WO2008091523A1 - Transparent paper and method of making same - Google Patents

Transparent paper and method of making same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2008091523A1
WO2008091523A1 PCT/US2008/000608 US2008000608W WO2008091523A1 WO 2008091523 A1 WO2008091523 A1 WO 2008091523A1 US 2008000608 W US2008000608 W US 2008000608W WO 2008091523 A1 WO2008091523 A1 WO 2008091523A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
microperforations
paper substrate
transparent
transparent field
field
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2008/000608
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Pauline Ozoemena Ukpabi
Original Assignee
Appleton Papers Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Appleton Papers Inc. filed Critical Appleton Papers Inc.
Priority to EP08724570A priority Critical patent/EP2102006A1/en
Priority to CA002670586A priority patent/CA2670586A1/en
Publication of WO2008091523A1 publication Critical patent/WO2008091523A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21HPULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H27/00Special paper not otherwise provided for, e.g. made by multi-step processes
    • D21H27/06Vegetable or imitation parchment; Glassine paper
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21HPULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H25/00After-treatment of paper not provided for in groups D21H17/00 - D21H23/00
    • D21H25/04Physical treatment, e.g. heating, irradiating
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/24Structurally defined web or sheet [e.g., overall dimension, etc.]
    • Y10T428/24273Structurally defined web or sheet [e.g., overall dimension, etc.] including aperture
    • Y10T428/24322Composite web or sheet
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/24Structurally defined web or sheet [e.g., overall dimension, etc.]
    • Y10T428/24355Continuous and nonuniform or irregular surface on layer or component [e.g., roofing, etc.]
    • Y10T428/24364Continuous and nonuniform or irregular surface on layer or component [e.g., roofing, etc.] with transparent or protective coating

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to paper generally. More particularly, the present invention also relates to secure substrates and generally to the field of transparent substrates, anti-counterfeiting and authentication devices and methods.
  • Manufacture of these papers can involve processes such as calendaring and embossing.
  • transparentizing of paper is accomplished by treating the paper substrate with a transparentizing material and curing the transparentizing material using heat, uv or other curing methods to help prevent migration of the transparentizing material from the application site.
  • Resins such as acrylic, polyester and urethane are typically used as the transparentizing medium as described in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,902,770; 5,849,398; 5,055,354; 4,569,888; 4,513,056; 4,416,950; and 4,271,227.
  • Solvents such as petroleum hydrocarbons, oils and waxes may also be used to impart transparency.
  • a typical example is found in the production of true vegetable parchment paper using sulfuric acid solution.
  • These transparentizing materials are typically applied as a solvent mixture to penetrate, infuse or coat the paper and impart transparency.
  • a variety of secure documents are known used in bank notes, credit cards, tickets, title documents, and similar instruments of value.
  • a variety of security tokens or authentication devices are also known.
  • a security token comprising a laminate of at least two layers of plastic sheeting. Positioned between the sheeting is an optically variable device such as a diffraction grating, liquid crystal, moire patterns and similar patterns produced by cross-gratings with or without superimposed, refractive, lenticular and transparent grids. These devices yield variable interference patterns.
  • an optically variable device such as a diffraction grating, liquid crystal, moire patterns and similar patterns produced by cross-gratings with or without superimposed, refractive, lenticular and transparent grids.
  • Amidror et al. U.S. Patent Nos. 5,995,618; 6,819,775; and 7,058,202 teach methods for authenticating documents using the intensity profile of moire patterns.
  • the present invention is a novel paper substrate having a transparent field, the transparent field comprising an array of a plurality of laser-formed microperforations separated by a land area, the array of microperforations having a density rate of at least 1200 microperforations per square centimeter, the land area separating adjacent microperforations being at least 50 microns and not exceeding 600 microns.
  • the transparent field is a close packed array of a plurality of laser microperforations having a density rate of at least 2000 microperforations per square centimeter with each individual microperforation being of less than 150 microns.
  • the spacing between adjacent microperforations can be not less than 20 and preferably not more than 600 microns.
  • the array of a plurality of microperforations is at a density rate of at least 3200 microperforations per square centimeter.
  • the paper substrate comprises a paper with a transparent field wherein in the array of a plurality of laser formed microperforations, each of the microperforations is spaced such that the microperforations create a lensing effect when two transparent fields are overlaid.
  • the microperforations consist of an array of one or more complex shapes designed so as not to be easily reproducible manually.
  • the paper substrate has a transparent field, the transparent field comprising an array of a plurality of laser-formed microperforations separated by a land area, the array of microperforations having a density rate of at least 1200, more preferably 2000 microperforation per square centimeter, the percent transmittance of the transparent field being at least 70% as measured by ASTM test method D 1726-03.
  • the paper substrate has a semitransparent watermark field, the semitransparent watermark field comprising an array of a plurality of laser-formed partial ablations separated by raised land areas, the array of partial ablations having a density rate of at least 1200 partial ablations per square centimeter.
  • Figure 1 is a micrograph of a transparent field comprising a close packed array of a plurality of laser-formed microperforations at a density rate of 20,000 microperforations per square centimeter according to the invention and a magnification of 4OX.
  • Figure 2 is a graphic representation of a laser formed transparent field according to the invention.
  • Figure 3 is a photographic reproduction of a paper with a transparent field overlaid over a second sheet. A puzzle shaped piece is visible in the transparent field.
  • Figure 4 is a photographic reproduction of a paper with a transparent field according to the invention.
  • the present invention teaches a transparent paper.
  • the present invention is a paper substrate having a transparent field.
  • the transparent field is integral to the document itself though as will be apparent to the skilled artisan, in alternative embodiments it can be applied onto the substrate or laminated or glued or otherwise attached.
  • the present invention is a paper substrate having an integral transparent field.
  • the transparent field is an array of a plurality of close- packed laser-formed microperforations.
  • the array is a dense field having a density rate of at least 1200 microperforations per square centimeter.
  • density rate it is meant that the density of microperforations if continued to fill a one centimeter by one centimeter area, the number of microperforations in such area would equal at least the stated density rate.
  • the transparent field of the paper substrate is surprisingly achieved through use of dense packed or close packed microperforations formed using a laser system.
  • a CO 2 laser system would usually be employed for best results.
  • other laser systems including UV and fiber lasers would yield similar results.
  • the microperforations are applied in sufficient density to transparentize the paper yet leaving sufficient fiber as wall material or land area such that sufficient strength characteristics of the paper are retained.
  • the paper can be transparentized with the laser to impart visibility characteristics similar to glassine while retaining the integrity of the paper stock in the transparentized field.
  • a paper of from 30 to 150 grams or higher per sq meter Useful papers can be from 2 to about 300 grams per square meter. Uniform fiber and filler distributions in the substrate are desirable to yield consistent transparencies across the substrate. Lighter weight paper substrates tend to be easier to perforate/transparentize. The degree of transparency is believed to be inversely related to paper thickness and directly related to the density of microperforations and the distance between perforations. As a thicker paper is selected, the level of transparency obtained via microperforations tends to be of a lesser degree. For a given substrate, however, the higher the density of the microperforations, the more transparent and the weaker the transparent area becomes.
  • the paper substrate can be anywhere from about 10 to 400 grams per square meter and preferably 30 to 150 grams per square meter. More preferably writing stock weight or bond weight is employed. Such papers are typically of from 30 to 75 grams per square meter or higher, such as up to 100 grams per square meter. Thicknesses are generally from 30 to 150 microns and preferably from about 60 to 100 microns, and more preferably from 60 to 90 microns. The selection of weight and thickness depends on the intended end use application. [0024] It is important that the land area between adjacent microperforations be kept from 20 to 700 microns, and preferably 20 to 500 microns and more preferably 20 to 400 microns. Similarly the land area between adjacent rows should be within such ranges.
  • the land area between adjacent rows is kept constant while varying the dimensions of the perforations, one observes that the larger perforations yield substrates with a higher degree of transparency.
  • a typical example is seen in a substrate with a land area of 400 microns between perforations with one set of perforations being 100 microns in diameter and the other set being 50 microns in diameter.
  • the 50 micron sized perforated area is about 50 - 80% less transparent than the 100 micron sized perforated area in this case.
  • microperforations are circular though other shapes are possible providing the density of the close-packed microperforations can be preserved.
  • the actual number or density of microperforations may differ.
  • the shape of the field, rather than being a circle may be in the shape of a square or other shape.
  • the density rate or concentration of microperforations in the areas perforated would be about the stated rate.
  • the density rate can be thought of in terms of the frequency of the occurrence of microperforations in the theoretical one square centimeter area.
  • the density of microperforations is at least 1200 microperforations per square centimeter, preferably at least 1500 microperforations per square centimeter, and more preferably at least 8000 microperforations per square centimeter and desirably at least 3200 microperforations per square centimeter.
  • Transparency of greater than 70% is perceivable at at least 4000 microperforations per square centimeter. Surprisingly the paper retains sufficient strength in the transparent field that it can function as a glassine window, a security element, or even a writing surface.
  • the individual microperforations are usually less than 150 microns in diameter usefully less than 120 microns, and preferably 100 microns or less and more preferably 50 microns or less.
  • An important aspect to achieve transparentizing of the paper substrate is to control or select the power of the impinging laser and beam width so as to avoid excessive heat buildup which can result in browning or charring of the substrate.
  • a suction means such as vacuum to draw off outgassing from the substrate surface.
  • an inert atmosphere or gas flow can be supplied in the area of the laser perforating or ablating to further minimize charring or discoloration, and to help cool the substrate.
  • FIG. 2 depicts a typical pattern of microperforations for transparentizing applications. There are five rows and seven columns of holes shown in the diagram. Each hole is X microns in radius and the distance between two adjacent holes in a row or in a column is Y microns. Alternatively, each row or column can be separately spaced or if desirable the spacing need not be orderly. The distance between adjacent holes in rows 1 and 2 is Z microns (or from the center of one hole to the next would be 2X + Z microns). The number of holes per square inch can depend on the values of X, Y and Z in an orderly arrangement. Differing sizes can optionally be employed, for a particular application. [0032] In Figure 2, microperforation A is shown immediately adjacent to microperforation B. Microperforation C in this pattern would be considered remote and not immediately adjacent to microperforation A for purposes of the formula 2X +
  • An advantage of the use of microperforations integral to the paper itself is that the paper retains strength even in the areas appearing transparent.
  • the paper could be optionally further strengthened via saturation or coating with latex or polymeric resin, or lamination to a second substrate.
  • the saturation latex or strengthening polymer can be selected from various polymeric or film forming materials including various synthetic or natural resins, varnishes, acrylates, methacrylates, urethanes, phenol-formaldehyde polymers, urea-formaldehyde polymers, vinyl resins such as polyvinyl alcohol, starches, methyl or ethyl cellulose emulsion, silane modified acrylates such as taught in U.S. Patent
  • Latex stabilization can ensure that the base paper has the requisite strength for the intended end use.
  • the transparent area also serves as a security feature depending on the design of the perforations (holes, squares, or other complex structures).
  • the design preferably is selected to be such that it cannot be easily reproduced manually or otherwise.
  • the transparent field itself can take on a variety of shapes such as square or rectangular, circular or other fanciful shape.
  • the transparent field can be a stripe or ribbon or lace pattern across the length or width of the sheet or web. Creating the transparent field as a stripe (understood for purpose hereof to include ribbon or lace patterns, or multiple stripes, lines or combinations thereof) can create a security paper which is a more economical substitute or replacement for windowing or a windowed thread.
  • the thread portion becomes optional since the pattern of the transparent field as a stripe can be sufficiently original so as to make the use of thread for windowing applications as optional. Additionally, the laser formed transparent field is difficult to recreate by conventional non-laser techniques making even simple transparent fields difficult to counterfeit.
  • the transparency level can be optionally selected to be of a lesser or higher degree.
  • the transparent area can also act as a self-authentication system. This self authentication is achieved via layering of two transparent areas to produce a lensing effect which would allow verification of perforation size and separation.
  • the lensing effect can be an observable optical effect such as wavelength interference or a diffraction pattern.
  • a simple magnifier may also be used for verification of the perforation size and separation.
  • a convenient way to measure transparency is to adapt test methods such as ASTM D 1746-03. This method describes calculating the percent transmittance as a ratio of the light intensity with a specimen, here the transparent field, being placed in the beam and compared to the light intensity with no specimen in the beam.
  • the transparent field of the invention yields transparent fields having at least 70%, preferably at least 80%, and more preferably at least 90% transmittance.

Landscapes

  • Credit Cards Or The Like (AREA)

Abstract

The invention teaches a novel paper substrate having a transparent field of a dense array of a plurality of laser-formed microperforations. The resultant paper can be useful as a replacement for glassine paper, and can be useful in secure documents. The transparent field is integral to the paper substrate and can be formed by laser techniques surprisingly resulting in a transparent field retaining acceptable strength characteristics after lasing. The transparent field acts as a self authentication device.

Description

TRANSPARENT PAPER AND METHOD OF MAKING SAME
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to paper generally. More particularly, the present invention also relates to secure substrates and generally to the field of transparent substrates, anti-counterfeiting and authentication devices and methods.
DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART
[0002] A variety of transparent, glassine and cellophane papers are known.
Manufacture of these papers can involve processes such as calendaring and embossing. Typically, however, transparentizing of paper is accomplished by treating the paper substrate with a transparentizing material and curing the transparentizing material using heat, uv or other curing methods to help prevent migration of the transparentizing material from the application site. Resins such as acrylic, polyester and urethane are typically used as the transparentizing medium as described in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,902,770; 5,849,398; 5,055,354; 4,569,888; 4,513,056; 4,416,950; and 4,271,227. Solvents such as petroleum hydrocarbons, oils and waxes may also be used to impart transparency. A typical example is found in the production of true vegetable parchment paper using sulfuric acid solution. These transparentizing materials are typically applied as a solvent mixture to penetrate, infuse or coat the paper and impart transparency.
[0003] Such chemical treatments to achieve transparency have their limitations and often such resin-treated substrates are difficult to recycle. [0004] Often, transparent papers such as glassine papers must be cut and separately attached to an envelope window opening by gluing or other fastening means.
[0005] Separate cutting and gluing steps are needed to utilize the transparent papers since the transparent regions are not integral to the balance of the paper. The transparent components must typically be separately applied.
[0006] A variety of secure documents are known used in bank notes, credit cards, tickets, title documents, and similar instruments of value. A variety of security tokens or authentication devices are also known.
[0007] Australian Patent No. 488,652 (Application No. 73762/74) filed
September 26, 1973 by Sefton Davidson Hamann et al., assigned to the
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization teaches a security token comprising a laminate of at least two layers of plastic sheeting. Positioned between the sheeting is an optically variable device such as a diffraction grating, liquid crystal, moire patterns and similar patterns produced by cross-gratings with or without superimposed, refractive, lenticular and transparent grids. These devices yield variable interference patterns.
[0008] Amidror et al., U.S. Patent Nos. 5,995,618; 6,819,775; and 7,058,202 teach methods for authenticating documents using the intensity profile of moire patterns. The various dot screens and perforations taught in Amidror while useful as authentication devices, however do not teach formation of transparent papers, or replacements for glassine paper. [0009] It is an object of the present invention to teach a distinctive form of a document or token with a transparent field that is difficult to reproduce using xerographic methods and a method of making same. Structural aspects of the substrate are often more difficult to reproduce by xerography and therefore provide an elevated level of security.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0010] The present invention is a novel paper substrate having a transparent field, the transparent field comprising an array of a plurality of laser-formed microperforations separated by a land area, the array of microperforations having a density rate of at least 1200 microperforations per square centimeter, the land area separating adjacent microperforations being at least 50 microns and not exceeding 600 microns. In an alternative embodiment, the transparent field is a close packed array of a plurality of laser microperforations having a density rate of at least 2000 microperforations per square centimeter with each individual microperforation being of less than 150 microns. The spacing between adjacent microperforations can be not less than 20 and preferably not more than 600 microns. Desirably the array of a plurality of microperforations is at a density rate of at least 3200 microperforations per square centimeter. In a yet further embodiment the paper substrate comprises a paper with a transparent field wherein in the array of a plurality of laser formed microperforations, each of the microperforations is spaced such that the microperforations create a lensing effect when two transparent fields are overlaid. [0011] Alternatively, the microperforations consist of an array of one or more complex shapes designed so as not to be easily reproducible manually. [0012] In a yet further embodiment the paper substrate has a transparent field, the transparent field comprising an array of a plurality of laser-formed microperforations separated by a land area, the array of microperforations having a density rate of at least 1200, more preferably 2000 microperforation per square centimeter, the percent transmittance of the transparent field being at least 70% as measured by ASTM test method D 1726-03.
[0013] In a yet alternative embodiment, the paper substrate has a semitransparent watermark field, the semitransparent watermark field comprising an array of a plurality of laser-formed partial ablations separated by raised land areas, the array of partial ablations having a density rate of at least 1200 partial ablations per square centimeter.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0014] Figure 1 is a micrograph of a transparent field comprising a close packed array of a plurality of laser-formed microperforations at a density rate of 20,000 microperforations per square centimeter according to the invention and a magnification of 4OX.
[0015] Figure 2 is a graphic representation of a laser formed transparent field according to the invention.
[0016] Figure 3 is a photographic reproduction of a paper with a transparent field overlaid over a second sheet. A puzzle shaped piece is visible in the transparent field.
[0017] Figure 4 is a photographic reproduction of a paper with a transparent field according to the invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0018] The present invention teaches a transparent paper. In a preferred embodiment the present invention is a paper substrate having a transparent field. [0019] Preferably the transparent field is integral to the document itself though as will be apparent to the skilled artisan, in alternative embodiments it can be applied onto the substrate or laminated or glued or otherwise attached. [0020] In one desirable form, the present invention is a paper substrate having an integral transparent field. The transparent field is an array of a plurality of close- packed laser-formed microperforations. The array is a dense field having a density rate of at least 1200 microperforations per square centimeter. By "density rate" it is meant that the density of microperforations if continued to fill a one centimeter by one centimeter area, the number of microperforations in such area would equal at least the stated density rate.
[0021] The transparent field of the paper substrate is surprisingly achieved through use of dense packed or close packed microperforations formed using a laser system. A CO2 laser system would usually be employed for best results. However, other laser systems including UV and fiber lasers would yield similar results. The microperforations are applied in sufficient density to transparentize the paper yet leaving sufficient fiber as wall material or land area such that sufficient strength characteristics of the paper are retained. Surprisingly the paper can be transparentized with the laser to impart visibility characteristics similar to glassine while retaining the integrity of the paper stock in the transparentized field.
[0022] To achieve transparent paper or paper with a transparent field it is useful to preferably select a paper of from 30 to 150 grams or higher per sq meter. Useful papers can be from 2 to about 300 grams per square meter. Uniform fiber and filler distributions in the substrate are desirable to yield consistent transparencies across the substrate. Lighter weight paper substrates tend to be easier to perforate/transparentize. The degree of transparency is believed to be inversely related to paper thickness and directly related to the density of microperforations and the distance between perforations. As a thicker paper is selected, the level of transparency obtained via microperforations tends to be of a lesser degree. For a given substrate, however, the higher the density of the microperforations, the more transparent and the weaker the transparent area becomes. Any weakness however can be effectively offset with the use of a saturation latex or strengthening polymer, if desired or needed. In a situation where a lighter weight substrate is perforated under the same conditions as a heavier weight (thicker) substrate, the lighter weight substrate hole dimensions tend to be slightly larger than the heavier weight substrate hole dimensions. Appropriate beam intensity adjustment can lead to similarity in hole dimensions. It should be noted that both synthetic and regular paper substrates can be transparentized using this process. A highly filled polyester synthetic paper, for instance, yields excellent results.
[0023] The paper substrate can be anywhere from about 10 to 400 grams per square meter and preferably 30 to 150 grams per square meter. More preferably writing stock weight or bond weight is employed. Such papers are typically of from 30 to 75 grams per square meter or higher, such as up to 100 grams per square meter. Thicknesses are generally from 30 to 150 microns and preferably from about 60 to 100 microns, and more preferably from 60 to 90 microns. The selection of weight and thickness depends on the intended end use application. [0024] It is important that the land area between adjacent microperforations be kept from 20 to 700 microns, and preferably 20 to 500 microns and more preferably 20 to 400 microns. Similarly the land area between adjacent rows should be within such ranges. If the land area between adjacent rows is kept constant while varying the dimensions of the perforations, one observes that the larger perforations yield substrates with a higher degree of transparency. A typical example is seen in a substrate with a land area of 400 microns between perforations with one set of perforations being 100 microns in diameter and the other set being 50 microns in diameter. The 50 micron sized perforated area is about 50 - 80% less transparent than the 100 micron sized perforated area in this case.
[0025] Preferably the microperforations are circular though other shapes are possible providing the density of the close-packed microperforations can be preserved.
[0026] If other shapes are used, the actual number or density of microperforations may differ. For example the shape of the field, rather than being a circle may be in the shape of a square or other shape. The density rate or concentration of microperforations in the areas perforated would be about the stated rate. The density rate can be thought of in terms of the frequency of the occurrence of microperforations in the theoretical one square centimeter area. [0027] The density of microperforations is at least 1200 microperforations per square centimeter, preferably at least 1500 microperforations per square centimeter, and more preferably at least 8000 microperforations per square centimeter and desirably at least 3200 microperforations per square centimeter. Transparency of greater than 70% is perceivable at at least 4000 microperforations per square centimeter. Surprisingly the paper retains sufficient strength in the transparent field that it can function as a glassine window, a security element, or even a writing surface.
[0028] The individual microperforations are usually less than 150 microns in diameter usefully less than 120 microns, and preferably 100 microns or less and more preferably 50 microns or less.
[0029] It can be desirable to use microperforations approaching 300 to 800 nanometer sizes for specific transparentizing applications.
[0030] An important aspect to achieve transparentizing of the paper substrate is to control or select the power of the impinging laser and beam width so as to avoid excessive heat buildup which can result in browning or charring of the substrate. To further reduce discoloration it can be advantageous to equip the laser system with a suction means such as vacuum to draw off outgassing from the substrate surface. If desired an inert atmosphere or gas flow can be supplied in the area of the laser perforating or ablating to further minimize charring or discoloration, and to help cool the substrate.
[0031] Figure 2 depicts a typical pattern of microperforations for transparentizing applications. There are five rows and seven columns of holes shown in the diagram. Each hole is X microns in radius and the distance between two adjacent holes in a row or in a column is Y microns. Alternatively, each row or column can be separately spaced or if desirable the spacing need not be orderly. The distance between adjacent holes in rows 1 and 2 is Z microns (or from the center of one hole to the next would be 2X + Z microns). The number of holes per square inch can depend on the values of X, Y and Z in an orderly arrangement. Differing sizes can optionally be employed, for a particular application. [0032] In Figure 2, microperforation A is shown immediately adjacent to microperforation B. Microperforation C in this pattern would be considered remote and not immediately adjacent to microperforation A for purposes of the formula 2X +
Z.
[0033] An advantage of the use of microperforations integral to the paper itself is that the paper retains strength even in the areas appearing transparent. To further reinforce the paper, the paper could be optionally further strengthened via saturation or coating with latex or polymeric resin, or lamination to a second substrate.
[0034] The saturation latex or strengthening polymer can be selected from various polymeric or film forming materials including various synthetic or natural resins, varnishes, acrylates, methacrylates, urethanes, phenol-formaldehyde polymers, urea-formaldehyde polymers, vinyl resins such as polyvinyl alcohol, starches, methyl or ethyl cellulose emulsion, silane modified acrylates such as taught in U.S. Patent
No. 3,951,893, and various solvent or aqueous based coatings known to the art. Latex stabilization can ensure that the base paper has the requisite strength for the intended end use.
[0035] The transparent area also serves as a security feature depending on the design of the perforations (holes, squares, or other complex structures). The design preferably is selected to be such that it cannot be easily reproduced manually or otherwise.
[0036] The combination of size and separation between perforations results in a unique or highly secure system for many end use applications. [0037] Similarly, the transparent field itself can take on a variety of shapes such as square or rectangular, circular or other fanciful shape. In an alternative embodiment, the transparent field can be a stripe or ribbon or lace pattern across the length or width of the sheet or web. Creating the transparent field as a stripe (understood for purpose hereof to include ribbon or lace patterns, or multiple stripes, lines or combinations thereof) can create a security paper which is a more economical substitute or replacement for windowing or a windowed thread. The thread portion becomes optional since the pattern of the transparent field as a stripe can be sufficiently original so as to make the use of thread for windowing applications as optional. Additionally, the laser formed transparent field is difficult to recreate by conventional non-laser techniques making even simple transparent fields difficult to counterfeit. When the transparent field is used as a replacement for windowing, the transparency level can be optionally selected to be of a lesser or higher degree. [0038] The transparent area can also act as a self-authentication system. This self authentication is achieved via layering of two transparent areas to produce a lensing effect which would allow verification of perforation size and separation. The lensing effect can be an observable optical effect such as wavelength interference or a diffraction pattern. A simple magnifier may also be used for verification of the perforation size and separation.
[0039] A convenient way to measure transparency is to adapt test methods such as ASTM D 1746-03. This method describes calculating the percent transmittance as a ratio of the light intensity with a specimen, here the transparent field, being placed in the beam and compared to the light intensity with no specimen in the beam. The transparent field of the invention yields transparent fields having at least 70%, preferably at least 80%, and more preferably at least 90% transmittance.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A paper substrate having a transparent field, the transparent field comprising
an array of a plurality of laser- formed microperforations separated by a land area, the
array of microperforations having a density rate of at least 1200 microperforations per
square centimeter, the land area separating adjacent microperforations being at least 50 microns and not exceeding 600 microns.
2 The paper substrate according to claim 1 wherein the transparent field is a close packed array of a plurality of laser microperforations having a density rate of at least 2000 microperforation per square centimeter;
each individual microperforation being of less than 150 microns;
the spacing between adjacent microperforations being not less than 20 and not more than 600 microns; and
the array of a plurality of microperforations being at a density rate of at least 3200 microperforations per square centimeter.
3. The paper substrate having a transparent field according to claim 1 wherein in the array of a plurality of laser formed microperforations, each of the microperforations is spaced such that the microperforations create a lensing effect when two transparent fields are overlaid.
4. The paper substrate according to claim 1 having a transparent field wherein
the microperforations consist of an array of one or more complex shapes designed so as not to be easily reproducible manually.
5. The paper substrate having a transparent field according to claim 1 such that
the transparent areas comprise self authenticating structures.
6. The paper substrate according to claim 1 wherein at least the transparent field includes in addition a latex material applied to the substrate to strengthen the paper.
7. The paper substrate according to claim 1 wherein the distance between immediately adjacent microperforations is Z and the distance between centers of adjacent holes is 2X + Z, wherein X is the radius of each of the adjacent holes.
8. The paper substrate according to claim 1 wherein the transparent field is a square or rectangular area.
9. The paper substrate according to claim 1 wherein the transparent field is a stripe across a width or length of the paper substrate.
10. The paper substrate according to claim 1 wherein the authentication field is in the shape of alphanumeric characters.
11. The paper substrate according to claim 1 wherein the transparent field is a geometric or artistic shape.
12. The paper substrate according to claim 1 wherein a backing sheet is laminated to the paper substrate, the backing sheet being visible through the transparent field.
13. A paper substrate having a transparent field, the transparent field comprising an array of a plurality of laser-formed microperforations separated by a land area, the array of microperforations having a density rate of at least 1200 microperforation per square centimeter, the percent transmittance of the transparent field being at least 70% as measured by ASTM test method D 1726-03.
14. The paper substrate according to claim 13 wherein the transparent field is a close packed array of a plurality of laser microperforations having a density rate of at least 2000 microperforation per square centimeter.
15. The paper substrate having a transparent field according to claim 13 wherein the array of a plurality of laser formed microperforations, each of the microperforations is spaced such that the microperforations create lensing effect when two transparent fields are overlaid.
16. The paper substrate according to claim 13 having a transparent field wherein the microperforations consist of an array of one or more complex shapes designed so as not to be easily reproducible manually.
17. The paper substrate having a transparent field according to claim 13 wherein the transparent areas comprise self-authenticating structures.
18. The paper substrate according to claim 13 wherein at least the transparent field includes in addition a latex material applied to the substrate to strengthen the paper.
19. The paper substrate according to claim 13 wherein the distance between immediately adjacent microperforations is Z and the distance between centers of adjacent holes is 2X + Z, wherein X is the distance between adjacent holes.
20. The paper substrate according to claim 13 wherein the transparent field is a square or rectangular area.
21. The paper substrate according to claim 13 wherein the transparent field is a stripe across the width or length of the paper substrate.
22. The paper substrate according to claim 13 wherein the transparent field is in the shape of alphanumeric characters.
23. The paper substrate according to claim 13 wherein the transparent field is selected from a geometric, artistic or ribbon shape.
24. The paper substrate according to claim 13 wherein a backing sheet is laminated to the paper substrate, the backing sheet being visible through the transparent field.
25. A paper substrate having a semitransparent watermark field, the semitransparent watermark field comprising an array of a plurality of laser formed partial ablation separated by raised land areas, the array of partial ablations having a density rate of at least 1200 partial ablations per square centimeter.
PCT/US2008/000608 2007-01-19 2008-01-17 Transparent paper and method of making same WO2008091523A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP08724570A EP2102006A1 (en) 2007-01-19 2008-01-17 Transparent paper and method of making same
CA002670586A CA2670586A1 (en) 2007-01-19 2008-01-17 Transparent paper and method of making same

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/655,101 2007-01-19
US11/655,101 US20080176037A1 (en) 2007-01-19 2007-01-19 Transparent paper and method of making same

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2008091523A1 true WO2008091523A1 (en) 2008-07-31

Family

ID=39641536

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2008/000608 WO2008091523A1 (en) 2007-01-19 2008-01-17 Transparent paper and method of making same

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US20080176037A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2102006A1 (en)
CA (1) CA2670586A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2008091523A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2010094838A1 (en) * 2009-02-20 2010-08-26 Laminating Papers Oy Method for the production of an impregnate provided with markings, a board coated with the impregnate, and use of the impregnate in a concrete casting mould
WO2023150812A1 (en) 2022-02-11 2023-08-17 Mondi Ag Transparent paper

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FI122332B (en) * 2008-10-20 2011-12-15 Valtion Teknillinen A fiber product and a method for forming transparent regions in a fiber product
US8479921B2 (en) * 2009-12-09 2013-07-09 Amcor Flexibles, Inc. Child resistant blister package
CN111907143B (en) * 2020-08-25 2022-05-03 温州新意特种纸业有限公司 High oil resistant glassine paper

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4798023A (en) * 1986-02-14 1989-01-17 Stork Perforated Products B.V. Method of controlling environmental conditions in the proximity of vegetation or crops with the aid of protective sheeting, protective sheeting for use in this method, and a protective device comprising sheeting
US6495231B2 (en) * 1994-06-27 2002-12-17 Exxonmobil Oil Corporation Epoxy coated multilayer structure for use in the production of security documents
US20060124239A1 (en) * 2003-02-10 2006-06-15 Colin Marshall Labels and labelling methods

Family Cites Families (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4271227A (en) * 1979-04-26 1981-06-02 Andrews Paper & Chemical Co., Inc. Transparent fibrous sheets and process for making
FR2524026B1 (en) * 1982-03-25 1985-09-13 Arjomari Prioux TRANSPARENTIATED CELLULOSIC MATERIALS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS, THEIR MANUFACTURING METHOD AND THE TRANSPARENT COMPOSITIONS THEREOF
US4416950A (en) * 1982-04-29 1983-11-22 Andrews Paper & Chemical Co. Transparent fibrous sheets
US4569888A (en) * 1984-07-13 1986-02-11 Andrews Paper & Chemical Co., Inc. Transparentized paper sheet
US5055354A (en) * 1989-07-27 1991-10-08 Phomat Reprographics, Inc. Transparentized paper and method for its manufacture
US5995638A (en) * 1995-08-28 1999-11-30 Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne Methods and apparatus for authentication of documents by using the intensity profile of moire patterns
US5919730A (en) * 1996-02-08 1999-07-06 Eastman Kodak Company Copy restrictive documents
US5849398A (en) * 1996-06-28 1998-12-15 Azon Corporation Transparentized medium and process for making same
US5864742A (en) * 1997-04-11 1999-01-26 Eastman Kodak Company Copy restrictive system using microdots to restrict copying of color-reversal documents
US6001516A (en) * 1997-06-12 1999-12-14 Eastman Kodak Company Copy restrictive color-negative photographic print media
US20020117845A1 (en) * 2000-01-03 2002-08-29 Bundesdruckerei Gmbh Security and/or valve document
US7058202B2 (en) * 2002-06-28 2006-06-06 Ecole polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Authentication with built-in encryption by using moire intensity profiles between random layers

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4798023A (en) * 1986-02-14 1989-01-17 Stork Perforated Products B.V. Method of controlling environmental conditions in the proximity of vegetation or crops with the aid of protective sheeting, protective sheeting for use in this method, and a protective device comprising sheeting
US6495231B2 (en) * 1994-06-27 2002-12-17 Exxonmobil Oil Corporation Epoxy coated multilayer structure for use in the production of security documents
US20060124239A1 (en) * 2003-02-10 2006-06-15 Colin Marshall Labels and labelling methods

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2010094838A1 (en) * 2009-02-20 2010-08-26 Laminating Papers Oy Method for the production of an impregnate provided with markings, a board coated with the impregnate, and use of the impregnate in a concrete casting mould
WO2023150812A1 (en) 2022-02-11 2023-08-17 Mondi Ag Transparent paper

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20080176037A1 (en) 2008-07-24
CA2670586A1 (en) 2008-07-31
EP2102006A1 (en) 2009-09-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN101528474B (en) See-through security element with microstructures
RU2321498C2 (en) Method for applying a marking distinguishable by touch onto valuable document, and also valuable document and counterfeiting-protected paper with such marking
DK172640B1 (en) safety Supplies
EP2991839B1 (en) Method of providing a security document with a security feature, and security document
EP1904311B1 (en) Security paper and a method for the production thereof
JP4712192B2 (en) Forgery prevention document and method for forming the same
US20080176037A1 (en) Transparent paper and method of making same
US7905422B2 (en) Relatively small security elements, production method thereof, sheet and security document comprising same
EP2332738A1 (en) Security document with security feature on edge
PH12015502510B1 (en) Method of providing a security document with a security feature, and security document
KR20170023064A (en) Security papers and methods of manufacture
WO2019077316A1 (en) Security documents and methods of manufacture thereof
EP1928669B1 (en) Security device for security substrates
EP3792071B1 (en) Valuable or security product and method for producing the same
KR960012523B1 (en) Security paper for bank notes and the like
RU2417899C2 (en) Element of protection with pattern made by gravure printing method
JP4946404B2 (en) Printed matter
RU2437974C2 (en) Small-sized protective element with through hole and sheet with such elements
JP5223345B2 (en) Image forming body
WO2013143007A1 (en) Perforation-based security feature in a multilayer substrate
JP4910658B2 (en) Printed matter
JP6771020B2 (en) Security element
KR102509867B1 (en) Security sheet comprising watermark
DE102009037236A1 (en) Composite film banknote and method for its production
AU2019314574A1 (en) Arrangement and method for mitigating tear propagation in a document

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 08724570

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2008724570

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2670586

Country of ref document: CA

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE