WO2006090190A1 - Catalysts - Google Patents

Catalysts Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2006090190A1
WO2006090190A1 PCT/GB2006/050036 GB2006050036W WO2006090190A1 WO 2006090190 A1 WO2006090190 A1 WO 2006090190A1 GB 2006050036 W GB2006050036 W GB 2006050036W WO 2006090190 A1 WO2006090190 A1 WO 2006090190A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
cobalt
catalyst precursor
process according
catalyst
heating
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB2006/050036
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Sharon Bale
Cornelis Martinus Lok
Original Assignee
Johnson Matthey Plc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Johnson Matthey Plc filed Critical Johnson Matthey Plc
Publication of WO2006090190A1 publication Critical patent/WO2006090190A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/70Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper
    • B01J23/74Iron group metals
    • B01J23/75Cobalt
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/70Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper
    • B01J23/89Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with noble metals
    • B01J23/8913Cobalt and noble metals
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J37/00Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
    • B01J37/02Impregnation, coating or precipitation
    • B01J37/0201Impregnation
    • B01J37/0203Impregnation the impregnation liquid containing organic compounds
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J37/00Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
    • B01J37/02Impregnation, coating or precipitation
    • B01J37/0201Impregnation
    • B01J37/0213Preparation of the impregnating solution
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J37/00Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
    • B01J37/02Impregnation, coating or precipitation
    • B01J37/0236Drying, e.g. preparing a suspension, adding a soluble salt and drying
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2/00Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon
    • C10G2/30Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen
    • C10G2/32Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen with the use of catalysts
    • C10G2/33Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen with the use of catalysts characterised by the catalyst used
    • C10G2/331Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen with the use of catalysts characterised by the catalyst used containing group VIII-metals
    • C10G2/332Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen with the use of catalysts characterised by the catalyst used containing group VIII-metals of the iron-group
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J21/00Catalysts comprising the elements, oxides, or hydroxides of magnesium, boron, aluminium, carbon, silicon, titanium, zirconium, or hafnium
    • B01J21/02Boron or aluminium; Oxides or hydroxides thereof
    • B01J21/04Alumina
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J21/00Catalysts comprising the elements, oxides, or hydroxides of magnesium, boron, aluminium, carbon, silicon, titanium, zirconium, or hafnium
    • B01J21/06Silicon, titanium, zirconium or hafnium; Oxides or hydroxides thereof
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J21/00Catalysts comprising the elements, oxides, or hydroxides of magnesium, boron, aluminium, carbon, silicon, titanium, zirconium, or hafnium
    • B01J21/06Silicon, titanium, zirconium or hafnium; Oxides or hydroxides thereof
    • B01J21/08Silica
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J35/00Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J35/30Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their physical properties
    • B01J35/391Physical properties of the active metal ingredient
    • B01J35/392Metal surface area
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J35/00Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J35/40Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by dimensions, e.g. grain size
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J35/00Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J35/60Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their surface properties or porosity
    • B01J35/61Surface area
    • B01J35/61310-100 m2/g
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J35/00Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J35/60Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their surface properties or porosity
    • B01J35/63Pore volume
    • B01J35/633Pore volume less than 0.5 ml/g
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J35/00Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J35/60Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their surface properties or porosity
    • B01J35/63Pore volume
    • B01J35/6350.5-1.0 ml/g
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J35/00Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J35/60Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their surface properties or porosity
    • B01J35/64Pore diameter
    • B01J35/6472-50 nm
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J37/00Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
    • B01J37/16Reducing
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J37/00Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
    • B01J37/16Reducing
    • B01J37/18Reducing with gases containing free hydrogen

Definitions

  • the application relates to supported cobalt catalysts, as well as to the preparation and use thereof.
  • Supported cobalt catalysts wherein the cobalt is in its elemental or reduced state are well known and find use in many reactions involving hydrogen such as hydrogenation reactions, and the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis of hydrocarbons.
  • the activity of the catalysts is believed to be directly proportional to the cobalt surface area of the reduced catalysts (e.g. see lglesia et al, Advances in Catalysis, vol 39, (1993) pages 221-302), but in order to achieve high cobalt surface areas, the cobalt should be well dispersed on the support.
  • Supports that have been used for cobalt catalysts include alumina, silica, titania, alumino silicates and carbon.
  • supported cobalt catalysts suitable for hydrogenation reactions or the Fischer- Tropsch synthesis of hydrocarbons has heretofore typically been by impregnation of soluble cobalt compounds into 'pre-formed' support materials or by precipitation of cobalt compounds from solution in the presence of support powders or extrudates, followed by a heating step and then, prior to use, activation of the catalysts by reduction of the resulting cobalt compounds to elemental, or 'zero-valent' form typically using a hydrogen-containing gas stream.
  • supported cobalt catalysts may be prepared by simultaneous co-precipitation of soluble cobalt and support compounds by addition of a base, followed again by heating and reduction stages.
  • the catalyst reduction stage may be performed in-situ, for example in a hydrogenation or hydrocarbon synthesis reactor, or the catalyst may be pre-reduced by the catalyst manufacturer.
  • the reduction stage whether performed in-situ or by the catalyst manufacturer, often requires considerable quantities of heated reducing gas and comprises a complex and expensive part of the overall catalyst activation process. Accordingly it is desirable to replace/minimise the catalyst reduction stage as a means to generate an active catalyst.
  • the present invention provides a process for the preparation of a supported cobalt catalyst precursor comprising the steps of;
  • the invention further provides a process for the preparation of a supported cobalt catalyst comprising steps (i) to (iii) and further (iv) heating the dried catalyst precursor under non- oxidising conditions so that at least part of the cobalt is converted to its elemental form.
  • the invention further provides catalysts obtainable by the above process and the use of such catalysts for performing hydrogenation reactions and the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis of hydrocarbons.
  • any soluble cobalt ammine carboxylate complex that is able to decompose to form elemental cobalt may be used.
  • carboxylate we mean a complex of cobalt with a carboxylic acid.
  • the cobalt ammine carboxylate is cobalt ammine formate, cobalt ammine acetate or cobalt ammine oxalate, more preferably cobalt ammine formate and cobalt ammine oxalate and most preferably cobalt ammine formate.
  • One or more of the cobalt complexes may be used.
  • GB 439274 states that a cobalt catalyst suitable for the hydrogenation of aliphatic nitriles may be formed by the pyrogenic decomposition of cobalt formate supported on active carbon, silica gel, pumice stone or bleaching earths.
  • cobalt formate has a low solubility in water (1.5% Co by weight at 2O 0 C) making it unsuitable for commercial scale impregnation of support materials because in order to achieve catalytically useful cobalt levels, a large number of separate impregnation steps are required.
  • cobalt ammine carboxylates have considerably improved solubility making them more suitable for catalyst preparation.
  • the cobalt ammine carboxylate may be conveniently formed by reacting the respective cobalt carboxylate, e.g. cobalt (II) formate, with ammonia. This is readily achieved by dissolving the cobalt carboxylate in aqueous ammonia, particularly 30% ammonia. In this way the ammonia is able to complex with the cobalt to form the soluble cobalt ammine carboxylate complex, rather than react with the carboxylic acid to form ammonium carboxylate salts.
  • cobalt carboxylate e.g. cobalt (II) formate
  • cobalt carboxylates such as cobalt oxalate, cobalt formate and cobalt acetate are available commercially from various sources.
  • a cobalt carboxylate can be prepared by reacting a carboxylic acid with cobalt metal or cobalt hydroxide.
  • basic cobalt (II) carbonate may be reacted with the corresponding carboxylic acid (e.g. formic acid, acetic acid or oxalic acid) and then aqueous ammonia added to the resulting cobalt carboxylate.
  • the molar ratio of carboxylic acid to cobalt carbonate should be about 2:1 carboxylic acid : Co for monofunctional carboxylic acids such as formic and acetic acid or may be about 1 :1 for difunctional carboxylic acids such as oxalic acid. Ammonia should preferably be present in excess.
  • the cobalt concentration that may be achieved in water is suitably between 50 g/litre and 200g/litre.
  • the pH of the solution is suitably between 8.0 and 11.0, preferably between 8.5 and
  • buffer salts of the carboxylic acid may be added (e.g. ammonium formate).
  • the support material may comprise alumina, silica, alumino-silicate, titania, zirconia, carbon or other suitable support.
  • the support material comprises silica, alumina, zirconia, titania or combinations of these in powder or shaped, e.g. extruded or pelleted, form.
  • the powdered supports have been subjected to a step of spray drying.
  • Silica supports may be formed from natural sources, e.g. as kieselguhr, may be a pyrogenic or fumed silica or may be a synthetic, e.g. precipitated silica. Precipitated silicas are preferred.
  • the particulate silica may be in the form of a powder or a shaped material, e.g. as extruded, pelleted or granulated silica pieces.
  • Suitable powdered silicas typically have particles of surface weighted mean diameter D[3,2] in the range 3 to 100 ⁇ m.
  • Shaped silicas may have a variety of shapes and particle sizes, depending upon the mould or die used in their manufacture. For example the particles may have a cross-sectional shape which is circular, lobed or other shape and a length from about 1 to > 10 mm.
  • the surface area of the powdered or granular silica is generally in the range 10 - 500 m 2 /g, preferably 100 - 400 m 2 g "1 .
  • the pore volume is generally between about 0.1 and 4 ml/g, preferably 0.2 - 2 ml/g and the mean pore diameter is preferably in the range from ⁇ 2 to about 30 nm.
  • the silica may be mixed with another metal oxide, such as titania or zirconia.
  • the silica may alternatively be present as a coating on a shaped unit, which is preferably of alumina typically as a coating of 0.5 to 5 monolayers of silica upon the underlying support.
  • Titania supports may be formed from natural sources or may be a synthetic, e.g. precipitated titania.
  • the titania may optionally comprise up to 20% by weight of another refractory oxide material, typically silica, alumina or zirconia.
  • the titania may alternatively be present as a coating on a support which is preferably of silica or alumina, for example as a coating of 0.5 to 5 monolayers of titania upon the underlying support. Therefore when we refer to titania we include titania-coated supports.
  • Conventional titania supports suitable for Fischer-Tropsch catalysts are based upon rutile forms of titania, which has superior attrition resistance compared with anatase forms.
  • the BET surface area is generally in the range 10 - 500 m 2 /g, preferably 100 to 400 m 2 /g.
  • the pore volume of the titania is generally between about 0.1 and 4 ml/g, preferably 0.2 to 2 ml/g and the mean pore diameter is preferably in the range from 2 to about 30 nm.
  • zirconia supports may be formed from natural sources or may be a synthetic, e.g. precipitated zirconia.
  • the zirconia may optionally comprise up to 20% by weight of another refractory oxide material, typically silica, alumina or titania.
  • the zirconia may alternatively be present as a coating on a support, which is preferably of silica or alumina, for example as a coating of 0.5 to 5 monolayers of zirconia upon the underlying support. Therefore when we refer to zirconia we include zirconia-coated supports.
  • the support material is preferably a transition alumina.
  • Transition aluminas are defined in "Ullmans Encyklopaedie der ischen Chemie", 4., neubector undessene Auflage, Band 7 (1974), pp.298-299.
  • Suitable transition alumina may be of the gamma-alumina group, for example eta-alumina or chi-alumina. These materials may be formed by calcination of aluminium hydroxides at 400 to 750 0 C and generally have a BET surface area in the range 150 to 400 m 2 /g.
  • the transition alumina may be of the delta-alumina group which includes the high temperature forms such as delta- and theta- aluminas which may be formed by heating a gamma group alumina to a temperature above about 800 0 C.
  • the delta-group aluminas generally have a BET surface area in the range 50 to 150 m 2 /g.
  • the transition alumina may be alpha-alumina.
  • the transition aluminas contain less than 0.5 mole of water per mole Of AI 2 O 3 , the actual amount of water depending on the temperature to which they have been heated.
  • a spinel such as a metal aluminate, may also be used as a support.
  • a suitable transition alumina powder generally has a surface-weighted mean diameter D[3,2] in the range 1 to 200 ⁇ m.
  • D[3,2] surface-weighted mean diameter
  • the term surface-weighted mean diameter D[3,2], otherwise termed the Sauter mean diameter is defined by M. Alderliesten in the paper "A Nomenclature for Mean Particle Diameters"; Anal. Pro ⁇ , vol 21 , May 1984, pages 167-172, and is calculated from the particle size analysis which may conveniently be effected by laser diffraction for example using a Malvern Mastersizer.
  • the alumina powder has a relatively large average pore diameter as the use of such aluminas appears to give catalysts of particularly good selectivity.
  • Preferred aluminas have an average pore diameter of at least 10 nm, particularly in the range 15 to 30 nm. [By the term average pore diameter we mean 4 times the pore volume as measured from the desorption branch of the nitrogen physisorption isotherm at 0.98 relative pressure divided by the BET surface area].
  • cobalt compounds are deposited in the pores of the alumina, and so the average pore diameter of the composition will be less than that of the alumina employed, and decreases as the proportion of cobalt increases.
  • the catalysts or precursors have an average pore diameter of at least 8 nm, preferably above 10 nm and particularly in the range 15 to 25 nm.
  • the alumina material is a gamma alumina or a theta alumina, more preferably a theta alumina, having a BET surface area of 90 - 120 m 2 /g and a pore volume of 0.4 -0.8 cm 3 /g.
  • the alumina support material may be in the form of a spray dried powder or formed into shaped units such as spheres, pellets, cylinders, rings, or multi-holed pellets, which may be multi-lobed or fluted, e.g. of cloverleaf cross-section, or in the form of extrudates known to those skilled in the art.
  • the alumina support may be advantageously chosen for high filterability and attrition resistance.
  • the support material is mixed with the cobalt ammine carboxylate solution to allow the solution to impregnate the pores of the support and form the catalyst precursor.
  • the support in the form of shaped units e.g. extrudates, pellets or granules is immersed in a solution of the cobalt ammine carboxylate for a period of time to permit impregnation of the pores to occur.
  • the excess solution is separated e.g. by decanting or filtration, and the impregnated shaped supports dried.
  • the support material is in the form of a powder and sufficient solution is used so that the resulting mixture is a mobile slurry.
  • the slurry may be heated, e.g. to >60°C, to displace ammonia prior to separation of the catalyst precursor. By removing ammonia, the pH of the solution is lowered and the less soluble cobalt carboxylate precipitates from solution onto the support material.
  • an incipient wetness technique is used on powder or shaped units whereby only sufficient cobalt solution to fill up the pores of the support material is used.
  • an incipient wetness method also known as 'dry-impregnation', the amount of waste cobalt solution is minimised.
  • the impregnation conditions are in part dictated by the support, the temperature and the cobalt solution concentration.
  • the temperature is preferably between 10 and 99 0 C.
  • the cobalt concentration should preferably be as high as practical under the temperature condition.
  • the impregnation of cobalt ammine carboxylate onto the support material should preferably be continued until the cobalt content of the dried catalyst precursor is ⁇ 10% by weight, more preferably ⁇ 15% by weight.
  • the catalyst precursor is separated from any excess cobalt ammine carboxylate solution and dried. Separation of excess cobalt solution may be by decantation, filtration or centrifugation or another method known to those skilled in the art. Any separated cobalt solution is preferably re-used.
  • the impregnation may be repeated on the catalyst precursor until the desired cobalt content is achieved.
  • the upper limit is dictated by the cobalt content of the cobalt ammine carboxylate solution, number of impregnations it is practical to perform and the pore volume and surface area of the support material, but may be about 40% by weight.
  • a cobalt content of the catalyst precursor ⁇ 10% by weight is desirable in order to provide sufficient catalytically active cobalt metal upon thermal decomposition of the cobalt complex.
  • the cobalt- support interaction that is known to occur with oxidic supports, results in the formation of cobalt species that do not form elemental zero valent cobalt upon heating, but require reduction under hydrogen at high temperatures.
  • cobalt aluminate and cobalt silicate species that form when cobalt compounds are deposited on alumina and silica respectively require heating under hydrogen at high temperature, e.g. >550°C, to form elemental cobalt.
  • high temperature e.g. >550°C
  • preparation of the catalyst precursor under conditions in which cobalt-support interactions are minimised is preferred.
  • the catalyst precursors of the present invention have at least a portion of the cobalt in thermally decomposable form, by which we mean in a form that provides elemental zero valent cobalt upon heating under non-oxidising conditions.
  • the drying step for cobalt complex impregnation may be performed at 20-120 0 C, preferably 95- 11O 0 C, in air or under an inert gas such as nitrogen, or in a vacuum oven. Care should be taken not to decompose the cobalt complex to oxidic form. Hence, in the present invention calcination in air at temperature >200°C is not performed. The absence of a calcination step is of direct benefit to the catalyst producer, and will potentially reduce the amount of cobalt spinel, e.g. cobalt aluminate that is present in the catalyst precursor. This can provide catalysts in which more of the cobalt is readily reduced and thereby give high cobalt surface areas. High cobalt surface areas are desirable as they lead to high activity catalysts.
  • the dried catalyst precursor may then be provided to the hydrogenation or hydrocarbon synthesis reactor and heated under non-oxidising conditions to generate active cobalt catalyst in-situ. Providing the dried catalyst precursor in this way overcomes the need for catalyst encapsulation. This is of direct benefit to the catalyst producer.
  • the dried catalyst precursor may be provided to the Fischer-Tropsch or Hydrogenation plant, placed in a holding vessel where it is heated under non-oxidising conditions to effect partial or full activation before passing the partially or fully activated catalyst to the Fischer-Tropsch or hydrogenation reaction vessel. Where partial activation is performed, the subsequent activation may be performed under the same or different conditions.
  • the catalyst may be provided in 'pre-reduced' form, where the dried catalyst precursor has been subjected to a heating step under non-oxidising conditions in order to decompose at least a portion of the cobalt complex so that at least part of the cobalt is transformed into the elemental 'zero-valent' state.
  • the pre-reduced catalyst is preferably provided to the reactor in either encapsulated or passivated form to prevent re-oxidation of the cobalt metal.
  • the decomposition temperature at which the cobalt carboxylate is converted to elemental cobalt is preferably greater than 200 0 C but the precise temperature will depend upon the cobalt complex or complexes chosen and whether a substance is present that promotes decomposition of the cobalt complex or complexes.
  • the rate of temperature increase during the heating step is preferably 0.5 to 20°C/minute. If this rate is exceeded there is a risk of reducing the cobalt dispersion. A slow rate of increase is preferable as this may itself lead to lower decomposition temperatures.
  • the preferred temperature range for thermal decomposition is 200 - 55O 0 C, more preferably 200 - 45O 0 C.
  • the catalyst precursors may be subjected to temperatures in this range for between 0.05 to 24 hours, preferably 0.1 - 10 hours.
  • the optimum conditions i.e. the conditions of temperature and time that result in catalysts with the highest cobalt dispersion (i.e. surface area/g cobalt), are dependant upon the cobalt complex used, whether a decomposition promoter is present and the non-oxidising conditions employed.
  • non-oxidising conditions we mean conditions under which the bulk of the cobalt in the elemental 'zero-valent' state is not substantially oxidised to inactive cobalt oxides.
  • the heating stage is performed under an inert gas such as nitrogen, helium or argon.
  • the heating stage is performed under vacuum.
  • the heating stage is performed in the presence of a hydrogen-containing gas, preferably pure hydrogen or hydrogen mixed with one or more inert or reducing gases.
  • a hydrogen-containing gas preferably pure hydrogen or hydrogen mixed with one or more inert or reducing gases.
  • the use of a hydrogen-containing gas to augment the thermal decomposition has been found to lead to high cobalt surface areas.
  • the heating step may be performed by passing a hydrogen-containing gas such as hydrogen, synthesis gas, e.g.
  • a hydrogen/carbon monoxide gas mixture or a mixture of hydrogen with nitrogen, methane or other inert gas over the dried catalyst precursor at elevated temperature for example by passing the hydrogen-containing gas over the composition at temperatures in the range 200-550 0 C for between 1 and 24 hours, preferably 300-500 0 C at atmospheric or higher pressures up to about 25 bar.
  • a hydrogen-containing gas is not essential in the present invention in order to form active cobalt catalysts.
  • active catalysts containing cobalt in the elemental zero valent state may be prepared by heating the catalyst precursor under non- oxidising conditions in the absence of hydrogen.
  • the cobalt carboxylate complex decomposes on heating to give elemental cobalt, hydrogen reduction may be omitted or the amount of hydrogen or other reducing gas used reduced compared to current catalyst types. This offers a considerable saving to the producer/user.
  • the gases generated carbon monoxide/carbon dioxide and hydrogen
  • the present invention overcomes the difficulties associated with reduction of cobalt-nitrate derived catalysts that can generate potentially corrosive nitrogen oxides.
  • the cobalt content of the dried catalyst precursor is preferably ⁇ 10% by weight, more preferably ⁇ 15% by weight, most preferably 15-35% by weight.
  • catalysts with very high dispersions expressed as cobalt surface area per gram cobalt may be obtained by the process of the present invention.
  • the cobalt surface area of the catalysts is in the range 25->100m 2 /g cobalt (in the active catalysts).
  • Cobalt surface areas may conveniently be determined by hydrogen chemisorption.
  • the preferred methods are as follows;
  • Cobalt surface area of catalyst prepared by thermal decomposition in absence of hydrogen An accurately known weight of sample (approx 0.5g) is charged to a chemisorption flow- through tube that is attached to a Micromeritics 2010 Chemisorption Analyser. The sample is heated to >200°C, e.g. 35O 0 C, in flowing helium (3.4-6.4 litres/h) at 3°C/min. The sample is maintained in the flowing gas at this temperature for 60 min and then evacuated to ⁇ 10 ⁇ mHg whilst still at this temperature and held under vacuum for 120 min. The sample is then cooled under vacuum to 15O 0 C. Once 15O 0 C has been reached the sample is held under vacuum for a further 30 mins.
  • the chemisorption analysis is carried out at 15O 0 C using pure (100%) hydrogen gas.
  • An automatic analysis program is used to measure a full isotherm over the range 100 mmHg up to 760 mmHg pressure of hydrogen.
  • the analysis is carried out twice; the first measures the "total" hydrogen uptake (i.e. includes chemisorbed hydrogen and physisorbed hydrogen) and immediately following the first analysis the sample is put under vacuum ( ⁇ 5mm Hg) for 30 min.
  • the analysis is then repeated to measure the physisorbed uptake.
  • a linear regression may then be applied to the "total" uptake data with extrapolation back to zero pressure to calculate the volume of gas chemisorbed (V).
  • Cobalt surface area of catalyst prepared by thermal decomposition in presence of hydrogen An accurately known weight of sample material (approx 0.2-0.5g) is firstly degassed and dried by heating to 140 0 C at 10°C/min in flowing helium and holding it at 140 0 C for 60 min. The degassed and dried sample is then heated from 140 0 C to >200°C, e.g. 425 0 C at a rate of 3°C/min under a 50 ml/min flow of hydrogen and then holding it under the same hydrogen flow, at this temperature for 6 hours. Following heating under hydrogen, the sample is placed under vacuum and heated to 45O 0 C at 10°C/min and held under these conditions for 2 hours. The sample is then cooled to 150 0 C and held for a further 30 minutes under vacuum. The chemisorption at 15O 0 C is then performed as described above.
  • SF Stoichiometry factor (assumed 2 for H 2 chemisorption on Co)
  • A area occupied by one atom of cobalt (assumed 0.0662 nm 2 ).
  • the catalyst may in addition to cobalt, further comprise one or more suitable additives and promoters useful in hydrogenation reactions and/or Fischer-Tropsch catalysis.
  • the catalysts may comprise one or more additives that alter the physical properties and/or promoters that effect the reducibility or activity or selectivity of the catalysts.
  • Suitable additives are selected from compounds of metals selected from molybdenum (Mo), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), titanium (Ti), zirconium (Zr), lanthanum (La), cerium (Ce), chromium (Cr), magnesium (Mg) or zinc (Zn).
  • Suitable promoters include rhodium (Rh), iridium (Ir), ruthenium (Ru), rhenium (Re), platinum (Pt) and palladium (Pd).
  • Additives and/or promoters may be incorporated into the catalysts by use of suitable compounds such as acids, e.g. perrhenic acid, metal salts, e.g. metal nitrates or metal acetates, or suitable metal-organic compounds, such as metal alkoxides or metal acetylacetonates. Typical amounts of promoters are 0.1 - 10% metal by weight on cobalt.
  • the compounds of additives and/or promoters may be added in suitable amounts to the solution of the cobalt ammine carboxylate. Alternatively, they may be combined with the catalyst precursor before or after drying.
  • one or more promoters selected from Pt, Pd, Ir, Re or Ru are included in the catalyst.
  • Palladium is a particularly preferred promoter as it is believed to reduce the temperature at which the cobalt complex on the support decomposes to form elemental cobalt.
  • the palladium is preferably added to the cobalt ammine carboxylate solution, e.g. as palladium acetate, in sufficient amount such that the palladium content of the catalyst precursor is greater than 10ppm, preferably about 250-1500 ppm (on catalyst precursor).
  • the cobalt catalyst comprises Co and Pd and optionally one or more of Ru, Re, Ir, and R.
  • Cobalt catalysts having cobalt in the elemental or zero-valent state can be difficult to handle as they can react spontaneously with oxygen in air, which can lead to undesirable self-heating and loss of activity. Consequently active cobalt catalysts suitable for hydrogenation reactions may be passivated following the final heating step with carefully controlled small amounts of an oxygen-containing gas, often air or oxygen in carbon dioxide and/or nitrogen. Passivation provides a thin protective layer sufficient to prevent undesirable reaction with air, but which is readily removed once the catalyst has been installed in a hydrogenation process by treatment with a hydrogen-containing gas. Considerably lower amounts of hydrogen are required to activate such passivated catalysts compared to the un-reduced catalysts.
  • the active cobalt catalyst is preferably protected by encapsulation of the catalyst particles with a suitable barrier coating.
  • a suitable barrier coating In the case of a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst, this may suitably be a FT-hydrocarbon wax.
  • the catalysts may be used for hydrogenation reactions and for the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis of hydrocarbons.
  • Typical hydrogenation reactions include the hydrogenation of aldehydes and nitriles to alcohols and amines respectively, and the hydrogenation of cyclic aromatic compounds or unsaturated hydrocarbons.
  • the catalysts of the present invention are particularly suitable for the hydrogenation of unsaturated organic compounds particularly oils, fats, fatty acids and fatty acid derivatives like nitriles.
  • Such hydrogenation reactions are typically performed in a continuous or batch-wise manner by treating the compound to be hydrogenated with a hydrogen-containing gas under pressure in an autoclave at ambient or elevated temperature in the presence of the cobalt-catalyst, for example the hydrogenation may be carried out with hydrogen at 80-250 0 C and a pressure in the range 0.1- 5.0 x 10 6 Pa.
  • the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis of hydrocarbons is well established.
  • the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis converts a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen to hydrocarbons.
  • the mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen is typically a synthesis gas having a hydrogen: carbon monoxide ratio in the range 1.7-2.5:1.
  • the reaction may be performed in a continuous or batch process using one or more stirred slurry-phase reactors, bubble-column reactors, loop reactors or fluidised bed reactors.
  • the process may be operated at pressures in the range 0.1-10Mpa and temperatures in the range 150-350 0 C.
  • the gas-hourly-space velocity (GHSV) for continuous operation is in the range 100-25000hr "1 .
  • the catalysts of the present invention are of particular utility because of their high cobalt surface areas/g catalyst.
  • the invention will now be further described by reference to the following examples.
  • the aqueous ammonia used was ammonia (30%) from BDH.
  • the solutions prepared in Examples 1 (a) and (b) were prepared using a commercial cobalt formate
  • Example 1 cobalt formate was prepared in the laboratory according to the following method. 200ml methanol (BDH) was added to 5Og basic cobalt carbonate (General Grade), and the resultant mixture stirred for a few minutes to form a slurry. Then, a formic acid solution containing 10Og of 90% formic acid (BDH) and 100ml methanol was added to the slurry at room temperature, and the mixture allowed to react at 65°C for 30 min. Immediately after the reaction, the reaction mixture was filtered while hot.
  • BDH basic cobalt carbonate
  • the resultant filter cake was washed with 50ml methanol three times and dried under vacuum or in a conventional oven at 80 0 C for 2 hours. Yield 6Og (Co contents 37.1 % wt (vacuum dried) and 36.8% wt (oven dried)).
  • Ammonium formate was used as received from BDH.
  • the gamma alumina used was Puralox HP14/150 available from Sasol.
  • the silica used was ES70X synthetic amorphous silica powder available from lneos Silica Limited.
  • the palladium acetate was used as received from Alfa Aesar. Cobalt and palladium contents in solutions or dried precursors were measured using ICP atomic absorption spectroscopy (ICP-AAS) and particle sizes by diffraction using a Malvern Mastersizer.
  • ICP-AAS ICP atomic absorption spectroscopy
  • Example 1 Using the solution as described above in Example 1 (b). Approximately 25g gamma AI 2 O 3 powder was placed in a 500ml round bottom flask. The AI 2 O 3 was stirred whilst adding the cobalt ammine formate solution dropwise through a dropping funnel. The addition was terminated at what was deemed as incipient wetness (when the solid just began to stick together). The solid was dried at 95°C for 16 hours. The dried powder was sieved to ⁇ 1.Omm particle size. Four further impregnations were carried out using the same method.
  • Impregnation details are given below.
  • TGMS Thermogravimetric mass spectroscopic
  • Example 2(a) was repeated using the solution of Example 1 (c).
  • TGMS Thermogravimetric mass spectroscopic
  • the precursors prepared in example 2(a) were heated in a stream of helium at 35O 0 C for 1 hour and then under vacuum for 2 hours and the Co surface area determined by hydrogen chemisorption at 15O 0 C according to the method described above.
  • the weight loss on heating (WLOH) was also measured. The results are as follows;
  • the dried catalyst precursors prepared in example 2(b), containing Pd, were heated in a stream of helium at 400 0 C for 1 hour and then under vacuum for 2 hours and the Co surface area determined by hydrogen chemisorption at 15O 0 C according to the method described above.
  • the weight loss on heating (WLOH) was also measured. The results are as follows;
  • Example 2(a) The catalyst precursors prepared in Example 2(a) were subjected to thermal decomposition under hydrogen at a temperature of 425 0 C for 6 hours followed by heating to 45O 0 C under vacuum for 2 hours and cobalt surface areas determined by hydrogen chemisorption at 15O 0 C according to the method as described above.
  • the precursor prepared in example 2(b), containing Pd were subjected to thermal decomposition under hydrogen at a temperature of 425 0 C for 6 hours followed by heating to 45O 0 C under vacuum for 2 hours cobalt surface areas determined by hydrogen chemisorption at 15O 0 C according to the method as described above.
  • Example 5 Cobalt ammine formate on theta alumina
  • Gamma alumina was fired at 1050 0 C in air for 4hours to produce theta phase AI 2 O3.
  • a cobalt ammine formate solution was prepared by dissolving 75g commercial cobalt formate in 180ml aqueous ammonia in a round bottom flask over 16 hours. After 16 hours the solution was filtered to remove residual solids.
  • the catalyst precursor was heated in a stream of helium at 350 0 C for 1 hour and then under vacuum for 2 hours and the Co surface area determined by hydrogen chemisorption at 150 0 C.
  • the weight loss on heating (WLOH) was also measured.
  • TGA/MS analysis shows thermal decomposition of the cobalt formate to elemental cobalt at 300 to 320 0 C. The results are as follows:
  • the catalyst precursor was subjected to thermal decomposition under hydrogen at a temperature of 425°C for 6 hours followed by heating to 450 0 C under vacuum for 2 hours and the Co surface area determined by hydrogen chemisorption at 150 0 C.
  • the weight loss on reduction (WLOR) was also measured. The results are as follows:
  • Cobalt surface areas of cobalt formate catalysts made with theta AI 2 O 3 using the hydrogen- augmented reduction method appear to be better than those made with gamma AI 2 O 3 .
  • the catalysts prepared with gamma AI 2 O 3 appear to be superior to those prepared with theta AI 2 O 3 .
  • Impregnation details are given below.
  • the catalyst precursor was heated in a stream of helium at 250 and 300 0 C for 1 hour and then under vacuum for 2 hours and the Co surface area determined by hydrogen chemisorption at 150 0 C.
  • the weight loss on heating (WLOH) was also measured.
  • TGA/MS analysis shows thermal decomposition to form elemental cobalt at 300 to 320 0 C. The results are as follows:
  • the catalyst precursor was subjected to thermal decomposition under hydrogen at a temperature of 425°C for 6 hours followed by heating to 450 0 C under vacuum for 2 hours and the Co surface area determined by hydrogen chemisorption at 150 0 C.
  • the weight loss on reduction (WLOR) was also measured. The results are as follows:
  • Catalysts were used for the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis of hydrocarbons in a laboratory-scale reactor. About 0.2 g of unreduced catalyst in a diluted bed (ca. 4 mm ID by 50 mm depth) was first reduced at 430 0 C for 420min in a hydrogen flow of 9851 litres/hr/kg of unreduced catalyst. Then hydrogen and carbon monoxide at a 2:1 ratio were passed through the bed at 200 0 C or 210°C at 20 barg. The space velocity was adjusted after 30 hrs to obtain as close as possible 50% CO conversion. The activity and selectivity of the catalyst to CH 4 , C2-C4 and C5+ hydrocarbons were measured using known Gas Chromatography (GC) techniques.
  • GC Gas Chromatography
  • Example 7a was the Co-formate/Pd/alumina catalyst precursor of Example 2(b) prepared by 4 impregnations.
  • Example 7b was the Co-formate/alumina catalyst precursor of Example 2(a) prepared by 4 impregnations.
  • Example 7c was the Co-formate/silica catalyst precursor of Example 6 prepared by 5 impregnations.
  • catalysts of the present invention may be more active than standard nitrate-based catalysts, and in the case of 7a and 7b in particular, give similar selectivity.
  • Example 7a was repeated using the same reaction conditions (210°C/20 barg) using the Cobalt-formate and Pd-promoted Cobalt-formate on alumina catalysts, but without the preceding hydrogen reduction step, i.e. the catalyst precursors were simply brought up to the reaction temperature in the presence of the synthesis gas. No 'extra' reduction time was used. Such simplified activation offers a considerable advantage to the catalyst user compared to current activation processes.
  • the catalysts of the present invention were compared against a standard cobalt-nitrate derived 20% cobalt/alumina catalyst (Std 2) prepared by impregnation and calcined in air. This catalysts was subjected to the same synthesis gas-only activation procedure. The results were as follows;
  • Example 7d was the Co-formate/alumina catalyst precursor of Example 2(a) prepared by 4 impregnations.
  • Example 7e was the Co-formate/Pd/alumina catalyst precursor of Example 2(b) prepared by 4 impregnations.
  • the comparative catalyst precursor was then subjected to heating to 35O 0 C under helium or hydrogen-augmented heating at 425 0 C and the cobalt surface areas measured by hydrogen chemisorption at 15O 0 C as described above.
  • the results were as follows;
  • the surface areas are lower than obtained for the present invention.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

A process is described for the preparation of a supported cobalt catalyst comprising the steps of; (i) mixing a support material with a solution of a thermally decomposable cobalt ammine carboxylate complex, e.g. cobalt ammine formate, to form a catalyst precursor, (ii) separating any excess solution from the catalyst precursor, (iii) drying the catalyst precursor, and (iv) heating the dried catalyst precursor under non-oxidising conditions so that at least part of the cobalt is converted to its elemental form. The catalyst may be used for the hydrogenation of unsaturated compounds or the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis of hydrocarbons.

Description

Catalysts
The application relates to supported cobalt catalysts, as well as to the preparation and use thereof.
Supported cobalt catalysts wherein the cobalt is in its elemental or reduced state are well known and find use in many reactions involving hydrogen such as hydrogenation reactions, and the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis of hydrocarbons. The activity of the catalysts is believed to be directly proportional to the cobalt surface area of the reduced catalysts (e.g. see lglesia et al, Advances in Catalysis, vol 39, (1993) pages 221-302), but in order to achieve high cobalt surface areas, the cobalt should be well dispersed on the support. Supports that have been used for cobalt catalysts include alumina, silica, titania, alumino silicates and carbon.
Preparation of supported cobalt catalysts suitable for hydrogenation reactions or the Fischer- Tropsch synthesis of hydrocarbons has heretofore typically been by impregnation of soluble cobalt compounds into 'pre-formed' support materials or by precipitation of cobalt compounds from solution in the presence of support powders or extrudates, followed by a heating step and then, prior to use, activation of the catalysts by reduction of the resulting cobalt compounds to elemental, or 'zero-valent' form typically using a hydrogen-containing gas stream. Alternatively supported cobalt catalysts may be prepared by simultaneous co-precipitation of soluble cobalt and support compounds by addition of a base, followed again by heating and reduction stages.
The catalyst reduction stage may be performed in-situ, for example in a hydrogenation or hydrocarbon synthesis reactor, or the catalyst may be pre-reduced by the catalyst manufacturer. However the reduction stage, whether performed in-situ or by the catalyst manufacturer, often requires considerable quantities of heated reducing gas and comprises a complex and expensive part of the overall catalyst activation process. Accordingly it is desirable to replace/minimise the catalyst reduction stage as a means to generate an active catalyst.
We have developed a process whereby the reduction process is simplified by utilising catalyst precursors comprising one or more cobalt carboxylates derived from cobalt ammine carboxylates.
The present invention provides a process for the preparation of a supported cobalt catalyst precursor comprising the steps of;
(i) mixing a support material with a solution of a thermally decomposable cobalt ammine carboxylate complex to form a catalyst precursor, (ii) separating any excess solution from the catalyst precursor, and (iii) drying the catalyst precursor. The invention further provides a process for the preparation of a supported cobalt catalyst comprising steps (i) to (iii) and further (iv) heating the dried catalyst precursor under non- oxidising conditions so that at least part of the cobalt is converted to its elemental form.
The invention further provides catalysts obtainable by the above process and the use of such catalysts for performing hydrogenation reactions and the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis of hydrocarbons.
We have found that the use of a thermally decomposable cobalt ammine carboxylate complex provides an improved route to alumina-supported cobalt catalysts. Any soluble cobalt ammine carboxylate complex that is able to decompose to form elemental cobalt may be used. By the term "carboxylate" we mean a complex of cobalt with a carboxylic acid. Preferably the cobalt ammine carboxylate is cobalt ammine formate, cobalt ammine acetate or cobalt ammine oxalate, more preferably cobalt ammine formate and cobalt ammine oxalate and most preferably cobalt ammine formate. One or more of the cobalt complexes may be used.
GB 439274 states that a cobalt catalyst suitable for the hydrogenation of aliphatic nitriles may be formed by the pyrogenic decomposition of cobalt formate supported on active carbon, silica gel, pumice stone or bleaching earths. However despite this known property of cobalt formate, commercial cobalt catalysts are not produced in this way. Cobalt formate has a low solubility in water (1.5% Co by weight at 2O0C) making it unsuitable for commercial scale impregnation of support materials because in order to achieve catalytically useful cobalt levels, a large number of separate impregnation steps are required. We have found surprisingly that cobalt ammine carboxylates have considerably improved solubility making them more suitable for catalyst preparation.
The cobalt ammine carboxylate may be conveniently formed by reacting the respective cobalt carboxylate, e.g. cobalt (II) formate, with ammonia. This is readily achieved by dissolving the cobalt carboxylate in aqueous ammonia, particularly 30% ammonia. In this way the ammonia is able to complex with the cobalt to form the soluble cobalt ammine carboxylate complex, rather than react with the carboxylic acid to form ammonium carboxylate salts.
The parent cobalt carboxylates such as cobalt oxalate, cobalt formate and cobalt acetate are available commercially from various sources. If necessary, a cobalt carboxylate can be prepared by reacting a carboxylic acid with cobalt metal or cobalt hydroxide. Alternatively, basic cobalt (II) carbonate may be reacted with the corresponding carboxylic acid (e.g. formic acid, acetic acid or oxalic acid) and then aqueous ammonia added to the resulting cobalt carboxylate. The molar ratio of carboxylic acid to cobalt carbonate should be about 2:1 carboxylic acid : Co for monofunctional carboxylic acids such as formic and acetic acid or may be about 1 :1 for difunctional carboxylic acids such as oxalic acid. Ammonia should preferably be present in excess.
The cobalt concentration that may be achieved in water is suitably between 50 g/litre and 200g/litre. The pH of the solution is suitably between 8.0 and 11.0, preferably between 8.5 and
11. If desired, buffer salts of the carboxylic acid may be added (e.g. ammonium formate).
The support material may comprise alumina, silica, alumino-silicate, titania, zirconia, carbon or other suitable support. Preferably, the support material comprises silica, alumina, zirconia, titania or combinations of these in powder or shaped, e.g. extruded or pelleted, form. Preferably the powdered supports have been subjected to a step of spray drying.
Silica supports may be formed from natural sources, e.g. as kieselguhr, may be a pyrogenic or fumed silica or may be a synthetic, e.g. precipitated silica. Precipitated silicas are preferred. The particulate silica may be in the form of a powder or a shaped material, e.g. as extruded, pelleted or granulated silica pieces. Suitable powdered silicas typically have particles of surface weighted mean diameter D[3,2] in the range 3 to 100 μm. Shaped silicas may have a variety of shapes and particle sizes, depending upon the mould or die used in their manufacture. For example the particles may have a cross-sectional shape which is circular, lobed or other shape and a length from about 1 to > 10 mm.
The surface area of the powdered or granular silica is generally in the range 10 - 500 m2/g, preferably 100 - 400 m2g"1. The pore volume is generally between about 0.1 and 4 ml/g, preferably 0.2 - 2 ml/g and the mean pore diameter is preferably in the range from <2 to about 30 nm.
If desired, the silica may be mixed with another metal oxide, such as titania or zirconia. The silica may alternatively be present as a coating on a shaped unit, which is preferably of alumina typically as a coating of 0.5 to 5 monolayers of silica upon the underlying support.
Titania supports may be formed from natural sources or may be a synthetic, e.g. precipitated titania. The titania may optionally comprise up to 20% by weight of another refractory oxide material, typically silica, alumina or zirconia. The titania may alternatively be present as a coating on a support which is preferably of silica or alumina, for example as a coating of 0.5 to 5 monolayers of titania upon the underlying support. Therefore when we refer to titania we include titania-coated supports. Conventional titania supports suitable for Fischer-Tropsch catalysts are based upon rutile forms of titania, which has superior attrition resistance compared with anatase forms. The BET surface area is generally in the range 10 - 500 m2/g, preferably 100 to 400 m2/g. The pore volume of the titania is generally between about 0.1 and 4 ml/g, preferably 0.2 to 2 ml/g and the mean pore diameter is preferably in the range from 2 to about 30 nm.
Similarly zirconia supports may be formed from natural sources or may be a synthetic, e.g. precipitated zirconia. The zirconia may optionally comprise up to 20% by weight of another refractory oxide material, typically silica, alumina or titania. The zirconia may alternatively be present as a coating on a support, which is preferably of silica or alumina, for example as a coating of 0.5 to 5 monolayers of zirconia upon the underlying support. Therefore when we refer to zirconia we include zirconia-coated supports.
The support material is preferably a transition alumina. Transition aluminas are defined in "Ullmans Encyklopaedie der technischen Chemie", 4., neubearbeitete und erweiterte Auflage, Band 7 (1974), pp.298-299. Suitable transition alumina may be of the gamma-alumina group, for example eta-alumina or chi-alumina. These materials may be formed by calcination of aluminium hydroxides at 400 to 7500C and generally have a BET surface area in the range 150 to 400 m2/g. Alternatively, the transition alumina may be of the delta-alumina group which includes the high temperature forms such as delta- and theta- aluminas which may be formed by heating a gamma group alumina to a temperature above about 8000C. The delta-group aluminas generally have a BET surface area in the range 50 to 150 m2/g. Alternatively, the transition alumina may be alpha-alumina. The transition aluminas contain less than 0.5 mole of water per mole Of AI2O3, the actual amount of water depending on the temperature to which they have been heated. Alternatively a spinel, such as a metal aluminate, may also be used as a support.
A suitable transition alumina powder generally has a surface-weighted mean diameter D[3,2] in the range 1 to 200 μm. In certain applications such as for catalysts intended for use in slurry reactions, it is advantageous to use very fine particles which are, on average, preferably less than 20 μm, e.g. 10 μm or less. For other applications e.g. as a catalyst for reactions carried out in a fluidised bed, it may be desirable to use larger particle sizes, preferably in the range 50 to 150 μm. The term surface-weighted mean diameter D[3,2], otherwise termed the Sauter mean diameter, is defined by M. Alderliesten in the paper "A Nomenclature for Mean Particle Diameters"; Anal. Proα, vol 21 , May 1984, pages 167-172, and is calculated from the particle size analysis which may conveniently be effected by laser diffraction for example using a Malvern Mastersizer.
It is preferred that the alumina powder has a relatively large average pore diameter as the use of such aluminas appears to give catalysts of particularly good selectivity. Preferred aluminas have an average pore diameter of at least 10 nm, particularly in the range 15 to 30 nm. [By the term average pore diameter we mean 4 times the pore volume as measured from the desorption branch of the nitrogen physisorption isotherm at 0.98 relative pressure divided by the BET surface area]. During the production of the compositions of the invention, cobalt compounds are deposited in the pores of the alumina, and so the average pore diameter of the composition will be less than that of the alumina employed, and decreases as the proportion of cobalt increases. It is preferred that the catalysts or precursors have an average pore diameter of at least 8 nm, preferably above 10 nm and particularly in the range 15 to 25 nm.
Preferably, the alumina material is a gamma alumina or a theta alumina, more preferably a theta alumina, having a BET surface area of 90 - 120 m2/g and a pore volume of 0.4 -0.8 cm3/g.
The alumina support material may be in the form of a spray dried powder or formed into shaped units such as spheres, pellets, cylinders, rings, or multi-holed pellets, which may be multi-lobed or fluted, e.g. of cloverleaf cross-section, or in the form of extrudates known to those skilled in the art. The alumina support may be advantageously chosen for high filterability and attrition resistance.
The support material is mixed with the cobalt ammine carboxylate solution to allow the solution to impregnate the pores of the support and form the catalyst precursor. In one embodiment, the support in the form of shaped units, e.g. extrudates, pellets or granules is immersed in a solution of the cobalt ammine carboxylate for a period of time to permit impregnation of the pores to occur. Once the shaped support material is saturated, the excess solution is separated e.g. by decanting or filtration, and the impregnated shaped supports dried.
In another embodiment, the support material is in the form of a powder and sufficient solution is used so that the resulting mixture is a mobile slurry. If desired, the slurry may be heated, e.g. to >60°C, to displace ammonia prior to separation of the catalyst precursor. By removing ammonia, the pH of the solution is lowered and the less soluble cobalt carboxylate precipitates from solution onto the support material.
Alternatively and preferably, an incipient wetness technique is used on powder or shaped units whereby only sufficient cobalt solution to fill up the pores of the support material is used. By using an incipient wetness method, also known as 'dry-impregnation', the amount of waste cobalt solution is minimised.
The impregnation conditions are in part dictated by the support, the temperature and the cobalt solution concentration. The temperature is preferably between 10 and 990C. The cobalt concentration should preferably be as high as practical under the temperature condition. The impregnation of cobalt ammine carboxylate onto the support material should preferably be continued until the cobalt content of the dried catalyst precursor is ≥ 10% by weight, more preferably ≥ 15% by weight.
In the process of the present invention the catalyst precursor is separated from any excess cobalt ammine carboxylate solution and dried. Separation of excess cobalt solution may be by decantation, filtration or centrifugation or another method known to those skilled in the art. Any separated cobalt solution is preferably re-used.
The impregnation may be repeated on the catalyst precursor until the desired cobalt content is achieved. The upper limit is dictated by the cobalt content of the cobalt ammine carboxylate solution, number of impregnations it is practical to perform and the pore volume and surface area of the support material, but may be about 40% by weight. We have found that a cobalt content of the catalyst precursor ≥10% by weight is desirable in order to provide sufficient catalytically active cobalt metal upon thermal decomposition of the cobalt complex. The cobalt- support interaction that is known to occur with oxidic supports, results in the formation of cobalt species that do not form elemental zero valent cobalt upon heating, but require reduction under hydrogen at high temperatures. For example, cobalt aluminate and cobalt silicate species that form when cobalt compounds are deposited on alumina and silica respectively require heating under hydrogen at high temperature, e.g. >550°C, to form elemental cobalt. Hence preparation of the catalyst precursor under conditions in which cobalt-support interactions are minimised is preferred. The catalyst precursors of the present invention have at least a portion of the cobalt in thermally decomposable form, by which we mean in a form that provides elemental zero valent cobalt upon heating under non-oxidising conditions.
The drying step for cobalt complex impregnation may be performed at 20-1200C, preferably 95- 11O0C, in air or under an inert gas such as nitrogen, or in a vacuum oven. Care should be taken not to decompose the cobalt complex to oxidic form. Hence, in the present invention calcination in air at temperature >200°C is not performed. The absence of a calcination step is of direct benefit to the catalyst producer, and will potentially reduce the amount of cobalt spinel, e.g. cobalt aluminate that is present in the catalyst precursor. This can provide catalysts in which more of the cobalt is readily reduced and thereby give high cobalt surface areas. High cobalt surface areas are desirable as they lead to high activity catalysts.
The dried catalyst precursor may then be provided to the hydrogenation or hydrocarbon synthesis reactor and heated under non-oxidising conditions to generate active cobalt catalyst in-situ. Providing the dried catalyst precursor in this way overcomes the need for catalyst encapsulation. This is of direct benefit to the catalyst producer. Alternatively, the dried catalyst precursor may be provided to the Fischer-Tropsch or Hydrogenation plant, placed in a holding vessel where it is heated under non-oxidising conditions to effect partial or full activation before passing the partially or fully activated catalyst to the Fischer-Tropsch or hydrogenation reaction vessel. Where partial activation is performed, the subsequent activation may be performed under the same or different conditions.
Alternatively, the catalyst may be provided in 'pre-reduced' form, where the dried catalyst precursor has been subjected to a heating step under non-oxidising conditions in order to decompose at least a portion of the cobalt complex so that at least part of the cobalt is transformed into the elemental 'zero-valent' state. The pre-reduced catalyst is preferably provided to the reactor in either encapsulated or passivated form to prevent re-oxidation of the cobalt metal.
The decomposition temperature at which the cobalt carboxylate is converted to elemental cobalt is preferably greater than 2000C but the precise temperature will depend upon the cobalt complex or complexes chosen and whether a substance is present that promotes decomposition of the cobalt complex or complexes. The rate of temperature increase during the heating step is preferably 0.5 to 20°C/minute. If this rate is exceeded there is a risk of reducing the cobalt dispersion. A slow rate of increase is preferable as this may itself lead to lower decomposition temperatures. The preferred temperature range for thermal decomposition is 200 - 55O0C, more preferably 200 - 45O0C. The catalyst precursors may be subjected to temperatures in this range for between 0.05 to 24 hours, preferably 0.1 - 10 hours. The optimum conditions, i.e. the conditions of temperature and time that result in catalysts with the highest cobalt dispersion (i.e. surface area/g cobalt), are dependant upon the cobalt complex used, whether a decomposition promoter is present and the non-oxidising conditions employed.
By "non-oxidising conditions" we mean conditions under which the bulk of the cobalt in the elemental 'zero-valent' state is not substantially oxidised to inactive cobalt oxides. In a first embodiment, the heating stage is performed under an inert gas such as nitrogen, helium or argon. In a second embodiment, the heating stage is performed under vacuum. In a third embodiment, the heating stage is performed in the presence of a hydrogen-containing gas, preferably pure hydrogen or hydrogen mixed with one or more inert or reducing gases. The use of a hydrogen-containing gas to augment the thermal decomposition has been found to lead to high cobalt surface areas. Thus the heating step may be performed by passing a hydrogen-containing gas such as hydrogen, synthesis gas, e.g. a hydrogen/carbon monoxide gas mixture or a mixture of hydrogen with nitrogen, methane or other inert gas over the dried catalyst precursor at elevated temperature, for example by passing the hydrogen-containing gas over the composition at temperatures in the range 200-5500C for between 1 and 24 hours, preferably 300-5000C at atmospheric or higher pressures up to about 25 bar. However, the presence of a hydrogen-containing gas is not essential in the present invention in order to form active cobalt catalysts. Thus in the present invention, active catalysts containing cobalt in the elemental zero valent state may be prepared by heating the catalyst precursor under non- oxidising conditions in the absence of hydrogen.
Because the cobalt carboxylate complex decomposes on heating to give elemental cobalt, hydrogen reduction may be omitted or the amount of hydrogen or other reducing gas used reduced compared to current catalyst types. This offers a considerable saving to the producer/user. Furthermore upon decomposition, the gases generated (carbon monoxide/carbon dioxide and hydrogen) are non-corrosive and generally compatible with the typical end uses in hydrogenation and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Thus the present invention overcomes the difficulties associated with reduction of cobalt-nitrate derived catalysts that can generate potentially corrosive nitrogen oxides.
The cobalt content of the dried catalyst precursor is preferably ≥ 10% by weight, more preferably ≥15% by weight, most preferably 15-35% by weight. In these regions, catalysts with very high dispersions, expressed as cobalt surface area per gram cobalt may be obtained by the process of the present invention. Preferably the cobalt surface area of the catalysts is in the range 25->100m2/g cobalt (in the active catalysts).
Cobalt surface areas may conveniently be determined by hydrogen chemisorption. The preferred methods are as follows;
1 ) Cobalt surface area of catalyst prepared by thermal decomposition in absence of hydrogen: An accurately known weight of sample (approx 0.5g) is charged to a chemisorption flow- through tube that is attached to a Micromeritics 2010 Chemisorption Analyser. The sample is heated to >200°C, e.g. 35O0C, in flowing helium (3.4-6.4 litres/h) at 3°C/min. The sample is maintained in the flowing gas at this temperature for 60 min and then evacuated to <10μmHg whilst still at this temperature and held under vacuum for 120 min. The sample is then cooled under vacuum to 15O0C. Once 15O0C has been reached the sample is held under vacuum for a further 30 mins. The chemisorption analysis is carried out at 15O0C using pure (100%) hydrogen gas. An automatic analysis program is used to measure a full isotherm over the range 100 mmHg up to 760 mmHg pressure of hydrogen. The analysis is carried out twice; the first measures the "total" hydrogen uptake (i.e. includes chemisorbed hydrogen and physisorbed hydrogen) and immediately following the first analysis the sample is put under vacuum (< 5mm Hg) for 30 min. The analysis is then repeated to measure the physisorbed uptake. A linear regression may then be applied to the "total" uptake data with extrapolation back to zero pressure to calculate the volume of gas chemisorbed (V). 2) Cobalt surface area of catalyst prepared by thermal decomposition in presence of hydrogen: An accurately known weight of sample material (approx 0.2-0.5g) is firstly degassed and dried by heating to 1400C at 10°C/min in flowing helium and holding it at 1400C for 60 min. The degassed and dried sample is then heated from 1400C to >200°C, e.g. 4250C at a rate of 3°C/min under a 50 ml/min flow of hydrogen and then holding it under the same hydrogen flow, at this temperature for 6 hours. Following heating under hydrogen, the sample is placed under vacuum and heated to 45O0C at 10°C/min and held under these conditions for 2 hours. The sample is then cooled to 1500C and held for a further 30 minutes under vacuum. The chemisorption at 15O0C is then performed as described above.
Cobalt surface areas were calculated in all cases using the following equation; Co surface area = (6.023 x 1023 x V x SF x A ) / 22414, where V = uptake of H2 in ml/g,
SF = Stoichiometry factor (assumed 2 for H2 chemisorption on Co) A = area occupied by one atom of cobalt (assumed 0.0662 nm2).
This equation is described in the Operators Manual for the Micromeretics ASAP 2010 Chemi System V 2.01 , Appendix C, Part No. 201-42808-01 , October 1996.
The catalyst may in addition to cobalt, further comprise one or more suitable additives and promoters useful in hydrogenation reactions and/or Fischer-Tropsch catalysis. For example, the catalysts may comprise one or more additives that alter the physical properties and/or promoters that effect the reducibility or activity or selectivity of the catalysts. Suitable additives are selected from compounds of metals selected from molybdenum (Mo), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), titanium (Ti), zirconium (Zr), lanthanum (La), cerium (Ce), chromium (Cr), magnesium (Mg) or zinc (Zn). Suitable promoters include rhodium (Rh), iridium (Ir), ruthenium (Ru), rhenium (Re), platinum (Pt) and palladium (Pd). Additives and/or promoters may be incorporated into the catalysts by use of suitable compounds such as acids, e.g. perrhenic acid, metal salts, e.g. metal nitrates or metal acetates, or suitable metal-organic compounds, such as metal alkoxides or metal acetylacetonates. Typical amounts of promoters are 0.1 - 10% metal by weight on cobalt.
If desired, the compounds of additives and/or promoters may be added in suitable amounts to the solution of the cobalt ammine carboxylate. Alternatively, they may be combined with the catalyst precursor before or after drying.
Preferably one or more promoters selected from Pt, Pd, Ir, Re or Ru are included in the catalyst. Palladium is a particularly preferred promoter as it is believed to reduce the temperature at which the cobalt complex on the support decomposes to form elemental cobalt. The palladium is preferably added to the cobalt ammine carboxylate solution, e.g. as palladium acetate, in sufficient amount such that the palladium content of the catalyst precursor is greater than 10ppm, preferably about 250-1500 ppm (on catalyst precursor). Thus in a preferred embodiment the cobalt catalyst comprises Co and Pd and optionally one or more of Ru, Re, Ir, and R.
Cobalt catalysts having cobalt in the elemental or zero-valent state can be difficult to handle as they can react spontaneously with oxygen in air, which can lead to undesirable self-heating and loss of activity. Consequently active cobalt catalysts suitable for hydrogenation reactions may be passivated following the final heating step with carefully controlled small amounts of an oxygen-containing gas, often air or oxygen in carbon dioxide and/or nitrogen. Passivation provides a thin protective layer sufficient to prevent undesirable reaction with air, but which is readily removed once the catalyst has been installed in a hydrogenation process by treatment with a hydrogen-containing gas. Considerably lower amounts of hydrogen are required to activate such passivated catalysts compared to the un-reduced catalysts. For catalysts suitable for Fischer-Tropsch processes, passivation is not preferred and the active cobalt catalyst is preferably protected by encapsulation of the catalyst particles with a suitable barrier coating. In the case of a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst, this may suitably be a FT-hydrocarbon wax.
The catalysts may be used for hydrogenation reactions and for the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis of hydrocarbons.
Typical hydrogenation reactions include the hydrogenation of aldehydes and nitriles to alcohols and amines respectively, and the hydrogenation of cyclic aromatic compounds or unsaturated hydrocarbons. The catalysts of the present invention are particularly suitable for the hydrogenation of unsaturated organic compounds particularly oils, fats, fatty acids and fatty acid derivatives like nitriles. Such hydrogenation reactions are typically performed in a continuous or batch-wise manner by treating the compound to be hydrogenated with a hydrogen-containing gas under pressure in an autoclave at ambient or elevated temperature in the presence of the cobalt-catalyst, for example the hydrogenation may be carried out with hydrogen at 80-2500C and a pressure in the range 0.1- 5.0 x 106 Pa.
The Fischer-Tropsch synthesis of hydrocarbons is well established. The Fischer-Tropsch synthesis converts a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen to hydrocarbons. The mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen is typically a synthesis gas having a hydrogen: carbon monoxide ratio in the range 1.7-2.5:1. The reaction may be performed in a continuous or batch process using one or more stirred slurry-phase reactors, bubble-column reactors, loop reactors or fluidised bed reactors. The process may be operated at pressures in the range 0.1-10Mpa and temperatures in the range 150-3500C. The gas-hourly-space velocity (GHSV) for continuous operation is in the range 100-25000hr"1. The catalysts of the present invention are of particular utility because of their high cobalt surface areas/g catalyst. The invention will now be further described by reference to the following examples. Throughout, the aqueous ammonia used was ammonia (30%) from BDH. The solutions prepared in Examples 1 (a) and (b) were prepared using a commercial cobalt formate
(Co(O2CH)2^H2O) available from City Chemical, 139 Allings Crossing Rd., West Haven, CT 06516, U.S.A (Co content 31.5% wt). For Example 1 (c) cobalt formate was prepared in the laboratory according to the following method. 200ml methanol (BDH) was added to 5Og basic cobalt carbonate (General Grade), and the resultant mixture stirred for a few minutes to form a slurry. Then, a formic acid solution containing 10Og of 90% formic acid (BDH) and 100ml methanol was added to the slurry at room temperature, and the mixture allowed to react at 65°C for 30 min. Immediately after the reaction, the reaction mixture was filtered while hot. The resultant filter cake was washed with 50ml methanol three times and dried under vacuum or in a conventional oven at 800C for 2 hours. Yield 6Og (Co contents 37.1 % wt (vacuum dried) and 36.8% wt (oven dried)). Ammonium formate was used as received from BDH. The gamma alumina used was Puralox HP14/150 available from Sasol. The silica used was ES70X synthetic amorphous silica powder available from lneos Silica Limited. The palladium acetate was used as received from Alfa Aesar. Cobalt and palladium contents in solutions or dried precursors were measured using ICP atomic absorption spectroscopy (ICP-AAS) and particle sizes by diffraction using a Malvern Mastersizer.
Example 1 : Preparation of cobalt ammine carboxylate solutions
a) A saturated solution of cobalt ammine formate/ammonium formate in aqueous NH3 was prepared by initially dissolving 15.Og cobalt formate in 52.5ml aqueous NH3 followed by the addition of 6.6g ammonium formate. The solution was filtered to remove residual solids. Concentration = 8.7% Co. Solution pH = 10.1.
b) A saturated solution of cobalt ammine formate in aqueous NH3 was prepared by initially dissolving 35.Og cobalt formate in 96ml aqueous NH3. The solution was filtered to remove residual solids. Concentration = 13.1% Co. Solution pH = 8.6.
c) A saturated solution of cobalt ammine formate in aqueous NH3 with Pd promoter was prepared by dissolving 5Og cobalt formate in 100ml aqueous NH3. The solution was filtered to remove residual solids. Following this palladium was added as palladium acetate. Concentration Cobalt = 15.0%. Concentration Palladium = 0.055% (550 ppm). Solution pH = 10.8. Example 2: Impregnation Of AI7Q3 support by incipient wetness method
a) Using the solution as described above in Example 1 (b). Approximately 25g gamma AI2O3 powder was placed in a 500ml round bottom flask. The AI2O3 was stirred whilst adding the cobalt ammine formate solution dropwise through a dropping funnel. The addition was terminated at what was deemed as incipient wetness (when the solid just began to stick together). The solid was dried at 95°C for 16 hours. The dried powder was sieved to < 1.Omm particle size. Four further impregnations were carried out using the same method. Impregnation details, cobalt loadings (measured by ICP-AAS), particle size analysis (measured using a Malvern Mastersizer) and nitrogen adsorption analysis results for BET surface area, average pore volume and average pore diameter are given below.
Figure imgf000013_0001
Thermogravimetric mass spectroscopic (TGMS) analysis on the dried catalyst precursors heated under helium from room temperature at a rate of 10°C/minute revealed that the thermal decomposition to yield cobalt in elemental form occurred around 300-3200C.
b) The method of Example 2(a) was repeated using the solution of Example 1 (c).
Figure imgf000013_0002
Thermogravimetric mass spectroscopic (TGMS) analysis on the dried catalyst precursor containing Pd obtained after 5 impregnations and heated from room temperature at 5°C/minute under helium revealed that the thermal decomposition to yield cobalt in elemental form occurred around 2350C. Thus the presence of Pd desirably lowers the of decomposition temperature of the Co complex.
Example 3 : Preparation of Catalysts
a) Without Hydrogen Augmentation:
The precursors prepared in example 2(a) were heated in a stream of helium at 35O0C for 1 hour and then under vacuum for 2 hours and the Co surface area determined by hydrogen chemisorption at 15O0C according to the method described above. The weight loss on heating (WLOH) was also measured. The results are as follows;
Figure imgf000014_0001
The results demonstrate that when the Co content of the dried precursor is >10% wt, particularly >15% wt, heating at 35O0C leads to catalysts with high cobalt surface areas. It has been found that heating these precursors under helium at temperatures greater than 35O0C upto 4250C reduces the resulting cobalt surface areas.
The dried catalyst precursors prepared in example 2(b), containing Pd, were heated in a stream of helium at 4000C for 1 hour and then under vacuum for 2 hours and the Co surface area determined by hydrogen chemisorption at 15O0C according to the method described above. The weight loss on heating (WLOH) was also measured. The results are as follows;
Figure imgf000014_0002
Comparing the cobalt surface areas with those where palladium is absent, these results suggest that the presence of palladium is having a beneficial effect on cobalt dispersion in the catalysts.
(b) With Hydrogen-Augmentation:
The catalyst precursors prepared in Example 2(a) were subjected to thermal decomposition under hydrogen at a temperature of 4250C for 6 hours followed by heating to 45O0C under vacuum for 2 hours and cobalt surface areas determined by hydrogen chemisorption at 15O0C according to the method as described above.
Figure imgf000015_0001
It can be seen that heating under hydrogen is increasing the elemental cobalt content of the catalysts and as a consequence the cobalt surface areas are higher.
The precursor prepared in example 2(b), containing Pd were subjected to thermal decomposition under hydrogen at a temperature of 4250C for 6 hours followed by heating to 45O0C under vacuum for 2 hours cobalt surface areas determined by hydrogen chemisorption at 15O0C according to the method as described above.
Figure imgf000015_0002
It appears that again the presence of Pd has had a beneficial effect on the resulting cobalt surface area. Example 4: Impregnation of AbO3 support by slurry method
A series of catalysts were prepared as follows;
(a) 16.1g laboratory prepared cobalt formate (Co content 37.1% wt) was dissolved in 96ml aqueous ammonia and 94ml demineralised water to form the cobalt formate ammine complex solution. pH solution = 10.4. 3g AI2O3 (Puralox HP14/150) was placed in a 3-litre round bottom flask along with the cobalt ammine complex solution. The contents of the flask were continuously agitated whilst heating to 1000C. Ammonia/water was distilled off until pH = 7.2. At this stage the solution was very pink. The flask contents were filtered whilst hot. The filtrate was pink, the solid was black. The filter cake was oven dried at 1050C for approximately 65 hours. Approximately 5.9g material was produced. Co content of dried precursor = 37.4% wt by ICP-AAS.
(b) 32.1g lab prepared cobalt formate (Co content 37.1% wt) was dissolved in 192mls aqueous ammonia and 188ml demineralised water to form the cobalt formate ammine complex solution. pH solution = 11.0. 6.1g AI2O3 (Puralox H P14/150) was placed in a 3-litre round bottom flask along with the cobalt ammine complex solution. The contents of the flask were continuously agitated whilst heating to 1000C. Ammonia/water was distilled off until pH = 7.6. At this stage the solution was very pink. The flask contents were filtered whilst hot. The filtrate was purple, the solid was black. The filter cake was oven dried at 1050C for approximately 16 hours. Approximately 14.8g material was produced. Co content of dried precursor = 39.2% wt.
Example 5 : Preparation of Catalysts
a) Without Hydrogen Augmentation: The precursors prepared in examples 4(a-b) were heated without hydrogen augmentation in a stream of helium at 4000C and then under vacuum for 2 hours and the Co surface area determined by hydrogen chemisorption at 15O0C according to the method described above. The weight loss on heating (WLOH) was also measured. The results are as follows;
Figure imgf000016_0001
b) With Hydrogen Augmentation: The precursors prepared in examples 4(a-b) were heated under hydrogen at 4250C followed by heating to 45O0C under vacuum for 2 hours and the Co surface area determined by hydrogen chemisorption at 15O0C according to the method described above. The weight loss on heating (WLOH) was also measured. The results are as follows;
Figure imgf000017_0001
Example 5: Cobalt ammine formate on theta alumina
Gamma alumina was fired at 10500C in air for 4hours to produce theta phase AI2O3. A cobalt ammine formate solution was prepared by dissolving 75g commercial cobalt formate in 180ml aqueous ammonia in a round bottom flask over 16 hours. After 16 hours the solution was filtered to remove residual solids.
Approximately 5Og theta AI2O3 powder was placed in a Pascall mixing barrel and placed onto the Pascall Conical Lab Mixer. The AI2O3 was stirred whilst adding the cobalt ammine formate solution dropwise onto the support. The addition was terminated at what was deemed as incipient wetness. Once incipient wetness had been reached the cover was placed on the barrel and the barrel rotated at full speed for a further 10 minutes. The solid was dried at 105°C/16h. Three further impregnations were carried out using the same method. The details are given below.
Figure imgf000017_0002
a) Results without H2 Augmentation:
The catalyst precursor was heated in a stream of helium at 3500C for 1 hour and then under vacuum for 2 hours and the Co surface area determined by hydrogen chemisorption at 1500C. The weight loss on heating (WLOH) was also measured. TGA/MS analysis shows thermal decomposition of the cobalt formate to elemental cobalt at 300 to 3200C. The results are as follows:
Figure imgf000018_0001
b) Results with H? Augmentation:
The catalyst precursor was subjected to thermal decomposition under hydrogen at a temperature of 425°C for 6 hours followed by heating to 4500C under vacuum for 2 hours and the Co surface area determined by hydrogen chemisorption at 1500C. The weight loss on reduction (WLOR) was also measured. The results are as follows:
Figure imgf000018_0002
Cobalt surface areas of cobalt formate catalysts made with theta AI2O3 using the hydrogen- augmented reduction method appear to be better than those made with gamma AI2O3. However, when using the heating in helium method, the catalysts prepared with gamma AI2O3 appear to be superior to those prepared with theta AI2O3.
Example 6: Cobalt ammine formate on silica
A cobalt ammine formate solution was prepared by dissolving 20Og commercial cobalt formate in 500ml aqueous NH3 in a 1 litre round bottom flask over 8 hours. The solution was filtered to remove residual solids. pH solution = 11.2.
Approximately 10Og SiO2 powder (as received) was placed in a Pascall mixing barrel and place onto the Pascall Conical Lab Mixer. The SiO2 was stirred whilst adding the cobalt ammine formate solution dropwise onto the support. The addition was terminated at what was deemed as incipient wetness. Once incipient wetness had been reached the cover was placed on the barrel and the barrel rotated at full speed for a further 10 minutes. The solid was dried at 105°C/16h. Further impregnations were carried out using the same method.
Impregnation details, cobalt loadings (measured by ICP-AAS), particle size analysis (measured using a Malvern Mastersizer) and nitrogen adsorption analysis results for BET surface area, average pore volume and average pore diameter are given below.
Figure imgf000019_0001
a) Results without H2 Augmentation:
The catalyst precursor was heated in a stream of helium at 250 and 300 0C for 1 hour and then under vacuum for 2 hours and the Co surface area determined by hydrogen chemisorption at 1500C. The weight loss on heating (WLOH) was also measured. TGA/MS analysis shows thermal decomposition to form elemental cobalt at 300 to 3200C. The results are as follows:
He 250°C
Figure imgf000019_0002
He 300°C
Figure imgf000020_0001
b) Results with H?Augmentation:
The catalyst precursor was subjected to thermal decomposition under hydrogen at a temperature of 425°C for 6 hours followed by heating to 4500C under vacuum for 2 hours and the Co surface area determined by hydrogen chemisorption at 1500C. The weight loss on reduction (WLOR) was also measured. The results are as follows:
Figure imgf000020_0002
Example 7 Catalysts Testing
a) in-situ reduction with hydrogen.
Catalysts were used for the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis of hydrocarbons in a laboratory-scale reactor. About 0.2 g of unreduced catalyst in a diluted bed (ca. 4 mm ID by 50 mm depth) was first reduced at 4300C for 420min in a hydrogen flow of 9851 litres/hr/kg of unreduced catalyst. Then hydrogen and carbon monoxide at a 2:1 ratio were passed through the bed at 2000C or 210°C at 20 barg. The space velocity was adjusted after 30 hrs to obtain as close as possible 50% CO conversion. The activity and selectivity of the catalyst to CH4, C2-C4 and C5+ hydrocarbons were measured using known Gas Chromatography (GC) techniques.
For comparison, a 20%wt Co catalyst promoted with 1 % wt Re, prepared by impregnation of Co nitrate and perrhenic acid on the gamma-alumina and calcined in air was also reduced and tested under the same conditions (Std 1 ). The activity of the catalysts of the present invention is given relative to this standard catalyst. The results are as follows;
Figure imgf000021_0001
Example 7a was the Co-formate/Pd/alumina catalyst precursor of Example 2(b) prepared by 4 impregnations.
Example 7b was the Co-formate/alumina catalyst precursor of Example 2(a) prepared by 4 impregnations.
Example 7c was the Co-formate/silica catalyst precursor of Example 6 prepared by 5 impregnations.
These results indicate that the catalysts of the present invention may be more active than standard nitrate-based catalysts, and in the case of 7a and 7b in particular, give similar selectivity.
b) in-situ reduction with synthesis gas
Example 7a was repeated using the same reaction conditions (210°C/20 barg) using the Cobalt-formate and Pd-promoted Cobalt-formate on alumina catalysts, but without the preceding hydrogen reduction step, i.e. the catalyst precursors were simply brought up to the reaction temperature in the presence of the synthesis gas. No 'extra' reduction time was used. Such simplified activation offers a considerable advantage to the catalyst user compared to current activation processes.
The catalysts of the present invention were compared against a standard cobalt-nitrate derived 20% cobalt/alumina catalyst (Std 2) prepared by impregnation and calcined in air. This catalysts was subjected to the same synthesis gas-only activation procedure. The results were as follows;
Figure imgf000022_0001
Example 7d was the Co-formate/alumina catalyst precursor of Example 2(a) prepared by 4 impregnations.
Example 7e was the Co-formate/Pd/alumina catalyst precursor of Example 2(b) prepared by 4 impregnations.
These results show that under these reduction conditions, the catalysts of the present invention are more active than the standard nitrate-based catalyst.
Comparative Example C1. Preparation of Cobalt formate solution and impregnation of alumina.
4.1g cobalt formate (laboratory prepared, Co content 36.8% wt) was dissolved in 170ml cold demineralised H2O in a round bottom flask. The solution was left to dissolve overnight. Solution pH = 6.8. Cobalt in solution = 0.94wt%.
Approximately 2Og gamma AI2O3 was placed in a round bottom flask. The AI2O3 was stirred whilst adding the cobalt formate solution dropwise through a dropping funnel. The addition was terminated at what was deemed as incipient wetness (when the solid just began to stick together). The colour of the solid was pink. The solid was dried at 1050C for 64 hrs. After drying the colour of the solid was lilac. The dried powder was sieved to < 1.0mm particle size. Three further impregnations were carried out using the same method, although drying was overnight (16 hours) rather than 64 hours. Final Co content of the dried precursor was measured at 4.1 % wt.
The comparative catalyst precursor was then subjected to heating to 35O0C under helium or hydrogen-augmented heating at 4250C and the cobalt surface areas measured by hydrogen chemisorption at 15O0C as described above. The results were as follows;
Figure imgf000022_0002
The surface areas are lower than obtained for the present invention.

Claims

Claims.
1. A process for the preparation of a supported cobalt catalyst precursor comprising the steps of; i) mixing a support material with a solution of a thermally decomposable cobalt ammine carboxylate complex to form a catalyst precursor, ii) separating any excess solution from the catalyst precursor, and iii) drying the catalyst precursor,
2. A process according to claim 1 wherein the cobalt ammine carboxylate is selected from the list consisting of cobalt ammine formate, cobalt ammine acetate or cobalt ammine oxalate or mixtures thereof.
3. A process according to acclaim 1 or claim 2 wherein the cobalt ammine carboxylate is cobalt ammine formate.
4. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 3 wherein the support material is alumina, silica, zirconia or titania.
5. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein the support material is a gamma alumina or a theta alumina.
6. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein one or more compounds of metals selected from molybdenum, nickel, copper, iron, manganese, titanium, zirconium, lanthanum, cerium, chromium, magnesium, zinc, nickel, rhodium, iridium, ruthenium, rhenium, platinum and palladium are included in the catalyst precursor.
7. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein the mixture of support material and thermally decomposable cobalt ammine carboxylate complex is heated to remove ammonia and water prior to separating excess solution from the resulting catalyst precursor.
8. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein the steps (i) to (iii) are repeated until the cobalt content of the dried catalyst precursor is ≥ 10% by weight.
9. A process according to claim 6 wherein sufficient palladium compound is present in the solution of cobalt ammine carboxylate such that the palladium content of the dried catalyst precursor is greater than 10 ppm.
10. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 9 further comprising (iv) converting the catalyst precursor to active catalyst by heating the dried catalyst precursor under non- oxidising conditions so that at least part of the cobalt is converted to its elemental form.
11. A process according to claim 10 wherein the temperature range for conversion is 200 to 55O0C.
12. A process according to claim 10 or claim 11 wherein the heating is performed under an inert gas such as nitrogen, helium or argon.
13. A process according to claim 10 or claim 11 wherein the heating is performed under vacuum.
14. A process according to claim 10 or claim 11 wherein the heating is performed in the presence of a hydrogen-containing gas.
15. A process according to claim 14 wherein the heating stage is performed under at temperatures in the range 200-5500C for between 1 and 24 hours at atmospheric or higher pressures up to about 25 bar.
16. A process according to any one of claims 10 to 15 wherein the catalyst precursor is disposed in a Fischer-Tropsch reactor and the reduction is performed in-situ.
17. A catalyst precursor obtainable by the process of any one of claims 1 to 9.
18. A catalyst obtainable by the process of any one of claims 10 to 15.
19. The use of a catalyst according to claim 18 for hydrogenation reactions.
20. The use of a catalyst according claim 18 for the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis of hydrocarbons.
PCT/GB2006/050036 2005-02-25 2006-02-14 Catalysts WO2006090190A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GBGB0503818.7A GB0503818D0 (en) 2005-02-25 2005-02-25 Catalysts
GB0503818.7 2005-02-25

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2006090190A1 true WO2006090190A1 (en) 2006-08-31

Family

ID=34430139

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2006/050036 WO2006090190A1 (en) 2005-02-25 2006-02-14 Catalysts

Country Status (2)

Country Link
GB (1) GB0503818D0 (en)
WO (1) WO2006090190A1 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2009118189A1 (en) * 2008-03-27 2009-10-01 Umicore Ag & Co. Kg Basic exchange for enhanced redox os materials for emission control applications
WO2010076126A1 (en) * 2008-12-16 2010-07-08 Wacker Chemie Ag Heterogenous catalyst for fischer-tropsch synthesis and a method for the production thereof
ITPD20090397A1 (en) * 2009-12-29 2011-06-30 Qid S R L PROCEDURE FOR PREPARATION OF BIMETALLIC COMPOSITIONS OF CO / PD AND COMPOSITIONS OBTAINED THROUGH IT
CN102489312A (en) * 2011-11-24 2012-06-13 武汉凯迪工程技术研究总院有限公司 Fischer-Tropsch synthesis cobalt-based nano-catalyst based on porous material confinement, and preparation method thereof
WO2013160490A1 (en) * 2012-04-23 2013-10-31 Repsol S.A. Catalyst for the selective oxidation of sulphur compounds
US8778831B2 (en) 2008-03-27 2014-07-15 Umicore Ag & Co. Kg Base metal and base metal modified diesel oxidation catalysts
US9403151B2 (en) 2009-01-30 2016-08-02 Umicore Ag & Co. Kg Basic exchange for enhanced redox OS materials for emission control applications

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4409131A (en) * 1982-02-22 1983-10-11 Maine Preparation of CoMo and NiMo catalyst using cobalt or nickel complexes that are stable in basic solution
US5874381A (en) * 1994-08-02 1999-02-23 Crosfield Limited Cobalt on alumina catalysts
US20030119668A1 (en) * 2000-05-19 2003-06-26 Johnson Matthey Plc Catalysts with high cobalt surface area

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4409131A (en) * 1982-02-22 1983-10-11 Maine Preparation of CoMo and NiMo catalyst using cobalt or nickel complexes that are stable in basic solution
US5874381A (en) * 1994-08-02 1999-02-23 Crosfield Limited Cobalt on alumina catalysts
US20030119668A1 (en) * 2000-05-19 2003-06-26 Johnson Matthey Plc Catalysts with high cobalt surface area

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
VAN DE LOOSDRECHT J ET AL: "Preparation and properties of supported cobalt catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis", APPLIED CATALYSIS A: GENERAL, ELSEVIER SCIENCE, AMSTERDAM, NL, vol. 150, no. 2, 13 March 1997 (1997-03-13), pages 365 - 376, XP004338059, ISSN: 0926-860X *

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2009118189A1 (en) * 2008-03-27 2009-10-01 Umicore Ag & Co. Kg Basic exchange for enhanced redox os materials for emission control applications
US8778831B2 (en) 2008-03-27 2014-07-15 Umicore Ag & Co. Kg Base metal and base metal modified diesel oxidation catalysts
WO2010076126A1 (en) * 2008-12-16 2010-07-08 Wacker Chemie Ag Heterogenous catalyst for fischer-tropsch synthesis and a method for the production thereof
US9403151B2 (en) 2009-01-30 2016-08-02 Umicore Ag & Co. Kg Basic exchange for enhanced redox OS materials for emission control applications
ITPD20090397A1 (en) * 2009-12-29 2011-06-30 Qid S R L PROCEDURE FOR PREPARATION OF BIMETALLIC COMPOSITIONS OF CO / PD AND COMPOSITIONS OBTAINED THROUGH IT
WO2011080275A1 (en) * 2009-12-29 2011-07-07 Qid S.R.L. Method for preparation of bimetallic compositions of cobalt and palladium on an intert material support and compositions obtainable by the same
US8664147B2 (en) 2009-12-29 2014-03-04 Qid S.R.L. Method for preparation of bimetallic compositions of cobalt and palladium on an inert material support and compositions obtainable by the same
CN102489312A (en) * 2011-11-24 2012-06-13 武汉凯迪工程技术研究总院有限公司 Fischer-Tropsch synthesis cobalt-based nano-catalyst based on porous material confinement, and preparation method thereof
WO2013160490A1 (en) * 2012-04-23 2013-10-31 Repsol S.A. Catalyst for the selective oxidation of sulphur compounds
CN104302388A (en) * 2012-04-23 2015-01-21 雷普索尔有限公司 Catalyst for the selective oxidation of sulphur compounds
RU2598384C2 (en) * 2012-04-23 2016-09-27 Репсоль С.А. Catalyst for selective oxidation of sulphur compounds
US9776176B2 (en) 2012-04-23 2017-10-03 Repsol, S.A. Catalyst for selective oxidation of sulphur compounds

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB0503818D0 (en) 2005-04-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DK1542794T3 (en) Process for preparing cobalt catalysts on a titanium oxide support
US8017544B2 (en) Catalyst manufacture
EP1824598B1 (en) Shaped eggshell catalysts containing cobalt , use and preparation thereof
AU2006260683B2 (en) Supported cobalt catalysts for the fischer tropsch synthesis
EP1791638A1 (en) High cobalt content, high cobalt surface area catalysts, preparation and use thereof
WO2005105299A1 (en) Catalysts
WO2006090190A1 (en) Catalysts
US8389437B2 (en) Process for preparing catalyst supports having reduced levels of contaminant

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 06710160

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 6710160

Country of ref document: EP