WO2008092171A2 - Interface permettant d'aider à la construction de demandes de recherche - Google Patents

Interface permettant d'aider à la construction de demandes de recherche Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2008092171A2
WO2008092171A2 PCT/US2008/052239 US2008052239W WO2008092171A2 WO 2008092171 A2 WO2008092171 A2 WO 2008092171A2 US 2008052239 W US2008052239 W US 2008052239W WO 2008092171 A2 WO2008092171 A2 WO 2008092171A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
search query
search
user
selection
results
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2008/052239
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
WO2008092171A3 (fr
WO2008092171A8 (fr
Inventor
Robert Bunn
Original Assignee
Robert Bunn
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Robert Bunn filed Critical Robert Bunn
Publication of WO2008092171A2 publication Critical patent/WO2008092171A2/fr
Publication of WO2008092171A3 publication Critical patent/WO2008092171A3/fr
Publication of WO2008092171A8 publication Critical patent/WO2008092171A8/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/95—Retrieval from the web
    • G06F16/953—Querying, e.g. by the use of web search engines
    • G06F16/9535—Search customisation based on user profiles and personalisation
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/903—Querying
    • G06F16/9032—Query formulation
    • G06F16/90324—Query formulation using system suggestions

Definitions

  • search engine' refers to an apparatus (or programs running on general purpose computers) that take as input a query and return a results list of hyperlinks to electronic documents or
  • the search engine includes the index of documents in its corpus, the code and algorithms that determine the relevance of each document, and the graphical user interface that delivers the results list to the user.
  • database Throughout the following description and claims the term 'database' refers to any system that can store information which allows that information to be searched.
  • query Throughout the following description and claims the terms 'query' or 'search query' refer to a set of terms submitted to the search engine whether typed, spoken, submitted through a 'link' that already has embedded a set of search terms, or submitted by any other interface.
  • a query (or search query) can comprise a single word, multiple words, a string of characters, or phrases.
  • the query can be phrased as a question (e.g., a 'natural language' query), a loose set of terms, or a structured Boolean expression.
  • a query or search query
  • a query can comprise symbols or any other characters used by a search engine to search for electronic documents or Web pages containing or related to the search characters. search query Throughout the following description and claims the terms
  • 'query' or 'search query' refer to a set of terms submitted to the search engine whether typed, spoken, submitted through a 'link' that already has embedded a set of search terms, or submitted by any other interface.
  • a query (or search query) can comprise a single word, multiple words, a string of characters, or phrases.
  • the query can be phrased as a question (e.g., a 'natural language' query), a loose set of terms, or a structured Boolean expression.
  • a query (or search query) can comprise symbols or any other characters used by a search engine to search for electronic documents or Web pages containing or related to the search characters.
  • web browser Throughout the following description and claims the term 'web browser' refers to any computer application allowing the user to view any content within the Internet, intranet, or other network system.
  • the term 'Internet browser' is synonymous with 'web browser' in this document.
  • Internet browser The term 'Internet browser' is synonymous with 'web browser' in this document.
  • Web site Throughout the following description and claims, the terms 'Web site' or 'website' refer to a collection of Web pages that are linked together and are available on the World Wide Web or Internet. website Throughout the following description and claims, the terms 'Web site' or
  • 'website' refer to a collection of Web pages that are linked together and are available on the World Wide Web or Internet.
  • HTTP Transfer Protocol
  • HTML Hypertext
  • HTTP Transfer Protocol
  • any other protocol for accessing Web pages or other electronic documents along with other associated information for each link, including, but not limited to, titles of the documents, summaries of the documents, links to cached copies of the documents, the date on which the documents were last indexed or last modified, images associated with or located within the documents, and information extracted from the documents.
  • 'document' is defined broadly, and includes, in addition to its ordinary meaning, computer files and Web pages whether those pages are actually stored or are generated dynamically in response to a request to display.
  • the term 'document' is not limited to computer files containing text, but also includes computer files containing graphics, audio, video, and other multimedia data.
  • the embodiments of the present invention include various operations, which will be described below.
  • the operations may be performed by hard-wired hardware, or may be embodied in machine-executable instructions that may be used to cause a general purpose or special purpose processor, or logic circuits programmed with the instructions to perform the operations.
  • the operations may be performed by any combination of hard-wired hardware, and software driven hardware.
  • the embodiments of the present invention may be provided as a computer program product that may include machine-readable medium, stored thereon instructions, which may be used to program a computer (or other programmable device) to perform a series of operations according to the embodiments of the present invention.
  • the machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, floppy diskettes, optical disks, CD-ROMs, DVDs, magno-optical disks, ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, hard drives, magnetic or optical cards, flash memory, or any other medium suitable for storing electronic instructions.
  • the embodiments of the present invention may also be downloaded as a computer software product, wherein the software may be transferred from a remote computer to a requesting computer by way of data signals embodied in a carrier wave or other propagation medium via a communication link
  • a modem e.g. a modem or a network connection.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary architecture 100 for the embodiments of the present invention.
  • a client computer 105 is coupled to the internet, an intranet or some other network via a network connection such as but not limited to a modem, a cable modem, or an Ethernet connection.
  • the client 105 will be running a software application designed for communication over the network.
  • that software application would typically be a web browser such as
  • Microsoft Internet Explorer or Mozilla Firefox that allows the client to receive and render HTML documents on its display 721 (FIG. 7).
  • Alternative embodiments may employ different software applications to facilitate network communication or in certain instances a special software application may not be required, and the requisite code to initiate an interactive search query refinement session may be resident in a client's operating system.
  • search engine 115 Also coupled to the Internet, Intranet, or other network via a network connection is a search engine 115.
  • the primary function of a search engine 115 is to return a relevant list of search results to a client 105 after a search query has been entered and submitted by the client 105. More specifically, the web browser on the client computer
  • routines executed to implement the embodiments of the present invention whether implemented as part of an operating system or a specific application, component, program, object, module or sequence of instructions, or even a subset thereof, will be referred to herein as 'computer program code,' 'program code,'
  • Program code typically comprises one or more instructions that are resident at various times in various memory and storage devices in a computer, and that, when read and executed by one or more processors in a computer, cause that computer to perform the operations necessary to execute operations or elements embodying the various aspects of the embodiments of the present invention.
  • the computer readable media may include, but is not limited to, transmission type media such as digital and analog communication links.
  • search query refinement on-demand is implemented in a browser, e.g., using a plug-in 410 containing the program code
  • on-demand search query refinement functionality may be integrated into the program code for a browser, or into another application that displays documents other than web pages.
  • On-demand search query refinement functionality may also be implemented within an operating system.
  • ondemand search query refinement may be performed in a distributed manner, e.g., using a central server to perform some of the functionality associated with on-demand search query refinement.
  • the embodiments of the present invention comprise systems and processes for receiving inputs from users of search engines and converting these inputs into a modified search query based on the original user-entered search query.
  • the user device is one of a personal computer, a portable phone, and a personal digital assistant, or any other device that is configured to communicate with a web server on the Internet or any other computer network.
  • the modified search query may be submitted automatically after each user input, or the submission can be directed by the user after some combination of inputs.
  • Inputs may be in any form of communication possible between a user and the computer. These forms of communication include, but are not limited to, keyboard, mouse, and speech.
  • An embodiment of the present invention allows a user to select words or phrases to cause the appearance of a graphical user interface.
  • This user interface is made interactive by embodiments of the present invention to allow the user to specify their intent in relation to the selected words or phrases.
  • An embodiment of the present invention automates the process of constructing and resubmitting a Boolean search query likely to be based on the current search query. It is not necessary for a user to understand anything about Boolean search queries in order to use the embodiments of the present invention.
  • An initial search is made on an Internet (or other computer network) search engine which creates a starting point for the user to continue to refine the search using the embodiments of the present invention. After this starting point has been created then the user may select specific words or phrases in the list of search results generated by a previous search. This embodiment of the present invention allows the user to click on
  • buttons which contain two images of buttons, one containing the image of a '+' symbol and the other an image of a '-' symbol.
  • these symbols are somewhat language neutral, it saves the effort of translating words describing the meaning of these symbols into various languages.
  • the user clicks on the '+' button if he/she desires more results relevant to or containing the chosen word or phrase, and clicking on the '-' button will result in limiting results relevant to or containing the chosen word or phrase in the newly returned search results.
  • the chosen word or phrase is automatically appended to the current search query along with any necessary symbols to convey the users' intent to the search engine using Boolean logic typically employed by search engines.
  • the results are refreshed for the user automatically at which point the user may repeat this process until the desired search results are obtained.
  • a specific example of how these symbols refine the search query follows. If the user had an initial search query of 'star', then after reviewing their set of results from this initial search the user then decided that they did not want results relating to the word 'celebrity' which they had found in the content of their results list. The user would then select the word 'celebrity' by highlighting or perhaps double-clicking on it (possibly with a mouse).
  • the user would then see the pop-up window appear near to the selection they just made, at which point the user can choose the '+' or '-' symbols to specify intent. In this specific example the user would select the '-' symbol.
  • the program code would create the following example search query to send to the search engine 'star -celebrity'. This refined search query would also be automatically sent to the search engine immediately after constructing the new query. The user will then be presented with a new set of results similar to the previous except for the removal of results related to the word 'celebrity'.
  • Embodiments consistent with the invention typically implement on-demand search query refinement in response to detecting the selection of content by the user, typically using manipulated pointer (e.g., via user manipulation of a GUI pointer via a mouse, touchpad, track ball, cursor key, touch screen input, gesture, voice or other suitable user input) over a region in a document containing content a user may want to select.
  • manipulated pointer e.g., via user manipulation of a GUI pointer via a mouse, touchpad, track ball, cursor key, touch screen input, gesture, voice or other suitable user input
  • the display of the user interface 635 is implemented within a pop-up window, e.g., a dialog box, a tool tip, a 'bubble' or other suitable graphical control, and typically adjacent to or proximate to the pointer.
  • FIG. 6, illustrates an exemplary browser window 600 for a browser utilizing a search query refinement plug-in incorporating on demand search query refinement functionality. Window 600 is shown displaying a web page 645 after the user has already performed a search using the search query of 'celebrity.'
  • Web page 645 includes a highlighted region 610 within which is displayed the content selected by the user, in this example the selected content is the word 'famous.'
  • FIG. 6 also illustrates a second region 625 which is shown in this example as a drop-down list box from which the user can select from a list of possible words or phrases the user may want to use in the refinement of the current search query, and a third region 640 which shows an area on the user interface 635 which allows for displaying advertisements or alternate hyperlinks of any kind to the user. It will be appreciated that, for example, if the current search query is the word 'celebrity,' then the area 640 may show advertisements or other hyperlinks related to the search query
  • FIG. 3 illustrates one exemplary implementation of a search query refinement routine 300 executed by the illustrated search refinement plug-in 410 (FIG. 4). It will be appreciated that routine 300 need not be implemented in a plug-in, but may be implemented in any suitable program code capable of being executed on a user computer.
  • Routine 300 begins in block 310 by injecting the program code into the search engine page which is typically done locally, but could also be done remotely if the program code is stored on a server.
  • block 310 waits on the user to make a selection of content. Typically the user would do this by double-clicking on a word on the page if using a mouse, or highlighting on a word or phrase. It should be appreciated that many other cursor control devices could provide the user the ability to make a selection as well. If a user selection is detected, block 320 passes control to block 325.
  • Block 345 simply clarifies that control remains at block 320 if no user selection has been made.
  • block 325 determines whether a pop-up window is already displayed. Assuming that no window is currently displayed, the program code will then cause one to be displayed.
  • Block 330 waits for a user to make a selection of either the '+' or the '-' button to specify their intent in relation to the selected content.
  • Block 335 then executes the proper code to refine the current search query depending if the user selected the '+' or the '-' symbol.
  • Block 340 then automatically submits this newly built search query to the search engine to return a new set of results to the user. Once this new set of results has been returned then control will return to block 315 so the user may repeat this process as many times as desired as shown in element 350.
  • routine 300 may monitor for events relating to a user selection such as mouseover, mouseenter, mouseout, mousemove events.
  • event relating to a user selection such as mouseover, mouseenter, mouseout, mousemove events.
  • region searched upon detecting pointer movement may vary in different embodiments of the present invention. The region may be based, for example, upon a certain distance from the pointer position, upon the graphical object over which the pointer is positioned, upon a number of words in either direction of the current text over which the pointer is positioned, etc.
  • some embodiments of the present invention may further automatically execute program code based on the position of the cursor, e.g., the cursor may move over content already determined to be a likely candidate to use in a search refinement.
  • the program code may also help the user find content that may be particularly helpful in refining a search by explicitly identifying such content to the user, e.g., specific words or phrases may already be highlighted or in some other way distinguished from the rest of the content.
  • the pop-up window may be placed multiple times on a search page for the convenience of the user.
  • the size, shape, and content of the pop-up window may change as may be decided by the user and/or program code. For example, small elements containing '+' and '-' symbols may be placed with each set of highlighted content which would not require the user to take any explicit action to enable or use. The user may simply interact with elements already placed within, or even outside of the content for their use if desired. It should also be noted that the user may still choose to edit their search query by hand if the search query built by the embodiments of the present invention is determined to be unsatisfactory by the user.
  • the program code may identify specific results in the results list which were not present in the previous search, or previous searches, to assist the user in identifying new content with each search refinement action.
  • Routine 300 performs both refinement of the current search query and the automatic submission of this newly constructed search query, ondemand, and in response to user selection or cursor movement over a region including appropriate content. In other embodiments, however, search query refinement suggestions may be performed prior to, and thus, non-responsive to user selection of content.
  • These pre -built search queries contain text and any necessary Boolean logic to return or filter results from a generic category of information such as education or science before it is resubmitted to the search engine. This allows a user to simply select a specific category of information that is desired or undesired after making an initial search.
  • a specific example might be that a user has made an initial search for the word
  • users of the Internet commonly have one of two goals when making a search. Either they are looking to make a purchase or they are simply looking for information. By creating two pre-built search queries, one for making purchases and one for information, a user can choose either category to limit content based on a financial related intent. This is shown in element 515 (FIG. 5).
  • FIG. 6 Another embodiment of the present invention involves showing the user potentially useful terms to refine their current search with as shown in element 625 (FIG. 6).
  • the user may select from a list of pre-built search queries which the embodiments of the present invention would use to refine the users' present search query.
  • Another embodiment of the present invention involves any combination of any described embodiments of the present invention and the addition of advertising or informational links in the graphical interface as shown in element 640 (FIG. 6).
  • the user may choose one of these alternative links as opposed to the links in the results list.
  • the advertising or informational links may be dynamically generated relating to the current search query, or they may be pre-determined unrelated to the users' searches. It should be noted that typically a user will have their attention focused on the area of the page where they are selecting specific content, this situation may cause the advertisements or hyperlinks contained in the pop-up window to be selected more often than other advertisements or hyperlinks present elsewhere on the results list page.
  • the user may be offered the choice of various alternative search engines to have a set of results returned from the chosen search engine likely to be more specific to the users' current search, as well as possibly a search engine supported by the embodiments of the present invention which would allow the user to continue to refine their search on the new search engine.
  • Another embodiment of the present invention would be to modify block 335 in such a way as to allow the user to preview and/or edit the search query before it is submitted to the search engine (block 340).
  • This embodiment of the present invention may be used as a specific option in the program code which the user could turn off or on as desired.
  • the desired setting of this feature may be stored as described in the paragraph which discusses the storing of user preferences.
  • Another embodiment of the present invention would be to integrate the embodiments of the present invention into the program code of an operating system, web browser, or even in the search engine itself. Any of these integrations would likely remove the need to install a separate plug-in onto the client computer. It should be noted that there may be other places in which the embodiments of the present invention could be integrated to provide the functionality of the embodiments of the present invention. The possible places on the client computer or on the remote server that may be places for integration that have been listed are not intended to be limiting, but to provide a few specific examples of how this embodiment of the present invention may be implemented.
  • Computer network 100 comprises a client computer 105, which is connected to the Internet or other computer network by means of any communication device.
  • the Internet or other computer network 110 is then connected to a search engine 115, or perhaps some other computer network 125 accessible only through the Internet.
  • Client computer 105 which is also labeled as 400 comprises memory 405, which holds the computer code for the search query refinement plug-in 410 (present invention), the browser 415, and the operating system 420.
  • the user interacts with user interface 425.
  • the CPU 430 is responsible for executing the computer code in memory.
  • the network interface 435 is the communication means for the client computer 105 to communicate with the Internet or other computer network.
  • Mass storage 440 is typically used for long-term storage of computer code and data.
  • Computer system 700 comprises a bus or other communication means 701 for communicating information, and a processing means such as processor 702 coupled with bus 701 for processing information.
  • Computer system 700 further comprises a random access memory (RAM) or other dynamically-generated storage device 704 (referred to as main memory), coupled to bus 701 for storing information and instructions to be executed by processor 702.
  • Main memory 704 also may be used for storing temporary variables or other immediate information during execution of instructions by processor
  • Computer system 700 also comprises a read only memory (ROM) and/or other static storage device 706 coupled to bus 701 for storing static information and instructions for processor 702.
  • ROM read only memory
  • static storage device 706 coupled to bus 701 for storing static information and instructions for processor 702.
  • a data storage device 707 such as a magnetic disk or optical disk and its corresponding drive may also be coupled to computer system 700 for storing information and instructions.
  • Computer system 700 can also be coupled via bus 701 to a display device 721, such as a cathode ray tube (CRT) or Liquid Crystal Display (LCD), for displaying information to an end user.
  • a display device 721 such as a cathode ray tube (CRT) or Liquid Crystal Display (LCD), for displaying information to an end user.
  • CTR cathode ray tube
  • LCD Liquid Crystal Display
  • keyboard 722 including alphanumeric and other keys, may be coupled to bus 701 for communicating information and/or command selections to processor 702.
  • cursor control 723 such as a mouse, a trackball, or cursor direction keys for communicating direction information and command selections to processor 702 and for controlling cursor movement on display 721.
  • a communication device 725 is also coupled to bus 701.
  • the communication device 725 may include a modem, a network interface card, or other well-known interface devices, such as those used for coupling to Ethernet, token ring, or other types of physical attachment for purposes of providing a communication link to support a local or wide area network, for example.
  • the computer system 700 may be coupled to a number of clients and/or servers via a conventional network infrastructure, such as a company's Intranet and/or the Internet, for example.
  • ASICs Application Specific Integrated Circuits
  • the method of the present invention may be performed by any combination of programmed general-purpose computer components and/or custom hardware components.
  • FIG. 2 there is shown a flow chart 200 of a prior art method for a user to search the internet.
  • the user enters a search query into their preferred search engine and then sends this request to the search engine.
  • the search engine returns a set of search results to the user.
  • the user may then select from the returned results or manually refine and resubmit their search.
  • FIG. 3 there is shown a flow chart 300 of a method for a user to search the internet utilizing the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • the search engine query construction code is placed into the client computer memory.
  • the javascript code (present invention) is loaded (injected) into the search engine page.
  • the javascript code waits for user to select a word or a phrase.
  • the javascript code decides if the user has made a selection it should act upon.
  • the fifth block 325 if the user has made a selection the javascript code will act upon, then it will display a pop-up window 635 (FIG.
  • the user then interacts with the pop-up window by selecting graphical elements which specify the users' intent in relation to the selected content.
  • these graphical elements will be the symbols '+' 615 (FIG.
  • the javascript code creates a new search query by appending Boolean logic and the user selection.
  • the present invention submits this newly constructed search query to the search engine automatically to have a new set of search results presented to the user.
  • a loop is described where the user may want to repeat this process on the new set of search results by returning to the point in this flowchart where the present invention is waiting for a user selection to act upon, which is block 320. This loop allows the user to repeat this process as many times as desired.
  • this side block is shown to clarify that the process of waiting for the user to make a selection is a continuous one. This clarifies that as long as the user has not made a selection then the present invention will continue to wait until one is made.
  • FIG. 5 there is shown an element 500 which the present invention may incorporate into the user interface to allow the user to select or deselect general categories of information which will be used to refine the search query in a similar way as the '+' or '-' symbols may.
  • the users' original search query was the word 'star' and the user then deselected the general category of 'science' then one possible refinement of the search query may be: 'star -physics -space - chemistry -astronomy'.
  • this search query employs standard Boolean logic used by many search engines at the time of the filing of the present invention, it can be explained as follows.
  • the '-' symbols before a word tell the search engine that the user does not desire results related to that particular word. In the specific example here, then results relating to the word star, but without results relating to the words
  • categories may be separated into sub-categories such as 510 and 515.
  • the category group 515 is used for a more specific purpose of allowing the user to select from somewhat mutually exclusive categories of information. An example of such a group is shown in 515.
  • FIG. 6 shows an exemplary search engine typically used on the Internet 600, also labeled as 645.
  • the elements of this exemplary search engine are as follows.
  • the search text box 605 is where the user would initially enter their search and this is also where the refined search queries may be shown as well.
  • the user selected content 610 is shown as being highlighted.
  • the pop-up window is also displayed in this figure as content has been selected in this case. It should be noted that the pop-up window 635 may not be present anywhere in the browser window before a user makes a selection. It should be noted that the graphical window may be permanently displayed in the browser window (on the search page or even on the browser itself) and may or may not be moved to accommodate the user.
  • the '+' 615 and '-' 620 symbols are shown which allow the user to specify their intent in relation to the selected content.
  • a list of suggested terms 625 the user may want to select from to refine their search is shown.
  • these additional hyperlinks need not only be text, but may be any content which the user may interact with to take them to another document.
  • This invention relates to searching electronic databases whether the information being sought is contained within the Internet or on another computer network.
  • Internet search engines are designed to locate desired information from among the vast amount of information contained across the Internet. Users describe the information they are looking for by entering queries containing search terms. The search engine matches the search terms against an index of Web pages using a variety of relevance calculations with the objective of identifying those Web pages that are most likely related to the information sought by the users. The search engine then returns a ranked list of hyperlinks to these Web pages, with the links determined to be most relevant nearer the top of the list. In order to use a search engine, each user must figure out for themselves how to construct and enter a query that will cause the search engine to return a results list containing links to sources that will most likely provide the information the user is seeking. Traditionally, searching was done by search experts who were skilled at crafting elaborate and precise Boolean queries. This is a skill that is still in common use at places such as news organizations, libraries and the United States
  • Patent Office However, on the Internet, most users are unfamiliar with such techniques, and usually enter no more than a few words, with no particular logical expression, hoping the search engine will provide the information they are seeking.
  • search engines have as an objective of their user interaction design to provide relevant search results without requiring precise queries, by factoring in other evidence about relevance.
  • search engines may analyze the hyperlinks between Web pages, or look for documents that contain terms that are semantically similar to the terms in the query, or demonstrate a high level of co-occurrence with terms in the query over the corpus of documents.
  • Results returned by search engines can also be manipulated. Web site owners can add content or meta data or hyperlinks from other Web sites to their Web site, so that their Web pages are listed near the top of results lists, even though the Web pages do not contain information that is highly related to a user's query. This practice is often referred to as Search Engine Optimization ('SEO').
  • 'SEO' Search Engine Optimization
  • search engines Because search techniques have limits and because search engines cannot divine the intent of users in conducting searches, users are often unsatisfied or frustrated with the results returned by search engines. If the user happens to construct a query that yields satisfactory results, there is no mechanism by which he can share that query with other users who wish to do the same or a similar search. Likewise, there is no mechanism for users to review input from others as they attempt to construct queries that will cause the search engine to return the desired results. Search engines do not allow users to learn from one another, or to take advantage of successful searches conducted by one another. The objective of search engines is not simply to provide lists of links to documents, but ultimately to provide access to the most relevant information to users in response to their queries. Conventional search engines provide primarily a ranked list of hyperlinks to Web pages that are determined by computer algorithms to be relevant. Users looking for answers to questions about a subject area must follow those hyperlinks and search around on those Web sites for the information they are seeking.
  • Search engines do not return information about the subject, or direct answers to questions in addition to links to Web sites.
  • search engines have a difficult time disambiguating between different concepts that can be described by the same query term.
  • the query 'star wars' may refer both to the movie 'Star Wars' and to the Strategic Defense Initiative.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of one possible architecture of a client/search engine relationship.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of a prior art method of a search engine user to obtain a set of search results from the submitted search query.
  • FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of an exemplary process of this invention as may be utilized in embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 is an exemplary illustration of the client computer 105 shown in FIG.l
  • FIG. 5 is an exemplary illustration of another possible interface for the search engine user to interact with to specify their intent relating to the content selected or to the search query itself.
  • This interface is designed to allow the user to construct a search query designed to add or remove content relating to a category of information instead of specific content.
  • FIG. 6 is an exemplary illustration of how an exemplary interface may be displayed for the user on an exemplary search engine.
  • FIG.7 is a block diagram of an exemplary computer system as may be utilized in embodiments of the invention.

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé permettant d'aider un utilisateur dans sa recherche sur Internet ou sur un autre réseau. L'utilisateur sélectionne un contenu à partir d'un ensemble de résultats de recherche au moment où une interface graphique lui est présentée. Par son interaction avec l'interface présentée, l'utilisateur transmet son intention concernant le contenu sélectionné, qui est ensuite ajoutée pour la recherche courante, permettant de renvoyer un nouvel ensemble de résultats. L'utilisateur peut répéter ce processus autant de fois que nécessaire.
PCT/US2008/052239 2007-01-26 2008-01-29 Interface permettant d'aider à la construction de demandes de recherche WO2008092171A2 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US88665607P 2007-01-26 2007-01-26
US60/886,656 2007-01-26
US94744207P 2007-07-01 2007-07-01
US60/947,442 2007-07-01

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2008092171A2 true WO2008092171A2 (fr) 2008-07-31
WO2008092171A3 WO2008092171A3 (fr) 2008-10-09
WO2008092171A8 WO2008092171A8 (fr) 2008-12-18

Family

ID=39645234

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2008/052239 WO2008092171A2 (fr) 2007-01-26 2008-01-29 Interface permettant d'aider à la construction de demandes de recherche

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2008092171A2 (fr)

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6523022B1 (en) * 1997-06-09 2003-02-18 Allen Hobbs Method and apparatus for selectively augmenting retrieved information from a network resource
US20050125397A1 (en) * 2003-12-04 2005-06-09 William Gross Transparent search engine
US20060294094A1 (en) * 2004-02-15 2006-12-28 King Martin T Processing techniques for text capture from a rendered document
US20070005576A1 (en) * 2005-06-29 2007-01-04 Microsoft Corporation Search engine user interface
US20070005581A1 (en) * 2004-06-25 2007-01-04 Yan Arrouye Methods and systems for managing data

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6523022B1 (en) * 1997-06-09 2003-02-18 Allen Hobbs Method and apparatus for selectively augmenting retrieved information from a network resource
US20050125397A1 (en) * 2003-12-04 2005-06-09 William Gross Transparent search engine
US20060294094A1 (en) * 2004-02-15 2006-12-28 King Martin T Processing techniques for text capture from a rendered document
US20070005581A1 (en) * 2004-06-25 2007-01-04 Yan Arrouye Methods and systems for managing data
US20070005576A1 (en) * 2005-06-29 2007-01-04 Microsoft Corporation Search engine user interface

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2008092171A3 (fr) 2008-10-09
WO2008092171A8 (fr) 2008-12-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20090193352A1 (en) Interface for assisting in the construction of search queries
EP2546766B1 (fr) Case de recherche dynamique de navigateur web
US8868539B2 (en) Search equalizer
US7840589B1 (en) Systems and methods for using lexically-related query elements within a dynamic object for semantic search refinement and navigation
US7747639B2 (en) Alternative search query prediction
US7693912B2 (en) Methods for navigating collections of information in varying levels of detail
US7516124B2 (en) Interactive search engine
US9613132B2 (en) Method of and system for displaying a plurality of user-selectable refinements to a search query
US10133823B2 (en) Automatically providing relevant search results based on user behavior
US9015175B2 (en) Method and system for filtering an information resource displayed with an electronic device
US20070100915A1 (en) Methods for displaying dynamic suggestions in a user interface
EP2109050A1 (fr) Affichage facilité d'un nuage interactif et dynamique des termes associés à un ou plusieurs termes d'entrée
US20060248078A1 (en) Search engine with suggestion tool and method of using same
US20020161752A1 (en) Apparatus for and method of searching
WO2009117830A1 (fr) Système et procédé pour extension de requêtes par info-bulles
US20230117568A1 (en) Knowledge attributes and passage information based interactive next query recommendation
EP2189917A1 (fr) Affichage facilité d'un nuage interactif et dynamique avec des publicités et des fonctions de domaine
Rahdari et al. Controlling Personalized Recommendations in Two Dimensions with a Carousel-Based Interface.
WO2008092171A2 (fr) Interface permettant d'aider à la construction de demandes de recherche
JP7467536B2 (ja) 進行中のタスクのためのコンテンツをサジェストするアクション要素の生成
WO2023069176A1 (fr) Recommandation interactive de requête suivante basée sur des attributs de connaissances et des informations de passage
Lieke Accessibility, usability and SEO: A study on social inclusiveness
Byrd et al. Clarifying Search

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 08714057

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

NENP Non-entry into the national phase in:

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 08714057

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2