WO2004057957A2

WO2004057957A2 - Method for increasing the efficacy of agricultural chemicals

Info

Publication number: WO2004057957A2
Application number: PCT/US2003/040089
Authority: WO
Inventors: Zhong-Min Wei
Original assignee: Eden Bioscience Corporation
Priority date: 2002-12-16
Filing date: 2003-12-15
Publication date: 2004-07-15
Also published as: EP1581057A2; US8232228B2; WO2004057957A3; EP1581057A4; US20070037705A1; AU2003297197A8; AU2003297197A1

Abstract

The present invention is directed to increasing the efficacy of agricultural chemicals. This can be achieved by applying at least one agricultural chemical to a plant or plant seed under conditions effective for the agricultural chemical to perform its intended function and applying at least one hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide to the plant or plant seed under conditions effective to increase the efficacy of the agricultural chemical. Alternatively, the present invention relates to a method for increasing the efficacy of agricultural chemicals by applying an agricultural chemical to a transgenic plants or transgenic seeds transformed with nucleic acid molecule which encodes a hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide, wherein the agricultural chemical is applied under conditions effective for the agricultural chemical to perform its intended function but with increased efficacy.

Description

METHOD FOR INCREASING THE EFFICACY OF AGRICULTURAL

CHEMICALS

FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention relates to methods of increasing the efficacy of commonly used agricultural chemicals.

BACKGROUND

Modern agricultural practices rely heavily on the use of chemical inputs to maintain and increase productivity. Agricultural chemical inputs can be broadly categorized as pesticides, fertilizers, and plant growth regulators. Based on monetary expenditure, as well as physical volumes, the vast majority of chemical inputs are in the form of pesticides and fertilizers. In the common agricultural sense, pests are any organisms that contribute to a loss of value or productivity in a crop. Pesticides can be categorized into; insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, as well as minor categories such as acaricides, avicides, virucides, and nematicides. In 1996, U.S. farmers spent over $8.5 billion on pesticides. This translates to the use of over 355 million pounds of herbicides, 70 million pounds of insecticides, and 180 million pounds of fungicides and other pesticides in 1996 alone (Fernandez-Conejo and Jans, "Pest Management in the U.S. Agriculture." Resource Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of agriculture. Agricultural Handbook No. 717.). With some exceptions, fertilizers are typically characterized as substances containing plant macronutrients or plant micronutrients, and are used in as proportionally as large of volumes as pesticides. In 1997, approximately 22 million tons of nutrients were applied in the United States alone (Data from the Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture). Plant growth regulators are a class of agricultural chemical inputs whose use is minor compared to pesticides and fertilizers. Nonetheless, plant growth regulators have significant importance in specific agricultural sectors such as fruit production and ornamentals. Though the increase in use of agricultural chemicals has directly contributed to an increase in productivity, the increased productivity has not come without a price. Most pesticides present inherent human and environmental health risks. Increasingly, municipalities are identifying hazardous agricultural chemicals, or their residues, in local water sources, streams, and lakes. In addition, the high volumes of pesticides being applied results in the development of pest resistance to the agricultural chemical being applied. Incidences of pest resistance have been documented in most classes of pesticide and a wide range of crop types. Resistance occurs after persistent use of a pesticide or closely related pesticides has decimated a local population of pests, but left a small sub-population of the same pest surviving. The sub-population, either through human pressure or natural divergence of ecotypes, has evolved to be less affected or resistant to the pesticide or closely related pesticides. After repeated cycles of heavy use of the pesticide, decimation of the local population, and survival of the resistant sub-populations, the resistant sub-population eventually multiplies to become the dominant population. The end result being, an entire pest population that is resistant to a given pesticide or closely related pesticides. A once effective and important pesticide is essentially rendered useless to the farmer or commercial grower. Prior to recognition of the actual existence of a resistant pest, the grower having recognized a decrease in efficacy of a pesticide will often intuitively increase the amount of pesticide being applied. Thus, compounding the situation by furthering the propagation of resistant pest through increased use of the pesticide, decreasing the profitability of the crop because of increased purchases of chemical inputs, and simultaneously increasing the human and environmental health risks. Greater crop yields, resulting from an increased use of fertilizers, have not come without detrimental effects either. Fertilizers are applied to cropland to replenish or add nutrients that are needed by an existing or future crop. The vast majority of the nutrients applied are in the form of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potash (i.e. potassium). Depending on a combination of factor such as the soil's chemical structure, pH, and texture; fertilizer components can be highly susceptible to leaching. Leaching occurs when the amount of water present in the soil, either from irrigation of rainfall, is greater than the soil's water-holding capacity. When this occurs, solubilized fertilizer components are carried low into the soil and out of the plant root zone, thus effectively removing the nutrients for use by the plant. Nitrate-nitrogen (NO₃ ^~) is particularly prone to leaching, and can result in hazardous nitrate accumulation in groundwater. In the U.S. and abroad, cropland is commonly over- fertilized. Soil nutrient analysis is often viewed as timely and not economically feasible. Thus, fertilizers are often applied at regular intervals regardless of their need. As with pesticides, the over use of the fertilizers has potentially far reaching detrimental effect on agricultural profitability and risk to environmental health.

In recent years, farmers and agricultural researchers have begun to develop programs and techniques to aid in combating the cycles of increased chemical inputs and decreased profitability. These programs and techniques are commonly referred to as Integrated Pest Management (IPM), or more broadly, Integrated Crop Management (ICM). ICM programs and techniques are being advanced by a range of organizations including; the USD A, land-grant universities and the private sector. ICM Programs are specifically designed with respect to crop type, local environmental conditions, and local pest pressures. In contrast to previous agricultural practices, ICM practices draw on a broad range of techniques and tools including; early and persistent monitoring of pest populations, establishment of acceptable pest population thresholds, the development of chemical control programs that routinely rotate the chemicals being utilized, establishment of cultural control techniques (e.g. adjusting planting and harvesting dates, no-till systems, crop rotation, etc.), promotion of the use of specific plant varieties or transgenic plants, and the development of biological controls techniques (e.g. use of beneficial insects, use of pheromones traps, use of live micro-organisms such as Bacillius thuringensis, etc.). Although ICM practices show great promise for combating many of the problems associated with the high chemical input of modern agricultural practices, the ability to increase the efficacy of the commonly used agricultural chemicals would greatly aid in the over all effort. Increased efficacy would provide greater pest control and or facilitate decreases in the volume of agricultural chemicals used.

As evident from the above discussion, modern agricultural practices dictate the need to apply several agricultural chemicals, often repeatedly, to a single crop over the course of a growing season. To facilitate this need to apply numerous chemicals to a single crop, it has become routine practice to make what is referred to as tank mixes. Tank mixes are a single application of one or more chemical at the same time. The agricultural chemicals that are desired to be applied are combined into one tank, mixed, soluablized if needed, and applied to the crop. There are limitations to this practice in that some agricultural chemicals are not compatible and may precipitate, become inactive, or decrease the efficacy of other chemicals when mixed together. Pesticide interactions are typically characterized as additive, synergistic, antagonistic, and enhancement. Additive effects occur when the combination of two pesticides produces the same amount of control as the combined effects of each of the chemicals applies independently. Synergistic effects occur when the combined effects of the chemicals is greater than the additive effects. It is assumed that in synergistic pesticide interactions the chemicals are not neutral to one another, and to some extent are chemically interacting with one another. Antagonistic effects are those resulting when the combination of chemicals is less than if the chemicals were used individually. Enhanced effects can occur when a pesticide is combined with an additive that is not a pesticide and the resulting control of the desired pest is greater than if the pesticide was used individually. Factor such as the quantity of water used, the order of mixing the chemicals, and the addition of ajuvants may also affect the utility of a tank mix (Petroff, "Pesticide Interaction and Compatibility," Montana State University).

The present invention is directed towards improving the efficacy of agricultural chemicals.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a method for increasing the efficacy of agricultural chemicals. In one embodiment of the present invention, the method is carried out by applying at least one agricultural chemical and at least one least one hypersensitive response elicitor proetien or peptide to a plant or plant seed under conditions effective to increase the efficacy of the agricultural chemical.

In addition, the present invention relates to a method for increasing the efficacy of agricultural chemicals by applying one or more agricultural chemicals to a transgenic plants or transgenic seeds transformed with a nucleic acid molecule which encodes a hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide under conditions effective for the agricultural chemical to perform its intended function but with increased efficacy.

By the present invention, the efficacy of an agricultural chemical is increased. In achieving this objective, the present invention enables the grower to more effectively manage their crops with respect to fertilizers and plant growth regulators and to more effectively control pests such as insects, fungus, disease, and weeds. As a result of the increased efficacy in controlling common pest problems, growers can reduce yield losses resulting from pest problems. In addition, the present invention enables growers to utilize lower quantities of commonly utilized agricultural chemicals while maintaining or increasing yields. The reduction of agricultural chemical use will also result in profound health and ecological benefits.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Agricultural chemicals, according to the present invention, can be divided into several broad categories pesticides, fertilizers, and plant growth regulators. Pesticides, perhaps the most diverse category of agricultural chemicals, can be subdivided into categories based on the type of pest or organism which they are intended to control, such as; insecticides, intended for the control of insect; fungicides, intended for the control of fungi; herbicides, intended for the control of noxious weeds and plants; acaricides, intended for the control of arachnids or spiders; virucides intended fo the control of viruses; and nematicides, intended for the control ofnematodes.

For use in accordance with this method, suitable insecticides include but, are not limited to those listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Common Agricultural Insecticides

Table 1 is intended as an example. Alternative example product names and classifications exist for the active ingredients cited and would fall within the scope of the present invention.

For use in accordance with this method, suitable fungicides include those listed in Table 2. In addition to Table 2, suitable fungicides include various forms of organic and inorganic copper. Examples of suitable copper compounds include, copper ammonium, copper hydroxide, copper oxychloride, and copper-zinc- chromate.

Table 2. Common Agricultural Fungicides

Table 2 is intended as an example. Alternative example product names and classifications exist for the active ingredients cited and would fall within the scope of the present invention.

For use in accordance with this method, suitable herbicides include, but are not limited to those listed in Tables 3 and 4. Table 3 outlines a Site of Action Classification of Herbicides and is based on the classification system developed by the Weed Science Society of America (WSSA). The herbicide's site of action is defined as the specific biochemical process in the plant that the herbicide acts upon or disrupts. For example, an herbicide containing the active ingredient primisulfuron, has a site of action classification number 2. Table 3 indicates that a Classification Number 2 has as its site of action actolactate synthase inhibition.

Table 3. Herbicide Site of Action and Classification Numbers.

Table 4 is intended as an example. Alternative example product names and classifications exist for the active ingredients cited and would fall within the scope of the present invention.

For use in accordance with this method, suitable fertilizers include, but are not limited to those containing plant micronutrients (molybdenum, copper, zinc, manganese, iron, boron, cobalt, and chlorine) and plant macronutrients (sulfur, phosphorus, magnesium, calcium, potassium, and nitrogen). Numerous combinations and forms of plant macro and micronutrients exist and are available in a wide range of formulations. The predominant fertilizers used in agriculture contain various combinations and concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. Micronutrient specific fertilizers are also common and may contain a single micronutrient or a combination of several micronutrients.

For use in accordance with this method, suitable plant growth regulators include, but are not limited to those containing various form and combinations of auxins, cytokinins, defoliants, gibberellins, ethylene releaser, growth inhibitors, growth retardants, and growth stimulators. Specific plant growth regulators include but are not limited to those listed in Table 5.

Table 5. Common Plant Growth Regulators

Table 5 is intended as an example. Alternative example product names and classifications exist for the active ingredients cited and would fall within the scope of the present invention.

For use in accordance with these methods, suitable hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide are from bacterial sources including, without limitation, Erwinia species (e.g., Erwinia amylovora, Erwinia chrysanthemi, Erwinia stewartii, Erwinia carotovora, etc.), Pseudomonas species (e.g., Pseudomonas syringae, Pseudomonas solanacearum, etc.), and Xanthomonas species (e.g., Xanthomonas campestris).

The hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide is derived, preferably, from Erwinia chrysanthemi, Erwinia amylovora, Pseudomonas syringae, Pseudomonas solanacearum, ox Xanthomonas campestris.

A hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide from Erwinia chrysanthemi has an amino acid sequence corresponding to SEQ. ID. No. 1 as follows:

Met Gin lie Thr lie Lys Ala His lie Gly Gly Asp Leu Gly Val Ser 1 5 10 15

Gly Leu Gly Ala Gin Gly Leu Lys Gly Leu Asn Ser Ala Ala Ser Ser 20 25 30

Leu Gly Ser Ser Val Asp Lys Leu Ser Ser Thr lie Asp Lys Leu Thr 35 40 45

Ser Ala Leu Thr Ser Met Met Phe Gly Gly Ala Leu Ala Gin Gly Leu 50 55 60

Gly Ala Ser Ser Lys Gly Leu Gly Met Ser Asn Gin Leu Gly Gin Ser 65 70 75 80

Phe Gly Asn Gly Ala Gin Gly Ala Ser Asn Leu Leu Ser Val Pro Lys 85 90 95

Ser Gly Gly Asp Ala Leu Ser Lys Met Phe Asp Lys Ala Leu Asp Asp 100 105 110

Leu Leu Gly His Asp Thr Val Thr Lys Leu Thr Asn Gin Ser Asn Gin 115 120 125

Leu Ala Asn Ser Met Leu Asn Ala Ser Gin Met Thr Gin Gly Asn Met 130 135 140

Asn Ala Phe Gly Ser Gly Val Asn Asn Ala Leu Ser Ser lie Leu Gly 145 150 155 160

Asn Gly Leu Gly Gin Ser Met Ser Gly Phe Ser Gin Pro Ser Leu Gly 165 170 175 Ala Gly Gly Leu Gin Gly Leu Ser Gly Ala Gly Ala Phe Asn Gin Leu

180 185 190

Gly Asn Ala He Gly Met Gly Val Gly Gin Asn Ala Ala Leu Ser Ala 195 200 205

Leu Ser Asn Val Ser Thr His Val Asp Gly Asn Asn Arg His Phe Val 210 215 220

Asp Lys Glu Asp Arg Gly Met Ala Lys Glu He Gly Gin Phe Met Asp 225 230 235 240

Gin Tyr Pro Glu He Phe Gly Lys Pro Glu Tyr Gin Lys Asp Gly Trp 245 250 255

Ser Ser Pro Lys Thr Asp Asp Lys Ser Trp Ala Lys Ala Leu Ser Lys 260 265 270

Pro Asp Asp Asp Gly Met Thr Gly Ala Ser Met Asp Lys Phe Arg Gin 275 280 285 Ala Met Gly Met He Lys Ser Ala Val Ala Gly Asp Thr Gly Asn Thr 290 295 300

Asn Leu Asn Leu Arg Gly Ala Gly Gly Ala Ser Leu Gly He Asp Ala 305 310 315 320

Ala Val Val Gly Asp Lys He Ala Asn Met Ser Leu Gly Lys Leu Ala 325 - 330 335

Asn Ala

This hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide has a molecular weight of 34 kDa, is heat stable, has a glycine content of greater than 16%, and contains substantially no cysteine. This Erwinia chrysanthemi hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide is encoded by a DNA molecule having a nucleotide sequence corresponding to SEQ. ID. No. 2 as follows:

cgattttacc cgggtgaacg tgctatgacc gacagcatca cggtattcga caccgttacg 60 gcgtttatgg ccgcgatgaa ccggcatcag gcggcgcgct ggtcgccgca atccggcgtc 120 gatctggtat ttcagtttgg ggacaccggg cgtgaactca tgatgcagat tcagccgggg 180 cagcaatatc ccggcatgtt gcgcacgctg ctcgctcgtc gttatcagca ggcggcagag 240 tgcgatggct gccatctgtg cctgaacggc agcgatgtat tgatcctctg gtggccgctg 300 ccgtcggatc ccggcagtta tccgcaggtg atcgaacgtt tgtttgaact ggcgggaatg 360 acgttgccgt cgctatccat agcaccgacg gcgcgtccgc agacagggaa cggacgcgcc 420 cgatcattaa gataaaggcg gcttttttta ttgcaaaacg gtaacggtga ggaaccgttt 480 caccgtcggc gtcactcagt aacaagtatc catcatgatg cctacatcgg gatcggcgtg 540 ggcatccgtt gcagatactt ttgcgaacac ctgacatgaa tgaggaaacg aaattatgca 600 aattacgatc aaagcgcaca tcggcggtga tttgggcgtc tccggtctgg ggctgggtgc 660 tcagggactg aaaggactga attccgcggc ttcatcgctg ggttccagcg tggataaact 720 gagcagcacc atcgataagt tgacctccgc gctgacttcg atgatgtttg gcggcgcgct 780 ggcgcagggg ctgggcgcca gctcgaaggg gctggggatg agcaatcaac tgggccagtc 840 tttcggcaat ggcgcgcagg gtgcgagcaa cctgctatcc gtaccgaaat ccggcggcga 900 tgcgttgtca aaaatgtttg ataaagcgct ggacgatctg ctgggtcatg acaccgtgac 960 caagctgact aaccagagca accaactggc taattcaatg ctgaacgcca gccagatgac 1020 ccagggtaat atgaatgcgt tcggcagcgg tgtgaacaac gcactgtcgt ccattctcgg 1080 caacggtctc ggccagtcga tgagtggctt ctctcagcct tctctggggg caggcggctt 1140 gcagggcctg agcggcgcgg gtgcattcaa ccagttgggt aatgccatcg gcatgggcgt 1200 ggggcagaat gctgcgctga gtgcgttgag taacgtcagc acccacgtag acggtaacaa 1260 ccgccacttt gtagataaag aagatcgcgg catggcgaaa gagatcggcc agtttatgga 1320 tcagtatccg gaaatattcg gtaaaccgga ataccagaaa gatggctgga gttcgccgaa 1380 gacggacgac aaatcctggg ctaaagcgct gagtaaaccg gatgatgacg gtatgaccgg 1440 cgccagcatg gacaaattcc gtcaggcgat gggtatgatc aaaagcgcgg tggcgggtga 1500 taccggcaat accaacctga acctgcgtgg cgcgggcggt gcatcgctgg gtatcgatgc 1560 ggctgtcgtc ggcgataaaa tagccaacat gtcgctgggt aagctggcca acgcctgata 1620 atctgtgctg gcctgataaa gcggaaacga aaaaagagac ggggaagcct gtctcttttc 1680 ttattatgcg gtttatgcgg ttacctggac cggttaatca tcgtcatcga tctggtacaa 1740 acgcacattt tcccgttcat tcgcgtcgtt acgcgccaca atcgcgatgg catcttcctc 1800 gtcgctcaga ttgcgcggct gatggggaac gccgggtgga atatagagaa actcgccggc 1860 cagatggaga cacgtctgcg ataaatctgt gccgtaacgt gtttctatcc gcccctttag 1920 cagatagatt gcggtttcgt aatcaacatg gtaatgcggt tccgcctgtg cgccggccgg 1980 gatcaccaca atattcatag aaagctgtct tgcacctacc gtatcgcggg agataccgac 2040 aaaatagggc agtttttgcg tggtatccgt ggggtgttcc ggcctgacaa tcttgagttg 2100 gttcgtcatc atctttctcc atctgggcga cctgatcggt t 2141

The above nucleotide and amino acid sequences are disclosed and further described in U.S. PatentNo.5,850,015 to Bauer et al. and U.S. Patent No.5,776,889 to Wei et al, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. One particular hypersensitive response elicitor protein, known as harpin_Ea, is commercially available from Eden Bioscience Corporation (Bothell, Washington) under the name of Messenger^®. Messenger contains 3% by weight of harpin_Ea as the active ingredient and 97% by weight inert ingredients. HarpinEa is one type of hypersensitive response elicitor protein from Erwinia amylovora. Harpin_Ea has an amino acid sequence corresponding to SEQ. ID. No. 3 as follows:

Met Ser Leu Asn Thr Ser Gly Leu Gly Ala Ser Thr Met Gin He Ser 1 5 10 15 He Gly Gly Ala Gly Gly Asn Asn Gly Leu Leu Gly Thr Ser Arg Gin

20 25 30

Asn Ala Gly Leu Gly Gly Asn Ser Ala Leu Gly Leu Gly Gly Gly Asn 35 40 45

Gin Asn Asp Thr Val Asn Gin Leu Ala Gly Leu Leu Thr Gly Met Met 50 55 60

Met Met Met Ser Met Met Gly Gly Gly Gly Leu Met Gly Gly Gly Leu 65 70 75 80

Gly Gly Gly Leu Gly Asn Gly Leu Gly Gly Ser Gly Gly Leu Gly Glu 85 90 95 Gly Leu Ser Asn Ala Leu Asn Asp Met Leu Gly Gly Ser Leu Asn Thr

100 105 110

Leu Gly Ser Lys Gly Gly Asn Asn Thr Thr Ser Thr Thr Asn Ser Pro 115 120 125

Leu Asp Gin Ala Leu Gly He Asn Ser Thr Ser Gin Asn Asp Asp Ser 130 135 140

Thr Ser Gly Thr Asp Ser Thr Ser Asp Ser Ser Asp Pro Met Gin Gin 145 150 155 160

Leu Leu Lys Met Phe Ser Glu He Met Gin Ser Leu Phe Gly Asp Gly 165 170 175 Gin Asp Gly Thr Gin Gly Ser Ser Ser Gly Gly Lys Gin Pro Thr Glu

180 185 190

Gly Glu Gin Asn Ala Tyr Lys Lys Gly Val Thr Asp Ala Leu Ser Gly 195 200 205

Leu Met Gly Asn Gly Leu Ser Gin Leu Leu Gly Asn Gly Gly Leu Gly 210 215 220

Gly Gly Gin Gly Gly Asn Ala Gly Thr Gly Leu Asp Gly Ser Ser Leu 225 230 235 240

Gly Gly Lys Gly Leu Gin Asn Leu Ser Gly Pro Val Asp Tyr Gin Gin 245 250 255 Leu Gly Asn Ala Val Gly Thr Gly He Gly Met Lys Ala Gly He Gin

260 265 270

Ala Leu Asn Asp He Gly Thr His Arg His Ser Ser Thr Arg Ser Phe 275 280 285

Val Asn Lys Gly Asp Arg Ala Met Ala Lys Glu He Gly Gin Phe Met 290 295 300

Asp Gin Tyr Pro Glu Val Phe Gly Lys Pro Gin Tyr Gin Lys Gly Pro 305 310 315 320

Gly Gin Glu Val Lys Thr Asp Asp Lys Ser Trp Ala Lys Ala Leu Ser 325 330 335

Lys Pro Asp Asp Asp Gly Met Thr Pro Ala Ser Met Glu Gin Phe Asn 340 345 350

Lys Ala Lys Gly Met He Lys Arg Pro Met Ala Gly Asp Thr Gly Asn 355 360 365

Gly Asn Leu Gin Ala Arg Gly Ala Gly Gly Ser Ser Leu Gly He Asp 370 375 380

Ala Met Met Ala Gly Asp Ala He Asn Asn Met Ala Leu Gly Lys Leu 385 390 395 400

Gly Ala Ala

This hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide has a molecular weight of about 39 kDa, has a pl of approximately 4.3, and is heat stable at 100°C for at least 10 minutes. This hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide has substantially no cysteine. The hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide derived from Erwinia amylovora is more fully described in Wei, Z-M., et al., "Harpin, Elicitor of the Hypersensitive Response Produced by the Plant Pathogen Erwinia amylovora," Science 257:85-88 (1992), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The DNA molecule encoding this hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide has a nucleotide sequence corresponding to SEQ. ID. No. 4 as follows:

aagcttcggc atggcacgtt tgaccgttgg gtcggcaggg tacgtttgaa ttattcataa 60 gaggaatacg ttatgagtct gaatacaagt gggctgggag cgtcaacgat gcaaatttct 120 atcggcggtg cgggcggaaa taacgggttg ctgggtacca gtcgccagaa tgctgggttg 180 ggtggcaatt ctgcactggg gctgggcggc ggtaatcaaa atgataccgt caatcagctg 240 gctggcttac tcaccggcat gatgatgatg atgagcatga tgggcggtgg tgggctgatg 300 ggcggtggct taggcggtgg cttaggtaat ggcttgggtg gctcaggtgg cctgggcgaa 360 ggactgtcga acgcgctgaa cgatatgtta ggcggttcgc tgaacacgct gggctcgaaa 420 ggcggcaaca ataccacttc aacaacaaat tccccgctgg accaggcgct gggtattaac 480 tcaacgtccc aaaacgacga ttccacctcc ggcacagatt ccacctcaga ctccagcgac 540 ccgatgcagc agctgctgaa gatgttcagc gagataatgc aaagcctgtt tggtgatggg 600 caagatggca cccagggcag ttcctctggg ggcaagcagc cgaccgaagg cgagcagaac 660 gcctataaaa aaggagtcac tgatgcgctg tcgggcctga tgggtaatgg tctgagccag 720 ctccttggca acgggggact gggaggtggt cagggcggta atgctggcac gggtcttgac 780 ggttcgtcgc tgggcggcaa agggctgcaa aacctgagcg ggccggtgga ctaccagcag 840 ttaggtaacg ccgtgggtac cggtatcggt atgaaagcgg gcattcaggc gctgaatgat 900 atcggtacgc acaggcacag ttcaacccgt tctttcgtca ataaaggcga tcgggcgatg 960 gcgaaggaaa tcggtcagtt catggaccag tatcctgagg tgtttggcaa gccgcagtac 1020 cagaaaggcc cgggtcagga ggtgaaaacc gatgacaaat catgggcaaa agcactgagc 1080 aagccagatg acgacggaat gacaccagcc agtatggagc agttcaacaa agccaagggc 1140 atgatcaaaa ggcccatggc gggtgatacc ggcaacggca acctgcaggc acgcggtgcc 1200 ggtggttctt cgctgggtat tgatgccatg atggccggtg atgccattaa caatatggca 1260 cttggcaagc tgggcgcggc ttaagctt 1288

The above nucleotide and amino acid sequences are disclosed and further described in U.S. Patent No. 5,849,868 to Beer et al. and U.S. Patent No. 5,776,889 to Wei et al., which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

Another hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide derived from Erwinia amylovora has an amino acid sequence corresponding to SEQ. ID. No. 5 as follows:

Met Ser He Leu Thr Leu Asn Asn Asn Thr Ser Ser Ser Pro Gly Leu 1 5 10 15

Phe Gin Ser Gly Gly Asp Asn Gly Leu Gly Gly His Asn Ala Asn Ser 20 25 30

Ala Leu Gly Gin Gin Pro He Asp Arg Gin Thr He Glu Gin Met Ala 35 40 45

Gin Leu Leu Ala Glu Leu Leu Lys Ser Leu Leu Ser Pro Gin Ser Gly 50 55 60 Asn Ala Ala Thr Gly Ala Gly Gly Asn Asp Gin Thr Thr Gly Val Gly 65 70 75 80

Asn Ala Gly Gly Leu Asn Gly Arg Lys Gly Thr Ala Gly Thr Thr Pro 85 90 95

Gin Ser Asp Ser Gin Asn Met Leu Ser Glu Met Gly Asn Asn Gly Leu 100 105 110

Asp Gin Ala He Thr Pro Asp Gly Gin Gly Gly Gly Gin He Gly Asp 115 120 125

Asn Pro Leu Leu Lys Ala Met Leu Lys Leu He Ala Arg Met Met Asp 130 135 140 Gly Gin Ser Asp Gin Phe Gly Gin Pro Gly Thr Gly Asn Asn Ser Ala 145 150 155 160

Ser Ser Gly Thr Ser Ser Ser Gly Gly Ser Pro Phe Asn Asp Leu Ser 165 170 175

Gly Gly Lys Ala Pro Ser Gly Asn Ser Pro Ser Gly Asn Tyr Ser Pro 180 185 190

Val Ser Thr Phe Ser Pro Pro Ser Thr Pro Thr Ser Pro Thr Ser Pro 195 200 205 Leu Asp Phe Pro Ser Ser Pro Thr Lys Ala Ala Gly Gly Ser Thr Pro 210 215 220

Val Thr Asp His Pro Asp Pro Val Gly Ser Ala Gly He Gly Ala Gly 225 230 235 240 Asn Ser Val Ala Phe Thr Ser Ala Gly Ala Asn Gin Thr Val Leu His

245 250 255

Asp Thr He Thr Val Lys Ala Gly Gin Val Phe Asp Gly Lys Gly Gin 260 265 270

Thr Phe Thr Ala Gly Ser Glu Leu Gly Asp Gly Gly Gin Ser Glu Asn 275 280 285

Gin Lys Pro Leu Phe He Leu Glu Asp Gly Ala Ser Leu Lys Asn Val 290 295 300

Thr Met Gly Asp Asp Gly Ala Asp Gly He His Leu Tyr Gly Asp Ala 305 310 315 320 Lys He Asp Asn Leu His Val Thr Asn Val Gly Glu Asp Ala He Thr

325 330 335

Val Lys Pro Asn Ser Ala Gly Lys Lys Ser His Val Glu He Thr Asn 340 345 350

Ser Ser Phe Glu His Ala Ser Asp Lys He Leu Gin Leu Asn Ala Asp 355 360 365

Thr Asn Leu Ser Val Asp Asn Val Lys Ala Lys Asp Phe Gly Thr Phe 370 375 380

Val Arg Thr Asn Gly Gly Gin Gin Gly Asn Trp Asp Leu Asn Leu Ser 385 390 395 400 His He Ser Ala Glu Asp Gly Lys Phe Ser Phe Val Lys Ser Asp Ser

405 410 415

Glu Gly Leu Asn Val Asn Thr Ser Asp He Ser Leu Gly Asp Val Glu 420 425 430

Asn His Tyr Lys Val Pro Met Ser Ala Asn Leu Lys Val Ala Glu 435 440 445

This protein or polypeptide is acidic, rich in glycine and serine, and lacks cysteine. It is also heat stable, protease sensitive, and suppressed by inhibitors of plant metabolism. The protein or polypeptide of the present invention has a predicted molecular size of ca. 45 kDa. The DNA molecule encoding this hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide has a nucleotide sequence corresponding to SEQ. ID. No. 6 as follows:

atgtcaattc ttacgcttaa caacaatacc tcgtcctcgc cgggtctgtt ccagtccggg 60 ggggacaacg ggcttggtgg tcataatgca aattctgcgt tggggcaaca acccatcgat 120 cggcaaacca ttgagcaaat ggctcaatta ttggcggaac tgttaaagtc actgctatcg 180 ccacaatcag gtaatgcggc aaccggagcc ggtggcaatg accagactac aggagttggt 240 aacgctggcg gcctgaacgg acgaaaaggc acagcaggaa ccactccgca gtctgacagt 300 cagaacatgc tgagtgagat gggcaacaac gggctggatc aggccatcac gcccgatggc 360 cagggcggcg ggcagatcgg cgataatcct ttactgaaag ccatgctgaa gcttattgca 420 cgcatgatgg acggccaaag cgatcagttt ggccaacctg gtacgggcaa caacagtgcc 480 tcttccggta cttcttcatc tggcggttcc ccttttaacg atctatcagg ggggaaggcc 540 ccttccggca actccccttc cggcaactac tctcccgtca gtaccttctc acccccatcc 600 acgccaacgt cccctacctc accgcttgat ttcccttctt ctcccaccaa agcagccggg 660 ggcagcacgc cggtaaccga tcatcctgac cctgttggta gcgcgggcat cggggccgga 720 aattcggtgg ccttcaccag cgccggcgct aatcagacgg tgctgcatga caccattacc 780 gtgaaagcgg gtcaggtgtt tgatggcaaa ggacaaacct tcaccgccgg ttcagaatta 840 ggcgatggcg gccagtctga aaaccagaaa ccgctgttta tactggaaga cggtgccagc 900 ctgaaaaacg tcaccatggg cgacgacggg gcggatggta ttcatcttta cggtgatgcc 960 aaaatagaca atctgcacgt caccaacgtg ggtgaggacg cgattaccgt taagccaaac 1020 agcgcgggca aaaaatccca cgttgaaatc actaacagtt ccttcgagca cgcctctgac 1080 aagatcctgc agctgaatgc cgatactaac ctgagcgttg acaacgtgaa ggccaaagac 1140 tttggtactt ttgtacgcac taacggcggt caacagggta actgggatct gaatctgagc 1200 catatcagcg cagaagacgg taagttctcg ttcgttaaaa gcgatagcga ggggctaaac 1260 gtcaatacca gtgatatctc actgggtgat gttgaaaacc actacaaagt gccgatgtcc 1320 gccaacctga aggtggctga atga 1344

The above nucleotide and amino acid sequences are disclosed and further described in

PCT Application Publication No. WO 99/07208 to Kim et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

A hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide derived from Pseudomonas syringae has an amino acid sequence corresponding to SEQ. ID. No. 7 as follows:

Met Gin Ser Leu Ser Leu Asn Ser Ser Ser Leu Gin Thr Pro Ala Met 1 5 10 15

Ala Leu Val Leu Val Arg Pro Glu Ala Glu Thr Thr Gly Ser Thr Ser 20 25 30

Ser Lys Ala Leu Gin Glu Val Val Val Lys Leu Ala Glu Glu Leu Met 35 40 45

Arg Asn Gly Gin Leu Asp Asp Ser Ser Pro Leu Gly Lys Leu Leu Ala 50 55 60

Lys Ser Met Ala Ala Asp Gly Lys Ala Gly Gly Gly He Glu Asp Val 65 70 75 80

He Ala Ala Leu Asp Lys Leu He His Glu Lys Leu Gly Asp Asn Phe 85 90 95

Gly Ala Ser Ala Asp Ser Ala Ser Gly Thr Gly Gin Gin Asp Leu Met 100 105 110

Thr Gin Val Leu Asn Gly Leu Ala Lys Ser Met Leu Asp Asp Leu Leu 115 120 125

Thr Lys Gin Asp Gly Gly Thr Ser Phe Ser Glu Asp Asp Met Pro Met 130 135 140

Leu Asn Lys He Ala Gin Phe Met Asp Asp Asn Pro Ala Gin Phe Pro 145 150 155 160 Lys Pro Asp Ser Gly Ser Trp Val Asn Glu Leu Lys Glu Asp Asn Phe

165 170 175

Leu Asp Gly Asp Glu Thr Ala Ala Phe Arg Ser Ala Leu Asp He He 180 185 190

Gly Gin Gin Leu Gly Asn Gin Gin Ser Asp Ala Gly Ser Leu Ala Gly 195 200 205

Thr Gly Gly Gly Leu Gly Thr Pro Ser Ser Phe Ser Asn Asn Ser Ser 210 215 220

Val Met Gly Asp Pro Leu He Asp Ala Asn Thr Gly Pro Gly Asp Ser 225 230 235 240 Gly Asn Thr Arg Gly Glu Ala Gly Gin Leu He Gly Glu Leu He Asp

245 250 255

Arg Gly Leu Gin Ser Val Leu Ala Gly Gly Gly Leu Gly Thr Pro Val 260 265 270

Asn Thr Pro Gin Thr Gly Thr Ser Ala Asn Gly Gly Gin Ser Ala Gin 275 280 285

Asp Leu Asp Gin Leu Leu Gly Gly Leu Leu Leu Lys Gly Leu Glu Ala 290 295 300

Thr Leu Lys Asp Ala Gly Gin Thr Gly Thr Asp Val Gin Ser Ser Ala 305 310 315 320 Ala Gin He Ala Thr Leu Leu Val Ser Thr Leu Leu Gin Gly Thr Arg

325 330 335

Asn Gin Ala Ala Ala 340

This hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide has a molecular weight of 34-35 kDa. It is rich in glycine (about 13.5%) and lacks cysteine and tyrosine. Further information about the hypersensitive response elicitor derived from Pseudomonas syringae is found in He, S. Y., et al., "Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae Harpinp_ss: a Protein that is Secreted via the Hip Pathway and Elicits the Hypersensitive Response in Plants," Cell 73: 1255-1266 (1993), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The DNA molecule encoding this hypersensitive response elicitor from Pseudomonas syringae has a nucleotide sequence corresponding to SEQ. ID. No. 8 as follows: atgcagagtc tcagtcttaa cagcagctcg ctgcaaaccc cggcaatggc ccttgtcctg 60 gtacgtcctg aagccgagac gactggcagt acgtcgagca aggcgcttca ggaagttgtc 120 gtgaagctgg ccgaggaact gatgcgcaat ggtcaactcg acgacagctc gccattggga 180 aaactgttgg ccaagtcgat ggccgcagat ggcaaggcgg gcggcggtat tgaggatgtc 240 atcgctgcgc tggacaagct gatccatgaa aagctcggtg acaacttcgg cgcgtctgcg 300 gacagcgcct cgggtaccgg acagcaggac ctgatgactc aggtgctcaa tggcctggcc 360 aagtcgatgc tcgatgatct tctgaccaag caggatggcg ggacaagctt ctccgaagac 420 gatatgccga tgctgaacaa gatcgcgcag ttcatggatg acaatcccgc acagtttccc 480 aagccggact cgggctcctg ggtgaacgaa ctcaaggaag acaacttcct tgatggcgac 540 gaaacggctg cgttccgttc ggcactcgac atcattggcc agcaactggg taatcagcag 600 agtgacgctg gcagtctggc agggacgggt ggaggtctgg gcactccgag cagtttttcc 660 aacaactcgt ccgtgatggg tgatccgctg atcgacgcca ataccggtcc cggtgacagc 720 ggcaataccc gtggtgaagc ggggcaactg atcggcgagc ttatcgaccg tggcctgcaa 780 tcggtattgg ccggtggtgg ac gggcaca cccgtaaaca ccccgcagac cggtacgtcg 840 gcgaatggcg gacagtccgc tcaggatctt gatcagttgc tgggcggctt gctgctcaag 900 ggcctggagg caacgctcaa ggatgccggg caaacaggca ccgacgtgca gtcgagcgct 960 gcgcaaatcg ccaccttgct ggtcagtacg ctgctgcaag gcacccgcaa tcaggctgca 1020 gcctga 1026

The above nucleotide and amino acid sequences are disclosed and further described in U.S. Patent No.5,708,139 to Collmer et al. and U.S. PatentNo.5,776,889 to Wei et al., which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

Anotherhypersensitive response elicitor protein orpolypeptide derived from Pseudomonas syringae has an amino acid sequence correspondingto SEQ. ID. No.9 as follows:

Met Ser He Gly He Thr Pro Arg Pro Gin Gin Thr Thr Thr Pro Leu 1 5 10 15

Asp Phe Ser Ala Leu Ser Gly Lys Ser Pro Gin Pro Asn Thr Phe Gly 20 25 30

Glu Gin Asn Thr Gin Gin Ala He Asp Pro Ser Ala Leu Leu Phe Gly 35 40 45

Ser Asp Thr Gin Lys Asp Val Asn Phe Gly Thr Pro Asp Ser Thr Val 50 55 60 Gin Asn Pro Gin Asp Ala Ser Lys Pro Asn Asp Ser Gin Ser Asn He 65 70 75 80

Ala Lys Leu He Ser Ala Leu He Met Ser Leu Leu Gin Met Leu Thr 85 90 95

Asn Ser Asn Lys Lys Gin Asp Thr Asn Gin Glu Gin Pro Asp Ser Gin 100 105 110

Ala Pro Phe Gin Asn Asn Gly Gly Leu Gly Thr Pro Ser Ala Asp Ser 115 120 125

Gly Gly Gly Gly Thr Pro Asp Ala Thr Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Asp Thr 130 135 140

Pro Ser Ala Thr Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Asp Thr Pro Thr Ala Thr Gly 145 150 155 160

Gly Gly Gly Ser Gly Gly Gly Gly Thr Pro Thr Ala Thr Gly Gly Gly 165 170 175 Ser Gly Gly Thr Pro Thr Ala Thr Gly Gly Gly Glu Gly Gly Val Thr

180 185 190

Pro Gin He Thr Pro Gin Leu Ala Asn Pro Asn Arg Thr Ser Gly Thr 195 200 205

Gly Ser Val Ser Asp Thr Ala Gly Ser Thr Glu Gin Ala Gly Lys He 210 215 220

Asn Val Val Lys Asp Thr He Lys Val Gly Ala Gly Glu Val Phe Asp 225 230 235 240

Gly His Gly Ala Thr Phe Thr Ala Asp Lys Ser Met Gly Asn Gly Asp 245 250 255 Gin Gly Glu Asn Gin Lys Pro Met Phe Glu Leu Ala Glu Gly Ala Thr

260 265 270

Leu Lys Asn Val Asn Leu Gly Glu Asn Glu Val Asp Gly He His Val 275 280 285

Lys Ala Lys Asn Ala Gin Glu Val Thr He Asp Asn Val His Ala Gin 290 295 300

Asn Val Gly Glu Asp Leu He Thr Val Lys Gly Glu Gly Gly Ala Ala 305 310 315 320

Val Thr Asn Leu Asn He Lys Asn Ser Ser Ala Lys Gly Ala Asp Asp 325 330 335 Lys Val Val Gin Leu Asn Ala Asn Thr His Leu Lys He Asp Asn Phe

340 345 350

Lys Ala Asp Asp Phe Gly Thr Met Val Arg Thr Asn Gly Gly Lys Gin 355 360 365

Phe Asp Asp Met Ser He Glu Leu Asn Gly He Glu Ala Asn His Gly 370 375 380

Lys Phe Ala Leu Val Lys Ser Asp Ser Asp Asp Leu Lys Leu Ala Thr 385 390 395 400

Gly Asn He Ala Met Thr Asp Val Lys His Ala Tyr Asp Lys Thr Gin 405 410 415 Ala Ser Thr Gin His Thr Glu Leu

420

This protein or polypeptide is acidic, glycine-rich, lacks cysteine, and is deficient in aromatic amino acids. The DNA molecule encoding this hypersensitive response elicitor from Pseudomonas syringae has a nucleotide sequence corresponding to SEQ. ID. No. 10 as follows: tccacttcgc tgattttgaa attggcagat tcatagaaac gttcaggtgt ggaaatcagg 60 ctgagtgcgc agatttcgtt gataagggtg tggtactggt cattgttggt catttcaagg 120 cctctgagtg cggtgcggag caataccagt cttcctgctg gcgtgtgcac actgagtcgc 180 aggcataggc atttcagttc cttgcgttgg ttgggcatat aaaaaaagga acttttaaaa 240 acagtgcaat gagatgccgg caaaacggga accggtcgct gcgctttgcc actcacttcg 300 agcaagctca accccaaaca tccacatccc tatcgaacgg acagcgatac ggccacttgc 360 tctggtaaac cctggagctg gcgtcggtcc aattgcccac ttagcgaggt aacgcagcat 420 gagcatcggc atcacacccc ggccgcaaca gaccaccacg ccactcgatt tttcggcgct 480 aagcggcaag agtcctcaac caaacacgtt cggcgagcag aacactcagc aagcgatcga 540 cccgagtgca ctgttgttcg gcagcgacac acagaaagac gtcaacttcg gcacgcccga 600 cagcaccgtc cagaatccgc aggacgccag caagcccaac gacagccagt ccaacatcgc 660 taaattgatc agtgcattga tcatgtcgtt gctgcagatg ctcaccaact ccaataaaaa 720 gcaggacacc aatcaggaac agcctgatag ccaggctcct ttccagaaca acggcgggct 780 cggtacaccg tcggccgata gcgggggcgg cggtacaccg gatgcgacag gtggcggcgg 840 cggtgatacg ccaagcgcaa caggcggtgg cggcggtgat actccgaccg caacaggcgg 900 tggcggcagc ggtggcggcg gcacacccac tgcaacaggt ggcggcagcg gtggcacacc 960 cactgcaaca ggcggtggcg agggtggcgt aacaccgcaa atcactccgc agttggccaa 1020 ccctaaccgt acctcaggta ctggctcggt gtcggacacc gcaggttcta ccgagcaagc 1080 cggcaagatc aatgtggtga aagacaccat caaggtcggc gctggcgaag tctttgacgg 1140 ccacggcgca accttcactg ccgacaaatc tatgggtaac ggagaccagg gcgaaaatca 1200 gaagcccatg ttcgagctgg ctgaaggcgc tacgttgaag aatgtgaacc tgggtgagaa 1260 cgaggtcgat ggcatccacg tgaaagccaa aaacgctcag gaagtcacca ttgacaacgt 1320 gcatgcccag aacgtcggtg aagacctgat tacggtcaaa ggcgagggag gcgcagcggt 1380 cactaatctg aacatcaaga acagcagtgc caaaggtgca gacgacaagg ttgtccagct 1440 caacgccaac actcacttga aaatcgacaa cttcaaggcc gacgatttcg gcacgatggt 1500 tcgcaccaac ggtggcaagc agtttgatga catgagcatc gagctgaacg gcatcgaagc 1560 taaccacggc aagttcgccc tggtgaaaag cgacagtgac gatctgaagc tggcaacggg 1620 caacatcgcc atgaccgacg tcaaacacgc ctacgataaa acccaggcat cgacccaaca 1680 caccgagctt tgaatccaga caagtagctt gaaaaaaggg ggtggactc 1729

The above nucleotide and amino acid sequences are disclosed and further described in U.S. PatentNo.6,172,184 to Collmer et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. A hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide derived from Pseudomonas solanacearum has an amino acid sequence corresponding to SEQ. ID. No. 11 as follows:

Met Ser Val Gly Asn He Gin Ser Pro Ser Asn Leu Pro Gly Leu Gin

1 5 10 15

Asn Leu Asn Leu Asn Thr Asn Thr Asn Ser Gin Gin Ser Gly Gin Ser 20 25 30

Val Gin Asp Leu He Lys Gin Val Glu Lys Asp He Leu Asn He He 35 40 45

Ala Ala Leu Val Gin Lys Ala Ala Gin Ser Ala Gly Gly Asn Thr Gly 50 55 60

Asn Thr Gly Asn Ala Pro Ala Lys Asp Gly Asn Ala Asn Ala Gly Ala 65 70 75 80 Asn Asp Pro Ser Lys Asn Asp Pro Ser Lys Ser Gin Ala Pro Gin Ser

85 90 95

Ala Asn Lys Thr Gly Asn Val Asp Asp Ala Asn Asn Gin Asp Pro Met 100 105 110

Gin Ala Leu Met Gin Leu Leu Glu Asp Leu Val Lys Leu Leu Lys Ala 115 120 125

Ala Leu His Met Gin Gin Pro Gly Gly Asn Asp Lys Gly Asn Gly Val 130 135 140

Gly Gly Ala Asn Gly Ala Lys Gly Ala Gly Gly Gin Gly Gly Leu Ala 145 150 155 160 Glu Ala Leu Gin Glu He Glu Gin He Leu Ala Gin Leu Gly Gly Gly

165 170 175

Gly Ala Gly Ala Gly Gly Ala Gly Gly Gly Val Gly Gly Ala Gly Gly 180 185 190

Ala Asp Gly Gly Ser Gly Ala Gly Gly Ala Gly Gly Ala Asn Gly Ala 195 200 205

Asp Gly Gly Asn Gly Val Asn Gly Asn Gin Ala Asn Gly Pro Gin Asn 210 215 220

Ala Gly Asp Val Asn Gly Ala Asn Gly Ala Asp Asp Gly Ser Glu Asp 225 230 235 240 Gin Gly Gly Leu Thr Gly Val Leu Gin Lys Leu Met Lys He Leu Asn

245 250 255

Ala Leu Val Gin Met Met Gin Gin Gly Gly Leu Gly Gly Gly Asn Gin 260 265 270

Ala Gin Gly Gly Ser Lys Gly Ala Gly Asn Ala Ser Pro Ala Ser Gly 275 280 285

Ala Asn Pro Gly Ala Asn Gin Pro Gly Ser Ala Asp Asp Gin Ser Ser 290 295 300

Gly Gin Asn Asn Leu Gin Ser Gin He Met Asp Val Val Lys Glu Val 305 310 315 320

Val Gin He Leu Gin Gin Met Leu Ala Ala Gin Asn Gly Gly Ser Gin 325 330 335 Gin Ser Thr Ser Thr Gin Pro Met 340

Further information regarding this hypersensitive response elicitorprotein or polypeptide derived from Pseudomonas solanacearum is set forth in Arlat, M., et al., "PopAl, aProtein which Induces a Hypersensitive-likeResponse in SpecificPetunia Genotypes, is Secreted via the Hrp Pathway of Pseudomonas solanacearum," EMBO L 13:543-533 (1994), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. It is encoded by a DNA molecule from Pseudomonas solanacearum having a nucleotide sequence corresponding SEQ. ID. No.12 as follows:

atgtcagtcg gaaacatcca gagcccgtcg aacctcccgg gtctgcagaa cctgaacctc 60 aacaccaaca ccaacagcca gcaatcgggc cagtccgtgc aagacctgat caagcaggtc 120 gagaaggaca tcctcaacat catcgcagcc ctcgtgcaga aggccgcaca gtcggcgggc 180 ggcaacaccg gtaacaccgg caacgcgccg gcgaaggacg gcaatgccaa cgcgggcgcc 240 aacgacccga gcaagaacga cccgagcaag agccaggctc cgcagtcggc caacaagacc 300 ggcaacgtcg acgacgccaa caaccaggat ccgatgcaag cgctgatgca gctgctggaa 360 gacctggtga agctgctgaa ggcggccctg cacatgcagc agcccggcgg caatgacaag 420 ggcaacggcg tgggcggtgc caacggcgcc aagggtgccg gcggccaggg cggcctggcc 480 gaagcgctgc aggagatcga gcagatcctc gcccagctcg gcggcggcgg tgctggcgcc 540 ggcggcgcgg gtggcggtgt cggcggtgct ggtggcgcgg atggcggctc cggtgcgggt 600 ggcgcaggcg gtgcgaacgg cgccgacggc ggcaatggcg tgaacggcaa ccaggcgaac 660 ggcccgcaga acgcaggcga tgtcaacggt gccaacggcg cggatgacgg cagcgaagac 720 cagggcggcc tcaccggcgt gctgcaaaag ctgatgaaga tcctgaacgc gctggtgcag 780 atgatgcagc aaggcggcct cggcggcggc aaccaggcgc agggcggctc gaagggtgcc 840 ggcaacgcct cgccggcttc cggcgcgaac ccgggcgcga accagcccgg ttcggcggat 900 gatcaatcgt ccggccagaa caatctgcaa tcccagatca tggatgtggt gaaggaggtc 960 gtccagatcc tgcagcagat gctggcggcg cagaacggcg gcagccagca gtccacctcg 1020 acgcagccga tgtaa 1035

The above nucleotide and amino acid sequences are disclosed and further described in U.S. Patent No. 5,776,889 to Wei et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. A hypersensitive response elicitor polypeptide or protein derived from Xanthomonas campestris has an amino acid sequence corresponding to SEQ. ID. No. 13 as follows:

Met Asp Ser He Gly Asn Asn Phe Ser Asn He Gly Asn Leu Gin Thr 1 5 10 15

Met Gly He Gly Pro Gin Gin His Glu Asp Ser Ser Gin Gin Ser Pro 20 25 30

Ser Ala Gly Ser Glu Gin Gin Leu Asp Gin Leu Leu Ala Met Phe He 35 40 45

Met Met Met Leu Gin Gin Ser Gin Gly Ser Asp Ala Asn Gin Glu Cys 50 55 60

Gly Asn Glu Gin Pro Gin Asn Gly Gin Gin Glu Gly Leu Ser Pro Leu 65 70 75- 80

Thr Gin Met Leu Met Gin He Val Met Gin Leu Met Gin Asn Gin Gly 85 90 95

Gly Ala Gly Met Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser Val Asn Ser Ser Leu Gly Gly 100 105 110

Asn Ala

This hypersensitive response elicitor polypeptide or protein has an estimated molecular weight of about 12 kDa based on the deduced amino acid sequence, which is consistent with a molecular weight of about 14 kDa as detected by SDS-PAGE. The above protein or polypeptide is encoded by a DNA molecule according to SEQ. ID. No. 14 as follows:

atggactcta tcggaaacaa cttttcgaat atcggcaacc tgcagacgat gggcatcggg 60 cctcagcaac acgaggactc cagccagcag tcgccttcgg ctggctccga gcagcagctg 120 gatcagttgc tcgccatgtt catcatgatg atgctgcaac agagccaggg cagcgatgca 180 aatcaggagt gtggcaacga acaaccgcag aacggtcaac aggaaggcct gagtccgttg 240 acgcagatgc tgatgcagat cgtgatgcag ctgatgcaga accagggcgg cgccggcatg 300 ggcggtggcg gttcggtcaa cagcagcctg ggcggcaacg cc 342

The above nucleotide and amino acid sequences are disclosed and further described in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/829,124, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Other embodiments of the present invention include, but are not limited to, use of a hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide derived from Erwinia carotovora and Erwinia sterwartii. Isolation of Erwinia carotovora hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide is described in Cui, et al., "The RsmA Mutants of Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora Strain Ecc71 Overexpress hrp N_ECC and Elicit a Hypersensitive Reaction-like Response in Tobacco Leaves," MPMI. 9(7):565-73 (1996), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. A hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide of Erwinia stewartii is set forth in Ahmad, et al., "Harpin is Not Necessary for the Pathogenicity of Erwinia stewartii on Maize," 8th Int'l. Cong. Molec. Plant-Microbe Interact., July 14-19, 1996 and Ahmad, et al., "Harpin is Not Necessary for the Pathogenicity of Erwinia stewartii on Maize," Ann. Mtg. Am. Phvtopath. Soc, July 27-31, 1996, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

Other elicitors can be readily identified by isolating putative hypersensitive response elicitors and testing them for elicitor activity as described, for example, in Wei, Z-M., et al., "Harpin, Elicitor of the Hypersensitive Response Produced by the Plant Pathogen Erwinia amylovora,^'" Science 257:85-88 (1992), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Cell-free preparations from culture supernatants can be tested for elicitor activity (i.e., local necrosis) by using them to infiltrate appropriate plant tissues. Once identified, DNA molecules encoding a hypersensitive response elicitor can be isolated using standard techniques known to those skilled in the art. The hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide can also be a fragment of the above referenced hypersensitive response elicitor proteins or polypeptides as well as fragments of full length elicitors from other pathogens.

Suitable fragments can be produced by several means. Subclones of the gene encoding a known elicitor protein can be produced using conventional molecular genetic manipulation for subcloning gene fragments, such as described by Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Springs Laboratory, Cold Springs Harbor, New York (1989), and Ausubel et al. (ed.), Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons (New York, NY) (1999 and preceding editions), which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. The subclones then are expressed in vitro or in vivo in bacterial cells to yield a smaller protein or polypeptide that can be tested for elicitor activity, e.g., using procedures set forth in Wei, Z-M., et al., Science 257: 85-88 (1992), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. In another approach, based on knowledge of the primary structure of the protein, fragments of the elicitor protein gene may be synthesized using the PCR technique together with specific sets of primers chosen to represent particular portions of the protein. Erlich, H.A., et al., "Recent Advances in the Polymerase Chain Reaction," Science 252: 1643-51 (1991), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. These can then be cloned into an appropriate vector for expression of a truncated protein or polypeptide from bacterial cells as described above.

Examples of suitable fragments of a hypersensitive response elicitor are described in WIPO International Publication Numbers: WO 98/54214 and WO 01/98501, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

DNA molecules encoding a hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide can also include a DNA molecule that hybridizes under stringent conditions to the DNA molecule having a nucleotide sequences from one of the above identified hypersensitive response licitors. An example of suitable stringency conditions is when hybridization is carried out at a temperature of about 37°C using a hybridization medium that includes 0.9M sodium citrate ("SSC") buffer, followed by washing with 0.2x SSC buffer at 37°C. Higher stringency can readily be attained by increasing the temperature for either hybridization or washing conditions or increasing the sodium concentration of the hybridization or wash medium. Nonspecific binding may also be controlled using any one of a number of known techniques such as, for example, blocking the membrane with protein-containing solutions, addition of heterologous RNA, DNA, and SDS to the hybridization buffer, and treatment with RNase. Wash conditions are typically performed at or below stringency. Exemplary high stringency conditions include carrying out hybridization at a temperature of about 42°C to about 65°C for up to about 20 hours in a hybridization medium containing 1M NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mM EDTA, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.2% ficoll, 0.2% polyvinylpyrrolidone, 0.2% bovine serum albumin, and 50 μg/ml E. coli DNA, followed by washing carried out at between about 42°C to about 65°C in a 0.2x SSC buffer. Variants of suitable hypersensitive response elicitor proteins or polypeptides can also be expressed. Variants may be made by, for example, the deletion, addition, or alteration of amino acids that have minimal influence on the properties, secondary structure and hydropathic nature of the polypeptide. For example, a polypeptide may be conjugated to a signal (or leader) sequence at the N- terminal end of the protein which co-translationally or post-translationally directs transfer of the protein. The polypeptide may also be conjugated to a linker or other sequence for ease of synthesis, purification, or identification of the polypeptide. The DNA molecule encoding the hypersensitive response elicitor polypeptide or protein can be incorporated in cells using conventional recombinant DNA technology. Generally, this involves inserting the DNA molecule into an expression system to which the DNA molecule is heterologous (i.e. not normally present). The heterologous DNA molecule is inserted into the expression system or vector in sense orientation and correct reading frame. The vector contains the necessary elements for the transcription and translation of the inserted protein-coding sequences.

U.S. Patent No. 4,237,224 to Cohen and Boyer, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, describes the production of expression systems in the form of recombinant plasmids using restriction enzyme cleavage and ligation with DNA ligase. These recombinant plasmids are then introduced by means of transformation and replicated in unicellular cultures including procaryotic organisms and eucaryotic cells grown in tissue culture.

Recombinant genes may also be introduced into viruses, such as vaccina virus. Recombinant viruses can be generated by transfection of plasmids into cells infected with virus.

Suitable vectors include, but are not limited to, the following viral vectors such as lambda vector system gtl 1, gt WES.tB, Charon 4, and plasmid vectors such as pBR322, pBR325, pACYC177, pACYC1084, pUC8, pUC9, pUC18, pUC19, pLG339, pR290, pKC37, pKClOl, SV 40, pBluescript II SK +/- or KS +/- (see

"Stratagene Cloning Systems" Catalog (1993) from Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety), pQE, pIH821, pGEX, pET series (see F.W. Studier et. al., "Use of T7 RNA Polymerase to Direct Expression of Cloned Genes," Gene Expression Technology vol. 185 (1990), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety), and any derivatives thereof. Recombinant molecules can be introduced into cells via transformation, particularly transduction, conjugation, mobilization, or electroporation. The DNA sequences are cloned into the vector using standard cloning procedures in the art, as described by Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Springs Laboratory, Cold Springs Harbor, New York (1989), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

A variety of host-vector systems may be utilized to express the protein- encoding sequence(s). Primarily, the vector system must be compatible with the host cell used. Host- vector systems include but are not limited to the following: bacteria transformed with bacteriophage DNA, plasmid DNA, or cosmid DNA; microorganisms such as yeast containing yeast vectors; mammalian cell systems infected with virus (e.g., vaccinia virus, adenovirus, etc.); insect cell systems infected with virus (e.g., baculovirus); and plant cells infected by bacteria. The expression elements of these vectors vary in their strength and specificities. Depending upon the host- vector system utilized, any one of a number of suitable transcription and translation elements can be used.

Different genetic signals and processing events control many levels of gene expression (e.g., DNA transcription and messenger RNA (mRNA) translation). Transcription of DNA is dependent upon the presence of a promotor which is a DNA sequence that directs the binding of RNA polymerase and thereby promotes mRNA synthesis. The DNA sequences of eucaryotic promotors differ from those of procaryotic promotors. Furthermore, eucaryotic promotors and accompanying genetic signals may not be recognized in or may not function in a procaryotic system, and, further, procaryotic promotors are not recognized and do not function in eucaryotic cells.

Similarly, translation of mRNA in prokaryotes depends upon the presence of the proper prokaryotic signals which differ from those of eukaryotes. Efficient translation of mRNA in prokaryotes requires a ribosome binding site called the Shine-Dalgarno ("SD") sequence on the mRNA. This sequence is a short nucleotide sequence of mRNA that is located before the start codon, usually AUG, which encodes the amino-terminal methionine of the protein. The SD sequences are complementary to the 3 '-end of the 16S rRNA (ribosomal RNA) and probably promote binding of mRNA to ribosomes by duplexing with the rRNA to allow correct positioning of the ribosome. For a review on maximizing gene expression, see Roberts and Lauer, Methods in Enzymology, 68:473 (1979), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Promoters vary in their "strength" (i.e., their ability to promote transcription). For the purposes of expressing a cloned gene, it is desirable to use strong promoters in order to obtain a high level of transcription and, hence, expression of the gene. Depending upon the host cell system utilized, any one of a number of suitable promoters may be used. For instance, when cloning in E. coli, its bacteriophages, or plasmids, promoters such as the T7 phage promoter, lac promoter, trp promoter, recA promoter, ribosomal RNA promoter, the P_R and P promoters of coliphage lambda and others, including but not limited, to ZαcUN5, ompF, bla, Ipp, and the like, may be used to direct high levels of transcription of adjacent DNA segments. Additionally, a hybrid trp-lacUV5 (tad) promoter or other E. coli promoters produced by recombinant DNA or other synthetic DNA techniques may be used to provide for transcription of the inserted gene.

Bacterial host cell strains and expression vectors may be chosen which inhibit the action of the promoter unless specifically induced. In certain operons, the addition of specific inducers is necessary for efficient transcription of the inserted DNA. For example, the lac operon is induced by the addition of lactose or IPTG (isopropylthio-beta-D-galactoside). A variety of other operons, such as trp, pro, etc., are under different controls.

Specific initiation signals are also required for efficient gene transcription and translation in prokaryotic cells. These transcription and translation initiation signals may vary in "strength" as measured by the quantity of gene specific messenger RNA and protein synthesized, respectively. The DNA expression vector, which contains a promoter, may also contain any combination of various "strong" transcription and/or translation initiation signals. For instance, efficient translation in E. coli requires a Shine-Dalgarno ("SD") sequence about 7-9 bases 5' to the initiation codon ("ATG") to provide a ribosome binding site. Thus, any SD-ATG combination that can be utilized by host cell ribosomes may be employed. Such combinations include, but are not limited to, the SD-ATG combination from the cro gene or the N gene of coliphage lambda, or from the E. coli tryptophan Ε, D, C, B or A genes. Additionally, any SD-ATG combination produced by recombinant DΝA or other techniques involving incorporation of synthetic nucleotides may be used.

Once the DΝA molecule coding for a hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide has been ligated to its appropriate regulatory regions using well known molecular cloning techniques, it can then be introduced into a vector or otherwise introduced directly into a host cell (Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Second Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Press, NY (1989), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety). The recombinant molecule can be introduced into host cells via transformation, particularly transduction, conjugation, mobilization, or electroporation. Suitable host cells include, but are not limited to, bacteria, virus, yeast, mammalian cells, insect, plant, and the like. Preferably the host cells are either a bacterial cell or a plant cell. The host cells, when grown in an appropriate medium, are capable of expressing the hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide, which can then be isolated therefrom and, if necessary, purified.

Alternatively, it is desirable for recombinant host cells to secrete the hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide into growth medium, thereby avoiding the need to lyse cells and remove cellular debris. To enable the host cell to secrete the hypersensitive response elicitor, the host cell can also be transformed with a type III secretion system in accordance with Ham et al., "A Cloned Erwinia chrysanthemi Hrp (Type III Protein Secretion) System Functions in Escherichia coli to Deliver Pseudomonas syringae Avr Signals to Plant Cells and Secrete Avr Proteins in Culture," Microbiol. 95: 10206-10211 (1998), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. After growing recombinant host cells which secrete the hypersensitive response elicitor into growth medium, isolation of the hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide from growth medium can be carried out substantially as described above.

The hypersensitive response elicitor of the present invention is preferably in isolated form (i.e. separated from its host organism) and more preferably produced in purified form (preferably at least about 60%,) by conventional techniques. Typically, the hypersensitive response elicitor of the present invention is produced but not secreted into the growth medium of recombinant host cells. Alternatively, the protein or polypeptide of the present invention is secreted into growth medium. In the case of unsecreted protein, to isolate the protein, the host cell (e.g., E. coli) carrying a recombinant plasmid is propagated, lysed by sonication, heat, or chemical treatment, and the homogenate is centrifuged to remove bacterial debris. The supernatant is then subjected to heat treatment and the hypersensitive response elicitor is separated by centrifugation. The supernatant fraction containing the hypersensitive response elicitor is subjected to gel filtration in an appropriately sized dextran or polyacrylamide column to separate the fragment. If necessary, the protein fraction may be further purified by ion exchange or HPLC.

A composition suitable for treating plants or plant seeds with a hypersensitive response elicitor polypeptide or protein in an isolated form contains a hypersensitive response elicitor polypeptide or protein in a carrier. Suitable carriers include water, aqueous solutions, slurries, or dry powders. In this embodiment, the composition contains greater than 500 nM hypersensitive response elicitor polypeptide or protein.

Alternatively, application of the hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide can also be applied in a non-isolated but non-infectious form. When applied in non-isolated but non-infectious form, the hypersensitive response elicitor is applied indirectly to the plant via application of a bacteria which expresses and then secretes or injects the expressed hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide into plant cells or tissues. Such application can be carried out by applying the bacteria to all or part of a plant or a plant seed under conditions where the polypeptide or protein contacts all or part of the cells of the plant or plant seed. Alternatively, the hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide can be applied to plants such that seeds recovered from such plants themselves are able to achieve the effects of the present invention. In the bacterial application mode of the present invention, the bacteria do not cause disease and have been transformed (e.g., recombinantly) with genes encoding a hypersensitive response elicitor polypeptide or protein. For example, E. coli, which does not elicit a hypersensitive response in plants, can be transformed with genes encoding a hypersensitive response elicitor polypeptide or protein and then applied to plants. Bacterial species other than E. coli can also be used in this embodiment of the present invention.

Alternatively, in the bacterial application mode of the present invention, a naturally occurring virulent bacteria that is capable of expressing and secreting a hypersensitive response elicitor is mutated or altered to be an aviralent pathogen while retaining its ability to express and secrete the hypersensitive response elicitoris. Examples of such naturally occurring virulent bacteria are noted above. In this embodiment, these bacteria are applied to plants or their seeds. For example, virulent Erwinia amylovora causes disease in apple. An avirulent Erwinia amylovora would not cause the disease in apples, but would retain its ability to express and secrete a hypersensitive response elicitor. Bacterial species other than Erwinia amylovora can also be used in this embodiment of the present invention.

The methods of the present invention which involve application of the agricultural chemicals and/or hypersensitive response elicitor polypeptides or proteins can be carried out through a variety of procedures in which all or part of the plant is treated, including leaves, stems, roots, etc. Application techniques may include but not limited to; foliar application, broadcast application, chemigation, high pressures injection, nesting, aerial spray, utilization of chemstations, root drench, and cutting drench. Application may, but need not, involve infiltration of the hypersensitive response elicitor polypeptide or protein into the plant. More than one application of the agricultural chemical and/or hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide may be desirable to realize maximal benefit over the course of a growing season.

Agricultural chemicals and/or hypersensitive response elicitor polypeptides or proteins can be applied to a plant or plant seed alone or mixed with additional components. Additional components can include one or more additional agricultural chemicals, carriers, adjuvants, buffering agents, coating agents, abrading agents, surfactants, preservatives, and color agents. These materials can be used to facilitate the process of the present invention. In addition, the agricultural chemicals and/or hypersensitive response elicitor polypeptides or proteins can be applied to plant seeds with other conventional seed formulation and treatment materials, including clays and polysaccharides.

When treating plant seeds in accordance with the application embodiment of the present invention, the agricultural chemicals and/or hypersensitive response elicitor polypeptides or proteins can be applied by low or high pressure spraying, seed dusting, seed soaking, and seed coating, or injection. Other suitable application procedures can be envisioned by those skilled in the art provided they are able to effect contact of the hypersensitive response elicitor polypeptide or protein with cells of the plant or plant seed. Once treated with the agricultural chemical and/or hypersensitive response elicitor of the present invention, the seeds can be planted in natural or artificial soil and cultivated using conventional procedures to produce plants. After plants have been propagated from seeds treated in accordance with the present invention, the plants may also be treated with one or more applications of the agricultural chemicals and/or hypersensitive response elicitor polypeptides or proteins. Such propagated plants may, in turn, be useful in producing seeds or propagules (e.g., cuttings) suitable for carrying out the present invention.

Typically, the manufacturer or distributor's product label for specific agricultural chemicals and/or hypersensitive response elicitor polypeptides or proteins will provide suggested application rates, the crops on which use of the agricultural chemicals and/or hypersensitive response elicitor polypeptides or proteins has been approved, and preferred application techniques if they exist.

The present method, for increasing the efficacy of common agricultural chemicals, can be utilized while treating a wide variety of plants and plant seeds types. Suitable plants include dicots and monocots. More particularly, useful crop plants can include, but are not limited to: canola, alfalfa, rice, wheat, barley, rye, cotton, sunflower, peanut, corn, potato, sweet potato, bean, pea, chicory, lettuce, endive, cabbage, brussel sprout, beet, parsnip, cauliflower, broccoli, turnip, radish, spinach, onion, garlic, eggplant, pepper, celery, carrot, squash, pumpkin, zucchini, cucumber, apple, pear, melon, citrus, strawberry, grape, raspberry, pineapple, soybean, tobacco, tomato, sorghum, and sugarcane. Examples of suitable ornamental plants are: Arabidopsis thaliana, Saintpaulia, petunia, pelargonium, poinsettia, chrysanthemum, carnation, and zinnia. In another embodiment of the present invention, one or more agricultural chemicals are applied to a transgenic plants or transgenic seeds encoding a hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide. This technique involves the use of transgenic plants and transgenic seeds encoding a hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide, a hypersensitive response elicitor proteins or polypeptides need not be applied to the plant or seed. Instead, transgenic plants transformed with a gene encoding such a hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide are produced according to procedures well known in the art as described below.

The vector described above can be microinjected directly into plant cells by use of micropipettes to transfer mechanically the recombinant DNA.

Crossway, Mol. Gen. Genetics, 202:179-85 (1985), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The genetic material may also be transferred into the plant cell using polyethylene glycol. Krens, et al., Nature, 296:72-74 (1982), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Another approach to transforming plant cells with a gene is particle bombardment (also known as biolistic transformation) of the host cell. This can be accomplished in one of several ways. This technique is disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,945,050, 5,036,006, and 5,100,792, all to Sanford et al., which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. Generally, this procedure involves propelling inert or biologically active particles at the cells under conditions effective to penetrate the outer surface of the cell and to be incorporated within the interior thereof. When inert particles are utilized, the vector can be introduced into the cell by coating the particles with the vector containing the heterologous DNA. Alternatively, the target cell can be surrounded by the vector so that the vector is carried into the cell by the wake of the particle. Biologically active particles (e.g., dried bacterial cells containing the vector and heterologous DNA) can also be propelled into plant cells.

Yet another method of introduction is fusion of protoplasts with other entities, either minicells, cells, lysosomes, or other fusible lipid-surfaced bodies. Fraley, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 79: 1859-63 (1982), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

The DNA molecule may also be introduced into the plant cells by electroporation. Fromm et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 82:5824 (1985), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. In this technique, plant protoplasts are elecfroporated in the presence of plasmids containing the expression cassette. Electrical impulses of high field strength reversibly permeabilize biomembranes allowing the introduction of the plasmids. Elecfroporated plant protoplasts reform the cell wall, divide, and regenerate.

Another method of introducing the DNA molecule into plant cells is to infect a plant cell with Agrobacterium tumefaciens or A. rhizogenes previously transformed with the gene. Under appropriate conditions known in the art, the transformed plant cells are grown to form shoots or roots, and develop further into plants. Generally, this procedure involves inoculating the plant tissue with a suspension of bacteria and incubating the tissue for 48 to 72 hours on regeneration medium without antibiotics at 25-28°C.

Agrobacterium is a representative genus of the Gram-negative family Rhizobiaceae. Its species are responsible for crown gall (A. tumefaciens) and hairy root disease (A. rhizogenes). The plant cells in crown gall tumors and hairy roots are induced to produce amino acid derivatives known as opines, which are catabolized only by the bacteria. The bacterial genes responsible for expression of opines are a convenient source of control elements for chimeric expression cassettes. In addition, assaying for the presence of opines can be used to identify transformed tissue.

Heterologous genetic sequences can be introduced into appropriate plant cells, by means of the Ti plasmid of A. tumefaciens or the Ri plasmid of A. rhizogenes. The Ti or Ri plasmid is transmitted to plant cells on infection by Agrobacterium and is stably integrated into the plant genome. J. Schell, Science, 237:1176-83 (1987), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

After transformation, the transformed plant cells must be regenerated. Plant regeneration from cultured protoplasts is described in Evans et al., Handbook of Plant Cell Cultures, Nol. 1: (MacMillan Publishing Co., New York, 1983); and Vasil I.R. (ed.), Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants. Acad. Press, Orlando, Vol. I, 1984, and Vol. Ill (1986), which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

It is known that practically all plants can be regenerated from cultured cells or tissues, including but not limited to, all major species of sugarcane, sugar beets, cotton, fruit trees, and legumes. Means for regeneration vary from species to species of plants, but generally a suspension of transformed protoplasts or a petri plate containing transformed explants is first provided. Callus tissue is formed and shoots may be induced from callus and subsequently rooted. Alternatively, embryo formation can be induced in the callus tissue. These embryos germinate as natural embryos to form plants. The culture media will generally contain various amino acids and hormones, such as auxin and cytokinins. It is also advantageous to add glutamic acid and proline to the medium, especially for such species as corn and alfalfa. Efficient regeneration will depend on the medium, on the genotype, and on the history of the culture. If these three variables are controlled, then regeneration is usually reproducible and repeatable. After the expression cassette is stably incorporated in transgenic plants, it can be transferred to other plants by sexual crossing. Any of a number of standard breeding techniques can be used, depending upon the species to be crossed.

Once transgenic plants of this type are produced, the plants themselves can be cultivated in accordance with conventional procedure. Alternatively, transgenic seeds or propagules (e.g., cuttings) are recovered from the transgenic plants. The seeds can then be planted in the soil and cultivated using conventional procedures to produce transgenic plants. The transgenic plants are propagated from the planted transgenic seeds.

EXAMPLES

Example 1 Application of Messenger with Roundup UltraMAX to improve control of various weeds. The objective of this study was to determine if pre, post, or tank-mix application of Messenger (active ingredient harpin_Ea) affected Roundup UltraMAX' s (active ingredient glyphosate, Monsanto, St. Louis, MO) ability to control weeds. In this experiment, control of two susceptible and two tolerant dicot weed species, as well as two susceptible and two tolerant monocot weed species was examined. Plots were constructed in the field and uniformilly planted with the respective weed seeds. Plots were maintained in ambient conditions. Messenger and Roundup UltraMAX applications were conducted at 2.25 oz. per acre and 16 oz. per acre, respectively. The various treatment groups were as follows; (1) Messenger application followed three days later by a Roundup UltraMAX application (Mess bf RU), (2) application of Messenger and Roundup UltraMAX at the same time via a tank-mix (MSS+RU), (3) application of Roundup UltraMAX followed one day (24 hours) later by a Messenger application (RU bf MSS), (4) Roundup UltraMAX application alone. Observations regarding the percent weed control of the specific weed species were made at seven and 14 days after treatments (DAT). Results are shown below in Tables 6 through 9. Table 6. Effect of Messenger upon Roundup UltraMAX Efficacy

(susceptible dicots)

Common Lambsquarter Common Cocklebur

Treatment 7 DAT 14 DAT 7 DAT 14 DAT

MSS bf RU 62 b 82 b 82 b 100

MSS+RU 73 a 94 a 91 a 100

RU bfMSS 72 a 91 a 92 a 100

RU 45 c 72 c 72 c 100

Same letters do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Ne man-Keuls)

Table 7. Effect of Messenger upon Roundup UltraMAX Efficacy

(tolerant dicots)

Velvetleaf Redroot Pigweed

Treatment 7 DAT 14 DAT 7 DAT 14 DAT

MSS bf RU 21 b 32 b 54 b 74 b

MSS+RU 32 a 44 a 81 a 96 a

RU bfMSS 33 a 46 a 77 a 94 a

RU l i e 18 c 35 c 46 c

Same letters do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)

Table 8. Effect of Messenger upon Roundup UltraMAX Efficacy

(susceptible monocots)

Smooth Crabgrass ( Giant Foxtail

Treatment 7 DAT 14 DAT 7 DAT 14 DAT

MSS bf RU 80 b 100 83 b 100

MSS+RU 92 a 100 93 a 100

RU bfMSS 91 100 92 a 100

RU 72 c 100 75 c 100

Same letters do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)

Table 9. Effect of Messenger upon Roundup UltraMAX Efficacy

(tolerant monocots)

Yellow Nutsedge Shattercane

Treatment 7 DAT 14 DAT 7 DAT 14 DAT

MSS bf RU 5 b 10 c 42 b 70 b

MSS+RU 14 a 29 a 75 a 97 a

RU bfMSS 13 a 24 b 72 a 93 a

RU 2 c 4 d 28 c 54 c Same letters do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)

In each case where 100% control was not achieved, the inclusion of Messenger with Roundup UltraMAX significantly increased Roundup UltraMAX' s control of the weed. Though Messenger treatment followed by Roundup UltraMAX treatment showd significantly increased weed control over that of Roundup Ultra Max alone, tank-mixing and application of Roundup UltraMAX followed by Messenger application showed the greatest control of weeds.

Example 2 - Application of Messenger with Orthene to control insects for blue mold in tobacco results in lower disease incidence than Orthene alone.

Tobacco (Nicotiana tobacum), var. K-326, was planted in a small-plot, replicated (3 times) field trial. Application of Messenger (active ingredient harpin_Ea) Orthene (active ingredient acephate, Nalent U.S.A. Corp., Walnut Creek, Ca), and Messenger + Orthene were made beginning with the transplant water and were followed by 4 foliar sprays at approximately 14-d intervals. Orthene was used in this trial to control aphids, a common vector for blue mold disease (Peronospora tabacina) in tobacco. The trial was not inoculated with insects or disease. Evaluation for blue mold was made approximately one week following the final (4 ) foliar application of each treatment. Addition of Messenger to the Orthene treatment resulted in lower blue mold infestation than the Messenger alone treatment, while the combination of both products resulted in substantially lower disease incidence than the Orthene alone treatment (Table 10). These results indicate a positive trend for the inclusion of Messenger with Orthene to give a slightly greater disease control than either Messenger or Orthene alone (Table 10).

Table 10. Messenger, Orthene, and Messenger + Orthene treatments applied to tobacco as transplant water drenches (TPW) and foliar sprays. _{UF A}™-™™. _{A T} T_{Ϊ A} P ^P_VX_A APPL. RATE (FOLIAR BLUE MOLD DISEASE TREATMEΝT(S) APPL. RATE (TPW) _SPRAY) INCIDENCE (%)

Messenger 30 ppm 30 ppm 8.2 Orthene 12 oz/A 12 ozIA 27.8 Messenger + Orthene 30 ppm + 12 oz/A 30 ppm + 12 oz/A 7 )

Messenger vs. Messenger + Orthene: 15% decrease in blue mold disease incidence.

Orthene vs. Messenger+Orthene: 75% decrease in blue mold disease incidence. Example 3 - Application of Messenger^® with Temik^® to control nematodes in cotton enhances performance of Temik.

Cotton, (Gossypium hirsutum), var. PM1218, was planted to a small- plot, replicated (6 times) field trial. Plot size was 6-8 rows x 50 feet with the center 4 rows treated and center 2 rows harvested. Ten-foot buffers were established between blocks. Temik (active ingredient aldricarb, Aventis CropScience, Research Triangle, NC) was applied in-furrow (at 5 lbs/ A) at planting. Messenger (active ingredient harpin_Ea) foliar applications (at 2.23 oz/A) were made at various timing regimes on both Temik-treated and non-Temik treated cotton. Yield data in response to these treatments is shown in Table 11.

Table 11. Messenger, Temik, and Messenger + Temik Treatments Effect on Cotton Seed Yield.

SEED COTTOT SEED INCREASE OVER

TREATMENT

YIELD (LBS/A) UNTREATED (%)

Messenger 2,203' 8.9

Messenger + Temik 2.388¹ 18.0

Temik 2,221 9.8

Untreated 2,023

Messenger + Temik, respectively.

Results from this field trial indicated that both the individual Messenger and Temik treatments boosted seed cotton yield about 10% above the untreated. However, the Messenger + Temik treatment gave an 18% yield above the untreated suggesting that addition of Messenger to the Temik treatment enhanced Temik' s ability to perform its intended function.

Example 4. - Application of Messenger^® with Equation Pro^® to control late blight in tomatoes enhances performance of Equation Pro.

Tomato seedlings were planted into greenhouse pots, 3 plants per pot replicated 4 pots per treatment. One week prior to artificial inoculation with

Phytopthora infestans (Late blight), one set of plants received a single foliar spray of Messenger (active ingredient harpinE_a) a approx. 20 ppm active ingredient (a.i.) followed by a second foliar spray approximately one week after inoculation. A second set of replicate pots received Messenger+Equation Pro (active ingredients famoxadone + cymoxanil, DuPont Crop Protection, Wilmington, DE) while a third set of replicates received only the Equation Pro treatment. An untreated control treatment was included in the test. After the disease had spread to fully infect the untreated plants, treated plants were rated for disease symptoms; severity and index were both calculated for each treatment. Results are presented in Table 12.

Table 12. Messenger, Messenger + Equation Pro, and Equation Pro Treatments Effect on Late Blight in Tomato.

TREATMENT DISEASE INDEX SEVERITY (%) EFFICACY (%)

Messenger 0.89¹ Ϊ3 7 0

Messenger+EquationPro 0.30¹ 6.0 90.2

Equation Pro 0.59 11.8 80.8

Untreated ^07 61A -^»

Mean values of four replicate pots, three plants in each.

Results from this greenhouse trial indicated that both the individual Messenger and Equation Pro treatments provided substantial resistance to Late blight in tomato. However, the Messenger + Equation Pro treatment resulted in an even greater degree of disease control than either treatment alone, suggesting that the addition of Messenger to the Equation Pro treatment enhances Equation Pro's ability to perform its intended function.

Example 5. - Inclusion of Messenger^® in Aliette^® treatment program increases control of Phytophthora cinnamomi root rot in avocado. Five month old avocado seedlings (Topo Topa) were inoculated with Phytophthora cinnamomi. Treatment groups included; (1) Aliette (active ingredient fosetyl-aluminum ISO, Aventis CropScience, Research Triangle Park, NC) pre- treatment, applied seven days prior to inoculation, (2) Messenger (active ingredient harpin_Ea) treatments seven days prior to inoculation, 14 days post-inoculation and every 21 days there after, (3) the combination of treatments 1 and 2 described above, (4) inoculated untreated control, and (5) uninoculated untreated control. Each treatment group was replicated six times. Observations were recorded with respect to the percent of necrotic roots present in the total root mass. Avocado roots show a distinct blackening when infected with P. cinnamomi, whereas non-infected roots are brown- white in color. Table 13 summarizes the the study details and resulting data. Table 13. Messenger, Messenger + Aliette, and Aliette Treatments Effect on Root Rot in Avocado. Treatment Application Technique % Diseased Roots

Aliette pre-trearment 60 be

Messenger foliar every 21 days 38.3 c

Aliette + Messenger pre-treat+ foliar 21d 27.5 cd

UTC none 96.5 a

UTC (no inoculation) none 6.3 d

Same letters do not significantly differ.

Although the invention has been described in detail for the purpose of illustration, it is understood that such details are solely for that purpose, and variations can be made therein by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the scope of the invention which is defined by the following claims.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED:

1. A method of increasing the efficacy of agricultural chemicals comprising: applying at least one agricultural chemical to a plant or plant seed under conditions effective for the agricultural chemical to perform its intended functions and applying at least one hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide to said plant or plant seed under conditions effective to increase the efficacy of the agricultural chemical.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein said plant is treated during said applying.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said plant seed is treated during said applying, said method further comprising: planting said treated plant seed in natural or artificial soil and propagating a plant from said treated plant seed planted in said natural or artificial soil.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein said plants or plant seeds are selected from the group consisting of canola, alfalfa, rice, wheat, barley, rye, cotton, sunflower, peanut, corn, potato, sweet potato, bean, pea, chicory, lettuce, endive, cabbage, brussel sprout, beet, parsnip, cauliflower, broccoli, turnip, radish, spinach, onion, garlic, eggplant, pepper, celery, carrot, squash, pumpkin, zucchini, cucumber, apple, pear, melon, citrus, strawberry, grape, raspberry, pineapple, soybean, tobacco, tomato, sorghum, avocado, sugarcane, Saintpaulia, petunia, pelargonium, poinsettia, chrysanthemum, carnation, and zinnia.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein said applying the agricultural chemical is conducted simultaneously or independently of said applying the hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide.

6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the agricultural chemical is selected from the group consisting of pesticides, fertilizers, and plant growth regulators.

7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the agricultural chemical is a pesticide selected from the group consisting of insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, acaricides, virucides, and nematicides.

8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the pesticide is a insecticide containing an active ingredient selected from the group consisting of carbamates, organochlorines, nicotinoids, phosphoramidothioates, organophosphates, and pyrethroids.

9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the insecticide is an aldricarb carbamate.

10. The method according to claim 8, wherein the insecticide is an endosulfan organochlorine.

11. The method according to claim 8, wherein the insecticide is an imidacloprid nicotinoid.

12. The method according to claim 8, wherein the insecticide is an acephate phosphoramidothioate.

13. The method according to claim 8, wherein the insecticide is a dimethoate organophosphate.

14. The method according to claim 8, wherein the insecticide is a permethrin pyrethroid.

15. The method according to claim 7, wherein the pesticide is a fungicide containing an active ingredient selected from the group consisting of aliphatic nitrogens, benzimidazoles, dicarboximides, dithiocarbamates, imidazoles, strobins, anilides, aromatics, sulfur derivatives, and copper derivatives.

16. The method according to claim 15, wherein the fungicide is a cymoxanil aliphatic nitrogen.

17. The method according to claim 15, wherein the fungicide is a thiabendazole benzimidazole.

18. The method according to claim 15, wherein the fungicide is a dicarboximide selected from the group consisting of vinclozolin and captan.

19. The method according to claim 15, wherein the fungicide is a dithiocarbamate selected from the group consisting of mancozeb, maneb, metiram, thiram, and ziram.

20. The method according to claim 15, wherein the fungicide is an iprodione imidazole.

21. The method according to claim 15, wherein the fungicide is an azoxystrobin strobin.

22. The method according to claim 15, wherein the fungicide is a metalaxyl anilide.

23. The method according to claim 15, wherein the fungicide is as a chlorothalonil aromatic.

24. The method according to claim 7, wherein the pesticide is a herbicide containing an active ingredient with a site of action classification number selected from the group consisting of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 22, 28, and combinations thereof.

25. The method according to claim 24, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 1 and is selected from the group consisting of sethoxydim and quizalofop-P.

26. The method according to claim 24, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 2 and is selected from the group consisting of primisulfuron and imazamox.

27. The method according to claim 24, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 3 and is selected from the group consisting of trifluralin and pendimethalin.

28. The method according to claim 24, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 4 and is selected from the group consisting of 2,4-D and dicamba.

29. The method according to claim 24, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 5 and is selected from the group consisting of atrazine and cyanazine.

30. The method according to claim 24, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 6 and is bromoxylin.

31. The method according to claim 24, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 7 and is diuron.

32. The method according to claim 24, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 8 and is EPTC.

33. The method according to claim 24, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 9 and is glyphosate.

34. The method according to claim 24, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 10 and glufosinate.

35. The method according to claim 24, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 12 and is norflurazon.

36. The method according to claim 24, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 13 and is clomazone.

37. The method according to claim 24, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 14 and is fomesafen.

38. The method according to claim 24, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 15 and is selected from the group consisting of alachlor and acetochlor.

39. The method according to claim 24, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 22 and is diquat.

40. The method according to claim 24, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 28 and is isoxaflutole.

41. The method according to claim 6, wherein the agricultural chemical is a plant growth regulator selected from the group consisting of auxins, cytokinins, defoliants, ethylene releasers, gibberellins, growth inhibitors, growth retardants, growth stimulators, (S)-trans-2-Amino-4-(2-aminoethoxy)-3-butenoic acid hydrochloride, and N-(phenylmethyl)-lH-purine-6-amine.

42. The method according to claim 41, wherein the plant growth regulator is an auxin selected from the group consisting of 1-naphthaleneacetic acid and indole-3 -butyric acid.

43. The method according to claim 41 , wherein the plant growth regulator is a zeatin cytokinin.

44. The method according to claim 41 , wherein the plant growth regulator is a defoliant selected from the group consisting of ethephon and thidiazuron.

45. The method according to claim 41 , wherein the plant growth regulator is a growth inhibitor selected from the group consisting of mepiquat and maleic hydrazide.

46. The method according to claim 41 , wherein the plant growth regulator is a gibberellic acid gibberellin.

47. The method according to claim 41 , wherein the plant growth regulator is a forchlorfenuron growth stimulator.

48. The method according to claim 6, wherein the agricultural chemical is a fertilizer containing plant nutrients selected from the group consisting of sulfur, phosphorus, magnesium, calcium, potassium, nitrogen, molybdenum, copper, zinc, manganese, iron, boron, cobalt, chlorine, and combinations thereof.

49. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the hypersensitive response elicitor or polypeptide is derived from a species of pathogens selected from the group consisting of Erwinia, Pseudomonas, and Xanthomonas.

50. The method according to claim 49, wherein the hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide is derived from an Erwinia species selected from the group consisting of Erwinia amylovora, Erwinia carotovora, Erwinia chrysanthemi, and Erwinia stewartii.

51. The method according to claim 49, wherein the hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide is derived from a Pseudomonas species selected from the group consisting of Pseudomonas syringae and Pseudomonas solanacearum.

52. The method according to claim 49, wherein the hypersensitive response elicitor or polypeptide is derived from Xanthomonas campestris.

53. A method of increasing the efficacy of agricultural chemicals comprising: applying at least one agricultural chemical to a transgenic plant or transgenic seed transformed with a nucleic acid molecule which encodes a hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide, wherein the agricultural chemical is applied under conditions effective for the agricultural chemical to perform its intended functions but with increased efficacy.

54. A method according to claim 53, wherein a transgenic plant is provided.

55. A method according to claim 53, wherein a transgenic plant seed is provided, said method further comprising: planting the transgenic seed in natural or artificial soil and propagating plants from said transgenic seed planted in natural or artificial soil.

56. The method according to claim 53, wherein the agricultural chemical is selected from the group consisting of pesticides, fertilizers, and plant growth regulators.

57. The method according to claim 56, wherein the agricultural chemical is a pesticide selected from the group consisting of insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, acaricides, avicides, virucides, and nematicides.

58. The method according to claim 57, wherein the pesticide is an insecticide containing an active ingredient selected from the group consisting of carbamates, organochlorines, nicotinoids, phosphoramidothioates, organophosphates, and pyrethroids.

59. The method according to claim 58, wherein the insecticide is an aldricarb carbamate.

60. The method according to claim 58, wherein the insecticide is an endosulfan organochlorine.

61. The method according to claim 58, wherein the insecticide is an imidacloprid nicotinoid.

62. The method according to claim 58, wherein the insecticide is an acephate phosphoramidothioate.

63. The method according to claim 58, wherein the insecticide is a dimethoate organophosphate.

64. The method according to claim 58, wherein the insecticide is a permethrin pyrethroid.

65. The method according to claim 57, wherein the pesticide is a fungicide containing an active ingredient selected from the group consisting of aliphatic nifrogens, benzimidazoles, dicarboximides, dithiocarbamates, imidazoles, strobins, anilides, aromatics, sulfur derivatives, and copper derivatives.

66. The method according to claim 65, wherein the fungicide is a cymoxanil aliphatic nitrogen.

67. The method according to claim 65, wherein the fungicide is a thiabendazole benzimidazole.

68. The method according to claim 65, wherein the fungicide is a dicarboximide selected from the group consisting of vinclozolin and captan.

69. The method according to claim 65, wherein the fungicide is a dithiocarbamate selected from the group consisting of mancozeb, maneb, metiram, thiram, and ziram.

70. The method according to claim 65, wherein the fungicide is a iprodione imidazole.

71. The method according to claim 65, wherein the fungicide is a azoxystrobin strobin.

72. The method according to claim 65, wherein the fungicide is a metalaxyl anilide.

73. The method according to claim 65, wherein the fungicide is a chlorothalonil aromatic.

74. The method according to claim 57, wherein the pesticide is an herbicide containing an active ingredient with a site of action classification number selected from the group of consisting of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 22, 28 and combinations thereof.

75. The method according to claim 74, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 1 and is selected from the group consisting of sethoxydim and quizalofop-P.

76. The method according to claim 74, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 2 and is selected from the group consisting of primisulfuron and imazamox.

77. The method according to claim 74, wherem the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 3 and is selected from the group consisting of trifluralin and pendimethalin.

78. The method according to claim 74, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 4 and is selected from the group consisting of 2,4-D and dicamba.

79. The method according to claim 74, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 5 and is selected from the group consisting of atrazine and cyanazine.

80. The method according to claim 74, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 6 and is bromoxylin.

81. The method according to claim 74, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 7 and is diuron.

82. The method according to claim 74, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 8 and is EPTC.

83. The method according to claim 74, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 9 and is glyphosate.

84. The method according to claim 74, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 10 and is glufosinate.

85. The method according to claim 74, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 12 and is norflurazon.

86. The method according to claim 74, wherein said active ingredient having said site of action classification number 13 is clomazone.

87. The method according to claim 74, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 14 and is fomesafen.

88. The method according to claim 74, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 15 and is selected from the group consisting of alachlor and acetochlor.

89. The method according to claim 74, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 22 and is diquat.

90. The method according to claim 74, wherein the active ingredient has a site of action classification number 28 and is isoxaflutole.

91. The method according to claim 56, wherein the agricultural chemical is a plant growth regulator selected from the group consisting of auxins, cytokinins, defoliants, ethylene releasers, gibberellins, growth inhibitors, growth retardants, growth stimulators, (S)-trans-2-Amino-4-(2-aminoethoxy)-3-butenoic acid hydrochloride, and N-(phenylmethyl)-lH-purine-6-amine.

92. The method according to claim 91 , wherein the plant growth regulator is an auxin selected from the group consisting of 1-naphthaleneacetic acid and indole-3 -butyric acid.

93. The method according to claim 91 , wherein the plant growth regulator is a zeatin cytokinin.

94. The method according to claim 91 , wherein the plant growth regulator is a defoliant selected from the group consisting of ethephon and thidiazuron.

95. The method according to claim 91 , wherein the plant growth regulator is a growth inhibitor selected from the group consisting of mepiquat and maleic hydrazide.

96. The method according to claim 91 , wherein the plant growth regulator is a gibberellic acid gibberellin.

97. The method according to claim 91 , wherein the plant growth regulator is a forchlorfenuron growth stimulator.

98. The method according to claim 56, wherein the agricultural chemical is a fertilizer containing plant nutrients selected from the group consisting of sulfur, phosphorus, magnesium, calcium, potassium, nitrogen, molybdenum, copper, zinc, manganese, iron, boron, cobalt, chlorine, and combinations thereof.

99. The method according to claim 53, wherein said transgenic plant or transgenic seed is selected from the group consisting of canola, alfalfa, rice, wheat, barley, rye, cotton, sunflower, peanut, corn, potato, sweet potato, bean, pea, chicory, lettuce, endive, cabbage, brussel sprout, beet, parsnip, cauliflower, broccoli, turnip, radish, spinach, onion, garlic, eggplant, pepper, celery, carrot, squash, pumpkin, zucchini, cucumber, apple, pear, melon, citrus, strawberry, grape, raspberry, pineapple, soybean, tobacco, tomato, sorghum, avocado, sugarcane, Saintpaulia, petunia, pelargonium, poinsettia, chrysanthemum, carnation, and zinnia.

100. The method according to claim 53, wherein the hypersensitive response elicitor protein or polypeptide is derived from the species of pathogen selected from the group consisting of Erwinia, Pseudomonas, and Xanthomonas.

101. The method according to claim 100, wherein the hypersensitive response elicitor or polypeptide is derived from an Erwinia species selected from the group consisting of Erwinia amylovora, Erwinia carotovora, Ei'winia chrysanthemi, and Erwinia stewartii.

102. The method according to claim 100, wherein the hypersensitive response elicitor or polypeptide is derived from a Pseudomonas species selected from the group consisting of Pseudomonas syringae and Pseudomonas solanacearum.

103. The method according to claim 100, wherein the hypersensitive response elicitor or polypeptide is derived from Xanthomonas campestris.