WO2005064422A1 - Procede installe dans un systeme de securite permettant de controler un processus ou un equipement - Google Patents

Procede installe dans un systeme de securite permettant de controler un processus ou un equipement Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2005064422A1
WO2005064422A1 PCT/IB2004/004177 IB2004004177W WO2005064422A1 WO 2005064422 A1 WO2005064422 A1 WO 2005064422A1 IB 2004004177 W IB2004004177 W IB 2004004177W WO 2005064422 A1 WO2005064422 A1 WO 2005064422A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
safety
event
representation
industrial
safety system
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/IB2004/004177
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Per C Juel
Robert Martinez
Per Fjelldalen
Original Assignee
Abb Research Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Abb Research Ltd filed Critical Abb Research Ltd
Priority to EP04806373A priority Critical patent/EP1741009A1/fr
Priority to US10/584,213 priority patent/US20070276514A1/en
Publication of WO2005064422A1 publication Critical patent/WO2005064422A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
    • G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
    • G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
    • G05B23/0259—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterized by the response to fault detection
    • G05B23/0267—Fault communication, e.g. human machine interface [HMI]
    • G05B23/027—Alarm generation, e.g. communication protocol; Forms of alarm
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B9/00—Safety arrangements
    • G05B9/02—Safety arrangements electric

Definitions

  • a method in an industrial safety system for controlling a process or equipment which industrial safety system comprises components with inputs and safety devices, that enables signals to be generated as a result of an event or alarm, wherein an event or alarm causes a signal to be generated.
  • a method for handling events in an industrial system such as alarms.
  • a method for enabling an action according to an event in an industrial system such as an alarm or other events.
  • An industrial process has a physical implementation comprising components such as devices and apparatuses for operation, control, regulation and protection of the process.
  • the industrial process also comprises systems for functionality, control and supervision. This results in a complex combination of system and components.
  • it is necessary to protect the process or an environment individual, systems subsystems and/or compo- nents.
  • measurements on parameters such as currents, voltages, phases, temperatures and so on are made substantially continuously and may result in different safety events, including even a plant shut-down.
  • the safety-related functions of the industrial system are performed by a safety system with input from safety devices.
  • Safety systems have been developed for the purpose of enabling action of reactions to the safety events.
  • Safety systems in industry have a general criterion of engineering with strong emphasis on quality and verification. Such systems are typically not fully standardised but are often purpose-built and usually include devices and/or subsystems, software and communication protocols.
  • a safety system must perform very reliably, even more reliably than the control systems they protect; this means that a different standard of engineering must be used, with stronger emphasis on quality and verification.
  • Current engineering toolsets do not have a safety emphasis as a first priority. They instead pri- oritise features and flexibility. Higher quality control systems can be achieved by minimising the manual coding effort, which is the largest single sources of computer bugs, such as incorrect programming code.
  • US 5,361 ,198 describes a concept including a safety system, comprising software, displays for input, a general safety system and hand-coded functions. Some specialized safety engineering tools exist, but these demand verification and hand-coded functions.
  • secure safety control code is compromised if there is a bug in the hand-coded function, such as an operator display, which gives a wrong indication. The operator may take action when none was required, or vice versa.
  • the aim of the present invention is to remedy one or more of the above mentioned problems.
  • a method in an industrial safety system for controlling a process or equipment which industrial safety system comprises components with safety devices.
  • the control system enables signals to be generated as a result of an event or alarm.
  • An automated link between the event or alarm and an action to be taken upon receipt of said event or alarm signal due to the event is created.
  • a control signal to initiate the action is generated.
  • HMI Human machine interface
  • Another advantage of the invention is that the resulting complete safety system can be more fully tested earlier in the product development cycle.
  • Yet another advantage of the invention is that the resulting complete safety system is created in a more cost-effective, work-effective and timesaving manner.
  • the system may be implemented as a server function, wherein the safety system is created and recreated thousands of times on hundreds of objects.
  • a method for an auto- generation of the HMI (Human machine interface) dependent on auto- generation of control code.
  • the method includes use of the human-machine interface of the invention comprising information displayed by the visual display and use of the display, and generation means to generate the operator display.
  • a computer program is described for carrying out the methods according to the invention.
  • a computer program product comprising a computer program for carrying out the method of the invention is described.
  • a computer data signal embodied in a carrier wave is described.
  • a graphical user interface is described for displaying safety data for the one or more of the apparatuses so protected.
  • the operator gains an online view of the safety system.
  • an automatic up-dating of the HMI according to the invention is also provided by the invention.
  • a representation of a safety device is configured, and configuring a representation of said event or alarm is configured.
  • a schematic representation of the safety system comprising the components and the safety devices and a representation of each component is created.
  • each safety device is created.
  • a representation of each action and a representation of each event is created.
  • one or more links comprising a link between the event and the input, comprising a path between the input and the safety device, a path between the safety device and output, and a path between the output and the action is configured.
  • the link is displayed by means of a representation in an HMI.
  • the link is displayed by means of a representation in a graphical user interface on a screen.
  • each path is represented by a table.
  • each table is displayed in a graphical user interface on a screen.
  • relations between the representations are displayed in the form of a matrix.
  • a graphical user interface is used for controlling a process or equipment in an industrial safety system, which industrial safety system comprises components with safety devices, that enable signals to be generated as a result of an event or alarm.
  • the graphical user interface comprises: display means to display a representation of an item, display means to display relations between the items, and input means to register said items and relations.
  • a graphical user interface comprises: input means to register an alarm signal or an event, and input means to register an input to a safety device
  • a graphical user interface comprising: display means to register an input signal, and display means to register an output signal
  • a graphical user interface comprises input means to register a path.
  • a graphical user interface comprises display means for creating a matrix.
  • the HMI according to the invention may also function as an editor.
  • Figure 1 shows elements of an industrial control system in a simplified block diagram
  • Figure 2 shows a preferred embodiment of a safety display
  • Figure 3 shows graphical user interfaces by which safety data are saved according to the invention
  • FIG. 4 shows elements of a safety system in a simplified block diagram
  • Figure 5a shows a meta-loop in a safety system in a simplified block diagram
  • Figure 5b shows a detailed loop in a safety system in a simplified block diagram
  • Figure 6 shows in a schematic way how one device or more devices are connected via a fieldbus network of a safety system
  • Figure 7 shows a meta-method to create an safety system according to the in- vention
  • Figure 8 shows a detailed method to create a safety system according to the invention.
  • Figure 1 shows elements of an industrial control system in a simplified block diagram.
  • the safety system is comprised in the control system or functions as an individual system in parallel with the control system, sometimes even ena- bling the same action, but with different decision chains.
  • the construction of the safety system structure is not unlike a tic-tac-toe game.
  • Every object has a predefined relation to all other objects.
  • the method involves auto-generating a Human machine interface (HMI) in parallel with auto- generation of a control code.
  • HMI Human machine interface
  • the safety system generates atomically the graphical object for the operator displays, which exposes the entire underlying object's functionality, such as access to data, start/stop or another functions.
  • Figure 2 shows a preferred embodiment of a safety display.
  • the display is associated with selection means for input etc. as shown as buttons in this example.
  • the structure of the system is to create a grid/ matrix of related objects.
  • the grid/matrix is a system of rows and columns. Each square is an underlying grid/ matrix until the last level. On the first level the rows comprise information that displays facts such as causes like overpressure.
  • Columns display levels, such as a plant shutdown. One column link to the cause a certain row can, for example, cause a shutdown action.
  • a marking in the grid/ matrix may be a marking for one or several columns.
  • Figure 3 shows a method by which safety data are saved according to the invention.
  • the user input is, for instance, carried out by means of mouse clicks on images of elements or other selection devices displayed on a suitable computer screen.
  • the generation of the control-code is made with a click on the generation button.
  • the code for the controller also generates the control system and the display system.
  • the user input can also be a touch-screen.
  • Another user input could also be voice- or hand-motion generated.
  • 5a Create a new device entry. Select Cause, Effect, Level, Block, Reset or Area. 5b. There are different user-friendly display options, such as show all, levels only and hide levels.
  • the first criterion are the parameters what name and what cause. Each cause has the following positions/parameters:
  • a name that means a specific identification of the object.
  • a designation that is if the device is designated or not.
  • a level that is what size of the area, part of the process, will be affected by the alarm.
  • Each cause has a display for parameter input, variables, such as Name, Designation, Area, Description, Action, Delay.
  • variables such as Name, Designation, Area, Description, Action, Delay.
  • the delay specifies the duration of an alarm before an action is taken.
  • Each position in the name corresponds to an object in the plant. Select an object and open the display.
  • Each variable has a number of available signals.
  • Each signal has the following parameters/ positions:
  • a name which is an identification of that signal.
  • An assign that is if the signal is assigned or not.
  • a normal the signal in normal mode.
  • Each level is connected to an object, with name, description and designation. 8b. Each level effects a predefined number of row positions. Each level corresponds to a predefined set of objects in the plant. This set of objects will be affected of a predefined action that is to be taken upon receipt of an alarm sig- nal from the object corresponding to the name in that row. The signal is due to a predefined event.
  • Each effect has a display that shows signals, digital signals and analogue signals. Each signal has a number of parameters.
  • Each digital and analogue signal has the following parameters/ positions: A name, which is an identification of that signal.
  • An assign that is if the signal is assigned or not.
  • a normal the value of the signal in normal mode.
  • Each project has a structure, here represented as a matrix.
  • COM controller is to be used in the plant.
  • Task name and task interval is specified.
  • the corresponding operator display screens are auto-generated.
  • the screen will show the cause (a pressure transmitter input) as a row, the level (the process shutdown) and the effect (the shutoff valve) as columns, properly labelled and positioned as in the editor.
  • these graphic elements are atomically subscribed to real-time data coming from the auto-generated code, exactly as the system would perform in the field. This combination of controller logic and display provides a more complete and faithful environment for testing the solution.
  • the generated control logic which runs in a safety controller
  • the corresponding operator display screens are auto-generated.
  • the screen will show the cause (a pressure transmitter input) as a row, the level (the process shutdown) and the effect (the shutoff valve) as columns, properly labelled and positioned as in the editor.
  • these graphic elements are atomically subscribed to real-time data coming from the auto-generated code, exactly as the system would per orm in the field.
  • a typical signal may be, for example, a warning for high pressure.
  • Operator display may be designed in that colours may be used to indicate the status, for example, green means true, red means off, yellow means active or other colours and meanings.
  • the displays are the operator screen.
  • Data such as for example safety data
  • the display shows real-time values.
  • FIG. 4 shows elements of a safety system in a simplified block diagram.
  • a microprocessor 40 is shown and a memory means 41.
  • Selections made by a selection means embodied as a mark or icon 45, in the grid/matrix in the display 44, corresponding to means or in other forms are registered with the microprocessor and stored if relevant in a working memory and/or in a long term storage memory.
  • the functions displayed at the time of selections being made are also displayed by means of the microprocessor; so that the selection options available are provided on display means by program means run by the microprocessor and the selection options actually made are saved in the memory means.
  • the auto-generated code is downloaded 46 via an engineering tool to the process device 49 which controls the safety process.
  • online values from the safety process 47 are made available in the grid/matrix in the display 44 of the operator work station via a field bus network and server arrangement.
  • Figure 5a shows a meta-loop in a safety system in a simplified block diagram.
  • a computer data representation is selected (111 ).
  • a HMI for said computer data representation is created (1 12), preferably as a table including preferred items.
  • the paths between the computer data representation and the preferred items are stored in the memory (113).
  • the process continues on another level and a new computer data representation is selected (100.)
  • Figure 5b shows a detailed loop in a safety system in a simplified block dia- gram.
  • a computer data representation for a matrix is selected (11 ).
  • a HMI for said computer data representation for a matrix s created (12).
  • the paths between the computer data representation and the preferred items are stored in the memory (13).
  • a computer data representation for a plant is selected (14).
  • a HMI for said computer data representation for a plant is created (15).
  • the paths between the computer data representation and the preferred items are stored in the memory (13).
  • a computer data representation for a device is selected (16).
  • a HMI for said computer data representation for a device is created (17).
  • the paths between the computer data representation and the preferred items are stored in the memory (13).
  • a computer data representation for an I/O (in- put/output) is selected (18).
  • a HMI for said computer data representation for an I/O is created (19). The paths between the computer data representation and the preferred items are stored in the memory (13). A computer data representation for an event is selected (20). A HMI for said computer data representation for an event is created (10). The paths between the computer data representa- tion and the preferred items are stored in the memory (13).
  • Display of the operations and configuration safety data of one or more of the devices in the system controlled by a safety means is displayed and examined using the HMI of the selected device.
  • Figure 6 shows in a schematic way how one process device 65 or more de- vices are connected via a field bus network 66 of a safety system.
  • Figure 6 shows a data network of a safety system a server 62 and a computer or workstation 60 connected to the safety system.
  • the safety system comprises a bank of safety devices 64 with (input/output) I/O means and a field bus to which the devices according to the invention are connected for digital exchange of data between the safety devices and the safety system.
  • Figure 6 shows two data ports 67.
  • the first data port represents a standard serial data port and the second data port represents another data port configured to any data any communication protocol.
  • the display 61 is, for example, preferably an LCD, Liquid Crystal Display. Another embodiment is including sensitive screen materials, touch screens and the like.
  • the HMI of the safety system may be embodied as a touch screen.
  • text lines or images included in the display of the preferred embodiment, and the select, navigation buttons may each be embodied as images on a touch screen.
  • Monitoring of the opera- tions of one or more of process devices protected by a safety means may be carried out according to the same method but executed by means of touching parts of the screen instead of pressing buttons, or by clicking with a computer mouse or other pointing/selection device.
  • this invention applies to the auto generation of plant shutdown logic and operator screens via a cause-and-effect matrix approach (CEM).
  • CEM cause-and-effect matrix approach
  • the CEM editor is used during the design phase to specify detection and action linkages such as a pressure switch triggering an emergency shut-off valve and a process-shutdown signal.
  • This and more processes including any of the one or more process devices that are being protected by a safety device and a HMI according to the invention are being monitored.
  • monitoring of many processes are being carried out without the use of extra sensors to measure safety data.
  • a industrial safety system comprises components with inputs and safety devices enabling signals to be generated as a result of an event or alarm
  • a system for controlling a process or equipment in a industrial safety system according to the invention may comprise components from any of the list of: a com- puter such as a tablet personal computer PC, a computer program and a graphical user interface.
  • the graphical user interface may also be displayed on a hand-held device displaying, said hand-held device comprising input means.
  • the communications from the safety device via a data network also comprise a computer data signal in another aspect of the invention.
  • the computer data signal is for monitoring and/or safety protection arranged to provide safety protection to one or more process devices embodied in a carrier wave.
  • the data signal complies with one of more formats, for example internally formatted as an XML file, and includes means to identify the sending elements and the type of data such as saved events, saved alarms, configured overload protection etc. for said device.
  • the data obtained from the device are analysed by any suitable statistical or modelling or simulation method.
  • the microprocessor, or processors, of device including the safety means comprises at least one central processing unit CPU performing the steps of the method according to an aspect of the invention. This is performed with the aid of one or more computer programs, which are stored at least in part in memory accessible by the processor. It is to be understood that the computer programs are also being run on one or more general-purpose industrial microprocessors or computers instead of a specially adapted computer.
  • the computer program comprises computer program code elements or software code portions that make the computer perform the method using equations, algorithms, data and calculations previously described.
  • a part of the program may be stored in a processor as above, but also in an ROM, RAM, PROM, EPROM or EEPROM chip or similar memory means.
  • the program in part or in whole may also be stored on, or in, another suitable computer- readable medium such as a magnetic disc, CD-ROM or DVD disk, hard disk, magneto-optical disk, CD-ROM or DVD disk, hard disk, magneto-optical memory storage means, in volatile memory, in flash memory, as firmware, or stored on a data server.
  • Removable memory media such as removable hard drives, bubble memory device, flash memory devices and commercially available proprietary removable media such as the Sony memory stick and memory cards for digital cameras, video cameras and the like may also be used.
  • the computer programs described may also be arranged in part as a distributed application capable of running on several computers or computer systems at more or less the same time.
  • a database may also contain information to be used in a method in an industrial safety system for controlling a process or equipment, according to the invention.
  • a website may also comprise client/server means to perform a method in an industrial safety system for controlling a process or equipment, according to the invention.
  • a data communication signal may also be used for controlling at least one component in an industrial facility for an industrial process.
  • the data communi- cation signal comprises safety information for controlling a process or equipment in an industrial safety system such as other signals generated as a result of an event or alarm.
  • This invention is applicable in all industrial areas where safety systems are mandated and other areas where introducing mandatory safety system is under discussion.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
  • User Interface Of Digital Computer (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention porte sur un procédé, dans un système de sécurité industriel, permettant de contrôler un processus ou un équipement. Ce système de sécurité industriel comprend des composants pourvus de dispositifs de sécurité, un système de contrôle permettant de générer des signaux en tant que résultat d'un événement ou en tant qu'alarme. Une liaison automatique est créée entre l'événement ou l'alarme et une action qui doit être prise lors de la réception du signal d'événement ou d'alarme en raison de l'événement. Un signal de contrôle est généré afin d'initier l'action. L'invention porte aussi sur un système informatisé conçu selon le procédé.
PCT/IB2004/004177 2003-12-23 2004-12-17 Procede installe dans un systeme de securite permettant de controler un processus ou un equipement WO2005064422A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP04806373A EP1741009A1 (fr) 2003-12-23 2004-12-17 Procede installe dans un systeme de securite permettant de controler un processus ou un equipement
US10/584,213 US20070276514A1 (en) 2003-12-23 2004-12-17 Method In A Safety System For Controlling A Process Or Equipment

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE0303577A SE527441C2 (sv) 2003-12-23 2003-12-23 Förfarande vid ett säkerhetssystem för styrning av en process eller utrustning
SE0303577-1 2003-12-23

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2005064422A1 true WO2005064422A1 (fr) 2005-07-14

Family

ID=30768886

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IB2004/004177 WO2005064422A1 (fr) 2003-12-23 2004-12-17 Procede installe dans un systeme de securite permettant de controler un processus ou un equipement

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US20070276514A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP1741009A1 (fr)
SE (1) SE527441C2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2005064422A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7324856B1 (en) * 2003-09-25 2008-01-29 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Autogeneration of code via human-machine interfaces (HMI) and self-building HMI
DE112006000785T5 (de) * 2005-04-01 2008-02-14 Abb Research Ltd. Verfahren und System für das Liefern einer Benutzerschnittstelle
WO2009074600A1 (fr) * 2007-12-10 2009-06-18 Abb Research Ltd Procédé mis en œuvre par ordinateur et système pour une inspection à distance d'un procédé industriel
WO2011160695A1 (fr) 2010-06-24 2011-12-29 Abb As Procédé et outil de distribution automatique d'un code de commande dans un système de sécurité
CN103097973B (zh) 2010-07-26 2016-08-03 Abb股份有限公司 在安全系统中用于因果矩阵的方法和查看器
EP2605096B1 (fr) * 2011-12-14 2014-03-19 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Commande orientée vers la sécurité en combinaison avec le cloud-computing
CN106327773A (zh) * 2015-07-01 2017-01-11 西门子瑞士有限公司 火灾报警控制器的配置装置及其配置方法
DE112016004627T5 (de) 2015-10-09 2018-07-19 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Emerson Process Management System und verfahren zum bereitstellen miteinander verknüpfter benutzerschnittstellen, die einer sicherheitslogik eines prozessleitsystemsentsprechen
US10444724B2 (en) 2016-06-20 2019-10-15 General Electric Company Interface method and apparatus
US10235853B2 (en) 2016-06-20 2019-03-19 General Electric Company Interface method and apparatus for alarms
US11194460B2 (en) 2019-04-01 2021-12-07 Honeywell International Inc. Systems and methods for commissioning a security system

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5054023A (en) * 1989-05-12 1991-10-01 Kronberg James W "Smart" watchdog safety switch
EP0482523A2 (fr) * 1990-10-24 1992-04-29 Osaka Gas Co., Ltd. Interface opérateur polyvalente pour afficher les résultats de diagnostic de faute dans un système de commande de processus intelligent
US5361198A (en) * 1992-04-03 1994-11-01 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Compact work station control room
WO1997004463A1 (fr) * 1995-07-14 1997-02-06 General Electric Company Systeme de protection de reacteur
NL1016345C2 (nl) * 2000-10-06 2002-04-10 Nedap Nv Elektronisch systeem voor het waarborgen van de veiligheid van elektronisch gestuurde apparaten.
US20020169514A1 (en) * 2001-03-01 2002-11-14 Evren Eryurek Automatic work order/parts order generation and tracking

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6233566B1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2001-05-15 Ultraprise Corporation System, method and computer program product for online financial products trading
US7562135B2 (en) * 2000-05-23 2009-07-14 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Enhanced fieldbus device alerts in a process control system
US8044793B2 (en) * 2001-03-01 2011-10-25 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Integrated device alerts in a process control system
US6975219B2 (en) * 2001-03-01 2005-12-13 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Enhanced hart device alerts in a process control system
US7272815B1 (en) * 1999-05-17 2007-09-18 Invensys Systems, Inc. Methods and apparatus for control configuration with versioning, security, composite blocks, edit selection, object swapping, formulaic values and other aspects
US6556950B1 (en) * 1999-09-30 2003-04-29 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Diagnostic method and apparatus for use with enterprise control
US6268853B1 (en) * 1999-09-30 2001-07-31 Rockwell Technologies, L.L.C. Data structure for use in enterprise controls
US6421571B1 (en) * 2000-02-29 2002-07-16 Bently Nevada Corporation Industrial plant asset management system: apparatus and method

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5054023A (en) * 1989-05-12 1991-10-01 Kronberg James W "Smart" watchdog safety switch
EP0482523A2 (fr) * 1990-10-24 1992-04-29 Osaka Gas Co., Ltd. Interface opérateur polyvalente pour afficher les résultats de diagnostic de faute dans un système de commande de processus intelligent
US5361198A (en) * 1992-04-03 1994-11-01 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Compact work station control room
WO1997004463A1 (fr) * 1995-07-14 1997-02-06 General Electric Company Systeme de protection de reacteur
NL1016345C2 (nl) * 2000-10-06 2002-04-10 Nedap Nv Elektronisch systeem voor het waarborgen van de veiligheid van elektronisch gestuurde apparaten.
US20020169514A1 (en) * 2001-03-01 2002-11-14 Evren Eryurek Automatic work order/parts order generation and tracking

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1741009A1 (fr) 2007-01-10
SE0303577D0 (sv) 2003-12-23
US20070276514A1 (en) 2007-11-29
SE527441C2 (sv) 2006-03-07
SE0303577L (sv) 2005-06-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7272451B2 (en) Programmable logic controller programming system
CA2783130C (fr) Systeme et procede de gestion d'automatisation
US7269468B2 (en) State machine function block with a user modifiable output configuration database
EP3270243B1 (fr) Procédés et systèmes d'assistance pour opérateurs basée sur le contexte pour systèmes de commande
US20070276514A1 (en) Method In A Safety System For Controlling A Process Or Equipment
EP2598963B1 (fr) Procédé et visualiseur pour matrice cause-effet dans un système de sécurité
US5644487A (en) Monitoring and control system and method
CN111989702A (zh) 质量检查管理系统
JP2014059900A (ja) プロセス制御システムにおける統合されたアドバンスド制御ブロック
JP2004303247A (ja) プロセス安全システムで使用するための原因結果マトリックスの機能ブロック実装
US10809689B2 (en) System and method for configuring separated monitor and effect blocks of a process control system
EP3249486A1 (fr) Appareil, procédé et programme de maintenance de dispositifs et support d'enregistrement
US6823272B2 (en) Test executive system with progress window
US20060208673A1 (en) Device and method to monitor an apparatus
US6760630B2 (en) Method and implementation of process control
US7386359B2 (en) Device and method for testing machine tools and production machines
US20050075831A1 (en) Reporting invalid parameter values for a parameter-based system
Chiang et al. Industrial implementation of on-line multivariate quality control
US10606239B2 (en) Shaping plant and safety program
EP1312931A2 (fr) Système d'essai électronique
CN117835093A (zh) 基于Intouch的气体综合监控系统及方法
CN116541192A (zh) 自动化装置的自动化软件的分析方法
IE904656A1 (en) A Test Control Apparatus
KR20040103737A (ko) 경영정보시스템과 연계된 데이타베이스를 구비한 실시간 6시그마 품질관리 시스템

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DPEN Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101)
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2004806373

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2004806373

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 10584213

Country of ref document: US

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 10584213

Country of ref document: US