WO2004093318A2 - Method and system to differentially enhance sensor dynamic range - Google Patents

Method and system to differentially enhance sensor dynamic range Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2004093318A2
WO2004093318A2 PCT/US2004/011314 US2004011314W WO2004093318A2 WO 2004093318 A2 WO2004093318 A2 WO 2004093318A2 US 2004011314 W US2004011314 W US 2004011314W WO 2004093318 A2 WO2004093318 A2 WO 2004093318A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
capacitor
voltage
photodetector
differential
pixel detector
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2004/011314
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2004093318A3 (en
Inventor
Cyrus Bamji
Hakan Yalcin
Xinqiao Liu
Ender Tunc Eroglu
Original Assignee
Canesta, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Canesta, Inc. filed Critical Canesta, Inc.
Priority to EP04759475.9A priority Critical patent/EP1614159B1/en
Priority to JP2006509960A priority patent/JP2006523074A/en
Publication of WO2004093318A2 publication Critical patent/WO2004093318A2/en
Publication of WO2004093318A3 publication Critical patent/WO2004093318A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S17/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves, e.g. lidar systems
    • G01S17/02Systems using the reflection of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves
    • G01S17/06Systems determining position data of a target
    • G01S17/08Systems determining position data of a target for measuring distance only
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01CMEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
    • G01C3/00Measuring distances in line of sight; Optical rangefinders
    • G01C3/02Details
    • G01C3/06Use of electric means to obtain final indication
    • G01C3/08Use of electric radiation detectors
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S17/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves, e.g. lidar systems
    • G01S17/88Lidar systems specially adapted for specific applications
    • G01S17/89Lidar systems specially adapted for specific applications for mapping or imaging
    • G01S17/8943D imaging with simultaneous measurement of time-of-flight at a 2D array of receiver pixels, e.g. time-of-flight cameras or flash lidar
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/48Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S17/00
    • G01S7/483Details of pulse systems
    • G01S7/486Receivers
    • G01S7/4861Circuits for detection, sampling, integration or read-out
    • G01S7/4863Detector arrays, e.g. charge-transfer gates
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/48Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S17/00
    • G01S7/483Details of pulse systems
    • G01S7/486Receivers
    • G01S7/4868Controlling received signal intensity or exposure of sensor
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/48Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S17/00
    • G01S7/483Details of pulse systems
    • G01S7/486Receivers
    • G01S7/487Extracting wanted echo signals, e.g. pulse detection
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N25/00Circuitry of solid-state image sensors [SSIS]; Control thereof
    • H04N25/50Control of the SSIS exposure
    • H04N25/57Control of the dynamic range
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N25/00Circuitry of solid-state image sensors [SSIS]; Control thereof
    • H04N25/50Control of the SSIS exposure
    • H04N25/57Control of the dynamic range
    • H04N25/58Control of the dynamic range involving two or more exposures
    • H04N25/587Control of the dynamic range involving two or more exposures acquired sequentially, e.g. using the combination of odd and even image fields
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N25/00Circuitry of solid-state image sensors [SSIS]; Control thereof
    • H04N25/70SSIS architectures; Circuits associated therewith
    • H04N25/76Addressed sensors, e.g. MOS or CMOS sensors
    • H04N25/77Pixel circuitry, e.g. memories, A/D converters, pixel amplifiers, shared circuits or shared components
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N25/00Circuitry of solid-state image sensors [SSIS]; Control thereof
    • H04N25/70SSIS architectures; Circuits associated therewith
    • H04N25/76Addressed sensors, e.g. MOS or CMOS sensors
    • H04N25/77Pixel circuitry, e.g. memories, A/D converters, pixel amplifiers, shared circuits or shared components
    • H04N25/772Pixel circuitry, e.g. memories, A/D converters, pixel amplifiers, shared circuits or shared components comprising A/D, V/T, V/F, I/T or I/F converters
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N3/00Scanning details of television systems; Combination thereof with generation of supply voltages
    • H04N3/10Scanning details of television systems; Combination thereof with generation of supply voltages by means not exclusively optical-mechanical
    • H04N3/14Scanning details of television systems; Combination thereof with generation of supply voltages by means not exclusively optical-mechanical by means of electrically scanned solid-state devices
    • H04N3/15Scanning details of television systems; Combination thereof with generation of supply voltages by means not exclusively optical-mechanical by means of electrically scanned solid-state devices for picture signal generation
    • H04N3/155Control of the image-sensor operation, e.g. image processing within the image-sensor
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S17/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves, e.g. lidar systems
    • G01S17/02Systems using the reflection of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves
    • G01S17/06Systems determining position data of a target
    • G01S17/08Systems determining position data of a target for measuring distance only
    • G01S17/10Systems determining position data of a target for measuring distance only using transmission of interrupted, pulse-modulated waves
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/48Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S17/00
    • G01S7/481Constructional features, e.g. arrangements of optical elements
    • G01S7/4811Constructional features, e.g. arrangements of optical elements common to transmitter and receiver
    • G01S7/4813Housing arrangements

Definitions

  • the invention relates generally to optical sensors, and more particularly to enhancing dynamic range of such sens.ors, while allowing the sensors to be fabricated using CMOS techniques.
  • Systems that rely upon sensing optical energy to discern information are known in the art and have many applications. Exemplary applications might include an optical-based system to determine range between the system and a target object, or to identify and recognize features of a target object. Many such systems acquire two-dimensional or intensity-based information, and rely upon an intensity image of light reflected from a target object. Such luminosity-based systems can use ambient light falling upon the target object, or may actively generate light that is directed toward the target object. [0004] Unfortunately, it is difficult to accurately determine distance solely from the amplitude and brightness of an intensity image. For example, in a range finding system, a highly reflecting target object that is father away from the system can produce a greater amplitude signal than a nearer target object that is less reflective.
  • the present invention may be used in a wide range of applications including, but not limited to, range finding systems. It may be useful at this juncture to briefly review such systems.
  • Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a three-dimensional range finding system 10 as exemplified by the '942 patent or the '496 patent. Such systems determine distance Z between the system and locations on target object 20.
  • System 10 may be fabricated upon a single IC 30, requires no moving parts, and relatively few off-chip components, primarily a source of optical energy 40, e.g., a light emitting diode (LED) or laser source, and associated optics 50. If desired, laser source 40 might be bonded onto the common substrate upon which IC 30 is fabricated.
  • a source of optical energy 40 e.g., a light emitting diode (LED) or laser source
  • laser source 40 might be bonded onto the common substrate upon which IC 30 is fabricated.
  • System 10 includes an array 60 of pixel detectors 70, each of which has dedicated circuitry 80 for processing detection charge output by the associated detector. (As used herein, the terms “detector” and “pixel” and “pixel detector” may be used interchangeably.)
  • Array 60 might include 100x100 pixels 70, and 100x100 associated detector processing circuits 80.
  • IC 30 preferably also includes a microprocessor or microcontroller unit 90, RAM and ROM memory, collectively 100, a high-speed distributable clock 110, and various computing and input/output (I/O) circuitry 120.
  • System 10 preferably further includes a lens 130 to focus light reflected from target object 20 upon pixels 70 in array 60.
  • controller unit 90 may carryout distance-to-object and object velocity calculations and can output such calculations as DATA, for use by a companion device, if desired.
  • substantially all of system 10 may be fabricated upon CMOS IC 30, which enables shorter signal paths, and reduced processing and delay times.
  • ambient light that is present in the environment in which system 10 and target object 20 are found.
  • microprocessor 90 can calculate the roundtrip time for optical energy from source 40 to travel to target object 20 and be reflected back to a pixel 70 within array 60.
  • This time-of-flight (TOF) is given by the following relationship:
  • system 10 determine proper TOF distances Z can be impacted when the magnitude of ambient light is large relative to the magnitude of reflected light from source 40.
  • the various pixels 70 respond to incoming optical energy that represents the real signal to be measured (e.g., active energy originating from source 40 and reflected by target object 20), and also respond to ambient light.
  • the depth resolution of each pixel i.e., the accuracy of the distance measurement, is determined by the system signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
  • SNR system signal-to-noise ratio
  • the active optical energy contributes to both a differential mode signal and a common mode signal
  • differential pixel detectors can exhibit higher SNR than single-ended pixel detectors, the presence of strong ambient light, sunlight perhaps, can degrade the performance of differential pixel detectors, as will now be described.
  • the term "differential detector” refers to a detector that responds to two input parameters. For example in the '496 patent, the differential detectors responded to amplitude of incoming optical energy and to phase of such energy relative to energy output by emitter 40; see Fig. 1 herein.
  • pixel will refer to a pair of differential photodetectors, for example first and second photodiode detectors DA and D B .
  • Incoming optical energy falling upon a pixel detector 70 generates an extremely small amount of photocurrent (or photocharge), typically on the order of picoamps (10 "12 amps). Such detection current signals are too small in magnitude to be measured directly. It is known in the art to provide pixel detectors that operate in a direct integration mode by which optical energy induced photocurrent is integrated on a capacitor and the final capacitor charge or voltage is readout at the end of an integration interval.
  • a capacitor C x has finite maximum charge capacity Qm a x defined by:
  • C x is the total capacitance and V SW j ng is the maximum voltage swing across the capacitor.
  • a pixel detector is said to be in saturation when the total charge integrated on the capacitor exceeds the maximum charge capacity, in which case no useful information can be readout from that pixel.
  • a differential pixel detector (e.g., detectors 70 in Fig. 1 ) may be represented as shown generically in Fig. 2A, in which modulation circuitry has been omitted for simplicity.
  • Each pixel 70 has a differential structure with two perhaps identical reset and readout circuit components denoted A and B. Components A and B may be considered as part of the pixel 70 or as part of
  • the pixel's associated circuitry 80 the photodetector pair comprising each differential pixel 70 is shown as photodiodes DA and DB, but other detector structures could be used instead, for example photogate structures.
  • Capacitors CA and CB are shown in parallel with diodes DA and DB and represent detector parasitic capacitance and/or dedicated fixed value capacitors.
  • microprocessor 90 causes optical energy source 40 to emit pulses of light that are directed by lens 50 toward target object 20. Some of this optical energy will be reflected back towards system 10 and will be focused by lens 130 onto pixels 70 within array 60. Incoming photon energy falling upon a detector 70 will cause photodetector pair DA and DB to generate a small amount of detection signal current that can be directly integrated by capacitors CA and CB. Before the start of integration, microprocessor 90 will cause photodetectors DA and DB and their respective capacitors CA and CB to be reset to a reference voltage V r ⁇ f . For the components shown in Fig.
  • reset is caused by raising a reset signal ⁇ reS et (see Fig. 2B).
  • photocurrent generated by detectors DA and DB respectively discharge associated capacitors C A , CB, as shown in Fig. 2B.
  • the voltage seen at nodes SA, S B will decrease as a function of the photocurrent generated by the associated photodiode DA, D B .
  • the magnitude of the photodiode-generated photocurrent will be a function of the amount of light energy received by the respective pixel 70 in array 60 in that the amount of light received by the pixel determines the final voltage on nodes S A and S B .
  • Readout circuitry is provided for circuit A and B, comprising transistors foiiower and Tread- At the end of the integration time, which will be a function of the repetition rate of the optical pulses emitted from optical energy source 40, microprocessor 90 causes a readout signal ⁇ read to go high. This enables the voltages on nodes S A and SB to be read-out of array 60, e.g., through a bitline.
  • pixel 70 will also generate photocurrent in response to ambient light that is also integrated by capacitors CA, CB, thus affecting the potential at nodes SA, SB.
  • Fig. 2B depicts two examples, showing the effect of relatively low magnitude ambient light, and relatively high magnitude of ambient light.
  • the difference (Aflnai - Bnnai) generally contains range information, and common mode is of lesser importance.
  • relatively weak ambient light does not cause the pixel to saturate, and at the end of integration time, the final voltages read-out from the pixel are above V sa t.
  • CMOS complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor
  • Embodiments of the present invention provide such methods and circuit topologies.
  • Effective differential dynamic range in a differential pixel detector is increased by avoiding saturation effects due to common mode contribution in optical energy to be detected.
  • Photocurrent generated by each photodetector pair is directly integrated by an associated capacitor over an integration time T.
  • the resultant capacitor voltage is proportional to detected optical energy including ambient light.
  • time T before either integrated capacitor voltage reaches V sat for the photodetector, at least one of the capacitors is reset to a voltage such that the desired differential detector signal is still determinable.
  • the voltage across each capacitor is preset to a fixed V ref voltage.
  • V ref voltage the voltage across each capacitor is preset to a fixed V ref voltage.
  • the common mode component of the integrated capacitor voltages is reset periodically to prevent either photodiode detector from saturating.
  • the differential component of the integrated capacitor voltages is preserved. The result is to extend effective differential dynamic range of the differential sensor in the presence of ambient light by avoiding the effects of saturation.
  • FIG. 1 depicts a three-dimension TOF system using conventional pixel detectors as exemplified by U.S. Patent No. 6,323,942 and U.S. Patent No. 6,580,496;
  • FIG. 2A depicts a conventional differential pixel detector
  • FIG. 2B depicts waveforms present in the detector of Fig. 2A showing the saturation effects of high ambient light
  • FIG. 3A depicts one-half of a self-resetting differential pixel detector according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 3B depicts waveforms present in the detector of Fig. 3A, according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 3C depicts one-half of a self-resetting differential pixel detector implemented with an analog counter, according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 4A depicts one-half of a self-resetting differential pixel detector using an analog counter with reset, according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 4B depicts waveforms for a differential time to saturation counter as shown in Fig. 4A, according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 5A depicts a differential pixel detector using a controlled charge pump, according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 5B depicts waveforms present in the detector of Fig. 5A, according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 6A depicts a common mode resettable differential pixel detector, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6B depicts control waveforms present in the detector of Fig. 6A, according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 6C depicts waveforms present in the detector of Fig. 6A over a two reset sequence, according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 6D depicts another configuration of a common mode resettable differential pixel detector, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6E depicts yet another configuration of a common mode resettable differential pixel detector, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 7A depicts a common mode resettable differential pixel detector using charge integration, according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 7B depicts control waveforms for the embodiment of Fig. 7A, according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 8A depicts a common mode resettable differential pixel detector with component mismatch cancellation using charge integration, according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 8B depicts waveforms associated with the configuration of Fig. 8A, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 9A depicts a resettable differential pixel detector implemented with VCCS/CCCS current mirror, and an external control signal, according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 9B depicts a resettable differential pixel detector implemented with VCCS/CCCS current mirror, and a pulsed reference input signal, according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 9C depicts waveforms found in a current-source implemented differential pixel detector over a two reset sequence, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 9D and FIG. 9E depicts two implementations of a CCCS current mirror for use in a differential pixel detector, according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 10A depicts a configuration for resetting common mode using a shunt capacitor, useable with a resettable differential pixel detector according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 10C depicts control waveforms found in the configuration of Fig. 10A, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 11 depicts a range finding type system using differential pixel detectors, according to the present invention.
  • Fig. 3A depicts one-half of differential pixel detector 70', where it is understood that system 10 in Fig. 1 might now employ an array 60 of rows and columns of differential pixel detectors 70' in lieu of prior pixel detectors 70.
  • Fig. 3A only one of the two pixels is shown for ease of illustration, namely photodetector D A (denoted PD DA).
  • PD DA photodetector D A
  • CA Associated with each photodetector in the pixel is a capacitor, CA being associated with DA, where CA can be the capacitance inherent with DA, and/or a discrete capacitor.
  • a signal typically ambient light
  • each differential pixel detector 70' includes two photodiodes and two capacitors, and each capacitor-photodiode node is independently reset to V ref , as soon as the voltage across either capacitor reaches V sat .
  • a comparator 140 compares the voltage signal from photodiode DA present at node SA to V ref . As soon as the SA potential reaches Vre , comparator 140 changes state, going from low-to-high for the
  • the output from comparator 140 is also input to a counter 150 that essentially will count the number of resets that occur for the detector. It is understood that as Fig. 3A depicts half of a differential pixel detector, there will be two comparators, two counters, and two sets of switching transistors for each differential pixel detector 70'.
  • the photodiode signal at node S A is coupled via a high input impedance voltage follower transistor Tf 0 n 0 was, whose output is read via a bitline when a ⁇ rea dA signal goes high (for the configuration shown).
  • An additional row selection transistor TreadD is coupled between the output from counter 150 and the bitline signal, and is turned on when a ⁇ r ⁇ a dD signal goes high (for the configuration shown). Note that a feedback path exists between the comparator output and the gate for reset transistor T reSe t.
  • optical energy source 40 typically outputs a pulse train of optical energy, which energy may be modulated, for example according to the '496 patent.
  • the pulse train will have a period between adjacent output pulses.
  • the maximum period of integration is made less than the period between adjacent pulses of optical energy emitted by source 40.
  • comparator 140 changes states, emitting a short output pulse that is present at node P. This pulse turns-on reset transistor T reSet for a short
  • Such reset is self- triggering, and can occur multiple times during the integration interval.
  • the total number of such resets is recorded by counter 150, there being one counter for each of the two photodiode detectors in a differential pixel detector 70'.
  • Fig. 3A is conceptual in that while counter 150 is shown being read-out as though its counter n were an analog value, in practice the digital counter will be read-out with a bus.
  • the signal waveforms for node SA and the comparator output at node P are shown in Fig. 3B.
  • V sw ⁇ ng n(V re f - V sa t) + Vfmai, which is n times larger than the maximum voltage swing (V r ⁇ f - V sa t) of known differential sensors.
  • FIG. 3A has been described with respect to use of a counter 150 that operates digitally, the role of counter 150 can instead be implemented in analog fashion.
  • Fig. 3C depicts such an implementation, in which an analog charge pump products an analog voltage value proportional to n.
  • Such an analog circuit can be implemented using small area on an IC, e.g., IC 30 in Fig. 1 , where conventional detectors 70 are replaced by detectors 70' according to the present invention.
  • a current source changes voltage across a capacitor C r , where each time a reset pulse (of fixed duration) is generated by comparator 140, the current source is turned on.
  • a reset pulse of fixed duration
  • capacitor C r is also initialized to V re f when the photodetector is initialized. If desired, an initial voltage other than V ref could be used for capacitor C r .
  • photodetector DA can be reset by using the non-inverting input of comparator 140, which input normally is set to V sa t. But this non- inverting input can be used to perform an initial (frame) reset before integration. For example, during the initial reset period this input can be switched to V D D, which will cause the comparator to output a pulse at node P that resets T reSe t and thus resets photodetector DA and its associated capacitor CA- Thereafter the non-inverting node of comparator 140 can be returned to Vs at to remain at that potential until the next (frame) reset. By judiciously making voltage V sat low, all photodetectors are simultaneously reset, thus removing the need for a separate reset signal.
  • Figs. 4A and 4B an embodiment of a differential comparator is described in which a differential time to saturation counter is employed.
  • a single detector PD DA is shown, although it is understood that a complete differential pixel detector 70' will comprise two detector diodes (or the like), two comparators, a counter, and associated reset and read-out transistors.
  • counter 150' is shown implemented with analog components, a counter could instead be implemented to function digitally.
  • counter 150' starts counting to measure the time since the last reset to V ref .
  • the magnitude of incoming ambient light does not change substantially during
  • each photodetector D A and D B (DB not shown) will reach V sat multiple times during one integration period. In this case, every time either photodetector reaches V sat , the photodetectors and counter 150' are simultaneously reset. At the end of the integration period, each photodetector will be at a determinable voltage level, which level will likely be different for each detector. Further, at the end of the integration period, the counter will have stored the time ( ⁇ tf) since the last reset required for the photodetectors to attain these final voltage levels.
  • each photodetector end-of-integration voltage level is known, as is the time ⁇ tf, the slope of the voltage curves for each photodetector and the number of resets that should have occurred during integration can be determined; see Fig. 4B.
  • the final photodiode voltages are (Vref - ⁇ V a f) and (Vref - ⁇ Vbf) for photodiodes D A and DB respectively. Subtracting these magnitudes from V ref yields ⁇ V af and ⁇ V bf .
  • the total swing can be calculated as follows:
  • T is the total integration time, which is known.
  • V swing - a ⁇ V af
  • an external computation unit perhaps microprocessor 90 in system 10 (see Fig. 1 ) or pure logic circuitry can calculate to provide the differential signal.
  • FIG. 4A an analog equivalent of a digital resettable counter 150' is used, in which a charge pump can be used to measure ⁇ tf.
  • a charge pump capacitor C r is reset by transistor Tc rrese t each time photodiode voltage reaches V sat .
  • the voltage on C r is proportional to the time from the last reset to the end of integration.
  • capacitor C r is initialized at the beginning of integration along with the photodetector.
  • the non-inverting input of comparator 140 may be switched to VDD (rather than to V sa t during integration) to reset pixel 70' (e.g., both photodetectors and C r ).
  • VDD voltage
  • V sa t voltage
  • all photodiodes are simultaneously reset, thus removing the need for a separate reset signal.
  • differential pixel detector 70' includes a voltage controlled charge pump 160 to record voltage difference between the two differential photodetectors D A and DB before they are saturated by high common mode signal. Once the photodetector voltage difference has been recorded on a third capacitor C r , photodetectors D A and D B and their
  • associated capacitors can be reset by the relevant reset transistors, and integration starts again.
  • charge pump 160 includes two voltage controlled current sources l s ⁇ , l S2 and a capacitor C r .
  • the voltage difference between photodetectors DA and DB may be monitored continuously by differential amplifier 170, charge pump 160 is only turned-on for a fixed period of time. In this fashion, charge accumulated on capacitor C r during each sample is proportional to the voltage difference.
  • the differential photodetector is reset and a new integration cycle starts.
  • the sampling frequency preferably depends upon incoming light intensity, e.g., optical energy falling upon photodetectors D A and DB, which intensity can be estimated.
  • the final charge on C r is the summation of the samples and is proportional to the total voltage difference between the differential photodetectors.
  • Fig. 5B depicts control signal and voltage waveforms at various nodes in the configuration of Fig. 5A.
  • V a voltage across DA
  • V b voltage across D B
  • V r voltage across capacitor C r
  • V SW in g -a - V SW ing-b ⁇ Vaf - ⁇ V f + f(V r ), where f(V r ) is a linear function of V r .
  • V r ⁇ f is the initial voltage for capacitor C r (e.g., the reset voltage for photodetectors D A , DB)
  • n is the number of sample/reset cycles
  • k is a constant determined from the circuit of Fig. 4A, and represents how much voltage change occurs on C r for given a unit voltage change in (V a - V b ).
  • the amount contributing to V SW ing-a - V S ing-b is n • (V a - Vb), which is equal to n •
  • ⁇ r ese t can be a delayed version of ⁇ sa mpi e -
  • Such a self-resetting configuration would use two comparators, an OR gate, and a delay element that could be a simple RC delay.
  • a differential pixel detector 70' is shown in which during reset operation capacitors acquire exactly the same charge in each half of the configuration. By adding exactly the same charge to each half of the configuration, common mode contribution is essentially removed and differential mode contribution is preserved.
  • Such an approach offers several advantages. For example, extra resets do not affect the system operation, and the pixel detector may be reset even if it is not discharged. Further, capacitor or component mismatch has substantially no effect on the accuracy of the reset.
  • common mode reset generates no KT/C noise in the differential domain. The only resulting KT/C contribution appears in common mode where it is unimportant.
  • Fig. 6A does not depict QA, which is the sum of the charge on the top plate of capacitors CA and C D A, or Q B , which is the sum of the charge on the top plate of capacitors CB and CDB-
  • QA which is the sum of the charge on the top plate of capacitors CA and C D A
  • Q B which is the sum of the charge on the top plate of capacitors CB and CDB-
  • the configuration of Fig. 6A preserves the differential quantity QA-QB during the common mode reset operation, although the common mode quantity, (Q A +
  • transistors T SW A and T swB are open, while transitors T vre fA and T vre fB, and Tdis A and TdisB are closed.
  • Initially photodetector diodes DA and DB are reset to V r ⁇ f via transistors T re setA and TresetB, but during integration transistors T re setA and T reS etB remain open.
  • As optical energy impinges on phododiode D A it discarges its parasitic capacitor CDA as well as capacitor CA, while photodiode DB discharges its parasitic capacitor CDB as well as its capacitor C B .
  • Initial reset is achieved though transistors T re set A and T reS etB, which initialize the circuit at potential V re f, although other potentenial levels may instead be used.
  • capacitors CA and CB are decoupled from associated photodiodes DA and D B by bring the ⁇ dis signal low, which opens discharge transistors TdisA and T d i S B going low. This operation does not change the differential charge quantity QA-QB, and no KT/C noise is introduced on QA-QB-
  • steps 5 and 6 may occur simultaneously or even out of sequence.
  • steps 1 ,2 and 5,6 clearly do not affect QA-QB, and it was demonstrated that steps 3 and 4 do not affect QCA-QCB-
  • steps 1 through 6 do not affect QA-QB-
  • the generation of the various control signals can be handled by microprocessor 90 in system 10 in Fig. 1 , where it is understood that array will comprise differential pixels 70', according to the present invention.
  • charge difference QA - QB is preserved in the configuration of Fig. 6A.
  • VDA and VDB must differ from the top plate voltages on capacitors CA and C B by only a constant K.
  • V DA V ref + V CA + K eq.
  • V DA ' + V DB ' f(V ref + V CA ) + C DA ° K/(C DA + C A )] + [(V ref - VCA) +
  • reset operation has the desired effect of centering the common mode about V r ⁇ f .
  • Relevant waveforms for Fig. 6A are shown in Fig. 6C.
  • a reset can be applied without consideration of over-saturating or under-saturating the common mode for the pixel configuration.
  • reset can occur as often as desired without concern as to ill effects resulting from over or under saturation of the common mode.
  • Transistors Tdi sA and T isB can be used as global shutters, thereby improving resilience to ambient light by stopping the effects of all light impinging on the differential pixel when the shutter is turned off.
  • capacitors C a and C b are decoupled from photodetectors PDDA and PDDB and therefore stop integrating the signal from PDDA and PD D B- If the output of the pixel is chosen to be top plate of capacitors CA and CB then the output of the pixel will be frozen after T d isA and T d isB are turned-off, thereby providing the function of a global shutter.
  • Fig. 6D depicts another embodiment of a capacitor common mode reset configuration for pixel 70', according to the present invention.
  • Basic operation for the configuration of Fig. 6D is as described for the configuration of Fig. 6A.
  • initialization of voltages VDA and V D B across photodiodes D A , D B respectively at the beginning of integration does not have any significant effect on the configuration of Fig. 6D.
  • transistors Tr esetA and T reSetB involve transistors Tr esetA and T reSetB as was the case for the configuration of Fig. 6A. Instead, in Fig. 6D, reset is achieved by simultaneously turning-on transistors Tdis A and T is B with high control signals ⁇ d is, turning-on transistors T SW A and TSWB with high control signal ⁇ sw , and by turning-off transistors TvrefA and TvrefB with low control signal ⁇ n0 rm- This has the effect of resetting photodetectors PDDA and PDDB to V re f- Note that transistors TdisA and TdisB may be used as global shutters in this configuration.
  • Fig. 6E depicts yet another embodiment for pixel 70', wherein discharge transistors T d i sA and T d is B are eliminated. Indeed these discharge transistors could also be removed from the configurations of Fig. 6A and Fig. 6D. While these alternative configurations reduced common mode, unfortunately detector performance is diminished. This degradation results as each reset reduces some of the differential mode signal, and after a usually small number of resets, the differential signal is lost as a function of CDA/CA and CDB/CB- Such embodiments may still find use in applications that do not require high precision, or where the number of resets is low, or where CDA « C A and C DB « C B .
  • Figs. 7A and 7B a configuration and waveforms for a differential pixel detector 70' is shown in which a charge integrator is used for differential signal integration and common mode reset. Integration is carried out by integrator 180 and integration capacitor CM- During an initial frame reset, transistors controlled by ⁇ re set, ⁇ r, and ⁇ j n t signals are all turned-on, and the voltages on photodetectors D A and DB are reset to V ref -
  • Fig. 7B depicts various control voltage waveforms used in the embodiment of Fig. 7A.
  • control signal ⁇ j n t goes low, causing transistors Tin t to decouple CA from C D A and to decouple C B from CDB- Then control signal ⁇ r goes high, turning-on transistors T r and charge in both CA and CB transfers to the integration capacitor Cint- Note that polarities of the charge transferred onto nt are opposite due to the arrangement of the T r switches.
  • the integrated charge on C int after the common mode reset can be expressed in terms of charge on CDA, CDB before the common mode reset as:
  • common mode reset is performed multiple times and is interleaved with the integration during the whole frame integration.
  • the integrating operational amplifier 180 may be turned off to save power.
  • the total number of common mode reset performed will depend on the intensity of ambient light.
  • the final signal readout is the accumulated charge (hence voltage) on nt.
  • each differential pixel e.g., each DA and DB photodiode pair
  • has its own integrator e.g. 180.
  • Fig. 8A an embodiment of a differential detector 170' is shown in which the common mode reset circuitry compensates for potential mismatch between components such as mismatched detector area between DA and DB, mismatched tolerance between capacitors C A and CB, as well as mismatched transistor sizes.
  • Fig. 8B depicts control waveforms found in an alternate embodiment of Fig. 8A.
  • the phase of the optical energy waveform from emitter 40 alternates between 0° and 180° with respect to the phase of a signal used to modulate the photodetectors.
  • LIGHT the phase of the optical energy waveform from emitter 40
  • polarity between D A and D B is switched synchronously in time with modulation of the light emitted from system 10 towards target object 20.
  • the accumulated charge on integration capacitor Qnt at the end of frame integration is expressed as:
  • Q A ,o represents the charge collected by detector D A with respect to 0° light phase
  • Q B ,o represents the charge collected by detector D B with respect to 0° light phase
  • QA,I SO represents the charge collected by detector DA with respect to 180° light phase
  • QB.I S O represents the charge collected by detector DB with respect to 180° light phase.
  • differential charge is collected from detector D A and half of the charge is collected from detector D B .
  • Another advantage of this embodiment is that KT/C noise associated with the transistor switches becomes common mode; therefore such noise is cancelled out from the final differential signal value.
  • FIG. 9A depicts an alternative approach in which potentials V a and V b are increased by a fixed amount ⁇ V before these potentials drop below a certain level due to high-common mode light. This approach is somewhat analogous to the capacitor common mode reset embodiments that have been described. However the embodiment of Fig. 9A uses a separate circuit with an external current source 190.
  • a periodic injection of a fixed amount of charge into detectors DA and D B occurs.
  • the result is that while the differential (DA-D B) charge does not change, the common mode of DA and DB is refreshed (i.e., decreased) to prevent photodetector saturation.
  • An external current source 190 is required, which current source may be a reference Voltage Controlled Current Source (VCCS) or perhaps a reference Constant Current Controlled Current source (CCCS), in which case the current source becomes a current mirror.
  • VCCS Voltage Controlled Current Source
  • CCCS Constant Current Controlled Current source
  • Fig. 9A and the embodiment of Fig. 9B demonstrate two approaches to periodically refreshing charge into detectors DA and DB.
  • current source 190 is always on, but switches Tsw responsive to an external signal ⁇ xc are used to couple the constant current output by source 190 to nodes SA and S B .
  • ⁇ xc is periodically turned-on for a brief period of time to charge-up nodes SA and SB, hundreds of nanoseconds perhaps.
  • Fig. 9C depicts waveforms for the configurations of Figs. 9A and 9B. Note that advantageously the final differential voltage is simply (VA - V B ) and that no other computation need be done.
  • the rate at which ⁇ X c or the reference input to current count 190 will depend upon the common mode ambient light. A higher rate would be called for in the presence of very strong ambient light to keep source nodes S A and S B from saturating.
  • current source 190 may be controlled using a voltage reference or a current reference. If a voltage reference is used, the voltage can be VDD or V r ⁇ f , in which case only the ⁇ xc signal would be needed to perform common-mode removal.
  • CCCS current mirrors
  • a variety of circuit configurations are structures are available, two of which are shown in Figs. 9D and 9E. While the configuration of Fig. 9D has fewer components, its current output may suffer from nonlinearity caused by transistor channel length modulation. The configuration of Fig. 9E provides a cascoded current mirror that is insensitive to voltage at the current output nodes. The choice of current source configuration involves a tradeoff between circuit complexity and accuracy.
  • Fig. 10A depicts a shunt capacitor embodiment of the present invention to periodically inject a certain amount of charge into photodetector DA and DB to compensate for the common mode.
  • Fig. 10A depicts one-half of such a circuit, while Fig. 10B depicts control signal waveforms.
  • A, preferably, very small capacitor C ha rg e is initially charged-up to a relatively high voltage.
  • Fig. 11 is a block diagram of a range finding system 10 using differential pixel detectors 70' according to any of the embodiments described herein.
  • target object 20' is an image of a input device, for example an image of a computer keyboard. The image may be printed on a piece of paper or may in fact be optically projected from within system 10. However presented, target object 20' is visible to a user who can type upon the image as though it were a real keyboard. System 10 can measure in three- dimensions the location of whichever virtual keys are typed upon by the user, and in what time order, e.g., did the user type "am" or "ma".
  • companion device 200 might be the control electronics for an air bag supplemental restraint system within the car. The control electronics can then intelligently deploy the air bag in one manner if the occupant to be protected is an adult, and can deploy differently if the occupant is a small child.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Transforming Light Signals Into Electric Signals (AREA)
  • Solid State Image Pick-Up Elements (AREA)
  • Facsimile Heads (AREA)

Abstract

Effective differential dynamic range in a differential pixel detector (70) is increased by avoiding saturation effects due to common mode contribution in optical energy to be detected. Photocurrent generated by each photodetector (Da) pair is directly integrated by an associated capacitor (Ca) over an integration time T. Within time T, before either integrated capacitor voltage reaches Vsat for the photodetector, at least one of the capacitors is reset to a voltage such that the desired differential detector signal is still determinable. Reset may be generated externally or internally to the differential pixel detector.

Description

METHOD AND SYSTEM TO DIFFERENTIALLY ENHANCE
SENSOR DYNAMIC RANGE
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
toooi] Priority is claimed from applicant's U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/462,167 filed on 11 April 2003 entitled "Differential Dynamic Range Enhancement Methods and Systems", assigned to Canesta, Inc., the entire content of which application is incorporated herein by reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The invention relates generally to optical sensors, and more particularly to enhancing dynamic range of such sens.ors, while allowing the sensors to be fabricated using CMOS techniques.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] Systems that rely upon sensing optical energy to discern information are known in the art and have many applications. Exemplary applications might include an optical-based system to determine range between the system and a target object, or to identify and recognize features of a target object. Many such systems acquire two-dimensional or intensity-based information, and rely upon an intensity image of light reflected from a target object. Such luminosity-based systems can use ambient light falling upon the target object, or may actively generate light that is directed toward the target object. [0004] Unfortunately, it is difficult to accurately determine distance solely from the amplitude and brightness of an intensity image. For example, in a range finding system, a highly reflecting target object that is father away from the system can produce a greater amplitude signal than a nearer target object that is less reflective. The result would be that the more distant, shiny, object is erroneously reported as being closer to the system than the closer, duller, object. In a range finding system used to control robot machinery in an industrial setting, such errors may be intolerable for reasons of safety to nearby human operators. If such a system is used to identify and recognize different target objects, an object might be misidentified. Simply stated, two- dimensional intensity-based systems are very prone to measurement error.
[0005] The present invention may be used in a wide range of applications including, but not limited to, range finding systems. It may be useful at this juncture to briefly review such systems.
[0006] U.S. Patent No. 6,323,942 to Bamji et al. (Nov. 2001 ) entitled "CMOS- Compatible Three-Dimensional Image Sensor IC" describes a three- dimensional range finding system that can determine range distance without reliance upon luminosity-based data, the entire content of which patent is incorporated herein by this reference. As disclosed in the '942 patent, such a system generates a depth map that contains the distance Z from each pixel in a CMOS-compatible sensor array to a corresponding location on a target object. Applicants refer to and incorporate by reference the '942 patent as background material. U.S. patent no. 6,580,496 to Bamji et al. (June 2003) entitled "Systems for CMOS-Compatible Three-Dimensional Image Sensing Using Quantum Efficiency Modulation" describes the use of quantum modulation techniques and differential detectors suitable for a three- dimensional range finding system, the entire content of which patent is incorporated herein by this reference. In the '496 patent the quantum efficiency of the substrate upon which differential CMOS sensors were
- 2 - (1136775) fabricated was modulated synchronously with optical energy emitted from an energy source. Applicants refer to and incorporate by reference the '496 patent as background material.
[0007] Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a three-dimensional range finding system 10 as exemplified by the '942 patent or the '496 patent. Such systems determine distance Z between the system and locations on target object 20. System 10 may be fabricated upon a single IC 30, requires no moving parts, and relatively few off-chip components, primarily a source of optical energy 40, e.g., a light emitting diode (LED) or laser source, and associated optics 50. If desired, laser source 40 might be bonded onto the common substrate upon which IC 30 is fabricated.
[0008] System 10 includes an array 60 of pixel detectors 70, each of which has dedicated circuitry 80 for processing detection charge output by the associated detector. (As used herein, the terms "detector" and "pixel" and "pixel detector" may be used interchangeably.) Array 60 might include 100x100 pixels 70, and 100x100 associated detector processing circuits 80. One will appreciate that other configurations may be used. IC 30 preferably also includes a microprocessor or microcontroller unit 90, RAM and ROM memory, collectively 100, a high-speed distributable clock 110, and various computing and input/output (I/O) circuitry 120. System 10 preferably further includes a lens 130 to focus light reflected from target object 20 upon pixels 70 in array 60. As noted in the above-mentioned patents, controller unit 90 may carryout distance-to-object and object velocity calculations and can output such calculations as DATA, for use by a companion device, if desired. As seen in Fig. 1 , substantially all of system 10 may be fabricated upon CMOS IC 30, which enables shorter signal paths, and reduced processing and delay times. Also shown in Fig. 1 is ambient light that is present in the environment in which system 10 and target object 20 are found. As described
- 3 - . (1136775) herein, high levels of ambient light relative to levels of light from energy source 40 can be detrimental to reliable operation of system 10.
[0009] In brief, microprocessor 90 can calculate the roundtrip time for optical energy from source 40 to travel to target object 20 and be reflected back to a pixel 70 within array 60. This time-of-flight (TOF) is given by the following relationship:
eq. (1): Z = C • t/2
where C is velocity of light.
[ooio] Thus, without reliance upon luminosity information, system 10 can calculate that Z1 = C • t1/2, Z2 = C • t2/2, Z2 = C • t3/2, and so on. The correct Z distances are obtained, even if more distant regions of target object 20 happen to be more reflective than nearer regions of the target object.
[0011] The ability of system 10 to determine proper TOF distances Z can be impacted when the magnitude of ambient light is large relative to the magnitude of reflected light from source 40. What occurs is that the various pixels 70 respond to incoming optical energy that represents the real signal to be measured (e.g., active energy originating from source 40 and reflected by target object 20), and also respond to ambient light. The depth resolution of each pixel, i.e., the accuracy of the distance measurement, is determined by the system signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Even if ambient light could be measured and subtracted from the total signal, its noise component (e.g., shot noise) would still degrade system performance. Further, the presence of ambient light can have even more severe consequences by causing the pixel detector to saturate.
[0012] In a so-called differential pixel detector, the active optical energy contributes to both a differential mode signal and a common mode signal,
- 4 - (1136775) while ambient light only contributes to the common mode signal. While differential pixel detectors can exhibit higher SNR than single-ended pixel detectors, the presence of strong ambient light, sunlight perhaps, can degrade the performance of differential pixel detectors, as will now be described. As used herein, the term "differential detector" refers to a detector that responds to two input parameters. For example in the '496 patent, the differential detectors responded to amplitude of incoming optical energy and to phase of such energy relative to energy output by emitter 40; see Fig. 1 herein. Typically the singular term "pixel" will refer to a pair of differential photodetectors, for example first and second photodiode detectors DA and DB.
[0013] Incoming optical energy falling upon a pixel detector 70 generates an extremely small amount of photocurrent (or photocharge), typically on the order of picoamps (10"12 amps). Such detection current signals are too small in magnitude to be measured directly. It is known in the art to provide pixel detectors that operate in a direct integration mode by which optical energy induced photocurrent is integrated on a capacitor and the final capacitor charge or voltage is readout at the end of an integration interval. A capacitor Cx has finite maximum charge capacity Qmax defined by:
Q. {■ ).' \ ,max ~ *~-x * ' swing
where Cx is the total capacitance and VSWjng is the maximum voltage swing across the capacitor. A pixel detector is said to be in saturation when the total charge integrated on the capacitor exceeds the maximum charge capacity, in which case no useful information can be readout from that pixel.
[0014] A differential pixel detector (e.g., detectors 70 in Fig. 1 ) may be represented as shown generically in Fig. 2A, in which modulation circuitry has been omitted for simplicity. Each pixel 70 has a differential structure with two perhaps identical reset and readout circuit components denoted A and B. Components A and B may be considered as part of the pixel 70 or as part of
- 5 - (1136775) the pixel's associated circuitry 80. For ease of depictions, the photodetector pair comprising each differential pixel 70 is shown as photodiodes DA and DB, but other detector structures could be used instead, for example photogate structures. Capacitors CA and CB are shown in parallel with diodes DA and DB and represent detector parasitic capacitance and/or dedicated fixed value capacitors.
[0015] Referring briefly to Fig. 1 , within system 10 microprocessor 90 causes optical energy source 40 to emit pulses of light that are directed by lens 50 toward target object 20. Some of this optical energy will be reflected back towards system 10 and will be focused by lens 130 onto pixels 70 within array 60. Incoming photon energy falling upon a detector 70 will cause photodetector pair DA and DB to generate a small amount of detection signal current that can be directly integrated by capacitors CA and CB. Before the start of integration, microprocessor 90 will cause photodetectors DA and DB and their respective capacitors CA and CB to be reset to a reference voltage Vrβf. For the components shown in Fig. 2A, reset is caused by raising a reset signal ΦreSet (see Fig. 2B). During the integration time, photocurrent generated by detectors DA and DB respectively discharge associated capacitors CA, CB, as shown in Fig. 2B. During the integration time, the voltage seen at nodes SA, SB will decrease as a function of the photocurrent generated by the associated photodiode DA, DB. The magnitude of the photodiode-generated photocurrent will be a function of the amount of light energy received by the respective pixel 70 in array 60 in that the amount of light received by the pixel determines the final voltage on nodes SA and SB.
[0016] Readout circuitry is provided for circuit A and B, comprising transistors foiiower and Tread- At the end of the integration time, which will be a function of the repetition rate of the optical pulses emitted from optical energy source 40, microprocessor 90 causes a readout signal Φread to go high. This enables the voltages on nodes SA and SB to be read-out of array 60, e.g., through a bitline.
- 6 - (1136775) In the exemplary configuration of Fig. 2A, if the voltage on node SA or SB drops below a certain level denoted here as saturation voltage Vsat, the readout circuit cannot perform the reading operation properly. Therefore the dynamic range of such known differential pixel configuration shown in Fig. 2A is (Vref - VSat), as depicted in Fig. 2B. While the waveforms in Fig. 2B depict a diminishing potential at nodes SA, SB as a function of photocurrent, one could instead configure the detector circuitry to charge rather than discharge a reference node potential.
[0017] But in addition to generating photocurrent in response to optical energy or active light (from emitter 40) reflected by target object 20, pixel 70 will also generate photocurrent in response to ambient light that is also integrated by capacitors CA, CB, thus affecting the potential at nodes SA, SB. Fig. 2B depicts two examples, showing the effect of relatively low magnitude ambient light, and relatively high magnitude of ambient light. In range finding applications, the difference (Aflnai - Bnnai) generally contains range information, and common mode is of lesser importance. As shown in Fig. 2B, relatively weak ambient light does not cause the pixel to saturate, and at the end of integration time, the final voltages read-out from the pixel are above Vsat. But relatively strong ambient light discharges the associated capacitor potential rapidly, which saturates the pixel. Due to the saturation condition, the pixel does not output any useful result in that the differential voltage, which contained range information, is now zero. Thus, a very real problem with prior differential pixel detectors is that the dynamic range of the pixel is not sufficient to handle strong ambient light.
[0018] Thus there is a need for a method and topology by which the dynamic range of a differential pixel detector can be enhanced such that degradation from ambient light is substantially reduced. Even in the presence of strong ambient light that might otherwise saturate the pixel, the differential response of the pixel should still be available. Further, such method and topology
- 7 - (1136775) should be implementable using CMOS such that the differential sensor array can still be fabricated on a common IC with associated range finding system.
[0019] Embodiments of the present invention provide such methods and circuit topologies.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0020] Effective differential dynamic range in a differential pixel detector is increased by avoiding saturation effects due to common mode contribution in optical energy to be detected. Photocurrent generated by each photodetector pair is directly integrated by an associated capacitor over an integration time T. The resultant capacitor voltage is proportional to detected optical energy including ambient light. Within time T, before either integrated capacitor voltage reaches Vsat for the photodetector, at least one of the capacitors is reset to a voltage such that the desired differential detector signal is still determinable.
[0021] In one embodiment, at start of integration time T, the voltage across each capacitor is preset to a fixed Vref voltage. During integration time T whenever the integrated capacitor voltage of either capacitor reaches Vsat, that capacitor is reset to Vrβf. After reset, capacitor voltages are again allowed to change as a function of photocurrent, and will be reset to Vrβf whenever and as soon as either capacitor voltage reaches Vsat. A count of total resets for each capacitor is maintained, and the amount of light falling upon each detector is a function of its final voltage at end of integration and the number of resets occurring during integration. In another embodiment, the common mode component of the integrated capacitor voltages is reset periodically to prevent either photodiode detector from saturating. However the differential component of the integrated capacitor voltages is preserved. The result is to extend effective differential dynamic range of the differential sensor in the presence of ambient light by avoiding the effects of saturation. Embodiments
- 8 - (1136775) of the present invention can extend differential dynamic range of the differential sensor despite mismatching in the components implementing the differential pixel detector.
[0022] Other features and advantages of the invention will appear from the following description in which the preferred embodiments have been set forth in detail, in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0023] FIG. 1 depicts a three-dimension TOF system using conventional pixel detectors as exemplified by U.S. Patent No. 6,323,942 and U.S. Patent No. 6,580,496;
[0024] FIG. 2A depicts a conventional differential pixel detector;
[0025] FIG. 2B depicts waveforms present in the detector of Fig. 2A showing the saturation effects of high ambient light;
[0026] FIG. 3A depicts one-half of a self-resetting differential pixel detector according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[0027] FIG. 3B depicts waveforms present in the detector of Fig. 3A, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[0028] FIG. 3C depicts one-half of a self-resetting differential pixel detector implemented with an analog counter, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[0029] FIG. 4A depicts one-half of a self-resetting differential pixel detector using an analog counter with reset, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
- 9 - ( 136775) [0030] FIG. 4B depicts waveforms for a differential time to saturation counter as shown in Fig. 4A, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[0031] FIG. 5A depicts a differential pixel detector using a controlled charge pump, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[0032] FIG. 5B depicts waveforms present in the detector of Fig. 5A, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[0033] FIG. 6A depicts a common mode resettable differential pixel detector, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[0034] FIG. 6B depicts control waveforms present in the detector of Fig. 6A, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[0035] FIG. 6C depicts waveforms present in the detector of Fig. 6A over a two reset sequence, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[0036] FIG. 6D depicts another configuration of a common mode resettable differential pixel detector, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[0037] FIG. 6E depicts yet another configuration of a common mode resettable differential pixel detector, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[0038] FIG. 7A depicts a common mode resettable differential pixel detector using charge integration, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[0039] FIG. 7B depicts control waveforms for the embodiment of Fig. 7A, according to the present invention;
- 10 - (1136775) [0040] FIG. 8A depicts a common mode resettable differential pixel detector with component mismatch cancellation using charge integration, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[0041] FIG. 8B depicts waveforms associated with the configuration of Fig. 8A, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[0042] FIG. 9A depicts a resettable differential pixel detector implemented with VCCS/CCCS current mirror, and an external control signal, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[0043] FIG. 9B depicts a resettable differential pixel detector implemented with VCCS/CCCS current mirror, and a pulsed reference input signal, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[0044] FIG. 9C depicts waveforms found in a current-source implemented differential pixel detector over a two reset sequence, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[0045] FIG. 9D and FIG. 9E depicts two implementations of a CCCS current mirror for use in a differential pixel detector, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[0046] FIG. 10A depicts a configuration for resetting common mode using a shunt capacitor, useable with a resettable differential pixel detector according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[0047] FIG. 10C depicts control waveforms found in the configuration of Fig. 10A, according to an embodiment of the present invention; and
[0048] FIG. 11 depicts a range finding type system using differential pixel detectors, according to the present invention.
- 1 1 - (1136775) DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0049] Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to those embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
[0050] Fig. 3A depicts one-half of differential pixel detector 70', where it is understood that system 10 in Fig. 1 might now employ an array 60 of rows and columns of differential pixel detectors 70' in lieu of prior pixel detectors 70. In Fig. 3A, only one of the two pixels is shown for ease of illustration, namely photodetector DA (denoted PD DA). Associated with each photodetector in the pixel is a capacitor, CA being associated with DA, where CA can be the capacitance inherent with DA, and/or a discrete capacitor. In a conventional configuration, in the presence of a signal, typically ambient light, the voltage across CA would decrease until a saturation voltage Vsat was attained, at which point an output signal from DA would be meaningless.
[0051] But as shown by the waveforms in Fig. 3B, the voltage at node SA, e.g., the voltage across CA and across DA, is prevented from exceeding Vsat by resetting the node voltage to a fixed reference Vref whenever Vsat is attained. Each differential pixel detector 70' includes two photodiodes and two capacitors, and each capacitor-photodiode node is independently reset to Vref, as soon as the voltage across either capacitor reaches Vsat.
[0052] In Fig. 3A, a comparator 140 compares the voltage signal from photodiode DA present at node SA to Vref. As soon as the SA potential reaches Vre , comparator 140 changes state, going from low-to-high for the
- 12 - (1136775) configuration shown. Thus when VSA > Vsat, the output from comparator 140 turns-on a reset transistor Treset coupled between node SA and Vref. The potential VSA at node SA is reset by being pulled from Vsatto Vref. The desired result is that overall dynamic range of pixel detector 70' is increased.
[0053] Returning to Fig. 3A and 3B, the output from comparator 140 (node P) is also input to a counter 150 that essentially will count the number of resets that occur for the detector. It is understood that as Fig. 3A depicts half of a differential pixel detector, there will be two comparators, two counters, and two sets of switching transistors for each differential pixel detector 70'. The photodiode signal at node SA is coupled via a high input impedance voltage follower transistor Tf0n0wer, whose output is read via a bitline when a ΦreadA signal goes high (for the configuration shown). An additional row selection transistor TreadD is coupled between the output from counter 150 and the bitline signal, and is turned on when a ΦadD signal goes high (for the configuration shown). Note that a feedback path exists between the comparator output and the gate for reset transistor TreSet. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that means other than the above described solid state switches, comparators, counters, etc., may be used to implement similar embodiments of the present invention.
[0054] Referring briefly to Fig. 1 , optical energy source 40 typically outputs a pulse train of optical energy, which energy may be modulated, for example according to the '496 patent. The pulse train will have a period between adjacent output pulses. Within differential detector 70', the maximum period of integration is made less than the period between adjacent pulses of optical energy emitted by source 40. Referring back to Figs. 3A and 3B, during integration in the present of strong ambient light, sunlight perhaps, the voltage at node SA across CA continues to decrease in magnitude until Vsat is reached. At that moment, comparator 140 changes states, emitting a short output pulse that is present at node P. This pulse turns-on reset transistor TreSet for a short
- 13 - (1136775) time, causing CA to be again reset to voltage Vref. Such reset is self- triggering, and can occur multiple times during the integration interval. The total number of such resets is recorded by counter 150, there being one counter for each of the two photodiode detectors in a differential pixel detector 70'.
[0055] At the end of the integration time, the counter value (n) and the final voltage Vfmaι on capacitor CA are read-out separately by turning-on TreadD and readA, respectively. Fig. 3A is conceptual in that while counter 150 is shown being read-out as though its counter n were an analog value, in practice the digital counter will be read-out with a bus. The signal waveforms for node SA and the comparator output at node P are shown in Fig. 3B. Note that the effective voltage swing on node SA is Vswιng = n(Vref - Vsat) + Vfmai, which is n times larger than the maximum voltage swing (Vrβf - Vsat) of known differential sensors. Thus using the self-resetting configuration of Fig. 3A, capacity is extended by n times, where n is the number of self-resets occurring during integration. The resultant extended maximum charge capacity for the photodiode enables the pixel sensor to detect differential mode signals even in the present of very strong ambient light.
[0056] While Fig. 3A has been described with respect to use of a counter 150 that operates digitally, the role of counter 150 can instead be implemented in analog fashion. Fig. 3C depicts such an implementation, in which an analog charge pump products an analog voltage value proportional to n. Such an analog circuit can be implemented using small area on an IC, e.g., IC 30 in Fig. 1 , where conventional detectors 70 are replaced by detectors 70' according to the present invention.
[0057] In Fig. 3C, a current source changes voltage across a capacitor Cr, where each time a reset pulse (of fixed duration) is generated by comparator 140, the current source is turned on. Thus for each comparator reset pulse, a
- 14 - (1136775) fixed amount of charge is injected into capacitor Cr, altering the voltage across the capacitor by ΔVr. At the end of the integration time, the voltage on capacitor Cr changes by an amount equal to ΔVr times the number of reset pulses n that occurred during integration. It is possible to determine n by n = (Vref - Vr)/ΔVr. Note that capacitor Cr is also initialized to Vref when the photodetector is initialized. If desired, an initial voltage other than Vref could be used for capacitor Cr.
[0058] In Fig. 3C, photodetector DA can be reset by using the non-inverting input of comparator 140, which input normally is set to Vsat. But this non- inverting input can be used to perform an initial (frame) reset before integration. For example, during the initial reset period this input can be switched to VDD, which will cause the comparator to output a pulse at node P that resets TreSet and thus resets photodetector DA and its associated capacitor CA- Thereafter the non-inverting node of comparator 140 can be returned to Vsat to remain at that potential until the next (frame) reset. By judiciously making voltage Vsat low, all photodetectors are simultaneously reset, thus removing the need for a separate reset signal.
[0059] Turning now to Figs. 4A and 4B, an embodiment of a differential comparator is described in which a differential time to saturation counter is employed. In the block diagram of Fig. 4A a single detector PD DA is shown, although it is understood that a complete differential pixel detector 70' will comprise two detector diodes (or the like), two comparators, a counter, and associated reset and read-out transistors. In Fig. 4A, while counter 150' is shown implemented with analog components, a counter could instead be implemented to function digitally.
[0060] At start of integration, counter 150' starts counting to measure the time since the last reset to Vref. In the following discussion it will be assumed that the magnitude of incoming ambient light does not change substantially during
- 15 - (1136775) the integration time. Two scenarios will be considered: ambient light is strong, and ambient light is not very strong.
[0061] If the ambient light is strong, each photodetector DA and DB (DB not shown) will reach Vsat multiple times during one integration period. In this case, every time either photodetector reaches Vsat, the photodetectors and counter 150' are simultaneously reset. At the end of the integration period, each photodetector will be at a determinable voltage level, which level will likely be different for each detector. Further, at the end of the integration period, the counter will have stored the time (Δtf) since the last reset required for the photodetectors to attain these final voltage levels. Since each photodetector end-of-integration voltage level is known, as is the time Δtf, the slope of the voltage curves for each photodetector and the number of resets that should have occurred during integration can be determined; see Fig. 4B. Note at the right-hand side of Fig. 4B that the final photodiode voltages are (Vref - ΔVaf) and (Vref - ΔVbf) for photodiodes DA and DB respectively. Subtracting these magnitudes from Vref yields ΔVaf and ΔVbf. The total swing can be calculated as follows:
eq. (3): Vswing.a = Δ Vaf T/Atf eq. (4): Vswing.b = Δ Vbf • T/Atf
where T is the total integration time, which is known.
[0062] If the ambient light is not strong, at the end of the integration time T, the counter value will be equal to the integration time, and the voltages across the photodiodes DA and DB will represent all that the photocharge each pixel could collect during the whole integration time. In this case, no further calculation is needed to determine the total voltages, since it follows from T = Δtf that:
eq. (5): Vswing-a = ΔVaf
- 16 - (1136775) eq. (6): Vswing.b = ΔVbf
[0063] Once the relevant times and photodiode voltages are read-out, an external computation unit, perhaps microprocessor 90 in system 10 (see Fig. 1 ) or pure logic circuitry can calculate to provide the differential signal.
[0064] As noted, in Fig. 4A an analog equivalent of a digital resettable counter 150' is used, in which a charge pump can be used to measure Δtf. A charge pump capacitor Cr is reset by transistor Tcrreset each time photodiode voltage reaches Vsat. Thus at the end of time T, the voltage on Cr is proportional to the time from the last reset to the end of integration. Assuming the constant current supplied to Cr is lr, then the final voltage on Cr will be Vr = Vf - lr • Δtf/Cr and Δtf can be determined as Δtf = (Vrβf - Vr) • Cr/ lr. In the above descriptions, two independent counters are present. However since only the counter causing the most recent reset is of use, both counters can be combined into a single counter. This single counter and the reset for both halves of the pixel detector could be controlled by the logical OR of both comparators.
[0065] As noted, capacitor Cr is initialized at the beginning of integration along with the photodetector. As with the self-reset method, the non-inverting input of comparator 140 may be switched to VDD (rather than to Vsat during integration) to reset pixel 70' (e.g., both photodetectors and Cr). By judiciously making voltage Vsat low, all photodiodes are simultaneously reset, thus removing the need for a separate reset signal.
[0066] Turning now to Figs. 5A and 5B an embodiment of the present invention is shown in differential pixel detector 70' includes a voltage controlled charge pump 160 to record voltage difference between the two differential photodetectors DA and DB before they are saturated by high common mode signal. Once the photodetector voltage difference has been recorded on a third capacitor Cr, photodetectors DA and DB and their
- 17 - (1136775) associated capacitors (CA, CB) can be reset by the relevant reset transistors, and integration starts again.
[0067] In Fig. 5A, charge pump 160 includes two voltage controlled current sources lsι, lS2 and a capacitor Cr. Although the voltage difference between photodetectors DA and DB may be monitored continuously by differential amplifier 170, charge pump 160 is only turned-on for a fixed period of time. In this fashion, charge accumulated on capacitor Cr during each sample is proportional to the voltage difference. After each sample, the differential photodetector is reset and a new integration cycle starts. The sampling frequency preferably depends upon incoming light intensity, e.g., optical energy falling upon photodetectors DA and DB, which intensity can be estimated. The final charge on Cr is the summation of the samples and is proportional to the total voltage difference between the differential photodetectors. Fig. 5B depicts control signal and voltage waveforms at various nodes in the configuration of Fig. 5A.
[0068] At the end of integration, three voltage values are read-out from pixel 70', namely Va (voltage across DA), Vb (voltage across DB), and Vr (voltage across capacitor Cr). Given these quantities, one can calculate the resulting differential voltage VSWing-a - VSWing-b as follows. Looking at Fig. 5B, it is seen that ΔVgf = Vref - Va and that ΔVbf = VrΘf - Vb. The differential voltage is then given by VSWing-a - VSWing-b = ΔVaf - ΔV f + f(Vr), where f(Vr) is a linear function of Vr.
[0069] This linear function f(Vr) is obtained by writing Vr as Vr = Vref + n • k • (Va - Vb). As noted,VrΘf is the initial voltage for capacitor Cr (e.g., the reset voltage for photodetectors DA, DB), n is the number of sample/reset cycles, and k is a constant determined from the circuit of Fig. 4A, and represents how much voltage change occurs on Cr for given a unit voltage change in (Va - Vb). The amount contributing to VSWing-a - VS ing-b is n (Va - Vb), which is equal to n •
- 18 - (1136775) (Va - Vb) = (Vr - Vref)// = f(Vr). In summary the final differential voltage is calculated from known quantities, according to VSWjng-a - VSWing-b = Vb - Va + (Vr - Vref)// . Common mode voltage can also be estimated from ΔVaf and ΔVb since the time between the last reset and the end of integration is known.
[0070] It is possible to automatically generate the ΔsamPιe or ΔreSet signals within each pixel 70', by providing some additional circuitry. One can use two comparators to compare SA, SB node potentials with Vsat, and the logical OR can be taken of the comparator outputs to yield the Δsampie signal. Thus as soon as either photodiode potential reaches Vsat, Δsampie goes high. If desired, Δreset can be a delayed version of Δsampie- Such a self-resetting configuration would use two comparators, an OR gate, and a delay element that could be a simple RC delay.
[0071] Turning now to Fig. 6A, an embodiment of a differential pixel detector 70' is shown in which during reset operation capacitors acquire exactly the same charge in each half of the configuration. By adding exactly the same charge to each half of the configuration, common mode contribution is essentially removed and differential mode contribution is preserved. Such an approach offers several advantages. For example, extra resets do not affect the system operation, and the pixel detector may be reset even if it is not discharged. Further, capacitor or component mismatch has substantially no effect on the accuracy of the reset. In addition, it can be shown that common mode reset generates no KT/C noise in the differential domain. The only resulting KT/C contribution appears in common mode where it is unimportant.
[0072] For ease of illustration, Fig. 6A does not depict QA, which is the sum of the charge on the top plate of capacitors CA and CDA, or QB, which is the sum of the charge on the top plate of capacitors CB and CDB- In operation, the configuration of Fig. 6A preserves the differential quantity QA-QB during the common mode reset operation, although the common mode quantity, (QA +
- 19 - (1136775) QB)/2, is changed at each reset. What occurs is that after a reset, the quantity (QA + QB)/2 is moved closer to some constant QreSeto- Thus in contrast to other reset approaches, additional resets have no adverse impact in Fig. 6A as they simply move the operating point for (QA + QB)/2 even closer to Qseto-
[0073] In normal operation switching transistors TSWA and TswB are open, while transitors TvrefA and TvrefB, and TdisA and TdisB are closed. Initially photodetector diodes DA and DB are reset to Vf via transistors TresetA and TresetB, but during integration transistors TresetA and TreSetB remain open. As optical energy impinges on phododiode DA it discarges its parasitic capacitor CDA as well as capacitor CA, while photodiode DB discharges its parasitic capacitor CDB as well as its capacitor CB. Initial reset is achieved though transistors TresetA and TreSetB, which initialize the circuit at potential Vref, although other potentenial levels may instead be used.
[0074] During common mode reset, signal ΦrΘSetA remains low, while the other control signals operate as shown in Fig. 6B. During operation of pixel 70', the following steps take place:
[0075] (1 ) First, capacitors CA and CB are decoupled from associated photodiodes DA and DB by bring the Φdis signal low, which opens discharge transistors TdisA and TdiSB going low. This operation does not change the differential charge quantity QA-QB, and no KT/C noise is introduced on QA-QB-
[0076] (2) Next, when control signal Φn0rm goes low, the bottom plates of capacitors CA and CB are decoupled from Vref by the opening of transistors TrefA and TrefB- The quantity QA-QB remains unaffected, even in terms of KT/C.
[0077] (3) When the control signal ΦSWitch goes high, capacitors CA and CB redistribute their charge. Let QCA be the charge on capacitor CAand let QCB be the charge on capacitor CB. If capacitors CA and CB are now shorted
- 20 - (1136775) together in parallel the total charge quantity QCA + QCB would be preserved. However since CB is connected to CA inverted, the quantity QCA -QCB is preserved during this operation. Since no switches are opened no KT/C arises from this step.
[0078] (4) When the control signal ΦswAgoes low; a KT/C uncertainty appears in the charge redistribution, but this KT/C appears as common mode on the quantities QCA and QCB- Any charge taken from QCA shows up exactly on QCB but with a minus sign. Thus after switches TS A and TSWB open, QCA' = QCA + Noiseκτc, and -QCB' = -QCB' - Noiseκτc- Thus there is no KT/C noise on QCA'- QCB' = QCA - QCB + (Noiseκτc - NoiseKτc)-
[0079] (5) Next, when control signal Φn0rm goes high again the differential charge QA-QB is unchanged.
[0080] (6) Finally, when control signal Φdis goes high, QA-QB is unchanged.
[0081] If desired some of the above steps may be combined for simplicity. For example steps 5 and 6 may occur simultaneously or even out of sequence. Steps 1 ,2 and 5,6 clearly do not affect QA-QB, and it was demonstrated that steps 3 and 4 do not affect QCA-QCB- Thus, steps 1 through 6 do not affect QA-QB- In operation, the generation of the various control signals can be handled by microprocessor 90 in system 10 in Fig. 1 , where it is understood that array will comprise differential pixels 70', according to the present invention.
[0082] Note that no assumption as to closeness of component matching was made in the above analysis, and the conclusions reached remain irrespective of the values of capacitors CA, CB, CDA, and CDB- Additionally the linearity of the capacitors does not affect performance, and the configuration shown in Fig. 6A will function with capacitors that are mismatched or even nonlinear.
- 21 - (1136775) [0083] Consider now the common mode voltage on photodiodes DA and DB after reset. Within reasonable bounds, the exact value of the common mode voltage is not critical. Although an analysis can be carried out for almost any capacitor values, for simplicity of explanation let it be assumed that CA = CB and CDA = CDB-
Since it is small, let KT/C reset noise be ignored. Thus after step 5 if VCA (the voltage across capacitor CA) and if VCB (the voltage across capacitor CB) have the relation VCA = - VCB, the voltage on the top plate of CA is (Vref + VCA) and the voltage on the top plate of CB is (Vref - VCA)-
[0085] As noted, charge difference QA - QB is preserved in the configuration of Fig. 6A. Assuming that CA = CA and CDA = CDB it can be shown that the voltage difference VDA - VDB on the photodiodes is also preserved, and that is voltage is VDA - VDB = 2VCA = -2VCB, after step 5. Thus following step 5, VDA and VDB must differ from the top plate voltages on capacitors CA and CB by only a constant K.
eq. (7): VDA = Vref + VCA + K eq. (8): VDB = Vref + VCB +K = Vref-VcA + K eq. (9): VDA + Vm = Vref + VCA + K + Vref-VCA + K = 2(Vref + K)
[0086] After step 6 because of charge redistribution the new voltages are:
eq. (10): VDA ' = [CDA VDA + CA - ( Vref + VCA)J / (CDA + CA) eq. (11): = [CDA - ( Vref + VCA +K) + CA • (Vref + VC )J / (CDA + CA) eq. (12): = [(Vref + VCA) + CDA • K/(CDA + CA)], and eq. (13): Vm ' = [CDB ° VDB + CB » (Vref + VCB)J / (CDB + CB) eq. (14): = [CDB • (Vref + VCB + K) + CB • (Vref + VCB)J / (CDB + CB) eq. (15): = f(Vref+ VCB) + CDB • K/(CDB + CB)J
- 22 - (1136775) eq. (16): = [(Vref - VCA) + CDA K/(CDA + CA)]
Thus the sum VDA' + VDB' then becomes
eq. (17): VDA ' + VDB ' = f(Vref + VCA) + CDA ° K/(CDA + CA)] + [(Vref - VCA) +
CDA ° K/(CDA + CA)] = 2 [Vref+K o CDA/(CDA + CA)]
Thus the sum VDA' + VDB' is advantageously always closer to 2Vref than to VDA + VDB- This demonstrates that with each reset in Fig. 6A, the common mode is brought closer to Vref by K»[1 -CDA/(CDA+CA)] = K*CA/(CDA+CA).
[0087] To recapitulate, for the embodiment of Fig 6A, reset operation has the desired effect of centering the common mode about VrΘf. Relevant waveforms for Fig. 6A are shown in Fig. 6C. As a consequence, a reset can be applied without consideration of over-saturating or under-saturating the common mode for the pixel configuration. Thus in normal operation, reset can occur as often as desired without concern as to ill effects resulting from over or under saturation of the common mode.
[0088] Transistors TdisA and T isB can be used as global shutters, thereby improving resilience to ambient light by stopping the effects of all light impinging on the differential pixel when the shutter is turned off. When TdisA and Tdisβ are off, capacitors Ca and Cb are decoupled from photodetectors PDDA and PDDB and therefore stop integrating the signal from PDDA and PDDB- If the output of the pixel is chosen to be top plate of capacitors CA and CB then the output of the pixel will be frozen after TdisA and TdisB are turned-off, thereby providing the function of a global shutter.
[0089] Fig. 6D depicts another embodiment of a capacitor common mode reset configuration for pixel 70', according to the present invention. Basic operation for the configuration of Fig. 6D is as described for the configuration of Fig. 6A. However, in Fig. 6D, initialization of voltages VDA and VDB across photodiodes DA, DB respectively at the beginning of integration does not
- 23 - (1136775) involve transistors TresetA and TreSetB as was the case for the configuration of Fig. 6A. Instead, in Fig. 6D, reset is achieved by simultaneously turning-on transistors TdisA and T isB with high control signals Φdis, turning-on transistors TSWA and TSWB with high control signal Φsw, and by turning-off transistors TvrefA and TvrefB with low control signal Φn0rm- This has the effect of resetting photodetectors PDDA and PDDB to Vref- Note that transistors TdisA and TdisB may be used as global shutters in this configuration.
[0090] Fig. 6E depicts yet another embodiment for pixel 70', wherein discharge transistors TdisA and TdisB are eliminated. Indeed these discharge transistors could also be removed from the configurations of Fig. 6A and Fig. 6D. While these alternative configurations reduced common mode, unfortunately detector performance is diminished. This degradation results as each reset reduces some of the differential mode signal, and after a usually small number of resets, the differential signal is lost as a function of CDA/CA and CDB/CB- Such embodiments may still find use in applications that do not require high precision, or where the number of resets is low, or where CDA « CA and CDB « CB.
[0091] Turning now to Figs. 7A and 7B, a configuration and waveforms for a differential pixel detector 70' is shown in which a charge integrator is used for differential signal integration and common mode reset. Integration is carried out by integrator 180 and integration capacitor CM- During an initial frame reset, transistors controlled by Φreset, Φr, and Φjnt signals are all turned-on, and the voltages on photodetectors DA and DB are reset to Vref-
[0092] During integration, transistors controlled by signal Φjnt are turned-on and transistors controlled by signals Φr, Φreset are turned-off. Thus during integration, light induced photocurrent discharges photodiode parasitic capacitance CDA, CDB, as well as capacitors CA and CB. As has been noted, the integrated signals contain both differential mode and common mode
- 24 - (1136775) components. Fig. 7B depicts various control voltage waveforms used in the embodiment of Fig. 7A.
[0093] Next, in a common mode reset phase, control signal Φjnt goes low, causing transistors Tint to decouple CA from CDA and to decouple CB from CDB- Then control signal Φr goes high, turning-on transistors Tr and charge in both CA and CB transfers to the integration capacitor Cint- Note that polarities of the charge transferred onto nt are opposite due to the arrangement of the Tr switches.
[0094] The integrated charge on Cint after the common mode reset can be expressed in terms of charge on CDA, CDB before the common mode reset as:
eq. (18): Qiat = QcDA ~ QcDB
[0095] Therefore the common mode signal is cancelled while the differential signal is preserved, which is the desired result.
[0096] Preferably common mode reset is performed multiple times and is interleaved with the integration during the whole frame integration. During integration, the integrating operational amplifier 180 may be turned off to save power. The total number of common mode reset performed will depend on the intensity of ambient light. The final signal readout is the accumulated charge (hence voltage) on nt.
[0097] While the charge integrator in the embodiment of Fig. 7A used a single- ended operational amplifier 180, a fully differential operational amplifier could be used, among other types of integration configurations.
[0098] In the embodiment of Fig. 7A, each differential pixel (e.g., each DA and DB photodiode pair) has its own integrator, e.g., 180. In an alternative embodiment, one can implement only integration capacitor Cmt within each
- 25 - (1136775) pixel, and share operational amplifier 180 as well as switches associated with connecting nt to amplifier 180 among multiple pixels. This approach would require fewer transistors per pixel, allowing a higher fill factor to be achieved on the integrated circuit containing the detector system.
[0099] Turning now to Fig. 8A, an embodiment of a differential detector 170' is shown in which the common mode reset circuitry compensates for potential mismatch between components such as mismatched detector area between DA and DB, mismatched tolerance between capacitors CA and CB, as well as mismatched transistor sizes.
[00100] Fig. 8B depicts control waveforms found in an alternate embodiment of Fig. 8A. In this alternate embodiment, as shown in Fig. 8B, the phase of the optical energy waveform from emitter 40 (LIGHT) alternates between 0° and 180° with respect to the phase of a signal used to modulate the photodetectors. Thus, rather than use fixed charge transfer polarity as in the embodiment of Fig. 7B, polarity between DA and DB is switched synchronously in time with modulation of the light emitted from system 10 towards target object 20. The accumulated charge on integration capacitor Qnt at the end of frame integration is expressed as:
2i„t = (fii,0 - Gi,o) + (Gi.180 " Qkm) + OSio - δiθ) + (βllBO " β«8θ) + " eq. (19): - 'Α t - 'Α , j=l 1=1
where QA,o represents the charge collected by detector DA with respect to 0° light phase, QB,o represents the charge collected by detector DB with respect to 0° light phase, QA,ISO represents the charge collected by detector DA with respect to 180° light phase, and QB.ISO represents the charge collected by detector DB with respect to 180° light phase. As is apparent from the above equation, if the total number of common mode resets is n, then half of the final
- 26 - (1136775) differential charge is collected from detector DA and half of the charge is collected from detector DB. Another advantage of this embodiment is that KT/C noise associated with the transistor switches becomes common mode; therefore such noise is cancelled out from the final differential signal value.
[00101] Most of the above-described embodiments accumulate the DA-DB charge difference in a capacitor, and periodically reset DAand DB to Vrefto avoid saturation. Fig. 9A depicts an alternative approach in which potentials Va and Vb are increased by a fixed amount ΔV before these potentials drop below a certain level due to high-common mode light. This approach is somewhat analogous to the capacitor common mode reset embodiments that have been described. However the embodiment of Fig. 9A uses a separate circuit with an external current source 190.
[00102] In the embodiment of Fig. 9A, a periodic injection of a fixed amount of charge into detectors DA and DB occurs. The result is that while the differential (DA-DB) charge does not change, the common mode of DA and DB is refreshed (i.e., decreased) to prevent photodetector saturation. An external current source 190 is required, which current source may be a reference Voltage Controlled Current Source (VCCS) or perhaps a reference Constant Current Controlled Current source (CCCS), in which case the current source becomes a current mirror.
[00103] The embodiment of Fig. 9A and the embodiment of Fig. 9B demonstrate two approaches to periodically refreshing charge into detectors DA and DB. In Fig. 9A, current source 190 is always on, but switches Tsw responsive to an external signal Φxc are used to couple the constant current output by source 190 to nodes SA and SB. During integration Φxc is periodically turned-on for a brief period of time to charge-up nodes SA and SB, hundreds of nanoseconds perhaps.
- 27 - (1136775) [00104] In the embodiment of Fig. 9B, switches Tsw are eliminated and instead the input current or voltage to current source 190 is itself pulsed. In essence rather than import a signal Φxc, Φxc pulses are imported into current source 190 and result in current pulses of constant amplitude as shown.
[00105] Fig. 9C depicts waveforms for the configurations of Figs. 9A and 9B. Note that advantageously the final differential voltage is simply (VA - VB) and that no other computation need be done. The rate at which ΦXc or the reference input to current count 190 will depend upon the common mode ambient light. A higher rate would be called for in the presence of very strong ambient light to keep source nodes SAand SB from saturating.
[00106] As noted, current source 190 may be controlled using a voltage reference or a current reference. If a voltage reference is used, the voltage can be VDD or VrΘf, in which case only the Φxc signal would be needed to perform common-mode removal. For CCCS (or current mirrors) a variety of circuit configurations are structures are available, two of which are shown in Figs. 9D and 9E. While the configuration of Fig. 9D has fewer components, its current output may suffer from nonlinearity caused by transistor channel length modulation. The configuration of Fig. 9E provides a cascoded current mirror that is insensitive to voltage at the current output nodes. The choice of current source configuration involves a tradeoff between circuit complexity and accuracy.
[00107] An important concern in implementing current mirrors is matching, in this case between output currents A and B. To minimize matching errors, transistors with large values of width and length should be used and should be carefully laid out. For example the orientation of transistors should be the same for currents A and B.
28 (1136775) [00108] Fig. 10A depicts a shunt capacitor embodiment of the present invention to periodically inject a certain amount of charge into photodetector DA and DB to compensate for the common mode. Fig. 10A depicts one-half of such a circuit, while Fig. 10B depicts control signal waveforms. A, preferably, very small capacitor Charge is initially charged-up to a relatively high voltage. When charge signal Φcharge goes low and reset signal ΦreSet goes high, Charge and CA are connected, and most of the charge will be transferred to CA since its capacitance is much higher than Charge- Since the same amount of charge is added into both halves of the configuration, the common mode signal is reset while the differential mode signal is preserved.
[00109] Fig. 11 is a block diagram of a range finding system 10 using differential pixel detectors 70' according to any of the embodiments described herein. In Fig. 11 , target object 20' is an image of a input device, for example an image of a computer keyboard. The image may be printed on a piece of paper or may in fact be optically projected from within system 10. However presented, target object 20' is visible to a user who can type upon the image as though it were a real keyboard. System 10 can measure in three- dimensions the location of whichever virtual keys are typed upon by the user, and in what time order, e.g., did the user type "am" or "ma". This information, which can be obtained even in strong ambient light, can then be passed to a companion device 200, perhaps a cellular telephone, a PDA, a computer, etc. In another application, target object 20' might be an occupant of the front passenger seat in a motor vehicle. System 10 can discern whether the occupant is an adult, a child, an infant, etc., even in strong ambient light. In such application, companion device 200 might be the control electronics for an air bag supplemental restraint system within the car. The control electronics can then intelligently deploy the air bag in one manner if the occupant to be protected is an adult, and can deploy differently if the occupant is a small child.
- 29 - ' (1136775) [00110] Although various embodiments of the present invention have been described in the context of dynamic range enhancement for three- dimensional image sensing, it is understood that embodiments of the present invention may be used in other applications that require dynamic range enhancement in the presence of a strong common mode signal. Further, those skilled in the art will appreciate that some or all of the described embodiments may be implemented with components other than the specific semiconductor switches, amplifiers, comparators, integrators, counters, etc. described herein.
[00111] The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the Claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
30 - (1136775)

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A method to increase effective differential dynamic range for a differential pixel detector exposed to optical energy having a common mode component, the differential pixel detector including a first photodetector and an associated first capacitor, and a second photodetector and an associated second capacitor, the method comprising:
(a) at start of an integration time T, resetting voltage on each said capacitor to a fixed reference voltage;
(b) during said integration time T, directly integrating photocurrent generated by said first photodetector in said first capacitor, and directly integrating photocurrent generated by said second photodetector in said second capacitor;
(c) within said integration time T, before voltage developed across either said first capacitor or said second capacitor attains a saturation voltage Vsat associated with said differential pixel detector resetting the developed voltage on said capacitor such that a desired differential pixel detector signal is still determinable.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein step (c) includes resetting with a reset signal generated external to the different pixel detector.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein step (c) includes resetting with a reset signal generated automatically inside the pixel when voltage developed on either said first capacitor or said second capacitor attains a voltage approaching said saturation voltage.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein step (c) includes resetting said developed voltage on said capacitor to a voltage Vref.
- 31 - (1136775)
5. The method of claim 4, further including sensing voltage developed across each said capacitor to reset voltage developed on each said capacitor to said Vrβf.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the voltage developed across each of said capacitor is reset in a manner selected from a group consisting of (i) simultaneously and (ii) independently.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein step (c) includes resetting said developed voltage on said capacitor to a voltage Vref; further including a step of counting number of resets of voltage developed across said capacitor during said integration time T; wherein effective dynamic range of the associated said photodetector is n (Vref - Vsat) + Vflnai, where n is said number of resets, and Vflnai is voltage on said capacitor at end of integration time T.
8. The method of claim 7, further including using an analog counter to sense said number of resets.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein said first capacitor is parasitic capacitance associated with said first photodetector, and said second capacitor is parasitic capacitance associated with said second photodetector; further including: providing a third capacitor switchably coupleable in parallel with said first capacitor, and providing a fourth capacitor switchably coupleable in parallel with said second capacitor; switchably decoupling said third capacitor from said first photodetector, and switchably decoupling said fourth capacitor from said second photodetector; switchably inverting and coupling together in parallel said third capacitor and said fourth capacitor such that accumulated charge
- 32 - (1136775) redistributes therebetween such that a common mode component is substantially reduced; wherein said desired differential pixel detector signal is still determinable and each reset bring common mode magnitude closer to a voltage Vref.
10. The method of claim 1 , wherein each said photodetector is selected from a group consisting of a photodiode and a photogate.
11. The method of claim 1 , further including controllably injecting a fixed amount of charge into said first capacitor and said second capacitor such that potential on each capacitor is moved away from a potential approaching Vsat; wherein said desired differential pixel detector signal is still determinable while common mode is suppressed to prevent saturation.
12. The method of claim 11 , wherein said fixed amount of charge is injected by switchably coupling outputs from two matched constant current sources to said first capacitor and said second capacitor.
13. The method of claim 11 , wherein said amount of charge is injected by switchably coupling outputs from small high voltage charged capacitors to said first capacitor and said second capacitor, respectively.
14. The method of claim 11 , wherein said fixed amount of charge is injected from outputs of pulsed matched constant current sources whose current outputs are coupled to said first capacitor and said second capacitor.
15. A differential pixel detector responsive to optical energy having a common mode component, comprising:
- 33 - (1136775) a first photodetector and an associated first capacitor that directly integrates photocurrent generated by said first photodetector during an integration time T; a second photodetector and an associated second capacitor that directly integrates photocurrent generated by said second photodetector during said integration time T; means for forcing potential on each said capacitor to a fixed voltage potential before start of said integration time T; and means for resetting potential on either capacitor during said integration time T before said potential attains a saturation voltage Vsat associated with said differential pixel detector such that a desired differential pixel detector signal is still determinable.
16. The pixel of claim 15, wherein said means for resetting is triggerable from an external signal.
17. The pixel of claim 15, further including means for detecting when voltage developed on one of said first capacitor or said second capacitor attains a magnitude approaching said saturation voltage Vsat-
18. The differential pixel detector of claim 15, wherein said means for forcing includes a first switch coupled between a source of a fixed voltage Vref potential and said first capacitor, and a second switch coupled between said source and said second capacitor.
19. The differential pixel detector of claim 18, further including: a differential comparator having a first input coupled to said first capacitor and a second input coupled to said second capacitor and outputting a differential signal proportional to a difference between signals at said first input and said second input; and
- 34 - (1136775) a resettable charge pump coupled to receive said differential signal output from said differential comparator and to be reset when each said first capacitor and said second capacitor are reset; wherein an output from said resettable charge pump is a stored accumulation of voltage differentials between said first photodetector and said second photodetector.
20. The differential pixel detector of claim 15, wherein said means for resetting resets said potential to a voltage Vref.
21. The differential pixel detector of claim 15, further including a first counter to count number of resets of potential across said first capacitor during said integration time T; wherein effective dynamic range of the associated said photodetector is n (Vref - Vsat) + Vfinaι, where n is said number of resets, Vref is a reset voltage and Vflnaι is voltage on said first capacitor at end of integration time T.
22. The differential pixel detector of claim 21 , wherein said first counter is selected from a group consisting of (a) a digital counter, and (b) an analog counter.
23. The differential pixel detector of claim 15, wherein said first capacitor is parasitic capacitance associated with said first photodetector, and said second capacitor is parasitic capacitance associated with said second photodetector, said differential pixel detector further including: a third capacitor switchably coupleable in parallel with said first capacitor, and a fourth capacitor switchably coupleable in parallel with said second capacitor; means for switchably decoupling said third capacitor from said first photodetector, and switchably decoupling said fourth capacitor from said second photodetector;
- 35 - (1136775) means for switchably inverting and coupling together in parallel said third capacitor and said fourth capacitor such that accumulated charge redistributes therebetween such that a common mode component is substantially reduced; wherein said desired differential pixel detector signal is still determinable and each reset brings common mode magnitude closer to a voltage Vrβf.
24. The differential pixel detector of claim 15, further including: means for complementarily switchingly coupling each lead of said first capacitor to a source of fixed potential Vref, and complementarily switchingly coupling each lead of said second capacitor to said source of fixed potential
Vref! a resettable integrator, switchably integrating a potential present at each lead of each said capacitor; wherein integration provides an output proportional to differential signal present at said first photodetector and said second photodetector while canceling common mode component including KT/C noise substantially independently of matching of components in said differential pixel detector.
25. The differential pixel detector of claim 15, further including: a mirrored current source to inject a fixed amount of charge into said first capacitor and into said second capacitor such that potential on each capacitor is moved away from a potential approaching Vsat; wherein desired differential pixel detector signal is still determinable while common mode is suppressed to prevent saturation; said mirrored current source selected from a group consisting of (a) a constant current source whose matched outputs are switchably coupled to said first capacitor and said second capacitor, and (b) a pulsed matched constant current source whose current outputs are coupled to said first capacitor and said second capacitor.
- 36 - (1136775)
26. The differential pixel detector of claim 15, further including: small high voltage capacitors to inject an amount of charge into said first capacitor and into said second capacitor such that potential on each capacitor is moved away from a potential approaching Vsat; wherein said desired differential pixel detector signal is still determinable while common mode is suppressed to prevent saturation.
27. The differential pixel detector of claim 15, wherein each said photodetector is selected from a group consisting of a photodiode and a photogate.
37 - (1136775)
PCT/US2004/011314 2003-04-11 2004-04-12 Method and system to differentially enhance sensor dynamic range WO2004093318A2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP04759475.9A EP1614159B1 (en) 2003-04-11 2004-04-12 Method and system to differentially enhance sensor dynamic range
JP2006509960A JP2006523074A (en) 2003-04-11 2004-04-12 Method and system for differentially expanding the dynamic range of a sensor

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US46216703P 2003-04-11 2003-04-11
US60/462,167 2003-04-11

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2004093318A2 true WO2004093318A2 (en) 2004-10-28
WO2004093318A3 WO2004093318A3 (en) 2005-06-09

Family

ID=33299917

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2004/011314 WO2004093318A2 (en) 2003-04-11 2004-04-12 Method and system to differentially enhance sensor dynamic range

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US6919549B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1614159B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2006523074A (en)
WO (1) WO2004093318A2 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007228054A (en) * 2006-02-21 2007-09-06 Stanley Electric Co Ltd Light receiving circuit for optical reflection sensor
WO2012151207A1 (en) * 2011-05-03 2012-11-08 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Systems and methods for adding or subtracting pixels
EP2622847A1 (en) * 2010-09-28 2013-08-07 Microsoft Corporation Integrated low power depth camera and projection device
EP3313064A1 (en) * 2016-10-20 2018-04-25 Chronocam Pixel circuit for detecting time-dependent visual data
US10871568B2 (en) 2015-04-28 2020-12-22 Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. Distance measurement device
WO2022122288A1 (en) * 2020-12-10 2022-06-16 ams Sensors Germany GmbH Optical sensing arrangement, ambient light sensor and method for providing an output count

Families Citing this family (149)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6701005B1 (en) 2000-04-29 2004-03-02 Cognex Corporation Method and apparatus for three-dimensional object segmentation
JP3965049B2 (en) * 2001-12-21 2007-08-22 浜松ホトニクス株式会社 Imaging device
US7920718B2 (en) * 2002-09-05 2011-04-05 Cognex Corporation Multi-zone passageway monitoring system and method
US7176438B2 (en) * 2003-04-11 2007-02-13 Canesta, Inc. Method and system to differentially enhance sensor dynamic range using enhanced common mode reset
US7709777B2 (en) * 2003-06-16 2010-05-04 Micron Technology, Inc. Pumps for CMOS imagers
US7081608B2 (en) * 2003-10-15 2006-07-25 Micron Technology, Inc. Pixel with differential readout
US7623674B2 (en) * 2003-11-05 2009-11-24 Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation Method and system for enhanced portal security through stereoscopy
US8326084B1 (en) 2003-11-05 2012-12-04 Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation System and method of auto-exposure control for image acquisition hardware using three dimensional information
JP4053007B2 (en) * 2004-01-09 2008-02-27 シャープ株式会社 Solid-state imaging device and signal readout method thereof
EP1751495A2 (en) * 2004-01-28 2007-02-14 Canesta, Inc. Single chip red, green, blue, distance (rgb-z) sensor
US7157685B2 (en) * 2004-04-12 2007-01-02 Canesta, Inc. Method and system to enhance differential dynamic range and signal/noise in CMOS range finding systems using differential sensors
US7321111B2 (en) * 2004-04-12 2008-01-22 Canesta, Inc. Method and system to enhance differential dynamic range and signal/noise in CMOS range finding systems using differential sensors
US7492400B2 (en) * 2004-06-01 2009-02-17 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Adaptive pixel for high dynamic range and disturbance detection and correction
US7470885B2 (en) * 2004-09-13 2008-12-30 Panasonic Corporation Photodetector-amplifier circuit and optical pickup device
WO2006061828A2 (en) * 2004-12-07 2006-06-15 Bright Imaging Ltd. Method and apparatus for imaging of scenes having large intensity variance
US20060131484A1 (en) * 2004-12-17 2006-06-22 Mark Peting High-dynamic range image sensors
US7635880B2 (en) * 2004-12-30 2009-12-22 Ess Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for proximate CMOS pixels
US7323671B1 (en) * 2004-12-30 2008-01-29 Ess Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for varying a CMOS sensor control voltage
US7755116B2 (en) * 2004-12-30 2010-07-13 Ess Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for controlling charge transfer in CMOS sensors with an implant by the transfer gate
WO2006111472A2 (en) * 2005-04-18 2006-10-26 Interuniversitair Microelektronica Centrum Vzw Sensor for eliminating undesired components and measurement method using said sensor
US7202463B1 (en) * 2005-09-16 2007-04-10 Adobe Systems Incorporated Higher dynamic range image sensor with signal integration
US8111904B2 (en) 2005-10-07 2012-02-07 Cognex Technology And Investment Corp. Methods and apparatus for practical 3D vision system
US8018579B1 (en) 2005-10-21 2011-09-13 Apple Inc. Three-dimensional imaging and display system
US7671460B2 (en) * 2006-01-25 2010-03-02 Teledyne Licensing, Llc Buried via technology for three dimensional integrated circuits
US8687087B2 (en) * 2006-08-29 2014-04-01 Csr Technology Inc. Digital camera with selectively increased dynamic range by control of parameters during image acquisition
US7714903B2 (en) * 2006-08-29 2010-05-11 Zoran Corporation Wide dynamic range image capturing system method and apparatus
KR100834763B1 (en) * 2006-11-14 2008-06-05 삼성전자주식회사 Image sensor for high dynamic range imaging and method for measuring charges in pixel
US20080164403A1 (en) * 2007-01-05 2008-07-10 International Business Machines Corporation Wide Dynamic Range Sensor
US20080164405A1 (en) * 2007-01-05 2008-07-10 Ezra Daniel Hall Wide dynamic range sensor
US7436342B2 (en) * 2007-01-30 2008-10-14 Teledyne Licensing, Llc Numerical full well capacity extension for photo sensors with an integration capacitor in the readout circuit using two and four phase charge subtraction
US7498650B2 (en) * 2007-03-08 2009-03-03 Teledyne Licensing, Llc Backside illuminated CMOS image sensor with pinned photodiode
US7923763B2 (en) * 2007-03-08 2011-04-12 Teledyne Licensing, Llc Two-dimensional time delay integration visible CMOS image sensor
US8126260B2 (en) 2007-05-29 2012-02-28 Cognex Corporation System and method for locating a three-dimensional object using machine vision
US20090109427A1 (en) * 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Ng Mei Yee Conversion Of Properties Of Light To Frequency Counting
US8027029B2 (en) 2007-11-07 2011-09-27 Magna Electronics Inc. Object detection and tracking system
JP5269456B2 (en) * 2008-03-26 2013-08-21 株式会社東芝 Image sensor and driving method thereof
EP2116864A1 (en) * 2008-05-09 2009-11-11 Vrije Universiteit Brussel TOF range finding with background radiation suppression
US8203699B2 (en) 2008-06-30 2012-06-19 Microsoft Corporation System architecture design for time-of-flight system having reduced differential pixel size, and time-of-flight systems so designed
JP5271643B2 (en) * 2008-09-19 2013-08-21 スタンレー電気株式会社 Control method and system for optical time-of-flight range image sensor
US7795650B2 (en) * 2008-12-09 2010-09-14 Teledyne Scientific & Imaging Llc Method and apparatus for backside illuminated image sensors using capacitively coupled readout integrated circuits
KR101668869B1 (en) * 2009-05-29 2016-10-28 삼성전자주식회사 Depth sensor, 3D image sensor and Depth sensing method there-of
WO2011020629A1 (en) * 2009-08-21 2011-02-24 Iee International Electronics & Engineering S.A. Imager with suppression of background light and corresponding method
KR101565969B1 (en) * 2009-09-01 2015-11-05 삼성전자주식회사 Method and device for estimating depth information and signal processing apparatus having the device
GB0916883D0 (en) * 2009-09-25 2009-11-11 St Microelectronics Ltd Ambient light detection
JP5302244B2 (en) 2010-02-26 2013-10-02 浜松ホトニクス株式会社 Distance image sensor
JP5695338B2 (en) * 2010-04-22 2015-04-01 セイコーインスツル株式会社 Illuminance sensor
JP5391146B2 (en) * 2010-05-13 2014-01-15 浜松ホトニクス株式会社 Signal processing apparatus and light detection apparatus
KR101669412B1 (en) * 2010-11-01 2016-10-26 삼성전자주식회사 Method and apparatus of measuring depth information for 3d camera
US9857868B2 (en) 2011-03-19 2018-01-02 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Method and system for ergonomic touch-free interface
US8840466B2 (en) 2011-04-25 2014-09-23 Aquifi, Inc. Method and system to create three-dimensional mapping in a two-dimensional game
FR2977413B1 (en) * 2011-06-30 2013-08-09 Commissariat Energie Atomique RADIATION DETECTOR COMPRISING A CALIBRATED QUANTITY INJECTION INJECTION CIRCUIT
ITUD20110149A1 (en) * 2011-09-29 2013-03-30 Monica Vatteroni FOTORILEVATOR DEVICE FOR ELECTRO-OPTICAL SENSORS WITH VARIABLE LIGHT DYNAMICS
JP5781918B2 (en) * 2011-12-28 2015-09-24 浜松ホトニクス株式会社 Distance measuring device
JP5876289B2 (en) 2011-12-28 2016-03-02 浜松ホトニクス株式会社 Distance measuring device
US8854433B1 (en) 2012-02-03 2014-10-07 Aquifi, Inc. Method and system enabling natural user interface gestures with an electronic system
WO2013158965A1 (en) * 2012-04-19 2013-10-24 Raytheon Company Repartitioned digital pixel
US9111135B2 (en) 2012-06-25 2015-08-18 Aquifi, Inc. Systems and methods for tracking human hands using parts based template matching using corresponding pixels in bounded regions of a sequence of frames that are a specified distance interval from a reference camera
US8934675B2 (en) 2012-06-25 2015-01-13 Aquifi, Inc. Systems and methods for tracking human hands by performing parts based template matching using images from multiple viewpoints
US10324033B2 (en) * 2012-07-20 2019-06-18 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Image processing apparatus and method for correcting an error in depth
US9509917B2 (en) 2012-07-26 2016-11-29 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Wide dynamic range using monochromatic sensor
US8836768B1 (en) 2012-09-04 2014-09-16 Aquifi, Inc. Method and system enabling natural user interface gestures with user wearable glasses
DE102012110538B4 (en) * 2012-11-05 2019-11-21 Odos Imaging Ltd. Apparatus and method for measuring distance values and distance images
US9092665B2 (en) 2013-01-30 2015-07-28 Aquifi, Inc Systems and methods for initializing motion tracking of human hands
US9129155B2 (en) 2013-01-30 2015-09-08 Aquifi, Inc. Systems and methods for initializing motion tracking of human hands using template matching within bounded regions determined using a depth map
US9019480B2 (en) 2013-02-26 2015-04-28 Jds Uniphase Corporation Time-of-flight (TOF) system, sensor pixel, and method
FR3002650B1 (en) * 2013-02-28 2015-11-27 Commissariat Energie Atomique DEVICE FOR PROCESSING A SIGNAL DELIVERED BY A RADIATION DETECTOR
US9298266B2 (en) 2013-04-02 2016-03-29 Aquifi, Inc. Systems and methods for implementing three-dimensional (3D) gesture based graphical user interfaces (GUI) that incorporate gesture reactive interface objects
US9319612B2 (en) * 2013-07-08 2016-04-19 Semiconductor Components Industries, Llc Imagers with improved analog-to-digital circuitry
US9798388B1 (en) 2013-07-31 2017-10-24 Aquifi, Inc. Vibrotactile system to augment 3D input systems
JP2015065532A (en) * 2013-09-24 2015-04-09 株式会社東芝 Signal processor and signal processing method
EP2874388B1 (en) 2013-11-15 2019-05-15 Sony Depthsensing Solutions Method for avoiding pixel saturation
US9507417B2 (en) 2014-01-07 2016-11-29 Aquifi, Inc. Systems and methods for implementing head tracking based graphical user interfaces (GUI) that incorporate gesture reactive interface objects
US9619105B1 (en) 2014-01-30 2017-04-11 Aquifi, Inc. Systems and methods for gesture based interaction with viewpoint dependent user interfaces
JP6555956B2 (en) * 2014-07-31 2019-08-07 株式会社半導体エネルギー研究所 Imaging device, monitoring device, and electronic device
JP6507529B2 (en) 2014-08-29 2019-05-08 株式会社デンソー Optical flight type distance measuring device
JP6520053B2 (en) 2014-11-06 2019-05-29 株式会社デンソー Optical flight type distance measuring device
WO2016075945A1 (en) * 2014-11-14 2016-05-19 株式会社デンソー Optical time-of-flight range-finding device
JP6539990B2 (en) * 2014-11-14 2019-07-10 株式会社デンソー Optical flight type distance measuring device
JP6424581B2 (en) * 2014-11-21 2018-11-21 株式会社デンソー Optical flight type distance measuring device
US9860465B2 (en) * 2015-06-23 2018-01-02 Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. Imaging device and electronic device
JP6406449B2 (en) * 2015-06-24 2018-10-17 株式会社村田製作所 Distance sensor
JP2018136123A (en) * 2015-06-24 2018-08-30 株式会社村田製作所 Distance sensor and user interface apparatus
US10419723B2 (en) 2015-06-25 2019-09-17 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle communication system with forward viewing camera and integrated antenna
US10137904B2 (en) 2015-10-14 2018-11-27 Magna Electronics Inc. Driver assistance system with sensor offset correction
US11027654B2 (en) 2015-12-04 2021-06-08 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle vision system with compressed video transfer via DSRC link
US10703204B2 (en) 2016-03-23 2020-07-07 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle driver monitoring system
US10571562B2 (en) 2016-03-25 2020-02-25 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle short range sensing system using RF sensors
US9854192B2 (en) * 2016-04-12 2017-12-26 Raytheon Company Digital unit cell with analog counter element
US10534081B2 (en) 2016-05-02 2020-01-14 Magna Electronics Inc. Mounting system for vehicle short range sensors
US10040481B2 (en) 2016-05-17 2018-08-07 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle trailer angle detection system using ultrasonic sensors
US10444364B2 (en) 2016-05-19 2019-10-15 Ams Sensors Singapore Pte. Ltd. Pinned photodiode pixels including current mirror-based background light suppression, and imaging devices including the same
US10768298B2 (en) 2016-06-14 2020-09-08 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle sensing system with 360 degree near range sensing
CN109565304B (en) 2016-07-08 2023-04-07 马格纳电子系统公司 2D MIMO radar system for vehicle
US10239446B2 (en) 2016-07-13 2019-03-26 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle sensing system using daisy chain of sensors
US10708227B2 (en) 2016-07-19 2020-07-07 Magna Electronics Inc. Scalable secure gateway for vehicle
JP6673084B2 (en) 2016-08-01 2020-03-25 株式会社デンソー Light flight type distance measuring device
US10641867B2 (en) 2016-08-15 2020-05-05 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle radar system with shaped radar antennas
US10852418B2 (en) 2016-08-24 2020-12-01 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle sensor with integrated radar and image sensors
US9915561B1 (en) 2016-08-24 2018-03-13 International Business Machines Corporation Self-clocked low noise photoreceiver (SCLNP)
US10677894B2 (en) 2016-09-06 2020-06-09 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle sensing system for classification of vehicle model
US10836376B2 (en) 2016-09-06 2020-11-17 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle sensing system with enhanced detection of vehicle angle
US10347129B2 (en) 2016-12-07 2019-07-09 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle system with truck turn alert
US10462354B2 (en) 2016-12-09 2019-10-29 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle control system utilizing multi-camera module
US10703341B2 (en) 2017-02-03 2020-07-07 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle sensor housing with theft protection
US11536829B2 (en) 2017-02-16 2022-12-27 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle radar system with radar embedded into radome
US10782388B2 (en) 2017-02-16 2020-09-22 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle radar system with copper PCB
US11142200B2 (en) 2017-02-23 2021-10-12 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicular adaptive cruise control with enhanced vehicle control
JP6735515B2 (en) * 2017-03-29 2020-08-05 パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 Solid-state imaging device
US10884103B2 (en) 2017-04-17 2021-01-05 Magna Electronics Inc. Calibration system for vehicle radar system
CN108807434B (en) * 2017-04-26 2023-12-05 松下知识产权经营株式会社 Image pickup apparatus and camera system
US10870426B2 (en) 2017-06-22 2020-12-22 Magna Electronics Inc. Driving assistance system with rear collision mitigation
CN208376630U (en) 2017-06-30 2019-01-15 麦格纳电子(张家港)有限公司 The vehicle vision system communicated with trailer sensor
US10962641B2 (en) 2017-09-07 2021-03-30 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle radar sensing system with enhanced accuracy using interferometry techniques
US10877148B2 (en) 2017-09-07 2020-12-29 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle radar sensing system with enhanced angle resolution using synthesized aperture
US10962638B2 (en) 2017-09-07 2021-03-30 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle radar sensing system with surface modeling
US11150342B2 (en) 2017-09-07 2021-10-19 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle radar sensing system with surface segmentation using interferometric statistical analysis
US10933798B2 (en) 2017-09-22 2021-03-02 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle lighting control system with fog detection
US11391826B2 (en) 2017-09-27 2022-07-19 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle LIDAR sensor calibration system
US11486968B2 (en) 2017-11-15 2022-11-01 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle Lidar sensing system with sensor module
US10816666B2 (en) 2017-11-21 2020-10-27 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle sensing system with calibration/fusion of point cloud partitions
EP3499872B1 (en) 2017-12-15 2020-08-19 ams AG Pixel structure, image sensor device and system with pixel structure, and method of operating the pixel structure
US11167771B2 (en) 2018-01-05 2021-11-09 Magna Mirrors Of America, Inc. Vehicular gesture monitoring system
US11047977B2 (en) 2018-02-20 2021-06-29 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle radar system with solution for ADC saturation
US11199611B2 (en) 2018-02-20 2021-12-14 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle radar system with T-shaped slot antennas
CN110763336B (en) * 2018-07-26 2021-03-09 京东方科技集团股份有限公司 Photodetection circuit, electronic device, and driving method
US11808876B2 (en) 2018-10-25 2023-11-07 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicular radar system with vehicle to infrastructure communication
US11683911B2 (en) 2018-10-26 2023-06-20 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicular sensing device with cooling feature
US11638362B2 (en) 2018-10-29 2023-04-25 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicular radar sensor with enhanced housing and PCB construction
US11454720B2 (en) 2018-11-28 2022-09-27 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicle radar system with enhanced wave guide antenna system
US11096301B2 (en) 2019-01-03 2021-08-17 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicular radar sensor with mechanical coupling of sensor housing
US11332124B2 (en) 2019-01-10 2022-05-17 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicular control system
US11294028B2 (en) 2019-01-29 2022-04-05 Magna Electronics Inc. Sensing system with enhanced electrical contact at PCB-waveguide interface
US11609304B2 (en) 2019-02-07 2023-03-21 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicular front camera testing system
US11333739B2 (en) 2019-02-26 2022-05-17 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicular radar system with automatic sensor alignment
US12044794B2 (en) 2019-02-26 2024-07-23 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicular radar system with automatic sensor alignment
US11267393B2 (en) 2019-05-16 2022-03-08 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicular alert system for alerting drivers of other vehicles responsive to a change in driving conditions
US11272133B1 (en) 2019-10-18 2022-03-08 Gigajot Technology, Inc. Time-resolved quanta image sensor
US12036990B2 (en) 2019-11-22 2024-07-16 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicular control system with controlled vehicle stopping and starting at intersection
US11766216B2 (en) 2019-12-11 2023-09-26 Rockley Photonics Limited Optical sensing module
WO2021142442A1 (en) 2020-01-10 2021-07-15 Optimus Ride, Inc. Communication system and method
US12071084B2 (en) 2020-02-14 2024-08-27 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicular sensing system with variable power mode for thermal management
US12013480B2 (en) 2020-06-05 2024-06-18 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicular radar sensor with waveguide connection embedded in PCB
US11823395B2 (en) 2020-07-02 2023-11-21 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicular vision system with road contour detection feature
US11749105B2 (en) 2020-10-01 2023-09-05 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicular communication system with turn signal identification
US12030501B2 (en) 2020-10-02 2024-07-09 Magna Electronics Inc. Vehicular control system with enhanced vehicle passing maneuvering
US12117555B2 (en) 2020-12-11 2024-10-15 Magna Mirrors Of America, Inc. Vehicular exterior door handle assembly with radar module and enhanced thermal management
US12007476B2 (en) 2021-09-13 2024-06-11 Magna Electronics Inc. Method for detecting objects via a vehicular sensing system
US12122324B2 (en) 2021-09-17 2024-10-22 Magna Mirrors Of America, Inc. Vehicular power door sensing and operating system
WO2023104589A1 (en) * 2021-12-06 2023-06-15 Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation Sensor exposure mode control and sensor exposure mode control method

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020084430A1 (en) 2000-11-09 2002-07-04 Canesta, Inc. Methods for CMOS-compatible three-dimensional image sensing using quantum efficiency modulation
US20020176067A1 (en) 2001-05-23 2002-11-28 Canesta, Inc. Method and system to enhance dynamic range conversion useable with CMOS three-dimensional imaging

Family Cites Families (46)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4764982A (en) * 1962-07-02 1988-08-16 Pfund Charles E Secure communication system
AT307762B (en) * 1971-04-28 1973-06-12 Eumig Method and device for distance measurement
US4277167A (en) * 1976-08-25 1981-07-07 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Depth mapping system
DE3404396A1 (en) * 1984-02-08 1985-08-14 Dornier Gmbh, 7990 Friedrichshafen DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TAKING DISTANCE IMAGES
US4733609A (en) * 1987-04-03 1988-03-29 Digital Signal Corporation Laser proximity sensor
US4954972A (en) * 1987-11-09 1990-09-04 Honeywell Inc. Color signature sensor
JPH05127809A (en) * 1991-04-19 1993-05-25 Sharp Corp Three-dimensional spatial coordinate input device
EP0554492B1 (en) * 1992-02-07 1995-08-09 International Business Machines Corporation Method and device for optical input of commands or data
US5446529A (en) * 1992-03-23 1995-08-29 Advanced Scientific Concepts, Inc. 3D imaging underwater laser radar
GB2265514B (en) * 1992-03-28 1995-08-16 Marconi Gec Ltd A receiver-transmitter for a target identification system
AU4026093A (en) * 1992-04-03 1993-11-08 Foster-Miller Inc. Method and apparatus for obtaining coordinates describing three-dimensional objects of complex and unique geometry using a sampling probe
US5309212A (en) * 1992-09-04 1994-05-03 Yaskawa Electric Corporation Scanning rangefinder with range to frequency conversion
JPH06197286A (en) * 1992-12-25 1994-07-15 Canon Inc Image pickup unit
US6281878B1 (en) * 1994-11-01 2001-08-28 Stephen V. R. Montellese Apparatus and method for inputing data
US5682229A (en) * 1995-04-14 1997-10-28 Schwartz Electro-Optics, Inc. Laser range camera
US5710621A (en) * 1995-04-25 1998-01-20 Omron Corporation Heterodyne measurement device and method
JP3669524B2 (en) * 1995-05-12 2005-07-06 三菱電機株式会社 Vehicle distance measuring device and distance measuring method
IL116438A (en) * 1995-12-18 2000-01-31 Israel State Laser sensor
AU2123297A (en) * 1996-02-12 1997-08-28 Golf Age Technologies Golf driving range distancing apparatus and methods
US5831719A (en) * 1996-04-12 1998-11-03 Holometrics, Inc. Laser scanning system
US5892575A (en) * 1996-05-10 1999-04-06 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Method and apparatus for imaging a scene using a light detector operating in non-linear geiger-mode
US6006021A (en) * 1996-07-01 1999-12-21 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Device for mapping dwellings and other structures in 3D
US5936615A (en) * 1996-09-12 1999-08-10 Digital Equipment Corporation Image-based touchscreen
US5898484A (en) * 1997-05-30 1999-04-27 Harris; Steven E. Hand-held distance-measurement device with an enhanced viewfinder
US6115128A (en) * 1997-09-17 2000-09-05 The Regents Of The Univerity Of California Multi-dimensional position sensor using range detectors
US6043805A (en) * 1998-03-24 2000-03-28 Hsieh; Kuan-Hong Controlling method for inputting messages to a computer
US5953110A (en) * 1998-04-23 1999-09-14 H.N. Burns Engineering Corporation Multichannel laser radar
DE19821974B4 (en) 1998-05-18 2008-04-10 Schwarte, Rudolf, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Apparatus and method for detecting phase and amplitude of electromagnetic waves
US6241675B1 (en) * 1998-06-09 2001-06-05 Volumetrics Medical Imaging Methods and systems for determining velocity of tissue using three dimensional ultrasound data
FR2780163B1 (en) * 1998-06-18 2000-08-11 Agence Spatiale Europeenne INCOHERENT LASER DOPPLER TELESCOPY SYSTEM
US6064354A (en) * 1998-07-01 2000-05-16 Deluca; Michael Joseph Stereoscopic user interface method and apparatus
US6137566A (en) * 1999-02-24 2000-10-24 Eoo, Inc. Method and apparatus for signal processing in a laser radar receiver
JP3914655B2 (en) * 1999-04-12 2007-05-16 日本放送協会 Solid-state imaging device
US6522395B1 (en) * 1999-04-30 2003-02-18 Canesta, Inc. Noise reduction techniques suitable for three-dimensional information acquirable with CMOS-compatible image sensor ICS
US6614422B1 (en) * 1999-11-04 2003-09-02 Canesta, Inc. Method and apparatus for entering data using a virtual input device
US6323942B1 (en) * 1999-04-30 2001-11-27 Canesta, Inc. CMOS-compatible three-dimensional image sensor IC
US6310682B1 (en) * 1999-07-06 2001-10-30 Quarton, Inc. System and method for laser range finder
US6512838B1 (en) * 1999-09-22 2003-01-28 Canesta, Inc. Methods for enhancing performance and data acquired from three-dimensional image systems
US6448572B1 (en) * 1999-09-29 2002-09-10 Innovative Technology Licensing, Llc Ranging three-dimensional laser imager and method
US6710770B2 (en) * 2000-02-11 2004-03-23 Canesta, Inc. Quasi-three-dimensional method and apparatus to detect and localize interaction of user-object and virtual transfer device
JP3574607B2 (en) * 2000-05-02 2004-10-06 ペンタックス株式会社 3D image input device
US6587186B2 (en) * 2000-06-06 2003-07-01 Canesta, Inc. CMOS-compatible three-dimensional image sensing using reduced peak energy
US6635857B1 (en) * 2000-07-10 2003-10-21 National Semiconductor Corporation Method and apparatus for a pixel cell architecture having high sensitivity, low lag and electronic shutter
US6580496B2 (en) * 2000-11-09 2003-06-17 Canesta, Inc. Systems for CMOS-compatible three-dimensional image sensing using quantum efficiency modulation
US6690354B2 (en) * 2000-11-19 2004-02-10 Canesta, Inc. Method for enhancing performance in a system utilizing an array of sensors that sense at least two-dimensions
AU2002239608A1 (en) * 2000-12-11 2002-06-24 Canesta, Inc. Cmos-compatible three-dimensional image sensing using quantum efficiency modulation

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020084430A1 (en) 2000-11-09 2002-07-04 Canesta, Inc. Methods for CMOS-compatible three-dimensional image sensing using quantum efficiency modulation
US20020176067A1 (en) 2001-05-23 2002-11-28 Canesta, Inc. Method and system to enhance dynamic range conversion useable with CMOS three-dimensional imaging

Non-Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
JEHYUK RHEE ET AL.: "A new wide dynamic range fixed point ADC for FPAs", THE 2002 45TH. MIDWEST SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS. CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 4 August 2002 (2002-08-04)
MIDWEST SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, vol. 2, 4 August 2002 (2002-08-04), pages 243 - 245
See also references of EP1614159A4
SID INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM - DIGEST OF TECHNICAL PAPERS, vol. 24, 1 January 1993 (1993-01-01), pages 495 - 498
YADID-PECHT: "SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION DISPLAY, SID INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM, DIGEST OF TECHNICAL PAPERS", 16 May 1993, article "The Automatic Wide-Dynamic-Range Sensor"

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007228054A (en) * 2006-02-21 2007-09-06 Stanley Electric Co Ltd Light receiving circuit for optical reflection sensor
EP2622847A1 (en) * 2010-09-28 2013-08-07 Microsoft Corporation Integrated low power depth camera and projection device
EP2622847A4 (en) * 2010-09-28 2014-08-06 Microsoft Corp Integrated low power depth camera and projection device
WO2012151207A1 (en) * 2011-05-03 2012-11-08 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Systems and methods for adding or subtracting pixels
US8963063B2 (en) 2011-05-03 2015-02-24 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Systems and methods for adding or subtracting pixels
US10871568B2 (en) 2015-04-28 2020-12-22 Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. Distance measurement device
EP3313064A1 (en) * 2016-10-20 2018-04-25 Chronocam Pixel circuit for detecting time-dependent visual data
WO2018073379A1 (en) * 2016-10-20 2018-04-26 Chronocam Pixel circuit for detecting time-dependent visual data
CN110089107A (en) * 2016-10-20 2019-08-02 普罗菲赛公司 Pixel circuit for the relevant vision data of detection time
US10721423B2 (en) 2016-10-20 2020-07-21 Prophesee Pixel circuit for detecting time-dependent visual data
CN110089107B (en) * 2016-10-20 2021-06-25 普罗菲赛公司 Pixel circuit for detecting time-dependent visual data
WO2022122288A1 (en) * 2020-12-10 2022-06-16 ams Sensors Germany GmbH Optical sensing arrangement, ambient light sensor and method for providing an output count

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1614159B1 (en) 2014-02-26
US6919549B2 (en) 2005-07-19
EP1614159A4 (en) 2012-03-28
US20050051707A1 (en) 2005-03-10
JP2006523074A (en) 2006-10-05
EP1614159A2 (en) 2006-01-11
WO2004093318A3 (en) 2005-06-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6919549B2 (en) Method and system to differentially enhance sensor dynamic range
US7507947B2 (en) Method and system to differentially enhance sensor dynamic range using enhanced common mode reset
US7321111B2 (en) Method and system to enhance differential dynamic range and signal/noise in CMOS range finding systems using differential sensors
US7157685B2 (en) Method and system to enhance differential dynamic range and signal/noise in CMOS range finding systems using differential sensors
US8508720B2 (en) Distance measuring system and distance measuring method
US9395440B2 (en) Optical distance measuring device and method for optical distance measurement
US9171985B2 (en) Pixel circuit with controlled capacitor discharge time of flight measurement
Cho et al. A high-sensitivity and low-walk error LADAR receiver for military application
US20060192938A1 (en) Distance image sensor
US11644551B2 (en) Lidar systems with improved time-to-digital conversion circuitry
US7947939B2 (en) Detection of optical radiation using a photodiode structure
US20110085043A1 (en) Image capturing apparatus, image capturing system, and processing method
EP3667367B1 (en) Distance sensor, distance measurement sensor, and image sensor
US20240337731A1 (en) Photoelectric conversion device and photoelectric conversion system
JPH04339209A (en) Distance detector
WO2006086455A2 (en) Method and system to enhance differential dynamic range and signal/noise in cmos range finding systems using differential sensors
JP2719086B2 (en) Photodetector
Davidovic et al. Range finding sensor in 90nm CMOS with bridge correlator based background light suppression
Schrey et al. A 4/spl times/64 pixel CMOS image sensor for 3D measurement applications
TW202008771A (en) Focal plane array having ratioed capacitors
TW202017360A (en) Dual mode focal plane array
HALIN et al. Design of a charge domain CMOS time-of-flight range image sensor
Joboji et al. A Range Finding Array Sensor Performing Correlated Calculations with a PN Code Modulation Light
Zach et al. Sunlight-proof optical distance measurements with a dual-line lock-in time-of-flight sensor
Nemecek et al. PIN-bridge distance measurement sensor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2004759475

Country of ref document: EP

Ref document number: 2006509960

Country of ref document: JP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2004759475

Country of ref document: EP