WO2007071307A1 - Projection objective with decentralized control - Google Patents

Projection objective with decentralized control Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2007071307A1
WO2007071307A1 PCT/EP2006/011370 EP2006011370W WO2007071307A1 WO 2007071307 A1 WO2007071307 A1 WO 2007071307A1 EP 2006011370 W EP2006011370 W EP 2006011370W WO 2007071307 A1 WO2007071307 A1 WO 2007071307A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
projection objective
manipulator
control
spui
spu
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2006/011370
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Torsten Gross
Original Assignee
Carl Zeiss Smt Ag
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Carl Zeiss Smt Ag filed Critical Carl Zeiss Smt Ag
Priority to EP06818857A priority Critical patent/EP1969428A1/en
Publication of WO2007071307A1 publication Critical patent/WO2007071307A1/en
Priority to US12/141,989 priority patent/US20080288108A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F7/00Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
    • G03F7/70Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
    • G03F7/70483Information management; Active and passive control; Testing; Wafer monitoring, e.g. pattern monitoring
    • G03F7/70491Information management, e.g. software; Active and passive control, e.g. details of controlling exposure processes or exposure tool monitoring processes
    • G03F7/70525Controlling normal operating mode, e.g. matching different apparatus, remote control or prediction of failure
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F7/00Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
    • G03F7/70Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
    • G03F7/70216Mask projection systems
    • G03F7/70258Projection system adjustments, e.g. adjustments during exposure or alignment during assembly of projection system
    • G03F7/70266Adaptive optics, e.g. deformable optical elements for wavefront control, e.g. for aberration adjustment or correction
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B7/00Mountings, adjusting means, or light-tight connections, for optical elements
    • G02B7/003Alignment of optical elements
    • G02B7/005Motorised alignment

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a projection objective for microlithography for the production of semiconductor components, which has one or a plurality of optical elements and/or optical assemblies that are adjustable by means of manipulator units with actuators and sensors, the manipulator units being driven by a control system via a data bus.
  • a projection objective of this type is known from DE 100 56 782 Al.
  • the actuators and sensors of the manipulators which are required in particular for eliminating imaging aberrations or the like, are driven and evaluated by a central control unit.
  • the transmission paths within the objective are generally very long, so that signal preamplifiers and signal amplifiers are necessary.
  • Such devices corrupt the sensor signals, however, which has a direct effect on the evaluation thereof by the central control unit and on the measurement accuracy.
  • the corruption of the measurement signals by the signal amplifiers may have diverse causes. Non-linearities of characteristic curves, temperature drifts or the like are factors in this context.
  • the signal transmission constitutes a further fault source.
  • the sensor cable has to be tuned to the sensor and the signal preamplifier used. If this is not the case, interfering signal reflections can occur, by way of example.
  • interference of this type can be minimized by appropriate laying of the signal cables and also by application of a wide variety of screening measures, this is complicated and requires structural space in addition.
  • the power loss rises considerably as a result of the use of signal preamplifiers and as a result of long transmission paths. This is manifested in an increased power demand and heating of the electronic apparatuses in the projection exposure apparatus. Such heating is undesirable and has to be dissipated in a complicated manner.
  • the present invention is based on the object of providing a projection objective of the type mentioned in the introduction which avoids the disadvantages of the prior art, in particular - even in the case of a high number of active manipulator units - reduces dynamic interference sources issuing from cables and simplifies integration into the projection exposure apparatus from electrical and regulation engineering standpoints.
  • the manipulator units in each case have one or a plurality of dedicated, decentralized control subsystems which are arranged in the region of the manipulator units and are connected to the control system via the common data bus formed in digital fashion, the control subsystems preferably being designed to independently execute the communicated control commands of the control system by means of a regulation of the actuators with the aid of the sensors.
  • the cabling outlay can advantageously be reduced essentially to one bus line and to one power supply line. Since the signal amplifiers thereby move very close to the sensors and actuators, interference over long cable sections is avoided.
  • the signal conditioning and signal processing are effected directly in the control subsystem of the manipulator.
  • the communication between manipulator unit and control system or objective controller is limited to manipulator control commands of the control system and to status feedback messages of the manipulator unit to the control system. Since this communication is effected digitally, communication errors can be detected by error correction measures (e.g. CRC check sums or the like) and thus avoided.
  • error correction measures e.g. CRC check sums or the like
  • the embodiment of the control subsystems which, on account of their regulation functionality, could of course also be referred to as regulation subsystems, is suitable for all types of projection objectives. They can be adapted to any actuator and sensor by software modification. Consequently, the projection objective can also be extended by new active manipulators. Moreover, signal amplification may be obviated in part. Signal transmission losses are significantly reduced.
  • the invention may furthermore provide for the control subsystems in each case to have at least one microprocessor and at least one data memory, and for calibration data for the respective actuators and sensors of the associated manipulator units to be stored in the data memory of the control subsystems.
  • the control subsystem can thereby autonomously supervise the functions of the associated manipulator unit. This includes the driving of the manipulators/actuators as well as the evaluation of the corresponding sensors.
  • the calibration data of the actuators and sensors and also the characteristic curve of the entire manipulator mount can be stored in the data memory of the control subsystems.
  • the microprocessor is thereby enabled to compensate for or take account of drift processes during the regulation and also to monitor the thermal behaviour of the entire manipulator unit.
  • the integration of a control subsystem into the manipulator unit leads to an additional input of energy. The latter can be compensated for in a variety of ways. Peltier elements or heating foils which are fitted on the manipulator and which keep the manipulator at a specific temperature level by means of a regulating circuit can be used for this purpose.
  • control subsystem The use of active and passive cooling systems is likewise possible for the temperature regulation. Furthermore, driving of the actuators by pulse width modulation (PWM) could also be provided.
  • PWM pulse width modulation
  • the main component part of the control subsystem is the microprocessor.
  • the control subsystem may furthermore have a temperature control. Multiplexers and A/D converters, and demultiplexers and D/A converters are required for connection and driving of the sensors and actuators.
  • An interface controller regulates access to the data bus.
  • control subsystems of the manipulator units are arranged on a housing of the projection objective, in particular on the outer side.
  • a separate power supply unit is provided for controlling the power supply of the control subsystems and of the manipulator units.
  • the power supply unit undertakes the power management of the manipulator units, which is effected independently of the control unit of the projection objective. Power supply and signal communication are thereby separate.
  • the control subsystem can communicate directly with the power supply unit, whereby the power demand can be coordinated precisely with the functions of the manipulator. Thermal supervision of the manipulator unit by the control subsystem is likewise possible.
  • Figure 1 shows a basic illustration of a projection exposure apparatus for microlithography, which can be used for the exposure of structures onto wafers coated with photosensitive materials, in accordance with the prior art
  • Figure 2 shows an illustration of a regulating circuit for a manipulator unit in accordance with the prior art
  • Figure 3 shows an illustration of a regulating circuit of a projection objective in accordance with the prior art
  • Figure 4 shows an illustration of a projection objective according to the invention with manipulator control subsystems
  • Figure 5 shows an illustration of a manipulator unit with a control subsystem
  • Figure 6 shows an illustration of a fundamental construction of a control subsystem of a manipulator unit.
  • Figure 1 illustrates a projection exposure apparatus 1 for microlithography.
  • Said apparatus serves for the exposure of structures onto a substrate coated with photosensitive materials, which generally predominantly comprises silicon and is referred to as a wafer 2, for the production of semiconductor components, such as e.g. computer chips.
  • the projection exposure apparatus 1 essentially comprises an illumination device 3, a device 4 for receiving and exactly positioning a mask provided with a grating-like structure, a so-called reticle 5, which determines the later structures on the wafer 2, a device 6 for the mounting, movement and exact positioning of precisely said wafer 2, and an imaging device, namely a projection objective 7 with a plurality of optical elements, such as e.g. lenses 8, 8', which are mounted by means of mounts 9, 9' and/or manipulator units Mi, M 2 in an objective housing 10 of the projection objective 7.
  • an illumination device 3 for receiving and exactly positioning a mask provided with a grating-like structure
  • a so-called reticle 5 which determines the later structures on the wafer 2
  • a device 6 for the mounting, movement and exact positioning of precisely said wafer 2
  • an imaging device namely a projection objective 7 with a plurality of optical elements, such as e.g. lenses 8, 8', which are mounted by means of mounts 9, 9' and/or manipulator units Mi
  • the basic functional principle provides for the structures introduced into the reticle 5 to be imaged onto the wafer 2 in demagnified fashion. After an exposure has been effected, the wafer 2 is moved further in the arrow direction A or xy direction, so that a multiplicity of individual fields, each having the structure predetermined by the reticle 5, are exposed on the same wafer 2.
  • the illumination device 3 provides a projection beam 11, for example light or a similar electromagnetic radiation, required for the imaging of the reticle 5 on the wafer 2.
  • a laser or the like may be used as a source for said radiation.
  • the manipulators Mi, M 2 are driven and evaluated by a central control system 12 of the projection objective 7, the so-called lens controller, which is in turn controlled by a superordinate control system 13 of the projection exposure apparatus .
  • the signal transmission paths are generally very long, so that, as can be seen from Figures 2 and 3, the control system 12 of the projection objective 7 has to use not only analogue/digital converters A/D and digital/analogue converters D/A but additionally signal amplifiers 14 and signal preamplifiers PA 1 , ..., PA n for driving the actuators Ai, A 2 (e.g. piezo-actuators, Lorenz actuators or the like) via an actuator interface 15 or for evaluating sensors Si, S 2 via a preamplifier 16.
  • the driving of the manipulator unit Mi of the lens 8 by the central control system 12 of the projection objective 7 in accordance with the prior art is illustrated in principle in Figure 2.
  • Figure .3 illustrates in a simplified manner the regulation of a plurality of manipulator units M 1 , ..., M n by the central control system 12 of the projection objective 7 by means of preamplifiers PAi, ... , PA n by a controller 12a in accordance with the prior art, corresponding to the detail S in Figure 1.
  • the use of the amplifiers and the preamplifiers 14, 16, PAi, ..., PA n corrupts the sensor signals, which has a direct influence on the measurement accuracy during the evaluation of the sensor signals by the control system 12 of the projection objective 7.
  • Applicable causes include e.g. non-linearity of the amplifier characteristic curves and temperature drifts.
  • the sensor cable has to be tuned to the sensor and the preamplifier used; if this tuning is inadequate, signal reflections may occur, which likewise have adverse effects on the measurement signals.
  • Crosstalk may likewise couple interference signals into the signal cables.
  • control system 12 of the projection objective 7 directly undertakes the regulation of the manipulator units Mi, ..., M n .
  • the control system 12 comprises the signal conditioning, the signal processing and also the actual controller 12a (see Figure 3) .
  • manipulator units M'i, ..., M' n of a projection objective 7' for use in the projection exposure apparatus 1 in each case have dedicated, decentralized control subsystems SPUi, • • • , SPU n which are arranged in the region of the manipulator units M'i, ..., M' n and which are connected to a control system 12' via a common data bus 17 formed in digital fashion.
  • Figure 4 shows the detail S from Figure 1 in a simplified manner in the embodiment according to the invention.
  • the control subsystems SPUi, ••-, SPU n convert the control commands communicated by the control system 12 ' independently by means of a regulation of the actuators Ai, A 2 and with the aid of the sensors Si, S 2 (see Figures 5 and 6) .
  • the signal conditioning and signal processing are effected directly in the manipulator control subsystems SPUi, •••, SPU n .
  • a respective microprocessor is integrated directly in the manipulator units M' I , ..., M' n as a manipulator control subsystem.
  • manipulator unit M'i, ..., M' n and control system 12' is thus limited to the manipulator unit M'i, ..., M' n receiving from the control system 12' control commands for manipulation of the corresponding optical element or the optical assembly (e.g. lens 8, 8' - not specifically illustrated in Figure 4) and then reporting its status back to the control system 12'. Since this communication is effected digitally, communication errors can be reliably detected and thus precluded by means of suitable error correction measures.
  • a power supply unit PCDU undertakes the power management of the manipulator units M'i, ..., M' n . This is effected independently of the control unit 12' of the projection objective 7' and constitutes an EMC separation between power supply and signal transmission.
  • the manipulator M'i has an autonomous control subsystem SPUi.
  • the signal processing of the sensors Si, S 2 is effected directly in the control subsystem SPUi of the manipulator unit M'i.
  • the actuators Ai, A 2 are likewise driven and regulated by the control subsystem SPUi.
  • the control subsystem SPUi is formed as an autonomous controller. In further exemplary embodiments, the latter could also be dependent on the control system 12' as it were as a slave.
  • the control subsystem SPUi communicates with the control system 12' and the power supply unit PCDU via a standardized interface. In the present case, the communication between the control subsystem SPU x and the power supply unit PCDU takes place independently of the control system 12'.
  • control system 12' prescribes for the control subsystem SPUi a command sequence for manipulation of the optical element or the lens 8', which the control subsystem SPUi then processes independently and subsequently reports the status back to the control system 12'.
  • the control subsystem SPU x can communicate directly with the power supply unit PCDU, as a result of which the power demand can be coordinated precisely with the functions of the manipulator M' ⁇ .
  • the control subsystem SPUi could additionally also undertake the thermal supervision of the manipulator M'i.
  • FIG. 6 shows the basic construction of the control subsystem SPUi of the manipulator unit M'i.
  • the main component of the control subsystem SPUi is a microprocessor 18.
  • the control subsystem SPUi furthermore has a data memory 19.
  • the control subsystem SPUi is constructed in a manner similar to a PCMCIA card, an SD card or the like.
  • the card should be readily accessible in order to ensure an exchange in the case of an upgrade or service.
  • the card could then be inserted into a drawer compartment or the like in the mount.
  • the control system SPUi autonomously supervises the functions of the manipulator unit M 1 I. This includes the driving, i.e. the regulation of the actuators Ai, A 2 as well as the evaluation of the sensor signals of the sensors Si, S 2 .
  • the actuators Ai, A 2 are driven by means of a digital/analogue converter D/A and a demultiplexer DEMUX by means of actuator interfaces AIFi, AIF 2 .
  • the sensor signals of the sensors Si, S 2 are received from sensor interfaces SIFi, SIF 2 via a multiplexer MUX and an analogue/digital converter A/D.
  • the calibration data of the actuators Ai, A 2 and of the sensors Si, S 2 and also the characteristic curve of the entire mount can advantageously be stored in the data memory 19 of the control subsystem SPUi. This enables the microprocessor 18 to compensate for and immediately take account of drift processes during the regulation.
  • a further function of the control subsystem SPUi is the monitoring of the thermal behaviour of the entire manipulator M'i.
  • the integration of the control subsystem SPUi in the manipulator M' I may lead to an additional input of energy. However, this can be compensated for by a plurality of countermeasures .
  • the temperature of the manipulator M'i could be regulated by means of Peltier elements in a further exemplary embodiment. There is furthermore the possibility of fitting heating foils on the manipulator M'i, which keep the manipulator M 1 ! at a specific temperature level by means of a regulating circuit.
  • the use of active and passive cooling systems is likewise possible for the temperature regulation.
  • control subsystem SPUi has an interface controller 20 and, for thermal regulation, a thermal controller 21.
  • the data interface of the control subsystem SPUi has an electrical physical interface and a software interface. Both interfaces are dependent on the data transmission protocol to be chosen. Serial as well as parallel data transmission are conceivable. Bus systems (e.g. MIL1553, LAN, CAN) are appropriate for serial data transmission. If necessary, it is possible to realize potential isolation of the data interfaces with respect to the other bus subscribers (MIL1553) . The management of the data interface is carried out by the interface controller 20.
  • the manipulator units M'i, ..., M' n are integrated into the control of the projection exposure apparatus 1 by means of the control system 12' of the projection objective 7', which is controlled by means of the control system 13' of the projection exposure apparatus 1.
  • the control system 12' of the projection objective 7' may also be omitted (indicated by dashed lines in Figures 5 and 6) .
  • the task of the control system 12' of the projection objective is to coordinate the control subsystems SPUi, •••, SPU n and could also be undertaken by the control system 13'.
  • the characteristic curve of the projection objective 7' may be stored in the control system 12'.
  • the communication between the control system 12 ' of the projection objective 7' and the control system 13' of the projection exposure apparatus 1 consists in exchanging control commands and status messages.
  • the projection objective 7' thus forms an autonomous subsystem of the projection exposure apparatus 1.
  • thermal and drift effects can also be compensated for during the regulation.
  • the same can be achieved with regard to the manipulator units by storing the manipulator characteristic curve in the corresponding control subsystems.
  • an advantageous overall system is created by the decentralized arrangement of the control subsystems SPUi, ⁇ •-, SPU n . Signal transmission losses are minimized in this case. Signal amplification can for the most part be omitted.
  • the interfaces to the control device 13' of the projection exposure apparatus 1 are reduced.
  • the manipulator characteristic curves can be included fully automatically for each mount in the respective control subsystem SPUi, ••-, SPU n .
  • the embodiments of the control subsystems SPUi, • • ⁇ , SPU n can be used for a plurality of different types of projection objectives.
  • the control subsystems SPU x , ... , SPU n can be adapted to any actuator Ai, A 2 and sensor Si, S 2 by modifications of the computer software that is executed. As a result, mechanical tolerances can be chosen to be coarser in a simple and advantageous manner.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Exposure And Positioning Against Photoresist Photosensitive Materials (AREA)
  • Exposure Of Semiconductors, Excluding Electron Or Ion Beam Exposure (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a projection objective (7') for microlithography for the production of semiconductor components, which has one or a plurality of optical elements and/or optical assemblies that are adjustable by means of manipulator units (M'1, ..., M'n) with actuators and sensors. The manipulator units (M'1, ..., M'n) are driven by a control system (12', 13') via a data bus (17). The manipulator units (M'1, ..., M'n) in each case have one or a plurality of dedicated, decentralized control subsystems (SPU1, …, SPUn) which are arranged at least approximately in the region of the manipulator units (M'1, ..., M'n) and are connected to the control system (12', 13') via the common data bus (17) formed in digital fashion.

Description

Projection objective with decentralized control
The invention relates to a projection objective for microlithography for the production of semiconductor components, which has one or a plurality of optical elements and/or optical assemblies that are adjustable by means of manipulator units with actuators and sensors, the manipulator units being driven by a control system via a data bus.
A projection objective of this type is known from DE 100 56 782 Al.
In the case of known projection objectives for microlithography, the actuators and sensors of the manipulators, which are required in particular for eliminating imaging aberrations or the like, are driven and evaluated by a central control unit. As a result, the transmission paths within the objective are generally very long, so that signal preamplifiers and signal amplifiers are necessary. Such devices corrupt the sensor signals, however, which has a direct effect on the evaluation thereof by the central control unit and on the measurement accuracy. The corruption of the measurement signals by the signal amplifiers may have diverse causes. Non-linearities of characteristic curves, temperature drifts or the like are factors in this context.
The signal transmission constitutes a further fault source. In the case of capacitive sensors, in particular, the sensor cable has to be tuned to the sensor and the signal preamplifier used. If this is not the case, interfering signal reflections can occur, by way of example. Furthermore, there is also the risk of crosstalk, that is to say that an energy source can couple interference signals into a signal cable. Although interference of this type can be minimized by appropriate laying of the signal cables and also by application of a wide variety of screening measures, this is complicated and requires structural space in addition.
The power loss rises considerably as a result of the use of signal preamplifiers and as a result of long transmission paths. This is manifested in an increased power demand and heating of the electronic apparatuses in the projection exposure apparatus. Such heating is undesirable and has to be dissipated in a complicated manner.
Taking this as a departure point, the present invention is based on the object of providing a projection objective of the type mentioned in the introduction which avoids the disadvantages of the prior art, in particular - even in the case of a high number of active manipulator units - reduces dynamic interference sources issuing from cables and simplifies integration into the projection exposure apparatus from electrical and regulation engineering standpoints.
This object is achieved according to the invention by virtue of the fact that the manipulator units in each case have one or a plurality of dedicated, decentralized control subsystems which are arranged in the region of the manipulator units and are connected to the control system via the common data bus formed in digital fashion, the control subsystems preferably being designed to independently execute the communicated control commands of the control system by means of a regulation of the actuators with the aid of the sensors. By virtue of the fact that each manipulator unit is provided with an independent control subsystem/controller, the cabling outlay can advantageously be reduced essentially to one bus line and to one power supply line. Since the signal amplifiers thereby move very close to the sensors and actuators, interference over long cable sections is avoided. The signal conditioning and signal processing are effected directly in the control subsystem of the manipulator. The communication between manipulator unit and control system or objective controller is limited to manipulator control commands of the control system and to status feedback messages of the manipulator unit to the control system. Since this communication is effected digitally, communication errors can be detected by error correction measures (e.g. CRC check sums or the like) and thus avoided. The embodiment of the control subsystems, which, on account of their regulation functionality, could of course also be referred to as regulation subsystems, is suitable for all types of projection objectives. They can be adapted to any actuator and sensor by software modification. Consequently, the projection objective can also be extended by new active manipulators. Moreover, signal amplification may be obviated in part. Signal transmission losses are significantly reduced.
The invention may furthermore provide for the control subsystems in each case to have at least one microprocessor and at least one data memory, and for calibration data for the respective actuators and sensors of the associated manipulator units to be stored in the data memory of the control subsystems.
The control subsystem can thereby autonomously supervise the functions of the associated manipulator unit. This includes the driving of the manipulators/actuators as well as the evaluation of the corresponding sensors. In this case, the calibration data of the actuators and sensors and also the characteristic curve of the entire manipulator mount can be stored in the data memory of the control subsystems. The microprocessor is thereby enabled to compensate for or take account of drift processes during the regulation and also to monitor the thermal behaviour of the entire manipulator unit. The integration of a control subsystem into the manipulator unit leads to an additional input of energy. The latter can be compensated for in a variety of ways. Peltier elements or heating foils which are fitted on the manipulator and which keep the manipulator at a specific temperature level by means of a regulating circuit can be used for this purpose. The use of active and passive cooling systems is likewise possible for the temperature regulation. Furthermore, driving of the actuators by pulse width modulation (PWM) could also be provided. The main component part of the control subsystem is the microprocessor. The control subsystem may furthermore have a temperature control. Multiplexers and A/D converters, and demultiplexers and D/A converters are required for connection and driving of the sensors and actuators. An interface controller regulates access to the data bus.
It is advantageous if the control subsystems of the manipulator units are arranged on a housing of the projection objective, in particular on the outer side.
This means that no additional heat is introduced into the projection objective.
In one refinement of the invention, it may furthermore be provided that a separate power supply unit is provided for controlling the power supply of the control subsystems and of the manipulator units.
The power supply unit undertakes the power management of the manipulator units, which is effected independently of the control unit of the projection objective. Power supply and signal communication are thereby separate. The control subsystem can communicate directly with the power supply unit, whereby the power demand can be coordinated precisely with the functions of the manipulator. Thermal supervision of the manipulator unit by the control subsystem is likewise possible.
Advantages with regard to the projection exposure apparatus according to Claim 6 emerge analogously and with reference to the description.
An exemplary embodiment is described in principle below with reference to the drawing.
In the figures:
Figure 1 shows a basic illustration of a projection exposure apparatus for microlithography, which can be used for the exposure of structures onto wafers coated with photosensitive materials, in accordance with the prior art;
Figure 2 shows an illustration of a regulating circuit for a manipulator unit in accordance with the prior art;
Figure 3 shows an illustration of a regulating circuit of a projection objective in accordance with the prior art; Figure 4 shows an illustration of a projection objective according to the invention with manipulator control subsystems;
Figure 5 shows an illustration of a manipulator unit with a control subsystem; and
Figure 6 shows an illustration of a fundamental construction of a control subsystem of a manipulator unit.
Figure 1 illustrates a projection exposure apparatus 1 for microlithography. Said apparatus serves for the exposure of structures onto a substrate coated with photosensitive materials, which generally predominantly comprises silicon and is referred to as a wafer 2, for the production of semiconductor components, such as e.g. computer chips.
In this case, the projection exposure apparatus 1 essentially comprises an illumination device 3, a device 4 for receiving and exactly positioning a mask provided with a grating-like structure, a so-called reticle 5, which determines the later structures on the wafer 2, a device 6 for the mounting, movement and exact positioning of precisely said wafer 2, and an imaging device, namely a projection objective 7 with a plurality of optical elements, such as e.g. lenses 8, 8', which are mounted by means of mounts 9, 9' and/or manipulator units Mi, M2 in an objective housing 10 of the projection objective 7.
In this case, the basic functional principle provides for the structures introduced into the reticle 5 to be imaged onto the wafer 2 in demagnified fashion. After an exposure has been effected, the wafer 2 is moved further in the arrow direction A or xy direction, so that a multiplicity of individual fields, each having the structure predetermined by the reticle 5, are exposed on the same wafer 2.
The illumination device 3 provides a projection beam 11, for example light or a similar electromagnetic radiation, required for the imaging of the reticle 5 on the wafer 2. A laser or the like may be used as a source for said radiation.
In this case, the manipulators Mi, M2 are driven and evaluated by a central control system 12 of the projection objective 7, the so-called lens controller, which is in turn controlled by a superordinate control system 13 of the projection exposure apparatus .
In this case, the signal transmission paths are generally very long, so that, as can be seen from Figures 2 and 3, the control system 12 of the projection objective 7 has to use not only analogue/digital converters A/D and digital/analogue converters D/A but additionally signal amplifiers 14 and signal preamplifiers PA1, ..., PAn for driving the actuators Ai, A2 (e.g. piezo-actuators, Lorenz actuators or the like) via an actuator interface 15 or for evaluating sensors Si, S2 via a preamplifier 16. The driving of the manipulator unit Mi of the lens 8 by the central control system 12 of the projection objective 7 in accordance with the prior art is illustrated in principle in Figure 2.
Figure .3 illustrates in a simplified manner the regulation of a plurality of manipulator units M1, ..., Mn by the central control system 12 of the projection objective 7 by means of preamplifiers PAi, ... , PAn by a controller 12a in accordance with the prior art, corresponding to the detail S in Figure 1. The use of the amplifiers and the preamplifiers 14, 16, PAi, ..., PAn corrupts the sensor signals, which has a direct influence on the measurement accuracy during the evaluation of the sensor signals by the control system 12 of the projection objective 7. Applicable causes include e.g. non-linearity of the amplifier characteristic curves and temperature drifts. In the case of capacitive sensors, the sensor cable has to be tuned to the sensor and the preamplifier used; if this tuning is inadequate, signal reflections may occur, which likewise have adverse effects on the measurement signals. Crosstalk may likewise couple interference signals into the signal cables.
The use of the preamplifiers PAi, ... , PAn and the long transmission paths result in an increase in the power loss and thus the heat in the projection objective 7 or in the projection exposure apparatus 1. This heat has to be dissipated in a complicated manner.
In the case of previous projection objectives 7, the control system 12 of the projection objective 7 directly undertakes the regulation of the manipulator units Mi, ..., Mn. In the case of this solution, the control system 12 comprises the signal conditioning, the signal processing and also the actual controller 12a (see Figure 3) .
As can be seen from Figure 4, manipulator units M'i, ..., M'n of a projection objective 7' according to the invention for use in the projection exposure apparatus 1 in each case have dedicated, decentralized control subsystems SPUi, • • • , SPUn which are arranged in the region of the manipulator units M'i, ..., M'n and which are connected to a control system 12' via a common data bus 17 formed in digital fashion. Figure 4 shows the detail S from Figure 1 in a simplified manner in the embodiment according to the invention. The control subsystems SPUi, ••-, SPUn convert the control commands communicated by the control system 12 ' independently by means of a regulation of the actuators Ai, A2 and with the aid of the sensors Si, S2 (see Figures 5 and 6) . The signal conditioning and signal processing are effected directly in the manipulator control subsystems SPUi, •••, SPUn. In the case of the projection objective 7', a respective microprocessor is integrated directly in the manipulator units M'I, ..., M'n as a manipulator control subsystem. The communication between manipulator unit M'i, ..., M'n and control system 12' is thus limited to the manipulator unit M'i, ..., M'n receiving from the control system 12' control commands for manipulation of the corresponding optical element or the optical assembly (e.g. lens 8, 8' - not specifically illustrated in Figure 4) and then reporting its status back to the control system 12'. Since this communication is effected digitally, communication errors can be reliably detected and thus precluded by means of suitable error correction measures.
As can furthermore be seen from Figure 4, a power supply unit PCDU undertakes the power management of the manipulator units M'i, ..., M'n. This is effected independently of the control unit 12' of the projection objective 7' and constitutes an EMC separation between power supply and signal transmission.
As can be seen from Figure 5, the manipulator M'i has an autonomous control subsystem SPUi. The signal processing of the sensors Si, S2 is effected directly in the control subsystem SPUi of the manipulator unit M'i. The actuators Ai, A2 are likewise driven and regulated by the control subsystem SPUi. In the present exemplary embodiment, the control subsystem SPUi is formed as an autonomous controller. In further exemplary embodiments, the latter could also be dependent on the control system 12' as it were as a slave. The control subsystem SPUi communicates with the control system 12' and the power supply unit PCDU via a standardized interface. In the present case, the communication between the control subsystem SPUx and the power supply unit PCDU takes place independently of the control system 12'. In the present exemplary embodiment, the control system 12' prescribes for the control subsystem SPUi a command sequence for manipulation of the optical element or the lens 8', which the control subsystem SPUi then processes independently and subsequently reports the status back to the control system 12'. The control subsystem SPUx can communicate directly with the power supply unit PCDU, as a result of which the power demand can be coordinated precisely with the functions of the manipulator M'χ. In a further exemplary embodiment, the control subsystem SPUi could additionally also undertake the thermal supervision of the manipulator M'i.
Figure 6 shows the basic construction of the control subsystem SPUi of the manipulator unit M'i. The main component of the control subsystem SPUi is a microprocessor 18. The control subsystem SPUi furthermore has a data memory 19. In this case, the control subsystem SPUi is constructed in a manner similar to a PCMCIA card, an SD card or the like. The card should be readily accessible in order to ensure an exchange in the case of an upgrade or service. The card could then be inserted into a drawer compartment or the like in the mount. The control system SPUi autonomously supervises the functions of the manipulator unit M1I. This includes the driving, i.e. the regulation of the actuators Ai, A2 as well as the evaluation of the sensor signals of the sensors Si, S2. The actuators Ai, A2 are driven by means of a digital/analogue converter D/A and a demultiplexer DEMUX by means of actuator interfaces AIFi, AIF2. The sensor signals of the sensors Si, S2 are received from sensor interfaces SIFi, SIF2 via a multiplexer MUX and an analogue/digital converter A/D. The calibration data of the actuators Ai, A2 and of the sensors Si, S2 and also the characteristic curve of the entire mount can advantageously be stored in the data memory 19 of the control subsystem SPUi. This enables the microprocessor 18 to compensate for and immediately take account of drift processes during the regulation. A further function of the control subsystem SPUi is the monitoring of the thermal behaviour of the entire manipulator M'i.
The integration of the control subsystem SPUi in the manipulator M'I may lead to an additional input of energy. However, this can be compensated for by a plurality of countermeasures . The temperature of the manipulator M'i could be regulated by means of Peltier elements in a further exemplary embodiment. There is furthermore the possibility of fitting heating foils on the manipulator M'i, which keep the manipulator M1 ! at a specific temperature level by means of a regulating circuit. The use of active and passive cooling systems is likewise possible for the temperature regulation.
Furthermore, the control subsystem SPUi has an interface controller 20 and, for thermal regulation, a thermal controller 21.
The data interface of the control subsystem SPUi has an electrical physical interface and a software interface. Both interfaces are dependent on the data transmission protocol to be chosen. Serial as well as parallel data transmission are conceivable. Bus systems (e.g. MIL1553, LAN, CAN) are appropriate for serial data transmission. If necessary, it is possible to realize potential isolation of the data interfaces with respect to the other bus subscribers (MIL1553) . The management of the data interface is carried out by the interface controller 20.
The manipulator units M'i, ..., M'n are integrated into the control of the projection exposure apparatus 1 by means of the control system 12' of the projection objective 7', which is controlled by means of the control system 13' of the projection exposure apparatus 1. In this case, the control system 12' of the projection objective 7' may also be omitted (indicated by dashed lines in Figures 5 and 6) . The task of the control system 12' of the projection objective is to coordinate the control subsystems SPUi, •••, SPUn and could also be undertaken by the control system 13'. Furthermore, the characteristic curve of the projection objective 7' may be stored in the control system 12'. The communication between the control system 12 ' of the projection objective 7' and the control system 13' of the projection exposure apparatus 1 consists in exchanging control commands and status messages. The projection objective 7' thus forms an autonomous subsystem of the projection exposure apparatus 1. As a result of storing the projection objective characteristic curve, thermal and drift effects can also be compensated for during the regulation. The same can be achieved with regard to the manipulator units by storing the manipulator characteristic curve in the corresponding control subsystems. Overall, an advantageous overall system is created by the decentralized arrangement of the control subsystems SPUi, ■•-, SPUn. Signal transmission losses are minimized in this case. Signal amplification can for the most part be omitted. The interfaces to the control device 13' of the projection exposure apparatus 1 are reduced. By compensating for drift effects, it is possible to achieve a lengthening of the service life of the projection objective 7'. The manipulator characteristic curves can be included fully automatically for each mount in the respective control subsystem SPUi, ••-, SPUn. The embodiments of the control subsystems SPUi, • • ■ , SPUn can be used for a plurality of different types of projection objectives. The control subsystems SPUx, ... , SPUn can be adapted to any actuator Ai, A2 and sensor Si, S2 by modifications of the computer software that is executed. As a result, mechanical tolerances can be chosen to be coarser in a simple and advantageous manner. When a serial data bus 17 is used, only a single cable is required for the data exchange between all the manipulator units M'i, ..., M'n and the control system 12'. For redundancy reasons, the control subsystems SPUi, • • • t SPUn should therefore have at least two data interfaces to the data bus 17. New functions can be implemented at any time by means of software changes. The thermal supervision is now possible directly at the manipulator. Power supply line and signal line are separate. Overall, the structural space requirement in the projection exposure apparatus 1 is reduced.

Claims

Patent Claims
1. Projection objective for microlithography for the production of semiconductor components, which has one or a plurality of optical elements and/or optical assemblies that are adjustable by means of manipulator units with actuators and sensors, the manipulator units being driven by a control system via a data bus, characterized in that the manipulator units (M'l, ..., M'n) in each case have one or a plurality of dedicated, decentralized control subsystems (SPUi, ..., SPUn) which are arranged in the region of the manipulator units
(M1 I, ..., M'n) and are connected to the control system (12', 13') via the common data bus (17) formed in digital fashion.
2. Projection objective according to Claim 1, wherein the control subsystems (SPUi, •••? SPUn) are designed to independently execute the communicated control commands of the control system (12', 13') by means of a regulation of the actuators (Ax, A2) with the aid of the sensors (Si, S2).
3. Projection objective according to Claim 1 or 2, wherein the control subsystems (SPUi, •••/ SPUn) in each case have at least one microprocessor (18) and at least one data memory (19) .
4. Projection objective according to Claim 3, wherein calibration data for the respective actuators (Ai, A2) and sensors
(Si, S2) of the associated manipulator units (M1 1, ..., M'n) are stored in the data memory (19) of the control subsystems
(SPUi, -.., SPUn) .
5. Projection objective according to one of Claims 1 to 4, wherein the control subsystems (SPUi, ••-, SPUn) of the manipulator units (M' i, ..., M'n) are arranged on a housing (18) of the projection objective (7 ' ) , in particular on the outer side.
6. Projection objective according to one of Claims 1 to 5, wherein that a separate power supply unit (PCDU) is provided for controlling the power supply of the control subsystems (SPU1, ..., SPUn) and of the manipulator units (M' i, ..., M'n).
7. Projection exposure apparatus (1) for microlithography for the production of semiconductor components comprising an illumination device (3) and comprising a projection objective (71) according to one of Claims 1 to 6.
PCT/EP2006/011370 2005-12-22 2006-11-28 Projection objective with decentralized control WO2007071307A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP06818857A EP1969428A1 (en) 2005-12-22 2006-11-28 Projection objective with decentralized control
US12/141,989 US20080288108A1 (en) 2005-12-22 2008-06-19 Projection objective with decentralized control

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102005062081.7 2005-12-22
DE102005062081A DE102005062081A1 (en) 2005-12-22 2005-12-22 Projection lens with decentralized control

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/141,989 Continuation US20080288108A1 (en) 2005-12-22 2008-06-19 Projection objective with decentralized control

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2007071307A1 true WO2007071307A1 (en) 2007-06-28

Family

ID=37692608

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2006/011370 WO2007071307A1 (en) 2005-12-22 2006-11-28 Projection objective with decentralized control

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US20080288108A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1969428A1 (en)
DE (1) DE102005062081A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2007071307A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012504329A (en) * 2008-09-30 2012-02-16 カール・ツァイス・エスエムティー・ゲーエムベーハー Projection exposure apparatus for microlithography for manufacturing semiconductor components

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CL2009001338A1 (en) * 2009-06-01 2010-10-08 Riquelme Jose Luis Gutierrez Disinfection device based on copper ions that adheres to a surgical or protective mask that is constituted by a copper sheet with folds and perforations that attaches a fastener element by means of screws.
US8606426B2 (en) * 2009-10-23 2013-12-10 Academia Sinica Alignment and anti-drift mechanism
DE102009056578B4 (en) * 2009-12-01 2014-02-27 Kuka Laboratories Gmbh industrial robots
DE102016226082A1 (en) * 2016-12-22 2018-06-28 Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh CONTROL DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING A ACTUATOR UNIT OF A LITHOGRAPHIC SYSTEM, LITHOGRAPHIC SYSTEM WITH A CONTROL DEVICE AND METHOD FOR OPERATING THE CONTROL DEVICE

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5117255A (en) * 1990-09-19 1992-05-26 Nikon Corporation Projection exposure apparatus
JP2001028328A (en) * 1999-07-14 2001-01-30 Nikon Corp Method and device for scanning aligner
US20050254042A1 (en) * 2001-09-21 2005-11-17 Bernd Geh Method for optimizing the image properties of at least two optical elements as well as methods for optimizing the image properties of at least three optical elements

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4600282A (en) * 1983-11-14 1986-07-15 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Alignment apparatus
US5980767A (en) * 1994-02-25 1999-11-09 Tokyo Electron Limited Method and devices for detecting the end point of plasma process
US5568003A (en) * 1994-09-28 1996-10-22 Zygo Corporation Method and apparatus for producing repeatable motion from biased piezoelectric transducers
US6072163A (en) * 1998-03-05 2000-06-06 Fsi International Inc. Combination bake/chill apparatus incorporating low thermal mass, thermally conductive bakeplate
DE10056782A1 (en) * 2000-11-16 2002-05-23 Zeiss Carl Method for dynamic manipulation and/or adjustment in the position of a subassembly in an optical system in a sub-mm range, uses actuators with motion detectors and interconnected sensors to move the subassembly
US6784096B2 (en) * 2002-09-11 2004-08-31 Applied Materials, Inc. Methods and apparatus for forming barrier layers in high aspect ratio vias
US7105836B2 (en) * 2002-10-18 2006-09-12 Asml Holding N.V. Method and apparatus for cooling a reticle during lithographic exposure
WO2006079537A2 (en) * 2005-01-26 2006-08-03 Carl Zeiss Smt Ag Optical assembly

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5117255A (en) * 1990-09-19 1992-05-26 Nikon Corporation Projection exposure apparatus
JP2001028328A (en) * 1999-07-14 2001-01-30 Nikon Corp Method and device for scanning aligner
US20050254042A1 (en) * 2001-09-21 2005-11-17 Bernd Geh Method for optimizing the image properties of at least two optical elements as well as methods for optimizing the image properties of at least three optical elements

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012504329A (en) * 2008-09-30 2012-02-16 カール・ツァイス・エスエムティー・ゲーエムベーハー Projection exposure apparatus for microlithography for manufacturing semiconductor components
US8885143B2 (en) 2008-09-30 2014-11-11 Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh Projection exposure apparatus for microlithography for the production of semiconductor components
US9513562B2 (en) 2008-09-30 2016-12-06 Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh Projection exposure apparatus for microlithography for the production of semiconductor components

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20080288108A1 (en) 2008-11-20
DE102005062081A1 (en) 2007-07-05
EP1969428A1 (en) 2008-09-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10185221B2 (en) Arrangement for actuating an element in a microlithographic projection exposure apparatus
US20080288108A1 (en) Projection objective with decentralized control
DE102008049616B4 (en) Projection exposure apparatus for microlithography for the production of semiconductor devices
JP6649636B2 (en) Measurement apparatus, lithography system, exposure apparatus, and device manufacturing method
KR100603006B1 (en) Exposure apparatus and aberration correction method
JP6719729B2 (en) Substrate processing system, substrate processing method, and device manufacturing method
EP1378782A2 (en) Deformable mirror with passive and active actuators
JP2021121872A (en) Measurement system and substrate processing system, and device manufacturing method
WO2009136924A1 (en) Arrays, system and method for bi-directional data transmission
JP2005315426A (en) Vibration insulating system, vibration insulating method, lithography device, and method for manufacturing the device
US20050111786A1 (en) Mems driver circuit arrangement
KR102162035B1 (en) Optical imaging arrangement with simplified manufacture
JP6270998B2 (en) EUV imaging device
US7472206B2 (en) Method and apparatus of communication control using direct memory access (DMA) transfer
US6754302B2 (en) X-ray exposure apparatus
KR102531573B1 (en) In particular, an assembly of an optical system of a microlithographic projection exposure apparatus
TW202043644A (en) Stationary vibration isolation system and control method thereof
US20210080841A1 (en) Projection exposure apparatus for semiconductor lithography
KR20210066824A (en) Actuator device for aligning elements, projection exposure apparatus for semiconductor lithography and method for aligning elements
WO2009124590A1 (en) Optical aperture device
JP2013070063A (en) Device for monitoring relative positions of plural arrangements
WO2013028066A1 (en) Lithography system and method for storing positional data of a target
US8212992B2 (en) Device for damping vibrations in projection exposure apparatuses for semiconductor lithography
KR102600384B1 (en) Sensor assembly and method for determining the respective positions of a plurality of mirrors in a lithography system
CN101141189B (en) Optical power automatic scaling system and method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2006818857

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2006818857

Country of ref document: EP