WO2008084194A1 - Methods and systems for fracturing subterranean wells - Google Patents
Methods and systems for fracturing subterranean wells Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2008084194A1 WO2008084194A1 PCT/GB2007/005011 GB2007005011W WO2008084194A1 WO 2008084194 A1 WO2008084194 A1 WO 2008084194A1 GB 2007005011 W GB2007005011 W GB 2007005011W WO 2008084194 A1 WO2008084194 A1 WO 2008084194A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- fracture
- fracturing
- plan
- fluid
- proppant
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/25—Methods for stimulating production
- E21B43/26—Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures
- E21B43/267—Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures reinforcing fractures by propping
Definitions
- the present application relates to methods and systems for conducting the hydraulic fracturing of subterranean wells, and more particularly to the control of processes related to subterranean hydraulic fracturing used to stimulate the production of hydrocarbon wells, and most especially to real-time and automatic control of fracture propagation and placement of proppant therein.
- Subterranean hydraulic fracturing is conducted to increase or "stimulate" production from a hydrocarbon well.
- high pressure is used to pump special fracturing fluids, including some that contain propping agents ("proppants") down-hole and into a hydrocarbon formation to split or "fracture” the rock formation along veins or planes extending from the well-bore.
- proppants propping agents
- the fluid flow is reversed and the liquid portion of the fracturing fluid is removed.
- the proppants are intentionally left behind to stop the fracture from closing onto itself due to the weight and stresses within the formation.
- the proppants thus literally "prop- apart”, or support the fracture to stay open, yet remain highly permeable to hydrocarbon fluid flow since they form a packed bed of particles with interstitial void space connectivity.
- Sand is one example of a commonly-used proppant.
- the newly-created-and-propped fracture or fractures can thus serve as new formation drainage area and new flow conduits from the formation to the well, providing for an increased fluid flow rate, and hence increased production, of hydrocarbons.
- an optimum result of a fracture includes balancing the width, length, and height of the fracture with the fluid permeability of the formation and fluid conductivity of the propped fracture.
- fracturing models can be used which predict the propagation of fractures through a formation of given mechanical properties in relation the pumped volume, pumping rate, and rheologic properties of the fracturing fluid being used.
- Two-dimensional models such as the Khristianovic-Geertsma-de-Klerk model and the Perkins-Kern-Nordgren model are well-known to those skilled in the art of fracturing. See Chapter 1 of "Mechanics of Hydraulic Fracturing" by Ching H. Yew, 1997, by Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, Texas, ISBN 0- 88415-474-2, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
- At least one perforation is made at a particular down-hole location through the wall of the well casing to provide access to the formation for the fracturing fluid.
- Perforation technologies are well known to those skilled in the art of hydrocarbon well technology.
- the direction of the perforation attempts to determine at least the initial direction of the fracture.
- a first "mini-fracture" test is usually conducted in which a relatively small amount of proppant-free fracturing fluid is pumped into, .the formation to determine and/or confirm at least some of the properties -of the formation, including the permeability of the formation itself.
- Accurately knowing the permeability allows for a prediction of the fluid leak-off rate at various pressures, whereby the amount of fracturing fluid that will flow into the formation can be considered in establishing a pumping and proppant schedule.
- the total amount of fluid to be pumped down-hole is at least the sum of the hold-up of the well, the amount of fluid that fills the fracture, and the amount of fluid that leaks-off into the formation during the fracturing process itself.
- Leak-off rate is an important parameter because once proppant-laden fluid is pumped into the fracture, leak-off can increase the concentration of the proppant in the fracturing fluid beyond a target level.
- Data from the mini- fracture test then is usually used by experts, either on-site or communicating from a distance, to confirm or modify the original desired target profile of the fracture and the process used to achieve the fracture.
- Fracturing then begins in earnest by first pumping proppant-free fluid into the well-bore or through tubing. The fracture is initiated and begins to grow in height, length, and/or width. This first proppant-free stage is usually called the "pre-pad” and consists of a low viscosity fluid. A second fluid pumping stage is usually then conducted of a different viscosity proppant-free fluid called the "pad. " At a particular time in the pumping process, the proppant is then added to the fracturing and propping flow stream using a continuous blending process, and is usually gradually stepped-up in proppant concentration.
- Another common problem for a fracturing process is that the current resulting fracture is of the wrong geometry, orientation, directional positioning, and/or dimensions, or tending to be of the wrong geometry, orientation, directional positioning, or dimensions.
- This type of problem can be related to the inconsistency of subterranean geologic formations such as variable rock or soil properties, variable formation dimensions, or the presence of natural faults or fractures.
- Those skilled in the art of fracturing usually conduct significant pre-fracturing studies such as the mini-fracture test or other investigative techniques.
- a mini-fracture treatment may be insufficiently conducted as to not reach out far enough from the well to detect, fro example, a particular change in rock formations and properties.
- Those conducting fracturing processes can use mapping of the fracture geometry using, for example, tilt-meters.
- U.S. Patent Number 6,935,424 also teaches aspects of fracture mapping.
- Another problem that can result during fracturing is that even though a fracture with correct geometry is formed, the- fracture is not sufficiently- propped, or is inconsistently propped. Thus, the fracture can fully or partially re-close once the hydraulic pressure is released. Or, the proppant is so unevenly distributed that it is not consistently held in place by the formation once the hydraulic pressure is released, i.e. the proppant is "unconsolidated.” So, once the well begins or resumes hydrocarbon flow after fracturing, the proppant can be swept-out of the fracture and carried back up the well in the hydrocarbon flow stream, and possibly damage or plug equipment.
- successful fracturing includes achieving desired fracture dimensions and a desired proppant distribution within the fracture. Because of the complexity of achieving both of these simultaneously, there is a need for real-time control of both fracture formation and proppant placement during a fracturing process to achieve total desired results. And, because of the rising cost of providing expert labor to conduct fracturing operations, there is a need for an automatic control method and system for conducting fracturing processes. Further, as the value of hydrocarbons continues to rise, there is an increasing need for reduction of risk of undesired results associated with fracturing.
- the present application discloses methods and systems for conducting subterranean fracturing for hydrocarbon wells.
- Inputs from fracture sensors and/or fracturing fluid flow stream sensors are monitored and used to estimate the progress of the propagation of a subterranean fracture.
- the progress estimate is exploited in real-time to automatically manipulate surface and/or down-hole physical components providing fracturing and propping fluids to a hydrocarbon well.
- This can be advantageously implemented using a real-time model of the fracture and the proppant distribution therein to determine the error from the desired fracture dimensions and the error from the desired proppant distribution within the fracture.
- the errors can be used by control transforms to derive fracturing and proppant fluid set-points to be used to control processing equipment delivering the fluid.
- Real-time modifications of the fracturing model can be made by comparing fracture sensor measurements of actual fracture dimensions to the predicted dimensions, and then adjusting the model for inaccuracies.
- Real-time updates to the fracturing plan can be made by comparing actual fracture and propping results to desired results, and then adjusting to achieve optimal results.
- the disclosed ideas are used to provide new fracturing and propping control methods and systems by sensing the status of the fracture propagation and automatically controlling the flow rates, compositions, and properties of fracturing and propping fluids.
- the disclosed ideas are used to provide new fracturing and propping control methods and systems by modifying the desired fracture dimensions and desired proppant distribution in real time in response to an unforeseen fracturing and/or propping event or events.
- the disclosed innovations in various embodiments provide one or more of at least the following advantages: • Improved hydrocarbon production from a hydrocarbon well. Improved results of subterranean fracturing whereby the resulting fracture dimensions, directional positioning, orientation, and geometry, and the placement of a proppant within the fracture more closely resemble the desired results.
- Figure 1 shows a preferred embodiment of the present innovations for a method for conducting a fracturing process consistent with the present application.
- Figure 2 shows embodiments of desired fractures consistent with desired fracturing profiles of the present innovations.
- Figure 2A shows an embodiment of the dimensional, directional positioning, orientation, and geometric attributes of a subterranean fracture.
- Figure 2B shows embodiments of fractures consistent with the present innovations.
- FIG. 2C shows embodiments of further fractures consistent with the present innovations.
- Figure 2D shows an embodiment of proppant placement within a fracture consistent with the present innovations.
- Figure 2E shows embodiments of propped fracture widths consistent with the present innovations.
- Figure 3 shows one embodiment of an exemplary subterranean hydrocarbon formation fracturing site, both surface and down-hole, to which the methods and systems of the present innovations can be applied.
- Figure 2 shows four embodiments of desired side-view profiles of resulting subterranean fractures, such as can be formed using the methods and systems of the present innovations, by way of examples, and not of limitations.
- desired fracture profile 292 shows a side view of a subterranean fracture 294 emanating from perforation 293 in hydrocarbon well 290 that is perfectly contained vertically within pay zone (e.g. hydrocarbon- bearing formation or zone) 291. Any extension beyond the pay zone can be undesirable because no extra hydrocarbon-drainage area is opened-up for production and the fracturing time and fluid was wasted in achieving the non- paying fracture portion.
- pay zone e.g. hydrocarbon- bearing formation or zone
- multiple horizontal pay zones or fractures 295 can be accessed and formed from the same hydrocarbon well with the resulting fractures perfectly vertically contained.
- two or more perforations e.g. multiple perforations, can be used to gain increased drainage from a single formation with the resulting formation perfectly contained.
- one or more perforations can be used to create multiple fractures in a single formation or pay zone. The fractures shown in 297 are viewed end-wise rather than from a side view.
- Figure 2A shows dimensional, orientation, directional positioning, and geometric attributes of fractures that can be controlled with the present innovations.
- Fracture 231 is a fracture oriented with its height in the vertical "z" direction 230, with reference to the surface of the earth. Such vertical orientation is the usual orientation resulting during a fracturing process.
- fracture 231 can be oriented horizontally, such that its width 234 is in the vertical direction 230 with its length 235 along the "x" horizontal direction 232 or "y" horizontal direction 236
- fracture 231 can be tilted and not in-line with the orthogonal axes depicted in Figure 2A.
- Width of fracture 234 is the smallest dimension of fracture 231, and usually on the order of magnitude of a fractions of a inch or inches.
- Length of fracture 235 is the dimension of growth generally away from the well.
- a desired fracture can have a generally constant height such that the height runs parallel to the top, and bottom, of a pay zone as shown in fracture 294 in Figure 2.
- the fracture can have a increasing or decreasing or variable height.
- a desired fracture can have a generally constant width.
- the fracture can have a increasing or decreasing or variable width.
- the fracture can consist of multiple fractures that form a network.
- Figure 2B shows top views and side views of embodiments of fractures that can be controlled or avoided using the methods and systems of the present innovations.
- fracture 254A extends out of pay zone 252A along the vertical axis and can be considered undesirable because fracturing fluids are wasted.
- fracture 254B undesirably extends vertically out of the pay zone 252B and into water bearing formation 260.
- fracture 254C forms in an unintended direction and out of the pay zone 252C but has a desirable vertical height.
- the profile of fracture 254C can be considered undesirable.
- Figure 2C shows further embodiments of fractures that can be controlled or avoided using the methods and systems of the present innovations.
- Fracture 254D formed horizontally instead of vertically but is completely within the pay zone 252D.
- fracture 254D can be undesirable.
- Fracture 254E formed in a horizontally-tilted direction but is completely within the pay zone 252E.
- fracture 254E can be ' undesirable.
- Fracture 254F formed in such a manner as one half of the fracture is vertical and the other half is oriented horizontally. In one embodiment, but still completely within pay zone 252F. In one embodiment, fracture 254F can be undesirable.
- Figure 2D shows one embodiment of a desired - proppant placement profile at a particular point in time of a fracturing and proppant process, by way of example and not of limitation, of proppant profiles that can be controlled by the methods and systems of the present innovations.
- a single type of proppant can be distributed in varying concentration within the fracturing fluid down the length of a fracture 212.
- no leak- off is assumed whereby the liquid portion of the fracturing fluids flow into the formation being fractured.
- Fracture 212 is shown extending from only one side of hydrocarbon well 208 for simplicity of illustration. Further, as fracturing and propping fluids are pumped down-hole, their direction of flow is shown as direction 210 within the fracture. For purposes of simple illustration, no other directions of flow are depicted, although many are possible. Additionally for purposes of simple illustration, the fracture is shown as constant height with no concentration gradient in the vertical dimension.
- fracture 212 grows in length.
- Time axis 218 shows the propagation of fracture over time.
- fracture zone 214A is the newest fracture zone but contains the fluid first pumped into the fracture.
- fracture zone 214G is the oldest zone but contains the latest fluid.
- Fracturing and propping fluids pumping schedule 204 shows the variation of proppant concentration 202 in the fracturing flow stream over the duration in pumping time 206 (corresponding to time axis 218) in which fracturing and propping fluids 202A through 202G are pumped into well 208.
- Schedule 204 assumes a constant pumping rate for simplicity of illustration.
- the schedule 204 and the fracture 218 are pictorially aligned such that their time axes are directionally opposite to each other.
- fracturing fluid 204A which has zero proppant, is the first to be pumped and it fills fracture zone 214A, which is the last to be formed.
- the fracturing process depicted in Figure 2B can be continued with a high degree of leak-off into the formation to the extent that virtually all of fracturing fluid 204A is leaked-off into the formation.
- the process can be continued in such a manner as to not only have all of fracturing fluid 204A leak-off into the formation, but that just the correct amounts of the liquid portions of each of fracturing fluids 204B through 204G leak-off into the surrounding formation such that at the moment all of fracturing fluid 204A has leaked-off, the concentration of the proppant across all fluids 204B though 204G are equal. Then, at the moment the concentration of the proppant can be constant across fluids and zones, the hydraulic pressure is released and fracturing is halted.
- the fracture can close upon itself and the liquid portion of the fracturing fluids can leak-off into the formation until the proppant consolidates to a bed such that the packed proppant bed supports or props the fracture.
- the fracture would be uniformly propped with a uniformly packed bed of proppant down the length of fracture 212.
- Proppant placement profiles over time can incorporate different properties including variation of concentration of proppant in three dimensions in space, variation in the size, shape or chemical composition of the proppant, mechanical strength of the proppant. in composition of special ingredients in the propping fluids, in the time special ingredients have been mixed into the fluids, and in temperature of the fluid or fluids within the fracture.
- Figure 2E shows embodiments of propped fracture widths that can be controlled or avoided with the methods and systems of the present innovations.
- the width of all of the proppant particles is assumed constant.
- the flow of a fracturing fluid containing proppant 268 can occur without the proppant collecting and causing a screen-out.
- fracture 262 is desirable.
- a small fracture width 264 the flow of a fracturing fluid containing proppant 268 is impeded because the proppant will collect and wedge in the small width fracture.
- small width fracture 264 is undesirable.
- the flow of a fracturing fluid containing proppant 268 can occur within fracture 266 if the concentration of the proppant is low enough as to not collect to form screen-outs and the rheology of fluid is such that the proppant stays suspended and the fluid itself is not of an excessively high viscosity.
- the methods and systems of the present innovations can simultaneously control the width of the fracture, the concentration of the proppant in the fracturing fluid, and the rheology of the fracturing fluid such that the fracturing process can be continue to be conducted without reaching a maximum operating pressure of the fracturing system whereby the desired fracture dimensions are increased, resulting in higher levels of drainage area being exposed to a hydrocarbon well.
- proppant concentration as well as proppant particle diameter and shape can also be planned to be modified during a pumping schedule such as schedule 24.
- Figure 3 shows a non-limiting embodiment of an exemplary subterranean hydrocarbon formation fracturing site 300 to which the methods and systems of the present innovations can be applied.
- Site 300 can be located on land or on or in a water environment. The embodiment will be described with reference to a land-based site.
- the site can contain one or more proppant stores 303 which contain one or more different proppant types or grades as would be known to one skilled in the art of proppant specification and design.
- the site can contain one or more fluid storage systems 304 for water, solvents, non-aqueous fluids, pad fluids, pre-pad-fluids, viscous fluids for suspending proppants, and liquid components to tailor-make fracturing fluids as would be known to open skilled in the art of fracturing fluid specification and design.
- the site can contain one or more special solid or liquid ingredient stores 306 which have specialized functions in the fracturing and propping processes.
- Blender or blenders 310 can receive the proppants, the fluids and special ingredients to prepare fracturing and propping fluids in various proportions.
- Pump or pumps 314 can pump the fracturing and propping fluids down-hole into hydrocarbon well 316 beneath the surface of the earth 334.
- Components 303, 304, 306, 308, 308A, 308B, 310, 313, 314, 335, and 342 comprise surface components 330.
- Sensors 313 can monitor the fracturing and propping fluid flow rates, as well as the properties of the fluids, at positions either before or after pumps 314, or at both locations.
- Down hole tools 318 can act directly on the fracturing and propping fluids to control the values of the properties of the fluids as the fluids create and enter fracture 333, which is shown, for simplicity of illustration, in one direction from well 316.
- Down hole fluid property sensors 324 can measure the fluid property values as the fluids enter fracture 333.
- In-fracture fluid sensors 328 can sense the fluid property values of the fluid inside the fracture.
- Down hole fracture sensors 326 can sense the dimensions of fracture 333 from a down hole location.
- Off-set fracture sensors 340 can sense the dimensions of fracture 333 from an off set , location down hole in a different well 338.
- Surface fracture sensors 335 can sense the dimensions of fracture 333 from the surface of the Earth.
- Control system 342 can be linked via signal links 336 to the listing of components as detailed in Figure 2.
- Control system 342 can also be linked to external system 344 which in one embodiment can be an external data collection or supervisory control system.
- Control system 342 can contain various embodiments of the innovative control methods of the present application, such as the method of Figure 1.
- Control system 342 can contain a desired subterranean fracture profile consistent with the present application.
- Figure 1 shows a preferred embodiment of the fracturing methods of the present innovations.
- the method of Figure 1 can be employed to conduct fracturing on a site such as fracturing site 300.
- the method of Figure 1 can be employed as part of control system 342 or external system 344 to conduct fracturing on site 300.
- Fracturing plan 30 can be designed to achieve a particular increase in hydrocarbon production from an operating well as known to one skilled in the art of fracturing hydrocarbon production using techniques such as the mini-fracture test prior to actual fracturing, as described earlier. Fracturing plan 30 can also be designed for a newly created well to achieve a .higher output upon start-up of the well had the fracturing operation not been -conducted.
- Fracture profile matrix 31 can be outputted from fracturing plan stage 30 as fracturing plan 3OA, where L(t) is the propagation function of the length dimension, L, over time, t, h(x,t) is the propagation function of the .height dimension, h, over time and over the distance, x down the fracture length Z, and w(x,t) is the propagation function of width dimension, w, over time and over x. SC(x,t) is the proppant placement function over time and over x. In one embodiment, the proppant placement function represents the concentration of the proppant at point x and time t.
- Conversion matrix 36 can use matrix 31 as a feed forward of the fracturing plan, as signal 3OB, to determine a feed forward of the fracturing fluid flow stream properties such as flow rate, viscosity, and density, as signal 36A.
- Stage 36 can determine the fracturing fluid viscosity function ⁇ (t), the fracturing fluid pumping flow rate function R(t), and fracturing fluid density function p(t).
- the fracturing plan matrix 31 as signal 3OA can be compared against the current fracture state estimate matrix 48B in summing stage 32.
- the error 32 A of the actual state versus the planned state can then be used to provide a correction of the fracturing fluid flow stream properties to summing stage 42.
- stage 32 can be multiplied by a pre-determined gain matrix 34 which can be processed through conversion inverse matrix 38.
- This stage this is the inverse of the fracturing model to convert the error correction input to a usable form (e.g. input viscosity, density, rate) for controlling the fracturing fluid flow stream properties.
- the inputs are derived by error correction vector [(L*-L)*kl, (W*- W)*k2,...]*inverse(G). This decouples the cross couple of the states, so that Z, w, h, and SC can be controlled independently.
- this decoupling may or may not be possible, but this action at least minimizes the cross couple effects up to what is physically possible, and adjusted by cross coupled temporal delay stage 40.
- the delay is used to ensure all the inputs are driven at the same time context. For example, rate can be changed instantly, but viscosity is delayed by the pipe travel time due to the hold-up of the volume of the well.
- the output of stage 42 as ⁇ corrected fluid property functions 43 can be used by stage 44 to generate drive-vectors for the fracturing fluid making and supply system as surface components 330 in Figure 3, as well as for down-hole tools 318, to be fed to control system 45.
- Control system 45 can then output signal 45A to control the surface and down-hole tools of the fracturing system, such as generally shown in site 300.
- the same information as signal 45B can then be used to update the current estimate of the state of the fracture and proppant placement therein.
- Signal 45B can be first conditioned using well delay stage 50 to adjust for the delay between when a fluid property such as density or viscosity is adjusted at the surface in the supply and making system and when such changes reach down-hole and begin to affect the mechanical fracturing process, if no down-hole tools are used to adjust those properties. If down-hole tools can be employed to adjust the properties, their use would effectively eliminate the need for the well delay stage 50. Additionally, changes in the fracturing fluid flow rate are essentially immediately effective down-hole and do not require adjustment by well delay 50.
- Fracturing model 48 can be used not only to create an initial fracture plan, but to estimate the current state of the fracture during fracturing in real-time. This estimate can use fracture well sensors 46, such as exemplified as down- hole sensors 326 and/or off-set sensors 340 and/or surface sensors 335 in Figure 3. Model 48 can also use mechanical fracturing models known to a person skilled in the art of fracturing, as either two-dimensional or three dimensional, as described earlier, to estimate the propagation (e.g. the dimensions, geometry, orientation, and directional positioning) of fractures through a formation of given mechanical properties in relation the pumped volume-, pumping rate, and rheologic properties of the fracturing fluid being used. -Model 48 can also modify itself by comparing actual results of measurements of well sensors 46 to predicted results of the mechanical fracturing models ⁇ to -correct for any inaccuracies.- ⁇ ---
- Fracturing model 48 can generate an estimate of the 'current state of the fracture as signal 48B, where the signal 48B is used to determine the error in current state from planned state in summing stage 32 as described earlier. Model 48 can also supply the same information as signal 48A to allow fracturing plan 30 to be updated to a new fracture plan using an adaptive system within stage 30.
- Signal 45 as actuator saturation feedback can be used to inform the fracturing plan 30 that the system has reached an operational limit.
- down hole fluid sensors can utilize the systems and methods of U.S. Patent Number 6,978,831B2, to Phillip D. Nguyen, entitled “System and Method for Sensing Data in a Well During Fracturing", granted December 27, 2005, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
- down hole viscosity can be adjusted using the methods of U.S Patent Numbers 6,719,055 and/or 6,959,773, both to AIi Mese and Mohamed Soliman, both entitled “Method for Drilling and Completing Boreholes with Electro-Rheological Fluids,” granted April 13, 2004 and November 1, 2005, respectively, which are hereby incorporated by reference.
- down hole tools 318 can utilize the teaching, tools, and/or methods of U.S. Patent Number 6,938,690, to Jim B. Surjaatmadja, entitled “Downhole Tool and Method for Fracturing a Subterranean Well Formation", granted September 6, 2005, which- is hereby incorporated by reference. - ⁇ , -r e -.-
- fracturing plan 3OA is a time series of desired geometric parameters, locations, and dimensions of fracture 333 over the time the fracturing process is conducted, and the concentration and distribution of proppant within the fracture. ⁇ ⁇
- fracturing plan 30A is determined from a desired performance target for the fracturing operation -where the target is a particular increase in production. Further to this embodiment, stage 30 uses the current fracture estimate 48 A to predict a resulting fracture profile based on the progress and trends of the current fracture propagation and proppant placement. Further, a resulting hydrocarbon production performance increase of the finished and propped fracture is determined. The resulting performance increase is compared to the targeted performance increase. If the error is above a predete ⁇ nined value, an adaptive model within stage 30 then adjusts the desired fracture profile over the remaining time for the process to better achieve the desired fracture performance increase.
- well sensors 46 comprise tilt-meter measurements as known to one skilled in the art of seismic movement and displacement.
- the sensing measurements comprise micro-seismic event monitoring measurements as also known to such a skilled person.
- a method for performing fracturing on a well comprising the actions of (a) fracturing, in accordance with a fracturing model and a fracturing plan, while monitoring inputs used to estimate fracturing progress;
- a subterranean fracturing process system for a hydrocarbon well comprising at least one pump for delivering a fracturing fluid flow stream into a hydrocarbon well, surface and/or down-hole actuators which jointly control the down-hole-values of one or more properties of said flow stream, and a control system which controls said actuators and said pump in relation to a subterranean fracturing plan using a fracturing model, to govern said down-hole values, wherein said control system further automatically modifies said fracturing model from time to time, when at least one monitoring action indicates that said fracturing model may be inaccurate; and wherein said control system automatically modifies said fracturing plan to optimize the results of the fracturing process.
- the methods and systems of the present application can operate across a wide range of subterranean hydrocarbon formation fi ⁇ acturing and propping situations and conditions.
- One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will recognize the appropriate use of the methods and systems for a chosen application of a given or dynamic set of operating parameters.
- the methods and systems of the present application can be configured or combined in various schemes.
- the combination or configuration depends partially on the required fracturing process control precision and accuracy and the operational envelope of the fracturing process.
- One of ordinary skill in the art of subterranean hydrocarbon formation fracturing, with the benefit of this disclosure, will recognize the appropriate combination or configuration for a chosen application.
- flags such as a particular process variable out of range which may define the reliability of the data or provide variables to use for process control.
- flags such as a particular process variable out of range which may define the reliability of the data or provide variables to use for process control.
- such measurements taken by the methods and systems of the present application may also be sent to the external system 344 of Figure 3 for further processing or use.
- this fact could be used to re-tune process controllers, e.g. pump speed controllers.
- fluid viscosity having a large standard deviation beyond a preset level might be used for the same flagging determination to re-tune viscosity controllers.
- rheologic property temperature compensation can be employed used to adjust for shifts in temperature using reference data sets relating temperature change to total fluid viscosity change, or curves fitted to such reference data.
- reference data sets or curves or hydraulic fracturing models fitted to such data sets may be employed, maintained, or stored in control system 342 or external system 344.
- the methods of the present application can also be embodied in a set of instructions that can be used on a general purpose desktop or laptop computer or microprocessor system, or external system 344 in addition to being embodied in control system 342.
- the set of instructions can comprise input instructions that receives data or models from external system 344.
- the input instructions can accept instructions from a user via one or more input devices, such as a keyboard, mouse, touchpad, or other input device.
- the instructions can cause the computer or microprocessor system to display information, such as the results of the methods of the present innovations, to a user, through a display monitor, printer, generated electronic file, or other such device.
- the instructions can also cause the computer or microprocessor system to transmit the results to a distant user via modem, cable, satellite, cell link, or other such means.
- RS-422 or RS-485 can optionally be used to allow links control system 342 or external system 344 to multiple external units.
- a 4-20 milliamp analog output signal can be used to allow external processing of the system measurements.
- the methods of the present invention can also be embodied in a computer readable medium.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2007343180A AU2007343180B2 (en) | 2007-01-10 | 2007-12-28 | Methods and systems for fracturing subterranean wells |
CA2674016A CA2674016C (en) | 2007-01-10 | 2007-12-28 | Methods and systems for fracturing subterranean wells |
EG2009071063A EG26292A (en) | 2007-01-10 | 2009-07-09 | Methods and systems for fracturing subterranean wells |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/651,913 US7516793B2 (en) | 2007-01-10 | 2007-01-10 | Methods and systems for fracturing subterranean wells |
US11/651,913 | 2007-01-10 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2008084194A1 true WO2008084194A1 (en) | 2008-07-17 |
Family
ID=39144458
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2007/005011 WO2008084194A1 (en) | 2007-01-10 | 2007-12-28 | Methods and systems for fracturing subterranean wells |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7516793B2 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2007343180B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2674016C (en) |
EG (1) | EG26292A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2008084194A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (72)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7740708B2 (en) * | 2006-06-14 | 2010-06-22 | Dana Wayne Lofton | Thermal fluid stimulation unit |
US8204724B2 (en) * | 2007-09-21 | 2012-06-19 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Predicting behavior of a tool using a model of a rheological characteristic of a fluid |
US8794316B2 (en) * | 2008-04-02 | 2014-08-05 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Refracture-candidate evaluation and stimulation methods |
CA2725088C (en) | 2008-05-20 | 2017-03-28 | Oxane Materials, Inc. | Method of manufacture and the use of a functional proppant for determination of subterranean fracture geometries |
US8727004B2 (en) * | 2008-06-06 | 2014-05-20 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods of treating subterranean formations utilizing servicing fluids comprising liquefied petroleum gas and apparatus thereof |
US8490693B2 (en) * | 2009-02-17 | 2013-07-23 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Determining fracture orientation using wellbore acoustic radial profiles |
US7891423B2 (en) * | 2009-04-20 | 2011-02-22 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | System and method for optimizing gravel deposition in subterranean wells |
US8498852B2 (en) * | 2009-06-05 | 2013-07-30 | Schlumberger Tehcnology Corporation | Method and apparatus for efficient real-time characterization of hydraulic fractures and fracturing optimization based thereon |
US10060241B2 (en) * | 2009-06-05 | 2018-08-28 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method for performing wellbore fracture operations using fluid temperature predictions |
WO2013016734A1 (en) * | 2011-07-28 | 2013-01-31 | Schlumberger Canada Limited | System and method for performing wellbore fracture operations |
US8731889B2 (en) * | 2010-03-05 | 2014-05-20 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Modeling hydraulic fracturing induced fracture networks as a dual porosity system |
US20120175121A1 (en) * | 2011-01-06 | 2012-07-12 | Veatch Ralph W | Method for Increasing Productivity of Hydraulically Fractured Wells |
CN103348098B (en) * | 2011-01-20 | 2016-10-05 | 联邦科学与工业研究组织 | Fracturing |
CN103477248A (en) * | 2011-02-23 | 2013-12-25 | 道达尔公司 | Computerized method for the estimation of a value for at least a parameter of a hydrocarbon-producing region, for planning the operation and operating the region |
CA2915625C (en) | 2011-03-11 | 2021-08-03 | Schlumberger Canada Limited | Method of calibrating fracture geometry to microseismic events |
US8701771B2 (en) | 2011-06-16 | 2014-04-22 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Managing treatment of subterranean zones |
US8701772B2 (en) | 2011-06-16 | 2014-04-22 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Managing treatment of subterranean zones |
US8602100B2 (en) | 2011-06-16 | 2013-12-10 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Managing treatment of subterranean zones |
US8800651B2 (en) | 2011-07-14 | 2014-08-12 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Estimating a wellbore parameter |
RU2567067C1 (en) | 2011-10-11 | 2015-10-27 | Шлюмберже Текнолоджи Б.В. | Production simulation method and system |
US10422208B2 (en) | 2011-11-04 | 2019-09-24 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Stacked height growth fracture modeling |
CA2854371C (en) * | 2011-11-04 | 2019-12-24 | Schlumberger Canada Limited | Modeling of interaction of hydraulic fractures in complex fracture networks |
US20130246022A1 (en) * | 2012-03-14 | 2013-09-19 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Screening potential geomechanical risks during waterflooding |
WO2014039036A1 (en) * | 2012-09-05 | 2014-03-13 | Stratagen, Inc. | Wellbore completion and hydraulic fracturing optimization methods and associated systems |
US9262713B2 (en) | 2012-09-05 | 2016-02-16 | Carbo Ceramics Inc. | Wellbore completion and hydraulic fracturing optimization methods and associated systems |
US10655442B2 (en) * | 2012-12-28 | 2020-05-19 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method for wellbore stimulation optimization |
US9418184B2 (en) * | 2013-07-25 | 2016-08-16 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Determining flow through a fracture junction in a complex fracture network |
US9367653B2 (en) * | 2013-08-27 | 2016-06-14 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Proppant transport model for well system fluid flow simulations |
WO2015057242A1 (en) | 2013-10-18 | 2015-04-23 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Managing a wellsite operation with a proxy model |
WO2015073005A1 (en) * | 2013-11-14 | 2015-05-21 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Adaptation of fracturing fluids |
CN105089594B (en) * | 2014-05-22 | 2018-09-18 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | A kind of carbonate reservoir control water synergy fracturing process |
CA2960137C (en) | 2014-10-14 | 2019-03-12 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | Automated fracture planning methods for multi-well fields |
US20160131800A1 (en) * | 2014-11-07 | 2016-05-12 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Modeling fluid-conducting fractures in reservoir simulation grids |
US10429528B2 (en) | 2014-11-19 | 2019-10-01 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Reducing microseismic monitoring uncertainty |
US10408955B2 (en) * | 2014-11-19 | 2019-09-10 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Filtering microseismic events for updating and calibrating a fracture model |
WO2016105351A1 (en) | 2014-12-23 | 2016-06-30 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Microseismic monitoring sensor uncertainty reduction |
WO2016108872A1 (en) * | 2014-12-31 | 2016-07-07 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Hydraulic fracturing apparatus, methods, and systems |
US10253599B2 (en) | 2014-12-31 | 2019-04-09 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Optimizing stimulation and fluid management operations |
US10301913B2 (en) | 2014-12-31 | 2019-05-28 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Optimizing running operations |
WO2016108893A1 (en) | 2014-12-31 | 2016-07-07 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Optimizing completion operations |
US10851636B1 (en) | 2015-06-08 | 2020-12-01 | DataInfoCom USA, Inc. | Systems and methods for analyzing resource production |
WO2016200808A1 (en) | 2015-06-09 | 2016-12-15 | Shell Oil Company | Controlled placement of proppant while fracturing |
CN106321044A (en) * | 2015-06-30 | 2017-01-11 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Proppant-carrying acid fracturing method for high-temperature ultra-deep carbonate reservoir |
CN104975837A (en) * | 2015-07-13 | 2015-10-14 | 中国石油大学(北京) | Hydraulic fracture initiation vertical extension control simulation device |
WO2017040158A1 (en) * | 2015-08-28 | 2017-03-09 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Microrheology of fluids used at wellsite |
US10273791B2 (en) | 2015-11-02 | 2019-04-30 | General Electric Company | Control system for a CO2 fracking system and related system and method |
US20180320484A1 (en) * | 2015-11-05 | 2018-11-08 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Hydraulic fracturing design |
US9945375B2 (en) * | 2016-01-20 | 2018-04-17 | Caterpillar Inc. | System and method for automatic tuning of reference model for fracking rig pump |
US10954766B2 (en) * | 2016-04-08 | 2021-03-23 | Intelligent Solutions, Inc. | Methods, systems, and computer-readable media for evaluating service companies, identifying candidate wells and designing hydraulic refracturing |
US11619115B2 (en) | 2016-07-27 | 2023-04-04 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Real-time monitoring and control of diverter placement for multistage stimulation treatments |
CA3027356C (en) * | 2016-07-27 | 2020-12-29 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Real-time monitoring and control of diverter placement for multistage stimulation treatments |
CA3180983A1 (en) * | 2016-08-18 | 2018-03-22 | Seismos, Inc. | Method for evaluating and monitoring formation fracture treatment using fluid pressure waves |
WO2018044323A1 (en) | 2016-09-02 | 2018-03-08 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Hybrid drive systems for well stimulation operations |
CA3041239C (en) | 2016-12-30 | 2021-08-31 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Automated rate control system for hydraulic fracturing |
US11319807B2 (en) | 2017-12-12 | 2022-05-03 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Fracture configuration using a Kalman filter |
CA3114003C (en) | 2018-12-21 | 2023-08-01 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Flow rate optimization during simultaneous multi-well stimulation treatments |
US10989035B2 (en) | 2019-06-20 | 2021-04-27 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Proppant ramp-up for cluster efficiency |
US11421150B2 (en) * | 2019-07-07 | 2022-08-23 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Methods for improving hydrocarbon production from an unconventional subterranean formation |
WO2021016212A1 (en) * | 2019-07-20 | 2021-01-28 | Seismos, Inc. | Hydraulic fracturing, completion, and diverter optimization method for known well rock properties |
US11230915B2 (en) | 2019-08-08 | 2022-01-25 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method to determine adjacent well communication |
US11556612B2 (en) | 2019-09-09 | 2023-01-17 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Predicting material distribution in a hydraulic fracturing treatment stage |
US11449645B2 (en) | 2019-09-09 | 2022-09-20 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Calibrating a diversion model for a hydraulic fracturing well system |
US11373058B2 (en) * | 2019-09-17 | 2022-06-28 | Halliburton Energy Services Inc. | System and method for treatment optimization |
US11319790B2 (en) | 2019-10-30 | 2022-05-03 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Proppant ramp up decision making |
US11674367B2 (en) * | 2019-11-06 | 2023-06-13 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | System and method for selecting fluid systems for hydraulic fracturing |
US11066915B1 (en) | 2020-06-09 | 2021-07-20 | Bj Energy Solutions, Llc | Methods for detection and mitigation of well screen out |
US11939853B2 (en) | 2020-06-22 | 2024-03-26 | Bj Energy Solutions, Llc | Systems and methods providing a configurable staged rate increase function to operate hydraulic fracturing units |
US11933153B2 (en) | 2020-06-22 | 2024-03-19 | Bj Energy Solutions, Llc | Systems and methods to operate hydraulic fracturing units using automatic flow rate and/or pressure control |
US11028677B1 (en) | 2020-06-22 | 2021-06-08 | Bj Energy Solutions, Llc | Stage profiles for operations of hydraulic systems and associated methods |
US11466680B2 (en) | 2020-06-23 | 2022-10-11 | Bj Energy Solutions, Llc | Systems and methods of utilization of a hydraulic fracturing unit profile to operate hydraulic fracturing units |
US11513500B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2022-11-29 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method for equipment control |
US11814947B2 (en) * | 2021-07-01 | 2023-11-14 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Distributed diagnostics and control of a multi-unit pumping operation |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6876959B1 (en) * | 1999-04-29 | 2005-04-05 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for hydraulic fractioning analysis and design |
US20050125209A1 (en) * | 2003-12-04 | 2005-06-09 | Soliman Mohamed Y. | Methods for geomechanical fracture modeling |
US6935424B2 (en) * | 2002-09-30 | 2005-08-30 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Mitigating risk by using fracture mapping to alter formation fracturing process |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5353637A (en) * | 1992-06-09 | 1994-10-11 | Plumb Richard A | Methods and apparatus for borehole measurement of formation stress |
US6938690B2 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2005-09-06 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Downhole tool and method for fracturing a subterranean well formation |
US6719055B2 (en) | 2002-01-23 | 2004-04-13 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method for drilling and completing boreholes with electro-rheological fluids |
US6978831B2 (en) | 2003-09-17 | 2005-12-27 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | System and method for sensing data in a well during fracturing |
-
2007
- 2007-01-10 US US11/651,913 patent/US7516793B2/en active Active
- 2007-12-28 CA CA2674016A patent/CA2674016C/en active Active
- 2007-12-28 WO PCT/GB2007/005011 patent/WO2008084194A1/en active Application Filing
- 2007-12-28 AU AU2007343180A patent/AU2007343180B2/en not_active Ceased
-
2009
- 2009-07-09 EG EG2009071063A patent/EG26292A/en active
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6876959B1 (en) * | 1999-04-29 | 2005-04-05 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for hydraulic fractioning analysis and design |
US6935424B2 (en) * | 2002-09-30 | 2005-08-30 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Mitigating risk by using fracture mapping to alter formation fracturing process |
US20050125209A1 (en) * | 2003-12-04 | 2005-06-09 | Soliman Mohamed Y. | Methods for geomechanical fracture modeling |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
MP CLEARY, SPE 17713, 13 June 1988 (1988-06-13) - 15 June 1988 (1988-06-15), pages 79 - 93, XP002472183 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA2674016A1 (en) | 2008-07-17 |
EG26292A (en) | 2013-06-12 |
US7516793B2 (en) | 2009-04-14 |
AU2007343180A1 (en) | 2008-07-17 |
US20080164021A1 (en) | 2008-07-10 |
AU2007343180B2 (en) | 2012-10-11 |
CA2674016C (en) | 2013-02-12 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2674016C (en) | Methods and systems for fracturing subterranean wells | |
US11143005B2 (en) | Electric pump flow rate modulation for fracture monitoring and control | |
RU2267610C2 (en) | Hydraulic reservoir fracture forming method | |
CA2672852C (en) | Real-time automated heterogeneous proppant placement | |
AU2014242196B2 (en) | Determining a target net treating pressure for a subterranean region | |
AU2014242283B2 (en) | Controlling net treating pressure in a subterranean region | |
US7891423B2 (en) | System and method for optimizing gravel deposition in subterranean wells | |
US20120215364A1 (en) | Field lift optimization using distributed intelligence and single-variable slope control | |
AU2009215713A1 (en) | Method of estimating well disposal capacity | |
EP3436662B1 (en) | Completion optimization process based on acoustic logging data in a lateral section of a horizontal well | |
US10331093B2 (en) | Systems and methods for optimizing facility limited production and injection in an integrated reservoir and gathering network | |
US6431278B1 (en) | Reducing sand production from a well formation | |
CA3142728A1 (en) | Fracturing-fluid formula workflow | |
Zhu et al. | Hydraulic fracture propagation in sand-mudstone interbedded reservoir integrated with different fluid flow of multi-perforated fractures | |
CN111094694B (en) | Well fracture modeling | |
Shelley et al. | Modeling Multi-Fractured Horizontal Well Completions; A Case For Planar Hydraulic Fractures | |
US20230383639A1 (en) | Automatic real time screen-out mitigation | |
AU2013201307B2 (en) | Method of Estimating Well Disposal Capacity | |
Miao | Study on adjustment technology of infilled horizontal wells in low abundance Putaohua reservoir of Daqing Changyuan peripheral oilfield | |
CA3097884A1 (en) | Real time parent child well interference control | |
Barrier | Circular Fracture |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 07848694 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2674016 Country of ref document: CA |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: DZP2009000399 Country of ref document: DZ |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2009071063 Country of ref document: EG |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2007343180 Country of ref document: AU |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2007343180 Country of ref document: AU Date of ref document: 20071228 Kind code of ref document: A |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 07848694 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |