WO2008033789A2 - Method of measuring fiber length for long fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites - Google Patents
Method of measuring fiber length for long fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2008033789A2 WO2008033789A2 PCT/US2007/078090 US2007078090W WO2008033789A2 WO 2008033789 A2 WO2008033789 A2 WO 2008033789A2 US 2007078090 W US2007078090 W US 2007078090W WO 2008033789 A2 WO2008033789 A2 WO 2008033789A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- fiber
- fibers
- composite
- automated
- imaging
- Prior art date
Links
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 217
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 60
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 23
- 229920001431 Long-fiber-reinforced thermoplastic Polymers 0.000 title claims abstract description 19
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 claims description 30
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N glycerol group Chemical group OCC(O)CO PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- 229920000098 polyolefin Polymers 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000003365 glass fiber Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000011187 glycerol Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 claims 3
- 239000002270 dispersing agent Substances 0.000 claims 2
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 239000012736 aqueous medium Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 229920001169 thermoplastic Polymers 0.000 claims 1
- 239000004416 thermosoftening plastic Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 3
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 40
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 13
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 13
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 8
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 6
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000008188 pellet Substances 0.000 description 4
- -1 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000003756 stirring Methods 0.000 description 3
- RZVAJINKPMORJF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetaminophen Chemical compound CC(=O)NC1=CC=C(O)C=C1 RZVAJINKPMORJF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- LYCAIKOWRPUZTN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethylene glycol Chemical compound OCCO LYCAIKOWRPUZTN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000004743 Polypropylene Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013480 data collection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000003733 fiber-reinforced composite Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000010191 image analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000465 moulding Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920001155 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000005297 pyrex Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005464 sample preparation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004513 sizing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003828 vacuum filtration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241000282836 Camelus dromedarius Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000004952 Polyamide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004698 Polyethylene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000593 degrading effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000428 dust Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005611 electricity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011049 filling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052736 halogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000002367 halogens Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- WGCNASOHLSPBMP-UHFFFAOYSA-N hydroxyacetaldehyde Natural products OCC=O WGCNASOHLSPBMP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000001746 injection moulding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000879 optical micrograph Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000704 physical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000049 pigment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920002647 polyamide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000573 polyethylene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012783 reinforcing fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000011218 segmentation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003381 stabilizer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002459 sustained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N15/00—Investigating characteristics of particles; Investigating permeability, pore-volume or surface-area of porous materials
- G01N15/02—Investigating particle size or size distribution
- G01N15/0205—Investigating particle size or size distribution by optical means
- G01N15/0227—Investigating particle size or size distribution by optical means using imaging; using holography
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/44—Resins; Plastics; Rubber; Leather
- G01N33/442—Resins; Plastics
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/40—Analysis of texture
- G06T7/41—Analysis of texture based on statistical description of texture
- G06T7/44—Analysis of texture based on statistical description of texture using image operators, e.g. filters, edge density metrics or local histograms
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/10—Image acquisition modality
- G06T2207/10056—Microscopic image
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/20—Special algorithmic details
- G06T2207/20048—Transform domain processing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
- G06T2207/30108—Industrial image inspection
- G06T2207/30124—Fabrics; Textile; Paper
Definitions
- the present invention relates to measuring the length of reinforcing fibers in long fiber reinforced thermoplastic (LFRT) materials using automated image analysis.
- LFRT long fiber reinforced thermoplastic
- the subject matter of this application relates to that disclosed in Untied States Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/823,527 entitled “Process for Forming Improved Fiber Reinforced Composites and Composites Therefrom” of Kenney et al. filed On August 25, 206.
- the disclosure of Untied States Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/823,527 is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
- LFRT materials are fast becoming the alternative to steel in many applications.
- shaped parts are prepared from pellets of coated, long fiber reinforced composite structures by injection molding. The composites are perhaps most preferably prepared by a pultrusion process.
- Composite Structure and Process of Preparation Thereof describes generally a production process wherein continuous fibers are coated in a die and then cut to the desired length.
- Suitable coating or matrix polymers include polyolefins such as polypropylene or polyethylene or blends of polyolefins with polyamides and the like. Stabilizers, pigments and so forth are added depending on the desired properties; details are seen in the following patents: United States Patent No. 6,844,059 to Bernd et al. for " Long-Fiber-Reinforced Polyolefin Structure, Process For Its Production, And Moldings Produced Therefrom"; United States Patent No.
- the pellets, or rod shaped composites generally have a length from 3 to 100 mm, preferably from 4 to 50 mm, and particularly preferably from about 7 to about 15 mm.
- the diameter of the rod-shaped structure or pellet is from 1 to 10 mm, preferably from 2 to 8 mm, and particularly preferably from 3 to 6 mm.
- the fibers suitably have a diameter of from 5-100 microns; typically, around 30 microns or so.
- Fiber length reduction is difficult to quantify and one of skill in the art will appreciate that, absent such quantification, it is difficult to improve existing processes. Indeed, understanding the fiber length distribution to optimize formulation and processing conditions is essential.
- practiced methods for measuring fiber lengths in the industry include labor intensive methods of measuring from optical micrographs or measuring directly from the fibers. Another method involves stacking sieves, filling them with water and introducing fibers while manually stirring. When stirring is halted, the fibers are assumed to stay horizontal until contacting the sieves, and becoming separated by length. After each sample, the apparatus is dismantled and the fibers are dried and weighed.
- a procedure for determining the length in LFRT materials including: thermally degrading the matrix polymer from a part by application of heat in order to liberate the fiber from the polymer matrix; randomizing the fiber in a liquid medium; filtering the fibers from the liquid medium and dispersing them on a substantially transparent surface; imaging the dispersion of fibers without operator bias and analyzing the images to determine fiber length.
- the imaging/analysis system is capable resolving fiber clusters through adjustment of settings.
- volume (length) weighted average lengths better represent the fiber length distribution than the number mean for LFRT materials. It has also been found that after about 3000 fibers are measured by the procedure described herein that the average length measured and standard deviation cease to change substantially.
- a unique methodology involves color coding touching and overlaying fibers of fiber clusters for classification.
- Figures l(a) and l(b) are SEM of glass fiber showing that sizing still exists on the fiber surface after recovery from a molded part;
- Figure 2 is a photograph of an automated imaging apparatus and image analyzer
- Figure 3 is an imaged area of dispersed fiber
- Figure 4 is a color coded image indicating classification of dispersed fibers
- Figures S and 6 are color coded images of fiber clusters.
- Figures 7 and 8 are graphical representations of fiber length distributions.
- the sample preparation method used in the invention attempts to separate the fibers that have not been cut from those that have. The cut fibers are then discarded. The remaining sample is evaluated for entangled fibers. If entangled fibers are present, they are gently untangled using wire probes. The fibers are then randomized and placed in a Petri dish for image analysis.
- the vacuum should be high enough so that the filter paper is observed drying soon after the methanol rinse.
- the filter paper should be thoroughly dry in 1 minute or less;
- the sample dish should contain randomly aligned fibers and virtually no clumps. If there are clumps: solution may have been expelled from the pipet too fast, too much solution may have been expelled from the pipet, the pipet was maneuvered too slowly over the filter paper as solution was expelled, the dry filter paper slid in the Petri dish prior to it being lifted and 'snapped', or the fiber solution is not dilute enough (add water);
- FIG. 2 A preferred apparatus employed is shown in Figure 2 which includes a
- Prior HlOl motorized stage 4"x 3" travel, repeatedly + l ⁇ m, with controller, joystick and holder, as well as a Qlcam monochromatic digital firewire camera: 1392 x 1040 pixels, 4.65 ⁇ m x 4.65 ⁇ m pixel size, 1/2" optical format Electronic Shutter, 12-bit, External trigger, Zoom 70XL module with detents/iris.
- MND44020 Nikon focus Mount and MSS modular support stand, a 15OW halogen transmitted light source with backlight, ImagePro Plus ver 6.0 software, Scope Pro plug-in module, Imaging computer: Windows XP Pro, Pentium 4 3.6GHz processor provided with MS Office 2003 Basic and Pyrex glass Petri dish 100mm X 15mm (top only).
- Hough Transform FASEP Version 1.51 Plug-In for ImagePro Plus, May, 2006, available from IDM Systems, Darmstadt, Germany.
- This system may be used to analyze clusters with overlaying fibers as well as curved fibers using Hough Transform analysis.
- the Hough Transform may be used to compute the edge orientation histogram.
- the Hough Transform is a well-known method for finding lines. A detailed description of the Hough Transform can be found in "Digital Picture Processing", by Azriel Rosenfeld and Avinash C. Kak, (Academic Press, Inc. 1982) Vol. 2, pp. 121 -126.
- the Hough Transform converts an edge map image into a 2-D histogram with one dimension being the line orientation and the other being the line intercept.
- Hough Transform entry HT (x,y) represents the length of a line that has an orientation of x and an intercept of y.
- the edge orientation histogram H(x) can be obtained by manipulating the HT (x,y) hist
- the edge orientation (EO) algorithm is performed on the edge orientation histogram H(x) as follows:
- the software is sometimes manually guided, and parameters adjusted so that clusters of fibers and optionally curved fibers are properly measured.
- the analysis is performed by setting a fiber diameter range and using Hough Transform analyses and rejecting results which are inconsistent with the physical image, discussed further below.
- the system calibration is set using an NlST 25mm stage micrometer so that live tiling tolerance is as tight as possible. This is done by positioning the micrometer on the stage so that it lies where frames meet in the X and Y directions. Using the User Defined tiling method and gradient blend stitching option, set X, Y, and guard frame values so that tiling with the algorithm results in a calibration of +_20 ⁇ m or less. (This is confirmed by imaging the stage micrometer.) Name the calibration file and set it as the System Calibration File.
- the system operates by placing the Petri dish with dispersed fibers on the motorized stage and imaging an area approximately 65mm X 50mm.
- the specimen is then processed as follows:
- This method enables appropriate pixel size calibration for short fibers and image processing so that approximately a 65 X 50mm area can be analyzed as shown in Figure 3.
- the process enables short and long fibers to be measured with accuracy.
- the fibers in the prescribed field are automatically imaged and measured so that sampling is unbiased.
- the operator chooses the fibers for measurement and therefore sampling is more subjective.
- long fibers may need to be centered within a field of view or imaging frame to be fully measured and therefore long fiber measurements are susceptible to operator bias. Repeatability of the measurements is limited to the agility and repeatability of the operator as well as pixel size.
- the automated imaging process ensures that fiber length is calculated using the same algorithms consistently. Accuracy (number of units per pixel) and imaging time were considered to arrive at a suitable magnification. The magnification instituted enables accuracy of + 2% for lmm fibers to + 0.2% for 10mm fibers. This allows imaging of a sample dish in less than 70 seconds. The number of fibers per sample dish will vary according to the extent of fiber length retention within the sample.
- Another challenge is measurement of crossing or touching fibers. As the fibers in the sample become longer, the frequency of crossing and touching of long fibers increases. Most image analysis software tends to offer an editing capability that separates intersecting fibers by cutting them. The cut fiber segments are either measured, or excluded from the data. The end result is mismeasured or discarded fiber length data. These processes can have a significant impact on long fiber data.
- the method of the invention identifies crossing and touching fibers and measures each fiber separately and in its entirety.
- fibers are identified as single fibers or clusters (touching fibers) as shown in Figure 4.
- the fibers are color-coded according to category (single fiber, or clustered fibers).
- the single fibers are measured and the touching fibers are individually grouped so that each cluster can be addressed separately.
- Each cluster can be separated into individual fibers on a cases-by-case basis with the FASEP software.
- the software proposes an initial separation scheme to the operator. This may be accepted, modified if fiber separation can be improved, or rejected and tried again.
- Figure S shows a cluster of fibers. The software colors the boundary of each fiber so the operator can confirm that fiber length is fully measured. Once the measurements are accepted, the data is added to the previously collected fiber length measurements. There are a few cases, however, when fiber separation is not successful. A few examples of successful and unsuccessful separations are illustrated in Figure 6. An experienced operator is able to separate most clusters that initially show an unsuccessful separation scheme. The fibers illustrated are relatively straight, but experience has shown that a number of long fibers are gently curved. Preferably, Software is selected that accounts for fiber curvature.
- Bin 1 equals fibers with a length less than lmm and greater than or equal to 0.5mm. The other bins correlate to fiber length similarly.
- Bin 1 equals fibers with a length less than 1 mm and greater than or equal to 0.5mm. The other bins correlate to fiber length similarly
- Another important test parameter is the minimal number of fibers that should be measured to sufficiently represent a sample. Ten thousand fibers with lengths > 0.5mm were measured from a polypropylene sample believed to have moderate fiber length retention. The minimum fiber length incorporated in the data was arrived at based on terms presented in International Standard ISO 22314 (International Standard ISO 22314 "Plastics- Glass fibre reinforced products- Determination of fibre length "). and the work of Thomason and Vlug (Thomason, J. L 1 Vlug, M. A.
- Table HI A comparison of sample size to volume weighted mean, shows that fluctuation in the mean decreases with a ssaamri ple size over 3000 fibers.
- Informative data presentation and interpretation are fundamental to understanding fiber distribution within a molded part.
- the number distribution shows the range of fiber lengths in the sample. It is reported using a histogram illustrating frequency vs. fiber length, and cumulative percent.
- long fibers are usually fewer in number compared to short fibers but represent a more significant volume of the sample. Long fibers also contribute more substantially to some desired physical properties.
- the number mean should never be reported alone, and should not be given too much weight when reviewing fiber length data, especially for LFRT.
- the volume (length) weighted mean is calculated and reported.
- number mean is about 1.1mm but the volume weighted mean is about 2.5mm.
- the long fibers are virtually ignored in the number statistics but are represented in the volume (length) weighted statistics.
- volume weighted mean is not sufficient to report alone.
- the volume (length) weighted mean is similar for both samples however the fiber length distribution is very different. Therefore distribution histograms and curves should be reported. Cumulative percents over 3 mm, 5mm and 8mm may be taken into consideration for further understanding and comparing data.
- L 0 a weighted mean length, expressed in micrometres, calculated from the following equation: L- - ⁇ where n t is the number of fibres of length L-,
- the method of the invention offers the ability to recover glass fibers from molded parts while retaining fiber pliability, therefore facilitating sample preparation and confidence in length retention during sample preparation.
- the automated data collection and measurement process reduced operator subjectivity and variability in length measurements encountered in a more manual procedure.
- the method enables length measurements of crossing and touching fibers in their entirety whereas most software edit options do not retain length of all crossing and touching fibers.
- the process is repeatable and accurate (+ 3% through + 0.3%), and hands-on time is less than other previously mentioned procedures.
- One preliminary conclusion is that fiber length analysis is most accurately and swiftly performed when the fibers are well- dispersed across the imaging dish and when touching fibers are minimized. Imaging several more sample dishes takes less hands-on time than editing and reviewing fiber clusters.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
- Food Science & Technology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Probability & Statistics with Applications (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Length Measuring Devices By Optical Means (AREA)
Abstract
A method of measuring fiber length distribution in a long fiber reinforced thermoplastic composite includes liberating the fiber from the composite by thermally decomposing the polymer followed by optical analysis capable of resolving fiber clusters and accounting for curved fibers, in particular using the Hough transform.
Description
METHOD OF MEASURING FIBER LENGTH FOR LONG FIBER REINFORCED THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITES
Technical Field
The present invention relates to measuring the length of reinforcing fibers in long fiber reinforced thermoplastic (LFRT) materials using automated image analysis. The subject matter of this application relates to that disclosed in Untied States Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/823,527 entitled "Process for Forming Improved Fiber Reinforced Composites and Composites Therefrom" of Kenney et al. filed On August 25, 206. The disclosure of Untied States Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/823,527 is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Background
LFRT materials are fast becoming the alternative to steel in many applications. Generally, shaped parts are prepared from pellets of coated, long fiber reinforced composite structures by injection molding. The composites are perhaps most preferably prepared by a pultrusion process. United States Patent No. 6,090,319 to Sharma et al, entitled "Coated Long Fiber Reinforcing
Composite Structure and Process of Preparation Thereof describes generally a production process wherein continuous fibers are coated in a die and then cut to the desired length. Suitable coating or matrix polymers include polyolefins such as polypropylene or polyethylene or blends of polyolefins with polyamides and the like. Stabilizers, pigments and so forth are added depending on the desired properties; details are seen in the following patents: United States Patent No. 6,844,059 to Bernd et al. for " Long-Fiber-Reinforced Polyolefin Structure, Process For Its Production, And Moldings Produced Therefrom"; United States Patent No. 6,794,032 to Borgner et al for "Long-Fiber Reinforced Polyolefin Plastic Structure And Shaped Bodies Formed Therefrom"; and also United States Patent No. 6,482,515 also to Berndt et al. for "Colored Long-Fiber-Reinforced Polyolefin Structure And Shaped Articles Produced Therefrom". The pellets, or
rod shaped composites generally have a length from 3 to 100 mm, preferably from 4 to 50 mm, and particularly preferably from about 7 to about 15 mm. The diameter of the rod-shaped structure or pellet, is from 1 to 10 mm, preferably from 2 to 8 mm, and particularly preferably from 3 to 6 mm. The fibers suitably have a diameter of from 5-100 microns; typically, around 30 microns or so.
When making the finished part, it is oftentimes desirable, or even critical, to measure fiber length; however, due to relatively complex processing during molding, length degradation always occurs. Fiber length reduction is difficult to quantify and one of skill in the art will appreciate that, absent such quantification, it is difficult to improve existing processes. Indeed, understanding the fiber length distribution to optimize formulation and processing conditions is essential. Currently practiced methods for measuring fiber lengths in the industry include labor intensive methods of measuring from optical micrographs or measuring directly from the fibers. Another method involves stacking sieves, filling them with water and introducing fibers while manually stirring. When stirring is halted, the fibers are assumed to stay horizontal until contacting the sieves, and becoming separated by length. After each sample, the apparatus is dismantled and the fibers are dried and weighed. These methods are time consuming and labor intensive. With the advent of high precision motorized stages, high resolution cameras which perform automated imaging, and new image analysis software capabilities, a procedure to automate fiber length measurement accurately and with repeatability requiring less manual intervention was developed after finding that existing automated optical systems did not adequately account for fiber clusters or curved fibers seen in LFRT materials.
Summary of the Invention
There is provided in accordance with various aspects of the invention, a procedure for determining the length in LFRT materials including: thermally degrading the matrix polymer from a part by application of heat in order to liberate the fiber from the polymer matrix; randomizing the fiber in a liquid
medium; filtering the fibers from the liquid medium and dispersing them on a substantially transparent surface; imaging the dispersion of fibers without operator bias and analyzing the images to determine fiber length. The imaging/analysis system is capable resolving fiber clusters through adjustment of settings.
Volume (length) weighted average lengths better represent the fiber length distribution than the number mean for LFRT materials. It has also been found that after about 3000 fibers are measured by the procedure described herein that the average length measured and standard deviation cease to change substantially.
A unique methodology involves color coding touching and overlaying fibers of fiber clusters for classification.
It has been discovered that readily available Hough Transform software can be utilized to analyze fiber dispersions when used with the FASEP plug-in and provide reliable characterization for fiber clusters seen in LFRT-derived samples. It may be preferred in some cases to additionally account for fiber curvature.
Further details and advantages will become apparent from the discussion which follows.
Brief Description of Drawings
The invention is described in detail below in connection with the drawings wherein:
Figures l(a) and l(b) are SEM of glass fiber showing that sizing still exists on the fiber surface after recovery from a molded part;
Figure 2 is a photograph of an automated imaging apparatus and image analyzer;
Figure 3 is an imaged area of dispersed fiber;
Figure 4 is a color coded image indicating classification of dispersed fibers;
Figures S and 6 are color coded images of fiber clusters; and
Figures 7 and 8 are graphical representations of fiber length distributions.
Detailed Description of the Invention
The invention is described in detail below for purposes of illustration without intending to limit the present invention in any way; the spirit and scope of which is set forth in the appended claims.
As noted earlier, the first challenge with quantifying fiber length in LFRT materials has been the recovery of fibers from molded parts without breakage and embrittlement. A fiber recovery process has been determined that yields pliable Fibers some of which are the entire length of the original pellets. This observation indicates high probability that the fibers sustained the recovery method intact. The images in Figure 1 show the fibers before and after 10 hours in a muffle furnace at the noted temperatures. These particular fibers shown were not embedded in a polymer matrix. Sizing is still observed on the fiber surface. At 45O0C, the fibers are found to retain their pliability demonstrated prior to heat treatment. However, at 6500C the fibers are not as pliable, and at 7250C the fibers break easily when maneuvered.
During removal of the sample from the molded part, some fibers are cut. The sample preparation method used in the invention attempts to separate the fibers that have not been cut from those that have. The cut fibers are then discarded. The remaining sample is evaluated for entangled fibers. If entangled
fibers are present, they are gently untangled using wire probes. The fibers are then randomized and placed in a Petri dish for image analysis.
A specific procedure for sample preparation is as follows:
(1) Cut a 1" inch square from the area of interest;
(2) Place sample in crucible and ash using a muffle furnace at 45O0C over-night (this temperature does not embrittle the fibers);
(3) Use an anti-static device to ensure that the glass sample dish (Pyrex glass Petri dish lOOmmxl Smm - top) is not statically charged. Place the glass sample dish over the crucible and invert crucible so that the ash is in the sample dish but retains its shape;
(4) With a brush, probe, or tweezers, gently part the outer fibers away from the center of the ash to separate those fibers that may have been cut from those which have not. The remaining sample should be - 3/," by %";
(5) Place the crucible over the separated center portion of uncut fibers and invert the glass sample dish over an open plastic bag, which will catch the unwanted saw-cut fibers. Tap the dish to dislodge the fibers that may adhere due to static electricity;
(6) Examine the ash that is left. If large clumps exist, gently separate the clump using probe tips or narrow tweezer tip;
(7) Assemble a vacuum filtration apparatus using a vacuum flask ~
1500ml, a Beuchner funnel with fixed perforated plate (diam.
60mm) and coarse/fast flow filter paper suitable for vacuum filtration;
(8) Place approximately 500ml of water into a beaker (usually a 1000ml beaker is used) and add ~40ml of glycerin. Stir to mix;
(9) Add glass fibers to the beaker and place beaker in ultrasonic bath;
(10) Place distilled water into the ultrasonic bath so that the beaker sits lightly in the bath;
(11) Turn on ultrasonic bath and wait 30 seconds, most of the fibers will separate;
(12) While waiting, wet the filter paper with water and 'seal1 it against the funnel by creating a slight vacuum. Make sure all holes are covered by the filer paper;
( 13) Place pipet, with an 1 1 mm diameter opening in the beaker and plunge the solution in and out of the pipet ~ 15 to 20 times until all the fibers are suspended and randomized - there should be no clumps. (A fiber-optic light, or other bright light source, may be used to shine into the beaker and illuminate the fibers to confirm suspension and randomization). Note - ash from black parts should be rinsed and filtered first using a similar procedure so that they may be observed randomizing in the solution;
(14) If any clumps are seen, they should be removed from the solution and placed in a separate beaker or dish. Add some solution and gently separate the clump using a probe tip or narrow tweezer tip.
Return to beaker;
(15) Expel any solution from the pipet and move the pipet so that the opening is in the center of the volume of solution. Draw solution in (~20ml):
(16) Increase vacuum in filtration system and bring the pipet over the funnel. Expel the solution in a circular motion in an effort to spread the fibers uniformly over the filter paper;
(17) Rinse the fibers using methanol in a squeeze bottle. Start from the walls of the Beuchner funnel and in a circular motion work to the center of the filter paper. The rinse will dissolve the glycol relatively quickly - a relatively small amount is needed;
(18) The vacuum should be high enough so that the filter paper is observed drying soon after the methanol rinse. The filter paper should be thoroughly dry in 1 minute or less;
(19) Turn off the vacuum and take the funnel off of the flask keeping it upright;
(20) Place a clean and static treated Petri dish over the funnel and quickly invert so that the filter paper falls into the Petri dish. Remove the funnel keeping the filter paper from sliding around the dish (this action will cause the fibers to clump);
(21) Place the Petri dish on a flat surface and the push down on one edge of the filter paper to secure it from moving. Grab the opposite side with tweezers or your finger tips and lift the filter up slightly, keeping it parallel to the bottom surface of the Petri dish. Pull the paper taut, and then bring the opposite sides of the paper together
so that the filter paper folds similar to a book, and snap taut to dislodge fibers from the filter paper. Move grasp on the filter paper 45 degrees and repeat;
(22) If fibers adhere to the filter paper, a soft brush (camel hair) is used to brush them into the Petri dish;
(23) The sample dish should contain randomly aligned fibers and virtually no clumps. If there are clumps: solution may have been expelled from the pipet too fast, too much solution may have been expelled from the pipet, the pipet was maneuvered too slowly over the filter paper as solution was expelled, the dry filter paper slid in the Petri dish prior to it being lifted and 'snapped', or the fiber solution is not dilute enough (add water);
(24) If there are too many fibers in the dish, select a second dish and invert the first one over the second one to reduce the number of fibers (analyze both dishes). The dispersion of fibers should be similar to appended Figure 3, below;
(25) Repeat until at least 3000 fibers are imaged. Add water and glycerin to the beaker if necessary to make up for the solution lost.
A preferred apparatus employed is shown in Figure 2 which includes a
Prior HlOl motorized stage: 4"x 3" travel, repeatedly + lμm, with controller, joystick and holder, as well as a Qlcam monochromatic digital firewire camera: 1392 x 1040 pixels, 4.65μm x 4.65μm pixel size, 1/2" optical format Electronic Shutter, 12-bit, External trigger, Zoom 70XL module with detents/iris. There is further provided an MND44020 Nikon focus Mount and MSS modular support stand, a 15OW halogen transmitted light source with backlight, ImagePro Plus ver
6.0 software, Scope Pro plug-in module, Imaging computer: Windows XP Pro, Pentium 4 3.6GHz processor provided with MS Office 2003 Basic and Pyrex glass Petri dish 100mm X 15mm (top only).
Preferred software to use in connection with the apparatus of Figure 1 is
FASEP Version 1.51 Plug-In for ImagePro Plus, May, 2006, available from IDM Systems, Darmstadt, Germany. This system may be used to analyze clusters with overlaying fibers as well as curved fibers using Hough Transform analysis. For example, the Hough Transform may be used to compute the edge orientation histogram. The Hough Transform is a well-known method for finding lines. A detailed description of the Hough Transform can be found in "Digital Picture Processing", by Azriel Rosenfeld and Avinash C. Kak, (Academic Press, Inc. 1982) Vol. 2, pp. 121 -126. The Hough Transform converts an edge map image into a 2-D histogram with one dimension being the line orientation and the other being the line intercept. Hough Transform entry HT (x,y) represents the length of a line that has an orientation of x and an intercept of y. The edge orientation histogram H(x) can be obtained by manipulating the HT (x,y) histogram as follows:
H(x)=(ΣHT(x,y)2) 1 2
where the summation is over all y values.
The edge orientation (EO) algorithm is performed on the edge orientation histogram H(x) as follows:
EO = -ΣH(x) log H(x)
The software is sometimes manually guided, and parameters adjusted so that clusters of fibers and optionally curved fibers are properly measured. We refer to this procedure as an "automated" resolving process and thus this feature of the
system is referred to as an automated cluster resolving capability. See, also, United States Patent No. 6,985,628 to Fan, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
In general, the analysis is performed by setting a fiber diameter range and using Hough Transform analyses and rejecting results which are inconsistent with the physical image, discussed further below.
The system calibration is set using an NlST 25mm stage micrometer so that live tiling tolerance is as tight as possible. This is done by positioning the micrometer on the stage so that it lies where frames meet in the X and Y directions. Using the User Defined tiling method and gradient blend stitching option, set X, Y, and guard frame values so that tiling with the algorithm results in a calibration of +_20μm or less. (This is confirmed by imaging the stage micrometer.) Name the calibration file and set it as the System Calibration File.
The system operates by placing the Petri dish with dispersed fibers on the motorized stage and imaging an area approximately 65mm X 50mm. The specimen is then processed as follows:
(1) Switch on power to the automated system BEFORE launching ImagePro;
(2) Select Acquire and StagePro;
(3) Initialize stage by selecting the second radio button down (Use physical limits of stage...) and press continue on the following dialogue box. Wait for stage to stop;
(4) Click on the Lens/Mag page, select your calibration file from the drop down window. Click on Calibrate XY and then set from file. Choose the file name of the system calibration and click OK;
(5) Go to the Stage tab and set the imaging origin to the lower right corner - use preview to see where the camera is imaging. Click on set origin to current position;
(6) Set the Scan Area to 5x5 and save settings (including guard frame) with an appropriate name;
(7) Place a clean, empty sample dish on the stage and choose correct background and flat field radio buttons on the Acquire page;
(8) Acquire a background image (a single image). Select the image as the background image. Do not close the background image;
(9) switch to the sample dish and aquire the 5 X 5 sequence. Select
Processing from the menu bar and tile images from the drop down;
(10) Choose the sequence to input and select set from frames. Apply the user defined stitching method (previously established). Save mosaic;
(1 1) Launch Fasep with only one image open (Fasep performs functions on open images, only one image should be open at a time);
(12) Set measurement parameters. Length minimum = 0.5mm, fiber width is sample dependent;
(13) Set segmentation threshold so that the long fibers are adequately filled in without gaps (-205);
( 14) Perform Blob analysis;
(15) Set 3 bins (dust, single fiber, cluster) for classification using fiber width. Classify sample;
(16) Check classifications and modify if needed;
(17) Separate objects into the classes;
(18) After cluster images have been generated, choose one at a time for separation analysis;
(19) Initially begin with Min. Maxima Area set at 4 and Avg. Fiber Diameter set at 8 (for ~30 μm diameter fibers). Separate fibers using Hough Transform;
(20) Use Maxima click as cited in the Fasep directions when separation is unsuccessful. Increase the Avg. Fiber Diameter as appropriate to measure long or curved fibers;
(21) When all clusters are analyzed, open data collector and export data to clipboard.
This method enables appropriate pixel size calibration for short fibers and image processing so that approximately a 65 X 50mm area can be analyzed as shown in Figure 3. The process enables short and long fibers to be measured with accuracy. The fibers in the prescribed field are automatically imaged and measured so that sampling is unbiased.
In comparison, when applying more manual methods of measurement, the operator chooses the fibers for measurement and therefore sampling is more subjective. Also, long fibers may need to be centered within a field of view or imaging frame to be fully measured and therefore long fiber measurements are susceptible to operator bias. Repeatability of the measurements is limited to the agility and repeatability of the operator as well as pixel size. The automated imaging process ensures that fiber length is calculated using the same algorithms consistently. Accuracy (number of units per pixel) and imaging time were considered to arrive at a suitable magnification. The magnification instituted enables accuracy of + 2% for lmm fibers to + 0.2% for 10mm fibers. This allows imaging of a sample dish in less than 70 seconds. The number of fibers per sample dish will vary according to the extent of fiber length retention within the sample.
An easily performed and effective sample preparation method along with automated data collection enables collection of thousands of fiber lengths within minutes.
Another challenge is measurement of crossing or touching fibers. As the fibers in the sample become longer, the frequency of crossing and touching of long fibers increases. Most image analysis software tends to offer an editing capability that separates intersecting fibers by cutting them. The cut fiber segments are either measured, or excluded from the data. The end result is mismeasured or discarded fiber length data. These processes can have a significant impact on long fiber data. The method of the invention identifies crossing and touching fibers and measures each fiber separately and in its entirety.
In this method, fibers are identified as single fibers or clusters (touching fibers) as shown in Figure 4. The fibers are color-coded according to category (single fiber, or clustered fibers). The single fibers are measured and the touching fibers are individually grouped so that each cluster can be addressed separately.
Each cluster can be separated into individual fibers on a cases-by-case basis with the FASEP software. The software proposes an initial separation scheme to the operator. This may be accepted, modified if fiber separation can be improved, or rejected and tried again. Figure S shows a cluster of fibers. The software colors the boundary of each fiber so the operator can confirm that fiber length is fully measured. Once the measurements are accepted, the data is added to the previously collected fiber length measurements. There are a few cases, however, when fiber separation is not successful. A few examples of successful and unsuccessful separations are illustrated in Figure 6. An experienced operator is able to separate most clusters that initially show an unsuccessful separation scheme. The fibers illustrated are relatively straight, but experience has shown that a number of long fibers are gently curved. Preferably, Software is selected that accounts for fiber curvature.
As previously mentioned, repeatability of sample imaging and the measuring algorithms used is another benefit of the automated system. To demonstrate, one sample was imaged at the magnification established for LFRT analysis and fiber lengths were measured three consecutive times. The data is reported in Table 1.
T/US2007/078090
15
Table I: The identical sample was imaged automatically three times. Automation offers a tighter tolerance of imaging and measuring algorithms over manual methods which improves repeatability. Bin 1 equals fibers with a length less than lmm and greater than or equal to 0.5mm. The other bins correlate to fiber length similarly.
Bin Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 SW Dev
1 0 15 5 15 5 156 0 10
1 5 384 384 389 027
20 536 536 537 0 02
2 5 648 64 8 64 8 001
3 0 71 6 71 6 71 7 001
3 5 78 9 78 9 78 9 001
4 0 854 85 4 85 4 0 01
4 5 88 6 88 6 88 6 0 00
5 0 92 1 92 1 92 1 0 00
5 5 94 7 94 7 94 7 0 00
60 962 962 96 2 0 00
65 97 7 97 7 97 7 0 00
70 97 7 97 7 97 7 000
7 5 97 7 97 7 97 7 0 00
80 97 7 97 7 977 000
85 97 7 97 7 97 7 0 00
9 0 97 7 977 97 7 000
9 5 100 100 100 000
Count 251 250 251 AVG 0 02
Std
CV. 77 9% 77 7% 77 9% Dev 0 07
VoI Mean 2.42 2.42 2.42
To further confirm imaging and measuring repeatability, the sample was rotated 30°, 45°, 90°, and 120° from its original orientation, and data was collected at each angle. Table II shows the resulting measurements.
Table II: A sample was rotated to four positions and imaged automatically each time. Variability may be due to the calibration values of X and Y and/or operator intervention with cluster separation. Bin 1 equals fibers with a length less than 1 mm and greater than or equal to 0.5mm. The other bins correlate to fiber length similarly
Cumulative Volume Weighted Fiber Length
Bin Start 30 deg 90 deg 120 deg 180 deg
1.0 14 8 14.8 14 8 14.8 14.8
1.5 39.4 39.4 39.2 39.4 38.9
2 0 53 0 53 1 52.7 52.8 52.3
2.5 64.5 64.4 64.3 64.4 63 8
3 0 71 1 71 3 71.1 70.9 71.4
3.5 76 4 77.0 764 76.2 77.0
4 0 82.0 82 7 82.0 81 9 83.1
4.5 87 3 87.5 87.3 86.1 87.9
5.0 92.7 93 4 92 7 92 7 92 7
5 5 94.0 94.8 940 94.0 94.0
6.0 94.7 95.5 94 7 94 7 94.7
6 5 96 3 96 3 96.3 96.3 96.3
7.0 96.3 96.3 96.3 963 96.3
7 5 96 3 96 3 96.3 96.3 96.3
8 0 96.3 96.3 96.3 96 3 96 3
8 5 96.3 96.3 963 96 3 96.3
9 0 96.3 96 3 96 3 96.3 96.3
9.5 97.4 97.4 974 97 4 97 4
10 0 97 4 97.4 97.4 97.4 97.4
10.5 100 100 100 100 100
Max 10.4 104 104 10 4 10.4
Count 488 488 488 488 488
CV. 75 0% 74.5% 75 6% 75 6% 75.0%
VoI Mean 2 54 2 52 2.54 2 55 2 53
007/078090
17
Another important test parameter is the minimal number of fibers that should be measured to sufficiently represent a sample. Ten thousand fibers with lengths > 0.5mm were measured from a polypropylene sample believed to have moderate fiber length retention. The minimum fiber length incorporated in the data was arrived at based on terms presented in International Standard ISO 22314 (International Standard ISO 22314 "Plastics- Glass fibre reinforced products- Determination of fibre length "). and the work of Thomason and Vlug (Thomason, J. L1 Vlug, M. A. et al, "Influence of fiber length and concentration on the properties of glass fiber-reinforced polypropylene: Part 1 - Tensile andflexural modulus ", Composites; 27 A; pp 477-484 (1996), "Part 4 - Impact properties ", Composites; 28A; p.p277-288 (1997)). . For this determination, the volume weighted mean was used. The preliminary results in Table III show that there is less change in the volume (length) weighted mean with a sample size over 3000 fibers. It is intended that the study be repeated several times to support the data.
Table HI: A comparison of sample size to volume weighted mean, shows that fluctuation in the mean decreases with a ssaamri ple size over 3000 fibers.
5
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
Max ΪTΪ ΪTS rTO VK2 ΪΪ3 ΪTo ϊϊl ΪTi ϊTo 115
Count 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
CV. 101.2% 101.9% 101.0% 101.0% 97.8% 97.5% 99.7% 99.4% 100.0% 100.5%
VoMWIean 3.00 2.84 2.57 2.49 2.43 2.47 2.53 2.50 2.51 2.50
Informative data presentation and interpretation are fundamental to understanding fiber distribution within a molded part. The number distribution shows the range of fiber lengths in the sample. It is reported using a histogram illustrating frequency vs. fiber length, and cumulative percent. However, long fibers are usually fewer in number compared to short fibers but represent a more significant volume of the sample. Long fibers also contribute more substantially to some desired physical properties. As such, the number mean should never be reported alone, and should not be given too much weight when reviewing fiber length data, especially for LFRT. To arrive at more meaningful and representative expression of fiber length in a sample, the volume (length) weighted mean is calculated and reported. For example: given a sample with two 10mm fibers and 100 lmm fibers, number mean is about 1.1mm but the volume weighted mean is about 2.5mm. The long fibers are virtually ignored in the number statistics but are represented in the volume (length) weighted statistics.
The equation for calculating volume weighted data is shown below.
Although more representative of the sample than the numerical mean, the volume weighted mean is not sufficient to report alone. For example, in Figures 7 and 8 the volume (length) weighted mean is similar for both samples however the fiber length distribution is very different. Therefore distribution histograms and curves should be reported. Cumulative percents over 3 mm, 5mm and 8mm may be taken into consideration for further understanding and comparing data. The volume weighted coefficient of variance can also be a useful tool when drawing comparisons regarding variability between data sets.
— Zn, the mean fibre length, expressed in micrometres, calculated from the following equation: i = »
where
Lf ts the length of the ith fibre, n (s the number of fibres measured:
L0, a weighted mean length, expressed in micrometres, calculated from the following equation:
L- - ^ where nt is the number of fibres of length L-,
The method of the invention offers the ability to recover glass fibers from molded parts while retaining fiber pliability, therefore facilitating sample preparation and confidence in length retention during sample preparation. The automated data collection and measurement process reduced operator subjectivity and variability in length measurements encountered in a more manual procedure. The method enables length measurements of crossing and touching fibers in their entirety whereas most software edit options do not retain length of all crossing and touching fibers. The process is repeatable and accurate (+ 3% through + 0.3%), and hands-on time is less than other previously mentioned procedures. One preliminary conclusion is that fiber length analysis is most accurately and swiftly performed when the fibers are well- dispersed across the imaging dish and when touching fibers are minimized. Imaging several more sample dishes takes less hands-on time than editing and reviewing fiber clusters.
Increasing applications of LFRT materials warrant an effective method for quantifying fiber length distribution. This method will enable industries engaged in manufacturing LFRT parts to accrue data upon which a baseline for understanding long fiber length distribution can be formed, and improved upon with time and experience. Equipped with this ability, questions that have been posed since the genesis of LFRT materials regarding fiber length in molded parts can more adequately be addressed.
While the invention has been described in detail above, modifications within the spirit and scope of the present invention, set forth in the appended claims, will be readily apparent to one of skill in the art.
Claims
1. A method of measuring fiber length distribution in a long fiber reinforced thermoplastic composite comprising:
5 (a) recovering fiber from the composite by application of heat sufficient to liberate the fiber from matrix polymer; and
(b) dispersing the fiber on a substantially transparent imaging support;
] 0 (c) imaging the dispersed fiber in an automated imaging apparatus with an automated fiber cluster-resolving capability; and
(d) analyzing the image of the fiber dispersion including resolving fiber clusters into individual Fibers using an automated resolving 15 process.
2. The method according to Claim 1, including the further step of accepting or rejecting a proposed automated resolution of a fiber cluster.
20 3. The method according to Claim 1, wherein the imaging apparatus is adapted to produce an edge-map image and analyze the edge-map image utilizing Hough Transform analysis.
4. A method of measuring fiber length distribution in a long fiber reinforced 25 thermoplastic composite comprising:
(a) recovering fiber from the composite by application of heat sufficient to liberate the fiber from matrix polymer; and
(b) dispersing the fiber on a substantially transparent imaging support;
(c) imaging the dispersed fiber in an automated imaging apparatus having adjustable fiber diameter parameters as well as an automated cluster-resolving capability; and
(d) analyzing the image of the fiber dispersion including resolving fiber clusters into individual fibers using an automated resolving process, and adjusting fiber diameter parameters.
5. A method of measuring fiber length distribution in a long fiber reinforced thermoplastic composite comprising:
(a) recovering fiber from the composite by application of heat sufficient to liberate the fiber from matrix polymer while controlling the temperature so as not to embrittle the fibers;
(b) randomizing and dispersing the recovered fibers on a substantially transparent imaging support;
(c) placing the imaging support with dispersed fibers in an automated imaging apparatus;
(d) imaging the fiber dispersion;
(e) analyzing the image of the fiber dispersion with a length-calibrated image analyzer adapted to identify and size individual fibers of the dispersion in order to determine fiber lengths; and
(f) calculating a fiber length distribution based on an analysis of step (e).
6. The method according to Claim 5, wherein at least about 3,000 individual recovered fibers are analyzed for length.
7. The method according to Claim 5, including randomizing the fibers in a liquid medium to resolve clusters and remove other additives and residual polymer, and filtering the liquid medium to recover fibers.
8. The method according to Claim 7, wherein the liquid medium is an aqueous medium provided with an organic dispersant
9. The method according to Claim 8, wherein the organic dispersant is glycerin.
10. The method according to Claim 5, wherein the composite is a glass fiber/polyolefin composite and the image analyzer is calibrated to measure fiber length up to about 15mm.
11. The method according to Claim 10, wherein the image analyzer is calibrated to measure fiber length from about l/2mm to about 1 lmm.
12. The method according to Claim 5, including resolving fiber clusters into individual fibers.
13. The method according to Claim 12, including color coding fibers in order to confirm resolution of individual fibers in fiber clusters.
14. The method according to Claim 5, further comprising the steps of (i) cutting a test specimen from a longer sample and (ii) discarding fiber adjacent to cut surfaces prior to analyzing the fiber length distribution of the test specimen.
15. The method according to Claim 5, wherein the temperature is controlled to between about 400°C and 600°C when heating the composite.
16. The method according to Claim 15, wherein the temperature is controlled to be between about 425°C and 525°C when heating the composite.
17. The method according to Claim 5, wherein the composite is heated in a muffle furnace at a temperature of from about 425°C to about 525°C for at least 6 hours.
18. A method of measuring fiber length distribution in a long fiber reinforced thermoplastic composite comprising:
(a) recovering fiber from the composite by applying heat sufficient to liberate the fiber from matrix polymer while controlling the temperature to be between about 400°C and about 600°C; and
(b) analyzing the recovered fiber for fiber length distribution using an automated imaging apparatus.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US82520006P | 2006-09-11 | 2006-09-11 | |
US60/825,200 | 2006-09-11 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2008033789A2 true WO2008033789A2 (en) | 2008-03-20 |
WO2008033789A3 WO2008033789A3 (en) | 2008-07-24 |
Family
ID=39167773
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2007/078090 WO2008033789A2 (en) | 2006-09-11 | 2007-09-11 | Method of measuring fiber length for long fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
WO (1) | WO2008033789A2 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102238952A (en) * | 2008-12-03 | 2011-11-09 | 赛诺菲 | Treatment for glomerulonephritis with 2 - [ 4- ( -7-ethyl-5h-pyrrolo [ 2,3-b ] -pyrazin- 6 -yl) propan-2-ol |
EP3158314A4 (en) * | 2014-06-20 | 2018-02-21 | Atomic Energy of Canada Limited/ Énergie Atomique du Canada Limitée | Photographic methods of quantification for water and debris mixtures |
CN108303522A (en) * | 2018-01-05 | 2018-07-20 | 华南理工大学 | A kind of short fiber reinforced composite fiber length distribution quantitative evaluating method |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030205508A1 (en) * | 2002-05-03 | 2003-11-06 | Charles Weber | Process and apparatus for determination of fiber length in reinforced thermoplastic composites |
-
2007
- 2007-09-11 WO PCT/US2007/078090 patent/WO2008033789A2/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030205508A1 (en) * | 2002-05-03 | 2003-11-06 | Charles Weber | Process and apparatus for determination of fiber length in reinforced thermoplastic composites |
Non-Patent Citations (6)
Title |
---|
ANONYMOUS: "FASEP Faserseparation" INTERNET ARTICLE, [Online] 13 July 2007 (2007-07-13), XP002474800 Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.fasep.de> [retrieved on 2008-03-19] * |
GUPTA V B ET AL: "Some studies on glass fiber-reinforced polypropylene. I. Reduction in fiber length during processing" POLYMER COMPOSITES, vol. 10, no. 1, February 1989 (1989-02), pages 8-15, XP002474796 ISSN: 0272-8397 * |
KUMAR S K ET AL: "Mechanical properties of injection molded long fiber polypropylene composites, part 1: tensile and flexural properties" POLYMER COMPOSITES, vol. 28, no. 2, April 2007 (2007-04), pages 259-266, XP002474801 ISSN: 0272-8397 * |
VON TURKOVICH R ET AL: "Fiber fracture in reinforced thermoplastic processing" POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, vol. 23, no. 13, September 1983 (1983-09), pages 743-749, XP002474799 ISSN: 0032-3888 * |
WETHERHOLD R C ET AL: "Prediction of thermoelastic properties in short-fiber composites using image analysis techniques" COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, vol. 37, no. 4, 1990, pages 393-410, XP002474797 ISSN: 0266-3538 * |
YURGARTIS S W ET AL: "Describing fiber spatial distribution in unidirectional composite materials" JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-ASSISTED MICROSCOPY, vol. 3, no. 3, September 1991 (1991-09), pages 117-125, XP009098025 ISSN: 1040-7286 * |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102238952A (en) * | 2008-12-03 | 2011-11-09 | 赛诺菲 | Treatment for glomerulonephritis with 2 - [ 4- ( -7-ethyl-5h-pyrrolo [ 2,3-b ] -pyrazin- 6 -yl) propan-2-ol |
EP3158314A4 (en) * | 2014-06-20 | 2018-02-21 | Atomic Energy of Canada Limited/ Énergie Atomique du Canada Limitée | Photographic methods of quantification for water and debris mixtures |
CN108303522A (en) * | 2018-01-05 | 2018-07-20 | 华南理工大学 | A kind of short fiber reinforced composite fiber length distribution quantitative evaluating method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2008033789A3 (en) | 2008-07-24 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
AU2017344741B2 (en) | System and method for performing automated analysis of air samples | |
EP2185333B1 (en) | Fiber reinforced cellular foam product | |
WO2008033789A2 (en) | Method of measuring fiber length for long fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites | |
Paciornik et al. | Measurement of void content and distribution in composite materials through digital microscopy | |
Kunc et al. | Fiber length distribution measurement for long glass and carbon fiber reinforced injection molded thermoplastics | |
CN111665243B (en) | Textile fiber identification and component detection system | |
CN105136839B (en) | Method and device for measuring fiber content based on microscopic counting of melting difference | |
WO2008147745A1 (en) | Method for controlling quality of a fiberglass mat | |
AU2018101327B4 (en) | System and method for performing automated analysis of air samples | |
CN114877810B (en) | Cotton fiber length detection device based on machine vision and application method | |
Barwick et al. | Identification of fiber misalignment in continuous fiber composites | |
EP3158314A1 (en) | Photographic methods of quantification for water and debris mixtures | |
Hendrickx et al. | Rapid and effective methods for the screening of flax fibres for composite applications | |
CN111665244B (en) | Method based on textile fiber identification and component detection system | |
CN111650198A (en) | Method for detecting black impurities in light calcium carbonate | |
JPH0469776A (en) | Automatic classifying method for red blood corpuscle micronucleus cell and automatic classifying device for red blood corpuscle micronucleus cell and red blood corpuscle micronucleus cell sample generating method | |
Kite et al. | Determination of porosity content in composites by micrograph image processing | |
Xu et al. | High volume measurements of cotton maturity by a customized microscopic system | |
Barwick et al. | Identification of sample preparation defects in automated topological characterization of composite materials | |
Hirvonen et al. | Design and implementation of an illumination system for microrobotic paper fiber studies | |
KR102621774B1 (en) | Slide and apparatus for cleaning optics | |
TWI836945B (en) | Cutting and screening analysis method for recycled carbon fiber | |
Geinitz et al. | Detection of filament misalignment in carbon fiber production using a stereovision line scan camera system | |
JP2019066390A (en) | Method for manufacturing prepared specimen, method for preparing dispersion for fiber length measurement, method for measuring fiber length, prepared specimen for fiber length measurement, fiber length measurement apparatus, and control program for fiber length measurement apparatus | |
CN104132840A (en) | Rapid celloidin embedding method for discriminating special animal hair fibers |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase in: |
Ref country code: DE |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 07842195 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A2 |