WO2010093879A1 - Managing task execution - Google Patents
Managing task execution Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2010093879A1 WO2010093879A1 PCT/US2010/024036 US2010024036W WO2010093879A1 WO 2010093879 A1 WO2010093879 A1 WO 2010093879A1 US 2010024036 W US2010024036 W US 2010024036W WO 2010093879 A1 WO2010093879 A1 WO 2010093879A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- data
- messages
- flow
- data processing
- tasks
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/46—Multiprogramming arrangements
- G06F9/50—Allocation of resources, e.g. of the central processing unit [CPU]
- G06F9/5005—Allocation of resources, e.g. of the central processing unit [CPU] to service a request
- G06F9/5027—Allocation of resources, e.g. of the central processing unit [CPU] to service a request the resource being a machine, e.g. CPUs, Servers, Terminals
- G06F9/5038—Allocation of resources, e.g. of the central processing unit [CPU] to service a request the resource being a machine, e.g. CPUs, Servers, Terminals considering the execution order of a plurality of tasks, e.g. taking priority or time dependency constraints into consideration
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programs
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programs
- G06F9/448—Execution paradigms, e.g. implementations of programming paradigms
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/46—Multiprogramming arrangements
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2209/00—Indexing scheme relating to G06F9/00
- G06F2209/50—Indexing scheme relating to G06F9/50
- G06F2209/506—Constraint
Definitions
- This description relates to managing task execution.
- a data processing system typically stores, manages, processes, and analyzes data.
- a data processing system may simply handle one or more tasks scheduled to be completed at a certain time.
- a data processing system may be a large-scale customer relationship management system.
- Simple or complex, a data processing system often includes one or more components, such as processing elements, input data, and output data.
- the processing elements of a data processing system determine the function of the data processing system, for example, data warehouse, customer relationship management, and data mining, etc..
- Input data of a data processing system can come from many sources. For example, input data may come from flat files, database tables, operational systems, etc.. Input data may also come from the Internet, carrying information from one system to another.
- Output data of a data processing system are what the processing elements generate. Formats of output data vary depending on the processing elements that generate them.
- a method for managing task execution includes receiving a specification of a plurality of tasks to be performed by respective functional modules; processing a flow of input data using a dataflow graph that includes nodes representing data processing components connected by links representing flows of data between data processing components; in response to at least one flow of data provided by at least one data processing component, generating a flow of messages; and in response to each of the messages in the flow of messages, performing an iteration of a set of one or more tasks using one or more corresponding functional modules.
- At least one of the functional modules is configured to initiate execution of the dataflow graph.
- the specification of the plurality of tasks specifies dependency relationships between the at least two of the tasks.
- a dependency relationship between the at least two tasks defines at least a partial ordering for execution of the functional modules corresponding to the tasks.
- a dependency relationship between the at least two tasks defines conditional logic for determine at least one condition upon which execution of at least one of the functional modules is based.
- At least one of the functional modules includes a fault-handling module that is executed when the conditional logic detects that a fault has occurred in execution of one of the other functional modules. Multiple iterations of a given set of one or more tasks are executed concurrently in response to two or more messages in the flow of messages.
- One or more of the messages in the flow of messages is generated in response to an element of data in the flow of data without including the element of data.
- One or more of the messages in the flow of messages includes at least a portion of an element of data in the flow of data.
- At least one of the functional modules is configured to send an acknowledgement in response to receiving one of the messages in the flow of messages.
- At least one of the data processing components resends an unacknowledged message.
- the method further includes storing a parameter value identifying the specification of a plurality of tasks.
- the method further includes transmitting the generated flow of messages to an application for receiving the messages identified by the parameter value.
- the method further includes storing messages received by the application in parameters visible to multiple processes for performing the tasks.
- a system for managing task execution includes: a task managing system including circuitry for receiving a specification of a plurality of tasks to be performed by respective functional modules; and a data processing system including circuitry for processing a flow of input data using a dataflow graph that includes nodes representing data processing components connected by links representing flows of data between data processing components.
- the data processing system is configured to generate a flow of messages in response to at least one flow of data provided by at least one data processing component.
- the task managing system is configured to perform an iteration of a set of one or more tasks using one or more corresponding functional modules in response to each of the messages in the flow of messages.
- a system for managing task execution includes: means for receiving a specification of a plurality of tasks to be performed by respective functional modules; and means for processing a flow of input data using a dataflow graph that includes nodes representing data processing components connected by links representing flows of data between data processing components.
- the data processing system is configured to generate a flow of messages in response to at least one flow of data provided by at least one data processing component.
- the task managing system is configured to perform an iteration of a set of one or more tasks using one or more corresponding functional modules in response to each of the messages in the flow of messages.
- a computer-readable medium stores a computer program for managing task execution.
- the computer program includes instructions for causing a computer to: receive a specification of a plurality of tasks to be performed by respective functional modules; process a flow of input data using a dataflow graph that includes nodes representing data processing components connected by links representing flows of data between data processing components; in response to at least one flow of data provided by at least one data processing component, generate a flow of messages; and in response to each of the messages in the flow of messages, perform an iteration of a set of one or more tasks using one or more corresponding functional modules.
- Dataflow graphs can be incorporated into the control flow of a task managing application, allowing different dataflow graphs for data processing based on the values stored in the incoming message generated in response to elements of a data flow.
- Having a separate data processing application and task managing application also facilitates software reuse.
- data may come from diverse external sources and take on different formats.
- Incoming data may be corrupted and error checking may be used to ensure data integrity.
- a separate data processing application that handles reformatting and error checking encapsulates and isolates this complexity from a downstream task managing application, allowing task managing application to be developed without specific knowledge of possible data sources and to be reused when data sources or formats are changed.
- data processing applications can be developed with a focus on the data sources and without specific knowledge of the downstream computation environment and can be reused even when downstream handling has been changed.
- FIGs. IA and IB show examples of data processing systems.
- FIG. 2 is an example of a dataflow graph.
- FIG. 3 is an example of a control flow diagram.
- FIG. 4 illustrates how to convert data flow to control flow.
- FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a data processing system.
- FIG. 6 is an example showing how to configure an application to run iteratively.
- FIGs. 7A and 7B are block diagrams showing implementations of iterative task handling.
- FIG. 8 is an example of a data transmitting mechanism.
- FIGs. IA and IB show examples of data processing systems.
- the data processing system 100 in FIG. IA is a chart generation tool.
- a Java program 104 reads input from a table 102 that contains sales data, then plots a bar chart 106 as output.
- the Java program 104 is a processing element of the data processing system 100; the table 102 is the input data; and the bar chart 106 is the output data.
- the data processing system 120 in FIG. IB includes a call center 130 deployed in a retail business.
- the call center 130 pulls data from a warehouse 122, a manufacturer 124, a retail store 126, and terminals 134 to give call center agents 131, 132, 133, and 134 real-time information regarding merchandise availability.
- Servers 136, the terminals 134, and the applications running on them are the processing elements.
- Information pulled from the warehouse 122, the manufacturer 124, the retail store 126, and the terminals 134 is input data.
- Real-time information regarding merchandise availability that is displayed on the call agents' terminals is output data.
- a complex data processing system such as the one shown in FIG. IB, handles volumes of data and performs myriads of computations through applications that run on the system. Some applications are commercially available. Some applications have to be customer tailored to meet customers' special demands. Applications in a complex data processing system tend to specialize. For example, some applications may mainly handle data processing and some may mainly handle task managing. Data processing applications usually handle data-related computations, such as reformatting, sorting, and organizing data. Data processing applications tend to have a focus on how data flow from a source to a destination and how data are transformed in the process. Task managing applications usually handle scheduling and initiating execution of computation-related jobs, such as executing programs, scheduling events, managing processes, and dealing with faulty conditions. Task managing applications tend to have an emphasis on how control flows from task to task and how control flow is affected by conditional logic and faulty conditions.
- Data processing applications and task managing applications typically have different characteristics. Development environments for these two types of applications may be the same or separate.
- An exemplary development environment for a data processing application is a graph-based computation environment described below.
- a graph-based computation environment allows a programmer to build a graph- based application by using components as building blocks.
- a graph-based application is often represented by a directed graph, with nodes (or “vertices") in the graph representing components (either data storage components or executable computation components), and the directed links (or “edges") in the graph representing flows of data between components.
- a dataflow graph (also called simply a "graph") is a modular entity. Each graph can be made up of one or more other graphs, and a particular graph can be a component in a larger graph.
- a graphical development environment provides a user interface for developers to develop, test, and deploy applications as executable graphs that are tailored to a given user-specific environment.
- FIG. 2 is an example of a dataflow graph that represents a data processing application.
- input dataset component 202 contains status data for a particular merchandise. The status data are pulled from warehouses, manufacturers, and retail stores.
- a computation component 204 reads the data contained in the input dataset component 202, reformats them, and feeds them to a next computation component 208.
- the computation component 208 analyzes the reformatted data and generates output data to be stored in output dataset component 210.
- the output data represent merchandise availability.
- Symbol 212 is an output port representing a source of data elements (e.g., records or other units of data) flowing out of the input dataset component 202.
- Symbol 214 is an input port representing a destination for data elements flowing into the computation component 208.
- Link 206 shows the direction in which the data flows, i.e., from the computation component 204 to the computation component 208.
- the data processing application embodied by the dataflow graph 200 can be used in a call center system, such as the call center system 120 shown in FIG. IB.
- a dataflow graph such as graph 200, embodies the data processing aspects of a data processing application such as, for example, where the data come from, what transformations the data undergo, and where the data arrive.
- FIG. 3 shows a control flow diagram 300 (also called a "Plan").
- the control flow diagram 300 represents a specification for a task managing application which specifies tasks to be performed by respective functional modules.
- a functional module may perform a task that includes, for example, a series of actions to be executed on a computer system.
- a functional module may be implemented using a dataflow graph or may represent another control flow diagram (called a "SubPlan").
- a functional module may be an implementation of conditional logic, or a program, or a user script.
- functional modules such as Demographics Graph 302, Mailing Graph 306, Top Customers Graph 310, and Bottom Customers Graph 314, are dataflow graphs.
- Load Transactions Program 304 is a functional module that includes executable code e.g., a script in Python or Perl.
- Distribute Mail Conditional Task 308 is an implementation of conditional logic, directing the control to either a Top Customers Graph 310, or a Credit SubPlan 312, or a Bottom Customers Graph 314 depending on whether a particular customer is classified as a top customer or a bottom customer or a customer who needs credit extension.
- Credit SubPlan 312 and Charge SubPlan 316 are themselves control flow diagrams.
- the functional modules are connected with arrow links, 322, 324, etc.. The arrow links specify dependency relationships among the tasks performed by the functional modules and thus indicate how control flows from one functional module to another and define at least a partial ordering according to which the functional modules run.
- a control flow diagram such as diagram 300, embodies the control aspects of the task managing application controlled by the control flow diagram.
- Control aspects of a task managing application include, for example, determining running sequences among different tasks and applying conditional logic.
- a complex data processing system may need to manage large volumes of data as well as perform numerous computations.
- task managing applications may be used.
- a simple dataflow graph may not be the best approach to capture the complexity of the multi-step process. It may be advantageous to convert data flow to control flow at a certain stage during the process.
- a complex data processing system such as the call center system
- Incoming data are first processed in a data processing application.
- the data is then used to drive the control flow in a task managing application.
- the technique of letting the data flow drive the control flow can be used, for example, when incoming data are streaming, continuous, and unpredictable, or when concurrent data processing may be needed. An example of this technique is illustrated in FIG. 4.
- a data processing application receives a flow of input data, such as warehouse data 402, manufacturing data 404, and retail-store sales data 406, from various external sources.
- a component in the graph 410 reformats the data coming from different sources into an appropriate format.
- Another component in the graph 410 stores the data and generates messages to be sent to the task managing application 450.
- Messages generated by the data processing application are based on the received incoming data or an element in the received incoming data, and in some implementations portions of the incoming data can be used as the messages.
- Different mechanisms can be used to transmit a message from the data processing application 410 to the task managing application 450, for example, message passing, queues, shared memory space, remote procedure calls.
- the task managing application 450 based on the messages or certain values contained in the messages, can invoke different processes, such as a process executing a Plan 442, a SubPlan 444, and/or a dataflow graph 446.
- the task managing application 450 invokes a separate iteration of a corresponding set of one or more tasks (e.g., Plan 442, SubPlan 444, or dataflow graph 446) for each incoming message received from the data processing application 410. So if each message is generated in response to an element of data generated as output of the data processing application 410, the application 450 is able to iterate for each element of data.
- a loop index increments for each iteration of the task managing application 450. In each loop iteration, a process associated with the current loop index is spun off to handle an incoming message. Depending on the message received by the task managing application 450 or a value contained in the message, the process spun off to handle an incoming message can execute a dataflow graph, or a SubPlan, or any program for performing a set of one or more tasks.
- a message 422 is generated by the data processing application 410 and transmitted to the task managing application 450.
- the task managing application 450 being in its first loop iteration (with loop index 0), spins off a child process 452 to handle the message 442.
- the process 452 corresponds to the Plan 442, evoked by the task managing application 450 to reduce the number of merchandise available.
- a child process 454 is initiated in a second loop iteration associated with loop index 1 of the task managing application 450 to handle the second element of incoming data, generated in response to the manufacturing data 404.
- the child process 454 may correspond to the SubPlan 444, which, for example, performs the task of increasing the number of merchandise available.
- a child process 456 is initiated in a third loop iteration associated with loop index 2 to handle the third element of incoming data, generated in response to the retail store sales data 406.
- the child process 456 may correspond to executing the dataflow graph 446.
- the task managing application may be configured to invoke the processes, 452, 454, and 456, concurrently or serially.
- Processes may refer to processes that run on different CPUs or on the same CPU. In the latter case, the processes may also be known as "threads”.
- the task managing application 450 may be configured to send an acknowledgement to the data processing application 410 when it receives a message.
- the acknowledgement can be a positive acknowledgement if the task managing application decides that the message received is intact or a negative one if the task managing application decides that the message received is corrupted.
- the data processing application 410 can be configured to wait for an acknowledgement that the last-sent message has been received before sending the next message. It can be further configured to send the next message upon receiving a positive acknowledgement and re-send the last message upon receiving a negative acknowledgement.
- FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an application development and execution system
- the system 500 includes two graphical development environments, a GDE 512 used for dataflow graph development and a GDE 514 used for control flow diagram development.
- a GDE 512 used for dataflow graph development
- a GDE 514 used for control flow diagram development
- one graphical development environment can be used for development of both dataflow graphs and control flow diagrams.
- a graphical development environment can be used for developing control flow diagrams and a command line user interface can be used for dataflow graphs, or vice versa.
- a data processing application 518 is built that includes a dataflow graph 580.
- a task managing application 516 is built that includes a control flow diagram 550.
- the system 500 also includes a database 520.
- the database 520 may be a scalable object-oriented database system that provides storage for various kinds of information (e.g., metadata) for the system 500.
- the database 520 may be, for example, an enterprise metadata database, which can support the development and execution of graph-based applications and the interchange of data between the graph-based applications and other systems, e.g., operating systems.
- the system 500 further includes an operating system 524.
- the operating system 524 may be, for example, a parallel operating environment.
- the operating system 524 provides support for running application development environments, such as GDE 512 and GDE 514, and provides for scalable parallel and distributed execution of the applications developed.
- a stream of input data 530 go through the dataflow graph 580 as the data are being processed by the data processing application 518.
- the dataflow graph 580 includes a computation component, reformat 584. In the dataflow graph 580, the data flow from input dataset 582 to output dataset 586. After being reformatted, the data flow out of the data processing application 518 and into the task managing application 516, and are used to drive the task managing application 516 driven by the control flow diagram 550.
- the control flow diagram 550 shows two tasks, task 552 and task 554.
- a task may be a computation performed, for example, by executing a dataflow graph or a script, such as a Perl script.
- a time sequence 556 shows the running sequence of the tasks specified in the control flow diagram 550. In this case, the task 552 is executed before the task 554.
- the task 552 in the control flow diagram 550 is a Perl script and the task 554 in the control flow diagram is itself a control flow diagram of sub-tasks.
- the task 554 includes several sub-tasks implemented by methods that can be executed in the operating system 524. These methods may be existing methods provided by the system or customized methods developed by users. As shown in FIG. 5 as an example, the task 554 includes five methods: Trigger, At Start, Perform, At Failure, and At Success. These methods may be provided by the system or may be developed by a customer. In some examples, the above five methods may be implemented as follows.
- Method Trigger may be implemented to represent the starting point of the task 554. It may contain the condition for starting the execution. The condition may be whether a specific file exists, or whether a flag has been set to true.
- Method At Start may be implemented as a method that prepares the system for the method Perform, such as setting environmental variables to desired values, or setting up log files to log runtime information.
- Method Perform may be implemented to perform the main functionality of the task 554.
- Task 554 may also contain conditional logic to handle what happens after method Perform. If method Perform succeeds during its execution, method At Success is executed to exit task 554 with a return code of zero. If method Perform fails during its execution, method At Failure is executed to exit task 554 with a return code of non-zero.
- additional methods can be added for rollback, error handling, and recovery. For example, a method of rollback can be added to roll back what has been done in reverse execution order starting at the point of failure. Alternatively, a method of cleanup can be added to clean up the failed conditions, by resetting flags, registers, etc..
- a looping SubPlan can be used.
- a task managing application is configured to include a looping SubPlan.
- the control flow diagram 602 is an example of a looping SubPlan and has conditional logic implemented for handling an element of incoming data.
- the screen shot 604 is an example showing how to configure a simple application, called "My Subplan" in this example, as a looping SubPlan by setting a predetermined property to "looping" and by setting appropriate looping properties.
- Looping properties include loop type (Do-While, For-Each, etc.), loop value vector, loop concurrent, loop count and loop indices, etc..
- FIGs. 7a and 7b demonstrate, as an example, how to construct a system that includes a task managing application and a data processing application to handle iterative incoming data.
- a developer can construct a data processing application 702 to handle data formatting and other preparation work, and a task managing application 704 to perform tasks to further process the data.
- the data processing application can be configured to pass data to the task managing application and the task managing application can be configured to listen for messages that are coming from the data processing application.
- messages passed between the data processing application and the task managing application may include data output by the data processing application (e.g., encapsulated and/or encrypted in messages).
- messages passed between the data processing application and the task managing application can be generated in response to data from the data processing application without including the output data itself.
- the term "message" can refer to information passed between the data processing application and the task managing application in any form or format.
- the task managing application 704 includes a looping set of one or more tasks (e.g., a SubPlan) that listens continuously for messages from the data processing application 702.
- Symbol 706 is a symbol indicating that the application is running iteratively.
- a message arriving for the task managing application 704 triggers a new loop iteration in which a process can be spun off.
- the task managing application 704 can be configured to wait until the last loop iteration finishes before starting a new loop iteration or to start a new iteration immediately upon the receipt of a message. In the latter case, processes spun out of each iteration run concurrently.
- a user can configure a message-transmitting application (e.g., a dataflow graph) to "talk" to a counterpart listening application, which in this case is the task managing application 704.
- the message- transmitting application defines a parameter that holds the name of the counterpart listening application so the message-transmitting application knows where to send messages.
- the task managing application i.e., the counterpart listening application
- the parameter in the message transmitting application that holds the name of the counterpart listening application needs to be updated correspondingly.
- a user may need to open the message-transmitting application and make the required change.
- parameter Name of Listening Application can be made visible to both the message transmitting application and any counterpart listening application.
- parameter Name of Listening Application is assigned the value of the listening application's name. Because the parameter is also visible to the message transmitting application, the message transmitting application can read the value of parameter Name of Listening Application to find out the application to which it is supposed to send message. In this way, the listening application can be changed even at run time without any need of opening the message transmitting application for updates.
- the listening application stores the received messages in parameters.
- a parameter of a process defines a system setting for that process.
- a parameter of a parent process can be inherited by and therefore visible to its child processes.
- parameter 720 in FIG. 7a are used to store messages transmitted from data processing application 702 to task managing application 704.
- the user can construct a program or a method on the task managing side to kick off the message-transmitting application, as shown in FIG. 7b.
- the task managing application 722 (a Plan) includes a listening program 704, which is a task managing application itself (a SubPlan), that listens for messages, and a starter program 726 that initiates execution of the message-transmitting data processing application 702, as shown by an arrow 730.
- FIG. 7b also shows that the data processing application 702 includes two data processing applications, 732 and 734, and a queue 736. The data processing application 732 first performs complex processing on incoming data. Then it hands the data over so that the data get published to the queue 736.
- the data processing application 734 retrieves the data, reformats them, and publishes them to the task managing application 704 by sending a message to be stored in a predetermined location.
- the queue 736 is acting as a buffer between the incoming data streaming into the data processing application 732 and the outgoing data streaming out of the data processing application 734.
- the data processing application 734 may be configured to wait for an acknowledgement of the previously sent message before sending out the next message without blocking the data processing application 732 from processing incoming data that are streaming in continuously and unpredictably.
- the data processing application 734 is kept simple and lightweight because part of the complex processing is removed from it.
- the starter program 726 initiates the data processing applications 732 and 734.
- the listening program 704 begins listening for messages from the message-transmitting data processing application 702.
- the data processing applications 732 and 734 and the task managing application 722 may be configured to run on the same host.
- the data processing applications 732 and 734 and the task managing application 722 may also include various error-handling methods, such as rollback, recovery, cleanup, and acknowledgements and message tracking that are used to make message transmitting resilient to failures, as demonstrated in FIG. 8.
- the message-transmitting application 802 labeled as publisher may be the data processing application 702 as shown in FIG. 7a or the data processing application 734 as shown in FIG. 7b.
- the receiving application 804, labeled as subscriber may be the task managing application 704 as shown in FIG. 7a or 7b.
- messages sent from the publisher are assigned a sequence number. Sequence numbers help the publisher to keep track of the messages sent and facilitate acknowledgements of receipt of the messages by the subscriber. For each message received, the subscriber sends an acknowledgement to the publisher. In the acknowledgement, the subscriber indicates the sequence number of the received message and whether the message is intact (positive) or corrupted (negative).
- the publisher When the publisher sends a message with a sequence number X, it may wait for an acknowledgement for the message. When it receives the acknowledgement that contains the sequence number X, it sends the next message of a sequence number X+l if the acknowledgement is positive or resends the message of the sequence number X if the acknowledgement is negative.
- the publisher may send messages without waiting for acknowledgements of previously sent messages.
- the publisher may store unacknowledged messages and resend the messages if no acknowledgement has been received within a certain period of time.
- the subscriber can be programmed to ignore messages with the same sequence number so that receiving a repeated message will not cause a problem.
- the publisher can resend the unacknowledged messages on recovery.
- the unacknowledged messages can be stored in a persistent storage, such as a disk, if it is desired that the data survive system failures.
- the approach described above can be implemented using software for execution on a computer.
- the software forms procedures in one or more computer programs that execute on one or more programmed or programmable computer systems (which may be of various architectures such as distributed, client/server, or grid) each including at least one processor, at least one data storage system (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device or port, and at least one output device or port.
- the software may form one or more modules of a larger program, for example, that provides other services related to the design and configuration of computation graphs.
- the nodes and elements of the graph can be implemented as data structures stored in a computer readable medium or other organized data conforming to a data model stored in a data repository.
- the software may be provided on a storage medium, such as a CD-ROM, readable by a general or special purpose programmable computer or delivered (encoded in a propagated signal) over a communication medium of a network to the computer where it is executed. All of the functions may be performed on a special purpose computer, or using special-purpose hardware, such as coprocessors.
- the software may be implemented in a distributed manner in which different parts of the computation specified by the software are performed by different computers.
- Each such computer program is preferably stored on or downloaded to a storage media or device (e.g., solid state memory or media, or magnetic or optical media) readable by a general or special purpose programmable computer, for configuring and operating the computer when the storage media or device is read by the computer system to perform the procedures described herein.
- a storage media or device e.g., solid state memory or media, or magnetic or optical media
- the inventive system may also be considered to be implemented as a computer-readable storage medium, configured with a computer program, where the storage medium so configured causes a computer system to operate in a specific and predefined manner to perform the functions described herein.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
- Computer And Data Communications (AREA)
- Stored Programmes (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA2750279A CA2750279C (en) | 2009-02-13 | 2010-02-12 | Managing task execution |
EP10741775A EP2396724A4 (en) | 2009-02-13 | 2010-02-12 | Managing task execution |
KR1020157008131A KR20150038758A (en) | 2009-02-13 | 2010-02-12 | Managing task execution |
CN201080007664.0A CN102317911B (en) | 2009-02-13 | 2010-02-12 | Management role performs |
KR1020117019122A KR101730513B1 (en) | 2009-02-13 | 2010-02-12 | Managing task execution |
AU2010213618A AU2010213618B9 (en) | 2009-02-13 | 2010-02-12 | Managing task execution |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US15266909P | 2009-02-13 | 2009-02-13 | |
US61/152,669 | 2009-02-13 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2010093879A1 true WO2010093879A1 (en) | 2010-08-19 |
Family
ID=42561000
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2010/024036 WO2010093879A1 (en) | 2009-02-13 | 2010-02-12 | Managing task execution |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US9886319B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2396724A4 (en) |
KR (2) | KR101730513B1 (en) |
CN (2) | CN102317911B (en) |
AU (1) | AU2010213618B9 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2750279C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2010093879A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (42)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7877350B2 (en) | 2005-06-27 | 2011-01-25 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Managing metadata for graph-based computations |
AU2007286155B2 (en) | 2006-08-10 | 2013-12-12 | Ab Initio Technology Llc. | Distributing services in graph-based computations |
EP2174222A4 (en) * | 2007-07-26 | 2010-10-27 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Transactional graph-based computation with error handling |
CN102317911B (en) | 2009-02-13 | 2016-04-06 | 起元技术有限责任公司 | Management role performs |
US8667329B2 (en) | 2009-09-25 | 2014-03-04 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Processing transactions in graph-based applications |
US9665620B2 (en) | 2010-01-15 | 2017-05-30 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Managing data queries |
KR20150042297A (en) | 2010-06-15 | 2015-04-20 | 아브 이니티오 테크놀로지 엘엘시 | Dynamically loading graph-based computations |
US9069632B2 (en) * | 2010-08-26 | 2015-06-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Message processing |
US9116955B2 (en) * | 2011-05-02 | 2015-08-25 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Managing data queries |
US9417935B2 (en) * | 2012-05-01 | 2016-08-16 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Many-core process scheduling to maximize cache usage |
US9575813B2 (en) | 2012-07-17 | 2017-02-21 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Pattern matching process scheduler with upstream optimization |
US10108521B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2018-10-23 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Dynamic component performance monitoring |
US9507682B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2016-11-29 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Dynamic graph performance monitoring |
US9274926B2 (en) | 2013-01-03 | 2016-03-01 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Configurable testing of computer programs |
WO2014176313A1 (en) | 2013-04-23 | 2014-10-30 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Controlling tasks performed by a computing system |
CA2932763C (en) * | 2013-12-05 | 2022-07-12 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Managing interfaces for dataflow graphs composed of sub-graphs |
CA3092699C (en) | 2013-12-06 | 2023-07-25 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Source code translation |
EP3189422A1 (en) | 2014-09-02 | 2017-07-12 | AB Initio Technology LLC | Executing graph-based program specifications |
US9933918B2 (en) | 2014-09-02 | 2018-04-03 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Specifying control and data connections in graph-based programs |
WO2016036822A1 (en) | 2014-09-02 | 2016-03-10 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Managing execution state of components in a graph-based program specification for controlling their associated tasks |
US9760406B2 (en) | 2014-09-02 | 2017-09-12 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Controlling data processing tasks |
SG11201701667WA (en) * | 2014-09-02 | 2017-04-27 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Visually specifying subsets of components in graph-based programs through user interactions |
AU2015311999B2 (en) * | 2014-09-02 | 2019-09-19 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Controlling data processing tasks |
CN106687920B (en) * | 2014-09-02 | 2020-07-03 | 起元科技有限公司 | Management task invocation |
US10496619B2 (en) | 2014-09-02 | 2019-12-03 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Compiling graph-based program specifications |
US10437819B2 (en) | 2014-11-14 | 2019-10-08 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Processing queries containing a union-type operation |
CN104407919A (en) * | 2014-12-15 | 2015-03-11 | 浪潮软件股份有限公司 | Data processing task scheduling system and method |
US10417281B2 (en) | 2015-02-18 | 2019-09-17 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Querying a data source on a network |
US10657134B2 (en) | 2015-08-05 | 2020-05-19 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Selecting queries for execution on a stream of real-time data |
US9910697B2 (en) * | 2015-10-13 | 2018-03-06 | Palantir Technologies Inc. | Fault-tolerant and highly-available configuration of distributed services |
CN108475189B (en) | 2015-12-21 | 2021-07-09 | 起元技术有限责任公司 | Method, system and computer readable medium for sub-graph interface generation |
US10318355B2 (en) * | 2017-01-24 | 2019-06-11 | Oracle International Corporation | Distributed graph processing system featuring interactive remote control mechanism including task cancellation |
KR102334511B1 (en) * | 2017-05-29 | 2021-12-03 | 바르셀로나 수퍼컴퓨팅 센터 - 센트로 나쇼날 드 수퍼컴퓨타숑 | Manage task dependencies |
CN108037973B (en) * | 2017-12-20 | 2021-11-16 | 苏州优圣美智能系统有限公司 | Data flow modeling and processing system interacting with data processing tool |
JPWO2019198221A1 (en) * | 2018-04-13 | 2020-04-30 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Data processing device, data processing method and program |
US11093223B2 (en) | 2019-07-18 | 2021-08-17 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Automatically converting a program written in a procedural programming language into a dataflow graph and related systems and methods |
US11710027B2 (en) * | 2020-03-03 | 2023-07-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Artificial intelligence workflow builder |
US11934872B2 (en) * | 2020-03-05 | 2024-03-19 | Nvidia Corporation | Program flow monitoring and control of an event-triggered system |
US11461130B2 (en) | 2020-05-26 | 2022-10-04 | Oracle International Corporation | Methodology for fast and seamless task cancelation and error handling in distributed processing of large graph data |
JP7494910B2 (en) * | 2020-06-30 | 2024-06-04 | 株式会社島津製作所 | Method, system and apparatus for designing experimental protocols |
US11880709B2 (en) | 2022-01-04 | 2024-01-23 | The Toronto-Dominion Bank | System and method for handling real-time transactional events |
WO2023249558A1 (en) * | 2022-06-22 | 2023-12-28 | Gp Network Asia Pte. Ltd. | Method and system for adaptively executing a plurality of tasks |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5357632A (en) * | 1990-01-09 | 1994-10-18 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Dynamic task allocation in a multi-processor system employing distributed control processors and distributed arithmetic processors |
US6044394A (en) * | 1997-07-21 | 2000-03-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing independently executing computer tasks that are interrelated by dataflow |
US6715145B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2004-03-30 | Accenture Llp | Processing pipeline in a base services pattern environment |
Family Cites Families (230)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US599729A (en) * | 1898-03-01 | Bicycle-saddle | ||
US563047A (en) * | 1896-06-30 | Car-coupling | ||
US3662343A (en) * | 1970-07-29 | 1972-05-09 | Docutel Corp | Credit card automatic currency dispenser |
US3662401A (en) * | 1970-09-23 | 1972-05-09 | Collins Radio Co | Method of program execution |
US4228496A (en) | 1976-09-07 | 1980-10-14 | Tandem Computers Incorporated | Multiprocessor system |
US4814979A (en) * | 1981-04-01 | 1989-03-21 | Teradata Corporation | Network to transmit prioritized subtask pockets to dedicated processors |
US4972314A (en) | 1985-05-20 | 1990-11-20 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Data flow signal processor method and apparatus |
US4720780A (en) * | 1985-09-17 | 1988-01-19 | The Johns Hopkins University | Memory-linked wavefront array processor |
US4914568A (en) * | 1986-10-24 | 1990-04-03 | National Instruments, Inc. | Graphical system for modelling a process and associated method |
US5127104A (en) * | 1986-12-29 | 1992-06-30 | Dataflow Computer Corporation | Method and product involving translation and execution of programs by automatic partitioning and data structure allocation |
JPS63231613A (en) | 1987-03-20 | 1988-09-27 | Matsushita Giken Kk | Command setting method |
JPS6413189A (en) | 1987-07-06 | 1989-01-18 | Nec Corp | Character signal generation circuit |
JPH0194431A (en) | 1987-10-06 | 1989-04-13 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Software parts synthesizer |
US5280619A (en) * | 1990-05-17 | 1994-01-18 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | System for accessing shared data using a serialization graph constructed from a history file showing completed locking dependencies between transactions |
US5323452A (en) * | 1990-12-18 | 1994-06-21 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Visual programming of telephone network call processing logic |
GB2256514B (en) | 1991-05-21 | 1994-11-16 | Digital Equipment Corp | Commitment ordering for guaranteeing serializability across distributed transactions |
EP0529303A3 (en) * | 1991-08-29 | 1993-09-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Checkpoint synchronization with instruction overlap enabled |
US6400996B1 (en) | 1999-02-01 | 2002-06-04 | Steven M. Hoffberg | Adaptive pattern recognition based control system and method |
US5333319A (en) * | 1992-03-02 | 1994-07-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Virtual storage data processor with enhanced dispatching priority allocation of CPU resources |
JP3223933B2 (en) | 1993-02-10 | 2001-10-29 | 日本電信電話株式会社 | Knowledge base reasoning method and apparatus |
US5745778A (en) * | 1994-01-26 | 1998-04-28 | Data General Corporation | Apparatus and method for improved CPU affinity in a multiprocessor system |
US6044211A (en) * | 1994-03-14 | 2000-03-28 | C.A.E. Plus, Inc. | Method for graphically representing a digital device as a behavioral description with data and control flow elements, and for converting the behavioral description to a structural description |
US5694546A (en) | 1994-05-31 | 1997-12-02 | Reisman; Richard R. | System for automatic unattended electronic information transport between a server and a client by a vendor provided transport software with a manifest list |
JPH08106540A (en) | 1994-10-06 | 1996-04-23 | Toshiba Corp | Editor |
US5692168A (en) | 1994-10-18 | 1997-11-25 | Cyrix Corporation | Prefetch buffer using flow control bit to identify changes of flow within the code stream |
JPH08305576A (en) | 1995-01-12 | 1996-11-22 | Internatl Business Mach Corp <Ibm> | Expert system and method for execution of dialog with computer user |
US5673369A (en) | 1995-03-02 | 1997-09-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Authoring knowledge-based systems using interactive directed graphs |
US5701400A (en) | 1995-03-08 | 1997-12-23 | Amado; Carlos Armando | Method and apparatus for applying if-then-else rules to data sets in a relational data base and generating from the results of application of said rules a database of diagnostics linked to said data sets to aid executive analysis of financial data |
US5805462A (en) | 1995-08-18 | 1998-09-08 | Vlsi Technology, Inc. | Automatic synthesis of integrated circuits employing boolean decomposition |
JP3154942B2 (en) | 1995-09-11 | 2001-04-09 | 株式会社東芝 | Distributed checkpoint generation method and computer system to which the method is applied |
US5630047A (en) * | 1995-09-12 | 1997-05-13 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method for software error recovery using consistent global checkpoints |
US5712971A (en) * | 1995-12-11 | 1998-01-27 | Ab Initio Software Corporation | Methods and systems for reconstructing the state of a computation |
JP3258228B2 (en) * | 1996-03-15 | 2002-02-18 | 株式会社東芝 | Checkpoint generation method |
US7415466B2 (en) | 1996-03-19 | 2008-08-19 | Oracle International Corporation | Parallel transaction recovery |
US6006242A (en) | 1996-04-05 | 1999-12-21 | Bankers Systems, Inc. | Apparatus and method for dynamically creating a document |
JP3672208B2 (en) * | 1996-07-02 | 2005-07-20 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション | Hierarchical transaction processing method |
US5966072A (en) | 1996-07-02 | 1999-10-12 | Ab Initio Software Corporation | Executing computations expressed as graphs |
US5857204A (en) * | 1996-07-02 | 1999-01-05 | Ab Initio Software Corporation | Restoring the state of a set of files |
US6016516A (en) * | 1996-08-07 | 2000-01-18 | Fuji Xerox Co. Ltd. | Remote procedure processing device used by at least two linked computer systems |
US6760903B1 (en) | 1996-08-27 | 2004-07-06 | Compuware Corporation | Coordinated application monitoring in a distributed computing environment |
US5799266A (en) | 1996-09-19 | 1998-08-25 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Automatic generation of test drivers |
US5930794A (en) * | 1996-10-18 | 1999-07-27 | Sagent Technologies, Inc. | Database repository with deferred transactions |
US6038558A (en) * | 1996-10-18 | 2000-03-14 | Sagent Technology, Inc. | Extensible database retrieval and viewing architecture |
US6151531A (en) | 1996-12-12 | 2000-11-21 | Charles Frankel Et Al | System and method for managing the alteration of garments |
US5924095A (en) * | 1997-02-05 | 1999-07-13 | Oracle Corporation | Processing distributed transactions in heterogeneous computing environments using two-phase commit |
US6330008B1 (en) | 1997-02-24 | 2001-12-11 | Torrent Systems, Inc. | Apparatuses and methods for monitoring performance of parallel computing |
US5933640A (en) | 1997-02-26 | 1999-08-03 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Method for analyzing and presenting test execution flows of programs |
US5999729A (en) | 1997-03-06 | 1999-12-07 | Continuum Software, Inc. | System and method for developing computer programs for execution on parallel processing systems |
US5950212A (en) | 1997-04-11 | 1999-09-07 | Oracle Corporation | Method and system for workload based group committing for improved performance |
US6088716A (en) | 1997-04-28 | 2000-07-11 | Ab Initio Software Corporation | Method for preventing buffer deadlock in dataflow computations |
US6032158A (en) * | 1997-05-02 | 2000-02-29 | Informatica Corporation | Apparatus and method for capturing and propagating changes from an operational database to data marts |
US6145017A (en) | 1997-08-05 | 2000-11-07 | Adaptec, Inc. | Data alignment system for a hardware accelerated command interpreter engine |
US6173276B1 (en) | 1997-08-21 | 2001-01-09 | Scicomp, Inc. | System and method for financial instrument modeling and valuation |
US6574661B1 (en) | 1997-09-26 | 2003-06-03 | Mci Communications Corporation | Integrated proxy interface for web based telecommunication toll-free network management using a network manager for downloading a call routing tree to client |
US6332212B1 (en) | 1997-10-02 | 2001-12-18 | Ltx Corporation | Capturing and displaying computer program execution timing |
US5958004A (en) | 1997-10-28 | 1999-09-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Disabling and enabling transaction committal in transactional application components |
US6014670A (en) * | 1997-11-07 | 2000-01-11 | Informatica Corporation | Apparatus and method for performing data transformations in data warehousing |
US6339775B1 (en) | 1997-11-07 | 2002-01-15 | Informatica Corporation | Apparatus and method for performing data transformations in data warehousing |
US6044374A (en) * | 1997-11-14 | 2000-03-28 | Informatica Corporation | Method and apparatus for sharing metadata between multiple data marts through object references |
JPH11184766A (en) | 1997-12-18 | 1999-07-09 | Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> | Business event server |
US6272650B1 (en) | 1998-02-03 | 2001-08-07 | Amazing Media, Inc. | System and method for disambiguating scene graph loads |
US6437796B2 (en) | 1998-02-17 | 2002-08-20 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Multiple processor visibility search system and method |
US6208345B1 (en) | 1998-04-15 | 2001-03-27 | Adc Telecommunications, Inc. | Visual data integration system and method |
US6256637B1 (en) * | 1998-05-05 | 2001-07-03 | Gemstone Systems, Inc. | Transactional virtual machine architecture |
US6480876B2 (en) | 1998-05-28 | 2002-11-12 | Compaq Information Technologies Group, L.P. | System for integrating task and data parallelism in dynamic applications |
US6675189B2 (en) | 1998-05-28 | 2004-01-06 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | System for learning and applying integrated task and data parallel strategies in dynamic applications |
US6314114B1 (en) | 1998-06-23 | 2001-11-06 | Oracle Corporation | Distributed resource management |
JP2000010788A (en) | 1998-06-25 | 2000-01-14 | Sharp Corp | Computer device with emergency operation processing function |
US6259988B1 (en) | 1998-07-20 | 2001-07-10 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Real-time mission adaptable route planner |
JP2000099317A (en) | 1998-09-18 | 2000-04-07 | Toshiba Corp | User interface design device and method therefor |
US6401216B1 (en) | 1998-10-29 | 2002-06-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | System of performing checkpoint/restart of a parallel program |
US6608628B1 (en) | 1998-11-06 | 2003-08-19 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration (Nasa) | Method and apparatus for virtual interactive medical imaging by multiple remotely-located users |
US6927783B1 (en) | 1998-11-09 | 2005-08-09 | Broadcom Corporation | Graphics display system with anti-aliased text and graphics feature |
US6449711B1 (en) | 1999-02-04 | 2002-09-10 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method, apparatus, and article of manufacture for developing and executing data flow programs |
US6538651B1 (en) * | 1999-03-19 | 2003-03-25 | John Hayman | Parametric geometric element definition and generation system and method |
US6728879B1 (en) * | 1999-06-02 | 2004-04-27 | Microsoft Corporation | Transactional log with multi-sector log block validation |
US6816825B1 (en) | 1999-06-18 | 2004-11-09 | Nec Corporation | Simulation vector generation from HDL descriptions for observability-enhanced statement coverage |
JP2001022571A (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2001-01-26 | Riso Kagaku Corp | Electronic equipment and rewriting method for control program of the equipment |
US6647408B1 (en) * | 1999-07-16 | 2003-11-11 | Novell, Inc. | Task distribution |
US6640244B1 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 2003-10-28 | Accenture Llp | Request batcher in a transaction services patterns environment |
US20020129340A1 (en) | 1999-10-28 | 2002-09-12 | Tuttle Douglas D. | Reconfigurable isomorphic software representations |
US7137116B2 (en) | 1999-11-09 | 2006-11-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for performing a task on a computer |
US6879946B2 (en) * | 1999-11-30 | 2005-04-12 | Pattern Discovery Software Systems Ltd. | Intelligent modeling, transformation and manipulation system |
US6584581B1 (en) * | 1999-12-06 | 2003-06-24 | Ab Initio Software Corporation | Continuous flow checkpointing data processing |
IES20010131A2 (en) | 1999-12-20 | 2001-05-30 | Headway Res Ltd | System and method for computer-aided graph-based dependency analysis |
US6848100B1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2005-01-25 | Intel Corporation | Hierarchical software path profiling |
US7062483B2 (en) * | 2000-05-18 | 2006-06-13 | Endeca Technologies, Inc. | Hierarchical data-driven search and navigation system and method for information retrieval |
US6922685B2 (en) | 2000-05-22 | 2005-07-26 | Mci, Inc. | Method and system for managing partitioned data resources |
US6813761B1 (en) | 2000-06-30 | 2004-11-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Methods for enhancing flow analysis |
US7164422B1 (en) | 2000-07-28 | 2007-01-16 | Ab Initio Software Corporation | Parameterized graphs with conditional components |
US6832369B1 (en) | 2000-08-01 | 2004-12-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Object oriented method and apparatus for class variable initialization |
US6496961B2 (en) | 2000-10-27 | 2002-12-17 | Nec Usa, Inc. | Dynamic detection and removal of inactive clauses in SAT with application in image computation |
US6975628B2 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2005-12-13 | Intel Corporation | Method for representing and controlling packet data flow through packet forwarding hardware |
US20020152244A1 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2002-10-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus to dynamically create a customized user interface based on a document type definition |
US6804800B2 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2004-10-12 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for detecting and recovering from errors in a source synchronous bus |
JP4294879B2 (en) | 2001-02-05 | 2009-07-15 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Transaction processing system having service level control mechanism and program therefor |
US20020111876A1 (en) | 2001-02-09 | 2002-08-15 | Rudraraju Panduranga R. | Transaction aggregation system and method |
US7082386B2 (en) | 2001-02-21 | 2006-07-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generalized software modeling tool |
US7188091B2 (en) * | 2001-03-21 | 2007-03-06 | Resolutionebs, Inc. | Rule processing system |
US6651234B2 (en) | 2001-04-06 | 2003-11-18 | Nec Corporation | Partition-based decision heuristics for SAT and image computation using SAT and BDDs |
US20020147745A1 (en) | 2001-04-09 | 2002-10-10 | Robert Houben | Method and apparatus for document markup language driven server |
US7082604B2 (en) * | 2001-04-20 | 2006-07-25 | Mobile Agent Technologies, Incorporated | Method and apparatus for breaking down computing tasks across a network of heterogeneous computer for parallel execution by utilizing autonomous mobile agents |
US20040093559A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2004-05-13 | Ruth Amaru | Web client for viewing and interrogating enterprise data semantically |
GB2376094A (en) | 2001-05-30 | 2002-12-04 | Ibm | Flexible navigation of a workflow graph in a data processing system |
US7069536B2 (en) * | 2001-06-28 | 2006-06-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and program for executing a workflow |
US20030033432A1 (en) * | 2001-08-08 | 2003-02-13 | Simpson Shell S. | Web based imaging service that converts web pages into content on behalf of another web site |
US7594220B2 (en) | 2001-08-14 | 2009-09-22 | National Instruments Corporation | Configuration diagram with context sensitive connectivity |
US20040006745A1 (en) * | 2001-08-31 | 2004-01-08 | Van Helden Wico | Methods, apparatuses, system, and articles for associating metadata with datastream |
US7165030B2 (en) * | 2001-09-17 | 2007-01-16 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Concatenative speech synthesis using a finite-state transducer |
US7085426B2 (en) | 2001-10-15 | 2006-08-01 | Jonas August | Volterra filters for enhancement of contours in images |
US7130484B2 (en) | 2001-10-15 | 2006-10-31 | Jonas August | Biased curve indicator random field filters for enhancement of contours in images |
DE10152213B4 (en) | 2001-10-23 | 2006-04-27 | Onespin Solutions Gmbh | Method for verifying digital arithmetic circuits by means of an equivalence comparison |
US7092401B2 (en) * | 2001-11-15 | 2006-08-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and method for managing work and completion queues using head and tail pointers with end-to-end context error cache for reliable datagram |
EP1320217B1 (en) | 2001-12-14 | 2004-10-13 | Hewlett-Packard Company, A Delaware Corporation | Method of installing monitoring agents, system and computer program for monitoring objects in an IT network |
US7240247B2 (en) | 2002-04-29 | 2007-07-03 | Intel Corporation | Providing a chain of tokenized error and state information for a call stack |
US7334099B2 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2008-02-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for managing image files |
US20040041838A1 (en) * | 2002-09-04 | 2004-03-04 | Adusumilli Venkata J.R.B. | Method and system for graphing data |
US7103597B2 (en) * | 2002-10-03 | 2006-09-05 | Mcgoveran David O | Adaptive transaction manager for complex transactions and business process |
US7167850B2 (en) * | 2002-10-10 | 2007-01-23 | Ab Initio Software Corporation | Startup and control of graph-based computation |
US7694272B2 (en) * | 2002-10-21 | 2010-04-06 | Sungard (Israel) Ltd | Method, a language and a system for the definition and implementation of software solutions by using a visualizable computer executable modeling language |
US7412658B2 (en) | 2002-11-14 | 2008-08-12 | Sap Ag | Modeling system for graphic user interface |
US7711772B2 (en) * | 2002-11-15 | 2010-05-04 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Web-based system and method for electronic data delivery |
US7430747B2 (en) * | 2002-12-04 | 2008-09-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Peer-to peer graphing interfaces and methods |
US7441008B2 (en) | 2002-12-18 | 2008-10-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for correlating transactions and messages |
US20050193056A1 (en) | 2002-12-26 | 2005-09-01 | Schaefer Diane E. | Message transfer using multiplexed connections in an open system interconnection transaction processing environment |
US20040148373A1 (en) * | 2003-01-23 | 2004-07-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Service level agreement compliance measurement |
US8281297B2 (en) * | 2003-02-05 | 2012-10-02 | Arizona Board Of Regents | Reconfigurable processing |
US7707564B2 (en) * | 2003-02-26 | 2010-04-27 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for creating network-based software services using source code annotations |
US7417645B2 (en) | 2003-03-27 | 2008-08-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Markup language and object model for vector graphics |
US7088374B2 (en) * | 2003-03-27 | 2006-08-08 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for managing visual structure, timing, and animation in a graphics processing system |
US7669129B2 (en) | 2003-04-04 | 2010-02-23 | Avid Technology, Inc. | Graphical user interface for providing editing of transform hierarchies within an effects tree |
US7665025B2 (en) | 2003-04-16 | 2010-02-16 | The Mathworks, Inc. | Signal navigation and label propagation in block diagrams |
US20040225657A1 (en) | 2003-05-07 | 2004-11-11 | Panacea Corporation | Web services method and system |
US8265979B2 (en) | 2003-06-17 | 2012-09-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic generation of process models |
EP1636730A2 (en) * | 2003-06-18 | 2006-03-22 | Applera Corporation | Methods and systems for the analysis of biological sequence data |
US20050177531A1 (en) | 2003-06-24 | 2005-08-11 | Bracewell Robert H. | Method, tool and system for increasing the efficiency of a design process |
CA2529925C (en) | 2003-06-25 | 2016-08-23 | Ab Initio Software Corporation | Computer-aided parallelizing of computation graphs |
WO2005008414A2 (en) * | 2003-07-11 | 2005-01-27 | Computer Associates Think, Inc. | Method and apparatus for parallel action processing |
GB0318196D0 (en) * | 2003-08-02 | 2003-09-03 | Ibm | A method apparatus and computer program for processing a queue of messages |
US7243088B2 (en) | 2003-08-06 | 2007-07-10 | Oracle International Corporation | Database management system with efficient version control |
US7444595B2 (en) * | 2003-08-13 | 2008-10-28 | National Instruments Corporation | Graphical programming system and method for creating and managing a scene graph |
WO2005022417A2 (en) * | 2003-08-27 | 2005-03-10 | Ascential Software Corporation | Methods and systems for real time integration services |
US7174479B2 (en) | 2003-09-10 | 2007-02-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for rollback-free failure recovery of multi-step procedures |
ATE515746T1 (en) | 2003-09-15 | 2011-07-15 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | DATA PROFILING |
US20050102670A1 (en) * | 2003-10-21 | 2005-05-12 | Bretl Robert F. | Shared object memory with object management for multiple virtual machines |
US20050097515A1 (en) | 2003-10-31 | 2005-05-05 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Data empowered laborsaving test architecture |
US7840949B2 (en) * | 2003-11-03 | 2010-11-23 | Ramal Acquisition Corp. | System and method for data transformation using dataflow graphs |
US7480863B2 (en) * | 2003-11-26 | 2009-01-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic and intelligent hover assistance |
US7296072B2 (en) * | 2003-12-12 | 2007-11-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Enhanced port type agnostic proxy support for web services intermediaries |
US7404189B2 (en) * | 2003-12-30 | 2008-07-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Scheduler supporting web service invocation |
US7543275B2 (en) | 2004-01-29 | 2009-06-02 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Mechanism for executing test suites written for different harnesses under one test execution harness |
US7594227B2 (en) | 2004-03-08 | 2009-09-22 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Dependency graph parameter scoping |
US7467383B2 (en) | 2004-03-08 | 2008-12-16 | Ab Initio Software Llc | System for controlling task execution using a graphical representation of task dependency |
EP1757087A4 (en) | 2004-04-16 | 2009-08-19 | James A Aman | Automatic event videoing, tracking and content generation system |
US20050256818A1 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2005-11-17 | Xerox Corporation | Workflow auto generation from user constraints and hierarchical dependence graphs for workflows |
JP2007536634A (en) * | 2004-05-04 | 2007-12-13 | フィッシャー−ローズマウント・システムズ・インコーポレーテッド | Service-oriented architecture for process control systems |
US7614037B2 (en) | 2004-05-21 | 2009-11-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for graph analysis and synchronization |
US7316001B2 (en) * | 2004-06-05 | 2008-01-01 | Graphlogic Inc. | Object process graph system |
US7730482B2 (en) | 2004-06-08 | 2010-06-01 | Covia Labs, Inc. | Method and system for customized programmatic dynamic creation of interoperability content |
US7398514B2 (en) * | 2004-09-29 | 2008-07-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Test automation stack layering |
US7343482B2 (en) * | 2004-10-20 | 2008-03-11 | Arm Limited | Program subgraph identification |
JP4759983B2 (en) | 2004-11-04 | 2011-08-31 | 船井電機株式会社 | Firmware rewriting method for disk device and firmware rewriting program |
US7598953B2 (en) * | 2004-11-05 | 2009-10-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Interpreter for simplified programming of graphics processor units in general purpose programming languages |
US8082541B2 (en) | 2004-12-09 | 2011-12-20 | Advantest Corporation | Method and system for performing installation and configuration management of tester instrument modules |
US7703027B2 (en) | 2005-01-13 | 2010-04-20 | National Instruments Corporation | Merging graphical programs |
WO2006078751A2 (en) | 2005-01-18 | 2006-07-27 | Everypoint, Inc. | Systems and methods for processing changing data |
US8396886B1 (en) | 2005-02-03 | 2013-03-12 | Sybase Inc. | Continuous processing language for real-time data streams |
US7620947B2 (en) | 2005-03-11 | 2009-11-17 | Autodesk, Inc. | Enhanced directed graph representation for dependency systems |
US7505975B2 (en) * | 2005-04-14 | 2009-03-17 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Use of transaction context to select single database instance for global transaction |
JP4246176B2 (en) | 2005-04-25 | 2009-04-02 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Transaction processing method, apparatus for executing the same, and medium storing the processing program |
US7877350B2 (en) * | 2005-06-27 | 2011-01-25 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Managing metadata for graph-based computations |
US7716630B2 (en) * | 2005-06-27 | 2010-05-11 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Managing parameters for graph-based computations |
US20070118839A1 (en) * | 2005-10-24 | 2007-05-24 | Viktors Berstis | Method and apparatus for grid project modeling language |
US7747565B2 (en) * | 2005-12-07 | 2010-06-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Garbage collector support for transactional memory |
US8073671B2 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2011-12-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Dynamic software performance models |
US7870556B2 (en) * | 2006-05-16 | 2011-01-11 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Managing computing resources in graph-based computations |
AU2007286155B2 (en) * | 2006-08-10 | 2013-12-12 | Ab Initio Technology Llc. | Distributing services in graph-based computations |
US7844946B2 (en) * | 2006-09-26 | 2010-11-30 | Intel Corporation | Methods and apparatus to form a transactional objective instruction construct from lock-based critical sections |
EP2092424B1 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2015-12-30 | Checkmarx Ltd. | Locating security vulnerabilities in source code |
US8191052B2 (en) | 2006-12-01 | 2012-05-29 | Murex S.A.S. | Producer graph oriented programming and execution |
US8275979B2 (en) * | 2007-01-30 | 2012-09-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Initialization of a data processing system |
US20080244524A1 (en) | 2007-03-27 | 2008-10-02 | Tim Kelso | Program Test System |
US7805635B2 (en) | 2007-04-09 | 2010-09-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Constraint programming for reduction of system test-configuration-matrix complexity |
US8069129B2 (en) | 2007-04-10 | 2011-11-29 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Editing and compiling business rules |
US8751918B2 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2014-06-10 | Earl Industries, Llc | Digital system for organizing diverse information |
JP4073033B1 (en) | 2007-04-27 | 2008-04-09 | 透 降矢 | A database query processing system using multi-operation processing using composite relational operations that considers improvement of processing functions of join operations |
EP2174222A4 (en) * | 2007-07-26 | 2010-10-27 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Transactional graph-based computation with error handling |
CN100562175C (en) * | 2007-07-26 | 2009-11-18 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Data transmission method and device |
US8347292B2 (en) * | 2007-08-30 | 2013-01-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Transaction aggregation to increase transaction processing throughout |
US8954482B2 (en) * | 2007-09-20 | 2015-02-10 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Managing data flows in graph-based computations |
US7886141B2 (en) | 2007-10-27 | 2011-02-08 | Asix Electronics Corporation | Method and systems for advanced reprogrammable boot codes and in-application programming of embedded microprocessor systems |
US8775441B2 (en) * | 2008-01-16 | 2014-07-08 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Managing an archive for approximate string matching |
US20090193416A1 (en) * | 2008-01-24 | 2009-07-30 | Nec Laboratories America, Inc. | Decidability of reachability for threads communicating via locks |
US8225288B2 (en) * | 2008-01-29 | 2012-07-17 | Intuit Inc. | Model-based testing using branches, decisions, and options |
US8797178B2 (en) | 2008-03-10 | 2014-08-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Efficient stream sharing for multi-user sensor data collection |
US20090235267A1 (en) | 2008-03-13 | 2009-09-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Consolidated display of resource performance trends |
US9184874B2 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2015-11-10 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Storing log likelihood ratios in interleaved form to reduce hardware memory |
US8336052B2 (en) | 2008-06-16 | 2012-12-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Management, control, and monitoring of workload including unrelated processes of different containers |
JP5331203B2 (en) | 2008-06-30 | 2013-10-30 | アビニシオ テクノロジー エルエルシー | Data recording in graph-based calculations |
US20100070955A1 (en) * | 2008-07-08 | 2010-03-18 | Nec Laboratories America | Alias analysis for concurrent software programs |
US8782613B2 (en) * | 2008-08-12 | 2014-07-15 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Optimizing applications using source code patterns and performance analysis |
US8286176B1 (en) | 2008-09-29 | 2012-10-09 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Optimizing resource configurations |
US20100169137A1 (en) * | 2008-12-31 | 2010-07-01 | Ebay Inc. | Methods and systems to analyze data using a graph |
US7979479B2 (en) * | 2009-01-08 | 2011-07-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Transaction-controlled graph processing and management |
US8635694B2 (en) * | 2009-01-10 | 2014-01-21 | Kaspersky Lab Zao | Systems and methods for malware classification |
CN102317911B (en) | 2009-02-13 | 2016-04-06 | 起元技术有限责任公司 | Management role performs |
US7992040B2 (en) | 2009-02-20 | 2011-08-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Root cause analysis by correlating symptoms with asynchronous changes |
US8327377B2 (en) | 2009-04-30 | 2012-12-04 | Ca, Inc. | Detecting, logging and tracking component dependencies in web service transactions |
US8332811B2 (en) | 2009-04-30 | 2012-12-11 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Systems and methods for generating source code for workflow platform |
US8473901B1 (en) | 2009-06-12 | 2013-06-25 | The Mathworks, Inc. | Non-literal representation of programming language code |
US8205113B2 (en) | 2009-07-14 | 2012-06-19 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Fault tolerant batch processing |
US8667329B2 (en) * | 2009-09-25 | 2014-03-04 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Processing transactions in graph-based applications |
KR20150042297A (en) | 2010-06-15 | 2015-04-20 | 아브 이니티오 테크놀로지 엘엘시 | Dynamically loading graph-based computations |
AU2014262225A1 (en) | 2010-06-15 | 2014-12-04 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Dynamically loading graph-based computations |
US8458729B2 (en) | 2010-07-20 | 2013-06-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing and optimizing workflows among computer applications |
US9158650B2 (en) * | 2010-08-04 | 2015-10-13 | BoxTone, Inc. | Mobile application performance management |
US9727438B2 (en) * | 2010-08-25 | 2017-08-08 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Evaluating dataflow graph characteristics |
WO2012061109A1 (en) | 2010-10-25 | 2012-05-10 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Managing data set objects in a dataflow graph that represents a computer program |
US8997024B2 (en) | 2010-12-09 | 2015-03-31 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Navigating between views of a graph using placemarkers |
AU2012100128A4 (en) | 2011-02-22 | 2012-03-08 | Zensar Technologies Ltd | A computer implemented system and method for indexing and optionally annotating use cases and generating test scenarios therefrom |
US8863089B2 (en) | 2011-02-25 | 2014-10-14 | Nintendo Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for visualizing computer program execution |
US8732669B2 (en) | 2011-03-11 | 2014-05-20 | Oracle International Corporation | Efficient model checking technique for finding software defects |
US9165029B2 (en) | 2011-04-12 | 2015-10-20 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Navigating performance data from different subsystems |
CN103827908A (en) | 2011-07-12 | 2014-05-28 | 益百利信息解决方案公司 | Systems and methods for a large-scale credit data processing architecture |
CA2847927C (en) | 2011-09-07 | 2019-08-27 | Digital Rapids Corporation | Systems and methods for computing applications |
US9607045B2 (en) | 2012-07-12 | 2017-03-28 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Progressive query computation using streaming architectures |
US9875094B2 (en) * | 2012-08-29 | 2018-01-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Microcode upgrade in a storage system |
US9507682B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2016-11-29 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Dynamic graph performance monitoring |
US9274926B2 (en) | 2013-01-03 | 2016-03-01 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Configurable testing of computer programs |
CA2932763C (en) | 2013-12-05 | 2022-07-12 | Ab Initio Technology Llc | Managing interfaces for dataflow graphs composed of sub-graphs |
-
2010
- 2010-02-12 CN CN201080007664.0A patent/CN102317911B/en active Active
- 2010-02-12 EP EP10741775A patent/EP2396724A4/en not_active Ceased
- 2010-02-12 WO PCT/US2010/024036 patent/WO2010093879A1/en active Application Filing
- 2010-02-12 US US12/704,998 patent/US9886319B2/en active Active
- 2010-02-12 KR KR1020117019122A patent/KR101730513B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2010-02-12 AU AU2010213618A patent/AU2010213618B9/en active Active
- 2010-02-12 CA CA2750279A patent/CA2750279C/en active Active
- 2010-02-12 KR KR1020157008131A patent/KR20150038758A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2010-02-12 CN CN201610144848.0A patent/CN105843684B/en active Active
-
2018
- 2018-01-17 US US15/873,095 patent/US10528395B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5357632A (en) * | 1990-01-09 | 1994-10-18 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Dynamic task allocation in a multi-processor system employing distributed control processors and distributed arithmetic processors |
US6044394A (en) * | 1997-07-21 | 2000-03-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing independently executing computer tasks that are interrelated by dataflow |
US6715145B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2004-03-30 | Accenture Llp | Processing pipeline in a base services pattern environment |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
See also references of EP2396724A4 * |
W.M.P. VAN DER AALSTA.H.M. TER HOFSTEDEB. KIEPUSZEWSKIA.P. BARROS, WORKFLOW PATTERNS |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
KR101730513B1 (en) | 2017-04-26 |
CA2750279C (en) | 2019-03-26 |
US9886319B2 (en) | 2018-02-06 |
EP2396724A4 (en) | 2012-12-12 |
AU2010213618B2 (en) | 2015-07-02 |
EP2396724A1 (en) | 2011-12-21 |
US20100211953A1 (en) | 2010-08-19 |
CN102317911B (en) | 2016-04-06 |
AU2010213618B9 (en) | 2015-07-30 |
CA2750279A1 (en) | 2010-08-19 |
CN105843684B (en) | 2020-03-03 |
CN102317911A (en) | 2012-01-11 |
KR20110116178A (en) | 2011-10-25 |
CN105843684A (en) | 2016-08-10 |
US10528395B2 (en) | 2020-01-07 |
US20180143861A1 (en) | 2018-05-24 |
AU2010213618A1 (en) | 2011-08-04 |
KR20150038758A (en) | 2015-04-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US10528395B2 (en) | Task managing application for performing tasks based on messages received from a data processing application initiated by the task managing application | |
US10915382B2 (en) | Event-driven serverless function orchestration | |
US8543534B2 (en) | Concurrency in event processing networks for event server | |
US20220043702A1 (en) | Method for deterministically reporting cause and effect in software systems | |
US8122006B2 (en) | Event processing query language including retain clause | |
JP3782880B2 (en) | Modular application collaboration device and method for providing common operability between applications | |
US20170255886A1 (en) | Workflow execution | |
US8789058B2 (en) | System and method for supporting batch job management in a distributed transaction system | |
US8589864B2 (en) | Automating the creation of an application provisioning model | |
GB2376094A (en) | Flexible navigation of a workflow graph in a data processing system | |
WO2018176356A1 (en) | System and method for determining the success of a cross-platform application migration | |
US20180276079A1 (en) | System and method for determining the success of a cross-platform application migration | |
Ritter | Experiences with business process model and notation for modeling integration patterns | |
US12014191B2 (en) | Using persistent finite state machine to coordinate lifecycle operations in service broker | |
US11113105B1 (en) | Computer implemented system and method for generating platform agnostic digital worker | |
Mammar et al. | An event-b-based approach to model and verify behaviors for component-based applications | |
Lakshmanan et al. | A business centric monitoring approach for heterogeneous service composites | |
Ghazi | Diagnosis of Errors in Stalled Inter-Organizational Workflow Processes | |
EP0892346A2 (en) | Propagation of a command status code from a remote unit to a host unit | |
EP0902366A2 (en) | System of propagating a command status code from a remote unit to a host unit | |
EP0892345A2 (en) | Method of propagating a command status code from a remote unit to a host unit | |
KR19990013427A (en) | Management method and management system for tasks running in a computer environment, and manufactured products therefor | |
Dunphy et al. | BizTalk Design Patterns and Practices | |
Bittler et al. | Oracle Fusion Applications Developer's Guide for Oracle Enterprise Scheduler 11g Release 1 (11.1. 1.5) E10142-01 | |
Vaculin | Monitoring and Recovery of Semantic Web Services |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 201080007664.0 Country of ref document: CN |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 10741775 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2010213618 Country of ref document: AU |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2750279 Country of ref document: CA |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 5319/CHENP/2011 Country of ref document: IN |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2010213618 Country of ref document: AU Date of ref document: 20100212 Kind code of ref document: A |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2010741775 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2011550259 Country of ref document: JP |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 20117019122 Country of ref document: KR Kind code of ref document: A |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: JP |