WO2010140930A1 - Système de diagnostic de vanne d'écoulement dans fourneau industriel - Google Patents

Système de diagnostic de vanne d'écoulement dans fourneau industriel Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2010140930A1
WO2010140930A1 PCT/SE2009/050641 SE2009050641W WO2010140930A1 WO 2010140930 A1 WO2010140930 A1 WO 2010140930A1 SE 2009050641 W SE2009050641 W SE 2009050641W WO 2010140930 A1 WO2010140930 A1 WO 2010140930A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
valve
measurement value
interval
certain
furnace
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/SE2009/050641
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Tomas Ekman
Original Assignee
Linde Ag
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Linde Ag filed Critical Linde Ag
Priority to PCT/SE2009/050641 priority Critical patent/WO2010140930A1/fr
Publication of WO2010140930A1 publication Critical patent/WO2010140930A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F27—FURNACES; KILNS; OVENS; RETORTS
    • F27D—DETAILS OR ACCESSORIES OF FURNACES, KILNS, OVENS, OR RETORTS, IN SO FAR AS THEY ARE OF KINDS OCCURRING IN MORE THAN ONE KIND OF FURNACE
    • F27D19/00—Arrangements of controlling devices
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
    • F16K—VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; DEVICES FOR VENTING OR AERATING
    • F16K37/00—Special means in or on valves or other cut-off apparatus for indicating or recording operation thereof, or for enabling an alarm to be given
    • F16K37/0075—For recording or indicating the functioning of a valve in combination with test equipment
    • F16K37/0083—For recording or indicating the functioning of a valve in combination with test equipment by measuring valve parameters
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
    • F16K—VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; DEVICES FOR VENTING OR AERATING
    • F16K37/00—Special means in or on valves or other cut-off apparatus for indicating or recording operation thereof, or for enabling an alarm to be given
    • F16K37/0075—For recording or indicating the functioning of a valve in combination with test equipment
    • F16K37/0091—For recording or indicating the functioning of a valve in combination with test equipment by measuring fluid parameters
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F27—FURNACES; KILNS; OVENS; RETORTS
    • F27D—DETAILS OR ACCESSORIES OF FURNACES, KILNS, OVENS, OR RETORTS, IN SO FAR AS THEY ARE OF KINDS OCCURRING IN MORE THAN ONE KIND OF FURNACE
    • F27D21/00—Arrangements of monitoring devices; Arrangements of safety devices

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a diagnostic system for industrial furnaces. More precisely, the present invention relates to industrial furnaces, where at least one burner is used for heating of the volume of the industrial furnaces, which furnaces are equipped with an existing control system for a burner and/or a flow valve.
  • arranged in an industrial furnace shall herein be seen as also comprising components that are arranged in the peripheral systems of the furnace, such as for example an external control system.
  • the present invention solves the above described problems.
  • the present invention relates to a method of diagnosis of the operation of a flow valve arranged in an industrial furnace with an existing control system, which control system is equipped with at least two sensors for two or several of the magnitudes pressure downstream or upstream in relation to the valve, pressure drop across the valve, pressure rise across the valve, temperature downstream or upstream in relation to the valve, flow through the valve, valve position and/or a time derivative of any one of these magnitudes, where the magnitudes vary over time and are correlated during operation, and is characterised in that a certain measurement value from a certain sensor is compared to a predetermined function of at least one comparison measurement value from another sensor, in that the certain measurement value is compared to a predetermined interval around the function, which interval is expressed either as a percentage or in absolute terms with respect to the value of the function, and in that a diagnostic alarm is set off when the certain mea- surment value consistently falls outside of this interval during a predetermined time period.
  • FIG. 1 is an overview representation of an industrial furnace, in which the present invention is applied.
  • FIG. 2a is a simplified, two-dimensional graph, showing a primary diagnosis of a flow valve in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIG. 2a is a simplified, two-dimensional graph, showing a secondary diagnosis of a flow valve in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIG. 2a is a simplified, three-dimensional graph, showing a primary diagnosis of a flow valve in accordance with the present invention.
  • Figure 1 shows an industrial furnace 1 which has a heated volume 2, a burner 3 and an exhaust valve 4.
  • the burner 3 may be of any type, heating the heated volume 2 of the furnace 1. Via a pipe work 5 it is connected to an feed valve 7 for fuel and to another feed valve 6 for oxidant.
  • the fuel may be any suitable fuel, such as a liquid hydrocarbon.
  • the oxidant may for example be air or 80% oxygen.
  • the exhaust valve 4 is arranged at the opposite side of the furnace 1 as seen from the burner 3, and is connected to a chimney 10 or the like, via a pipe work 9. However, the ex- haust valve 4 may be arranged in other locations of the furnace 1. Hence, flue gases from the furnace 1 flow out through the exhaust valve 4 and further through the pipe work 9.
  • a control system 11 is arranged to ⁇ control the operation of the furnace 1.
  • the control system 11 receives information regarding the operation from at least two sensors, arranged at respective strategic locations in the furnace 1.
  • sensors In the present exemplifying industrial furnace 1, there are arranged a number of sensors, whereof some for reasons of clarity are not shown in the Figure 1.
  • Those shown in Figure 1 comprise:
  • the control system 11 is arranged to control the flow through the valve 4 by controlling the valve position.
  • the control system 11 is arranged to control the flow through the valve 7 by controlling the valve position.
  • a sensor 12a for the temperature inside the heated volume 2 of the furnace 1.
  • a sensor 12b for the pressure inside the heated volume 2 of the furnace 1.
  • a pressure regulator 8 is driven so that a predetermined, constant pressure is maintained in the feed conduit for fuel upstream of the valve 7.
  • the feed conduit for oxidant may for example be driven with a similar pressure regulator means and a sensor means as the feed conduit for fuel.
  • control means arranged in the furnace 1, among other things in order to control different valve position. For reasons of clarity, several such means and parts are not shown in Figure 1.
  • All sensors and control means arranged in the furnace 1 constitute parts of the existing control system 11 for the oper- ation of the furnace 1. It is preferred that the present invention is applied to the operation of an industrial furnace without any additional sensors or control means being arranged in the furnace as a direct consequence solely of the application of the invention, but that the already existing equipment, constituting parts of the control system 11, is used. This results in substantial cost savings in comparison to installing a separate system including hardware for the diagnosis of the operation of the furnace 1.
  • the present invention in no part relates to the control of the operation of an industrial furnace, it rather relates merely to a passive diagnosis of the operation, with the purpose of simple and reliable early- discovery of errors.
  • control system 11 is equipped with at least two sensors for pressure, pressure fall, pressure rise, tempera- ture, flow, valve position and/or an expression which is a time derivative of any one of these magnitudes.
  • diag- nostics module 13 Data from the various sensors is continuously fed to a diag- nostics module 13.
  • the diagnostics module 13 is shown as a separate unit. However, it is realised that the diagnostics module 13 preferably is implemented in the form of a software module, intended for execution in an existing computer environment in connection to the furnace 1.
  • the diagnostics module 13 is shown with a symbolic alarm device 14.
  • This alarm device 14 is arranged to emit diagnostic alarms and is preferably arranged at least partly in the form of software, which efficiently directs the attention of operation personnel to the fact that a diagnosed component needs attention, for example by the use of electronic communication via existing computer screens used for operation surveillance.
  • the diagnostics module 13 is arranged to, during the opera- tion of the furnace 1, continuously diagnose selected flow valves that are arranged in the furnace 1. Such a diagnosis of a certain valve takes place by a certain measurement value, in the following denoted “surveilled measurement value”, from a certain sensor being compared to a predetermined func- tion of at least one other measurement value from another sensor, in the following denoted “comparison measurement value”, and by the surveilled measurement value being compared to a predetermined acceptable interval around the func- tion.
  • the measurement values used for the diagnosis of a certain valve must to some extent be correlated during the operation of the furnace 1, in other words they must not be independent variables.
  • a diagnostic alarm regarding the valve is set off in case the surveilled measurement value falls outside of the acceptable interval. More precisely, according to the invention, the diagnostic alarm is set off in case the surveilled measure- ment value is found to consistently fall outside of the acceptable interval during a certain predetermined minimum time period. This way, the number of false alarms can be kept to a minimum, since temporary effects due to various events, such as the switching to another operating state, externally or internally to the furnace 1, not per se indicating an increased risk of operation malfunctioning, will often not set off the alarm.
  • the length of the predetermined time period may vary across various applications, but is preferably less than or equal to 60 seconds, more preferably less than or equal to 30 seconds, most preferably less than or equal to 10 seconds .
  • the acceptable interval is formulated beforehand, either as a percentage or in absolute terms in relation to the value of the function in each point. Moreover, the interval may be formulated as a function of the comparison measurement values .
  • both the function and the interval for each diagnosed component is determined empirically during the installation and the trimming of the furnace 1.
  • the empirical determination may of course also be carried out periodically or when the operation of the furnace 1 somehow is altered.
  • the intent of the empirical determination is that the function should define an average normal state regarding the diagnosted component during the operation of the industrial furnace, and that the interval shall define the limits of deviation from the average normal state which are deemed to be acceptable for the diagnosted valve. That a deviation is deemed to be normal means that the deviation is not so large that it is to be feared that it means or risks leading to operation errors.
  • the acceptable interval for each diagnosed valve is preferably made so narrow so that a diagnostic alarm is set off essentially before the surveilled measurement value is so far from the value of the function so that the risk of a fatal error in the diagnosed valve or in equipment arranged in connection to the valve, or an error with fatal consequences of any type, becomes unacceptably large.
  • the certain measurement value that is the controlled value for the feed valve 7 for fuel
  • the valve position is controlled by the control system 11 with the purpose of achieving a certain predetermined flow through the valve 7, which flow is measured by the aid of the sensor 7b.
  • the measurement value is continuously compared to a function of the comparison measurement value, namely the flow through the feed valve 7 itself. It is realised that a correlation is present between the certain measurement value and the comparison measurement value because of the above described control of the valve position.
  • Figure 2a is a graph, along the Y-axis of which illustrates a function f ia , representing the normal value during operation for the certain measurement value, that is for the valve position, as a function of the comparison aprameter, that is the flow.
  • the X-axis shows the flow
  • the Y-axis shows the valve position.
  • the expected result during unproblematic operation is that the valve position increases with increasing flow.
  • the detailed pattern of the increase depends on several parameters besides the design of the control system 10, among other things the construction of the valve 7, and has, for the specific industrial furnace 1 used in this embodiment, been measured empirically to be the curve f ia illustrated in Figure 2a during normal conditions of operation.
  • valve position is more opened or more closed than the normal value according to the function f ⁇ a for a certain flow
  • This disturbance may be in the form or wear, leakage, clogging or similar.
  • the acceptable interval Ii a is either formulated as the value of the function ⁇ 10% of the value of a completely open position. In this case, another preferred definition of the interval is Ii a ⁇ 30% of the measured value at normal operation.
  • the flow will to some extent vary around the average normal state illustrated by the function f ia .
  • the flow on the other hand varies outside of the interval I la , it is estimated to be so far from normal so that an error may be feared. Since the interval Ii a is empirically determined beforehand by operation personnel, problems with systematical errors and accustoming are avoided when it comes to discovering gradually arising errors.
  • the alarm device 14 sets off an alarm to the operation personnel.
  • the operation personnel can conclude that an error has arisen along the conduit for fuel.
  • a secondary analysis comprises that a certain secondary measurement value, in this exemplifying case the pressure downstream in relation to the valve 7, which pressure is measured by the sensor 7c, is compared to a certain secondary comparison measurement value, in this case the flow through the valve 7, which flow again is measured by the sensor 7b.
  • the comparison measurement value for the secondary analysis is not different from that of the primary analysis, but it is realised that the comparison measurement value in applicable cases may be the same or different for several analyses.
  • Figure 2b shows a function fi b , established beforehand so that it reflects normal values during operation for the pressure downstream in relation to the valve 7, as a function of the flow through the valve 7.
  • An interval Ii b has also been established, in a way which is similar to that for the interval Ii a , around the function fi b , within which interval the measurement value from the pressure sensor 7c is deemed to vary during normal operation for each given flow.
  • the position for the valve 7 for example turns out to be too open in comparison to the flow through the valve 7 in the primary analysis, operation personnel may obtain more precise information regarding any sources of error via the result from the seconary analysis.
  • the pressure in the secondary analysis is lower than what is normal, that is if the pressure measured by the sensor 7c falls below the lower limit of the interval li b , it is possible that the valve 7 is plugged or damaged.
  • an error such as a leakage, in or downstream of the pressure regulator 8, is present, leading to the pressure upstream of the flow sensor 7b being lower than what is normal.
  • Table 1 shows how various outcomes of the primary and the secondary analysis, respectively, can give guidance to operation personnel with respect to possible sources of errors in the system, in a manner which is similar to that described above.
  • VO denotes that the certain measurement value in the primary analysis, that is the position of the valve 7, is more open than what is normal
  • VC that it is more closed than what is normal
  • PH that the certain measurement value in the secondary analysis, that is the pressure downstream of the valve 7, is higher than what is normal
  • PL that it is lower than what is normal.
  • VN and “PN”, respectively, denote a normal state of the valve position and the pressure, in other words that the certain measurement value falls within the acceptable interval.
  • VN PL Smaller leakage downstream of valve 7
  • VN PN Normal operation, no sources of errors
  • the alarm will be set off substantially earlier than what in many cases has been possible earlier, for example in the case with damages that are slowly coming into existance, for example of the type wear damages.
  • the alarm is set off when the surveilled measurement value consistently falls outside of the interval during the predetermined time period, regardless of which value the measurement value has had historically.
  • the certain surveilled measurement value is the controlled position of the exhaust valve 4 for flue gases, the position of which is measured by the sensor 4b.
  • This measurement value is continuously compared to a function of two comparison measurement values.
  • the first comparison measurement value is the total influx of fuel and oxidant into the furnace 1, which is measured by the sensor ⁇ a in combination with the sensor 7b.
  • the second comparison measurement value is the temperature inside the heated volume 2 of the furnace 1, which is measured by the sensor 12a.
  • Figure 3 is a graph, along the Z-axis of which is illustrated a function f 2a describing the average position of the valve 4 as the comparison parameters vary under normal operation conditions.
  • the X-axis shows the influx.
  • the Y-axis shows the temperature.
  • a two-dimensional surface is shown, where the value in the Z-direction varies with the two comparison parameters.
  • the form of the function f 2a is empirically measured in a way which is similar to that for the function f la .
  • the valve position is controlled by the control system 11 with the purpose of among other things maintaining a correct operating pressure inside the furnace 1. Since both the comparison parameters, in combination among other things with the flow through the valve 4b, affect the said operating pressure, there is a correlation between the certain measurement value and both the respective comparison measurement values.
  • the acceptable interval I 2a whithin which the valve position must be if the diagnostics module 13 will not give rise to a diagnostic alarm during operation, is not shown in Figure 3.
  • the interval I 2a would in Figure 3 be represented as two surfaces, one on either side of the func- tion f 2a , between which surfaces the acceptable values for the valve position are found for different values of the influx and the temperature, respectively.
  • the interval I 2a may be formulated as the value of the function f 2a ⁇ 10%.
  • the formulation of the interval Ii a , lib/ I2a/ the acceptble interval may thus be formulated either in absolute terms or as a percentage.
  • More precise information regarding the source of the error may, in a manner similar to the one described above in connection to the surveillance of the fuel valve 7, be achieved by carrying out one or several secondary analyses.
  • One exem- pie of such a secondary analysis is to compare pressure inside the heated volume 2 of the furnace 1, which pressure is measured by the pressure sensor 12b, to an empirically measured normal state function f ⁇ b of the two comparison parameters, namely the temperature in the heated volume 2 of the furnace 1 and the flow in the furnace 1, and to an acceptable interval 1 2b associated therewith. This process is similar to the one described above regarding the secondary analysis of the fuel valve 7, the function f lb and the interval Ii b .
  • both the primary as well as the secondary analysis is carried out continuously. If either the flow through the valve 4 or the pressure inside the heated volume 2 of the furnace 1 falls outside their respective acceptable interval I 2a/ I ⁇ b? this is a sign of that an error may be present in connection to the valve 4. Hence, when this happens consistently during the predetermined time period, a diagnostic alarm is issued to the operation personnel, and suitable actions may quickly and efficiently be carried out depending on the more precise nature of the valve problem. Thus, this is also true for errors of the type that arises gradually, such as for example valve wear. In this latter case, a diagnostic alarm is issued well before the wear has continued so long that the risk of fatal errors becomes unac- ceptably large.
  • Table 2 shows how different outcomes of the primary and the secondary analysis, respectively, may give guidance to opera- tion personnel with respect to possible sources of errors in the system.
  • VO denotes that the certain measurement value in the primary analysis, that is the position of the valve 4, is more open than what is normal
  • VC that it is more closed than what is normal
  • PH that the certain measurement value in the secondary analysis, that is the pressure inside the heated volume 2 of the furnace 1, is higher than what is normal
  • PL that it is lower than what is normal.
  • VN and “PN”, respectively, denote a normal state of the valve position and the pressure, respectively, in other words that the certain measurement value falls within the acceptable interval.
  • VN PN Normal operation , no error sources
  • the method of the present invention may be applied both to valves that may be controlled over a range of values, possibly a continuous range, but also to on/off valves, that is valves that are associated only with an opened "on” state and a closed “off” state.
  • on/off valves that is valves that are associated only with an opened "on” state and a closed “off” state.
  • diagnostic alarms it is preferable to only allow diagnostic alarms to be set off when the valve in question is not set to its "off” state. This way, false alarms are avoided for valves not being used at the moment .
  • any suitable function using continuously measured values for pressure, pressure fall, pressure rise, temperature, flow, valve position and/or an expression which is a time derivative of any one of these magnitudes as input parameters may be used as the function to which the surveilled measurement value is compared during the diagnosis of a valve in an industrial furnace.
  • Which magnitudes or derivatives that are chosen, as well as the mathe- matical expression of the function and the interval depends on the current operating configurations, among other things the mutual positioning, function and interaction of the components of the furnace, as well as the features of the con- trol system, but also depend, among other things, on the desired fault tolerance of the diagnostics system.
  • the certain measure- ment value For example, other magnitudes other than the instantaneous position of a flow valve may be used as the certain measure- ment value.
  • the time derivative of the valve position may be used as the certain measurement value, and be compared to a function representing a normal operating state, and to an acceptable interval, expressed in terms of for example the time derivative of the flow through the valve.
  • the function representing the normal operating state and the acceptable interval are determined so that they describe the normal operating properties of the flow valve during changes in the flow through the valve.
  • the normal operating characteristics of a flow valve in terms of pressure rises and/or pressure falls across the valve can be empirically determined as a function representing the normal operation, whereafter for example the size of a certain pressure drop or a certain pressure fall across the valve is used as the certain measurement value, and the valve position and the flow through the valve may be used as the comparison measurement values.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Waste-Gas Treatment And Other Accessory Devices For Furnaces (AREA)
  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention porte sur un procédé de diagnostic du fonctionnement d'une vanne d'écoulement (4, 7) agencée dans un fourneau industriel (1) avec un système de commande existant (10), ledit système de commande (10) étant équipé d'au moins deux capteurs (4a, 4b, 6a, 7a, 7b, 7c, 7d, 12a, 12b) pour au moins deux des grandeurs de pression en aval ou en amont par rapport à la vanne, de chute de pression à travers la vanne, d'élévation de pression à travers la vanne, de température en amont ou en aval par rapport à la vanne, d'écoulement à travers la vanne, de position de vanne et/ou d'une dérive dans le temps de l'une quelconque de ces grandeurs, les grandeurs variant au cours du temps et étant corrélées pendant le fonctionnement. L'invention est caractérisée en ce qu'une certaine valeur de mesure provenant d'un certain capteur est comparée à une fonction prédéterminée d'au moins une valeur de mesure de comparaison provenant d'un autre capteur, en ce que la certaine valeur de mesure est comparée à un intervalle prédéterminé autour de la fonction, lequel intervalle est exprimé soit en pourcentage, soit en termes absolus par rapport à la valeur de la fonction, et en ce qu'une alarme de diagnostic est déclenchée lorsque la certaine valeur de mesure tombe de façon constante en dehors de cet intervalle pendant une période de temps prédéterminée.
PCT/SE2009/050641 2009-06-02 2009-06-02 Système de diagnostic de vanne d'écoulement dans fourneau industriel WO2010140930A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/SE2009/050641 WO2010140930A1 (fr) 2009-06-02 2009-06-02 Système de diagnostic de vanne d'écoulement dans fourneau industriel

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/SE2009/050641 WO2010140930A1 (fr) 2009-06-02 2009-06-02 Système de diagnostic de vanne d'écoulement dans fourneau industriel

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2010140930A1 true WO2010140930A1 (fr) 2010-12-09

Family

ID=43297919

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/SE2009/050641 WO2010140930A1 (fr) 2009-06-02 2009-06-02 Système de diagnostic de vanne d'écoulement dans fourneau industriel

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2010140930A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102016216707A1 (de) 2016-09-05 2018-03-08 Ifm Electronic Gmbh Ventilstellungsgeber und Verfahren zu Auswertung der Messwerte

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5329465A (en) * 1987-10-30 1994-07-12 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Online valve diagnostic monitoring system
JPH09151911A (ja) * 1995-11-30 1997-06-10 Nisshin Steel Co Ltd 高炉炉頂油圧設備用電磁弁の異常検出方法および装置
US6131609A (en) * 1996-06-11 2000-10-17 Neles Controls Oy Method for surveying the condition of a control valve, and a valve apparatus
WO2009040349A1 (fr) * 2007-09-24 2009-04-02 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Système et procédé de diagnostic pour une soupape, en particulier une soupape de fermeture ou une soupape de réglage

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5329465A (en) * 1987-10-30 1994-07-12 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Online valve diagnostic monitoring system
JPH09151911A (ja) * 1995-11-30 1997-06-10 Nisshin Steel Co Ltd 高炉炉頂油圧設備用電磁弁の異常検出方法および装置
US6131609A (en) * 1996-06-11 2000-10-17 Neles Controls Oy Method for surveying the condition of a control valve, and a valve apparatus
WO2009040349A1 (fr) * 2007-09-24 2009-04-02 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Système et procédé de diagnostic pour une soupape, en particulier une soupape de fermeture ou une soupape de réglage

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102016216707A1 (de) 2016-09-05 2018-03-08 Ifm Electronic Gmbh Ventilstellungsgeber und Verfahren zu Auswertung der Messwerte
DE102016216707B4 (de) 2016-09-05 2020-07-09 Ifm Electronic Gmbh Ventilstellungsgeber und Verfahren zu Auswertung der Messwerte

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2013224891B2 (en) Method and system for real time dry low nitrogen oxide (DLN) and diffusion combustion monitoring
EP1445450B1 (fr) Méthode pour la surveillance de la performance d'un système de turbine à gaz
CN1097153C (zh) 监视带有多个喷燃器的燃气轮机的供给系统的方法及装置
US5878566A (en) Gas turbine and a gas turbine control method
US20140344007A1 (en) Plant operating point determination by integrating profit profile and risk profile
CN102345515A (zh) 用于控制燃料分流至燃气轮机燃烧器的方法
US20090120111A1 (en) Remote Diagnostics and Prognostics for Refrigerant Systems
US8578763B2 (en) System and method for fuel system health monitoring
CA2870918C (fr) Controle de combustion selon une limite croisee pour un four avec des caracteristiques de diagnostic en temps reel
EP2017531B1 (fr) Procédé de vérification d'un signal issu d'électrodes d'ionisation pour brûleurs
WO2020158072A1 (fr) Système de surveillance, procédé de surveillance et programme de surveillance pour équipement utilisant de la vapeur
WO2010140930A1 (fr) Système de diagnostic de vanne d'écoulement dans fourneau industriel
EP3324118B1 (fr) Système de commande d'émission à charge partielle faible pour système de combustion de système de turbine à gaz
EP2458179B1 (fr) Procédé de surveillance d'un système électronique de commande de moteur pour détecter l'encrassement d'un filtre à carburant
EP3101342B1 (fr) Procédé et système pour faire fonctionner un dispositif de combustion
US20150075170A1 (en) Method and system for augmenting the detection reliability of secondary flame detectors in a gas turbine
JP2002039531A (ja) 燃焼状態の診断方法
JP6339956B2 (ja) 不具合要因特定支援装置および不具合要因特定支援方法
US9696697B2 (en) Automatic switching of HMI screens based on process, task, and abnormal deviation in a power plant
SE531849C2 (sv) Diagnosförfarande för att diagnostisera driften av en flödesventil anordnad i en industriugn
JP2013177860A (ja) 発電設備の運転支援装置
JP2011007428A (ja) ボイラの運転継続方法
EP4163697A1 (fr) Système de maintenance de lentille de détecteur de flamme
US20160215703A1 (en) Control system for can-to-can variation in combustor system and related method
Sisk et al. Automated diagnostics software requirements specification, Version 1.1

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 09845601

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 09845601

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1