WO2010136320A1 - Fermented soy-based food product - Google Patents

Fermented soy-based food product Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2010136320A1
WO2010136320A1 PCT/EP2010/056271 EP2010056271W WO2010136320A1 WO 2010136320 A1 WO2010136320 A1 WO 2010136320A1 EP 2010056271 W EP2010056271 W EP 2010056271W WO 2010136320 A1 WO2010136320 A1 WO 2010136320A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
soy
process according
lab
fermentation
thermophilic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/EP2010/056271
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Christoph Hendrik Beckmann
Marie-Solenne Coic
Michel Mellema
Jan Willem Sanders
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hindustan Unilever Ltd
Unilever NV
Original Assignee
Hindustan Unilever Ltd
Unilever NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hindustan Unilever Ltd, Unilever NV filed Critical Hindustan Unilever Ltd
Priority to BRPI1007568A priority Critical patent/BRPI1007568A8/en
Priority to CN201080022808XA priority patent/CN102448319A/en
Priority to MX2011012486A priority patent/MX2011012486A/en
Publication of WO2010136320A1 publication Critical patent/WO2010136320A1/en
Priority to ZA2011/07801A priority patent/ZA201107801B/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23JPROTEIN COMPOSITIONS FOR FOODSTUFFS; WORKING-UP PROTEINS FOR FOODSTUFFS; PHOSPHATIDE COMPOSITIONS FOR FOODSTUFFS
    • A23J3/00Working-up of proteins for foodstuffs
    • A23J3/14Vegetable proteins
    • A23J3/16Vegetable proteins from soybean
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23LFOODS, FOODSTUFFS OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; PREPARATION OR TREATMENT THEREOF
    • A23L11/00Pulses, i.e. fruits of leguminous plants, for production of food; Products from legumes; Preparation or treatment thereof
    • A23L11/30Removing undesirable substances, e.g. bitter substances
    • A23L11/37Removing undesirable substances, e.g. bitter substances using microorganisms
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23LFOODS, FOODSTUFFS OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; PREPARATION OR TREATMENT THEREOF
    • A23L2/00Non-alcoholic beverages; Dry compositions or concentrates therefor; Preparation or treatment thereof
    • A23L2/52Adding ingredients
    • A23L2/66Proteins
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23LFOODS, FOODSTUFFS OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; PREPARATION OR TREATMENT THEREOF
    • A23L5/00Preparation or treatment of foods or foodstuffs, in general; Food or foodstuffs obtained thereby; Materials therefor
    • A23L5/20Removal of unwanted matter, e.g. deodorisation or detoxification
    • A23L5/28Removal of unwanted matter, e.g. deodorisation or detoxification using microorganisms

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the field of fermented (or cultured) soy-containing products, especially fermented soy-based beverages.
  • soy protein In addition, interest for milk replacement by soy protein has increased in view of, on the one hand, issues in relation to over-sensitivity and/or intolerance towards milk constituents experienced by growing numbers of consumers, a desire for products suitable for (strict) vegetarians and, on the other hand, elevated milk protein prices and supply issues that some manufacturers are experiencing relative to this commodity. Soy proteins have been proposed to replace milk proteins, either partially or totally, depending on the system, and dairy-like products have been developed based entirely on soy protein.
  • soy protein In view of soy protein's documented health benefits it is desirable to incorporate substantial quantities of soy protein in beverages.
  • incorporation of soy protein into e.g. beverages presents several challenges.
  • the incorporation of soy protein in beverages is known to impart a noticeable aftertaste and a distinctive "beany" taste.
  • Different types of processes to isolate soy protein have been proposed which aim to remove these undesirable (off-) flavour-notes.
  • it is almost impossible to completely remove the typical soy "off-notes” from sources of soy protein such as soy concentrates and soy isolates.
  • the intensity of soy off-notes increases during processing and storage, probably as a result of the formation of off-flavour compounds from precursor molecules.
  • US 3,364,034 describes a method for removing characteristic flavour and/or odour from vegetable protein materials to provide a substantially bland product, comprising: inoculating said protein materials with bacteria selected from the group consisting of Lactobacillus lactis, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Leuconostoc citrovorum, Pediococcus cerivisiae, Pseudomonas ovalis, Pseudomonae tragi, Aerobacter aerogenes, Streptococcus lactis, incubating for 16-144 hours under conditions conducive to bacterial growth; and terminating said bacterial growth after said material is rendered substantially bland.
  • bacteria selected from the group consisting of Lactobacillus lactis, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Leuconostoc citrovorum, Pediococcus cerivisiae, Pseudomonas ovalis, Ps
  • US 4,664,919 describes a process for producing yogurt-like food, comprising fermenting soy milk with Streptococcus sojalactis. It is observed in the US patent that the yogurt-like food so obtained does not have peculiar 'green' smell of soy milk and that it has a good taste. It is further stated that the aforementioned Streptococcus strain is capable of removing the 'green' smell of soybeans and that the amount of diacetyl and acetone formed is larger than that of other lactic acid bacteria. Data provided about the Streptococcus sojalactis show that the micro-organism is capable of growing at temperatures in the range of 30-40 0 C, but not at 20 0 C or less or at temperatures of 45 0 C or higher.
  • US 6,599,543 relates to process for preparing a fermented soybean milk comprising: contacting dehulled and dehypocotyl whole soybeans with warm or hot water; removing warm or hot water-soluble component from the soybeans; pulverizing the soybeans to make a slurry; removing insoluble component from the slurry to make a soybean milk, inoculating a lactic acid bacterium of the genus Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus bulgaricus and one strain selected from the group consisting of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei into the soybean milk, adding one or more saccharides which can be utilized by the lactic acid bacterium to the soybean milk, and fermenting the soybean milk to produce the fermented soybean milk.
  • EP-A 0 386 817 describes a process of preparing a fermented soymilk, which comprises the steps of: a) inoculating soymilk with an exocellular polysaccharide-forming lactic acid bacterium; b) incubating the inoculated soymilk; and c) recovering the fermented product.
  • Example 1 of the European patent application describes how 100 ml of soybean milk containing 0.5 wt.% of a added lactose was fermented with a culture of exocellular polysaccharide-forming lactic acid bacteria ⁇ Streptococcus cremoris) for 15 hours at 25 0 C, after which the pH had dropped to 4.6. After fermentation, a product was obtained with a highly viscous consistency and practically no beany flavour.
  • EP-A 1 145 648 describes a method of preparing a lactic acid fermented soy proteinaceous food ingredient with reduced levels of flatulence inducing oligosaccharides and conserved levels of isoflavones, said method comprising: a) providing an aqueous crude soy material containing soy protein, flatulence-inducing oligosaccharides, and isoflavones; and b) simultaneously treating the aqueous crude soy material with (1 ) a source of glycosidase activity that is effective to hydrolyze the flatulence-inducing oligosaccharides to fermentable saccharides and (2) a lactic acid producing culture that ferments the fermentable saccharides.
  • Example 2 describes how a 30% solids slurry of defatted soy flour in water was simultaneously inoculated with about 5 percent of a lactic acid culture (mixture of Lactococus lactis and Streptococcus cremoris) and about 0.01 percent of ⁇ - galactosidase enzyme.
  • the inoculated slurry was held at 35 0 C for 4 hours, during which time the pH dropped from 6.6 to 5.3.
  • JP-A-2004-261003 describes a method of preparing fermented soybean milk by fermenting soybean milk and by adding palatinose (isomaltulose) before, during or after fermentation.
  • a starter culture is used that comprises Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus and Streptoccus thermophilus.
  • the drink yogurts disclosed in the Japanese application are extremely sweet as they contain more than 8 wt.% of added disaccharide (isomaltulose and/or sucrose).
  • Murti TW et al., Journal of Food Science (1993), 58(1 ), pages 153-157 describe experiments in which soymilk and cow milk were inoculated with Streptococci, Lactobacilli in the absence or presence of Bifidobacteria and wherein the concentration of a number of volatile compounds was monitored during fermentation.
  • EP 1145648 discloses that low cost soy proteinaceous food ingredients that have reduced levels of those oligosaccharides that lead to abdominal discomfort. Such can be achieved by fermenting soy flour with a dairy culture comprising Lactobacillus helveticus and Lactobacillus casei, or a dairy culture comprising Lactobacillus casei and Streptococcus cremoris.
  • soy protein-containing food product which is processed such that it has a reduced amount of undesired flavour components (compared to products not so processed), and preferably such process should be able to deliver both products (depending on the conditions) that can have a dairy-like flavour character or a more bland flavour character.
  • Such more bland character would allow processing into various other products.
  • such should be achievable with a limited number of different ingredients, to allow for convenient processing. So the aim is that the taste profile can be steered towards a desired one, be it bland or dairy or something in between.
  • a process for modifying the flavour of a soy protein containing substrate comprising the steps of: providing a pasteurised or sterilised aqueous liquid comprising 0.5-15% by weight of dissolved soy protein and at least 0.1 % by weight of carbohydrates, said soy protein being derived from soybeans that have not been dehypocotylized, inoculating said soy protein-containing liquid with bacteria selected from mesophilic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) selected from the group consisting of Lactococcus lactis (incl.
  • LAB mesophilic lactic acid bacteria
  • lactis subspecies lactis, cremoris, and biovar diacetylactis
  • Lactobacillus brevis Lactobacillus fermentum
  • Lactobacillus sake Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis
  • Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides L. acidophilus, L. reuteri, L. rhamnosus
  • LAB thermophilic lactic acid bacteria
  • thermophilic LAB 45 0 C for 0.5-24 hours, and wherein: o inoculation with said mesophilic LAB and thermophilic LAB is done simultaneously, or o inoculation with thermophilic LAB is carried out first and subsequently the inoculation with said mesophilic LAB is carried out in a period of less than 1 hour between both inoculations or o inoculation with said mesophilic LAB is carried out first and subsequently the inoculation with thermophilic LAB is carried out in a period of less than 0.4 hours between both inoculations, wherein the bacteria of said mesophilic LAB and the bacteria of the thermophilic LAB are inoculated in a ratio Cfu of mesophilic LAB to thermophilic LAB of between 10:1 and 1 :100, preferably 1 :1 to 1 :40.
  • the present method employs soy protein derived from soybeans that have not been dehypocotylized (as such avoids additional process steps).
  • the aforementioned soy isolate, soy concentrate and/or soy flour are derived from optionally dehulled soybeans that still comprise the hypocotyl.
  • Most preferably the latter sources of soy protein sources are derived from dehulled soybeans that still comprise the hypocotyls.
  • dehypocotylized soybeans refers to soybeans from which the hypocotyl has been removed. Hypocotyl is a botanical term for a part of a germinating seedling of a seed plant.
  • the plant embryo As the plant embryo grows at germination, it sends out a shoot called a radicle that becomes the primary root and penetrates down into the soil. After emergence of the radicle, the hypocotyl emerges and lifts the growing tip above the ground, bearing the embryonic leaves (called cotyledons) and the plumule that gives rise to the first true leaves.
  • the hypocotyl is the primary organ of extension of the young plant and develops into the stem. Unlike the process taught by US 6,599,543, the present method does not require that the soy protein in the substrate is derived from soybeans from which the hypocotyl has been removed.
  • thermophilic lactic acid bacteria Fermentation of soy protein containing substrates with thermophilic lactic acid bacteria may be known to provide beneficial flavour components to such soy protein preparations, which, when untreated, suffer from off-flavours.
  • the presence of such positive "dairy”and “yoghurt” notes may mask soy off flavours to some extent, but there is a desire for improvement, also as such thermophilic bacteria have a limited ability to reduce the level of components which are present which are responsible to part of the off-flavour.
  • undesired soy off notes are more efficiently removed when a mesophilic culture is added to a thermophilic culture mix.
  • thermophilic lactic acid bacteria are present, the positive effects of the thermophilic lactic acid bacteria are not completely suppressed by the mesophilic lactic acid bacteria, as mesophilic lactic acid bacteria are also known to use as part of their metabolism some of the products produced by the thermophilic lactic acid bacteria. It was also surprisingly found that depending on the reaction conditions (e.g. fermentation time) one could produce a product having a more dairy character in taste, or a more bland character, and for both of which the level of off-flavour components is reduced.
  • the mesophilic LAB is selected from the group consisting of Lactococcus lactis (incl. subspecies lactis, cremoris, and biovar diacetylactis), Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus sake, Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis, Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides, L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus, L. reuteri.
  • Lactococcus lactis incl. subspecies lactis, cremoris, and biovar diacetylactis
  • Lactobacillus brevis Lactobacillus fermentum
  • Lactobacillus sake Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis
  • Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus, L. reuteri.
  • thermophilic herein is to be understood as having a temperature optimum for growth of between 25 and 37°C.
  • thermophilic LAB is selected from the group consisting of Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbruecki, Lactobacillus delbruecki subsp bulgaricus, Lactobacillus delbruecki subsp lactis, L. helveticus.
  • "Thermophilic” herein is to be understood as cultures having a temperature optimum for growth of above 40 0 C and below 50 0 C, preferably 40-46°C, more preferably 41-45°C.
  • lactic acid bacteria refers to acid tolerant, non-sporulating, non-respiring rod-shaped Gram positive bacilli or cocci that produce lactic acid as the major metabolic endproduct of carbohydrate fermentation.
  • lactic acid bacterium does not encompass Bifidobacterium.
  • the bacteria of the mesophilic LAB and the bacteria of the thermophilic LAB are inoculated in a ratio Cfu of mesophilic LAB to thermophilic LAB of between 10:1 and 1 :100, preferably 1 :1 to 1 :40, and more preferably between 1 :1 and 1 :20.
  • the ratio is e.g. depending on the fermentation time and therefore the specific ratio can vary for short fermentation e.g. 3h (leading to a neutral pH product) and long fermentation e.g 8 and 24h (for acidic end product).
  • the actual fermentation itself is preferably carried out at a temperature of 25 to 40 0 C, as at such temperature both will grow and the desired flavour effects are achieved.
  • the duration of the fermentation herein typically lies in the range of 1-12 hours, more preferably of 2-10 hours. According to another preferred embodiment the fermentation time does not exceed 14 hours, even more preferably it does not exceed 10 hours and most preferably it does not exceed 8 hours.
  • the substrate which is inoculated comprises at least 0.1 % by weight of carbohydrates, and preferably comprises between 0.1% and 10%, and more preferably between 0.2% and 5% by weight of carbohydrates.
  • Preferred carbohydrates are in this connection glucose, fructose, galactose, sucrose, raffinose, stachyose, lactose and combinations thereof.
  • the present method enables the preparation of a pleasant tasting beverage without using high amounts of sweetener to mask soy off-flavour notes.
  • the fermented product in the sealed container contains less than 5 wt.% of disaccharides, most preferably less than 4 wt.% of disaccharides.
  • the packaged fermented product contains less than 8 wt.% of mono- and/or disaccharides, most preferably less than 5 wt.% of mono- and/or disaccharides.
  • soy protein present in the substrate to be inoculated As to the level of soy protein present in the substrate to be inoculated: it is believed that the process works well for wide ranges of soy protein concentration. Most commercial products for human consumption will contain between 1 and 5% protein, but the process may well be carried out at lower or higher protein concentrations. In the latter case, the fermentation may be done on a concentrated substrate, which is diluted in one or other form prior to consumption. Such processes on concentrated soy protein may be more economical. In this connection, it is preferred that the liquid which is inoculated comprises soy protein in an amount of 0.1 to 10% by weight, and preferably such is from 0.2 to 5% by weight.
  • soy protein content refers to the total amount of soy protein and soy protein derived peptides contained in the fermented product.
  • the fermented product may be based on soy protein, on soy protein hydrolysate or combinations thereof. As will be understood by the skilled person (enzymatic) hydrolysis of peptide bonds may occur during fermentation.
  • the substrate that is fermented in the present method i.e. the aqueous liquid containing 0.5-15 wt.% of dissolved soy protein is preferably prepared from a soy protein source selected from the group consisting of soy isolate, soy concentrate, soy flour and combinations thereof.
  • the latter soy protein sources were obtained from soy beans exhibiting very low lipoxygenase activity, e.g. a lipoxygenase activity of less than 15 kU/mg. Even more preferably the soy protein source is derived from soy beans exhibiting a lipoxygenase activity of less than 10 kU/mg, most preferably of less than 8 kU/mg. Likewise, it is advantageous to prepare the present aqueous liquid from a soy protein source having a lipoxygenase activity of less than 5 kU per gram of soy protein. Most preferably the soy protein source has a lipoxygenase activity of less than 1 kU per gram of soy protein.
  • Lipoxygenase activity is suitably determined spectrophotometrically by using a dye- coupling assay specific for hydroperoxides generated from linoleic acid, as fully described by Anthon and Barrett ⁇ J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001 , 49, 32-37).
  • the present method employs soy protein derived from soybeans that have not been dehypocotylized (as such avoids additional process steps).
  • the aforementioned soy isolate, soy concentrate and/or soy flour are derived from optionally dehulled soybeans that still comprise the hypocotyl.
  • Most preferably the latter sources of soy protein sources are derived from dehulled soybeans that still comprise the hypocotyls.
  • dehypocotylized soybeans refers to soybeans from which the hypocotyl has been removed. Hypocotyl is a botanical term for a part of a germinating seedling of a seed plant.
  • the plant embryo As the plant embryo grows at germination, it sends out a shoot called a radicle that becomes the primary root and penetrates down into the soil. After emergence of the radicle, the hypocotyl emerges and lifts the growing tip above the ground, bearing the embryonic leaves (called cotyledons) and the plumule that gives rise to the first true leaves.
  • the hypocotyl is the primary organ of extension of the young plant and develops into the stem.
  • the present method is advantageously employed to produce a fermented aqueous liquid that can be used as a base for the production of a beverage.
  • the product so produced is a beverage, it has a relatively low viscosity, e.g. a viscosity at a temperature of 7 0 C of less than 50 mPa.s at 100 s "1 , most preferably of less than 25 mPa.s at 100 s ' ⁇
  • a viscosity of 50 mPa.s at 100 s "1 means that the product is 50 times more viscous than water and about 25 times more viscous than milk.
  • Viscosity can suitably be measured with the help of a rheometer AR1000 (TA Instruments, Etten- Leur, the Netherlands), using a 40-mm diameter, 2% angle cone measuring system. A steady-state shear process should be used, increasing shear rate from 0.01 to 250/s. The measuring temperature is 7 0 C and only the data point at 100 s "1 is used. C 5 -C 9 n-alkanals and (£)-2-hexenal are flavour molecules that are believed to be largely responsible for the 'beany' off-flavour often found in soy based products. The inventors have discovered that it is possible to remove typical soy-related off-notes in a very effective way using the process as set out herein.
  • Components such as diacetyl and acetaldehyde when present, may impart a more dairy character of the soy protein containing product. So a fermentation which produces one or preferably both of these compounds, along removal with above "beany" off-flavour molecules, can impart an improved flavour profile with a dairy character, whereas a fermentation which does not or only in a low amount produces one or preferably both of diacetyl and acetaldehyde, along removal with above "beany" off-flavour molecules, can impart an improved flavour profile with a more bland character. In this way, the flavour provile can be improved but also steered towards a more bland or a more dairy character.
  • flavour compounds By using the process according to the present invention, one can achieve during fermentation the following changes in concentrations of flavour compounds:
  • the process according to the present invention preferably further comprises a pasteurising or sterilising step of the so-fermented aqueous composition, depending upon the further desired use.
  • the fermented product obtained by the current process is preferably filled into containers, which containers are subsequently sealed.
  • an edible acid is added to the fermented product prior to the filling into the containers so as to adjust the pH to less than 4.5 is an acid product is desired, and wherein the fermented product is not subjected to pasteurisation or sterilisation prior, during or after the filling into the containers.
  • an edible acid is added to the fermented product before the fermentation has reached the point at which product inhibition prevents further production of lactic acid by lactic acid bacteria.
  • the process according to the present invention is especially suited to prepare a beverage comprising soy protein, but the process may also be employed to prepare set products, such as set yoghurts.
  • Gerstel CIS-4 injector and a Gerstel MPS-2 autosampler with SPME option.
  • Calibration lines were constructed by plotting the peak areas of ion 45 (for acetaldehyde) against the amount added. These calibration lines were then used to determine the amount of acetaldehyde in the fermented soy samples.
  • the headspace was drawn at 33 ml.min "1 into the heated transfer line, of which 20 ml.min "1 entered the ionisation source, for 0.5 minutes.
  • the drift pressure (2.2mbar), voltage (600V) and temperature (7O 0 C) were set to operate the ionisation condition at E/N of 140Td.
  • the ion mass and dwell time to monitor the acetaldehyde over the samples were:
  • Lipoxygenase activity was determined spectrophotometrically by using a dye-coupling assay specific for hydroperoxides generated from linoleic acid, as fully described by
  • Enzyme extracts were obtained by homogenising 100 mg of defatted soybean grindings in 20 ml of 100 mM pH 6.0 Na 2 HPO 4 buffer + 1% w/v NaCI then centrifuging at 15,000 rpm at 4°C for 30 minutes and filtering the supernatant through a 0.2 ⁇ m filter.
  • Na 2 HPO 4 was added 20 ⁇ l of 27 mM linoleic acid dispersed in 1.4% w/v Tween 20, and 10 ⁇ l of enzyme extract. After 5 minutes, 500 ⁇ l of a solution containing 0.2 mM 3- methyl-2-benzothiazolinone hydrazone and 0.1 mg/ml bovine haemoglobin was added.
  • the number of live bacteria in the cultures was determined by plate counting appropriate dilutions of samples containing Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis on MRS agar and anaerobic incubation for 3 days at 30 0 C. Lactococcus lactis (FD-0013) and Streptococcus thermophilus (YF-L01 ) mixed cultures were enumerated using M17 agar and aerobic incubation for 3 days at 30 0 C (FD-0013) or 37°C (YF-L01 ). Numbers are expressed as Colony forming units per ml of product (Cfu/ml).
  • Lactobacillus brevis Lb20 (CBS122084, deposited under the Budapest treaty at
  • Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis ATCC27651 (freely available from ATCC) complex Lactococcus lactis culture FD-0013 (commercially available under code FD- 0013 from Chr Hansen, Denmark) Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis LbO5-14 (CBS109270, deposited under the Budapest treaty at Centraal Bureau voor Schimmelcultures, Baarn, The Netherlands
  • a soy base was prepared by dissolving 5.5% Sunopta SSFR powder (resulting in a protein concentration of 2.5% protein) and 0.5% sucrose in water. The mix was preserved by a heat treatment for 12 seconds at 120 0 C, packed aseptically and cooled for further storage at 5°C.
  • B fermentation
  • Lactobacillus brevis Lb20 (CBS122084, deposited at Centraal Bureau voor Schimmelcultures, Baarn, The Netherlands), was prepared by overnight cultivation in MRS broth at 30 0 C. A two-fold concentrated culture of this was obtained by washing and re-suspending the cells in a Peptone Physiological salt solution. Soy base as prepared under A was heated to 30 0 C and inoculated with 1 % of the concentrated cell preparation of L. brevis Lb20 so-obtained.
  • the so-obtained soy-protein preparation containing Lb20 was further inoculated with YF-L01 DF within 5 minutes and incubated at 30°C for up to 24 hours.
  • soy protein As a control, one sample of soy protein (same concentration as under A above) was inoculated with YF-L01 DF only and also incubated at 30 0 C for up to 24 hours.
  • Soy base was inoculated with L brevis at about 2x10 7 Cfu/ml and S. thermophilus at about 2x10 7 Cfu/ml. Therefore, the ratio of combined cultures was 1 :1 for the combination of L. brevis and S. thermophilus.
  • thermophilic culture S. thermophilus on M17 agar
  • 300 ml portions of products harvested after 3, 8, or 24 h fermentation were pasteurised by incubation at 85°C for 30 minutes in a water bath and subsequently evaluated for volatiles and smell.
  • the volatile analysis shows that combined fermentation for a period of 3h of a soy protein containing a preparation with L.brevis Lb20 (a mesophilic culture) and S. thermophilus YF-L01 DF (a thermophilic culture) result in a lower amount of those compounds contributing to soy off-flavours and a similar amount of components contributing to a positive flavour impression than by fermentation with a thermophilic organism alone.
  • prolonged fermentation for 8 and 24 hours with a mixture of mesophilic and thermophilic culture leads to reduction in off-flavour compounds but also to reduced levels of positive aroma compounds.
  • thermophile mirocorganism only, a fairly strong dairy character is obtained, due to production of e.g.
  • diacetyl and acetaldehyde Using jointly a mesophilic and thermophilic micro organism in the fermentation (according to the invention, when used e.g. in the ratio as in example 1 ) gives lower amounts of diacetyl and acetaldehyde than with a thermophile microorganism alone, but also gives removal of off flavours. After short fermentation times (e.g. 3 hours) the dairy character is quite prominent due to higher levels of dacetyl and acetaldehyde, whereas after 8 hours the taste character is less intense dairy. By adjusting e.g. the ratio between the meso and thermophilic microorganisms and the fermentation time, the taste profile can be steered towards a desired one, be it bland or dairy or something in between.
  • a soy base was prepared by dissolving 5.5% Sunopta SSFR powder (resulting in a protein concentration of 2.5% protein) and 0.5% sucrose in water. The mix was preserved by a heat treatment for 12 seconds at 120 0 C, packed aseptically and cooled for further storage at 5°C.
  • Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis ATCC27651 (freely available) was prepared by overnight cultivation in MRS broth at 30 0 C. Cells were washed in a Peptone Physiological salt solution and concentrated twofold. Soy base as prepared under A was heated to 30 0 C and inoculated with 1 % of the concentrated cell preparation of L sanfranciscensis.
  • the so-obtained soy-protein prepaparation containing L. sanfranciscensis was further inoculated with YF-L01 DF within 5 minutes and incubated at 30 0 C for up to 24 hours.
  • YF-L01 DF (Streptococcus thermophilus culture from Chr Hansen, Denmark) was provided as frozen pellets and dosed at 0.02% in said soy base.
  • soy protein As a control, one sample of soy protein (same concentration as under A above) was inoculated with YF-L01 DF only and also incubated at 30°C for up to 24 hours.
  • Soy base was inoculated with cultures at about 1x10 7 Cfu/ml for L. sanfranciscensis and about 2x10 7 Cfu/ml for S. thermophilus, resulting in a 1 :2 ratio in the combination of L. sanfranciscensis and S. thermophilus.
  • thermophilic culture S. thermophilus on M17 agar
  • L. sanfranciscensis an increase of about 75 fold of S. thermophilus was found after 24h. 300 ml portions of products harvested after 3, 8, or 24 h fermentation were pasteurised by incubation at 85°C for 30 minutes in a water bath and subsequently evaluated for volatiles and smell.
  • a soy base was prepared by dissolving 5.5% Sunopta SSFR powder (resulting in a protein concentration of 2.5% protein) and 0.5% sucrose in water. The mix was preserved by a heat treatment for 12 seconds at 120 0 C, packed aseptically and cooled for further storage at 5°C.
  • YF-L01 DF Streptococcus thermophilus culture from Chr Hansen, Denmark
  • FD- 0013 complex Lactococcus lactis culture, commercially available from Chr Hansen, Denmark
  • soy protein As a control, one sample of soy protein (same concentration as under A above) was inoculated with YF-L01 DF only and was also incubated at 30 0 C for up to 24 hours.
  • Soy base was inoculated with cultures at about 1x10 7 Cfu/ml for L lactis and about 2x10 7 Cfu/ml for S. thermophilus, resulting in a ratio of approximately 1 :2 for the combined fermentation.
  • thermophilic culture alone acidified the soy base to pH 6.0 in less than 3h and products had a pH of about 4.5 after 24h at 30 0 C. Also mixed mesophilic and thermophilic cultures achieved acidification to pH 6.0 within 3h and products had a pH of about 4.5 in 24 h.
  • thermophilus YF-L01 DF a thermophilic culture
  • a soy base was prepared by dissolving 5.5% Sunopta SSFR powder (resulting in a protein concentration of 2.5% protein) and 0.5% sucrose in water. The mix was preserved by a heat treatment for 12 seconds at 120 0 C, packed aseptically and cooled for further storage at 5°C.
  • Lactobacillus brevis Lb20 (CBS122084, deposited under the Budapest treaty at Centraal Bureau voor Schimmelcultures, Baarn, The Netherlands), was prepared by overnight cultivation in MRS broth at 30 0 C. A two-fold concentrated culture of this was obtained by washing and re-suspending the cells in water and the OD 6 oo of this was measured. A cell suspension of 8-fold higher OD 6 oo was obtained by concentrating the cells by centrifugation and resuspension in a smaller volume. A preculture of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp.
  • lactis LbO5-14 (CBS109270, deposited under the Budapest treaty at Centraal Bureau voor Schimmelcultures, Baarn, The Netherlands), was prepared by overnight cultivation in MRS broth at 37°C. Cells were concentrated or diluted to the same OD 6 oo ⁇ f Lactobacillus brevis Lb20 with water. A cell suspension with a 50-fold higher OD 6 oo was obtained by centrifugation of the cells and resuspending in a smaller volume.
  • Soy base as prepared under A was inoculated with 1 % of the concentrated cell preparation of L. brevis Lb20 so-obtained.
  • the so-obtained soy-protein preparation containing Lb20 was further inoculated with 1 % of the concentrated cell preparation of
  • soy protein As a control, one sample of soy protein (same concentration as under A above) was inoculated with 2% of Lb20 only. A second control was prepared by inoculation with 2% of Lb05-14 only.
  • Soy base was inoculated with L brevis at about 1.4x10 7 Cfu/ml and L. delbrueckii at about 2.1x10 7 Cfu/ml in the first combination. Therefore, the ratio of combined cultures was 1 :1.5 for the combination of L. brevis and L. delbrueckii.
  • soy base was inoculated with L brevis at about 1.1x10 8 Cfu/ml and L. delbrueckii at about 2.1x10 7 Cfu/ml. Therefore, the ratio of combined cultures was
  • soy base was inoculated with L brevis at about 1.4x10 7 Cfu/ml and L. delbrueckii at about 4.2x10 8 Cfu/ml. Therefore, the ratio of combined cultures was 1 :30.
  • the pH measurements show that Lb20 alone and LbO5-14 alone acidified the soy base to pH 6.0 in about 6h and products had a pH of about 5.7 after 24h at 30 0 C.
  • Mixed cultures of Lb20 and LbO5-14 achieved acidification to pH 6.0 within 4h and products had a pH of about 4.0 after 24 h.
  • thermophilic culture L delbrueckii on MRS agar
  • mesophilic culture L brevis on MRS Vm agar
  • 500 ml portions of products harvested after 24 h fermentation were pasteurised by incubation at 85°C for 30 minutes in a water bath and subsequently evaluated for smell.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Nutrition Science (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Botany (AREA)
  • Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Beans For Foods Or Fodder (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
  • Dairy Products (AREA)
  • Soy Sauces And Products Related Thereto (AREA)

Abstract

A process for fermenting a substrate comprising soy protein and a carbohydrate using both thermophilic lactic acid bacteria as well as mesophilic lactic acid bacteria.

Description

FERMENTED SOY-BASED FOOD PRODUCT
Field of the Invention The present invention relates to the field of fermented (or cultured) soy-containing products, especially fermented soy-based beverages.
Background of the invention
Consumers have become more knowledgeable about protein and its role in a healthy diet. This new understanding has had a profound effect, stimulating consumer interest and demand for healthier beverages that are fortified with protein. Because beverages are a convenient way to incorporate protein into the diet, manufacturers continue to formulate new products in an effort to make protein more accessible to a wider group of consumers. The two most popular beverage proteins are milk protein and soy protein, and their various isolate derivatives. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the consumption of food products rich in soy protein can reduce cholesterol, enhance athletic performance, and even aid in the battle against diabetes. In addition, interest for milk replacement by soy protein has increased in view of, on the one hand, issues in relation to over-sensitivity and/or intolerance towards milk constituents experienced by growing numbers of consumers, a desire for products suitable for (strict) vegetarians and, on the other hand, elevated milk protein prices and supply issues that some manufacturers are experiencing relative to this commodity. Soy proteins have been proposed to replace milk proteins, either partially or totally, depending on the system, and dairy-like products have been developed based entirely on soy protein.
In view of soy protein's documented health benefits it is desirable to incorporate substantial quantities of soy protein in beverages. However, incorporation of soy protein into e.g. beverages presents several challenges. The incorporation of soy protein in beverages is known to impart a noticeable aftertaste and a distinctive "beany" taste. Different types of processes to isolate soy protein have been proposed which aim to remove these undesirable (off-) flavour-notes. Unfortunately, however, it is almost impossible to completely remove the typical soy "off-notes" from sources of soy protein such as soy concentrates and soy isolates. In addition, in most product applications the intensity of soy off-notes increases during processing and storage, probably as a result of the formation of off-flavour compounds from precursor molecules.
US 3,364,034 describes a method for removing characteristic flavour and/or odour from vegetable protein materials to provide a substantially bland product, comprising: inoculating said protein materials with bacteria selected from the group consisting of Lactobacillus lactis, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Leuconostoc citrovorum, Pediococcus cerivisiae, Pseudomonas ovalis, Pseudomonae tragi, Aerobacter aerogenes, Streptococcus lactis, incubating for 16-144 hours under conditions conducive to bacterial growth; and terminating said bacterial growth after said material is rendered substantially bland.
US 4,664,919 describes a process for producing yogurt-like food, comprising fermenting soy milk with Streptococcus sojalactis. It is observed in the US patent that the yogurt-like food so obtained does not have peculiar 'green' smell of soy milk and that it has a good taste. It is further stated that the aforementioned Streptococcus strain is capable of removing the 'green' smell of soybeans and that the amount of diacetyl and acetone formed is larger than that of other lactic acid bacteria. Data provided about the Streptococcus sojalactis show that the micro-organism is capable of growing at temperatures in the range of 30-40 0C, but not at 20 0C or less or at temperatures of 45 0C or higher. US 6,599,543 relates to process for preparing a fermented soybean milk comprising: contacting dehulled and dehypocotyl whole soybeans with warm or hot water; removing warm or hot water-soluble component from the soybeans; pulverizing the soybeans to make a slurry; removing insoluble component from the slurry to make a soybean milk, inoculating a lactic acid bacterium of the genus Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus bulgaricus and one strain selected from the group consisting of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei into the soybean milk, adding one or more saccharides which can be utilized by the lactic acid bacterium to the soybean milk, and fermenting the soybean milk to produce the fermented soybean milk. The removal of hypocotyl from the soybeans as taught by US 6,599,543 is laborious and costly. EP-A 0 386 817 describes a process of preparing a fermented soymilk, which comprises the steps of: a) inoculating soymilk with an exocellular polysaccharide-forming lactic acid bacterium; b) incubating the inoculated soymilk; and c) recovering the fermented product. Example 1 of the European patent application describes how 100 ml of soybean milk containing 0.5 wt.% of a added lactose was fermented with a culture of exocellular polysaccharide-forming lactic acid bacteria {Streptococcus cremoris) for 15 hours at 25 0C, after which the pH had dropped to 4.6. After fermentation, a product was obtained with a highly viscous consistency and practically no beany flavour.
EP-A 1 145 648 describes a method of preparing a lactic acid fermented soy proteinaceous food ingredient with reduced levels of flatulence inducing oligosaccharides and conserved levels of isoflavones, said method comprising: a) providing an aqueous crude soy material containing soy protein, flatulence-inducing oligosaccharides, and isoflavones; and b) simultaneously treating the aqueous crude soy material with (1 ) a source of glycosidase activity that is effective to hydrolyze the flatulence-inducing oligosaccharides to fermentable saccharides and (2) a lactic acid producing culture that ferments the fermentable saccharides. Example 2 describes how a 30% solids slurry of defatted soy flour in water was simultaneously inoculated with about 5 percent of a lactic acid culture (mixture of Lactococus lactis and Streptococcus cremoris) and about 0.01 percent of α- galactosidase enzyme. The inoculated slurry was held at 35 0C for 4 hours, during which time the pH dropped from 6.6 to 5.3. JP-A-2004-261003 describes a method of preparing fermented soybean milk by fermenting soybean milk and by adding palatinose (isomaltulose) before, during or after fermentation. In the Japanese application it is observed that the grass smell inherent to soybean milk can be reduced to a certain extent by fermenting soybean milk with a combination of a lactic acid bacterium and a bifidobacterium, but that satisfactory results cannot always be established, in particular due to the taste and smell of acetic acid, which is metabolic product of the fermentation. Palatinose is incorporated in the fermented soybean milk to suppress the unpleasant taste, fermentation smell, harshness and acetic acid smell generated in the course of lactic acid fermentation or acetic acid fermentation. The examples of the Japanese patent application describe the preparation of fermented drink yogurts from a soybean milk to which isomaltulose and sucrose are added prior and/or after fermentation. In the examples a starter culture is used that comprises Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus and Streptoccus thermophilus. The drink yogurts disclosed in the Japanese application are extremely sweet as they contain more than 8 wt.% of added disaccharide (isomaltulose and/or sucrose). Murti TW et al., Journal of Food Science (1993), 58(1 ), pages 153-157 describe experiments in which soymilk and cow milk were inoculated with Streptococci, Lactobacilli in the absence or presence of Bifidobacteria and wherein the concentration of a number of volatile compounds was monitored during fermentation. The results show that during fermentation of soy milk at 42 0C the concentration of n-hexanal was decreased from 2.31 ppm to 0.55 ppm (no Bifidobacteria) or 0.45 ppm (with Bifidobacteria) after 4 hours. The lactic acid content after 4 hours of fermentation was at least 0.4 wt.%.
EP 1145648 discloses that low cost soy proteinaceous food ingredients that have reduced levels of those oligosaccharides that lead to abdominal discomfort. Such can be achieved by fermenting soy flour with a dairy culture comprising Lactobacillus helveticus and Lactobacillus casei, or a dairy culture comprising Lactobacillus casei and Streptococcus cremoris.
There is a desire for a soy protein-containing food product which is processed such that it has a reduced amount of undesired flavour components (compared to products not so processed), and preferably such process should be able to deliver both products (depending on the conditions) that can have a dairy-like flavour character or a more bland flavour character. Such more bland character would allow processing into various other products. Preferably, such should be achievable with a limited number of different ingredients, to allow for convenient processing. So the aim is that the taste profile can be steered towards a desired one, be it bland or dairy or something in between.
Summary of the Invention
It has now been found that the above objective can be achieved, at least in part, by a process for modifying the flavour of a soy protein containing substrate, said method comprising the steps of: providing a pasteurised or sterilised aqueous liquid comprising 0.5-15% by weight of dissolved soy protein and at least 0.1 % by weight of carbohydrates, said soy protein being derived from soybeans that have not been dehypocotylized, inoculating said soy protein-containing liquid with bacteria selected from mesophilic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) selected from the group consisting of Lactococcus lactis (incl. subspecies lactis, cremoris, and biovar diacetylactis), Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus sake, Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis, Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides, L. acidophilus, L. reuteri, L. rhamnosus, in an amount of between 105 to 1 O9 CfU / ml substrate, and inoculating said soy-protein-containing liquid with thermophilic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in an amount of between 105 to 109 CfU / ml substrate,
- fermenting the inoculated aqueous liquid by incubation at a temperature of 20 to
45 0C for 0.5-24 hours, and wherein: o inoculation with said mesophilic LAB and thermophilic LAB is done simultaneously, or o inoculation with thermophilic LAB is carried out first and subsequently the inoculation with said mesophilic LAB is carried out in a period of less than 1 hour between both inoculations or o inoculation with said mesophilic LAB is carried out first and subsequently the inoculation with thermophilic LAB is carried out in a period of less than 0.4 hours between both inoculations, wherein the bacteria of said mesophilic LAB and the bacteria of the thermophilic LAB are inoculated in a ratio Cfu of mesophilic LAB to thermophilic LAB of between 10:1 and 1 :100, preferably 1 :1 to 1 :40.
Detailed Description of the Invention
The present method employs soy protein derived from soybeans that have not been dehypocotylized (as such avoids additional process steps). Accordingly, the aforementioned soy isolate, soy concentrate and/or soy flour are derived from optionally dehulled soybeans that still comprise the hypocotyl. Most preferably the latter sources of soy protein sources are derived from dehulled soybeans that still comprise the hypocotyls. The term "dehypocotylized soybeans" as used herein refers to soybeans from which the hypocotyl has been removed. Hypocotyl is a botanical term for a part of a germinating seedling of a seed plant. As the plant embryo grows at germination, it sends out a shoot called a radicle that becomes the primary root and penetrates down into the soil. After emergence of the radicle, the hypocotyl emerges and lifts the growing tip above the ground, bearing the embryonic leaves (called cotyledons) and the plumule that gives rise to the first true leaves. The hypocotyl is the primary organ of extension of the young plant and develops into the stem. Unlike the process taught by US 6,599,543, the present method does not require that the soy protein in the substrate is derived from soybeans from which the hypocotyl has been removed. This is a distinct advantage as it allows sources of soy bean that may be perceived as more natural than dehypocotylized soybeans, and also it may lead to higher levels of certain beneficial components in the soy protein material, such as e.g. isoflavones.
Fermentation of soy protein containing substrates with thermophilic lactic acid bacteria may be known to provide beneficial flavour components to such soy protein preparations, which, when untreated, suffer from off-flavours. The presence of such positive "dairy"and "yoghurt" notes may mask soy off flavours to some extent, but there is a desire for improvement, also as such thermophilic bacteria have a limited ability to reduce the level of components which are present which are responsible to part of the off-flavour. Surprisingly, it was found that undesired soy off notes are more efficiently removed when a mesophilic culture is added to a thermophilic culture mix.
Additionally, it was surprisingly found that, if one ensures that sufficient thermophilic lactic acid bacteria are present, the positive effects of the thermophilic lactic acid bacteria are not completely suppressed by the mesophilic lactic acid bacteria, as mesophilic lactic acid bacteria are also known to use as part of their metabolism some of the products produced by the thermophilic lactic acid bacteria. It was also surprisingly found that depending on the reaction conditions (e.g. fermentation time) one could produce a product having a more dairy character in taste, or a more bland character, and for both of which the level of off-flavour components is reduced. This brings the benefit of being able to produce a variety of products with different taste profiles, whilst only two different lactic acid bacteria strains are used, which is definitely an advantage form a processing point of view, as it gives flexibility in manufacturing with a limited number of bacteria strains which one needs to keep.
In the process according to the present invention the mesophilic LAB is selected from the group consisting of Lactococcus lactis (incl. subspecies lactis, cremoris, and biovar diacetylactis), Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus sake, Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis, Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides, L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus, L. reuteri. These were found to give a reduction on one or more of the off- flavour components, whilst they still could be combined with thermophilic lactic acid bacteria that generate positive flavours, without too much of a detrimental effect on production of positive flavour components by these thermophilic components. "Mesophilic" herein is to be understood as having a temperature optimum for growth of between 25 and 37°C.
In the process of the invention, it was found that the combination works well when the thermophilic LAB is selected from the group consisting of Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbruecki, Lactobacillus delbruecki subsp bulgaricus, Lactobacillus delbruecki subsp lactis, L. helveticus. "Thermophilic" herein is to be understood as cultures having a temperature optimum for growth of above 400C and below 500C, preferably 40-46°C, more preferably 41-45°C.
The term "lactic acid bacteria" as used herein refers to acid tolerant, non-sporulating, non-respiring rod-shaped Gram positive bacilli or cocci that produce lactic acid as the major metabolic endproduct of carbohydrate fermentation. As used herein, the term "lactic acid bacterium" does not encompass Bifidobacterium.
In the process according to the present invention, the bacteria of the mesophilic LAB and the bacteria of the thermophilic LAB are inoculated in a ratio Cfu of mesophilic LAB to thermophilic LAB of between 10:1 and 1 :100, preferably 1 :1 to 1 :40, and more preferably between 1 :1 and 1 :20. The ratio is e.g. depending on the fermentation time and therefore the specific ratio can vary for short fermentation e.g. 3h (leading to a neutral pH product) and long fermentation e.g 8 and 24h (for acidic end product).
The actual fermentation itself is preferably carried out at a temperature of 25 to 400C, as at such temperature both will grow and the desired flavour effects are achieved.
The duration of the fermentation herein typically lies in the range of 1-12 hours, more preferably of 2-10 hours. According to another preferred embodiment the fermentation time does not exceed 14 hours, even more preferably it does not exceed 10 hours and most preferably it does not exceed 8 hours.
It is beneficial for the fermentation that at least some carbohydrates, preferably simple sugars such as monosaccharides and disaccharides, are present. Often such materials will already be part of the soy protein preparation, or they may need to be added as such. In this connection, it is preferred that upon the start of the fermentation the substrate which is inoculated comprises at least 0.1 % by weight of carbohydrates, and preferably comprises between 0.1% and 10%, and more preferably between 0.2% and 5% by weight of carbohydrates. Preferred carbohydrates are in this connection glucose, fructose, galactose, sucrose, raffinose, stachyose, lactose and combinations thereof. However, as the present method enables the preparation of a pleasant tasting beverage without using high amounts of sweetener to mask soy off-flavour notes. Thus, advantageously less than 6 wt.% of disaccharides are added before, during or after fermentation. According to a particularly preferred embodiment, the fermented product in the sealed container contains less than 5 wt.% of disaccharides, most preferably less than 4 wt.% of disaccharides. According to yet another preferred embodiment, the packaged fermented product contains less than 8 wt.% of mono- and/or disaccharides, most preferably less than 5 wt.% of mono- and/or disaccharides.
As to the level of soy protein present in the substrate to be inoculated: it is believed that the process works well for wide ranges of soy protein concentration. Most commercial products for human consumption will contain between 1 and 5% protein, but the process may well be carried out at lower or higher protein concentrations. In the latter case, the fermentation may be done on a concentrated substrate, which is diluted in one or other form prior to consumption. Such processes on concentrated soy protein may be more economical. In this connection, it is preferred that the liquid which is inoculated comprises soy protein in an amount of 0.1 to 10% by weight, and preferably such is from 0.2 to 5% by weight.
"Soy protein content", as used herein, refers to the total amount of soy protein and soy protein derived peptides contained in the fermented product. The fermented product may be based on soy protein, on soy protein hydrolysate or combinations thereof. As will be understood by the skilled person (enzymatic) hydrolysis of peptide bonds may occur during fermentation. The substrate that is fermented in the present method, i.e. the aqueous liquid containing 0.5-15 wt.% of dissolved soy protein is preferably prepared from a soy protein source selected from the group consisting of soy isolate, soy concentrate, soy flour and combinations thereof. According to a particularly preferred embodiment, the latter soy protein sources were obtained from soy beans exhibiting very low lipoxygenase activity, e.g. a lipoxygenase activity of less than 15 kU/mg. Even more preferably the soy protein source is derived from soy beans exhibiting a lipoxygenase activity of less than 10 kU/mg, most preferably of less than 8 kU/mg. Likewise, it is advantageous to prepare the present aqueous liquid from a soy protein source having a lipoxygenase activity of less than 5 kU per gram of soy protein. Most preferably the soy protein source has a lipoxygenase activity of less than 1 kU per gram of soy protein.
Lipoxygenase activity is suitably determined spectrophotometrically by using a dye- coupling assay specific for hydroperoxides generated from linoleic acid, as fully described by Anthon and Barrett {J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001 , 49, 32-37).
The present method employs soy protein derived from soybeans that have not been dehypocotylized (as such avoids additional process steps). Accordingly, the aforementioned soy isolate, soy concentrate and/or soy flour are derived from optionally dehulled soybeans that still comprise the hypocotyl. Most preferably the latter sources of soy protein sources are derived from dehulled soybeans that still comprise the hypocotyls. The term "dehypocotylized soybeans" as used herein refers to soybeans from which the hypocotyl has been removed. Hypocotyl is a botanical term for a part of a germinating seedling of a seed plant. As the plant embryo grows at germination, it sends out a shoot called a radicle that becomes the primary root and penetrates down into the soil. After emergence of the radicle, the hypocotyl emerges and lifts the growing tip above the ground, bearing the embryonic leaves (called cotyledons) and the plumule that gives rise to the first true leaves. The hypocotyl is the primary organ of extension of the young plant and develops into the stem.
The present method is advantageously employed to produce a fermented aqueous liquid that can be used as a base for the production of a beverage. In case the product so produced is a beverage, it has a relatively low viscosity, e.g. a viscosity at a temperature of 7 0C of less than 50 mPa.s at 100 s"1, most preferably of less than 25 mPa.s at 100 s'\ A viscosity of 50 mPa.s at 100 s"1 means that the product is 50 times more viscous than water and about 25 times more viscous than milk. Viscosity can suitably be measured with the help of a rheometer AR1000 (TA Instruments, Etten- Leur, the Netherlands), using a 40-mm diameter, 2% angle cone measuring system. A steady-state shear process should be used, increasing shear rate from 0.01 to 250/s. The measuring temperature is 7 0C and only the data point at 100 s"1 is used. C5-C9 n-alkanals and (£)-2-hexenal are flavour molecules that are believed to be largely responsible for the 'beany' off-flavour often found in soy based products. The inventors have discovered that it is possible to remove typical soy-related off-notes in a very effective way using the process as set out herein.
Components such as diacetyl and acetaldehyde, when present, may impart a more dairy character of the soy protein containing product. So a fermentation which produces one or preferably both of these compounds, along removal with above "beany" off-flavour molecules, can impart an improved flavour profile with a dairy character, whereas a fermentation which does not or only in a low amount produces one or preferably both of diacetyl and acetaldehyde, along removal with above "beany" off-flavour molecules, can impart an improved flavour profile with a more bland character. In this way, the flavour provile can be improved but also steered towards a more bland or a more dairy character.
By using the process according to the present invention, one can achieve during fermentation the following changes in concentrations of flavour compounds:
• the concentration of n-hexanal decreases by at least 40%, preferably by at least 50%; • at least two of n-pentanal concentration, n-heptanal concentration, and n- nonanal concentration decrease by at least 30% when compared to such levels in the soy protein material prior to fermentation according to this invention. Likewise, during fermentation (£)-2-hexenal concentration decreases by at least 20%, preferably by at least 30%. It was found that by achieving such reductions, the products were perceived as having much lower levels of off tastes which are usually associated with soy protein material.
The process according to the present invention preferably further comprises a pasteurising or sterilising step of the so-fermented aqueous composition, depending upon the further desired use. Also, the fermented product obtained by the current process is preferably filled into containers, which containers are subsequently sealed. Optionally, an edible acid is added to the fermented product prior to the filling into the containers so as to adjust the pH to less than 4.5 is an acid product is desired, and wherein the fermented product is not subjected to pasteurisation or sterilisation prior, during or after the filling into the containers. If so desired, an edible acid is added to the fermented product before the fermentation has reached the point at which product inhibition prevents further production of lactic acid by lactic acid bacteria.
The process according to the present invention is especially suited to prepare a beverage comprising soy protein, but the process may also be employed to prepare set products, such as set yoghurts.
The invention is further illustrated by means of the following non-limiting examples:
EXAMPLES
Analytical methods
Analysis of off-flavour volatiles and diacetyl by Solid Phase Micro Extraction (SPME) followed by GC-MS
2 g of sample was put in a 20 ml headspace vial and sealed with an airtight cap.
Samples were analyzed by means of solid phase micro extraction. Fiber used:
Carboxen/PDMS 85 μm ex. Supelco. Analyses were carried out on an Agilent GC/MS (MS: LECO Pegasus IV TOF; 15 scans/s; m/z: 29-250 at 1700 V), equipped with a
Gerstel CIS-4 injector and a Gerstel MPS-2 autosampler with SPME option. Column:
VF-5; 50m * 0.2 mm * 0.33 μm.
GC program: • 40°C(2 min) -(37min)->160°C(0 min)-(207min)->250°C (2 min)
• Gas: Helium
• Flow: 1 ml/min, constant flow
SPME Sampling time: 35 min at 400C Desorption: 40 minutes at 1700C Split-less time: 2 min. Quantitative analysis of acetaldehyde
1 g of sample was put in a closed 150 ml glass headspace vial. All samples were analyzed in triplicate. External calibration levels were constructed by adding acetaldehyde to 1 g of soy base prepared according to example 1 , at levels of 0, 0.2, 0.5, 2 and 5 ppm.
Calibration lines were constructed by plotting the peak areas of ion 45 (for acetaldehyde) against the amount added. These calibration lines were then used to determine the amount of acetaldehyde in the fermented soy samples.
Analyses were carried out on the lonicon Analytik PTR-MS (Proton Transfer Reaction- Mass Spectrometry).
After 1 hour equilibrium time, the headspace was drawn at 33 ml.min"1 into the heated transfer line, of which 20 ml.min"1 entered the ionisation source, for 0.5 minutes. The drift pressure (2.2mbar), voltage (600V) and temperature (7O0C) were set to operate the ionisation condition at E/N of 140Td. The ion mass and dwell time to monitor the acetaldehyde over the samples were:
• Ion monitored on PTR-MS: 45
• Dwell time: 500 ms
Sensory analysis
The fermented products were evaluated/smelled by an expert tasting panel (n=10), with a ranking test on soy and yoghurt intensity.
Lipoxygenase activity
Lipoxygenase activity was determined spectrophotometrically by using a dye-coupling assay specific for hydroperoxides generated from linoleic acid, as fully described by
Anthon and Barrett {J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001 , 49, 32-37).
Enzyme extracts were obtained by homogenising 100 mg of defatted soybean grindings in 20 ml of 100 mM pH 6.0 Na2HPO4 buffer + 1% w/v NaCI then centrifuging at 15,000 rpm at 4°C for 30 minutes and filtering the supernatant through a 0.2 μm filter.
To 500 μl of a solution of 10 mM 3-(dimethylamino)benzoic acid in 100 mM pH 6.0
Na2HPO4 was added 20 μl of 27 mM linoleic acid dispersed in 1.4% w/v Tween 20, and 10 μl of enzyme extract. After 5 minutes, 500 μl of a solution containing 0.2 mM 3- methyl-2-benzothiazolinone hydrazone and 0.1 mg/ml bovine haemoglobin was added.
After a further 5 minutes, 500 μl of 1% w/v sodium lauryl sulphate was added to terminate the reaction. The absorbance at 598 nm was then measured. The above actions can be carried out in a single 4.5 ml 1 cm path cuvette. A standard curve was produced by reacting dilutions of soybean lipoxygenase from Sigma-AIdrich, of certificated activity. This was used to calculate the activities of the extracts from the soybeans. Blank readings were subtracted, obtained using denatured enzyme extracts heated at 95°C for 30 minutes. One unit of activity is the increase of 0.001 absorbance units at 598 nm per minute from the hydroperoxidation of linoleic acid.
Viable counts
The number of live bacteria in the cultures was determined by plate counting appropriate dilutions of samples containing Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis on MRS agar and anaerobic incubation for 3 days at 300C. Lactococcus lactis (FD-0013) and Streptococcus thermophilus (YF-L01 ) mixed cultures were enumerated using M17 agar and aerobic incubation for 3 days at 300C (FD-0013) or 37°C (YF-L01 ). Numbers are expressed as Colony forming units per ml of product (Cfu/ml).
Strains
Lactobacillus brevis Lb20 (CBS122084, deposited under the Budapest treaty at
Centraal Bureau voor Schimmelcultures, Baarn, The Netherlands) Streptococcus thermophilus YF-L01 DF (commercial culture of available under this name from Chr Hansen, Denmark)
Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis ATCC27651 (freely available from ATCC) complex Lactococcus lactis culture FD-0013 (commercially available under code FD- 0013 from Chr Hansen, Denmark) Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis LbO5-14 (CBS109270, deposited under the Budapest treaty at Centraal Bureau voor Schimmelcultures, Baarn, The Netherlands
Example 1
Combinations of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus brevis A: raw material
A soy base was prepared by dissolving 5.5% Sunopta SSFR powder (resulting in a protein concentration of 2.5% protein) and 0.5% sucrose in water. The mix was preserved by a heat treatment for 12 seconds at 1200C, packed aseptically and cooled for further storage at 5°C. B: fermentation
A preculture of Lactobacillus brevis Lb20 (CBS122084, deposited at Centraal Bureau voor Schimmelcultures, Baarn, The Netherlands), was prepared by overnight cultivation in MRS broth at 300C. A two-fold concentrated culture of this was obtained by washing and re-suspending the cells in a Peptone Physiological salt solution. Soy base as prepared under A was heated to 300C and inoculated with 1 % of the concentrated cell preparation of L. brevis Lb20 so-obtained.
The so-obtained soy-protein preparation containing Lb20 was further inoculated with YF-L01 DF within 5 minutes and incubated at 30°C for up to 24 hours. YF-L01 DF
(commercial culture of Streptococcus thermophilus available under this name from Chr Hansen, Denmark) was provided as frozen pellets and dosed at 0.02% in said soy base.
As a control, one sample of soy protein (same concentration as under A above) was inoculated with YF-L01 DF only and also incubated at 300C for up to 24 hours.
After inoculation with YF-L01 DF only or with combination of YF-L01 DF and L. brevis Lb20 the pH of the soy base was measured at regular intervals. The viable count (Colony forming units per ml, Cfu/ml) of the cultures was measured after inoculation (t=0), after 3 and 8 hours by plating appropriate dilutions on MRS agar and incubation at 300C for 2 days (for the quantification of Lactobacilli). Streptococci were quantified by plating samples on M17 agar containing 0.5% glucose and incubation at 37°C for 2 days. (Table 1.1 and 1.2).
Figure imgf000015_0001
Table 1.2 Acidification of soy base fermented with L. brevis and YF-L01
Figure imgf000016_0001
Soy base was inoculated with L brevis at about 2x107 Cfu/ml and S. thermophilus at about 2x107 Cfu/ml. Therefore, the ratio of combined cultures was 1 :1 for the combination of L. brevis and S. thermophilus.
The pH measurements show that YF-L01 alone acidified the soy base to pH 6.0 in less than 3h and products had a pH of about 4.5 after 24h at 300C. Mixed cultures of L.brevis and YF-L01 achieved acidification to pH 6.0 within 3h and products had a pH of 4.6 after 24 h. Viable counts of the thermophilic culture (S. thermophilus on M17 agar) increased to a two-fold higher level in the combination when compared to the mixture. 300 ml portions of products harvested after 3, 8, or 24 h fermentation were pasteurised by incubation at 85°C for 30 minutes in a water bath and subsequently evaluated for volatiles and smell.
C: volatiles
An aliquot of the sample fermented with the combined culture of L. brevis Lb20 and YF- L01 and an aliquot of the sample fermented with YF-L01 only were subjected to SPME followed by GC-MS analysis. It was found that during fermentation with the combined culture the peak areas for pentanal, hexanal, heptanal, nonanal, (£)-2-hexenal, (£)-2- nonenal, (£,£)-2,4-Heptadienal, (£,£)-2,4-decadienal and 2-Heptanone, which all are identified as contributing to off-flavours, had decreased considerably as shown in Table 1.3.
Table 1.3 Soy off-flavours in soy products fermented with L. brevis and YF-L01
Figure imgf000017_0001
The analyses further showed that during fermentation with a combination of L. brevis Lb20 and YF-L01 the concentration of diacetyl and acetaldehyde (quantified by PTR- MS) is changed as shown in table 1.4.
Table 1.4 Dairy flavours in soy products fermented with L. brevis and YF-L01
Figure imgf000017_0002
Thus, the volatile analysis shows that combined fermentation for a period of 3h of a soy protein containing a preparation with L.brevis Lb20 (a mesophilic culture) and S. thermophilus YF-L01 DF (a thermophilic culture) result in a lower amount of those compounds contributing to soy off-flavours and a similar amount of components contributing to a positive flavour impression than by fermentation with a thermophilic organism alone. In contrast prolonged fermentation for 8 and 24 hours with a mixture of mesophilic and thermophilic culture leads to reduction in off-flavour compounds but also to reduced levels of positive aroma compounds. By fermentation with a thermophile mirocorganism only, a fairly strong dairy character is obtained, due to production of e.g. diacetyl and acetaldehyde. Using jointly a mesophilic and thermophilic micro organism in the fermentation (according to the invention, when used e.g. in the ratio as in example 1 ) gives lower amounts of diacetyl and acetaldehyde than with a thermophile microorganism alone, but also gives removal of off flavours. After short fermentation times (e.g. 3 hours) the dairy character is quite prominent due to higher levels of dacetyl and acetaldehyde, whereas after 8 hours the taste character is less intense dairy. By adjusting e.g. the ratio between the meso and thermophilic microorganisms and the fermentation time, the taste profile can be steered towards a desired one, be it bland or dairy or something in between.
D: sensory
A higher intensity of yoghurt odour was observed for the soybase inoculated with the combination of cultures than the one inoculated with the S. thermophilus only, after 3 hours fermentation time. After 8 hours fermentation, the soybase inoculated with a combination of cultures seemed to be perceived as less intense in yoghurt odour than the one inoculated with the S. thermophilus only. The sensory description is in line with the volatile data described above.
Example 2
Combinations of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis
A: raw material
A soy base was prepared by dissolving 5.5% Sunopta SSFR powder (resulting in a protein concentration of 2.5% protein) and 0.5% sucrose in water. The mix was preserved by a heat treatment for 12 seconds at 1200C, packed aseptically and cooled for further storage at 5°C.
B: fermentation
A preculture of Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis ATCC27651 (freely available) was prepared by overnight cultivation in MRS broth at 300C. Cells were washed in a Peptone Physiological salt solution and concentrated twofold. Soy base as prepared under A was heated to 300C and inoculated with 1 % of the concentrated cell preparation of L sanfranciscensis.
The so-obtained soy-protein prepaparation containing L. sanfranciscensis was further inoculated with YF-L01 DF within 5 minutes and incubated at 300C for up to 24 hours. YF-L01 DF (Streptococcus thermophilus culture from Chr Hansen, Denmark) was provided as frozen pellets and dosed at 0.02% in said soy base.
As a control, one sample of soy protein (same concentration as under A above) was inoculated with YF-L01 DF only and also incubated at 30°C for up to 24 hours.
After inoculation with single cultures or with combinations of both cultures the pH of the soy base was measured at regular intervals. The viable count (Colony forming units per ml, Cfu/ml) of the cultures was determined after inoculation (t=0), after 3 and 8 hours by plating appropriate dilutions on MRS agar and incubation at 300C for 2 days (for the quantification of Lactobacilli). Streptococci were quantified by plating samples on M17 agar containing 0.5% glucose and incubation at 37°C for 2 days (Tables 2.1 and 2.2).
Table 2.1 Viable counts of soy base fermented with L. sanfranciscensis and YF-L01
Figure imgf000019_0001
Table 2.2 Acidification of soy base fermented with L. sanfranciscensis and YF-L01
Figure imgf000020_0001
Soy base was inoculated with cultures at about 1x107 Cfu/ml for L. sanfranciscensis and about 2x107 Cfu/ml for S. thermophilus, resulting in a 1 :2 ratio in the combination of L. sanfranciscensis and S. thermophilus.
The pH measurements show that YF-L01 alone acidified the soy base to pH 6.0 in less than 3h and products had a pH of about 4.5 after 24h at 300C. Also mixed mesophilic and thermophilic cultures achieved acidification to pH 6.0 within 3h and products had a pH of about 4.5 in 24 h. Viable counts of the thermophilic culture (S. thermophilus on M17 agar) increased about fourfold in 8 h. In the combination with L. sanfranciscensis an increase of about 75 fold of S. thermophilus was found after 24h. 300 ml portions of products harvested after 3, 8, or 24 h fermentation were pasteurised by incubation at 85°C for 30 minutes in a water bath and subsequently evaluated for volatiles and smell.
C: volatiles
An aliquot of the sample fermented with the combined culture of L. sanfranciscensis and YF-L01 and an aliquot of the sample fermented with YF-L01 only were subjected to SPME followed by GC-MS analysis. It was found that during fermentation with the combined culture the peak areas for pentanal, hexanal, heptanal, (£)-2-hexenal, (£)-2- nonenal, (£,£)-2,4-Heptadienal, (£,£)-2,4-decadienal and 2-Heptanone, which all are identified as contributing to off-flavours, had decreased considerably as shown in Table 2.3. Table 2.3 Soy off-flavours in soy products fermented with L sanfranciscensis and YF-L01
Figure imgf000021_0001
The analyses further showed that during fermentation with a combination of L. sanfranciscensis and YF-L01 the concentration of diacetyl and acetaldehyde (quantified by PTR-MS) is changed as shown in table 2.4.
Table 2.4 Dairy flavours in soy products fermented with L. sanfranciscensis and YF-L01
Figure imgf000021_0002
Thus the volatile analysis shows that combined fermentation for a period of 8 and 24 hours of a soy protein containing a preparation with L. sanfranciscensis (a mesophilic culture) and S. thermophilus YF-L01 DF (a thermophilic culture) result in a lower amount of those compounds contributing to soy off-flavours but also to reduced levels of positive aroma compounds.
D: sensory After 8 hours fermentation, the soybase inoculated with a combination of cultures seemed to be perceived as less intense in yoghurt odour than the one inoculated with the S. thermophilus only. The sensory description is in line with the volatile data described above.
Example 3
Combinations of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactococcus lactis A: raw material
A soy base was prepared by dissolving 5.5% Sunopta SSFR powder (resulting in a protein concentration of 2.5% protein) and 0.5% sucrose in water. The mix was preserved by a heat treatment for 12 seconds at 1200C, packed aseptically and cooled for further storage at 5°C.
B: fermentation
YF-L01 DF (Streptococcus thermophilus culture from Chr Hansen, Denmark) and FD- 0013 (complex Lactococcus lactis culture, commercially available from Chr Hansen, Denmark) were provided as frozen pellets and dosed as such at 0.02% (weight) in a soy base as prepared under A (which had been heated to 300C), within 5 minutes of each other and was incubated at 300C for up to 24 hours.
As a control, one sample of soy protein (same concentration as under A above) was inoculated with YF-L01 DF only and was also incubated at 300C for up to 24 hours.
After inoculation with a single culture or with combinations of cultures the pH of the soy base was measured at regular intervals. The viable count (Colony forming units per ml, Cfu/ml) of the cultures was determined after inoculation (t=0) by plating appropriate dilutions on M17 agar containing 0.5% glucose and incubation at 37°C for 2 days for the quantification of Lactococci and/or Streptococci. (Tables 3.1 and 3.2). Table 3.1 Viable counts of soy base fermented with L. lactis and YF-L01
Figure imgf000023_0001
Table 3.2 Acidification of soy base fermented with L. lactis and YF-L01
Figure imgf000023_0002
Soy base was inoculated with cultures at about 1x107 Cfu/ml for L lactis and about 2x107 Cfu/ml for S. thermophilus, resulting in a ratio of approximately 1 :2 for the combined fermentation.
The pH measurements show that the thermophilic culture alone acidified the soy base to pH 6.0 in less than 3h and products had a pH of about 4.5 after 24h at 300C. Also mixed mesophilic and thermophilic cultures achieved acidification to pH 6.0 within 3h and products had a pH of about 4.5 in 24 h.
300 ml portions of products harvested after 3, 8, or 24 h fermentation were pasteurised by incubation at 85°C for 30 minutes in a water bath and subsequently evaluated for volatiles and smell.
C: volatiles
An aliquot of the sample fermented with the combined culture of L. lactis and YF-L01 and an aliquot of the sample fermented with YF-L01 only were subjected to SPME followed by GC-MS analysis. It was found that during fermentation with the combined culture the peak areas for pentanal, hexanal, heptanal, (£)-2-hexenal, (£)-2-nonenal, (£,£)-2,4-Heptadienal, (£,£)-2,4-decadienal and 2-Heptanone, which all are identified as contributing to off-flavours, had decreased considerably as shown in Table 3.3. Table 3.3 Soy off-flavours in soy products fermented with L. lactis and YF-L01
Figure imgf000024_0001
* negative number denote decrease, positive numbers increase in peak area
The analyses further showed that during fermentation with a combination of L. lactis and YF-L01 the concentration of diacetyl and acetaldehyde (quantified by PTR-MS) is changed as shown in table 3.4.
Table 3.4 Dairy flavours in soy products fermented with L. lactis and YF-L01
Figure imgf000024_0002
* negative number denote decrease, positive numbers increase in peak area
Thus the volatile analysis shows that combined fermentation for a period of 3h and 8h of a soy protein containing a preparation with L. lactis (a mesophilic culture) and S. thermophilus YF-L01 DF (a thermophilic culture) result in a lower amount of many of soy off-flavours and a similar or even increased amount of components contributing to a positive dairy flavour impression than by fermentation with the thermophilic organism alone. In contrast prolonged fermentation for 24 hours with a mixture of mesophilic and thermophilic culture leads to reduction in off-flavour compounds but also to reduced levels of positive aroma compounds.
D: sensory
A higher intensity of yoghurt odour was observed for the soybase inoculated with the combination of cultures than the one inoculated with the S. thermophilus only, after 3 hours and 8 hours fermentation time. The sensory description is in line with the volatile data described above.
Example 4
Combinations of Lactobacillus delbrueckii and Lactobacillus brevis A: raw material
A soy base was prepared by dissolving 5.5% Sunopta SSFR powder (resulting in a protein concentration of 2.5% protein) and 0.5% sucrose in water. The mix was preserved by a heat treatment for 12 seconds at 1200C, packed aseptically and cooled for further storage at 5°C.
B: fermentation
A preculture of Lactobacillus brevis Lb20 (CBS122084, deposited under the Budapest treaty at Centraal Bureau voor Schimmelcultures, Baarn, The Netherlands), was prepared by overnight cultivation in MRS broth at 300C. A two-fold concentrated culture of this was obtained by washing and re-suspending the cells in water and the OD6oo of this was measured. A cell suspension of 8-fold higher OD6oo was obtained by concentrating the cells by centrifugation and resuspension in a smaller volume. A preculture of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis LbO5-14 (CBS109270, deposited under the Budapest treaty at Centraal Bureau voor Schimmelcultures, Baarn, The Netherlands), was prepared by overnight cultivation in MRS broth at 37°C. Cells were concentrated or diluted to the same OD6oo θf Lactobacillus brevis Lb20 with water. A cell suspension with a 50-fold higher OD6oo was obtained by centrifugation of the cells and resuspending in a smaller volume.
Soy base as prepared under A was inoculated with 1 % of the concentrated cell preparation of L. brevis Lb20 so-obtained. The so-obtained soy-protein preparation containing Lb20 was further inoculated with 1 % of the concentrated cell preparation of
LbO5-14 within 5 minutes.
Similarly, a combination of cultures was made by inoculating soy base with 1% of Lb20 of 8-fold OD600 and 1 % of LbO5-14. Another combination of cultures was made by inoculating soy base with 1 % of Lb20 and 1% of LbO5-14 with 50-fold OD600.
As a control, one sample of soy protein (same concentration as under A above) was inoculated with 2% of Lb20 only. A second control was prepared by inoculation with 2% of Lb05-14 only.
After inoculation with Lb20 only or with LbO5-14 only or with different combinations of L delbreuckii LbO5-14 and L brevis Lb20 the pH of the soy base was measured at regular intervals. The viable count (Colony forming units per ml, Cfu/ml) of the cultures was measured after inoculation (t=0), after 5 and 24 hours by plating appropriate dilutions on MRS agar and incubation at 45°C for 2 hours and subsequently at 430C 3-4 days (for the quantification of L. delbreuckii). L. brevis was quantified by plating samples on MRS agar containing 1 mg/l Vancomycin and incubation at 300C for 3-4 days. (Table 4.1 and 4.2).
Table 4.1 Viable counts of soy base fermented with L. brevis and L delbrueckii
Figure imgf000026_0001
Table 4.2 Acidification of soy base fermented with L. brevis and L. delbrueckii
Figure imgf000027_0001
Soy base was inoculated with L brevis at about 1.4x107 Cfu/ml and L. delbrueckii at about 2.1x107 Cfu/ml in the first combination. Therefore, the ratio of combined cultures was 1 :1.5 for the combination of L. brevis and L. delbrueckii. For the second combination soy base was inoculated with L brevis at about 1.1x108 Cfu/ml and L. delbrueckii at about 2.1x107 Cfu/ml. Therefore, the ratio of combined cultures was
4.5:1. In the third combination soy base was inoculated with L brevis at about 1.4x107 Cfu/ml and L. delbrueckii at about 4.2x108 Cfu/ml. Therefore, the ratio of combined cultures was 1 :30. The pH measurements show that Lb20 alone and LbO5-14 alone acidified the soy base to pH 6.0 in about 6h and products had a pH of about 5.7 after 24h at 300C. Mixed cultures of Lb20 and LbO5-14 achieved acidification to pH 6.0 within 4h and products had a pH of about 4.0 after 24 h. Viable counts of the thermophilic culture (L delbrueckii on MRS agar) increased slightly over 5hr in the single culture and increased to a 1.5 to 5-fold higher level over 24 hr in the mixed cultures. Viable counts of the mesophilic culture (L brevis on MRS Vm agar) increased 5.5-fold over 24h in the single culture and increased 6 to 30 fold in the combined cultures. 500 ml portions of products harvested after 24 h fermentation were pasteurised by incubation at 85°C for 30 minutes in a water bath and subsequently evaluated for smell.
C: sensory
A higher intensity of dairy / yoghurt odour was observed for the soybase inoculated with the combination of cultures than the ones inoculated with the L. delbrueckii only or the L.brevis only, after 24 hours fermentation time, with a highest intensity for the 1 :1 ratio. The soy odour character was significantly lower in inoculated samples with L delbrueckii only, L.brevis only and the combination L. delbrueckii : L.brevis in a 1 :1 ratio.
Optimal ratio in this selected range was thus the 1 :1 ratio between L. delbrueckii and
L.brevis, with a significantly reduced soy odour and generated yoghurt character.
Figure imgf000029_0001
1 The indications made below relate to the deposited microorganism(s) or other biological material referred to in the description on:
1-1 page 13 1-2 line 18-26
1-3 Identification of deposit
1 -3-1 Name of depositary institution CBS Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures
1 -3-2 Address of depositary institution Uppsalalaan 8 , NL-3584 CT Utrecht , The Netherlands / P . O . Box 85167 , NL-3508 AD Utrecht , The Netherlands
1 -3-3 Date of deposit 26 January 2001 (26 . 01 . 2001 ) 1 -3-4 Accession Number CBS 109270
1-5 Designated States for Which Indications are Made All designations
2 The indications made below relate to the deposited microorganism(s) or other biological material referred to in the description on:
2-1 page 13 2-2 line 18-26
2-3 Identification of deposit
2-3-1 Name of depositary institution CBS Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures
2-3-2 Address of depositary institution Uppsalalaan 8 , NL-3584 CT Utrecht , The Netherlands / P . O . Box 85167 , NL-3508 AD Utrecht , The Netherlands
2-3-3 Date of deposit 22 November 2007 (22 . 11 . 2007 ) 2-3-4 Accession Number CBS 122084
2-5 Designated States for Which Indications are Made All designations
FOR RECEIVING OFFICE USE ONLY
0-4 This form was received with the international application:
(yes or no) Yes
0-4-1 Authorized officer
Krista Delimon
FOR INTERNATIONAL BUREAU USE ONLY
0-5 This form was received by the international Bureau on:
0-5-1 Authorized officer

Claims

Claims
1. A process for modifying the flavour of a soy protein containing substrate, said method comprising the steps of: providing a pasteurised or sterilised aqueous liquid comprising 0.5-15% by weight of dissolved soy protein and at least 0.1 % by weight of carbohydrates, said soy protein being derived from soybeans that have not been dehypocotylized, inoculating said soy protein-containing liquid with bacteria selected from mesophilic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) selected from the group consisting of Lactococcus lactis (incl. subspecies lactis, cremoris, and biovar diacetylactis), Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus sake, Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis, Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides, L. acidophilus, L. reuteri, L. rhamnosus, in an amount of between 105 to 109 Cfu / ml substrate, and inoculating said soy-protein-containing liquid with thermophilic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in an amount of between 105 to 109 Cfu / ml substrate,
- fermenting the inoculated aqueous liquid by incubation at a temperature of 20 to 45 0C for 0.5-24 hours, and wherein: o inoculation with said mesophilic LAB and thermophilic LAB is done simultaneously, or o inoculation with thermophilic LAB is carried out first and subsequently the inoculation with said mesophilic LAB is carried out in a period of less than 1 hour between both inoculations or o inoculation with said mesophilic LAB is carried out first and subsequently the inoculation with thermophilic LAB is carried out in a period of less than 0.4 hours between both inoculations, wherein the bacteria of the mesophilic LAB and the bacteria of the thermophilic LAB are inoculated in a ratio Cfu of mesophilic LAB to thermophilic LAB of between 10:1 and 1 :100, preferably 1 :1 to 1 :40.
2. Process according to claim 1 , wherein the thermophilic LAB is selected from the group consisting of Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbruecki, Lactobacillus delbruecki subsp bulgaricus, Lactobacillus delbruecki subsp lactis, L. helveticus.
3. Process according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the mesophilic cultures are cultures having a temperature optimum for growth of between 25 and 37°C.
4. Process according to any of the preceeding claims, wherein the thermophilic cultures are cultures having a temperature optimum for growth of above 400C and below 500C, preferably 40-46°C, more preferably 41-45°C.
5. Process according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the pasteurised or sterilised aqueous liquid which is inoculated comprises soy protein in an amount of between 1 and 10% by weight, preferably between 1 and 8% by weight.
6. Process according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the pasteurised or sterilised aqueous liquid which is inoculated comprises carbohydrates in an amount of 0.1 to 10% by weight, preferably 0.2 to 5% by weight.
7. Process according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the carbohydrates comprise mono- and/or di-saccharide.
8. Process according to any of the preceding claims, wherein in total less than 6% disaccharides by weight of the fermented product are added before, during or after fermentation.
9. Process according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the fermentation is carried out at a temperature of 25 to 400C.
10. Process according to any of the preceding claims, wherein during fermentation the following changes in concentrations of flavour compounds occur:
• concentration of n-hexanal decreases by at least 40%, preferably by at least 50%;
• at least two of n-pentanal concentration, n-heptanal concentration and n- nonanal concentration decrease by at least 30%.
1 1. Process according to any of the preceding claims, wherein during fermentation (£)-2-hexenal concentration decreases by at least 20%, preferably by at least 30%.
12. Process according to any of the preceeding claims, wherein the process comprises a further step comprising pasteurising or sterilising the so-fermented aqueous composition.
13. Process according to any one of the preceding claims, comprising filling the fermented product into containers and subsequently sealing the filled containers, wherein edible acid is added to the fermented product prior to the filling into the containers so as to adjust the pH to less than 4.5 and optionally the fermented product is not subjected to pasteurisation or sterilisation prior, during or after the filling into the containers.
14. Process according to claim 13, wherein the edible acid is added to the fermented product before the fermentation has reached the point at which product inhibition prevents further production of lactic acid by lactic acid bacteria.
15. Process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the aqueous liquid containing 0.5-15 wt.% of dissolved soy protein is prepared from a soy protein source selected from the group consisting of soy isolate, soy concentrate, soy flour and combinations thereof, said soy protein source being derived from soy beans exhibiting a lipoxygenase activity of less than 15 kU/mg, more preferably of less than 10 kU/mg.
16. Process according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the substrate is a liquid, and the resulting product is a beverage.
PCT/EP2010/056271 2009-05-25 2010-05-07 Fermented soy-based food product Ceased WO2010136320A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
BRPI1007568A BRPI1007568A8 (en) 2009-05-25 2010-05-07 PROCESS FOR MODIFYING THE FLAVOR OF A SUBSTRATE CONTAINING SOY PROTEIN
CN201080022808XA CN102448319A (en) 2009-05-25 2010-05-07 Fermented soy-based food product
MX2011012486A MX2011012486A (en) 2009-05-25 2010-05-07 Fermented soy-based food product.
ZA2011/07801A ZA201107801B (en) 2009-05-25 2011-10-25 Fermented soy-based food product

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP09160957 2009-05-25
EP09160957.8 2009-05-25

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2010136320A1 true WO2010136320A1 (en) 2010-12-02

Family

ID=41213191

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2010/056271 Ceased WO2010136320A1 (en) 2009-05-25 2010-05-07 Fermented soy-based food product

Country Status (6)

Country Link
CN (1) CN102448319A (en)
AR (1) AR076595A1 (en)
BR (1) BRPI1007568A8 (en)
MX (1) MX2011012486A (en)
WO (1) WO2010136320A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA201107801B (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2021019269A1 (en) * 2019-07-31 2021-02-04 Sodima Modulated vegetable protein
US10986848B2 (en) 2013-01-11 2021-04-27 Impossible Foods Inc. Methods and compositions for consumables
WO2023001633A1 (en) * 2021-07-23 2023-01-26 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Lactococcus strains
US20230102612A1 (en) * 2020-03-31 2023-03-30 Dsm Ip Assets B.V. Accelerating the acidification speed of lactic acid bacteria
EP4631357A1 (en) * 2024-04-12 2025-10-15 Sas C&Dac Lactococcus bacterial strains for fermentation of plant-based preparation

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105028661B (en) * 2015-06-08 2017-04-26 浙江工商大学 Method for preparing soybean milk fermented milk by lactobacillus strains capable of producing high-yield folic acid

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3937843A (en) * 1972-12-04 1976-02-10 Laboratorios Del Dr. Esteve Sa Bean-odor-free soy bean product and its production
EP0386817A1 (en) * 1989-03-07 1990-09-12 Unilever N.V. Fermented food product
EP0521331A2 (en) * 1991-06-19 1993-01-07 N.V. Vandemoortele International Soy milk fermentation process
EP1145648A1 (en) * 2000-04-10 2001-10-17 Kraft Foods, Inc. Low-cost soy proteinacaous food ingredients
US6599543B1 (en) * 1997-01-22 2003-07-29 Fuji Oil Company, Limited Process for preparing fermented soybean milk
WO2009065722A1 (en) * 2007-11-23 2009-05-28 Unilever Nv Fermented soy-based beverage
WO2009065724A1 (en) * 2007-11-23 2009-05-28 Unilever Nv Fermented soy-based beverage

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3937843A (en) * 1972-12-04 1976-02-10 Laboratorios Del Dr. Esteve Sa Bean-odor-free soy bean product and its production
EP0386817A1 (en) * 1989-03-07 1990-09-12 Unilever N.V. Fermented food product
EP0521331A2 (en) * 1991-06-19 1993-01-07 N.V. Vandemoortele International Soy milk fermentation process
US6599543B1 (en) * 1997-01-22 2003-07-29 Fuji Oil Company, Limited Process for preparing fermented soybean milk
EP1145648A1 (en) * 2000-04-10 2001-10-17 Kraft Foods, Inc. Low-cost soy proteinacaous food ingredients
WO2009065722A1 (en) * 2007-11-23 2009-05-28 Unilever Nv Fermented soy-based beverage
WO2009065724A1 (en) * 2007-11-23 2009-05-28 Unilever Nv Fermented soy-based beverage

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
ANTHON; BARRETT, J. AGRIC. FOOD CHEM., vol. 49, 2001, pages 32 - 37
MURTI TW ET AL., JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, vol. 58, no. 1, 1993, pages 153 - 157

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10986848B2 (en) 2013-01-11 2021-04-27 Impossible Foods Inc. Methods and compositions for consumables
AU2019246895B2 (en) * 2013-01-11 2021-05-06 Impossible Foods Inc. Non-dairy cheese replica comprising a coacervate
WO2021019269A1 (en) * 2019-07-31 2021-02-04 Sodima Modulated vegetable protein
CN114207141A (en) * 2019-07-31 2022-03-18 速迪马公司 Modulated plant proteins
US20230102612A1 (en) * 2020-03-31 2023-03-30 Dsm Ip Assets B.V. Accelerating the acidification speed of lactic acid bacteria
WO2023001633A1 (en) * 2021-07-23 2023-01-26 Dupont Nutrition Biosciences Aps Lactococcus strains
EP4631357A1 (en) * 2024-04-12 2025-10-15 Sas C&Dac Lactococcus bacterial strains for fermentation of plant-based preparation
WO2025215230A1 (en) * 2024-04-12 2025-10-16 C&Dac Lactococcus bacterial strains for fermentation of plant-based preparation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
MX2011012486A (en) 2011-12-12
CN102448319A (en) 2012-05-09
ZA201107801B (en) 2012-12-27
BRPI1007568A2 (en) 2015-08-25
AR076595A1 (en) 2011-06-22
BRPI1007568A8 (en) 2017-11-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2219465B1 (en) Fermented soy-based beverage
CN101932250B (en) Fermented soy-based beverage
CN101124970B (en) Soybean peptide lactic acid bacteria beverage and its preparation method
JP4332247B2 (en) A lactic acid bacterium having high ability to produce γ-aminobutyric acid, a fermented food containing a high amount of γ-aminobutyric acid using the lactic acid bacterium, and a method for producing the same.
KR101442621B1 (en) Flavor imparting substance of food and drink, preparation method thereof and food and drink containing flavor imparting substance
CA2609959C (en) Fermented food containing bifidobacterium bacteria and method for producing the same
CN103261402B (en) Local flavor is regulated by using the biological treatment of the bacterial isolates forming cream-style
WO2010136320A1 (en) Fermented soy-based food product
JP2806156B2 (en) How to ferment soy milk
JPWO2013047201A1 (en) Taste improving agent
WO2010136321A1 (en) Process for preparing a fermented soy-based product
JP7385387B2 (en) Method for producing gallic acid, method for producing fermented tea products, lactic acid bacteria, lactic acid bacteria compositions, fermented tea products, and food and drink products
Saglam et al. An investigation for the development of whey-based probiotic beverages
EP2209384B1 (en) Fermented soy-based beverage
US20060127560A1 (en) Protein-containing preparation which can be biotechnologically produced, method for the production thereof, and use of the same as a food ingredient
JP3913200B2 (en) Removal method of unpleasant taste and unpleasant odor of vegetables and / or beans and processed food obtained using the same
CN107691642A (en) Flavor is adjusted by using the biological treatment for the bacterium bacterial strain for forming flavor
KR20090041521A (en) Liquid Fermented Tofu Fermented with Kimchi Lactobacillus and Its Manufacturing Method
JP2008295348A (en) Soy fermented food
JP7094745B2 (en) Manufacturing method of lactic acid bacteria starter for soymilk lactic acid fermented food and soymilk lactic acid fermented food
JP2871379B2 (en) How to improve the flavor and color of soy products
CN117062905B (en) New lactic acid bacteria strains and compositions containing the same
TWI846822B (en) Method for masking off-flavor of beverage
JP2011512807A (en) Fermented soymilk and method for improving sensory characteristics of fermented soymilk
JP7394537B2 (en) beverage

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 201080022808.X

Country of ref document: CN

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 10717654

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

DPE1 Request for preliminary examination filed after expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101)
DPE1 Request for preliminary examination filed after expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2342/MUMNP/2011

Country of ref document: IN

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: MX/A/2011/012486

Country of ref document: MX

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 10717654

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: BR

Ref legal event code: B01A

Ref document number: PI1007568

Country of ref document: BR

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: PI1007568

Country of ref document: BR

Kind code of ref document: A2

Effective date: 20111124