WO2006068885A1 - Load bearing structure and method of manufacture thereof - Google Patents

Load bearing structure and method of manufacture thereof Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2006068885A1
WO2006068885A1 PCT/US2005/045066 US2005045066W WO2006068885A1 WO 2006068885 A1 WO2006068885 A1 WO 2006068885A1 US 2005045066 W US2005045066 W US 2005045066W WO 2006068885 A1 WO2006068885 A1 WO 2006068885A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
load bearing
bearing structure
load
molding
cell density
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2005/045066
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Chinniah Thiagarajan
Narayanaswamy Venkatesha
Original Assignee
General Electric Company
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by General Electric Company filed Critical General Electric Company
Publication of WO2006068885A1 publication Critical patent/WO2006068885A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E01CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
    • E01BPERMANENT WAY; PERMANENT-WAY TOOLS; MACHINES FOR MAKING RAILWAYS OF ALL KINDS
    • E01B3/00Transverse or longitudinal sleepers; Other means resting directly on the ballastway for supporting rails
    • E01B3/44Transverse or longitudinal sleepers; Other means resting directly on the ballastway for supporting rails made from other materials only if the material is essential

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to load bearing structures, and specifically, to efficient load bearing structures and methods for manufacturing the same.
  • Load bearing structures such as railway ties or railway sleepers serve to transfer the rail loading from the wheel load, which is around 500 IcN, to support the structure of the train and the railroad base, to facilitate in gauge maintenance, and to absorb vibrations imparted to the railway tracks, among other functions.
  • Popular conventional materials for railway sleepers include concrete, steel and wood. Concrete is typically a very rigid material and therefore has poor shock absorption characteristics, while steel also suffers from poor vibration absorption characteristics, while use of wood is increasingly being discouraged because it results in depletion of natural resources. In fact, in many countries, policies discontinuing the use of wooden sleepers have been affected. Accordingly, there is a need in the industry for an alternative material for railway sleeper due to problems with conventional sleepers.
  • polymeric railroad sleepers have emerged as a probable alternative.
  • Some contemplated polymeric railway sleepers include recycled, reinforced plastic constituents, sandwich and hybrid concepts. These conceptualizations, however, suffer from a number of disadvantages, such as high weight, leading to an increase in material costs, and low strength to weight ratios, among others.
  • the weight of the conventional railway sleepers ranges from 100 kg to 200 kg, and in general there exists a need for railway sleepers with reduced weight. There is also a need to improve the load bearing capacity, gauge maintenance and vibration characteristics of the alternate material railroad sleepers, and a need for efficiently manufacturing such railway sleepers.
  • a load bearing structure configured to bear a load
  • the load bearing structure includes a number of cells and the load bearing structure has a length, a center, and a cell density.
  • the cell density of the load bearing structure varies along the length.
  • the load bearing structure has a mass of 6 kg or more.
  • a method for manufacturing a load bearing structure includes providing a mold configured for making the load bearing structure, injection molding a suitable composite material into the mold, and recovering the injection-molded load bearing structure.
  • FIG. 1 is a front elevation perspective view of a load bearing structure in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a top perspective view of the load bearing structure of FIG. 1.
  • FlG. 3 is a bottom perspective view of the load bearing structure of FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 4 is a plot illustrating a load on the load bearing structure and cell density versus the length of the load bearing structure of FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 5 is front view of a load bearing structure with consolidated parts in accordance with another embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates a method for manufacturing a load bearing structure in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIGS. 1-3 illustrate such a load bearing structure, for example, a railway sleeper 10 in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • the railway sleeper 10 holds and supports the rails, bearing a load P at localized zones in the railway sleeper, illustrated in FIG. 1 as equally distributed (P/2 for each rail).
  • the load P typically represents the load of railway vehicles imparted to the sleeper 10, typically through two rails (not shown).
  • the railway sleeper 10 may be supported by girders 12 as shown, or other alternate supports such as those employed in ballast tracks, or other alternate supports such as those employed in ballastless tracks may be used.
  • Critical parameters for railway sleeper performance include load bearing capacity or bearing stiffness, and dimensional stability or gauge maintenance.
  • vibration absorption characteristics of the railroad sleeper 10 translate into passenger comfort through reduction in noise and vibrations.
  • Other important considerations include the weight of the railway sleeper, its cost, and the cost and complexity of additional fixtures required for facilitating load bearing, such as rail fasteners.
  • An aspect of the invention resides in providing a railway sleeper or a load bearing structure that offers improvement in these parameters.
  • the load bearing structure is non- uniformly composed to efficiently support the load.
  • the load bearing structure comprises multiple cells 14 (FIG. 3) having walls, within the railway sleeper 10 body, the cells 14 configured to bear loads according to the spatial loading requirements of the railway sleeper 10.
  • the cells 14 may proceed from top of the sleeper 10 to the bottom (along the height) or from left of the sleeper 10 to the right (along the width). More specifically, it was observed that the key loading for railway sleepers comes from the rail loading, as illustrated by loads P/2 shown in FIG. 1. Accordingly, the cells 14 are distributed based on the expected loading characteristics of the load bearing structure 10. For example, the invention advantageously provides a high density of cells 16 immediately below the zone of load transfer from the rail to the sleeper.
  • a reduced cell density 18 may be employed at locations distant from the primary load transfer zones.
  • the load bearing capacity of the railway sleeper is concentrated in the zones where the loading is high, and this concept is employed for both transverse and longitudinal load bearing capacity of the railway sleeper.
  • spatially varying includes variations along the length, breadth and height of the load bearing structure.
  • the present invention performs the intended load bearing function at about a third of the material weight in some cases.
  • the load bearing structure provided by the present invention offers significant weight and cost reductions over conventional load bearing structures.
  • the cell density is configured to vary according to the loading of the load bearing structure 10. Such a configuration is illustrated by the plot of FIG. 4, wherein the cell density 20 is at a maximum at the locations of concentrated loading, illustrated by curves 30, for the embodiment of FIGS. 1-3.
  • the cell density varies symmetrically from the center of the load bearing structure, and in another embodiment the cell density varies un-symmetrically from the center.
  • the cells 14 may have a closed configuration with walls enclosing a volume from all sides, as opposed to an open configuration of illustrated embodiment of FIGS. 1-3, in which the cells have at least one open side without a wall. It is appreciated that the load bearing structures being discussed have a load bearing capacity above about 10 kN, for example support beams, and railway sleepers 10 for which typical loads are about 200 - 500 kN.
  • the material constituents for the railway sleeper may also be tailored for desired features.
  • rail fixtures such as sloped top surface, transverse rail supports, rail fasteners, bolt holders among others, may be integrated in the sleeper, thereby beneficially providing a consolidated parts feature. Parts consolidated at the time of manufacture advantageously eliminate the need to attach or fix those parts when the load bearing structure is put in service, reducing the need for labor and equipment at that time.
  • the load bearing structure such as the railway sleeper 10
  • Polymeric materials include thermoplastics and thermosets, and combinations thereof. More specifically polymeric materials suitable for use in the load bearing structures of the present invention may be selected from materials such as polycarbonates, polyamides, olefin polymers, polyesters, polyestercarbonates, epoxides, polysulfones, polyethers, polyetherimides, polyimides, silicone polymers, phenol formaldehyde resins, mixtures of the foregoing polymers, copolymers of the foregoing polymers, and mixtures thereof.
  • the load bearing structure comprises a composite material.
  • the composite material typically includes an organic polymeric matrix with a filler material dispersed in the organic polymer matrix.
  • Suitable materials for use as the organic polymeric matrix include thermoplastics, thermosets and combinations thereof.
  • the organic polymeric matrix and the filler material are chosen to impart desired properties to the load bearing structure, such as decreased thermal dimensional variation (thermal expansion or contraction), high bearing strength, rigidity, and vibration damping characteristics, among others.
  • Suitable filler materials include glass fibers, carbon fibers, polymeric fibers, natural fibers, and zeolites, among others.
  • the load bearing structure may further be configured to comprise functional surfaces such as surfaces comprising a weatherable coating layer, chemical resistance coating, surfaces comprising an anti algae coating, surfaces comprising an anti slip coating, and combinations thereof.
  • functional surfaces such as surfaces comprising a weatherable coating layer, chemical resistance coating, surfaces comprising an anti algae coating, surfaces comprising an anti slip coating, and combinations thereof.
  • the load bearing structure's polymeric material or filler material may impart the above functionalities.
  • Embodiments of the present invention utilizing surfaces and cells for performance enhancement and spatially varying cell density configurations in load bearing structure 10 have been described.
  • the invention is useful in other alternative configurations as well.
  • the spatially varying cell density configuration can be custom designed for girder bridge supports.
  • the spatially varying cell density configuration can be custom designed for use in combination with ballasted tracks.
  • the spatially varying cell density configuration can be custom designed for use in combination with ballastless tracks.
  • a load bearing structure comprises at least one organic polymeric matrix material and at least two reinforcement filler materials wherein a first reinforcement filler material has a negative thermal expansion coefficient (for example carbon fibers) and a second reinforcement filler has a positive thermal expansion coefficient (for example glass fibers).
  • the two reinforcement fillers are present in amounts such that the overall thermal expansion coefficient is zero.
  • the use of fillers having offsetting thermal expansion characteristics is useful in controlling the dimensional integrity of a structure, for example gauge maintenance in railroad applications.
  • Fig. 6 illustrates a method 100 for manufacturing a load bearing structure in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
  • a mold having cavities configured to form the load bearing structure, the structure comprising cells is provided.
  • a suitable polymeric material is injected into the mold.
  • the polymeric material may be a single polymeric material, a mixture of polymeric materials, or a composite material.
  • the load bearing structure is recovered from the mold.
  • the railway sleeper is molded in two or more injection shots of the polymeric material. For example, a left half of the part along length is first molded, and then a right half is molded to complete the sleeper. In another embodiment, the sleeper may be manufactured in different parts.
  • the railway sleeper 10 comprises an open cell configuration (or "rib cell") as illustrated in FIG. 3 that meets the engineering requirements of a load bearing structure such as a railway sleeper and may be manufactured by an injection molding process and provides for faster cycle time and more cost effective fabrication relative to the manufacture of structures lacking the open cell configuration.
  • functional parts such as those not required for the purpose of bearing the load, for example rail fasteners, rail supports, bolt holders, among others, may be advantageously co-molded into the load bearing structure 10.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a railway sleeper 10 having consolidated rail fasteners 22.
  • Example 1 A comparison of performance parameters of a conventional polymer railway sleeper (Comparative Example), and a railway sleeper comprising spatially varying cell density structure (Example 1), indicates the advantages brought forth by various embodiments discussed above.
  • the following data was generated by simulating various Railway sleepers by forming a test mesh using HypermeshTM software, and testing it for strength (maximum Von-Mises stress and maximum deflection) using ABAQUSTM software, and for manufacturing (Injection mold, moldability, productivity and shot capacity of machine) using MoldflowTM software.
  • the term "example” as used herein will be understood to refer to a numerical simulation outcome, and not an actual physical test.
  • the part volume and part weight values required to meet the engineering requirements for the load bearing structure of the Comparative Example as compared to Example 1 indicates a substantially higher volume and mass of material is required for a polymeric railway sleeper having a conventional design relative to the sleeper design of Example 1 , which represents polymeric railway sleepers possessing spatially varying cell density.
  • the railway sleeper of Example 1 comprising a rib cell structure advantageously provides for an injection molding process that is a simple manufacturing process, simple injection molds, low tooling cost, easy moldability, high productivity and lower shot capacity machine, as compared to that of the Comparative Example.
  • the volume and weight reduction in Example 1 is substantial, and accordingly the reduction in material costs is also substantial. Table 1
  • Example 1 which is polymeric railway sleepers possessing spatially varying cell density.
  • the railway sleeper of Example 1 comprising a rib cell structure provides for an advantageous injection molding process, requiring a low shot capacity of injection molding machine for Example 1, as compared to that of the Comparative Example.
  • the advantage of weight reduction exhibited by Example 1 is substantial, as is the associated cost reduction.
  • the weight reduction of Example 1 in comparison to conventional sleepers, such as those of wood is especially advantageous.
  • a low von-Mises stress and a low deflection of the Example 1 in comparison to the conventional polymeric sleeper indicates a higher stability and toughness of the Example 1 , and are further advantages explored by the present design provided by the invention. While preserving desired strength, and other desirable parameters such as vibration damping, the railway sleeper of Example 1 weighs about 24 kilograms, whereas conventional sleepers may weigh between 100 and 200 kilograms, and current polymeric sleepers may weigh upto about 50 kilograms. Additionally, ease of manufacture, which is an important factor, is also an advantageous aspect of the embodiment of Example 1. This is also illustrated by nearly half the shot capacity required for manufacturing the conventional polymeric sleeper.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Sliding-Contact Bearings (AREA)

Abstract

A load bearing structure configured to bear a load, the structure comprising a multiple cells. The load bearing structure has a length, a center, and a cell density, which varies at least along the length of the load bearing structure, which weighs at least 6 kg.

Description

LOAD BEARING STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE
THEREOF
BACKGROUND
This invention relates generally to load bearing structures, and specifically, to efficient load bearing structures and methods for manufacturing the same.
Load bearing structures such as railway ties or railway sleepers serve to transfer the rail loading from the wheel load, which is around 500 IcN, to support the structure of the train and the railroad base, to facilitate in gauge maintenance, and to absorb vibrations imparted to the railway tracks, among other functions. Popular conventional materials for railway sleepers include concrete, steel and wood. Concrete is typically a very rigid material and therefore has poor shock absorption characteristics, while steel also suffers from poor vibration absorption characteristics, while use of wood is increasingly being discouraged because it results in depletion of natural resources. In fact, in many countries, policies discontinuing the use of wooden sleepers have been affected. Accordingly, there is a need in the industry for an alternative material for railway sleeper due to problems with conventional sleepers. For instance, polymeric railroad sleepers have emerged as a probable alternative. Some contemplated polymeric railway sleepers include recycled, reinforced plastic constituents, sandwich and hybrid concepts. These conceptualizations, however, suffer from a number of disadvantages, such as high weight, leading to an increase in material costs, and low strength to weight ratios, among others.
Further, the weight of the conventional railway sleepers ranges from 100 kg to 200 kg, and in general there exists a need for railway sleepers with reduced weight. There is also a need to improve the load bearing capacity, gauge maintenance and vibration characteristics of the alternate material railroad sleepers, and a need for efficiently manufacturing such railway sleepers. BRIEF DESCRIPTION
Briefly, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention, there is provided a load bearing structure. The load bearing structure is configured to bear a load, the load bearing structure includes a number of cells and the load bearing structure has a length, a center, and a cell density. The cell density of the load bearing structure varies along the length. The load bearing structure has a mass of 6 kg or more.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, there is provided a method for manufacturing a load bearing structure. The method includes providing a mold configured for making the load bearing structure, injection molding a suitable composite material into the mold, and recovering the injection-molded load bearing structure.
DRAWINGS
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a front elevation perspective view of a load bearing structure in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 2 is a top perspective view of the load bearing structure of FIG. 1.
FlG. 3 is a bottom perspective view of the load bearing structure of FIG. 1.
FIG. 4 is a plot illustrating a load on the load bearing structure and cell density versus the length of the load bearing structure of FIG. 1.
FIG. 5 is front view of a load bearing structure with consolidated parts in accordance with another embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 6 illustrates a method for manufacturing a load bearing structure in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
As noted, the present invention provides a load bearing structure for bearing a load. FIGS. 1-3 illustrate such a load bearing structure, for example, a railway sleeper 10 in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. The railway sleeper 10 holds and supports the rails, bearing a load P at localized zones in the railway sleeper, illustrated in FIG. 1 as equally distributed (P/2 for each rail). The load P typically represents the load of railway vehicles imparted to the sleeper 10, typically through two rails (not shown). The railway sleeper 10 may be supported by girders 12 as shown, or other alternate supports such as those employed in ballast tracks, or other alternate supports such as those employed in ballastless tracks may be used. Critical parameters for railway sleeper performance include load bearing capacity or bearing stiffness, and dimensional stability or gauge maintenance. Importantly, vibration absorption characteristics of the railroad sleeper 10 translate into passenger comfort through reduction in noise and vibrations. Other important considerations include the weight of the railway sleeper, its cost, and the cost and complexity of additional fixtures required for facilitating load bearing, such as rail fasteners. An aspect of the invention resides in providing a railway sleeper or a load bearing structure that offers improvement in these parameters.
According to an inventive aspect of the invention, the load bearing structure is non- uniformly composed to efficiently support the load. Specifically, the load bearing structure comprises multiple cells 14 (FIG. 3) having walls, within the railway sleeper 10 body, the cells 14 configured to bear loads according to the spatial loading requirements of the railway sleeper 10. The cells 14 may proceed from top of the sleeper 10 to the bottom (along the height) or from left of the sleeper 10 to the right (along the width). More specifically, it was observed that the key loading for railway sleepers comes from the rail loading, as illustrated by loads P/2 shown in FIG. 1. Accordingly, the cells 14 are distributed based on the expected loading characteristics of the load bearing structure 10. For example, the invention advantageously provides a high density of cells 16 immediately below the zone of load transfer from the rail to the sleeper. A reduced cell density 18 may be employed at locations distant from the primary load transfer zones. By spatially positioning the cells 14, the load bearing capacity of the railway sleeper is concentrated in the zones where the loading is high, and this concept is employed for both transverse and longitudinal load bearing capacity of the railway sleeper. It is noted here that the term "spatially varying" includes variations along the length, breadth and height of the load bearing structure. By concentrating material where it is required, the present invention performs the intended load bearing function at about a third of the material weight in some cases. Thus, the load bearing structure provided by the present invention offers significant weight and cost reductions over conventional load bearing structures.
In an embodiment, the cell density is configured to vary according to the loading of the load bearing structure 10. Such a configuration is illustrated by the plot of FIG. 4, wherein the cell density 20 is at a maximum at the locations of concentrated loading, illustrated by curves 30, for the embodiment of FIGS. 1-3. In another embodiment, the cell density varies symmetrically from the center of the load bearing structure, and in another embodiment the cell density varies un-symmetrically from the center. Also, in certain embodiments, the cells 14 may have a closed configuration with walls enclosing a volume from all sides, as opposed to an open configuration of illustrated embodiment of FIGS. 1-3, in which the cells have at least one open side without a wall. It is appreciated that the load bearing structures being discussed have a load bearing capacity above about 10 kN, for example support beams, and railway sleepers 10 for which typical loads are about 200 - 500 kN.
In addition to performing the critical functions such as load bearing, gauge maintenance, weight and cost reductions, the material constituents for the railway sleeper may also be tailored for desired features. In an embodiment, rail fixtures such as sloped top surface, transverse rail supports, rail fasteners, bolt holders among others, may be integrated in the sleeper, thereby beneficially providing a consolidated parts feature. Parts consolidated at the time of manufacture advantageously eliminate the need to attach or fix those parts when the load bearing structure is put in service, reducing the need for labor and equipment at that time.
In an embodiment the load bearing structure, such as the railway sleeper 10, comprises a polymeric material. Polymeric materials include thermoplastics and thermosets, and combinations thereof. More specifically polymeric materials suitable for use in the load bearing structures of the present invention may be selected from materials such as polycarbonates, polyamides, olefin polymers, polyesters, polyestercarbonates, epoxides, polysulfones, polyethers, polyetherimides, polyimides, silicone polymers, phenol formaldehyde resins, mixtures of the foregoing polymers, copolymers of the foregoing polymers, and mixtures thereof.
In another embodiment, the load bearing structure comprises a composite material. The composite material typically includes an organic polymeric matrix with a filler material dispersed in the organic polymer matrix. Suitable materials for use as the organic polymeric matrix include thermoplastics, thermosets and combinations thereof. The organic polymeric matrix and the filler material are chosen to impart desired properties to the load bearing structure, such as decreased thermal dimensional variation (thermal expansion or contraction), high bearing strength, rigidity, and vibration damping characteristics, among others. Suitable filler materials include glass fibers, carbon fibers, polymeric fibers, natural fibers, and zeolites, among others. The load bearing structure may further be configured to comprise functional surfaces such as surfaces comprising a weatherable coating layer, chemical resistance coating, surfaces comprising an anti algae coating, surfaces comprising an anti slip coating, and combinations thereof. In other embodiments, the load bearing structure's polymeric material or filler material may impart the above functionalities.
Embodiments of the present invention utilizing surfaces and cells for performance enhancement and spatially varying cell density configurations in load bearing structure 10 have been described. The invention however is useful in other alternative configurations as well. For example, in an embodiment of the invention, the spatially varying cell density configuration can be custom designed for girder bridge supports. In yet another embodiment of the invention, the spatially varying cell density configuration can be custom designed for use in combination with ballasted tracks. In yet another embodiment of the invention, the spatially varying cell density configuration can be custom designed for use in combination with ballastless tracks. In one embodiment of the present invention, a load bearing structure comprises at least one organic polymeric matrix material and at least two reinforcement filler materials wherein a first reinforcement filler material has a negative thermal expansion coefficient (for example carbon fibers) and a second reinforcement filler has a positive thermal expansion coefficient (for example glass fibers). The two reinforcement fillers are present in amounts such that the overall thermal expansion coefficient is zero. The use of fillers having offsetting thermal expansion characteristics is useful in controlling the dimensional integrity of a structure, for example gauge maintenance in railroad applications.
Fig. 6 illustrates a method 100 for manufacturing a load bearing structure in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In step 110, a mold having cavities configured to form the load bearing structure, the structure comprising cells is provided. In step 120, a suitable polymeric material is injected into the mold. The polymeric material may be a single polymeric material, a mixture of polymeric materials, or a composite material. In step 130, the load bearing structure is recovered from the mold. It is appreciated here that various injection molding techniques, or other techniques such as high pressure plastic injection molding, high or low pressure structural foam molding, gas assist injection molding, extrusion, thermoset molding, injection-compression molding, water assist molding, multi shot molding are generally known in the art, and any of such obvious techniques may be used without deviating from the scope and spirit of the invention. In multi-shot injection molding, the railway sleeper is molded in two or more injection shots of the polymeric material. For example, a left half of the part along length is first molded, and then a right half is molded to complete the sleeper. In another embodiment, the sleeper may be manufactured in different parts. These different parts are molded separately, and then joined together using mechanical type of joints for example, Dovetail joint or other fastening techniques known in the art, for example thermoplastic welding, bolt and screws, among others. In one embodiment, the railway sleeper 10 comprises an open cell configuration (or "rib cell") as illustrated in FIG. 3 that meets the engineering requirements of a load bearing structure such as a railway sleeper and may be manufactured by an injection molding process and provides for faster cycle time and more cost effective fabrication relative to the manufacture of structures lacking the open cell configuration. In an embodiment, functional parts, such as those not required for the purpose of bearing the load, for example rail fasteners, rail supports, bolt holders, among others, may be advantageously co-molded into the load bearing structure 10. For example, FIG. 5 illustrates a railway sleeper 10 having consolidated rail fasteners 22.
Numerical Evaluation Section
A comparison of performance parameters of a conventional polymer railway sleeper (Comparative Example), and a railway sleeper comprising spatially varying cell density structure (Example 1), indicates the advantages brought forth by various embodiments discussed above. The following data was generated by simulating various Railway sleepers by forming a test mesh using Hypermesh™ software, and testing it for strength (maximum Von-Mises stress and maximum deflection) using ABAQUS™ software, and for manufacturing (Injection mold, moldability, productivity and shot capacity of machine) using Moldflow™ software. The term "example" as used herein will be understood to refer to a numerical simulation outcome, and not an actual physical test.
As can be seen from Table 1 , the part volume and part weight values required to meet the engineering requirements for the load bearing structure of the Comparative Example as compared to Example 1 indicates a substantially higher volume and mass of material is required for a polymeric railway sleeper having a conventional design relative to the sleeper design of Example 1 , which represents polymeric railway sleepers possessing spatially varying cell density.
The railway sleeper of Example 1 comprising a rib cell structure advantageously provides for an injection molding process that is a simple manufacturing process, simple injection molds, low tooling cost, easy moldability, high productivity and lower shot capacity machine, as compared to that of the Comparative Example. The volume and weight reduction in Example 1 is substantial, and accordingly the reduction in material costs is also substantial. Table 1
Figure imgf000009_0001
As can be seen from Table 1 , the high part volume, and accordingly high part weight values are required to meet the engineering requirements for the load bearing structure of the Comparative Example as compared to Example 1 , which is polymeric railway sleepers possessing spatially varying cell density. The railway sleeper of Example 1 comprising a rib cell structure provides for an advantageous injection molding process, requiring a low shot capacity of injection molding machine for Example 1, as compared to that of the Comparative Example. The advantage of weight reduction exhibited by Example 1 is substantial, as is the associated cost reduction. The weight reduction of Example 1 in comparison to conventional sleepers, such as those of wood is especially advantageous. A low von-Mises stress and a low deflection of the Example 1 in comparison to the conventional polymeric sleeper indicates a higher stability and toughness of the Example 1 , and are further advantages explored by the present design provided by the invention. While preserving desired strength, and other desirable parameters such as vibration damping, the railway sleeper of Example 1 weighs about 24 kilograms, whereas conventional sleepers may weigh between 100 and 200 kilograms, and current polymeric sleepers may weigh upto about 50 kilograms. Additionally, ease of manufacture, which is an important factor, is also an advantageous aspect of the embodiment of Example 1. This is also illustrated by nearly half the shot capacity required for manufacturing the conventional polymeric sleeper. Other advantages pertaining to manufacture include use of injection molding process, simple injection molds, low tooling costs, high moldability and productivity as compared to the conventional polymeric sleeper. Therefore, the configurations illustrated in Example 1, as projected and compared with the Comparative Example are a substantial improvement over the existing art.
The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood by those skilled in the art, that variations and modifications can be effected within the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims

CLAIMS:
1. A load bearing structure configured to bear a load, said load bearing structure comprising a plurality of cells, said load bearing structure having a length, a center, and a cell density, wherein said cell density varies at least along said length, and said load bearing structure having a mass of at least 6 kg.
2. The load bearing structure of claim 1 , wherein said plurality of cells comprises open cells.
3. The load bearing structure of claim 1, wherein said cell density varies symmetrically from the center of said load bearing structure.
4. The load bearing structure of claim 3, wherein said cell density is concentrated in a region bearing a substantial component of said load.
5. The load bearing structure of claim 1, wherein said cell density varies unsymmetrically from the center of said load bearing structure.
6. The load bearing structure of claim 1, wherein said plurality of cells comprises at least one closed cell.
7. The load bearing structure of claim 1 , wherein said load is greater than about 1O kN.
8. The load bearing structure of claim 1 , which is a support beam.
9. The load bearing structure of claim 1 , which is a railway sleeper.
10. The load bearing structure of claim 9, further comprising a consolidated part.
1 1. The load bearing structure of claim 9, wherein the consolidated part is a rail support mechanism.
12. The load bearing structure of claim 1 1 , wherein said rail support mechanism is a support structure attachment mechanism.
13. The load bearing structure of claim 1 comprising at least one polymeric material
14. The load bearing structure of claim 13, wherein said polymeric material is selected from the group consisting of themoplastics, thermosets and combinations thereof.
15. The load bearing structure of claim 14, wherein said polymeric material is selected from the group consisting of polycarbonates, polyamides, olefin polymers, polyesters, polyestercarbonates, epoxides, polysulfones, polyethers, polyetherimides, polyimides, silicone polymers, mixtures of the foregoing polymers, copolymers of the foregoing polymers, and mixtures thereof.
16. The load bearing structure of claim 1 comprising at least one composite material.
17. The load bearing structure of claim 16, wherein said composite material comprises an organic polymeric matrix and a filler material dispersed therein.
18. The load bearing structure of claim 17, wherein the filler material is a glass fiber.
19. The load bearing structure of claim 17, wherein the filler material is a carbon fiber.
20. The load bearing structure of claim 17, wherein the filler material is a polymeric fiber.
21. The load bearing structure of claim 17, wherein the filler material is a natural fiber.
22. The load bearing structure of claim 17, wherein the organic polymeric matrix is selected form the group consisting of thermoplastics, thermosets and combinations thereof.
23. The load bearing structure of claim 17, wherein the filler material is configured to decrease dimensional variation.
24. The load bearing structure of claim 23, wherein the filler material is selected from the group consisting of carbon fibres and zeolites.
25. The load bearing structure of claim 17, wherein the load bearing structure comprises functional surfaces.
26. The load bearing structure of claim 25, wherein said functional surfaces comprises a coating selected from the group consisting of weatherable coating, chemical resistance coating anti algae coating, anti slip coating and combinations thereof.
27. The load bearing structure of claim 9, wherein the railway sleeper is configured to be compatible with a girder bridge, a ballasted track or a ballast less track.
28. A method of manufacturing a load bearing structure, the method comprising:
providing a mold having cavities complimentary to the load bearing structure;
molding a polymeric material into the mold; and
recovering the load bearing structure from the mold,
wherein the load bearing structure configured to bear a load, the load bearing structure comprising a plurality of cells, the load bearing structure having a length, a center, and a cell density, wherein said cell density varies at least along said length, and the load bearing structure having a mass of at least 6 kg.
29. The method of claim 28, wherein said molding comprises one selected from the group consisting of high pressure plastic injection molding, high pressure structural foam molding, low pressure structural foam molding, gas assist injection molding, extrusion, thermoset molding, injection-compression molding, water assist molding and combinations thereof.
30. The method of claim 28, wherein the mold has cavities complimentary to a rib cell structure.
31. The method of claim 28, further comprising co-molding a functional part into the load bearing structure.
32. The method of claim 28, further comprising surface-treating the load bearing structure.
33. The method of claim 32, wherein said surface treating is selected from the group consisting of painting, plating, electrolytic coating, spraying and combinations thereof.
PCT/US2005/045066 2004-12-21 2005-12-12 Load bearing structure and method of manufacture thereof WO2006068885A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/019,446 US20060131437A1 (en) 2004-12-21 2004-12-21 Load bearing structure and method of manufacture thereof
US11/019,446 2004-12-21

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2006068885A1 true WO2006068885A1 (en) 2006-06-29

Family

ID=36218467

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2005/045066 WO2006068885A1 (en) 2004-12-21 2005-12-12 Load bearing structure and method of manufacture thereof

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US20060131437A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2006068885A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101812819A (en) * 2010-04-28 2010-08-25 中铁二十局集团有限公司 Whole construction process for double block type ballastless track
DE102017207746A1 (en) * 2017-05-08 2018-11-08 Hyperion Verwaltung Gmbh Railway sleeper of plastic blocks and a connecting element connecting them and methods for acquiring information and / or data

Families Citing this family (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102008010869A1 (en) * 2008-02-23 2009-09-10 Thermoplast Composite Gmbh Support structure and method for producing and using such a support structure
CN101691726A (en) * 2009-09-04 2010-04-07 中铁四局集团有限公司 Construction process of double-block ballastless track
KR101029542B1 (en) * 2009-12-04 2011-04-18 이민로 Railroad tie and coupler therefor
FR2956673B1 (en) * 2010-02-23 2012-11-30 Arkema France USE OF A THERMOPLASTIC RESIN COMPOSITION FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF RAILWAY TRAVERS
US9346237B2 (en) 2010-10-27 2016-05-24 Richard W. Roberts Recyclable plastic structural articles and method of manufacture
US8342420B2 (en) 2010-10-27 2013-01-01 Roberts Jr Richard W Recyclable plastic structural articles and method of manufacture
US20130115399A1 (en) 2010-10-27 2013-05-09 Richard W. Roberts In-situ foam core articles
US9272484B2 (en) 2012-01-25 2016-03-01 Richard W. Roberts, JR. Structural plastic articles, method of use, and methods of manufacture
US9073462B2 (en) 2012-03-28 2015-07-07 Richard W. Roberts In-situ foam core vehicle seating system and method of manufacture
US10207606B2 (en) 2012-03-28 2019-02-19 Richard W. Roberts Recyclable plastic structural articles and method of manufacture
US9102086B2 (en) 2012-03-28 2015-08-11 Richard W. Roberts In-situ foam core structural articles and methods of manufacture of profiles
US8840819B2 (en) 2012-03-28 2014-09-23 Richard W. Roberts, JR. In-situ foam core structural energy management system and method of manufacture
US8708177B2 (en) 2012-03-29 2014-04-29 Richard W. Roberts In-situ foam core dielectrically-resistant systems and method of manufacture
TW201347723A (en) * 2012-05-30 2013-12-01 Univ Nat Central Replaceable micro-surgical instrument
US10328662B2 (en) 2012-11-01 2019-06-25 Richard W. Roberts In-situ foam core stress mitigation component and method of manufacture
CN102990783A (en) * 2012-12-18 2013-03-27 陆泽鹏 Hopper lifting device
US9271610B2 (en) 2013-04-12 2016-03-01 Richard W. Roberts, JR. Bathtub/shower tray support
CN103526654B (en) * 2013-10-14 2015-07-01 中铁十九局集团有限公司 Ballastless track bed base plate concrete leveling device
CN108345568B (en) * 2018-02-09 2021-04-06 石家庄铁道大学 Health monitoring characteristic parameter-based heavy-load railway concrete bearing capacity evaluation method
CN110129005B (en) * 2019-05-31 2021-01-19 南通中国科学院海洋研究所海洋科学与技术研究发展中心 Road anti-skid agent based on seaweed modified material and preparation method thereof
CN110654088A (en) * 2019-10-29 2020-01-07 天津爱思达新材料科技有限公司 Thermoplastic composite material sandwich plate structure and welding forming method

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB104645A (en) * 1916-10-14 1917-03-15 Frederick Lewis Rings Improved Reinforced Concrete Railway Sleeper.
US1526591A (en) * 1924-07-17 1925-02-17 George Seper Tie
US4229497A (en) * 1977-11-03 1980-10-21 Maso-Therm Corporation Composite module with reinforced shell
US6179215B1 (en) * 1996-07-29 2001-01-30 Primix International, Llc Composite railroad crosstie

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5609295A (en) * 1995-01-05 1997-03-11 Green Track Inc. Composite railway tie and method of manufacture thereof
US5886078A (en) * 1996-08-13 1999-03-23 Tietek, Inc. Polymeric compositions and methods for making construction materials from them
US6191228B1 (en) * 1999-01-27 2001-02-20 Polywood Inc. Use of recycled plastics for preparing high performance composite railroad ties
EP1114719B1 (en) * 1999-02-22 2008-03-05 Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd. Composite material and synthetic sleeper using the composite material
US6828372B2 (en) * 2001-03-05 2004-12-07 Tie Tek, Inc. Railroad tie and method for making same
US20020177663A1 (en) * 2001-03-16 2002-11-28 Cahill Paul J. Composites for railroad ties and other products
US7011253B2 (en) * 2001-11-06 2006-03-14 Polywood, Inc. Engineered railroad ties

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB104645A (en) * 1916-10-14 1917-03-15 Frederick Lewis Rings Improved Reinforced Concrete Railway Sleeper.
US1526591A (en) * 1924-07-17 1925-02-17 George Seper Tie
US4229497A (en) * 1977-11-03 1980-10-21 Maso-Therm Corporation Composite module with reinforced shell
US6179215B1 (en) * 1996-07-29 2001-01-30 Primix International, Llc Composite railroad crosstie

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101812819A (en) * 2010-04-28 2010-08-25 中铁二十局集团有限公司 Whole construction process for double block type ballastless track
DE102017207746A1 (en) * 2017-05-08 2018-11-08 Hyperion Verwaltung Gmbh Railway sleeper of plastic blocks and a connecting element connecting them and methods for acquiring information and / or data

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20060131437A1 (en) 2006-06-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2006068885A1 (en) Load bearing structure and method of manufacture thereof
US6286879B1 (en) I-Section automotive bumper formed from mineral-filled glass mat thermoplastic (GMT) composite
US6237304B1 (en) Laminate structural bulkhead
US5269574A (en) High performance vehicle bumper
KR101396822B1 (en) Method for manufacturing thermoplastic composite using continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic prepreg sheet and thermoplastic compositemanufactured by that method
EP0594131A1 (en) Composite chassis structure and method of manufacture
CN1290203A (en) Three dimensional composite joint reinforcement for an automotive vehicle
MX2013004732A (en) Recyclable plastic structural articles and method of manufacture.
MX2012009531A (en) Polymer based railroad tie shape designed to reduce center bounding.
CN110494264A (en) Mixed structure and manufacturing method
WO2005100691A1 (en) A railway sleeper
JPS60233254A (en) Wall element
CN104746392B (en) A kind of novel high-strength high shear composite sleeper and preparation method thereof
US9598111B2 (en) Microtruss replacing structural foam in body structural application
KR101337593B1 (en) Bicycle frame haing the carbon fiber and the packed layer
JPH04254201A (en) Resinous wheel
AU661949B2 (en) High performance vehicle bumper
WO2006088857A1 (en) Tie suitable for use on a track
JP2006083355A (en) Fiber-reinforced resin structure and railroad tie
KR102518187B1 (en) Lower stiffener for bumper of vehicle
JPH0641901A (en) Vibration proofing sleeper
KR0121490Y1 (en) Synthetic resin sleepers for railways
JP2023517967A (en) Railway track rail supports
KR102691978B1 (en) ROOF LACK AND Method for manufacturing roof lack
CN110158371B (en) Bamboo reinforced railway composite sleeper

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KM KN KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV LY MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NG NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SM SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 05853884

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1