WO2008117994A1 - Method of encoding data using a low density parity check code - Google Patents
Method of encoding data using a low density parity check code Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2008117994A1 WO2008117994A1 PCT/KR2008/001725 KR2008001725W WO2008117994A1 WO 2008117994 A1 WO2008117994 A1 WO 2008117994A1 KR 2008001725 W KR2008001725 W KR 2008001725W WO 2008117994 A1 WO2008117994 A1 WO 2008117994A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- matrix
- base matrix
- parity check
- base
- sub
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03M—CODING; DECODING; CODE CONVERSION IN GENERAL
- H03M13/00—Coding, decoding or code conversion, for error detection or error correction; Coding theory basic assumptions; Coding bounds; Error probability evaluation methods; Channel models; Simulation or testing of codes
- H03M13/03—Error detection or forward error correction by redundancy in data representation, i.e. code words containing more digits than the source words
- H03M13/05—Error detection or forward error correction by redundancy in data representation, i.e. code words containing more digits than the source words using block codes, i.e. a predetermined number of check bits joined to a predetermined number of information bits
- H03M13/11—Error detection or forward error correction by redundancy in data representation, i.e. code words containing more digits than the source words using block codes, i.e. a predetermined number of check bits joined to a predetermined number of information bits using multiple parity bits
- H03M13/1102—Codes on graphs and decoding on graphs, e.g. low-density parity check [LDPC] codes
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method of low density parity check (LDPC) encoding, and more particularly, to a method of LDPC encoding using a parity check matrix.
- LDPC low density parity check
- FIG. 1 illustrates a structure of a mobile communication channel to which the present invention and the related art are applied.
- a transmitter undergoes a channel coding procedure to transmit data without loss or distortion through a wireless channel.
- Examples of the channel coding include convolutional coding, turbo coding, LDPC coding, etc.
- the data which has undergone the channel coding procedure can be transmitted to the wireless channel as a single symbol which includes several bits.
- modulation a procedure of mapping several bits to a single symbol is referred to as modulation.
- the modulated data is converted into a signal for multiple transmission through a multiplexing procedure or a multiple access method.
- the multiplexing procedure include CDM, TDM, FDM, etc.
- the signal which has undergone the multiplexing block is changed to a structure suitable for transmission to one or more multi-antennas, and then is transferred to a receiver through the wireless channel. Fading and thermal noise occur in the transmitted data when the data passes through the wireless channel. For this reason, distortion may occur in the data.
- the modulated data is transferred to the receiver through the wireless channel. In this case, fading and thermal noise occur in the transmitted data, whereby distortion may occur therein.
- the receiver performs a series of procedures of the transmitter in reverse order after receiving the distorted data.
- the receiver performs demodulation to convert the data mapped to the symbol into a bit stream, undergoes channel decoding, and recovers the distorted data to the original data.
- An apparatus of performing the channel coding stores a matrix H or a generation matrix G, wherein the matrix H is a parity check matrix used to generate parity bits to be added to input data (information bits or systematic bits), and the generation matrix G is derived from the matrix H.
- the transmitter includes an encoder which generates parity bits through the input data and the matrix H or G.
- An apparatus of performing channel decoding checks whether the systematic bits are recovered well, through operation of the received data (distorted systematic bits + parity bits) with the matrix H, and performs operation again if the systematic bits are failed to be recovered. Examples of the modulation include BPSK (Binary Phase Shift Keying), QPSK
- 16-QAM maps the data stream which has undergone channel encoding during modulation to a single symbol in a unit of 4 bits.
- 16-QAM de-maps the single symbol received through the wireless channel during demodulation to four bits.
- HARQ Hybrid Automatic Repeat reQuest
- the HARQ scheme is obtained by combination of FEC (Forward Error Correction) symbol and ARQ (Automatic Repeat reQuest) which is a retransmission scheme in a mobile communication system.
- ARQ Automatic Repeat reQuest
- the receiver requests the transmitter to perform retransmission.
- Examples of the ARQ scheme include Stop-And-Wait, Selective Repeat, Go-Back-N, etc. depending on the retransmission method.
- the Stop-And-Wait method as shown in FIG. 2, if the transmitter receives an acknowledgement (ACK) message from the receiver after transmitting data, the transmitter transmits next data, wherein the ACK message notifies that the receiver has successfully received the data. If the transmitter receives a NACK message from the receiver, wherein the NACK message notifies that the receiver has failed to successfully receive the data, the transmitter retransmits the failed data.
- ACK acknowledgement
- the transmitter first transmits N number of data and receives ACK messages from the receiver in due order.
- FIG. 4 illustrates a Selective Repeat method.
- the Selective Repeat method like the Go-Back-N method, the number N of data which are transmitted without ACK or NACK message is referred to as a window size, and retransmission is selectively performed for only data with NACK message.
- the aforementioned HARQ method if retransmission is performed in the ARQ method, previously transmitted data is combined with retransmitted data to restore the data through FEC symbol.
- the HARQ method is classified into a chase combining method and an incremental redundancy method depending on a combining method of the two data.
- the chase combining method as shown in FIG. 5, the receiver combines transmission data with retransmission data to increase a receiving signal to noise ratio (SNR), thereby increasing a receiving success ratio of data at the receiver.
- SNR receiving signal to noise ratio
- the incremental redundancy method (hereinafter, referred to as 'IR method') transmits some of encoded data, which have not been used for first transmission, during retransmission of the transmitter to decrease a coding rate of data received at the receiver, thereby increasing a receiving success ratio.
- LDPC coding will be described.
- a concept of LDPC coding is as follows.
- a linear code can be described with the generation matrix G or the parity check
- a characteristic of the linear code is that the equation of "c — U j s satisfied for every bit of a codeword 'c'.
- the LDPC code which is recently paid attention to was proposed by Gallager in 1962 for the first time.
- One of the characteristics of the LDPC coding is that most of elements of the parity check matrix H are '0' and the number of elements which are not '0' is small compared to the codeword, so that repetitive decoding based on probability is possible.
- a parity check matrix H for the first proposed LDPC code was defined in a non-systematic form and each row and column of the parity check matrix were designed to equally have a small weight.
- the weight means the number of ' 1 ' included in each row and column.
- the LDPC coding scheme has low decoding complexity since a density of elements which are not '0' on the parity check matrix H is low. Further, decoding performance of the LDPC coding is superior to other coding schemes, which is adjacent to the theoretical limit of Shannon. However, the LDPC coding scheme could not be implemented with the hardware technique at the time of proposal by Gallegar, so that the LDPC coding scheme has not been paid attention to by the people for 30 years.
- a repetitive decoding scheme using graphs was developed in early 1980's and a couple of decoding algorithms for the LDPC code have been developed using the repetitive decoding scheme. One of them is a sum-product algorithm.
- the LDPC coding has a superior error correction capability, thereby improving communication speed and capacity.
- MIMO multi-input and multi-output
- the LDPC coding can be applied to a high speed wireless LAN having a data transmission speed of several hundred Mbit/s, a high speed mobile communication system having a data transmission speed of one Mbit/s or greater for a user moving at a speed of 250 km/h, and an optical communication system having a data transmission speed of 40 Gbit/s or greater.
- the LDPC coding can enable quantum encryption communication diminishing the number of retransmission times on a communication path having low quality since transmission quality is improved due to its high error correction capability.
- information bits are encoded by using a generation matrix G derived from an LDPC parity check matrix H.
- the parity check matrix H is configured in the form of [ P ⁇ : I ] by using a Gaussian reduction method. Assuming the number of the information bits is 'k' and a size of an encoded codeword is 'n', the 'P' is a matrix having 'k' number of rows and '(n- k)' number of columns and the T is an identity matrix having 'k' number of rows and columns.
- the generation matrix G has the form of [ I : P ].
- the information bits of k bits to be encoded can be represented as a matrix 'x' having one row and 'k' number of columns.
- the codeword 'c' is represented in the form of the following equation.
- x represents an information part (or a systematic part), and xP represents a parity part.
- a matrix H S y s is derived from a LDPC parity check matrix H
- a matrix G sys is derived from the matrix H sys , whereby encoding is performed.
- the matrix H sys is obtained by configuring one part of the parity check matrix H in a systematic type through row operation.
- the matrixes H sys and G sys can be expressed by the following equations 2 and 3. [Equation 2] [Equation 3]
- Data encoded in a communication system includes noise when passing through a wireless channel of FIG. 1.
- a receiver represents a decoding procedure of data through a procedure as shown in FIG. 6.
- cH T 0.
- a value of c'H T is calculated.
- first k number of bits from c' are determined as the information bit x.
- c' which satisfies c'H T of 0 is searched by using a decoding method such as a sum-product algorithm through a graph, thereby restoring the information bit x.
- a coding rate (R) is as follows.
- the structure of the matrix H is very important. In other words, since encoding and decoding performance is greatly affected by the structure of the matrix H, design of the matrix H is more important than anything else.
- An object of the present invention is to provide a method of LDPC encoding, which can reduce complexity and improve efficiency.
- a method for encoding data using a parity check matrix comprises generating a fourth base matrix by applying a row permutation pattern and a column permutation pattern to rows and columns of a third base matrix, respectively, the third base matrix including a plurality of indexes, each of the plurality of indexes indicating a sub-matrix; generating the parity check matrix by replacing each index of the fourth base matrix with a corresponding sub-matrix; outputting an encoded bit stream by encoding an input bit stream using the generated parity check matrix; and permuting an order of sequences of the encoded bit stream according to an inverse of the column permutation pattern.
- FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a structure of a mobile communication channel to which the present invention and the related art are applied.
- FIG. 2 to FIG. 4 are diagrams illustrating retransmission schemes according to the related art.
- FIG. 5 and FIG. 6 are diagrams illustrating retransmission schemes according to the related art and the present invention.
- FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating a concept of a sub-block on a parity check matrix.
- FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating a method of LDPC decoding according to the related art and the present invention.
- FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an example of a base matrix suggested in the related art.
- FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating a method of expressing a matrix depending on indexes, i.e., shift numbers.
- FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment according to the present invention.
- FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating an example of a 2x2 expansion method.
- FIG. 13 is a flow chart illustrating a procedure of an embodiment according to the present invention
- FIG. 14A to FIG. 14F are diagrams illustrating examples of base matrixes according to the embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 15A and FIG. 15B are diagrams illustrating another embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 16A to FIG. 16C are diagrams illustrating examples of row/column permutation methods according to one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 17A to FIG. 27C are diagrams illustrating examples of row/column permutation methods according to another embodiment of the present invention.
- a parity check matrix is used to encode data using an LDPC code.
- the parity check matrix is a binary matrix and includes elements, most of which are '0' and some of which are '1.' Since the parity check matrix actually used for encoding or decoding has a size of 10 5 bits or greater, a large-scaled memory is required to store the parity check matrix.
- a parity check matrix is stored in a type of a base matrix.
- the base matrix includes a plurality of indexes, each of which indicates a sub-matrix.
- each sub-matrix is a matrix of a constant size (LxL) and is expressed by a specific index.
- LxL constant size
- Each index of the base matrix is replaced with a sub- matrix indicated by the corresponding index when encoding or decoding is performed, whereby the base matrix is used by being expanded to the parity check matrix.
- the term of "base matrix” can be replaced with a "model matrix” or a "base parity check matrix.”
- FIG. 9 illustrates an example of the base matrix.
- each integer means an index of a corresponding sub-matrix.
- a sub-matrix having the index of '-1 ' means a zero matrix having a specific size.
- the index is equal to O,' a sub-matrix having the index of '0' means an identity matrix having the specific size.
- indexes excluding '-1 ' and O,' which are positive integers can represent a predetermined rule which generates a corresponding sub-matrix. For example, indexes which are positive integers represent shift values.
- each sub-matrix is a permutation matrix generated by shifting each row or column of the identity matrix in a constant direction
- the shift value could be an index of the corresponding sub-matrix.
- a sub-matrix is expressed by an index of ' 1
- the corresponding sub-matrix is generated by shifting each row or column of the identity matrix by one space (row or column) in a specific direction.
- No index may be used in the base matrix, so as to express a sub-matrix which is a zero matrix.
- a sub-matrix which is a zero matrix may be expressed as "NULL" in the base matrix without index.
- the zero matrix may be expressed as "•" in the base matrix.
- FIG. 10 illustrates a method of expressing a matrix according to the aforementioned indexes, i.e., shift values.
- a specific parity check matrix is structured as a matrix (i.e., sub-matrix) of 4x4 size
- a sub-matrix having an index of '3' becomes a permutation matrix generated by shifting each column of the identity matrix of 4x4 size to the right by three columns.
- Memory capacity for storing the parity check matrix can be saved in such a manner that a base matrix obtained by expressing each sub-matrix by one index is stored in accordance with a structured LDPC scheme and a base matrix stored during encoding or decoding is expanded to its original parity check matrix.
- FIG. 11 illustrates one embodiment according to the present invention.
- the embodiment of FIG. 11 relates to an example of generating a parity check matrix (H) through a flooring operation procedure and expansion procedures of two times based on a first model matrix (G).
- H parity check matrix
- G first model matrix
- flooring operation is performed for the first base matrix (G) to generate a second base matrix (G').
- the flooring operation means an operation scheme for generating a second base matrix for a second sub-matrix of actual lifting order (for example,
- shift (L) means the number of shift intervals of the second sub- matrix
- floor(x) means an integer most approximate from x to a minus infinity direction.
- each element of the first base matrix is configured by an index (for example, if each row or column of a base permutation matrix is shifted in a given direction, the index means a shift number) indicating the first sub-matrix of L max ⁇ L max dimension (or size)
- each element of the first base matrix can be replaced with each element of the second base matrix using the Equation 6.
- a second sub-matrix which is formed by mapping a first sub-matrix for an identity matrix of 5x5 dimension, can be obtained as illustrated in the following way in accordance with the equation 6.
- the first sub-matrix is formed by shifting each row of an identity matrix of 12 ⁇ 12 dimension by '7' in a specific direction.
- the first sub-matrix which is formed by shifting each row of an identity matrix of 12x12 dimension by '7' in a specific direction, is mapped with the second matrix which is formed by shifting each row of an identity matrix of 5x5 dimension by '2' in a specific direction.
- element values of the first base matrix can be replaced with element values of the second base matrix to generate the second base matrix.
- the second base matrix has the same size as that of the first base matrix.
- the location of "NULL" in the first base matrix, i.e., index indicating a zero matrix becomes "NULL" even in the second base matrix.
- the 'floor' operation can make complexity very simple.
- a modulo operation may be performed when the second base matrix is generated from the first base matrix.
- the 2x2 expansion procedure means that a third base matrix (G") is generated by expanding each element (index) of the second base matrix (G') to a 2x2 matrix.
- FIG. 12(a) illustrates an example of a 2x2 expansion method when a specific index of the second base matrix is an odd number
- FIG. 12(b) illustrates a 2x2 expansion method when a specific index of the second base matrix is an even number.
- Each sub-matrix of the second base matrix (G') is expanded to four sub-matrixes in the third base matrix (G") by the 2x2 expansion procedure.
- each sub-matrix of the third base matrix (G) has a size of 1/2 of each sub-matrix of the second base matrix (G')
- the whole size of the second base matrix (G') becomes the same as that of the third base matrix (G").
- a sub-matrix having a size of 1024 is expanded to four sub-matrixes each having a size of 512.
- the first to third base matrixes will be compared with one another in view of size. It is supposed that the number of columns in the first base matrix is n ⁇ , the number of rows in the first base matrix is (n ⁇ -k ⁇ ), and each sub-matrix has a L max ⁇ L max dimension.
- index matrix means a matrix generated as one index is expanded by the 2x2 expansion method. As shown in FIG. 12, the index matrix can include two indexes and two "NULL" elements.
- each sub-matrix of the second base matrix is expanded to four sub-matrixes.
- the sub-matrixes in (1, 1) and (2, 2) locations are zero matrixes
- index of the sub-matrix in (1, 2) location is (S+l)
- index of the sub-matrix in (2, 1) location is S.
- a corresponding sub-matrix is expanded to a diagonal structure type of 2x2 dimension.
- indexes of the sub-matrixes in (1, 1) and (2, 2) locations are S
- the sub-matrixes in (1, 2) and (2, 1) locations are zero matrixes.
- an index of a sub-matrix in the second model matrix is equal to '0,' it means that the corresponding sub-matrix is an identity matrix. In this case, the index is expanded in accordance with the example of FIG. 12(b).
- the corresponding sub-matrix is expanded to four zero matrixes of 1/2 size by the 2x2 expansion procedure.
- the sub-matrix which is a zero matrix included in the first model matrix and the second model matrix can be expressed as "NULL.”
- an element (NULL) of which index is not expressed in the first model matrix or the second model matrix indicates a zero matrix.
- a permutation procedure means that permutation is applied to either at least one of rows and columns of the third base matrix (G") in accordance with a row permutation pattern or a column permutation pattern, so as to generate a fourth base matrix (G'").
- G third base matrix
- G' fourth base matrix
- Each element of the fourth base matrix is configured by index indicating a specific sub-matrix.
- each index is replaced with a corresponding sub-matrix to generate a final parity check matrix (H) and input data streams can be encoded by using the generated parity check matrix.
- all the procedures of FIG. 11 may not be performed.
- the flooring operation procedure, the 2 X 2 expansion procedure, and the permutation procedure of columns/rows may be omitted if the final parity check matrix is stored.
- at least one of the flooring operation procedure and the 2 X 2 expansion procedure may be omitted.
- FIG. 13 is a flow chart illustrating one embodiment according to the present invention.
- permutation is applied to rows, columns, or rows and columns of the parity check matrix, so as to generate a final parity check matrix for encoding or decoding of input data streams (S 131 ).
- H a is an information part
- H p is a parity part.
- k means a length (bit unit) of input data streams
- n means a length (bit unit) of encoded codeword (c).
- the parity part H p has a substantial dual diagonal structure.
- the dual diagonal structure means a matrix of which main diagonal elements and diagonal elements under or above the main diagonal elements are all ' 1 ' and the other elements are '0' regardless of its dimension.
- the substantial dual diagonal structure means that, although not the perfect dual diagonal structure, the parity part H p has a structure almost similar to the dual diagonal structure. Accordingly, it is preferable that permutation is applied to rows and/or columns in the permutation procedure (S 131) in order that the parity part H p of the parity check matrix has the substantial dual diagonal structure. Meanwhile, although the permutation procedure (Sl 31) has been performed for the third base matrix in FIG.
- the fourth base matrix 11 to generate the fourth base matrix it may be performed for the first or second base matrix.
- the permutation procedure of rows/columns is performed for any one or two or more of the first base matrix (G), the second base matrix (G') and the third base matrix (G"), so that the parity part of the fourth base matrix finally has a dual diagonal structure.
- the first column of the parity part of the fourth base matrix has a weight of 3 through the permutation procedure (Sl 31) of rows and/or columns.
- a row permutation pattern for permutation of rows and a column permutation pattern for permutation of columns are previously determined, and the row permutation pattern and the column permutation pattern are applied to the third base matrix (G"), whereby the fourth base matrix (G'") can easily be generated.
- input source data can be encoded using a generator matrix.
- input source data sjx k of k bit are encoded in the generator matrix to obtain a codeword xjx k of n bit.
- de-permutation is applied to the order of symbols constituting the codeword encoded by the parity check matrix (S 135).
- de-permutation is performed in such a manner that the order of symbols constituting the codeword corresponds to the order of columns of the final parity check matrix corresponding to the case where permutation is not applied to the columns in the row/column permutation procedure (S 131).
- the order of the symbols becomes an inverse order of the permutation order of columns configured in the row/column permutation procedure (S 131 ).
- the codeword configured by 'n' number of symbols is output.
- the 'n' number of symbols constituting the codeword is the same as the number of columns of the parity check matrix, and the order of the symbols constituting the codeword corresponds to the order of columns of the parity check matrix.
- permutation is also applied to the order of the symbols of the encoded codeword. Accordingly, it is necessary that permutation is applied to the order of the codeword symbols so as to correspond to the columns of the parity check matrix before permutation. It is possible to efficiently support a retransmission scheme such as ARQ or HARQ through permutation of the order of the codeword.
- the transmitter transmits the codeword, to which permutation has been applied, to the receiver
- a data processing procedure required in a communication system such as rate matching, interleaving, and modulation, can be performed during the transmission procedure of the codeword.
- the receiver When the receiver receives the codeword from the transmitter and decodes the received codeword, the receiver generates the parity check matrix in accordance with the method of generating a parity check matrix according to the embodiment of the present invention and decodes the received codeword by using the generated parity check matrix.
- FIG. 14A to FIG. 14F illustrate examples of base matrixes (first base matrix G in FIG. 11) according to the embodiments of the present invention, i.e., examples of the cases where the number k ⁇ of information blocks is 6 to 11.
- '0' means an identity matrix
- "•" means a zero matrix
- a random positive integer means a sub-matrix obtained by shifting each row of the identity matrix by the corresponding positive integer.
- Each base matrix has related parameter values k ⁇ , n ⁇ , S ⁇ , and L max , wherein k ⁇ and n ⁇ are values related to the size of the corresponding base matrix and L max means a maximum lifting order of each sub-matrix included in the corresponding base matrix.
- each base matrix The number of columns and the number of rows of each base matrix are n ⁇ and n ⁇ -k ⁇ , respectively.
- S B means the number of state columns of each base matrix, wherein the "state columns” mean elements of the codeword which is not transmitted to the receiver.
- s B is 3 and L max is 1024.
- Table 1 illustrates permutation patterns for making the parity part having a dual diagonal structure through permutation of rows and columns of the base matrixes illustrated in FIG. 14A to FIG. 14F.
- T means index of the base matrix
- K 1 means the number of multiplexing chains
- Q means a row permutation pattern for permutation of rows
- P means a column permutation pattern for permutation of columns.
- rows are permuted by the number of multiplexing chains.
- the fourth base matrix (G'") can be generated in such a manner that permutation is applied to the order of rows of the third base matrix (G") like the order represented by Q 1 and permutation is applied to the order of columns of the third base matrix (G") like the order represented by P 1 , with respect to the base matrix corresponding to the number of information blocks.
- the row permutation pattern Q 1 and the column permutation pattern P are applied in such a manner that row index k r and column index k c in the fourth base matrix (G'") are the same as row index Q ⁇ k n ) and column index P,(k c )in the third base matrix (G").
- permutation is applied to the order of symbols of the encoded codeword (S 135)
- de-permutation is applied to the order of symbols of the codeword by using the column permutation pattern (P 1 ) to correspond to the order of columns of the parity check matrix before permutation is applied to the rows and columns.
- permutation is applied to the order of symbols of the encoded codeword in accordance with an inverse order of the column permutation pattern (P,).
- the sixth column and the eleventh column in FIG. 14A can be transposed each other, the sixth column and the eighth column in FIG. 14B can be substituted each other, and the eighth column and the ninth column in FIG. 14C can be substituted each other.
- the ninth column can be substituted for the tenth column in FIG. 14D
- the tenth column can be substituted for the eleventh column in FIG. 14E
- the eleventh column can be substituted for the twelfth column in FIG. 14F.
- Table 2 to Table 7 respectively illustrate base matrixes generated when locations of two columns of each base matrix of FIG. 14A to FIG. 14F are substituted as aforementioned.
- Each base matrix of Table 2 to Table 7 has related parameter values k ⁇ , ne, S B , and L max , of which description can be obtained with reference to the description of each base matrix illustrated in FIG. 14A to FIG. 14F.
- row degree of the second column means the number of columns having "non- NULL” index in a corresponding row
- the third column represents the location of columns having "non-NULL” index (shift value) in a corresponding row.
- the fourth column of Table 2 to Table 7 represents a shift value of each column of "non-NULL" in a corresponding row.
- columns having "non-NULL” index in the "O"th row of Table 2 are “l”st, “2"nd, “3”rd, "4"th, “8”th, and “9”th columns, and shift values of the respective columns are 1110, 680, 424, 180, 0, 0, respectively.
- Columns excluding the above columns in the "O"th row have index of "NULL", i.e., index which means a zero matrix.
- Matrixes of types as illustrated in FIG. 14A to FIG. 14F can be illustrated in accordance with information included in Table 2 to Table 7. [Table 2]
- Table 8 illustrates permutation patterns for making the parity part having a dual diagonal structure through permutation of rows and columns of the base matrixes illustrated in Table 2 to Table 7.
- i means index of the base matrix
- K 1 means the number of multiplexing chains
- Q means a row permutation pattern for permutation of rows
- P means a column permutation pattern for permutation of columns.
- rows are permuted by the number (K 1 ) of multiplexing chains.
- the input data streams can include a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) code according to a CRC algorithm.
- CRC cyclic redundancy check
- the parity check matrix is generated in such a manner that an element having "non- NULL" index of the third base matrix is replaced with a sub-matrix of L/2 X L/2 size indicated by a corresponding index and an element corresponding to "NULL" is replaced with a zero matrix of L/2 X L/2 size.
- V 1 is expressed as a column vector V'i, ..., vV -i). At this time, is obtained.
- Locations of "0" bits in V 1 are as follows. When V 1 is divided into 2k ⁇ blocks of L/2 size, "0" bits are inserted to the end of the (2k ⁇ -4) t h and (2k ⁇ -3) t h blocks. When zp is an even number, each block has "0" bits of the same number.
- V 1 J V" 1 , for i ⁇ (2k B -3)(L/2)-zp'
- V" means a codeword obtained by encoding vector V 1 through the parity check matrix. First k B L number of elements of the vector V" are equal to elements of V 1 .
- the vector V" has a length of n B L.
- Permutation is applied to the order of the vector V" in accordance with an inverse order of the column permutation pattern P, so as to obtain a binary data stream V".
- a binary data stream V 0 having a length of n B L is obtained by performing interleaving of the data stream V" in accordance with the following equation 8. [Equation 8]
- V out is expressed as the following equation 9. [Equation 9] yOUt _yO
- FIG. 15A and FIG. 15B illustrate another embodiments of the present invention, in which technical features of the present invention are applied to a base matrix (corresponding to the case where the number of six information blocks is 6) according to the 3GPP2 standard which is a technical standard of an asynchronous mobile communication system.
- FIG. 15A illustrates an example of modifying a parity part to a dual diagonal structure through row/column permutation in the step of the first base matrix (G) or the second base matrix (G')
- FIG. 15B illustrates an example of configuring a dual diagonal structure in the step of the third base matrix (G").
- FIG. 16A to FIG. 16C illustrate examples of row/column permutation methods according to one embodiment of the present invention, in which the number of information blocks is 6
- a left matrix and a right matrix respectively illustrate a part of a matrix obtained by modifying the parity part of the base matrix of the 3GPP2 standard, which is in the course of expansion, to a dual diagonal type, and a party of a finally expanded parity check matrix.
- the left matrix is a part of a base matrix in which rows and columns are permuted to obtain a parity part of a dual diagonal structure when sequence indexes are used for rows and columns of the first base matrix
- the right matrix is a part of an expanded parity check matrix having a parity part of a dual diagonal structure, which is permuted from the first base matrix.
- this procedure may be performed in such a manner that the parity part in the base matrix is permuted to obtain a dual diagonal structure and then modified to a finally expanded parity check matrix like the embodiments which will be described later, the base matrix may directly be modified to a final parity check matrix having a parity part of a dual diagonal structure.
- FIG. 16B and FIG. 16C respectively mean the permutation order when columns and rows are permuted to modify the parity part to the dual diagonal structure in the 2x2 expansion procedure.
- FIG. 17A to FIG. 17C illustrate examples of row/column permutation methods according to another embodiment of the present invention, in which the number of information blocks is 6 (k ⁇ -6).
- a left matrix and a right matrix are the same as those described in FIG. 16A.
- the description of FIG. 16B and FIG. 16C can be referred to.
- the description of FIG. 16B and FIG. 16C can be referred to.
- FIG. 19A to FIG. 19C illustrate examples of row/column permutation methods according to another embodiment of the present invention, in which the number of information blocks is 7
- FIG. 21 A to FIG. 21 C illustrate examples of row/column permutation methods according to another embodiment of the present invention, in which the number of information blocks is 8
- FIG. 22A to FIG. 22C illustrate examples of row/column permutation methods according to another embodiment of the present invention, in which the number of information blocks is 9
- FIG. 26A to FIG. 26C illustrate examples of row/column permutation methods according to another embodiment of the present invention, in which the number of information blocks is 11 (k ⁇ -l l).
- FIG. 27A to FIG. 27C illustrate examples of row/column permutation methods according to another embodiment of the present invention, in which the number of information blocks is 11
- the embodiments according to the present invention may be implemented by various means, for example, hardware, firmware, software, or their combination. If the embodiment according to the present invention is implemented by hardware, the embodiment of the present invention may be implemented by one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), digital signal processors (DSPs), digital signal processing devices (DSPDs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), processors, controllers, microcontrollers, microprocessors, etc.
- ASICs application specific integrated circuits
- DSPs digital signal processors
- DSPDs digital signal processing devices
- PLDs programmable logic devices
- FPGAs field programmable gate arrays
- processors controllers, microcontrollers, microprocessors, etc.
- the method of transmitting and receiving data in the wireless communication system according to the embodiment of the present invention may be implemented by a type of a module, a procedure, or a function, which performs functions or operations described as above.
- a software code may be stored in a memory unit and then may be driven by a processor.
- the memory unit may be located inside or outside the processor to transmit and receive data to and from the processor through various means which are well known.
- the present invention can be applied to every field where encoding and decoding are used, as well as a wireless communication system such as a mobile communication system or a wireless Internet system.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Probability & Statistics with Applications (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Error Detection And Correction (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/593,171 US8689088B2 (en) | 2007-03-27 | 2008-03-27 | Method of encoding data using a low density parity check code |
GB0917001A GB2459828B (en) | 2007-03-27 | 2008-03-27 | Method of encoding data using a low density parity check code |
Applications Claiming Priority (10)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US90837907P | 2007-03-27 | 2007-03-27 | |
US60/908,379 | 2007-03-27 | ||
US91019007P | 2007-04-04 | 2007-04-04 | |
US60/910,190 | 2007-04-04 | ||
US91063007P | 2007-04-06 | 2007-04-06 | |
US60/910,630 | 2007-04-06 | ||
US91786707P | 2007-05-14 | 2007-05-14 | |
US60/917,867 | 2007-05-14 | ||
KR1020070063353A KR101455978B1 (en) | 2007-03-27 | 2007-06-26 | Method for encoding data using a Low Density Parity Check code |
KR10-2007-0063353 | 2007-06-26 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2008117994A1 true WO2008117994A1 (en) | 2008-10-02 |
Family
ID=39788691
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/KR2008/001725 WO2008117994A1 (en) | 2007-03-27 | 2008-03-27 | Method of encoding data using a low density parity check code |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
WO (1) | WO2008117994A1 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2016140516A3 (en) * | 2015-03-02 | 2016-11-03 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Transmitter and parity permutation method thereof |
US10306516B2 (en) | 2017-02-22 | 2019-05-28 | Ceva D.S.P. Ltd. | Rate matching for wireless communication |
WO2023216991A1 (en) * | 2022-05-10 | 2023-11-16 | 华为技术有限公司 | Ldpc coding and decoding method and related device |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR20050100152A (en) * | 2004-04-13 | 2005-10-18 | 한국전자통신연구원 | A decoding apparatus of low-density parity-check codes using sequential decoding, and a method thereof |
US7020829B2 (en) * | 2002-07-03 | 2006-03-28 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Method and system for decoding low density parity check (LDPC) codes |
KR20060032807A (en) * | 2004-10-13 | 2006-04-18 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for generating low density parity check metrix |
KR20060061145A (en) * | 2004-12-01 | 2006-06-07 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method and apparatus for generating low density parity check codes |
-
2008
- 2008-03-27 WO PCT/KR2008/001725 patent/WO2008117994A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7020829B2 (en) * | 2002-07-03 | 2006-03-28 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Method and system for decoding low density parity check (LDPC) codes |
KR20050100152A (en) * | 2004-04-13 | 2005-10-18 | 한국전자통신연구원 | A decoding apparatus of low-density parity-check codes using sequential decoding, and a method thereof |
KR20060032807A (en) * | 2004-10-13 | 2006-04-18 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for generating low density parity check metrix |
KR20060061145A (en) * | 2004-12-01 | 2006-06-07 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method and apparatus for generating low density parity check codes |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2016140516A3 (en) * | 2015-03-02 | 2016-11-03 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Transmitter and parity permutation method thereof |
US10277250B2 (en) | 2015-03-02 | 2019-04-30 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Transmitter and parity permutation method thereof |
US10567000B2 (en) | 2015-03-02 | 2020-02-18 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Transmitter and parity permutation method thereof |
US10931309B2 (en) | 2015-03-02 | 2021-02-23 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Transmitter and parity permutation method thereof |
US11515892B2 (en) | 2015-03-02 | 2022-11-29 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Transmitter and parity permutation method thereof |
US10306516B2 (en) | 2017-02-22 | 2019-05-28 | Ceva D.S.P. Ltd. | Rate matching for wireless communication |
WO2023216991A1 (en) * | 2022-05-10 | 2023-11-16 | 华为技术有限公司 | Ldpc coding and decoding method and related device |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8689088B2 (en) | Method of encoding data using a low density parity check code | |
EP2030327B1 (en) | Data retransmission using low density parity check (ldpc) matrixes | |
EP2025063B1 (en) | Method of encoding/decoding using low density check code matrix | |
US8201046B2 (en) | Method of encoding/decoding using low density check code matrix | |
US8086929B2 (en) | Method of executing LDPC coding using parity check matrix | |
CN107294652A (en) | A kind of data mixing retransmission processing method and device | |
WO2008117994A1 (en) | Method of encoding data using a low density parity check code | |
KR101265636B1 (en) | method of performing a Low-density parity-check codes decoding using a model matrix | |
KR101227514B1 (en) | Method for configuring a model matrix for Low Density Parity Check encoding and decoding | |
KR20080084178A (en) | Method of low density parity check code decoding using a plurality of layers | |
KR101162217B1 (en) | Method of LDPC encoding using a parity check matrix | |
KR101187070B1 (en) | Method for encoding using parity check matrix | |
KR101191197B1 (en) | Method of decoding using a plurality of parity check matrices | |
KR101221911B1 (en) | Method for a retransmission using a Low Density Parity Check code | |
KR101137349B1 (en) | Method of encoding using a plurality of parity check matrices | |
KR101221897B1 (en) | LDPC encoder | |
Yao et al. | Frame fountain: Coding and decoding MAC frames | |
Jeong et al. | A partial IR hybrid ARQ scheme using rate-compatible punctured LDPC codes in an HSDPA system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 08723761 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 12593171 Country of ref document: US |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 0917001 Country of ref document: GB Kind code of ref document: A Free format text: PCT FILING DATE = 20080327 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 08723761 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |