WO2005020421A2 - Dispositif de production de champ - Google Patents

Dispositif de production de champ Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2005020421A2
WO2005020421A2 PCT/GB2004/003663 GB2004003663W WO2005020421A2 WO 2005020421 A2 WO2005020421 A2 WO 2005020421A2 GB 2004003663 W GB2004003663 W GB 2004003663W WO 2005020421 A2 WO2005020421 A2 WO 2005020421A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
field
mass
cancellation
centre
fields
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB2004/003663
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
WO2005020421A3 (fr
Inventor
Remi Oseri Cornwall
Original Assignee
Remi Oseri Cornwall
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Remi Oseri Cornwall filed Critical Remi Oseri Cornwall
Publication of WO2005020421A2 publication Critical patent/WO2005020421A2/fr
Publication of WO2005020421A3 publication Critical patent/WO2005020421A3/fr

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02N—ELECTRIC MACHINES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H02N11/00—Generators or motors not provided for elsewhere; Alleged perpetua mobilia obtained by electric or magnetic means
    • H02N11/006—Motors

Definitions

  • a Field Generation Device relates to a field generation device, and in particular seeks to provide an improved field generation device.
  • one aspect of the present invention provides a field generation device, comprising a field generation arrangement operable to: generate a first field having a first field angular momentum and a first field mass associated therewith, the first field mass having a centre of mass at a first point relative to the device, such that the device tends to rotate in a direction substantially opposite to that of the first field angular momentum; and generate a second field having a second field angular momentum and a second field mass associated therewith, the second field mass having a centre of mass at a second point relative to the device, such that the device tends to rotate in a direction substantially opposite to that of the second field angular momentum, wherein the first and second points are displaced from one another.
  • the field generation arrangement comprises a first field generator, operable to generate the first field, and a second field generator, operable to generate the second field.
  • the first field generator comprises at least one first field generation solenoid
  • the second field generator comprises at least one second field generation solenoid
  • the field generation arrangement is operable to generate the first and second fields alternately.
  • the first and second fields are generated alternately at a rate of at least one cycle per second.
  • the device comprises one or more reaction elements, to cause rotation of the craft upon generation of the first and second fields.
  • At least one of the reaction elements comprises an electret element.
  • the electret element comprises a simulated electret comprising an electric field maintained between a pair of electrodes.
  • a plurality of substantially parallel plates are provided between the electrodes.
  • a neutral electrode is provided in proximity to one of the pair of electrodes.
  • the device comprises at least one first reaction element, to cause rotation of the craft upon generation of the first field, and at least one second reaction element, to cause rotation of the craft upon generation of the second field.
  • the device further comprises a field cancellation arrangement, operable to cancel at least partially effects of switching off the first field and the second field.
  • the field cancellation arrangement comprises a first field cancellor, for cancelling at least partially effects of switching off the first field, and a second field cancellor, for cancelling at least partially effects of switching off the second field.
  • the first field cancellor comprises at least one first cancellation field generator, operable to generate a first cancellation field having a first cancellation field mass associated therewith, and at least one second cancellation field generator, operable to generate a second cancellation field having a second cancellation field mass associated therewith.
  • At least one of the first and second cancellation field generators comprises at least one solenoid.
  • at least one of the first cancellation field mass and the second cancellation field mass has a centre of mass located within the device.
  • both the first cancellation field mass and the second cancellation field mass have a centre of mass located within the device.
  • the first cancellation field generator is operable to be switched on during the time when the first field is switched from being on to being off.
  • the first cancellation field generator is operable to be switched on before the first field is switched off, and to be switched off after the first field has been switched off.
  • the second cancellation field generator is operable to be switched on during the time when the second field is switched from being on to being off.
  • the second cancellation field generator is operable to be switched on before the second field is switched off, and to be switched off after the second field has been switched off.
  • the first and second points are on substantially opposite sides of the centre of mass of the device.
  • the first and second points are substantially the same distance from the centre of mass of the device.
  • the first and second points lie outside the device.
  • the first and second field angular momenta are in opposite directions.
  • the device has a rest centre of mass, being the centre of mass of the device when neither the first nor the second fields is being generated; generation of the first field results in rotation of the device around a point which is substantially between the centre of mass of the first field mass and the rest centre of mass of the device; and generation of the second field results in rotation of the device around a point which is substantially between the centre of mass of the second field mass and the rest centre of mass of the device.
  • Another aspect of the present invention provides a means of transportation having a device according to the above.
  • the device is provided within a cavity in the means of transportation.
  • At least part of a gap between the device and an internal surface of the cavity acts as a resonant cavity for at least one of the fields.
  • the device is coupled to the means of transportation by at least one substantially frictionless coupling.
  • At least one of the substantially frictionless couplings comprises an electromagnetic coupling.
  • the coupling between the means of transportation and the device is activated periodically.
  • the first and second fields are generated alternately at a rate which is substantially greater than the rate of activation of the coupling means.
  • Another aspect of the present invention provides a method of generating fields, comprising the steps of: providing a field generation device; generating a first field having a first field angular momentum and a first field mass associated therewith, the first field mass having a centre of mass at a first point relative to the device, such that the device tends to rotate in a direction substantially opposite to that of the first field angular momentum; and generating a second field having a second field angular momentum and a second field mass associated therewith, the second field mass having a centre of mass at a second point relative to the device, such that the device tends to rotate in a direction substantially opposite to that of the second field angular momentum, wherein the first and second points are displaced from one another.
  • the first and second fields are generated alternately.
  • the first and second fields are generated alternately at a rate of at least one cycle per second.
  • the method further comprises the step of providing one or more reaction elements, to cause rotation of the craft upon generation of the first and second fields.
  • the method further comprises the step of providing a field cancellation arrangement, operable to cancel at least partially effects of switching off the first field and the second field.
  • the method further comprises the step of generating a first cancellation field having a first cancellation field mass associated therewith, and generating a second cancellation field having a second cancellation field mass associated therewith.
  • at least one of the first cancellation field mass and the second cancellation field mass has a centre of mass located within the device.
  • both the first cancellation field mass and the second cancellation field mass have a centre of mass located within the device.
  • At least one of the first cancellation field mass and the second cancellation field mass has a centre of mass which is external to the device.
  • both the first cancellation field mass and the second cancellation field mass have a centre of mass which is external to the device.
  • the first and second points are on substantially opposite sides of the centre of mass of the device.
  • the first and second points are substantially the same distance from the centre of mass of the device.
  • the first and second points lie outside the device.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic representation of Feynman's disk
  • Figure 2 is a distorted version of the Feynman disk
  • Figure 3 is a schematic representation of a device embodying the present invention
  • Figure 4 represents a superposition of electric fields during operation of the device of Figure 3;
  • Figures 5a, 5b and 5c show forces acting on the device of Figure 3 during operation thereof;
  • Figures 6a and 6b are further representations of a device embodying the present invention.
  • Figure 7 is a view of a part of the device of Figure 6a;
  • Figure 8 is a graph of a probability of photon-photon scattering
  • Figure 9 depicts a simulated electret element
  • Figure 10 depicts a means of transport incorporating a device embodying the present invention.
  • the Lagrangian for the system being the sum of kinetic and potential energy terms expressed in terms of the generalised co-ordinates.
  • Application of Lagrangian method and Relativity to the combined system of mechanics and electromagnetics renders the field a system with infinitely many degrees of freedom.
  • the final "Poynting term" the cross product of electrical and magnetic fields represents the field momentum.
  • the effect of the field term is well known in the dynamic or radiative regime and is the pressure of radiation that insures the stability of our Sun or the deflection of comet trails.
  • the device 1 comprises a disk 2, which is formed from plastic or another insulating material, and is provided with a number of charged metal spheres 3 distributed near the rim thereof.
  • the disk 2 is supported on an elongated spindle 4 passing through the centre thereof, perpendicular to the plane of the disk 2 and the disk 2 is free to rotate about the axis of the spindle 4.
  • a coil 5 of conducting wire is placed around the spindle 4, and a battery 6 or other current source drives a current around the coil 5.
  • the device will undergo a rotation about the centre of mass of the device 7 and the centre of mass of the external field whose centre is at 9. Also the centre of rotation can be made to occur around a point that is located outside the device. Note that the electric field generated by the "beam" of the solenoid as it sweeps into new space only has an effect on charges moving relative to it and so will have no effect on the metal spheres 3.
  • Figure 3 shows a simplified arrangement of a distorted Feynman disk for analysis, in which the device comprises two balls 10 connected by a stiff rod
  • the field is projected outside of the device.
  • the centre of mass of the system is shown shifted from its quiescent position equidistant between the balls 10, and lies substantially between the quiescent centre of mass and the centre of mass of the mass associated with the field.
  • the device is shifted to the right (in this depiction) and the field to the left.
  • the device At the end of the cycle the device returns to the system centre of mass equidistant between the two balls, since the electromagnetic energy is called back to the device.
  • the Poynting flow ceases too and acts on the electret element 12 and the craft leaving it with zero angular momentum but the device has undergone an angular translation.
  • the aim of the device is to render the integral on the right-hand-side of equation 3 non-zero over a cycle ("decoupling" the electrical aspects of the system from the mechanical) leaving both the device and field with angular momentum at the end of the cycle - in short, 'dumping' excess momentum on the field and its zero-point quantum basis in a mechanism postulated later.
  • decoupling the electrical aspects of the system from the mechanical
  • FIG 4 shows we have to cancel the electrical field imposed on the electret drive element 12 by switching on at least one cancellation solenoid to generate a field whose field (shown as a dotted line) centre is different to that of the field generated by the selenoid of the distorted Feynman disk at the same instant as the electric field generated by the solenoid of the distorted Feynman disk (solid line) goes negative.
  • Figures 5a, 5b and 5c resolve the torques into forces acting at mi m 2 and m f since these masses are called back to the device at the end of the cycle. Shown are the forces on switching on the field and then switching off the field. The resultant shown is the summation of these forces.
  • Figures 5a, 5b and 5c depict the cancellation field's centre as so distant that the forces acting at mi, and m 2 are almost the same - in short the torque vector fields have different curvature for the thrust and cancellation solenoids.
  • M b be the mass of the base and V its velocity m p be the mass of the projectile and v its velocity
  • Figure 7 shows a construction to point out that the hidden momentum argument used against electromagnetic propulsion is not valid here.
  • hidden momentum effects arise from electrical potentials being applied to a relativistic charge carrying fluid.
  • the solenoids 13, 14 both field generation and cancellation
  • These solenoids are shielded from the electret element 12 by a conducting box 15 at the device's potential.
  • the hidden momentum argument is irrelevant.
  • the force on charged entities constituting the solenoid current from the radiation field is thus of the order of 1/c 3 down on the forces generated on the electret element 12 by the induction fields: ⁇ 0 f— (B x E)dV Ref. eqns. 2 and 4 y dt
  • V>A - ⁇ 0 dt 2
  • A ⁇ (a t e' k r + a;e-' k r ) k and If all the vectors a k are defined, the field in the volume is completely determined.
  • A ⁇ (a, .e -ik.r -ik.r ⁇ + ⁇
  • k cyc ⁇ e is proportional to the cycle time of the device.
  • This real photon flux can be considered one system in juxtaposition to the virtual photon flux occupying the same space.
  • the virtual photon flux series is however summed to the Planck Frequency.
  • Figure 5a shows the thrust forces on their own as the act on the representation of the device as two masses mi, m 2 separated by a rod of length L (figure 3).
  • the field mass has been projected back to the centre of the device but its momentum contribution is negligible and shall not be mentioned from here on.
  • the forces at the masses mi, m 2 are symmetrical on the cycle.
  • Figure 5b shows the cancellation forces at the masses m l5 m 2 . They act at a different centre since the field has been projected to a different location and shown here for exaggeration; the masses mi, m 2 are so distant from the centre that approximately the same force is experienced by both.
  • the torque vector field of the field generation and cancellation solenoids have different curvatures.
  • Figure 5c shows the resultant forces when the cancellation scheme of figure 4 is applied. Note that it is not a case of merely superimposing figures 5 a and 5b as the cancellation field removes the forces on the masses m 1? m 2 in the off-phase of the field generation solenoid by superimposing the on-phase of the cancellation solenoid - thus only the on-phase of the field generation solenoid and the off-phase of the cancellation solenoid act at the masses m l5 m 2 .
  • the forces at one of the masses mi cancelling by contrivance of having the same field strength present at the electret element) leaving only the force acting at the other of the masses m 2 ( ⁇ i f has been neglected as mentioned earlier). This force on its own would leave the device to rotate but the dual sided symmetrical device (figure 6) has another set of field generation and cancellation solenoids on the other side of the device leaving a true linear force.
  • Figure 9 depicts an active electret element.
  • a high voltage power source 16 is connected by shielded wires 17 to electrodes 18 between which a plurality of field shaping, conductive elements 19 embedded in a high permittivity dielectric 20 exists.
  • Around one electrode is a neutral, conductive electrode 21 such that the field projected into space is of substantially one polarity; field lines are depicted.
  • the propulsive effect from the Poynting vector is proportional to magnetic, electric field strength and the volume over which the fields exist. If an unmodified dipole is used for the electret element then the effects from the positive and negative ends will cancel. Thus the element should project substantially a field of one polarity into space. This can be achieved by having one pole of the dipole shielded by a conductive electrode at neutral polarity.
  • Suitable elements will always be dielectrics as anything charged will tend to attract dust and water vapour and the like to form a dielectric in consequence.
  • a slab of positively charged material to which cancelling negative charges are attracted to its outer surface then the electric fields will be that more intense over the short distance on the surface between the negative charges and positive charges of the greater dielectric slab than in the dielectric itself; so one would think that due to these intense fields at the surface that the propulsive effect would overall be zero.
  • the line of charges we can consider that the potential varies in a constant manner so that the field varies in a linear manner. It is then a case of integrating over space to calculate the total Poynting propulsive effect: assume that they see the same constant magnetic field and the electric field is constant too (but scaled):
  • Figure 10 shows the device of figure 6 as a propulsion sub-assembly (P.S.A.) inside a greater craft 22 coupled to the P.S.A. by a low friction electromagnetic, intermittent spherical joint coupling 23.
  • P.S.A. propulsion sub-assembly
  • the greater craft 22 Since no torque is developed by the joint 23, the greater craft 22 is reduced to a point mass acting at the device's (P.S.A.) centre. This doesn't interfere with the device's operation and its need to have the electromagnetic fields shift its centre of mass for "leverage” to translate; thus the greater craft 22 is towed and pushed along by the device.
  • the coupling can be made periodic and intermittent to allow the sub-assembly to develop momentum before "catching" and then releasing it.
  • the space 24 between the craft 22 and the P.S.A can be made into a resonant cavity allowing the electromagnetic fields to be set up in operation at microwave frequencies and above.
  • This offers advantages for higher force production because the device is linear in frequency (eqn. 12) given the higher speed over a LCR arrangement.
  • the field energy is recouped too on each cycle by the natural action of a resonant cavity.
  • the cavities are tuned to the Fourier components to allow a waveform such as figure 4 to be constructed. Radiation pressure will not interfere with torque-less coupling between the crafts and because as we have seen (eqn. 13) radiative field effects are minuscule compared to the inductive field effects responsible for the motive force of device.

Abstract

L'invention concerne un dispositif de production de champ, qui comprend un système de production de champ permettant de produire un premier champ comportant un premier moment cinétique de champ et un premier volume de champ associé. Le premier volume de champ comporte un centre de volume se situant en un premier point par rapport au dispositif, de sorte que le dispositif tend à tourner dans un sens sensiblement opposé à celui du premier moment cinétique. Le système de production de champ permet de produire un second champ comportant un second moment cinétique de champ et un second volume de champ associé. Le second volume de champ comporte un centre de volume se situant en un second point par rapport au dispositif, de sorte que le dispositif tend à tourner dans un sens sensiblement opposé à celui du second moment cinétique, lesdits premier et second points étant distincts l'un de l'autre.
PCT/GB2004/003663 2003-08-26 2004-08-26 Dispositif de production de champ WO2005020421A2 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0319944A GB0319944D0 (en) 2003-08-26 2003-08-26 Method of electro magnetic propulsion
GB0319944.5 2003-08-26

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2005020421A2 true WO2005020421A2 (fr) 2005-03-03
WO2005020421A3 WO2005020421A3 (fr) 2008-01-03

Family

ID=28460274

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2004/003663 WO2005020421A2 (fr) 2003-08-26 2004-08-26 Dispositif de production de champ

Country Status (2)

Country Link
GB (2) GB0319944D0 (fr)
WO (1) WO2005020421A2 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2012053921A3 (fr) * 2010-10-22 2012-11-22 Alexandro Tiago Baptista De Alves Martins Système de propulsion électromagnétique et applications

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE4012335A1 (de) * 1990-04-18 1991-10-24 Oliver Frisius Verfahren zur potenzierung und verwendung als antrieb von einseitig wirkenden kraeften bei wechselwirkenden zeitlich veraenderlichen elektromagnetischen feldern

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE4012335A1 (de) * 1990-04-18 1991-10-24 Oliver Frisius Verfahren zur potenzierung und verwendung als antrieb von einseitig wirkenden kraeften bei wechselwirkenden zeitlich veraenderlichen elektromagnetischen feldern

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
H.E. PUTHOFF, S.R. LITTLE, M. IBISON: "Engineering the Zero-Point Field and polarizable vacuum for interstellar flight" FIRST INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP IN FIELD PROPULSION, January 2001 (2001-01), pages 1-12, XP002328961 BRIGHTON, UK *
HNIZDO V: "HIDDEN MOMENTUM OF A RELATIVISTIC FLUID CARRYING CURRENT IN AN EXTERNAL ELECTRIC FIELD" AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICS TEACHERS, US, vol. 65, no. 1, January 1997 (1997-01), pages 92-94, XP008010451 ISSN: 0002-9505 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2012053921A3 (fr) * 2010-10-22 2012-11-22 Alexandro Tiago Baptista De Alves Martins Système de propulsion électromagnétique et applications

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB0320464D0 (en) 2003-10-01
WO2005020421A3 (fr) 2008-01-03
GB0319944D0 (en) 2003-09-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10135323B2 (en) Capacitive-discharge electromagnetic propulsion system
US20190168897A1 (en) Segmented Current Magnetic Field Propulsion System
Tajmar et al. Direct thrust measurements of an emdrive and evaluation of possible side-effects
Weber et al. Interferometry of flashboard and cable-gun plasma opening switches on Hawk
US20120092107A1 (en) Propulsion system using the antigravity force of the vacuum and applications
US11511891B2 (en) System and method for generating forces using asymmetrical electrostatic pressure
WO2012053921A2 (fr) Système de propulsion électromagnétique et applications
WO2005020421A2 (fr) Dispositif de production de champ
Wayne The relationship between the optomechanical Doppler force and the magnetic vector potential
Majkic Derivation of Electromagnetism from Quantum Theory of Photons: Tesla Scalar Waves
US20230121805A1 (en) System and method for generating forces using asymmetrical electrostatic pressure
Ashmore Galaxies “Boiling off” Electrons Due to the Photo-Electric Effect Leading to a New Model of the IGM and a Possible Mechanism for “Dark Matter”
US20180229864A1 (en) High Frequency Gravitational Wave Generator
Ţiplea et al. Extraction of energy from the vacuum in SED: theoretical and technological models and limitations
Lehnert et al. An extended electromagnetic theory
Herrmann et al. Heaviside’s gravitoelectromagnetism: what is it good for and what not?
Barone The vacuum as ether in the last century
Bhattacharjee Foundation of Electromagnetic Waves
US11818829B2 (en) Method for creating a rapidly changing energy shell of quantum fluctuations about masses for acceleration without mass ejection
Sarkar et al. Lateral and axial magnetisation in the inverse Faraday effect for the interaction of waves in plasma
Frolov New aerospace technologies
Nomura et al. PIC simulation of electrodeless plasma thruster with rotating electric field
Arbab Dual quantum mechanics and its electromagnetic analog
Mestel The pulsar magnetosphere
Moss A Unified Field Theory Derived from a Magnetic Confinement Method that Stimulates Curvature Upon Charged Particles Relative to a Solitary Location that Produces Energy from Particle Deviation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
NENP Non-entry into the national phase in:

Ref country code: DE

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase