WO2008148588A1 - Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder - Google Patents

Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2008148588A1
WO2008148588A1 PCT/EP2008/053508 EP2008053508W WO2008148588A1 WO 2008148588 A1 WO2008148588 A1 WO 2008148588A1 EP 2008053508 W EP2008053508 W EP 2008053508W WO 2008148588 A1 WO2008148588 A1 WO 2008148588A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
iron
silicon
weight
oxide powder
mixed oxide
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2008/053508
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Stipan Katusic
Markus PRIDÖHL
Guido Zimmermann
Rainer Hahn
Meike Pelz
Original Assignee
Evonik Degussa Gmbh
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Evonik Degussa Gmbh filed Critical Evonik Degussa Gmbh
Publication of WO2008148588A1 publication Critical patent/WO2008148588A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01FMAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; SELECTION OF MATERIALS FOR THEIR MAGNETIC PROPERTIES
    • H01F1/00Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties
    • H01F1/0036Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties showing low dimensional magnetism, i.e. spin rearrangements due to a restriction of dimensions, e.g. showing giant magnetoresistivity
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B82NANOTECHNOLOGY
    • B82YSPECIFIC USES OR APPLICATIONS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MEASUREMENT OR ANALYSIS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF NANOSTRUCTURES
    • B82Y25/00Nanomagnetism, e.g. magnetoimpedance, anisotropic magnetoresistance, giant magnetoresistance or tunneling magnetoresistance
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B82NANOTECHNOLOGY
    • B82YSPECIFIC USES OR APPLICATIONS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MEASUREMENT OR ANALYSIS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF NANOSTRUCTURES
    • B82Y30/00Nanotechnology for materials or surface science, e.g. nanocomposites
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01BNON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
    • C01B33/00Silicon; Compounds thereof
    • C01B33/113Silicon oxides; Hydrates thereof
    • C01B33/12Silica; Hydrates thereof, e.g. lepidoic silicic acid
    • C01B33/18Preparation of finely divided silica neither in sol nor in gel form; After-treatment thereof
    • C01B33/181Preparation of finely divided silica neither in sol nor in gel form; After-treatment thereof by a dry process
    • C01B33/183Preparation of finely divided silica neither in sol nor in gel form; After-treatment thereof by a dry process by oxidation or hydrolysis in the vapour phase of silicon compounds such as halides, trichlorosilane, monosilane
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01GCOMPOUNDS CONTAINING METALS NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C01D OR C01F
    • C01G49/00Compounds of iron
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09CTREATMENT OF INORGANIC MATERIALS, OTHER THAN FIBROUS FILLERS, TO ENHANCE THEIR PIGMENTING OR FILLING PROPERTIES ; PREPARATION OF CARBON BLACK  ; PREPARATION OF INORGANIC MATERIALS WHICH ARE NO SINGLE CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS AND WHICH ARE MAINLY USED AS PIGMENTS OR FILLERS
    • C09C1/00Treatment of specific inorganic materials other than fibrous fillers; Preparation of carbon black
    • C09C1/22Compounds of iron
    • C09C1/24Oxides of iron
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01FMAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; SELECTION OF MATERIALS FOR THEIR MAGNETIC PROPERTIES
    • H01F1/00Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties
    • H01F1/01Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials
    • H01F1/03Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials characterised by their coercivity
    • H01F1/12Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials characterised by their coercivity of soft-magnetic materials
    • H01F1/34Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials characterised by their coercivity of soft-magnetic materials non-metallic substances, e.g. ferrites
    • H01F1/36Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials characterised by their coercivity of soft-magnetic materials non-metallic substances, e.g. ferrites in the form of particles
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01PINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO STRUCTURAL AND PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF SOLID INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    • C01P2002/00Crystal-structural characteristics
    • C01P2002/50Solid solutions
    • C01P2002/52Solid solutions containing elements as dopants
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01PINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO STRUCTURAL AND PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF SOLID INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    • C01P2002/00Crystal-structural characteristics
    • C01P2002/70Crystal-structural characteristics defined by measured X-ray, neutron or electron diffraction data
    • C01P2002/72Crystal-structural characteristics defined by measured X-ray, neutron or electron diffraction data by d-values or two theta-values, e.g. as X-ray diagram
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01PINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO STRUCTURAL AND PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF SOLID INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    • C01P2004/00Particle morphology
    • C01P2004/01Particle morphology depicted by an image
    • C01P2004/04Particle morphology depicted by an image obtained by TEM, STEM, STM or AFM
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01PINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO STRUCTURAL AND PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF SOLID INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    • C01P2004/00Particle morphology
    • C01P2004/60Particles characterised by their size
    • C01P2004/64Nanometer sized, i.e. from 1-100 nanometer
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01PINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO STRUCTURAL AND PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF SOLID INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    • C01P2006/00Physical properties of inorganic compounds
    • C01P2006/12Surface area
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01PINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO STRUCTURAL AND PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF SOLID INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
    • C01P2006/00Physical properties of inorganic compounds
    • C01P2006/42Magnetic properties

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a silicon-iron mixed oxide powder, and to its preparation and use.
  • Silicon-iron mixed oxide particles with magnetic properties are described in the literature. These particles can be prepared, for example, by sol-gel processes or pyrogenic processes. In the latter, generally organic, chloride-free starting materials are used. These processes are uneconomic for the preparation of relatively large amounts.
  • EP-A-1284485 discloses a process in which chloride- containing starting materials can be used and the resulting silicon-iron mixed oxide particles, in spite of a chloride content of up to 1000 ppm, still have good magnetic properties.
  • the particles disclosed in EP-A-1284485 comprise superparamagnetic iron oxide domains with a diameter of 3 to 20 nm in a silicon- dioxide-containing matrix. Compared to the purely organic processes, the process disclosed in EP-A- 1284485 offers economic advantages, but there is still the desire for inexpensively preparable particles.
  • the invention provides a silicon-iron mixed oxide powder having magnetic properties in the form of aggregated primary particles, a) for which TEM images show the presence of primary particles composed of spatially separate regions of silicon dioxide and iron oxide and the mean particle diameter of the iron oxide is 2 to 100 nm and b) in which the proportion of - silicon, calculated as Si ⁇ 2 , is 5 to 65% by weight iron, calculated as Fe 2 U3, is 30 to 90% by weight and the proportion of silicon and iron, each calculated as abovementioned oxides, is at least 95% by weight c) in which the proportion of chloride is 0.2 to 3% by weight.
  • Magnetic properties are understood to mean ferrimagnetic, ferromagnetic and/or superparamagnetic properties. Preference may be given to inventive powder with superparamagnetic properties.
  • Superparamagnetic substances do not have permanent (coincident) arrangement of the elementary magnetic dipoles in the absence of external, active magnetic fields. They may have a low residual magnetization.
  • the primary particles include those in which the mixed oxide components are present both in and on the surface of a primary particle.
  • Si-O- Fe may be present.
  • individual primary particles even composed only of silicon dioxide and/or iron oxide may be present.
  • the primary particles are very substantially pore-free, but have free hydroxyl groups on the surface and may have different degrees of aggregation.
  • the aggregates are three-dimensional aggregates. In general, the aggregate diameter, in one three-dimensional direction in each case, is preferably not more than 250 nm, generally from 30 to 200 nm.
  • Figure 1 shows a schematic of such a three-dimensional structure with an aggregate diameter of 135 nm and 80 nm. Several aggregates may combine to form agglomerates. These agglomerates can be separated again easily. In contrast, the division of the aggregates into the primary particles is generally impossible.
  • the inventive silicon-iron mixed oxide powder is notable in particular for a high chloride content of 0.2 to 3% by weight, based on the silicon-iron mixed oxide particles.
  • the chloride content originates from the preparation of the particles.
  • the inventive particles are obtained by a pyrogenic process in which chlorine-containing precursors are used.
  • the particles which form contain chlorine generally in the form of hydrochloric acid. This can adhere or be incorporated within the particles which form.
  • chloride contents of 0.2 to 3% by weight have only a negligible influence, if any, on the magnetic properties of the powder.
  • the total chloride content is determined by Wickbold combustion or by digestion with subsequent titration or ion chromatography.
  • TEM images of the inventive powder show the presence of primary particles composed of spatially separate regions of silicon dioxide and iron oxide.
  • Silicon dioxide may form an envelope around the iron oxide with a thickness of 1 to 15 nm.
  • the mean diameter of the iron oxide constituents is 2 to 100 nm.
  • the mean particle diameter is preferably less than 70 nm. Particular preference may be given to a range of >20 to 60 nm.
  • the inventive silicon-iron mixed oxide powder may further comprise at least one or more primary particles which consist of silicon dioxide or iron oxide, i.e. in which silicon dioxide and iron oxide are not present together.
  • the proportions of primary particles which have only silicon dioxide or iron oxide may be evaluated by counting from TEM images; in general, several thousand primary particles are evaluated. The proportions are 0 to a maximum of 5%, generally 0 to ⁇ 1%, of the counted primary particles.
  • the silicon dioxide constituent in the inventive mixed oxide powder may be present in either crystalline or amorphous form, preference being given to purely amorphous silicon dioxide.
  • the iron oxide constituent of the particles of the inventive mixed oxide powder preferably has magnetite and/or maghemite as the main constituent.
  • it may comprise a total of up to 15%, generally less than 10%, based on the iron oxides, of haematite, beta- Fe203 and iron silicate.
  • Particular preference may be given in particular to a mixed oxide powder in which the proportion of magnetite and/or maghemite, based on the iron oxides, is at least 80%, most preferably at least 90%.
  • maghemite/magnetite weight ratio is 0.3:1 to 100:1. It is likewise possible that the iron oxide is present only in the form of maghemite.
  • the proportion of iron oxide, calculated as Fe2U3, in the inventive powder is 30 to 90% by weight.
  • the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder may preferably have a proportion of iron oxide of 50 ⁇ 10% by weight or 80 ⁇ 10% by weight. Particular preference is given to a range of 50 ⁇ 5% by weight or 80 ⁇ 5% by weight.
  • the sum of silicon dioxide and iron oxide in the inventive powder is at least 95% by weight, preferably at least 98% by weight and more preferably at least 98.5% by weight.
  • the inventive mixed oxide powder may comprise at least one doping component. This is preferably selected from the group consisting of the oxides of manganese, cobalt, chromium, europium, yttrium, samarium, nickel and gadolinium.
  • a particularly preferred doping component is manganese oxide .
  • the proportion of the doping component is preferably 0.005 to 2% by weight, more preferably 0.5 to 1.8% by weight and most preferably 0.8 to 1.5% by weight, calculated in each case as the oxide and based on the mixed oxide powder.
  • the doping component is generally distributed homogeneously in the powder. Depending on the type of dopant and the reaction, the doping component may be present in enriched form in regions of silicon dioxide or iron oxide.
  • the BET surface area of the inventive mixed oxide powder can be varied within wide ranges.
  • a favourable BET surface area has been found to be in the range of 10 to 100 m 2 /g.
  • Preference may be given to powders having a BET surface area of 40 to 70 m 2 /g.
  • the particles of the inventive mixed oxide powder may be enveloped by one or more shells of identical or different polymers or polymer mixtures.
  • Particularly suitable polymers may be polymethyl methacrylates .
  • the inventive mixed oxide powder features a high saturation magnetization. Preference may be given to mixed oxide powders whose saturation magnetization is 40 to 120 Am 2 /kg Fe 2 O 3 and more preferably 60 to 100 Am 2 /kg Fe 2 O 3 .
  • an advantageous mixed oxide powder is one which has the following features: a) BET surface area 50 ⁇ 5 m 2 /g b) proportion of
  • an advantageous mixed oxide powder is one which has the following features: a) BET surface area 50 ⁇ 10 m 2 /g b) proportion of
  • the invention further provides a process for preparing the inventive silicon-iron mixed oxide powder, in which a) 10 to 60% by weight of one or more vaporous halosilicon compounds, calculated as Si ⁇ 2, b) 40 to 90% by weight of iron chloride, calculated as Fe2U3, in the form of a solution and c) optionally 0.005 to 2% by weight of one or more doping compounds, calculated as oxide, d) are fed separately to the high-temperature zone of a reactor, e) are reacted in the high-temperature zone at temperatures of 700 to 2500 0 C with an excess of oxygen or an oxygenous gas, f) and, in a second zone of the reactor downstream of the high-temperature zone, reducing gases are added to the reaction mixture at one or more points in an amount such as to give rise to a reducing atmosphere overall in this second zone, and the temperature is reduced to 500 0 C to 150 0 C, g) the resulting solid is separated from gaseous substances in a further, third zone in which a reducing atmosphere is
  • a solution is understood to mean one in which the main constituent of the liquid phase is water, water and one or more organic solvents, or a mixture of water with one or more organic solvents.
  • the preferred organic solvents used may be alcohols such as methanol, ethanol, n- propanol, isopropanol, n-butanol or isobutanol or tert- butanol. Particular preference is given to those solutions in which water is the main constituent.
  • a doping component is understood to mean the oxide of an element which is present in the inventive powder.
  • a dopant is understood to mean the compound which is used in the process in order to obtain the doping component.
  • the dopant may be added separately from the halosilicon compound and the iron chloride. This can be done in the form of a vapour or of a solution.
  • the dopant may also be introduced in the form of a vapour together with the halosilicon compound or as a constituent of the iron chloride- containing solution.
  • the temperature results from a flame which is generated by igniting a mixture which comprises one or more combustion gases and an oxygen- containing gas and which burns into the reaction chamber .
  • Suitable combustion gases may be hydrogen, methane, ethane, propane, natural gas, acetylene, carbon monoxide or mixtures of the aforementioned gases. Hydrogen is the most suitable.
  • the oxygen-containing gas used is generally air.
  • the reaction mixture also comprises the gaseous reaction products and any unreacted gaseous feedstocks. Gaseous reaction products may, for example, be hydrogen chloride and carbon dioxide .
  • the reaction mixture is mixed with a reducing gas or a mixture of a reducing gas with air which is added in zone II of the reactor.
  • the reducing gas may, for example, be forming gas, hydrogen, carbon monoxide, ammonia or mixtures of the aforementioned gases, and particular preference may be given to forming gas.
  • Such a reducing gas is, in the process according to the invention, added to the reaction mixture in such an amount as to give rise to a reducing atmosphere.
  • a reducing atmosphere is understood to mean one in which the lambda value is less than 1.
  • Lambda is calculated from the quotient of the sum of the oxygen content of the oxygenous gas divided by the sum of the iron and silicon compounds to be oxidized and/or to be hydrolysed and of the hydrogen-containing combustion gas, in each case in mol/h.
  • the lambda value is greater than 1.
  • the lambda value in zone I is determined according to the following formula: 0.21-air/0.5-H 2 .
  • the residence time in the first zone may be between 0.8 and 1.5 seconds.
  • the sum of the residence times in the second and third zone may be between 15 seconds and 15 minutes.
  • Figure 2 shows, by way of example, a schematic setup for the performance of the process according to the invention.
  • I, II and III denote the three reaction zones.
  • 1 atomized solution of iron chloride which optionally comprises additional dopants;
  • oxygen-containing gas preferably air
  • combustion gas preferably hydrogen
  • the iron chloride used may preferably be iron (II) chloride (FeC12), iron (III) chloride (FeC13) or a mixture of the two.
  • the iron chloride is introduced as a solution in accordance with the invention.
  • the concentration of the iron chloride may preferably be 1 to 30% by weight and more preferably 10 to 20% by weight, based in each case on the solution.
  • the fractional cuts may also comprise proportions of Ci-Ci 2 -hydrocarbons .
  • the proportion of these hydrocarbons may be up to 10% by weight, based on one fraction. Usually, these proportions are between 0.01 and 5% by weight, and the proportion of the Ce hydrocarbons, for example cis- and trans-2-hexene, cis- and trans-3-methyl-2-pentene, 2, 3-dimethyl-2-butene, 2- methylpentane, 3-methylpentane generally predominates.
  • halosilicon compounds from the Muller-Rochow synthesis this is preferably done in mixtures with silicon tetrachloride.
  • the invention further comprises a second process for preparing the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder, in which a) 10 to 60% by weight of one or more vaporous halosilicon compounds, calculated as SiO 2 , b) 40 to 90% by weight of iron chloride, calculated as Fe 2 O 3 , in the form of a solution and c) optionally 0.005 to 2% by weight of one or more doping compounds, calculated as oxide, d) are fed separately to the high-temperature zone of a reactor, e) are reacted in the high-temperature zone at temperatures of 700 to 2500 0 C in a flame which is generated by the ignition of a mixture which comprises one or more combustion gases and an oxygen-containing gas and which burns into the reaction chamber, and in which oxygen is used in deficiency, f) in a second zone of the reactor downstream of the high-temperature zone, air or air and steam are added to the reaction mixture at one or more points in an amount such as to give rise to, overall in this second zone a reducing atmosphere or oxidizing
  • a reducing atmosphere is understood to mean one in which the lambda value in zone I, II and III is less than 1.
  • an oxidizing atmosphere is understood to mean one in which the lambda value in zone II and III is greater than 1.
  • Figure 2 shows, by way of example, a schematic setup for performing this process according to the invention.
  • I, II and III denote the three reaction zones.
  • I, II and III denote the three reaction zones.
  • I, II and III denote the three reaction zones.
  • I, II and III denote the three reaction zones.
  • I, II and III denote the three reaction zones.
  • I, II and III denote the three reaction zones.
  • I, II and III denote the three reaction zones.
  • III denote the three reaction zones.
  • oxygen-containing gas preferably air
  • 3 combustion gas, preferably hydrogen (excess) ;
  • 4a air (excess or deficiency) ;
  • 4b steam (optional) ;
  • 4c air (optional) ;
  • the invention further provides for the use of the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder for producing dispersions and pastes.
  • the invention further provides for the use of the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder as a constituent of rubber mixtures.
  • the invention further provides for the use of the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder as a constituent of polymer formulations.
  • the invention further provides for the use of the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder as a constituent of adhesive compositions.
  • the invention further provides for the use of the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder as a constituent of plastic composite mouldings obtainable by welding in an electromagnetic alternating field.
  • the silicon- iron mixed oxide powder is a component of a HDPE (high density poly ethylene) containing composition.
  • the amount of the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder is preferably in the range of 0.1 to 15 wt . % and most preferably in the range of 0.5 to 5 wt.%, based on the HDPE containing composition.
  • the composition may further comprise additives known to the person skilled in the art, e.g. organic peroxides.
  • the HDPE containing composition can be used for pipe extrusion. Due to the presence of the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder the curing may be performed in an electromagnetic alternating field.
  • the BET surface area of the inventive particles was determined to DIN 66131.
  • Determination of the content of silicon dioxide and iron oxide Approx. 0.3 g of the inventive particles are weighed accurately into a platinum crucible and, to determine the ignition loss, calcined at 700 0 C for 2 h in a crucible, cooled in a desiccator and reweighed. After the edges have been rinsed with ultrapure water, the sample material is fumed to dryness on a hotplate with 1 ml of H 2 SO 4 p. a. 1:1 and at least 3 ml of HF 40% p. a. The weight loss as a result of the fuming is assumed to be SiO 2 and the remainder to be Fe 2 ⁇ 3.
  • Determination of the adiabatic combustion temperature It is calculated from the mass and energy balance of the streams entering the reactor.
  • the energy balance takes account both of the reaction enthalpy of the hydrogen combustion and the conversion of the silicon tetrachloride to silicon dioxide and of the iron (II) chloride to iron (II) oxide, and the evaporation of the aqueous solution.
  • Determination of the residence time It is calculated from the quotient of the plant volume flowed through and the operating volume flow rate of the process gases at adiabatic combustion temperature.
  • the Curie temperature is determined by means of thermogravimetry
  • TG TG
  • This determination method is based on the behaviour of magnetic substances of losing their magnetizability at a characteristic temperature, the Curie temperature. At this temperature, the alignment of the elementary magnets is prevented owing to increasing thermal motion.
  • the TG curve of a ferromagnetic curve is measured in an inhomogeneous magnetic field, the magnetic force disappears at the Curie temperature.
  • the inhomogeneous magnetic field is generated by applying two magnets laterally above the oven body. The sudden change in force at the Curie point brings about the end of the apparent weight increase.
  • the Curie temperature corresponds to the extrapolated end of the TG stage.
  • the inventive powder is heated up to 1000 0 C 1. in a magnetic field, 2.
  • Example 1 0.87 kg/h of SiCl 4 is evaporated and fed into a mixing zone with 7.0 m (STP) /h of hydrogen and 18.00 m 3 (STP) /h of air.
  • an aerosol which is obtained from a 25 per cent by weight solution of iron (II) chloride, corresponding to 4.60 kg/h of iron (II) chloride, in water by means of a two-substance nozzle is introduced into the mixing zone within the burner by means of a carrier gas (3 m 3 (STP) /h of nitrogen) .
  • the homogeneously mixed gas-aerosol mixture burns in zone I of the reactor at an adiabatic combustion temperature of about 1300°C and a residence time of about 40 msec.
  • the solid is deposited out of the gaseous substances on a filter, and 10 m 3 (STP) /h of air are added to the offgas stream.
  • Example 2 As Example 1, but with different feedstock amounts for SiCl 4 and FeCl2.
  • Example 3 As Example 1, except using a solution of 97 parts of iron (II) chloride and 3 parts of iron (III) chloride instead of a solution of iron (II) chloride.
  • Example 4 As Example 1, except using a solution of iron (III) chloride instead of a solution of iron (II) chloride. Furthermore, an additional 6.0 m 3 (STP) /h of steam are introduced into zone II.
  • Example 5-7 As Example 1, except using a solution of 25% by weight of iron (II) chloride and 20% by weight of manganese (II) chloride.
  • Example 8 0.28 kg/h of SiCl 4 are evaporated and fed into a mixing zone with 7.0 m 3 (STP) /h of hydrogen and 16 m 3 (STP) /h of air.
  • an aerosol which is obtained from a 25 per cent by weight solution of iron (II) chloride in water by means of a two-substance nozzle is introduced into the mixing zone within the burner by means of a carrier gas (4.0 m 3 (STP) /h of nitrogen) .
  • the homogeneously mixed gas-aerosol mixture burns in zone I of the reactor at an adiabatic combustion temperature of about 1230 0 C and a residence time of about 50 msec.
  • zone III downstream of zone II the solid is deposited out of the gaseous substances on a filter.
  • an oxidizing atmosphere is present in the course of deposition.
  • Example 9 As Example 8, except using a solution of 25% by weight of iron (II) chloride and 20% by weight of manganese ( II ) chloride. Furthermore, an additional 8 kg/h of steam are introduced into zone II.
  • zone III downstream of zone II the solid is deposited out of the gaseous substances on a filter.
  • a reducing atmosphere is present in the course of deposition.
  • Feedstocks, use amounts and reaction parameters of Examples 1 to 9 are reproduced in Table 1.
  • the physico- chemical values of the resulting solids are reproduced in Table 2.
  • Comparative Example 1 (C-I): 0.14 kg/h of SiCl 4 is evaporated at approx. 200 0 C and fed into a mixing zone with 3.5 m 3 (STP) /h of hydrogen and 15 m 3 (STP) /h of air.
  • STP 3.5 m 3
  • STP 15 m 3
  • aqueous iron (III) chloride solution corresponding to 1.02 kg/h of iron (II) chloride, by means of a two-substance nozzle, is introduced into the mixing zone within the burner by means of a carrier gas
  • the homogeneously mixed gas-aerosol mixture burns there at an adiabatic combustion temperature of about 1200 0 C and a residence time of about 50 msec.
  • the powder has an iron oxide content of 50% by weight, a BET surface area of 146 m 2 /g, a chloride content of 368 ppm and a saturation magnetization of 17 Am 2 /kg.
  • Comparative Example 2 As C-I, except using 0.23 kg/h of SiCl 4 and 0.41 kg/h of FeCl 3 .
  • the powder has an iron oxide content of 50% by weight, a BET surface area of 174 m 2 /g, a chloride content of 220 ppm and a saturation magnetization of 6.5 Am 2 /kg.
  • Comparative Example 3 (C-3) : As C-I, except using 0.21 kg/h of SiCl 4 and 0.40 kg/h of FeCl 2 .
  • the powder has an iron oxide content of 25% by weight, a BET surface area of 143 m 2 /g, a chloride content of 102 ppm and a saturation magnetization of 10.4 Am 2 /kg.
  • X-ray diffractometry Haematite is identifiable unambiguously owing to the unobscured reflections. The reflections of magnetite and of maghemite overlap one another to a very high degree. Maghemite is detectable significantly on the basis of the (110) and (211) reflections in the acute angle range. With the aid of the Rietveld method, quantitative phase analysis is performed (error approx. 10% relative) .
  • Figure 3 shows the X-ray diffractogram of the powder from Example 5.
  • the saturation magnetization is the maximum achievable magnetic moment per unit volume.
  • the saturation magnetization is attained in infinitely large magnetic fields.
  • the saturation magnetization of the inventive examples from Examples 1 to 9 is significantly higher than that of Comparative Examples 1 to 3. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy
  • the inventive silicon-iron mixed oxide powder features excellent magnetic properties. Contrary to the adverse influences, described in the literature, of chloride on the magnetic properties, the present invention shows that up to 3% by weight of chloride in the powder has no effect on the magnetic properties. Instead, the novel inventive processes allow the preparation of powders with a high chloride content, whose saturation magnetizations are significantly above those from the prior art. The processes additionally allow large amounts of powder to be prepared inexpensively.
  • the inventive powders can be used in various ways.
  • Example HA 12.0 g of the powder from Example 5 are added to 108 g of distilled water and then sufficient IM NaOH is added that the pH is between 9.1 and 9.2.
  • dispersion is effected at 2000 rpm for 5 min.
  • the pH of the dispersion is 9.1
  • the content of inventive powder is 10% by weight and the mean particle diameter d 5 o is 320 nm.
  • Example HB As Example HA, except, after dispersion by means of a dissolver, dispersion by means of an Ultraturrax over a period of 5 min at 10 000 rpm.
  • the pH of the dispersion is 9.1
  • the content of inventive powder is 10% by weight and the mean particle diameter d 5 o is 180 nm.
  • Example HC As Example HB, except, after dispersion by means of a dissolver and Ultraturrax, dispersion by means of ultrasound over a period of 4 min at an amplitude of 80%.
  • the pH of the dispersion is 9.1
  • the content of inventive powder is 10% by weight
  • the mean particle diameter d 5 o is 140 nm.
  • the inventive silicon-iron mixed oxide powder can be incorporated into rubber mixtures. This can be done, for example, with the feedstocks shown in Table 3A and the method shown in Table 3B.
  • the samples can be heated rapidly in a high-frequency field, in which case the amount of inventive powder is simultaneously low.
  • Example 2 25 g of the powder from Example 1 are suspended in 100 ml of ethanol and 20 g of oxybis- (benzosulphohydrazide) are added as a blowing agent. The mixture is heated to 60 0 C with stirring for 5 hours and then the solvent is drawn off on a rotary evaporator. The dry formulation is ground in a ball mill for 3 minutes and then screened. The fraction with a particle size of nominally less than 63 ⁇ m is used for the further experiments. 10 g of this powder are mixed with 300 g of the moisture-curing one-component polyurethane adhesive dinitrol PUR 501 FC (Dinol GmbH) in the Planimax mixer (Molteni) provided with kneading hooks. The mixture is kneaded at level 1 (150 rpm) for 15 minutes.
  • the adhesive thus modified is used to produce a thick- layer adhesive bond from a sand-blasted and degreased aluminium sheet and a 3 mm-thick float glass pane.
  • the overlap length is 25 mm and the adhesive layer thickness 3 mm.
  • the bond is separated by excitation with an STS M230 semiconductor generator.
  • the excitation frequency of this generator is 300 kHz.
  • a coil with three turns and an internal diameter of 3 cm is used for inductive excitation of the adhesive in the adhesive bond.
  • the adhesive surface is oriented at right angles to the coil axis in the middle of the coil. At a power of 3000 W and an action time of 2 min, the adhesive is destroyed by the foaming of the blowing agent.
  • the two joined parts can be separated in a simple manner.
  • Example 14 Plastic composite mouldings obtainable by welding in an electromagnetic alternating field
  • 2 kg of the inventive mixed oxide particles from Example 5 are mixed in the melt with 8 kg of polyamide granules (Vestamid® L1901; designation according to ISO 1874-1: PA12, XN, 18-010; Degussa AG) in a Berstorff ZE25-33D twin-screw extruder at 250 0 C and a throughput of 10 kg/h, extruded and granulated.
  • the granules are subsequently extruded to sheets of thickness 1 mm.
  • the inductor coil has the following data: dimensions: 200 x 45 x 40 mm (L x W x H) , material: rectangular copper tube 10 x 6 x 1 mm, cross-sectional power area: 28 mm 2 , coil supply length: 120 mm, number of coil turns: 3, coil winding length (eff .) : 35 mm, coil diameter (internal) : 20 mm to 40 mm, inner coil area: 720 mm 2 , inductance (at 100 kHz) : approx. 270 nH, working frequency: 323 kHz
  • the high-frequency semiconductor generator used has the following data: manufacturer: STS - Systemtechnik Skorna GmbH, model designation: STS M260S, clamp power: 6 kW, inductance range: 250 - 1200 nH, working frequency: 150 - 400 kHz (323 kHz with the inductor coil used) .
  • the adhesive strength is assessed according to the following marks:

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Nanotechnology (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Composite Materials (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
  • Compounds Of Iron (AREA)
  • Developing Agents For Electrophotography (AREA)
  • Silicon Compounds (AREA)
  • Hard Magnetic Materials (AREA)

Abstract

Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder having magnetic properties in the form of aggregated primary particles, a) for which TEM images show the presence of primary particles composed of spatially separate regions of silicon dioxide and iron oxide and the mean particle diameter of the iron oxide is 2 to 100 nm and b) in which the proportion of silicon, calculated as SiO2, is 5 to 65% by weight iron, calculated as Fe2O3, is 30 to 90% by weight and the proportion of silicon and iron, each calculated as abovementioned oxides, is at least 95% by weight c) in which the proportion of chloride is 0.2 to 3% by weight.

Description

Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder
The invention relates to a silicon-iron mixed oxide powder, and to its preparation and use.
Silicon-iron mixed oxide particles with magnetic properties, especially superparamagnetic properties, are described in the literature. These particles can be prepared, for example, by sol-gel processes or pyrogenic processes. In the latter, generally organic, chloride-free starting materials are used. These processes are uneconomic for the preparation of relatively large amounts.
EP-A-1284485 discloses a process in which chloride- containing starting materials can be used and the resulting silicon-iron mixed oxide particles, in spite of a chloride content of up to 1000 ppm, still have good magnetic properties. The particles disclosed in EP-A-1284485 comprise superparamagnetic iron oxide domains with a diameter of 3 to 20 nm in a silicon- dioxide-containing matrix. Compared to the purely organic processes, the process disclosed in EP-A- 1284485 offers economic advantages, but there is still the desire for inexpensively preparable particles.
It was therefore an object of the present invention to provide particles with good magnetic properties, which are preparable by means of an economically viable process .
The invention provides a silicon-iron mixed oxide powder having magnetic properties in the form of aggregated primary particles, a) for which TEM images show the presence of primary particles composed of spatially separate regions of silicon dioxide and iron oxide and the mean particle diameter of the iron oxide is 2 to 100 nm and b) in which the proportion of - silicon, calculated as Siθ2, is 5 to 65% by weight iron, calculated as Fe2U3, is 30 to 90% by weight and the proportion of silicon and iron, each calculated as abovementioned oxides, is at least 95% by weight c) in which the proportion of chloride is 0.2 to 3% by weight.
Magnetic properties are understood to mean ferrimagnetic, ferromagnetic and/or superparamagnetic properties. Preference may be given to inventive powder with superparamagnetic properties.
Superparamagnetic substances do not have permanent (coincident) arrangement of the elementary magnetic dipoles in the absence of external, active magnetic fields. They may have a low residual magnetization.
Preference may be given to inventive powders whose proportion of silicon is 50 ± 10% by weight or 20 ± 10% by weight.
Preference may further be given to inventive powders whose proportion of iron is 50 ± 10% by weight or 80 ± 10% by weight.
The primary particles include those in which the mixed oxide components are present both in and on the surface of a primary particle. In the contact region of silicon dioxide and iron oxide within a primary particle, Si-O- Fe may be present. Furthermore, individual primary particles even composed only of silicon dioxide and/or iron oxide may be present. The primary particles are very substantially pore-free, but have free hydroxyl groups on the surface and may have different degrees of aggregation. The aggregates are three-dimensional aggregates. In general, the aggregate diameter, in one three-dimensional direction in each case, is preferably not more than 250 nm, generally from 30 to 200 nm. Figure 1 shows a schematic of such a three-dimensional structure with an aggregate diameter of 135 nm and 80 nm. Several aggregates may combine to form agglomerates. These agglomerates can be separated again easily. In contrast, the division of the aggregates into the primary particles is generally impossible.
The inventive silicon-iron mixed oxide powder is notable in particular for a high chloride content of 0.2 to 3% by weight, based on the silicon-iron mixed oxide particles. The chloride content originates from the preparation of the particles. The inventive particles are obtained by a pyrogenic process in which chlorine-containing precursors are used. The particles which form contain chlorine generally in the form of hydrochloric acid. This can adhere or be incorporated within the particles which form.
It has, however, been found that chloride contents of 0.2 to 3% by weight have only a negligible influence, if any, on the magnetic properties of the powder.
Preference may be given to a silicon-iron mixed oxide powder having a chloride content of 0.5 to 2.5% by weight. Particular preference may be given to a silicon-iron mixed oxide powder having a chloride content of from 1 to 2% by weight. The total chloride content is determined by Wickbold combustion or by digestion with subsequent titration or ion chromatography.
Moreover, TEM images of the inventive powder show the presence of primary particles composed of spatially separate regions of silicon dioxide and iron oxide. Silicon dioxide may form an envelope around the iron oxide with a thickness of 1 to 15 nm.
The mean diameter of the iron oxide constituents is 2 to 100 nm. The mean particle diameter is preferably less than 70 nm. Particular preference may be given to a range of >20 to 60 nm.
The inventive silicon-iron mixed oxide powder may further comprise at least one or more primary particles which consist of silicon dioxide or iron oxide, i.e. in which silicon dioxide and iron oxide are not present together. The proportions of primary particles which have only silicon dioxide or iron oxide may be evaluated by counting from TEM images; in general, several thousand primary particles are evaluated. The proportions are 0 to a maximum of 5%, generally 0 to <1%, of the counted primary particles.
The silicon dioxide constituent in the inventive mixed oxide powder may be present in either crystalline or amorphous form, preference being given to purely amorphous silicon dioxide.
The iron oxide constituent of the particles of the inventive mixed oxide powder preferably has magnetite and/or maghemite as the main constituent. In addition, it may comprise a total of up to 15%, generally less than 10%, based on the iron oxides, of haematite, beta- Fe203 and iron silicate. Particular preference may be given in particular to a mixed oxide powder in which the proportion of magnetite and/or maghemite, based on the iron oxides, is at least 80%, most preferably at least 90%.
When the intention is to vary the magnetic properties of the powder, it may also be advantageous to provide powders in which the maghemite/magnetite weight ratio is 0.3:1 to 100:1. It is likewise possible that the iron oxide is present only in the form of maghemite.
The proportion of iron oxide, calculated as Fe2U3, in the inventive powder is 30 to 90% by weight. The silicon-iron mixed oxide powder may preferably have a proportion of iron oxide of 50 ± 10% by weight or 80 ± 10% by weight. Particular preference is given to a range of 50 ± 5% by weight or 80 ± 5% by weight.
The sum of silicon dioxide and iron oxide in the inventive powder is at least 95% by weight, preferably at least 98% by weight and more preferably at least 98.5% by weight.
In addition to silicon dioxide, iron oxide and chloride, the inventive mixed oxide powder may comprise at least one doping component. This is preferably selected from the group consisting of the oxides of manganese, cobalt, chromium, europium, yttrium, samarium, nickel and gadolinium.
A particularly preferred doping component is manganese oxide .
The proportion of the doping component is preferably 0.005 to 2% by weight, more preferably 0.5 to 1.8% by weight and most preferably 0.8 to 1.5% by weight, calculated in each case as the oxide and based on the mixed oxide powder.
The doping component is generally distributed homogeneously in the powder. Depending on the type of dopant and the reaction, the doping component may be present in enriched form in regions of silicon dioxide or iron oxide.
The BET surface area of the inventive mixed oxide powder can be varied within wide ranges. A favourable BET surface area has been found to be in the range of 10 to 100 m2/g. Preference may be given to powders having a BET surface area of 40 to 70 m2/g.
The particles of the inventive mixed oxide powder may be enveloped by one or more shells of identical or different polymers or polymer mixtures. Particularly suitable polymers may be polymethyl methacrylates .
The inventive mixed oxide powder features a high saturation magnetization. Preference may be given to mixed oxide powders whose saturation magnetization is 40 to 120 Am2/kg Fe2O3 and more preferably 60 to 100 Am2/kg Fe2O3.
It has also been found that an advantageous mixed oxide powder is one which has the following features: a) BET surface area 50 ± 5 m2/g b) proportion of
- silicon, calculated as SiO2, 50 ± 5% by weight
- iron, calculated as Fe2O3, 45 ± 5% by weight
- chloride 1.5 ± 0.5% by weight
- manganese, calculated as MnO, 0.5 ± 0.3% by weight, where the sum of the oxides adds up to 100%, c) mean diameter of the iron oxide 10-30 nm d) proportion of (magnetite + maghemite) , based on iron oxide, 90 ± 10% by weight.
It has also been found that an advantageous mixed oxide powder is one which has the following features: a) BET surface area 50 ± 10 m2/g b) proportion of
- silicon, calculated as Siθ2, 10 ± 5% by weight
- iron, calculated as Fe2U3, 85 ± 5% by weight - chloride 1.0 ± 0.2% by weight
- manganese, calculated as MnO, 1.8 ± 0.2% by weight, c) mean diameter of the iron oxide 10-30 nm d) proportion of (magnetite + maghemite) , based on iron oxide, 90 ± 10% by weight.
The invention further provides a process for preparing the inventive silicon-iron mixed oxide powder, in which a) 10 to 60% by weight of one or more vaporous halosilicon compounds, calculated as Siθ2, b) 40 to 90% by weight of iron chloride, calculated as Fe2U3, in the form of a solution and c) optionally 0.005 to 2% by weight of one or more doping compounds, calculated as oxide, d) are fed separately to the high-temperature zone of a reactor, e) are reacted in the high-temperature zone at temperatures of 700 to 25000C with an excess of oxygen or an oxygenous gas, f) and, in a second zone of the reactor downstream of the high-temperature zone, reducing gases are added to the reaction mixture at one or more points in an amount such as to give rise to a reducing atmosphere overall in this second zone, and the temperature is reduced to 5000C to 1500C, g) the resulting solid is separated from gaseous substances in a further, third zone in which a reducing atmosphere is likewise still present, and h) optionally, sufficient air is added to the gaseous substances that the offgas does not give rise to a reducing atmosphere.
In the context of the invention, a solution is understood to mean one in which the main constituent of the liquid phase is water, water and one or more organic solvents, or a mixture of water with one or more organic solvents. The preferred organic solvents used may be alcohols such as methanol, ethanol, n- propanol, isopropanol, n-butanol or isobutanol or tert- butanol. Particular preference is given to those solutions in which water is the main constituent.
In the context of the invention, a doping component is understood to mean the oxide of an element which is present in the inventive powder. A dopant is understood to mean the compound which is used in the process in order to obtain the doping component. The dopant may be added separately from the halosilicon compound and the iron chloride. This can be done in the form of a vapour or of a solution. The dopant may also be introduced in the form of a vapour together with the halosilicon compound or as a constituent of the iron chloride- containing solution.
In a preferred embodiment, the temperature results from a flame which is generated by igniting a mixture which comprises one or more combustion gases and an oxygen- containing gas and which burns into the reaction chamber .
Suitable combustion gases may be hydrogen, methane, ethane, propane, natural gas, acetylene, carbon monoxide or mixtures of the aforementioned gases. Hydrogen is the most suitable. The oxygen-containing gas used is generally air. As well as the mixed oxides, the reaction mixture also comprises the gaseous reaction products and any unreacted gaseous feedstocks. Gaseous reaction products may, for example, be hydrogen chloride and carbon dioxide .
According to the invention, the reaction mixture is mixed with a reducing gas or a mixture of a reducing gas with air which is added in zone II of the reactor. The reducing gas may, for example, be forming gas, hydrogen, carbon monoxide, ammonia or mixtures of the aforementioned gases, and particular preference may be given to forming gas. Such a reducing gas is, in the process according to the invention, added to the reaction mixture in such an amount as to give rise to a reducing atmosphere.
In the context of the invention, a reducing atmosphere is understood to mean one in which the lambda value is less than 1.
Lambda is calculated from the quotient of the sum of the oxygen content of the oxygenous gas divided by the sum of the iron and silicon compounds to be oxidized and/or to be hydrolysed and of the hydrogen-containing combustion gas, in each case in mol/h.
When, for example, hydrogen and air are used in the high-temperature zone (zone I) and air and forming gas
(80:20 N2/H2) are used in zone II, the lambda value is calculated according to the following formula in zone
II and III to be 0.21-excess air from zone
I/O .5 (H2+0.2 forming gas), based in each case on the amount of gas introduced per unit time. For zone I, the lambda value is greater than 1. When hydrogen and air are used, the lambda value in zone I is determined according to the following formula: 0.21-air/0.5-H2.
In a preferred embodiment, the residence time in the first zone may be between 0.8 and 1.5 seconds.
In a further preferred embodiment, the sum of the residence times in the second and third zone may be between 15 seconds and 15 minutes.
It is additionally possible for steam to be introduced into the second reactor zone.
Figure 2 shows, by way of example, a schematic setup for the performance of the process according to the invention. I, II and III denote the three reaction zones. In addition: 1 = atomized solution of iron chloride which optionally comprises additional dopants;
2 = oxygen-containing gas, preferably air;
3 = combustion gas, preferably hydrogen;
4a = reducing gas; 4b = steam (optional); 4c = air (optional)
5 = inventive powder deposited on filters;
6 = offgas.
The iron chloride used may preferably be iron (II) chloride (FeC12), iron (III) chloride (FeC13) or a mixture of the two. The iron chloride is introduced as a solution in accordance with the invention. The concentration of the iron chloride may preferably be 1 to 30% by weight and more preferably 10 to 20% by weight, based in each case on the solution. The halosilicon compounds used with preference may be SiCl4, CH3SiCl3, (CH3)2SiCl2, (CH3)3SiCl, (CH3)4Si, HSiCl3, (CH3)2HSiCl, CH3C2H5SiCl2, disilanes of the general formula RnCl3-nSiSiRmCl3-m where R=CH3 and n+m = 2,3,4,5 and 6, and also mixtures of the aforementioned compounds. Particular preference is given to the use of silicon tetrachloride.
It is also possible to use halosilicon compounds from those fractional cuts obtained in the Muller-Rochow synthesis, and the fractional cuts may also comprise proportions of Ci-Ci2-hydrocarbons . The proportion of these hydrocarbons may be up to 10% by weight, based on one fraction. Usually, these proportions are between 0.01 and 5% by weight, and the proportion of the Ce hydrocarbons, for example cis- and trans-2-hexene, cis- and trans-3-methyl-2-pentene, 2, 3-dimethyl-2-butene, 2- methylpentane, 3-methylpentane generally predominates.
When halosilicon compounds from the Muller-Rochow synthesis are used, this is preferably done in mixtures with silicon tetrachloride.
The invention further comprises a second process for preparing the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder, in which a) 10 to 60% by weight of one or more vaporous halosilicon compounds, calculated as SiO2, b) 40 to 90% by weight of iron chloride, calculated as Fe2O3, in the form of a solution and c) optionally 0.005 to 2% by weight of one or more doping compounds, calculated as oxide, d) are fed separately to the high-temperature zone of a reactor, e) are reacted in the high-temperature zone at temperatures of 700 to 25000C in a flame which is generated by the ignition of a mixture which comprises one or more combustion gases and an oxygen-containing gas and which burns into the reaction chamber, and in which oxygen is used in deficiency, f) in a second zone of the reactor downstream of the high-temperature zone, air or air and steam are added to the reaction mixture at one or more points in an amount such as to give rise to, overall in this second zone a reducing atmosphere or oxidizing atmosphere and the temperature is reduced to 5000C to 1500C and g) the resulting solid, in a further, third zone, is removed from gaseous substances of the same atmosphere as are present in the second zone, and h) optionally, sufficient air is added to the gaseous substances that the offgas does not give rise to a reducing atmosphere.
In the context of the invention, a reducing atmosphere is understood to mean one in which the lambda value in zone I, II and III is less than 1.
In the context of the invention, an oxidizing atmosphere is understood to mean one in which the lambda value in zone II and III is greater than 1.
With regard to the type of compounds used and the reaction parameters, the statements made for the process already specified apply.
Figure 2 shows, by way of example, a schematic setup for performing this process according to the invention. I, II and III denote the three reaction zones. In addition :
1 = atomized solution of iron chloride which optionally comprises additional dopants;
2 = oxygen-containing gas, preferably air;
3 = combustion gas, preferably hydrogen (excess) ; 4a = air (excess or deficiency) ; 4b = steam (optional) ; 4c = air (optional) ;
5 = inventive powder deposited on filters;
6 = offgas.
The invention further provides for the use of the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder for producing dispersions and pastes.
The invention further provides for the use of the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder as a constituent of rubber mixtures.
The invention further provides for the use of the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder as a constituent of polymer formulations.
The invention further provides for the use of the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder as a constituent of adhesive compositions.
The invention further provides for the use of the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder as a constituent of plastic composite mouldings obtainable by welding in an electromagnetic alternating field.
In a special embodiment of the invention the silicon- iron mixed oxide powder is a component of a HDPE (high density poly ethylene) containing composition. The amount of the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder is preferably in the range of 0.1 to 15 wt . % and most preferably in the range of 0.5 to 5 wt.%, based on the HDPE containing composition. The composition may further comprise additives known to the person skilled in the art, e.g. organic peroxides.
The HDPE containing composition can be used for pipe extrusion. Due to the presence of the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder the curing may be performed in an electromagnetic alternating field.
Examples
Analytical processes
Determination of the BET surface area: The BET surface area of the inventive particles was determined to DIN 66131.
Determination of the content of silicon dioxide and iron oxide: Approx. 0.3 g of the inventive particles are weighed accurately into a platinum crucible and, to determine the ignition loss, calcined at 7000C for 2 h in a crucible, cooled in a desiccator and reweighed. After the edges have been rinsed with ultrapure water, the sample material is fumed to dryness on a hotplate with 1 ml of H2SO4 p. a. 1:1 and at least 3 ml of HF 40% p. a. The weight loss as a result of the fuming is assumed to be SiO2 and the remainder to be Fe2θ3.
Determination of the chloride content: Approx. 0.3 g of the inventive particles are weighed accurately, admixed with 20 ml of 20 per cent sodium hydroxide solution p. a., dissolved and transferred into 15 ml of cooled HNO3 with stirring. The chloride content in the solution is titrated with AgNO3 solution (0.1 mol/1 or 0.01 mol/1) .
Determination of the adiabatic combustion temperature: It is calculated from the mass and energy balance of the streams entering the reactor. The energy balance takes account both of the reaction enthalpy of the hydrogen combustion and the conversion of the silicon tetrachloride to silicon dioxide and of the iron (II) chloride to iron (II) oxide, and the evaporation of the aqueous solution.
Determination of the residence time: It is calculated from the quotient of the plant volume flowed through and the operating volume flow rate of the process gases at adiabatic combustion temperature.
Determination of the Curie temperature: The Curie temperature is determined by means of thermogravimetry
(TG) . This determination method is based on the behaviour of magnetic substances of losing their magnetizability at a characteristic temperature, the Curie temperature. At this temperature, the alignment of the elementary magnets is prevented owing to increasing thermal motion. When the TG curve of a ferromagnetic curve is measured in an inhomogeneous magnetic field, the magnetic force disappears at the Curie temperature. The inhomogeneous magnetic field is generated by applying two magnets laterally above the oven body. The sudden change in force at the Curie point brings about the end of the apparent weight increase. The Curie temperature corresponds to the extrapolated end of the TG stage. To illustrate the pure magnetic behaviour, the inventive powder is heated up to 10000C 1. in a magnetic field, 2. without a magnetic field, and measurement 2 is subtracted from measurement 1. This difference curve shows the pure magnetic behaviour. At the start of heating, the TG curve shows an increase in the magnetic force, which corresponds to an apparent decrease in the weight. From a particular temperature, the decrease in the magnetic force sets in, which leads to an apparent weight increase. This weight increase ends at the Curie temperature . X-ray diffractograms (XRD) Measurement :
Reflection, θ/θ diffractometer, Co-Ka, U = 4OkV, I = 35mA Linear PSD with Fe filter, sample rotation Slits: 2χ8 mm, 0.8 mm Angle range (2theta) : 15 - 112.5° Step width: 0.2°
Evaluation: Rietveld program SiroQuant®.
Examples
Example 1 : 0.87 kg/h of SiCl4 is evaporated and fed into a mixing zone with 7.0 m (STP) /h of hydrogen and 18.00 m3 (STP) /h of air.
In addition, an aerosol which is obtained from a 25 per cent by weight solution of iron (II) chloride, corresponding to 4.60 kg/h of iron (II) chloride, in water by means of a two-substance nozzle is introduced into the mixing zone within the burner by means of a carrier gas (3 m3 (STP) /h of nitrogen) . The homogeneously mixed gas-aerosol mixture burns in zone I of the reactor at an adiabatic combustion temperature of about 1300°C and a residence time of about 40 msec.
Subsequently, 6500 m3 (STP) /h of forming gas (80:20% by vol. of N2/H2) are added to the reaction mixture leaving zone I in a zone II. This cools the entire reaction mixture to 250°C.
In the zone III downstream of the zone II, the solid is deposited out of the gaseous substances on a filter, and 10 m3 (STP) /h of air are added to the offgas stream.
The physico-chemical values of the resulting solid are reproduced in Table 1. Example 2: As Example 1, but with different feedstock amounts for SiCl4 and FeCl2.
Example 3 : As Example 1, except using a solution of 97 parts of iron (II) chloride and 3 parts of iron (III) chloride instead of a solution of iron (II) chloride.
Example 4 : As Example 1, except using a solution of iron (III) chloride instead of a solution of iron (II) chloride. Furthermore, an additional 6.0 m3 (STP) /h of steam are introduced into zone II.
Example 5-7: As Example 1, except using a solution of 25% by weight of iron (II) chloride and 20% by weight of manganese (II) chloride.
Example 8: 0.28 kg/h of SiCl4 are evaporated and fed into a mixing zone with 7.0 m3 (STP) /h of hydrogen and 16 m3 (STP) /h of air.
In addition, an aerosol which is obtained from a 25 per cent by weight solution of iron (II) chloride in water by means of a two-substance nozzle is introduced into the mixing zone within the burner by means of a carrier gas (4.0 m3 (STP) /h of nitrogen) . The homogeneously mixed gas-aerosol mixture burns in zone I of the reactor at an adiabatic combustion temperature of about 12300C and a residence time of about 50 msec.
Subsequently, 12 kg/h of quench air are added to the reaction mixture leaving zone I in a zone II. This cools the entire reaction mixture to 2800C.
In the zone III downstream of zone II, the solid is deposited out of the gaseous substances on a filter. In the course of deposition, an oxidizing atmosphere is present .
Example 9: As Example 8, except using a solution of 25% by weight of iron (II) chloride and 20% by weight of manganese ( II ) chloride. Furthermore, an additional 8 kg/h of steam are introduced into zone II.
In the zone III downstream of zone II, the solid is deposited out of the gaseous substances on a filter. In the course of deposition, a reducing atmosphere is present .
Feedstocks, use amounts and reaction parameters of Examples 1 to 9 are reproduced in Table 1. The physico- chemical values of the resulting solids are reproduced in Table 2.
Comparative Example 1 (C-I): 0.14 kg/h of SiCl4 is evaporated at approx. 2000C and fed into a mixing zone with 3.5 m3 (STP) /h of hydrogen and 15 m3 (STP) /h of air. In addition, an aerosol which is obtained from a
10% by weight aqueous iron (III) chloride solution, corresponding to 1.02 kg/h of iron (II) chloride, by means of a two-substance nozzle, is introduced into the mixing zone within the burner by means of a carrier gas
(3 m3 (STP) /h of nitrogen).
The homogeneously mixed gas-aerosol mixture burns there at an adiabatic combustion temperature of about 12000C and a residence time of about 50 msec.
After the flame hydrolysis, the reaction gases and the powder formed are cooled, and the solid is separated from the offgas stream by means of a filter. In a further step, treatment with steam-containing nitrogen removes hydrochloric acid residues which still adhere on the powder. The powder has an iron oxide content of 50% by weight, a BET surface area of 146 m2/g, a chloride content of 368 ppm and a saturation magnetization of 17 Am2/kg.
Comparative Example 2 (C-2): As C-I, except using 0.23 kg/h of SiCl4 and 0.41 kg/h of FeCl3. The powder has an iron oxide content of 50% by weight, a BET surface area of 174 m2/g, a chloride content of 220 ppm and a saturation magnetization of 6.5 Am2/kg.
Comparative Example 3 (C-3) : As C-I, except using 0.21 kg/h of SiCl4 and 0.40 kg/h of FeCl2. The powder has an iron oxide content of 25% by weight, a BET surface area of 143 m2/g, a chloride content of 102 ppm and a saturation magnetization of 10.4 Am2/kg.
X-ray diffractometry (XRD) : Haematite is identifiable unambiguously owing to the unobscured reflections. The reflections of magnetite and of maghemite overlap one another to a very high degree. Maghemite is detectable significantly on the basis of the (110) and (211) reflections in the acute angle range. With the aid of the Rietveld method, quantitative phase analysis is performed (error approx. 10% relative) . Figure 3 shows the X-ray diffractogram of the powder from Example 5.
Magnetization : The saturation magnetization is the maximum achievable magnetic moment per unit volume. The saturation magnetization is attained in infinitely large magnetic fields. The magnetization which is established at an external field of B = 5 T corresponds approximately to the saturation magnetization and is employed as a measure of the magnetizability . The saturation magnetization of the inventive examples from Examples 1 to 9 is significantly higher than that of Comparative Examples 1 to 3. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy
(HR-TEM) : For the manganese-containing inventive powders from Examples 5-7, the lattice spacings were determined by means of HR-TEM images. The powders exhibit lattice spacings of 0.25 nm, 0.26 nm and
0.27 nm. These values agree very well with the reference values for maghemite 0.25 nm, magnetite
0.252 nm and haematite 0.269 nm. Values which would suggest the presence of a manganese oxide are not found. It can also be concluded from this that manganese is incorporated into the lattice of the iron oxide .
The inventive silicon-iron mixed oxide powder features excellent magnetic properties. Contrary to the adverse influences, described in the literature, of chloride on the magnetic properties, the present invention shows that up to 3% by weight of chloride in the powder has no effect on the magnetic properties. Instead, the novel inventive processes allow the preparation of powders with a high chloride content, whose saturation magnetizations are significantly above those from the prior art. The processes additionally allow large amounts of powder to be prepared inexpensively.
The inventive powders can be used in various ways.
Examples 11 A-C: Preparation of dispersions
Example HA: 12.0 g of the powder from Example 5 are added to 108 g of distilled water and then sufficient IM NaOH is added that the pH is between 9.1 and 9.2. By means of a dissolver, dispersion is effected at 2000 rpm for 5 min. The pH of the dispersion is 9.1, the content of inventive powder is 10% by weight and the mean particle diameter d5o is 320 nm. Example HB: As Example HA, except, after dispersion by means of a dissolver, dispersion by means of an Ultraturrax over a period of 5 min at 10 000 rpm. The pH of the dispersion is 9.1, the content of inventive powder is 10% by weight and the mean particle diameter d5o is 180 nm.
Example HC: As Example HB, except, after dispersion by means of a dissolver and Ultraturrax, dispersion by means of ultrasound over a period of 4 min at an amplitude of 80%. The pH of the dispersion is 9.1, the content of inventive powder is 10% by weight and the mean particle diameter d5o is 140 nm.
Example 12: Rubber mixtures
The inventive silicon-iron mixed oxide powder can be incorporated into rubber mixtures. This can be done, for example, with the feedstocks shown in Table 3A and the method shown in Table 3B.
The samples can be heated rapidly in a high-frequency field, in which case the amount of inventive powder is simultaneously low.
Example 13: Adhesive compositions
25 g of the powder from Example 1 are suspended in 100 ml of ethanol and 20 g of oxybis- (benzosulphohydrazide) are added as a blowing agent. The mixture is heated to 600C with stirring for 5 hours and then the solvent is drawn off on a rotary evaporator. The dry formulation is ground in a ball mill for 3 minutes and then screened. The fraction with a particle size of nominally less than 63 μm is used for the further experiments. 10 g of this powder are mixed with 300 g of the moisture-curing one-component polyurethane adhesive dinitrol PUR 501 FC (Dinol GmbH) in the Planimax mixer (Molteni) provided with kneading hooks. The mixture is kneaded at level 1 (150 rpm) for 15 minutes.
200700380 -AL-II
23
Table 1 : Reaction parameters of inventive Examples 1 to 9
Figure imgf000024_0001
* 4:1 parts by volume of H2/N2; after cooling; *** red. (ox.) = deposition of the powder in reducing (oxidizing) atmosphere
200700380 -AL-II
24 Table 2: Physico-chemical values of the powders from Examples 1 to 9
Figure imgf000025_0001
= mean particle diameter of iron oxide; b) as Fe2θ3,- c) as Mnθ2.
Table 3A: Feedstocks for rubber mixture
Figure imgf000026_0001
Keltan®: DSM; Corax®: Degussa; Edenor: Caldic Deutschland; Sunpar: Sun Oil Company; Rhenogran®: Rheinchemie; (§)ρhr: parts per hundred rubber; (*) based on the overall, accelerated rubber mixture Table 3B: Preparation of the rubber mixtures
Figure imgf000027_0001
The adhesive thus modified is used to produce a thick- layer adhesive bond from a sand-blasted and degreased aluminium sheet and a 3 mm-thick float glass pane. The overlap length is 25 mm and the adhesive layer thickness 3 mm. After a curing time of 1 week at 25°C and 50% relative air humidity, the bond is separated again by inductive excitation.
The bond is separated by excitation with an STS M230 semiconductor generator. The excitation frequency of this generator is 300 kHz. For inductive excitation of the adhesive in the adhesive bond, a coil with three turns and an internal diameter of 3 cm is used. The adhesive surface is oriented at right angles to the coil axis in the middle of the coil. At a power of 3000 W and an action time of 2 min, the adhesive is destroyed by the foaming of the blowing agent. The two joined parts can be separated in a simple manner.
Example 14: Plastic composite mouldings obtainable by welding in an electromagnetic alternating field
2 kg of the inventive mixed oxide particles from Example 5 are mixed in the melt with 8 kg of polyamide granules (Vestamid® L1901; designation according to ISO 1874-1: PA12, XN, 18-010; Degussa AG) in a Berstorff ZE25-33D twin-screw extruder at 2500C and a throughput of 10 kg/h, extruded and granulated. The granules are subsequently extruded to sheets of thickness 1 mm.
One such sheet is placed between one sheet each of the same or different plastic base material (without inventive powder) , and adhesive tape is wound firmly around this multilayer structure. Subsequently, the multilayer structure was placed into an electromagnetic alternating field for given times at 100% power. The inductor coil has the following data: dimensions: 200 x 45 x 40 mm (L x W x H) , material: rectangular copper tube 10 x 6 x 1 mm, cross-sectional power area: 28 mm2, coil supply length: 120 mm, number of coil turns: 3, coil winding length (eff .) : 35 mm, coil diameter (internal) : 20 mm to 40 mm, inner coil area: 720 mm2, inductance (at 100 kHz) : approx. 270 nH, working frequency: 323 kHz
The high-frequency semiconductor generator used has the following data: manufacturer: STS - Systemtechnik Skorna GmbH, model designation: STS M260S, clamp power: 6 kW, inductance range: 250 - 1200 nH, working frequency: 150 - 400 kHz (323 kHz with the inductor coil used) .
After the sample has been removed from the alternating field, the adhesive strength is assessed according to the following marks:
In a multilayer structure a) Vestamid® L1901 - Example 14A - Vestamid® L1901 or b) Vestamid® L1901 - Example 14A - Trogamid® X7323 or c) Vestamid® L1901 - Example 14A - Trogamid® X7323 and a welding time of 30 s, an adhesion mark of 4 in each case is found. The marks mean: 0 = no adhesion, 1 = slight adhesion, 2 = some adhesion; can be separated with a little effort, 3 = good adhesion; can be separated only with great effort and possibly with the use of tools, 4 = inseparable adhesive bond; separation only by breakage of cohesion.

Claims

Claims
Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder having magnetic properties in the form of aggregated primary particles, a) for which TEM images show the presence of primary particles composed of spatially separate regions of silicon dioxide and iron oxide and the mean particle diameter of the iron oxide is 2 to 100 nm and b) in which the proportion of
- silicon, calculated as Siθ2, is 5 to 65% by weight
- iron, calculated as Fe2U3, is 30 to 90% by weight
- and the proportion of silicon and iron, each calculated as abovementioned oxides, is at least 95% by weight c) in which the proportion of chloride is 0.2 to 3% by weight.
Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claim 1, characterized in that the proportion of silicon, calculated as Siθ2, is
50 ± 10% by weight or 20 ± 10% by weight.
Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claims 1 and 2, characterized in that the proportion of iron, calculated as Fe2U3, is 50 ± 10% by weight or 80 ± 10% by weight.
Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claims 1 to 3, characterized in that the proportion of chloride is 0.5 to 2.5% by weight .
5. Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claims 1 to 4, characterized in that the primary particles have an envelope of silicon dioxide having a thickness of 1 to 15 nm.
6. Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claims 1 to 5, characterized in that the iron oxide comprises, as the main constituent, magnetite and/or maghemite.
7. Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claim 6, characterized in that the proportion of magnetite and/or maghemite, based on the iron oxides, is at least 80%.
8. Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claims 6 and 7, characterized in that the maghemite/magnetite weight ratio is 0.3:1 to 100:1.
9. Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claims 1 to 8, characterized in that it comprises at least one doping component.
10. Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claim 9, characterized in that the proportion of doping component is 0.005 to 2% by weight.
11. Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claims 1 to 10, characterized in that its BET surface area is 40 to 70 m2/g.
12. Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claims 1 to 11, characterized in that the particles are enveloped with poly (meth) acrylates .
13. Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claims 1 to 12, characterized in that it has a saturation magnetization of 40 to 120 Am2/kg of Fe2O3.
14. Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claim 1, characterized in that it has the following features: a) BET surface area 50 ± 5 m2/g b) proportion of
- silicon, calculated as SiO2, 50 ± 5% by weight
- iron, calculated as Fe2O3, 45 ± 5% by weight
- chloride 1.5 ± 0.5% by weight
- manganese, calculated as MnO, 0.5 ± 0.3% by weight, where the sum of the oxides adds up to 100%, c) mean diameter of the iron oxide 10-30 nm d) proportion of (magnetite + maghemite) , based on iron oxide, 90 ± 10% by weight.
15. Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claim 1, characterized in that it has the following features: a) BET surface area 50 ± 10 m2/g b) proportion of - silicon, calculated as SiO2, 10±5% by weight
- iron, calculated as Fe2O3, 85 ± 5% by weight
- chloride 1.0 ± 0.2% by weight - manganese, calculated as MnO, 1.8 ± 0.2% by weight, c) mean diameter of the iron oxide 10-30 nm d) proportion of (magnetite + maghemite) , based on iron oxide, 90 ± 10% by weight.
16. Process for preparing the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claims 1 to 15, characterized in that a) 5 to 65% by weight of one or more vaporous halosilicon compounds, calculated as Siθ2, b) 30 to 90% by weight of iron chloride, calculated as Fe2U3, in the form of a solution and c) optionally 0.005 to 2% by weight of one or more doping compounds, calculated as oxide, d) are fed separately to the high-temperature zone of a reactor, e) are reacted in the high-temperature zone at temperatures of 700 to 25000C with an excess of oxygen or an oxygenous gas, f) and, in a second zone of the reactor downstream of the high-temperature zone, reducing gases are added to the reaction mixture at one or more points in an amount such as to give rise to a reducing atmosphere overall in this second zone, and the temperature of the reaction mixture is reduced to 5000C to 150°C, g) the resulting solid is separated from gaseous substances in a further, third zone in which a reducing atmosphere is likewise still present, and h) optionally, sufficient air is added to the gaseous substances that the offgas does not give rise to a reducing atmosphere.
17. Process according to Claim 16, characterized in that the temperature results from a flame which is generated by igniting a mixture which comprises one or more combustion gases and an oxygen- containing gas and which burns into the reaction chamber .
18. Process according to Claims 16 or 17, characterized in that the reducing gases used are forming gas, carbon monoxide, hydrogen, ammonia or mixtures of these gases .
19. Process according to Claims 16 to 18, characterized in that the residence time in the first zone is between 0.8 and 1.5 seconds .
20. Process according to Claims 16 to 19, characterized in that the sum of the residence time in the second and third zone is between 15 seconds and 15 minutes.
21. Process according to Claims 16 to 20, characterized in that steam is additionally introduced into the second reactor zone.
22. Process according to Claims 16 to 21, characterized in that the iron chloride used is iron (II) chloride.
23. Process according to Claims 16 to 22, characterized in that the halosilicon compound used is silicon tetrachloride.
24. Process for preparing the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claims 1 to 15, characterized in that a) 5 to 65% by weight of one or more vaporous halosilicon compounds, calculated as Siθ2, b) 30 to 90% by weight of iron chloride, calculated as Fe2U3, in the form of a solution and c) optionally 0.005 to 2% by weight of one or more doping compounds, calculated as oxide, d) are fed separately to the high-temperature zone of a reactor, e) are reacted in the high-temperature zone at temperatures of 700 to 25000C in a flame which is generated by the ignition of a mixture which comprises one or more combustion gases and an oxygen-containing gas and which burns into the reaction chamber, and in which oxygen is used in deficiency, f) in a second zone of the reactor downstream of the high-temperature zone, air or air and steam are added to the reaction mixture at one or more points in an amount such as to give rise to, overall in this second zone a
- reducing atmosphere or
- oxidizing atmosphere and the temperature is reduced to 5000C to 1500C and g) the resulting solid, in a further, third zone, is removed from gaseous substances of the same atmosphere as are present in the second zone, h) and optionally, sufficient air is added to the gaseous substances that the offgas does not give rise to a reducing atmosphere.
25. Use of the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claims 1 to 15 for producing dispersions.
26. Use of the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claims 1 to 15 as a constituent of rubber mixtures.
27. Use of the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claims 1 to 15 as a constituent of polymer formulations.
28. Use of the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claims 1 to 15 as a constituent of adhesive compositions.
29. Use of the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claims 1 to 15 as a constituent of plastic composite mouldings obtainable by welding in an electromagnetic alternating field.
30. HDPE composition containing the silicon-iron mixed oxide powder according to Claims 1 to 15.
PCT/EP2008/053508 2007-06-06 2008-03-25 Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder WO2008148588A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP07109763A EP2000439B1 (en) 2007-06-06 2007-06-06 Silicium-iron mixed oxide powder
EPEP07109763 2007-06-06

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2008148588A1 true WO2008148588A1 (en) 2008-12-11

Family

ID=38694825

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2008/053508 WO2008148588A1 (en) 2007-06-06 2008-03-25 Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2000439B1 (en)
CN (1) CN101320610B (en)
AT (1) ATE539038T1 (en)
WO (1) WO2008148588A1 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110207869A1 (en) * 2008-12-05 2011-08-25 Evonik Degussa Gmbh Iron-silicon oxide particles with a core-shell structure
DE102010003647A1 (en) 2010-04-06 2011-10-06 Evonik Degussa Gmbh Janus-like iron-silicon oxide particles
DE102010003649A1 (en) 2010-04-06 2011-10-06 Evonik Degussa Gmbh Janus-like iron-silicon oxide particles
TWI461369B (en) * 2011-02-03 2014-11-21 Evonik Degussa Gmbh Iron-silicon oxide particles having an improved heating rate in an alternating magnetic and electromagnetic field
US8959690B2 (en) 2012-06-29 2015-02-24 Nike, Inc. Induction heating apparatuses and processes for footwear manufacturing
US9986787B2 (en) 2012-06-29 2018-06-05 Nike, Inc. Induction heating apparatuses and processes for footwear manufacturing
US10100170B2 (en) 2012-09-28 2018-10-16 Dow Global Technologies Llc Composition, connector, process for improving bonding between two or more means for conveying fluids, and system for conveying fluids

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102009027091A1 (en) * 2009-06-23 2011-02-17 Evonik Degussa Gmbh Thermally activated radical starter and composite material containing magnetic particles
EP2600359A1 (en) 2011-11-30 2013-06-05 Evonik Degussa GmbH Magnetic core-shell particle
DE102012213986A1 (en) 2012-08-07 2014-05-15 Evonik Industries Ag Iron-silicon oxide particles with improved heating rate
DE102012216010A1 (en) 2012-09-10 2014-03-13 Evonik Industries Ag Rubber mixture containing iron-silicon oxide particles with improved heating rate
DE102013215498A1 (en) * 2013-08-07 2015-02-12 Evonik Industries Ag Iron oxide and silica containing core-shell particles with improved heating rate
CN105965012B (en) * 2016-06-07 2018-01-02 广州新莱福磁电有限公司 A kind of method of soft-magnetic alloy powder body Surface coating silica insulation film layer

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1284485A1 (en) * 2001-08-16 2003-02-19 Degussa AG Superparamagnetic oxidic particles,their preparation process and application
EP1308240A1 (en) * 2001-10-30 2003-05-07 Degussa AG Dispersion, containing abrasive,by pyrogenesis produced particles containing superparamagnetic domains
DE102004041746A1 (en) * 2004-08-28 2006-03-02 Degussa Ag Rubber mixture containing nanoscale, magnetic fillers
DE102005049136A1 (en) * 2004-12-01 2006-06-08 Degussa Ag A preparation containing a polymerizable monomer and / or a polymer and dispersed therein a superparamagnetic powder

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1284485A1 (en) * 2001-08-16 2003-02-19 Degussa AG Superparamagnetic oxidic particles,their preparation process and application
EP1308240A1 (en) * 2001-10-30 2003-05-07 Degussa AG Dispersion, containing abrasive,by pyrogenesis produced particles containing superparamagnetic domains
DE102004041746A1 (en) * 2004-08-28 2006-03-02 Degussa Ag Rubber mixture containing nanoscale, magnetic fillers
DE102005049136A1 (en) * 2004-12-01 2006-06-08 Degussa Ag A preparation containing a polymerizable monomer and / or a polymer and dispersed therein a superparamagnetic powder

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012510420A (en) * 2008-12-05 2012-05-10 エボニック デグサ ゲーエムベーハー Iron-silicon oxide particles having a core-shell structure
US8845919B2 (en) * 2008-12-05 2014-09-30 Evonik Degussa Gmbh Iron-silicon oxide particles with a core-shell structure
US20110207869A1 (en) * 2008-12-05 2011-08-25 Evonik Degussa Gmbh Iron-silicon oxide particles with a core-shell structure
JP2013523585A (en) * 2010-04-06 2013-06-17 エボニック デグサ ゲーエムベーハー Janus iron-silicon oxide particles
WO2011124437A1 (en) 2010-04-06 2011-10-13 Evonik Degussa Gmbh Janus-like iron-silicon oxide particle
WO2011124436A1 (en) 2010-04-06 2011-10-13 Evonik Degussa Gmbh Janus-like iron-silicon-oxide particles
DE102010003649A1 (en) 2010-04-06 2011-10-06 Evonik Degussa Gmbh Janus-like iron-silicon oxide particles
JP2013523586A (en) * 2010-04-06 2013-06-17 エボニック デグサ ゲーエムベーハー Janus iron-silicon oxide particles
DE102010003647A1 (en) 2010-04-06 2011-10-06 Evonik Degussa Gmbh Janus-like iron-silicon oxide particles
TWI461369B (en) * 2011-02-03 2014-11-21 Evonik Degussa Gmbh Iron-silicon oxide particles having an improved heating rate in an alternating magnetic and electromagnetic field
US8959690B2 (en) 2012-06-29 2015-02-24 Nike, Inc. Induction heating apparatuses and processes for footwear manufacturing
US9591892B2 (en) 2012-06-29 2017-03-14 Nike, Inc. Induction heating apparatuses and processes for footwear manufacturing
US9986787B2 (en) 2012-06-29 2018-06-05 Nike, Inc. Induction heating apparatuses and processes for footwear manufacturing
US10986898B2 (en) 2012-06-29 2021-04-27 Nike, Inc. Induction heating apparatuses and processes for footwear manufacturing
US10100170B2 (en) 2012-09-28 2018-10-16 Dow Global Technologies Llc Composition, connector, process for improving bonding between two or more means for conveying fluids, and system for conveying fluids

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN101320610A (en) 2008-12-10
EP2000439A1 (en) 2008-12-10
ATE539038T1 (en) 2012-01-15
EP2000439B1 (en) 2011-12-28
CN101320610B (en) 2015-04-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2008148588A1 (en) Silicon-iron mixed oxide powder
US20110006247A1 (en) Hydrophobized silicon-iron mixed oxide
KR101316969B1 (en) Iron-silicon oxide particles with a core-shell structure
US6746767B2 (en) Superparamagnetic oxidic particles, processes for their production and their use
Cao et al. Preparation of amorphous Fe2O3 powder with different particle sizes
Santosh et al. Effect of cation proportion on the structural and magnetic properties of Ni-Zn ferrites nano-size particles prepared by co-precipitation technique
TWI557072B (en) Iron-silicon oxide particles having an improved heating rate
Nguyen et al. Two-phase synthesis of colloidal annular-shaped Ce x La1− x CO3OH nanoarchitectures assemblied from small particles and their thermal conversion to derived mixed oxides
Manigandan et al. Manganese sesquioxide to trimanganese tetroxide hierarchical hollow nanostructures: effect of gadolinium on structural, thermal, optical and magnetic properties
JP6480715B2 (en) Precursor of iron-based oxide magnetic particle powder and method for producing iron-based oxide magnetic particle powder using the same
Park et al. Synthesis and structural properties of thermoelectric Ca 3− x Ag x Co 4 O 9+ δ powders
Anantharaman et al. Effect of structural, electrical and magneto-optical properties of CeMnxFe1-xO3-δ perovskite materials
Gabal et al. Effect of Zn-substitution on the structural and magnetic properties of Mn–Zn ferrites synthesized from spent Zn–C batteries
Abd El-Lateef et al. Synthesis of crystalline and amorphous iron phosphate nanoparticles by simple low-temperature method
TW201247547A (en) Iron-silicon oxide particles having an improved heating rate in an alternating magnetic and electromagnetic field
Tola et al. Ferromagnetism in LaMnO 3 nanoparticles prepared by sol–gel method combined with polyvinyl alcohol
Rane et al. The low temperature synthesis of metal oxides by novel hydrazine method
Patil et al. LPG gas sensing application of lithium ferrite
Radev et al. Sol-gel synthesis and structure of La2O3-CoO-SiO2 powders
TW201231401A (en) Coated iron oxide particles
Singh et al. Optimal selection role of chelating agents in the synthesis of YFeO3 nanomaterials prepared via sol-gel technique
Patil et al. Structural, Magnetic and Gas Sensing Application of Novel Polyol Route Synthesized Cobalt Ferrite
JP5678169B2 (en) Janus iron-silicon oxide particles
CN113661145A (en) Substituted epsilon-iron oxide magnetic particle powder, method for producing substituted epsilon-iron oxide magnetic particle powder, green compact, method for producing green compact, and radio wave absorber
Prakash et al. Synthesis of SiO 2/CoFe 2 O 4 nanocomposite by Base Catalyst Assisted In‐situ Sol‐Gel Process

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 08718193

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 08718193

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1