WO2010141517A2 - Synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model - Google Patents
Synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2010141517A2 WO2010141517A2 PCT/US2010/036968 US2010036968W WO2010141517A2 WO 2010141517 A2 WO2010141517 A2 WO 2010141517A2 US 2010036968 W US2010036968 W US 2010036968W WO 2010141517 A2 WO2010141517 A2 WO 2010141517A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- partition
- computer
- client computer
- server computer
- electronic document
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000005192 partition Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 236
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 23
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 13
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005055 memory storage Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000053 physical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007723 transport mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/10—File systems; File servers
- G06F16/17—Details of further file system functions
- G06F16/178—Techniques for file synchronisation in file systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F15/00—Digital computers in general; Data processing equipment in general
- G06F15/16—Combinations of two or more digital computers each having at least an arithmetic unit, a program unit and a register, e.g. for a simultaneous processing of several programs
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/10—Protecting distributed programs or content, e.g. vending or licensing of copyrighted material ; Digital rights management [DRM]
- G06F21/106—Enforcing content protection by specific content processing
- G06F21/1062—Editing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F40/00—Handling natural language data
- G06F40/10—Text processing
- G06F40/166—Editing, e.g. inserting or deleting
Definitions
- an electronic document file may be edited by multiple users at different client computers.
- the electronic document file may include associated editing session data (e.g., metadata) which is different and independent from the main document file content.
- the electronic document file is synchronized between a client computer and a central server in order to store any edits made to the electronic document file which may then be viewed by users of other client computers in a network.
- any associated metadata must be synchronized together with the edits made to the electronic document file.
- metadata may be put in extensible file format for synchronization.
- the metadata associated with an electronic document file is automatically exposed on the server, even if a user synchronizing the electronic document file does not desire the metadata to be viewed by or downloaded (within the electronic document file) to other users. It is with respect to these considerations and others that the various embodiments of the present invention have been made.
- Embodiments are provided for synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model in a client-server computer network. Edits to content of an electronic document may be received at a client computer. The content may be included in a first partition of a file stored on a server computer. The first partition may include a first stream which includes the electronic document content. The file may include multiple partitions with each partition including one or more streams. The client computer may generate metadata in a second partition of the file.
- the metadata may be associated with the edits to the electronic document content in the first partition.
- the second partition may then be individually synchronized with the server computer to store the metadata.
- the first partition may then be individually synchronized with the server computer to store the edits made to the electronic document content.
- FIGURE 1 is a block diagram illustrating a client-server network architecture which may utilize a server storage model for synchronizing file partitions, in accordance with various embodiments;
- FIGURE 2 is a block diagram illustrating a client computing environment which may utilize a server storage model for synchronizing file partitions, in accordance with various embodiments;
- FIGURE 3 is a flow diagram illustrating a routine for synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model, in accordance with an embodiment;
- FIGURE 4 is a flow diagram illustrating a routine for synchronizing a single file partition utilizing a server storage model, in accordance with the embodiment illustrated in FIGURE 3;
- FIGURE 5 is a flow diagram illustrating a routine for synchronizing another file partition utilizing a server storage model, in accordance with the embodiment illustrated in FIGURE 3;
- FIGURE 6 is a flow diagram illustrating a routine for synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model, in accordance with another embodiment
- FIGURE 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a routine for synchronizing a file partition on a second client computer utilizing a server storage model, in accordance with the embodiment illustrated in FIGURE 6.
- Embodiments are provided for synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model in a client-server computer network.
- Edits to content of an electronic document may be received at a client computer.
- the content may be included in a first partition of a file stored on a server computer.
- the first partition may include a first stream which includes the electronic document content.
- the file may include multiple partitions with each partition including one or more streams.
- the client computer may generate metadata in a second partition of the file.
- the metadata may be associated with the edits to the electronic document content in the first partition.
- the second partition may then be individually synchronized with the server computer to store the metadata.
- the first partition may then be individually synchronized with the server computer to store the edits made to the electronic document content.
- FIGURE 1 is a block diagram illustrating a client-server network architecture which may utilize a server storage model for synchronizing file partitions, in accordance with various embodiments.
- the network architecture includes a client computer 2 and a client computer 6, both of which are in communication with a server computer 70 over a network 4.
- the network 4 which may include a local network or a wide area network (e.g., the Internet).
- the client computer 2 may store a productivity application 30 which may be used to edit an electronic document file 40 (also stored on the client computer 2).
- the productivity application 30 may comprise the WORD word processing software, the POWERPOINT presentation graphics program, and the GROOVE software from MICROSOFT CORPORATION of Redmond, Washington. It should be appreciated, however, that other productivity or application programs from other manufacturers may be utilized in accordance with the various embodiments described herein.
- the electronic document file 40 may be received at the client computer 2 via a download operation over the network 4 from the server computer 70 or generated by the productivity application 30 on the client computer 30.
- the electronic document file 40 may include a partition 50.
- the partition 50 may include streams 52 and 56.
- the stream 52 may further include content (i.e., electronic document content) 54A.
- the electronic document file 40 may also include a partition 60.
- the partition 60 may include streams 62 and 68.
- the stream 62 may further include metadata 64A.
- the metadata 64A may be associated with the content 54A stored in the partition 50.
- the metadata 64A may include an author list 67A describing one or more authors of the content 54A and document locks 66A describing a current user of the electronic document file 40 (e.g., a user currently editing the content 54A).
- a "partition" is defined as a "file” within a file (such as the electronic document file 40) and may contain one or more streams.
- a "stream,” which is contained within a partition, contains data associated with an electronic document file (such as the content 54A or the metadata 64A). It should be understood that each of the partitions in a file may be synchronized independently of each other and at different synchronization rates (i.e., partitions in a single file may be synchronized at different times).
- multiple streams in the same partition are related to each other while no relationship may exist between streams in different partitions.
- stream 56 comprise data associated with electronic document content (and thus related to stream 52) but may not contain metadata associated with the electronic document file 40.
- multiple streams in a given partition are synchronized simultaneously, thereby ensuring consistency between streams in the same partition.
- the client computer 6 may store the productivity application 30 which also may be used to edit the electronic document file 40 (also stored on the client computer 6).
- the electronic document file 40 may be received at the client computer 6 via a download operation over the network 4 from the server computer 70 or generated by the productivity application 30 on the client computer 6.
- the electronic document file 40 may include the partition 50.
- the partition 50 may include the streams 52 and 56.
- the stream 52 may further include content (i.e., electronic document content) 54B.
- the electronic document file 40 may also include the partition 60.
- the partition 60 may include the streams 62 and 68.
- the stream 62 may further include metadata 64B.
- "metadata" represents content contained with a stream in a partition.
- the metadata 64B may be associated with the content 54B stored in the partition 50.
- the metadata 64B may include an author list 67B describing one or more authors of the content 54B and document locks 66B describing a current user of the electronic document file 40 (e.g., a user currently editing the content 54B).
- the sever computer 70 may store a server application 42.
- the server computer 70 may function as a document storage system for electronic files created on the client computers 2 and 6.
- the server application 42 may comprise a collaborative services application program such as the SHAREPOINT SERVER services application from MICROSOFT CORPORATION.
- SHAREPOINT services technology enables users to create, maintain, and present a collaborative environment to share information.
- a user or organization can create one or more websites to provide and share information (e.g., documents on a web server or web folder, etc.) for other users associated with the websites.
- the embodiments described herein should not be construed as being limited to SHAREPOINT services technology and that other collaborative services technology from other developers and/or manufacturers may also be utilized.
- the server computer 70 may also store the electronic document file 40.
- the electronic document file 40 may include the partition 50.
- the partition 50 may include the streams 52 and 56.
- the stream 52 may further include content (i.e., electronic document content) 54.
- the electronic document file 40 may also include the partition 60.
- the partition 60 may include the streams 62 and 68.
- the stream 62 may further include metadata 64.
- the metadata 64 may be associated with the content 54 stored in the partition 50.
- the metadata 64 may include an author list 67 describing one or more authors of the content 54 and document locks 66 describing a current user of the electronic document file 40 (e.g., a user currently editing the content 54).
- the electronic document file 40 may be downloaded from the server computer 70 to the client computers 2 and 6 for editing thereby potentially creating different versions of the content 54 and the metadata 64 in the electronic document file 40 when changes are made prior to being synchronized back to the server computer 70.
- versions of the content 54 and the metadata 64 on the client computers 2 and 6 are identified by the letters "A” and "B” appended after the reference numerals for these file components.
- the sever application 42 and the productivity application 30 may be configured to facilitate the synchronization of the partitions 50 and 60 on the client computers 2 and 6, with the server computer 70.
- the server application 42 may be configured to utilize a protocol (including, but not limited to a stateless protocol) to facilitate incremental document synchronization and to add support for server files to expose multiple independent or dependent data streams.
- a protocol including, but not limited to a stateless protocol
- each of the partitions in an electronic file may be synchronized independently of each other and at different synchronization rates (i.e., partitions in a single file may be synchronized at different times).
- the server application 42 in conjunction with the productivity application 30, may be configured to synchronize the partition 60 (containing the metadata 64) on the client computer 2 with the server computer 70 before the partition 50 (containing the content 54A). It should be appreciated that by synchronizing partitions at different rates, the amount of data communicated to the server computer 70 over the network 4 is reduced, thereby improving server scalability.
- An illustrative stateless protocol which may be utilized in accordance with various embodiments is described in related patent application U.S. Serial No. 12/113,975 entitled "Document Synchronization over Stateless Protocols," filed on May 2, 2008, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein, in its entirety, by reference.
- an electronic document file may contain only a single partition and a single stream while in accordance with other embodiments an electronic document file may contain multiple partitions and multiple streams.
- the content of the streams contained within an electronic document file on the client computers 2 and 6 and the server computer 70 are not limited to metadata but may also include generic data (i.e., data which is not associated with content stored in an electronic document file partition) as well.
- the embodiments described herein should not be construed as being limited to the aforementioned software applications and that other software applications from other developers and/or manufacturers may also be utilized.
- the network architecture of FIGURE 1 and its components include functionality to communicate with other computing devices, communication devices, and/or other systems and are not intended to be limited to the embodiments and examples described herein.
- the network architecture of FIGURE 1 may include additional client computers in communication with the server computer 70, in accordance with various embodiments.
- FIGURE 2 the following discussion is intended to provide a brief, general description of a suitable computing environment in which various illustrative embodiments may be implemented. While various embodiments will be described in the general context of program modules that execute in conjunction with program modules that run on an operating system on a personal computer, those skilled in the art will recognize that the various embodiments may also be implemented in combination with other types of computer systems and program modules.
- program modules include routines, programs, components, data structures, and other types of structures that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types.
- FIGURE 2 shows the client computer 2 which may include a general purpose desktop, laptop, handheld, tablet, or other type of computer capable of executing one or more application programs.
- the client computer 2 includes at least one central processing unit 8 ("CPU"), a system memory 12, including a random access memory 18 (“RAM”) and a read-only memory (“ROM”) 20, and a system bus 10 that couples the memory to the CPU 8.
- CPU central processing unit
- RAM random access memory
- ROM read-only memory
- the client computer 2 further includes a mass storage device 14 for storing an operating system 32, the productivity application 30, and the electronic document file 40 which includes the partition 50, the streams 52, 56, 62, and 68, the content 54A, the metadata 64A, the author list 67 A, and the document locks 66A, described above with respect to FIGURE 1.
- the operating system 32 may be suitable for controlling the operation of a networked personal computer, such as the WINDOWS operating systems from MICROSOFT CORPORATION of Redmond, Washington.
- the mass storage device 14 is connected to the CPU 8 through a mass storage controller (not shown) connected to the bus 10.
- the mass storage device 14 and its associated computer- readable media provide non-volatile storage for the client computer 2.
- computer-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed or utilized by the client computer 2.
- Computer-readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media.
- Computer storage media includes volatile and non-volatile, removable and nonremovable hardware storage media implemented in any physical method or technology for the storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data.
- Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other solid state memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (“DVD”), or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by the client computer 2.
- Communication media typically embodies computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism and includes any information delivery media.
- modulated data signal means a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal.
- communication media includes wired media such as a wired network or direct- wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, RF, infrared, and other wireless media. Combinations of any of the above should also be included within the scope of computer-readable media.
- Computer-readable media may also be referred to as a computer program product.
- the client computer 2 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to remote computers through the network 4 which may comprise, for example, a local network or a wide area network (e.g., the Internet).
- the client computer 2 may connect to the network 4 through a network interface unit 16 connected to the bus 10. It should be appreciated that the network interface unit 16 may also be utilized to connect to other types of networks and remote computing systems.
- the client computer 2 may also include an input/output controller 22 for receiving and processing input from a number of input types, including a keyboard, mouse, pen, stylus, finger, and/or other means. Similarly, an input/output controller 22 may provide output to a display device 82, a printer, or other type of output device. Additionally, a touch screen can serve as an input and an output mechanism.
- the client computer 6 and the server computer 70 shown in FIGURE 1 may include many of the conventional components shown with respect to the client computer 2 in FIGURE 2.
- FIGURE 3 is a flow diagram illustrating a routine 300 for synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model, in accordance with an embodiment.
- routine 300 for synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model.
- the logical operations of various embodiments of the present invention are implemented (1) as a sequence of computer implemented acts or program modules running on a computing system and/or (2) as interconnected machine logical circuits or circuit modules within the computing system.
- the implementation is a matter of choice dependent on the performance requirements of the computing system implementing the invention. Accordingly, the logical operations illustrated in FIGURES 3-7 and making up the various embodiments described herein are referred to variously as operations, structural devices, acts or modules.
- the routine 300 begins at operation 305, where the productivity application 30 executing on the client computer 2 receives edits to electronic document content (contained in the stream 52) in the partition 50 of the electronic document file 40.
- the electronic document file 40 may be downloaded from the server computer 70 including all of the partitions and streams contained therein.
- the partition 50 may then be opened in order to edit the content 54 contained therein, thereby creating the content 54A.
- the routine 300 continues to operation 310 where the productivity application 30 generates the metadata 64A in the partition 60 of the electronic document file 40.
- the productivity application 30 may generate metadata to update the author list 67 in the partition 60 of the electronic document file 40 to add the user of the client computer 2 as an author (thereby generating the author list 67A).
- the productivity application 30 may also generate metadata to add a document lock 66A to the partition 60 of the electronic document file 40 to indicate that the electronic document file 40 is currently being edited by the user of the client computer 2.
- the routine 300 continues to operation 315 where the productivity application 30 sends a request to the server application 42 to synchronize the partition 60 with the server computer 70 in order to save the changes made to the metadata 64 (i.e., the metadata 64A containing the author list 67 A and the document lock 66A) to the server computer 70.
- the partition 60 may be synchronized independently from the partition 50 such that only the changed metadata 64A is saved to the server computer 70.
- An illustrative routine for synchronizing the partition 60 with the server computer will be described in greater detail below with respect to FIGURE 4.
- the routine 300 continues to operation 320 where the productivity application 30 sends a request to the server application 42 to synchronize the partition 50 with the server computer 70 in order to save the edited content 54A to the server computer 70.
- the partition 50 may be synchronized independently from the partition 60 such that only the edited content 54A is saved to the server computer 70. It should further be understood that the order of synchronization of the partitions 60 and 50 may be reversed such that the partition 50 is synchronized independently with the server computer 70 prior to the partition 60.
- An illustrative routine for synchronizing the partition 50 with the server computer 70 will be described in greater detail below with respect to FIGURE 5. From operation 320, the routine 300 continues to operation 325 where it then ends. It should be understood that the operations 310-320, discussed above, may also be performed by the productivity application 30 executing on the client computer 6, in accordance with an embodiment.
- FIGURE 4 is a flow diagram illustrating a routine 400 for synchronizing a single file partition utilizing a server storage model, in accordance with the embodiment illustrated in FIGURE 3.
- the routine 400 begins from operation 315 of FIGURE 3 and continues to operation 405, where the server application 42 determines whether a conflict exists with synchronizing the partition 60 on the client computer 2 with the server computer 70.
- the server application 42 may compare the metadata 64A stored in the partition 60 on the client computer 2 with the metadata 64 stored on the server computer 70 to determine any differences. If the metadata 64A and the metadata 64 are different, then the server application 42 determines there is a conflict and the routine 400 continues to operation 410.
- the routine 400 returns to operation 320 of FIGURE 3.
- the server application 42 determines how to resolve the conflict based on whether the metadata 64A in the partition 60 on the client computer 2 is more recent than the metadata 64 stored on the server computer 70.
- the request from the productivity application 30 to synchronize the partition 60 may include a timestamp indicating when the metadata 64A was stored in the partition 60 on the client computer 2.
- the server application 42 may compare the timestamp with a timestamp indicating when the metadata 64 was stored in the partition 60 on the server computer 70. If it is determined that the metadata 64A is more recent than the metadata 64, then the routine 400 continues to operation 415.
- the routine 400 branches to operation 420.
- the request from the productivity application 30 to synchronize the partition 60 may include a hypertext markup language ("HTTP") entity tag ("ETAG”) to identify (and resolve) conflicts.
- HTTP hypertext markup language
- ETAG entity tag
- the server application 42 automatically synchronizes the partition 60 on the client computer 2 with the server computer 70 to resolve the conflict in favor of the most recent metadata 64A being present on the client computer 2.
- the server application 42 may update the metadata 64 in the partition 60 on the server computer 70 with the metadata 64A.
- the routine 400 returns to operation 320 of FIGURE 3.
- the server application 42 automatically causes the synchronization of the partition 60 on the client computer 2 with the server computer 70 to fail in order to resolve the conflict in favor of the metadata 64 being more recent than the metadata 64A.
- the server application 42 may maintain the metadata 64 in the partition 60 on the server computer 70. From operation 420, the routine 400 returns to operation 320 of FIGURE 3.
- FIGURE 5 is a flow diagram illustrating a routine 500 for synchronizing another file partition utilizing a server storage model, in accordance with the embodiment illustrated in FIGURE 3.
- the routine 500 begins from operation 320 of FIGURE 3 and continues to operation 505, where the server application 42 determines whether a conflict exists with synchronizing the partition 50 on the client computer 2 with the server computer 70.
- the server application 42 may compare the content 54A stored in the partition 50 on the client computer 2 with the content 54 stored in the partition 50 on the server computer 70. If the content 54 contains edits which are not present in the edited content 54A in the partition 50 on the client computer 2, then the server computer 70 determines there is a conflict and the routine 500 continues to operation 510.
- the routine 500 continues to operation 515.
- the server application 42 generates a conflict error message for the user of the client computer 2.
- the conflict error message generated by the server application 42 on the client computer 2 may include unseen edits to the content 54 (made, for example by a user of the client computer 6) which have been previously uploaded to the server 70.
- a user of the client computer 2 may manually resolve the conflict by merging the edited content 54A with the edits to the content 54, or alternatively, letting the previous edits to the content 54 remain unaltered on the server 70. From operation 510, the routine 500 returns to operation 325 of FIGURE 3.
- FIGURE 6 is a flow diagram illustrating a routine 600 for synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model, in accordance with another embodiment.
- the routine 600 begins at operation 605, where the productivity application 30 executing on the client computer 2 receives edits to electronic document content (contained in the stream 52) in the partition 50 of the electronic document file 40.
- the electronic document file 40 may be downloaded from the server computer 70 including all of the partitions and streams contained therein.
- the partition 50 may then be opened in order to edit the content 54 contained therein, thereby creating the content 54A.
- routine 600 continues to operation 610 where the productivity application 30 generates the metadata 64A in the partition 60 of the electronic document file 40 to identify the editor of the content 54A in the partition 50.
- the productivity application 30 may generate metadata to add the name of the editor of the content 54A to the author list 67 in the partition 60 of the electronic document file 40 (thereby generating the author list 67A).
- the routine 600 continues to operation 615 where the productivity application 30 sends a request to the server application 42 to synchronize the partition 60 with the server computer 70 in order to save the changes made to the metadata 64 (i.e., the metadata 64A containing the author list 67A) to the server computer 70. It should be understood that the partition 60 may be synchronized independently from the partition 50 such that only the changed metadata 64A is saved to the server computer 70.
- the routine 600 continues to operation 620 where the productivity application 30 executing on the client computer 6 receives the file partitions 50 and 60 (including the streams 42, 56, 62, and 68 contained therein) from the server computer 70 by downloading the electronic file 40.
- the client computer 6, in receiving the file partition 60 also receives the metadata 64A identifying the editor of the content 54A from the client computer 2, as a result of the synchronization of the partition 60 on the client computer 2 with the server computer 70 at operation 615.
- a user of the client computer 6 is able to determine that a user of the client computer 2 has also downloaded the content 54 from the server computer 70 for editing.
- the routine 600 continues to operation 625 where the productivity application 30 executing on the client computer 6 receives edits to electronic document content (contained in the stream 52) in the partition 50 of the electronic document file 40.
- the partition 50 may then be opened in order to edit the content 54 contained therein, thereby creating the content 54B.
- the routine 600 continues to operation 630 where the productivity application 30 executing on the client computer 6 sends a request to the server application 42 to synchronize the partition 60 with the server computer 70 in order to save the changes made to the metadata 64 (i.e., the metadata 64B containing the author list 67B) to the server computer 70.
- the partition 60 may be synchronized independently from the partition 50 such that only the changed metadata 64B is saved to the server computer 70.
- the routine 600 continues to operation 635 where the client computer 2 receives the metadata 64B identifying the editor of the content 54B from the client computer 6, as a result of the synchronization of the partition 60 with the server computer 70 at operation 630.
- the productivity application 30 executing on the client computer 2 may download the partition 60 from the server computer 70 which has been previously updated with the metadata 64B from the client computer 6.
- a user of the client computer 2 is able to determine that a user of the client computer 6 has also downloaded the content 54 from the server computer 70 for editing.
- the routine 600 continues to operation 640 where the productivity application 30 executing on the client computer 2 sends a request to the server application 42 to synchronize the partition 50 with the server computer 70 in order to save the edited content 54A to the server computer 70.
- the partition 50 may be synchronized independently from the partition 60 such that only the edited content 54A is saved to the server computer 70. It should further be understood that the order of synchronization of the partitions 60 and 50 may be reversed such that the partition 50 is synchronized independently with the server computer 70 prior to the partition 60.
- the routine 600 continues to operation 645 where the productivity application 30 executing on the client computer 6 sends a request to the server application 42 to synchronize the partition 50 with the server computer 70 in order to save the edited content 54B to the server computer 70.
- the partition 50 may be synchronized independently from the partition 60 such that only the edited content 54B is saved to the server computer 70. It should further be understood that the order of synchronization of the partitions 60 and 50 may be reversed such that the partition 50 is synchronized independently with the server computer 70 prior to the partition 60.
- An illustrative routine for synchronizing the partition 50 with the server computer 70 will be described in greater detail below with respect to FIGURE 7. From operation 645, the routine 600 continues to operation 600 where it then ends.
- FIGURE 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a routine 700 for synchronizing a file partition on a second client computer utilizing a server storage model, in accordance with the embodiment illustrated in FIGURE 6.
- the routine 700 begins from operation 645 of FIGURE 6 and continues to operation 605, where the productivity application 30 executing on the client computer 6 checks with the server computer 70 for any updates made to the partition 50.
- the productivity application 30 may send a query to the server application 42 as to whether the content 54 in the partition 60 on the server computer 70 has been updated by the client computer 2.
- a user of the client computer 6 may be aware that the content 54 in the partition 50 of the server computer 70 is being edited by another user at the client computer 2 upon receiving the file partitions 50 and 60 in the electronic file 40 downloaded from the server computer 70.
- routine 700 continues to operation 710 where the client computer 6 receives a confirmation from the server application 42 that the partition 50 on the server computer 70 has been updated (i.e., by the client computer 2) and thus the edited content 54A from the client computer 2 is available to be merged with the edited content 54B in the partition 50 of the client computer 6. From operation 710, the routine 700 continues to operation 715 where the client computer 6 receives the edited content 54A from the server computer 70.
- routine 700 continues to operation 720 where the productivity application 30 executing on the client computer 6 requests the server application 42 on the server computer 70 to update the partition 50 with the edited content 54A (from the client computer 2) and the edited content 54B (from the client computer 6). From operation 720, the routine 700 returns to operation 650 of FIGURE 6.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- Technology Law (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
- Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)
- Document Processing Apparatus (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (13)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP10783964A EP2438526A4 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2010-06-01 | Synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model |
RU2011149273/08A RU2554845C2 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2010-06-01 | Synchronising parts of file using server information storage model |
AU2010256703A AU2010256703B2 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2010-06-01 | Synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model |
KR1020167023991A KR101740207B1 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2010-06-01 | Synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model |
CN2010800252229A CN102460409A (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2010-06-01 | Synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model |
CA2761165A CA2761165C (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2010-06-01 | Synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model |
BRPI1011684A BRPI1011684A2 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2010-06-01 | file partition synchronization using a server storage model |
SG2011079316A SG175387A1 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2010-06-01 | Synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model |
JP2012514057A JP5280583B2 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2010-06-01 | File partition synchronization using server storage model |
MX2011012937A MX2011012937A (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2010-06-01 | Synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model. |
ZA2011/07867A ZA201107867B (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2011-10-27 | Synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model |
IL216022A IL216022A (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2011-10-30 | Synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model |
IL244625A IL244625A (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2016-03-16 | Synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/479,189 US8219526B2 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2009-06-05 | Synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model |
US12/479,189 | 2009-06-05 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2010141517A2 true WO2010141517A2 (en) | 2010-12-09 |
WO2010141517A3 WO2010141517A3 (en) | 2011-02-17 |
Family
ID=43298457
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2010/036968 WO2010141517A2 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2010-06-01 | Synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model |
Country Status (16)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US8219526B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2438526A4 (en) |
JP (2) | JP5280583B2 (en) |
KR (2) | KR101655497B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN102460409A (en) |
AU (1) | AU2010256703B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI1011684A2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2761165C (en) |
CL (1) | CL2011003047A1 (en) |
IL (2) | IL216022A (en) |
MX (1) | MX2011012937A (en) |
MY (1) | MY163754A (en) |
RU (1) | RU2554845C2 (en) |
SG (1) | SG175387A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2010141517A2 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA201107867B (en) |
Families Citing this family (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8078957B2 (en) | 2008-05-02 | 2011-12-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Document synchronization over stateless protocols |
US9396279B1 (en) | 2009-02-17 | 2016-07-19 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, Na | Collaborative virtual markup |
US8219526B2 (en) * | 2009-06-05 | 2012-07-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model |
EP2302509B1 (en) * | 2009-09-29 | 2012-09-26 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Synchronization of server-side cookies with client-side cookies |
KR101994163B1 (en) | 2012-08-24 | 2019-09-30 | 삼성전자 주식회사 | Device and method for synchronizing compression contents file and system using the same |
US9430491B2 (en) | 2013-01-11 | 2016-08-30 | Commvault Systems, Inc. | Request-based data synchronization management |
US10318492B2 (en) * | 2013-02-25 | 2019-06-11 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Predictive storage service |
US10169121B2 (en) | 2014-02-27 | 2019-01-01 | Commvault Systems, Inc. | Work flow management for an information management system |
US9898520B2 (en) | 2014-03-25 | 2018-02-20 | Open Text Sa Ulc | Systems and methods for seamless access to remotely managed documents using synchronization of locally stored documents |
US9952934B2 (en) * | 2015-01-20 | 2018-04-24 | Commvault Systems, Inc. | Synchronizing selected portions of data in a storage management system |
US9588849B2 (en) | 2015-01-20 | 2017-03-07 | Commvault Systems, Inc. | Synchronizing selected portions of data in a storage management system |
RU2609081C2 (en) * | 2015-06-29 | 2017-01-30 | Общество С Ограниченной Ответственностью "Яндекс" | Method (versions) and system (versions) of document processing in distributed architecture |
US10503699B2 (en) | 2016-04-25 | 2019-12-10 | Sap Se | Metadata synchronization in a distrubuted database |
US10152284B2 (en) | 2016-10-26 | 2018-12-11 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Synchronizing metadata with alterations to a portable document format print job |
US11003632B2 (en) | 2016-11-28 | 2021-05-11 | Open Text Sa Ulc | System and method for content synchronization |
US11301431B2 (en) | 2017-06-02 | 2022-04-12 | Open Text Sa Ulc | System and method for selective synchronization |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050223047A1 (en) | 2003-08-21 | 2005-10-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and methods for synchronizing computer systems through an intermediary file system share or device |
Family Cites Families (62)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5774868A (en) * | 1994-12-23 | 1998-06-30 | International Business And Machines Corporation | Automatic sales promotion selection system and method |
US5924092A (en) * | 1997-02-07 | 1999-07-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Computer system and method which sort array elements to optimize array modifications |
JPH10301828A (en) * | 1997-04-23 | 1998-11-13 | Fujitsu Ltd | Method for managing database |
JPH11232159A (en) * | 1998-02-13 | 1999-08-27 | The Japan Reserch Institute Ltd | File management method and medium storing file management program |
US6801938B1 (en) * | 1999-06-18 | 2004-10-05 | Torrent Systems, Inc. | Segmentation and processing of continuous data streams using transactional semantics |
US6671757B1 (en) * | 2000-01-26 | 2003-12-30 | Fusionone, Inc. | Data transfer and synchronization system |
US6694336B1 (en) | 2000-01-25 | 2004-02-17 | Fusionone, Inc. | Data transfer and synchronization system |
AU2001288495A1 (en) * | 2000-08-29 | 2002-03-13 | Eloquent | Tool for collaborative edit/search of dyanamic objects |
WO2003107219A1 (en) * | 2000-09-11 | 2003-12-24 | Zambeel, Inc. | Storage system having partitioned migratable metadata |
JP2002251350A (en) | 2001-02-22 | 2002-09-06 | Sony Corp | Transmitter, receiver, transmitter-receiver, transmitting method and receiving method |
JP4270771B2 (en) * | 2001-05-29 | 2009-06-03 | 富士通株式会社 | Display program, display method, and recording medium |
US7389201B2 (en) * | 2001-05-30 | 2008-06-17 | Microsoft Corporation | System and process for automatically providing fast recommendations using local probability distributions |
US7702563B2 (en) * | 2001-06-11 | 2010-04-20 | Otc Online Partners | Integrated electronic exchange of structured contracts with dynamic risk-based transaction permissioning |
US6928458B2 (en) * | 2001-06-27 | 2005-08-09 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for translating synchronization information between two networks based on different synchronization protocols |
TW579463B (en) * | 2001-06-30 | 2004-03-11 | Ibm | System and method for a caching mechanism for a central synchronization server |
US8442957B2 (en) * | 2001-09-26 | 2013-05-14 | Emc Corporation | Efficient management of large files |
US7058664B1 (en) * | 2002-04-29 | 2006-06-06 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Method and system for data recovery |
US6925467B2 (en) * | 2002-05-13 | 2005-08-02 | Innopath Software, Inc. | Byte-level file differencing and updating algorithms |
US7096311B2 (en) * | 2002-09-30 | 2006-08-22 | Innopath Software, Inc. | Updating electronic files using byte-level file differencing and updating algorithms |
US7138998B2 (en) * | 2002-11-14 | 2006-11-21 | Intel Corporation | Multi-resolution spatial partitioning |
US7325202B2 (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2008-01-29 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and system for selectively retrieving updated information from one or more websites |
US7750908B2 (en) * | 2003-04-04 | 2010-07-06 | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | Focus plus context viewing and manipulation of large collections of graphs |
US7299404B2 (en) * | 2003-05-06 | 2007-11-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic maintenance of web indices using landmarks |
US7406499B2 (en) * | 2003-05-09 | 2008-07-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Architecture for partition computation and propagation of changes in data replication |
US7424671B2 (en) * | 2003-05-16 | 2008-09-09 | Justsystems Canada Inc. | Methods and systems for enabling collaborative authoring of hierarchical documents |
US20050010576A1 (en) * | 2003-07-09 | 2005-01-13 | Liwei Ren | File differencing and updating engines |
US20050033811A1 (en) * | 2003-08-07 | 2005-02-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Collaborative email |
JP2005092583A (en) * | 2003-09-18 | 2005-04-07 | Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> | Method, device, and program for storing metadata, recording medium with the program recorded thereon |
US7203708B2 (en) * | 2003-11-06 | 2007-04-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Optimizing file replication using binary comparisons |
US20050289152A1 (en) * | 2004-06-10 | 2005-12-29 | Earl William J | Method and apparatus for implementing a file system |
US7313575B2 (en) * | 2004-06-14 | 2007-12-25 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Data services handler |
US7873669B2 (en) * | 2004-07-09 | 2011-01-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Direct write back systems and methodologies |
US7613787B2 (en) * | 2004-09-24 | 2009-11-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Efficient algorithm for finding candidate objects for remote differential compression |
US7401192B2 (en) * | 2004-10-04 | 2008-07-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of replicating a file using a base, delta, and reference file |
US7933868B2 (en) * | 2004-11-04 | 2011-04-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for partition level cleanup of replication conflict metadata |
WO2006052946A2 (en) * | 2004-11-08 | 2006-05-18 | Innopath Software, Inc. | Static file system differencing and updating |
US7480654B2 (en) * | 2004-12-20 | 2009-01-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Achieving cache consistency while allowing concurrent changes to metadata |
US7519579B2 (en) * | 2004-12-20 | 2009-04-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for updating a summary page of a document |
US7953794B2 (en) | 2005-01-14 | 2011-05-31 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for transitioning between synchronous and asynchronous communication modes |
US7720890B2 (en) * | 2005-02-22 | 2010-05-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Ghosted synchronization |
US7680835B2 (en) * | 2005-02-28 | 2010-03-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Online storage with metadata-based retrieval |
WO2006113597A2 (en) * | 2005-04-14 | 2006-10-26 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Method for information retrieval |
US20060242204A1 (en) * | 2005-04-22 | 2006-10-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Sync manager conflict resolution |
KR100733054B1 (en) | 2005-07-27 | 2007-06-27 | 주식회사 유텍 | Document Conversion System Using Synchronization of Structured Documents, And It's Method |
US7606812B2 (en) * | 2005-11-04 | 2009-10-20 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Dynamic intent log |
US7801864B2 (en) * | 2005-11-28 | 2010-09-21 | Commvault Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for using metadata to enhance data identification operations |
CN101005428A (en) * | 2006-01-19 | 2007-07-25 | 华为技术有限公司 | Realizing method for detecting and resolving data synchronous conflict |
US20070198659A1 (en) * | 2006-01-25 | 2007-08-23 | Lam Wai T | Method and system for storing data |
US8307119B2 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2012-11-06 | Google Inc. | Collaborative online spreadsheet application |
EP2014097A4 (en) | 2006-05-03 | 2010-07-14 | Ericsson Telefon Ab L M | Method and apparatus for re-constructing media from a media representation |
US20080059539A1 (en) | 2006-08-08 | 2008-03-06 | Richard Chin | Document Collaboration System and Method |
JP2008077485A (en) * | 2006-09-22 | 2008-04-03 | Sharp Corp | Communication terminal device and control program |
JP2008165299A (en) * | 2006-12-27 | 2008-07-17 | Update It Inc | Document preparation system |
US20080163056A1 (en) * | 2006-12-28 | 2008-07-03 | Thibaut Lamadon | Method and apparatus for providing a graphical representation of content |
US7933952B2 (en) * | 2007-06-29 | 2011-04-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Collaborative document authoring |
US20090144654A1 (en) * | 2007-10-03 | 2009-06-04 | Robert Brouwer | Methods and apparatus for facilitating content consumption |
US20090106454A1 (en) * | 2007-10-17 | 2009-04-23 | Girle David A | Independent synchronization of meta-data between devices |
US7941399B2 (en) * | 2007-11-09 | 2011-05-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Collaborative authoring |
US9436927B2 (en) | 2008-03-14 | 2016-09-06 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Web-based multiuser collaboration |
US9262764B2 (en) * | 2008-04-30 | 2016-02-16 | Yahoo! Inc. | Modification of content representation by a brand engine in a social network |
US8078957B2 (en) * | 2008-05-02 | 2011-12-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Document synchronization over stateless protocols |
US8219526B2 (en) * | 2009-06-05 | 2012-07-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model |
-
2009
- 2009-06-05 US US12/479,189 patent/US8219526B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2010
- 2010-06-01 SG SG2011079316A patent/SG175387A1/en unknown
- 2010-06-01 AU AU2010256703A patent/AU2010256703B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2010-06-01 JP JP2012514057A patent/JP5280583B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2010-06-01 CA CA2761165A patent/CA2761165C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2010-06-01 WO PCT/US2010/036968 patent/WO2010141517A2/en active Application Filing
- 2010-06-01 MX MX2011012937A patent/MX2011012937A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2010-06-01 MY MYPI2011005776A patent/MY163754A/en unknown
- 2010-06-01 EP EP10783964A patent/EP2438526A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2010-06-01 RU RU2011149273/08A patent/RU2554845C2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2010-06-01 CN CN2010800252229A patent/CN102460409A/en active Pending
- 2010-06-01 KR KR1020117028994A patent/KR101655497B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2010-06-01 BR BRPI1011684A patent/BRPI1011684A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2010-06-01 KR KR1020167023991A patent/KR101740207B1/en active IP Right Grant
-
2011
- 2011-10-27 ZA ZA2011/07867A patent/ZA201107867B/en unknown
- 2011-10-30 IL IL216022A patent/IL216022A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2011-12-02 CL CL2011003047A patent/CL2011003047A1/en unknown
-
2012
- 2012-06-12 US US13/494,685 patent/US8572030B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2013
- 2013-05-22 JP JP2013108070A patent/JP5646686B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2016
- 2016-03-16 IL IL244625A patent/IL244625A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050223047A1 (en) | 2003-08-21 | 2005-10-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and methods for synchronizing computer systems through an intermediary file system share or device |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20120246117A1 (en) | 2012-09-27 |
JP2012529118A (en) | 2012-11-15 |
MX2011012937A (en) | 2012-01-27 |
CN102460409A (en) | 2012-05-16 |
MY163754A (en) | 2017-10-17 |
US20100312758A1 (en) | 2010-12-09 |
BRPI1011684A2 (en) | 2016-03-22 |
US8219526B2 (en) | 2012-07-10 |
JP5280583B2 (en) | 2013-09-04 |
IL216022A (en) | 2016-03-31 |
KR20120017442A (en) | 2012-02-28 |
JP5646686B2 (en) | 2014-12-24 |
AU2010256703A1 (en) | 2011-11-17 |
KR101655497B1 (en) | 2016-09-07 |
EP2438526A4 (en) | 2012-11-28 |
SG175387A1 (en) | 2011-12-29 |
ZA201107867B (en) | 2013-01-30 |
EP2438526A2 (en) | 2012-04-11 |
RU2011149273A (en) | 2013-06-10 |
CA2761165A1 (en) | 2010-12-09 |
WO2010141517A3 (en) | 2011-02-17 |
KR20160106774A (en) | 2016-09-12 |
CA2761165C (en) | 2017-02-28 |
KR101740207B1 (en) | 2017-05-25 |
AU2010256703B2 (en) | 2014-07-17 |
IL216022A0 (en) | 2012-01-31 |
US8572030B2 (en) | 2013-10-29 |
RU2554845C2 (en) | 2015-06-27 |
CL2011003047A1 (en) | 2012-06-15 |
JP2013211036A (en) | 2013-10-10 |
IL244625A0 (en) | 2016-04-21 |
IL244625A (en) | 2017-04-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2761165C (en) | Synchronizing file partitions utilizing a server storage model | |
US10755234B2 (en) | System and method for offline synchronization of exception items of shared services for client applications | |
US10606809B2 (en) | Multi-master text synchronization using deltas | |
EP3408745B1 (en) | Automatically updating a hybrid application | |
US11132420B2 (en) | Utilizing server pre-processing to deploy renditions of electronic documents in a computer network | |
KR101501174B1 (en) | Network operating system | |
EP1452982A2 (en) | A method for managing multiple file states for replicated files | |
KR101574816B1 (en) | Asynchronous replication | |
WO2009079116A2 (en) | Collaborative authoring modes | |
US8346869B2 (en) | Granular data synchronization for editing multiple data objects | |
KR101586419B1 (en) | Gesture-based collaboration | |
Mehta et al. | Mobile AJAX Applications: Going Far Without The Bars |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 201080025222.9 Country of ref document: CN |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 10783964 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A2 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 216022 Country of ref document: IL |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2761165 Country of ref document: CA |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2010256703 Country of ref document: AU Date of ref document: 20100601 Kind code of ref document: A |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2012514057 Country of ref document: JP |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2011149273 Country of ref document: RU Kind code of ref document: A Ref document number: 20117028994 Country of ref document: KR Kind code of ref document: A |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2011003047 Country of ref document: CL Ref document number: 9498/DELNP/2011 Country of ref document: IN Ref document number: MX/A/2011/012937 Country of ref document: MX |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2010783964 Country of ref document: EP |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: BR Ref legal event code: B01A Ref document number: PI1011684 Country of ref document: BR |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 244625 Country of ref document: IL |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: PI1011684 Country of ref document: BR Kind code of ref document: A2 Effective date: 20111130 |