WO2008014948A1 - Process for the total conversion of heavy feedstocks to distillates - Google Patents

Process for the total conversion of heavy feedstocks to distillates Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2008014948A1
WO2008014948A1 PCT/EP2007/006709 EP2007006709W WO2008014948A1 WO 2008014948 A1 WO2008014948 A1 WO 2008014948A1 EP 2007006709 W EP2007006709 W EP 2007006709W WO 2008014948 A1 WO2008014948 A1 WO 2008014948A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
area
distillation
hydrotreatment
process according
catalyst
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2007/006709
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2008014948A8 (en
Inventor
Mario Marchionna
Salvatore Meli
Luigi Patron
Alberto Delbianco
Nicoletta Panariti
Original Assignee
Eni S.P.A.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Eni S.P.A. filed Critical Eni S.P.A.
Priority to BRPI0714607-8A priority Critical patent/BRPI0714607A2/en
Priority to MX2009001164A priority patent/MX2009001164A/en
Priority to EP07786418A priority patent/EP2046922A1/en
Priority to US12/375,615 priority patent/US8057660B2/en
Priority to CN2007800356067A priority patent/CN101558139B/en
Publication of WO2008014948A1 publication Critical patent/WO2008014948A1/en
Publication of WO2008014948A8 publication Critical patent/WO2008014948A8/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G67/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one process for refining in the absence of hydrogen only
    • C10G67/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one process for refining in the absence of hydrogen only plural serial stages only
    • C10G67/04Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one process for refining in the absence of hydrogen only plural serial stages only including solvent extraction as the refining step in the absence of hydrogen
    • C10G67/0454Solvent desasphalting
    • C10G67/049The hydrotreatment being a hydrocracking
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/10Feedstock materials
    • C10G2300/1033Oil well production fluids
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/10Feedstock materials
    • C10G2300/107Atmospheric residues having a boiling point of at least about 538 °C
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/10Feedstock materials
    • C10G2300/1077Vacuum residues
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/20Characteristics of the feedstock or the products
    • C10G2300/201Impurities
    • C10G2300/205Metal content
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/20Characteristics of the feedstock or the products
    • C10G2300/201Impurities
    • C10G2300/205Metal content
    • C10G2300/206Asphaltenes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/20Characteristics of the feedstock or the products
    • C10G2300/201Impurities
    • C10G2300/207Acid gases, e.g. H2S, COS, SO2, HCN
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/40Characteristics of the process deviating from typical ways of processing
    • C10G2300/4081Recycling aspects
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/40Characteristics of the process deviating from typical ways of processing
    • C10G2300/44Solvents
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2400/00Products obtained by processes covered by groups C10G9/00 - C10G69/14
    • C10G2400/02Gasoline
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2400/00Products obtained by processes covered by groups C10G9/00 - C10G69/14
    • C10G2400/06Gasoil

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a high productivity process for the total conversion to distillates only, without the contextual production of fuel oil or coke, of heavy feedstocks, among which heavy crude oils also with a high metal content, distillation residues, heavy oils coming from catalytic treatment, visbreaker tars, thermal tars, bitumens from oil sands possibly obtained from mining, liquids from coals of different origins and other high-boiling feedstocks of a hydrocarbon origin known as "black oils” .
  • Fuel oil and coke are undesired by-products of con- version processes of heavy feedstocks due to the high level of pollutants accumulated therein, thus greatly limiting the possibility of their use or even obliging them to be sent for disposal (coke) .
  • the upgrading schemes currently applied comprise the production of fuel oil, coke or side-streams destined for thermal use or to be gasified. Apart from the above economical and environmental reasons, these processes seem inadequate as a result of the unproductive yield to distillates when the highest possible volume of products is requested from each barrel of feedstock to be used.
  • hydroconversion technologies currently adopted use fixed or ebullated bed reactors and make use of catalysts generally consisting of one or more transition met- als (Mo, W, Ni, Co, etc..) supported on silica and/or a- lumina, or other oxide carriers.
  • transition met- als Mo, W, Ni, Co, etc..
  • Catalysts in a spheroidal form can in fact reach metal (Ni+V) uptake levels of up to 100% of their weight.
  • metal (Ni+V) uptake levels of up to 100% of their weight.
  • the ebullated bed technology benefits from the improvements granted by the continuous re- generation of the catalyst, it only allows conversion levels to distillates up to a maximum of 60% to be obtained. It is possible to bring the conversion to 80% by operating under highly severe conditions and with the recycling of a quota of the products, with problems however of stability of the fuel oil produced due to the separation of the non-converted asphaltene phase which, also in this case, remains the core of the problem. For these reasons, even if the ebullated bed technology leads to a significant production of fuel oil, it is not suitable for total conversion processes to distillates.
  • Said patent application IT-95A001095 describes more specifically a process which allows the catalyst recovered to be recycled to the hydrotreatment reactor without the necessity of a further regeneration step. It is gen- erally necessary to effect a flushing on the recycled stream to prevent the metallic sulfides produced as a result of the demetallation, from accumulating at such high levels as to hinder the efficiency of the process (hy- drotreatment reactor, column bottom, separators, pumps and piping) .
  • the volumes of the flushing stream therefore depend on the level of metals in the feedstock and quantity of solids the recycled stream can tolerate and which, on the basis of our experience, can vary from 0.3- 4% of the feedstock itself.
  • the catalyst is obviously also fatally subtracted from the reaction cycle together with the flushing and must consequently be continuously reintegrated to an equivalent extent.
  • the definition of a conversion process which allows the total transformation of heavy feedstocks to distillates has so far remained unsolved.
  • the main obstacle consists of the operability limits, mainly the formation of coke, which are encountered when, in order to complete the conversion of heavy oils to distillates, the conditions of the hydrogenation reactor, whether it be with or without a supported catalyst, become severe. More specifically, the objectives at which an ideal process (at the moment not available) in the field of the treatment of residues should be aimed, are the following:
  • a process configuration has therefore been surprisingly found for the treatment of heavy feedstocks based on two steps wherein in the first step the heavy feedstock is effectively hydrotreated in a slurry reactor with a dispersed catalyst.
  • the objective of this opera- tion is to demolish the high molecular weight asphaltene structures to favour the removal of Ni and V (hydrodemet- allation, HDM) and contemporaneously to reduce the content of asphaltenes in the feedstock converting part of it to distillates by means of rapid dealkylation proc- esses.
  • the liquid effluent containing the dispersed catalyst and Ni and V sulphides, is subjected to unitary separation operations (distillations and deasphaltations or possibly physical separations of the solids comprising the catalyst) in order to recover the products resulting from the HDM reaction and hydrotreatment reactions which accompany it (HDS, HDN, HDA and HC) .
  • the asphaltene residue containing the solids in dispersed phase (catalysts and N and V sulphides) is sent for disposal or other further treatment to recover the metals.
  • This particular configuration is particularly suit- able when the heavy feedstock treated is extremely reactive, which leads to a reduction in the volume of the asphaltene fraction, which is further concentrated through the use in deasphalting of solvents having a considerable extracting power (pentanes and hexanes) .
  • particularly reactive feedstocks such as oil sands possibly produced from mining
  • this process proves to be particularly advantageous as the possible inorganic sediments present in the feedstock are concentrated, together with the solids, in this asphal- tene fraction.
  • An aliquot of catalyst, which must be reintegrated, is inevitably subtracted on this stream containing the solid products. This quota can be kept suitably low by operating with relatively low concentrations of catalyst.
  • the practically demetalled oily product obtained is then sent to a second step where it can be treated under high concentration conditions of catalyst and temperature to directly obtain end-products, at the same time limiting the undesired production of coke which impedes the recycling of the catalyst.
  • the first reactor can operate under sufficiently bland conditions to avoid the undesired formation of coke and favour the desired reactions (obtaining an efficient demetallation, a significant Hydrocracking of the alkyl side chains present on the heavy aromatic structures with the consequent production of distillates and a partial reduction in asphaltenes) .
  • the use of sufficiently reduced residence times allows high productivities to be reached;
  • the second reactor can operate under forced conditions (high temperatures and high concentration of catalyst) , thus obtaining high productivities, as the hydrogenating capacity can be enhanced, now free of flushing aspects relating to the presence of other metals and coke, as well as of problems relating to instability of the asphaltenes.
  • this approach allows, on the one hand, the direct production of semi-finished distillates re- quired by the market with industrially acceptable reaction rates for a high capacity process and, on the other, the formation of coke to be avoided without the necessity of effecting a flushing (at least on the second hy- drotreatment reactor) , otherwise envisaged in the schemes so far known.
  • the process, object of the present invention for the conversion of heavy feedstocks selected from heavy crude oils, distillation residues from crude oil or coming from catalytic treatment, vis- breaker tars, thermal tars, bitumens from oil sands, liq- uids from coals of different origins and other high- boiling feedstocks of a hydrocarbon origin, known as "black oils”, comprises the following steps:
  • the first distillation area (Dl) preferably consists of an atmospheric distillation column and a vacuum distillation column, fed by the bottom fraction of said atmospheric distillation column.
  • One or more flash steps can be optionally added before said atmospheric distillation columnphase to the second hydrotreatment area (HT2) .
  • VGO vacuum gas oil
  • the second distillation area (D2) preferably consists of one or more flash steps and an atmospheric distillation column, even if in some cases the presence of an additional column operating under vacuum can be envisaged.
  • Substantially all the distillation residue (tar) is preferably recycled to the second hydrotreatment area (HT2) .
  • the heavy feedstocks treated can be of a varying nature: they can be selected from heavy crude oils, distillation residues, heavy oils coming from catalytic treatment, such as for example heavy cycle oils from catalytic cracking treatment, residue products from fixed bed and/or ebullated bed hydroconversion treatment, thermal tars (coming for example from visbreaking or similar thermal processes), bitumens from oils sands, liquids from coals of different origins and other high-boiling feedstocks of a hydrocarbon origin known in the art as "black oils” .
  • the catalysts used can be selected from those obtained from in-situ decomposable precursors (various kinds of metallic carboxylates such as naphthenates, oc-novs, etc., metallic derivatives of phosphonic acids, metallocarbonyls, heteropolyacids, etc.) or from pre- formed compounds based on one or more transition metals such as Ni, Co, Ru, W and Mo: the latter is preferred thanks to its high catalytic activity.
  • the concentration of transition metal contained in the catalyst fed to the first hydrotreatment area ranges from 20 to 2,000 ppm, preferably from 50 to 1,000 ppm.
  • the concentration of transition metal contained in the catalyst fed to the second hydrotreatment area ranges from 1,000 to 30,000 ppm, preferably from 3,000 to 20,000 ppm .
  • the first hydrotreatment area can consist of one or more reactors: part of the distillates produced in the first reactor can be sent to the subsequent reactors.
  • Said first hydrotreatment area preferably operates at a temperature ranging from 360 to 48O 0 C, more preferably from 380 to 440 0 C, at a pressure ranging from 3 to 30 MPa, more preferably from 10 to 20 MPa, and with a residence time varying from 0.1 to 5 h, preferably from 0.5 to 3.5 h.
  • the second hydrotreatment area can consist of one or more reactors: part of the distillates produced in the first reactor of said area can be sent to the subsequent reactors of said area.
  • Said second hydrotreatment area preferably operates at a temperature ranging from 400 to 48O 0 C, more prefera- bly from 420 to 460 0 C, at a pressure ranging from 3 to 30 MPa, more preferably from 10 to 20 MPa, and with a residence time varying from 0.5 to 6 h, preferably from 1 to 4 h.
  • Hydrogen is fed to the reactor, which can operate in both a down- flow mode and, preferably, up- flow. Said gas can be fed to several sections of the reactor.
  • the vacuum section of the first distillation area preferably operates at a reduced pressure ranging from 0. 005 to 1 atm, more preferably from 0.015 to 0.1 atm.
  • the vacuum section, when present, of the second distillation area preferably operates at reduced pressure ranging from 0.005 to 1 atm, more preferably from 0.015 to 0.1 atm.
  • the deasphalting step effected by means of an extraction with solvent, either hydrocarbon or non- hydrocarbon, preferably with paraffins or iso-paraffins having from 3 to 6, preferably from 4 to 5 , carbon atoms, is normally carried out at temperatures ranging from 40 to 230 0 C and a pressure of 0.1 to 7 MPa.
  • DAO deasphalted oil
  • a further secondary section can be optionally present for the hydrogenation post-treatment on a fixed bed reactor of the C 2 -500°C fraction, preferably the C 5 - 350 0 C fraction, coming from the section of high pressure separators envisaged upstream of the first and second distillation area and downstream of the hydrotreatment section (HTl) and hydrotreatment section (HT2) .
  • the fixed bed hydrotreatment section of the light fractions obtained from the separation pre- steps effected at a high pressure on the hydrotreatment reaction products can be shared.
  • at least a part of the stream containing asphaltenes, coming from the deasphalting section (SDA) is sent to a treatment section with a suitable solvent for the separation of the product into a solid fraction and a liquid fraction from which said solvent can subsequently be removed.
  • Said possible treatment section of at least part of the stream containing asphaltenes consists of a deoiling step with solvent (toluene or gas oil or other streams rich in aromatic compounds) and separation of the solid from the liquid fraction.
  • the liquid fraction obtained can be fed, at least partially, to the "fuel oil pool", as such or after being separated from the solvent and/or after the addition of a suitable fluxant, wherein, in some cases, the sol- vent and fluxant can coincide.
  • the solid fraction can be disposed of as such or, more advantageously, can be sent to a selective recovery treatment of metals .
  • the deoiling step consists in the treatment of at least part of the stream containing asphaltenes with a solvent capable of reducing the higher possible amount of organic compounds to the liquid state, leaving the metal sulphides, coke and most refractory carbonaceous residues
  • insoluble toluene or similar
  • inorganic solvents in the solid state possible further inorganic solvents in the solid state.
  • the rate of the operation is facilitated by increasing the temperature and reaction time, but for economical reasons an excessive increase is not advisable.
  • the operating temperatures depend on the solvent used and the pressure conditions; temperatures ranging from 80 to 150 0 C are generally recommended; the reaction times can vary between 0.1 and 12 hrs, preferably between 0.5 and 4 hrs.
  • the volumetric ratio between the solvent and stream containing asphaltenes is also an important variable to be considered; it can vary from 1 to 10 (w/w) , preferably from 1 to 5, more preferably from 1.5 to 3.5.
  • This operation can be one of those typically used in industrial practice, such as decanting, centrifugation and filtration.
  • the liquid phase can then be sent to a stripping phase with recovery of the solvent, which is recycled to the first step (deoiling) for the treatment of the flush- ing stream.
  • the remaining heavy fraction can be advantageously used in the refinery as a stream practically free of metals and with a relatively low content of sulphur. If the treatment operation is effected with a gas oil, for example, part of this gas oil can be left in the heavy product so as to bring* it to specification for the "fuel oil pool" .
  • the solid part can be disposed of as such or it can be sent to treatment for the selective recovery of metals .
  • a preferred embodiment of the present invention is now provided with the help of the enclosed figure 1 which should not be considered a limitation of the scope of the invention.
  • the heavy feedstock (1) is mixed with fresh catalyst (2) and sent to the first hydrotreatment area (HTl) consisting of one or more reactors in series and/or in parallel wherein hydrogen or a mixture of hydrogen/H 2 S (3) is introduced.
  • a stream (4) leaves the reaction section HTl, containing the reaction product and the catalyst in dispersed phase, which is sent to a first distillation area (Dl) consisting of an atmospheric distillation column (D1 A ) and a distillation column under vacuum (Dl v ) .
  • Two streams are obtained from the deasphalting unit: one consisting of DAO (8) , the other containing asphalte- nes (9) .
  • the stream containing asphaltenes and solid products (9) is sent for disposal or possible treatment for the recovery of the metals .
  • the stream consisting of DAO (8) is sent to a second hydrotreating area (HT2) , consisting of a hydrotreating reactor in which hydrogen or a blend of hydrogen/H 2 S (3) is introduced.
  • a stream (10) leaves this reactor (HT2) , containing the reaction product and the catalyst in dispersed phase, which is sent to a second distillation area (D2) consisting of an atmospheric distillation column in order to separate the lighter fractions (D2 X , D2 2 , D2 3# .... D2 ⁇ ) from the heavier fraction at the bottom (11) which is recycled to the second hydrotreatment area (HT2) .
  • Example 1 Some examples are provided hereunder for a better illustration of the invention, which should in no way be considered as being limited thereto or thereby.
  • Example 1
  • the system is kept under stirring by means of a swinging capillary system operating at a rotation rate of 900 rpm; the total pressure is kept constant by means of an automatic reintegrating system of the hydrogen consumed;
  • the quenching of the reaction is effected; the autoclave is then depressurised and the gases collected in a sampling bag; the gaseous samples are subsequently sent for gas chromatographic analysis; - the reaction product is recovered and filtered to separate the catalyst. The liquid fraction is analyzed for the determination of the yields and quality of the products .
  • Catalyst 500 ppm of Mo/feedstock added using an oil- soluble organometallic precursor containing 15%w of metal
  • the quenching of the reaction is effected; the autoclave is then depressurised and the gases collected in a sampling bag; the gaseous samples are subsequently sent for gas chromatographic analysis;
  • reaction product is recovered and filtered to separate the catalyst.
  • the liquid fraction is analyzed for the determination of the yields and quality of the prod- ucts.
  • the feedstock used for the test was prepared from Example 3, and specifically from the DAO obtained by the deasphalting with n-pentane of the residue produced by the hydrogenation reaction in the presence of dispersed catalyst.
  • a DAO 50O + conversion of 80.1% to distilled products and a desul- phuration of 68.3% was obtained.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)

Abstract

Process for the conversion of heavy feedstocks selected from heavy crude oils, distillation residues from crude oil or catalytic treatment, 'visbreaker tars', 'thermal tars', bitumens from 'oil sands' liquids from coals of different origins and other high boiling feedstocks of a hydrocarbon origin, comprising the following steps: • mixing the heavy feedstock with a suitable hydrogenation catalyst and sending the mixture obtained to a first hydrotreatment area (HTl) to which hydrogen or a mixture of hydrogen and H2S are introduced; • sending the effluent stream from the first hydrotreatment area (HTl), containing the hydrotreatment reaction product and the catalyst in dispersed phase, to a first distillation area (Dl) having one or more flash steps and/or atmospheric distillation and/or vacuum distillation whereby the various fractions coming from the hydrotreatment reaction are separated; • sending at least part of the distillation residue (tar) or liquid leaving the flash unit of the first distillation area (Dl), containing the catalyst in dispersed phase, rich in metallic sulfides produced by demetallation of the feedstock and optionally minimum quantities of coke, to a deasphalting area (SDA) in the presence of solvents obtaining two streams, one consisting of deasphalted oil (DAO), the other containing asphaltenes and solids to be sent to disposal or to metal recovery; • sending the stream consisting of deasphalted oil (DAO) to a second hydrotreatment area (HT2), to which hydrogen or a mixture of hydrogen and H2S and a suitable hydrogenation catalyst are introduced; • sending the effluent stream from the second hydrotreatment area (HT2), containing the hydrotreatment reaction product and the catalyst in dispersed phase, to a second distillation area (D2) having one or more flash and/or distillation steps whereby the various fractions coming from the second hydrotreatment area are separated; • recycling at least part of the distillation residue or liquid leaving the flash unit of the second distillation area (D2), containing the catalyst in dispersed phase to the second hydrotreatment area (HT2).

Description

PROCESS FOR THE TOTAL CONVERSION OF HEAVY FEEDSTOCKS TO DISTILLATES
The present invention relates to a high productivity process for the total conversion to distillates only, without the contextual production of fuel oil or coke, of heavy feedstocks, among which heavy crude oils also with a high metal content, distillation residues, heavy oils coming from catalytic treatment, visbreaker tars, thermal tars, bitumens from oil sands possibly obtained from mining, liquids from coals of different origins and other high-boiling feedstocks of a hydrocarbon origin known as "black oils" .
Fuel oil and coke are undesired by-products of con- version processes of heavy feedstocks due to the high level of pollutants accumulated therein, thus greatly limiting the possibility of their use or even obliging them to be sent for disposal (coke) . The upgrading schemes currently applied comprise the production of fuel oil, coke or side-streams destined for thermal use or to be gasified. Apart from the above economical and environmental reasons, these processes seem inadequate as a result of the unproductive yield to distillates when the highest possible volume of products is requested from each barrel of feedstock to be used.
The conversion of heavy feedstocks into liquid products can be substantially effected in two ways: one thermally, and the other by means of hydrogenating treatments . Current studies are mainly directed towards hydrogenating treatments, as thermal processes, still widely used, have intrinsic limits associated with the production of coke or heavy pitches with a consequent low yield to distillates. Upgrading processes of residues by means of hydro- conversion consist in treating the feedstock in the presence of hydrogen and suitable catalysts, following different objectives:
* Demolishing the high molecular weight asphaltenes structures and favouring the removal of Ni and V (hy- drodemetallation, HDM) and contemporaneously reducing the content of asphaltenes in the feedstock.
* Removing S and N by means of hydrogenation and hy- drogenolysis reactions (hydrodesulphuration HDS and hy- drodenitrogenation HDN respectively) . • Reducing the CCR (Conradson Carbonaceous Residue) by- means of Hydrocracking (HC) and hydrodearomatization (HDA) reactions.
• Transforming the high molecular weight molecules into light molecules (distillates) by means of Hydro- cracking reactions (HC) .
The hydroconversion technologies currently adopted use fixed or ebullated bed reactors and make use of catalysts generally consisting of one or more transition met- als (Mo, W, Ni, Co, etc..) supported on silica and/or a- lumina, or other oxide carriers.
Fixed bed technologies, also in the most advanced versions, have great limitations:
• they cannot process feedstocks with Ni+V contents higher than 250 ppm as this would imply too frequent regeneration cycles of the catalyst;
• they cannot process heavy feedstocks as described above due the excessive formation of pitches on the catalyst;
• they do not allow the conversion of heavy feedstocks to degrees higher than 30-40%.
As a result of these limitations, fixed bed hydro- conversion technologies are totally inadequate for configuring total conversion schemes of heavy feedstocks to distillates . In order to partly overcome these limitations, ebul- lated bed processes were developed in which although the catalytic bed is confined within a certain area of the reactor, it is mobile and can expand as a result of the flow of reagents in liquid and gaseous phase. This allows the reactor to be equipped with mechanical apparatuses for removing the exhausted catalyst and feeding fresh catalyst in continuous without interrupting the running of the reactor. For this possibility of continuously substituting the exhausted catalyst, ebullated bed technolo- gies can process heavy feedstocks with a metal content of up to 1,200 ppm Ni+V. Catalysts in a spheroidal form can in fact reach metal (Ni+V) uptake levels of up to 100% of their weight. Although the ebullated bed technology benefits from the improvements granted by the continuous re- generation of the catalyst, it only allows conversion levels to distillates up to a maximum of 60% to be obtained. It is possible to bring the conversion to 80% by operating under highly severe conditions and with the recycling of a quota of the products, with problems however of stability of the fuel oil produced due to the separation of the non-converted asphaltene phase which, also in this case, remains the core of the problem. For these reasons, even if the ebullated bed technology leads to a significant production of fuel oil, it is not suitable for total conversion processes to distillates. As an alternative to hydroconversion processes based on the use of fixed bed or ebullated bed supported catalysts, processes have been proposed which use catalysts homogeneously dispersed in the reaction medium (slurry) . These slurry processes are characterized by the presence of particles of catalyst having very small average dimensions and uniformly dispersed in the hydrocarbon phase.
It is consequently difficult for the activity of the catalyst to be influenced by the presence of metals or carbonaceous residues coming from the degradation of as- phaltenes . This, together with the high efficiency of the catalyst defined, forms the premises for configuring, as described in patent application IT-95A001095, a conversion process of heavy feedstocks which allows their total transformation (zero residue refinery) , comprising the asphaltene section, to distillates and hydrocarbon streams (deasphalted oils) of such a high quality that they can be fed to refinery catalytic cracking plants, such as Hydrocracking and Fluid Bed Catalytic Cracking (FCC) .
Said patent application IT-95A001095, describes more specifically a process which allows the catalyst recovered to be recycled to the hydrotreatment reactor without the necessity of a further regeneration step. It is gen- erally necessary to effect a flushing on the recycled stream to prevent the metallic sulfides produced as a result of the demetallation, from accumulating at such high levels as to hinder the efficiency of the process (hy- drotreatment reactor, column bottom, separators, pumps and piping) . The volumes of the flushing stream therefore depend on the level of metals in the feedstock and quantity of solids the recycled stream can tolerate and which, on the basis of our experience, can vary from 0.3- 4% of the feedstock itself. The catalyst is obviously also fatally subtracted from the reaction cycle together with the flushing and must consequently be continuously reintegrated to an equivalent extent.
A desirable evolution of this process should aim at obtaining distillates alone for obvious economical rea- sons and for considerably simplifying the refining cycle, which is specifically what the present invention proposes, together with other objectives.
The definition of a conversion process which allows the total transformation of heavy feedstocks to distillates has so far remained unsolved. The main obstacle consists of the operability limits, mainly the formation of coke, which are encountered when, in order to complete the conversion of heavy oils to distillates, the conditions of the hydrogenation reactor, whether it be with or without a supported catalyst, become severe. More specifically, the objectives at which an ideal process (at the moment not available) in the field of the treatment of residues should be aimed, are the following:
• maximizing the conversion without producing coke or fuel oil;
• maximizing the production of distillates;
• optimally managing the reactivity of the system (kinetics of conversion reactions to distillates and kinetics of reactions which lead to the formation of by- products) to minimize the reaction volumes and therefore reduce the investment costs, taking into account that said technologies applied for the upgrading of extra-heavy oils or bituminous sands, have to have considerable potentialities. A process configuration has therefore been surprisingly found for the treatment of heavy feedstocks based on two steps wherein in the first step the heavy feedstock is effectively hydrotreated in a slurry reactor with a dispersed catalyst. The objective of this opera- tion is to demolish the high molecular weight asphaltene structures to favour the removal of Ni and V (hydrodemet- allation, HDM) and contemporaneously to reduce the content of asphaltenes in the feedstock converting part of it to distillates by means of rapid dealkylation proc- esses. At the outlet of the first hydrotreatment reactor, after separation of the gaseous effluents, the liquid effluent, containing the dispersed catalyst and Ni and V sulphides, is subjected to unitary separation operations (distillations and deasphaltations or possibly physical separations of the solids comprising the catalyst) in order to recover the products resulting from the HDM reaction and hydrotreatment reactions which accompany it (HDS, HDN, HDA and HC) .
The asphaltene residue containing the solids in dispersed phase (catalysts and N and V sulphides) is sent for disposal or other further treatment to recover the metals.
This particular configuration is particularly suit- able when the heavy feedstock treated is extremely reactive, which leads to a reduction in the volume of the asphaltene fraction, which is further concentrated through the use in deasphalting of solvents having a considerable extracting power (pentanes and hexanes) . When particularly reactive feedstocks are treated, such as oil sands possibly produced from mining, this process proves to be particularly advantageous as the possible inorganic sediments present in the feedstock are concentrated, together with the solids, in this asphal- tene fraction. An aliquot of catalyst, which must be reintegrated, is inevitably subtracted on this stream containing the solid products. This quota can be kept suitably low by operating with relatively low concentrations of catalyst. The practically demetalled oily product obtained is then sent to a second step where it can be treated under high concentration conditions of catalyst and temperature to directly obtain end-products, at the same time limiting the undesired production of coke which impedes the recycling of the catalyst.
We have also found that the tendency towards the formation of coke depends on both the concentration of the hydrogenation catalyst based on a transition metal (with high concentrations of catalyst, the formation is practically suppressed within a wide temperature range, whereas it is evident under analogously severe conditions, when the catalyst is present in low concentrations) , and also on the nature and quantity of maltenes with respect to the asphaltenes present in the system (an increase in the maltenes/asphaltenes ratio can in fact create a situation of instability which can lead to the precipitation of the asphaltenes and subsequently to the formation of coke) .
As far as the first aspect is concerned, operating at high temperatures with high concentrations of catalyst allows high productivities to be reached with a good control on the formation of coke. In conventional processes, this is not possible as high concentrations of catalyst correspond, in relation to the flushing degree, to a high consumption which can jeopardize the economical aspect, in the present invention however this drawback is overcome as an efficient preventive demetallation is effected.
An important positive aspect of this approach, how- ever, relates to the fact that high severity reactions
(i.e. those that lead to the total transformation of the feedstock to distillates) are carried out in a system without a certain quantity of light paraffins and malte- nes (i.e. the distillates of the first step) and they can therefore be run at relatively high temperatures without coming up against problems of instability of the asphal- tenes .
To summarize, the specific characteristic of this approach is to envisage two hydrotreatment steps operat- ing under different severity conditions:
* the first reactor can operate under sufficiently bland conditions to avoid the undesired formation of coke and favour the desired reactions (obtaining an efficient demetallation, a significant Hydrocracking of the alkyl side chains present on the heavy aromatic structures with the consequent production of distillates and a partial reduction in asphaltenes) . The use of sufficiently reduced residence times allows high productivities to be reached; * the second reactor, on the other hand, can operate under forced conditions (high temperatures and high concentration of catalyst) , thus obtaining high productivities, as the hydrogenating capacity can be enhanced, now free of flushing aspects relating to the presence of other metals and coke, as well as of problems relating to instability of the asphaltenes.
By separating the various reactive functions in the best possible way, this approach allows, on the one hand, the direct production of semi-finished distillates re- quired by the market with industrially acceptable reaction rates for a high capacity process and, on the other, the formation of coke to be avoided without the necessity of effecting a flushing (at least on the second hy- drotreatment reactor) , otherwise envisaged in the schemes so far known.
More specifically, the process, object of the present invention, for the conversion of heavy feedstocks selected from heavy crude oils, distillation residues from crude oil or coming from catalytic treatment, vis- breaker tars, thermal tars, bitumens from oil sands, liq- uids from coals of different origins and other high- boiling feedstocks of a hydrocarbon origin, known as "black oils", comprises the following steps:
• mixing the heavy feedstock with a suitable hydrogena- tion catalyst and sending the mixture obtained to a first hydrotreatment area (HTl) to which hydrogen or a mixture of hydrogen and H2S are introduced;
• sending the effluent stream from the first hydrotreatment area (HTl) , containing the hydrotreatment reaction product and the catalyst in dispersed phase, to a first distillation area (Dl) having one or more flash steps and/or atmospheric distillation and/or vacuum distillation whereby the various fractions coming from the hydrotreatment reaction are separated; • sending at least part of the distillation residue (tar) or liquid leaving the flash unit of the first distillation area (Dl) , containing the catalyst in dispersed phase, rich in metallic sulphides produced by demetal- lation of the feedstock and optionally minimum quanti- ties of coke, to a deasphalting area (SDA) in the presence of solvents or to a physical separation zone, obtaining, in the case of the deasphalting area, two streams, one consisting of deasphalted oil (DAO) , the other containing asphaltenes and solid products to be sent to disposal or metal recovery; • sending the stream consisting of deasphalted oil (DAO) to a second hydrotreatment reaction area (HT2) , to which hydrogen or a mixture of hydrogen and H2S and a suitable hydrogenation catalyst are introduced; • sending the effluent stream from the second hydrotreatment area (HT2) , containing the hydrotreatment reaction product and the catalyst in dispersed phase, to a second distillation area (D2) having one or more flash and/or distillation steps whereby the various fractions coming from the second hydrotreatment area are separated;
• recycling at least part of the distillation residue or liquid leaving the flash unit of the second distillation area (D2) , containing the catalyst in dispersed The first distillation area (Dl) preferably consists of an atmospheric distillation column and a vacuum distillation column, fed by the bottom fraction of said atmospheric distillation column. One or more flash steps can be optionally added before said atmospheric distillation columnphase to the second hydrotreatment area (HT2) .
Two streams are obtained from the vacuum distillation column, a bottom stream consisting of the distillation residue, the other essentially consisting of vacuum gas oil (VGO) which can be optionally sent, at least par- tially, to the second hydrotreatment area (HT2) .
The second distillation area (D2) preferably consists of one or more flash steps and an atmospheric distillation column, even if in some cases the presence of an additional column operating under vacuum can be envisaged.
Substantially all the distillation residue (tar) is preferably recycled to the second hydrotreatment area (HT2) . The heavy feedstocks treated can be of a varying nature: they can be selected from heavy crude oils, distillation residues, heavy oils coming from catalytic treatment, such as for example heavy cycle oils from catalytic cracking treatment, residue products from fixed bed and/or ebullated bed hydroconversion treatment, thermal tars (coming for example from visbreaking or similar thermal processes), bitumens from oils sands, liquids from coals of different origins and other high-boiling feedstocks of a hydrocarbon origin known in the art as "black oils" .
The catalysts used can be selected from those obtained from in-situ decomposable precursors (various kinds of metallic carboxylates such as naphthenates, oc- toates, etc., metallic derivatives of phosphonic acids, metallocarbonyls, heteropolyacids, etc.) or from pre- formed compounds based on one or more transition metals such as Ni, Co, Ru, W and Mo: the latter is preferred thanks to its high catalytic activity.
The concentration of transition metal contained in the catalyst fed to the first hydrotreatment area ranges from 20 to 2,000 ppm, preferably from 50 to 1,000 ppm.
The concentration of transition metal contained in the catalyst fed to the second hydrotreatment area ranges from 1,000 to 30,000 ppm, preferably from 3,000 to 20,000 ppm .
The first hydrotreatment area can consist of one or more reactors: part of the distillates produced in the first reactor can be sent to the subsequent reactors.
Said first hydrotreatment area preferably operates at a temperature ranging from 360 to 48O0C, more preferably from 380 to 4400C, at a pressure ranging from 3 to 30 MPa, more preferably from 10 to 20 MPa, and with a residence time varying from 0.1 to 5 h, preferably from 0.5 to 3.5 h. The second hydrotreatment area can consist of one or more reactors: part of the distillates produced in the first reactor of said area can be sent to the subsequent reactors of said area.
Said second hydrotreatment area preferably operates at a temperature ranging from 400 to 48O0C, more prefera- bly from 420 to 4600C, at a pressure ranging from 3 to 30 MPa, more preferably from 10 to 20 MPa, and with a residence time varying from 0.5 to 6 h, preferably from 1 to 4 h. Hydrogen is fed to the reactor, which can operate in both a down- flow mode and, preferably, up- flow. Said gas can be fed to several sections of the reactor.
The vacuum section of the first distillation area preferably operates at a reduced pressure ranging from 0. 005 to 1 atm, more preferably from 0.015 to 0.1 atm.
The vacuum section, when present, of the second distillation area preferably operates at reduced pressure ranging from 0.005 to 1 atm, more preferably from 0.015 to 0.1 atm. The deasphalting step, effected by means of an extraction with solvent, either hydrocarbon or non- hydrocarbon, preferably with paraffins or iso-paraffins having from 3 to 6, preferably from 4 to 5 , carbon atoms, is normally carried out at temperatures ranging from 40 to 2300C and a pressure of 0.1 to 7 MPa. It can also consist of one or more sections operating with the same solvent or different solvents; the recovery of the solvent can be effected under sub-critical or super-critical conditions with one or more steps, thus allowing a further fractionation between the deasphalted oil (DAO) and res- ins .
By incorporating the process described in patent application IT-MI2003A-000692 in the present patent application, a further secondary section can be optionally present for the hydrogenation post-treatment on a fixed bed reactor of the C2-500°C fraction, preferably the C5- 3500C fraction, coming from the section of high pressure separators envisaged upstream of the first and second distillation area and downstream of the hydrotreatment section (HTl) and hydrotreatment section (HT2) .
The fixed bed hydrotreatment section of the light fractions obtained from the separation pre- steps effected at a high pressure on the hydrotreatment reaction products (HTl and HT2) can be shared. In addition to the possible secondary hydrogenating post-treatment section there can optionally be a further secondary post-treatment section of the asphaltene stream containing the solid products, which can be further enriched in the inorganic fraction. In this case, at least a part of the stream containing asphaltenes, coming from the deasphalting section (SDA) , is sent to a treatment section with a suitable solvent for the separation of the product into a solid fraction and a liquid fraction from which said solvent can subsequently be removed. Said possible treatment section of at least part of the stream containing asphaltenes consists of a deoiling step with solvent (toluene or gas oil or other streams rich in aromatic compounds) and separation of the solid from the liquid fraction.
The liquid fraction obtained can be fed, at least partially, to the "fuel oil pool", as such or after being separated from the solvent and/or after the addition of a suitable fluxant, wherein, in some cases, the sol- vent and fluxant can coincide.
The solid fraction can be disposed of as such or, more advantageously, can be sent to a selective recovery treatment of metals .
The deoiling step consists in the treatment of at least part of the stream containing asphaltenes with a solvent capable of reducing the higher possible amount of organic compounds to the liquid state, leaving the metal sulphides, coke and most refractory carbonaceous residues
("insoluble toluene " or similar) and possible further inorganic solvents in the solid state.
Considering that the components of a metallic nature can become pyrophoric when very dry, it is advisable to operate in an inert atmosphere, as much as possible without oxygen and moisture. Different solvents can be advantageously used in this "deoiling" phase; among these, aromatic solvents such as toluene and/or blends of xylenes, hydrocarbon feedstocks available in the plant such as the gas oil produced therein, or in the refinery such as, for exam- pie, Light Cycle Oil coming from the FCC unit or Thermal Gas oil coming from the Visbreaker/Thermal Cracker unit .
Within certain limits, the rate of the operation is facilitated by increasing the temperature and reaction time, but for economical reasons an excessive increase is not advisable.
The operating temperatures depend on the solvent used and the pressure conditions; temperatures ranging from 80 to 1500C are generally recommended; the reaction times can vary between 0.1 and 12 hrs, preferably between 0.5 and 4 hrs.
The volumetric ratio between the solvent and stream containing asphaltenes is also an important variable to be considered; it can vary from 1 to 10 (w/w) , preferably from 1 to 5, more preferably from 1.5 to 3.5. Once the mixing phase between the solvent and the stream containing asphaltenes has been completed, the effluent maintained under stirring is sent to a separation section of the liquid from the solid phase.
This operation can be one of those typically used in industrial practice, such as decanting, centrifugation and filtration.
The liquid phase can then be sent to a stripping phase with recovery of the solvent, which is recycled to the first step (deoiling) for the treatment of the flush- ing stream. The remaining heavy fraction can be advantageously used in the refinery as a stream practically free of metals and with a relatively low content of sulphur. If the treatment operation is effected with a gas oil, for example, part of this gas oil can be left in the heavy product so as to bring* it to specification for the "fuel oil pool" .
The solid part can be disposed of as such or it can be sent to treatment for the selective recovery of metals . A preferred embodiment of the present invention is now provided with the help of the enclosed figure 1 which should not be considered a limitation of the scope of the invention.
The heavy feedstock (1) is mixed with fresh catalyst (2) and sent to the first hydrotreatment area (HTl) consisting of one or more reactors in series and/or in parallel wherein hydrogen or a mixture of hydrogen/H2S (3) is introduced. A stream (4) leaves the reaction section HTl, containing the reaction product and the catalyst in dispersed phase, which is sent to a first distillation area (Dl) consisting of an atmospheric distillation column (D1A) and a distillation column under vacuum (Dlv) .
From the atmospheric distillation column (D1A) , the lighter fractions (Dl1, Dl2, Dl3,.... Dln) are separated from the heavier fraction on the bottom (5) which is fed to the vacuum distillation column (Dlv) separating two streams, one essentially consisting of vacuum gas oil (6), the other (7)at the bottom, which forms the distillation residue of the first distillation area which is sent to the deasphalting section (SDA) , said operation being effected by means of solvent extraction.
Two streams are obtained from the deasphalting unit: one consisting of DAO (8) , the other containing asphalte- nes (9) . The stream containing asphaltenes and solid products (9) is sent for disposal or possible treatment for the recovery of the metals .
The stream consisting of DAO (8) is sent to a second hydrotreating area (HT2) , consisting of a hydrotreating reactor in which hydrogen or a blend of hydrogen/H2S (3) is introduced. A stream (10) leaves this reactor (HT2) , containing the reaction product and the catalyst in dispersed phase, which is sent to a second distillation area (D2) consisting of an atmospheric distillation column in order to separate the lighter fractions (D2X, D22, D23#.... D2π) from the heavier fraction at the bottom (11) which is recycled to the second hydrotreatment area (HT2) .
Some examples are provided hereunder for a better illustration of the invention, which should in no way be considered as being limited thereto or thereby. Example 1
Following the scheme represented in Figure 1, with reference to the HTl treatment, the following experimentation was effected. The catalytic tests were carried out using a 30 cm3 stirred micro-autoclave according to the following general operating procedure:
- approximately 10 g of the feedstock and molybdenum- based catalyst precursor are charged into the reactor; - the system is then pressurized with hydrogen and brought to the desired temperature by means of an electrically heated oven (total pressure under the reaction conditions: 16 MPa);
- during the reaction the system is kept under stirring by means of a swinging capillary system operating at a rotation rate of 900 rpm; the total pressure is kept constant by means of an automatic reintegrating system of the hydrogen consumed;
- at the end of the test, the quenching of the reaction is effected; the autoclave is then depressurised and the gases collected in a sampling bag; the gaseous samples are subsequently sent for gas chromatographic analysis; - the reaction product is recovered and filtered to separate the catalyst. The liquid fraction is analyzed for the determination of the yields and quality of the products .
The tests were carried out using the feedstock indicated in Table 1. Table 1: Characteristics of residue from Borealis vacuum
Figure imgf000024_0001
Following the scheme represented in Figure 1 with reference to the HTl treatment, the following experimentation was effected. By operating at a temperature of 4150C, with a catalyst concentration corresponding to 500 ppm of Molybdenum and during a reaction time of 3 hours, a concentration of residual asphaltenes of 6.5% was obtained, corresponding to a deasphalting of 70% and a metal concentration of 9 ppm, corresponding to a deasphalting of 93%. Example 2
The same method was used as in example 1, but a different vacuum residue was treated, whose characteristics are shown in Table 2.
Table 2 : Characteristics of residue from Ural vacuum
Figure imgf000025_0001
A residual asphaltenes concentration of 10.4%, corresponding to a deasphalting of 36% and a concentration of metals of 15 ppm, corresponding to a deasphalting of 96%, was obtained by operating at a temperature of 43O0C, a catalyst concentration corresponding to 500 ppm of Molybdenum, and with a reaction time of 1 hour. Example 3
Following the scheme represented in Figure 1 with reference to the HTl, Distillation 1 and SDA treatment, the following experimentation was effected. Hydrotreatment step 1
• Reactor: 3,500 cc steel equipped with magnetic stirrer
• Catalyst: 500 ppm of Mo/feedstock added using an oil- soluble organometallic precursor containing 15%w of metal
• Temperature : 4300C
• Pressure: 16 MPa of hydrogen
• Reaction time: 1.5 h The properties of the feedstock are those indicated in Table 2 of Example 2. A test was carried out according to the procedure described below. The reactor was charged with the residue and molybdenum compound and pressurized with hydrogen. The reaction was carried out under the op- erating conditions indicated. When the test was completed, quenching was effected; the autoclave was depres- surised and the gases collected in a sampling bag for gas chromatographic analysis. The liquid product present in the reactor was subjected to distillation and to subsequent deasphalting with pen- tane. Distillation step
This was effected using laboratory equipment for distilling oil feedstocks. Deasphalting step (SDA)
• Feedstock: residue produced from the hydrogenation reaction
• Deasphalting agent: n-pentane
• Temperature: from 80 to 1800C The product to be deasphalted and a volume of solvent equal to 8-10 times the residue volume are charged into an autoclave. The feedstock and solvent mixture is heated to a temperature of 80-1800C and subjected to stirring (800 rpm) by means of a mechanical stirrer for a period of 30 minutes. At the end of the operation, de- canting is effected and the separation of the two phases, the asphaltene phase which is deposited on the bottom of the autoclave, and the deasphalted oil phase diluted in the solvent. The decanting lasts about two hours. The DAO-solvent phase is transferred, by means of a suitable recovery system, to a second tank. The DAO-solvent phase is then recovered, and the solvent is subsequently eliminated by evaporation.
Results of the experimentation Following the procedure described above, the results indicated in Table 3 were obtained.
Figure imgf000027_0001
Table 3 : yields and quality of products. Example 4
Following the scheme represented in Figure 1, with reference to the HT2 reaction step, the following experimentation was effected. Hydrotreatment step 2
The catalytic tests were carried out using a 30 cm3 stirred micro-autoclave according to the following general operating procedure:
- approximately 10 g of the feedstock and molybdenum- based catalyst precursor are charged into the reactor; - the system is then pressurized with hydrogen and brought to the desired temperature by means of an electrically heated oven,-
- during the reaction the system is kept under stirring by means of a swinging capillary system operating at a rotation rate of 900 rpm,- the total pressure is kept constant by means of an automatic reintegrating system of the hydrogen consumed;
- at the end of the test, the quenching of the reaction is effected; the autoclave is then depressurised and the gases collected in a sampling bag; the gaseous samples are subsequently sent for gas chromatographic analysis;
- the reaction product is recovered and filtered to separate the catalyst. The liquid fraction is analyzed for the determination of the yields and quality of the prod- ucts.
The feedstock used for the test was prepared from Example 3, and specifically from the DAO obtained by the deasphalting with n-pentane of the residue produced by the hydrogenation reaction in the presence of dispersed catalyst. By operating at 4500C, with a catalyst concentration of 6,000 ppm and a reaction time of 2 hrs, a DAO 50O+ conversion of 80.1% to distilled products and a desul- phuration of 68.3% was obtained.

Claims

1. A process for the conversion of heavy feedstocks selected from heavy crude oils, distillation residues from crude oil or coming from catalytic treatment, visbreaker tars, thermal tars, bitumens from oil sands, liquids from coals of different origins and other high-boiling feedstocks of a hydrocarbon nature known as "black oils" ,
comprising the following steps: • mixing the heavy feedstock with a suitable hydrogena- tion catalyst and sending the mixture obtained to a first hydrotreatment area (HTl) to which hydrogen or a mixture of hydrogen and H2S are introduced;
• sending the effluent stream from the first hydrotreat- ment area (HTl) , containing the hydrotreatment reaction product and the catalyst in dispersed phase, to a first distillation area (Dl) having one or more flash steps and/or atmospheric distillation and/or vacuum distillation whereby the various fractions coming from the hydrotreatment reaction are separated;
• sending at least part of the distillation residue (tar) or the liquid leaving the flash unit of the first distillation area (Dl) , containing the catalyst in dispersed phase, rich in metallic sulphides pro- duced by demetallation of the feedstock and optionally minimum quantities of coke, to a deasphalting area (SDA) in the presence of solvents obtaining two streams, one consisting of deasphalted oil (DAO), the other containing asphaltenes and solids to be sent to disposal or to the metal recovery,-
• sending the stream consisting of deasphalted oil (DAO) to a second hydrotreatment area (HT2) , to which hydrogen or a mixture of hydrogen and H2S and a suitable hydrogenation catalyst are introduced; • sending the effluent stream from the second hydrotreatment area (HT2) , containing the hydrotreatment reaction product and the catalyst in dispersed phase, to a second distillation area (D2) having one or more flash and/or distillation steps whereby the various fractions coming from the second hydrotreatment area are separated;
• recycling at least part of the distillation residue or liquid leaving the flash unit of the second distillation area (D2) , containing the catalyst in dispersed phase to the second hydrotreatment area (HT2) .
2. The process according to claim 1, wherein the first distillation area (Dl) consists of an atmospheric distillation column and a vacuum distillation column, fed by the bottom fraction of said atmospheric distilla- tion column.
3. The process according to claim 2, wherein one or more flash steps are added before the atmospheric distillation column.
4. The process according to claim 2 or 3 , wherein two streams are obtained from the vacuum distillation column, a bottom stream consisting of the distillation residue of the first distillation area, the other essentially consisting of vacuum gas oil (VGO) .
5. The process according to claim 4, wherein at least part of the stream essentially consisting of vacuum gas oil (VGO) is recycled to the second hydrotreatment area (HT2) .
6. The process according to at least one of the claims from 1 to 3, wherein at least part of the stream con- taining asphaltenes, coming from the deasphalting section (SDA) , is sent to a treatment section with a suitable solvent to separate the product into a solid fraction and a liquid fraction from which said solvent can be subsequently separated, at least part of the liquid fraction being sent, as such or after separation from the solvent and/or after the addition of a suitable fluxant, to the fuel oil fraction, and the solid fraction being sent to a further treatment for the selective recovery of the metals.
7. The process according to claim 6, wherein the solvent used in the treatment section is an aromatic solvent or a mixture of gas oils produced in the process itself or available in the refinery.
8. The process according to claim 1, wherein the second distillation area (D2) consists of one or more flash steps and one distillation column.
9. The process according to claim 1, wherein all the distillation residue (tar) or the liquid leaving the flash unit of the second distillation area (D2) is re- cycled to the second hydrotreatment area (HT2) .
10. The process according to claim 1, wherein the vacuum section of the first distillation area operates at reduced pressure ranging from 0.005 to 1 atm.
11. The process according to claim 10, wherein the vac- uum section of the first distillation area operates at reduced pressure, ranging from 0.015 to 0.1 atm.
12. The process according to claim 1, wherein the vacuum section of the second distillation area operates at reduced pressure, ranging from 0.005 to 0.1 atm.
13. The process according to claim 12, wherein the vacuum section of the second distillation area operates at reduced pressure, ranging from 0.015 to 0.1 atm
14. The process according to claim 1, wherein the step of the first hydrotreatment area (HTl) is carried out at a temperature ranging from 360 to 4800C and at a pressure ranging from 3 to 30 MPa.
15. The process according to claim 14, wherein the step of the first hydrotreatment area (HTl) is carried out at a temperature ranging from 380 to 4400C and a pres- sure ranging from 10 to 20 MPa.
16. The process according to claim 1, wherein the step of the second hydrotreatment area (HT2) is carried out at a temperature ranging from 400 to 4800C and at a pressure ranging from 3 to 30 MPa.
17. The process according to claim 16, wherein the step of the second hydrotreatment area (HT2) is carried out at a temperature ranging from 420 to 4600C and at a pressure ranging from 10 to 20 MPa.
18. The process according to claim 1, wherein the deasphalting step is carried out at temperatures ranging from 40 to 200 0C and a pressure ranging from 0.1 to 7 MPa.
19. The process according to claim 1, wherein the deasphalting solvent is a light paraffin with from 3 to 7 carbon atoms.
20. The process according to claim 19, wherein the deasphalting solvent is a light paraffin with from 5 to 6 carbon atoms .
21. The process according to claim 1 wherein the deasphalting step is effected under sub-critical or supercritical conditions with one or more steps.
22. The process according to claim 1 wherein the hydro- genation catalyst is a decomposable precursor or a preformed compound based on one or more transition metals.
23. The process according to claim 22 wherein the transition metal is molybdenum.
24. The process according to claim 1 wherein the metal concentration contained in the catalyst fed to the first hydrotreatment area ranges from 20 to 2,000 ppm.
25. The process according to claim 24, wherein the concentration of the transition metal contained in the catalyst fed to the first hydrotreatment area ranges from 50 to 1,000 ppm.
26. The process according to claim 24, wherein the concentration of the transition metal contained in the catalyst fed to the second hydrotreatment area ranges from 1,000 to 30,000 ppm.
27. The process according to claim 26, wherein the con- centration of the transition metal contained in the catalyst fed to the second hydrotreatment area ranges from 3,000 to 20,000 ppm.
28. The process according to one of the claims from 1 to 3, wherein the effluent from the first hydrotreatment area, containing the product of the hydrotreatment re- action and the catalyst in dispersed phase, before being sent to the first distillation area (Dl) , is subjected to a pre-separation step effected at high pressure so as to obtain a light fraction and a heavy fraction, only said heavy fraction being sent to said first distillation area (Dl) .
29. The process according to claim 28, wherein the light fraction obtained by means of the high pressure separation step, is sent to a secondary hydrogenating post-treatment section, producing a lighter fraction containing Ci-C4 and H2S gas and a light fraction containing hydrotreated naphtha and gas oil.
PCT/EP2007/006709 2006-07-31 2007-07-27 Process for the total conversion of heavy feedstocks to distillates WO2008014948A1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
BRPI0714607-8A BRPI0714607A2 (en) 2006-07-31 2007-07-27 process for converting heavy feed loads
MX2009001164A MX2009001164A (en) 2006-07-31 2007-07-27 Process for the total conversion of heavy feedstocks to distillates.
EP07786418A EP2046922A1 (en) 2006-07-31 2007-07-27 Process for the total conversion of heavy feedstocks to distillates
US12/375,615 US8057660B2 (en) 2006-07-31 2007-07-27 Process for the total conversion of heavy feedstocks to distillates
CN2007800356067A CN101558139B (en) 2006-07-31 2007-07-27 Process for the total conversion of heavy feedstocks to distillates

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
ITMI2006A001511 2006-07-31
IT001511A ITMI20061511A1 (en) 2006-07-31 2006-07-31 PROCEDURE FOR THE TOTAL CONVERSION TO HEAVY DISTILLATES

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2008014948A1 true WO2008014948A1 (en) 2008-02-07
WO2008014948A8 WO2008014948A8 (en) 2008-04-24

Family

ID=37992754

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2007/006709 WO2008014948A1 (en) 2006-07-31 2007-07-27 Process for the total conversion of heavy feedstocks to distillates

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US8057660B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2046922A1 (en)
CN (1) CN101558139B (en)
BR (1) BRPI0714607A2 (en)
CA (1) CA2593810C (en)
IT (1) ITMI20061511A1 (en)
MX (1) MX2009001164A (en)
RU (1) RU2455343C2 (en)
WO (1) WO2008014948A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102453541A (en) * 2010-10-15 2012-05-16 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Combined processing method for treating residual oil
CN102453545A (en) * 2010-10-15 2012-05-16 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for lightening residual oil
WO2021025893A1 (en) * 2019-08-02 2021-02-11 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Hydrocracking process and system including separation of heavy poly nuclear aromatics from recycle by extraction

Families Citing this family (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ITMI20011438A1 (en) 2001-07-06 2003-01-06 Snam Progetti PROCEDURE FOR THE CONVERSION OF HEAVY CHARGES SUCH AS HEAVY FATS AND DISTILLATION RESIDUES
CN102311770B (en) * 2010-07-07 2014-03-05 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Reduced-pressure flash tank and reduced-pressure distillation method
CN103789027B (en) * 2012-10-26 2015-04-29 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Modifying method for heavy oil hydrogenating
CN103789036B (en) * 2012-10-26 2015-09-23 中国石油化工股份有限公司 A kind of inferior heavy oil combinational processing method
RU2510642C1 (en) * 2013-01-10 2014-04-10 Андрей Владиславович Курочкин Oil refining method
US20140221713A1 (en) * 2013-02-04 2014-08-07 Lummus Technology Inc. Residue hydrocracking processing
US9650312B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2017-05-16 Lummus Technology Inc. Integration of residue hydrocracking and hydrotreating
US9637686B2 (en) * 2013-04-18 2017-05-02 Canadian Natural Resources Limited Process for treating mined oil sands deposits
PL2989182T3 (en) * 2013-04-22 2019-01-31 Eni S.P.A. Process for treating a hydrocarbon-based heavy residue
ITMI20131137A1 (en) 2013-07-05 2015-01-06 Eni Spa PROCEDURE FOR REFINING THE CRUDE
RU2556997C2 (en) * 2013-12-02 2015-07-20 Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Ордена Трудового Красного Знамени Институт нефтехимического синтеза им. А.В. Топчиева Российской академии наук (ИНХС РАН) Method for hydroconversion of heavy oil fractions
EP3420051B1 (en) * 2016-02-25 2022-03-30 SABIC Global Technologies B.V. An integrated process for increasing olefin production by recycling and processing heavy cracker residue
CA3021229C (en) 2016-04-25 2022-08-09 Sherritt International Corporation Process for partial upgrading of heavy oil
IT201600122525A1 (en) 2016-12-02 2018-06-02 Eni Spa PROCEDURE FOR THE PRODUCTION OF LIPIDS AND OTHER BIOMASS ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
US10731091B2 (en) * 2016-12-22 2020-08-04 Lummus Technology Llc Multistage resid hydrocracking
CN109134801B (en) * 2017-06-15 2021-01-12 狄超 Method for preparing polyurethane catalyst by using rectification residue in production of dimethylaminoethyl acrylate
WO2019014012A1 (en) * 2017-07-14 2019-01-17 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Multistage upgrading hydrocarbon pyrolysis tar
WO2020123370A2 (en) * 2018-12-10 2020-06-18 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Upgrading challenged feeds and pitches produced therefrom
US20220372381A1 (en) * 2021-05-24 2022-11-24 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Integrated slurry hydroprocessing catalyst and process

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3905892A (en) * 1972-03-01 1975-09-16 Cities Service Res & Dev Co Process for reduction of high sulfur residue
US4176048A (en) 1978-10-31 1979-11-27 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Process for conversion of heavy hydrocarbons
ITMI951095A1 (en) 1995-05-26 1996-11-26 Snam Progetti PROCEDURE FOR THE CONVERSION OF HEAVY CRUDE OILS AND DISTILLATION RESIDUES TO DISTILLATES
WO2005047425A1 (en) 2003-11-14 2005-05-26 Eni S.P.A. Integrated process for the conversion of feedstocks containing coal into liquid products

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NL7510465A (en) * 1975-09-05 1977-03-08 Shell Int Research PROCESS FOR CONVERTING HYDROCARBONS.
US5013427A (en) * 1989-07-18 1991-05-07 Amoco Corportion Resid hydrotreating with resins
ITMI20011438A1 (en) 2001-07-06 2003-01-06 Snam Progetti PROCEDURE FOR THE CONVERSION OF HEAVY CHARGES SUCH AS HEAVY FATS AND DISTILLATION RESIDUES
JP2006511682A (en) 2002-12-20 2006-04-06 エニ、ソシエタ、ペル、アチオニ Method for converting heavy feedstocks such as heavy crude oil and distillation residue
CA2510357C (en) * 2002-12-20 2012-09-25 Eni S.P.A. Process for the conversion of heavy feedstocks such as heavy crude oils and distillation residues
ITMI20042446A1 (en) 2004-12-22 2005-03-22 Eni Spa PROCEDURE FOR CONVERSION OF PESANTYI CHARGES SUCH AS HEAVY CRATES AND DISTILLATION RESIDUES
ITMI20042445A1 (en) 2004-12-22 2005-03-22 Eni Spa PROCEDURE FOR THE CONVERSION OF HEAVY CHARGES WHICH WEIGHING AND DISTILLATION WASTE

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3905892A (en) * 1972-03-01 1975-09-16 Cities Service Res & Dev Co Process for reduction of high sulfur residue
US4176048A (en) 1978-10-31 1979-11-27 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Process for conversion of heavy hydrocarbons
ITMI951095A1 (en) 1995-05-26 1996-11-26 Snam Progetti PROCEDURE FOR THE CONVERSION OF HEAVY CRUDE OILS AND DISTILLATION RESIDUES TO DISTILLATES
US5932090A (en) * 1995-05-26 1999-08-03 Snamprogetti S.P.A. Process for the conversion of heavy crude oils and distillation residues to distillates
WO2005047425A1 (en) 2003-11-14 2005-05-26 Eni S.P.A. Integrated process for the conversion of feedstocks containing coal into liquid products

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102453541A (en) * 2010-10-15 2012-05-16 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Combined processing method for treating residual oil
CN102453545A (en) * 2010-10-15 2012-05-16 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for lightening residual oil
CN102453545B (en) * 2010-10-15 2013-11-06 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for lightening residual oil
CN102453541B (en) * 2010-10-15 2013-11-20 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Combined processing method for treating residual oil
WO2021025893A1 (en) * 2019-08-02 2021-02-11 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Hydrocracking process and system including separation of heavy poly nuclear aromatics from recycle by extraction
US11180701B2 (en) 2019-08-02 2021-11-23 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Hydrocracking process and system including separation of heavy poly nuclear aromatics from recycle by extraction

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ITMI20061511A1 (en) 2008-02-01
EP2046922A1 (en) 2009-04-15
BRPI0714607A2 (en) 2013-05-14
CN101558139B (en) 2013-10-16
MX2009001164A (en) 2009-03-30
RU2009103551A (en) 2010-09-10
WO2008014948A8 (en) 2008-04-24
CA2593810C (en) 2015-01-06
US20090314681A1 (en) 2009-12-24
CN101558139A (en) 2009-10-14
CA2593810A1 (en) 2008-01-31
RU2455343C2 (en) 2012-07-10
US8057660B2 (en) 2011-11-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8057660B2 (en) Process for the total conversion of heavy feedstocks to distillates
US8147675B2 (en) Process for the total conversion of heavy feedstocks to distillates
JP4891259B2 (en) Methods for converting heavy inputs such as heavy crude oil and distillation residues
RU2352616C2 (en) Method for processing of heavy charge, such as heavy base oil and stillage bottoms
CA2510290C (en) Process for the conversion of heavy feedstocks such as heavy crude oils and distillation residues
US20130112593A1 (en) Process for the conversion of heavy charge stocks such as heavy crude oils and distillation residues
US20030089636A1 (en) Process for the conversion of heavy charges such as heavy crude oils and distillation residues
WO2005047425A1 (en) Integrated process for the conversion of feedstocks containing coal into liquid products
AU2002358182B2 (en) Process for the conversion of heavy charges such as heavy crude oils and distillation residues

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 200780035606.7

Country of ref document: CN

DPE2 Request for preliminary examination filed before expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 07786418

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

REEP Request for entry into the european phase

Ref document number: 2007786418

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2007786418

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: MX/A/2009/001164

Country of ref document: MX

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2009103551

Country of ref document: RU

Kind code of ref document: A

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 12375615

Country of ref document: US

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: PI0714607

Country of ref document: BR

Kind code of ref document: A2

Effective date: 20090130