WO2006103379A1

WO2006103379A1 - Vented teat

Info

Publication number: WO2006103379A1
Application number: PCT/GB2005/001264
Authority: WO
Inventors: Ilan Zadik Samson
Original assignee: Ilan Zadik Samson
Priority date: 2005-03-31
Filing date: 2005-03-31
Publication date: 2006-10-05
Also published as: KR101149112B1; JP4745384B2; US20100163508A1; ATE523184T1; CN101175463A; IL186329A; DK1863427T3; EP1863427B1; CN101175463B; IL186329A0; ES2372500T3; JP2008534101A; CA2603355A1; PL1863427T3; AU2005329741B2; AU2005329741A1; US8640897B2; CA2603355C; KR20080011656A; EP1863427A1

Abstract

A teat for a feeding bottle has a one-way valve 16 located remotely from the nipple of the teat to allow air to enter the feeding bottle to replace liquid sucked out of the bottle through the nipple while preventing liquid from leaking from the bottle. The one-way valve 16 comprises an inwardly-oriented depression having opposed mutually inclined sidewalls lea and 16b meeting along a ridge having a slit. In the invention, when undeflected, the side walls lea and 16b make line contact with one another at the ridge and the thickness of the side walls is less than 0.4 mm so that, when acted upon by an increased pressure in the feeding bottle, the side walls collapse against one another and make sealing contact along a surface that extends from the ridge in the direction away from it.

Description

VENTED TEAT

The present invention relates to a teat for a feeding bottle.

Babies can suckle from their mother' s breast continuously without the need to vent. For this reason, when young babies move on to sucking from a feeding bottle teat they are not yet aware of the need to vent. If the baby does not stop sucking to allow air to enter the feeding bottle, the pressure in the bottle drops and the resulting counter suction makes it more difficult for the baby to suck liquid out of the bottle. Apart from frustrating the baby's efforts to drink, this has two more serious effects. First, with the need to apply an increasing suction force, the baby's lips become unable to make an effective seal around the teat and the baby ends up swallowing air with the liquid and the trapped gas gives the baby colic. Second, the dome of the teat collapses inwards, making it difficult for the baby's lips to maintain a grip on the nipple.

Numerous attempts have been made to vent feeding bottle teats. Teats are made from a resilient material such as rubber or a silicone and previous attempts usually involved making a small slit or hole somewhere in the teat at a location remote from the nipple. It is important with any venting opening that it should not allow liquid to leak out of the feeding bottle and a trade-off then exists between the ease of opening for venting and leak-prevention.

It is common practice to prevent leakage by making the slits/holes very small, and in thick walls. Specifically, the leak-prevention is made to rely on the strength of the walls to maintain the slit/holes in a closed position in the absence of suction. A common improvement involves placing the slit at the apex of an inwardly-oriented depression such that the pressure of liquid trying to leak out would tend to force the lips towards each other.

Such prior art attempts have not proved entirely successful for the following reasons. The thickness of the valve material causes the need of a substantial suction level to exist in the bottle before the slit opens for venting and even then it hinders the sufficient opening for adequate venting air flow rate. The thickness of the valve material also limits the transmission of inside pressure to aid the closing of the slit. The usual small size of the inward depression does not have sufficient area over which to build up into an effective closing force, and the short length of the slit - to limit leakage - is then also too small to afford sufficient opening for adequate venting.

To overcome the above problems DE 29906849 describes a teat for a feeding bottle having a one-way valve located in the wall of the teat to allow air to enter the feeding bottle to^' replace liquid sucked out of the bottle through the nipple while preventing liquid from leaking from the bottle, wherein the one-way valve comprises an inwardly- oriented depression having opposed mutually inclined side walls that, at their inward end, are bent over towards each other to meet along a slit. This arrangement causes the weight of any liquid within the bottle, while attempting to escape through the valve, to urge the edges of lips of the slit, and the edges only, into a closed state. The reason for this is the known practice of concentrating sealing regions onto a line, known as (and cited as such in DE 29906849) a "lip seal".

A disadvantage of the above proposal is that the reliance on a lip seal makes it susceptible to particles in the liquid becoming lodged between these lips, risking undesirable leakage.

The present invention seeks therefore to provide a teat that is tolerant of small impurities and in which prevention of leakage through the venting valve does not rely on the strength of the walls and the smallness of the slit to maintain the opening closed in the absence of suction. As a result it makes it possible to enhance both the ease of venting as well as the sealing efficiency rather than one at the expense of the other.

According to the present invention, there is provided a teat for a feeding bottle having a one-way valve located remotely from the nipple of the teat to allow air to enter the feeding bottle to replace liquid sucked out of the bottle through the nipple while preventing liquid from leaking from the bottle, wherein the one-way valve comprises an inwardly-oriented depression having opposed mutually inclined side walls meeting along a ridge having a slit, characterised in that when undeflected the side walls make line contact with one another at the ridge and in that the thickness of the side walls is less than 0.4 mm whereby when acted upon by an increased pressure in the feeding bottle the side walls collapse against one another and make sealing contact on an interface surface that extends from the ridge in the direction away from it.

In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the depth of the depression is in excess of 4 mm and the slit has a length exceeding 3 mm.

By forming the one-way valve in the preferred embodiment of the invention with at least one large area (4 mm x 4 mm) thin-section (less than 0.4 mm thick) side wall and providing a long (3 mm) slit along the ridge of the depression, a force is generated by the weight of the liquid within the bottle attempting to escape through the valve, which collapses the side walls towards one another and maintains the slit in the ridge closed. The greater the water pressure, the greater the force applied to maintain the valve closed. Thus, the valve does not rely on the resilience of its own walls to remain shut, nor on the smallness of the slit to minimize leaks, but on the pressure of the liquid trying to escape.

When the pressure of the liquid is below the ambient atmospheric pressure (as the infant is sucking on the teat) the thinness of the side walls allows them to separate readily to open the slit and allow air to enter the bottle, this being further assisted by the slit being long. In this way, a build up of negative pressure within the bottle is avoided. As a result, while still preventing leakage through the valve, liquid can be sucked out of the bottle easily and continuously.

The difference between the present invention and the prior art is not merely a matter of size or dimensions but the invention relies on a different principle for its operation. This can best be appreciated from noting that, in common prior art, the sealing properties could only be enhanced be reducing the venting ability and vice versa and a compromise needed to be reached between sealing and venting. By contrast, in the present invention, there is no need for any such compromise as the venting can be improved while enhancing the sealing, thereby allowing both functions to be optimised.

It should be noted though, that the size of such a valve cannot be increased indefinitely because if it were too large, e.g. a base area in excess of 1 cm² (particularly with the thin walls) there is a risk of the excessive deformation of the valve under pressure, and even its inversion. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the depression has a tent-like configuration with two flat generally rectangular or trapezoidal side walls meeting along the slit ridge and two generally triangular end walls.

The invention will now be described further, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

Figure 1 is a partial section through a vented teat of the invention,

Figure 2 is a plan view from above of a detail of the teat of Figure 1 showing the venting valve,

Figure 3 is a section taken along the line III-III in Figure 2, Figure 4 is a section taken along the line IV-IV in Figure 2 with the side walls of the valve in their undeflected state,

Figure 5 is a section similar to that of Figure 4 showing the effect of increased pressure in the feeding bottle on the side walls of the valve, and

Figure 6 is a section similar to that of Figure 6 demonstrating the ability of the valve seal to function even when small particles are trapped in the sealing surface .

The teat 10 in the drawings has a generally conventional nipple 12 and only the parts of the teat that are concerned with the venting valve are shown in the drawings. As is common, a flange 14 surrounds the base of the teat 10. The flange 14 acts as a sealing ring and, in use, is sandwiched between the top of the feeding bottle and an annular ring that is screwed on to the mouth of the bottle. The bottle and the annular ring are not shown in the drawings because they too are conventional.

The flexible material of which the teat and the venting valve are made may also be conventional being typically a silicone or elastomer that can withstand being chewed and being sterilised without suffering damage or perforation.

The one-way venting valve, which is generally designated 16 in the drawings, has a tent like structure formed by two rectangular or trapezoidal side walls 16a and 16b and two triangular end walls 16c. At the ridge of the tent like structure, the side walls 16a and 16b meet along a slit which opens to let air enter the feeding bottle when the pressure in the bottle is below atmospheric. However, when liquid is pressing on the side walls 16a and 16b, they are urged towards one another to close the slit and prevent the liquid from escaping.

In the present invention, the thickness of one or both of the side walls is less than 0.4 mm, preferably less than 0.3 mm. This small thickness makes the side wall(s) supple, allowing it to deform readily to open and close the valve. The responsiveness of the valve to pressure differences is enhanced by increasing the area of the side walls, this being achieved in the preferred embodiment of the invention by increasing the depth of the depression to 4 mm or more and increasing the length of the slit to 3 mm or more.

The side walls 16a and 16b need not have a uniform thickness along their entire height but they may taper towards the ridge, as shown in Fig. 4. In this case, the thickness of the side walls could start with more than 0.3 or even more than 0.4 at the bottom, and near the slit may be even less than even 0.3 mm.

It is clear that such a construction will allow the slit to open, to vent the bottle, under very low suction. However, the leak-prevention in the absence of suction (it being only in the absence of suction that leaks can occur) is now afforded not by the strength of the side walls but because their thinness and large size allow them to respond to the pressure acted on them by the liquid that tries to escape, so as to cave in as shown in Figs. 5 and 6.

In detail, three things happen that enhance the sealing efficiency. First, the large size of the side walls translates the pressure of the liquid into a larger force. Second, the thinness of the side walls makes it more responsive to being pushed closed. Third, the size of the walls make them more bendable under a given force.

The caving in of the side walls caused by the three effects described above results in the seal being extended from a line seal (Fig. 4) to a surface seal (Figs 5 and 6) . In this respect it should be noted that the gap between the side walls tapers continuously without steps until they meet, so that the gap can be closed continuously to spread the sealing contact over an area as the side walls collapse. This is to be contrasted with the prior art in which the area of the lips that make sealing contact with one another does not change and only the pressure between the lips is increased. If, in the prior art, a particle is caught in a part of a lip seal, leakage will occur. However, in the present invention, as shown in Fig. 6, small particles can be tolerated because a seal with be established around them.

The described valve can be located anywhere on the teat as long as it is not too close to the nipple. The preferred locations are near the inside radius of the annular flange 14 at the base of the teat or in the side-wall of the teat.

Claims

1. A teat for a feeding bottle having a one-way valve located remotely from the nipple of the teat to allow air to enter the feeding bottle to replace liquid sucked out of the bottle through the nipple while preventing liquid from leaking from the bottle, wherein the one-way valve comprises an inwardly-oriented depression having opposed mutually inclined side walls meeting along a ridge having a slit, characterised in that when undeflected the side walls make line contact with one another at the ridge and in that the thickness of the side walls is less than 0.4 mm whereby when acted upon by an increased pressure in the feeding bottle the side walls collapse against one another and make sealing contact on an interface surface that extends from the ridge in the direction away from it.

2. A teat as claimed in claim 1, wherein at least one of the side walls of the depression has a thickness not exceeding 0.3 mm.

3. A teat as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein the side walls of the depression are tapered in thickness, having a minimum thickness not exceeding 0.4 mm adjacent the ridge.

4. A teat as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the depression has a depth of at least 4 mm.

5. A teat as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the line of contact of he side walls at the ridge has a length is in excess of 3 mm.

6. A teat as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the depression has a tent-like configuration with two flat generally rectangular or trapezoidal side walls meeting at the ridge and two generally triangular end walls.