WO2010100146A1 - Simulation model - Google Patents

Simulation model Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2010100146A1
WO2010100146A1 PCT/EP2010/052618 EP2010052618W WO2010100146A1 WO 2010100146 A1 WO2010100146 A1 WO 2010100146A1 EP 2010052618 W EP2010052618 W EP 2010052618W WO 2010100146 A1 WO2010100146 A1 WO 2010100146A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
rotor
converter
model
resistance value
simulation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/EP2010/052618
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Peter Nielsen
Martin Høgdahl ZAMASTIL
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Vestas Wind Systems AS
Original Assignee
Vestas Wind Systems AS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Vestas Wind Systems AS filed Critical Vestas Wind Systems AS
Publication of WO2010100146A1 publication Critical patent/WO2010100146A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/30Circuit design
    • G06F30/36Circuit design at the analogue level
    • G06F30/367Design verification, e.g. using simulation, simulation program with integrated circuit emphasis [SPICE], direct methods or relaxation methods

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for simulating the stability of a power generating unit adapted to feed electrical power into a power supply grid.
  • Simulation methods can be implemented using general purpose electronics simulation tools where each component of the real system is represented by a corresponding component in the simulation model. Simulation method may give a good perception of the real system's behavior, e.g. during transient grid conditions.
  • the ideal situation would be to simulate the power electronic converter by using the fast switches during the fault. However, this would slow down the simulation time by several decades.
  • Another way to simulate the power electronic converter would be to model the converter using a simple diode model. This would increase the speed of the simulation.
  • An even faster way to simulate the blocked converter situation would be to insert a resistor between the generator and the voltage/current source.
  • LVRT Low Voltage Ride Through
  • the present invention relates, in a first aspect, to a model for simulating a power generation system comprising an electrical power generator operatively connected to an electronic power converter, wherein, during a predetermined mode of operation of the power generation system, a first rotor resistance value, R r , of the model is replaced by a second rotor resistance value, R B co-
  • the model according to the first aspect of the present invention may be implemented as a single-phase in a synchronous system or a multi-phase model in a stationary system, i.e. a model for simulating single- or multi-phase systems, such as three-phase system.
  • the power generator may, in said simulation model, be represented by a set of rotor winding equations and a set of stator winding equations.
  • the electronic power converter may be represented by a modified rotor resistor value during the predetermined mode of operation.
  • the electronic power converter may be represented by a voltage source during said predetermined mode of operation.
  • the electronic power converter may be represented by a modified rotor resistor value in combination with a voltage source.
  • the predetermined mode of operation is typically initiated if some sort of fault is detected.
  • the predetermined mode of operation may relate to a blocked converter situation, i.e. to a situation where the power converter is defect or not able to supply power due to the low voltage situation.
  • the voltage source representing the electronic power converter during the predetermined mode of operation may comprise a controllable voltage source.
  • the second rotor resistance value, R BC o may be variable.
  • the predetermined mode of operation such as a LVRT event, may be detected by an AGO module of the model. As it will be described in further details below the AGO module goes into a certain mode of operation, said mode of operation launching the predetermined mode of operation.
  • the simulation model according to the first aspect of the present invention may in principle be implemented in any simulation tools, such as for example in a PSS/E environment.
  • the present invention relates to a method for simulating a blocked rotor converter situation in a power generation system comprising an electrical power generator operatively connected to a rotor converter, the method comprising the step of replacing a first rotor resistance value, R r , by a second rotor resistance value, R B co, during said blocked rotor converter situation, said second rotor resistance value, R BC o, preferably being variable.
  • the method may simulate single- or multi-phase systems, such as three-phase system.
  • the present invention relates to a computer program product for performing the simulation method according to the second aspect when said computer program product is run on, or executed by, a microprocessor.
  • Fig. 1 shows the overall block diagram of the simulation model
  • Fig. 3 shows equivalent circuits of the 4 th and the 2 th order QD synchronous models
  • Fig. 4a shows the voltage source, the inserted resistor R BC o and the generator equivalent circuit in a QD synchronous domain
  • Fig. 4b shows a 3 phase voltage source, the inserted resistors R B co and the generator rotor and stator windings in a 3 phase representation
  • Fig. 5 illustrates the AGO state control.
  • the present invention relates to a simulation model for simulating a power generation system with an electrical generator feeding energy to a power electronic converter.
  • the converter model is changed in that a blocking resistor is inserted, or alternatively or in addition, an existing rotor resistance is changed so that its value also contains a blocking resistor.
  • the power electronic converter is represented by a variable voltage source.
  • the generator is represented by a set of rotor winding equations and a set of stator winding equation.
  • the model can be represented a multiphase system or a synchronous DQ system.
  • the model can be represented by a vector having a length and an angle.
  • detection of converter blocking may be done by voltage level rather than current level.
  • shaping of the curve for the response due to the blocking can be implemented in the simulation model using pre-calculated results.
  • a 4 th or 2 nd order model for the induction machine or doubly fed induction machine is needed.
  • the induction machine model implemented in the simulation tools is often considering the reference frame moving at the synchronous or stator speed, leading the internal signals to be DC in nature.
  • U s is the stator voltage
  • I s is the stator current
  • U 1 is the rotor voltage transformed to stator side.
  • I 1 . is the rotor current transformed to stator side.
  • ⁇ s is the stator flux
  • ⁇ r is the rotor flux transformed to stator side.
  • ⁇ s is the stator or synchronous angular speed.
  • R s is the stator resistance
  • R is the rotor resistance.
  • L ls is the stator leakage inductance.
  • L lr is the rotor leakage inductance transformed to the stator side.
  • L m is the magnetising inductance
  • s is the slip of the machine, a-dimensional by definition.
  • u rd -r r ⁇ i rd --j- ⁇ - ⁇ p- * ⁇ ® s ⁇ ⁇ rq ii b at
  • FIG. 1 an embodiment of the present invention is depicted.
  • the system comprises wind turbine generator in a DFIG configuration together with a rotor connected to a power electronic converter.
  • the power electronic converter can be split into two parts, namely a grid side converter and a generator side converter.
  • the DC-link controller feeds the rotor power to the grid in order to preserve the energy balance across the DC-link.
  • the contribution of the rotor power to the total current out of the wind turbine is modelled by an ideal ratio changer with a built- in slip dependency.
  • the controllable switch just in front of the generator allows to switch the rotor voltages of the machine away from the current controller outputs and onto a controlled voltage source. This switching action is activated by an AGO state machine, cf. Fig. 5. At the same time the rotor resistance value used in the machine equations is changed from its nominal value (R R ) to a value called R BC o-
  • Fig. 2 shows the converter blocking operation emulated by external controlled voltage source and a variable rotor resistance, R BC o, in the DFIG model.
  • V BCO and R B co are determined 'empirically' by running numerous simulations with a very detailed model. The same simulations have been used to define the criteria for switching the AGO state machine into State 2. This means that even though the simulation runs with a much higher time steps than the actual response shows, the performance can show the proper response since the 'empirically' simulations are stored in the model and can be used during the converter blocking operation.
  • a LVRT logics block must generate three outputs for the rest of the system to use during a low voltage ride through event. These outputs are:
  • the AGO state signal affects the PQ-limit block and it is also used to control the BCO-switch at the rotor terminals of the generator, cf. Fig. 1.
  • Fig. 4a shows the voltage source, the inserted resistor R BC o and the generator equivalent circuit in a QD synchronous domain.
  • Fig. 4b shows a 3 phase voltage source, the inserted resistors R B co and the generator rotor and stator windings in a 3 phase representation,
  • the main function of the AGO state machine is to switch the electrical control block between power control and current control mode.
  • the AGO state signal is also used to reset reference filters and the integrator of the power loop PI controller.
  • the AGO state machine is shown in Fig. 5.
  • the AGO In this state the AGO is inactive, but it continuously monitors the stator voltage in order to detect if a ride-through sequence should be initiated.
  • the stator voltage amplitude and its rate of change determine whether the state changes to State 1 or State 2.
  • the electrical control remains in normal operation (power control) as long as the AGO state machine is in State 0.
  • State 2 is a transition phase between State O and State 1. Entry is exclusively from State O and exit is always to State 1. This State is introduced in order to represent the generator response to a blocked rotor converter.
  • the BCO-switch (Blocked Converter Operation) switched to the voltage source V B co all the time the AGO state machine is in State 2. Furthermore, the rotor resistance of the generator model is altered throughout the activation period of State 2.
  • a timer is activated. When this timer expires, the state machine shifts to mode 1.
  • the integrator as well as the output of the current controllers are reset to the value of zero.
  • the currents are ramped towards the values calculated by the State 1 controllers.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Control Of Eletrric Generators (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method and a model for simulating a blocked rotor converter situation in a power generation system comprising an electrical power generator operatively connected to a rotor converter, the method comprising the step of replacing a first rotor resistance value, Rr, by a second rotor resistance value, RBCO, during said blocked rotor converter situation.

Description

SIMULATION MODEL
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a method for simulating the stability of a power generating unit adapted to feed electrical power into a power supply grid.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Simulation methods can be implemented using general purpose electronics simulation tools where each component of the real system is represented by a corresponding component in the simulation model. Simulation method may give a good perception of the real system's behavior, e.g. during transient grid conditions.
However, when simulating e.g. electrical grids with a plurality of power generating units, such simulations may be very time consuming, particularly if different protective measures are provided to protect the converters during transient grid conditions.
It may be seen as an object of embodiments of the present invention to provide a simulation model that facilitates faster simulations of power generating units during transient grid conditions, such as low voltage ride through events.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
When simulating electrical power generating systems with a power electronic converter in a large electrical power network, there is a need for fast simulation speeds. Moreover, the simulation must show the real response like it would be the in the real network.
When using power electronic converters having a switch frequency of several kHz it is pointless to show the actual switching. Instead the power electronic converter is simulated by using a variable current or voltage source. This works well for the steady state operation.
For situations where there are disturbances in the grid or faults in the power electronic converter, that causes the converter to go into a blocking mode, the simple representation by using variable current or voltage sources, would not show the right response.
The ideal situation would be to simulate the power electronic converter by using the fast switches during the fault. However, this would slow down the simulation time by several decades. Another way to simulate the power electronic converter would be to model the converter using a simple diode model. This would increase the speed of the simulation. An even faster way to simulate the blocked converter situation would be to insert a resistor between the generator and the voltage/current source.
Often the need for the simulation of the converter blocking happens during a so called Low Voltage Ride Through (LVRT) event where the voltage on the electrical power supply grid drops to a rather low value. Whether it is a LVRT event depends on the grid operator. In some areas a 15% voltage drop would be considered a LVRT event whereas in other areas a higher voltage drop is required.
In order to comply with the above-mentioned object and the above-mentioned needs the present invention relates, in a first aspect, to a model for simulating a power generation system comprising an electrical power generator operatively connected to an electronic power converter, wherein, during a predetermined mode of operation of the power generation system, a first rotor resistance value, Rr, of the model is replaced by a second rotor resistance value, RBco-
The model according to the first aspect of the present invention may be implemented as a single-phase in a synchronous system or a multi-phase model in a stationary system, i.e. a model for simulating single- or multi-phase systems, such as three-phase system. The power generator may, in said simulation model, be represented by a set of rotor winding equations and a set of stator winding equations.
Thus, the electronic power converter may be represented by a modified rotor resistor value during the predetermined mode of operation.
In addition, the electronic power converter may be represented by a voltage source during said predetermined mode of operation. Thus, the electronic power converter may be represented by a modified rotor resistor value in combination with a voltage source.
The predetermined mode of operation is typically initiated if some sort of fault is detected. Thus, the predetermined mode of operation may relate to a blocked converter situation, i.e. to a situation where the power converter is defect or not able to supply power due to the low voltage situation.
The voltage source representing the electronic power converter during the predetermined mode of operation may comprise a controllable voltage source. Also, the second rotor resistance value, RBCo, may be variable.
The predetermined mode of operation, such a LVRT event, may be detected by an AGO module of the model. As it will be described in further details below the AGO module goes into a certain mode of operation, said mode of operation launching the predetermined mode of operation.
The simulation model according to the first aspect of the present invention may in principle be implemented in any simulation tools, such as for example in a PSS/E environment.
In a second aspect, the present invention relates to a method for simulating a blocked rotor converter situation in a power generation system comprising an electrical power generator operatively connected to a rotor converter, the method comprising the step of replacing a first rotor resistance value, Rr, by a second rotor resistance value, RBco, during said blocked rotor converter situation, said second rotor resistance value, RBCo, preferably being variable.
The method may simulate single- or multi-phase systems, such as three-phase system.
The method may further comprise the step of representing the rotor converter by a controllable voltage source during said blocked rotor converter situation.
In a third aspect, the present invention relates to a computer program product for performing the simulation method according to the second aspect when said computer program product is run on, or executed by, a microprocessor.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention will now be explained in further details with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein
Fig. 1 shows the overall block diagram of the simulation model,
Fig. 2 illustrates the converter blocking operation,
Fig. 3 shows equivalent circuits of the 4th and the 2th order QD synchronous models,
Fig. 4a shows the voltage source, the inserted resistor RBCo and the generator equivalent circuit in a QD synchronous domain, and Fig. 4b shows a 3 phase voltage source, the inserted resistors RBco and the generator rotor and stator windings in a 3 phase representation, and
Fig. 5 illustrates the AGO state control.
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of examples in the drawings and will be described in detail herein. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In its broadest aspect the present invention relates to a simulation model for simulating a power generation system with an electrical generator feeding energy to a power electronic converter. During a blocked converter scenario the converter model is changed in that a blocking resistor is inserted, or alternatively or in addition, an existing rotor resistance is changed so that its value also contains a blocking resistor. The power electronic converter is represented by a variable voltage source. For simulation purposes the generator is represented by a set of rotor winding equations and a set of stator winding equation.
The model can be represented a multiphase system or a synchronous DQ system. The model can be represented by a vector having a length and an angle.
According to the present invention it becomes possible to identify if a blocking of a converter has happened between two time steps. This information is important for fast simulations where the time steps are much faster than the actual converter blocking.
Also, detection of converter blocking may be done by voltage level rather than current level. Finally, shaping of the curve for the response due to the blocking can be implemented in the simulation model using pre-calculated results.
In order to implement reliable simulation models of electrical machines in simulation software tools, such as for example PSS/E, a 4th or 2nd order model for the induction machine or doubly fed induction machine (DFIG) is needed. The induction machine model implemented in the simulation tools is often considering the reference frame moving at the synchronous or stator speed, leading the internal signals to be DC in nature.
For the SI model written in space vector form, it should be noted that the space vector representation is valid in both D+jQ or Q+jD frame conventions.
= Ls .L + Lm .L
Figure imgf000007_0001
Figure imgf000007_0002
The parameters and the space vectors involved in the model [Eq 1] are as follows:
Us is the stator voltage.
Is is the stator current.
U1. is the rotor voltage transformed to stator side.
I1. is the rotor current transformed to stator side.
Φs is the stator flux.
Φr is the rotor flux transformed to stator side.
Ωs is the stator or synchronous angular speed.
Rs is the stator resistance.
R is the rotor resistance. Lls is the stator leakage inductance.
Llr is the rotor leakage inductance transformed to the stator side.
Lm is the magnetising inductance.
s is the slip of the machine, a-dimensional by definition.
The definition of the slip is given below. Similar to the synchronous speed, the rotor speed in electrical radians will be denominated with Ωr .
Ω. [Eq 2]
The total stator L5 and rotor L1. inductances are also exemplified in [Eq 1] as the final variables composing the stator and rotor fluxes.
The OD 4m Order Model
In this case, the space vector system leads to the next 4th order model in SI units - it is basically what [Eq 1] is stated but only decomposed on Q-D axes.
sa
Usg = Λs 1Sq , T "s ^ sd
Figure imgf000008_0001
dΦ,
Ur =-K-Irq -^ + s-Ωsr,
"r ~rq ~ dt dΦr
Urd =-Rr Ird-—^-s Qs Φ dt rq The OD 2nd Order Model
The 2nd order version of the per-unit model will follows the 4th order closely; the only difference will come from the derivatives of the stator flux components that will equal zero in the 2nd order model - meaning the stator flux is considered constant.
Figure imgf000009_0001
- u Sd = -r s - L - ω s - Φsq
urd = -rr ird --j- -^p- * ®s Φrq iib at
The models shown are all represented in a so called synchronous reference frame system. It would be general knowledge to the person skilled in the art to use the same model in a stationary reference frame with a multi phase representation. Other more simple or complex generator model could be used as well. The associated simulation results would most like vary but the spirit of the invention would not be any different.
The equivalent circuits of the 4th and the 2nd order QD models are shown in Fig. 3a and Fig. 3b, respectively.
Referring now to Fig. 1 an embodiment of the present invention is depicted. As seen in Fig. 1 the system comprises wind turbine generator in a DFIG configuration together with a rotor connected to a power electronic converter. The power electronic converter can be split into two parts, namely a grid side converter and a generator side converter.
As the grid-side converter is consequently controlled with unity power factor, there is no reactive current flowing through the grid side converter. The DC-link controller feeds the rotor power to the grid in order to preserve the energy balance across the DC-link. The contribution of the rotor power to the total current out of the wind turbine is modelled by an ideal ratio changer with a built- in slip dependency.
Ptotal = ( 1 + Slip) X Pstator Qtotal = Qstator
Still referring to Fig. 1 the controllable switch just in front of the generator (BCO switch) allows to switch the rotor voltages of the machine away from the current controller outputs and onto a controlled voltage source. This switching action is activated by an AGO state machine, cf. Fig. 5. At the same time the rotor resistance value used in the machine equations is changed from its nominal value (RR) to a value called RBCo-
Fig. 2 shows the converter blocking operation emulated by external controlled voltage source and a variable rotor resistance, RBCo, in the DFIG model. The signal from the current controller state to the VBco state in controlled by the AGO state machine.
Both VBCO and RBco are determined 'empirically' by running numerous simulations with a very detailed model. The same simulations have been used to define the criteria for switching the AGO state machine into State 2. This means that even though the simulation runs with a much higher time steps than the actual response shows, the performance can show the proper response since the 'empirically' simulations are stored in the model and can be used during the converter blocking operation.
A LVRT logics block must generate three outputs for the rest of the system to use during a low voltage ride through event. These outputs are:
1. AGO state
2. Ird_AGO current
3. Irq_AGO current During LVRT, the turbine is running in current control mode and hence the power loop is disabled in this mode.
The outputs of the LVRT block are thus reference currents in the d and q axis and a logic signal indicating whether the system is in normal mode (0=power control) or LVRT mode (l=current control).
Besides the generator controls, the AGO state signal affects the PQ-limit block and it is also used to control the BCO-switch at the rotor terminals of the generator, cf. Fig. 1.
Fig. 4a shows the voltage source, the inserted resistor RBCo and the generator equivalent circuit in a QD synchronous domain. Fig. 4b shows a 3 phase voltage source, the inserted resistors RBco and the generator rotor and stator windings in a 3 phase representation,
The main function of the AGO state machine is to switch the electrical control block between power control and current control mode. In order to assure a bump-less transfer when the power control is regained, the AGO state signal is also used to reset reference filters and the integrator of the power loop PI controller. The AGO state machine is shown in Fig. 5.
AGO state 0
In this state the AGO is inactive, but it continuously monitors the stator voltage in order to detect if a ride-through sequence should be initiated. The stator voltage amplitude and its rate of change determine whether the state changes to State 1 or State 2. The electrical control remains in normal operation (power control) as long as the AGO state machine is in State 0.
AGO state 1
In this state the power control loop is disabled and AGO current references are fed directly to the rotor current controllers. When the voltage is restored ( | US| > ULVRT), preparations to finish the AGO sequence and return to State = (Normal Operation) is initiated. Upon the change from State 1 back to State 0, the AGO- switch in the control loop switches back in the power controller with a reset of the integrator state.
AGO state 2
State 2 is a transition phase between State O and State 1. Entry is exclusively from State O and exit is always to State 1. This State is introduced in order to represent the generator response to a blocked rotor converter. The BCO-switch (Blocked Converter Operation) switched to the voltage source VBco all the time the AGO state machine is in State 2. Furthermore, the rotor resistance of the generator model is altered throughout the activation period of State 2. Upon entry into this State a timer is activated. When this timer expires, the state machine shifts to mode 1. During the AGO state 2, the integrator as well as the output of the current controllers are reset to the value of zero. When leaving State 2 (and entering State 1= current control), the currents are ramped towards the values calculated by the State 1 controllers.

Claims

1. A model for simulating a power generation system comprising an electrical power generator operatively connected to an electronic power converter, wherein, during in a predetermined mode of operation of the power generation system, a first rotor resistance value, Rr , of the model is replaced by a second rotor resistance value, RBCo-
2. A simulation model according to claim 1, wherein the predetermined mode of operation is associated with a blocked converter situation.
3. A simulation model according to claim 2, wherein the electronic power converter is furthermore represented by a voltage source during said predetermined mode of operation.
4. A simulation model according to claim 3, wherein the voltage source representing the electronic power converter during the predetermined mode of operation comprises a controllable voltage source.
5. A simulation model according to any of claims 1-4, wherein the second rotor resistance value, RBco, is variable.
6. A simulation model according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the electronic power converter represented in the model comprises a rotor power converter.
7. A simulation model according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the predetermined mode of operation is triggered by an AGO module of the model.
8. A simulation model according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the model is implemented in a PSS/E environment.
9. A method for simulating a blocked rotor converter situation in a power generation system comprising an electrical power generator operatively connected to a rotor converter, the method comprising the step of replacing a first rotor resistance value, R1-, by a second rotor resistance value, RBCo, during said blocked rotor converter situation.
10. A method according to claim 9, further comprising the step of representing the electronic power converter with a controllable voltage source during said blocked rotor converter situation.
11. A method according to claim 9 or 10, wherein the second rotor resistance value, RBCO, is variable.
12. A computer program product for performing the simulation method according to any of claims 9-11 when said computer program product is run on, or executed by, a microprocessor.
PCT/EP2010/052618 2009-03-02 2010-03-02 Simulation model Ceased WO2010100146A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15680809P 2009-03-02 2009-03-02
US61/156,808 2009-03-02

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2010100146A1 true WO2010100146A1 (en) 2010-09-10

Family

ID=42378720

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2010/052618 Ceased WO2010100146A1 (en) 2009-03-02 2010-03-02 Simulation model

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2010100146A1 (en)

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
FERNANDEZ ET AL: "Aggregated dynamic model for wind farms with doubly fed induction generator wind turbines", RENEWABLE ENERGY, PERGAMON PRESS, OXFORD, GB LNKD- DOI:10.1016/J.RENENE.2007.01.010, vol. 33, no. 1, 30 October 2007 (2007-10-30), pages 129 - 140, XP022321595, ISSN: 0960-1481 *
SANCHEZ ET AL: "Dynamic model of wind energy conversion systems with variable speed synchronous generator and full-size power converter for large-scale power system stability studies", RENEWABLE ENERGY, PERGAMON PRESS, OXFORD, GB LNKD- DOI:10.1016/J.RENENE.2007.06.019, vol. 33, no. 6, 19 February 2008 (2008-02-19), pages 1186 - 1198, XP022489721, ISSN: 0960-1481 *

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN101026301B (en) Method and apparatus for injection current
Iwanski et al. DFIG-based power generation system with UPS function for variable-speed applications
D'Arco et al. Virtual synchronous machines—Classification of implementations and analysis of equivalence to droop controllers for microgrids
Gkavanoudis et al. A combined fault ride-through and power smoothing control method for full-converter wind turbines employing supercapacitor energy storage system
Hachicha et al. Rotor power control in doubly fed induction generator wind turbine under grid faults
CN118412923B (en) Transient overvoltage suppression control parameter optimization method and system for follow-up network type converter
WO2013163266A1 (en) Power conversion system with open- circuit fault detection and method thereof
KR20120064051A (en) Fault-ride-through method, converter and power generating unit for a wind turbine
CN109154275B (en) Operating a wind turbine generator during an abnormal grid event
US8861239B2 (en) Regulating output characteristics of static energy supply units
Khayat et al. DC-link voltage control aided for the inertial support during severe faults in weak grids
US20240275301A1 (en) Power Conversion Device
JP2026012896A (en) Power converter control method, converter device, and computer program product
Pholboon et al. Virtual synchronous machine control for grid transmission compliance studies
JP2020043688A (en) Voltage control type virtual synchronous machine control device and voltage control type virtual synchronous machine
Abderrezak et al. Sensor fault detection, localization, and system reconfiguration with a sliding mode observer and adaptive threshold of PMSM
Roy et al. Transmission side protection performance with Type-IV wind turbine system integration
Thankachen et al. Hysteresis controller based fault current interruption using DVR
EP4300747A1 (en) System and method for simulating electric power grid conditions
Luna et al. Control of DFIG-WT under unbalanced grid voltage conditions
CN117728434A (en) A VSG fault ride-through control method and system based on virtual impedance
Elizondo et al. Enhanced critical clearing time estimation and fault recovery strategy for an inverter-based microgrid with IM load
Amin et al. Phase-frequency controlled in virtual synchronous converter for low-voltage microgrid-inverter synchronization
Ernst et al. Validation of a Converter Control based on a Generator Model as Voltage Source
Patel et al. Improved Traditional Demagnetization Control of DFIG Under Balanced Grid Faults

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 10713591

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 10713591

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1