WO2007009335A1 - A method for realizing the multicast service in an automatic switch optical network - Google Patents

A method for realizing the multicast service in an automatic switch optical network Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2007009335A1
WO2007009335A1 PCT/CN2006/001212 CN2006001212W WO2007009335A1 WO 2007009335 A1 WO2007009335 A1 WO 2007009335A1 CN 2006001212 W CN2006001212 W CN 2006001212W WO 2007009335 A1 WO2007009335 A1 WO 2007009335A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
lsp
node
service
same
multicast
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/CN2006/001212
Other languages
French (fr)
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
Hao Zi
Original Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. filed Critical Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Publication of WO2007009335A1 publication Critical patent/WO2007009335A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L49/00Packet switching elements
    • H04L49/20Support for services
    • H04L49/201Multicast operation; Broadcast operation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00Data switching networks
    • H04L12/02Details
    • H04L12/16Arrangements for providing special services to substations
    • H04L12/18Arrangements for providing special services to substations for broadcast or conference, e.g. multicast
    • H04L12/1863Arrangements for providing special services to substations for broadcast or conference, e.g. multicast comprising mechanisms for improved reliability, e.g. status reports
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L49/00Packet switching elements
    • H04L49/35Switches specially adapted for specific applications
    • H04L49/356Switches specially adapted for specific applications for storage area networks
    • H04L49/357Fibre channel switches

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to digital information transmission technologies, and in particular, to a method for implementing multicast services in an automatic switched optical network.
  • the services in the Automatically Switched Optical Network mainly include one-way point-to-point, two-way point-to-point and one-way point-to-multipoint connection.
  • the optical multicast service is a one-way point-to-multipoint connection, and refers to a set of one-way service connections with the same source end entry and different sink end exits.
  • the Resource Reservation Protocol includes the RSVP-TE (RSVP-TE, RSVP-Traffic Engineering) signaling protocol.
  • the RSVP-TE signaling protocol is used as the signaling protocol of the ASON control plane, and its role is to establish and maintain services.
  • a protocol packet such as RSVP-TE is used to establish a protocol data packet related to the service, and is transmitted to each node in the network through a channel such as an overhead byte of the SDH network in the control plane, and each node is The establishment of the service according to the content of the received protocol data packet, thereby completing the connection establishment of the entire service from the source node to the sink node.
  • the establishment of the service is to establish a label switched path (LSP), and then the data can be transmitted through the established LSP to implement the service.
  • LSP label switched path
  • the most direct way to implement the optical multicast service is to use the LSP establishment procedure of the RSVP-TE signaling protocol to establish a set of homologous different sinks and time slots.
  • One-way business is to use the LSP establishment procedure of the RSVP-TE signaling protocol to establish a set of homologous different sinks and time slots.
  • FIG 1 shows an established solution for optical multicast services.
  • the optical multicast service actually establishes three unidirectional services.
  • the three unidirectional services use different LSP links.
  • the three LSP links are:
  • LSP1 A->B->F ;
  • LSP3 A—>B—>C— >G.
  • the RSVP-TE signaling protocol can be used in the ASON network. It is proposed to establish a set of unidirectional services allocated by different sets of different sinks and time slots to implement multicast services, but since each unidirectional service established is independent, the time slots in each link are also allocated, even if LSP1
  • the path of A->B in LSP2 and LSP3 is the same, and the time slot cannot be shared in the part of the path.
  • the path of B->C in LSP2 and LSP3 is the same, but the time slot cannot be shared. . Obviously this causes a waste of time slot resources.
  • the main purpose of the present invention is to provide a method for implementing a multicast service in an ASON, which implements time slot sharing of an optical multicast service and effectively utilizes time slot resources to overcome the waste of time slot resources in the prior art. Defects.
  • the present invention provides the following technical solutions:
  • a method for implementing a multicast service in an automatic switched optical network the method first assigning a multicast group number (GroupID) to a multicast service, and the method further includes the following steps:
  • the node in the ASON is configured to establish a unidirectional service for the multicast service, it is determined whether the LSP of the current multicast service group ID exists in the local device. If not, go to step b. Otherwise, go to step c. ;
  • the node establishes an LSP for the unidirectional service, allocates a source and a sink slot for the LSP, and establishes a cross-connection, and the identifier information of the established LSP includes the GroupID of the multicast service, and then the processing ends.
  • the node determines whether the existing LSP is the same as the egress link of the unidirectional service to be established currently. If the LSP is the same, the LSP is directly used after the LSP is established for the unidirectional service. Source and sink timeslots and cross-connections; if different, after establishing an LSP for the unidirectional service, directly use the source time slot of the existing LSP, allocate a sink time slot, and establish a cross-connection.
  • the group ID assigned to the multicast service is: Assign a unique GroupID to all multicast services in the automatic switched optical network.
  • the group ID assigned to the multicast service is: assigning a unique GroupID to all multicast services under the same first node;
  • the node further includes: determining whether the first node of the existing LSP is the same as the first node of the one-way service that is currently to be established, and if yes, Go to step C, otherwise, go to step 13.
  • the node before the performing step c, further comprises: determining whether the ingress link and the source time slot of the existing LSP are the same as the ingress link and the source time slot of the currently established unidirectional service. If they are all the same, step c is performed; if the ingress links are different, and/or the source time slots are different, the processing flow is ended.
  • the node further includes: performing an error reporting process.
  • the method may further comprise:
  • the node in the ASON When the node in the ASON deletes the unidirectional service of the multicast service, it determines whether the other LSP exists in the local node, and the group ID included in the identifier information of the other LSP and the identifier information of the LSP of the unidirectional service are included.
  • the groupID is the same, if it does not exist, go to step e, otherwise, go to step f;
  • the node directly deletes the LSP of the unidirectional service, deletes the source and sink time slots and the cross connection of the LSP, and ends the processing flow;
  • the node determines whether the unidirectional service has the same egress link as the other LSPs existing on the node, and if yes, deletes only the LSP of the unidirectional service; otherwise, deletes the unidirectional The LSP of the service, and only the slot slots and cross-connections are released.
  • the group ID assigned to the multicast service is: assigning a unique GroupID to all multicast services under the same first node;
  • the node before the step f is performed, the node further includes: determining whether the first node of the other LSP existing by the node is the same as the first node of the one-way service, and if yes, performing step f; otherwise , perform step ⁇
  • the node before the step f is performed, the node further includes: determining whether the ingress link and the source time slot of other LSPs existing by the node are the same as the ingress link and the source time slot of the unidirectional service If they are all the same, step f is performed; if the ingress links are different, and/or the source time slots are different, the process flow ends.
  • the node further includes: performing an error reporting process.
  • the GroupID allocated for the multicast service is a non-zero value.
  • the beneficial effects of the present invention are: in the present invention, the GroupID is allocated for the multicast service, and the GroupID of the multicast group is added to the identification information of the LSP, and the same group is determined by the judgment of the GroupID based on the processing of the existing LSP. slots shared between different multicast traffic unidirectional service, i.e., each service node of the link determination is performed, processing in accordance with the multicast service Gr 0U pID different unidirectional traffic, the inlet and outlet links link, etc., in order to achieve The time slot sharing of the multicast service effectively utilizes the time slot resources, which improves the resource utilization and operation efficiency of the network.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a process flow for establishing a unidirectional service by a node in the solution of the present invention
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a process flow of deleting a unidirectional service by a node in the solution of the present invention.
  • the LSP is as follows:
  • the node sends a message according to the obtained routing information according to the obtained routing information, establishes an LSP, allocates a time slot for the LSP, and establishes a cross-connection of each node. That is, the connection of the source slot to the sink slot of the node is established.
  • the A node and the B node in FIG. 2 need to allocate 4 source slots and sink slots, and establish 4 for the source slot and the sink slot.
  • the C-node needs to allocate 3 source slots and sink slots, and establish 3 cross-connections for the source slot and the sink slot.
  • any one of the same multicast services different LSPs of the same multicast service must have the same ingress link and source time slot. Therefore, when establishing each unidirectional service of the same multicast service, If the time slot is allocated for the LSP of the one-way service and the cross-connection is established, it can be confirmed If the LSP belongs to the same multicast service as the previously established LSP, the LSPs established by the node for the same multicast service can share at least the source time slot.
  • LSPs of the same multicast service may have the same egress link at the node, as the A node in FIG. 2 has the same egress link, and the B node in FIG. 2 is between the node and the C node. This link also has the same egress link. Therefore, if the LSP is determined to belong to the same multicast service as the previously established LSP, and the LSP has the same egress link as the previously established LSP, before the LSP is allocated to the LSP and the cross-connection is established, The LSPs established by the node for the same multicast service can directly share the source and sink slots, and since the source and sink slots are all original slots, in this case, no cross-connection is established.
  • the group ID of the multicast service to which the LSP belongs is also required to be added, so that each node according to the The GroupID determines whether the node has an LSP that belongs to the same multicast service.
  • the identification information of the LSP in addition to the original information, should also include a GroupID, where the original information usually includes: an IPv4/IPv6 tunnel end node address, a tunnel ID, an extended tunnel ID, an IPv4/IPv6 tunnel sender address, and The LSP ID, and the IPv4/IPv6 tunnel sender address is the address of the first node of the multicast service.
  • GroupID can be added to the current Path, Resv, PassErr, and ResvErr message data structures as an object.
  • the group ID should be set. For example, if the group ID is set to 0, the corresponding LSP is not a multicast service. If the group ID is non-zero, the corresponding LSP is a multicast service. Belong to the same multicast service.
  • each node should perform the processing shown in Figure 3 when establishing a one-way service for the multicast service.
  • the processing corresponds to the following steps:
  • the normal service establishment process is: allocate an LSP for the service, allocate a source and sink time slot for the LSP, and establish a cross-connection, and the identifier information of the established LSP should be included.
  • the GroupID of the multicast service is: allocate an LSP for the service, allocate a source and sink time slot for the LSP, and establish a cross-connection, and the identifier information of the established LSP should be included.
  • Steps 303 to 305 determining whether the egress link of the existing LSP is the same as the egress link of the unidirectional service to be established currently. If the LSP is the same, the existing LSP is directly used after the LSP is established for the unidirectional service. Source and sink timeslots and cross-connections of the LSP, that is, the shared source and sink time slots, and the cross-connection is not required to be established; if different, the source of the existing LSP is directly used after the LSP is established for the unidirectional service. Gap, but need to allocate sink slots, and need to establish cross-connections.
  • the above processing requirement can assign a unique GroupIDo to all multicast services in ASON.
  • a GroupID may not be uniquely associated with a multicast service. Therefore, when identifying a multicast service, all multicast services under the same node in the ASON can be assigned uniquely.
  • GroupID the first node is the source ingress node of the multicast service. Based on the allocation scheme, before the step 303 is performed, the node needs to determine whether the first node of the existing LSP is the same as the first node of the unidirectional service to be established, and may be based on the IPv4/IPv6 in the LSP identification information. The tunnel sender address is judged.
  • step 303 can be performed; but if the two head nodes are different, the The existing LSP has the same GroupID as the current unidirectional service, but does not belong to the same multicast service. Therefore, step 303 cannot be performed.
  • the unidirectional service should be established according to the normal processing flow.
  • the node finds that the ingress link and the ingress slot of the unidirectional service to be established currently exist and the ingress link and the ingress slot of the existing LSP exist. In different cases, the difference may be different only for the ingress link, or only the ingress slot is different. Of course, the ingress link and the ingress slot are different, regardless of the unidirectional service to be established and the exit of the existing LSP. If the link is the same, the above situation should not exist under the guarantee of the routing multicast algorithm. Therefore, the node should end the process of establishing the one-way service in this case, and of course, can perform error processing.
  • the multicast service After the multicast service is established, the multicast service is usually deleted, and the unidirectional service in the multicast service is deleted.
  • the LSP of the present invention is based on the LSP sharing time slot of the unidirectional service. Therefore, when the node initiates the deletion of a unidirectional service in the multicast service according to the RSVP protocol, the LSP of the unidirectional service and the local node are required. Whether other LSPs share time slots to determine whether to release the time slot and whether to delete the cross-connection while deleting the LSP of the one-way service.
  • deletion process corresponds to the following steps:
  • Steps 401 to 402 When the node needs to delete the unidirectional service of the multicast service, it determines whether there are other LSPs of the GroupID included in the identification information of the LSP including the unidirectional service in the identification information, and if not, directly follow the LSP. If the LSP is deleted, the LSP of the unidirectional service is deleted, the source and sink slots are released, and the cross-connection is deleted. Otherwise, step 403 is performed.
  • Steps 403 to 405 further determining whether the unidirectional service has the same egress link as the other LSPs existing. If yes, the source and sink slots are not released, and the cross-connection is not deleted, but the one-way service needs to be deleted. LSP; otherwise, only the slot is released, but the source slot is not released, but the corresponding cross-connection needs to be deleted, and the LSP to be deleted is deleted.
  • the LSP deletion of the multicast service is implemented through the above processing.
  • the GroupID may uniquely identify a certain multicast service in the ASON, and may also identify multiple multicast services in the ASON. If it is the former case, the flow shown in Figure 4 can be directly executed. If the latter case is performed, before performing the above step 403, that is, whether to determine whether the same egress link is present, whether the unidirectional service and the other LSPs existing have the same head node, and if so, Then, the determination process of step 403 is performed; otherwise, the deletion is performed according to the normal situation, that is, the LSP of the one-way service is deleted, the source and sink time slots are released, and the cross-connection is deleted. When deleting a multicast service, there may be some erroneous situations.
  • the node finds that the ingress link of the unidirectional service to be deleted is different from the ingress link of other existing LSPs, and/or is to be deleted.
  • the ingress slot of the unidirectional service is different from the ingress link of other existing LSPs. Regardless of whether the egress link is the same, this situation should not exist under the guarantee of the routing multicast algorithm, so the node can end the current Deleting the processing of one-way services, of course, can also perform error handling.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)

Abstract

A method for realizing the multicast service in an automatic switch optical network, which distributes GroupID for multicast service, comprises: when the node in the ASON establishes the one-way service for multicast service, determines whether the LSP of GroupID of the current multicast included in the identifier information is existed in the node, if it is not, then the node establishes the one-way service according to the normal process, and the LSP identifier information of the established one-way service includes the GroupID of the multicast service, then finish the process; otherwise, the node judges whether the existent LSP is the same to the output link of the one-way service, if it is, after the one-way service establishes the LSP, the source and the target time slots and the interconnect of the existent LSP is used directly; if it is not, after the one-way service establishes the LSP, the source time slot of the existent LSP is used directly and the target time slot is distributed and the interconnect is needed to be established. The present invention realizes the share of the time slot of the multicast service, and improves the resource utilization factor and the operating efficiency of the network.

Description

一种自动交换光网络中实现组播业务的方法  Method for realizing multicast service in automatic switched optical network
技术领域 Technical field
本发明涉及数字信息传输技术, 尤其涉及一种自动交换光网络中实现组 播业务的方法。  The present invention relates to digital information transmission technologies, and in particular, to a method for implementing multicast services in an automatic switched optical network.
背景技术 Background technique
自动交换光网络(ASON, Automatically Switched Optical Network) 中的 业务主要包括单向点到点、双向点到点和单向点到多点连接这几种连接方式。 其中, 光组播业务即为单向点到多点的连接, 指的是一组源端入口相同而宿 端出口不同的单向业务连接。  The services in the Automatically Switched Optical Network (ASON) mainly include one-way point-to-point, two-way point-to-point and one-way point-to-multipoint connection. The optical multicast service is a one-way point-to-multipoint connection, and refers to a set of one-way service connections with the same source end entry and different sink end exits.
资源预留协议 (RSVP, Resource Reservation Protocol)包括 RSVP流量 工程扩展(RSVP-TE, RSVP-Traffic Engineering)信令协议。 该 RSVP-TE信 令协议作为 ASON控制平面的信令协议,其作用就是进行业务的建立和维护。 比如, 在 ASON中利用诸如 RSVP-TE之类的协议建立与该业务相关的协议 数据包,通过控制平面中诸如 SDH网络的开销字节之类的通道传送到网络中 的各个节点, 各个节点则根据收到的协议数据包中的内容进行业务的建立, 从而完成整条业务从源节点到宿节点的连接建立。 其中, 建立业务即为建立 标签交换路径(LSP), 之后即可通过所建立的 LSP来实现数据的传输, 从而 实现该业务。  The Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) includes the RSVP-TE (RSVP-TE, RSVP-Traffic Engineering) signaling protocol. The RSVP-TE signaling protocol is used as the signaling protocol of the ASON control plane, and its role is to establish and maintain services. For example, in ASON, a protocol packet such as RSVP-TE is used to establish a protocol data packet related to the service, and is transmitted to each node in the network through a channel such as an overhead byte of the SDH network in the control plane, and each node is The establishment of the service according to the content of the received protocol data packet, thereby completing the connection establishment of the entire service from the source node to the sink node. The establishment of the service is to establish a label switched path (LSP), and then the data can be transmitted through the established LSP to implement the service.
对于单向点到多点连接的光组播业务来说, 实现光组播业务最直接的方 法就是利用 RSVP-TE信令协议的 LSP建立流程, 建立一组同源不同宿、 时 隙各自分配的单向业务。  For the optical multicast service with unidirectional point-to-multipoint connection, the most direct way to implement the optical multicast service is to use the LSP establishment procedure of the RSVP-TE signaling protocol to establish a set of homologous different sinks and time slots. One-way business.
图 1所示为光组播业务的一种建立方案。 由图 1可以看出, 该光组播业 务实际上是建立了三个单向业务,这三个单向业务分别使用不同的 LSP链路, 这三条 LSP链路分别为:  Figure 1 shows an established solution for optical multicast services. As shown in Figure 1, the optical multicast service actually establishes three unidirectional services. The three unidirectional services use different LSP links. The three LSP links are:
LSP1 : A->B->F; LSP1 : A->B->F ;
LSP2: A->B->C->D;  LSP2: A->B->C->D;
LSP3: A— >B— >C— >G。  LSP3: A—>B—>C— >G.
由以上描述可以看出, 在 ASON网络中虽然可以通过 RSVP-TE信令协 议建立一组同源不同宿、 时隙各自分配的单向业务来实现组播业务, 但由于 所建立的各个单向业务是各自独立的, 各个链路中的时隙也是各自分配, 即 使 LSP1、 LSP2和 LSP3中的 A—>B这部分路径相同, 也无法在该部分路径 中共享时隙, 其它类似的还有, LSP2和 LSP3中 B—>C的路径相同, 但也无 法共享时隙。 显然这造成了时隙资源的浪费。 As can be seen from the above description, although the RSVP-TE signaling protocol can be used in the ASON network. It is proposed to establish a set of unidirectional services allocated by different sets of different sinks and time slots to implement multicast services, but since each unidirectional service established is independent, the time slots in each link are also allocated, even if LSP1 The path of A->B in LSP2 and LSP3 is the same, and the time slot cannot be shared in the part of the path. Similarly, the path of B->C in LSP2 and LSP3 is the same, but the time slot cannot be shared. . Obviously this causes a waste of time slot resources.
发明内容 Summary of the invention
有鉴于此, 本发明的主要目的在于提供一种 ASON中实现组播业务的方 法, 实现光组播业务的时隙共享, 有效利用时隙资源, 以克服现有技术中的 造成时隙资源浪费的缺陷。  In view of the above, the main purpose of the present invention is to provide a method for implementing a multicast service in an ASON, which implements time slot sharing of an optical multicast service and effectively utilizes time slot resources to overcome the waste of time slot resources in the prior art. Defects.
为解决上述问题, 本发明提供了以下技术方案:  In order to solve the above problems, the present invention provides the following technical solutions:
一种自动交换光网络中实现组播业务的方法, 该方法首先为组播业务分 配组播组号 (GroupID), 该方法还包括以下步骤:  A method for implementing a multicast service in an automatic switched optical network, the method first assigning a multicast group number (GroupID) to a multicast service, and the method further includes the following steps:
a. ASON中的节点在为组播业务建立单向业务时, 判断本节点是否已存 在标识信息中包括当前组播业务的 GroupID的 LSP, 如果不存在, 则执行步 骤 b, 否则, 执行步骤 c;  If the node in the ASON is configured to establish a unidirectional service for the multicast service, it is determined whether the LSP of the current multicast service group ID exists in the local device. If not, go to step b. Otherwise, go to step c. ;
b.所述节点为所述单向业务建立 LSP, 为该 LSP分配源宿时隙, 并建立 交叉连接, 且所建立的 LSP的标识信息中包括所述组播业务的 GroupID, 之 后结束本处理流程;  The node establishes an LSP for the unidirectional service, allocates a source and a sink slot for the LSP, and establishes a cross-connection, and the identifier information of the established LSP includes the GroupID of the multicast service, and then the processing ends. Process;
c所述节点判断所述已存在的 LSP是否与当前所要建立的单向业务的出 口链路相同, 如果相同, 则在为所述单向业务建立 LSP后, 直接使用所述已 存在的 LSP的源宿时隙及交叉连接;如果不同,则在为所述单向业务建立 LSP 后, 直接使用所述已存在的 LSP的源时隙, 并分配宿时隙, 以及建立交叉连 接。  The node determines whether the existing LSP is the same as the egress link of the unidirectional service to be established currently. If the LSP is the same, the LSP is directly used after the LSP is established for the unidirectional service. Source and sink timeslots and cross-connections; if different, after establishing an LSP for the unidirectional service, directly use the source time slot of the existing LSP, allocate a sink time slot, and establish a cross-connection.
所述为组播业务分配 GroupID为: 为自动交换光网络中的所有组播业务 分别分配唯一的 GroupID。  The group ID assigned to the multicast service is: Assign a unique GroupID to all multicast services in the automatic switched optical network.
所述为组播业务分配 GroupID为: 为同一首节点下的所有组播业务分别 分配唯一的 GroupID;  The group ID assigned to the multicast service is: assigning a unique GroupID to all multicast services under the same first node;
步骤 a中, 所述节点在执行步骤 c之前进一步包括: 判断所述已存在的 LSP的首节点是否与当前所要建立的单向业务的首节点相同, 如果是, 贝 IJ执 行步骤 C, 否则, 执行步骤13。 In step a, before the step c is performed, the node further includes: determining whether the first node of the existing LSP is the same as the first node of the one-way service that is currently to be established, and if yes, Go to step C, otherwise, go to step 13.
所述步骤 a中, 所述节点在执行步骤 c之前进一步包括: 判断所述已存 在的 LSP的入口链路和源时隙是否与当前所要建立的单向业务的入口链路和 源时隙相同, 如果均相同, 则执行步骤 c; 如果入口链路不同, 和 /或源时隙 不同, 则结束本处理流程。  In the step a, before the performing step c, the node further comprises: determining whether the ingress link and the source time slot of the existing LSP are the same as the ingress link and the source time slot of the currently established unidirectional service. If they are all the same, step c is performed; if the ingress links are different, and/or the source time slots are different, the processing flow is ended.
所述步骤 a中, 所述节点在确定入口链路不同, 和 /或源时隙不同后, 并 在结束本处理流程之前, 进一步包括: 执行报错处理。  In the step a, after determining that the ingress link is different, and/or the source time slot is different, and before ending the processing flow, the node further includes: performing an error reporting process.
该方法还可以进一步包括:  The method may further comprise:
d. ASON中的节点在删除组播业务的单向业务时, 判断本节点是否存在 其它 LSP, 且所述其它 LSP的标识信息中包含的 GroupID与所述单向业务的 LSP的标识信息中包含的 GroupID相同, 如果不存在, 则执行步骤 e, 否则, 执行步骤 f;  When the node in the ASON deletes the unidirectional service of the multicast service, it determines whether the other LSP exists in the local node, and the group ID included in the identifier information of the other LSP and the identifier information of the LSP of the unidirectional service are included. The groupID is the same, if it does not exist, go to step e, otherwise, go to step f;
e.所述节点直接删除所述单向业务的 LSP,删除该 LSP的源宿时隙及交 叉连接, 并结束本处理流程;  e. The node directly deletes the LSP of the unidirectional service, deletes the source and sink time slots and the cross connection of the LSP, and ends the processing flow;
f.所述节点判断所述单向业务与本节点己存在的所述其它 LSP是否具有 相同的出口链路, 如果是, 则只删除所述单向业务的 LSP; 否则, 删除所述 单向业务的 LSP, 且只释放宿时隙及交叉连接。  f. The node determines whether the unidirectional service has the same egress link as the other LSPs existing on the node, and if yes, deletes only the LSP of the unidirectional service; otherwise, deletes the unidirectional The LSP of the service, and only the slot slots and cross-connections are released.
所述为组播业务分配 GroupID为: 为同一首节点下的所有组播业务分别 分配唯一的 GroupID;  The group ID assigned to the multicast service is: assigning a unique GroupID to all multicast services under the same first node;
步骤 d中, 所述节点在执行步骤 f之前, 进一步包括: 判断本节点所存 在的所述其它 LSP的首节点是否与所述单向业务的首节点相同, 如果相同, 则执行步骤 f; 否则, 执行步骤^  In step d, before the step f is performed, the node further includes: determining whether the first node of the other LSP existing by the node is the same as the first node of the one-way service, and if yes, performing step f; otherwise , perform step ^
所述步骤 d中, 所述节点在执行步骤 f之前, 进一步包括: 判断本节点 所存在的其它 LSP的入口链路和源时隙是否与所述单向业务的入口链路和源 时隙相同, 如果均相同, 则执行步骤 f; 如果入口链路不同, 和 /或源时隙不 同, 则结束本处理流程。  In the step d, before the step f is performed, the node further includes: determining whether the ingress link and the source time slot of other LSPs existing by the node are the same as the ingress link and the source time slot of the unidirectional service If they are all the same, step f is performed; if the ingress links are different, and/or the source time slots are different, the process flow ends.
所述步骤 d中, 所述节点在确定入口链路不同, 和 /或源时隙不同后, 并 在结束本处理流程之前, 进一步包括: 执行报错处理。  In the step d, after determining that the ingress link is different, and/or the source time slot is different, and before ending the processing flow, the node further includes: performing an error reporting process.
所述为组播业务分配的 GroupID为非零值。 本发明的有益效果为:在本发明中, 为组播业务分配 GroupID, 并在 LSP 的标识信息中增加所在组播组的 GroupID, 基于现有 LSP 的处理, 通过对 GroupID 的判断以实现同一组播业务的不同单向业务之间的时隙共享, 即各 个业务链路的节点根据组播业务的不同单向业务的 Gr0UpID、 入口链路和出 口链路等进行判断、 处理, 从而实现组播业务的时隙共享, 有效地利用了时 隙资源, 提高了网络的资源利用率和运行效率。 The GroupID allocated for the multicast service is a non-zero value. The beneficial effects of the present invention are: in the present invention, the GroupID is allocated for the multicast service, and the GroupID of the multicast group is added to the identification information of the LSP, and the same group is determined by the judgment of the GroupID based on the processing of the existing LSP. slots shared between different multicast traffic unidirectional service, i.e., each service node of the link determination is performed, processing in accordance with the multicast service Gr 0U pID different unidirectional traffic, the inlet and outlet links link, etc., in order to achieve The time slot sharing of the multicast service effectively utilizes the time slot resources, which improves the resource utilization and operation efficiency of the network.
附图说明 DRAWINGS
图 1为现有技术的应用示意图;  1 is a schematic diagram of application of the prior art;
图 2为本发明的应用示意图;  2 is a schematic view of the application of the present invention;
图 3为本发明方案中的节点建立单向业务的处理流程示意图;  3 is a schematic diagram of a process flow for establishing a unidirectional service by a node in the solution of the present invention;
图 4为本发明方案中的节点删除单向业务的处理流程示意图。  FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a process flow of deleting a unidirectional service by a node in the solution of the present invention.
具体实施方式 detailed description
以图 2所示的 ASON网络为例, 假设该网络中需要建立一个组播业务, 且该组播业务需要包括四个单向业务, 这四个单向业务分别对应四个 LSP, 这四个 LSP如下所示:  Taking the ASON network shown in Figure 2 as an example, it is assumed that a multicast service needs to be established in the network, and the multicast service needs to include four unidirectional services, and the four unidirectional services respectively correspond to four LSPs. The LSP is as follows:
LSP1 : A->B->F  LSP1 : A->B->F
LSP2: A->B->C->G  LSP2: A->B->C->G
LSP3: A->B->C->D->H  LSP3: A->B->C->D->H
LSP4: A->B->C->D->E  LSP4: A->B->C->D->E
如果按照已有方案, 则为: 在需要创建组播业务的路由时, 由各节点根 据得到的路由信息按照正常流程发送消息, 建立 LSP, 为该 LSP分配时隙, 并建立各个节点的交叉连接, 即建立该节点的源时隙到宿时隙的连接。 对于 已有方案来说, 在分配时隙及建立交叉连接时, 图 2中的 A节点和 B节点需 要分配 4个源时隙及宿时隙,并针对该源时隙及宿时隙建立 4次交叉连接, C 节点则需要分配 3个源时隙及宿时隙, 并针对该源时隙及宿时隙建立 3次交 叉连接。  If the route is to be created, the node sends a message according to the obtained routing information according to the obtained routing information, establishes an LSP, allocates a time slot for the LSP, and establishes a cross-connection of each node. That is, the connection of the source slot to the sink slot of the node is established. For the existing scheme, when allocating time slots and establishing a cross-connection, the A node and the B node in FIG. 2 need to allocate 4 source slots and sink slots, and establish 4 for the source slot and the sink slot. For the secondary cross-connection, the C-node needs to allocate 3 source slots and sink slots, and establish 3 cross-connections for the source slot and the sink slot.
实际上, 在同一组播业务中的任意一个节点, 同一组播业务的不同 LSP 必然会有相同的入口链路及源时隙, 因此, 在建立同一组播业务的每个单向 业务时, 如果在为该单向业务的 LSP分配时隙及建立交叉连接之前, 能够确 定该 LSP与之前已建立的 LSP属于同一组播业务,则在该节点针对同一组播 业务所建立的各个 LSP至少可以共享源时隙。 In fact, in any one of the same multicast services, different LSPs of the same multicast service must have the same ingress link and source time slot. Therefore, when establishing each unidirectional service of the same multicast service, If the time slot is allocated for the LSP of the one-way service and the cross-connection is established, it can be confirmed If the LSP belongs to the same multicast service as the previously established LSP, the LSPs established by the node for the same multicast service can share at least the source time slot.
当然, 同一组播业务的不同 LSP在该节点还可能有相同的出口链路, 如 图 2中的 A节点即具有相同的出口链路,图 2中的 B节点在本节点到 C节点 之间的这段链路也具有相同的出口链路。 因此, 如果在为 LSP分配时隙及建 立交叉连接之前, 能够确定该 LSP与之前已建立的 LSP属于同一组播业务, 且该 LSP与之前已建立的 LSP具有相同的出口链路,则在该节点针对同一组 播业务所建立的各个 LSP可以直接共享源宿时隙, 且由于源宿时隙均为原有 的时隙, 因此在这种情况下也不用建立交叉连接。  Of course, different LSPs of the same multicast service may have the same egress link at the node, as the A node in FIG. 2 has the same egress link, and the B node in FIG. 2 is between the node and the C node. This link also has the same egress link. Therefore, if the LSP is determined to belong to the same multicast service as the previously established LSP, and the LSP has the same egress link as the previously established LSP, before the LSP is allocated to the LSP and the cross-connection is established, The LSPs established by the node for the same multicast service can directly share the source and sink slots, and since the source and sink slots are all original slots, in this case, no cross-connection is established.
基于上述分析, 在新建组播业务时, 首先需要为该组播业务分配一个组 播组号 (GroupID)。 因此, 在建立组播业务的每个单向业务时, 除设置该单 向业务的普通 LSP的输入参数外,还需要增加用于指定该 LSP所属的组播业 务的 GroupID, 以便各个节点根据该 GroupID判断本节点是否已有属于同一 组播业务的 LSP。则 LSP的标识信息除了原有信息之夕卜,还应包括 GroupID, 其中, 该原有信息通常包括: IPv4/IPv6隧道末节点地址、隧道 ID、扩展隧道 ID、 IPv4/IPv6隧道发送者地址和 LSP ID, 且 IPv4/IPv6隧道发送者地址即为 组播业务的首节点的地址。  Based on the above analysis, when creating a multicast service, you need to assign a multicast group number (GroupID) to the multicast service. Therefore, when establishing the unidirectional service of the multicast service, in addition to setting the input parameters of the common LSP of the unidirectional service, the group ID of the multicast service to which the LSP belongs is also required to be added, so that each node according to the The GroupID determines whether the node has an LSP that belongs to the same multicast service. The identification information of the LSP, in addition to the original information, should also include a GroupID, where the original information usually includes: an IPv4/IPv6 tunnel end node address, a tunnel ID, an extended tunnel ID, an IPv4/IPv6 tunnel sender address, and The LSP ID, and the IPv4/IPv6 tunnel sender address is the address of the first node of the multicast service.
GroupID可采用 32位整形, 作为一个对象增加到目前的 Path、 Resv、 PassErr、 ResvErr消息数据结构中。 还应对 GroupID进行设置, 比如, 设置 GroupID为 0时, 表示对应的 LSP不属于组播业务; GroupID为非 0时, 则 表示对应的 LSP属于组播业务,因此可以根据该 GroupID确定两条 LSP是否 属于同一个组播业务。  GroupID can be added to the current Path, Resv, PassErr, and ResvErr message data structures as an object. The group ID should be set. For example, if the group ID is set to 0, the corresponding LSP is not a multicast service. If the group ID is non-zero, the corresponding LSP is a multicast service. Belong to the same multicast service.
在设置了上述 GroupID之后, 各个节点在为组播业务建立单向业务时, 还应执行如图 3所示的处理, 该处理对应以下步骤:  After the above group ID is set, each node should perform the processing shown in Figure 3 when establishing a one-way service for the multicast service. The processing corresponds to the following steps:
步骤 301〜302、根据当前组播业务的 GroupID判断本节点是否已存在标 识信息中包括该 GroupID的 LSP, 如果存在, 则执行步骤 303; 否则, 按照 正常的处理流程建立单向业务。  Steps 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301 301
该步骤中, 正常的业务建立处理流程即为: 为该业务分配 LSP, 并为该 LSP分配源宿时隙, 以及建立交叉连接, 且所建立的 LSP的标识信息中应包 括所述组播业务的 GroupID。 In this step, the normal service establishment process is: allocate an LSP for the service, allocate a source and sink time slot for the LSP, and establish a cross-connection, and the identifier information of the established LSP should be included. The GroupID of the multicast service.
步骤 303〜305、判断该已存在的 LSP的出口链路是否与当前所要建立的 单向业务的出口链路相同, 如果相同, 则在为该单向业务建立 LSP后, 直接 使用该已存在的 LSP的源宿时隙及交叉连接, 即共享源宿时隙, 且不需要建 立交叉连接; 如果不同, 则在为所述单向业务建立 LSP后, 直接使用所述已 存在的 LSP的源时隙, 但需要分配宿时隙, 且需要建立交叉连接。  Steps 303 to 305: determining whether the egress link of the existing LSP is the same as the egress link of the unidirectional service to be established currently. If the LSP is the same, the existing LSP is directly used after the LSP is established for the unidirectional service. Source and sink timeslots and cross-connections of the LSP, that is, the shared source and sink time slots, and the cross-connection is not required to be established; if different, the source of the existing LSP is directly used after the LSP is established for the unidirectional service. Gap, but need to allocate sink slots, and need to establish cross-connections.
通过以上步骤即可在建立 LSP的同时,保证同一组播业务的不同 LSP能 够尽可能地共享时隙。  Through the above steps, it is possible to establish an LSP while ensuring that different LSPs of the same multicast service can share time slots as much as possible.
上述处理要求能够为 ASON 中的所有组播业务分别分配唯一的 GroupIDo  The above processing requirement can assign a unique GroupIDo to all multicast services in ASON.
显然, 如果 ASON中的组播业务非常多, 则一个 GroupID可能无法唯一 对应一种组播业务, 因此在标识组播业务时, 可以为 ASON中同一首节点下 的所有组播业务分别分配唯一的 GroupID, 该首节点即为组播业务的源端入 口节点。 基于这种分配方案, 在执行上述步骤 303之前, 节点还需判断该已 存在的 LSP的首节点是否与当前所要建立的单向业务的首节点相同, 具体可 以根据 LSP标识信息中的 IPv4/IPv6隧道发送者地址进行判断, 如果相同, 则说明该已存在的 LSP与当前所要建立的单向业务属于同一个组播业务, 因 此可以执行步骤 303; 但如果这两个首节点不同, 则说明该已存在的 LSP与 当前所要建立的单向业务虽然具有相同的 GroupID, 但并不属于同一个组播 业务, 因此不能执行步骤 303, 而应按照正常的处理流程来建立该单向业务。  Obviously, if there are many multicast services in the ASON, a GroupID may not be uniquely associated with a multicast service. Therefore, when identifying a multicast service, all multicast services under the same node in the ASON can be assigned uniquely. GroupID, the first node is the source ingress node of the multicast service. Based on the allocation scheme, before the step 303 is performed, the node needs to determine whether the first node of the existing LSP is the same as the first node of the unidirectional service to be established, and may be based on the IPv4/IPv6 in the LSP identification information. The tunnel sender address is judged. If the same, it indicates that the existing LSP belongs to the same multicast service as the current one-way service, so step 303 can be performed; but if the two head nodes are different, the The existing LSP has the same GroupID as the current unidirectional service, but does not belong to the same multicast service. Therefore, step 303 cannot be performed. The unidirectional service should be established according to the normal processing flow.
由以上处理可知, 在 GroupID相同、 首节点相同、 源时隙相同、 入口链 路和出口链路均相同时, 组播业务中的各个单向业务的 LSP共享源宿时隙, 由此可知, 如图 2所示, 四个业务中:  It can be seen from the above that when the GroupID is the same, the first node is the same, the source time slots are the same, and the ingress link and the egress link are the same, the LSPs of the unidirectional services in the multicast service share the source and sink slots. As shown in Figure 2, among the four businesses:
在图 2中①处, 即 A—>B链路, LSP1、 LSP2、 LSP3、 LSP4共用源宿 时隙;  In Figure 1, where 1 is the A->B link, LSP1, LSP2, LSP3, and LSP4 share the source and sink slots;
在图 2中②处, 即 B— >C链路, LSP2、 LSP3、 LSP4共用源宿时隙; 在图 2中③处, 即 C— >D链路, LSP3、 LSP4共用源宿时隙。  In Figure 2, 2, that is, B->C link, LSP2, LSP3, and LSP4 share source and sink slots; in Figure 3, 3, that is, C->D link, LSP3, LSP4 share source and sink slots.
由于还可能存在一些出错的情况, 比如, 假设节点发现当前所要建立的 单向业务的入口链路和入口时隙与已存在的 LSP的入口链路和入口时隙存在 不同的情况, 该不同可以只是入口链路不同, 也可以只是入口时隙不同, 当 然也可以是入口链路和入口时隙均不同, 则不管所要建立的单向业务与已存 在的 LSP的出口链路是否相同, 上述情况在路由组播算法的保证下都不应存 在, 因此该节点在此情况下应结束当前建立单向业务的处理, 当然还可以执 行报错处理。 Since there may be some erroneous situations, for example, it is assumed that the node finds that the ingress link and the ingress slot of the unidirectional service to be established currently exist and the ingress link and the ingress slot of the existing LSP exist. In different cases, the difference may be different only for the ingress link, or only the ingress slot is different. Of course, the ingress link and the ingress slot are different, regardless of the unidirectional service to be established and the exit of the existing LSP. If the link is the same, the above situation should not exist under the guarantee of the routing multicast algorithm. Therefore, the node should end the process of establishing the one-way service in this case, and of course, can perform error processing.
在建立组播业务后, 通常还需要删除该组播业务, 且删除组播业务具体 是分别删除该组播业务中的各个单向业务。  After the multicast service is established, the multicast service is usually deleted, and the unidirectional service in the multicast service is deleted.
本发明方案由于存在多个单向业务的 LSP共享时隙的情况, 因此在节点 根据 RSVP协议发起删除组播业务中的某个单向业务时, 需要根据该单向业 务的 LSP与本节点的其它 LSP是否共享时隙来确定在删除该单向业务的 LSP 的同时, 是否释放时隙, 以及是否删除交叉连接。  The LSP of the present invention is based on the LSP sharing time slot of the unidirectional service. Therefore, when the node initiates the deletion of a unidirectional service in the multicast service according to the RSVP protocol, the LSP of the unidirectional service and the local node are required. Whether other LSPs share time slots to determine whether to release the time slot and whether to delete the cross-connection while deleting the LSP of the one-way service.
下面对该删除情况进行详细描述。 如图 4所示, 该删除处理对应以下步 骤:  The deletion will be described in detail below. As shown in FIG. 4, the deletion process corresponds to the following steps:
步骤 401〜402、 节点在需要删除组播业务的单向业务时, 判断是否存在 标识信息中包括该单向业务的 LSP的标识信息所包含的 GroupID的其它 LSP,, 如果不存在, 则直接按照正常情况进行删除, 即删除该单向业务的 LSP、 释 放源宿时隙及删除交叉连接; 否则, 执行步骤 403。  Steps 401 to 402: When the node needs to delete the unidirectional service of the multicast service, it determines whether there are other LSPs of the GroupID included in the identification information of the LSP including the unidirectional service in the identification information, and if not, directly follow the LSP. If the LSP is deleted, the LSP of the unidirectional service is deleted, the source and sink slots are released, and the cross-connection is deleted. Otherwise, step 403 is performed.
步骤 403〜405、进一步判断该单向业务是否与所存在的其它 LSP具有相 同的出口链路, 如果是, 则不用释放源宿时隙, 也不用删除该交叉连接, 但 需要删除该单向业务的 LSP; 否则, 只释放宿时隙, 而不释放源时隙, 但需 要删除对应的交叉连接, 并删除该待删除的 LSP。  Steps 403 to 405, further determining whether the unidirectional service has the same egress link as the other LSPs existing. If yes, the source and sink slots are not released, and the cross-connection is not deleted, but the one-way service needs to be deleted. LSP; otherwise, only the slot is released, but the source slot is not released, but the corresponding cross-connection needs to be deleted, and the LSP to be deleted is deleted.
通过以上处理实现对组播业务的 LSP的删除。  The LSP deletion of the multicast service is implemented through the above processing.
如前所述, GroupID可能可以唯一地标识 ASON中的某一个组播业务, 也可能同时标识 ASON中的多个组播业务。 如果是前一种情况, 则可以直接 执行图 4所示的流程。 如果是后一种情况, 则在执行上述步骤 403, 即执行 判断是否具有相同的出口链路之前, 还应判断该单向业务与所存在的其它 LSP是否具有相同的首节点, 如果是, 则再执行步骤 403的判断处理; 否则, 应直接按照正常情况进行删除, 即刪除该单向业务的 LSP、 释放源宿时隙及 删除交叉连接。 在删除组播业务时, 同样可能存在一些出错的情况, 比如, 假设节点通 过判断发现待删除的单向业务的入口链路与已存在的其它 LSP的入口链路, 不同,和 /或待删除的单向业务的入口时隙与已存在的其它 LSP的入口链路不 同, 不管出口链路是否相同, 这种情况在路由组播算法的保证下都不应存在, 因此该节点可以结束当前的删除单向业务的处理,当然还可以执行报错处理。 As mentioned above, the GroupID may uniquely identify a certain multicast service in the ASON, and may also identify multiple multicast services in the ASON. If it is the former case, the flow shown in Figure 4 can be directly executed. If the latter case is performed, before performing the above step 403, that is, whether to determine whether the same egress link is present, whether the unidirectional service and the other LSPs existing have the same head node, and if so, Then, the determination process of step 403 is performed; otherwise, the deletion is performed according to the normal situation, that is, the LSP of the one-way service is deleted, the source and sink time slots are released, and the cross-connection is deleted. When deleting a multicast service, there may be some erroneous situations. For example, it is assumed that the node finds that the ingress link of the unidirectional service to be deleted is different from the ingress link of other existing LSPs, and/or is to be deleted. The ingress slot of the unidirectional service is different from the ingress link of other existing LSPs. Regardless of whether the egress link is the same, this situation should not exist under the guarantee of the routing multicast algorithm, so the node can end the current Deleting the processing of one-way services, of course, can also perform error handling.
虽然通过实施例描绘了本发明, 但本领域普通技术人员知道, 在不脱离 本发明的精神和实质的情况下, 就可使本发明有许多变形和变化, 本发明的 范围由所附的权利要求来限定。  While the invention has been described by the embodiments of the invention in the embodiments of the invention Request to limit.

Claims

权利 要 求 书 Claim
1.一种自动交换光网络中实现组播业务的方法, 其特征在于, 为组播业 务分配组播组号 GroupID, 该方法还包括以下步骤: A method for implementing a multicast service in an automatic switched optical network, characterized in that a multicast group number GroupID is allocated for a multicast service, and the method further comprises the following steps:
a. 自动交换光网络 ASON中的节点在为组播业务建立单向业务时, 判断 本节点是否已存在标识信息中包括当前组播业务的 GroupID的 LSP, 如果不存 在, 则执行步骤 b, 否则, 执行步骤 c;  If the node in the automatic switching optical network ASON establishes a unidirectional service for the multicast service, it determines whether the LSP of the current multicast service group ID exists in the identity information. If not, execute step b. Otherwise, , performing step c;
b.所述节点为所述单向业务建立 LSP,为该 LSP分配源宿时隙,并建立交 叉连接, 且所建立的 LSP的标识信息中包括所述组播业务的 GroupID, 之后结 束本处理流程;  The node establishes an LSP for the unidirectional service, allocates a source and sink time slot for the LSP, and establishes a cross-connection, and the identifier information of the established LSP includes the GroupID of the multicast service, and then the processing ends. Process;
c所述节点判断所述已存在的 LSP是否与当前所要建立的单向业务的出 口链路相同, 如果相同, 则在为所述单向业务建立 LSP后, 直接使用所述已 存在的 LSP的源宿时隙及交叉连接; 如果不同, 则在为所述单向业务建立 LSP 后, 直接使用所述已存在的 LSP的源时隙, 并分配宿时隙, 以及建立交叉连 接。  The node determines whether the existing LSP is the same as the egress link of the unidirectional service to be established currently. If the LSP is the same, the LSP is directly used after the LSP is established for the unidirectional service. Source and sink time slots and cross-connections; if different, after establishing an LSP for the unidirectional service, directly use the source time slot of the existing LSP, allocate a sink time slot, and establish a cross-connection.
2. 根据权利要求 1所述的方法, 其特征在于, 所述为组播业务分配 GroupID为: 为自动交换光网络中的所有组播业务分别分配唯一的 GroupE The method according to claim 1, wherein the group ID assigned to the multicast service is: assigning a unique GroupE to all multicast services in the automatic switched optical network.
3. 根据权利要求 1所述的方法, 其特征在于, 所述为组播业务分配 GroupID为: 为同一首节点下的所有组播业务分别分配唯一的 GroupID; The method according to claim 1, wherein the group ID assigned to the multicast service is: assigning a unique GroupID to all multicast services under the same first node;
步骤 a中,所述节点在执行步骤 c之前进一步包括:判断所述已存在的 LSP 的首节点是否与当前所要建立的单向业务的首节点相同, 如果是, 则执行步 骤0, 否则, 执行步骤1?。  In step a, before the step c is performed, the node further includes: determining whether the first node of the existing LSP is the same as the first node of the one-way service that is currently established, and if yes, performing step 0, otherwise, performing step 1?.
4.根据权利要求 1至 3中任意一项所述的方法, 其特征在于所述步骤 a中, 所述节点在执行步骤 c之前进一步包括: 判断所述已存在的 LSP的入口链路和 源时隙是否与当前所要建立的单向业务的入口链路和源时隙相同, 如果均相 同, 则执行步骤 c; 如果入口链路不同, 和 /或源时隙不同, 则结束本处理流 程。  The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein in the step a, the node further comprises: determining the ingress link and source of the existing LSP before performing step c Whether the time slot is the same as the ingress link and the source time slot of the unidirectional service to be established currently, if they are all the same, step c is performed; if the ingress link is different, and/or the source time slot is different, the process is terminated.
5.根据权利要求 4所述的方法, 其特征在于, 所述步骤 a中, 所述节点在 确定入口链路不同, 和 /或源时隙不同后, 并在结束本处理流程之前, 进一步 包括: 执行报错处理。 The method according to claim 4, wherein in the step a, after determining that the ingress link is different, and/or the source time slot is different, and before ending the processing flow, the node further Including: Perform error handling.
6.根据权利要求 1所述的方法, 其特征在于, 该方法进一步包括: d. ASON中的节点在删除组播业务的单向业务时,判断本节点是否存在其 它 LSP, 且所述其它 LSP的标识信息中包含的 GroupID与所述单向业务的 LSP 的标识信息中包含的 GroupID相同, 如果不存在, 则执行步骤 e, 否则, 执行 步骤 f;  The method according to claim 1, wherein the method further comprises: d. determining, by the node in the ASON, whether the node has other LSPs when deleting the unidirectional service of the multicast service, and the other LSP The group ID included in the identification information is the same as the GroupID included in the identification information of the LSP of the unidirectional service. If not, step e is performed, otherwise, step f is performed;
e.所述节点直接删除所述单向业务的 LSP,删除该 LSP的源宿时隙及交叉 连接, 并结束本处理流程;  e. The node directly deletes the LSP of the unidirectional service, deletes the source and sink timeslots and cross-connections of the LSP, and ends the processing flow;
f. 所述节点判断所述单向业务与本节点已存在的所述其它 LSP是否具有 相同的出口链路, 如果是, 则只删除所述单向业务的 LSP; 否则, 删除所述 单向业务的 LSP, 且只释放宿时隙及交叉连接。  f. The node determines whether the unidirectional service has the same egress link as the other LSPs already existing on the node, and if yes, deletes only the LSP of the unidirectional service; otherwise, deleting the one-way service The LSP of the service, and only the slot slots and cross-connections are released.
7. 根据权利要求 6所述的方法, 其特征在于, 所述为组播业务分配 GroupID为: 为同一首节点下的所有组播业务分别分配唯一的 GroupID;  The method according to claim 6, wherein the group ID assigned to the multicast service is: assigning a unique GroupID to all multicast services under the same head node;
步骤 d中, 所述节点在执行步骤 前, 进一步包括: 判断本节点所存在 的所述其它 LSP的首节点是否与所述单向业务的首节点相同, 如果相同, 则 执行步骤 f; 否则, 执行步骤6。  In step d, the node, before performing the step, further includes: determining whether the first node of the other LSP existing by the node is the same as the first node of the one-way service, and if yes, performing step f; otherwise, Go to step 6.
8. 根据权利要求 6或 7所述的方法, 其特征在于所述步骤 d中, 所述节点 在执行步骤 £ 前, 进一步包括: 判断本节点所存在的其它 LSP的入口链路和 源时隙是否与所述单向业务的入口链路和源时隙相同, 如果均相同, 则执行 步骤 f; 如果入口链路不同, 和 /或源时隙不同, 则结束本处理流程。  The method according to claim 6 or 7, wherein in the step d, the node further comprises: determining the ingress link and the source time slot of other LSPs existing by the node before performing the step £ Whether it is the same as the ingress link and the source time slot of the unidirectional service, if they are all the same, step f is performed; if the ingress links are different, and/or the source time slots are different, the process flow ends.
9.根据权利要求 8所述的方法, 其特征在于, 所述步骤 d中, 所述节点在 确定入口链路不同, 和 /或源时隙不同后, 并在结束本处理流程之前, 进一步 包括: 执行报错处理。  The method according to claim 8, wherein in the step d, after determining that the ingress link is different, and/or the source time slot is different, and before ending the processing flow, the node further includes : Perform error handling.
10.根据权利要求 1所述的方法, 其特征在于, 所述为组播业务分配的 GroupID为非零值。  The method according to claim 1, wherein the GroupID allocated for the multicast service is a non-zero value.
PCT/CN2006/001212 2005-06-04 2006-06-05 A method for realizing the multicast service in an automatic switch optical network WO2007009335A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN200510035163.4 2005-06-04
CNB2005100351634A CN100531117C (en) 2005-06-04 2005-06-04 Information transmission method of optical network of automatic exchange

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2007009335A1 true WO2007009335A1 (en) 2007-01-25

Family

ID=37484566

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CN2006/001212 WO2007009335A1 (en) 2005-06-04 2006-06-05 A method for realizing the multicast service in an automatic switch optical network

Country Status (2)

Country Link
CN (1) CN100531117C (en)
WO (1) WO2007009335A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101394677B (en) * 2007-09-19 2012-10-03 烽火通信科技股份有限公司 Method and device for verifying link attribute in node of ASON
CN101415131B (en) * 2008-11-28 2011-05-18 北京邮电大学 Self-adapting transmission control method for optical network based on signaling
CN102098591B (en) * 2009-12-11 2013-08-21 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Method for sharing resources in automatic switched optical network (ASON) and service node
CN103491001B (en) * 2012-06-11 2018-03-13 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Layered LSP LSP processing methods, device and gateway node
CN105491558A (en) * 2014-09-18 2016-04-13 北京信威通信技术股份有限公司 Method for generating IPv6 multicast address of cluster group

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20010088047A (en) * 2000-03-10 2001-09-26 윤종용 Method for setting lsp in mpls system
US20030137971A1 (en) * 2002-01-22 2003-07-24 Mark Gibson Telecommunications system and method
WO2004071032A1 (en) * 2003-02-07 2004-08-19 Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation Multicast transfer route setting method, and multicast label switching method for implementing former method
CN1549521A (en) * 2003-05-07 2004-11-24 华为技术有限公司 Method for realizing universal multi-protocol mark exchange in network

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20010088047A (en) * 2000-03-10 2001-09-26 윤종용 Method for setting lsp in mpls system
US20030137971A1 (en) * 2002-01-22 2003-07-24 Mark Gibson Telecommunications system and method
WO2004071032A1 (en) * 2003-02-07 2004-08-19 Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation Multicast transfer route setting method, and multicast label switching method for implementing former method
CN1549521A (en) * 2003-05-07 2004-11-24 华为技术有限公司 Method for realizing universal multi-protocol mark exchange in network

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN100531117C (en) 2009-08-19
CN1874293A (en) 2006-12-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7394772B2 (en) Method of routing point-to-multipoint traffic on an MPLS network
US7570649B2 (en) Forwarding state sharing between multiple traffic paths in a communication network
US7095712B2 (en) Method and apparatus for protection path setup
AU2003264320B2 (en) The system and method for realizing the resource distribution in the communication network
US7710901B2 (en) GMPLS control of ethernet
US7792111B2 (en) Point-to-multipoint for multicast and unicast forwarding
US20080212496A1 (en) Communication network system and signal transmission method between leaf-nodes of multicast tree and node thereof
US10484299B2 (en) Method and apparatus for configuring quality of service
JP5005815B2 (en) Method for establishing a bi-directional point-to-point connection
US7873053B2 (en) Method and apparatus for reserving network resources for pseudo point-to-point connections
CN106982157B (en) Traffic engineering tunnel establishment method and device
JP2003309595A (en) Router and routing method in network
JP3751473B2 (en) Packet relay device
WO2007009335A1 (en) A method for realizing the multicast service in an automatic switch optical network
US20070140233A1 (en) Resource sharing among network
US20080320153A1 (en) Resource Management Device For a Communications Network With Inter-Node Connections Associated With Shared Resource Preemption Rights and Resource Access Priority Rights
EP2898626A1 (en) Method and system for supporting dynamic resource management in a backhaul network
CN109005473B (en) Method, device and system for cooperatively selecting path
WO2013037319A1 (en) Bandwidth resource management method, device and system for label switched path
KR100310302B1 (en) Method of multicast label switched path establishment using multicast label in mpls network
WO2013013577A1 (en) Method, device and system for managing bandwidth resource of label switched path
JP2001285356A (en) Device for connecting of label switch pass, method for the same and recording media
CN101692650A (en) Dynamic hose technology based virtual special network user port system and signaling control mechanism thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 06742098

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1