WO2006098639A1 - Method for cancelling interference - Google Patents

Method for cancelling interference Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2006098639A1
WO2006098639A1 PCT/NO2006/000100 NO2006000100W WO2006098639A1 WO 2006098639 A1 WO2006098639 A1 WO 2006098639A1 NO 2006000100 W NO2006000100 W NO 2006000100W WO 2006098639 A1 WO2006098639 A1 WO 2006098639A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
base station
auxiliary
antenna
signal
received
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/NO2006/000100
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Ole GRØNDALEN
Original Assignee
Telenor Asa
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Telenor Asa filed Critical Telenor Asa
Publication of WO2006098639A1 publication Critical patent/WO2006098639A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04B—TRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
    • H04B7/04—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
    • H04B7/08—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the receiving station
    • H04B7/0837—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the receiving station using pre-detection combining
    • H04B7/0842—Weighted combining

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to broadband radio access systems for wireless transfer of data, and in particular a method and system for reducing base station to base station interference in TDD based radio access systems.
  • P-MP point-to- multipoint
  • the client terminals are equipped with directive antennas (narrow opening angle) that transmit (and receive) the major part of its energy in a narrow beam pointing towards the base stations.
  • the base stations are equipped with antennas that transmit (and receive) signals in a wide sector (e.g. sectors of 60 or 90 degrees) for reaching all client terminals in the sector. Commonly, one antenna is used both for transmitting and receiving signals, both at the base station and the client terminal.
  • a prerequisite for the success of broadband access is that the solution is sufficiently cost-effective. As spectrum has risen in cost, the frequencies must be exploited efficiently. If the spectral efficiency can be improved, the number of simultaneous clients may be increased and the cost per client reduced.
  • time division duplex instead of frequency division duplex (FDD) is one of the most effective ways of increasing the spectral efficiency in P-MP radio networks.
  • frequency division duplex signals are transmitted downstream (from base station towards clients) and upstream (from clients towards base station) on different frequencies, while in time division duplex signals are transmitted on one frequency but in different time slots.
  • the biggest advantage of using TDD is that the share of spectral resources used for upstream and downstream traffic, respectively, can easily be changed by changing the length of the time slots. Thus, the system may optimize the distribution of spectral resources to maximize the total capacity. In FDD systems it is normally not possibly to change the spectral resources for upstream and downstream traffic.
  • a major challenge in TDD based systems is to control interference between base stations.
  • interference between base stations can not occur, as the base stations are transmitting and receiving on different frequencies.
  • TDD based systems on the other hand, the base stations are transmitting and receiving on the same frequencies.
  • the signals from the base stations will cover large areas due to the large opening angles of the antennas, and the stations will also receive signals from the same large areas.
  • the interference in question is both co-channel and adjacent channel interference .
  • the present invention provides a new method for overcoming the problems discussed above by exploiting the fact that both the signal and the interference sources are under the control of the network operator (s).
  • the invention relates to a method for cancelling interference between base stations in a Time Division Duplex radio access system, said method including the following steps: transmitting and receiving signals in a first base station to and from a number of client terminals with a main antenna covering a sector around said first base station, receiving a reference signal from a second interfering base station over an auxiliary channel, and subtracting the reference signal from the signal received by the main antenna, as claimed in the appended claim 1.
  • the invention also relates to a base station in a Time Division Duplex radio access system, said base station including a main antenna, the base station further including an auxiliary antenna, said base station being arranged to subtract a reference signal received from an interfering base station by the auxiliary antenna from a signal received by the main antenna, as covered in the appended claim 6.
  • Fig. 1 is an overview of the inventive system for interference cancellation
  • Fig. 2 shows some more detail of a receiver setup that may be used in a system according to the invention
  • Fig. 3 illustrates the principle of an adaptive filter as used in the invention.
  • interferer will be used for the interfering base station and the term "victim" for the base station suffering from the interference.
  • the adaptive interference cancellation is performed by the victim 2 receiving an additional signal that is correlated with the received interference. This may be done by sending a copy of the signal emitted by the interferer 1 to the victim 2 over a copper cable, an optical fibre or by using a free space optic system.
  • a more feasible alternative is the victim using an auxiliary antenna with a narrow lobe (high directivity) for receiving a high quality version of the signal emitted by the interferer. The high quality version of the signal emitted by the interferer is then used by the victim for estimating and reducing the interference component in the signal received by the main antenna. This solution is illustrated in Fig. 1.
  • the signal received by the victim' s main antenna 3 will include a desired upstream signal from a client terminal, an undesired and distorted (mainly due to multipath transmission) signal from the interfering base station 1, as well as thermal noise and other interference.
  • the signal received on the auxiliary antenna 4 will include a practically undisturbed signal from the interfering base station, thermal noise and other interfering signals.
  • this antenna has a small opening angle (high directivity) , the interfering signal will be received nearly undisturbed (negligible multipath) and with a good signal-to-noise ratio .
  • the signal from the auxiliary antenna 4 is input to an adaptive filter 5.
  • the output from this filter should be an estimate of the signal component in the signal received in the main antenna 3 originated by the interfering base station 1.
  • the taps (coefficients) in the adaptive filter are determined from the signal received by the two antennas.
  • the tap weights may be determined continuously or based on particular pilot symbols (or both) .
  • Fig. 2 shows the receiver system in more detail.
  • the signals received by the main antenna 3 and the auxiliary antenna 4 are processed in identical receivers.
  • the receivers shown in the figure are direct conversion receivers, even though any type of receiver may be used.
  • the signals received by the antennas 3, 4 are filtered in bandpass filters 11, 17, converted to baseband in mixers 12, 18, again filtered in lowpass filters 13, 19 and digitized in A/D converters 14, 20.
  • the mixers 12, 18 share a common local oscillator 16.
  • the signal in the auxiliary antenna path is filtered in a filter 21 with n taps, whereupon the signal is subtracted from the main antenna signal in subtractor 15.
  • the filter taps w H (n) for the filter 21 is determined in optimizer 22 by comparing the signals d(n) in the main path and u(n) in the auxiliary path.
  • the filter 21 is illustrated in Fig. 3.
  • the tap weights may be determined using various algorithms.
  • LMS Least Mean Square
  • the received interfering signal will be a sum of a number of copies of the emitted interfering signal in which each copy has different amplitude, time delay and phase.
  • the number of "copies", their amplitude, time delay and phase will vary with time as both the vegetation and reflecting objects may move.
  • the filter coefficients in the adaptive filter must be updated often.
  • Each set of filter coefficients must then be computed based on short observation times (few samples) , and the accuracy will turn out low.
  • the filter coefficients must be determined in a more efficient way.
  • the filter coefficients may be calculated in a more efficient way by using one or both of the following methods :
  • the victim instructing ⁇ X its" client terminals not to send in certain time slots. Then, the victim will receive only the interfering signal (and some noise from other sources) .
  • the filter coefficients may then be determined with great accuracy from a small number of samples. How frequently the victim should add such time slots depends on how rapidly the channel between interferer and victim is changing.
  • the interferer adds reference signals in certain time slots of the emitted signal.
  • the reference signals must be feasible for channel estimation.
  • the victim knows which reference signals that are emitted and in which time slots they are sent.
  • the reference signals are designed for channel estimation, they may provide much better information on the channel over the bandwidth of interest than an arbitrary signal of identical length (duration) .
  • the outcome is that the filter coefficients of the adaptive filter can be determined with greater efficiency.
  • the interferer may add reference signals according to a fixed pattern, or he can arrange the frequency by which the reference signals are emitted and which reference signals to be utilized, dependent on how rapidly the channel between interferer and victim is changing.

Abstract

A method for cancelling interference between base stations in a Time Division Duplex radio access system, by transmitting and receiving signals in a first base station (2) to and from a number of client terminals with a main antenna (3) covering a sector around said first base station (2), receiving a signal from a second interfering base station (1) with an auxiliary narrow beam antenna (4), filtering said signal in an adaptive filter and determining filter coefficients in said adaptive filter from the signals received by the main and auxiliary antennas, and subtracting the signal received by the auxiliary antenna (4) from the signal received by the main antenna (3).

Description

METHOD FOR CANCELLING INTERFERENCE
Field of the invention
The present invention relates to broadband radio access systems for wireless transfer of data, and in particular a method and system for reducing base station to base station interference in TDD based radio access systems.
Technical background
Broadband radio access is expected to both complement and become an important competitor to broadband access systems based on copper, fibre and cable. The most common architecture of such systems is so called point-to- multipoint (P-MP) , in which there is a network of base stations, each base station servicing a number of clients. The client terminals are equipped with directive antennas (narrow opening angle) that transmit (and receive) the major part of its energy in a narrow beam pointing towards the base stations. The base stations, on the other hand, are equipped with antennas that transmit (and receive) signals in a wide sector (e.g. sectors of 60 or 90 degrees) for reaching all client terminals in the sector. Commonly, one antenna is used both for transmitting and receiving signals, both at the base station and the client terminal.
A prerequisite for the success of broadband access is that the solution is sufficiently cost-effective. As spectrum has soared in cost, the frequencies must be exploited efficiently. If the spectral efficiency can be improved, the number of simultaneous clients may be increased and the cost per client reduced.
Using time division duplex (TDD) instead of frequency division duplex (FDD) is one of the most effective ways of increasing the spectral efficiency in P-MP radio networks. In frequency division duplex, signals are transmitted downstream (from base station towards clients) and upstream (from clients towards base station) on different frequencies, while in time division duplex signals are transmitted on one frequency but in different time slots. The biggest advantage of using TDD is that the share of spectral resources used for upstream and downstream traffic, respectively, can easily be changed by changing the length of the time slots. Thus, the system may optimize the distribution of spectral resources to maximize the total capacity. In FDD systems it is normally not possibly to change the spectral resources for upstream and downstream traffic.
A major challenge in TDD based systems is to control interference between base stations. In FDD based systems, interference between base stations can not occur, as the base stations are transmitting and receiving on different frequencies. In TDD based systems on the other hand, the base stations are transmitting and receiving on the same frequencies. The signals from the base stations will cover large areas due to the large opening angles of the antennas, and the stations will also receive signals from the same large areas. Thus, there is a large probability of a transmitting base station interfering with an adjacent base station receiving signals. The interference in question is both co-channel and adjacent channel interference .
Existing solutions for preventing interference is mainly based on allocating different frequencies to base stations that may possibly interfere. Another solution is to synchronize the network such that all base stations switch to the same modus (receiving or transmitting) simultaneously. However, then it is only possible to adjust the share between downstream and upstream capacity collectively, and not individually for each base station. This will severely reduce the capacity and flexibility of the system. Thus, there exists a need for a method of controlling the interference level between base stations in a TDD network while preserving the flexibility of adjusting the spectrum use in individual base stations.
From adaptive filter theory, it is well known that interference might be reduced if it is possible to obtain an auxiliary signal that is correlated with the interference [Simon Haykin, "Adaptive Filter Theory", 2nd ed. 1991 Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632] . This method is for example used for echo cancellation in telephony systems .
But this method can not be employed directly in the P-MP radio access case due to the temporal characteristics of the physical channel between the antennas of two base stations .
Summary of the invention
The present invention provides a new method for overcoming the problems discussed above by exploiting the fact that both the signal and the interference sources are under the control of the network operator (s).
In particular, the invention relates to a method for cancelling interference between base stations in a Time Division Duplex radio access system, said method including the following steps: transmitting and receiving signals in a first base station to and from a number of client terminals with a main antenna covering a sector around said first base station, receiving a reference signal from a second interfering base station over an auxiliary channel, and subtracting the reference signal from the signal received by the main antenna, as claimed in the appended claim 1. The invention also relates to a base station in a Time Division Duplex radio access system, said base station including a main antenna, the base station further including an auxiliary antenna, said base station being arranged to subtract a reference signal received from an interfering base station by the auxiliary antenna from a signal received by the main antenna, as covered in the appended claim 6.
Advantageous embodiments of the invention appear from the associated dependent claims.
Brief description of the drawings
The invention will now be described in detail in reference to the appended drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 is an overview of the inventive system for interference cancellation,
Fig. 2 shows some more detail of a receiver setup that may be used in a system according to the invention,
Fig. 3 illustrates the principle of an adaptive filter as used in the invention.
Detailed description
In the following description the term "interferer" will be used for the interfering base station and the term "victim" for the base station suffering from the interference.
The adaptive interference cancellation is performed by the victim 2 receiving an additional signal that is correlated with the received interference. This may be done by sending a copy of the signal emitted by the interferer 1 to the victim 2 over a copper cable, an optical fibre or by using a free space optic system. A more feasible alternative is the victim using an auxiliary antenna with a narrow lobe (high directivity) for receiving a high quality version of the signal emitted by the interferer. The high quality version of the signal emitted by the interferer is then used by the victim for estimating and reducing the interference component in the signal received by the main antenna. This solution is illustrated in Fig. 1.
The signal received by the victim' s main antenna 3 will include a desired upstream signal from a client terminal, an undesired and distorted (mainly due to multipath transmission) signal from the interfering base station 1, as well as thermal noise and other interference.
The signal received on the auxiliary antenna 4 will include a practically undisturbed signal from the interfering base station, thermal noise and other interfering signals. As this antenna has a small opening angle (high directivity) , the interfering signal will be received nearly undisturbed (negligible multipath) and with a good signal-to-noise ratio .
The signal from the auxiliary antenna 4 is input to an adaptive filter 5. The output from this filter should be an estimate of the signal component in the signal received in the main antenna 3 originated by the interfering base station 1. The taps (coefficients) in the adaptive filter are determined from the signal received by the two antennas. The tap weights may be determined continuously or based on particular pilot symbols (or both) .
Fig. 2 shows the receiver system in more detail. The signals received by the main antenna 3 and the auxiliary antenna 4 are processed in identical receivers. The receivers shown in the figure are direct conversion receivers, even though any type of receiver may be used. The signals received by the antennas 3, 4 are filtered in bandpass filters 11, 17, converted to baseband in mixers 12, 18, again filtered in lowpass filters 13, 19 and digitized in A/D converters 14, 20. The mixers 12, 18 share a common local oscillator 16. The signal in the auxiliary antenna path is filtered in a filter 21 with n taps, whereupon the signal is subtracted from the main antenna signal in subtractor 15. The filter taps wH(n) for the filter 21 is determined in optimizer 22 by comparing the signals d(n) in the main path and u(n) in the auxiliary path.
The filter 21 is illustrated in Fig. 3. In principle, the filter includes a series of delay elements Z"1. Different weights w(n), n=0 - M-I are applied to the input signal u(n) and each delayed signal before the weighted signals are summed into output signal y(n) .
The tap weights may be determined using various algorithms. An example is the Least Mean Square (LMS) adaptation algorithm:
w(0)=0
y (n) =wH (n) u (n)
e(n)=d(n) -y (n)
w (n+1) =w (n)+μ*u(n)»e*(n)
where underscore refers to a vector variable, * means complex conjugated, the superscript H means "Hermitian transpose" and the parameter μ is the step size (1/ μ representing the memory of the LMS algorithm) .
However, the signal emitted by the interferer 1 will be reflected by various objects and pass through vegetation before being received by the victim's main antenna 3. The received interfering signal will be a sum of a number of copies of the emitted interfering signal in which each copy has different amplitude, time delay and phase. The number of "copies", their amplitude, time delay and phase will vary with time as both the vegetation and reflecting objects may move.
When the variations are rapid, the filter coefficients in the adaptive filter must be updated often. Each set of filter coefficients must then be computed based on short observation times (few samples) , and the accuracy will turn out low. In such cases, in order for the interference cancellation to work, the filter coefficients must be determined in a more efficient way.
The filter coefficients may be calculated in a more efficient way by using one or both of the following methods :
• The victim instructing ΛXits" client terminals not to send in certain time slots. Then, the victim will receive only the interfering signal (and some noise from other sources) . The filter coefficients may then be determined with great accuracy from a small number of samples. How frequently the victim should add such time slots depends on how rapidly the channel between interferer and victim is changing.
• The interferer adds reference signals in certain time slots of the emitted signal. The reference signals must be feasible for channel estimation. The victim knows which reference signals that are emitted and in which time slots they are sent. As the reference signals are designed for channel estimation, they may provide much better information on the channel over the bandwidth of interest than an arbitrary signal of identical length (duration) . The outcome is that the filter coefficients of the adaptive filter can be determined with greater efficiency.
The interferer may add reference signals according to a fixed pattern, or he can arrange the frequency by which the reference signals are emitted and which reference signals to be utilized, dependent on how rapidly the channel between interferer and victim is changing.

Claims

C l a i m s
1. A method for cancelling interference between base stations in a Time Division Duplex based radio access system, said method including the following steps:
transmitting and receiving signals in a first base station (2) to and from a number of client terminals with a main antenna (3) covering a sector around said first base station (2) ,
characterized in receiving an auxiliary signal from a second interfering base station (1) over an auxiliary channel, and
subtracting the auxiliary signal from the signal received by the main antenna (3) .
2. A method as claimed in claim 1, in which said auxiliary signal is received over a cable link.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1, in which said auxiliary signal is received over an optical fibre link.
4. A method as claimed in claim 1, in which said auxiliary signal is received over a free space optical link.
5. A method as claimed in claim 1, in which said auxiliary signal is received with an auxiliary narrow beam antenna (4 ) .
6. A method as claimed in claim 5, said method including the additional steps of filtering the auxiliary signal received by the auxiliary antenna (4) in an adaptive filter (5) and determining filter coefficients in said adaptive filter from the signals received by the main (3) and auxiliary (4) antennas.
7. A method as claimed in claim 6, said method including the step of the first base station (2) instructing said client terminals not to send signals in some time slots.
8. A method as claimed in claim 6 or 7, said method including the step of said second base station (2) including reference signals in some time slots when transmitting .
9. A method as claimed in claim 8, in which the reference signals are transmitted according to a predefined pattern.
10. A base station in a Time Division Duplex radio access system, said base station (2) including a main antenna (3),
characterized in the base station further including an auxiliary antenna (4), said base station being arranged to subtract an auxiliary signal received by the auxiliary antenna (4) from an interfering base station (1) from a signal received by the main antenna (3) .
11. A base station as claimed in claim 10, said base station (2) further including an adaptive filter (5) arranged to filter the auxiliary signal received by the auxiliary antenna (4) before it is subtracted from the signal received on the main antenna (3) .
PCT/NO2006/000100 2005-03-16 2006-03-16 Method for cancelling interference WO2006098639A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NO20051366 2005-03-16
NO20051366A NO20051366L (en) 2005-03-16 2005-03-16 Procedure for canceling interference

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2006098639A1 true WO2006098639A1 (en) 2006-09-21

Family

ID=35267029

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/NO2006/000100 WO2006098639A1 (en) 2005-03-16 2006-03-16 Method for cancelling interference

Country Status (2)

Country Link
NO (1) NO20051366L (en)
WO (1) WO2006098639A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2009038507A1 (en) * 2007-09-18 2009-03-26 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) A tdd testing device
GB2496431A (en) * 2011-11-11 2013-05-15 Vodafone Ip Licensing Ltd Mitigating transmit leakage using interference cancellation
AT525174A4 (en) * 2021-12-22 2023-01-15 Frequentis Ag Method of eliminating echoes when playing back radio signals transmitted over a radio channel

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0720405A2 (en) * 1994-12-27 1996-07-03 AT&T Corp. Multiple access cellular communication with dynamic slot allocation and reduced co-channel interference
EP0766416A2 (en) * 1995-09-29 1997-04-02 AT&T Corp. Multiple access cellular communication with signal cancellation to reduce co-channel interference
US20040081121A1 (en) * 2002-08-23 2004-04-29 Navini Networks, Inc. Method and system for multi-cell interference reduction in a wireless communication system

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0720405A2 (en) * 1994-12-27 1996-07-03 AT&T Corp. Multiple access cellular communication with dynamic slot allocation and reduced co-channel interference
EP0766416A2 (en) * 1995-09-29 1997-04-02 AT&T Corp. Multiple access cellular communication with signal cancellation to reduce co-channel interference
US20040081121A1 (en) * 2002-08-23 2004-04-29 Navini Networks, Inc. Method and system for multi-cell interference reduction in a wireless communication system

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
KAZUJI WATANABE ET AL: "EXTRACTION AND REINJECTION-TYPE INTERFERENCE CANCELLER", ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS IN JAPAN, PART I - COMMUNICATIONS, WILEY, HOBOKEN, NJ, US, vol. 75, no. 5, 1 May 1992 (1992-05-01), pages 85 - 97, XP000311471, ISSN: 8756-6621 *

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2009038507A1 (en) * 2007-09-18 2009-03-26 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) A tdd testing device
CN101803249A (en) * 2007-09-18 2010-08-11 爱立信电话股份有限公司 A TDD testing device
GB2496431A (en) * 2011-11-11 2013-05-15 Vodafone Ip Licensing Ltd Mitigating transmit leakage using interference cancellation
GB2496431B (en) * 2011-11-11 2014-11-05 Vodafone Ip Licensing Ltd Coexisting wireless systems
AT525174A4 (en) * 2021-12-22 2023-01-15 Frequentis Ag Method of eliminating echoes when playing back radio signals transmitted over a radio channel
AT525174B1 (en) * 2021-12-22 2023-01-15 Frequentis Ag Method of eliminating echoes when playing back radio signals transmitted over a radio channel

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
NO20051366D0 (en) 2005-03-16
NO20051366L (en) 2006-09-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1252728B1 (en) Linear signal separation using polarization diversity
EP1062711B1 (en) Adaptive cancellation of fixed interferers
US6128486A (en) Reception method and base station receiver
US8706167B2 (en) Communication system for mobile users using adaptive antenna with auxiliary elements
US5481570A (en) Block radio and adaptive arrays for wireless systems
US8155303B2 (en) System and method for cancelling echo
US20070285312A1 (en) Adaptive multi-beam system
MXPA02001462A (en) Baseband processing method based on smart antenna and interference cancellation.
JP2002050991A (en) Configurable antenna equipment, mobile terminal and base station for radio station
JP2008543237A (en) Method for realizing smart antenna based on software radio and system for realizing smart antenna
CN109617566A (en) A kind of self-interference removing method of full duplex satellite relay communication
CN111512558B (en) Full duplex transceiver device
US6628969B1 (en) One-tuner adaptive array
WO2006098639A1 (en) Method for cancelling interference
EP1146665A1 (en) Base station device and radio receiving method
Kamiya et al. Interference rejection for frequency-hopping communication systems using a constant power algorithm
US6564044B1 (en) Simultaneous processing of multiple signals by an adaptive antenna
KR20010067033A (en) Broadband Wireless Repeater for Mobile Communication
WO2001029988A1 (en) Adaptive array antenna device and base station adaptive array antenna device
EP0739554A1 (en) Tetherless access to communication networks
Lee et al. Adaptive antenna arrays and equalization techniques for high bit-rate QAM receivers
KR100914040B1 (en) Interference cancellation apparatus and method for MIMO type wireless repeater
González et al. Blind LMS algorithm with multiple error cost function for self-interference compensation in full-duplex relays
CN101606333A (en) Beamforming system and method
AU1861499A (en) Radio communications receiver and method of receiving radio signals

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DPE1 Request for preliminary examination filed after expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101)
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: RU

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 06716771

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1