WO2007023540A1 - Cram school operation information providing system - Google Patents
Cram school operation information providing system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2007023540A1 WO2007023540A1 PCT/JP2005/015360 JP2005015360W WO2007023540A1 WO 2007023540 A1 WO2007023540 A1 WO 2007023540A1 JP 2005015360 W JP2005015360 W JP 2005015360W WO 2007023540 A1 WO2007023540 A1 WO 2007023540A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- information
- score
- computer
- school
- cram
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B19/00—Teaching not covered by other main groups of this subclass
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a system for providing management information to a management computer having management information in a computer installed in each cram school.
- each cram school entered the student's name, address, telephone number, school name, grade, gender, and other basic student information and grade information into a database built on a personal computer for reference.
- the program was started, and appropriate reference was made and corrected through an appropriate form.
- This system is called a teaching system.
- instructor basic information such as instructor's name, address, telephone number, educational background, work history, age, etc.
- the device was installed at the entrance to the instructor of the cram school !, and the attendance information of the instructor was stored and managed by the instructor.
- This system is called a lecturer system.
- each cram school uses a device that supports the accounting of the cram school. This system is called the accounting system.
- the teaching system, the management system, the lecturer system, and the accounting system are each constructed on one computer or a plurality of computers, and the school manager starts each system for reference for management purposes. If necessary, there is a problem.
- the educational system handles information about students, and the management system manages information about classes
- the lecturer system handles information related to the instructor
- the accounting system handles information related to accounting
- the accounting system has a direct impact on management
- the junior managers usually refer only to the accounting system. Since fixed costs have risen from this month, profits have been declining, and next month we will be able to secure profits to curb promotional costs, and we are thinking about future cram school management.
- Cram school managers may not be able to activate and refer to the educational system, instructor system, and management system in order to consider the number of students, the availability of classrooms, and the number of lecturers, but only refer to these simple numbers.
- the information stored in the corners is not effectively used for management.
- the present invention has been made to solve the above-mentioned problem, and collects information necessary for operating a cram school, and collects a plurality of cram school powers, and each cram school is significant in comparison with other cram schools.
- the purpose is to provide useful management information.
- the method for providing learning cram school management information is such that the management computer collects at least one of teaching information, management information, lecturer information, and accounting information collected from learning cram computers arranged in each cram school.
- the score calculation step to obtain the score of each cram school by referring to the evaluation setting information set in advance and the scoring power average score of each cram school obtained by the management computer in the score calculation step and
- the deviation value calculation step for obtaining the standard deviation and the deviation value of each cram school the management computer calculates the score power of each cram school, the rank calculation step for obtaining the rank of each cram school, and the request from the cram school computer Management Based on the information that identifies the cram school computer requested by the computer, the score, deviation value, and rank of the corresponding cram school are sent to the cram computer that requested it.
- the management computer reads various information, obtains the score of each cram school based on the evaluation setting information, obtains the average score and the standard deviation, and then obtains the deviation value of each cram school.
- the score power also determines the ranking of each cram school, and sends the score, deviation value, and rank obtained for the cram school to the cram school computer in response to the demand of the cram school computer.
- Objective information such as deviation values and ranks can be obtained, and management information that can be compared with other cram schools can be obtained.
- the management computer reads teaching information, management information, lecturer information, and accounting information collected from learning cram computers arranged in each learning cram, A score calculation step for obtaining each information and total score of each cram school by referring to the evaluation setting information set in advance, and each information and each information of each cram school obtained by the management computer in the score calculation step From the total score, the average value and standard deviation of each information and total are obtained, the deviation value calculation step to obtain each information and total deviation value of each cram school, and the management computer Information to identify each cram school computer that has been requested by the management computer in response to a request from the cram school computer.
- the cram school management information providing method includes, as necessary, the number, deviation value, and rank of the cram school of the requested cram school computer as well as the score, deviation value, and rank of the other cram school.
- the management computer transmits the score, deviation value, and rank of the other cram school just for the requested cram school to the cram school computer, and the self and other received by the cram school computer.
- the school cram score, deviation value, and ranking are displayed in a contrasting manner. The pros and cons of this school can be found clearly and immediately.
- the cram school management information providing method provides the management computer with a high-ranking cram school score, deviation value, rank, and low rank as required by the cram school computer. Sending the number, deviation value, and rank of the cram school, and the score, deviation value and rank of the high-ranking cram school received by the cram computer, deviation score, and rank And a step of displaying them on the display device.
- the scores, deviation values, and ranks of high-ranking and low-ranking cram schools it is preferable to strengthen what part, and weaken any part. It can be judged whether it will be terrible management.
- the method for providing information on the learning cram school according to the present invention is operated by the learning cram computer when the user operates the number of the learning cram displayed on the learning cram computer.
- the evaluation setting items that constitute the evaluation setting information related to the target score and the score for each evaluation setting item are displayed on the display device, and the score for each evaluation setting item is accepted for editing, and the cram school computer has edited the score. And a step of obtaining a score of the operation target reflecting the score for each evaluation setting item.
- the user operates the score displayed on the display device by using the input device as a trigger, and the evaluation setting item for the score and the score for the evaluation setting item are displayed.
- the management computer specifies the evaluation setting items constituting the worst evaluation setting information of the corresponding learning cram based on the score and the deviation value as necessary.
- Management guideline items are transmitted together with deviation values and ranks.
- the evaluation setting information is configured. Management guideline items are established to correspond to the evaluation setting items that are created, and the management guideline items corresponding to the worst and evaluation setting items of the private school specified based on the score and deviation are read and stored in the learning cram computer. Since it is transmitted, the management guideline regarding the worst part can be received, and appropriate management can be promoted.
- the method for providing learning cram school management information if necessary, in response to a request for specifying a learning cram school computer period, the management computer provides instruction information, management information, and lecturer for a specified period.
- a score calculation step of reading at least one of information and accounting information, and referring to the evaluation setting information to determine the score of each cram school, and the deviation value calculation step and the rank calculation step according to the determined score The score, deviation value, and rank for the specified period are sent to the requested cram school computer.
- the score, deviation value, and rank of the corresponding cram school are calculated for the designated period received by the cram school computer power, so by grasping the management situation at the time required by the cram school manager, We can plan smooth management of own school. Schools also have busy periods, such as summer and winter classes, and there is a great need for management information related to these busy periods only.
- the method for providing learning cram school management information includes a step in which the management computer transmits evaluation setting items constituting the evaluation setting information in response to a request from the learning cram computer, as necessary. Unnecessary evaluation setting items are selected from the sent evaluation setting items, or the contents of the evaluation setting items are edited, and the learning cram computer sends the updated evaluation setting information to the management computer. In addition, a score calculation step, a deviation value calculation step, and a rank calculation step are executed for the evaluation setting information for which the management computer has been updated.
- the cram school manager edits the evaluation setting items constituting the evaluation setting information, and calculates the score, deviation value, and rank for the evaluation setting items after the editing. It is possible to exclude or edit the evaluation setting items that are contrary to your management philosophy, and to determine the score, deviation value and ranking as desired by the cram school management. Even in the form of management, it is possible to obtain meaningful management information.
- the management computer is a learning cram computer arranged in each cram school Reading at least one of the educational information, management information, instructor information, and accounting information collected from the school, and referring to the evaluation setting information that has been set in advance, the score calculation means that calculates the score Degree calculation means for obtaining the average score and standard deviation of each learning cram obtained in the step, obtaining the deviation value of each learning cram, Rank calculating means for obtaining the rank of each learning cram from the score of each learning cram, And a means for transmitting to the cram computer requesting the score, deviation value and rank of the corresponding cram school based on the information identifying the cram school computer requested by the management computer in response to the demand of the cram school power.
- the invention of (9) expresses the learning cram school management information provision method of (1) in a system. More precisely, it relates to a management computer that is a sub-combination on the cram school management information provision system.
- the management program reads out at least one piece of teaching information, management information, lecturer information, and accounting information collected from the learning school computer arranged in each learning school to the computer.
- the invention of (10) is a program representation of the management computer of the method for providing learning cram school management information of (1). To be precise, it relates to the management computer that is a sub-combination on the school information management system.
- FIG. 1 is an overall system configuration diagram of a cram school management information providing system according to a first embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a hardware configuration diagram of a general-purpose computer according to the first embodiment of the present invention. is there.
- FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of services that can be used in the cram school management information providing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a detailed block diagram of the entire system configuration of the learning school management information providing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a detailed block diagram of the entire system configuration of the learning cram school management information providing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention, which is specialized in teaching services.
- FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram of evaluation setting information related to a teaching service of the cram school management information providing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram of evaluation setting information related to the management service of the learning school management information providing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram of evaluation setting information related to a lecturer service of the cram school management information providing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram of evaluation setting information related to the accounting service of the cram school management information providing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 10 is an operational flowchart of calculation of management performance information of the learning school management information providing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 11 is a screen display of scores, averages, ranks, management guidelines, and a contrast screen display by means of a bar graph with the average of the cram school information providing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 12 is a comparison screen display based on a radar chart with respect to the standard regarding the score of the cram school management information providing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 13 is a comparison screen display based on a radar chart of the best ranking and worst ranking regarding the score of the cram school management information provision system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 14 shows a confirmation and setting form for evaluation setting information of a cram school management information providing system according to another embodiment of the present invention.
- Management results reference means Student basic information input reference means Grade management information input reference means Curriculum management input reference means 224 Participation history information input reference means
- the present invention can also be implemented as a program and method usable on a computer.
- the present invention can be implemented in hardware, software, or software and hardware embodiments.
- the program can be recorded on any computer-readable medium such as a hard disk, CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, optical storage device, or magnetic storage device.
- the program can be recorded on other computers via the network
- FIG. 1 is an overall system configuration diagram of the cram school management information providing system according to this embodiment.
- a management computer 10 that holds data for each cram school and uses the stored data to make management information
- at least one cram school computer installed for each cram school. 20 and the management computer 10 and the cram school computer 20 can communicate with each other via the network 30.
- network devices such as hubs and routers will be placed as appropriate.
- FIG. 2 is a hardware configuration diagram of a general-purpose computer according to the present embodiment.
- the management computer 10 is a general-purpose computer, and the hardware configuration is CPU 11, DRAM (Dynamic RAM), and DRAM (Dynamic RAM), and DRAM (Dynamic RAM).
- the learning school computer 20 is a general-purpose computer similar to the management computer 10, and has the same hardware configuration. Here, even if the computer is a general-purpose computer, it is desirable to use a large-sized general-purpose computer with higher specifications than the personal computer for the management computer 10. Specific large general-purpose computer configurations include server racks, rack mountable sano, hard disk cabinets, backup cabinets, UPS (Uninterruptible
- FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of services that can be used in the learning school management information providing system according to the present embodiment.
- various schools have already started using various systems, and these systems provide services.
- information on students, information on learning, and information on advancement are received, and it is possible to refer to them as necessary, as well as information on seats and timetables, information on classroom management, and parental support.
- a management service that receives information input and can refer to it as needed
- a lecturer service that receives information on instructors, information on instructor evaluations, and information on instructor salaries and can refer to them as needed.
- Sales Provide accounting services that can be referred to as needed by receiving information on payments, information on payments, information on classroom preparations, and information on personnel expenses.
- the power that employs these services may be added, or another service may be added, or a configuration that excludes some of the adopted services may be employed.
- some of the services described above can be designed as appropriate by those skilled in the art, and a specific data structure will not be described here. However, the data structure will be described later if necessary.
- FIG. 4 is a detailed block diagram of the entire system configuration of the learning school management information providing system according to this embodiment.
- the management computer 10 includes the teaching DB 310, the management DB 320, the lecturer DB 330, the accounting for each of the teaching service, the management service, the lecturer service, and the accounting service.
- DB340 database is being built.
- a so-called person skilled in the art can appropriately design the database. Further, those skilled in the art can naturally design the hardware, but it can be constructed on hardware other than the database management computer 10 .
- each of these means is realized by developing a program recorded in a specific hard disk area in the main memory and executing it by the CPU!
- files such as system programs and data can be copied to a hard disk and read out, and settings are made as necessary, that is, installation is executed. .
- the management result reference means 230 for making the management information reference request, and the authentication form is displayed and the authentication request is made by the ID and password entered by the user.
- Authentication means 210 the above-mentioned teaching DB 310, administration DB 320, lecturer DB 33 0, the accounting DB 340 is requested to store data input by the user, and the input reference means 220 for requesting to refer to the data stored in these databases is implemented.
- the ID and password entered in response to the authentication request that the access server works are authenticated, and whether or not the access to the management computer 10 is permitted.
- the management computer 10 can be configured to have a function of authenticating.
- FIG. 5 is a detailed block diagram of the entire system configuration of the learning school management information providing system according to the present embodiment, which is specific to the educational service. For convenience of explanation, some components of the management computer 10 and the cram school computer 20 are omitted. If each service is classified as a major category, there is a middle category for each major category.
- the basic block of student information input means 221, grade management information input reference means 222, curriculum management input reference means 223, attendance history information input reference means 224, and interview management information input reference are shown as building blocks of the cram school computer 20. Means 225 and advancement management information input reference means 226 are listed. These means follow the form.
- the database of the management computer 10 includes the basic student information DB 311, the grade management information DB 312, the curriculum management DB 313, the attendance history information DB 314, the interview management information DB 315, and the advance management information DB 316, respectively. Build it.
- These databases are built in the DB DB310 in Figure 4!
- the teaching DB 31 is the entire database, and the student basic information DB 31
- Grade management information DB312, curriculum management DB313, attendance history information DB314, interview management information DB315, and college management information DB316 can be regarded as tables.
- Fig. 5 is a diagram of the educational service. Other services have the same block configuration, but the example is sufficient and the explanation is omitted.
- the evaluation setting information has a configuration in which the large classification has medium classification power and the medium classification includes evaluation setting items.
- the evaluation setting information is divided into major classification and middle classification because the management information provided is also classified into major classification and middle classification.
- multiple evaluation setting information A configuration comprising evaluation setting items may be used.
- For each evaluation setting item what kind of data power S is necessary for teaching DB310, administration DB320, lecture self-administration DB330, accounting DB340, and how to calculate and evaluate are set. By calculating using the data according to the evaluation setting items, the score of the evaluation setting items can be derived.
- the contents to be set for each evaluation setting item can usually be divided into alternative evaluation setting items and evaluation setting items based on calculation formulas.
- an alternative evaluation setting item is, for example, “if there is a ⁇ , it is a dot, and if there is no ⁇ , it is a dot.
- weights are assigned to the evaluation setting items according to the importance of the evaluation setting items, and the score of the evaluation setting items changes with this weight.
- the number of points for each evaluation setting item is obtained by multiplying the number of points obtained by the alternative evaluation setting item and the point obtained by the evaluation setting item based on the calculation formula by the weight.
- FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram of the evaluation setting information related to the teaching service of the cram school management information providing system according to this embodiment.
- “the ability to register all basic information” is an alternative evaluation setting item. Each student who is registered at a cram school has basic information registered for each student. Then, a predetermined score is given, and the score of the evaluation setting item is obtained by multiplying the weight. Whether the basic information is registered or not is determined by reading the information related to the basic information based on the information (student ID) that identifies the student from the academic affairs DB310 (other DB if necessary). It can be determined by determining.
- FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram of evaluation setting information related to the management service of the cram school management information providing system according to this embodiment.
- evaluation setting items “ku individual>” is individual guidance, and “ku group>” is class-based guidance. Since class-based guidance is widely used in schools and cram schools, explanation is omitted. In tutoring, multiple students are assigned to one instructor, and these students are taught simultaneously.
- Instructors who are not educated will be teaching individually. Therefore, the seats, students, and instructors are associated in advance, and the lecturer individually instructs a plurality of students in the assigned seats for each designated seat according to the schedule.
- the score for " ⁇ Individual> is the teacher's seat setting consistently?"
- “transfer” is to allocate the amount of power that cannot be received on the other day when the student is unable to receive guidance at the scheduled date and time. If the management service is used, the results are entered using the cram school computer 20 after the instruction is completed. However, if the student is unable to receive the instruction, the result will not be input, and the student who needs to be transferred. Are counted. The student's schedule is interviewed for this total, and the schedule is entered into the cram school computer 20 to confirm the transfer. The score of “ku individual> transfer destination has been confirmed!
- the “time schedule creation function” is a function that automatically creates a time schedule based on information received from the student and attendance information from the instructor, and is responsible for reducing the burden of paperwork.
- “school student” refers to students before the specified date
- “maternal student” refers to students after the specified date
- “pure student” refers to students at the school. It is a person who has not, and specifically, only students who have attended the course.
- the “family contact table” is the student's achievements at the cram school, which contains information such as when and what subjects were received, and is prepared for parents every month.
- “report entry / exit information to parents” is currently used by the cram school to read the IC card distributed to the students into the classroom reader, and at the same time, the parent registered in advance for the student. This will notify the e-mail address of your mobile phone to enter or leave the room.
- “medical record” is a guidance guide that is prepared monthly based on the grades and home contact table.
- FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram of evaluation setting information related to the lecturer service of the cram school management information providing system according to this embodiment.
- evaluation points based on teaching results One point will be given for regular instruction.
- evaluation points based on parent / student questionnaire are points that are added and subtracted based on parents and student questionnaires that are actually executed in a predetermined cycle.
- “lecturer evaluation points” are points given by evaluating the lecturer given by the cram school.
- FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram of evaluation setting information related to the accounting service of the cram school management information providing system according to this embodiment.
- the point of “sales growth rate (monthly / yearly)” can be calculated by the formula of “sales growth rate (monthly / by year) X base score X weight”.
- the score of “School student growth rate (monthly 'yearly)” can be calculated by the formula of “School student growth rate (monthly' yearly) X reference score X weight”.
- the point of “sales to operating profit ratio (monthly / yearly)” can be obtained from the formula “sales to operating profit ratio (monthly / yearly) X base score X weight”.
- the “operating profit growth rate (monthly / yearly)” score can be obtained from the formula of “operating profit growth rate (monthly / yearly) X base score X weight”.
- the “sales added value rate (monthly / yearly)” score can be obtained from the formula of “sales added value ratio (monthly • yearly) X base score X weight”.
- the ratio of the amount of deposit per student (monthly 'year') can be calculated using the formula of the ratio of the amount of deposit per student (monthly 'year) X reference score X weight.
- "Break-even ratio (monthly ⁇ yearly)" is "Break-even ratio (monthly ⁇ yearly)
- the score of “marginal profit rate (monthly 'yearly)” can be calculated by the formula of “marginal profit rate (monthly' yearly) X reference score X weight” it can.
- the score of “Management Safety Factor (Monthly 'Yearly)” can be obtained by the formula of “Management Safety Factor (Monthly' Yearly) X Reference Score X Weight”.
- the score for “Budget has been created! Monthly or yearly” is determined by reading the necessary data from the accounting DB340, determining whether there is a value, and multiplying by the weight. Score can be obtained.
- the score of “Achievement achievement rate (monthly 'by year)” can be obtained from the formula “Achievement achievement rate (monthly' by year) X reference score X weight”.
- the score of “Branch break-even ratio per student (monthly 'by year)” can be calculated by the formula “Branch break-even ratio per student (monthly“ by year) X Reference score X Weight ”.
- the rate of “Deposit method power 'bow I fall”, rate (monthly ⁇ yearly) ” is the rate of“ deposit ”payment method (monthly' year) X reference score X weight” It can be obtained by a calculation formula.
- the score of “Payment rate (monthly / yearly)” can be calculated by the formula of “Payment rate (monthly / yearly) X Reference score X Weight”.
- the score of the “cash deposit ratio per student (monthly 'yearly)” can be calculated using the formula “the ratio of deposit per student (monthly' year) X reference score X weight”.
- the score of “teaching efficiency (monthly / yearly)” can be calculated by the formula of “teaching efficiency (monthly / yearly) X standard score X weight”.
- the score of “Personnel Cost Rate (Monthly 'Yearly)” can be obtained from the formula of “Personnel Cost Rate (Monthly' Yearly) X Reference Score X Weight”.
- the evaluation setting information for various services has been described with reference to FIGS. 6 to 9, but all evaluation setting information is not mentioned. This is because a person skilled in the art can naturally design based on the already described evaluation setting information.
- the evaluation setting information shown here is an example, and the present invention is not limited to this.
- the calculation formula for deriving points is an example.
- the cram school computer 20 accesses the management computer 10 when the user starts the program by clicking on the icon to be marked.
- the management computer 10 transmits authentication screen information to the learning school computer 20.
- the learning school computer displays an authentication screen on the display 24.
- the user inputs the “user ID” and “password” using the keyboard 25.
- the management computer 10 authenticates via the access server. If the authentication is successful, the management computer 10 transmits menu display information and The computer 20 receives and displays the menu on the display 24.
- menu menu items that activate forms related to educational services, administrative services, and instructor services are displayed.
- a menu item that includes a menu item that activates a form related to the accounting service also displays a menu item that can be called from the currently displayed menu.
- the management computer 10 transmits form information corresponding to the information specifying the menu item, and the learning school computer 20 displays the form on the display.
- the user inputs and selects values in the input box and list box on the form displayed on the display 24 using the keyboard 25 and mouse 26.
- the input on the displayed form is completed, it is sent to the management computer 10 and recorded in the corresponding area of the input data. Therefore, the input data is not recorded on the learning cram computer 20, but all is recorded on the management computer 10.
- FIG. 10 is an operational flowchart of calculation of business performance information of the learning school management information providing system according to the present embodiment.
- the management computer 10 determines whether or not the time is a time designated in advance by the system operator (step 101). If the management computer 10 determines that it is not the specified time, the process returns to step 101.
- the management computer 10 determines that it is the designated time, the management computer 10 reads the evaluation setting item information (step 111).
- the management computer 10 reads necessary information from the teaching DB 310, the management DB 320, the lecturer DB 330, and the accounting DB 340 in accordance with the read evaluation setting items (step 121).
- the management computer 10 obtains a score from the evaluation setting items and the read data (step 131).
- the management computer 10 temporarily stores the obtained score (step 132).
- step 121 for example, information is read for all learning cram schools, and step 131 and step 132 are executed for each learning cram school, and the management computer 10 determines whether or not the last data ability is available (step 133). If it is determined that it is not the last data, the process returns to step 131 for the next data. If it is determined that it is the last data, the obtained score is written in the database (step 141). It is determined whether or not the management computer 10 is the last evaluation setting item (step 151). Last If it is determined that the item is not an evaluation setting item, the process returns to step 111 for the next evaluation setting item (that is, the next evaluation setting item is read).
- step 161 If it is determined that it is the last evaluation setting item, it is determined whether or not it is the last service (step 161). If it is determined that the service is not the last service, the process returns to step 111 for the next service (that is, the evaluation setting item of the next service is read). If it is determined that this is the last service, the process ends.
- the scores for all the evaluation setting items are obtained and stored in the database.
- the management computer 10 also counts the stored score power for each middle class of the evaluation setting information, and calculates the average score and standard deviation for each middle class. Furthermore, the management computer 10 also counts the stored score power for each major classification of the evaluation setting information, and obtains the average score and standard deviation for each major classification.
- the management computer 10 totals the total number of points from the stored points, and obtains a total average point and standard deviation. Scores are obtained for each cram school for the major classification and synthesis, and the ranking of the cram school is calculated in descending order of the scores for the major classification and synthesis. Also, for each cram school, the deviation value of each cram school is obtained from the average score and standard deviation obtained for the middle class, major class, and total and the score of each cram school. Management computer 10 Write the score and deviation of each of the major, major, and overall learning cram schools and the ranking of each major and comprehensive cram school into the database. Explain how to obtain management guidelines. Management guideline information is set to correspond to each evaluation setting item!
- Actions to be taken when the evaluation setting item is bad are set as management guidance items.
- management guidelines are also available to correspond to the middle classification. For example, for student management in Figure 6, “Most basic inputs are made! / Not. This input is less updatable than other inputs and can be accomplished in less time. Please start typing now. " To do. For learning management in Fig. 6, “Student learning information may not have been entered.
- the management computer 10 reads out the management guideline item corresponding to the evaluation setting item with the lowest score of the middle class having the lowest deviation value among the major classes of the learning cram school, and records it in correspondence with the corresponding cram school.
- management guideline items are associated with bad evaluation setting items, but conversely, management guideline items that best relate to management guideline items with respect to evaluation setting items and refer to methods for further improving the strengths. It is also possible to set up and configure the system, which can support the management with strong strengths.
- the cram school computer 20 accesses the management computer 10 when the cram school manager clicks on the icon to start the program.
- the management computer 10 transmits authentication screen information to the learning school computer 20.
- the learning school computer displays an authentication screen on the display 24.
- the user inputs the “user ID” and “password” using the keyboard 25.
- the management computer 10 authenticates via the access server. If the authentication is successful, the management computer 10 transmits menu display information, and the learning cram computer 20 receives it and displays the menu on the display 24.
- the user operating from the user ID is the management company of the school, and the menu items for management information provision are displayed in addition to the menu items described above. It has been done.
- the cram school manager presses the menu items for providing management information with the mouse 26, and the menu items for normal analysis display, contrast analysis display, and ranking display are displayed in a selectable manner.
- FIG. 11 is a screen display of the scoring school management information providing system according to the present embodiment, a screen display of scores, averages, rankings, management guidelines, and a comparison screen display by means of a bar graph with the average.
- Learning Cram School When the manager selects the normal analysis display, the cram school computer 20 requests management information provision.
- the management computer 10 identifies the learning cram from the user ID, and reads the information of the learning cram, deviation value, rank, and management guidelines from the database card.
- Management convenience Data 10 reads the average score.
- the management computer 10 transmits the read information to the cram school computer 20 together with the form information.
- the cram school computer 20 displays a form, and as shown in FIG.
- the cram school computer 20 displays a large graph and a total score and an average score in a bar graph on the left side of the center of the form, and a bar graph of a score in the middle category on the right side of the center of the form.
- FIG. 12 is a comparison screen display based on a radar chart with respect to the standard regarding the score of the cram school management information providing system according to the present embodiment.
- the cram school computer 20 requests provision of management information.
- the management computer 10 identifies the request and sends the selection form information to be compared.
- the cram school manager chooses one of them.
- the cram school computer 20 sends the information identifying the selected menu item to the management computer 10, and the management computer 10 stores the score and deviation value of the corresponding cram school and the best cram school or average score and deviation value in the database.
- the school 20 Read out and sent to the school computer 20 together with the form information.
- the school 20 displays the form on the display 24. As shown in Figure 12, the best 1 school or average score is displayed on the left side of the form, and a radar chart is also displayed on the right side of the form. The radar chart is displayed from the number of points.
- the cram school computer 20 displays the top 1 cram school or average score and deviation value on the bottom of the form in a tabular format by comparing the score and deviation value of the corresponding cram school.
- FIG. 13 is a comparison screen display based on a radar chart of the best trunking and worst rankings regarding the score of the cram school management information providing system according to the present embodiment.
- the management computer 10 reads the scores and the overall ranking of the learning crams of the comprehensive best 1 to best 3 and the comprehensive worst 1 to 3 learning crams and sends them to the learning cram computer 10 together with the form ⁇ blueprint.
- the cram school computer 10 displays the form on the display 24, and as shown in Fig. 13, displays the radar chart from the best 1 to best 3 cram scores on the top of the form and the worst 1 to worst 3 on the bottom of the form.
- the radar chart is displayed from the number of the cram school.
- the total ranking and total score are displayed at the bottom of each radar chart.
- batch processing is performed once a day at a specified time, for example, to obtain scores, deviation values, rankings, and management guidelines. However, only the data for each day is required. For each year, every year, batch processing can be used to obtain points, deviation values, rankings, and management guidelines. Juku management has a high frequency of reference, and the data is pre-obtained by the management computer 10 in a batch process and stored in the database in advance. The load on the management computer 10 can be reduced as well.
- the score, deviation value, rank, and management guideline are obtained by performing, for example, nighttime batch processing once a day at a specified time.
- the score, deviation value, ranking, and management guideline can be obtained.
- the summer school is a busy period for cram schools, and it is necessary for management to increase sales during this busy period. By collecting only information related to this period, short-term management tactics can be devised.
- the processing of the target period from the cram school computer 10 that occurs at random must be processed in real time, but for each cram school, the target period can be specified on the previous day, and the target period can be specified on the previous day.
- the score, deviation value, order, and management guidelines can be obtained in batch processing for the specified period on the next day. It leads to reduction. This period will continue Can be saved for each cram school, and the points, deviation values, rankings, and management stakes ⁇ for the target period can be obtained periodically.
- FIG. 14 is a confirmation and setting form of evaluation setting information of the learning school management information providing system according to the present embodiment.
- the system operator's evaluation setting information setting method was not clearly specified.
- select the factor item that is the setting item contents select the list box force, select the weight as the list box force, and select the module as the list box force to set.
- the setting items and modules can be entered by the system operator by simply selecting the list box power.
- modules which are calculation formulas, enter parameters, operators, and coefficients. Can be created with force.
- the configuration of the learning cram school manager can also be configured to deselect the evaluation setting items using a learning cram computer.
- the score, deviation value, ranking, and management guidelines are determined without them, and the information that the cram school manager wants is flexible Can be provided.
- the G UI for example, a configuration can be adopted in which a selection cancellation column is provided between the factor item and the weight in FIG. 14 so that the selection can be made by the chuck box, and the selected evaluation setting item is canceled.
- the evaluation setting item itself is a card set by the vendor at the time of system introduction, which is set and edited by the system operator. It can also be configured to be edited using Gakushu Computer 20. Specifically, parameters of calculation formulas can be added or deleted, coefficients can be changed, operators can be changed, and weights can be changed. You can also give the manager a desired score. In this case, since the setting of the entire system is changed, it is reflected only for the cram school of the cram school manager who made the change. As the GUI, Figure 14 which is the GUI of the system operator can be diverted.
- the management guideline also corresponds to the middle classification, and the management setting item corresponding to the evaluation setting item with the lowest score of the middle classification with the lowest deviation value was recorded and provided to the cram school management.
- each service is ranked according to whether the deviation value of each service exceeds the first threshold and the second threshold (greater than the first threshold). For example, the service exceeds the second threshold.
- the rank A is assigned to rank A
- rank B is defined as rank B
- rank 1 is defined as rank C
- rank 1 is determined for each service
- rank 1 is determined for each service.
- the computer possessed by the student's parent can be made accessible to the management computer 10, and the attendance, grades, and schedule are obtained through authentication.
- Sarako can also be configured to edit the schedule, and can effectively utilize the data possessed by the management computer 10.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Educational Technology (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
[PROBLEMS] To provide significant operation information by collecting information necessary to operating a cram school from cram schools and comparing each school with the other schools. [MEANS FOR SOLVING PROBLEMS] A managing computer (10) reads various information, determines the score of each cram school on the basis of evaluation set information, determines the average points and standard deviation, determines the adjusted standard deviation of the cram school, determines the ranking of the cram school on the basis of the determined points, and transmits the points, adjusted standard deviation, and ranking of the cram school to the cram school in response to a request of the cram school computer (20). With this, each cram school can acquires objective information on the points, standard deviation, and ranking of the cram school and operating information enabling the cram school to compare itself with the other cram schools.
Description
明 細 書 Specification
学習塾経営情報提供システム Learning school management information provision system
技術分野 Technical field
[0001] 本発明は、各学習塾に設置されているコンピュータに経営情報を有する管理コンビ ユータカも経営情報を提供するシステムに関する。 [0001] The present invention relates to a system for providing management information to a management computer having management information in a computer installed in each cram school.
背景技術 Background art
[0002] 従前、各学習塾では生徒の氏名、住所、電話番号、学校名、学年、性別等の生徒 基本情報、成績に関する情報をパーソナルコンピュータに構築されているデータべ ースに入力し、参照用のプログラムを起動して適当なフォームを介して適宜参照、修 正を行って 、た。このシステムは教務システムと呼ばれる。 [0002] Previously, each cram school entered the student's name, address, telephone number, school name, grade, gender, and other basic student information and grade information into a database built on a personal computer for reference. The program was started, and appropriate reference was made and corrected through an appropriate form. This system is called a teaching system.
[0003] また、学習塾ではコース毎の時間割の情報と、コースに所属する学生の情報とが格 納され、生徒に識別情報が付与された磁気カードを配布し、教室毎に設置された磁 気カード読取装置に授業毎に磁気カードを読み取らせ、生徒の出席管理を行ってい た。このシステムは運営システムと呼ばれる。勿論、磁気カードを使用せず、フォーム 入力により生徒の出欠管理を行う運営システムもある。 [0003] In addition, in a cram school, information on the timetable for each course and information on students belonging to the course are stored, and magnetic cards with identification information are distributed to the students, and the magnetic cards installed in each classroom are distributed. The Qi card reader reads the magnetic card for each class and manages student attendance. This system is called a management system. Of course, there is also an operating system that manages student attendance by filling in forms without using a magnetic card.
[0004] さらに、各学習塾では講師の氏名、住所、電話番号、学歴、職歴、年齢等の講師基 本情報と、前記生徒の出席管理と同様の構成 (ただし、講師が使用する磁気カード 読取装置は塾の講師用出入り口に設置されて!、る)で講師の勤怠情報とを格納し、 講師の管理を行って 、た。このシステムは講師システムと呼ばれる。 [0004] Furthermore, in each cram school, instructor basic information such as instructor's name, address, telephone number, educational background, work history, age, etc., and the same configuration as the attendance management of the student (however, reading the magnetic card used by the instructor) The device was installed at the entrance to the instructor of the cram school !, and the attendance information of the instructor was stored and managed by the instructor. This system is called a lecturer system.
[0005] さらにまた、各学習塾では学習塾の経理を支援する装置を使用していた。このシス テムは経理システムと呼ばれる。 [0005] Furthermore, each cram school uses a device that supports the accounting of the cram school. This system is called the accounting system.
発明の開示 Disclosure of the invention
発明が解決しょうとする課題 Problems to be solved by the invention
[0006] 前記教務システム、運営システム、講師システム、経理システムはそれぞれ一つの コンピュータ又は複数のコンピュータに構築されており、塾経営者が経営のために参 照するためにはそれぞれのシステムを起動する必要があると 、う課題を有する。 [0006] The teaching system, the management system, the lecturer system, and the accounting system are each constructed on one computer or a plurality of computers, and the school manager starts each system for reference for management purposes. If necessary, there is a problem.
[0007] 教務システムは生徒に関する情報を取り扱い、運営システムは授業に関する情報
を取り扱い、講師システムは講師に関する情報を取り扱い、経理システムは経理に関 する情報を取り扱い、この中で経営に直接影響があるのは経理システムであり、塾経 営者は普段経理システムのみを参照し、今月から固定費が上昇したので利益薄とな つた、来月は販促費を抑えるため利益を確保することができる等の判断を行い、今後 の塾経営のことを思案している。塾経営者は生徒数、教室の空き状況、講師数を考 慮するため、教務システム、講師システム、運営システムを起動させて参照する力もし れないが、それらの単純な数字のみを参照にするに留まり折角蓄積されている情報 を経営に有効活用していないという課題も有する。ここで、小規模の塾の経営者なら まだしも、大規模の塾の経営者であれば、直接自分でシステムを起動することもしな いのが通例である。 [0007] The educational system handles information about students, and the management system manages information about classes The lecturer system handles information related to the instructor, the accounting system handles information related to accounting, and the accounting system has a direct impact on management, and the junior managers usually refer only to the accounting system. Since fixed costs have risen from this month, profits have been declining, and next month we will be able to secure profits to curb promotional costs, and we are thinking about future cram school management. Cram school managers may not be able to activate and refer to the educational system, instructor system, and management system in order to consider the number of students, the availability of classrooms, and the number of lecturers, but only refer to these simple numbers. However, there is a problem that the information stored in the corners is not effectively used for management. Here, it is customary that small-scale cram school managers or large-scale cram school managers do not start the system directly on their own.
[0008] 仮に、それぞれのシステムを毎時起動させて、常に参照して!/、る塾の経営者カ^ヽた としても、時間が力かって非効率であるだけでなぐ具体的な数字を見てもそれは直 接経営のための情報ではないため、塾経営者それぞれの主観的なものさしで判断し 、自塾の他塾と比べ劣っている部分を客観的に特定することができず、それにより誤 つた分析を行 、適切な経営判断を行うことができな 、と 、う課題を有する。 [0008] Even if you start each system every hour and always refer to it! /, Even if you are a manager of a cram school, you will see specific figures that are just time-consuming and inefficient. However, since it is not information for direct management, it is not possible to objectively identify inferior parts compared to other cram schools, based on the subjective measure of each cram school manager. Therefore, there is a problem that a wrong management analysis cannot be performed and an appropriate management judgment cannot be made.
[0009] 本発明は、前記課題を解決するためになされたものであり、塾を運用していく上で 必要となる情報を複数の塾力 収集し、塾毎に他塾との比較で有意な経営情報を提 供することを目的とする。 [0009] The present invention has been made to solve the above-mentioned problem, and collects information necessary for operating a cram school, and collects a plurality of cram school powers, and each cram school is significant in comparison with other cram schools. The purpose is to provide useful management information.
課題を解決するための手段 Means for solving the problem
[0010] (1) 本発明に係る学習塾経営情報提供方法は、管理コンピュータが、各学習塾に 配置される学習塾コンピュータから収集される教務情報、運営情報、講師情報、経理 情報の少なくとも 1つの情報を読み出し、予め設定している評価設定情報を参照して 各学習塾の点数を求める点数算出ステップと、管理コンピュータが、当該点数算出ス テツプで求めた各学習塾の点数力 平均点及び標準偏差を求め、各学習塾の偏差 値を求める偏差値算出ステップと、管理コンピュータが、各学習塾の点数力 各学習 塾の順位を求める順位算出ステップと、学習塾コンピュータからの要求に応じて管理 コンピュータが要求してきた学習塾コンピュータを特定する情報に基づき該当学習塾 の点数、偏差値及び順位を要求してきた学習塾コンピュータに送信するステップとを
含むものである。このように本発明においては、管理コンピュータが各種情報を読み 出し、評価設定情報に基づき各学習塾の点数を求め、平均点及び標準偏差を求め た後各学習塾の偏差値を求め、求めた点数力も各学習塾の順位を求め、学習塾コ ンピュータの要求に応じて該当学習塾について求めた点数、偏差値及び順位を学 習塾コンピュータに送信するので、学習塾が自己の学習塾の点数、偏差値及び順位 の客観的な情報を得ることができ、他学習塾との対比を行うことができる経営情報を 得ることができる。 [0010] (1) The method for providing learning cram school management information according to the present invention is such that the management computer collects at least one of teaching information, management information, lecturer information, and accounting information collected from learning cram computers arranged in each cram school. The score calculation step to obtain the score of each cram school by referring to the evaluation setting information set in advance and the scoring power average score of each cram school obtained by the management computer in the score calculation step and The deviation value calculation step for obtaining the standard deviation and the deviation value of each cram school, the management computer calculates the score power of each cram school, the rank calculation step for obtaining the rank of each cram school, and the request from the cram school computer Management Based on the information that identifies the cram school computer requested by the computer, the score, deviation value, and rank of the corresponding cram school are sent to the cram computer that requested it. That the step Is included. As described above, in the present invention, the management computer reads various information, obtains the score of each cram school based on the evaluation setting information, obtains the average score and the standard deviation, and then obtains the deviation value of each cram school. The score power also determines the ranking of each cram school, and sends the score, deviation value, and rank obtained for the cram school to the cram school computer in response to the demand of the cram school computer. Objective information such as deviation values and ranks can be obtained, and management information that can be compared with other cram schools can be obtained.
[0011] (2) 本発明に係る学習塾経営情報提供方法は、管理コンピュータが、各学習塾に 配置される学習塾コンピュータから収集される教務情報、運営情報、講師情報、経理 情報を読み出し、予め設定している評価設定情報を参照して各学習塾の各情報及 び総合の点数を求める点数算出ステップと、管理コンピュータが、当該点数算出ステ ップで求めた各学習塾の各情報及び総合の点数から各情報及び総合の平均点及 び標準偏差を求め、各学習塾の各情報及び総合の偏差値を求める偏差値算出ステ ップと、管理コンピュータが、各学習塾の各情報及び総合の点数から各学習塾の各 情報及び総合の順位を求める順位算出ステップと、学習塾コンピュータからの要求 に応じて管理コンピュータが要求してきた学習塾コンピュータを特定する情報に基づ き該当学習塾の各情報及び総合の点数、偏差値及び順位を要求してきた学習塾コ ンピュータに送信するステップとを含むものである。このように本発明においては、(1 )に比べ、教務情報、運営情報、講師情報、経理情報の全ての情報を読み出し、点 数、偏差値及び順位を求め、多角的な視点からの経営情報を得ることができる。 [0011] (2) According to the method for providing learning cram school management information according to the present invention, the management computer reads teaching information, management information, lecturer information, and accounting information collected from learning cram computers arranged in each learning cram, A score calculation step for obtaining each information and total score of each cram school by referring to the evaluation setting information set in advance, and each information and each information of each cram school obtained by the management computer in the score calculation step From the total score, the average value and standard deviation of each information and total are obtained, the deviation value calculation step to obtain each information and total deviation value of each cram school, and the management computer Information to identify each cram school computer that has been requested by the management computer in response to a request from the cram school computer. And transmitting the information to the learning cram computer that has requested each information and the total score, deviation value, and rank of the corresponding cram school based on the information. As described above, in the present invention, compared to (1), all the information of teaching information, management information, lecturer information, and accounting information is read out, the score, deviation value and rank are obtained, and management information from a multifaceted viewpoint is obtained. Can be obtained.
[0012] (3) 本発明に係る学習塾経営情報提供方法は必要に応じて、前記要求した学習 塾コンピュータの学習塾の点数、偏差値及び順位と共に、他の学習塾の点数、偏差 値及び順位を送信するステップと、学習塾コンピュータで受信した自身の学習塾の 点数、偏差値及び順位と他の学習塾の点数、偏差値及び順位を対比させて表示装 置に表示するステップとをさらに含むものである。このように本発明においては、要求 した学習塾についてだけでなぐ他の学習塾についての点数、偏差値及び順位を管 理コンピュータが学習塾コンピュータに送信し、学習塾コンピュータが受信した自己 及び他の学習塾の点数、偏差値及び順位を対比させて表示させているので、自己
の学習塾の良い点、悪い点を明瞭に且つ即座に見出すことができる。 (3) The cram school management information providing method according to the present invention includes, as necessary, the number, deviation value, and rank of the cram school of the requested cram school computer as well as the score, deviation value, and rank of the other cram school. A step of transmitting the rank, and a step of comparing the score, deviation value, and rank of the own cram school received by the cram school computer with the score, deviation value, and rank of the other cram school and displaying them on the display device. Is included. As described above, in the present invention, the management computer transmits the score, deviation value, and rank of the other cram school just for the requested cram school to the cram school computer, and the self and other received by the cram school computer. The school cram score, deviation value, and ranking are displayed in a contrasting manner. The pros and cons of this school can be found clearly and immediately.
[0013] (4) 本発明に係る学習塾経営情報提供方法は必要に応じて、学習塾コンビユー タカ の要求に応じて管理コンピュータが高順位の学習塾の点数、偏差値及び順位 と、低順位の学習塾の点数、偏差値及び順位を送信するステップと、学習塾コンビュ ータで受信した高順位の学習塾の点数、偏差値及び順位と低順位の学習塾の点数 、偏差値及び順位とを対比させて表示装置に表示するステップとをさらに含むもので ある。このように本発明においては、高い順位の学習塾と低い学習塾の点数、偏差 値及び順位を知ることにより、どのような部分を強化することが好ましい経営となり、ど のような部分を弱化することでひどい経営となるかを判断することができる。 [0013] (4) The cram school management information providing method according to the present invention provides the management computer with a high-ranking cram school score, deviation value, rank, and low rank as required by the cram school computer. Sending the number, deviation value, and rank of the cram school, and the score, deviation value and rank of the high-ranking cram school received by the cram computer, deviation score, and rank And a step of displaying them on the display device. As described above, in the present invention, by knowing the scores, deviation values, and ranks of high-ranking and low-ranking cram schools, it is preferable to strengthen what part, and weaken any part. It can be judged whether it will be terrible management.
[0014] (5) 本発明に係る学習塾経営情報提供方法は必要に応じて、学習塾コンビユー タで表示されている自身の学習塾の点数を使用者が操作すると、学習塾コンビユー タが操作対象の点数に係る評価設定情報を構成する評価設定項目と当該評価設定 項目毎の点数を表示装置に表示し、評価設定項目毎の点数を編集を受け付けるス テツプと、学習塾コンピュータが編集後の評価設定項目毎の点数を反映した操作対 象の点数を求めるステップとをさらに含むものである。このように本発明においては、 使用者が表示装置に表示されている点数を入力装置を用いて操作することをトリガと して、力かる点数の評価設定項目及び評価設定項目の点数を表示し、評価設定項 目の点数を編集し、操作対象の点数を求めるので、使用者がシュミレーシヨンしたい 点数に着目して、かかる着目した点数に関する評価設定項目と評価設定項目の点 数を確認して評価設定項目の点数を高くしたり、低くしたりすることができ、自身の学 習塾が取り組むべき内容を特定し、効率的によりよい学習塾の経営を目指すことがで きる。 [5] (5) If necessary, the method for providing information on the learning cram school according to the present invention is operated by the learning cram computer when the user operates the number of the learning cram displayed on the learning cram computer. The evaluation setting items that constitute the evaluation setting information related to the target score and the score for each evaluation setting item are displayed on the display device, and the score for each evaluation setting item is accepted for editing, and the cram school computer has edited the score. And a step of obtaining a score of the operation target reflecting the score for each evaluation setting item. As described above, in the present invention, the user operates the score displayed on the display device by using the input device as a trigger, and the evaluation setting item for the score and the score for the evaluation setting item are displayed. Since the score of the evaluation setting item is edited and the score of the operation target is obtained, paying attention to the score that the user wants to simulate, check the score of the evaluation setting item and the evaluation setting item related to the focused score. You can increase or decrease the number of evaluation setting items, identify the content that your school should work on, and aim for more efficient school management.
[0015] (6) 本発明に係る学習塾経営情報提供方法は必要に応じて、管理コンピュータ は点数及び偏差値に基づき該当学習塾の最も悪い評価設定情報を構成する評価 設定項目を特定し、予め評価設定項目に対応付!、て設定されて!、る経営指針項目 を特定された評価設定項目に基づき読み出すステップとをさらに含み、前記要求し てきた学習塾コンピュータに送信するステップで、点数、偏差値及び順位と共に経営 指針項目を送信するものである。このように本発明においては、評価設定情報を構
成する評価設定項目に対応するように経営指針項目が設けられ、点数及び偏差に 基づき特定される自塾の最も悪!、評価設定項目に対応する経営指針項目を読み出 し、学習塾コンピュータに送信するので、最も悪い部分に関する経営指針を受けるこ とができ、適切な経営運営を図ることができる。 [0015] (6) In the learning cram school management information providing method according to the present invention, the management computer specifies the evaluation setting items constituting the worst evaluation setting information of the corresponding learning cram based on the score and the deviation value as necessary. A step of reading the management guideline item based on the specified evaluation setting item, and sending it to the requested cram school computer. Management guideline items are transmitted together with deviation values and ranks. Thus, in the present invention, the evaluation setting information is configured. Management guideline items are established to correspond to the evaluation setting items that are created, and the management guideline items corresponding to the worst and evaluation setting items of the private school specified based on the score and deviation are read and stored in the learning cram computer. Since it is transmitted, the management guideline regarding the worst part can be received, and appropriate management can be promoted.
[0016] (7) 本発明に係る学習塾経営情報提供方法は必要に応じて、学習塾コンビユー タカ 期間を指定された要求に応じて、管理コンピュータが指定期間の教務情報、運 営情報、講師情報、経理情報の少なくとも 1つの情報を読み出し、評価設定情報を 参照して各学習塾の点数を求める点数算出ステップとをさらに含み、求めた点数に っ 、て前記偏差値算出ステップ及び順位算出ステップを実行し、要求してきた学習 塾コンピュータに指定期間の点数、偏差値及び順位を送信するものである。このよう に本発明においては、学習塾コンピュータ力 受けた指定期間について該当学習塾 の点数、偏差値及び順位を算出するので、学習塾経営者が必要とする時期の経営 状況を把握することで、自塾の円滑な経営運営を図ることができる。学習塾において も、夏季講習、冬季講習のように繁忙期があり、この繁忙期のみに関する経営情報を 必要とするニーズが大きい。 [0016] (7) The method for providing learning cram school management information according to the present invention, if necessary, in response to a request for specifying a learning cram school computer period, the management computer provides instruction information, management information, and lecturer for a specified period. A score calculation step of reading at least one of information and accounting information, and referring to the evaluation setting information to determine the score of each cram school, and the deviation value calculation step and the rank calculation step according to the determined score The score, deviation value, and rank for the specified period are sent to the requested cram school computer. In this way, in the present invention, the score, deviation value, and rank of the corresponding cram school are calculated for the designated period received by the cram school computer power, so by grasping the management situation at the time required by the cram school manager, We can plan smooth management of own school. Schools also have busy periods, such as summer and winter classes, and there is a great need for management information related to these busy periods only.
[0017] (8) 本発明に係る学習塾経営情報提供方法は必要に応じて、学習塾コンビユー タの要求に応じて管理コンピュータが評価設定情報を構成する評価設定項目を送信 するステップと、この送信された評価設定項目のうち不必要な評価設定項目が選択 解除しされ、または、評価設定項目の内容が編集され、更新された評価設定情報を 学習塾コンピュータが管理コンピュータに送信するステップとを含み、管理コンビユー タが更新された評価設定情報について点数算出ステップ、偏差値算出ステップ及び 順位算出ステップを実行するものである。このように本発明においては、学習塾経営 者が評価設定情報を構成する評価設定項目を編集し、編集後の評価設定項目につ いて点数、偏差値及び順位を求めるので、学習塾経営者が自己の経営理念と反す る評価設定項目の評価を対象外とし、または、編集することができ、学習塾経営者が 望む形で点数、偏差値及び順位を決定することができ、どのような形態の経営にお V、ても有意義な経営情報を得ることができる。 [0017] (8) The method for providing learning cram school management information according to the present invention includes a step in which the management computer transmits evaluation setting items constituting the evaluation setting information in response to a request from the learning cram computer, as necessary. Unnecessary evaluation setting items are selected from the sent evaluation setting items, or the contents of the evaluation setting items are edited, and the learning cram computer sends the updated evaluation setting information to the management computer. In addition, a score calculation step, a deviation value calculation step, and a rank calculation step are executed for the evaluation setting information for which the management computer has been updated. As described above, in the present invention, the cram school manager edits the evaluation setting items constituting the evaluation setting information, and calculates the score, deviation value, and rank for the evaluation setting items after the editing. It is possible to exclude or edit the evaluation setting items that are contrary to your management philosophy, and to determine the score, deviation value and ranking as desired by the cram school management. Even in the form of management, it is possible to obtain meaningful management information.
[0018] (9) 本発明に係る管理コンピュータは、各学習塾に配置される学習塾コンピュータ
から収集される教務情報、運営情報、講師情報、経理情報の少なくとも 1つの情報を 読み出し、予め設定している評価設定情報を参照して各学習塾の点数を求める点数 算出手段と、当該点数算出ステップで求めた各学習塾の点数力 平均点及び標準 偏差を求め、各学習塾の偏差値を求める偏差値算出手段と、各学習塾の点数から 各学習塾の順位を求める順位算出手段と、学習塾コンピュータ力 の要求に応じて 管理コンピュータが要求してきた学習塾コンピュータを特定する情報に基づき該当学 習塾の点数、偏差値及び順位を要求してきた学習塾コンピュータに送信する手段と を含むものである。この(9)の発明は、(1)の学習塾経営情報提供方法をシステムで 表現したものである。正確には、学習塾経営情報提供システム上のサブコンビネーシ ヨンとなる管理コンピュータに関するものである。 [0018] (9) The management computer according to the present invention is a learning cram computer arranged in each cram school Reading at least one of the educational information, management information, instructor information, and accounting information collected from the school, and referring to the evaluation setting information that has been set in advance, the score calculation means that calculates the score Degree calculation means for obtaining the average score and standard deviation of each learning cram obtained in the step, obtaining the deviation value of each learning cram, Rank calculating means for obtaining the rank of each learning cram from the score of each learning cram, And a means for transmitting to the cram computer requesting the score, deviation value and rank of the corresponding cram school based on the information identifying the cram school computer requested by the management computer in response to the demand of the cram school power. The invention of (9) expresses the learning cram school management information provision method of (1) in a system. More precisely, it relates to a management computer that is a sub-combination on the cram school management information provision system.
[0019] (10) 本発明に係る管理プログラムは、コンピュータに、各学習塾に配置される学 習塾コンピュータから収集される教務情報、運営情報、講師情報、経理情報の少なく とも 1つの情報を読み出し、予め設定している評価設定情報を参照して各学習塾の 点数を求める点数算出手順と、当該点数算出ステップで求めた各学習塾の点数力 平均点及び標準偏差を求め、各学習塾の偏差値を求める偏差値算出手順と、各学 習塾の点数力 各学習塾の順位を求める順位算出手順と、学習塾コンピュータから の要求に応じて管理コンピュータが要求してきた学習塾コンピュータを特定する情報 に基づき該当学習塾の点数、偏差値及び順位を要求してきた学習塾コンピュータに 送信する手順を実行させるものである。この(10)の発明は、(1)の学習塾経営情報 提供方法の管理コンピュータについてプログラムで表現したものである。正確には、 学習塾経営情報提供システム上のサブコンビネーションとなる管理コンピュータに関 するものである。 [0019] (10) The management program according to the present invention reads out at least one piece of teaching information, management information, lecturer information, and accounting information collected from the learning school computer arranged in each learning school to the computer. The score calculation procedure for obtaining the score of each cram school with reference to the evaluation setting information set in advance, the score power average point and standard deviation of each cram school obtained in the score calculation step, and Deviation value calculation procedure for obtaining the deviation value, point power of each cram school, ranking calculation procedure for obtaining the rank of each cram school, and information identifying the cram school computer requested by the management computer in response to a request from the cram school computer Based on this, the procedure to send to the cram school computer that requested the score, deviation value and rank of the corresponding cram school is executed. The invention of (10) is a program representation of the management computer of the method for providing learning cram school management information of (1). To be precise, it relates to the management computer that is a sub-combination on the school information management system.
これら前記の発明の概要は、本発明に必須となる特徴を列挙したものではなぐこ れら複数の特徴のサブコンビネーションも発明となり得る。 These outlines of the invention do not enumerate the features essential to the present invention, and a sub-combination of these features can also be an invention.
図面の簡単な説明 Brief Description of Drawings
[0020] [図 1]本発明の第 1の実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの全体システム 構成図である。 FIG. 1 is an overall system configuration diagram of a cram school management information providing system according to a first embodiment of the present invention.
[図 2]本発明の第 1の実施形態に係る汎用的なコンピュータのハードウェア構成図で
ある。 FIG. 2 is a hardware configuration diagram of a general-purpose computer according to the first embodiment of the present invention. is there.
[図 3]本発明の第 1の実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムで利用可能なサ 一ビスの説明図である。 FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of services that can be used in the cram school management information providing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
[図 4]本発明の第 1の実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの全体システム 構成詳細ブロック図である。 FIG. 4 is a detailed block diagram of the entire system configuration of the learning school management information providing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
[図 5]本発明の第 1の実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの全体システム 構成詳細ブロック図であって、教務サービスに特ィ匕したものである。 FIG. 5 is a detailed block diagram of the entire system configuration of the learning cram school management information providing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention, which is specialized in teaching services.
[図 6]本発明の第 1の実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの教務サービス に関する評価設定情報の説明図である。 FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram of evaluation setting information related to a teaching service of the cram school management information providing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
[図 7]本発明の第 1の実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの運営サービス に関する評価設定情報の説明図である。 FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram of evaluation setting information related to the management service of the learning school management information providing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
[図 8]本発明の第 1の実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの講師サービス に関する評価設定情報の説明図である。 FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram of evaluation setting information related to a lecturer service of the cram school management information providing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
[図 9]本発明の第 1の実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの経理サービス に関する評価設定情報の説明図である。 FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram of evaluation setting information related to the accounting service of the cram school management information providing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
[図 10]本発明の第 1の実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの経営成績情 報の演算の動作フローチャートである。 FIG. 10 is an operational flowchart of calculation of management performance information of the learning school management information providing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
[図 11]本発明の第 1の実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの得点、平均、 順位、経営指針の画面表示、並びに、平均との棒グラフによる対比画面表示である。 FIG. 11 is a screen display of scores, averages, ranks, management guidelines, and a contrast screen display by means of a bar graph with the average of the cram school information providing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
[図 12]本発明の第 1の実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの点数に関し て基準とのレーダーチャートによる対比画面表示である。 FIG. 12 is a comparison screen display based on a radar chart with respect to the standard regarding the score of the cram school management information providing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
[図 13]本発明の第 1の実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの点数に関し てべストランキング、ワーストランキングのレーダーチャートによる対比画面表示である FIG. 13 is a comparison screen display based on a radar chart of the best ranking and worst ranking regarding the score of the cram school management information provision system according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
[図 14]本発明のその他の実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの評価設定 情報の確認及び設定フォームである。 FIG. 14 shows a confirmation and setting form for evaluation setting information of a cram school management information providing system according to another embodiment of the present invention.
符号の説明 Explanation of symbols
10 管理コンピュータ
CPU 10 Management computer CPU
DRAM HD DRAM HD
ディスプレイ display
キーボード The keyboard
マウス The mouse
LANカード LAN card
CD - ROMド、ライブ CD-ROM, live
学習塾コンピュータ Cram school computer
CPU DRAM HD CPU DRAM HD
ディスプレイ display
キーボード The keyboard
マウス The mouse
LANカード LAN card
CD - ROMド、ライブ CD-ROM, live
ネットワーク The network
算出手段 Calculation means
指針選択手段 Pointer selection means
提供処理手段 Provision processing means
評価設定手段 Evaluation setting means
経営指針情報 Management guideline information
認証手段 Authentication means
経営成績参照手段 生徒基本情報入力参照手段 成績管理情報入力参照手段 カリキュラム管理入力参照手段
224 受講履歴情報入力参照手段 Management results reference means Student basic information input reference means Grade management information input reference means Curriculum management input reference means 224 Participation history information input reference means
225 面談管理情報入力参照手段 225 Interview management information input reference means
226 進学管理情報入力参照手段 226 Referral information entry method
230 入力参照手段 230 Input reference means
310 教務 DB 310 Academic Affairs DB
311 生徒基本情報 DB 311 Student Basic Information DB
312 成績管理情報 DB 312 Grade Management Information DB
313 カリキュラム管理 DB 313 Curriculum Management DB
314 受講履歴情報 DB 314 Course History Information DB
315 面談管理情報 DB 315 Interview Management Information DB
316 進学管理情報 DB 316 Advancement Management Information DB
320 運営 DB 320 Management DB
330 講師 DB 330 Lecturer DB
340 経理 DB 340 Accounting DB
350 経営成績 DB 350 Business Results DB
発明を実施するための最良の形態 BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
[0022] (本発明の第 1の実施形態) [0022] (First embodiment of the present invention)
ここで、本発明は多くの異なる形態で実施可能である。したがって、下記の各実施 形態の記載内容のみで解釈すべきではない。また、各実施形態の全体を通して同じ 要素には同じ符号を付けている。 Here, the present invention can be implemented in many different forms. Therefore, it should not be interpreted only by the description of the following embodiments. Further, the same reference numerals are given to the same elements throughout the embodiments.
各実施形態では、主にシステムについて説明するが、所謂当業者であれば明らか な通り、本発明はコンピュータで使用可能なプログラム及び方法としても実施できる。 また、本発明は、ハードウェア、ソフトウェア、または、ソフトウェア及びハードウェアの 実施形態で実施可能である。プログラムは、ハードディスク、 CD-ROM, DVD-R OM、光記憶装置または磁気記憶装置等の任意のコンピュータ可読媒体に記録でき る。さらに、プログラムはネットワークを介した他のコンピュータに記録することができる In each embodiment, the system will be mainly described. However, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art, the present invention can also be implemented as a program and method usable on a computer. In addition, the present invention can be implemented in hardware, software, or software and hardware embodiments. The program can be recorded on any computer-readable medium such as a hard disk, CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, optical storage device, or magnetic storage device. In addition, the program can be recorded on other computers via the network
[0023] 本発明の第 1の実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムについて、図に基づ
き説明する。 [0023] The cram school management information providing system according to the first embodiment of the present invention is based on the drawings. I will explain.
図 1は本実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの全体システム構成図であ る。この図 1に示されるように、各学習塾のデータを保持し、保持しているデータをカロ ェして経営情報にする管理コンピュータ 10と、学習塾毎に少なくとも 1台設置される 学習塾コンピュータ 20とを備え、管理コンピュータ 10と学習塾コンピュータ 20とはネ ットワーク 30を介して通信可能となっている。ネットワークの構成は当業者であれば適 宜設計可能である。また、 HUB,ルータ等のネットワーク機器を適宜配置する。 FIG. 1 is an overall system configuration diagram of the cram school management information providing system according to this embodiment. As shown in Fig. 1, there is a management computer 10 that holds data for each cram school and uses the stored data to make management information, and at least one cram school computer installed for each cram school. 20 and the management computer 10 and the cram school computer 20 can communicate with each other via the network 30. Those skilled in the art can appropriately design the network configuration. In addition, network devices such as hubs and routers will be placed as appropriate.
[0024] 図 2は本実施形態に係る汎用的なコンピュータのハードウェア構成図である。管理 コンピュータ 10は汎用的なコンピュータであり、ハードウェアの構成としては CPU11、 DRAM(Dynamic FIG. 2 is a hardware configuration diagram of a general-purpose computer according to the present embodiment. The management computer 10 is a general-purpose computer, and the hardware configuration is CPU 11, DRAM (Dynamic
Random Access Memory) 12等のメインメモリ、外部記憶装置である HD(hard disk) 13 、表示装置であるディスプレイ 14、入力装置であるキーボード 15及びマウス 16、ネッ トワークに接続するための拡張カードである LANカード 17、 CD- ROMドライブ 18等か らなる。学習塾コンピュータ 20も管理コンピュータ 10と同様に汎用的なコンピュータ であり、同様のハードウェア構成である。ここで、汎用的なコンピュータだとしても、管 理コンピュータ 10にはパーソナルコンピュータよりも高スペックの大型汎用コンビユー タを使用するこのが望ましい。具体的な大型汎用コンピュータの構成としては、サー バラックに、ラックマウント型サーノ 、ハードディスクキャビネット、バックアップキャビネ ット、 UPS (Uninterruptible Random Access Memory) 12 and other main memory, HD (hard disk) 13 as an external storage device, display 14 as a display device, keyboard 15 and mouse 16 as input devices, and an expansion card for connecting to the network Consists of LAN card 17, CD-ROM drive 18, etc. The learning school computer 20 is a general-purpose computer similar to the management computer 10, and has the same hardware configuration. Here, even if the computer is a general-purpose computer, it is desirable to use a large-sized general-purpose computer with higher specifications than the personal computer for the management computer 10. Specific large general-purpose computer configurations include server racks, rack mountable sano, hard disk cabinets, backup cabinets, UPS (Uninterruptible
Power Supply)、マウンド台付ディスプレイ及びキーボードを配設した構成である。 Power Supply), display with mound stand and keyboard.
[0025] 図 3は本実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムで利用可能なサービスの説 明図である。背景技術で記載した通り、学習塾でも既に各種システムの利用が始まつ ており、これらのシステムが提供するものがサービスである。本実施形態では生徒に 関する情報、学習に関する情報及び進学に関する情報の入力を受け、必要に応じて 参照することができる教務サービスと、座席 ·時間割に関する情報、教室運営に関す る情報及び父母対応に関する情報の入力を受け、必要に応じて参照することができ る運営サービスと、講師に関する情報、講師評価に関する情報及び講師給に関する 情報の入力を受け、必要に応じて参照することができる講師サービスと、売上げに関
する情報、入金に関する情報、教室予実に関する情報及び人件費に関する情報の 入力を受け、必要に応じて参照することができる経理サービスとを提供する。本実施 形態では、これらのサービスを採用した力 他のサービスを付加した構成でもよいし、 採用したサービスのいくつかを除いた構成を採ることもできる。なお、前記したサービ スのいくつかは既に当業者であれば適宜設計することができ、ここでは具体的なデー タ構成については説明しない。ただし、必要に応じてデータ構成について後記する。 FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of services that can be used in the learning school management information providing system according to the present embodiment. As described in the background art, various schools have already started using various systems, and these systems provide services. In this embodiment, information on students, information on learning, and information on advancement are received, and it is possible to refer to them as necessary, as well as information on seats and timetables, information on classroom management, and parental support. A management service that receives information input and can refer to it as needed, and a lecturer service that receives information on instructors, information on instructor evaluations, and information on instructor salaries and can refer to them as needed. , Sales Provide accounting services that can be referred to as needed by receiving information on payments, information on payments, information on classroom preparations, and information on personnel expenses. In the present embodiment, the power that employs these services may be added, or another service may be added, or a configuration that excludes some of the adopted services may be employed. Note that some of the services described above can be designed as appropriate by those skilled in the art, and a specific data structure will not be described here. However, the data structure will be described later if necessary.
[0026] 図 4は本実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの全体システム構成詳細ブ ロック図である。管理コンピュータ 10は、前記教務サービス、運営サービス、講師サ 一ビス、経理サービス毎にそれぞれ教務 DB310、運営 DB320、講師 DB330、経理 FIG. 4 is a detailed block diagram of the entire system configuration of the learning school management information providing system according to this embodiment. The management computer 10 includes the teaching DB 310, the management DB 320, the lecturer DB 330, the accounting for each of the teaching service, the management service, the lecturer service, and the accounting service.
DB340のデータベースを構築している。なお、所謂当業者であればデータベースを 適宜設計することができる。また、当業者であれば当然の設計事項であるが、これら のデータベース管理コンピュータ 10以外のハードウェア上に構築することもできる。 DB340 database is being built. A so-called person skilled in the art can appropriately design the database. Further, those skilled in the art can naturally design the hardware, but it can be constructed on hardware other than the database management computer 10 .
[0027] 管理コンピュータ 10上には図 4に示すように、教務 DB310、運営 DB320、講師 DB 330、経理 DB340からデータを取り出し、予め設定している評価設定情報を参照し ながら点数、偏差値、順位を算出し、経営成績 DB350に格納する算出手段 110と、 経営成績 DB350に格納された点数、偏差値、順位に基づき、予め用意されている経 営指針情報を参照しながら経営指針を経営成績 DB350に格納する指針選択手段 1 20と、学習塾経営者の学習塾コンピュータ 20を介しての経営情報参照要求に対応 して経営成績 DB350に格納されている経営情報を提供する提供処理手段 130とを 実装している。これら各手段はコンピュータ分野の当業者であれば周知なように、特 定のハードディスクの領域に記録されているプログラムをメインメモリに展開し CPUが 実行することで具現化されて!/、る。コンピュータをこのように実行可能とするためには 、システムに係るプログラムやデータなどのファイルをハードディスクなどにコピーして 読み出し可能とし、必要に応じて設定を行う、すなわち、インストール (install)を実行 する。 [0027] On the management computer 10, as shown in FIG. 4, data is extracted from the teaching DB 310, the management DB 320, the lecturer DB 330, and the accounting DB 340, referring to the evaluation setting information set in advance, the score, the deviation value, Based on the calculation means 110 to calculate the ranking and store it in the management results DB350, and the points, deviation values, and rankings stored in the management results DB350, refer to the management guidelines information prepared in advance. Guide selection means stored in DB350 1 20 and provision processing means 130 that provides management information stored in DB350 in response to management information reference request via learning cram school computer 20 of cram school management Is implemented. As is well known to those skilled in the computer art, each of these means is realized by developing a program recorded in a specific hard disk area in the main memory and executing it by the CPU! In order to make a computer executable in this way, files such as system programs and data can be copied to a hard disk and read out, and settings are made as necessary, that is, installation is executed. .
[0028] 学習塾コンピュータ 20上には図 4に示すように、前記経営情報参照要求を行う経営 成績参照手段 230と、認証フォームを表示し使用者が入力した ID及びパスワードに よって認証要求を行う認証手段 210と、前記教務 DB310、運営 DB320、講師 DB33
0、経理 DB340に使用者が入力したデータを格納するように要請し、また、これらデ ータベースに格納されて 、るデータを参照するように要請する入力参照手段 220とを 実装している。認証手段 210により要求された認証要求に対しては、本実施形態で はアクセスサーバが力かる認証要求に対応して入力された ID及びパスワードを認証 し、管理コンピュータ 10へのアクセスの許可の可否を決定する。ここで、管理コンビュ ータ 10に認証する機能を備えた構成にすることもできる。 [0028] As shown in FIG. 4, on the cram school computer 20, the management result reference means 230 for making the management information reference request, and the authentication form is displayed and the authentication request is made by the ID and password entered by the user. Authentication means 210, the above-mentioned teaching DB 310, administration DB 320, lecturer DB 33 0, the accounting DB 340 is requested to store data input by the user, and the input reference means 220 for requesting to refer to the data stored in these databases is implemented. For the authentication request requested by the authentication means 210, in this embodiment, the ID and password entered in response to the authentication request that the access server works are authenticated, and whether or not the access to the management computer 10 is permitted. To decide. Here, the management computer 10 can be configured to have a function of authenticating.
[0029] 図 5は本実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの全体システム構成詳細ブ ロック図であって、教務サービスに特ィ匕したものである。説明の便宜上、管理コンビュ ータ 10及び学習塾コンピュータ 20の構成要素の一部を省略して図示している。各種 サービスを大分類とすると、各大分類に中分類が存在する。図 5において学習塾コン ピュータ 20の構成ブロックとして、生徒基本情報入力参照手段 221、成績管理情報 入力参照手段 222、カリキュラム管理入力参照手段 223、受講履歴情報入力参照手 段 224、面談管理情報入力参照手段 225及び進学管理情報入力参照手段 226を 挙げている。これらの手段はフォームに従ったものである。通常、学習塾経営者、学 習塾の事務員、学習塾の講師が使用者となって、フォームを介して入力し、フォーム を介して参照する。これらの手段に対応するように、管理コンピュータ 10のデータべ ースも、それぞれ生徒基本情報 DB311、成績管理情報 DB312、カリキュラム管理 DB 313、受講履歴情報 DB314、面談管理情報 DB315及び進学管理情報 DB316と構 築して 、る。図 4の教務 DB310内にこれらのデータベースが構築されて!、ると!/、うわ けである。さらに、 DBの構築の一例を示すとすれば、データモデルをリレーショナル データモデルとすれば、教務 DB31がデータベース全体であり、生徒基本情報 DB31 FIG. 5 is a detailed block diagram of the entire system configuration of the learning school management information providing system according to the present embodiment, which is specific to the educational service. For convenience of explanation, some components of the management computer 10 and the cram school computer 20 are omitted. If each service is classified as a major category, there is a middle category for each major category. In FIG. 5, the basic block of student information input means 221, grade management information input reference means 222, curriculum management input reference means 223, attendance history information input reference means 224, and interview management information input reference are shown as building blocks of the cram school computer 20. Means 225 and advancement management information input reference means 226 are listed. These means follow the form. In general, a cram school manager, a cram school clerk, and a cram school instructor become users and input through forms and refer to through forms. Corresponding to these means, the database of the management computer 10 includes the basic student information DB 311, the grade management information DB 312, the curriculum management DB 313, the attendance history information DB 314, the interview management information DB 315, and the advance management information DB 316, respectively. Build it. These databases are built in the DB DB310 in Figure 4! Furthermore, if an example of DB construction is shown, if the data model is a relational data model, the teaching DB 31 is the entire database, and the student basic information DB 31
1、成績管理情報 DB312、カリキュラム管理 DB313、受講履歴情報 DB314、面談管 理情報 DB315及び進学管理情報 DB316をテーブルとして捉えることができる。図 5 は教務サービスについての図であり、他のサービスも同様のブロック構成を有するが 、一例をもって十分とし説明を省略する。 1. Grade management information DB312, curriculum management DB313, attendance history information DB314, interview management information DB315, and college management information DB316 can be regarded as tables. Fig. 5 is a diagram of the educational service. Other services have the same block configuration, but the example is sufficient and the explanation is omitted.
[0030] 評価設定情報は、大分類が中分類力 なり、中分類が評価設定項目からなる構成 である。評価設定情報を、大分類、中分類と区分けしているのは、提供する経営情報 も大分類、中分類としている力 である。なお、評価設定情報を区分けせずに複数の
評価設定項目からなる構成にすることもできる。評価設定項目毎に、教務 DB310、 運営 DB320、講自帀 DB330、経理 DB340のどのようなデータ力 S必要であり、どのように 計算して評価するのかが設定されている。評価設定項目に従ってデータを用いて算 出することで、力かる評価設定項目の点数が導かれる。評価設定項目毎に設定する 内容としては、通常、択一的な評価設定項目か、計算式による評価設定項目かに分 けることができる。すなわち、択一的な評価設定項目は、例えば、「〜があれば〜点 であり、〜がなければ〜点である」といったものである。また、計算式による評価設定 項目は、例えば、「点数 =パラメータ 演算子 パラメータ 演算子 パラメータ」とい つたものである。さらに、評価設定項目には、評価設定項目の重要性に応じて重みを 付与しており、この重みにより評価設定項目の点数は変化する。択一的な評価設定 項目で求められた点数、計算式による評価設定項目で求められた点数に重みを乗じ て各評価設定項目の点数を求めるようにする。 [0030] The evaluation setting information has a configuration in which the large classification has medium classification power and the medium classification includes evaluation setting items. The evaluation setting information is divided into major classification and middle classification because the management information provided is also classified into major classification and middle classification. Note that multiple evaluation setting information A configuration comprising evaluation setting items may be used. For each evaluation setting item, what kind of data power S is necessary for teaching DB310, administration DB320, lecture self-administration DB330, accounting DB340, and how to calculate and evaluate are set. By calculating using the data according to the evaluation setting items, the score of the evaluation setting items can be derived. The contents to be set for each evaluation setting item can usually be divided into alternative evaluation setting items and evaluation setting items based on calculation formulas. That is, an alternative evaluation setting item is, for example, “if there is a ~, it is a dot, and if there is no ~, it is a dot. In addition, the evaluation setting item based on the calculation formula is, for example, “number of points = parameter operator parameter operator parameter”. Furthermore, weights are assigned to the evaluation setting items according to the importance of the evaluation setting items, and the score of the evaluation setting items changes with this weight. The number of points for each evaluation setting item is obtained by multiplying the number of points obtained by the alternative evaluation setting item and the point obtained by the evaluation setting item based on the calculation formula by the weight.
図 6は本実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの教務サービスに関する評 価設定情報の説明図である。図 6において、「基本情報の登録がすべてなされている 力」とは択一的な評価設定項目であり、学習塾に登録されて 、る生徒それぞれにつ V、て基本情報が登録されて 、れば所定の点数が付与され、重みを乗じて評価設定 項目の点数が得られる。基本情報が登録されている力否かは、教務 DB310 (必要に 応じて他の DB)から生徒を特定する情報 (生徒 ID)に基づき基本情報に係る情報を 読み出し、値がある力否かを判断することにより判別することができる。図 6中の他の 評価設定項目について「登録されている力」については同様に、教務 DB310から必 要なデータを読み出し、値がある力否かを判断することにより判別し、重みを乗じて点 数を求めることができる。「家庭連絡表を毎月印刷している力」は、教務 DB310には 生徒毎に各月で印刷をした力否かを示すフラグを有し、このフラグを読み出して印刷 したフラグ数をカウントし、「点数 = (印刷のフラグ数 Z生徒数) X基準点数 X重み」 の計算式により点数を求めることができる。すなわち、この評価設定項目は、計算式 による評価設定項目である。「面談実施状況」は、「点数 = (面談実施のフラグ数 Z生 徒数) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により点数を求めることができる。「進学状況 (偏 差値 60以上)」の点数は、「(偏差値 60以上の生徒数) X基準点数 X重み」の計算
式により求めることができる (ただし、最大値有り)。「進学状況 (偏差値 50以上 60未 満)」の点数も同様である。 FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram of the evaluation setting information related to the teaching service of the cram school management information providing system according to this embodiment. In Fig. 6, “the ability to register all basic information” is an alternative evaluation setting item. Each student who is registered at a cram school has basic information registered for each student. Then, a predetermined score is given, and the score of the evaluation setting item is obtained by multiplying the weight. Whether the basic information is registered or not is determined by reading the information related to the basic information based on the information (student ID) that identifies the student from the academic affairs DB310 (other DB if necessary). It can be determined by determining. For other evaluation setting items in Figure 6, “Registered power” is similarly determined by reading out necessary data from the academic affairs DB 310 and judging whether or not the value has power, and multiplying by the weight. Score can be obtained. “The ability to print the home contact list every month” has a flag indicating whether or not each student has the ability to print each month in the teaching DB 310, reads this flag, counts the number of flags printed, The score can be calculated by the following formula: “Score = (Number of printing flags Z Number of students) X Reference score X Weight”. That is, this evaluation setting item is an evaluation setting item based on a calculation formula. “Interview implementation status” can be calculated by the following formula: “Score = (Number of flags of interview implementation Z Number of students) X Reference score X Weight”. The score for “admission status (deviation value 60 or more)” is calculated as “(number of students with deviation value 60 or more) X reference score X weight” It can be calculated by the formula (however, there is a maximum value). The same applies to the score of “admission status (deviation value 50 to less than 60)”.
図 7は本実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの運営サービスに関する評 価設定情報の説明図である。評価設定項目中、「く個別〉」は個別指導であり、「く 集団 >」はクラス単位の指導である。クラス単位の指導は学校、塾でも広く行われて いるため説明は略する。個別指導は、 1人の講師に複数人の生徒が割り当てられ、こ の生徒達を同時に教 FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram of evaluation setting information related to the management service of the cram school management information providing system according to this embodiment. Among the evaluation setting items, “ku individual>” is individual guidance, and “ku group>” is class-based guidance. Since class-based guidance is widely used in schools and cram schools, explanation is omitted. In tutoring, multiple students are assigned to one instructor, and these students are taught simultaneously.
えるのではなぐ講師が個別に指導するものである。したがって、座席、生徒、講師を 予め対応付けておき、そのスケジュールに沿って生徒は指定された座席につき、講 師は担当座席の複数の生徒を個別に指導することになる。「 <個別 >生徒 ·指導科 目の座席設定はしつ力り行われている力」の点数は、「点数 = (生徒'指導科目の座 席設定が行われて 、な 、数) Z (生徒'指導科目の座席設定を行うべき数) X基準点 数 X重み」の計算式により求めることができる。「<個別〉講師の座席設定はしつかり 行われているか」の点数も同様に求めることができる。評価設定項目中、「振替」とは 、生徒が予定日時に指導を受けれな力つた場合に、他に日に受けれな力つた分を割 り当てるものである。運営サービスを用いると、実績として、指導終了後に学習塾コン ピュータ 20を用いて入力を行うが、指導を受けれな力つた場合には実績が入力され ないことになり、振替を行う必要がある生徒が集計される。この集計に対して生徒の 予定をヒアリングして学習塾コンピュータ 20に予定を入力し振り替えを確定する。「く 個別 >振替先が確定して!/、るか (月毎)」の点数は、「点数 = (振り替え確定数) / (振 り替えすべき数) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めることができる。「く個別 > 補習率 (補習 Z全座席数)」の点数は、「点数 = (補習の座席数) / (全座席数) X基 準点数 X重み」の計算式より求めることができる。評価設定項目中、「時間割作成機 能」は生徒の指導を受ける情報及び講師の出勤情報から、自動的に時間割を作成 する機能であり、事務処理負担の軽減を担うものである。「<集団 >時間割作成機能 を使用して!/、るか (月毎)」の点数は、「点数 = (時間割作成機能を使用した回数) / ( 時間割作成回数) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めることができる。評価設定 項目中、「座席割当状況」は物理的な教室の座席数中既に割り当てられている座席
数の割り合 、である。「未納は前日よりも減って 、る力」の点数は、前日の未納件数と 当日の未納件数の比較により求めることができる。「問い合わせ件数」の点数は、「点 数 = (問い合わせ件数) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めることができる。「問 い合わせに対する面談数」の点数は、「点数 = (面談数) Z (問い合わせ件数) X基 準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めることができる。「補捉率」の点数は、「点数 = (成 約数) Z (問 、合わせ件数) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めることができる。Instructors who are not educated will be teaching individually. Therefore, the seats, students, and instructors are associated in advance, and the lecturer individually instructs a plurality of students in the assigned seats for each designated seat according to the schedule. The score of “<Individual> Student / Instructive Course Seating Force is Persistently Forced” is as follows: “Score = (Student's seating setting for the subject subject is the number) Z ( The number of students who should set seats for the teaching subject) can be obtained from the formula of “X reference points X weights”. The score for "<Individual> is the teacher's seat setting consistently?" Among the evaluation setting items, “transfer” is to allocate the amount of power that cannot be received on the other day when the student is unable to receive guidance at the scheduled date and time. If the management service is used, the results are entered using the cram school computer 20 after the instruction is completed. However, if the student is unable to receive the instruction, the result will not be input, and the student who needs to be transferred. Are counted. The student's schedule is interviewed for this total, and the schedule is entered into the cram school computer 20 to confirm the transfer. The score of “ku individual> transfer destination has been confirmed! /, Or (monthly)” is the calculation formula of “number of points = (number of confirmed transfer) / (number to be transferred) X number of reference points X weight” It can ask for. The score of “ku individual> supplementary school rate (supplementary Z total number of seats)” can be obtained from the calculation formula of “score = (number of supplementary seats) / (total number of seats) X standard score X weight”. Among the evaluation setting items, the “time schedule creation function” is a function that automatically creates a time schedule based on information received from the student and attendance information from the instructor, and is responsible for reducing the burden of paperwork. The score of "Use <group> timetable creation function! /, Or (monthly)" is "score = (number of times the timetable creation function was used) / (number of timetable creation times) X reference score X weight" It can be obtained by a calculation formula. Among the evaluation setting items, “Seat Allocation Status” is the number of seats already allocated among the number of physical classroom seats. The ratio of numbers. The score for “Unpaid is less than the previous day and the power” can be obtained by comparing the number of unpaid cases on the previous day with the number of unpaid cases on the current day. The number of “inquiries” can be calculated by the following formula: “score = (number of inquiries) X reference score X weight”. The score of “number of interviews for inquiries” can be calculated by the following formula: “number of points = (number of interviews) Z (number of inquiries) X reference points X weights”. The score of “capture rate” can be obtained by the following formula: “number of points = (contract number) Z (question, number of combined items) X reference point number X weight”.
「塾生に対する面談数」の点数は、「点数 = (面談数) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式 により求めることができる。「講師の 30分前入室率」の点数は、「点数 = (講師の 30分 前入室数) Z (入室数) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めることができる。「生 徒の 10分前入室率」の点数は、「点数 = (生徒の 10分前入室数) Z (入室数) X基 準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めることができる。「講師の出勤率」の点数は、「点 数 = (講師の出勤数) / (講師の予定出勤数) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求 めることができる。評価設定項目中、「塾生」とは所定期日以前の生徒のことで、「母 外生」とは所定期日以降の生徒のことであり、「純外生」とは学習塾の生徒ではない 者のことであり、具体的には、講習のみ受講者が該当する。「塾生申込率」の点数は 、「点数 = (講習申込の塾生数) Z (塾生数) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求め ることができる。「母外生申込率」の点数は、「点数 = (講習申込の母外生数) Z (母外 生数) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めることができる。「純外生申込率」の点 数は、「点数 = (純外生数) Z (講習申込者数) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求 めることができる。評価設定項目中、「家庭連絡表」とは生徒の学習塾での実績であ り、どのような科目をいつ受けたか等の情報が記載されたもので、月毎に父母用に作 成される。評価設定項目中、「入退室情報の父母への報告」は現在学習塾では生徒 に配布した ICカードを教室の読み取り装置に読み込ませると同時に、該当生徒に対 応して予め登録されている親の携帯電話のメールアドレス等へ入退室を知らせるもの である。評価設定項目中、「カルテ」とは成績、家庭連絡表に基づき月毎に作成され る指導指針である。 The score of “number of interviews with cram students” can be calculated by the following formula: “number of points = (number of interviews) X reference points X weights”. The score of “Lecturer's entrance rate 30 minutes before” can be calculated by the following formula: “Point = (Number of lecturers 30 minutes before entrance) Z (Number of entrances) X Reference points X Weight”. The score of “Students' entrance rate 10 minutes ago” can be calculated by the following formula: “Score = (Students 10 minutes before entrance) Z (Number of entrances) X Reference points X Weight”. The score of the “instructor attendance rate” can be obtained by the following formula: “score = (instructor attendance) / (instructor attendance) X reference score X weight”. Among the evaluation setting items, “school student” refers to students before the specified date, “maternal student” refers to students after the specified date, and “pure student” refers to students at the school. It is a person who has not, and specifically, only students who have attended the course. The score of the “School Student Application Rate” can be obtained by the following formula: “Score = (Number of School Students Applying for the Course) Z (Number of School Students) X Reference Score X Weight”. The score of “external student application rate” can be calculated by the following formula: “score = (external student number of course application) Z (external student number) X reference score X weight”. The score of “net exogenous application rate” can be obtained by the following formula: “score = (net exogenous number) Z (number of applicants for the course) X reference score X weight”. Among the evaluation setting items, the “family contact table” is the student's achievements at the cram school, which contains information such as when and what subjects were received, and is prepared for parents every month. The Among the evaluation setting items, “report entry / exit information to parents” is currently used by the cram school to read the IC card distributed to the students into the classroom reader, and at the same time, the parent registered in advance for the student. This will notify the e-mail address of your mobile phone to enter or leave the room. Among the evaluation setting items, “medical record” is a guidance guide that is prepared monthly based on the grades and home contact table.
図 8は本実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの講師サービスに関する評 価設定情報の説明図である。評価設定項目中、「指導実績による評価ポイント」は所
定時間指導を行うことで 1ポイント付与されるものである。「指導実績による評価ポイン トが 100ポイント以上の講師比率」の点数は「点数 = (100ポイント以上の講師) Z (講 師数) FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram of evaluation setting information related to the lecturer service of the cram school management information providing system according to this embodiment. Among the evaluation setting items, “Evaluation points based on teaching results” One point will be given for regular instruction. The score of “Rate of teachers with 100 or more evaluation points based on teaching results” is “Score = (Lecturers with 100 or more points) Z (Number of teachers)
X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めることができる。評価設定項目中、「保護者' 生徒アンケートによる評価ポイント」は所定周期で実際される保護者及び生徒アンケ ートに基づけ加算、減算されるポイントである。「保護者 ·生徒アンケートによる評価ポ イントが 100ポイント以上の講師比率」の点数は「点数 = (100ポイント以上の講師) It can be calculated by the formula of “X reference point X weight”. Among the evaluation setting items, “Evaluation points based on parent / student questionnaire” are points that are added and subtracted based on parents and student questionnaires that are actually executed in a predetermined cycle. The score of “Parent / Student Questionnaire Evaluation Point is 100 points or more” is “Score = (100 or more teachers)”
Z (講師数) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めることができる。「前回テスト比 較による成績上昇者を指導して!/、る講師比率」の点数は「点数 = (前記テストと今回 テストとを比較した場合に成績が上昇した生徒を指導して 、る講師数) / (総講師数)Z (number of lecturers) X number of reference points X weight " The score of “Instructors who have improved their grades from the previous test comparison! / Lecturer ratio” is “Score = (Lecturer who teaches students who have improved their scores when comparing the previous test and this test. Number) / (total number of lecturers)
X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めることができる。評価設定項目中、「講師評 価ポイント」は学習塾側が付与する講師を評価して付与するポイントである。「講師評 価 90ポイント以上の講師比率」の点数は「点数 = (講師評価 90ポイント以上の講師 数) / (総講師数) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めることができる。 It can be calculated by the formula of “X reference point X weight”. Among the evaluation setting items, “lecturer evaluation points” are points given by evaluating the lecturer given by the cram school. The score of the “lecturer rating of 90 or more teachers” can be calculated by the following formula: “score = (number of lecturers who have 90 or more teachers evaluation) / (total number of lecturers) X reference score X weight”.
図 9は本実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの経理サービスに関する評 価設定情報の説明図である。「売上高伸び率 (月別 ·年別)」の点数は「売上高伸び 率 (月別'年別) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めることができる。「塾生数伸 び率 (月別'年別)」の点数は「塾生数伸び率 (月別'年別) X基準点数 X重み」の計 算式により求めることができる。「売上高対営業利益率 (月別 ·年別)」の点数は「売上 高対営業利益率 (月別 ·年別) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めることができ る。「営業利益高の伸び率 (月別 ·年別)」の点数は「営業利益高の伸び率 (月別 ·年 別) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めることができる。「売上高付加価値率 (月 別 ·年別)」の点数は「売上高付加価値率 (月別 ·年別) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式 により求めることができる。「塾生一人当たりの入金額比率 (月別'年別)」の点数は「 塾生一人当たりの入金額比率 (月別'年別) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求め ることができる。「損益分岐比率 (月別 ·年別)」の点数は「損益分岐比率 (月別 ·年別) FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram of evaluation setting information related to the accounting service of the cram school management information providing system according to this embodiment. The point of “sales growth rate (monthly / yearly)” can be calculated by the formula of “sales growth rate (monthly / by year) X base score X weight”. The score of “School student growth rate (monthly 'yearly)” can be calculated by the formula of “School student growth rate (monthly' yearly) X reference score X weight”. The point of “sales to operating profit ratio (monthly / yearly)” can be obtained from the formula “sales to operating profit ratio (monthly / yearly) X base score X weight”. The “operating profit growth rate (monthly / yearly)” score can be obtained from the formula of “operating profit growth rate (monthly / yearly) X base score X weight”. The “sales added value rate (monthly / yearly)” score can be obtained from the formula of “sales added value ratio (monthly • yearly) X base score X weight”. The ratio of the amount of deposit per student (monthly 'year') can be calculated using the formula of the ratio of the amount of deposit per student (monthly 'year) X reference score X weight. "Break-even ratio (monthly · yearly)" is "Break-even ratio (monthly · yearly)
X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めることができる。「限界利益率 (月別'年別)」 の点数は「限界利益率 (月別'年別) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めることが
できる。「経営安全率 (月別'年別)」の点数は「経営安全率 (月別'年別) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めることができる。「予算が作成されて!、るか (月別'年別)」 の点数については、経理 DB340から必要なデータを読み出し、値があるか否かを判 断することにより判別し、重みを乗じて点数を求めることができる。「予実の達成率 (月 別'年別)」の点数は「予実の達成率 (月別'年別) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により 求めることができる。「塾生一人当たりの損益分岐比率 (月別'年別)」の点数は「塾生 一人当たりの損益分岐比率 (月別'年別) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めるこ とができる。「入金方法力 '弓 I落"になって 、る率 (月別 ·年別)」の点数は「入金方法が "引落"になっている率 (月別'年別) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めることが できる。「入金率 (月別 ·年別)」の点数は「入金率 (月別 ·年別) X基準点数 X重み」の 計算式により求めることができる。「塾生一人当たりの入金額比率 (月別'年別)」の点 数は「塾生一人当たりの入金額比率 (月別'年別) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により 求めることができる。「指導効率 (月別 ·年別)」の点数は「指導効率 (月別 ·年別) X基 準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めることができる。「人件費率 (月別'年別)」の点数 は「人件費率 (月別'年別) X基準点数 X重み」の計算式により求めることができる。 It can be calculated by the formula of “X reference point X weight”. The score of “marginal profit rate (monthly 'yearly)” can be calculated by the formula of “marginal profit rate (monthly' yearly) X reference score X weight” it can. The score of “Management Safety Factor (Monthly 'Yearly)” can be obtained by the formula of “Management Safety Factor (Monthly' Yearly) X Reference Score X Weight”. The score for “Budget has been created! Monthly or yearly” is determined by reading the necessary data from the accounting DB340, determining whether there is a value, and multiplying by the weight. Score can be obtained. The score of “Achievement achievement rate (monthly 'by year)” can be obtained from the formula “Achievement achievement rate (monthly' by year) X reference score X weight”. The score of “Branch break-even ratio per student (monthly 'by year)” can be calculated by the formula “Branch break-even ratio per student (monthly“ by year) X Reference score X Weight ”. The rate of “Deposit method power 'bow I fall”, rate (monthly · yearly) ”is the rate of“ deposit ”payment method (monthly' year) X reference score X weight” It can be obtained by a calculation formula. The score of “Payment rate (monthly / yearly)” can be calculated by the formula of “Payment rate (monthly / yearly) X Reference score X Weight”. The score of the “cash deposit ratio per student (monthly 'yearly)” can be calculated using the formula “the ratio of deposit per student (monthly' year) X reference score X weight”. The score of “teaching efficiency (monthly / yearly)” can be calculated by the formula of “teaching efficiency (monthly / yearly) X standard score X weight”. The score of “Personnel Cost Rate (Monthly 'Yearly)” can be obtained from the formula of “Personnel Cost Rate (Monthly' Yearly) X Reference Score X Weight”.
[0035] 以上、図 6ないし図 9で各種サービスについての評価設定情報について説明したが 、全ての評価設定情報については言及していない。これは既に説明した評価設定情 報に基づけば当業者であれば当然に設計が可能であるからである。また、ここで示し た評価設定情報は一例であり、本発明はこれに限定されるものではない。さらに、点 数を導く計算式も一例である。さらにまた、基準点数とあるが、これは各項目毎に値 が異なり、運用時必要に応じて、システム運用者の調整が必要となる。 As described above, the evaluation setting information for various services has been described with reference to FIGS. 6 to 9, but all evaluation setting information is not mentioned. This is because a person skilled in the art can naturally design based on the already described evaluation setting information. The evaluation setting information shown here is an example, and the present invention is not limited to this. Furthermore, the calculation formula for deriving points is an example. Furthermore, there is a reference score, but this value differs for each item, and it is necessary to adjust the system operator as necessary during operation.
[0036] 次に、本実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの動作について説明する。 Next, the operation of the learning school management information providing system according to the present embodiment will be described.
まず、データ入力について説明する。使用者が標識するアイコンをクリックしてプロ グラムを起動することで、学習塾コンピュータ 20は管理コンピュータ 10にアクセスする 。管理コンピュータ 10は学習塾コンピュータ 20に認証画面情報を送信する。学習塾 コンピュータはディスプレイ 24に認証画面を表示する。使用者はキーボード 25を用 いて「ユーザ ID」及び「パスワード」を入力する。管理コンピュータ 10はアクセスサーバ を介して認証を行い、認証に成功した場合にはメニュー表示情報を送信し、学習塾
コンピュータ 20が受信しディスプレイ 24にメニューを表示する。メニューには教務サ 一ビス、運営サービス、講師サービスに係るフォームを起動するメニュー項目が選択 可能に表示されている。経理サービスに係るフォームを起動するメニュー項目を包含 するメニューは現在表示されているメニューから呼び出し可能なように呼び出すため のメニュー項目も表示されて 、る。これらのメニュー項目を使用者が選択することで、 学習塾コンピュータ 20が力かる選択されたメニュー項目を特定する情報を管理コン ピュータ 10に送信する。管理コンピュータ 10はメニュー項目を特定する情報に対応 するフォーム情報を送信し、学習塾コンピュータ 20がディスプレイにフォームを表示 する。使用者はディスプレイ 24に表示されたフォーム上の入力ボックス、リストボックス に値をキーボード 25、マウス 26を用いて入力、選択する。表示されたフォーム上の入 力が完了すると、管理コンピュータ 10に送信され、入力されたデータの該当する領域 に記録される。したがって、学習塾コンピュータ 20上には入力したデータが記録され ず、全て管理コンピュータ 10上に記録されることになる。 First, data input will be described. The cram school computer 20 accesses the management computer 10 when the user starts the program by clicking on the icon to be marked. The management computer 10 transmits authentication screen information to the learning school computer 20. The learning school computer displays an authentication screen on the display 24. The user inputs the “user ID” and “password” using the keyboard 25. The management computer 10 authenticates via the access server. If the authentication is successful, the management computer 10 transmits menu display information and The computer 20 receives and displays the menu on the display 24. In the menu, menu items that activate forms related to educational services, administrative services, and instructor services are displayed. A menu item that includes a menu item that activates a form related to the accounting service also displays a menu item that can be called from the currently displayed menu. When the menu item is selected by the user, information for identifying the selected menu item that is used by the learning cram computer 20 is transmitted to the management computer 10. The management computer 10 transmits form information corresponding to the information specifying the menu item, and the learning school computer 20 displays the form on the display. The user inputs and selects values in the input box and list box on the form displayed on the display 24 using the keyboard 25 and mouse 26. When the input on the displayed form is completed, it is sent to the management computer 10 and recorded in the corresponding area of the input data. Therefore, the input data is not recorded on the learning cram computer 20, but all is recorded on the management computer 10.
経営成績情報の演算について説明する。図 10は本実施形態に係る学習塾経営情 報提供システムの経営成績情報の演算の動作フローチャートである。管理コンビユー タ 10はシステム運用者により予め指定された時刻であるカゝ否かを判断する (ステップ 101)。管理コンピュータ 10が指定時刻でないと判断した場合には、ステップ 101に 戻る。管理コンピュータ 10が指定時刻であると判断した場合には、管理コンピュータ 10が評価設定項目情報を読み出す (ステップ 111)。管理コンピュータ 10は読み出 した評価設定項目に従い、必要な情報を教務 DB310、運営 DB320、講師 DB330及 び経理 DB340から読み出す (ステップ 121)。管理コンピュータ 10は評価設定項目 及び読み出したデータから点数を求める (ステップ 131)。管理コンピュータ 10は求め た点数を一時保存する (ステップ 132)。ステップ 121では例えば全ての学習塾に関 して情報を読み出しており、学習塾毎にステップ 131及びステップ 132を実行し、管 理コンピュータ 10が最後のデータ力否かを判断する (ステップ 133)。最後のデータ でないと判断した場合には次のデータに関してステップ 131に戻る。最後のデータで あると判断した場合には求めた点数をデータベースに書き込む (ステップ 141)。管 理コンピュータ 10が最後の評価設定項目か否かを判断する (ステップ 151)。最後の
評価設定項目でな 、と判断した場合には、次の評価設定項目につ 、てステップ 111 に戻る (すなわち、次の評価設定項目を読み出す)。最後の評価設定項目であると判 断した場合には、最後のサービスであるか否かを判断する (ステップ 161)。最後のサ 一ビスでな 、と判断した場合には、次のサービスにつ 、てステップ 111に戻る(すな わち、次のサービスの評価設定項目を読み出す)。最後のサービスであると判断した 場合には、終了する。以上のステップ 111ないしステップ 161が実行されることにより 、全ての評価設定項目についての点数が求まり、データベースに格納されることにな る。次に、管理コンピュータ 10は格納されている点数力も評価設定情報の中分類毎 に点数を集計し、中分類毎の平均点及び標準偏差を求める。さらに、管理コンビユー タ 10は格納されている点数力も評価設定情報の大分類毎に点数を集計し、大分類 毎の平均点及び標準偏差を求める。さらにまた、管理コンピュータ 10は格納されてい る点数から総点数を集計し、総合の平均点及び標準偏差を求める。大分類、総合に ついて学習塾毎に点数を求め、大分類、総合についてそれぞれ学習塾の順位を点 数の降順で求める。また、管理コンピュータ 10各学習塾に関して、中分類、大分類、 総合について求めた平均点及び標準偏差と各学習塾の点数から各学習塾の偏差 値を求める。管理コンピュータ 10これら求めた中分類、大分類、総合の各学習塾の 点数及び偏差値と、大分類、総合の各学習塾の順位をデータベースに書き込む。 経営指針の求め方について説明する。経営指針情報は各評価設定項目に対応す るように経営指針項目が設定されて!、る。評価設定項目が悪 、場合の対処が経営指 針項目として設定されている。例えば、図 6の評価設定項目「基本情報の登録がすべ てなされているか」に対しては、経営指針項目「生徒の管理が不完全です。基本情報 を登録して下さい。」が対応する。図 6の評価設定項目「進学状況 (偏差値 60以上)」 に対しては、経営指針項目「成績が優秀な生徒が少なぐ塾の宣伝効果が弱ぐ低い 集客力、短期の退塾を招いている可能性があります。優秀な生徒を集めるベぐ講師 の充実及び優秀な生徒の呼び込みを行って下さい。」が対応する。また、中分類に 対応するように経営指針も対応している。例えば、図 6の生徒管理に対して、「もっと も基本的な入力がなされて!/、ません。この入力は他の入力に比べ更新性が少なく、 少ない時間で達成することができるので、いますぐに入力を開始して下さい。」が対応
する。図 6の学習管理に対して、「生徒の学習に関する情報が入力されていない可能 性があります。このような状態が続けば、生徒個人を成績を把握することも困難となり 、塾経営に大きな影響を及ぼす可能性があります。」が対応する。管理コンピュータ 1 0は学習塾の大分類のうちもっとも偏差値が低い中分類の最も点数の低い評価設定 項目に対応する経営指針項目を読み出し、該当学習塾に対応させて記録する。ここ では、悪い評価設定項目に対する経営指針項目を対応付けているが、逆に、最も良 V、評価設定項目に対して経営指針項目を対応付け、長所をさらに伸ばす方法に言 及する経営指針項目を設定して構成することもでき、強みを出した経営を支援するこ とがでさる。 The calculation of business performance information will be described. FIG. 10 is an operational flowchart of calculation of business performance information of the learning school management information providing system according to the present embodiment. The management computer 10 determines whether or not the time is a time designated in advance by the system operator (step 101). If the management computer 10 determines that it is not the specified time, the process returns to step 101. When the management computer 10 determines that it is the designated time, the management computer 10 reads the evaluation setting item information (step 111). The management computer 10 reads necessary information from the teaching DB 310, the management DB 320, the lecturer DB 330, and the accounting DB 340 in accordance with the read evaluation setting items (step 121). The management computer 10 obtains a score from the evaluation setting items and the read data (step 131). The management computer 10 temporarily stores the obtained score (step 132). In step 121, for example, information is read for all learning cram schools, and step 131 and step 132 are executed for each learning cram school, and the management computer 10 determines whether or not the last data ability is available (step 133). If it is determined that it is not the last data, the process returns to step 131 for the next data. If it is determined that it is the last data, the obtained score is written in the database (step 141). It is determined whether or not the management computer 10 is the last evaluation setting item (step 151). Last If it is determined that the item is not an evaluation setting item, the process returns to step 111 for the next evaluation setting item (that is, the next evaluation setting item is read). If it is determined that it is the last evaluation setting item, it is determined whether or not it is the last service (step 161). If it is determined that the service is not the last service, the process returns to step 111 for the next service (that is, the evaluation setting item of the next service is read). If it is determined that this is the last service, the process ends. By executing the above steps 111 to 161, the scores for all the evaluation setting items are obtained and stored in the database. Next, the management computer 10 also counts the stored score power for each middle class of the evaluation setting information, and calculates the average score and standard deviation for each middle class. Furthermore, the management computer 10 also counts the stored score power for each major classification of the evaluation setting information, and obtains the average score and standard deviation for each major classification. Furthermore, the management computer 10 totals the total number of points from the stored points, and obtains a total average point and standard deviation. Scores are obtained for each cram school for the major classification and synthesis, and the ranking of the cram school is calculated in descending order of the scores for the major classification and synthesis. Also, for each cram school, the deviation value of each cram school is obtained from the average score and standard deviation obtained for the middle class, major class, and total and the score of each cram school. Management computer 10 Write the score and deviation of each of the major, major, and overall learning cram schools and the ranking of each major and comprehensive cram school into the database. Explain how to obtain management guidelines. Management guideline information is set to correspond to each evaluation setting item! Actions to be taken when the evaluation setting item is bad are set as management guidance items. For example, the management guideline item “Student management is incomplete. Please register basic information.” Corresponds to the evaluation setting item “whether all basic information is registered” in FIG. For the evaluation setting item “admission status (deviation value of 60 or more)” in FIG. Please enhance the beg instructor who gathers excellent students and attract excellent students. " In addition, management guidelines are also available to correspond to the middle classification. For example, for student management in Figure 6, “Most basic inputs are made! / Not. This input is less updatable than other inputs and can be accomplished in less time. Please start typing now. " To do. For learning management in Fig. 6, “Student learning information may not have been entered. If this situation continues, it will be difficult for students to understand their grades, which will have a major impact on cram school management. May respond. ” The management computer 10 reads out the management guideline item corresponding to the evaluation setting item with the lowest score of the middle class having the lowest deviation value among the major classes of the learning cram school, and records it in correspondence with the corresponding cram school. Here, management guideline items are associated with bad evaluation setting items, but conversely, management guideline items that best relate to management guideline items with respect to evaluation setting items and refer to methods for further improving the strengths. It is also possible to set up and configure the system, which can support the management with strong strengths.
[0039] 経営成績情報の提供にっ 、て説明する。以上の経営成績情報の演算及び経営指 針の求め方で既に各学習塾について、点数、偏差値、順位、経営指針の情報がデ ータベースに格納されて 、る。学習塾の経営者が標識するアイコンをクリックしてプロ グラムを起動することで、学習塾コンピュータ 20は管理コンピュータ 10にアクセスする 。管理コンピュータ 10は学習塾コンピュータ 20に認証画面情報を送信する。学習塾 コンピュータはディスプレイ 24に認証画面を表示する。使用者はキーボード 25を用 いて「ユーザ ID」及び「パスワード」を入力する。管理コンピュータ 10はアクセスサーバ を介して認証を行い、認証に成功した場合にはメニュー表示情報を送信し、学習塾 コンピュータ 20が受信しディスプレイ 24にメニューを表示する。ここで、認証ではユー ザ IDから操作している使用者が学習塾の経営者であることを判別し、メニューには前 記したメニュー項目の他、経営情報提供のメニュー項目が選択可能に表示されて ヽ る。学習塾経営者は力かる経営情報提供のメニュー項目をマウス 26を用いて押下し 、さらに、通常分析表示、対比分析表示、ランキング表示のメニュー項目が選択可能 に表示される。 [0039] The provision of business performance information will be described. With the above calculation of business performance information and how to obtain management guidelines, points, deviation values, rankings, and management guidelines are already stored in the database for each cram school. The cram school computer 20 accesses the management computer 10 when the cram school manager clicks on the icon to start the program. The management computer 10 transmits authentication screen information to the learning school computer 20. The learning school computer displays an authentication screen on the display 24. The user inputs the “user ID” and “password” using the keyboard 25. The management computer 10 authenticates via the access server. If the authentication is successful, the management computer 10 transmits menu display information, and the learning cram computer 20 receives it and displays the menu on the display 24. Here, in the authentication, it is determined that the user operating from the user ID is the management company of the school, and the menu items for management information provision are displayed in addition to the menu items described above. It has been done. The cram school manager presses the menu items for providing management information with the mouse 26, and the menu items for normal analysis display, contrast analysis display, and ranking display are displayed in a selectable manner.
[0040] 図 11は本実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの得点、平均、順位、経 営指針の画面表示、並びに、平均との棒グラフによる対比画面表示である。学習塾 経営者が通常分析表示を選択すると、学習塾コンピュータ 20が経営情報提供の要 請を行う。管理コンピュータ 10はユーザ IDから学習塾を特定し、該当学習塾の点数、 偏差値、順位、経営指針の情報をデータベースカゝら読み出す。また、管理コンビユー
タ 10は平均の点数を読み出す。管理コンピュータ 10は読み出した情報をフォーム情 報と共に学習塾コンピュータ 20に送信する。学習塾コンピュータ 20はフォームを表 示し、図 11に示すように、右側上部に中分類毎に得点、平均の得点、順位 Z総学習 塾数、経営指針を表示する。また、学習塾コンピュータ 20はフォームの中央部左側 に大分類及び総合の点数及び平均点を対比して棒グラフ表示し、フォームの中央部 右側に中分類の点数を棒グラフ表示する。 FIG. 11 is a screen display of the scoring school management information providing system according to the present embodiment, a screen display of scores, averages, rankings, management guidelines, and a comparison screen display by means of a bar graph with the average. Learning Cram School When the manager selects the normal analysis display, the cram school computer 20 requests management information provision. The management computer 10 identifies the learning cram from the user ID, and reads the information of the learning cram, deviation value, rank, and management guidelines from the database card. Management convenience Data 10 reads the average score. The management computer 10 transmits the read information to the cram school computer 20 together with the form information. The cram school computer 20 displays a form, and as shown in FIG. 11, the score, average score, rank Z total number of cram schools, and management guidelines are displayed in the upper right part for each middle category. The cram school computer 20 displays a large graph and a total score and an average score in a bar graph on the left side of the center of the form, and a bar graph of a score in the middle category on the right side of the center of the form.
[0041] 図 12は本実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの点数に関して基準との レーダーチャートによる対比画面表示である。学習塾経営者が対比分析表示を選択 すると、学習塾コンピュータ 20が経営情報提供の要請を行う。管理コンピュータ 10が 要請を識別し、対比対象の選択のフォーム情報を送信する。学習塾コンピュータ 20 1S ベスト 1の学習塾、平均のメニュー項目を表示する。学習塾経営者はどちらか一 方を選択する。学習塾コンピュータ 20は選択したメニュー項目を特定する情報を管 理コンピュータ 10に送信し、管理コンピュータ 10が該当学習塾の点数及び偏差値と 、ベスト 1の学習塾または平均の点数及び偏差値をデータベース力 読み出し、フォ ーム情報と共に学習塾コンピュータ 20に送信する。学習塾コンピュータ 20はフォー ムをディスプレイ 24に表示し、図 12〖こ示すよう〖こ、フォーム中央左側にベスト 1の学 習塾または平均の点数力もレーダチャートを表示し、フォーム中央右側に該当学習 塾の点数からレーダチャートを表示する。学習塾コンピュータ 20はフォーム底部にベ スト 1の学習塾または平均の点数及び偏差値、該当学習塾の点数及び偏差値を対 比させて表形式で表示する。 [0041] FIG. 12 is a comparison screen display based on a radar chart with respect to the standard regarding the score of the cram school management information providing system according to the present embodiment. When the cram school manager selects the comparative analysis display, the cram school computer 20 requests provision of management information. The management computer 10 identifies the request and sends the selection form information to be compared. Gakusho Computer 20 1S Best Shows the best cram school and average menu items. The cram school manager chooses one of them. The cram school computer 20 sends the information identifying the selected menu item to the management computer 10, and the management computer 10 stores the score and deviation value of the corresponding cram school and the best cram school or average score and deviation value in the database. Read out and sent to the school computer 20 together with the form information. The school 20 displays the form on the display 24. As shown in Figure 12, the best 1 school or average score is displayed on the left side of the form, and a radar chart is also displayed on the right side of the form. The radar chart is displayed from the number of points. The cram school computer 20 displays the top 1 cram school or average score and deviation value on the bottom of the form in a tabular format by comparing the score and deviation value of the corresponding cram school.
[0042] 図 13は本実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提供システムの点数に関してべストラン キング、ワーストランキングのレーダーチャートによる対比画面表示である。学習塾経 営者がランキング表示のメニュー項目を選択すると、学習塾コンピュータ 20が経営者 情報提供の要請を行う。管理コンピュータ 10は総合べスト 1ないしべスト 3の学習塾、 総合ワースト 1ないしワースト 3の学習塾の点数及び総合順位を読み出し、学習塾コ ンピュータ 10にフォーム†青報と共に送信する。学習塾コンピュータ 10はフォームをデ イスプレイ 24に表示し、図 13に示すように、フォーム上段にベスト 1ないしべスト 3の 学習塾の点数からレーダチャートを表示し、フォーム下段にワースト 1ないしワースト 3
の学習塾の点数からレーダチャートを表示する。また、各レーダチャートの底部には 総合順位、総合点数を表示する。 FIG. 13 is a comparison screen display based on a radar chart of the best trunking and worst rankings regarding the score of the cram school management information providing system according to the present embodiment. When the cram school manager selects a menu item on the ranking display, the cram school computer 20 requests management information provision. The management computer 10 reads the scores and the overall ranking of the learning crams of the comprehensive best 1 to best 3 and the comprehensive worst 1 to 3 learning crams and sends them to the learning cram computer 10 together with the form † blueprint. The cram school computer 10 displays the form on the display 24, and as shown in Fig. 13, displays the radar chart from the best 1 to best 3 cram scores on the top of the form and the worst 1 to worst 3 on the bottom of the form. The radar chart is displayed from the number of the cram school. The total ranking and total score are displayed at the bottom of each radar chart.
[0043] 次に、シュミレーシヨンについて説明する。学習塾コンピュータ 20が図 12に示すよう に対比分析表示がなされている状態で、フォーム底部の表の自己の点数を編集する ことが可能であり、変更した点数に基づいてフォーム右側のレーダチャートを再描画 する。ここで、表中の中分類の点数を編集するのではなぐ中分類の点数を選択する ことで、別途評価設定項目が表示され、評価設定項目の点数を編集可能にする構成 にすることもでき、より塾経営者が具体的にどうような対策を施せば、例えば、ベスト 1 の学習塾に近づくことができるのかを把握することができる。 [0043] Next, simulation will be described. When the cram school computer 20 is in the comparative analysis display as shown in Fig. 12, it is possible to edit the score of the table on the bottom of the form, and based on the changed score, the radar chart on the right side of the form Redraw. Here, by selecting the score for the middle category rather than editing the score for the middle category in the table, a separate evaluation setting item can be displayed, and the score of the evaluation setting item can be edited. For example, it is possible to understand how the cram school managers can take specific measures, for example, to get closer to the best cram school.
[0044] (その他の実施形態) [0044] (Other Embodiments)
[バッチ処理] 前記第 1の実施形態においては、指定時刻に 1日 1回例えば夜間 バッチ処理を行って点数、偏差値、順位、経営指針を求めていたが、 1日毎のデータ だけでなぐ月毎、年ごとについてもバッチ処理で点数、偏差値、順位、経営指針を 求める構成にすることもできる。学習塾経営者が参照頻度が高 、データにっ 、ては 予めバッチ処理で管理コンピュータ 10で求めてデータベースに格納しておくことで、 経営成績情報の要求がなされて力 求める場合と比べてレスポンスが早いだけでな ぐ管理コンピュータ 10の負荷も軽減することができる。 [Batch processing] In the first embodiment, batch processing is performed once a day at a specified time, for example, to obtain scores, deviation values, rankings, and management guidelines. However, only the data for each day is required. For each year, every year, batch processing can be used to obtain points, deviation values, rankings, and management guidelines. Juku management has a high frequency of reference, and the data is pre-obtained by the management computer 10 in a batch process and stored in the database in advance. The load on the management computer 10 can be reduced as well.
[0045] [対象期間の指定] 前記第 1の実施形態においては、指定時刻に 1日 1回例えば 夜間バッチ処理を行って点数、偏差値、順位、経営指針を求めていたが、学習塾経 営者が学習塾コンピュータ 10用いて指定した期間に関して、点数、偏差値、順位、 経営指針を求める構成にすることもできる。例えば、学習塾にとって夏季講習は繁忙 期であり、この繁忙期に売上げを上げることが経営上必要となり、この期間に関する 情報のみを収集することで、短期的な経営戦術を捻出することができる。このときラン ダムに生じる学習塾コンピュータ 10からの対象期間の処理はリアルタイムで処理しな ければならないが、学習塾毎に対象期間を前日に指定することもでき、かかる対象期 間を前日に指定することで翌日には指定された対象期間について点数、偏差値、順 位、経営指針をバッチ処理で求めることもでき、学習塾経営者も長いレスポンスに苦 慮することなぐ管理コンピュータ 10も負荷の軽減に繋がる。この対象期間は継続し
て学習塾毎に保存することもでき、定期的に、対象期間の点数、偏差値、順位、経営 旨金†を求めることもできる。 [Specifying the target period] In the first embodiment, the score, deviation value, rank, and management guideline are obtained by performing, for example, nighttime batch processing once a day at a specified time. For the period specified by the manager using the cram school computer 10, the score, deviation value, ranking, and management guideline can be obtained. For example, the summer school is a busy period for cram schools, and it is necessary for management to increase sales during this busy period. By collecting only information related to this period, short-term management tactics can be devised. At this time, the processing of the target period from the cram school computer 10 that occurs at random must be processed in real time, but for each cram school, the target period can be specified on the previous day, and the target period can be specified on the previous day. By doing so, the score, deviation value, order, and management guidelines can be obtained in batch processing for the specified period on the next day. It leads to reduction. This period will continue Can be saved for each cram school, and the points, deviation values, rankings, and management stakes † for the target period can be obtained periodically.
[0046] [過去対比] 前記第 1の実施形態においては、自己の学習塾と他の学習塾との対 比、平均との対比を行っていたが、 自己の学習塾の過去の点数、偏差値、順位、経 営指針と比較することもでき、自己の学習塾がどのように変化してきたかを客観的に みることができ、中長期的な視点で経営戦略を練ることができる。例えば、平成 15年 度、平成 16年度、平成 17年度の期間で点数、偏差値、順位を比較することで、どの 部分が改良され、他方でどの部分が悪くなつたの力を客観的に判別することができる 。例えば、優秀な講師が集まり、優秀な生徒が育っているが、営業赤字に陥っている 場合に、料金体系に問題があるの力 月謝の回収に問題があるの力 講師給に問題 があるのかを過去との対比で客観的且つ具体的につきとめることができる。本発明で なければ複数システムを起動させたり、複数の膨大な資料力 資料を探したり、実際 の分析に入る前の段階で徒労が生じる。 [Past comparison] In the first embodiment, the comparison between the private cram school and other cram schools and the average were performed. Compared with values, rankings, and management guidelines, you can objectively see how your school has changed, and you can formulate management strategies from a medium- to long-term perspective. For example, by comparing scores, deviation values, and rankings during the period of FY2003, FY2004, and FY2005, it is possible to objectively determine which part has been improved and which part has become worse. can do . For example, there are problems with the fee structure when there are problems with the fee structure when there is a problem with the fee structure when there is a problem with the fee structure when excellent teachers gather and excellent students are growing up Can be objectively and concretely compared with the past. If it is not the present invention, labor will occur before starting multiple systems, searching for a large number of materials, and starting actual analysis.
[0047] [連絡処理] 前記第 1の実施形態においては、学習塾コンピュータ 20からランキン グ表示している学習塾コンピュータ 20に対してメッセージを送信し、返信を受ける構 成にすることもでき、ランキング上位の学習塾力も学習塾の経営についてアドバイス を受けることもでき、また、経営提携及び合併についての話し合いの口火にすることも できる。すなわち、それぞれの経営成績を相互に見ることで経営の共通点、相違点を 見ることができ、互いの長所をより強化したり、短所を補ったする経営提携及び合併 を具体的に実現することができる。 [0047] [Contact processing] In the first embodiment, it is possible to send a message from the learning cram computer 20 to the learning cram computer 20 displayed in a ranking and receive a reply. The cram school power of the top rankings can also receive advice on the management of the cram school, and can also spark discussions about business alliances and mergers. In other words, each business performance can be viewed from each other to see common points and differences in management, and strengthening each other's strengths and concretely realizing business alliances and mergers that compensate for the shortcomings. Can do.
[0048] [評価設定項目の確認及び編集] 図 14は本実施形態に係る学習塾経営情報提 供システムの評価設定情報の確認及び設定フォームである。前記第 1の実施形態に おいては、システム運用者の評価設定情報の設定方法を明示しな力つたが、図 14の 示すように、大分類のサービス名をリストボックス力も選択し、中分類をリストボックスか ら選択し、設定項目内容である要因項目をリストボックス力 選択し、重みをリストボッ タス力 選択し、モジュールをリストボックス力 選択して設定を行う。ここで、設定項 目内容、モジュールはリストボックス力も選択するだけでなぐシステム運用者が自ら 入力することもでき、特に、計算式であるモジュールはパラメータ、演算子、係数を入
力して作成することができる。 [Confirmation and Editing of Evaluation Setting Items] FIG. 14 is a confirmation and setting form of evaluation setting information of the learning school management information providing system according to the present embodiment. In the first embodiment, the system operator's evaluation setting information setting method was not clearly specified. However, as shown in FIG. Select from the list box, select the factor item that is the setting item contents, select the list box force, select the weight as the list box force, and select the module as the list box force to set. Here, the setting items and modules can be entered by the system operator by simply selecting the list box power. In particular, modules, which are calculation formulas, enter parameters, operators, and coefficients. Can be created with force.
[0049] [評価設定項目の選択] 前記第 1の実施形態にお!、ては、評価設定項目を学習 塾コンピュータを用いて選択解除する構成にすることもで、学習塾経営者が自己の 経営に関係しない、または、経営方針に合わない評価設定項目を選択解除すること で、それを除いた状態で点数、偏差値、順位、経営指針が決定され、学習塾経営者 の欲する情報を柔軟に提供することができる。この場合にシステム全体の設定がかわ るのではなぐ変更を行った学習塾経営者の学習塾についてのみ反映がなされる。 G UIとしては、図 14の要因項目と重みとの間に選択解除の列を設け、チャックボックス で選択可能とし、選択された評価設定項目は選択解除となる構成を例えば採ること ができる。 [Selection of Evaluation Setting Items] In the first embodiment, the configuration of the learning cram school manager can also be configured to deselect the evaluation setting items using a learning cram computer. By deselecting the evaluation setting items that are not related to management or that do not match the management policy, the score, deviation value, ranking, and management guidelines are determined without them, and the information that the cram school manager wants is flexible Can be provided. In this case, since the setting of the entire system is changed, it is reflected only for the cram school of the cram school manager who made the change. As the G UI, for example, a configuration can be adopted in which a selection cancellation column is provided between the factor item and the weight in FIG. 14 so that the selection can be made by the chuck box, and the selected evaluation setting item is canceled.
[0050] [評価設定項目の編集] 前記第 1の実施形態においては、評価設定項目自体は システム導入時にベンダーが設定するカゝ、システム運用者が設定、編集するもので あるが、使用者が学習塾コンピュータ 20を用いて編集する構成にすることもでき、具 体的には、計算式のパラメータを追加したり削除したり、係数を変更したり、演算子を 変えたり、重みを変更したりすることもでき、経営者所望の点数の付け方を行うことが できる。この場合にシステム全体の設定がかわるのではなぐ変更を行った学習塾経 営者の学習塾についてのみ反映がなされる。 GUIとしては、システム運用者の GUIと なる図 14を転用することができる。 [0050] [Edit Evaluation Setting Item] In the first embodiment, the evaluation setting item itself is a card set by the vendor at the time of system introduction, which is set and edited by the system operator. It can also be configured to be edited using Gakushu Computer 20. Specifically, parameters of calculation formulas can be added or deleted, coefficients can be changed, operators can be changed, and weights can be changed. You can also give the manager a desired score. In this case, since the setting of the entire system is changed, it is reflected only for the cram school of the cram school manager who made the change. As the GUI, Figure 14 which is the GUI of the system operator can be diverted.
[0051] [経営指針の応用] 前記第 1の実施形態においては、評価設定項目と経営指針 項目が [0051] [Application of management guideline] In the first embodiment, the evaluation setting item and the management guideline item are
対応し、中分類にも経営指針が対応し、偏差値が最も低い中分類の最も点数が低い 評価設定項目に対応する経営設定項目を記録し、学習塾経営者に提供したが、総 合の経営指針として、各サービスの偏差値が第 1の閾値、第 2の閾値 (第 1の閾値より 大きい)を超えている力否かでランクを各サービスに付け、例えば、第 2の閾値を超え るものをランク Aとし、第 2の閾値を超えず第 1の閾値を超えるものをランク Bとし、第 1 の閾値を超えな ヽものをランク Cとし、各サービス毎にランクを決定し、サービスとラン クの組み合わせに対して総合の経営指針を予め設定しておき、力かるサービスとラン クの組み合わせに基づき総合の経営指針を読み出し、記録する構成にすることもで
きる。本実施形態では、サービス力 種類で、ランクが 3種類あるので、 81種類の総 合の経営指針を用意する。総合の経営指針だけこのような構成としたが、中分類の 経営指針、経営指針項目も同様な構成にすることもできる。 Correspondingly, the management guideline also corresponds to the middle classification, and the management setting item corresponding to the evaluation setting item with the lowest score of the middle classification with the lowest deviation value was recorded and provided to the cram school management. As a management guideline, each service is ranked according to whether the deviation value of each service exceeds the first threshold and the second threshold (greater than the first threshold). For example, the service exceeds the second threshold. The rank A is assigned to rank A, rank B is defined as rank B, rank 1 is defined as rank C, rank 1 is determined for each service, and rank 1 is determined for each service. It is also possible to pre-set general management guidelines for the combination of services and ranks, and to read and record the comprehensive management guidelines based on the combination of strong services and ranks. wear. In this embodiment, there are three types of service capabilities and ranks, so 81 types of management guidelines are prepared. Although only the general management guidelines are configured in this way, the middle-class management guidelines and management guideline items can be configured in the same way.
[0052] [生徒'父母コンピュータの導入] 前記第 1の実施形態においては、生徒'父母が 所持するコンピュータが、管理コンピュータ 10にアクセス可能とすることもでき、認証 を経て出欠、成績、スケジュールを参照し、さら〖こは、スケジュールを編集する構成に することもでき、管理コンピュータ 10が所持するデータを有効活用することができる。 [Introduction of Student's Parent Computer] In the first embodiment, the computer possessed by the student's parent can be made accessible to the management computer 10, and the attendance, grades, and schedule are obtained through authentication. As a reference, Sarako can also be configured to edit the schedule, and can effectively utilize the data possessed by the management computer 10.
[0053] 以上の前記各実施形態により本発明を説明したが、本発明の技術的範囲は実施 形態に記載の範囲には限定されず、これら各実施形態に多様な変更又は改良を加 えることが可能である。そして、力 うな変更又は改良を加えた実施の形態も本発明 の技術的範囲に含まれる。このことは、特許請求の範囲及び課題を解決する手段か らち明らかなことである。
[0053] Although the present invention has been described with the above embodiments, the technical scope of the present invention is not limited to the scope described in the embodiments, and various modifications or improvements can be added to these embodiments. Is possible. Embodiments to which vigorous changes or improvements are added are also included in the technical scope of the present invention. This is clear from the claims and the means to solve the problems.
Claims
[1] 管理コンピュータが、各学習塾に配置される学習塾コンピュータ力 収集される教務 情報、運営情報、講師情報、経理情報の少なくとも 1つの情報を読み出し、予め設定 している評価設定情報を参照して各学習塾の点数を求める点数算出ステップと、管 理コンピュータが、当該点数算出ステップで求めた各学習塾の点数力 平均点及び 標準偏差を求め、各学習塾の偏差値を求める偏差値算出ステップと、管理コンビュ ータが、各学習塾の点数力 各学習塾の順位を求める順位算出ステップと、学習塾 コンピュータからの要求に応じて管理コンピュータが要求してきた学習塾コンピュータ を特定する情報に基づき該当学習塾の点数、偏差値及び順位を要求してきた学習 塾コンピュータに送信するステップとを含むコンピュータを用いた学習塾経営情報提 供方法。 [1] The management computer reads at least one of the educational information, management information, instructor information, and accounting information collected from the cram school computer power assigned to each cram school, and refers to the preset evaluation setting information The score calculation step to obtain the score of each cram school, and the management computer calculates the score power average point and standard deviation of each cram school obtained in the score calculation step, and the deviation value to obtain the deviation value of each cram school Calculation step, management computer score power of each cram school Rank calculation step to obtain the ranking of each cram school, and information that identifies the cram school computer requested by the management computer in response to a request from the cram school computer Learning using a computer including the step of transmitting to a cram school computer which requested the score, deviation value and rank of the corresponding cram school based on Management information provides ways.
[2] 管理コンピュータが、各学習塾に配置される学習塾コンピュータ力 収集される教務 情報、運営情報、講師情報、経理情報を読み出し、予め設定している評価設定情報 を参照して各学習塾の各情報及び総合の点数を求める点数算出ステップと、管理コ ンピュータが、当該点数算出ステップで求めた各学習塾の各情報及び総合の点数か ら各情報及び総合の平均点及び標準偏差を求め、各学習塾の各情報及び総合の 偏差値を求める偏差値算出ステップと、管理コンピュータが、各学習塾の各情報及 び総合の点数から各学習塾の各情報及び総合の順位を求める順位算出ステップと、 学習塾コンピュータからの要求に応じて管理コンピュータが要求してきた学習塾コン ピュータを特定する情報に基づき該当学習塾の各情報及び総合の点数、偏差値及 び順位を要求してきた学習塾コンピュータに送信するステップとを含むコンピュータを 用いた学習塾経営情報提供方法。 [2] Learning school computer power assigned to each study school The management computer reads the collected affair information, management information, lecturer information, and accounting information, and refers to the pre-set evaluation setting information for each study school. The score calculation step to calculate each information and total score, and the management computer calculates the average score and standard deviation of each information and total from each information and total score of each cram school determined in the score calculation step Deviation value calculation step to find each information and total deviation value of each cram school, and the management computer calculates the rank to obtain each information and total rank of each cram school from each information and total score of each cram school Based on the steps and information identifying the cram computer requested by the management computer in response to requests from the cram computer, each information of the cram school and the total score and deviation A method for providing learning cram school management information using a computer including a step of transmitting the value and ranking to a cram school computer that has requested the value and ranking.
[3] 前記要求した学習塾コンピュータの学習塾の点数、偏差値及び順位と共に、他の学 習塾の点数、偏差値及び順位を送信するステップと、学習塾コンピュータで受信した 自身の学習塾の点数、偏差値及び順位と他の学習塾の点数、偏差値及び順位を対 比させて表示装置に表示するステップとをさらに含む [3] A step of transmitting the number, deviation value, and rank of the other cram school along with the requested cram school computer score, deviation value, and rank, and the number of the school cram received by the cram computer. And a step of comparing the deviation value and ranking with the score, deviation value and ranking of other cram schools on the display device.
前記請求項 1または 2に記載のコンピュータを用いた学習塾経営情報提供方法。 A method for providing information to a school for learning using the computer according to claim 1 or 2.
[4] 学習塾コンピュータからの要求に応じて管理コンピュータが高順位の学習塾の点数、
偏差値及び順位と、低順位の学習塾の点数、偏差値及び順位を送信するステップと 、学習塾コンピュータで受信した高順位の学習塾の点数、偏差値及び順位と低順位 の学習塾の点数、偏差値及び順位とを対比させて表示装置に表示するステップとを さらに含む [4] In response to a request from a cram school computer, the management computer scores the higher ranking cram school, The step of transmitting the deviation value and rank, the score of the low-ranking cram school, the deviation value and the rank, the score of the high-ranking cram school received by the cram school computer, the deviation value, the rank and the score of the cram school of the low rank And displaying the deviation value and the ranking on the display device in comparison with each other.
前記請求項 1または 2に記載のコンピュータを用いた学習塾経営情報提供方法。 A method for providing information to a school for learning using the computer according to claim 1 or 2.
[5] 学習塾コンピュータで表示されている自身の学習塾の点数を使用者が操作すると、 学習塾コンピュータが操作対象の点数に係る評価設定情報を構成する評価設定項 目と当該評価設定項目毎の点数を表示装置に表示し、評価設定項目毎の点数を編 集を受け付けるステップと、学習塾コンピュータが編集後の評価設定項目毎の点数 を反映した操作対象の点数を求めるステップとをさらに含む [5] When the user operates the score of his / her own learning cram displayed on the cram school computer, the learning cram computer configures the evaluation setting information related to the score to be operated and each evaluation setting item. And a step of accepting the edit of the score for each evaluation setting item, and the step of obtaining the score of the operation target reflecting the score for each evaluation setting item after editing by the cram school computer
前記請求項 3に記載のコンピュータを用いた学習塾経営情報提供方法。 4. A method for providing information to a school for learning using a computer according to claim 3.
[6] 管理コンピュータは点数及び偏差値に基づき該当学習塾の最も悪い評価設定情報 を構成する評価設定項目を特定し、予め評価設定項目に対応付!、て設定されて ヽ る経営指針項目を特定された評価設定項目に基づき読み出すステップとをさらに含 み、 [6] Based on the score and deviation value, the management computer identifies the evaluation setting items that constitute the worst evaluation setting information of the relevant cram school, and corresponds to the evaluation setting items in advance! And a step of reading based on the specified evaluation setting item,
前記要求してきた学習塾コンピュータに送信するステップで、点数、偏差値及び順 位と共に経営指針項目を送信する In the step of transmitting to the requested cram school computer, the management guideline item is transmitted together with the score, deviation value and order.
前記請求項 1または 2に記載のコンピュータを用いた学習塾経営情報提供方法。 A method for providing information to a school for learning using the computer according to claim 1 or 2.
[7] 学習塾コンピュータ力も期間を指定された要求に応じて、管理コンピュータが指定期 間の教務情報、運営情報、講師情報、経理情報の少なくとも 1つの情報を読み出し、 評価設定情報を参照して各学習塾の点数を求める点数算出ステップとをさらに含み 求めた点数について前記偏差値算出ステップ及び順位算出ステップを実行し、要 求してきた学習塾コンピュータに指定期間の点数、偏差値及び順位を送信する 前記請求項 1または 2に記載のコンピュータを用いた学習塾経営情報提供方法。 [7] In response to a request that specifies the period of the cram school computer, the management computer reads at least one of the affairs information, management information, lecturer information, and accounting information for the specified period, and refers to the evaluation setting information. A score calculation step for obtaining the score of each cram school. The deviation value calculation step and the rank calculation step are executed for the obtained score, and the score, deviation value and rank for the specified period are transmitted to the requested cram school computer. A method for providing information to a school for learning using the computer according to claim 1 or 2.
[8] 学習塾コンピュータの要求に応じて管理コンピュータが評価設定情報を構成する評 価設定項目を送信するステップと、この送信された評価設定項目のうち不必要な評 価設定項目が選択解除され、または、評価設定項目の内容が編集され、更新された
評価設定情報を学習塾コンピュータが管理コンピュータに送信するステップとを含み 管理コンピュータが更新された評価設定情報について点数算出ステップ、偏差値 算出ステップ及び順位算出ステップを実行する [8] In response to a request from the cram school computer, the management computer transmits the evaluation setting items constituting the evaluation setting information, and unnecessary evaluation setting items are deselected from the transmitted evaluation setting items. Or, the contents of evaluation setting items have been edited and updated The evaluation computer executes a score calculation step, a deviation value calculation step, and a rank calculation step with respect to the updated evaluation setting information, including the step of transmitting the evaluation setting information to the management computer.
前記請求項 1または 2に記載のコンピュータを用いた学習塾経営情報提供方法。 A method for providing information to a school for learning using the computer according to claim 1 or 2.
[9] 各学習塾に配置される学習塾コンピュータから収集される教務情報、運営情報、講 師情報、経理情報の少なくとも 1つの情報を読み出し、予め設定している評価設定情 報を参照して各学習塾の点数を求める点数算出手段と、当該点数算出ステップで求 めた各学習塾の点数力 平均点及び標準偏差を求め、各学習塾の偏差値を求める 偏差値算出手段と、各学習塾の点数から各学習塾の順位を求める順位算出手段と、 学習塾コンピュータからの要求に応じて管理コンピュータが要求してきた学習塾コン ピュータを特定する情報に基づき該当学習塾の点数、偏差値及び順位を要求してき た学習塾コンピュータに送信する手段とを含む管理コンピュータ。 [9] Read at least one of the affairs information, administration information, lecturer information, and accounting information collected from the cram school computers located at each cram school, and refer to the preset evaluation setting information A score calculation means for obtaining the score of each cram school, a score power average point and a standard deviation of each cram school obtained in the score calculation step, a deviation value calculation means for obtaining a deviation value of each cram school, and each learning Based on the information for identifying the cram school computer requested by the management computer in response to a request from the cram school computer, the rank calculation means for obtaining the ranking of each cram school from the cram school score, the deviation value and the learning cram computer A management computer including means for transmitting to a cram school computer that has requested the ranking.
[10] コンピュータに、各学習塾に配置される学習塾コンピュータ力 収集される教務情報 、運営情報、講師情報、経理情報の少なくとも 1つの情報を読み出し、予め設定して いる評価設定情報を参照して各学習塾の点数を求める点数算出手順と、当該点数 算出ステップで求めた各学習塾の点数力 平均点及び標準偏差を求め、各学習塾 の偏差値を求める偏差値算出手順と、各学習塾の点数力 各学習塾の順位を求め る順位算出手順と、学習塾コンピュータからの要求に応じて管理コンピュータが要求 してきた学習塾コンピュータを特定する情報に基づき該当学習塾の点数、偏差値及 び順位を要求してきた学習塾コンピュータに送信する手順を実行させるための管理 プログラム。
[10] Learning cram computer power placed at each cram school on a computer Read out at least one of the collected affair information, management information, lecturer information, and accounting information and refer to the evaluation setting information that has been set in advance. The score calculation procedure for obtaining the score of each cram school, the score power average score and standard deviation of each cram school obtained in the score calculation step, the deviation value calculation procedure for obtaining the deviation value of each cram school, and each learning School scoring ability Based on the ranking calculation procedure for determining the ranking of each cram school and the information that identifies the cram school computer requested by the management computer in response to requests from the cram school computer, Management program to execute the procedure to send to the cram school computer that has requested the ranking.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2005/015360 WO2007023540A1 (en) | 2005-08-24 | 2005-08-24 | Cram school operation information providing system |
TW094129202A TW200709082A (en) | 2005-08-24 | 2005-08-24 | Cram school operation information providing system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2005/015360 WO2007023540A1 (en) | 2005-08-24 | 2005-08-24 | Cram school operation information providing system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2007023540A1 true WO2007023540A1 (en) | 2007-03-01 |
Family
ID=37771298
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2005/015360 WO2007023540A1 (en) | 2005-08-24 | 2005-08-24 | Cram school operation information providing system |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
TW (1) | TW200709082A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2007023540A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2022155222A (en) * | 2021-03-30 | 2022-10-13 | 株式会社地域教育工房 | Cram school educational affairs system |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2003049063A1 (en) * | 2001-12-06 | 2003-06-12 | Digital Communications Planning Institute Incorporated | Test result analysis apparatus, method, and program, and learning support system and method |
JP2005004521A (en) * | 2003-06-12 | 2005-01-06 | Hitachi Ltd | Management support system |
-
2005
- 2005-08-24 TW TW094129202A patent/TW200709082A/en unknown
- 2005-08-24 WO PCT/JP2005/015360 patent/WO2007023540A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2003049063A1 (en) * | 2001-12-06 | 2003-06-12 | Digital Communications Planning Institute Incorporated | Test result analysis apparatus, method, and program, and learning support system and method |
JP2005004521A (en) * | 2003-06-12 | 2005-01-06 | Hitachi Ltd | Management support system |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2022155222A (en) * | 2021-03-30 | 2022-10-13 | 株式会社地域教育工房 | Cram school educational affairs system |
JP7378827B2 (en) | 2021-03-30 | 2023-11-14 | 株式会社地域教育工房 | Educational affairs system for cram schools |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
TW200709082A (en) | 2007-03-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Hollands et al. | Cost-effectiveness analysis of early reading programs: A demonstration with recommendations for future research | |
Cuartero et al. | Educational Management Information System (EMIS) in public elementary school | |
Capaldi et al. | Performance and costs in higher education: A proposal for better data | |
JP2000305990A (en) | Qualification management system and recording medium | |
KR101753957B1 (en) | Student management system, server and method for entering an art, music and physical education school | |
US20160307456A1 (en) | Methods and systems for teaching and training people | |
Kleist et al. | A performance evaluation framework for a public university knowledge management system | |
Foster et al. | Cracking the Nut on LCME Standard 8.7: innovations to ensure comparability across geographically distributed campuses | |
Misko et al. | VET for secondary school students: acquiring an array of technical and non-technical skills | |
WO2007023540A1 (en) | Cram school operation information providing system | |
McGregor et al. | The Craft of Benchmarking: Finding and Utilizing District-Level, Campus-Level, and Program-Level Standards. | |
Wimberley et al. | Management support organizations and university partnership in nonprofit education, training and consultation | |
Poole et al. | Learning, spaces and technology: exploring the concept | |
Thorn et al. | Evidence and decision making in education systems | |
Romadhona et al. | Analytic Study of Information Functions: Management Information System Transformation at MAN 2 Yogyakarta | |
Stamatelos et al. | The role of engineering laboratories in the establishment of a quality culture in higher education in Greece | |
Winter | Digital Opportunities Pilot Project (2001-2003) Evaluation of Generation XP | |
Acanit | Status of information and communication technologies in academic libraries in Central Uganda | |
Oh et al. | Proclaiming Library Worth in a Program Prioritization Process at a Mid-Sized Public University | |
Meyer et al. | Developing knowledge through practical experience: The principles of financial sustainability for online programs | |
EGBE | The contribution of Education Management Information System on administrative effectiveness of secondary schools in Yaoundé municipality. | |
Abubakar | Adoption and Use of Information and Communication Technology in Academic Libraries of Selected Private Universities in Ghana. | |
Kinnell | From autonomy to systems: education for the information and library professions 1986‐1999 | |
Smith et al. | The future of school information systems | |
Mays | Training new acquisitions and collection development librarians: Some technical and philosophical guideposts |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 05774893 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: JP |