WO2011073126A1 - Method for speckle mitigation in an interferometric distance meter and corresponding distance meter - Google Patents
Method for speckle mitigation in an interferometric distance meter and corresponding distance meter Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2011073126A1 WO2011073126A1 PCT/EP2010/069481 EP2010069481W WO2011073126A1 WO 2011073126 A1 WO2011073126 A1 WO 2011073126A1 EP 2010069481 W EP2010069481 W EP 2010069481W WO 2011073126 A1 WO2011073126 A1 WO 2011073126A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- distance
- speckle
- target
- pointing
- optical radiation
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
- G01B9/00—Measuring instruments characterised by the use of optical techniques
- G01B9/02—Interferometers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S17/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves, e.g. lidar systems
- G01S17/02—Systems using the reflection of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves
- G01S17/06—Systems determining position data of a target
- G01S17/08—Systems determining position data of a target for measuring distance only
- G01S17/32—Systems determining position data of a target for measuring distance only using transmission of continuous waves, whether amplitude-, frequency-, or phase-modulated, or unmodulated
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
- G01B11/00—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques
- G01B11/02—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques for measuring length, width or thickness
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
- G01B9/00—Measuring instruments characterised by the use of optical techniques
- G01B9/02—Interferometers
- G01B9/02055—Reduction or prevention of errors; Testing; Calibration
- G01B9/02075—Reduction or prevention of errors; Testing; Calibration of particular errors
- G01B9/02082—Caused by speckles
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
- G01B2290/00—Aspects of interferometers not specifically covered by any group under G01B9/02
- G01B2290/45—Multiple detectors for detecting interferometer signals
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for speckle mitigation in an interferometric distance meter according to the pre- characterizing clause of Claim 1, and an interferometric distance meter according to the pre-characterizing clause of Claim 12.
- One approach consists in emitting frequency-modulated electromagnetic radiation, such as, for example, light, to the target to be surveyed and subsequently receiving one or more echoes from back- scattering objects, ideally exclusively from the target to be surveyed, it being possible for the target to be surveyed to have both specular - for example retroreflectors - and diffuse back-scattering characteristics.
- a laser light source is used for the distance measurement.
- the signal received is superposed with a second signal which is derived from the emitted light signal.
- the resulting beat frequency of the mixed product, the interferogram is a measure of the distance to the target object.
- interferometry is a well known technique for electro-optic distance measurements that excels by a very high measurement accuracy and shot-noise limited sensitivity.
- a variety of further embodiments exists ranging from incremental interferometers that operate at a fixed wavelength, to absolute distance meters that may use a multitude of discrete wavelengths (multi-wavelength interferometry) , frequency modulated continuous wave interferometry (FMCW) or white-light interferometry .
- multi-wavelength interferometry multi-wavelength interferometry
- FMCW frequency modulated continuous wave interferometry
- white-light interferometry white-light interferometry
- Absolute distance meters make use of the sensitivity of the interferometric phase ⁇ on the wavelength ⁇ .
- the optical frequency of the laser source is tuned linearly.
- the distance d - for small wavelength changes - is obtained from
- the methods used to mitigate the effect of these amplitude fluctuations are based on the measurement of decorrelated speckle patterns - a method often termed speckle diversity.
- a h is the target roughness, the target tilt angle relative to the optical axis, C the normalized autocorrelation of the pupil function, d ⁇ the distance from the lens to the image plane, M the magnification of the imaging optics, d(x) contains the systematic distance/height profile of the target:
- this causes stochastic range fluctuations when measuring on rough, tilted targets.
- the standard uncertainty of the measured distance can be roughly estimated by where 6x and are the resolution of the imaging system and the tilt angle, respectively.
- a method and an apparatus for remotely sensing the orientation of a plane surface from measuring the speckle pattern of a coherent light beam reflected off the surface are disclosed.
- the surface is illuminated with radiation of two different frequencies and the corresponding speckle patterns are compared to determine the magnitude and direction of shift from the first speckle pattern to the second.
- Magnitude and direction of the speckle pattern shift indicates the orientation of the object, i.e. the method measures the lateral shift of the speckle pattern when changing the optical frequency from a first frequency f 1 to a second frequency f 2 in order to calculate the angle of incidence and the azimuthal angle of the surface.
- An object of the invention is to provide an improved interferometric distance measurement method, particularly for use with tilted targets, and a correspondingly designed interferometric distance meter.
- a further object is to provide a method and a distance meter that are able to determine properties of a speckle field with only one single wavelength or with more than one wavelength at the same time or without a change of wavelengths.
- the present invention relates to a method for speckle mitigation in an interferometric distance meter where the properties of the speckle field are employed to determine the pointing direction of each distance measurement.
- the speckle pattern is measured at a single wavelength to correct for speckle induced measurement errors without determining the orientation of the surface. Nevertheless, the invention is not restricted to the use of one single frequency and the use a plurality of frequencies is also claimed.
- the invention employs statistical properties of the speckle field with a certain similarity to the approach of US 5,811,826.
- no measures of the surface properties are taken, but rather a pointing direction is calculated from the measurement at a single frequency - rather than two frequencies.
- the invention is not restricted to the use of one single frequency and it is also possible to use a plurality of frequencies.
- the invention deals with reducing the range fluctuations when measuring the distance to targets that are tilted with respect to the optical axis using interferometric absolute distance sensors.
- the method achieves a measurement accuracy that is primarily limited by the target roughness, rather than the total depth distribution within the measurement spot.
- phase decorrelation errors are compensated for by pointing angle corrections based on measurements of the speckle field. Due to speckles, the "centroid" of the measurement is not on the optical axis, but rather slightly offset from the optical axis.
- centroid - or pointing direction - is calculated according to the method described in the sequel.
- Each interferometric distance measurement is tagged with a corresponding correction of the pointing direction, thereby correcting for the phase decorrelation errors, i.e.
- the measurement or estimation of pointing directions can be performed in parallel or sequentially, e.g. scanning. Thereby the speckle field is resolved with the granularity or resolution of the distribution of points.
- the statistics or the distribution of pointing directions allows a compensation or correction of phase decorrelation errors.
- the method according to the invention involves determining the pointing direction to at least one point of the speckle field relative to the optical axis, wherein the speckle field is at least partially resolved, in particular using a plurality of K detectors or by moving at least one detector relative to the speckle field.
- the direction compensation can be easily accounted for in standard point-cloud processing software, e.g. as angular correction of spherical coordinates provided by a scanner mechanism.
- Interferometric measurement systems suffer from the bat- wing effect: When scanning across a step-like feature the measured distance may over- and overshoot, as illustrated in Fig. 8, yielding large measurement errors. In the context of the present invention, this effect is related to the fact that the pointing direction becomes function of the laser wavelength. In the presence of a step-feature, this may cause a large change of the interferometric phase versus wavelength, ⁇ , resulting - according to equation (1) - in a large measurement error.
- Fig. 9 shows example data of measurement error versus sensitivity of pointing direction versus wavelength, demonstrating the strong correlation between the two figures.
- the wavelength dependency of the speckle phase depends on the static light distribution at a certain wavelength. Furthermore, it is shown that the measurement error caused by the stochastic phase-change can be compensated by a proper choice of pointing direction.
- the tilt angle a is related to the components of the normal vector
- Each pointing direction is associated with a position in the detector plane
- the illumination wave V encodes the absolute time and distance information; for a plane follows j—(cl-2R 0 )
- V(x ) V 0 -e (17)
- the function p(x) describes the microscopic structure of the object, which has a negligible wavelength dependence within the small wavelength changes considered here.
- the impulse response h(x) of the imaging system is also assumed not to depend on the wavelength in a relevant way.
- the pointing direction can be estimated by using a detector array as set forth below.
- a detector array has a number K of detectors, indexed by k, covering the areas
- A f A(x)d 2 x, ⁇ ⁇ k ⁇ K .
- bracket denotes expectation
- asterisk denotes complex conjugate
- B k is the Jf-th column of the matrix B.
- ⁇ p ⁇ x)p(y)) n-6(x-y) (34) for some unimportant constant ⁇ , where ⁇ is the Dirac distribution. This is the basic requirement to render the correlation matrices independent of the surface structure of the measured object. After some standard computation, the field in the image plane can be derived
- the matrices X,B,C ⁇ can be computed in advance, since they are independent of the properties of the measured target, provided that (34) applies.
- the pointing direction is then, using (11),
- the other case refers to a single-speckle system with quadrant detection.
- Equations (42) and (44) suggest that a reasonable approximation of x p could be
- the present invention relates to a method for speckle mitigation in an interferometric distance meter comprising the steps:
- ⁇ transmitting optical radiation with at least one wavelength ⁇ to a target to be surveyed; " receiving a portion of the optical radiation scattered back by the target in an optical axis, wherein the optical radiation forms a speckle field;
- the method involves determining a pointing direction of the interferometric measurement to at least one point of the speckle field, which point is associated with the interferometric distance measurement, in particular the point being a centroid of the speckle field, relative to the optical axis, wherein the speckle field is at least partially resolved, in particular using a plurality of K detectors or by moving at least one detector relative to the speckle field.
- Fig.l shows the basic principle of interferometric distance meters measuring to tilted rough surfaces ;
- Fig.2A-B show examples for speckle patterns observed in the detector plane for a multi-speckle system;
- Fig.4 shows an abstract system overview for a interferometric distance meter
- Fig.5 shows a two-step procedure for pointing direction estimation
- Fig.6 shows a setup with analog demodulators for removing the phase offset
- Fig.7 shows a schematic of pointing correction
- Fig.8 shows example errors of the measured distance for scanning across a step-like feature
- Fig. 9 shows example data of measurement error versus sensitivity of pointing direction versus
- Fig.l shows the basic principle of interferometric distance meters measuring to tilted rough surfaces.
- a measurement beam 12 with at least one wavelength ⁇ is sent from a radiation source 16 to a non-cooperative target 11 that has to be surveyed and where the optical radiation forms a speckle field.
- the target 11 is microscopically rough and not angularly aligned to the optical axis such that the optical phase of the reflected light becomes randomized.
- a portion of the optical radiation scattered back by the target 11 is received and partially collected in an optical axis OA by the imaging lens 13, travels through the LO combiner optics 14, and eventually is imaged to a receiver 15 in an image plane, where it interferes with the reference beam from the radiation source 16 for absolute or incremental interferometric distance measurements.
- receiver 15 for acquiring the detector signals A k individually and perform all operations digitally or also a 2x2 quadrant detector for resolving a single-speckle image or a single channel detector that is moved over the speckle field measuring pointing directions sequentially.
- Figs.2A-B The appearance of speckle fields formed on the target is illustrated in Figs.2A-B as examples observed in the detector plane for a multi-speckle system.
- a speckle pattern will be observed in the detector plane that has a granular appearance with a number of bright and dark spots. If - on average - there is a single predominant bright spot, this pattern can be called a single-speckle system.
- Figs.2A-B multiple speckles are observed - which are designated as a multi-speckle system.
- Fig.2A the intensity distribution
- Fig.2B the spatial distribution of optical phase are shown.
- speckles cause a randomization of both the intensity and the phase of the received field at the image plane.
- the specific appearance depends on the microscopic characteristics of the target at the measurement beam location, such that it may be considered as random for most cases and surfaces.
- Fig.3 shows the geometric relations underlying a compensation of pointing direction.
- the axes of a coordinate system are designated with x, y and z wherein the z-axis points towards the target 11.
- i3 ⁇ 4 designates the true target distance, n a vector normal to target plane and p the pointing direction of a current measurement. This means that the receiver or sensor does not provide the true distance to the target i3 ⁇ 4 at the optical axis, but rather the distance d at an offset direction to a point ⁇ and - in addition - the corresponding angular offset p off the optical axis.
- the direction compensation can be easily accounted for in standard point-cloud processing software, e.g.
- Fig.4 shows an abstract system overview for a interferometric distance meter where the components are designated as follows
- an imaging optical system with a number K of detectors is used for resolving the speckle pattern.
- this setup allows a parallel acquisition of signals which is beneficial under non-stable and dynamic conditions.
- the sensor signals A k can be used directly to evaluate the pointing direction p according to equation (42) . If the speckle pattern is finely resolved, e.g. by a large number of small detectors, a uniform field distribution may be assumed within each detector area, yielding a signal processing that becomes insensitive to the correlation structure of the received speckle pattern, albeit at the expense of a large number of detectors.
- a conventional quadrant detector can be used for a single- speckle system.
- the pointing direction estimation can be performed in a two-step procedure as shown in Fig.5 where the components are designated as follows
- the phase-offset 4 ⁇ I ⁇ ⁇ in (24) is removed in a second step in order to generate low-bandwidth interferograms A k '
- analog demodulators are used to generate the filtered detector signals A k ' by analog means.
- the low-bandwidth signals A[ can be sampled at low speed without loss of information. This simplifies interfacing to the detector array since the demodulated detector signals can be multiplexed to a small number of/single output line.
- Fig.8 shows example errors of the measured distance for scanning across a step-like feature.
- the abscissa shows the measurement position when scanning across a step-like, diffusively reflecting feature of 5 ⁇ height located at 125 ⁇ .
- the ordinate shows the measured distance for various microscopic surface characteristics. Depending on the microscopic characteristics, the measurement may exhibit unphysical over- and undershoot effects. These measurement artefacts can be detected by observing the pointing direction while tuning the laser wavelength. Those measurements that show a large sensitivity of pointing direction to laser wavelength are identified to potentially suffer from the bat-wing effect.
- the pointing direction is tracked during a frequency modulation of the laser with recorded data tagged as potentially suffering from bat-wing effect if sensitivity of pointing direction to laser wavelength is exceeding a predefined threshold.
- the threshold can be set as a parameter or also be automatically calculated on the basis of current or historic data.
- Fig. 9 shows the result of a Monte-Carlo analysis on a diffusively reflecting step-like feature, where each dot shows the measurement error versus the sensitivity of pointing direction versus wavelength (center of gravity variation) .
- the maximum measurement error can be limited to the two bounds shown in the graph if the measurements with a center of gravity variation above 20 nm are dropped. This demonstrates the strong correlation between measurement accuracy and sensitivity of pointing direction to laser wavelength.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Length Measuring Devices By Optical Means (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2010333031A AU2010333031B2 (en) | 2009-12-14 | 2010-12-13 | Method for speckle mitigation in an interferometric distance meter and corresponding distance meter |
EP10790837.8A EP2513595B1 (en) | 2009-12-14 | 2010-12-13 | Method for speckle mitigation in an interferometric distance meter and corresponding distance meter |
KR1020127018187A KR101418832B1 (en) | 2009-12-14 | 2010-12-13 | Method for speckle mitigation in an interferometric distance meter and corresponding distance meter |
CA2783337A CA2783337C (en) | 2009-12-14 | 2010-12-13 | Method for speckle mitigation in an interferometric distance meter and corresponding distance meter |
CN201080056600.XA CN102713503B (en) | 2009-12-14 | 2010-12-13 | Method for speckle mitigation in an interferometric distance meter and corresponding distance meter |
US13/514,210 US8896843B2 (en) | 2009-12-14 | 2010-12-13 | Method for speckle mitigation in an interferometric distance meter by determining a pointing direction |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP09179135 | 2009-12-14 | ||
EP09179135.0 | 2009-12-14 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2011073126A1 true WO2011073126A1 (en) | 2011-06-23 |
Family
ID=42111331
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/069481 WO2011073126A1 (en) | 2009-12-14 | 2010-12-13 | Method for speckle mitigation in an interferometric distance meter and corresponding distance meter |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8896843B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2513595B1 (en) |
KR (1) | KR101418832B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN102713503B (en) |
AU (1) | AU2010333031B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2783337C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2011073126A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2587213A1 (en) * | 2011-10-24 | 2013-05-01 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Multi-wavelength interferometer, measurement apparatus, and measurement method |
EP2604972A1 (en) * | 2011-12-15 | 2013-06-19 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Measuring apparatus including multi-wavelength interferometer |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2662661A1 (en) * | 2012-05-07 | 2013-11-13 | Leica Geosystems AG | Measuring device with an interferometer and an absorption medium defining a thick line spectrum |
CN107525593A (en) * | 2017-06-13 | 2017-12-29 | 乐山师范学院 | Laser guide star inclination of wave front measuring method based on the measurement of rim of the mouth footpath |
EP3438699A1 (en) * | 2017-07-31 | 2019-02-06 | Hexagon Technology Center GmbH | Range finder using spad arrangement for acquiring multiple targets |
CN110296666B (en) * | 2018-03-23 | 2021-04-20 | 泓邦科技有限公司 | Three-dimensional measuring device |
CN109751971B (en) * | 2019-01-23 | 2020-10-02 | 南京理工大学 | High-precision short coherent light three-dimensional morphology rapid measurement algorithm |
IL268654B (en) | 2019-08-12 | 2021-02-28 | Elbit Systems Land & C4I Ltd | Optical seismic surveying system |
WO2022179683A1 (en) | 2021-02-24 | 2022-09-01 | Leica Geosystems Ag | Laser tracker having two measurement functionalities and fmcw distance measurement |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5811826A (en) | 1996-02-07 | 1998-09-22 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Methods and apparatus for remotely sensing the orientation of an object |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7379651B2 (en) * | 2003-06-10 | 2008-05-27 | Abu-Ageel Nayef M | Method and apparatus for reducing laser speckle |
EP1696201A1 (en) * | 2005-02-23 | 2006-08-30 | Leica Geosystems AG | Phase noise compensation for an interferometer measuring absolute distance |
US7948606B2 (en) | 2006-04-13 | 2011-05-24 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Moving beam with respect to diffractive optics in order to reduce interference patterns |
CN1987342A (en) * | 2006-12-21 | 2007-06-27 | 中国船舶重工集团公司第七一一研究所 | Digital electronic cutting speckle interferometer |
-
2010
- 2010-12-13 KR KR1020127018187A patent/KR101418832B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2010-12-13 CA CA2783337A patent/CA2783337C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2010-12-13 AU AU2010333031A patent/AU2010333031B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2010-12-13 WO PCT/EP2010/069481 patent/WO2011073126A1/en active Application Filing
- 2010-12-13 EP EP10790837.8A patent/EP2513595B1/en active Active
- 2010-12-13 CN CN201080056600.XA patent/CN102713503B/en active Active
- 2010-12-13 US US13/514,210 patent/US8896843B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5811826A (en) | 1996-02-07 | 1998-09-22 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Methods and apparatus for remotely sensing the orientation of an object |
Non-Patent Citations (6)
Title |
---|
AKIHIRO YAMAMOTO ET AL: "Profilometry of Sloped Plane Surfaces by Wavelength Scanning Interferometry", OPTICAL REVIEW, SPRINGER, BERLIN, DE LNKD- DOI:10.1007/S10043-002-0112-2, vol. 9, no. 3, 1 May 2002 (2002-05-01), pages 112 - 121, XP019353947, ISSN: 1349-9432 * |
GOODMAN J W: "Some Fundamental Properties of Speckle", JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA,, vol. 66, no. 11, 1 November 1976 (1976-11-01), pages 1145 - 1150, XP002181682, ISSN: 0093-5433 * |
U. VRY; A. F. FERCHER: "Higher-order statistical properties of speckle fields and their application to rough-surface interferometry", J. OPT. SOC. AM., vol. 3, 1986, pages 988FF |
W. GOODMAN: "Some fundamental properties of speckle", J. OPT. SOC. AM, vol. 66, no. 11, 1976, pages 1145FF |
Y. SALVADE: "Distance Measurement by Multiple Wavelength Interferometry", THESIS, UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL, 1999 |
YVES SALVADÉ: "Distance Measurement by Multiple-Wavelength Interferometry", 31 July 1999 (1999-07-31), XP002580051, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://www-optics.unine.ch/publications/theses/Thesis_Salvade.pdf> [retrieved on 20100428] * |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2587213A1 (en) * | 2011-10-24 | 2013-05-01 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Multi-wavelength interferometer, measurement apparatus, and measurement method |
US9062957B2 (en) | 2011-10-24 | 2015-06-23 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Multi-wavelength interferometer, measurement apparatus, and measurement method |
EP2604972A1 (en) * | 2011-12-15 | 2013-06-19 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Measuring apparatus including multi-wavelength interferometer |
US9372068B2 (en) | 2011-12-15 | 2016-06-21 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Measuring apparatus including multi-wavelength interferometer |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
KR101418832B1 (en) | 2014-08-13 |
AU2010333031B2 (en) | 2013-02-07 |
CN102713503A (en) | 2012-10-03 |
EP2513595A1 (en) | 2012-10-24 |
US20120242998A1 (en) | 2012-09-27 |
CA2783337A1 (en) | 2011-06-23 |
CN102713503B (en) | 2015-06-03 |
US8896843B2 (en) | 2014-11-25 |
CA2783337C (en) | 2015-01-27 |
KR20120094126A (en) | 2012-08-23 |
AU2010333031A1 (en) | 2012-05-24 |
EP2513595B1 (en) | 2015-02-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2513595B1 (en) | Method for speckle mitigation in an interferometric distance meter and corresponding distance meter | |
CN100354599C (en) | Common-path frequency-scanning interferometer | |
US7321430B2 (en) | Vibration resistant interferometry | |
US9638519B2 (en) | Method for determining a change in distance to a movable and reflective target by means of interferometer to determine if the movement of the reflective target is really executable | |
JP5241806B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for surface contour measurement | |
US8755036B2 (en) | Active imaging system and method | |
WO2001025749A2 (en) | Optical method and system for measuring three-dimensional surface topography | |
KR20170120462A (en) | An Improved Holographic Reconstruction Apparatus and Method | |
CN113196003B (en) | Method, interferometer and signal processing device for determining the input phase and/or input amplitude of an input light field, respectively | |
US10962348B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for optimizing the optical performance of interferometers | |
KR101968916B1 (en) | Flat Mirror Profile Measuring Apparatus and Method Of The Same | |
GB2539427A (en) | High resolution remote imaging system providing depth information | |
WO2005106386A2 (en) | Vibration resistant interferometry | |
US9052189B2 (en) | Measurement apparatus for measuring shape of test object and measurement method | |
JP4390957B2 (en) | Method for determining fringe phase in fringe analysis | |
KR20240035895A (en) | Interferometric lens aligner and method thereof | |
Abdelsalam et al. | An automatic processing technique for accurate surface form measurement | |
Álvarez et al. | Conoscopic holography based profilometers for defect inspection: improviements in speed, resolution, and noise reduction | |
Álvarez et al. | Conoscopic holography based profilometers for defect inspection: improviements in speed, resolution, and noise reduction | |
EP1552243A2 (en) | Common-path frequency-scanning interferometer |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 201080056600.X Country of ref document: CN |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 10790837 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2010333031 Country of ref document: AU Ref document number: 3781/DELNP/2012 Country of ref document: IN |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2010333031 Country of ref document: AU Date of ref document: 20101213 Kind code of ref document: A |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2783337 Country of ref document: CA |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 13514210 Country of ref document: US Ref document number: 2010790837 Country of ref document: EP |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 20127018187 Country of ref document: KR Kind code of ref document: A |