WO2011002136A1

WO2011002136A1 - Method and system for managing a pollution-prevention facility

Info

Publication number: WO2011002136A1
Application number: PCT/KR2009/007179
Authority: WO
Inventors: 최일환; 김한수; 김선태; 이익재
Original assignee: 주식회사 과학기술분석센타
Priority date: 2009-06-30
Filing date: 2009-12-03
Publication date: 2011-01-06
Also published as: CN101934178B; CN101934178A

Abstract

Disclosed are a method for managing a pollution-prevention facility and a system thereof. The system for managing a pollution-prevention facility includes: one pollution measuring device for measuring pollutants from a pollutant discharge source before treatment of the pollution-prevention facility; a second pollution measuring device for measuring pollutants of the pollutant discharge source after the treatment of the pollution-prevention facility; and a management server for monitoring the state of the pollution-prevention facility according to the values measured by the first pollution measuring device and the second pollution measuring device, to inform a user of the monitored results. The method for managing a pollution-prevention facility comprises: a first measuring step for measuring pollutants from a pollutant discharge source before the treatment of the pollution-prevention facility; a second measuring step for measuring the amount of pollutants from the pollutant discharge source after the treatment of the pollution-prevention facility; and a managing step for calculating the difference between the amount of pollutants measured in the first measuring step and the second measuring step to provide a period for removing substances accumulated in the pollution-prevention facility. Therefore, a manager may easily confirm from a remote location whether the pollution-prevention facility is operating normally and whether the substances accumulated in the pollution-preventing facility should be removed.

Description

Prevention facility management method and prevention facility management system

The present invention relates to a prevention facility management method and a prevention facility management system, and more particularly, to a prevention facility management method and management system capable of effectively managing a prevention facility that discharges pollutants.

Prevention facility means a facility for removing or reducing air pollutants discharged. Air pollutant discharge facilities are facilities, machines, appliances, and other objects that release air pollutants to the atmosphere, which are designated by the Ministry of Environment. Facilities for reducing or removing pollutants from these discharge facilities are called air pollution prevention facilities and are prescribed in Article 2 of the Air Quality Preservation Act and Article 6 of the Enforcement Rules.

Air pollution prevention facilities include gravity dust collector, inertial dust collector, centrifugal dust collector, washing dust collector, filter dust collector, electric dust collector, sound wave dust collector, absorption facility, adsorption facility, direct combustion facility, catalyst It is settled as a facility using reaction, a facility by condensation, and a treatment facility using soil microorganisms. In addition, the prevention facility includes a device for collecting contaminants, a pipeline through which the contaminants pass, a blower for transporting the pollutants, and a machine or apparatus necessary for the prevention facility such as various pumps.

As mentioned above, air pollution prevention facilities prevent air pollution by absorption, adsorption, and filtration, and therefore, various filling materials used for them are required. When the air pollutants are excessively absorbed and adsorbed, the fillers are less effective in preventing the air pollutants from being discharged as they are, causing pollution and direct odor complaints of nearby residents.

In order to prevent such a risk, in the past, a method of replacing the filling material when a certain period of use has elapsed, but this is to replace the filling material that still has the prevention ability, causing cost wastage.

In addition, environmental guidance and public officials who manage hundreds and thousands of workplaces are difficult to check the emission of environmental pollutants at these sites, which makes it difficult to supervise them.

The present invention has been made to solve the above problems, it is possible to know the replacement time of the filling material in real time, to prevent the waste of costs, to prevent the management of the prevention facilities in the remote control and management method and management Its purpose is to provide a system.

The present invention to solve the above problems, the first measuring step of measuring the pollutant before the treatment facility of the pollution discharge source; A second measuring step of measuring an amount of pollutant after treating said prevention facility of said pollutant discharge source; And calculating a difference between the amounts of pollutants measured in the first measurement step and the second measurement step, and managing a replacement cycle of the internal filling material of the prevention facility. This is provided.

On the other hand, as another category of the present invention, the first pollution measuring device for measuring the pollutant before the treatment facility of the pollution discharge source; A second pollution measuring device for measuring a pollutant after treating the prevention facility of the pollution discharge source; And a management server that monitors the status of the prevention facility by using the values measured by the first pollution measurement device and the second pollution measurement device, and informs a user of the prevention facility management system. do.

Here, the management server, the outlet pollution monitoring unit for informing the manager when the value measured by the second pollution measuring device is a predetermined value or more; preferably further comprises a.

In addition, the management server, when the difference between the value measured by the first pollution measuring device and the value measured by the second pollution measuring device is less than a predetermined value, the filling material exchange time notification unit to notify the manager; It is effective to include.

Here, the first pollution measuring device and the second pollution measuring device, the dust filter for filtering dust from the pollutant; A water removal device for filtering water from the contaminants; A detection sensor array comprising a plurality of pollutant detection sensors installed on a flow path through which the pollutant passes through the dust filter and the water removal device; And a data processor which processes a value measured by the sensing sensor array and transmits the measured value to the management server.

In addition, the sensing sensor array, the electrochemical sensor, it is effective that the electrochemical sensor is installed at the bent point of the flow path.

In addition, the inlet of the sensor array is preferably formed with a separate flow path for the uncontaminated air flows.

According to the problem solving means of the present invention as described above it can be expected a variety of effects including the following matters. However, the present invention is not achieved by exerting all of the following effects.

First, the concentration of the pollutant before the prevention facility removes the pollutant and the concentration of the pollutant after the prevention facility removes the pollutant can be easily checked to determine whether the prevention facility is operating properly.

As described above, the prevention facility management system of the present invention has an advantage that it is possible to easily determine whether the discharge of the pollutant and the exchange time of the filling material through the management server directly without visiting the site.

Figure 1 is a block diagram showing the structure of the prevention facility management system of the present invention

FIG. 2 is a block diagram schematically illustrating internal structures of the first pollution measuring device and the second pollution measuring device of FIG. 1.

3 is a simplified view of a portion where the second detection sensor of FIG. 2 is installed;

4 is a simplified view of a part where the third sensor of FIG. 2 is installed;

5 is a graph of output versus time of the sensor of FIG.

6 is a sensor chromatogram graph of FIG.

7 is a graph illustrating integrating the sensor chromatogram graph of FIG. 6.

** Description of symbols for main parts of the drawings **

100a: first pollution measuring device 10: pollution source

20: prevention facility 100b: second pollution measuring device

200: management server 210: outlet pollution monitoring unit

220: filling material replacement time notification unit 110: dust filter

120: moisture removal device 101: euro

131 to 139: detection sensor 130: detection sensor array

140: data processing unit

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

However, in describing the present invention, a detailed description of known functions or configurations will be omitted in order not to disturb the gist of the present invention.

1 is a block diagram showing the structure of the prevention facility management system of the present invention.

Prevention facility management system according to an embodiment of the present invention is the first pollution measurement device (100a) for measuring the pollutant before processing the pollution facility 20 of the pollution discharge source 10, and the pollutant after the treatment of the pollution discharge source. The state of the prevention facility is monitored by using a value measured by the second pollution measuring device 100b and the first pollution measuring device 100a and the second pollution measuring device 100b. It includes a management server 200 to inform.

The first pollution measuring device 100a is installed between the pollution discharge source 10 and the prevention facility 20, and the second pollution measurement device 100b is installed between the prevention facility 20 and the discharge port 30. Therefore, the concentration of the pollutant before the prevention facility 20 removes the pollutant and the concentration of the pollutant after the prevention facility 20 removes the pollutant can be easily checked to determine whether the prevention facility is operating properly. Can be.

The management server, when the value measured by the second pollution measuring device 100b is a predetermined value or more, the outlet pollution monitoring unit 210 to inform the manager and the value measured by the first pollution measuring device 100a and When the difference between the values measured by the second pollution measuring apparatus 100b is less than or equal to a predetermined value, the apparatus further includes a filling material exchange time notification unit 220 informing the manager.

The outlet pollution monitoring unit 210 prevents the polluted air from being discharged to the atmosphere by notifying the manager when the pollutant discharged directly to the atmosphere is above a certain concentration.

In addition, the filling material exchange time notification unit 220 to inform the efficiency of the prevention facility, by measuring the concentration of pollutants before and after the prevention facility 20, if the next predetermined value or less, the prevention facility does not operate properly Notify your manager to replace the filling.

The first pollution measuring device 100a and the second pollution measuring device 100b include a dust filter 110 that filters dust from the pollutants, a water removing device 120 that filters moisture from the pollutants, and A detection sensor array 130 including a plurality of pollutant detection sensors 131 to 139 installed on a flow path 101 through which the pollutant passes through the dust filter 110 and the water removing device 120, and the It includes a data processing unit 140 for processing the value measured by the sensor array 130 and transmitting to the management server.

The dust filter 110 includes a first dust filter 111 and a second dust filter 112 installed before and after the water removing device 120. The water treated by the water removing device 120 is discharged to the outside air by the solenoid valve.

The sensing sensor array includes a plurality of sensing sensors 131 to 139. The sensing sensors 131 to 139 may be a semiconductor gas sensor, an electrochemical sensor, an optical sensor, or the like. The electrochemical sensor is preferably disposed at the second, seventh and eighth 132, 137, 138. The

electrochemical sensors

132, 137, and 138 may be installed at angled portions of the flow path, thereby increasing the efficiency of sensing. That is, as shown in FIG. 3, the electrochemical sensor 132 is disposed at the point where the flow path 101 is bent so that the sensing surface 132a of the sensor is positioned perpendicular to the flow of the fluid. As shown in FIG. 4, the electrochemical sensor 132 has a higher sensing efficiency than the case where the electrochemical sensor 132 is disposed perpendicular to the flow of fluid, as shown in FIG. 3. .

In addition, a flow path 102 through which uncontaminated air is introduced is formed at an inlet of the sensor array, and a valve capable of selectively injecting air at a point where the contaminated air meets with the flow path 104 ( 103 is installed. Therefore, after measuring the contaminated air, clean air is put in, thereby cleaning and stabilizing the sensor, maintaining the measurement accuracy of the sensor, and increasing the life of the sensor.

The flow rate meter 150 capable of measuring the flow rate is provided on the flow path 104 or the flow path 101 of the sensor array in which the polluted air flows.

The data processor 140 may include a gas amount measuring unit 141 that calculates an amount of gas attached to the sensor from the measured value measured by the sensor, and a gas amount calculated by the gas amount measuring unit 141. Concentration calculator 142 for calculating the concentration of the.

The gas amount measuring unit 141 calculates the variation ratio S of the measured value with respect to time, and then calculates an area value A obtained by integrating the area of the variation ratio S, and calculates the amount of gas adsorbed and desorbed. . The detailed description thereof will be replaced with the description of the prevention facility management method described later.

The said concentration calculating part extracts the density | concentration of the said measurement gas from the characteristic relationship formula of the said adsorption amount and the density | concentration of the said measurement gas. The characteristic relation is obtained by a regression analysis method between the adsorption amount and the concentration of the gas sample by measuring the adsorption amount on a plurality of measured gas samples. Detailed description thereof will also be replaced with the description of the prevention facility management method described later.

In the prevention facility management method of the present invention using the prevention facility management system as described above, the first measurement step of measuring the pollutant before the treatment facility of the pollution discharge source measures the amount of the pollutant after the treatment facility treatment of the pollution source. The second measurement step of measuring and calculating the difference between the amount of the pollutant measured in the first measurement step and the second measurement step, it can be implemented in the step of managing the replacement cycle of the internal filling material of the prevention facility.

The first measuring step and the second measuring step include the step of injecting the pollutant into the detection sensor (131 ~ 139), and the both ends of the load resistor 400 is connected in series with the detection sensor (131 ~ 139) Output voltage (VL) or the internal resistance of the sensor (131 ~ 139) (hereinafter, referred to as the output voltage and internal resistance value collectively referred to as 'measured value') is measured during the time that the measuring gas is injected, and outputted against time 5, the adsorption amount calculated from the step of calculating the adsorption amount of the gas (FIG. 6 and FIG. 7) and the step of calculating the adsorption amount of the gas from the output graph versus time; Extracting the concentration of the gas using.

The step of calculating the adsorption amount of the gas includes calculating a rate of change of the measured value with respect to time (FIG. 6), and calculating an area value obtained by integrating the area of the rate of change (FIG. 7).

The step of calculating the variation ratio of the output voltage with respect to time is to calculate the slope of the output voltage graph (Fig. 5) with respect to time, and is expressed as a graph with time as shown in FIG.

The step of calculating the area value is a value obtained by integrating the area in the graph of FIG. 6. The method calculated as in FIG. 7 is called a sensor chromatogram area extraction method.

Tables below show hydrogen sulfide (H ₂ S) of various concentrations measured by a conventional voltage comparison method and the value measured by the sensor chromatogram area extraction method of the present invention.

Table 1

Gas: H 2 S 1ppm, Sensor model: MICS 5521 (manufacturer E2V, Switzerland)

division	Base (Vair)	Max (Vgas)	Vgas / Vair	Sout area
1st	1.57	2.10	1.34	50.4
2nd	1.59	2.09	1.31	49.6
3rd	1.62	2.08	1.28	50.5
Average	1.59	2.09	1.31	50.17
Standard deviation (SD)	0.03	0.01	0.03	0.49
Relative standard deviation (% RSD)	1.58	0.48	2.05	0.98

In the table above, Vair is the sensor's output voltage when exposed to odorless air, Vgas is the sensor's output voltage when exposed to the target gas, and Sout_area is the value extracted by the sensor chromatogram area extraction method.

TABLE 2

Gas: H 2 S 5ppm, Sensor model: MICS 5521 (manufacturer E2V, Switzerland)

division	Base (Vair)	Max (Vgas)	Vgas / Vair	Sout area
1st	1.53	2.69	1.76	103.9
2nd	1.60	2.55	1.59	106.7
3rd	1.65	2.41	1.46	103.0
Average	1.59	2.55	1.60	104.53
Standard deviation (SD)	0.06	0.14	0.15	1.93
Relative standard deviation (% RSD)	3.78	5.49	9.29	1.85

TABLE 3

Gas: H 2 S 10ppm, Sensor model: MICS 5521 (manufacturer E2V, Switzerland)

division	Base (Vair)	Max (Vgas)	Vgas / Vair	Sout area
1st	1.54	2.81	1.82	133.8
2nd	1.67	2.71	1.62	129.8
3rd	1.76	2.67	1.52	129.4
Average	1.66	2.73	1.65	131.00
Standard deviation (SD)	0.11	0.07	0.16	2.43
Relative standard deviation (% RSD)	6.68	2.64	9.45	1.86

Table 4

Target gas: H 2 S 1ppm, Sensor model: TGS 2602 (Manufacturer Figaro Technology Research Institute, Japan)

division	Base (Vair)	Max (Vgas)	Vgas / Vair	Sout area
1st	1.42	2.19	1.54	65.2
2nd	1.44	2.10	1.46	68.4
3rd	1.44	2.07	1.44	64.1
Average	1.43	2.12	1.48	65.90
Standard deviation (SD)	0.01	0.06	0.06	2.23
Relative standard deviation (% RSD)	0.81	2.95	3.75	3.39

Table 5

Target gas: H 2 S 5ppm, sensor model: TGS2602 (manufactured by Figaro Technology Research Institute, Japan)

division	Base (Vair)	Max (Vgas)	Vgas / Vair	Sout area
1st	1.43	2.95	2.06	152.7
2nd	1.48	2.94	1.99	150.5
3rd	1.59	2.92	1.84	144.4
Average	1.50	2.94	1.96	149.20
Standard deviation (SD)	0.08	0.02	0.12	4.30
Relative standard deviation (% RSD)	5.46	0.52	5.87	2.88

Table 6

Target gas: H 2 S 10ppm, Sensor model: TGS2602 (manufactured by Figaro Technology Research Institute, Japan)

division	Base (Vair)	Max (Vgas)	Vgas / Vair	Sout area
1st	1.55	3.48	2.25	206.9
2nd	1.65	3.55	2.15	204.6
3rd	1.76	3.40	1.93	201.7
Average	1.65	3.48	2.11	204.40
Standard deviation (SD)	0.11	0.08	0.16	2.61
Relative standard deviation (% RSD)	6.35	2.16	7.62	1.27

As can be seen from the results of Tables 1 to 6, the conventional voltage measurement method can be seen that the variation of the initial Vair value occurs as the number of measurements is repeated, and the occurrence of deviation increases as the concentration of the measurement gas increases. .

On the other hand, the sensor chromatogram area extraction method has the advantage of excellent reproducibility by showing the characteristics of the low relative standard deviation even when the concentration increases and the number of repetitions increases.

Extracting the concentration of the gas may include extracting the concentration of the measurement gas from the characteristic relational expression of the adsorption amount and the concentration of the measurement gas, wherein the characteristic relational expression includes the adsorption amount to a plurality of measurement gas samples. By measuring this, it can be obtained by a regression analysis method between the adsorption amount and the concentration of the gas sample. Since this method is a method that is frequently used statistically, detailed description thereof will be omitted.

Here, it is preferable to further include an odorless air injection step of injecting odorless air before injecting the measurement gas to the detection sensors (131 ~ 139). Conventionally, a small amount of gas is adsorbed on the surface of the sensor while the sensor is exposed to the atmosphere. In the case of injecting the measurement gas in such a state, there was a disadvantage in that it was difficult to obtain a desired characteristic graph because the sensitivity of the sensor was low. In contrast, the present invention has the advantage that the gas attached to the sensor can be removed by performing the odorless air injection step of injecting the odorless air before the measurement gas injection. In addition, when injecting odorless air, by extracting the sensor chromatogram, it is possible to measure the amount of gas falling from the surface of the sensor, which also has the advantage that it is possible to reverse the normal air pollution.

In the odorless air injection step, the time for injecting the odorless air is preferably longer than the time for injecting the measurement gas in the step of introducing the measurement gas.

That is, the time for injecting the odorless air is longer than the time for injecting the measurement gas, it is possible to increase the sensitivity of the sensor to the measurement air. In other words, when the measurement air is injected into the sensor for a long time, the amount of gas adhering to the sensor surface is increased, and the characteristics of the sensor are changed. Therefore, when the odorless air is injected for a long time and there is no increase or decrease in the amount of adhesion on the surface of the sensor, the measurement air is injected to obtain more accurate measured values.

On the other hand, the step of injecting the odorless air to the sensor (131 ~ 139) (in Figure 5, the time indicated by reference numeral 42) and the odorless air is injected into the measured value of the sensor (131 ~ 139) Measuring the time period during which the output time graph is obtained (after 42 in FIG. 5), and calculating the desorption amount of gas (112 in FIG. 6 and 117 in FIG. 7) from the output graph over time; Comparing the adsorption amount of the gas obtained in the step of calculating the adsorption amount of the gas with the desorption amount calculated from the step of calculating the desorption amount of the gas, and determining the state of the detection sensors 131 to 139. Include.

The step of calculating the desorption amount of the gas includes calculating a rate of change of the measured value with respect to time (112 of FIG. 6), and calculating an area value obtained by integrating the area of the rate of change (117 of FIG. 7). do.

That is, after inject | pouring a measurement gas, odorless air is inject | poured and the desorption amount of the gas adhering to a sensor is calculated | required.

In the determining of the states of the sensors 131 to 139, the performance of the sensors 131 to 139 may be evaluated by comparing the desorption amount. That is, when the difference in the adsorption and desorption amount of the surfaces of the detection sensors (131 to 139) is managed within 3%, since the adsorption and desorption of gas is made reversibly on the surfaces of the detection sensors (131 to 139), the gas sensor is in a good state. If the difference in the amount of adsorption and desorption is greater than 3 to 5%, the gas is adsorbed onto the gas sensor and then desorption is not possible. In addition, it can be used as an indicator of filter replacement for odorless air and contamination of internal pipes.

Although the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described above by way of example, the scope of the present invention is not limited to these specific embodiments, and may be appropriately changed within the scope described in the claims.

Claims

A first measuring step of measuring contaminants before treatment of the pollution discharge source;

A second measuring step of measuring an amount of pollutant after treating said prevention facility of said pollutant discharge source; And

Calculating a difference between the amounts of pollutants measured in the first and second measurement steps, and managing a replacement cycle of the internal filling material of the prevention facility;

Prevention facility management method comprising a.
The method of claim 1,

The first measuring step and the second measuring step,

Injecting the pollutant into a sensor;

The output voltage of both ends of the load resistance connected in series with the detection sensor or the internal resistance of the detection sensor (hereinafter, referred to as the output voltage and internal resistance value collectively referred to as 'measurement value') is measured during the injection time of the measurement gas. To obtain an output graph over time;

Calculating an adsorption amount of a gas from the output time graph; And

Extracting a concentration of gas using the adsorption amount calculated from calculating the adsorption amount of the gas;

Prevention facility management method comprising a.
The method of claim 2,

An odorless air injection step of injecting odorless air before injecting the measurement gas into the detection sensor;

Prevention facility management method comprising a further.
The method of claim 3, wherein

In the odorless air injecting step, the time for injecting the odorless air, the step of injecting the measurement gas, the prevention facility management method, characterized in that longer than the time of injecting the measurement gas.
The method of claim 2,

Injecting odorless air into the detection sensor;

Measuring the measured value of the sensor during the time that the odorless air is injected to obtain an output graph with respect to time;

Calculating a desorption amount of gas from the output time graph; And

Comparing the adsorption amount of the gas obtained in the step of calculating the adsorption amount of the gas with the desorption amount calculated from the step of calculating the desorption amount of the gas, and determining a state of the sensor;

Prevention facility management method comprising the further.
The method according to any one of claims 2 to 5,

Calculating the adsorption amount of the gas,

Calculating a rate of change of the measured value against time; And

Obtaining an area value obtained by integrating the area of the change rate;

Prevention facility management method comprising a.
The method of claim 5,

Calculating the desorption amount of the gas,

Calculating a rate of change of the measured value against time; And

Obtaining an area value obtained by integrating the area of the change rate;

Prevention facility management method comprising a.
The method according to any one of claims 2 to 5,

Extracting the concentration of the gas,

Extracting the concentration of the measurement gas from the characteristic relationship between the adsorption amount and the concentration of the measurement gas;

Prevention facility management method comprising a.
The method of claim 8,

The characteristic relation is

And measuring the adsorption amount on a plurality of measurement gas samples, and obtaining a regression analysis method between the adsorption amount and the concentration of the gas sample.
A first pollution measuring device for measuring a pollutant before treatment of the pollution discharge source;

A second pollution measuring device for measuring a pollutant after treating the prevention facility of the pollution discharge source; And

A management server that monitors a state of the prevention facility by using the values measured by the first pollution measuring device and the second pollution measuring device and informs a user;

Prevention facility management system comprising a.
The method of claim 10,

The management server,

An outlet pollution monitoring unit for notifying a manager when a value measured by the second pollution measuring device is greater than or equal to a predetermined value;

Prevention facility management system further comprises.
The method of claim 10,

The management server,

A filling material exchange time notifying unit notifying a manager when a difference between the value measured by the first pollution measuring device and the value measured by the second pollution measuring device is equal to or less than a predetermined value;

Prevention facility management system further comprises.
The method of claim 11,

The management server,

A filling material exchange time notifying unit notifying a manager when a difference between the value measured by the first pollution measuring device and the value measured by the second pollution measuring device is equal to or less than a predetermined value;

Prevention facility management system further comprises.
The method according to any one of claims 10 to 13,

The first pollution measuring device and the second pollution measuring device,

A dust filter for filtering dust from the pollutants;

A water removal device for filtering water from the contaminants;

A detection sensor array comprising a plurality of pollutant detection sensors installed on a flow path through which the pollutant passes through the dust filter and the water removal device; And

A data processor for processing a value measured by the detection sensor array and transferring the measured value to the management server;

Prevention facility management system comprising a.
The method of claim 14,

The detection sensor array,

Prevention facility management system comprising an electrochemical sensor.
The method of claim 15,

The electrochemical sensor is installed in the bending point of the flow path prevention facility management system, characterized in that.
The method of claim 15,

Preventing facility management system, characterized in that the inlet of the non-contaminated air flow path is formed separately at the inlet of the sensor array.
The method of claim 14,

The data processing unit,

A gas amount measuring unit configured to calculate an amount of gas attached to the sensor from the measured value measured by the sensor; And

A concentration calculating unit calculating a concentration of the gas from the gas amount calculated by the gas amount measuring unit;

Prevention facility management system comprising a.
The method of claim 18,

The gas amount measuring unit,

After calculating the rate of change (S) of the measured value over time,

Preventing facility management system, characterized in that to obtain the amount of gas adsorbed and desorbed from the area value (A) of the area of the change rate (S).
The method of claim 18,

The concentration calculation unit,

The concentration facility of the said measurement gas is extracted from the characteristic relationship formula of the said adsorption amount and the density | concentration of the said measurement gas, The prevention facility management system characterized by the above-mentioned.
The method of claim 20,

The characteristic relation is

And the adsorption amount is measured on a plurality of measurement gas samples, and is obtained by a regression analysis method between the adsorption amount and the concentration of the gas sample.