WO2010036351A1 - Construction de filtre améliorée pour retirer des polluants d'une enceinte - Google Patents

Construction de filtre améliorée pour retirer des polluants d'une enceinte Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2010036351A1
WO2010036351A1 PCT/US2009/005316 US2009005316W WO2010036351A1 WO 2010036351 A1 WO2010036351 A1 WO 2010036351A1 US 2009005316 W US2009005316 W US 2009005316W WO 2010036351 A1 WO2010036351 A1 WO 2010036351A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
filter
drive
disk drive
adsorbent
particles
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2009/005316
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Peter Roeber
Earl Ball
Edwin Dauber
Original Assignee
Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. filed Critical Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc.
Publication of WO2010036351A1 publication Critical patent/WO2010036351A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G11—INFORMATION STORAGE
    • G11B—INFORMATION STORAGE BASED ON RELATIVE MOVEMENT BETWEEN RECORD CARRIER AND TRANSDUCER
    • G11B33/00—Constructional parts, details or accessories not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
    • G11B33/14—Reducing influence of physical parameters, e.g. temperature change, moisture, dust
    • G11B33/1446—Reducing contamination, e.g. by dust, debris
    • G11B33/146—Reducing contamination, e.g. by dust, debris constructional details of filters
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D46/00—Filters or filtering processes specially modified for separating dispersed particles from gases or vapours
    • B01D46/0002—Casings; Housings; Frame constructions
    • B01D46/0005—Mounting of filtering elements within casings, housings or frames
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D46/00—Filters or filtering processes specially modified for separating dispersed particles from gases or vapours
    • B01D46/0002—Casings; Housings; Frame constructions
    • B01D46/0012—In-line filters
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D46/00—Filters or filtering processes specially modified for separating dispersed particles from gases or vapours
    • B01D46/0027—Filters or filtering processes specially modified for separating dispersed particles from gases or vapours with additional separating or treating functions
    • B01D46/0032—Filters or filtering processes specially modified for separating dispersed particles from gases or vapours with additional separating or treating functions using electrostatic forces to remove particles, e.g. electret filters
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D46/00—Filters or filtering processes specially modified for separating dispersed particles from gases or vapours
    • B01D46/0027—Filters or filtering processes specially modified for separating dispersed particles from gases or vapours with additional separating or treating functions
    • B01D46/0036—Filters or filtering processes specially modified for separating dispersed particles from gases or vapours with additional separating or treating functions by adsorption or absorption
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D46/00—Filters or filtering processes specially modified for separating dispersed particles from gases or vapours
    • B01D46/10—Particle separators, e.g. dust precipitators, using filter plates, sheets or pads having plane surfaces
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D2239/00—Aspects relating to filtering material for liquid or gaseous fluids
    • B01D2239/04—Additives and treatments of the filtering material
    • B01D2239/0435—Electret
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D2253/00—Adsorbents used in seperation treatment of gases and vapours
    • B01D2253/10—Inorganic adsorbents
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D2253/00—Adsorbents used in seperation treatment of gases and vapours
    • B01D2253/10—Inorganic adsorbents
    • B01D2253/102—Carbon
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D2253/00—Adsorbents used in seperation treatment of gases and vapours
    • B01D2253/10—Inorganic adsorbents
    • B01D2253/104—Alumina
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D2253/00—Adsorbents used in seperation treatment of gases and vapours
    • B01D2253/10—Inorganic adsorbents
    • B01D2253/106—Silica or silicates
    • B01D2253/108—Zeolites
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D2257/00—Components to be removed
    • B01D2257/20—Halogens or halogen compounds
    • B01D2257/202—Single element halogens
    • B01D2257/2025—Chlorine
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D2257/00—Components to be removed
    • B01D2257/30—Sulfur compounds
    • B01D2257/302—Sulfur oxides
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D2275/00—Filter media structures for filters specially adapted for separating dispersed particles from gases or vapours
    • B01D2275/10—Multiple layers
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D2279/00—Filters adapted for separating dispersed particles from gases or vapours specially modified for specific uses
    • B01D2279/45—Filters adapted for separating dispersed particles from gases or vapours specially modified for specific uses for electronic devices, e.g. computers, hard-discs, mobile phones
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D53/00—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/02—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by adsorption, e.g. preparative gas chromatography
    • B01D53/04—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by adsorption, e.g. preparative gas chromatography with stationary adsorbents
    • B01D53/0407—Constructional details of adsorbing systems
    • B01D53/0415—Beds in cartridges
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D71/00—Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
    • B01D71/06—Organic material
    • B01D71/30—Polyalkenyl halides
    • B01D71/32—Polyalkenyl halides containing fluorine atoms
    • B01D71/36—Polytetrafluoroethene

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a device for filtering contaminants, such as particulates and vapor phase contaminants, from a confined environment such as electronic or optical devices susceptible to contamination (e.g. computer disk drives) by improving the fit of the filter to improve its functionality.
  • contaminants such as particulates and vapor phase contaminants
  • enclosures that contain sensitive instrumentation must maintain very clean environments in order for the equipment to operate properly. Examples include enclosures with sensitive optical surfaces or electronic connections that are sensitive to particles and gaseous contaminants which can interfere with mechanical, optical, or electrical operation. Other examples include data recording devices such as computer hard disk drives that are sensitive to particles, organic vapors, and corrosive vapors. Still others include enclosures for processing, transporting or storing thin films and semiconductor wafers. Also included are electronic control boxes such as those used in automobiles and industrial applications that can be sensitive to particles, moisture buildup, and corrosion as well as contamination from fluids and vapors. Contamination in such enclosures originates from both inside and outside the enclosures.
  • hard drives damage may result from external contaminates as well as from particles and outgassing generated from internal sources.
  • hard drives or “hard disk drives” or “disk drives” or “drives” will be used herein for convenience and are understood to include any of the enclosures mentioned above.
  • Stiction results from the increased adhesion of a drive head to a disk while the disk is stationary plus increased viscous drag parallel to the head-disk interface.
  • Newer high-density disks are more sensitive to contamination-caused stiction because they are smoother and only thin layers of lubricants are present.
  • Contaminants on the disk change the surface energy and i the adhesive forces between the head and disk, which cause stiction.
  • vapors that condense in the gap between the head and disk can cause stiction. Further exacerbating these effects are the newer lower energy, lower torque motors being used in smaller disk drives for portable computers and consumer applications.
  • Head crashes can occur when particles get into the head disk interface.
  • Newer high density drives have 30 nanometer or less flying heights or spacing between the head and disk during operation and typically have disks rotating 4500 revolutions per minute or greater.
  • Even submicron-sized particles can be a problem, causing the head to crash into the particle or the disk after flying over a particle, bringing the drive to an abrupt failure mode.
  • Particles can also adversely affect data integrity and mechanical reliability of a drive, sometimes referred to as thermal asperity.
  • disk drives must be protected against a large number of contaminants in the surrounding environment that can penetrate the drive. This is true for drives used in small to medium sized computer systems which may not be used in the typical data processing environment. This is especially true in drives that are removable and portable to any environment such as disk drives that are used in laptop computers, Personal Computer Memory Card International Association (PCMCIA) slots. Newer consumer applications such as car navigation systems and cell phone applications will extend the environmental challenges and therefore, the protection needs for hard disk drives.
  • PCMCIA Personal Computer Memory Card International Association
  • Filtration devices to keep particles from entering these enclosures are well known. They may consist of a filtration media held in place by a housing of polycarbonate, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), or some other material; or they may consist of a filtration media in the form of a self-adhesive disk utilizing a layer or layers of pressure sensitive adhesive. These devices are mounted and sealed over a vent hole in the enclosure to filter particles from the air entering the drive. Filtration performance depends not only on the filter having high filtration efficiency but also on having a low resistance to airflow so that unfiltered air does not leak into the enclosure through a gasket or seam instead of entering through the filter.
  • Combination sorbent breather filters to keep particles and vapors from entering enclosures are also well known. These can be made by filling a cartridge of polycarbonate, ABS, or similar material with sorbent and securing filter media on one or more ends of the cartridge. Examples of such filters are described in U.S. Patents 4,863,499 issued to Osendorf (an anti-diffusion chemical breather assembly for disk drives with filter media having a layer impregnated with activated charcoal granules); 5,030,260 issued to Beck et al. (a disk drive breather filter including an assembly with an extended diffusion path); 5,124,856 issued to Brown et al.
  • a second combination adsorbent breather filter is also well known that encapsulates the adsorbent material such as an activated carbon impregnated polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) composite layer between two layers of filter media and is applied over a hole in the enclosure with a layer of pressure sensitive adhesive.
  • PTFE polytetrafluoroethylene
  • These filters work well and are of a size that can be used in today's small drives but are typically designed to filter air coming into the drive.
  • the adsorbent is typically primarily desired to adsorb both organic and corrosive vapors from the outside environment and will filter particles only from air coming into or leaving the drive. Internally generated vapors can be adsorbed by these filters, but often times these filters are used in conjunction with another internal adsorbent so they can be smaller in size. Again, particles are also generated inside the drive and are not typically captured by these filters.
  • a diffusion tube can be included with either the initial particulate breather filter or an adsorbent breather filter as described in U.S. Patent 5,417,743 to Dauber and in US patent 5,997,614 by Tuma et al.
  • Diffusion tubes provide additional protection against vaporous contaminants (including moisture) entering the drive through the breather opening by providing a diffusion barrier in the form of the diffusion tube which creates a tortuous or a longer path for contaminants to diffuse through before entering the drive enclosure.
  • Diffusion tubes reduce the number of contaminants reaching the interior of the enclosure (and/or the adsorbent depending on the location of the filter) and increase the humidity time constants or time required for the enclosure to reach humidity equilibrium with the environment.
  • the term "diffusion tube" may refer to either a conventional tortuous path or it may refer to a non-tortuous cavity into which incoming air passes before entering the filter.
  • Internal particulate filters are also well known. These filters are typically pieces of filter media, such as expanded PTFE membrane laminated to backing material such as a polyester nonwoven, or "pillow-shaped" filters containing electret (i.e., electrostatic) filter media. They are pressure fit into slots or C channels and are placed in the active air stream such as near the rotating disks in a computer hard disk drive or in front of a fan in electronic control cabinets, etc. Alternatively, the recirculation filter media can be framed in a plastic frame. These filters work well for particulate removal of internally generated particles but do not address the problem of vapor phase contaminants.
  • a major problem with these filters is that in their simplest form they are press fit into slots or C channels as mentioned and sometimes this is not an adequate means of installation.
  • manufacturers often have several vendors supplying base plates that contain the slots for installation. Each of those vendors may have multiple molds to mold the base plates. And each manufacturer will also have several filter suppliers that each have their own die cutting tooling. Additionally, each mold has to have a draft angle to be moldable and variations in draft angles also exist. Also it is desirable to be able to install a filter upside down so drafting a filter to fit a molded draft angle often isn't an option.
  • the filter If the filter is too loose, it can simply fall out of the slots. If the filter is too tight, the filter can spring out of the slots with the added vibration of the base plate moving down an assembly line. If there is then no final check before the lid is placed on the base plate, the drive can be assembled with a misplaced filter which will cause the drive to fail when it is put into operation.
  • Filters in disk drives are normally held in place by C-channels.
  • the C- channel is often cast as part of the base plate or can be molded of plastic and secured in place.
  • These molded or cast features cannot completely seal or touch the top cover since pressure is needed on the gasket to seal the drive, these features could interfere with this sealing if they contacted the top cover. Accordingly, there is an airgap over these C-channels where air can bypass the filter and be unfiltered.
  • a second well known internal adsorbent assembly incorporates a layer of adsorbent, such as activated carbon/PTFE composite, between an encapsulating filter layer and layer of pressure sensitive adhesive that helps encapsulate the adsorbent as well as provides a means of mounting the adsorbent assembly on an interior wall in the enclosure.
  • adsorbent such as activated carbon/PTFE composite
  • a third internal adsorbent assembly incorporates a layer of adsorbent such as activated carbon/PTFE composite between two layers of filter media or is alternately wrapped in a layer of filter media and can be installed between slots or C channels much the way a recirculation filter is installed but without much real airflow through the filter.
  • a layer of adsorbent such as activated carbon/PTFE composite between two layers of filter media or is alternately wrapped in a layer of filter media and can be installed between slots or C channels much the way a recirculation filter is installed but without much real airflow through the filter.
  • a commercially available adsorbent recirculation filter incorporates activated carbon beads glued to a nonwoven carrier that is sandwiched between two layers of electret filter material and two layers of plastic support screen.
  • This filter provides some sorbent protection at the sacrifice of some internal particle filtration effectiveness, as this construction appears to increase resistance to airflow to the filter relative to a conventional recirculation filter.
  • the sorbent capability is limited, however, due to, for example, the constraints of the filter size and the blockage of sorbent surface area by the glue holding the carbon to the carrier.
  • These filters are again placed in between slots or C channels and again a major problem with these filters is obtaining the required fit for use in between these slots.
  • Patent No 4,857,087, to Bolton et al. teaches incorporating a breather filter in a recirculation filter housing, but has significantly more parts and incorporates a third filter element complete with housings, apertures, and gaskets to accomplish this inclusion.
  • the combinations described in these patents either locate the filter components in separate regions of the disk drive or incorporate space-consuming fixtures to orient the component parts within the drives.
  • a multifunction filter providing a breather filter and a recirculation filter with optional; adsorbents can solve many of the problems associated with the previous filters. This is described in US Patent No 6,395,073 to Dauber. This is an adequate solution when the space can be found for placing such a combination filter. But sometimes with such limited space particularly in today's smaller drives, the need exists to have individual components that can be individually maximized for its performance. As the drives continue to increase in recording data density and capacity, they continue to become more sensitive to particulate and vaporous contamination, such that the filtration components performance must be individually maximized to meet the more demanding filtration requirements.
  • US Patent Application Publication Number 2004/0006954 describes a filter having a filtering portion through which flowing air passes and particles are filtered from the flowing air, and an insertion portion included at both ends of the filtering portion.
  • the inserted portion is inserted into support grooves in a channel in a disk drive to form a seal.
  • the patent application teaches that since there is no gap between the support groove of the channel and the insertion portion of the filter, all the air flowing toward the filter passes through the filtering portion.
  • the invention provides a disk drive filter for mounting in a channel, the channel having a width and comprising two bearing surfaces spaced apart, the filter comprising at least a first end comprising a first linear edge and a second end opposite the first end, the second end comprising a second linear edge, the filter having a length equal to the minimum distance between the first linear edge and the second linear edge; and at least one flexible projecting element extending from at least one of the first linear edge and the second linear edge for an orthogonal distance equal to at least 0.060" (1.5 mm) and wherein the projection extends over the top of at least one of the bearing surfaces.
  • the invention provides a filter for a disk drive, the disk drive having at least one channel for mounting said filter, the filter comprising at least one filter layer disposed between a first and second functional layer, the filter having a sealed perimeter, the perimeter comprising a top edge and a bottom edge opposite the top edge, wherein the length of the top edge is greater than the length of the bottom edge such that and the top edge extends over at least one of the channels for mounting the filter.
  • Figure 1 is a profile view of an embodiment of the filter unit of the present invention with full side projecting elements
  • Figure 2 is a profile view of another embodiment of the filter unit of the present invention with smaller side projecting elements
  • Figure 3 is a profile view of another embodiment of the filter unit of the present invention with multiple side projecting elements
  • Figures 4A, and 4B are profile and end views respectively, of another embodiment of the filter unit of the present invention with slits creating multiple projecting elements along the entire sides of the filter;
  • Figure 5 is a profile view of another embodiment of the filter unit of the present invention with shaped projecting elements
  • Figure 6 is a profile view of another embodiment of the filter unit of the present invention with serrated type projecting elements
  • Figure 7 is a profile view of another embodiment of the filter unit of the present invention with a three-dimensional shaped projecting element
  • Figures 8 and 8A are profile and end views respectively of another embodiment of the filter unit of the present invention with foldable projecting elements;
  • Figure 9 is a profile view of another embodiment of the filter unit of the present invention with a single projecting element on a single side;
  • Figure 10 is a top view of an embodiment of the present invention with smaller projecting elements on opposite ends of the filter unit as it is installed between opposing C channels with the projecting elements flexed for a spring loaded effect;
  • Figures 11A and 11B are top and profile views respectively of another embodiment of a filter unit of the present invention with projecting elements that fit in slits of the channels;
  • Figure 12 is a profile view of another embodiment of the filter unit of the present invention with an overmolded flexible plastic molded onto the bas filter;
  • Figure 13 is a side profile view of another embodiment of the filter unit of the present invention in which the top edge of the filter extends over one C- channel.
  • Figure 14 is a side profile view of another embodiment of the filter unit of the present invention in which the top edge of the filter extends over two C- channels.
  • the present invention provides a new, improved filter that can filter the air of particles and vaporous contaminants.
  • the inventive filter features an improved fit which assures that when the filter is installed between slots or C channels it will remain in place.
  • the present invention also provides multiple means of obtaining a secured filter fit between slots or C channels in a disk drive.
  • the inventive filters may be a particle filter or recirculation filter or it can include adsorbents and be a combination particle and vapor filter or adsorbent recirculation filter.
  • the filter or adsorbent filter has a projecting element or projecting elements that are more flexible than the filter body and extend from an edge or edges of the filter to give an improved spring-loaded type friction fit. Any number of multiple projecting elements can be utilized.
  • the entire side or sides of the filter can be tabbed by forming slits into the side to make multiple flexible projecting elements for the interference or "spring loaded" fit.
  • the projecting elements can take any desired shape.
  • the projecting elements can also be of any desired length.
  • projecting element length can be determined depending on such factors as projecting element material, width and overall filter length. Projecting element lengths as small as 0.005" can be used. Projecting elements longer than 0.25" can also be used. Typically projecting element lengths of from 0.020" to 0.125" would be adequate.
  • the filter can have a projecting element that folds for some portion of its length and provides added interference fit for the filter in the slots or C channels, as depicted in Figure 8.
  • the filter can have a shaped three dimensional projecting element that again adds to the interference spring loaded fit into the channels such a filter is depicted in Figure 7.
  • the filter can have a projecting element or projecting elements that fit into added slits in the C channels to help hold the filter into the channels. This extends the filter beyond the channels and secures it from sliding out of the channels while the base plate or enclosure may vibrate during an installation assembly line process as seen in Figure 11.
  • the filter can have a projecting element or projecting elements added to the filter in a post operation that might include gluing projecting elements on, overmolding projecting elements of a moldable material onto the base filter, or other means of adding a projecting element or projecting elements that can help in the press fit or spring loaded post assembly process.
  • the filters of the present invention are not only simple to use and install, but also low in out gassing and nonvolatile residues and low in parti culation.
  • the filters can have the added benefit that they can be washed with deionized water to remove surface ionic contamination and particles to improve their suitability for those applications requiring such cleanliness such as in computer disk drives without washing out beneficial treatments such as salts which remove acid gases from the air streams.
  • This washability is accomplished by using hydrophobic filter materials to surround the adsorbent layers.
  • "Hydrophobic" as used in this application means the filter materials have a water (or water with surfactant if one is used) entry pressure sufficient to withstand the conditions of conventional washing steps, such as heating, stirring, ultrasonics, etc.
  • a layer or layers of filter media are provided in substantially laminar relation to filter the recirculating air of particles and has added features to improve the filters fit in the installation application and process.
  • a layer or layers of adsorbent media may optionally be provided alongside the filter layers, or between filter media layers, to filter the recirculating air stream of vaporous contaminants.
  • Figure 1 there is shown a profile perspective view of a first embodiment of the improved recirculation filter 10 of the present invention.
  • Figure 1 shows full-sided projecting elements 11 on either profile of the main filter body 12.
  • Figure 2 shows a profile view of another embodiment of the improved filter of the present invention.
  • Figure 2 shows small projecting elements 11 on either profile of the main filter body 12.
  • Figure 3 shows a profile view of another embodiment of the improved filter of the present invention.
  • Figure 3 shows dual projecting elements 1 1 on either profile of the main filter body 12.
  • Figures 4A and 4B show a profile view and end view respectively of another embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 4A shows multiple projecting elements 11 on either side on the main filter 12, made essentially by slitting the ends of the filter 10.
  • Figure 4B shows how the ends can look after slitting and handling as they can tend to separate and give a spring loaded effect into the C channel or slot holding features for the filter.
  • Figure 5A shows a profile view of another embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 5 shows dual projecting elements 11 on either profile of the main filter body 12. These projecting elements can be of any shape and here are shown as triangular projecting elements which can adjust for any draft angle that may be molded into the disk-drive C channels. They also have the ability to push past and hold into any locking type feature that might be employed to hold the filter.
  • Figure 5b shows the shaped projection element engaging a feature of the channel in a disk drive filter.
  • Figure 6 shows a profile view of another embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 6 shows serrated or scalloped projecting elements 11 that can have any shape and be any number on both sides of the main filter 12.
  • Figure 7 shows an end view of another embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 7 shows a three-dimensional projecting element 14 on the end of main filter element 13.
  • the projecting element 14 adds a spring loading effect in the C channels by compressing or deforming the projecting element 14.
  • Figures 8 and 8A show profile and end views respectively of a further embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 8 shows slit projecting elements 15 on the main filter body 12.
  • Figure 8A shows an end view with the projecting elements folded over to provide the spring loading effect when pressed into the holding C channels.
  • Figure 9 shows a profile view of a further embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 9 shows a single projecting element 11 on a single profile of the main filter body 12.
  • Figure 10 is a top view of a filter similar to the filter shown in Figure 2 installed between two C channels 20.
  • the two projecting elements 11 that extend beyond the main filter body 12, are slightly bent providing the spring force to help locate and hold the filter in place.
  • Figures 1 1 A and 11 B show a top view and profile view respectively of a filter where the projecting elements 11 extend beyond the main filter body 12, and extend through slots in the C channels 20 to help secure the filter in place.
  • the filter is more secured through the slots rather than being spring loaded into the channels.
  • Figure 12 shows a profile view of a further embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 12 shows projecting elements 15 that are overmolded onto a standard filter as a post assembly process to provide projecting elements for securing the filter into the assembly channels.
  • Figures 13A and 13B show profile views of another embodiment of filter 10 and of the filter 10 as installed in C-channels 20 respectively.
  • the top edge includes a projection extending over one C-channel to help seal the area above the C-channel to reduce air bypass around the filter and potentially provide additional filter area to the inventive filter.
  • Figure 14 shows a profile view of still another embodiment of filter 10 and of filter 10 as installed in C-channels 20 respectively.
  • the top edge includes projections 17 and 18 extend over each of the two C-channels 20 to help seal the area above the C-channels to reduce air bypass around the filters and potentially provide additional filter area to the inventive filter.
  • an adsorbent or adsorbent layers may be added to change the filter from a particle filter to a combination particle and vapor filter.
  • the adsorbent can be treated for the adsorption of specific gaseous species such as acid gasses.
  • the adsorbent can be disposed within the filter portion 12, and can extend into the sealed tabbed regions 11 within the assembly portion of the filter.
  • the adsorbent may comprise one or more layers of 100% adsorbent materials, such as granular activated carbon, or may be a filled product matrix such as a polymeric scaffold of porous polymeric material compounded with adsorbents that fill the void spaces.
  • adsorbent impregnated nonwovens or beads on a scrim where the non-woven or scrim may be cellulose or polymeric and may include latex or other binders as well as porous castings or tablets of adsorbents and fillers that are polymeric or ceramic.
  • the adsorbent can also be a mixture of different types of adsorbents.
  • adsorbent materials that may be contained within the adsorbent layer include: physisorbers (e.g. silica gel, activated carbon, activated alumina, molecular sieves, etc.); chemisorbers (e.g. potassium permanganate, potassium carbonate, potassium iodide, calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, sodium carbonate, sodium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, powdered metals or other reactants for scavenging gas phase contaminants); as well as mixtures of these materials.
  • physisorbers e.g. silica gel, activated carbon, activated alumina, molecular sieves, etc.
  • chemisorbers e.g. potassium permanganate, potassium carbonate, potassium iodide, calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, sodium carbonate, sodium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, powdered metals or other reactants for scavenging gas phase contaminants
  • a preferred embodiment of the adsorbent layer utilizes an sorbent filled PTFE sheet wherein the sorbent particles are entrapped within the reticular PTFE structure as taught by U.S. Patent No. 4,985,296 issued to Mortimer, Jr. and specifically incorporated herein by reference.
  • particles are packed in a multi-modal (e.g. bi-modal or tri-modal) manner with particles of different sizes interspersed around one another to fill as much of the available void space between particles as is possible, so as to maximize the amount of active material contained in the core.
  • This technique also allows a number of sorbents to be filled into a single layer.
  • the PTFE/adsorbent composite can easily be made in thicknesses from less than 0.001" to 0.400" and greater allowing a great deal of flexibility in finished filter thicknesses and adsorbent loading. Additionally, sorbent densities approximating 80-90% of full density are possible with multi-model packing and physical compression, so that maximum adsorbent material can be packed per unit volume.
  • the use of PTFE as the binding element also does not block the adsorbent pores as do binders such as acrylics, melted plastic resins, etc.
  • the adsorbent is preferably covered with a polymeric membrane such as expanded PTFE.
  • a polymeric membrane such as expanded PTFE.
  • PTFE membranes as a filter material over the adsorbent layers imparts a number of additional advantages to this improved filter construction.
  • PTFE is hydrophobic.
  • Some adsorbents used in industry use a water-soluble salt to impregnate a physical adsorbent such as activated carbon to provide a chemical adsorbent with a large active surface area.
  • a water-soluble salt to impregnate a physical adsorbent such as activated carbon to provide a chemical adsorbent with a large active surface area.
  • Ionic contamination has become a big concern for corrosion susceptible apparatus such as computer disk drives. Ions of concern, such as chlorine and sulfur dioxide, are readily soluble in water, and thus a deionized water wash has become routine for many components used within the drive.
  • embodiments utilizing PTFE filter layers to encapsulate the adsorbent allow use of water soluble salt treated adsorbents incorporated into the adsorbent layer and can withstand washing without loss of adsorbent treatment and effectiveness.
  • PTFE membranes While these PTFE membranes are hydrophobic and can be washed, they also have a high moisture vapor transmission rate, which allows contaminants in the air to quickly and easily diffuse through the membranes into the adsorbents. They can also be made with very good filtration efficiencies which contain the carbon particles as well as filters air that passes through the material.
  • An example of a preferred membrane for that would be one made in accordance with U. S. Patent 3,953,566.
  • Such membranes have an efficiency of 99.97% at 0.3 microns sized particles and a permeability or face velocity of 7 feet/minute at 0.5 inches of water pressure.
  • Such membranes are commercially available in finished filter form from W. L. Gore and Associates, Inc.
  • Another preferred filter media to encapsulate the adsorbent layer is a layer of expanded PTFE membrane made in accordance with the teachings of U.S. Patent No. 4,902,423 to Bacino et al. incorporated by reference.
  • This filter media has several advantages. It can be made very highly permeable, with resistances to air flow of less than 0.5 mm H2O @ 10.5 feet per minute (3.2 meters per minute) and still contain adsorbent particulate within the filter.
  • the particle filtration efficiency of this highly expanded membrane as measured on a TSI 8160 efficiency test rig available from TSI Inc., in Minnesota, is also very good (e.g. in excess of 55% at 0.3 ⁇ m) which provides good particle filtration along with the adsorbent containment.
  • This filter media may optionally be structurally supported by a layer of woven, nonwoven, or expanded porous material, such as polyester, polypropylene, polyamide, etc.
  • a preferred support layer is a Reemay 2014 polyester nonwoven, 1.0 oz/yd2 available from Reemay, Inc., Old Hickory, Tennessee.
  • Yet another preferred filter media to be used in both recirculation filter and adsorbent recirculation filter applications, is a layer of an electrostatic triboelectret material available in finished filter form from W. L. Gore and Associates, Inc. under the trademark GORE-TRET® recirculation filters.
  • this media is very high in efficiency (e.g., in excess of 90% @0.3 micron) and also very permeable (e.g., less than 1 mm H 2 O at 10.5 fpm or 3.2 m/min). While this media loses its charge while being washed with deionized water, it immediately regains its efficiency upon drying due to the triboelectric effect of the mix of dissimilar fibers.
  • filter materials can also be used without departing from the spirit of the invention. They could be alternative electret or other triboelectret materials that yield high efficiencies and low resistances to airflow. They could also be other filter papers or filter membranes such as polypropylene membranes or cast polymeric membranes or some combination of filter materials. These materials may be wovens, nonwovens, or expanded porous materials, such as polyester, polypropylene, polyamide, etc.
  • Additional functional layers may be added such as an outer protective layer or layers can also be used to add durability to the filter and to contain any protruding fibers from either the triboelectret type filter media or the filter support media for the membrane filter media. Typically, this would be an extruded or expanded plastic material such as polypropylene, polyethylene, polyamide, polyester, etc. A preferred material is a Delnet 0707 expanded polypropylene material available from DelStar Technology, Inc., Middletown, DE. Nonwoven layers may also be used for support and/or fiber containment and may be used alone in three layer constructions with the filter layer or as part of five or more layered constructions.
  • adsorbent layers may be added to improve various aspects of the filter, such as adsorbent layers to add adsorption performance to the filter.
  • nonwovens such as Reemay 2014 polyester nonwoven, 1.0 oz/yd2 available from Reemay, Inc., Old Hickory, Tennessee may be used as support layers or added for additional fiber containment layers.
  • the inventive filter can be comprised entirely of the layers of the filter media and surrounding layers without the need for added framing elements.
  • the inventive filter has one or more projections that are comprised of the filter layers extending beyond a main length or width of the filter without the need for any additional framing material.
  • the edges of the filter are typically sealed by some means such as but not limited to heat or ultrasonics to contain the fibers of the various layers and give it shape and structural form, but no additional framing elements are needed.
  • inventive filter can add additional filter area and a secure self sealing effect to reduce airflow around the filter and increase airflow through the filter to improve particle clean-up within the drive by extending one or more projections over the C-channels that hold the filter in place adding material between the top of the C-channels and the drive enclosure.
  • An example of the present invention was tested for particulate filtration performance using a commercially available 3.5 inch form factor disk drive (DiamondMax Plus 8 40GB drive from Maxtor Corporation, Milpitas, CA). None of the drive components were removed prior to modification of the drive for testing purposes. Modification consisted of drilling two holes in the drive lid to allow introduction of contaminants and sampling of the internal drive atmosphere during performance testing. Each of the holes in the lid was covered with a stainless steel fitting (Part No. SS-200-7-4, Baltimore Valve and Fitting Co., Baltimore, MD), which was centered over the hole and attached and sealed using two component epoxy. In addition, the electrical connection to the voice coil motor (VCM) was severed in order to keep the actuator in a fixed position during all tests.
  • VCM voice coil motor
  • the drive lid was cleaned using isopropanol and clean, pressurized air to remove any oils and particles created during modification.
  • the head suspension assemblies were removed from the E-block prior to reassembly into the drive in order to eliminate the possibility of head crashes during testing.
  • the filters were mounted into the C channels in the drive baseplate and tested.
  • This test is designed to measure the effectiveness of the features of the present invention in holding the filter in the drive.
  • the above mentioned drive was fitted with samples of a conventional filter and samples of the present invention respectively.
  • the drive was turned over and placed on the corner of a support such that the recirculation filter was unsupported and hanging over the support.
  • a drive top cover with a mass of approximately 166 grams was then dropped onto the back of the drive from a distance of 2 inches.
  • the filters were observed to either drop out of the drive or remain in the drive.
  • This test is designed to measure the effectiveness of a recirculation filter in reducing the particle concentration inside a disk drive from an initial state in which the drive has been charged with particles.
  • the performance of the recirculation filter is quantified in terms of a cleanup time, which is the time required to reduce the particle counts to a fixed percentage of their initial value.
  • the device was tested in the modified disk drive.
  • the existing breather hole in the drive was left uncovered in order to provide a means for venting any overpressure from the drive and to allow air to enter the drive during periods when the drive environment was being sampled without air being purposefully introduced into the drive.
  • the lid was fastened securely to the baseplate.
  • a tube supplying an aerosol mixture of 0.1 ⁇ m and 0.3 ⁇ m particles was connected to the port in the drive lid upstream of the filter based on the direction of disk rotation.
  • a second tube for sampling the internal atmosphere of the drive connected the laser particle counter (LPC) to the port in the drive lid downstream of the filter.
  • LPC laser particle counter
  • the recirculation filter test consisted of the following sequence: With the drive powered on and clean air passing through the drive, the counts of 0.1 ⁇ m and 0.3 ⁇ m particles were monitored until a low background count was achieved, typically when 0.3 ⁇ m particles were less than 3 counts per second and 0.1 ⁇ m particles were less than 10 counts per second. At that time the aerosol was flowed into the drive in order to charge the internal environment with particles. When fully charged and stabilized, counts of 0.1 ⁇ m particles were typically between 5000 and 10000 per second and counts of 0.3 ⁇ m particles were typically between 3000 and 6500 per second.
  • the data was analyzed by measuring the time required for the counts of 0.1 ⁇ m and 0.3 ⁇ m particles to fall to 0.1% of their value when the drive was fully charged with particles, defined as the cleanup time or t 99 or 99% cleaned up.
  • Three individual tests were performed in order to check reproducibility and eliminate error from noise in the background counts. The results from the three tests were averaged to obtain the average cleanup times for 0.1 ⁇ m and 0.3 ⁇ m particles. Again, results reported are for 0.1 micron particles unless otherwise noted. Further analysis can calculate a RCUR time by dividing the t 99 time of the filter by the t 99 time of the no filter run to get a number referred to as the RCUR number or Relative Clean-Up Ratio.
  • Example 2 samples of a standard sized and construction recirculation filter for another drive as supplied by W. L. Gore and Associates in Elkton, MD was tested as well as a similar filter but designed as Figure 14A where two small the projecting elements were added to each end of the filter. The filter appeared similar to Figure 14B when installed into the drive.
  • Samples were made up to test the recirculation filter functionality of a recirculation filter with and without projecting elements and without any adsorbents.
  • the conventional filter without projecting elements was a standard filter for the drive as supplied by W. L. Gore and Associates, Elkton MD.
  • the conventional filter had length and width dimensions of 13mm by 7 mm.
  • An inventive filter similar to that as shown in Figure 2 was also made.
  • the inventive filter included a filter portion that was 0.040" shorter in overall length than the conventional filter and had a small projecting element extending 0.040" from each end of the filter.
  • the filter with projecting elements was constructed of the same material set as the conventional filter.
  • the disk drive shock test was performed on ten different filters for each of the conventional filters and the present inventive filters
  • the filters were inserted into the c-channels in the drive and shocked as described above All ten of the conventional filters fell out of the channels and dropped onto the floor, either when the drive was initially turned over (before impact) or when the cover was dropped onto the back of the drive All ten of the inventive recirc filters remained in place during both turning the drive over and dropping the cover onto the back of the drive Example 2
  • Samples were constructed to test the recirculation filter with and without projecting elements and without any adsorbents.
  • the conventional filter (without projecting elements) was a standard filter for the drive as supplied by W. L. Gore and Associates, Elkton MD.
  • the conventional filter had length and width dimensions of 0.680" (25.4 mm) by 0.695" (17.65 mm) respectively.
  • An inventive filter similar to that as shown in Figure 14 was the same overall length and width as the conventional filter and had a small projecting element extending from each end of the top edge had a length of 0.062" (1.6mm) and height of 0.165" (4.14 mm) while the other projection had a length or 0.125" (3.18 mm) and a height of 0.165" (4.14 mm) as depicted in Figure 14.
  • the filter was placed in the drive such that the projecting elements were over the C-channels.
  • the shorter projection was over the C-channel closest to the drive perimeter because that C-channel was close to the perimeter and gasket used for sealing the drive.
  • the filter with projecting elements was constructed of the same material set as the conventional filter: five layer constructions with outer layers of previously described Delnet 0707, inner layers of a Reemay nonwoven around a center layer of electret filter material all as supplied in finished filter form by W. L. Gore and Associates. A no-filter test was also run as a control. The results are plotted in Chart 2, and tabulated in Table 2.
  • the particle clean-up time to clean the air of 99% of the particles improved from 52 seconds with a standard filter to 23 seconds with the filter with projections or an improvement of 56%.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Filtering Materials (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un dispositif pour filtrer des polluants, tels que des particules et des polluants en phase vapeur, d'un environnement confiné tel que des dispositifs électroniques ou optiques susceptibles d'être contaminés (par exemple, des lecteurs de disque d'ordinateur) en prévoyant un filtre pour un meilleur assemblage dans l'enceinte. Les fonctions de filtration comprennent un filtre de recirculation et un filtre de recirculation adsorbant optionnel.
PCT/US2009/005316 2008-09-26 2009-09-23 Construction de filtre améliorée pour retirer des polluants d'une enceinte WO2010036351A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US23930108A 2008-09-26 2008-09-26
US12/239,301 2008-09-26

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2010036351A1 true WO2010036351A1 (fr) 2010-04-01

Family

ID=41382392

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2009/005316 WO2010036351A1 (fr) 2008-09-26 2009-09-23 Construction de filtre améliorée pour retirer des polluants d'une enceinte

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2010036351A1 (fr)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8885291B2 (en) 2012-08-10 2014-11-11 Donaldson Company, Inc. Recirculation filter for an electronic enclosure
US10010822B2 (en) 2012-08-10 2018-07-03 Donaldson Company, Inc. Recirculation filter for an electronic enclosure
US10482928B2 (en) 2014-02-13 2019-11-19 Donaldson Company, Inc. Recirculation filter for an electronic enclosure

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5034835A (en) * 1989-04-20 1991-07-23 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Disk drive having air filtration system
US6208484B1 (en) * 1999-06-11 2001-03-27 Maxtor Corporation Recirculation filter for use in a disk drive
WO2007005084A2 (fr) * 2005-06-30 2007-01-11 Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. Construction de filtre amelioree servant a retirer des contaminants d'un boitier

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5034835A (en) * 1989-04-20 1991-07-23 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Disk drive having air filtration system
US6208484B1 (en) * 1999-06-11 2001-03-27 Maxtor Corporation Recirculation filter for use in a disk drive
WO2007005084A2 (fr) * 2005-06-30 2007-01-11 Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. Construction de filtre amelioree servant a retirer des contaminants d'un boitier

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8885291B2 (en) 2012-08-10 2014-11-11 Donaldson Company, Inc. Recirculation filter for an electronic enclosure
US9153291B2 (en) 2012-08-10 2015-10-06 Donaldson Company, Inc. Recirculation filter for an electronic enclosure
US10010822B2 (en) 2012-08-10 2018-07-03 Donaldson Company, Inc. Recirculation filter for an electronic enclosure
US10482928B2 (en) 2014-02-13 2019-11-19 Donaldson Company, Inc. Recirculation filter for an electronic enclosure
US11183222B2 (en) 2014-02-13 2021-11-23 Donaldson Company, Inc. Recirculation filter for an enclosure

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1218090B1 (fr) Modele ameliore de filtre polyvalent d'elimination des contaminants d'une enceinte
US6296691B1 (en) Multi-functional molded filter for removing contaminants from an enclosure
EP1222661B1 (fr) Ensemble a filtre multifonctionnel rigide
CA2577148C (fr) Filtre reniflard adsorbant
CA2576529C (fr) Filtres adsorbants actifs et passifs rainures
US5538545A (en) Nonparticulating adsorbent recirculating filter
CA2584403C (fr) Filtres absorbants modulaires
US20090183475A1 (en) Pleated recirculation filter
WO2007005084A2 (fr) Construction de filtre amelioree servant a retirer des contaminants d'un boitier
WO2010036351A1 (fr) Construction de filtre améliorée pour retirer des polluants d'une enceinte
WO1999004884A1 (fr) Filtre respirateur absorbant a flux important

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 09789370

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 09789370

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1