WO2007136568A2 - Core drill assembly with adjustable total flow area and restricted flow between outer and inner barrel assemblies - Google Patents

Core drill assembly with adjustable total flow area and restricted flow between outer and inner barrel assemblies Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2007136568A2
WO2007136568A2 PCT/US2007/011355 US2007011355W WO2007136568A2 WO 2007136568 A2 WO2007136568 A2 WO 2007136568A2 US 2007011355 W US2007011355 W US 2007011355W WO 2007136568 A2 WO2007136568 A2 WO 2007136568A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
assembly
seal
core head
lower shoe
core
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2007/011355
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2007136568A3 (en
WO2007136568B1 (en
Inventor
Bob T. Wilson
Thorsten Regener
Original Assignee
Baker Hughes Incorporated
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Baker Hughes Incorporated filed Critical Baker Hughes Incorporated
Priority to CA002652563A priority Critical patent/CA2652563A1/en
Priority to GB0821569A priority patent/GB2451788B/en
Publication of WO2007136568A2 publication Critical patent/WO2007136568A2/en
Publication of WO2007136568A3 publication Critical patent/WO2007136568A3/en
Publication of WO2007136568B1 publication Critical patent/WO2007136568B1/en
Priority to NO20084841A priority patent/NO20084841L/en

Links

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B10/00Drill bits
    • E21B10/02Core bits
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B10/00Drill bits
    • E21B10/60Drill bits characterised by conduits or nozzles for drilling fluids
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B10/00Drill bits
    • E21B10/60Drill bits characterised by conduits or nozzles for drilling fluids
    • E21B10/605Drill bits characterised by conduits or nozzles for drilling fluids the bit being a core-bit
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B25/00Apparatus for obtaining or removing undisturbed cores, e.g. core barrels, core extractors

Definitions

  • Embodiments of the present invention are related to a core drill assembly with adjustable drill fluid total flow area and, more particularly, to a core drill assembly which includes replaceable cutting fluid nozzles and a seal assembly disposed between adjacent portions of the outer barrel assembly and the inner barrel assembly, as well as to methods of coring.
  • TFA total flow area
  • Drilling fluid is circulated through the ID fluid courses and the face discharge ports to cool and clean cutting structure carried on the face of the core head, and to remove cuttings generated when the cutting head penetrates the formation being cored.
  • the hydraulic force or the ability of the drilling fluid to removing material cuttings from the cutting head face, is measured in hydraulic horsepower/ in 2 (HSI) and is an indicator of drilling fluid cleaning efficiency. If the hydraulic force is too low, there will be poor cleaning of the cutting structure and cuttings will interfere with the rate of penetration (ROP) in forming the bore hole. If the hydraulic force is too high, there may be erosion of the bole hole, which can result in a stuck drill string, and the drilling fluid may contaminate the core sample. By using HSI and ROP measurements, the optimum amount of hydraulic force can be designed into a core drill assembly.
  • HSI hydraulic horsepower/ in 2
  • FIG. 1 is a cross-section of a conventional core drill assembly 10, with a non- adjustable TFA or drilling fluid flow area defined by the areas of the annulus 50 and the discharge ports 30.
  • the annulus 50 is the gap between the ID of core head 14 and the outside of the lower shoe 18.
  • drilling fluid is pumped down the drill string, to core drill assembly 10, where a portion of the drilling fluid will travel through the annulus 50 and exit the core drill assembly 10 proximate the leading edge of the lower shoe 18, while the remaining drilling fluid enters the fluid course 20 within in core head 14, and exits the discharge port 30 located on the face 16 of core head 14, as respectively shown by the arrows in FIG. 1.
  • the drilling fluid is used to cool the cutters 60 and flush cuttings away from the core head face 16.
  • the TFA is non-adjustable, the operator cannot optimize the amount of drilling fluid at the drill face 16 and the HSI.
  • the only variable is the circulation rate of the drilling fluid, and therefore, the HSI cannot be optimized.
  • the annulus gap is nominally 0.95 cm to 1.27 cm ( 3 Za" to 1 Zi”); however, when using an aluminum or fiberglass inner tube, in the inner barrel assembly, gaps up to about 14 cm (5 Vi") may be required in order to compensate for the different rates of thermal expansion attributed to the materials of the inner tube and the core head. Under bottom-hole temperature, the gap may decrease to the estimated desirable gap of 0.95 mm to 1.27 cm ( 3 / ⁇ " to Vi"), but uncertainty about the actual and estimated bottom-hole temperature, can result in a significant error in spacing adjustment. As the area of the annulus gap is added directly into the TFA calculation, the uncertainty of the gap size makes accurately calculating TFA difficult.
  • the split of flow between the annulus between the OD of the inner tube shoe and the ID of the core head, and the face discharge ports is dependent upon their relative TFA.
  • the annular TFA could be higher than the TFA of the face discharge ports, with the result that most of the flow of drilling fluid will pass through the ID annulus. This significantly reduces the effectiveness of the face discharge ports, and reduces further the HSI delivered to the cutting structure of the core head. Adjusting the TFA of the face discharge ports in this case would not increase HSI, since the bypass flow would simple be increased through the ID annulus.
  • the bypass flow through the ID annulus must be sealed off, or severely restricted, to divert as much of the flow as possible to the face discharge ports, or nozzles.
  • the TFA can be optimized by utilizing different diameter nozzles in the discharge ports.
  • a change of discharge port size will change the resistance at the nozzles and will proportionally change the amount of drilling fluid bypassing through the annulus. This problem is highlighted when looking at the performance of the drill bit versus a core drill.
  • a drill bit will normally operate in the range of 4-8 HSI, whereas 21.6 cm x 10.16 cm (8 ' ⁇ " x 4") core drill may operate as low as 0.2 HSI.
  • Embodiments of the invention include replaceable nozzles fitted in at least some of the drilling fluid outlet ports, proximate the face of the core head.
  • the nozzle design will compensate for the smaller surface area of the typical core drill face and new nozzle locations and jet directions are contemplated to take advantage of the improved HSI at the cutting face, including directing nozzles towards interior cutters of the core head in order to clear cuttings and provide cooling.
  • the annulus between the cutting head and the lower shoe is substantially sealed with a seal structure, which may be broadly characterized as a seal assembly or a seal element, without substantial rotational interference between the core head and the lower shoe, which would cause the lower shoe and inner tube to turn with the outer barrel assembly and core head.
  • a seal structure which may be broadly characterized as a seal assembly or a seal element
  • One embodiment includes one or more grooves formed into the ID of the core head to accommodate an annular seal similar to an O-ring in each of the grooves.
  • the design of the O-ring or other annular seal allows some drilling fluid flow to bypass under reduced pressure, but under normal operating circumstances the O-ring or other annular seal seals substantially completely.
  • the annulus between the core head and the lower shoe is substantially sealed using split rings made from a material such as nylon or Teflon®.
  • This embodiment includes one or more grooves formed in the ID of the core head where split rings of the appropriate size are installed to seal the annulus.
  • the seals will fit somewhat loosely in the grooves and may rotate during coring operations, but will provide a sufficient seal to enable effective TFA adjustments by installing different sizes of drilling fluid nozzles. The loose fit will reduce friction between the core head ID and the lower shoe, to eliminate any tendency for the lower shoe and inner tube to rotate.
  • FIG. 1 A block diagram illustrating an exemplary computing environment in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 A block diagram illustrating an exemplary computing environment in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 A block diagram illustrating an exemplary computing environment in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 A block diagram illustrating an exemplary computing environment in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 A block diagram illustrating an exemplary computing environment in accordance with the present inventions.
  • Embodiments of the present invention also include methods of using a core drill assembly.
  • FIG. 1 is a cross-section of a conventional core drill assembly with a non-adjustable TFA defined by the area of the annulus between the core head and the lower shoe, and the area of the drilling fluid ports;
  • FIG. 2 is a cross-section of a core drill assembly with a seal structure between the core head and the lower shoe and replaceable drilling fluid nozzles;
  • FIG. 3 is a partial cross-section of a core drill assembly including a O-ring or wiper seal type seal assembly
  • FIG. 4 is a partial cross-section of a core drill assembly including a split-ring type seal assembly
  • FIG. 5 is a partial cross-section of a core drill assembly including a labyrinth seal assembly
  • FIG. 6 is a partial cross-section of a core drill assembly including a restrictor sleeve.
  • FIG. 2 schematically depicts a core drill assembly 10 of the present invention including replaceable discharge nozzles 36 at the discharge ends of fluid courses 20, and at least one seal assembly 40 disposed between the core head 14 and the lower shoe IS.
  • These features allow the operator to change the TFA of the core drill assembly 10 and optimize the HSI.
  • the operator can select nozzles 36 having a discharge opening 34 of an appropriate diameter to adjust TFA.
  • seal assembly 40 will divert substantially all of the drilling fluid volume away from the annulus 50 and into the fluid courses 20 where the drilling fluid will exit through discharge opening 34 of replaceable nozzles 36.
  • the diameters of discharge openings 34 will affect both the rate of discharge and the velocity of the escaping drilling fluid. Under optimized conditions, as provided by the present invention, the drilling fluid, emanating from the discharge openings 34, will effectively clear cuttings away from the core head face 16 and properly cool cutters 60.
  • the optimum diameter discharge openings 34 for a specific material or formation, and core head or core size, can be determined or predicted by the use of historical data, including ROP measurements.
  • the seal assembly 40 may be partially received in a groove in ID of the core head 14 or, as shown at the right-hand side of FIG. 2, the seal assembly 40 may be partially received in a groove in the exterior of the lower shoe 18. As core head 14 rotates about lower shoe 18 during a coring operation, fluid flow therebetween will be substantially restricted by seal assembly 40, as indicated by the smaller size of the arrows below annulus 50 in comparison to those in fluid courses 20.
  • FIGS. 3 and 4 are partial cross-section views of core drill assembly 10 provided, to show additional detail of several embodiments of the at least one seal assembly 40.
  • the at least one seal assembly 40 is positioned in the annulus 50, or the gap defined between the ID of core head 14 and the outside of the lower shoe 18.
  • the seals 42 and 44 are installed in grooves 46 formed in the ID of core head 14.
  • the seals 44 shown in FIG. 3 may comprise an O-ring or other continuous ring type that may have a round or oval cross-section, or may include lips which fiinction as "wipers," as shown.
  • the material of seals 44 may include, but is not limited to, rubber, neoprene, or polyethylene or a combination thereof.
  • the at least one seal assembly 40 will substantially restrict the flow of the drilling fluid pumped down the drill string, forcing the drilling fluid to bypass the annulus 50 and into the fluid courses 20, traveling in the direction of flow arrows 26.
  • FIG. 5 is a partial cross-section view of a core drill assembly 10 including a labyrinth seal assembly 48 having a plurality of radially projecting, axially spaced annular elements separated by slots 56.
  • the labyrinth seal assembly 48 is formed into the structure of one of the core head 14 ID or the exterior surface of the lower shoe 18.
  • a labyrinth seal 48 with mating, interdigitated elements or components E as shown in broken lines can be formed with the cooperating parts disposed on both the core head 14 ID and the lower shoe 18.
  • the total number of labyrinth slots 56 is not specified, and will vary depending on the expected pressure differential between the pumped drilling fluid and drill work face.
  • the labyrinth seal assembly 48 must have sufficient length and number of slots 56 to effectively seal annulus 50. With annulus 50 sealed, the drilling fluid will enter fluid courses 20, flowing in the direction indicated by flow arrows 26. It is also contemplated that the seals may be carried on the exterior of the lower shoe 18 instead of on core head 14, or may be carried on both components. It is also contemplated that a seal comprising an upwardly facing packer cup with a frustoconical elastomeric skirt may be utilized in addition to, or in lieu of, other seal configurations. Chevron type seals, as well as metallic or elastomeric seal back-up components, may also be employed.
  • FIG. 6 depicts yet another embodiment of the present invention, wherein a seal element in the form of restrictor sleeve 60 is disposed on an annular shoulder 62 machined or otherwise formed on the ID of the core head 14, and retained therein through the use of an appropriate bonding agent, such as BAKERLOK® compound, available from various operating units of Baker Hughes Incorporated, assignee of the present invention.
  • an appropriate bonding agent such as BAKERLOK® compound, available from various operating units of Baker Hughes Incorporated, assignee of the present invention.
  • discharge openings 34 of replaceable nozzles 36 may be selected for optimum TFA.
  • a conventional lower core shoe 18 is run inside of core head 14, and extends longitudinally therethrough.
  • the outer surface (shown in broken lines for clarity) of lower shoe 18 is in close proximity to the ID of restrictor sleeve 60, so that a very small clearance radial clearance C 1 for example about 1 mm, is achieved.
  • This small, annular clearance C between core shoe 18 and restrictor sleeve 60, while permitting rotation of core shoe 18 and restrictor sleeve 60 about lower shoe 18, will substantially restrict the flow of the drilling fluid pumped down the drill string, forcing the drilling fluid to bypass the annulus 50 and into the fluid courses 20 to exit through discharge openings of replaceable nozzles 36. While the present invention has been depicted and described with reference to certain embodiments, the invention is not so limited. Additions and modifications to, and deletions from, the described embodiments will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. The present invention is, thus, limited only by the claims which follow, and equivalents thereof.

Abstract

A core drill assembly with replaceable cutting fluid nozzles permitting effective total flow area adjustment (TFA), substantial optimization of hydraulic force at the cutting face to improve rate of penetration (ROP) and core quality. At least one seal assembly to restrict drilling fluid flow while permitting mutual rotation between the core head ID and the lower shoe is disposed in an annulus defined therebetween.

Description

CORE DRILL ASSEMBLY WITH ADJUSTABLE TOTAL FLOW AREA AND RESTRICTED FLOW BETWEEN OUTER AND INNER BARREL
ASSEMBLIES
INVENTORS: WILSON, Bob T. and REGENER, Ttaorsten
TECHNICAL FIELD Embodiments of the present invention are related to a core drill assembly with adjustable drill fluid total flow area and, more particularly, to a core drill assembly which includes replaceable cutting fluid nozzles and a seal assembly disposed between adjacent portions of the outer barrel assembly and the inner barrel assembly, as well as to methods of coring.
BACKGROUND Current core head designs use a fixed total flow area (TFA) to circulate drilling fluid through the core head, also known as a core bit, during down-hole coring operations. The TFA is a calculated discharge area for the drilling fluid which may include an annulus ID gauge fluid course between the core head ID and the exterior of the lower shoe, carried by the inner barrel assembly, or core head face discharge ports, or a combination of the two. Drilling fluid is circulated through the ID fluid courses and the face discharge ports to cool and clean cutting structure carried on the face of the core head, and to remove cuttings generated when the cutting head penetrates the formation being cored. The hydraulic force, or the ability of the drilling fluid to removing material cuttings from the cutting head face, is measured in hydraulic horsepower/ in2 (HSI) and is an indicator of drilling fluid cleaning efficiency. If the hydraulic force is too low, there will be poor cleaning of the cutting structure and cuttings will interfere with the rate of penetration (ROP) in forming the bore hole. If the hydraulic force is too high, there may be erosion of the bole hole, which can result in a stuck drill string, and the drilling fluid may contaminate the core sample. By using HSI and ROP measurements, the optimum amount of hydraulic force can be designed into a core drill assembly.
FIG. 1 is a cross-section of a conventional core drill assembly 10, with a non- adjustable TFA or drilling fluid flow area defined by the areas of the annulus 50 and the discharge ports 30. The annulus 50 is the gap between the ID of core head 14 and the outside of the lower shoe 18. With this arrangement, drilling fluid is pumped down the drill string, to core drill assembly 10, where a portion of the drilling fluid will travel through the annulus 50 and exit the core drill assembly 10 proximate the leading edge of the lower shoe 18, while the remaining drilling fluid enters the fluid course 20 within in core head 14, and exits the discharge port 30 located on the face 16 of core head 14, as respectively shown by the arrows in FIG. 1. The drilling fluid is used to cool the cutters 60 and flush cuttings away from the core head face 16. However, since the TFA is non-adjustable, the operator cannot optimize the amount of drilling fluid at the drill face 16 and the HSI.
With the non-adjustable TFA of current core head designs, the only variable is the circulation rate of the drilling fluid, and therefore, the HSI cannot be optimized.
Also, in current core heads there is always some drilling fluid flow through the annular space between the core head ID and the lower shoe. In core heads using ID fluid courses only, all of the flow travels through the annulus whereas, when core head face discharge ports are used in combination with the annulus, it is difficult to determine amount of drilling fluid "split" between the discharge ports and the annulus. The difficulty arises because the actual annulus gap spacing between the core head ID and the lower shoe is not known when the core head is down hole. The annulus gap is nominally 0.95 cm to 1.27 cm ( 3Za" to 1Zi"); however, when using an aluminum or fiberglass inner tube, in the inner barrel assembly, gaps up to about 14 cm (5 Vi") may be required in order to compensate for the different rates of thermal expansion attributed to the materials of the inner tube and the core head. Under bottom-hole temperature, the gap may decrease to the estimated desirable gap of 0.95 mm to 1.27 cm (3/β" to Vi"), but uncertainty about the actual and estimated bottom-hole temperature, can result in a significant error in spacing adjustment. As the area of the annulus gap is added directly into the TFA calculation, the uncertainty of the gap size makes accurately calculating TFA difficult. The split of flow between the annulus between the OD of the inner tube shoe and the ID of the core head, and the face discharge ports is dependent upon their relative TFA. Depending upon actual spacing down hole, the annular TFA could be higher than the TFA of the face discharge ports, with the result that most of the flow of drilling fluid will pass through the ID annulus. This significantly reduces the effectiveness of the face discharge ports, and reduces further the HSI delivered to the cutting structure of the core head. Adjusting the TFA of the face discharge ports in this case would not increase HSI, since the bypass flow would simple be increased through the ID annulus. To increase HSI, the bypass flow through the ID annulus must be sealed off, or severely restricted, to divert as much of the flow as possible to the face discharge ports, or nozzles.
For a conventional drill bit with replaceable nozzles, the TFA can be optimized by utilizing different diameter nozzles in the discharge ports. However, in a conventional core drill assembly, since at least some of the drilling fluid flow travels through the annulus, a change of discharge port size will change the resistance at the nozzles and will proportionally change the amount of drilling fluid bypassing through the annulus. This problem is highlighted when looking at the performance of the drill bit versus a core drill. A drill bit will normally operate in the range of 4-8 HSI, whereas 21.6 cm x 10.16 cm (8 'Λ" x 4") core drill may operate as low as 0.2 HSI.
In view of the shortcomings in the art, it would be advantageous to provide a core drill with adjustable TFA, by fitting the core head with replaceable cutting fluid nozzles and sealing off the annulus between the core head ID and the lower shoe. This will allow an operator to apply the same drilling optimization concepts to coring as used with conventional drilling, and allow the HSI to be improved over conventional core head designs, with corresponding improvements in coring performance, ROP and core quality.
DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION
Embodiments of the invention include replaceable nozzles fitted in at least some of the drilling fluid outlet ports, proximate the face of the core head. The nozzle design will compensate for the smaller surface area of the typical core drill face and new nozzle locations and jet directions are contemplated to take advantage of the improved HSI at the cutting face, including directing nozzles towards interior cutters of the core head in order to clear cuttings and provide cooling.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the annulus between the cutting head and the lower shoe is substantially sealed with a seal structure, which may be broadly characterized as a seal assembly or a seal element, without substantial rotational interference between the core head and the lower shoe, which would cause the lower shoe and inner tube to turn with the outer barrel assembly and core head.
One embodiment includes one or more grooves formed into the ID of the core head to accommodate an annular seal similar to an O-ring in each of the grooves. The design of the O-ring or other annular seal allows some drilling fluid flow to bypass under reduced pressure, but under normal operating circumstances the O-ring or other annular seal seals substantially completely.
In a second embodiment of the present invention, the annulus between the core head and the lower shoe is substantially sealed using split rings made from a material such as nylon or Teflon®. This embodiment includes one or more grooves formed in the ID of the core head where split rings of the appropriate size are installed to seal the annulus. The seals will fit somewhat loosely in the grooves and may rotate during coring operations, but will provide a sufficient seal to enable effective TFA adjustments by installing different sizes of drilling fluid nozzles. The loose fit will reduce friction between the core head ID and the lower shoe, to eliminate any tendency for the lower shoe and inner tube to rotate.
Other embodiments of the present invention employ one or more of a wiper seal, a chevron seal, a packer cup or a restrictor sleeve disposed between the core head and the lower shoe to substantially restrict fluid flow therebetween while permitting rotational movement of the core head about the lower shoe.
Embodiments of the present invention also include methods of using a core drill assembly.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
The foregoing and other advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a cross-section of a conventional core drill assembly with a non-adjustable TFA defined by the area of the annulus between the core head and the lower shoe, and the area of the drilling fluid ports;
FIG. 2 is a cross-section of a core drill assembly with a seal structure between the core head and the lower shoe and replaceable drilling fluid nozzles;
FIG. 3 is a partial cross-section of a core drill assembly including a O-ring or wiper seal type seal assembly; FIG. 4 is a partial cross-section of a core drill assembly including a split-ring type seal assembly;
FIG. 5 is a partial cross-section of a core drill assembly including a labyrinth seal assembly; and FIG. 6 is a partial cross-section of a core drill assembly including a restrictor sleeve.
MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
FIG. 2 schematically depicts a core drill assembly 10 of the present invention including replaceable discharge nozzles 36 at the discharge ends of fluid courses 20, and at least one seal assembly 40 disposed between the core head 14 and the lower shoe IS. These features allow the operator to change the TFA of the core drill assembly 10 and optimize the HSI. The operator can select nozzles 36 having a discharge opening 34 of an appropriate diameter to adjust TFA. Thus, if a volume of drilling fluid is pumped under pressure, at a substantially constant flow rate, down the drill string, seal assembly 40 will divert substantially all of the drilling fluid volume away from the annulus 50 and into the fluid courses 20 where the drilling fluid will exit through discharge opening 34 of replaceable nozzles 36. The diameters of discharge openings 34 will affect both the rate of discharge and the velocity of the escaping drilling fluid. Under optimized conditions, as provided by the present invention, the drilling fluid, emanating from the discharge openings 34, will effectively clear cuttings away from the core head face 16 and properly cool cutters 60. The optimum diameter discharge openings 34 for a specific material or formation, and core head or core size, can be determined or predicted by the use of historical data, including ROP measurements. As shown at the left-hand side of FIG. 2, the seal assembly 40 may be partially received in a groove in ID of the core head 14 or, as shown at the right-hand side of FIG. 2, the seal assembly 40 may be partially received in a groove in the exterior of the lower shoe 18. As core head 14 rotates about lower shoe 18 during a coring operation, fluid flow therebetween will be substantially restricted by seal assembly 40, as indicated by the smaller size of the arrows below annulus 50 in comparison to those in fluid courses 20.
FIGS. 3 and 4, are partial cross-section views of core drill assembly 10 provided, to show additional detail of several embodiments of the at least one seal assembly 40. The at least one seal assembly 40 is positioned in the annulus 50, or the gap defined between the ID of core head 14 and the outside of the lower shoe 18. The seals 42 and 44 are installed in grooves 46 formed in the ID of core head 14. The seals 44 shown in FIG. 3 may comprise an O-ring or other continuous ring type that may have a round or oval cross-section, or may include lips which fiinction as "wipers," as shown. The material of seals 44 may include, but is not limited to, rubber, neoprene, or polyethylene or a combination thereof. The seals 42 shown in FIG. 4 are of a split ring design which rides loosely in the grooves 46. Examples of suitable materials for the split ring seals 42 are nylon and Teflon® polymers. The at least one seal assembly 40 will substantially restrict the flow of the drilling fluid pumped down the drill string, forcing the drilling fluid to bypass the annulus 50 and into the fluid courses 20, traveling in the direction of flow arrows 26.
FIG. 5 is a partial cross-section view of a core drill assembly 10 including a labyrinth seal assembly 48 having a plurality of radially projecting, axially spaced annular elements separated by slots 56. The labyrinth seal assembly 48 is formed into the structure of one of the core head 14 ID or the exterior surface of the lower shoe 18. However, a labyrinth seal 48 with mating, interdigitated elements or components E as shown in broken lines can be formed with the cooperating parts disposed on both the core head 14 ID and the lower shoe 18. The total number of labyrinth slots 56 is not specified, and will vary depending on the expected pressure differential between the pumped drilling fluid and drill work face. The labyrinth seal assembly 48 must have sufficient length and number of slots 56 to effectively seal annulus 50. With annulus 50 sealed, the drilling fluid will enter fluid courses 20, flowing in the direction indicated by flow arrows 26. It is also contemplated that the seals may be carried on the exterior of the lower shoe 18 instead of on core head 14, or may be carried on both components. It is also contemplated that a seal comprising an upwardly facing packer cup with a frustoconical elastomeric skirt may be utilized in addition to, or in lieu of, other seal configurations. Chevron type seals, as well as metallic or elastomeric seal back-up components, may also be employed.
FIG. 6 depicts yet another embodiment of the present invention, wherein a seal element in the form of restrictor sleeve 60 is disposed on an annular shoulder 62 machined or otherwise formed on the ID of the core head 14, and retained therein through the use of an appropriate bonding agent, such as BAKERLOK® compound, available from various operating units of Baker Hughes Incorporated, assignee of the present invention. As with the previous embodiments, discharge openings 34 of replaceable nozzles 36 may be selected for optimum TFA. A conventional lower core shoe 18 is run inside of core head 14, and extends longitudinally therethrough. The outer surface (shown in broken lines for clarity) of lower shoe 18 is in close proximity to the ID of restrictor sleeve 60, so that a very small clearance radial clearance C1 for example about 1 mm, is achieved. This small, annular clearance C between core shoe 18 and restrictor sleeve 60, while permitting rotation of core shoe 18 and restrictor sleeve 60 about lower shoe 18, will substantially restrict the flow of the drilling fluid pumped down the drill string, forcing the drilling fluid to bypass the annulus 50 and into the fluid courses 20 to exit through discharge openings of replaceable nozzles 36. While the present invention has been depicted and described with reference to certain embodiments, the invention is not so limited. Additions and modifications to, and deletions from, the described embodiments will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. The present invention is, thus, limited only by the claims which follow, and equivalents thereof.

Claims

CLAIMS What is claimed is:
1. A core drill assembly comprising: a core head including an inside diameter, a face, and at least one fluid course having an outlet on the face; a lower shoe; at least one replaceable nozzle disposed in the at least one fluid course proximate the outlet; and at least one seal structure, configured to permit rotation between the core head and lower shoe assembly, disposed between the core head inside diameter and an exterior surface of the lower shoe.
2. The assembly of claim 1, wherein the at least one replaceable nozzle is replaceable with another replaceable nozzle having a different inner diameter.
3. The assembly of claim 1 , wherein the at least one seal structure comprises a seal assembly and includes at least one groove formed on at least one of the inside diameter of the core head and the exterior surface of the lower shoe.
4. The assembly of claim 3, wherein the at least one seal assembly includes at least one seal element carried in the at least one groove.
5. The assembly of claim 4, wherein the at least one seal element is at least one of an o-ring seal, a wiper seal, a split-ring seal, a chevron seal or a packer cup.
6. The assembly of claim 4, wherein the at least one seal element is made of at least one of a nylon, a Teflon®, a polyethylene, a rubber or a neoprene material.
7. The assembly of claim 1, wherein the at least one seal structure comprises a labyrinth seal.
8. The assembly of claim 1 , wherein the at least one seal structure comprises a restrictor sleeve disposed within the core head laterally adjacent an exterior surface of the lower shoe.
9. The assembly of claim 8, wherein the restrictor sleeve rests on an annular shoulder on the ID of the core head.
10. The assembly of claim 8, wherein an ID of the restrictor sleeve and the laterally adjacent exterior surface of the lower shoe are mutually spaced by about 1 mm.
1 1. A method for substantially controlling the total flow area (TFA) of a core drill assembly comprising: providing a core head including at least one fluid course having an outlet on the face thereof; installing a replaceable nozzle having a selected inner diameter in the fluid course proximate the outlet; disposing a lower shoe at least partially within the core head; and rotating the core head about the lower shoe while substantially preventing a flow of drilling fluid between the core head and the lower shoe and directing flow through the at least one replaceable nozzle.
12. The method of claim 1 1 , further including replacing the at least one replaceable nozzle with another replaceable nozzle having a different inner diameter.
13. The method of claim 13, further comprising providing an absolute fluid seal between the core head and the lower shoe.
PCT/US2007/011355 2006-05-15 2007-05-10 Core drill assembly with adjustable total flow area and restricted flow between outer and inner barrel assemblies WO2007136568A2 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA002652563A CA2652563A1 (en) 2006-05-15 2007-05-10 Core drill assembly with adjustable total flow area and restricted flow between outer and inner barrel assemblies
GB0821569A GB2451788B (en) 2006-05-15 2007-05-10 Core drill assembly with adjustable total flow area and restricted flow between outer and inner barrel assemblies
NO20084841A NO20084841L (en) 2006-05-15 2008-11-18 Core drilling device with adjustable total flow area and limited flow between outer and inner cylinder assemblies

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US80062006P 2006-05-15 2006-05-15
US60/800,620 2006-05-15
US11/746,931 2007-05-10
US11/746,931 US20070261886A1 (en) 2006-05-15 2007-05-10 Core drill assembly with adjustable total flow area and restricted flow between outer and inner barrel assemblies

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2007136568A2 true WO2007136568A2 (en) 2007-11-29
WO2007136568A3 WO2007136568A3 (en) 2008-02-21
WO2007136568B1 WO2007136568B1 (en) 2008-04-03

Family

ID=38684052

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2007/011355 WO2007136568A2 (en) 2006-05-15 2007-05-10 Core drill assembly with adjustable total flow area and restricted flow between outer and inner barrel assemblies

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US20070261886A1 (en)
CA (1) CA2652563A1 (en)
GB (1) GB2451788B (en)
NO (1) NO20084841L (en)
WO (1) WO2007136568A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100051528A1 (en) * 2008-08-26 2010-03-04 Clark Filter, Inc. Seal Improvement for Lube Filter
US8201642B2 (en) * 2009-01-21 2012-06-19 Baker Hughes Incorporated Drilling assemblies including one of a counter rotating drill bit and a counter rotating reamer, methods of drilling, and methods of forming drilling assemblies
US20140166366A1 (en) * 2012-12-13 2014-06-19 Smith International, Inc. Single-trip lateral coring systems and methods
CA2857841C (en) 2013-07-26 2018-03-13 National Oilwell DHT, L.P. Downhole activation assembly with sleeve valve and method of using same
US9494004B2 (en) 2013-12-20 2016-11-15 National Oilwell Varco, L.P. Adjustable coring assembly and method of using same
US9598911B2 (en) * 2014-05-09 2017-03-21 Baker Hughes Incorporated Coring tools and related methods
US10125553B2 (en) 2015-03-06 2018-11-13 Baker Hughes Incorporated Coring tools for managing hydraulic properties of drilling fluid and related methods
CN106014314B (en) * 2016-07-05 2018-11-20 中交第四航务工程勘察设计院有限公司 A kind of drill takes device with hydraulic rock core card
CN113175307B (en) * 2021-04-29 2022-04-15 四川大学 Rotary seal core lifting mechanism
CN116104421B (en) * 2023-04-04 2023-06-20 成都迪普金刚石钻头有限责任公司 PDC mixed-inlaid drill bit suitable for coring of hard broken stratum

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3308896A (en) 1964-08-20 1967-03-14 Homer I Henderson Drilling bit
WO1998054437A1 (en) 1997-05-30 1998-12-03 Dresser Industries, Inc. Drill bit nozzle and method of attachment

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2013838A (en) * 1932-12-27 1935-09-10 Rowland O Pickin Roller core drilling bit
US2326435A (en) * 1940-05-24 1943-08-10 Pink T Bynum Coring apparatus
US2760758A (en) * 1952-03-07 1956-08-28 Us Industries Inc Core taking apparatus
US2870993A (en) * 1956-09-27 1959-01-27 Koebel Diamond Tool Co Core bit drilling tool
US3323604A (en) * 1964-08-28 1967-06-06 Homer I Henderson Coring drill
US3424255A (en) * 1966-11-16 1969-01-28 Gulf Research Development Co Continuous coring jet bit
US3688853A (en) * 1971-03-01 1972-09-05 William C Maurer Method and apparatus for replacing nozzles in erosion bits
US4494618A (en) * 1982-09-30 1985-01-22 Strata Bit Corporation Drill bit with self cleaning nozzle
BE1005201A4 (en) * 1991-08-28 1993-05-25 Diamant Boart Stratabit S A En Crown core.
BE1010325A3 (en) * 1996-06-05 1998-06-02 Dresser Ind Core.
BE1011502A3 (en) * 1997-10-17 1999-10-05 Dresser Ind Core.
BE1012557A3 (en) * 1999-03-15 2000-12-05 Security Dbs Core.
US7055626B2 (en) * 2002-03-15 2006-06-06 Baker Hughes Incorporated Core bit having features for controlling flow split

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3308896A (en) 1964-08-20 1967-03-14 Homer I Henderson Drilling bit
WO1998054437A1 (en) 1997-05-30 1998-12-03 Dresser Industries, Inc. Drill bit nozzle and method of attachment

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
CLYDEDALE ET AL.: "Core bit deasign reduces mud invasion, improves ROP", OIL & GAS JOURNAL, vol. 92, no. 32, 8 August 1994 (1994-08-08), pages 51 - 57

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20070261886A1 (en) 2007-11-15
NO20084841L (en) 2008-12-12
WO2007136568A3 (en) 2008-02-21
GB2451788B (en) 2011-02-16
GB0821569D0 (en) 2008-12-31
WO2007136568B1 (en) 2008-04-03
GB2451788A (en) 2009-02-11
CA2652563A1 (en) 2007-11-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20070261886A1 (en) Core drill assembly with adjustable total flow area and restricted flow between outer and inner barrel assemblies
US7954568B2 (en) Drill bit nozzle assembly and insert assembly including a drill bit nozzle assembly
EP1632639B1 (en) Downhole tool
CA2314114C (en) Improved rock drill bit with neck protection
US7383881B2 (en) Stabiliser, jetting and circulating tool
RU2455448C2 (en) Method and device for hydraulic control of well rotor drilling systems
US6874388B2 (en) Method for hardfacing roller cone drill bit legs
US6254275B1 (en) Sealed bearing drill bit with dual-seal configuration and fluid-cleaning capability
US4071101A (en) Stabilizer for single or dual tube drilling
CN101025076A (en) Roller cone drill bit with enhanced debris diverter grooves
US4790396A (en) Rotary drill bits for use in coring holes in subsurface formations
US7484572B2 (en) Roller cone drill bit with debris flow paths through associated support arms
US20200182006A1 (en) Rotating Control Device with Mechanical Seal
CA2482532C (en) Bearing and lubrication system for earth boring bit
US11377911B2 (en) Fixed cutter drill bits including nozzles with end and side exits
US7543660B2 (en) Roller cone drill bit with debris diverter plugs
US11668146B2 (en) Piston shut-off valve for rotary steerable tool
CA2321469C (en) Dual-seal drill bit with fluid cleaning capability
EP1131531A2 (en) Rotary cone drill bit having a bit body with integral stabilizers
NO20160551A1 (en) Seal assembly for wellbore tool

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 07776976

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

DPE1 Request for preliminary examination filed after expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2652563

Country of ref document: CA

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 0821569.1

Country of ref document: GB

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 07776976

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2