、議案内容予測部150は抽出された各項目の数値の合算値を算出する(ステップS72)。各項目の数値化は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51を作成する段階で、数値化部120によって行われている。次に、予め設定されている退職慰労金支給の基準値#7Aと、算出された合算値との大小を比較する判定を行い(ステップS73)、合算値が基準値#7A以上の場合には退職慰労金支給議案が「有る」と判定し(ステップS74)、合算値が基準値#7Aより小さい場合には退職慰労金支給議案が「無い」と判定する(ステップS75)。株主総会議案予測報告書作成部160は、判定された退職慰労金支給議案の有無の予測結果を株主総会議案予測報告書60として作成する。 That is, in the algorithm example of the presence / absence determination regarding the retirement allowance payment proposal shown in FIG. 24, the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the proposal. First, the data extraction unit 120 has the serial numbers ST36 (information relating to remuneration), ST44 (incidents such as scandals), ST55 (details when retirement benefits are provided) from the data list 51 for calculating the shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm. Each item of ST65 (characteristics of the person who receives retirement benefits) and ST70 (policy for executive compensation) is extracted (step S71), and the agenda content prediction unit 150 calculates the sum of the values of the extracted items ( Step S72). The digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51. Next, a determination is made to compare the preset retirement allowance payment reference value # 7A with the calculated sum (step S73). If the sum is greater than or equal to the reference value # 7A, It is determined that the retirement benefit payment proposal is “present” (step S74), and if the total value is smaller than the reference value # 7A, it is determined that there is no retirement benefit payment proposal (step S75). The shareholder general meeting plan prediction report creation unit 160 creates a prediction result of the presence / absence of the determined retirement allowance payment plan as a shareholder general meeting plan prediction report 60.
 さらに、退職慰労金支給の議案があると予測された場合には、議案判断部170は、作成された退職慰労金支給予測議案の判定に用いた項目の数値の中での最低値を求め(ステップS76)、この算出最低値と、別途株主が作成する議決権行使ガイドラインが定めた記番号ST36(報酬に関する情報)、ST44(不祥事等の事件)、ST55(退職慰労金支給がある場合にその詳細)、ST65(退職慰労金支給対象者の特徴)、ST70(役員報酬に関する方針)の数値の合算値である基準値#7Bとを比較し(ステップS77)、退職慰労金支給の予測議案に対する賛否を判断する。つまり、算出最低値が基準値#7B以上の場合には予測議案に賛成し(ステップS78)、算出最低値が基準値#7Bより小さい場合には予測議案に反対し(ステップS79)、株主総会議案決定報告書作成部180はその議決権行使の判断結果(賛否)を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 Further, when it is predicted that there is a proposal for retirement benefits payment, the bill decision unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the determination of the created retirement benefit payment prediction bill ( Step S76), the calculated minimum value, and the serial numbers ST36 (information on remuneration), ST44 (incidents such as scandals) and ST55 (if retirement benefits are provided) determined by the separate voting rights exercise guidelines prepared by shareholders Details), ST65 (Characteristics of persons eligible for retirement bonus payments), ST70 (Policy on compensation for officers) and the standard value # 7B, which is the sum of the values (Step S77) Judge the pros and cons. That is, if the calculated minimum value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 7B, it agrees with the prediction proposal (step S78), and if the calculated minimum value is less than the reference value # 7B, it is opposed to the prediction proposal (step S79). The agenda decision report preparation unit 180 prepares the decision result (promotion) of the exercise of voting rights as a general shareholders meeting proposal determination report 52.
 役員報酬額改定議案においては、適時開示情報報告書44より入力された報酬に関するデータを基に、議案の有無を予測すると共に、有価証券報告書41、コーポレート・ガバナンス報告書42、定款および過去の株主総会招集通知の書類46より入力された個々のデータを組み合わせ、株主総会に提示されるであろう役員報酬額改定議案の有無を予測する。役員報酬額改定の議案が有ると予測された場合には、更にその議決権行使の判断結果を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 In the executive remuneration revision proposal, based on the data on remuneration input from the Timely Disclosure Information Report 44, the presence or absence of the proposal is predicted, the Securities Report 41, the Corporate Governance Report 42, the Articles of Incorporation and the past The individual data input from the document 46 of the shareholders meeting convocation notice are combined to predict whether or not there will be a proposal for revising the executive compensation amount that will be presented to the shareholders meeting. If it is predicted that there will be a proposal for revising the amount of executive remuneration, the decision on exercising the voting rights is further prepared as a shareholder meeting proposal decision report 52.
 即ち、図25に示す役員報酬額改定議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例では、議案内容予測部150が議案の有無を判定する。先ずデータ抽出部120は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51から記番号ST36(報酬に関する情報)、ST44(不祥事等の事件)、ST56(役員報酬額改定がある場合にその詳細)、ST66(役員報酬改定後の水準)、ST70(役員報酬に関する方針)の各項目を抽出し(ステップS81)、議案内容予測部150は抽出された各項目の数値の合算値を算出する(ステップS82)。各項目の数値化は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51を作成する段階で、数値化部120によって行われている。次に、予め設定されている役員報酬額改定の基準値#8Aと、算出された合算値との大小を比較する判定を行い(ステップS83)、合算値が基準値#8A以上の場合には役員報酬額改定議案が「有る」と判定し(ステップS84)、合算値が基準値#8Aより小さい場合には役員報酬額改定議案が「無い」と判定する(ステップS85)。株主総会議案予測報告書作成部160は、判定された役員報酬額改定議案の有無の予測結果を株主総会議案予測報告書60として作成する。 That is, in the algorithm example of the presence / absence determination regarding the executive remuneration revision proposal shown in FIG. 25, the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the proposal. First, the data extraction unit 120 has the serial numbers ST36 (information relating to remuneration), ST44 (incidents such as scandals), ST56 (details when there is an officer remuneration revision) from the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51, Each item of ST66 (level after officer compensation revision) and ST70 (policy regarding officer compensation) is extracted (step S81), and the agenda content prediction unit 150 calculates the sum of the values of the extracted items (step S82). ). The digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51. Next, a determination is made to compare the preset reference value # 8A for remuneration revision and the calculated total value (step S83). If the total value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 8A, It is determined that the executive compensation amount revision proposal is “present” (step S84), and if the combined value is smaller than the reference value # 8A, it is determined that there is no executive compensation amount revision proposal (step S85). The shareholder general meeting plan prediction report creation unit 160 creates a prediction result of the presence / absence of the determined officer remuneration revision proposal as a shareholder general meeting plan prediction report 60.
 さらに、役員報酬額改定の議案があると予測された場合には、議案判断部170は、作成された役員報酬額改定予測議案の判定に用いた項目の数値の中での最低値を求め(ステップS86)、この算出最低値と、別途株主が作成する議決権行使ガイドラインが定めた記番号ST36(報酬に関する情報)、ST44(不祥事等の事件)、ST56(役員報酬額改定がある場合にその詳細)、ST66(役員報酬改定後の水準)、ST70(役員報酬に関する方針)の数値の合算値である基準値#8Bとを比較し(ステップS87)、役員報酬額改定の予測議案に対する賛否を判断する。つまり、算出最低値が基準値#8B以上の場合には予測議案に賛成し(ステップS88)、算出最低値が基準値#8Bより小さい場合には予測議案に反対し(ステップS89)、株主総会議案決定報告書作成部180はその議決権行使の判断結果(賛否)を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 Further, when it is predicted that there is a proposal for the revision of the executive compensation amount, the proposal judgment unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the judgment of the created executive compensation amount revision forecast proposal ( Step S86), this calculated minimum value, and the serial numbers ST36 (information relating to remuneration), ST44 (incidents such as scandals), ST56 (executive remuneration revisions) determined by the separate voting rights exercise guidelines prepared by shareholders Details), ST66 (level after officer compensation revision), ST70 (policy on officer compensation) are compared with the standard value # 8B, which is the combined value (step S87), and the pros and cons of the forecast proposal for officer compensation revision are compared. to decide. In other words, if the calculated minimum value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 8B, it agrees with the prediction proposal (step S88), and if the calculated minimum value is less than the reference value # 8B, it is opposed to the prediction proposal (step S89). The agenda decision report preparation unit 180 prepares the decision result (promotion) of the exercise of voting rights as a general shareholders meeting proposal determination report 52.
 新株予約権付与議案においては、適時開示情報報告書44より入力された報酬に関するデータを基に、議案の有無を予測すると共に、有価証券報告書41、コーポレート・ガバナンス報告書42、定款および過去の株主総会招集通知の書類46より入力された個々のデータを組み合わせ、株主総会に提示されるであろう新株予約権付与議案の有無を予測する。新株予約権付与の議案が有ると予測された場合には、更にその議決権行使の判断結果を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 In the proposal for granting stock acquisition rights, the existence of a proposal is predicted based on the data on remuneration input from the timely disclosure information report 44, the securities report 41, the corporate governance report 42, the articles of incorporation and the past The individual data input from the shareholders meeting convocation notice 46 are combined to predict whether there will be a proposal for granting stock acquisition rights that will be presented to the shareholders meeting. If it is predicted that there will be a proposal for granting stock acquisition rights, the decision result of exercising the voting rights is further prepared as a shareholder meeting proposal decision report 52.
 即ち、図26に示す新株予約権発行議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例では、議案内容予測部150が議案の有無を判定する。先ずデータ抽出部120は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51から記番号ST36(報酬に関する情報)、ST44(不祥事等の事件)、ST57(新株予約権がある場合にその詳細)、ST67(新株予約権付与対象者の特徴)、ST70(役員報酬に関する方針)の各項目を抽出し(ステップS91)、議案内容予測部150は抽出された各項目の数値の合算値を算出する(ステップS92)。各項目の数値化は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51を作成する段階で、数値化部120によって行われている。次に、予め設定されている新株予約権発行の基準値#9Aと、算出された合算値との大小を比較する判定を行い(ステップS93)、合算値が基準値#9A以上の場合には新株予約権発行議案が「有る」と判定し(ステップS94)、合算値が基準値#9Aより小さい場合には新株予約権発行議案が「無い」と判定する(ステップS95)。株主総会議案予測報告書作成部160は、判定された新株予約権発行議案の有無の予測結果を株主総会議案予測報告書60として作成する。 That is, in the algorithm example of the presence / absence determination regarding the stock acquisition right issuance proposal shown in FIG. 26, the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the proposal. First, the data extraction unit 120 reads the serial number ST36 (information relating to remuneration), ST44 (incidents such as scandals), ST57 (details when there is a stock acquisition right), ST67 from the data list 51 for calculating the shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm. (Characteristics of grantees of stock acquisition rights) and ST70 (policy on executive compensation) are extracted (step S91), and the agenda content prediction unit 150 calculates the sum of the values of the extracted items (step S91). S92). The digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51. Next, a determination is made to compare the preset reference value # 9A for issuing stock acquisition rights with the calculated sum (step S93). If the sum is greater than or equal to the reference value # 9A, It is determined that the stock acquisition right issuance proposal is “present” (step S94), and if the total value is smaller than the reference value # 9A, it is determined that there is no stock acquisition right issuance proposal (step S95). The shareholder general meeting plan forecast report creating unit 160 creates a predicted result of the presence or absence of the judged stock acquisition right issuance plan as a shareholder general meeting plan forecast report 60.
 さらに、新株予約権発行の議案があると予測された場合には、議案判断部170は、作成された新株予約権発行予測議案の判定に用いた項目の中での最低値を求め(ステップS96)、この算出最低値と、別途株主が作成する議決権行使ガイドラインが定めた記番号ST36(報酬に関する情報)、ST44(不祥事等の事件)、ST57(新株予約権がある場合にその詳細)、ST67(新株予約権付与対象者の特徴)、ST70(役員報酬に関する方針)の数値の合算値である基準値#9Bとを比較し(ステップS97)、新株予約権発行の予測議案に対する賛否を判断する。つまり、算出最低値が基準値#9B以上の場合には予測議案に賛成し(ステップS98)、算出最低値が基準値#9Bより小さい場合には予測議案に反対し(ステップS99)、株主総会議案決定報告書作成部180はその議決権行使の判断結果(賛否)を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 Further, when it is predicted that there is a bill for issuance of stock acquisition rights, the bill judgment unit 170 obtains the minimum value among the items used for the judgment of the prepared stock acquisition right issuance prediction bill (step S96). ), The calculated minimum value, serial number ST36 (information relating to remuneration), ST44 (incidents such as scandals), ST57 (details if there is a stock acquisition right), as determined by separate guidelines for exercising voting rights prepared by shareholders, Compare the standard value # 9B, which is the combined value of ST67 (characteristics of those to whom stock acquisition rights are granted) and ST70 (policy for executive remuneration) (step S97), and determine whether or not to agree with the forecast proposal for issuance of stock acquisition rights To do. That is, if the calculated minimum value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 9B, it agrees with the prediction proposal (step S98), and if the calculated minimum value is less than the reference value # 9B, it is opposed to the prediction proposal (step S99). The agenda decision report preparation unit 180 prepares the decision result (promotion) of the exercise of voting rights as a general shareholders meeting proposal determination report 52.
 自己株式取得議案においては、適時開示情報報告書44より入力された自己株式取得に関するデータを基に、議案の有無を予測すると共に、報道および取材情報情報47を基に入力された個々のデータを組み合わせ、株主総会に提示されるであろう自己株式取得議案の有無を予測する。自己株式取得の予測議案が有ると予測された場合には、更にその議決権行使の判断結果を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 In the treasury stock acquisition proposal, the existence of the proposal is predicted based on the data related to treasury stock input from the timely disclosure information report 44, and individual data input based on the news report and interview information information 47 Combine and predict whether there will be a share repurchase proposal that will be presented at the general meeting of shareholders. In the case where it is predicted that there is a forecast proposal for the acquisition of treasury stock, the judgment result of the exercise of voting rights is further prepared as a shareholder meeting proposal decision report 52.
 即ち、図27に示す自己株式取得議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例では、議案内容予測部150が議案の有無を判定する。先ずデータ抽出部120は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51から記番号ST45(昨年度定時総会議案の有)、ST72(その他情報がある場合にその詳細)の各項目を抽出し(ステップS101)、議案内容予測部150は抽出された各項目の数値の合算値を算出する(ステップS102)。各項目の数値化は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51を作成する段階で、数値化部120によって行われている。次に、予め設定されている自己株式取得の基準値#10Aと、算出された合算値との大小を比較する判定を行い(ステップS103)、合算値が基準値#10A以上の場合には自己株式取得議案が「有る」と判定し(ステップS104)、合算値が基準値#10Aより小さい場合には自己株式取得議案が「無い」と判定する(ステップS105)。株主総会議案予測報告書作成部160は、判定された自己株式取得議案の有無の予測結果を株主総会議案予測報告書60として作成する。 That is, in the example of the algorithm for determining whether or not there is a proposal for the acquisition of treasury stock shown in FIG. First, the data extraction unit 120 extracts each item of the serial number ST45 (presence of the general meeting plan last year) and ST72 (details when there is other information) from the shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51 (step) S101), the bill content prediction unit 150 calculates the sum of the numerical values of the extracted items (step S102). The digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51. Next, a determination is made to compare the magnitude of the preset reference value # 10A for the acquisition of treasury stock with the calculated total value (step S103). If the total value is equal to or greater than the reference value # 10A, It is determined that the stock acquisition proposal is “present” (step S104). If the total value is smaller than the reference value # 10A, it is determined that there is no treasury stock acquisition proposal (step S105). The shareholder general meeting plan prediction report creation unit 160 creates a prediction result of the presence / absence of the determined treasury stock acquisition plan as a shareholder general meeting plan prediction report 60.
 さらに、自己株式取得の議案があると予測された場合には、議案判断部170は、作成された自己株式取得予測議案の判定に用いた項目の数値の中での最低値を求め(ステップS106)、この算出最低値と、別途株主が作成する議決権行使ガイドラインが定めた記番号ST45(昨年度定時総会議案の有)およびST72(その他情報がある場合にその詳細)の数値の合算値である基準値#10Bとを比較し(ステップS107)、自己株式取得の予測議案に対する賛否を判断する。つまり、算出最低値が基準値#10B以上の場合には予測議案に賛成し(ステップS108)、算出最低値が基準値#10Bより小さい場合には予測議案に反対し(ステップS109)、株主総会議案決定報告書作成部180はその議決権行使の判断結果(賛否)を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 Further, when it is predicted that there is a bill for the acquisition of treasury stock, the bill determination unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the determination of the prepared treasury stock acquisition prediction bill (step S106). ), The calculated minimum value, and the sum of the values of serial numbers ST45 (with the last year's regular general meeting draft) and ST72 (details when other information is available) defined by separate guidelines for exercising voting rights prepared by shareholders The reference value # 10B is compared (step S107), and whether or not the forecast proposal for the acquisition of treasury stock is approved is determined. In other words, if the calculated minimum value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 10B, it agrees with the prediction bill (step S108), and if the calculated minimum value is smaller than the reference value # 10B, it is opposed to the prediction bill (step S109). The agenda decision report preparation unit 180 prepares the decision result (promotion) of the exercise of voting rights as a general shareholders meeting proposal determination report 52.
 会計監査人選任議案においては、適時開示情報報告書44より入力された会計監査人選任に関するデータを基に議案の有無を予測すると共に、過去の株主総会招集通知(書類47)より入力された会計監査人に関するデータを組み合わせ、その属性を一覧表として提示した上で監査役選任議案の有無を予測する。会計監査人選任の議案が有ると予測された場合には、更にその議決権行使の判断結果を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。
即ち、図28に示す会計監査人選任議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例では、議案内容予測部150が議案の有無を判定する。先ずデータ抽出部120は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51から記番号ST72(その他情報がある場合にその詳細)およびST59(会計監査人選任がある場合にその詳細)の項目を抽出し(ステップS111)、議案内容予測部150は抽出された項目の数値を合算値とする(ステップS112)。当該項目の数値化は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51を作成する段階で、数値化部120によって行われている。次に、予め設定されている会計監査人選任の基準値#11Aと、算出された合算値との大小を比較する判定を行い(ステップS113)、合算値が基準値#11A以上の場合には会計監査人選任議案が「有る」と判定し(ステップS114)、合算値が基準値#11Aより小さい場合には会計監査人選任議案が「無い」と判定する(ステップS115)。株主総会議案予測報告書作成部160は、判定された会計監査人選任議案の有無の予測結果を株主総会議案予測報告書60として作成する。
In the accounting auditor appointment proposal, the existence of the proposal is predicted based on the data on the appointment of the accounting auditor entered from the timely disclosure information report 44, and the accounting entered from the past general meeting of shareholders general meeting notice (Document 47). Combine the data related to auditors, present their attributes as a list, and predict whether there will be a proposal to appoint auditors. If it is predicted that there will be a proposal for the appointment of an accounting auditor, the decision on exercising voting rights is further prepared as a shareholder meeting proposal decision report 52.
That is, in the algorithm example of the presence / absence determination regarding the bill for appointment of the accounting auditor shown in FIG. 28, the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the proposal. First, the data extraction unit 120 extracts the items of serial numbers ST72 (details when there is other information) and ST59 (details when there is an accounting auditor appointment) from the data list 51 for shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation. (Step S111), the agenda content prediction unit 150 sets the extracted value of the item as a total value (Step S112). The quantification of the item is performed by the quantification unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51. Next, a determination is made to compare the preset reference value # 11A for accounting auditor appointment with the calculated sum (step S113). If the sum is greater than or equal to the reference value # 11A, It is determined that the accounting auditor appointment proposal is “present” (step S114). If the sum is smaller than the reference value # 11A, it is determined that there is no accounting auditor appointment proposal (step S115). The shareholder general meeting draft forecast report creating section 160 creates a forecast result of whether or not the determined accounting auditor appointment proposal is present as a shareholder general meeting draft forecast report 60.
 さらに、会計監査人選任の議案があると予測された場合には、議案判断部170は、作成された会計監査人選任予測議案の判定に用いた項目の数値の中での最低値を求め(ステップS116)、この算出最低値と、別途株主が作成する議決権行使ガイドラインが定めた記番号ST72およびST59の数値の合算値である基準値#11Bとを比較し(ステップS117)、会計監査人選任の予測議案に対する賛否を判断する。つまり、算出最低値が基準値#11B以上の場合には予測議案に賛成し(ステップS118)、算出最低値が基準値#11Bより小さい場合には予測議案に反対し(ステップS119)、株主総会議案決定報告書作成部180はその議決権行使の判断結果(賛否)を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 Further, when it is predicted that there is a bill for the appointment of the accounting auditor, the bill judgment unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the judgment of the prepared accounting auditor appointment prediction bill ( In step S116), the calculated minimum value is compared with the reference value # 11B, which is the sum of the numbers of the serial numbers ST72 and ST59 determined by the separate voting rights exercise guidelines prepared by the shareholders (step S117), and the accounting auditor Decide whether or not to accept the election proposal. That is, if the calculated minimum value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 11B, it agrees with the prediction proposal (step S118), and if the calculated minimum value is less than the reference value # 11B, it is opposed to the prediction proposal (step S119). The agenda decision report preparation unit 180 prepares the decision result (promotion) of the exercise of voting rights as a general shareholders meeting proposal determination report 52.
 買収防衛策導入議案においては、適時開示情報報告書44より入力された買収防衛策に関するデータを基に議案の有無を予測すると共に、報道および取材情報47、有価証券報告書41、コーポレート・ガバナンス報告書42、定款および過去の株主総会招集通知の書類46より入力された個々のデータを組み合わせ、株主総会に提示されるであろう買収防衛策導入議案の有無を予測する。買収防衛策導入の予測議案が有ると判断された場合には、更にその議決権行使の判断結果を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 In the takeover defense measure introduction proposal, the presence or absence of the proposal is predicted based on the data on the takeover defense measure input from the timely disclosure information report 44, and the report and interview information 47, the securities report 41, the corporate governance report Combining the individual data input from the document 42, the articles of incorporation and the document 46 of the past general meeting of shareholders, the presence or absence of a takeover defense measure introduction proposal that will be presented to the general meeting of shareholders is predicted. If it is determined that there is a forecast proposal for the introduction of takeover defense measures, the decision result of exercising the voting rights is further prepared as a shareholder general meeting proposal decision report 52.
 即ち、図29に示す買収防衛策導入議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例では、議案内容予測部150が議案の有無を判定する。先ずデータ抽出部120は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51から記番号ST39(買収防衛策に関する方針)、ST68(買収防衛策に関する方針)の各項目を抽出し(ステップS121)、議案内容予測部150は抽出された各項目の数値の合算値を算出する(ステップS122)。各項目の数値化は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51を作成する段階で、数値化部120によって行われている。次に、予め設定されている買収防衛策導入の基準値#12Aと、算出された合算値との大小を比較する判定を行い(ステップS123)、合算値が基準値#12A以上の場合には買収防衛策導入議案が「有る」と判定し(ステップS124)、合算値が基準値#12Aより小さい場合には買収防衛策導入議案が「無い」と判定する(ステップS125)。株主総会議案予測報告書作成部160は、判定された買収防衛策導入議案の有無の予測結果を株主総会議案予測報告書60として作成する。 That is, in the algorithm example of the presence / absence determination regarding the takeover defense measure introduction proposal shown in FIG. 29, the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the proposal. First, the data extraction unit 120 extracts each item of serial number ST39 (policy regarding takeover defense measures) and ST68 (policy concerning takeover defense measures) from the data list 51 for calculating the shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm (step S121). The content prediction unit 150 calculates the sum of the values of the extracted items (step S122). The digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51. Next, a determination is made to compare the magnitude of the preset reference value # 12A for introducing takeover defense measures with the calculated total value (step S123). If the total value is equal to or greater than the reference value # 12A It is determined that the takeover defense measure introduction proposal is “present” (step S124), and if the total value is smaller than the reference value # 12A, it is determined that there is no takeover defense measure introduction proposal (step S125). The shareholder general meeting draft forecast report creating section 160 creates a prediction result of the presence / absence of the determined takeover defense measure introduction bill as a shareholder general meeting draft forecast report 60.
 さらに、買収防衛策導入の予測議案があると予測された場合には、議案判断部170は、作成された買収防衛策導入予測議案の判定に用いた項目の中での最低値を求め(ステップS126)、この算出最低値と、別途株主が作成する議決権行使ガイドラインが定めた記番号ST39(買収防衛策に関する方針)およびST68(買収防衛策に関する方針)の数値の合算値である基準値#12Bとを比較し(ステップS127)、買収防衛策導入の予測議案に対する賛否を判断する。つまり、算出最低値が基準値#12B以上の場合には予測議案に賛成し(ステップS128)、算出最低値が基準値#12Bより小さい場合には予測議案に反対し(ステップS129)、株主総会議案決定報告書作成部180はその議決権行使の判断結果(賛否)を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 In addition, when it is predicted that there is a predictive bill for introducing the takeover defense measure, the bill judging unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the items used for the determination of the prepared takeover defense measure introduction predictive bill (step). S126), the reference value # that is the sum of the calculated minimum value and the values of serial numbers ST39 (policy on takeover defense measures) and ST68 (policy on takeover defense measures) established by the separate voting rights exercise guidelines prepared by shareholders 12B is compared (step S127), and the approval or disapproval of the anticipation proposal for introducing the takeover defense measure is determined. In other words, if the calculated minimum value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 12B, it agrees with the prediction proposal (step S128), and if the calculated minimum value is less than the reference value # 12B, it is opposed to the prediction proposal (step S129). The agenda decision report preparation unit 180 prepares the decision result (promotion) of the exercise of voting rights as a general shareholders meeting proposal determination report 52.
 事業再編関連議案においては、適時開示情報報告書44より入力された事業再編に関するデータを基に議案の有無を予測すると共に、報道及び取材情報47を基に入力された個々のデータを組み合わせ、株主総会に提示されるであろう事業再編関連議案の有無を予測する。事業再編関連の予測議案が有ると予測された場合には、更にその議決権行使の判断結果を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 In proposals related to business restructuring, the existence of proposals is predicted based on data related to business restructuring input from the timely disclosure information report 44, and individual data input based on news reports and interview information 47 are combined to Presence of business restructuring related proposals to be presented at the general meeting. If it is predicted that there will be a business reorganization-related forecast proposal, the decision on exercising voting rights is further prepared as a shareholder meeting proposal decision report 52.
 即ち、図30に示す事業再編関連議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例では、議案内容予測部150が議案の有無を判定する。先ずデータ抽出部120は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51から記番号ST44(不祥事等の事件)、ST69(企業再編に関する方針)の各項目を抽出し(ステップS131)、議案内容予測部150は抽出された各項目の数値の合算値を算出する(ステップS132)。各項目の数値化は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51を作成する段階で、数値化部120によって行われている。次に、予め設定されている事業再編関連の基準値#13Aと、算出された合算値との大小を比較する判定を行い(ステップS133)、合算値が基準値#13A以上の場合には事業再編関連議案が「有る」と判定し(ステップS134)、合算値が基準値#13Aより小さい場合には事業再編関連議案が「無い」と判定する(ステップS135)。株主総会議案予測報告書作成部160は、判定された事業再編関連議案の有無の予測結果を株主総会議案予測報告書60として作成する。 That is, in the algorithm example of the presence / absence determination regarding the business reorganization related proposal shown in FIG. 30, the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the proposal. First, the data extraction unit 120 extracts each item of serial number ST44 (incidents such as scandals) and ST69 (policy regarding corporate reorganization) from the shareholder general meeting proposal prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51 (step S131), and predicts the contents of the proposal. The unit 150 calculates the sum of the numerical values of the extracted items (step S132). The digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51. Next, a determination is made to compare the preset reference value # 13A related to business restructuring with the calculated sum (step S133). If the sum is greater than or equal to the reference value # 13A, the business It is determined that the reorganization related proposal is “present” (step S134), and if the total value is smaller than the reference value # 13A, it is determined that there is no business reorganization related proposal (step S135). The shareholder general meeting plan prediction report creation unit 160 creates a prediction result of the presence / absence of the determined business reorganization related plan as a shareholder general meeting plan prediction report 60.
 さらに、事業再編関連の予測議案があると予測された場合には、議案判断部170は、作成された事業再編関連予測議案の判定に用いた項目の数値の中での最低値を求め(ステップS136)、この算出最低値と、別途株主が作成する議決権行使ガイドラインが定めた記番号ST44(不祥事等の事件)、ST69(企業再編に関する方針)の数値の合算値である基準値#13Bとを比較し(ステップS137)、事業再編関連の予測議案に対する賛否を判断する。つまり、算出最低値が基準値#13B以上の場合には予測議案に賛成し(ステップS138)、算出最低値が基準値#13Bより小さい場合には予測議案に反対し(ステップS139)、株主総会議案決定報告書作成部180はその議決権行使の判断結果(賛否)を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する(ステップS136)。 Further, when it is predicted that there is a business restructuring-related forecast bill, the bill judgment unit 170 obtains a minimum value among the numerical values of the items used for the determination of the prepared business restructuring-related forecast bill (step S136), the reference value # 13B, which is the sum of the calculated minimum value and the values of serial number ST44 (case for scandals) and ST69 (policy on corporate restructuring) established by the separate voting guidelines for voting rights created by shareholders Are compared (step S137), and the pros and cons of the prediction proposal related to the business reorganization are determined. In other words, if the calculated minimum value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 13B, it agrees with the prediction proposal (step S138), and if the calculated minimum value is smaller than the reference value # 13B, it is opposed to the prediction proposal (step S139). The agenda decision report preparation part 180 prepares the decision result (approval) of the exercise of the voting right as the general shareholders meeting proposal determination report 52 (step S136).
 その他会社提案議案においては、適時開示情報報告書44より入力されたその他会社提案に関するデータを基に議案の有無を予測すると共に、報道および取材情報47を基に入力された個々のデータを組み合わせ、株主総会に提示されるであろうその他会社提案議案の有無を予測する。その他会社提案の議案が有ると予測された場合には、更にその議決権行使の判断結果を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 In other company proposal proposals, the presence or absence of proposals is predicted based on the data related to other company proposals input from the timely disclosure information report 44, and individual data input based on news reports and interview information 47 are combined. Presence of other company proposals that will be presented at the general meeting of shareholders. If it is predicted that there will be a proposal for other company proposals, the decision result of exercising the voting rights is further prepared as a shareholder general meeting proposal decision report 52.
 即ち、図31に示すその他会社提案議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例では、議案内容予測部150が議案の有無を判定する。先ずデータ抽出部120は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51から基番号ST44(不祥事等の事件)、ST71(株主提案に関する情報)の各項目を抽出し(ステップS141)、議案内容予測部150は抽出された各項目の数値の合算値を算出する(ステップS142)。各項目の数値化は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51を作成する段階で、数値化部120によって行われている。次に、予め設定されているその他会社提案基準値#14Aと、算出された合算値との大小を比較する判定を行い(ステップS143)、合算値が基準値#14A以上の場合にはその他会社提案議案が「有る」と判定し(ステップS144)、合算値が基準値#14Aより小さい場合にはその他会社提案議案が「無い」と判定する(ステップS145)。株主総会議案予測報告書作成部160は、判定されたその他会社提案議案の有無の予測結果を株主総会議案予測報告書60として作成する。 That is, in the example of the algorithm for determining whether or not there are other company proposals shown in FIG. 31, the proposal content prediction unit 150 determines whether or not there is a proposal. First, the data extraction unit 120 extracts the items of the basic numbers ST44 (incidents such as scandals) and ST71 (information regarding shareholder proposals) from the shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51 (step S141), and predicts the contents of the proposal. The unit 150 calculates the sum of the numerical values of the extracted items (step S142). The digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51. Next, a determination is made to compare the size of the other company proposal standard value # 14A set in advance with the calculated total value (step S143). If the total value is greater than or equal to the standard value # 14A, the other company It is determined that the proposal is “present” (step S144). If the total value is smaller than the reference value # 14A, it is determined that there is no other company proposal (step S145). The shareholder general meeting plan forecast report creation unit 160 creates a predicted result of the presence / absence of the determined other company proposal plan as a shareholder general meeting plan forecast report 60.
 さらに、その他会社提案議案があると予測された場合には、議案判断部170は、作成されたその他会社提案予測議案の判定に用いた項目の数値の中での最低値を求め(ステップS146)、この算出最低値と、別途株主が作成する議決権行使ガイドラインが定めた記番号ST44(不祥事等の事件)、ST71(株主提案に関する情報)の数値の合算値である基準値#14Bとを比較し(ステップS147)、その他会社提案の予測議案に対する賛否を判断する。つまり、算出最低値が基準値#14B以上の場合には予測議案に賛成し(ステップS148)、算出最低値が基準値#14Bより小さい場合には予測議案に反対し(ステップS149)、株主総会議案決定報告書作成部180はその議決権行使の判断結果(賛否)を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する(ステップS146)。 Further, when it is predicted that there is another company proposal bill, the bill judgment unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the determination of the created other company proposal forecast bill (step S146). Compare this calculated minimum value with reference value # 14B, which is the combined value of the numbers ST44 (incidents of scandals) and ST71 (information on shareholder proposals) defined by the separate voting rights exercise guidelines prepared by shareholders (Step S147), it is determined whether or not the other company proposal prediction proposal. In other words, if the calculated minimum value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 14B, it agrees with the prediction proposal (step S148), and if the calculated minimum value is less than the reference value # 14B, it is opposed to the prediction proposal (step S149). The agenda decision report preparation part 180 prepares the decision result (promotion) of the exercise of the voting right as the general shareholders meeting proposal determination report 52 (step S146).
 株主提案議案においては、適時開示情報報告書44より入力された株主提案に関するデータを基に議案の有無を予測すると共に、報道および取材情報47を基に収集された個々のデータを組み合わせ、株主総会に提示されるであろう株主提案議案の有無を予測する。株主提案議案が有ると予測された場合には、更にその議決権行使の判断結果を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 In the shareholder proposal, the presence or absence of the proposal is predicted based on the data related to the shareholder proposal input from the timely disclosure information report 44, and individual data collected based on news reports and news gathering information 47 are combined. Presence or absence of shareholder proposals that will be presented in When it is predicted that there is a proposal for shareholder proposal, the decision result of exercising the voting right is further prepared as a shareholder meeting proposal decision report 52.
 即ち、図32に示す株主提案議案に関する有無判断のアルゴリズム例では、議案内容予測部150が議案の有無を判定する。先ずデータ抽出部120は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51から記番号ST44(不祥事等の事件)、ST71(株主提案に関する情報)の各項目を抽出し(ステップS151)、議案内容予測部150は抽出された各項目の数値の合算値を算出する(ステップS152)。各項目の数値化は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51を作成する段階で、数値化部120によって行われている。次に、予め設定されている株主提案の基準値#15Aと、算出された合算値との大小を比較する判定を行い(ステップS153)、合算値が基準値#15A以上の場合には株主提案議案が「有る」と判定し(ステップS154)、合算値が基準値#15Aより小さい場合には株主提案議案が「無い」と判定する(ステップS155)。株主総会議案予測報告書作成部160は、判定された株主提案議案の有無の予測結果を株主総会議案予測報告書60として作成する。 That is, in the example of the algorithm for determining the presence / absence regarding the shareholder proposal bill shown in FIG. 32, the bill content prediction unit 150 determines the presence / absence of the bill. First, the data extraction unit 120 extracts each item of serial number ST44 (incidents such as scandals) and ST71 (information regarding shareholder proposals) from the data list 51 for shareholder general meeting proposal prediction system algorithm calculation (step S151), and predicts the contents of the proposal. The unit 150 calculates the sum of the numerical values of the extracted items (step S152). The digitization of each item is performed by the digitizing unit 120 at the stage of creating the shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51. Next, a determination is made to compare the preset reference value # 15A of the shareholder proposal with the calculated total value (step S153). If the total value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 15A, the shareholder proposal It is determined that the proposal is “present” (step S154), and if the sum is smaller than the reference value # 15A, it is determined that there is no shareholder proposal (step S155). The shareholder general meeting draft prediction report creating section 160 creates a prediction result of the presence / absence of the determined shareholder proposal bill as a shareholder general meeting draft prediction report 60.
 さらに、株主提案議案があると予測された場合には、議案判断部170は、作成された株主提案予測議案の判定に用いた項目の数値の中での最低値を求め(ステップS156)、この算出最低値と、別途株主が作成する議決権行使ガイドラインが定めた記番号ST44(不祥事等の事件)、ST71(株主提案に関する情報)の数値の合算値とを比較し(ステップS157)、株主提案の予測議案に対する賛否を判断する。つまり、算出最低値が基準値#15B以上の場合には予測議案に賛成し(ステップS158)、算出最低値が基準値#15Bより小さい場合には予測議案に反対し(ステップS159)、株主総会議案決定報告書作成部180はその議決権行使の判断結果(賛否)を株主総会議案決定報告書52として作成する。 Further, when it is predicted that there is a shareholder proposal proposal, the proposal determination unit 170 obtains the lowest value among the numerical values of the items used for the determination of the prepared shareholder proposal prediction proposal (step S156). The calculated minimum value is compared with the sum of the values of serial numbers ST44 (incidents such as scandals) and ST71 (information on shareholder proposals) established by separate guidelines for exercising voting rights prepared by shareholders (step S157), and the shareholder proposal Pros and cons of the forecast proposal. That is, if the calculated minimum value is greater than or equal to the reference value # 15B, it agrees with the prediction proposal (step S158), and if the calculated minimum value is less than the reference value # 15B, it is opposed to the prediction proposal (step S159). The agenda decision report preparation unit 180 prepares the decision result (promotion) of the exercise of voting rights as a general shareholders meeting proposal determination report 52.
 上述のように本発明システムでは株主総会の議案予測を行うと共に、その予測内容が、株主が議決権を行使する際に総合的な判断を行えるように株主総会の概要を予測すると共に、当該会社の株主総会に関する総合的な判断報告書を作成し、株主総会議案における株主の意思決定および議決権行使に有用となる情報を提供する。
上記の予測対象会社の議案に影響を与え得る事項の分析におけるアルゴリズムでは、株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表51における記番号DT1(取締役または監査役の氏名)、DT9(社外役員)、DT10(社外役員の属性)、DT11(役員の異動に関する情報)、ST5(決算概要(当年決算短信))、ST20(安定比率(株式の所有者別状況より算出))、ST22(取締役会形態)、ST23(取締役総数)、ST24(社外取締役数)、ST31(基本的な考え方)、ST32(基本構成)、ST33(企業属性)、ST34(取締役および監査役に関する情報)、ST35(社外取締役および社外監査役の属性および関連する情報)、ST36(報酬に関する情報)、ST37(株主その他利害関係者に関する施策)、ST38(内部統制)、ST39(買収防衛策に関する方針)、ST40(企業再編に関する方針)、ST41(役員報酬に関する方針)、ST42(株主提案に関する情報)の各項目を抽出し、各項目が示す分析結果を文章化して表示する。
As described above, the system of the present invention predicts the proposals of the general meeting of shareholders, and predicts the outline of the general meeting of shareholders so that the contents of the prediction can make a comprehensive judgment when the shareholders exercise their voting rights. Comprehensive Judgment Report on General Meeting of Shareholders and provide useful information for decision making and exercising voting rights in shareholder general meeting proposals.
In the algorithm for analysis of matters that may affect the proposal of the forecast target company, the serial number DT1 (name of director or corporate auditor), DT9 (outside officer) in the shareholder general meeting proposal prediction system algorithm calculation data list 51, DT10 (attributes of outside officers), DT11 (information on changes in officers), ST5 (financial summary (financial summary of current year)), ST20 (stability ratio (calculated from the status of each stockholder)), ST22 (Board of Directors) , ST23 (total number of directors), ST24 (number of outside directors), ST31 (basic concept), ST32 (basic structure), ST33 (company attributes), ST34 (information on directors and corporate auditors), ST35 (outside directors and outside directors) Auditor attributes and related information), ST36 (remuneration information), ST37 (shareholders and other interests) Measures related to officials), ST38 (internal control), ST39 (policy on takeover defense measures), ST40 (policy on corporate restructuring), ST41 (policy on executive compensation), ST42 (information on shareholder proposals) The analysis result indicated by each item is displayed in text.
本発明の株主総会招集通知における議案予測システムによれば、株主総会における議案を、発行会社が株主総会招集通知を公開するよりも2,3週間早くその内容を予測することが可能であり、短期間に投資先の議案に対する意思決定を行わなければならない機関投資家にとって、議案内容の十分な吟味が可能となる。さらに、議案の「有り」が予測される場合、各議案に対する賛否情報を得ることができるので、議決権行使の上で貴重な支援を得ることができる。 According to the proposal forecasting system in the notice of the general meeting of shareholders of the present invention, it is possible to predict the contents of the proposal in the general meeting of shareholders a few weeks earlier than the issuing company publishes the notice of convocation of the general meeting of shareholders. For institutional investors who have to make decisions on the agenda of the investee in the meantime, the content of the agenda can be fully examined. In addition, when the “presence” of a proposal is predicted, information on the pros and cons of each proposal can be obtained, so that valuable support can be obtained upon exercising voting rights.
 これにより、発行会社と株主の間の理解を促進し、相互にとって円滑かつ有益な意思疎通を実現することが可能となり、産業上の利用価値は甚大である。 This will facilitate understanding between the issuer and shareholders, enable smooth and beneficial communication with each other, and the industrial utility value is enormous.
10        CPU
11        ROM
12        RAM
13        表示制御部
14        表示部
15        出力部
16        入力部
20        データベース(DB)
30        端末
31        インターネット
32        インタフェース(I/F)部
41        有価証券報告書
42        コーポレート・ガバナンス報告書
43        決算短信報告書
44        適時開示情報報告書
45        独立役員報告書
46        定款および過去の株主総会招集通知の書類
47        報道および取材情報
50        株主総会議案予測システム収集データ一覧表
51        株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表
52        株主総会決定報告書
60        株主総会議案予測報告書
100       演算処理部
110       数値化部
120       データ抽出部
130       株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表作成部
140       データ並び替え部
150       議案内容予測部
160       株主総会議案予測報告書作成部
170       議案判断部
180       株主総会議案決定報告書作成部
200       議決権行使ガイドライン  
10 CPU
11 ROM
12 RAM
13 Display Control Unit 14 Display Unit 15 Output Unit 16 Input Unit 20 Database (DB)
30 Terminal 31 Internet 32 Interface (I / F) Department 41 Securities Report 42 Corporate Governance Report 43 Financial Summary Report 44 Timely Disclosure Information Report 45 Independent Officers Report 46 Articles of Incorporation and Past Shareholders Meeting Notice 47 Report and Interview Information 50 Shareholder General Meeting Proposal Prediction System Collected Data List 51 Shareholder General Meeting Proposal Prediction System Algorithm Calculation Data List 52 Shareholder General Meeting Decision Report 60 Shareholder General Meeting Proposal Prediction Report 100 Arithmetic Processing Unit 110 Digitization Unit 120 Data Extraction unit 130 Shareholder general meeting draft prediction system algorithm calculation data list creation unit 140 Data rearrangement unit 150 Proposal content prediction unit 160 Shareholder general meeting draft prediction Tsugesho creating section 170 bill determination section 180 Shareholders' Meeting proposal decision report creation section 200 guidelines for exercising voting rights

Claims (7)

  1. 入力部と、記憶部を具備した演算処理部と、出力部とを具え、
    前記演算処理部が、数値化部と、データ抽出部と、株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表作成部と、データ並び替え部と、議案内容予測部と、株主総会議案予測報告書作成部とを具え、
    前記入力部より入力された有価証券報告書、コーポレート・ガバナンス報告書、決算短信報告書、適時情報開示報告書、独立役員報告書、定款および過去の株主総会招集通知の書類のデータより、前記数値化部は議案項目毎に数値化し、前記データ並び替え部はデータの並び替えを行うことにより前記株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表作成部は株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表を作成し、
    株主総会議案毎に、
    前記データ抽出部は当該議案に必要な項目を前記株主総会議案予測システムアルゴリズム算出用データ一覧表から抽出し、前記議案内容予測部は前記抽出された項目の数値の合算値を算出し、前記合算値と前記当該議案の基準値Aとを比較することによって当該議案の有無を判定し、前記株主総会議案予測報告書作成部は前記当該議案の有無の判定結果に基づいて株主総会議案予測報告書を作成することを特徴とする株主総会招集通知における議案予測システム。
    Comprising an input unit, an arithmetic processing unit having a storage unit, and an output unit;
    The arithmetic processing unit includes a digitization unit, a data extraction unit, a shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation data list generation unit, a data rearrangement unit, a proposal content prediction unit, and a general meeting proposal prediction report With parts,
    Based on the securities report, corporate governance report, financial briefing report, timely information disclosure report, independent officer report, articles of incorporation and documents for convocation notices of the previous general meeting of shareholders entered from the input section The conversion unit digitizes each agenda item, and the data rearrangement unit rearranges the data, whereby the shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation data list creation unit generates a data list for calculation of shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm Create
    For each shareholder meeting proposal,
    The data extraction unit extracts items necessary for the proposal from the shareholder general meeting plan prediction system algorithm calculation data list, the proposal content prediction unit calculates a sum of numerical values of the extracted items, and the sum The shareholder general meeting draft forecast report preparation section determines whether or not the proposal exists by comparing the value with the standard value A of the bill, and the shareholder general meeting draft forecast report preparation unit A proposal prediction system for a notice of convocation of a general meeting of shareholders.
  2. 前記入力部より入力されるデータに、更に報道および取材情報が含まれている請求項1に記載の株主総会招集通知における議案予測システム。 The proposal prediction system in the notice of convocation of a general meeting of shareholders according to claim 1, wherein the data input from the input unit further includes news reports and interview information.
  3. 前記株主総会議案が剰余金分配、定款一部変更、取締役選任、監査役選任、補欠監査役選任、役員賞与支給、退職慰労金支給、役員報酬改定、新株予約権発行、自己株式取得、会計監査人選任、買収防衛策導入、事業再編関連、その他会社提案、株主提案である請求項1又は2に記載の株主総会招集通知における議案予測システム。 Shareholders 'meeting proposal: surplus distribution, partial amendments to the Articles of Incorporation, appointment of directors, appointment of corporate auditors, election of substitute corporate auditors, provision of directors' bonuses, provision of retirement benefits, revision of executive compensation, issuance of stock acquisition rights, acquisition of treasury stock, accounting audit The proposal prediction system in the notice of convocation of the general meeting of shareholders according to claim 1 or 2, which is a person selection, introduction of takeover defense measures, business reorganization related, other company proposals, shareholder proposals.
  4. 前記株主総会議案予測報告書を前記出力部より、外部の端末に電子データで送信するようになっている請求項1に記載の株主総会招集通知における議案予測システム。 2. The proposal prediction system in a notice of convocation of a general meeting of shareholders according to claim 1, wherein the shareholder general meeting proposal prediction report is transmitted by electronic data from the output unit to an external terminal.
  5. 前記演算処理部が更に議案判断部および株主総会議案決定報告書作成部を具えており、前記議案判断部は、前記抽出された項目の数値の中での最低値を求め、議決権行使ガイドラインで定められている前記抽出された項目の数値の合算値を基準値Bとし、前記最低値と前記基準値Bとを比較することによって前記予測議案に対する賛否を判断し、前記株主総会議案決定報告書作成部は前記賛否の結果に基づいて株主総会議案決定報告書を作成するようになっている請求項1に記載の株主総会招集通知における議案予測システム。 The arithmetic processing unit further comprises a bill judgment unit and a shareholder general meeting draft decision report preparation unit, and the bill judgment unit obtains the lowest value among the extracted items, and follows the voting guidelines for exercising voting rights. The total value of the extracted items that have been determined is set as a reference value B, and whether or not the proposal is approved is determined by comparing the minimum value with the reference value B. 2. The proposal forecasting system in the notice of convocation of a general meeting of shareholders according to claim 1, wherein the preparation part prepares a report for determining a general meeting of shareholders based on the result of approval or disapproval.
  6. 前記株主総会議案決定報告書が前記株主総会議案予測報告書に含まれている請求項5に記載の株主総会招集通知における議案予測システム。 6. The agenda forecasting system in a convocation notice of a general meeting of shareholders according to claim 5, wherein the shareholder general meeting draft decision report is included in the shareholder general meeting draft forecast report.
  7. 前記株主総会議案決定報告書を前記出力部より、外部の端末に電子データで送信するようになっている請求項5に記載の株主総会招集通知における議案予測システム。 6. The system for predicting proposals in a convocation notice for a general meeting of shareholders according to claim 5, wherein said shareholder general meeting proposal determination report is transmitted by electronic data from said output unit to an external terminal.
PCT/JP2010/058425 2010-05-19 2010-05-19 Bill prediction system for invitation notice to general meeting of shareholders WO2011145185A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2011554339A JP4972232B2 (en) 2010-05-19 2010-05-19 Agenda forecast system for notice of convocation of shareholders meeting
PCT/JP2010/058425 WO2011145185A1 (en) 2010-05-19 2010-05-19 Bill prediction system for invitation notice to general meeting of shareholders

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2010/058425 WO2011145185A1 (en) 2010-05-19 2010-05-19 Bill prediction system for invitation notice to general meeting of shareholders

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2011145185A1 true WO2011145185A1 (en) 2011-11-24

Family

ID=44991309

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2010/058425 WO2011145185A1 (en) 2010-05-19 2010-05-19 Bill prediction system for invitation notice to general meeting of shareholders

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4972232B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2011145185A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR102543934B1 (en) * 2020-06-30 2023-06-14 주식회사 우리은행 Method of intermediating a right of voting and server performing the same

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000194745A (en) * 1998-12-25 2000-07-14 Nec Corp Trend evaluating device and method
JP2001306833A (en) * 2000-04-25 2001-11-02 Jcnland Inc Contents sales system
JP2003085355A (en) * 2001-09-12 2003-03-20 Nec Corp Corporate control support system, shareholder's meeting information processing device, shareholder's right exercise support server, corporate control support method, and control program
JP2006227965A (en) * 2005-02-18 2006-08-31 Dainippon Printing Co Ltd Trend prediction device and its method

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000194745A (en) * 1998-12-25 2000-07-14 Nec Corp Trend evaluating device and method
JP2001306833A (en) * 2000-04-25 2001-11-02 Jcnland Inc Contents sales system
JP2003085355A (en) * 2001-09-12 2003-03-20 Nec Corp Corporate control support system, shareholder's meeting information processing device, shareholder's right exercise support server, corporate control support method, and control program
JP2006227965A (en) * 2005-02-18 2006-08-31 Dainippon Printing Co Ltd Trend prediction device and its method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPWO2011145185A1 (en) 2013-07-22
JP4972232B2 (en) 2012-07-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Grewal et al. Market reaction to mandatory nonfinancial disclosure
Kurnia et al. Carbon emission disclosure, good corporate governance, financial performance, and firm value
Soon Yau et al. Intellectual capital reporting and corporate characteristics of public‐listed companies in Malaysia
Escrig-Olmedo et al. Socially responsible investing: sustainability indices, ESG rating and information provider agencies
Dunne et al. The implementation of IFRS in the UK, Italy and Ireland
Redmayne et al. An assessment of the impact of IFRS adoption on public sector audit fees and audit effort–some evidence of the transition costs on changes in reporting regimes
Romero et al. A measurement theory perspective on business measurement
Spathis et al. The adoption of IFRS in South Eastern Europe: the case of Greece
Qu et al. Voluntary disclosure in a changing regulatory environment: Evidence from Chinese stock market
KR20220074176A (en) Enterprise analysis using finance big data analysis and investment portfolio optimization system and method
CN112766893A (en) Cross-enterprise collaborative accounting information processing method, system, storage medium and application
Mustafa et al. Microfinance institutions performance measurement: introducing a new performance measurement framework
Biondi et al. Accounting for the Chinese context: a comparative analysis of international and Chinese accounting standards focusing on business combinations
JP4972232B2 (en) Agenda forecast system for notice of convocation of shareholders meeting
CN113674075A (en) Method for credit rating of enterprise debt financing tool
Chen et al. The impact of the top management team faultlines on environment, social and governance performance of listed companies
JP2006018816A (en) Method and system for credit information monitoring, financing method, method of operating securities exchange market, credit ranking method, method of operating bond trading market, method of forming investment fund, occupation introduction method, selling method, guaranteeing method, and credit insurance method
Liu et al. Media coverage and labor investment efficiency: Evidence from China
Babayev et al. Potential of Business Entities: Essence, Assessment and Role in National Development
Olli Impact of ESG on financial performance: empirical evidence from the European market 2002–2019
JP4430486B2 (en) Support system for exercising voting rights at general meetings of shareholders
Finningham The Impact of the Introduction of IFRS on Corporate Annual Reports and Accounts in the UK
Kumalasari et al. Managing Audit Information with The Atlas Application (Audit Tool and Linked Archive System) As an Effort to Improve Audit Quality
Fatima et al. Fostering innovation sustainability with the impact of incremental environmental information disclosure under green credit constraints
de Aguiar Is the use of financial accounting fit for purpose? An exploration of the theoretical foundations, framework and practicalities

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2011554339

Country of ref document: JP

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 10851749

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 10851749

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1