WO2004056058A2 - Signal processing method and apparatus using bit confidence values - Google Patents

Signal processing method and apparatus using bit confidence values Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2004056058A2
WO2004056058A2 PCT/IB2003/005658 IB0305658W WO2004056058A2 WO 2004056058 A2 WO2004056058 A2 WO 2004056058A2 IB 0305658 W IB0305658 W IB 0305658W WO 2004056058 A2 WO2004056058 A2 WO 2004056058A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
bits
symbols
bit
equalisation
symbol
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/IB2003/005658
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2004056058A3 (en
Inventor
Danish Ali
Original Assignee
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. filed Critical Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Priority to CN2003801063506A priority Critical patent/CN1726684B/en
Priority to JP2004560033A priority patent/JP4495596B2/en
Priority to DE60312382T priority patent/DE60312382T2/en
Priority to AU2003302948A priority patent/AU2003302948A1/en
Priority to US10/539,355 priority patent/US7920654B2/en
Priority to EP03813226A priority patent/EP1576778B1/en
Publication of WO2004056058A2 publication Critical patent/WO2004056058A2/en
Publication of WO2004056058A3 publication Critical patent/WO2004056058A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/004Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using forward error control
    • H04L1/0045Arrangements at the receiver end
    • H04L1/0047Decoding adapted to other signal detection operation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L25/00Baseband systems
    • H04L25/02Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
    • H04L25/06Dc level restoring means; Bias distortion correction ; Decision circuits providing symbol by symbol detection
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L25/00Baseband systems
    • H04L25/02Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
    • H04L25/06Dc level restoring means; Bias distortion correction ; Decision circuits providing symbol by symbol detection
    • H04L25/067Dc level restoring means; Bias distortion correction ; Decision circuits providing symbol by symbol detection providing soft decisions, i.e. decisions together with an estimate of reliability
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L27/00Modulated-carrier systems
    • H04L27/18Phase-modulated carrier systems, i.e. using phase-shift keying
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L27/00Modulated-carrier systems
    • H04L27/18Phase-modulated carrier systems, i.e. using phase-shift keying
    • H04L27/22Demodulator circuits; Receiver circuits
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/004Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using forward error control
    • H04L1/0045Arrangements at the receiver end
    • H04L1/0054Maximum-likelihood or sequential decoding, e.g. Viterbi, Fano, ZJ algorithms
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/004Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using forward error control
    • H04L1/0056Systems characterized by the type of code used
    • H04L1/0067Rate matching
    • H04L1/0068Rate matching by puncturing
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/004Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using forward error control
    • H04L1/0056Systems characterized by the type of code used
    • H04L1/0071Use of interleaving
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/20Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received using signal quality detector
    • H04L1/203Details of error rate determination, e.g. BER, FER or WER

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method of signal processing and to apparatus for signal processing.
  • European patent specification no. EP 0 987 863 A1 describes a system for demodulating a 8-PSK modulated signal involving splitting the symbol into its I and Q components and supplying these as input bits into a Viterbi decoder.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide improved demodulation of PSK signals.
  • Another object of the present invention is to provide improved decoding of transmitted symbols.
  • Another object of the present invention is to provide improved performance of the transmitted signals.
  • a further object of the present invention is to provide significant reduction in block error rate, without significant increase in required processing power.
  • a method of processing a data signal comprising receiving a data sequence incorporating PSK symbols, separating the data sequence into bits of symbols, assigning a confidence value to each bit in a symbol, and effecting convolutional decoding of the bit stream associated with the assigned confidence values.
  • the method may provide enhanced performance of the decoding operation with reduced block error rate.
  • the method may include any one or more of the following features:- • assigning a confidence value comprises mapping symbols to binary bits by means of a Gray code;
  • Another aspect of the present invention provides a computer program product directly loadable into the internal memory of a digital computer, comprising software portions for performing the steps of the method of the present invention when said product is run on a computer.
  • Another aspect of the present invention provides a computer program for performing the steps of the method of the present invention when said program is run on a computer.
  • the present invention also provides a carrier, which may comprise electronic signals, for a computer program embodying the present invention.
  • a further aspect of the present invention provides electronic distribution of a computer program of the method of the present invention.
  • a further aspect of the present invention provides apparatus for processing a data signal comprising means to receive a data sequence incorporating PSK symbols, mapping means to map the data sequence into bits of symbols and to assign a confidence value to each bit in the symbols, and means to effect convolutional decoding of the bit stream associated with the assigned confidence values.
  • a further aspect of the present invention provides a system for processing data signal incorporating such apparatus.
  • a further aspect of the present invention provides a look-up table derived from a method of the present invention or from apparatus of the present invention.
  • a further aspect of the present invention provides a method for using such a look-up table and apparatus for using such a look-up table.
  • the present invention is generally applicable to 8-level PSK signals, and particularly suited to digital cellular communications for example using the GSM standard especially incorporating the EDGE services.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a radio receiver for a handset incorporating the present invention
  • Figure 2 is a block diagram of an equaliser incorporating the present invention
  • Figure 3 is a block diagram of the remainder of the signal processing of the present system
  • Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of 8-PSK modulation; and Figure 5 shows a block error testing system.
  • FIG. 1 a dual-conversion receiver architecture for a UMTS/GSM receiver with EDGE services capability.
  • GSM signals received at antenna 10 pass to low noise amplifier 11 and onto mixer 12 to be input to a low intermediate frequency unit 13 of 100 kHz (contrasting with a zero intermediate frequency for the CDMA node), thereby to allow integration of the channel filters (in this architecture channel filtering is performed digitally) without the performance loss associated with zero-IF receivers for narrowband systems, then passing to amplifier 14, and mixer 15, and on to A/D unit 16.
  • Details of the GSM/EDGE standard are disclosed in the 3G UMTS standard, see for example the Technical Specification published under reference 3GPP TS 45.004, v 4.2.0 (2001-11).
  • a cellular telephone handset is capable of receiving EDGE modulated signals and the EDGE (Enhanced Data-rates for GSM Evolution) protocol builds upon the successful GSM cellular telephone standard in order to give faster communication links while using the same amount of radio spectrum as GSM.
  • EDGE Enhanced Data-rates for GSM Evolution
  • the faster data transfer makes such actions as web browsing run at a tolerable speed on a handset; WAP handsets, which allowed web browsing using traditional GSM modulation have been found to be extremely slow.
  • GSM Global System for Mobile communications
  • the modulation scheme is Gaussian-filtered minimum-shift-keying (GMSK), a form of frequency modulation.
  • the bit rate is sufficiently high that typical propagation conditions result in inter-symbol-interference (ISI).
  • ISI inter-symbol-interference
  • a training sequence 20 (a predefined sequence of bits) is transmitted as part of the burst.
  • the signal received when this training sequence is due is used to work out how the radio propagation conditions have distorted the signal, as well as providing timing and phase references using estimator 21.
  • noise As well as several copies of the transmitted signal (all at different times and with different amplitudes and phases) there is also noise, be it thermal noise or interference from other cells using the same frequency.
  • Equaliser 22 determines what was the transmitted sequence, by working out a likely sequence of bits given a received sequence of samples and the ISI deduced from the training sequence 20.
  • a popular equaliser is the Viterbi equaliser, which relies on each bit only affecting a small number of bits after it (a window, typically up to 9 bits long).
  • the Viterbi equaliser By working out the probabilities of all possible sets of 9 bits being transmitted given the received sequence and the expected inter- symbol-interference, the most likely set has the correct first bit. This bit is then fixed, and the remaining bits are shifted down, with a new unknown bit and corresponding received samples being considered in the window.
  • Convolutional coding For sending digital information, further error correction is necessary.
  • Convolutional coding is used, typically 1/2-rate (so that for every information bit to be transmitted, a sequence of two bits is actually transmitted). Convolutional coding is more complicated than simple repetition, and the performance improvement correspondingly better than repetition.
  • One measure of the quality of a coding scheme is the "minimum distance" - how many bits in a coded sequence have to be wrong before another valid coded sequence has been created. Where a bit is received in error, it does not fit in with the bits before or after it. The Viterbi maximum-likelihood-sequence algorithm is therefore applied to decode the bit sequence. On a radio channel, bit errors are likely to occur in bursts, for example because the equaliser 22 has moved too far from the training sequence 20, or because of a spark of noise, or because of a short fade. Since convolutional coding uses nearby bits to correct a bad bit, it is useful to interleave the bits, so that the nearby bits for decoding are not nearby for propagation.
  • the 270.833 kbit/s raw bit rate translates to 9600 data bits/s when using a GSM data link.
  • EDGE introduces two changes to the GSM standard: more options for data coding, and modulation that is more efficient.
  • weaker convolutional coding may be used (or none at all). While it is possible to use (for example) a 2/3-rate convolutional coder, this is not the approach taken by the EDGE standard. Instead, it uses the 1/2-rate coder, but then discards a portion of the output bits, evenly distributed, in a process called puncturing. This allows bit-rates to be increased to 17.6 kbit/s.
  • the option for 8-symbol phase-shift-keying (8PSK) is introduced in the EDGE standard. This is done at the same symbol rate (270833 symbols/s) and in the same modulation bandwidth (200 kHz), but since three bits can be sent per symbol, the raw bit rate is tripled to 812.5 kbit s. While retaining the 1/8 duty cycle (hence the amount of channel capacity allocated to one user), the useful data rate increases to 59.2 kbit/s when conditions are sufficiently good.
  • the receiver is active only when a burst intended for the handset is expected.
  • the analogue radio parts are powered up during the burst.
  • the digital signal processing essentially is delayed until the burst is complete, with the whole burst being processed as a single vector.
  • equalisation at equaliser 22 is done from the training sequence 20 outwards (so both forwards and backwards in time), the implementation must use memory, and this is easiest in the digitial domain.
  • the equaliser algorithm may be implemented as software in a digital signal processor, but it could alternatively be implemented as dedicated signal processing hardware.
  • the output from equaliser 22 is 116 bits (GMSK) or symbols (8PSK), namely 157.25 less the training sequence and guard spaces as shown in Figure 2.
  • the 8PSK symbols are mapped to bits by a mapping means 28 which also assigns a confidence value to each bit in a symbol.
  • the interleaving 30, depuncturing 31 and incremental redundancy blocks 32 follow as shown in Figure 3.
  • the symbols-to-bits mapping increases the number of bits fed to the deinterleaver 30 from 1 16 to 348.
  • the convolutional decoder 33 works most effectively if it is arranged to take soft inputs, because the values of the punctured bits are unknown, rather than being received as either 1 or 0 (subject to noise and interference).
  • the decoder 33 can take in (for example) +1.0 as being reasonably confident logic 1 , -1.0 as being reasonably confident logic 0, and 0.0 to indicate that a bit is equally likely to be 1 or 0.
  • the present invention ensures improved mapping of symbols to bits, taking advantage of the fact that the convolutional decoder takes soft inputs.
  • equaliser is able to produce greater information, by determining where the constellation point is on the complex plane rather than which symbol is closest, even better results will be obtained by interpolating between specified points in the lookup table.
  • the present invention is a development from the conventional system involving a decision-feedback equaliser which produces hard decisions and chooses the most likely symbol given the received signal, but provides no further information about how close the received signal was to that symbol or whether there was another symbol almost as likely.
  • this conventional system there is a direct translation between symbols and the binary patterns they represent.
  • One such system takes hard symbol decisions and produces equally hard binary output. Although this conversion is correct, it does not indicate the different degree of confidence in which bits are held, assuming that the symbol might be in error.
  • Table 1 If one decodes symbol 5 in the presence of noise, it could be that the transmitted symbol was actually 4 or 6. Looking at the binary patterns in Table 1 , it is clear that whether the transmitted signal was 4, 5 or 6, bit 1 is still be zero. Bit 0 or bit 2, which in symbol 5 would decode as ones, might be zero if the transmitted symbol was actually 4 or 6 respectively. Therefore, when symbol 5 is received, bit 1 is known to be zero with greater confidence than one knows bits 0 and 2 to be ones.
  • the optimum value for ⁇ depends on propagation conditions. Under static sensitivity conditions, the optimum value has been determined to be around 3.4, delivering up to 4 dB reduction in SNR required to achieve the specified block-error-rate. Since the toughest test is a TU50 co-channel, ⁇ must be optimised for those conditions. From simulations summarised in Table 3 (which shows benefits observed for improved decoding under TU50 Co-channel conditions), it was concluded that the optimum value for ⁇ is 1.7, with an improvement in receiver performance around 0.7 dB. This is a small improvement, but significantly advantageous.
  • the present invention concerns the radio receiver used in cellular telephones supporting the EDGE standard (enhanced data rates for GSM evolution).
  • EDGE enhanced data rates for GSM evolution
  • data bits are convolutionally coded and then Gray coded onto 8-PSK symbols.
  • the Grey coding ensures that only one bit error occurs if (due to noise) the received symbol is adjacent to the symbol transmitted.
  • the present invention involves an improved conversion which uses the observation that the bits in a symbol are known to different levels of confidence. If one looks at symbol 110, it might really be 111 or 100. The leading 1 is known much more strongly than the other two bits. It should therefore be mapped to some other value, more positive than 1. Let this value be ⁇ , a constant value greater than or equal to 1. 110 then maps to ⁇ , 1, 0). The full mapping table becomes:- 000 ⁇ (- ⁇ ,-1,-1)
  • Gray coding ensures that only one bit error occurs if (due to noise) the decoded symbol is adjacent to the symbol transmitted, e.g. the adjacent symbols to 110 are 111 and 100.
  • soft decisions are made by the demodulator, assigning increased confidence to the bit in a symbol which is the same in adjacent symbols.
  • the first bit is known to be 1 with a much higher degree of certainty than the value of the other two bits.
  • using binary to integer mapping (so that 1 maps to +1 and 0 to -1) the symbol is represented as ( ⁇ , 1 , -1).
  • the known prior art takes the starting position that one has I and Q components of received signals (with no mention of how multipath propagation, which leads to inter-symbol interference, is mitigated). They only establish that one can generate soft decisions on all bits, depending on where the measured (l,Q) vector ended up.
  • the present invention starts with the output from a multipath equaliser which produces hard decisions, thereby losing useful information, good results being obtained from an equaliser that generates soft decisions.
  • the present invention takes the hard decisions, re-codes them as an (l,Q) pair, and then takes soft decisions from that. In this way the present invention gets soft decisions out of a decision-feedback equaliser.
  • the present invention softens the decisions made by equalisers which produce hard decisions.
  • This invention may provide significant reduction in block error rate, without significant increase in required processing power.
  • the present invention is particularly applicable to the implementation of receivers for EDGE phones (enhanced GSM data rates), and other receivers for standards using gray-coded symbols.
  • bit-and block-error-rate testing system which has been used to obtain the results shown in Table 3.
  • the raw (uncoded) bit error rate and block-error-rate for EDGE coded data were measured in the same simulation to allow direct comparsions of performance using the system in Figure 5.
  • the new blocks are shown with shadowing.
  • the difference as far as bit-error-rate calculations are concerned is that the bit sequence being used is the output of convolutional encoder 33 fed with random bits, rather than raw random bits. This does not make a significant difference because the demodulator is unaware of forbidden bit-sequences, but there might be some change in the statistics of transitions.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Error Detection And Correction (AREA)
  • Detection And Prevention Of Errors In Transmission (AREA)
  • Communication Control (AREA)
  • Compression, Expansion, Code Conversion, And Decoders (AREA)
  • Signal Processing For Digital Recording And Reproducing (AREA)
  • Alarm Systems (AREA)
  • Circuits Of Receivers In General (AREA)
  • Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
  • Digital Transmission Methods That Use Modulated Carrier Waves (AREA)

Abstract

In a UMTS/GSM receiver with EDGE services capability, a data sequence incorporating PSK symbols is separated into bits which are assigned confidence values and input to convoluntional decoder (33) to provide improved decoding.

Description

DESCRIPTION
SIGNAL PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS USING BIT CONFIDENCE VALUES
The present invention relates to a method of signal processing and to apparatus for signal processing.
European patent specification no. EP 0 987 863 A1 describes a system for demodulating a 8-PSK modulated signal involving splitting the symbol into its I and Q components and supplying these as input bits into a Viterbi decoder.
An article entitled "Turbo-detection for Enhanced Data for GSM Evolution" by V Franz and G Bauch, IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 19-22 September 1998 vol 5 p 2954-8 describes a technique used to improve the equalisation and decoding by an iterative procedure in which the output from a convolutional decoder is re-coded and used to generate symbol probabilities before another attempt at equalisation (followed by another attempt at decoding).
This approach has the substantial disadvantage of requiring considerable processing power.
An object of the present invention is to provide improved demodulation of PSK signals.
Another object of the present invention is to provide improved decoding of transmitted symbols.
Another object of the present invention is to provide improved performance of the transmitted signals.
A further object of the present invention is to provide significant reduction in block error rate, without significant increase in required processing power. According to the present invention, there is provided a method of processing a data signal comprising receiving a data sequence incorporating PSK symbols, separating the data sequence into bits of symbols, assigning a confidence value to each bit in a symbol, and effecting convolutional decoding of the bit stream associated with the assigned confidence values.
In this way, the method may provide enhanced performance of the decoding operation with reduced block error rate.
The method may include any one or more of the following features:- • assigning a confidence value comprises mapping symbols to binary bits by means of a Gray code;
• incorporating data on the mapping determination in a look-up table for reference;
• re-coding hard decisions as an (l,Q) pair and taking soft decisions therefrom;
• demodulation by decision feedback equalisation with whitening matched filtering;
• using a digital processor for equalisation;
• using dedicated signal processing hardware for equalisation; • de-interleaving, de-puncturing and incremental redundancy steps before convolutional decoding.
Another aspect of the present invention provides a computer program product directly loadable into the internal memory of a digital computer, comprising software portions for performing the steps of the method of the present invention when said product is run on a computer.
Another aspect of the present invention provides a computer program for performing the steps of the method of the present invention when said program is run on a computer.
The present invention also provides a carrier, which may comprise electronic signals, for a computer program embodying the present invention. A further aspect of the present invention provides electronic distribution of a computer program of the method of the present invention.
A further aspect of the present invention provides apparatus for processing a data signal comprising means to receive a data sequence incorporating PSK symbols, mapping means to map the data sequence into bits of symbols and to assign a confidence value to each bit in the symbols, and means to effect convolutional decoding of the bit stream associated with the assigned confidence values.
A further aspect of the present invention provides a system for processing data signal incorporating such apparatus.
A further aspect of the present invention provides a look-up table derived from a method of the present invention or from apparatus of the present invention.
A further aspect of the present invention provides a method for using such a look-up table and apparatus for using such a look-up table.
The present invention is generally applicable to 8-level PSK signals, and particularly suited to digital cellular communications for example using the GSM standard especially incorporating the EDGE services.
It is also applicable to high-order Gray-coded constellation points (for example for CDMA 2000 standard and the UMTS standard) and to data coding and forward-error-correction. Furthermore, it is also applicable to digital video broadcasting and OFDM modulation.
In order that the invention may more readily be understood, a description is now given, by way of example only, reference being made to the accompanying drawings, in which:-
Figure 1 is a block diagram of a radio receiver for a handset incorporating the present invention;
Figure 2 is a block diagram of an equaliser incorporating the present invention; Figure 3 is a block diagram of the remainder of the signal processing of the present system;
Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of 8-PSK modulation; and Figure 5 shows a block error testing system.
There is shown in Figure 1 a dual-conversion receiver architecture for a UMTS/GSM receiver with EDGE services capability. GSM signals received at antenna 10 pass to low noise amplifier 11 and onto mixer 12 to be input to a low intermediate frequency unit 13 of 100 kHz (contrasting with a zero intermediate frequency for the CDMA node), thereby to allow integration of the channel filters (in this architecture channel filtering is performed digitally) without the performance loss associated with zero-IF receivers for narrowband systems, then passing to amplifier 14, and mixer 15, and on to A/D unit 16. Details of the GSM/EDGE standard are disclosed in the 3G UMTS standard, see for example the Technical Specification published under reference 3GPP TS 45.004, v 4.2.0 (2001-11).
A cellular telephone handset is capable of receiving EDGE modulated signals and the EDGE (Enhanced Data-rates for GSM Evolution) protocol builds upon the successful GSM cellular telephone standard in order to give faster communication links while using the same amount of radio spectrum as GSM. The faster data transfer makes such actions as web browsing run at a tolerable speed on a handset; WAP handsets, which allowed web browsing using traditional GSM modulation have been found to be extremely slow.
GSM is a digital transmission scheme that uses time-division- multiple-access to allow up to eight handsets to simultaneously use the same 200 kHz frequency channel. When making a call, the transmitter at one end (and the corresponding receiver at the other end) is turned on for a burst lasting 156.25 bits at a bit rate of 270.833 kbits/s and left off for seven further burst periods before being turned on again. The modulation scheme is Gaussian-filtered minimum-shift-keying (GMSK), a form of frequency modulation.
The bit rate is sufficiently high that typical propagation conditions result in inter-symbol-interference (ISI). To allow for this, a training sequence 20 (a predefined sequence of bits) is transmitted as part of the burst. The signal received when this training sequence is due is used to work out how the radio propagation conditions have distorted the signal, as well as providing timing and phase references using estimator 21.
As well as several copies of the transmitted signal (all at different times and with different amplitudes and phases) there is also noise, be it thermal noise or interference from other cells using the same frequency.
Equaliser 22 determines what was the transmitted sequence, by working out a likely sequence of bits given a received sequence of samples and the ISI deduced from the training sequence 20. For GSM, a popular equaliser is the Viterbi equaliser, which relies on each bit only affecting a small number of bits after it (a window, typically up to 9 bits long). By working out the probabilities of all possible sets of 9 bits being transmitted given the received sequence and the expected inter- symbol-interference, the most likely set has the correct first bit. This bit is then fixed, and the remaining bits are shifted down, with a new unknown bit and corresponding received samples being considered in the window. The number of different sequence probabilities which must be simultaneously considered is 29 = 512 (with a different 512 for each bit). By considering all possible sequences within the window, the Viterbi equaliser gives very good results.
Even with the Viterbi equaliser, results are not perfect. As one gets further from the training sequence, the risk of bit errors gets larger. For this reason, the GSM standard places important bits close to the training sequence 20 and less important bits further away at the ends of the burst. Under typical urban conditions, the minimum acceptable standard is to have 8 % of bits decoded wrongly. This gives rise to clicks and whistles on top of the voice one is listening to, but it is generally tolerable.
For sending digital information, further error correction is necessary. Convolutional coding is used, typically 1/2-rate (so that for every information bit to be transmitted, a sequence of two bits is actually transmitted). Convolutional coding is more complicated than simple repetition, and the performance improvement correspondingly better than repetition.
One measure of the quality of a coding scheme is the "minimum distance" - how many bits in a coded sequence have to be wrong before another valid coded sequence has been created. Where a bit is received in error, it does not fit in with the bits before or after it. The Viterbi maximum-likelihood-sequence algorithm is therefore applied to decode the bit sequence. On a radio channel, bit errors are likely to occur in bursts, for example because the equaliser 22 has moved too far from the training sequence 20, or because of a spark of noise, or because of a short fade. Since convolutional coding uses nearby bits to correct a bad bit, it is useful to interleave the bits, so that the nearby bits for decoding are not nearby for propagation.
Because of all the overheads of training sequences, convolutional coding, control information and the 1/8 duty cycle, the 270.833 kbit/s raw bit rate translates to 9600 data bits/s when using a GSM data link.
EDGE introduces two changes to the GSM standard: more options for data coding, and modulation that is more efficient.
When propagation conditions are known to be good enough, so that the raw bit error rate is much less than 8 %, weaker convolutional coding may be used (or none at all). While it is possible to use (for example) a 2/3-rate convolutional coder, this is not the approach taken by the EDGE standard. Instead, it uses the 1/2-rate coder, but then discards a portion of the output bits, evenly distributed, in a process called puncturing. This allows bit-rates to be increased to 17.6 kbit/s.
As well as GMSK, the option for 8-symbol phase-shift-keying (8PSK) is introduced in the EDGE standard. This is done at the same symbol rate (270833 symbols/s) and in the same modulation bandwidth (200 kHz), but since three bits can be sent per symbol, the raw bit rate is tripled to 812.5 kbit s. While retaining the 1/8 duty cycle (hence the amount of channel capacity allocated to one user), the useful data rate increases to 59.2 kbit/s when conditions are sufficiently good. One downside to the modulation change is that a Viterbi equaliser would need to keep track of 89 = 134217728 sequence probabilities, and even with the advances in computing power since the introduction of GSM it would be impractical to perform this many calculations for each symbol being decoded. Demodulation is therefore done with a different technique, for example a decision feedback equaliser with whitening matched filter. After depuncturing and deinterleaving, a Viterbi decoder is still the best choice for removing the convolutional coding.
Because power efficiency is important in battery-powered cellular telephones, the receiver is active only when a burst intended for the handset is expected. The analogue radio parts are powered up during the burst. The digital signal processing essentially is delayed until the burst is complete, with the whole burst being processed as a single vector.
Because equalisation at equaliser 22 is done from the training sequence 20 outwards (so both forwards and backwards in time), the implementation must use memory, and this is easiest in the digitial domain. The equaliser algorithm may be implemented as software in a digital signal processor, but it could alternatively be implemented as dedicated signal processing hardware. The output from equaliser 22 is 116 bits (GMSK) or symbols (8PSK), namely 157.25 less the training sequence and guard spaces as shown in Figure 2. The 8PSK symbols are mapped to bits by a mapping means 28 which also assigns a confidence value to each bit in a symbol.
The interleaving 30, depuncturing 31 and incremental redundancy blocks 32 follow as shown in Figure 3. The symbols-to-bits mapping increases the number of bits fed to the deinterleaver 30 from 1 16 to 348.
Even in the absence of soft decisions from the equaliser, the convolutional decoder 33 works most effectively if it is arranged to take soft inputs, because the values of the punctured bits are unknown, rather than being received as either 1 or 0 (subject to noise and interference). The decoder 33 can take in (for example) +1.0 as being reasonably confident logic 1 , -1.0 as being reasonably confident logic 0, and 0.0 to indicate that a bit is equally likely to be 1 or 0.
The present invention ensures improved mapping of symbols to bits, taking advantage of the fact that the convolutional decoder takes soft inputs.
Examination of the PSK symbols shows that some of the decoded bits are known with more confidence than other bits because even if the correct symbol turned out to be one next to the one selected by the equaliser, one of the bits would remain unchanged. Taking the "reasonably confident" bits to have values of ±1.0, the "very confident" bits were assigned values of ±α, where α is a value greater than 1.0. The optimum value for α depends on the propagation conditions (probably the relative strengths of inter-symbol-interference after equalisation and noise/interference). Since it is difficult to measure what the propagation conditions are, a fixed value of α is proposed, the value being determined by system simulation beforehand. The value chosen is a compromise, and could be weighted towards parts of the standard that are considered difficult to meet, or towards conditions that are most likely to occur in practice. Where the set of symbols and bits is more complicated (eg 16QAM or 64QAM), there might need to be more levels of confidence, but they can still be put into a lookup table from "symbol decoded by equaliser" to
"probability that each bit is a 1 or 0".
If the equaliser is able to produce greater information, by determining where the constellation point is on the complex plane rather than which symbol is closest, even better results will be obtained by interpolating between specified points in the lookup table.
Essentially, the present invention is a development from the conventional system involving a decision-feedback equaliser which produces hard decisions and chooses the most likely symbol given the received signal, but provides no further information about how close the received signal was to that symbol or whether there was another symbol almost as likely. In this conventional system, there is a direct translation between symbols and the binary patterns they represent. One such system takes hard symbol decisions and produces equally hard binary output. Although this conversion is correct, it does not indicate the different degree of confidence in which bits are held, assuming that the symbol might be in error.
With 8-PSK modulation, the symbols are equally spaced around a circle, as shown in Figure 4. In order to reduce the bit error rate should transmitted symbol 6 be mistakenly decoded as symbol 5, these symbols are mapped to binary bits by means of a Gray code, shown in Table 1.
Figure imgf000010_0001
Table 1 If one decodes symbol 5 in the presence of noise, it could be that the transmitted symbol was actually 4 or 6. Looking at the binary patterns in Table 1 , it is clear that whether the transmitted signal was 4, 5 or 6, bit 1 is still be zero. Bit 0 or bit 2, which in symbol 5 would decode as ones, might be zero if the transmitted symbol was actually 4 or 6 respectively. Therefore, when symbol 5 is received, bit 1 is known to be zero with greater confidence than one knows bits 0 and 2 to be ones.
A similar analysis is applied to all eight symbols. Writing a confident mapping of one as +α over the normal value of +1 , and confident mapping of zero as -α over the normal value of -1 there results an improved mapping table, shown as Table 2 (which indicates improved mapping of 8- PSK bits to give softer input to convolutional decoder). With α being some value greater than unity, the hard decisions of 8-PSK symbols can therefore be transformed into softer decisions that are fed to the convolutional decoder. This technique has no impact on the raw bit error rate, but can significantly improve the coded bit- and block-error-rates.
Figure imgf000011_0001
Table 2
The optimum value for α depends on propagation conditions. Under static sensitivity conditions, the optimum value has been determined to be around 3.4, delivering up to 4 dB reduction in SNR required to achieve the specified block-error-rate. Since the toughest test is a TU50 co-channel, α must be optimised for those conditions. From simulations summarised in Table 3 (which shows benefits observed for improved decoding under TU50 Co-channel conditions), it was concluded that the optimum value for α is 1.7, with an improvement in receiver performance around 0.7 dB. This is a small improvement, but significantly advantageous.
Figure imgf000012_0001
Table 3
Thus, the present invention concerns the radio receiver used in cellular telephones supporting the EDGE standard (enhanced data rates for GSM evolution). In this standard, data bits are convolutionally coded and then Gray coded onto 8-PSK symbols. The Grey coding ensures that only one bit error occurs if (due to noise) the received symbol is adjacent to the symbol transmitted.
As another example, if the transmitted symbol was 110, and the receiver made an error and chose an adjacent symbol (either 111 or 100), in either case there would only be one bit in error.
In known systems, hard decisions are used, in that the demodulator has to choose one symbol - it cannot say that the signal is somewhere between two of the symbols. This is because the demodulator has many things to handle when sorting out inter-symbol-interference (a major problem in GSM/EDGE).
These symbols are then converted into a bit stream for feeding to the convolutional decoder. In one known system, the conversion done is direct binary to integer (using the mapping, 1 maps to +1 and 0 maps to -
1).
The present invention involves an improved conversion which uses the observation that the bits in a symbol are known to different levels of confidence. If one looks at symbol 110, it might really be 111 or 100. The leading 1 is known much more strongly than the other two bits. It should therefore be mapped to some other value, more positive than 1. Let this value be α, a constant value greater than or equal to 1. 110 then maps to α, 1, 0). The full mapping table becomes:- 000→ (-α,-1,-1)
001→(-1,-α, 1)
010→(-α, 1,-1)
011→(-1,α, 1)
100→(α, -1,-1) 101→(1,-α, 1)
110→(α, 1,-1)
111→(1,α, 1)
These can then be used by convolutional decoder 33 as soft decisions, giving a much better performance.
When α is 1.0 (the reference performance) MCS-5 coding with a co- channel interferer 8 dB below the wanted signal, a block error rate of 0.311 is observed. If α is increased to 3.4, the block error rate drops to 0.044. This is equivalent to an improvement in signal-to-interferer ratio of more than 2dB. Values of between 3 and 4 give the best results, although it is not critical.
Thus the data on the mapping determination is incorporated in a look-up table which is referenced by units of the receiver as appropriate. Thus, in the present invention, Gray coding ensures that only one bit error occurs if (due to noise) the decoded symbol is adjacent to the symbol transmitted, e.g. the adjacent symbols to 110 are 111 and 100. In the invention, it is proposed that soft decisions are made by the demodulator, assigning increased confidence to the bit in a symbol which is the same in adjacent symbols. In the example above, the first bit is known to be 1 with a much higher degree of certainty than the value of the other two bits. For this example, using binary to integer mapping (so that 1 maps to +1 and 0 to -1) the symbol is represented as (α, 1 , -1). These values are then used by a standard convolutional decoder. Values of α between 3 and 4 have been found to give particularly good results.
The known prior art takes the starting position that one has I and Q components of received signals (with no mention of how multipath propagation, which leads to inter-symbol interference, is mitigated). They only establish that one can generate soft decisions on all bits, depending on where the measured (l,Q) vector ended up.
The present invention starts with the output from a multipath equaliser which produces hard decisions, thereby losing useful information, good results being obtained from an equaliser that generates soft decisions.
The present invention takes the hard decisions, re-codes them as an (l,Q) pair, and then takes soft decisions from that. In this way the present invention gets soft decisions out of a decision-feedback equaliser.
The present invention softens the decisions made by equalisers which produce hard decisions.
This invention may provide significant reduction in block error rate, without significant increase in required processing power. The present invention is particularly applicable to the implementation of receivers for EDGE phones (enhanced GSM data rates), and other receivers for standards using gray-coded symbols.
In Figure 5, there is shown a bit-and block-error-rate testing system which has been used to obtain the results shown in Table 3. The raw (uncoded) bit error rate and block-error-rate for EDGE coded data were measured in the same simulation to allow direct comparsions of performance using the system in Figure 5. The new blocks are shown with shadowing. The difference as far as bit-error-rate calculations are concerned is that the bit sequence being used is the output of convolutional encoder 33 fed with random bits, rather than raw random bits. This does not make a significant difference because the demodulator is unaware of forbidden bit-sequences, but there might be some change in the statistics of transitions.
To determine if this would alter the simulated performance of the system, static sensitivity tests were run with both random bits and random bits fed through the EDGE encoder from which it is evident that for signals in the range -115 dBm to -100 dBm, the difference between raw bits for coded and uncoded systems is small.
In the present specification and claims the word "a" or "an" preceding an element does not exclude the presence of a plurality of such elements. Further, the word "comprising" does not exclude the presence of other elements or steps than those listed.
The inclusion of reference signs in parentheses in the claims is intended to aid understanding and is not intended to be limiting.
From reading the present disclosure, other modifications will be apparent to persons skilled in the art. Such modifications may involve other features which are already known in the art of signal processing and which may be use instead of or in addition to features already described herein.

Claims

1. A method of processing a data signal comprising receiving a data sequence incorporating PSK symbols, separating the data sequence into bits of symbols, assigning a confidence value to each bit in a symbol, and effecting convolutional decoding of the bit stream associated with the assigned confidence values.
2. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the step of assigning a confidence value comprises mapping symbols to binary bits by means of a Gray code.
3. A method according to any preceding claim comprising incorporating data on the mapping determination in a look-up table for reference.
4. A method according to any preceding claim comprising re- coding hard decisions as an (l,Q) pair and taking soft decisions therefrom.
5. A method according to any preceding claim comprising demodulation by decision feedback equalisation with whitening matched filtering.
6. A method according to any preceding claim comprising using a digital processor (22) for equalisation.
7. A method according to any of Claims 1 to 5 using dedicated signal processing hardware (22) for equalisation.
8. A method according to any preceding claim comprising de- interleaving, de-puncturing and incremental redundancy steps before convolutional decoding.
9. A computer program product directly loadable into the internal memory of a digital computer, comprising software code portions for performing the steps of any one or more of Claims 1 to 8 when said product is run a computer.
10. Apparatus for processing a data signal comprising means to receive (10) a data sequence incorporating PSK symbols, mapping means (28) to map the data sequence into bits of symbols and to assign a confidence value to each bit in the symbols, and means (33) to effect convolutional decoding of the bit stream associated with the assigned confidence values.
11 . Apparatus according to Claim 10 wherein the mapping means (28) is adapted to map symbols to binary bits by a Gray code.
12. Apparatus according to Claim 10 or 1 1 comprising a look-up table incorporating data on the mapping determination for reference.
13. Apparatus according to any of Claims 10 to 12 comprising means to re-code hard decisions as an (l,Q) pair and means to take soft decisions therefrom.
14. Apparatus according to any of Claims 10 to 13 comprising demodulation by decision feedback equalisation with whitening matched filtering.
15. Apparatus according to any of Claims 10 to 14 comprising a digital processor (22) for equalisation.
16. Apparatus according to any of Claims 10 to 15 comprising dedicated signal processing hardware (22) for equalisation.
17. Apparatus according to any of Claims 10 to 16 comprising means (30,31 ,32) to de-interleave, depuncture, and effect incremental redundancy before convolutional decoding.
18. A look-up table produced by the method of any one of Claims 1 to 9 or the apparatus of any one of Claims 10 to 17.
PCT/IB2003/005658 2002-12-17 2003-12-03 Signal processing method and apparatus using bit confidence values WO2004056058A2 (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN2003801063506A CN1726684B (en) 2002-12-17 2003-12-03 Signal processing method and apparatus using bit confidence values
JP2004560033A JP4495596B2 (en) 2002-12-17 2003-12-03 Signal processing method and apparatus using bit confidence factor
DE60312382T DE60312382T2 (en) 2002-12-17 2003-12-03 SIGNAL PROCESSING AND DEVICE USING BIT SECURITY VALUES
AU2003302948A AU2003302948A1 (en) 2002-12-17 2003-12-03 Signal processing method and apparatus using bit confidence values
US10/539,355 US7920654B2 (en) 2002-12-17 2003-12-03 Signal processing method and apparatus using bit confidence values
EP03813226A EP1576778B1 (en) 2002-12-17 2003-12-03 Signal processing method and apparatus using bit confidence values

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0229320.7 2002-12-17
GBGB0229320.7A GB0229320D0 (en) 2002-12-17 2002-12-17 Signal processing method and apparatus

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2004056058A2 true WO2004056058A2 (en) 2004-07-01
WO2004056058A3 WO2004056058A3 (en) 2004-08-05

Family

ID=9949788

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IB2003/005658 WO2004056058A2 (en) 2002-12-17 2003-12-03 Signal processing method and apparatus using bit confidence values

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (1) US7920654B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1576778B1 (en)
JP (1) JP4495596B2 (en)
KR (1) KR100993461B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1726684B (en)
AT (1) ATE356502T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2003302948A1 (en)
DE (1) DE60312382T2 (en)
GB (1) GB0229320D0 (en)
WO (1) WO2004056058A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7515652B2 (en) * 2003-09-30 2009-04-07 Broadcom Corporation Digital modulator for a GSM/GPRS/EDGE wireless polar RF transmitter
US8126085B2 (en) * 2004-11-22 2012-02-28 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus to estimate channel tap
KR102095668B1 (en) 2016-01-12 2020-03-31 국민대학교산학협력단 DSM-PSK optical wireless transmission method and apparatus

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0625829A2 (en) * 1993-05-21 1994-11-23 AT&T Corp. Post processing method and apparatus symbol reliability generation
US20020122510A1 (en) * 2001-01-04 2002-09-05 Evgeny Yakhnich Apparatus for and method of converting soft symbol information to soft bit information

Family Cites Families (39)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4742533A (en) * 1987-01-02 1988-05-03 Motorola, Inc. Soft decision digital communication apparatus
US4882733A (en) * 1987-03-13 1989-11-21 Ford Aerospace Corporation Method and apparatus for combining encoding and modulation
US5105442A (en) * 1990-11-07 1992-04-14 At&T Bell Laboratories Coded modulation with unequal error protection
US5233630A (en) * 1991-05-03 1993-08-03 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for resolving phase ambiguities in trellis coded modulated data
US5233629A (en) * 1991-07-26 1993-08-03 General Instrument Corporation Method and apparatus for communicating digital data using trellis coded qam
US5633881A (en) * 1993-02-22 1997-05-27 Qualcomm Incorporated Trellis encoder and decoder based upon punctured rate 1/2 convolutional codes
US5396518A (en) * 1993-05-05 1995-03-07 Gi Corporation Apparatus and method for communicating digital data using trellis coding with punctured convolutional codes
US5438590A (en) * 1993-05-24 1995-08-01 Comstream Corporation Transmitting and receiving apparatus and method including punctured convolutional encoding and decoding
US6466629B1 (en) * 1996-09-02 2002-10-15 Stmicroelectronics N.V. Multi-carrier transmission systems
CN1189728A (en) * 1996-11-05 1998-08-05 索尼公司 Receiving apparatus and decoder
US6424685B1 (en) * 1997-11-03 2002-07-23 Harris Corporation Polar computation of branch metrics for TCM
US6005897A (en) * 1997-12-16 1999-12-21 Mccallister; Ronald D. Data communication system and method therefor
US6236685B1 (en) * 1998-06-05 2001-05-22 Sicom, Inc. Pragmatic trellis-coded digital communication with multi-stage branch metrics
DE69829661T2 (en) 1998-09-17 2006-03-09 Sony International (Europe) Gmbh Soft decision method and apparatus in 8-PSK demodulation
US6700926B1 (en) * 1999-12-10 2004-03-02 Nokia Corporation Method and apparatus providing bit-to-symbol mapping for space-time codes
US6658071B1 (en) * 2000-02-14 2003-12-02 Ericsson Inc. Delayed decision feedback log-map equalizer
US7106813B1 (en) * 2000-03-16 2006-09-12 Qualcomm, Incorporated Method and apparatus for combined soft-decision based interference cancellation and decoding
JP2001292185A (en) 2000-04-07 2001-10-19 Sony Corp Encoder, encoding method, recording medium with encoding program recorded thereon, and decoder, decoding method, recording medium with decoding program recorded thereon
US6687507B2 (en) * 2000-05-03 2004-02-03 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Time of arrival estimation for edge/GSM
FR2809249B1 (en) * 2000-05-16 2004-04-23 France Telecom METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ITERATIVE DETECTION AND DECODING OF RECEIVED SYMBOLS, COUPLED TO A REESTIMATION OF THE TRANSMISSION CHANNEL COEFFICIENTS
US6697441B1 (en) * 2000-06-06 2004-02-24 Ericsson Inc. Baseband processors and methods and systems for decoding a received signal having a transmitter or channel induced coupling between bits
US6798852B2 (en) * 2000-06-06 2004-09-28 Ericsson Inc. Methods and systems for extracting a joint probability from a map decision device and processing a signal using the joint probability information
JP2002076933A (en) * 2000-08-31 2002-03-15 Sony Corp Soft output decoder and soft output decoding method and decoder and decoding method
JP2002111754A (en) 2000-09-29 2002-04-12 Toshiba Corp Receiving demapping unit dealing with a plurality of modulation systems
US6907084B2 (en) * 2000-10-06 2005-06-14 Texas Instruments Incorporated Method and apparatus for processing modulation symbols for soft input decoders
US20020085651A1 (en) * 2000-10-16 2002-07-04 Jian Gu Removing frequency and timing offsets in digital transmitters and receivers
US6731700B1 (en) * 2001-01-04 2004-05-04 Comsys Communication & Signal Processing Ltd. Soft decision output generator
US6981202B2 (en) * 2001-01-08 2005-12-27 Nokia Corporation Method and system for allocating convolutional encoded bits into symbols before modulation for wireless communication
US6529559B2 (en) * 2001-01-12 2003-03-04 Comsys Communication & Signal Processing Ltd. Reduced soft output information packet selection
US7012957B2 (en) * 2001-02-01 2006-03-14 Broadcom Corporation High performance equalizer having reduced complexity
US6823027B2 (en) * 2001-03-05 2004-11-23 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method for enhancing soft-value information
US6865235B2 (en) * 2001-03-06 2005-03-08 Agere Systems Inc. Multi-protocol modulator
US6909758B2 (en) * 2001-04-27 2005-06-21 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Systems and methods for decoding data blocks
US6691263B2 (en) * 2001-05-03 2004-02-10 Agere Systems Inc. Interative decoding based on dominant error events
US7042938B2 (en) * 2001-08-13 2006-05-09 Nokia Corporation Soft bit computation for a reduced state equalizer
EP1292077A3 (en) * 2001-09-11 2006-10-11 Broadcom Corporation Sequence estimation for PSK signals
EP1303074B1 (en) * 2001-10-15 2015-04-08 Broadcom Corporation Symbol synchronisation in EDGE handsets
US6704376B2 (en) * 2002-01-23 2004-03-09 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Power and confidence ordered low complexity soft turbomud with voting system
US7136435B2 (en) * 2002-03-30 2006-11-14 Broadcom Corporation Modified branch metrics for processing soft decisions to account for phase noise impact on cluster variance

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0625829A2 (en) * 1993-05-21 1994-11-23 AT&T Corp. Post processing method and apparatus symbol reliability generation
US20020122510A1 (en) * 2001-01-04 2002-09-05 Evgeny Yakhnich Apparatus for and method of converting soft symbol information to soft bit information

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE60312382D1 (en) 2007-04-19
EP1576778A2 (en) 2005-09-21
EP1576778B1 (en) 2007-03-07
KR20050089829A (en) 2005-09-08
AU2003302948A8 (en) 2004-07-09
KR100993461B1 (en) 2010-11-09
DE60312382T2 (en) 2007-12-06
GB0229320D0 (en) 2003-01-22
JP4495596B2 (en) 2010-07-07
US7920654B2 (en) 2011-04-05
CN1726684A (en) 2006-01-25
ATE356502T1 (en) 2007-03-15
US20060193403A1 (en) 2006-08-31
CN1726684B (en) 2012-08-15
WO2004056058A3 (en) 2004-08-05
JP2006510295A (en) 2006-03-23
AU2003302948A1 (en) 2004-07-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7277498B2 (en) Mapping method of code word with QAM modulation
EP1142244B1 (en) Method and system for the transmission, reception and processing of 4-level and 8-level signaling symbols
Hanzo et al. Single-and multi-carrier quadrature amplitude modulation: principles and applications for personal communications, WATM and broadcasting: 2nd
US6986096B2 (en) Scaling and quantizing soft-decision metrics for decoding
EP1489774B1 (en) System and method to determine a bit error probability of received data within a cellular wireless network
EP1908204B1 (en) Estimating bit error probability (bep) in an edge wireless system
US20070140164A1 (en) Method and system for decoding control channels using partial combining with weighted SNR
EP1173959B1 (en) Method and apparatus for estimating channel conditions in wireless communication systems
EP1872547A1 (en) Detection of signal modulation format type
EP1489770A2 (en) Cooperative link characterization and MCS selection by wireless terminal and network for improved system performance
EP1576778B1 (en) Signal processing method and apparatus using bit confidence values
US7489741B2 (en) System and method to perform DC compensation on a radio frequency burst in a cellular wireless network
Mueller et al. A DSP implemented dual 9600/7200 bps TCM modem for mobile communications over FM voice radios
US7406139B2 (en) System and method to identify a modulation format of a data frame within a cellular wireless network
EP1524811B1 (en) Adaptive multi-step combined DC offset compensation
Wang et al. Novel soft-bit demodulator with multidimensional projection for high-order modulation
EP1453266B1 (en) Modulation method in a TETRA communication system
Benedix et al. Turbo coding for an OFDM-based wireless LAN at 17 GHz
Checked KI/ERA/SRF/BT Girum Alebachew
JP2003258775A (en) Iteration decoding system and power consumption reduction method therein
Seymour et al. Full-Rate AMR over DQPSK.
GB2393621A (en) TETRA communications systems

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2003813226

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2006193403

Country of ref document: US

Ref document number: 10539355

Country of ref document: US

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 20038A63506

Country of ref document: CN

Ref document number: 1020057011081

Country of ref document: KR

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2004560033

Country of ref document: JP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1020057011081

Country of ref document: KR

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2003813226

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 10539355

Country of ref document: US

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 2003813226

Country of ref document: EP