WO2004069332A1 - Electrode intraluminale - Google Patents

Electrode intraluminale Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2004069332A1
WO2004069332A1 PCT/US2004/002849 US2004002849W WO2004069332A1 WO 2004069332 A1 WO2004069332 A1 WO 2004069332A1 US 2004002849 W US2004002849 W US 2004002849W WO 2004069332 A1 WO2004069332 A1 WO 2004069332A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
patient
disorders
vagal
blocking
stimulation
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2004/002849
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
WO2004069332A9 (fr
Inventor
Mark B. Knudson
Timothy R. Conrad
Luke B. Evnin
Richard R. Wilson
Katherine S. Tweden
Original Assignee
Enteromedics Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US10/358,093 external-priority patent/US20040172084A1/en
Priority claimed from US10/752,940 external-priority patent/US7444183B2/en
Application filed by Enteromedics Inc. filed Critical Enteromedics Inc.
Publication of WO2004069332A1 publication Critical patent/WO2004069332A1/fr
Publication of WO2004069332A9 publication Critical patent/WO2004069332A9/fr

Links

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
    • A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
    • A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
    • A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
    • A61N1/36007—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation of urogenital or gastrointestinal organs, e.g. for incontinence control

Definitions

  • This invention pertains to treatments of disorders associated, at least in part, with neural activity. These may include, without limitation, gastrointestinal, pancreo-biliary, cardio-respiratory and central nervous system disorders (including neurological and psychiatric, psychological and panic disorders). More particularly, this invention pertains to treatment of such disorders through management of neural impulse stimulation and blocking.
  • FGIDs Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders
  • FGIDs are a diagnostic grouping having diagnostic criteria based on symptomatology, because the pathophysiology of these diseases is multifactorial with some pathophysiologic mechanisms in common. FGIDs are thought to be due to altered autonomic nervous system balance and to be pathophysiological combinations of: (1) abnormal GI motility; (2) visceral hypersensitivity; and, (3) brain-gut interactions. Tougas, "The Autonomic Nervous System in Functional Bowel Disorders", Gut, Vol. 47 (Suppl IV), pp.
  • the FGIDs of interest to the present invention are functional dyspepsia (dysmotility-like) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).
  • Functional dyspepsia (dysmotility-like), is diagnosed when a patient's symptoms, in the absence of other organic disease likely to explain the symptoms, include persistent or recurrent pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen that may be accompanied by upper abdominal fullness, early satiety, bloating or nausea.
  • Talley et al. "Rome II: A Multinational Consensus Document on Gastrointestinal Disorders - Functional Gastroduodenal Disorders" Gut, Vol. 45 (Suppl II), pp. 137- 1142 (1999).
  • IBS Irritable Bowel Syndrome
  • the second FGID of interest, IBS is diagnosed when a patient's symptoms include persistent abdominal pain or discomfort, in the absence of other explanatory organic disease, along with at least two of the following: relief of pain with defecation, onset of symptoms associated with a change in frequency of stools and/or onset of symptoms associated with a change in appearance/form of stools.
  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome Relationship of Disorders in the Transit of a Single Solid Meal to Symptoms Patterns", Gut, (1983);24:405-411.
  • Kellow JE, et al. "Dysmotihty of the Small Intestine in Irritable Bowel Syndrome", Gut, (1988);29:1236-1243.
  • Evans PR, et al. "Jejunal Sensorimotor Dysfunction in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Clinical and Psychosocial Features", Gastroenterol, (1996); 110:393-404.
  • Zelnorm ® A recently approved drug to treat selected patients with FGIPs is tegaserod maleate sold under the tradename "Zelnorm ® " by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
  • the product literature on Zelnorm recognizes the enteric nervous system is a key element in treating IBS.
  • the literature suggests Zelnorm ® acts to enhance basal motor activity and to normalize impaired motility.
  • Novartis product description, Zelnorm ® July 2002 (T2002-19).
  • Zelnorm's approved use is limited to females with constipation-related IBS. It is for short-term use only.
  • gastroparesis or delayed gastric emptying
  • upper GI symptoms such as nausea, vomiting fullness, bloating and early satiety.
  • Gastroparesis can be caused by many underlying conditions. The most important, because of chronicity and prevalence, are diabetes, idiopathic and post-surgical. Hornbuckle K, et al. "The Piagnosis and Work-Up of the Patient with Gastroparesis", J Clin Gastroenterol, (2000);30:117-124.
  • GI dysmotihty in the form of delayed gastric emptying is, by definition, present in these patients.
  • the current treatments for gastroparesis are far from satisfactory. They include supportive care, such as dietary modification, prokinetic drugs, and; when required, interventions such as intravenous fluids and placement of a nasogastric tube may be needed.
  • Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease The fourth indication, GERD, can be associated with a wide spectrum of symptoms, including dyspepsia, reflux of gastric contents into the mouth, dysphagia, persistent cough, refractory hyperreactive airway disease and even chronic serous otitis media.
  • Sontag SJ, et al. "Asthmatics with Gastroesophageal Reflux: Long Term Results of a Randomized Trial of Medical and Surgical Antireflux Therapies", Am J Gastroenterol, (2003);98:987-999.
  • GERP is considered to be a chronic condition for which long-term medical therapy and/or surgical therapy is often deemed necessary, in significant part because esophageal adenocarcinoma is sometimes a consequence of GERP.
  • PeVault KR et al., "Updated Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease", Am J Gastroenterol, (1999);94:1434-1442.
  • Lagergren J, et al. "Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux as a Risk Factor for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma", New Engl J Med, (1999);340:825-831.
  • TLESRs transient lower esophageal relaxations
  • gastric distention is thought to be associated with an increase in TLESRs.
  • Mittal RK et al., "Mechanism of Disease: The Esophagogastric Junction", New Engl J Med, (1997);336:924-932.
  • Scheffer RC et al., "Elicitation of Transient Lower Oesophageal Sphincter Relaxations in Response to Gastric Distension", Neuro astroenterol Motil, (2002);14:647-655.
  • GERP ulcerative colitis .
  • Hunt "The Relationship Between The Control Of pH And healing And Symptom Relief In Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Oisease", Ailment Pharmacol Ther., 9 (Suppl. 1) pp. 3 - 7 (1995).
  • Many factors are believed to contribute to the onset of GERP. These include transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (as previously described), decreased LES resting tone, delayed stomach emptying and an ineffective esophageal clearance.
  • Certain drugs have had some effectiveness at controlling GERP but fail to treat underlying causes of the disease.
  • examples of such drugs are H 2 -receptor antagonists (which control gastric acid secretion in the basal state) and proton pump inhibitors (which control meal-stimulated acid secretion).
  • H 2 -receptor antagonists which control gastric acid secretion in the basal state
  • proton pump inhibitors which control meal-stimulated acid secretion
  • Surgery treatments are also employed for the treatment of GERP and include techniques for bulking the lower esophageal sphincter such as fundoplication and techniques described in US Pat. No. 6,098,629 Johnson et al, Aug 8, 2000.
  • Other surgical techniques include placement of pacemakers for stimulating muscle contractions in the esophageal sphincter, the stomach muscles or in the pyloric valve.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 6,104,955 to Bourgeois U.S. Pat. No. 5,861,014 to Familoni.
  • D. Electrical Stimulation to Treat GI Disorders Treatment of gastrointestinal diseases through nerve stimulation have been suggested.
  • U.S. Past. No. 6,238,423 to Bardy dated May 29, 2001 describes a constipation treatment involving electrical stimulation of the muscles or related nerves of the gut.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 6,571,127 to Ben-Haim et al. dated May 27, 2003 describes increasing motility by applying an electrical field to the GI tract.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,540,730 to Terry, Jr. et al., dated July 30, 1996 describes a motility treatment involving vagal stimulation to alter GI contractions in response to a sense condition indicative of need for treatment.
  • the '730 patent also uses a definition of dysmotihty more restrictive than in the present application.
  • dysmotihty is described as hyper- or hypo-contractility.
  • dysmotihty is a broader concept to refer to all abnormalities of gastric emptying or bowel transfer regardless of cause.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 6,610,713 to Tracey dated August 26, 2003 describes inhibiting release of a proinflammatory cytokine by treating a cell with a cholinergic agonist by stimulating efferent vagus nerve activity to inhibit the inflammatory cytokine cascade.
  • a substantial body of literature is developed on nerve stimulation.
  • vagal influence on colonic motor activity in conscious nonhuman primates was investigated in conscious monkeys.
  • vagal cooling was performed via vagal cooling and a vagal stimulation electrode was implanted distal to the vagal block.
  • vagal efferent stimulation increased contractile frequency and that the vagus has either a direct or indirect influence on fasting and fed colonic motor activity throughout the colon, and that a non-adrenergic, noncholinergic inhibitory pathway is under vagal control.
  • Colonic and gastric stimulation are also described in a number of articles associated with M.
  • Mintchev P. Mintchev. These include: Mintchev, et al., "Electrogastrographic impact of multi-site functional gastric electrical stimulation", J. of Medical Eng. & Tech., Vol. 23, No. 1 pp. 5 - 9 (1999); Rashev, et al., "Three- dimensional static parametric modeling of phasic colonic contractions for the purpose of microprocessor-controlled functional stimulation", J. of Medical Eng. & Tech., Vol. 25, No. 3 pp. 85 - 96 (2001); Lin et al., "Hardware - software co-design of portable functional gastrointestinal stimulator system", J. of Medical Eng. & Tech., Vol. 27, No. 4 pp.
  • the present invention utilizes vagal stimulation to improve vagal tone (similar in concept to improving cardiac electrical tone through cardiac pacing) and/or to treat GI disorders by altering the nature of duodenum contents by stimulation pancreatic and biliary output.
  • the invention is also applicable to treating other diseases such as neuropsychiatric disorders.
  • Vagal tone has been shown to be associated with dyspepsia. Hjelland, et al., "Vagal tone and meal-induced abdominal symptoms in healthy subjects", Digestion, 65: 172 - 176 (2002). Also, Hausken, et al., "Low Vagal Tone and Antral
  • the present invention includes, in several embodiments, a blocking of a nerve (such as the vagal nerve) to avoid antidromic influences during stimulation.
  • Cryogenic nerve blocking of the vagus is described in Dapoigny et al., "Vagal influence on colonic motor activity in conscious nonhuman primates", Am. J. Phvsiol. 262: G231 - G236 (1992).
  • Electrically induced nerve blocking is described in Van Den Honert, et al, “Generation of Unidirectionally Propagated Action Potentials in a Peripheral Nerve by Brief Stimuli", Science, Vol. 206, pp. 1311 - 1312.
  • a method and apparatus are disclosed for treating at least one of a plurality of disorders of a patient associated with vagal activity innervating at least one of a plurality of organs of the patient at an innervation site.
  • the method includes positioning a neurostimulator carrier within a body lumen of the patient.
  • An electrode disposed on the carrier is positioned near a mucosal layer of the lumen.
  • An electrical signal is applied to the electrode to modulate vagal activity by an amount selected to treat the disorder.
  • the signal may be a blocking or a stimulation signal.
  • Fig. 1 is a schematic representation of a gastric-emptying feedback loop with a patient-controlled stimulator for stimulating an organ of the loop
  • Fig. 2 is a view similar to Fig. 1 with an automatic controller replacing the patient-controller of Fig. 1 and with feedback circuits to the automatic controller schematically represented;
  • Fig. 3 is a schematic illustration of an alimentary tract (GI tract plus non-GI organs such as the pancreas and liver) and its relation to vagal and enteric innervation;
  • Fig. 4 is the view of Fig. 3 showing the application of a pacing electrode according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • Fig. 5 is a schematic representation of pacing system
  • Fig. 6 is the view of Fig. 4 showing the application of a nerve conduction block electrode proximal to the pacing electrode;
  • Fig. 7 is the view of Fig. 6 showing the application of a nerve conduction block electrode distal to the pacing electrode;
  • Fig. 8 is the view of Fig. 3 showing the application of a nerve conduction block electrode according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • Fig. 9 is a schematic representation of a patients' stomach shown partially in section and illustrating a representative placement of anterior and posterior vagus nerves with respect to the anatomy of the stomach and diaphragm;
  • Fig. 10 is the view of Fig. 9 showing a further embodiment of the present invention in utilizing electrode bands
  • Fig. 11 is a perspective view of a band for use in the embodiment of Fig. 10;
  • Fig. 12 is a side sectional view of a patients' stomach in illustrating a yet alternative embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 13 is a side elevation view of a balloon portion of an apparatus for use in the embodiment of Fig. 12;
  • Fig. 14 is a side elevation view of an alternative embodiment of a balloon portion of an apparatus for use in the embodiment of Fig. 12;
  • Fig. 15 is a side sectional view of a patients' stomach in illustrating a yet alternative embodiment of the invention of Fig. 12;
  • Fig. 16 is a side sectional view of a patients' stomach in illustrating a still further alternative embodiment of the invention of Fig. 12;
  • Fig. 17 is a schematic view of a balloon with magnetic coils
  • Fig. 18 is a side sectional view of the esophagus and stomach junction and illustrating a yet further embodiment of the present invention
  • Fig. 19 is a view similar to that of Fig. 15 and illustrating an alternative embodiment of the invention shown in Fig. 15.
  • a gastric emptying feedback loop is shown schematically for ease of illustration.
  • the feedback loop illustrates a patient's stomach S which is provided with food from the esophagus E.
  • a lower esophageal sphincter LES is shown positioned between the esophagus E and the stomach S.
  • the lower esophageal sphincter normally provides control of reflux of stomach contents into the esophagus E.
  • the stomach discharges into the superior duodenum O which is an upper portion of the intestines.
  • the superior duodenum P and the stomach S are separated by a pyloric valve PV which opens to permit gastric emptying from the stomach into the duodenum P.
  • Fig. 1 Also schematically illustrated in Fig. 1 are nerve paths N providing signal flow paths from both the superior duodenum P and the stomach S to the brain B.
  • An efferent Vagal nerve VN connects the brain B to the pancreas P of the patient.
  • a conduit pancreatic duct PP extends from the pancreas P and discharges into the superior duodenum P.
  • the presence of food contents within the duodenum D may prevent passage of gastric content of the stomach S past the pyloric valve PV into the duodenum D.
  • contents can be forced retrograde past the lower esophageal sphincter LES and into the esophagus E creating the symptoms and discomfort of GERP.
  • the contents discharging from the stomach S into the duodenum P are acidic (and high osmolality) and reside in the duodenum P until pH is elevated (close to a neutral pH of 6 - 7) and osmolality is normalized.
  • the elevation of pH and reduction of osmolality of chyme in the duodenum P results from exocrine secretion being administered from the pancreas P and from bile from the liver into the duodenum P. This raises the pH and lowers the osmolality of the duodenum P content permitting discharge from the duodenum P and thereby permitting gastric emptying across the pyloric valve PV.
  • gastroesophageal reflux disease results from a derangement of the feedback loops involved in upper GI digestion and motility control.
  • This problem encompasses receptors and reflexes that regulate the propulsive contractions of the stomach, upper duodenum and biliary tree and the secretions of the exocrine pancreas.
  • the interaction of these receptors and reflexes control gastric emptying (by coordinating gastric propulsive contractions and sphincter [primarily pyloric] tone) and regulate the pH and osmolality of the chyme in the duodenum.
  • This chemo-regulation is mediated through control of bile delivery and stimulation of secretion by the exocrine pancreas of fluid delivered to the superior duodenum.
  • Chey et al "Neural Hormonal Regulation of Exocrine Pancreatic Secretion", Pancreatology, pp. 320 - 335 (2001).
  • ingestate delivered to the stomach is mixed by low intensity gastric mixing contractions with the enzymatic, ionic, including hydrogen ion (H + ), and water secretions of the glands of the stomach.
  • the fluid now called chyme
  • the fluid is delivered to the ampulla of the small intestine by the much stronger propulsive, or emptying, contractions of the stomach coupled with transitory relaxation of the pyloric sphincter.
  • This material is at a very low pH (about 2) and high osmolality, which activates receptors, including those for H + and osmotic pressure, which are abundant in the wall of the ampulla.
  • This receptor activation initiates the series of reflexes that cause pancreatic exocrine secretion to be delivered into the superior duodenum and ampulla.
  • This fluid contains digestive enzymes, water and buffering compounds to raise the pH, and reduce the osmolality, of the chyme.
  • control system If the control system is down regulated by, for example, by increased pH of gastric contents entering the ampulla, feedback may thereby be reduced from the H receptors in the duodenum that stimulate pancreatic exocrine secretion and bile delivery to the duodenum, then movement of chyme from the superior duodenum is delayed, causing delay of gastric emptying.
  • Mabayo, et al "Inhibition of Food Passage by Osmeprazole in the Chicken", European J. of Pharmacology, pp. 161 — 165 (1995).
  • the drugs used to treat this disease raise pH further dampening the hydrogen-receptor-pancreatic secretion loop, further delaying gastric emptying.
  • Benini "Gastric Emptying and Pyspeptic Symptoms in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux", Amer. J. of Gastroenterology, pp. 1351 - 1354 (1996).
  • the present invention is directed towards reestablishing the link between gastric emptying and pancreatic secretion delivery, thereby addressing the main pathology of this disease by shortening chyme residence time in the superior duodenum so that intestinal contents move into the distal digestive tract in a more normal manner.
  • this is done by stimulating the H+ ion receptors or by stimulation of the pancreas directly or via its para-sympathetic innervation (pre-ganglionic Vagal nerves).
  • Stimulation of pancreatic exocrine secretion has been shown by direct stimulation of the thoracic vagus nerves in dogs. Kaminski et al, "The Effect of Electrical Vagal Stimulation on Canine Pancreatic Exocrine Function", Surgery, pp.
  • Acidity can be assessed by measuring bicarbonate. It will be understood that references to -H includes such indirect measurements. Also, effects of the therapy described herein can be assessed and/or controlled by measuring an indication of pancreatic exocrine secretion or bile (e.g., HCO 3 " ).
  • An alternative embodiment uses gastrocopic delivery of a paralyzing agent
  • the gall bladder can be stimulated to encourage bile movement into the duodenum.
  • the gall bladder GB resides below the liver L.
  • the gall bladder is connected to the small intestine (specifically the duodenum O) via a bile duct BP.
  • the bile duct BP can discharge directly into the duodenum P or via the pancreatic duct PP as shown.
  • the bile can normalize the chyme to accelerate duodenal emptying.
  • Bile consists of bile acids (detergents that emulsify lipids), cholesterol, phospholipids, electrolytes such as (Na + , K + , Ca +2 , CI, HCO 3 " ) and H 2 0. Chapter 4, "The Liver and Biliary Tract", Gastrointestinal System, 2 nd Ed., M.S. Long editor, Mosby Publisher, London (2002).
  • the gall bladder GB or bile duct can be stimulated indirectly via stimulation of the vagal nerve VN or directly stimulated by an electrode 11 (shown in phantom lines).
  • an electrical stimulator 10, 20 which may be implanted is provided which alternatively may be directly connected to the Vagal nerve VN or the pancreas P to stimulate the pancreas directly or indirectly to excrete exocrine into the duodenum O (or more distally into the small intestine - e.g., into the jejunum) and increase the pH of chyme in the duodenum D as described. Alternatively, the same can be done to promote bile release. The frequency may be varied to maximize the response and selectively stimulate exocrine instead of endocrine secretions.
  • the patient may activate the stimulator 10 by remote transmitter to stimulate an electrical charge either after eating (e.g., about 60 to 90 minutes after eating) or on onset of GERD symptoms.
  • the stimulator 10 may activate the stimulator 10 by remote transmitter to stimulate an electrical charge either after eating (e.g., about 60 to 90 minutes after eating) or on onset of GERD symptoms.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates an additional embodiment where the patient activated loop is replaced with an automatic loop having a programmable stimulator 20 which receives as an input signals from sensors in the duodenum to measure pH, osmolality or strain (e.g., from baro-sensors) on the duodenum indicating filling or may measure acidity in the esophagus or strain on the lower esophageal sphincter LES or stomach S all of which may be provided to the implantable controller 20 which can be provided with desirable software to process the incoming signals and generate a stimulating signal to either the vagal nerve, the pancreas P or the duodenum P (or jejunum) directly in response to such received signals.
  • a programmable stimulator 20 which receives as an input signals from sensors in the duodenum to measure pH, osmolality or strain (e.g., from baro-sensors) on the duodenum indicating filling or may measure acidity in the esophagus or strain on the
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,540,730 teaches a neurostimulator to stimulate a vagus nerve to treat a motility disorder.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,292,344 teaches gastrointestinal sensors, including pH sensors.
  • the foregoing invention is applicable to treatment of a plurality of GI diseases associated with delayed gastric emptying or altered autonomic activity. These include functional gastrointestinal disorders and gastroparesis. Furthermore, applicants have determined that duodenal content impacts a plurality of motility disorders throughout the bowels and can diseases associated with dysmotihty (e.g., irritable bowel syndrome). Accordingly it is an object of the present invention to use the teachings of the aforementioned parent application to treat GI disorders associated with delayed gastric emptying and abnormal intestinal transport.
  • Fig. 3 is a schematic illustration of an alimentary tract (GI tract plus non-GI organs such as the pancreas and ball bladder, collectively labeled PG) and its relation to vagal and enteric innervation.
  • the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) acts as a gate to pass food into the stomach S and, assuming adequate function of all components, prevent reflux.
  • the pylorus PV controls passage of chyme from the stomach S into the intestines I (collectively shown in the figures and including the large intestine or colon and the small intestine including the duodenum, jejunum and ileum).
  • the biochemistry of the contents of the intestines I is influenced by the pancreas P and gall bladder PG which discharge into the duodenum. This discharge is illustrated by dotted arrow A.
  • the vagus nerve VN contains both afferent and efferent components sending signals away from and to, respectively, its innervated organs.
  • the enteric nervous system ENS is an interconnected network of nerves, receptors and actuators throughout the GI tract. There are many millions of nerve endings of the enteric nervous system ENS in the tissues of the GI organs. For ease of illustration, the enteric nervous system ENS is illustrated as a line enveloping the organs innervated by the enteric nervous system ENS.
  • the vagus nerve VN innervates, at least in part, the enteric nervous system
  • vagal trunk VN3 which represents many vagus- ENS innervation throughout the cut.
  • receptors in the intestines I connect to the enteric nervous system ENS.
  • Arrow B in the figures illustrates the influence of duodenal contents on the enteric nervous system ENS as a feedback to the secretion function of the pancreas, liver and gall bladder.
  • receptors in the intestine I respond the biochemistry of the intestine contents (which are chemically modulated by the pancreao-biliary output of Arrow A). This biochemistry includes pH and osmolality.
  • vagal trunks VN1, VN2, VN4 and VN6 illustrate schematically the direct vagal innervation of the GI organs of the LES, stomach S, pylorus PV and intestines I.
  • Trunk VN3 illustrates direct communication between the vagus VN and the ENS.
  • Trunk VN5 illustrates direct vagal innervation of the pancreas and gall bladder.
  • Enteric nerves ENS1 - ENS4 represent the multitude of enteric nerves in the stomach S, pylorus PV, pancreas and gall bladder PG and intestines I.
  • the enteric nervous system ENS can act independently of the vagus and the central nervous system. For example, in patients with a severed vagus nerve (vagotomy - an historical procedure for treating ulcers), the enteric nervous system can operate the gut. Most enteric nerve cells are not directly innervated by the vagus. Gershon, "The Second Brain", Harper Collins Publishers, hie, New York, NY p. 19 (1998)
  • FIG. 3 the vagus VN and its trunks (illustrated as VN1 - VN6) and the enteric nervous system ENS are shown in phantom lines to illustrate reduced vagal and enteric nerve tone (i.e., sub-optimal nerve transmission levels).
  • Reduced vagal and enteric tone contribute directly to the ineffectiveness of the GI organs as well as indirectly (through reduced pancreatic/biliary output).
  • the reduced pancreatic/biliary output is illustrated by the dotted presentation of arrow A.
  • the vagus can be stimulated to stimulate pancreatic or biliary output. Therefore, the reduced output of arrow A results in a reduced feedback illustrated by the dotted presentation of arrow B.
  • a stimulating or pacing electrode PE is applied to the vagus VN. While only one electrode is shown in Fig. 4, separate electrodes could be applied to both the anterior and posterior vagus nerves (or to the common vagus or vagal branches), h a prefened embodiment, the electrode PE is placed a few centimeters below the diaphragm and proximal to stomach and pancreo/biliary innervation. While this placement is presently preferred for ease of surgical access, other placement locations may be used.
  • vagal tone By pacing the vagus through the pacing electrode, vagal tone is optimized by either up- or down-regulation.
  • tone refers to basal activity of a nerve or nervous system facilitating appropriate physiologic response to a patient's internal environment.
  • low vagal tone implies a reduction in vagus nerve activity resulting in decreased response of the alimentary tract to ingested food.
  • pacing is not limited to mean timed events coordinated with specifically timed physiologic events. Instead, pacing means any electrical stimulation of a nerve trunk to induce bi-directional propagation of nervous impulses in the stimulated nerve.
  • the operating effectiveness of the vagus is enhanced so that local physiological signals generated in the enteric nervous system (or sent to the brain from the organs) are more appropriately responded to within the alimentary tract.
  • pacing of the vagus enhances the functional tone of the enteric nervous system.
  • the stimulation pacing is elevating the degree of functionality of the vagus and enteric nerves.
  • pacing is not meant to mean timed pulsed coordinated with muscular contractions or synchronized with other invents. Pacing means elevating the activity level of the nerves.
  • the pacing can be done intermittently over the day to provide an enhanced level of operating functionality to the vagus.
  • the stimulation pacing can be done during awake hours. For example, every ten minutes, pacing signals can be sent to the pacing electrodes.
  • the pacing signals have a duration of 30 seconds with a current of 4mA, a frequency of 12 Hz and an impulse duration of 2 msec. These parameters are representative only. A wide range of signal parameters may be used to stimulate the vagus nerve.
  • Implantable Pacing Circuit A representative pacing circuit 100 is schematically shown in Fig. 5. Similar to cardiac pacing devices, an implantable controller 102 contains an induction coil 104 for inductive electrical coupling to a coil 106 of an external controller 108.
  • the implantable controller 102 includes anterior and posterior pulse generators 110, 112 electrically connected through conductors 114, 116 to anterior and posterior pacing electrodes 118, 120 for attachment to anterior and posterior trunks, respectively, of the vagus nerve VN.
  • the implantable controller 102 also includes a battery 122 and a CPU 124 which includes program storage and memory. The timing and parameters of the pulse at the electrodes 118, 120 can be adjusted by inductively coupling the external controller 108 to the implantable controller 102 and inputting pacing parameters (e.g., pulse width, frequency and amplitude).
  • pacing parameters e.g., pulse width, frequency and amplitude
  • the electrodes 118, 120 can be implanted connected to a receiving antenna placed near the body surface.
  • the control circuits i.e., the elements 124, 110, 112 and 108, can be housed in an external pack worn by the patient with a transmitting antenna held in place on the skin over the area of the implanted receiving antenna.
  • Such a design is forward-compatible in that the implanted electrodes can be later substituted with the implantable controller 102 at a later surgery if desired.
  • the controller 102 can also include circuits generating nerve conduction block signals (as will be described) which connect to electrodes which may be positioned on a nerve proximally, distally (or both) of the electrodes 118, 120.
  • Fig. 6 shows an alternative embodiment using a nerve conduction blocking electrode PBE proximal to the pacing electrode for providing a conduction block.
  • a nerve block is, functionally speaking, a reversible vagotomy. Namely, application of the block at least partially prevents nerve transmission across the site of the block. Removal of the block restores normal nerve activity at the site.
  • a block is any localized imposition of conditions that at least partially diminish transmission of impulses.
  • the vagal block may be desirable in some patients since unblocked pacing may result in afferent vagal and antidromic efferent signals having undesired effect on organs innervated by the vagus proximal to the GI tract (e.g., undesirable cardiac response). Further, the afferent signals of the pacing electrode PE can result in a central nervous system response that tends to offset the benefits of the pacing electrode on the ENS and pancreo/biliary function, thereby reducing the GI and enteric rhythm management effectiveness of vagal pacing.
  • the block may be intermittent and applied only when the vagus is paced by the pacing electrode PE.
  • the preferred nerve conduction block is an electronic block created by a signal at the vagus by an electrode PBE controlled by the implantable controller (such as controller 102 or an external controller).
  • the nerve conduction block can be any reversible block.
  • cryogenics either chemically or electronically induced
  • drag blocks can be used.
  • An electronic cryogenic block may be a Peltier solid-state device which cools in response to a current and may be electrically controlled to regulate cooling.
  • Drug blocks may include a pump-controlled subcutaneous drug delivery.
  • the block parameters can be altered by a controller and can be coordinated with the pacing signals to block only during pacing.
  • a representative blocking signal is a 500Hz signal with other parameters (e.g., timing and current) matched to be the same as the pacing signal. While an alternating current blocking signal is described, a direct current (e.g., -70mV DC) could be used.
  • a direct current e.g., -70mV DC
  • the nerve conduction block is preferably within the parameters disclosed in Solomonow, et al, "Control of Muscle Contractile Force through Indirect High-Frequency
  • the nerve conduction block is applied with electrical signal selected to block the entire cross-section of the nerve (e.g., both afferent, efferent, myelinated and nonmyelinated fibers) at the site of applying the blocking signal (as opposed to selected sub-groups of nerve fibers or just efferent and not afferent or visa versa) and, more preferably, has a frequency selected to exceed the 200 Hz threshold frequency described in Solomonow et al
  • preferred parameters are a frequency of 500 Hz (with other parameters, as non-limiting examples , being amplitude of 4 mA, pulse width of 0.5 msec, and duty cycle of 5 minutes on and 10 minutes off).
  • the present invention gives a physician great latitude in selected pacing and blocking parameters for individual patients.
  • vagus VN and enteric nervous system ENS in Fig. 6 distal to the block PBE are shown in solid lines to illustrate enhanced tone (except for the direct innervation VNl, VN2, VN4, VN6 to the GI tract organs).
  • arrows A', B' are shown in solid lines to illustrate the enhanced pancreo-biliary output and resultant enhanced feedback stimulation to the enteric nervous system ENS.
  • the proximal vagus nerve segment VNP proximal to the block PBE is shown in phantom lines to illustrate it is not stimulated by the pacing electrode PE while the blocking electrode PBE is activated. 5.
  • Fig. 7 illustrates the addition over Fig. 6 of a nerve conductive block DBE distal to the pacing electrode PE.
  • the proximal block PBE prevents adverse events resulting from afferent signals and heightens the GI effectiveness by blocking antidromic interference as discussed with reference to Fig. 6.
  • the distal block DBE is provided in the event there is a desire to isolate the pacing effect of electrode PE.
  • a physician may which to enhance the vagus and enteric activity in the region proximal to the duodenum but may wish to avoid stimulating pancreo-biliary output.
  • a patient may have a GI problem without apparent colon dysfunction (e.g., gastroparesis functional dyspepsia without bowel symptoms).
  • Placing the distal block DBE on a branch of the vagus between the pacing electrode PE and the pancreas and gall bladder PG prevents increased pancreo-biliary output and resultant feedback (illustrated by dotted arrows A and B in Fig. 7 and dotted distal vagal nerve segment VND and vagal trunk VN5) .
  • Fig. 8 illustrates an alternative embodiment of the invention.
  • the vagus nerve may be hyperactive contributing to diarrhea-dominant IBS.
  • Use of a blocking electrode alone in the vagus permits down-regulating the vagus nerve VN, the enteric nervous system ENS and pancreo- biliary output. The block down-regulates efferent signal transmission.
  • the hyperactive vagus is illustrated by the solid line of the proximal vagus nerve segment VNP. The remainder of the vagus and enteric nervous system are shown in reduced thickness to illustrate down-regulation of tone. The pancreo-biliary output (and resulting feedback) is also reduced.
  • the blocking electrode BE is shown high on the vagus relative to the GI tract innervation (e.g., just below the diaphragm), the sole blocking electrode could be placed lower (e.g., just proximal to pancreo/biliary innervation VN5). Blocking of the entire vagus as described above can be used to down-regulate the vagus for various benefits including: pancreatitis and obesity treatments. Further, blocking the vagus interrupts the vagally-mediated neurogenic inflammatory arc.
  • blocking as an independent therapy also permits treatment for pancreatitis by down regulating vagal activity and pancreatic output including pancreatic exocrine secretion.
  • the blocking may be used as a separate treatment for reducing discomfort and pain associated with gastrointestinal disorders or other vagally mediated pain (i.e., somatic pain sensations transmitted along any nerve fibers with pain sensation modulated by vagal afferent fibers).
  • vagally mediated pain i.e., somatic pain sensations transmitted along any nerve fibers with pain sensation modulated by vagal afferent fibers.
  • a treatment of a gastrointestinal disorder may include a treatment of a patient's perception of pain without any additional functional therapy associated with a gastrointestinal disorder.
  • Vagal blocking as described herein can treat gastrointestinal pain or discomfort (including that associated with Crohn's disease) and chronic somatic pain as well as the inflammatory basis of Crolm's disease.
  • the vagal blocking as described herein can also treat nausea secondary, for example, to chronic cancer chemotherapy.
  • the present invention can electrically simulate the effects of PPY by using the vagal block to down-regulate afferent vagal activity to create a desired sensation of satiety. Since the down-regulation does not require continuous blocking signals, the beneficial efferent signals are permitted.
  • vagal pacing or stimulation to treat a wide variety of diseases.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,188,104 dated February 23, 1993 describes vagal stimulation to treat eating disorders.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,231,988 dated August 3, 1993 describes vagal stimulation to treat endocrine disorders.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,215,086 dated June 1, 1993 describes vagal stimulation to treat migraines.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,269,303 dated December 14, 1993 describes vagal stimulation to treat dementia.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,330,515 dated July 19, 1994 describes vagal stimulation to treat pain.
  • pacing a vagus nerve in the thoracic cavity or neck combined with a blocking electrode on the vagus nerve distal to the pacing electrode can be used to treat neuropsychiatric disorders (such as depression and schizophrenia) and Parkinson's and epilepsy and dementia.
  • the blocking electrode is placed distal to the stimulating electrode 25 shown in Figs. 4 and 2, respectively, of each of U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,269,303 and 5,299,569.
  • the present invention thereby enables the teachings of the afore-referenced patents listed in foregoing two paragraphs.
  • Gastrointestinal disorders are complex. For many, the precise mechanism is of the disorder is unknown. Diagnosis and treatment are often iterative processes. The present invention is particularly desirable for treating such disorders.
  • Use of proximal and distal blocking electrodes in combination with one or more pacing electrode permits a physician to alter an operating permutation of the electrodes. This pennits regional and local up- or down-regulation of the nervous system and organs. Further, pacing parameters (duty cycle, current, frequency, pulse length) can all be adjusted. Therefore, the treating physician has numerous options to alter a treatment to meet the needs of a specific patient.
  • a physician can combine the present invention with other therapies (such as drug therapies like prokinetic agents).
  • a stomach S is shown schematically for the purpose of facilitating an understanding of alternative embodiments of the invention as illustrated in Figs. 10-15.
  • the stomach S is shown with a collapsed ftmdus F which is deflated due to fasting.
  • the fundus F can be reduced in size and volume (as shown in Fig. 9) or expanded (as shown in Fig. 12).
  • the esophagus E passes through the diaphragm D at an opening or hiatus H.
  • trunks of the vagal nerve illustrated as the anterior vagus nerve AVN and posterior vagus nerve PVN
  • anterior vagus nerve AVN and posterior vagus nerve PVN trunks of the vagal nerve
  • PVN posterior vagus nerve
  • the anterior and posterior vagus nerves AVN, PVN divide into a plurality of trunks that innervate the stomach directly and via the enteric nervous system and may include portions of the nerves which may proceed to other organs such as the pancreas, gallbladder and intestines.
  • the anterior and posterior vagus nerves AVN, PVN are still in close proximity to the esophagus E and stomach (and not yet extensively branched out) at the region of the junction of the esophagus E and stomach S.
  • the Z-line In the region of the hiatus H, there is a transition from esophageal tissue to gastric tissue. This region is refened to as the Z-line (labeled "Z" in the Figures). Above the Z-line, the tissue of the esophagus is thin and fragile. Below the Z-line, the tissue of the esophagus E and stomach S are substantially thickened and more vascular. Within a patient population, the Z-line is in the general region of the lower esophageal sphincter. This location may be slightly above, slightly below or at the location of the hiatus H.
  • a band 200 is shown placed around the esophagus E below the diaphragm D and overlying the anterior and posterior vagus nerves AVN, PVN at the cardiac notch CN. Alternatively, it can be placed completely around the upper portion of the stomach near its junction of the esophagus. Placement of a band 200 around the esophagus E directly beneath the diaphragm D ensures that the band may be placed around the anterior and posterior vagus nerves AVN, PVN without the need for extensive dissection of the nerves AVN, PVN.
  • the nerves AVN, PVN are indirectly stimulated by passing electrical signals through the tissue sunounding the nerves.
  • the band 200 may be formed of polyester or the like or any other suitable material which may be sutured in place or otherwise fastened in place surrounding the esophagus E or gastric cardia.
  • the band 200 is placed at the junction of the esophagus E and stomach S such that the band may overly both the esophagus E and stomach S at the cardiac notch CN.
  • the band 200 may have a plurality of electrodes which, in the embodiment of Fig. 10 include an upper electrode array 202 and a lower electrode anay 203. h the embodiment of Fig. 11 (in which a band 200 is shown lying flat), the electrode arrays 202, 203 are shown with electrodes placed at an angle relative to the cylindrical axis X-X of the band 200.
  • Placement of the band 200 as described ensures that at least a subset of the electrodes 202, 203 will be in overlying relation to the anterior and posterior vagus nerves AVN, PVN. As a result, energizing the electrodes 202, 203 will result in stimulation of the anterior and posterior vagus nerves AVN, PVN and/or their branches.
  • the upper array 202 of electrodes may be connected to a blocking electrical signal source (with a blocking frequency and other parameters as previously described) and the lower array 203 of electrodes may be connected to a stimulation electrical signal source as previously described.
  • a blocking electrical signal source with a blocking frequency and other parameters as previously described
  • the lower array 203 of electrodes may be connected to a stimulation electrical signal source as previously described.
  • only a single array of electrodes could be used with all electrodes connected to either a blocking or a stimulating signal
  • the electrical connection of the electrodes 202, 203 to a controller is not shown but may be as previously described by having a leads connecting the electrodes directly to an implantable controller. Alternatively, and as previously described, electrodes may be connected to an implanted antenna for receiving a signal to energize the electrodes.
  • an array of electrodes permits the collar 200 to be placed without the need for great accuracy at the time of placement, hi the event it is desirable that electrodes not directly overlying a vagus nerve be deactivated, the electrodes could, through operation of a controller, be individually energized to detect a physiological response.
  • the absence of a physiological response (other than possible muscular action of the stomach and esophagus) would indicate the absence of an overlying relation to a vagus nerve.
  • the presence of a physiological response would indicate overlying relation of the tested electrode to a vagus nerve.
  • a physiological response would be a cardiovascular response which may be attributed to a signal of about 2-80 hertz and up to 50 milliamps and as more fully described in US Patent 6,532,388 to Hill et al dated
  • a selected one of the AVN or PVN could be energized.
  • identifying electrodes to be deactivated is a non-limiting embodiment.
  • all electrodes could be energized.
  • the therapies as previously described could be employed by using blocking electrodes or stimulation electrodes or both in order to block or energize (or both) the vagus nerve.
  • Figure 10 also illustrates an alternative embodiment in the form of a band 200' surrounding the body of the stomach S and having anays 202', 203'. Since the band 200' is more distal to the esophagus E, different and more distal trunks of the vagus nerves would be energized. Also, such a placement would permit the option of covering the anterior vagus nerve while not covering the posterior vagus nerve (or visa versa).
  • the benefits of vagal stimulation with resulting enteric rhythm management and the aforementioned benefits of blocking can be achieved without the need for extensive dissection of the vagus nerve. Further, the benefits can be achieved without the need for directly clamping electrodes on a vagus nerve, thereby reducing the possibility of injury to a vagus nerve.
  • the band 200 can also be used to restrict and potentially lengthen the esophagus thereby reducing possibilities for reflux as more fully described in commonly assigned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/600,080 filed June 20, 2003 and entitled “Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease” (GERD) Treatment Method and Apparatus”.
  • Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease Treatment Method and Apparatus.
  • Fig. 10 is particularly suitable for the treatment of obesity.
  • Obesity is of epidemic proportions and is associated with large decreases in life expectancy and early mortality.
  • Peeters, et al "Obesity in Adulthood and Its Consequences for Life Expectancy: A Life Table Analysis", Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 138, No. 1, pp. 24 - 32 (2003).
  • the upper band 200 is placed around the stomach near the cardiac notch CN.
  • Electrode array 202 may be de-activated (or not present on the band 200).
  • Lower anay 203 can be energized with a blocking signal.
  • the prior art suggests stimulating the vagas with a stimulating signal for treating obesity or eating disorders. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,188,104 to Wernicke et al, dated February 23, 1993; U.S. Pat. No. 5,263,480 to Wernicke et al, dated November 23, 1993; U.S. Pat. No. 6,587,719 to Barrett et al, dated July 1, 2003 and U.S. Pat. No.
  • vagotomy data in which truncal vagotomy patients have experienced weight loss and increased satiety. See, e.g., Rral, "Vagotomy as a Treatment for Morbid Obesity", Surg. Clinics of N. Amer., Vol. 59, No. 6, pp. 1131 - 1138 (1979) , Gortz, et al, "Truncal Vagotomy Reduces Food and Liquid Intake in Man", Physiology & Behavior, Vol. 48, pp.
  • the optional lower band 200' is placed lower on the stomach (e.g., close to the pylorus).
  • the lower electrode array 203' of the lower band 200' is energized with a stimulation signal to modulate intestinal motility in the event motility is otherwise impaired by the upper band blocking.
  • the upper anay 202' of the lower band 200' is energized with a blocking signal so that the stimulation signal at electrodes 203 ' does not interfere with the blocking effect of electrodes 203 of upper band 200.
  • the electrodes of the bands 200, 200' can be placed on constricting bands (such as the well-known Lap-Band ® system of Inamed Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, USA, and used in obesity treatment). More preferably, the bands 200, 200' are not constricting thereby minimizing erosion risks otherwise associated with highly constricting bands.
  • the neural blocking technology of the present invention can be incorporated into such constricting bands or used in conjunction other obesity surgeries or therapies.
  • these include obesity, ulcers or chronic pain or discomfort (alone or in combination with conjunctive procedures).
  • bulimia has been identified as a disease amenable to treatment by decreasing afferent vagal activity via pharmacological vagal inhibitors delivered systemically.
  • Faris, et al "Effect of Decreasing Afferent Vagal Activity with Ondansetron on Symptoms of Bulimia Nervosa: a Randomized, Double-Blind Trial", The Lancet, pp. 792 - 797 (2000). Therefore, bulimia and other diseases treatable with vagal blocker drags can be treated with the targeted and site-specific vagal neural block of the present invention.
  • Acute Treatment Device a. Device Description Figure 12 illustrates a still further embodiment of the present invention where a nasogastric tube 300 is passed into the stomach.
  • nasogastric tubes are well known and form no part of this invention per se.
  • Some nasogastric tubes have specialized functions.
  • An example is a tamponade tube having gastric and esophageal balloons.
  • An example of such is the Bard ® Minnesota Four Lumen Esophagogastric Tamponade Tube for the Control of Bleeding from Esophageal Varices as described in product literature (information for use) contained with the product of that name dated 1998 by C. R. Bard, Inc., Covmgton, GA, USA.
  • the nasogastric tube 300 is multi-lumen tube which includes distal openings 302 to which suction can be applied to remove gastric contents through the tube 300.
  • a compliant balloon 304 surrounds the gastric tube. Proximal to the balloon 304 is an opening 309 in communication with a lumen (not shown) to which a suction can be applied to remove saliva through the opening 309.
  • the balloon 304 has a plurality of electrodes which may include an upper array 306 of electrodes and a lower array 307 of stimulation electrodes.
  • the electrodes of the upper array 306 may be coimected to a blocking signal source via conductors 306a (Fig. 13).
  • the electrodes of the lower array 307 may be connected to a stimulation signal source via conductors 307a.
  • the conductors 306a, 307a may be passed through a lumen in the tube 300 to an external controller (not shown).
  • Fig. 14 shows an alternative design where the arrays 306, 307 are replaced with expandable, circumferential electrodes 306', 307' connected to a controller (not shown) by conductors 306a', 307a'.
  • the individual electrodes of the arrays 306, 307 may optionally be selectively energized to detect a cardiovascular signal indicating an electrical coupling of the electrodes to the vagus nerves AVN, PVN. Electrodes that do not create such a coupling may optionally be deactivated such that only the electrodes having an effective coupling with the vagus nerves AVN, PVN will be activated. Also, and as in the embodiment of Fig. 10, there may be a single array of electrodes or all electrodes may be energized with either a blocking or stimulation signal.
  • the electrodes are disposed abutting the mucosal surface of the esophageal and stomach lining and are not in direct contact with the vagus nerves AVN, PVN. Instead, the electrodes are spaced from the vagus nerves AVN, PVN by the thickness of the stomach and lower esophageal wall thickness.
  • Transmucosal electrical stimulation of nerves is well l ⁇ iown. Such stimulation is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,532,388 to Hill et al dated March 11, 2003 (describing transmucosal stimulation of nerves across a trachea using a balloon with electrodes in the trachea to modulate cardiac activity). Also, the phenomena of transmucosal electrical stimulation of nerves is described in Accarino, et al,
  • Fig. 15 and 16 Alternative embodiments of the transmucosal stimulation device of Fig. 12 are shown in Fig. 15 and 16.
  • the balloon 304' is conical in shape with a base end 304a' placed distally on the tube 300'. After expansion, the base end 304a' expands within the stomach S. The physician then pulls on the tube 300'.
  • the base end 304a' (which is larger in diameter than the esophagus E) abuts the stomach S at the cardiac notch CN acting as a stop. This insures the electrodes 305' (only a single array is shown for ease of illustration) abuts the mucosal tissue at the junction of the stomach S and esophagus E.
  • the electrodes 305' are on the narrow end 304b' of the balloon 304' and expansion of the balloon 304' ensures contact of the electrodes with the mucosal tissue.
  • Fig. 16 illustrates an embodiment using two balloons 304" and 309".
  • the distal balloon 309 when expanded, is larger than the esophagus E and acts as a stop when the physician pulls on the tube 300".
  • the electrodes 305" are on a smaller balloon 304" which may expand in the esophagus E.
  • the balloon 304", 309" are positioned for the electrodes 305 " to be against the mucosal tissue at the junction of the stomach S and esophagus E when the distal balloon 309" abuts the cardiac notch CN and the proximal balloon 304" is expanded.
  • the electrodes may be positioned to be completely within the stomach to reduce risk of injury to esophageal tissue. More conveniently, a tube such as the afore-mentioned Bard ® tube may be modified for electrodes to be placed on the proximal side of the gastric balloon.
  • a balloon is expanded to urge the electrodes against the mucosal tissue. While this is a presently preferred embodiment, any mechanism for urging the electrodes against the mucosal tissue may be used.
  • the tube 300', 300" is shown as it passes through the balloons 304', 304" and 309". This illustration is made to indicate the tube passes through the balloons and does terminate at the balloons, h fact, as the tube 300', 300" passes through the balloons 304', 304" and 309" it would be surrounded by the material of the balloons 304', 304" and 309" and would not be visible.
  • FIG. 17 A still further embodiment is shown in Fig. 17.
  • the nerves are stimulated with magnetic fields.
  • the electrodes are coils 307'" insulated within the balloon 304'".
  • the coils 307'" create magnetic fields which inductively couple with the vagus nerves to create the blocking and stimulating impulses within the nerves.
  • Fig. 13 Application to Acute Pancreatitis When energized with a blocking frequency, the embodiment of Fig. 13 is useful for treating acute or recurrent pancreatitis.
  • This extremely serious disease is characterized by an over-active pancreas which excretes digestive enzymes to such an extent that the pancreas itself is digested.
  • the disease can be extremely painful In many cases, the disease is fatal The number of US patients who suffer an episode of acute pancreatitis is approximately 185,000 annually. Baron, et al,
  • Pancreatitis maybe associated with a number of etiologies including chronic alcoholism or gallstones (e.g., gallstones lodged in the pancreatic or common duct). When acute pancreatitis becomes severe, treatment options are severely limited. Morbidity and mortality rates for pancreatitis are sobering. Baron, et al, "Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis", New England J. of Medicine, Vol. 340, No. 18, pp. 1412 - 1417 (1999) and Steer et al, "Chronic Pancreatitis", New England J. of Medicine, pp. 1482 - 1490 (1995).
  • Zapater, et al "Do Muscarinic Receptors Play a Role in Acute Pancreatitis?", Clin. Drug Invest., 20(6), pp. 401 - 408 (2000); Norton, et al, "Optimizing Outcomes in Acute Pancreatitis", Drags, 61(11), pp. 1581 - 1591 (2001).
  • Atropine is a drag that blocks parasympathetic nerve endings. It is known to be desirable to use atropine in acute pancreatitis patients to down-regulate pancreatic activity. Unfortunately, for most such patients, this drug cannot be used due to its many side effects.
  • Acute pancreatitis patients may be placed on intravenous feeding with the device 300 left in place for a chronic length of time (e.g., several days or weeks). At least the electrodes of the lower array 307 may be energized with a blocking signal for the treatment of acute pancreatitis.
  • the invention permits down-regulation of pancreatic output through vagal blocking without the need for undesirable surgery for direct vagal access.
  • the present invention may be used to avoid pancreatitis in patients having an increased likelihood of developing the disease.
  • patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and/or related procedures are known to having a higher likelihood of developing pancreatitis.
  • ERCP endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
  • Such patients may be treated with the present invention with a blocking signal to down-regulate pancreatic output and reduce the likelihood of developing pancreatitis.
  • Many physicians treating patients with pancreatitis use a nasogastric tube as part of the treatment.
  • the present invention is illustrated as being incorporated on a nasogastric tube.
  • pancreatitis patients benefit from a feeding involving placing nourishment directly into the jejunum portion of the small intestine via a naso- jejunal tube.
  • the present invention is illustrated in an embodiment of placement of the balloon and electrodes on a naso-gastric tube, the invention can also be placed on a nasojejunal tube or a nasogastricjejunal tube.
  • the distal electrodes 307 may be energized with a stimulation frequency as described for treatment of ileus.
  • ileus which is a dysfunction of the GI tract characterized in part by a lack of motility through the intestines. Prolonged ileus can result in stasis and serious infection.
  • Kaiser "Gallstone Ileus", New England J. of Medicine, Vol. 336, No. 12, pp. 879 - 880 (1997) (correspondence), Taguchi, et al, "Selective Postoperative Inhibition of Gastrointestinal Opioid Receptors", New England J. of Medicine, Vol.
  • the present invention can be used as the nasogastric tube with the addition of stimulation electrodes to stimulate the vagus to enhance motility.
  • the embodiment of Fig. 12 would permit the lower electrodes 307 to be energized for stimulation frequency to treat ileus.
  • the upper electrodes 306 can be energized for blocking frequency if needed to prevent antidromic inhibitory responses or to prevent undesired cardiac response.
  • the embodiment of Fig. 12 - 16 is useful to permit a diagnosis for a surgical implants as described in foregoing embodiments. Namely, responsiveness of a patient's gastro-intestinal symptoms (such as IBS) to the embodiment of Fig. 12 could justify a more invasive surgical placement of electrodes directly on the anterior or posterior vagus nerves.
  • a blocking or stimulating signal can be applied to the electrode
  • a blocking frequency is anticipated to be a therapeutic value for treating, for example, acute pancreatitis or an exacerbation of chronic pancreatitis.
  • a stimulating frequency is anticipated to be of therapeutic value for treating ileus. With the embodiment of Fig. 12, ileus, for example, can be treated by applying a stimulation frequency to the lower electrode 307.
  • a blocking frequency to the upper electrode 306 can be used to block antidromic responses or to block adverse side effects of the stimulation signal on proximal organs (e.g., cardiac responses). 4. Diagnostic Device
  • Fig. 18 illustrates a still further embodiment of the present invention where a stimulating electrode 400 is placed near a distal end of an esophageal gastric duodenal (EGD) scope 402. Leads (not shown) pass through the scope 402 connecting the electrode 400 to a controller (not shown).
  • ESD esophageal gastric duodenal
  • Stimulation may be applied via the electrode 400 for transmucosal stimulation of an opposing vagus nerve (AVN in Fig. 18).
  • APN opposing vagus nerve
  • Proper placement to achieve stimulation can be identified through the previously described techniques of identifying a cardiovascular response to the stimulation indicating appropriate opposition of the electrode 400 to a vagus nerve.
  • the scope may be left in place or may be removed by placing the electrode attached to the mucosal wall (Fig. 19) through a pigtail or other attachment (such as an adhesive) with leads passing through the nostril or mouth.
  • the electrode 400 may be kept in place positioned underneath the mucosal layer and may be energized by radio frequencies applied externally.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)
  • Pharmaceuticals Containing Other Organic And Inorganic Compounds (AREA)

Abstract

Selon l'invention, au moins un trouble d'une pluralité de troubles d'un patient associés à une activité vagale innervant au moins un organe de la pluralité d'organes du patient au niveau d'un site d'innervation est traité par positionnement d'un support neurostimulateur dans une lumière corporelle du patient. Une électrode disposée sur le support est positionnée sur une couche de muqueuse de la lumière. Un signal électrique est appliqué sur l'électrode afin de moduler une activité vagale selon une quantité sélectionnée pour traiter le trouble. Le signal peut être un signal de blocage ou de stimulation.
PCT/US2004/002849 2003-02-03 2004-01-30 Electrode intraluminale WO2004069332A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/358,093 US20040172084A1 (en) 2003-02-03 2003-02-03 Method and apparatus for treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD)
US10/358,093 2003-02-03
US10/752,940 US7444183B2 (en) 2003-02-03 2004-01-06 Intraluminal electrode apparatus and method
US10/752,940 2004-01-06

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2004069332A1 true WO2004069332A1 (fr) 2004-08-19
WO2004069332A9 WO2004069332A9 (fr) 2004-11-25

Family

ID=32853099

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2004/002849 WO2004069332A1 (fr) 2003-02-03 2004-01-30 Electrode intraluminale

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2004069332A1 (fr)

Cited By (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7678068B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2010-03-16 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Atraumatic delivery devices
US7682330B2 (en) 2003-12-09 2010-03-23 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Intestinal sleeve
US7695446B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2010-04-13 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Methods of treatment using a bariatric sleeve
US7758535B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2010-07-20 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Bariatric sleeve delivery devices
US7766973B2 (en) 2005-01-19 2010-08-03 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Eversion resistant sleeves
US7766861B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2010-08-03 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Anti-obesity devices
US7771382B2 (en) 2005-01-19 2010-08-10 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Resistive anti-obesity devices
US7815591B2 (en) 2004-09-17 2010-10-19 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Atraumatic gastrointestinal anchor
US7819836B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2010-10-26 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Resistive anti-obesity devices
US7837643B2 (en) 2004-07-09 2010-11-23 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Methods and devices for placing a gastrointestinal sleeve
US7976488B2 (en) 2005-06-08 2011-07-12 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Gastrointestinal anchor compliance
US8057420B2 (en) 2003-12-09 2011-11-15 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Gastrointestinal implant with drawstring
US8137301B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2012-03-20 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Bariatric sleeve
US8801647B2 (en) 2007-02-22 2014-08-12 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Use of a gastrointestinal sleeve to treat bariatric surgery fistulas and leaks
US9526648B2 (en) 2010-06-13 2016-12-27 Synerz Medical, Inc. Intragastric device for treating obesity
US10413436B2 (en) 2010-06-13 2019-09-17 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Intragastric device for treating obesity
US10420665B2 (en) 2010-06-13 2019-09-24 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Intragastric device for treating obesity
US10779980B2 (en) 2016-04-27 2020-09-22 Synerz Medical, Inc. Intragastric device for treating obesity
US11135078B2 (en) 2010-06-13 2021-10-05 Synerz Medical, Inc. Intragastric device for treating obesity

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5263480A (en) * 1991-02-01 1993-11-23 Cyberonics, Inc. Treatment of eating disorders by nerve stimulation
US5292344A (en) * 1992-07-10 1994-03-08 Douglas Donald D Percutaneously placed electrical gastrointestinal pacemaker stimulatory system, sensing system, and pH monitoring system, with optional delivery port
WO2002026320A1 (fr) * 2000-09-26 2002-04-04 Medtronic, Inc. Procede et systeme de stimulation endotracheale/oesophagienne avant et pendant une procedure medicale
US20020087192A1 (en) * 2001-01-02 2002-07-04 Barrett Burke T. Treatment of obesity by sub-diaphragmatic nerve stimulation

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5263480A (en) * 1991-02-01 1993-11-23 Cyberonics, Inc. Treatment of eating disorders by nerve stimulation
US5292344A (en) * 1992-07-10 1994-03-08 Douglas Donald D Percutaneously placed electrical gastrointestinal pacemaker stimulatory system, sensing system, and pH monitoring system, with optional delivery port
WO2002026320A1 (fr) * 2000-09-26 2002-04-04 Medtronic, Inc. Procede et systeme de stimulation endotracheale/oesophagienne avant et pendant une procedure medicale
US20020087192A1 (en) * 2001-01-02 2002-07-04 Barrett Burke T. Treatment of obesity by sub-diaphragmatic nerve stimulation

Cited By (46)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8137301B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2012-03-20 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Bariatric sleeve
US9901474B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2018-02-27 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Anti-obesity devices
US7695446B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2010-04-13 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Methods of treatment using a bariatric sleeve
US7758535B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2010-07-20 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Bariatric sleeve delivery devices
US9750596B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2017-09-05 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Bariatric sleeve
US7766861B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2010-08-03 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Anti-obesity devices
US9278020B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2016-03-08 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Methods of treatment using a bariatric sleeve
US9155609B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2015-10-13 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Bariatric sleeve
US8882698B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2014-11-11 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Anti-obesity devices
US8870806B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2014-10-28 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Methods of treatment using a bariatric sleeve
US7678068B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2010-03-16 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Atraumatic delivery devices
US7935073B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2011-05-03 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Methods of treatment using a bariatric sleeve
US8486153B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2013-07-16 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Anti-obesity devices
US8162871B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2012-04-24 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Bariatric sleeve
US8771219B2 (en) 2003-12-09 2014-07-08 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Gastrointestinal implant with drawstring
US9084669B2 (en) 2003-12-09 2015-07-21 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Methods and apparatus for anchoring within the gastrointestinal tract
US8057420B2 (en) 2003-12-09 2011-11-15 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Gastrointestinal implant with drawstring
US7981163B2 (en) 2003-12-09 2011-07-19 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Intestinal sleeve
US8303669B2 (en) 2003-12-09 2012-11-06 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Methods and apparatus for anchoring within the gastrointestinal tract
US7682330B2 (en) 2003-12-09 2010-03-23 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Intestinal sleeve
US9744061B2 (en) 2003-12-09 2017-08-29 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Intestinal sleeve
US8628583B2 (en) 2003-12-09 2014-01-14 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Methods and apparatus for anchoring within the gastrointestinal tract
US9585783B2 (en) 2003-12-09 2017-03-07 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Methods and apparatus for anchoring within the gastrointestinal tract
US9237944B2 (en) 2003-12-09 2016-01-19 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Intestinal sleeve
US8834405B2 (en) 2003-12-09 2014-09-16 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Intestinal sleeve
US7815589B2 (en) 2003-12-09 2010-10-19 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Methods and apparatus for anchoring within the gastrointestinal tract
US9095416B2 (en) 2003-12-09 2015-08-04 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Removal and repositioning devices
US7837643B2 (en) 2004-07-09 2010-11-23 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Methods and devices for placing a gastrointestinal sleeve
US7815591B2 (en) 2004-09-17 2010-10-19 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Atraumatic gastrointestinal anchor
US7766973B2 (en) 2005-01-19 2010-08-03 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Eversion resistant sleeves
US7771382B2 (en) 2005-01-19 2010-08-10 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Resistive anti-obesity devices
US8920358B2 (en) 2005-01-19 2014-12-30 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Resistive anti-obesity devices
US8096966B2 (en) 2005-01-19 2012-01-17 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Eversion resistant sleeves
US8425451B2 (en) 2005-06-08 2013-04-23 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Gastrointestinal anchor compliance
US7976488B2 (en) 2005-06-08 2011-07-12 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Gastrointestinal anchor compliance
US7819836B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2010-10-26 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Resistive anti-obesity devices
US8801647B2 (en) 2007-02-22 2014-08-12 Gi Dynamics, Inc. Use of a gastrointestinal sleeve to treat bariatric surgery fistulas and leaks
US9526648B2 (en) 2010-06-13 2016-12-27 Synerz Medical, Inc. Intragastric device for treating obesity
US10420665B2 (en) 2010-06-13 2019-09-24 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Intragastric device for treating obesity
US10413436B2 (en) 2010-06-13 2019-09-17 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Intragastric device for treating obesity
US10512557B2 (en) 2010-06-13 2019-12-24 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Intragastric device for treating obesity
US11135078B2 (en) 2010-06-13 2021-10-05 Synerz Medical, Inc. Intragastric device for treating obesity
US11351050B2 (en) 2010-06-13 2022-06-07 Synerz Medical, Inc. Intragastric device for treating obesity
US11596538B2 (en) 2010-06-13 2023-03-07 Synerz Medical, Inc. Intragastric device for treating obesity
US11607329B2 (en) 2010-06-13 2023-03-21 Synerz Medical, Inc. Intragastric device for treating obesity
US10779980B2 (en) 2016-04-27 2020-09-22 Synerz Medical, Inc. Intragastric device for treating obesity

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2004069332A9 (fr) 2004-11-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9586046B2 (en) Electrode band system and methods of using the system to treat obesity
AU2009245845B2 (en) Electrode band
EP1603634B1 (fr) Bande d'electrode
US7844338B2 (en) High frequency obesity treatment
WO2004069332A1 (fr) Electrode intraluminale
AU2011265519B2 (en) Electrode band

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
COP Corrected version of pamphlet

Free format text: PAGES 1/13-13/13, DRAWINGS, REPLACED BY NEW PAGES 1/12-12/12; DUE TO LATE TRANSMITTAL BY THE RECEIVING OFFICE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
DPEN Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101)