APPARATUS FOR GENERATING GAS AND / OR SMOKE
TECHNICAL AREA OF THE INVENTION
The purposes of this invention are that it should make air flows visible and test the function of smoke detectors or carbon monoxide detectors. Air flows can be made visible by observing how smoke behaves on leaving the opening in the apparatus.
The smoke unit mentioned in this description has two functions. One is to generate visible smoke, which is used for observing air flows. The latter is necessary for the optimum siting of smoke and gas detectors. The second function, in addition to generating smoke for testing smoke detectors, is that the smoke unit generates carbon monoxide for also testing detectors used to detect this gas.
"Smoke unit" here designates a smoke and/or gas generating unit of a pyrotechnic nature. When it burns, it generates both smoke and carbon monoxide. The design of the smoke unit can give different amounts of either smoke or gas.
THE INVENTION'S BACKGROUND
Previously, various types of pressurised aerosols or gases in various types of purpose-oriented containers have been used to test smoke detectors. These pressurised aerosols generate simulated smoke in the form of liquid particles. One of the disadvantages of these known devices is that the generated liquid particles reflect light poorly and thus give inferior results when testing smoke detectors with optical sensors. Furthermore, good light reflection is important when checking the siting of all types of smoke detectors. "Siting check" here means checking the interaction between a smoke detector and ventilation equipment that is already installed or is in the process of installation. It also extends to similar checking in relation to installations of doors, windows or other units that can have an impact on a smoke detector's ability to detect fumes generated in a fire. The simulated smoke generated by pressurised aerosols is more or less invisible when used in air. This makes it entirely unsuitable for siting checks.
A further disadvantage is that the simulated smoke generated by pressurised aerosols is short lived. This means that pressurised aerosols cannot be used to test the function of smoke detectors of the so-called sampling type. These sampling systems comprise a main unit that houses the smoke sensor. Attached to the main unit are one or more tubular transport hoses that, via negative pressure, can lead fumes a long way to the main unit. Testing the function of a sampling system requires a smoke particle with a very long life and good light reflection.
The weight and the designs of the applications are further disadvantages of testing the function of smoke detectors by using simulated smoke from pressurised aerosols in purpose-oriented containers. For it to be possible to activate said aerosol containers above a smoke detector, an unnecessarily complicated design is required This drastically increases the weight, which is yet a further disadvantage when one of the purpose-oriented containers is mounted on a long extension shaft for testing high up in a roof.
Yet another disadvantage is that simulated smoke via pressurised aerosols cannot be used to test the function of carbon monoxide type detectors. To carry out a function test of a detector that is sensitive to carbon monoxide, said gas must itself be used. The existing pressurised aerosols produced for testing smoke detectors do not contain carbon monoxide.
Present systems for testing the function of carbon monoxide detectors comprise a pressurised container (containing carbon monoxide) and a sealed container. At testing, the carbon monoxide detector is dismounted and placed inside said sealed container. The gas is then introduced. As testing time is altogether too long, this is not considered to be a commercially viable design.
More disadvantages of the aerosol container and the pressurised liquids themselves are that these aerosols are mostly mixtures of an oil with one or more types of alcohols. From an environmental point of view, production of the
packaging requires a lot of energy and most of the raw materials are finite resources. On top of this, being pressurised containers, aerosol packagings are surrounded by transport restrictions.
SHORT DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
Figure 1 shows one design of an apparatus with a smoke/gas unit in a small lower container.
Figure 2 shows a side view of another design of an apparatus with a smoke/gas unit.
Figure 3 shows another view of a design as per figure 2.
Figure 4 shows smoke in a container as per figure 1.
Figure 5 shows a variant of the mounting of the smoke/gas unit with a fan (17) and lighting (18). Figure 6 shows a different view of the variant in figure 5.
Explanation of drawings with reference numbers:
1. Smoke detector.
2. Container that concentrates the test smoke (gas) around the detector and protects the test from external influences such as air flows from, for example, ventilation systems. The diameter can vary depending on the test object.
3. Locking device (e.g. locking screw) for locking mounting yoke 10.
4. Lower air hole supplying oxygen to the smoke/gas unit in order to set up circulation of the gas/smoke through container 2 and out through upper evacuation hole 5. The number and diameters of lower air holes can vary.
5. The upper evacuation hole ensures that the smoke flows through container 2. It also provides an outlet for the smoke. The number and diameters of upper air holes can vary. 6. Sealing ring for better sealing to the detector's mounting surface.
7. Handle that can be equipped with a mount for an extension shaft.
8. Container for smoke/gas unit.
9. Mounting plate for smoke/gas unit or universal holder for a product called smoke pen.
10. Mounting yoke that enables the angling of the unit through: undoing locking screws 3; positioning container 2 at a predetermined angle; and, doing up the screws at this angle.
11. Smoke/gas unit.
12. Two rubber cushions (fitted in line as per the sketch) enable container 2 to be angled in the direction of the arrows (13).
13. Direction arrows showing the angling possibilities for the container. 14. Inner mounting plate.
15. Outer mounting plate.
16. Smoke/gas
PREFERRED DESIGN
A container (2) as per figure 1 designed with an opening towards the top where a sealing ring (6) may be provided for a better seal against the detector (1). At the bottom of this container (2), there is a small container (8) for a smoke/gas unit. The small container is mounted with its opening upwards. At the bottom of the small container, there is a mounting plate for a smoke/gas unit or for a universal holder for a smoke pen. The container (8) may have an air hole (4) for the supply of air. The large container (2) can be equipped with a mounting yoke (10) that, via the undoing/tightening of a locking device, e.g. locking screws (3), enables angling of the unit and the free selection of any angle between the container (2) and the mounting yoke (10). To provide the possibility of generating a through flow of air mixed with the smoke or gas generated by the smoke/gas unit, the large container (2) may have an air hole (5).
Figure 4 shows how smoke/gas is generated by combustion of/in the smoke/gas unit (11).
Figures 2 and 3 show an alternative mounting between the handle (7) and the bottom of the container (2). In this case, rubber cushions are mounted between
handle (7) and container (2), said cushions making it possible to angle the container when so required.
To more quickly evacuate smoke and gas from the container (2), there is a fan (17) that can be operated independently of, or together with, a light (18) that can be either integrated into the fan or kept separate in the container, the purpose of the light being to more easily find and orientate with a test object in poor lighting.