WO2008080185A2 - Procédé de comparaison de la similitude entre deux objets - Google Patents

Procédé de comparaison de la similitude entre deux objets Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2008080185A2
WO2008080185A2 PCT/AT2008/000001 AT2008000001W WO2008080185A2 WO 2008080185 A2 WO2008080185 A2 WO 2008080185A2 AT 2008000001 W AT2008000001 W AT 2008000001W WO 2008080185 A2 WO2008080185 A2 WO 2008080185A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
images
image
vector
values
objects
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/AT2008/000001
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Alessandro Del Bianco
Andreas Kurzmann
Original Assignee
Ipac Improve Process Analytics And Control Gmbh
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ipac Improve Process Analytics And Control Gmbh filed Critical Ipac Improve Process Analytics And Control Gmbh
Publication of WO2008080185A2 publication Critical patent/WO2008080185A2/fr

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06VIMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V10/00Arrangements for image or video recognition or understanding
    • G06V10/40Extraction of image or video features
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06VIMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V10/00Arrangements for image or video recognition or understanding
    • G06V10/70Arrangements for image or video recognition or understanding using pattern recognition or machine learning
    • G06V10/74Image or video pattern matching; Proximity measures in feature spaces
    • G06V10/75Organisation of the matching processes, e.g. simultaneous or sequential comparisons of image or video features; Coarse-fine approaches, e.g. multi-scale approaches; using context analysis; Selection of dictionaries
    • G06V10/758Involving statistics of pixels or of feature values, e.g. histogram matching

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method according to the preamble of claim 1.
  • the object of the invention is the similarity of two objects based on two
  • Each object image is used in a number of images for evaluation, i. E. at least two images, preferably a plurality of images, of each of the two objects are made available or used for the similarity comparison.
  • the respective image sets of the two subject images in the form of hyperspectral images with predetermined spectral resolution and / or in the form of images in different color channels, eg XYZ, ClELab, ClELuv, RGB and / or CHS color channels , present.
  • spectral resolution e.g XYZ, ClELab, ClELuv, RGB and / or CHS color channels
  • correspondingly many values of vectors can be created, which contributes to the accuracy of the similarity comparison.
  • the method according to the invention can be used advantageously if the method for comparing the similarity of actual images of objects with target images stored in stored form is used, in particular for comparing an actual image, e.g. a printing unit, a surface design, an article surface, a fabric, a wallpaper, a veneer plate, a patterned article surface, with a corresponding, a target value specifying comparison image.
  • an actual image e.g. a printing unit, a surface design, an article surface, a fabric, a wallpaper, a veneer plate, a patterned article surface, with a corresponding, a target value specifying comparison image.
  • the invention further relates to a data carrier with a program stored on this program for carrying out the method according to the invention.
  • Fig. 1 shows two sets of images to be compared.
  • Fig. 3 shows a vector v of a certain length and its angle ⁇ with respect to a reference vector v ref .
  • 4 shows a point cloud formed by the lengths of the vectors v and v ', respectively.
  • Fig. 5 shows a point cloud formed by the difference angles of the vectors v and v ', respectively.
  • Fig. 1 two sets of object images 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 1 ', 2', 3 ', 4', 5 'are shown, which originate from identical or congruent image areas. These images or image areas have pixels or pixels X ⁇ 1 , x 2 yi, x 3 , yi ..., xy 2 , x 2 y 2 > ⁇ 2, ••• •
  • the individual images of the two image sets are using different recording techniques taking into account different image parameters, for example by recording the object in different wavelength ranges and / or different color channels.
  • a vector is now formed in which the intensity values determined for the respective pixels in the individual images, ie gray values or color values, are entered. Is obtained in this manner, a number of vectors v ⁇ y containing as values of the color intensities of the mutually corresponding image points or pixels of the images of the two object images.
  • All values of the pixels with the same x and y values of the individual images of each of the two image sets each yield a vector v * y (z,) with z elements, where z is the number of images in the image set or eg the number of color channels can be.
  • Each vector can be interpreted as a point in z-dimensional space, as shown in FIG.
  • the procedure is such that for each of these vectors v , v 'its length
  • FIG. 3 explains the determination of the difference angles ⁇ and ⁇ 'of the vectors v and v ' to a predetermined reference vector v r ⁇ f .
  • the length and angle of the vectors determined for the individual pixels of the image areas of the two image sets are possibly different due to any differences or deviations of the color values and thus the vectors are not the same length and / or include a different angle to the reference vector v ref . If one plots the lengths L and L 'of the vectors v and v ' obtained for corresponding pixels of the image areas of the two image sets against one another in a diagram, ie one forms points with the coordinates (L, L '), one obtains those shown in FIG 4 illustrated point cloud.
  • the vector v g can be represented as the tuple (L, j , ⁇ , j ) or the vector v , / as (L 1J 1 , ⁇
  • One is still at the position ij of the two sets of images and now the lengths L and L 'as well as the difference angles (Q 11 and ⁇ ,,') are to be compared.
  • the lengths L are now plotted against the lengths U for the corresponding pixels in the diagram of FIG. 4 for the two vectors.
  • the length Ly is plotted against the length Lj /, ie the x-section of the point in the diagram is determined by Ly, the y-section by Ly '.
  • the resulting point has the coordinates (Ly, Lj /).
  • angles ⁇ are plotted against the angles ⁇ 'in a second diagram according to FIG.
  • the angle ⁇ y is plotted against the angle ⁇ y ', i. the resulting point in the diagram has the coordinates ( ⁇ y, ⁇ y '). This procedure is performed for all the pixels in the two sets of images, yielding two point clouds in the two diagrams of FIGS. 4 and 5.
  • a characteristic straight line is laid through each of the two point clouds, or in each of the two point clouds, the respectively contained points are fitted or approximated with a straight line.
  • the slopes and the abscissa sections of the two obtained straight lines, in particular the vector formed with these values, are then used as a measure for the evaluation of the similarity of the two object images. In this way one obtains a vector with numerical values or at most a single number, if the length of this vector is taken as a measure of the similarity between the two objects.
  • the vector formed by the two gradients and the two abscissa sections of the straight lines in normal form is normalized or standardized by standard methods or the length of the normalized vector is determined and the number obtained as a measure of the similarity of the object images to be compared, especially the actual image and the target image, is considered. It can further be provided that the two slopes and the two abscissa sections are weighted and / or inverted such that their maximum value is 1.
  • the corresponding images of the image sets correspond not only to the image areas but also to the wavelength ranges for which they were taken.
  • the images to be compared or the corresponding images should have the same spatial resolution, otherwise a corresponding conversion of the image coordinates would have to take place in order to be able to compare corresponding images or congruent image regions.
  • the selection or the creation of congruent image areas is carried out in particular in a preprocessing of the images to be compared with one another. It is advantageous if, for the purpose of creating corresponding identical image areas, the object images or the images of the image sets are subjected to preprocessing, e.g. a rotation, equalization, resizing and / or displacement.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Image Analysis (AREA)
PCT/AT2008/000001 2007-01-04 2008-01-03 Procédé de comparaison de la similitude entre deux objets WO2008080185A2 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
ATA22/2007 2007-01-04
AT0002207A AT505885B1 (de) 2007-01-04 2007-01-04 Verfahren zum ähnlichkeitsvergleich von zwei gegenständen

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2008080185A2 true WO2008080185A2 (fr) 2008-07-10

Family

ID=39323058

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/AT2008/000001 WO2008080185A2 (fr) 2007-01-04 2008-01-03 Procédé de comparaison de la similitude entre deux objets

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AT (1) AT505885B1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2008080185A2 (fr)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120218391A1 (en) * 2011-02-24 2012-08-30 Tektronix, Inc Stereoscopic image registration and color balance evaluation display
EP3578939A1 (fr) 2018-06-06 2019-12-11 Flooring Technologies Ltd. Procédé de contrôle de qualité en ligne de l'impression de décors sur des matériaux supports
EP3972232A1 (fr) 2020-09-21 2022-03-23 Improve Process Analytics and Control GmbH Procédé de caractérisation automatisée d'un système d'impression numérique continu

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1265190B1 (fr) * 1993-12-10 2009-06-24 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Méthode pour la reconnaissance d'images et pour extraire/reconnaître une image spécifique à partir d'un signal d'image d'entrée
US7379627B2 (en) * 2003-10-20 2008-05-27 Microsoft Corporation Integrated solution to digital image similarity searching
JP2005234994A (ja) * 2004-02-20 2005-09-02 Fujitsu Ltd 類似度判定プログラム、マルチメディアデータ検索プログラム、類似度判定方法、および類似度判定装置

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120218391A1 (en) * 2011-02-24 2012-08-30 Tektronix, Inc Stereoscopic image registration and color balance evaluation display
US9307227B2 (en) * 2011-02-24 2016-04-05 Tektronix, Inc. Stereoscopic image registration and color balance evaluation display
EP3578939A1 (fr) 2018-06-06 2019-12-11 Flooring Technologies Ltd. Procédé de contrôle de qualité en ligne de l'impression de décors sur des matériaux supports
WO2019234147A1 (fr) 2018-06-06 2019-12-12 Flooring Technologies Ltd. Procédé de contrôle de qualité en ligne d'impressions décoratives sur des matériaux supports
US11548274B2 (en) 2018-06-06 2023-01-10 Flooring Technologies Ltd. Method for the online quality control of decorative prints on substrate materials
EP3972232A1 (fr) 2020-09-21 2022-03-23 Improve Process Analytics and Control GmbH Procédé de caractérisation automatisée d'un système d'impression numérique continu
EP3972233A1 (fr) 2020-09-21 2022-03-23 Improve Process Analytics and Control GmbH Procédé de caractérisation automatisée d'un système d'impression en continu
WO2022058608A1 (fr) 2020-09-21 2022-03-24 Improve Process Analytics And Control Gmbh Procédé de caractérisation automatisée d'un système d'impression en continu

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AT505885A3 (de) 2010-09-15
AT505885A2 (de) 2009-04-15
AT505885B1 (de) 2011-07-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE19837004C1 (de) Verfahren zum Erkennen von Objekten in digitalisierten Abbildungen
DE2063932A1 (de) Verfahren zum Korrelieren zweier Bilder
WO2008128759A2 (fr) Dispositif et procédé pour déterminer un histogramme de côtés, dispositif et procédé de classement d'une image dans une base d'images de données, dispositif et procédé pour trouver deux images similaires et programme d'ordinateur
DE102018102688A1 (de) Bildverarbeitungsvorrichtung, Bildverarbeitungsprogramm und Bildverarbeitungssystem
EP3289398B1 (fr) Procédé de génération d'une image de contraste à réflexion réduite et dispositifs associés
WO2017103050A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de traitement de données pour détermination assistée par ordinateur de caractéristiques de couleurs de cheveux
DE102012002321B4 (de) Verfahren zur Erkennung eines vorgegebenen Musters in einem Bilddatensatz
EP3903077B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de détection et d'ajustement des formulations de peintures à effet par rapport à la perception visuelle de propriétés de texture
DE102009050075B4 (de) Verfahren zur Messung der Wolkigkeit von Lackierungen auf Prüftafeln
DE102018127754A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Inspizieren einer Objektoberfläche, insbesondere zum Inspizieren der Oberfläche eines Pulverbettes mit einer Vielzahl von Pulverpartikeln
DE102011002464A1 (de) Schnelles Farbverifikationssystem unter Verwendung eines digitalen Bildgebungs- und Kurvenvergleichsalgorithmus
WO2018206225A1 (fr) Procédé mis en oeuvre par ordinateur pour mesurer un objet à partir d'une représentation numérique de l'objet
AT505885B1 (de) Verfahren zum ähnlichkeitsvergleich von zwei gegenständen
DE2262914A1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zum erzeugen einer visuellen darstellung der bildpunkte des zu analysierenden feldes und der zugehoerigen information
DE60320076T2 (de) Verfahren zur elektronischen farbentfernung unter nutzung räumlicher beziehungen zur verbesserung der genauigkeit
AT504213B1 (de) Verfahren zum ähnlichkeitsvergleich von gegenständen
EP3692348B1 (fr) Procédé et système de détermination d'une pluralité des indicateurs de qualité de couleur pour un contrôle couleur d'un vernis
DE19828318A1 (de) Drahthervorhebung
CH696254A5 (de) Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Kantenposition in Farbbildern
EP2399241A1 (fr) Procédé de détermination des contours d'un objet basée sur l'entropie
DE102017122063A1 (de) Verfahren zur Erkennung einer Geometrie eines Teilbereichs eines Objekts
DE10020067B4 (de) Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Kantenposition in Farbbildern, insbesondere für Farb- und Intensitätsübergänge
DE102007001273A1 (de) Verfahren zur selbsttätigen Analyse von Objektbewegungen
AT505887B1 (de) Verfahren zur extraktion von kantensegmenten
EP1139285A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour contrôle ou inspection d'objets

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 08700269

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 08700269

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2