WO2004010482A1 - Dual chamber vacuum processing system - Google Patents
Dual chamber vacuum processing system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2004010482A1 WO2004010482A1 PCT/US2003/022676 US0322676W WO2004010482A1 WO 2004010482 A1 WO2004010482 A1 WO 2004010482A1 US 0322676 W US0322676 W US 0322676W WO 2004010482 A1 WO2004010482 A1 WO 2004010482A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- chamber
- processing
- pump
- chambers
- pumping
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H10—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- H10P—GENERIC PROCESSES OR APPARATUS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF DEVICES COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H10P72/00—Handling or holding of wafers, substrates or devices during manufacture or treatment thereof
- H10P72/04—Apparatus for manufacture or treatment
- H10P72/0451—Apparatus for manufacturing or treating in a plurality of work-stations
- H10P72/0462—Apparatus for manufacturing or treating in a plurality of work-stations characterised by the construction of the processing chambers, e.g. modular processing chambers
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H10—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- H10P—GENERIC PROCESSES OR APPARATUS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF DEVICES COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H10P72/00—Handling or holding of wafers, substrates or devices during manufacture or treatment thereof
- H10P72/04—Apparatus for manufacture or treatment
- H10P72/0402—Apparatus for fluid treatment
Definitions
- the present invention relates to dual chamber vacuum processing systems for processing semiconductor wafers and other substrates and, more particularly, to the sharing of hardware resources in such systems.
- Dual chamber vacuum processing systems have been developed in which certain hardware components are shared between the processing chambers. The idea is that, by sharing components between the chambers, the total cost of the system can be reduced without significantly adversely affecting wafer throughput. Examples of such dual chamber processing systems are disclosed in
- FIG. 1 A pumping system of an exemplary dual chamber vacuum processing system of the above patents is illustrated schematically in Figure 1.
- the system of Figure 1 generally includes two processing chambers 10, 12 which are both served by a single microwave source (not shown) that can be switched between the chambers 10, 12.
- the system includes two vacuum pumps 20, 22.
- a pump down pump 20 is operated to evacuate the chambers 10, 12 prior to processing.
- a process pump 22 is operated to evacuate the chambers 10, 12 during processing.
- Vacuum lines 26 connect the pumps 20, 22 to the chambers 10, 12. Isolation valves 30, 32, 34, 36 are provided in the vacuum lines 26 to selectively isolate the pumps 20, 22 from the chambers 10,
- the isolation valves 32 and 36 are open, and the isolation valves 30, 34 are closed.
- the isolation valves 30 and 34 are open, and the isolation valves 32, 36 are closed.
- a throttle valve 40 is provided upstream of the process pump 22 to regulate pressure in the chamber 10, 12 in which a substrate is being processed.
- the other chamber 10, 12 In operation, while one of the chambers 10, 12 is processing, the other chamber 10, 12 is vented, unloaded of a processed substrate, loaded with a fresh substrate, and pumped down. If all of these overhead operations can be performed while the first chamber 10, 12 is processing, the microwave source can be switched to the other chamber 10, 12 immediately after the first chamber 10, 12 is finished processing. Accordingly, the microwave source is fully utilized and, ideally, there is no system overhead time in which processing is not occurring in one of the chambers 10, To achieve this "zero overhead" operating condition, however, the system of Figure 1 requires four isolation valves 30, 32, 34, 35, two vacuum pumps 20, 22, and a relatively complex system of vacuum lines 26. These components, and especially the pumps 20, 22 can be relatively expensive. In addition, the pump down pump 20 is not fully utilized, because the actual pump down process constitutes only a relatively small proportion of the total overhead time.
- a photoresist ashing system in which additional components are shared to reduce cost without significantly adversely affecting wafer throughput.
- the system includes two processing chambers configured for alternate operation and a single pump that performs both pump down and process pumping of both of the chambers.
- a dual chamber processing system for continuously processing a plurality of workpieces comprises a common power source switchable between a first plasma applicator of a first chamber and a second plasma applicator of a second chamber.
- the first chamber is configured for processing a second worl ⁇ iece in a vacuum to completion therein when the power source is applied to the first plasma applicator and switched ON.
- a robot is provided for removing at substantially atmospheric pressure a first worl ⁇ iece from the second chamber after processing and reloading the second chamber with a third workpiece to be processed while the second worl ⁇ iece is being processed in the first chamber.
- the second chamber is configured for processing the third worl ⁇ iece in a vacuum to completion therein when the power source is applied to the second plasma applicator and switched ON.
- the robot is configured for removing at substantially atmospheric pressure the second worl ⁇ iece from the first chamber after processing and reloading the first chamber with a fourth worl ⁇ iece to be processed while the third worl ⁇ iece is being processed in the second chamber.
- Exactly one pump is provided and adapted to be in fluid communication with the first and second chambers. The pump is configured to perform both process pumping and pump-down
- a computer can be provided and configured to repeatedly synchronously and alternately control the power source application, the robot movement, the chamber processing, and the pumping.
- a method for processing substrates in a processing apparatus.
- the method comprises providing a first processing chamber, a second processing chamber; and a single a vacuum pump adapted to selectively communicate with the first processing chamber via a first vacuum line, and with the second processing chamber via a second vacuum line.
- the method further comprises alternately pumping the first and second chambers with the single pump.
- a method further comprises providing a first isolation valve in said first vacuum line, and a second isolation valve in said second vacuum line.
- the method includes opening the first isolation valve in the first vacuum line, pumping down the first processing chamber with the pump and processing a first substrate in the first processing chamber.
- the method further provides for unloading a second substrate from the second processing chamber.
- the method further comprises loading a third substrate into the second processing chamber, closing the first isolation valve in the first vacuum line, opening the second isolation valve in the second vacuum line, and pumping down the second processing chamber with the pump after completing the processing of the first substrate. Finally, the third substrate is processed in the second processing chamber.
- FIG. 1 is a simplified schematic diagram of a pumping system for a dual chamber substrate processing system of the prior art
- FIG. 2 is a simplified schematic diagram of a pumping system for a dual chamber substrate processing system according to one embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 3 is a graphical representation of timing of preparation and processing phases using the pumping system of FIG. 1; and FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of timing of preparation and processing phases using the pumping system of FIG. 2.
- a dual-chamber processing system of the present invention can generally include: a plasma source with a switchable power supply, such as a microwave source or other suitable source; suitable robotic interfaces for loading and unloading wafers and performing other wafer-transfer steps; process gas sources; a venting system for bringing a chamber back to atmospheric pressure after a processing step is complete; and a pumping system for reducing the pressure within the chambers before and during wafer processing.
- the plasma source includes an individual remote plasma applicator associated with each of the chambers.
- the plasma source is in situ. Other additional components can also be used as desired.
- Figure 2 illustrates one embodiment of a pumping system for a dual chamber substrate processing system.
- the system of Figure 2 generally includes a first processing chamber 60 and a second processing chamber 62, which are both served by a single microwave or other power source (not shown) that can be switched between the chambers 60, 62.
- the illustrated system is designed for synchronously alternating processing of substrates, such that one while one chamber (60 or 62) is performing a processing step, the remaining chamber (60 or 62) can be unloaded of any processed wafers and re-loaded with wafers to be processed.
- the processing components operate on only one of the two chambers at any given time.
- the system has only one vacuum pump 64 configured to serve as both a process pump and a pump-down or evacuation pump for both of the chambers 60, 62.
- the pump 64 is utilized to rapidly reduce the pressure within the process chamber from atmospheric pressure (about 760 Torr) to a pressure at or near a desired process pressure (usually about 1 Torr) in about 3 to 5 seconds.
- the pump 64 is used to maintain the chamber at a desired process pressure for the duration of the substrate processing step.
- the pump is preferably sized for the maximum required pumping load, which can often be determined from the chamber size, the desired pump-down rate, and other variables.
- the pump 64 can be either a dry pump (i.e., one that does not require lubrication oil) or a wet pump (i.e., one that does use lubrication oil).
- a first vacuum line 66 connects the pump 64 to the first chamber 60.
- a second vacuum line 68 connects the pump 64 to the second chamber 62.
- Isolation valves 70,72 are provided in the vacuum lines 66, 68 to isolate the pump 64 from the chambers 60, 62, as desired.
- a throttle valve 80 is provided upstream of the pump 64 between the pump 64 and the isolation valves 70, 72 to control a flow rate of gas through the vacuum lines. Additional valves and vacuum lines can also be added as desired, for example, to bypass the throttle valve, etc.
- the steps of venting, unloading, re-loading and pumping down were performed in the first chamber 10 while simultaneously processing wafers (e.g. in a photoresist ashing process) in the second chamber 20 (the 'processing phase').
- the processing phase and the preparation phase take exactly the same length of time, thereby creating a "zero overhead condition" by allowing the power source to be switched from one chamber to the other with no idle time.
- the ideal "zero overhead" operating condition of the previous system is not always achieved because in some situations, the preparation phase takes slightly longer than the processing phase.
- a given process such as a photoresist removal process, may take roughly 15 seconds to complete. If the preparation phase also took 15 seconds to complete, the system would be operating at "zero overhead," and thus the system of Figure 1 could process 240 substrates per hour. In certain situations, however, the system of Figure 1 has been found to have a throughput rate of only 200 substrates per hour for a 15 second process, thus implying that the preparation phase can take slightly longer than the processing step.
- the isolation valve 70 of the first vacuum line 66 is opened and the isolation valve 72 of the second vacuum line 68 is closed, so that the pump 64 communicates with the first processing chamber 60.
- the throttle valve 80 can be adjusted to regulate the pressure in the first chamber 60 during processing by controlling a flow rate of gases drawn out of the chamber by the pump 64.
- the preparation phase 92 of the second chamber 62 is carried out.
- the preparation phase 92 includes venting, unloading, and reloading the chamber with a new substrate.
- the chambers can transition to their respective opposite phases by closing the isolation valve 70 of the first vacuum line 66 and opening the isolation valve 72 of the second vacuum line 68, so that the pump 64 communicates with the second chamber 62.
- the processing phase can then begin in the second chamber 62 by pumping down and processing in the second chamber 62. Thus, only one chamber is pumped at a time, and a single pump can serve this function.
- the preparation phase is carried out in the first chamber 60 by venting, unloading, and reloading the chamber 60 with a new substrate.
- the processing phase 102 is completed in the second chamber 62
- the preparation phase 92 will be completed in the first chamber 60.
- the chambers can then be transitioned again and the phases can be repeated.
- the pump down time is effectively subtracted from the total overhead time of the preparation phase 92 and added to the process phase 102. Accordingly, if it takes roughly 3 seconds to pump down one of the chambers 60, 62, and the process time is roughly 15 seconds, the other chamber has 18 seconds to vent, unload, and reload.
- the simplified system of Figure 2 can likely attain nearly the same throughput rate (200 substrates per hour in the example described above) as the more complex and costly system of Figure 1.
- one vacuum pump and two isolation valves of the previous system can be eliminated to provide a substantially less costly system.
- the layout of the vacuum lines 66, 68 of the system of Figure 2 is relatively simple, thus further cost savings are associated with a reduction of vacuum lines. As a result, the system of Figure 2 is cheaper and easier to maintain than the previous system.
- the microwave remote plasma source is not utilized during pump down, the vacuum pump 64, which is relatively expensive, is fully utilized and is never idling.
- the arrangement shown and described herein advantageously allows for elimination of one costly pump relative to prior systems and 100% utilization of the vacuum pump that is present.
- both machine cost and facility expense are reduced without sacrificing throughput or process times.
- the total process gas flow is on the order of 5 liters per minute for a typical single wafer chamber. Therefore, the gas going through the chamber being processed should be at a higher pressure than what is in the line.
- the vacuum lines are preferably of sufficient length to provide isolation between the two process chambers. To assist in isolation, the vacuum lines should also be fairly large in diameter to provide more volume for the air to expand from the chamber being pumped down.
- a bypass valve can be provided with a 1/4 inch line to slow the initial burst of air from the chamber being pumped down. A second or two later, the main ISO 80 valve can be opened, thereby providing a higher conductance to rapidly pump the remaining air from the chamber.
Landscapes
- Drying Of Semiconductors (AREA)
Abstract
A photoresist ashing system includes two processing chambers configured for alternate operation in processing substrates. The system includes a single pump that performs both pump-down and process pumping of both of the chambers. In operation, one of the chambers is pumped down and processed while the other chamber is vented, unloaded and re-loaded.
Description
DUAL CHAMBER VACUUM PROCESSING SYSTEM
Field of the Invention The present invention relates to dual chamber vacuum processing systems for processing semiconductor wafers and other substrates and, more particularly, to the sharing of hardware resources in such systems.
Background of the Invention
Dual chamber vacuum processing systems have been developed in which certain hardware components are shared between the processing chambers. The idea is that, by sharing components between the chambers, the total cost of the system can be reduced without significantly adversely affecting wafer throughput. Examples of such dual chamber processing systems are disclosed in
U.S. Patent No. 6,228,7.73, issued May 8, 2001 to Cox, and U.S. Patent No. 6,273,956, issued
August 14, 2001, both of which are incorporated herein by reference and made part of the present disclosure. A pumping system of an exemplary dual chamber vacuum processing system of the above patents is illustrated schematically in Figure 1. The system of Figure 1 generally includes two processing chambers 10, 12 which are both served by a single microwave source (not shown) that can be switched between the chambers 10, 12. The system includes two vacuum pumps 20, 22. A pump down pump 20 is operated to evacuate the chambers 10, 12 prior to processing. A process pump 22 is operated to evacuate the chambers 10, 12 during processing.
Vacuum lines 26 connect the pumps 20, 22 to the chambers 10, 12. Isolation valves 30, 32, 34, 36 are provided in the vacuum lines 26 to selectively isolate the pumps 20, 22 from the chambers 10,
12, as desired. For example, when a substrate is undergoing a process in the chamber 10, and the chamber 12 is undergoing pump down, the isolation valves 32 and 36 are open, and the isolation valves 30, 34 are closed. When a substrate is undergoing a process in the chamber 12, and the chamber 10 is undergoing pump down, the isolation valves 30 and 34 are open, and the isolation valves 32, 36 are closed. A throttle valve 40 is provided upstream of the process pump 22 to regulate pressure in the chamber 10, 12 in which a substrate is being processed.
In operation, while one of the chambers 10, 12 is processing, the other chamber 10, 12 is vented, unloaded of a processed substrate, loaded with a fresh substrate, and pumped down. If all of these overhead operations can be performed while the first chamber 10, 12 is processing, the microwave source can be switched to the other chamber 10, 12 immediately after the first chamber 10, 12 is finished processing. Accordingly, the microwave source is fully utilized and, ideally, there is no system overhead time in which processing is not occurring in one of the chambers 10,
To achieve this "zero overhead" operating condition, however, the system of Figure 1 requires four isolation valves 30, 32, 34, 35, two vacuum pumps 20, 22, and a relatively complex system of vacuum lines 26. These components, and especially the pumps 20, 22 can be relatively expensive. In addition, the pump down pump 20 is not fully utilized, because the actual pump down process constitutes only a relatively small proportion of the total overhead time.
Summary of the Invention Accordingly, a need exists for a dual chamber vacuum processing system in which additional components are shared to reduce cost without significantly adversely affecting wafer throughput. In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, a photoresist ashing system is provided. The system includes two processing chambers configured for alternate operation and a single pump that performs both pump down and process pumping of both of the chambers.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a dual chamber processing system for continuously processing a plurality of workpieces comprises a common power source switchable between a first plasma applicator of a first chamber and a second plasma applicator of a second chamber. The first chamber is configured for processing a second worlφiece in a vacuum to completion therein when the power source is applied to the first plasma applicator and switched ON. A robot is provided for removing at substantially atmospheric pressure a first worlφiece from the second chamber after processing and reloading the second chamber with a third workpiece to be processed while the second worlφiece is being processed in the first chamber. The second chamber is configured for processing the third worlφiece in a vacuum to completion therein when the power source is applied to the second plasma applicator and switched ON. The robot is configured for removing at substantially atmospheric pressure the second worlφiece from the first chamber after processing and reloading the first chamber with a fourth worlφiece to be processed while the third worlφiece is being processed in the second chamber. Exactly one pump is provided and adapted to be in fluid communication with the first and second chambers. The pump is configured to perform both process pumping and pump-down
(evacuation) pumping of both chambers. Additionally, a computer can be provided and configured to repeatedly synchronously and alternately control the power source application, the robot movement, the chamber processing, and the pumping.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a method is provided for processing substrates in a processing apparatus. The method comprises providing a first processing chamber, a second processing chamber; and a single a vacuum pump adapted to selectively communicate with the first processing chamber via a first vacuum line, and with the second
processing chamber via a second vacuum line. The method further comprises alternately pumping the first and second chambers with the single pump.
According to an alternative embodiment, a method further comprises providing a first isolation valve in said first vacuum line, and a second isolation valve in said second vacuum line. The method includes opening the first isolation valve in the first vacuum line, pumping down the first processing chamber with the pump and processing a first substrate in the first processing chamber. The method further provides for unloading a second substrate from the second processing chamber. According to another embodiment, the method further comprises loading a third substrate into the second processing chamber, closing the first isolation valve in the first vacuum line, opening the second isolation valve in the second vacuum line, and pumping down the second processing chamber with the pump after completing the processing of the first substrate. Finally, the third substrate is processed in the second processing chamber.
Brief Description of the Drawings FIG. 1 is a simplified schematic diagram of a pumping system for a dual chamber substrate processing system of the prior art;
FIG. 2 is a simplified schematic diagram of a pumping system for a dual chamber substrate processing system according to one embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a graphical representation of timing of preparation and processing phases using the pumping system of FIG. 1; and FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of timing of preparation and processing phases using the pumping system of FIG. 2.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments
The dual chamber processing system shown and described herein can include many of the components of the systems shown and described in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,228,773 and 6,273,956. For example, in addition to the components described herein, embodiments of a dual-chamber processing system of the present invention can generally include: a plasma source with a switchable power supply, such as a microwave source or other suitable source; suitable robotic interfaces for loading and unloading wafers and performing other wafer-transfer steps; process gas sources; a venting system for bringing a chamber back to atmospheric pressure after a processing step is complete; and a pumping system for reducing the pressure within the chambers before and during wafer processing. According to one embodiment, the plasma source includes an individual remote plasma applicator associated with each of the chambers. In an alternative embodiment, the plasma source is in situ. Other additional components can also be used as desired.
Figure 2 illustrates one embodiment of a pumping system for a dual chamber substrate processing system. The system of Figure 2 generally includes a first processing chamber 60 and a
second processing chamber 62, which are both served by a single microwave or other power source (not shown) that can be switched between the chambers 60, 62. The illustrated system is designed for synchronously alternating processing of substrates, such that one while one chamber (60 or 62) is performing a processing step, the remaining chamber (60 or 62) can be unloaded of any processed wafers and re-loaded with wafers to be processed. Generally, in the preferred operation of the present system, the processing components operate on only one of the two chambers at any given time.
In the illustrated embodiment, the system has only one vacuum pump 64 configured to serve as both a process pump and a pump-down or evacuation pump for both of the chambers 60, 62. As a pump-down pump, the pump 64 is utilized to rapidly reduce the pressure within the process chamber from atmospheric pressure (about 760 Torr) to a pressure at or near a desired process pressure (usually about 1 Torr) in about 3 to 5 seconds. As a process pump, the pump 64 is used to maintain the chamber at a desired process pressure for the duration of the substrate processing step. Thus, the pump is preferably sized for the maximum required pumping load, which can often be determined from the chamber size, the desired pump-down rate, and other variables. The pump 64 can be either a dry pump (i.e., one that does not require lubrication oil) or a wet pump (i.e., one that does use lubrication oil).
A first vacuum line 66 connects the pump 64 to the first chamber 60. A second vacuum line 68 connects the pump 64 to the second chamber 62. Isolation valves 70,72 are provided in the vacuum lines 66, 68 to isolate the pump 64 from the chambers 60, 62, as desired. A throttle valve 80 is provided upstream of the pump 64 between the pump 64 and the isolation valves 70, 72 to control a flow rate of gas through the vacuum lines. Additional valves and vacuum lines can also be added as desired, for example, to bypass the throttle valve, etc
In the system described in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,228,773 and 6,273,956, the pumping system of which is illustrated schematically in Figure 1, the steps of venting, unloading, re-loading and pumping down (the 'preparation phase') were performed in the first chamber 10 while simultaneously processing wafers (e.g. in a photoresist ashing process) in the second chamber 20 (the 'processing phase'). Ideally, the processing phase and the preparation phase take exactly the same length of time, thereby creating a "zero overhead condition" by allowing the power source to be switched from one chamber to the other with no idle time.
The inventors have discovered that, in practice, the ideal "zero overhead" operating condition of the previous system is not always achieved because in some situations, the preparation phase takes slightly longer than the processing phase. For example, a given process, such as a photoresist removal process, may take roughly 15 seconds to complete. If the preparation phase also took 15 seconds to complete, the system would be operating at "zero overhead," and thus the
system of Figure 1 could process 240 substrates per hour. In certain situations, however, the system of Figure 1 has been found to have a throughput rate of only 200 substrates per hour for a 15 second process, thus implying that the preparation phase can take slightly longer than the processing step. As illustrated graphically in Figure 3, if the steps carried out in the preparation phase 90 of the first chamber 10 (for example) are not completed when the second chamber 12 finishes its processing phase 100, then the process pump 22 must idle until the first chamber 10 can be transitioned to the processing phase 100. Similarly, in the system of Figures 1 and 3, the pump- down pump 20 will remain idle for substantial lengths of time during which it is not needed. These idle times represent a substantial facility expense incurred in operating and maintaining the pumps. These idle times can be substantially eliminated by switching the pump down procedure from the preparation phase 90 to the processing phase 102 as shown in Figure 4, thereby providing substantial savings in facility expense as well as allowing for the elimination of a number of costly pumping system components. The operation of the pumping system embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to Figures 2 and 4. During the processing phase 102 of the first chamber 60, the isolation valve 70 of the first vacuum line 66 is opened and the isolation valve 72 of the second vacuum line 68 is closed, so that the pump 64 communicates with the first processing chamber 60. The throttle valve 80 can be adjusted to regulate the pressure in the first chamber 60 during processing by controlling a flow rate of gases drawn out of the chamber by the pump 64.
As shown schematically in Figure 4, During the processing phase 102 of the first chamber 60, the preparation phase 92 of the second chamber 62 is carried out. As shown, the preparation phase 92 includes venting, unloading, and reloading the chamber with a new substrate. Once the processing phase 102 is completed in the first chamber 60, the chambers can transition to their respective opposite phases by closing the isolation valve 70 of the first vacuum line 66 and opening the isolation valve 72 of the second vacuum line 68, so that the pump 64 communicates with the second chamber 62. The processing phase can then begin in the second chamber 62 by pumping down and processing in the second chamber 62. Thus, only one chamber is pumped at a time, and a single pump can serve this function. During the processing phase 102 in the second chamber 62, the preparation phase is carried out in the first chamber 60 by venting, unloading, and reloading the chamber 60 with a new substrate. By the time the processing phase 102 is completed in the second chamber 62, the preparation phase 92 will be completed in the first chamber 60. The chambers can then be transitioned again and the phases can be repeated.
As described above, the pump down time is effectively subtracted from the total overhead time of the preparation phase 92 and added to the process phase 102. Accordingly, if it takes roughly 3 seconds to pump down one of the chambers 60, 62, and the process time is roughly 15 seconds, the other chamber has 18 seconds to vent, unload, and reload. Thus, the simplified system of Figure 2 can likely attain nearly the same throughput rate (200 substrates per hour in the example described above) as the more complex and costly system of Figure 1.
By moving the pump down step from the preparation phase to the processing phase 102, one vacuum pump and two isolation valves of the previous system can be eliminated to provide a substantially less costly system. The layout of the vacuum lines 66, 68 of the system of Figure 2 is relatively simple, thus further cost savings are associated with a reduction of vacuum lines. As a result, the system of Figure 2 is cheaper and easier to maintain than the previous system. In addition, while the microwave remote plasma source is not utilized during pump down, the vacuum pump 64, which is relatively expensive, is fully utilized and is never idling.
Thus, the arrangement shown and described herein advantageously allows for elimination of one costly pump relative to prior systems and 100% utilization of the vacuum pump that is present. Thus, both machine cost and facility expense are reduced without sacrificing throughput or process times.
One need not be concerned about connecting both chambers to a single vacuum pump out of fear of interaction when one chamber is processing a wafer and the other chamber begins to pump down from atmosphere, expecting that the burst of air could potentially travel down the vacuum line to the pump and back up to the chamber processing the wafer. The most negative pressure is going to be at the pump head. If the vacuum lines are long enough and big enough in diameter, the pressure will equalize and expand to fill the space.
In the case of ashing, the total process gas flow is on the order of 5 liters per minute for a typical single wafer chamber. Therefore, the gas going through the chamber being processed should be at a higher pressure than what is in the line. The vacuum lines are preferably of sufficient length to provide isolation between the two process chambers. To assist in isolation, the vacuum lines should also be fairly large in diameter to provide more volume for the air to expand from the chamber being pumped down. Furthermore, a bypass valve can be provided with a 1/4 inch line to slow the initial burst of air from the chamber being pumped down. A second or two later, the main ISO 80 valve can be opened, thereby providing a higher conductance to rapidly pump the remaining air from the chamber.
Although certain embodiments and examples have been described herein, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that many elements of the methods and devices shown and described in the present disclosure may be differently combined and/or modified to form still
further embodiments. Additionally, it will be recognized that the methods described herein may be practiced using any device suitable for performing the recited steps. Such alternative embodiments and/or uses of the methods and devices described above and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof are intended to be within the scope of the present disclosure. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present invention should not be limited by the particular embodiments described above, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims that follow.
Claims
WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
I . A photoresist ashing system comprising two processing chambers configured for alternate operation and a single pump in fluid communication with the two chambers, the pump being configured to perform both pump down and process pumping of the two chambers. 2. The system of Claim 1, further comprising a throttle valve between the single pump and the two chambers, the throttle valve configured to regulate a pressure in at least one of the chambers.
3. The system of Claim 1 , wherein the single pump is a dry pump.
4. The system of Claim 1, wherein the system further comprises only one isolation valve between the pump and a first one of the chambers.
5. The system of Claim 4, wherein the system further comprises only one isolation valve between the pump and a second one of the chambers.
6. The apparatus of Claim 1, wherein the chambers are adjacent to each other.
7. The apparatus of Claim 1, wherein each chamber comprises a remote plasma applicator configured to be powered by a common power source switchable between the first chamber and the second chamber.
8. The apparatus of Claim 7, wherein the power supply is microwave.
9. The apparatus of Claim 7, wherein the power supply is a common radio frequency power source synchronously multiplexed between the pair of processing chambers. 10. The apparatus of Claim 1 wherein the processing chambers are each configured to receive a single silicon wafer at a time, and the processing chambers each comprise a downstream plasma reactor.
I I . The apparatus of Claim 1 wherein the processing chambers are each configured to receive a single silicon wafer at a time, and the processing chambers each comprise an in-chamber plasma reactor.
12. A dual chamber processing system for continuously processing a plurality of workpieces comprising: a common power source switchable between a first plasma applicator of a first chamber and a second plasma applicator of a second chamber, the first chamber for processing a second worlφiece in a vacuum to completion therein when the power source is applied thereto and switched ON, a robot for removing at substantially atmospheric pressure a first worlφiece from the second chamber after processing and reloading the second chamber with a third worlφiece to be processed while the second worlφiece is being processed in the first chamber,
the second chamber for processing the third workpiece in a vacuum to completion therein when the power source is applied to the second plasma applicator and switched ON, the robot for removing at substantially atmospheric pressure the second worlφiece from the first chamber after processing and reloading the first chamber with a fourth worlφiece to be processed while the third worlφiece is being processed in the second chamber, and exactly one pump adapted to be in fluid communication with the first and second chambers, the pump being configured to perform both process pumping and pump-down pumping of both chambers; a computer configured to repeatedly synchronously alternately control the power source application, the robot movement, the chamber processing, and the pump. 13. The apparatus of Claim 12, wherein the computer is further configured to open the pump to fluid communication with only one of the chambers at a time. 14. A method of processing substrates in a processing apparatus, the method comprising: providing a first processing chamber and a second processing chamber; providing a single vacuum pump adapted to selectively communicate with the first processing chamber via a first vacuum line, and with the second processing chamber via a second vacuum line; alternately pumping the first and second chambers with the single pump.
15. The method of Claim 14, wherein alternately pumping comprises : providing a first isolation valve in said first vacuum line, and a second isolation valve in said second vacuum line; opening the first isolation valve in the first vacuum line; pumping down the first processing chamber with the pump; processing a first substrate in the first processing chamber; unloading a second substrate from the second processing chamber;
16. The method of Claim 15, wherein alternately pumping comprises: loading a third substrate into the second processing chamber; closing the first isolation valve in the first vacuum line; opening the second isolation valve in the second vacuum line; pumping down the second processing chamber with the pump after completing the processing of the first substrate; and processing the third substrate in the second processing chamber.
17. The method of Claim 17, wherein said unloading a second substrate, and loading a third substrate are performed simultaneously with said pumping down the first processing chamber with the pump.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2004523187A JP2005534174A (en) | 2002-07-19 | 2003-07-21 | Photoresist ashing equipment |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US39759202P | 2002-07-19 | 2002-07-19 | |
| US60/397,592 | 2002-07-19 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2004010482A1 true WO2004010482A1 (en) | 2004-01-29 |
Family
ID=30771084
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2003/022676 Ceased WO2004010482A1 (en) | 2002-07-19 | 2003-07-21 | Dual chamber vacuum processing system |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20040089227A1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP2005534174A (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2004010482A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103370768A (en) * | 2011-03-01 | 2013-10-23 | 应用材料公司 | Vacuum chambers with shared pumps |
| US10770272B2 (en) | 2016-04-11 | 2020-09-08 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma-enhanced anneal chamber for wafer outgassing |
Families Citing this family (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7601648B2 (en) | 2006-07-31 | 2009-10-13 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method for fabricating an integrated gate dielectric layer for field effect transistors |
| KR100826502B1 (en) | 2006-09-18 | 2008-05-02 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Semiconductor manufacturing equipment |
| JP5185226B2 (en) * | 2009-07-29 | 2013-04-17 | 株式会社アルバック | Plasma generating method and plasma processing apparatus system for a plurality of plasma processing apparatuses |
| US20120009694A1 (en) * | 2010-07-12 | 2012-01-12 | National Institute Of Standards And Technology | Apparatus and method for monitoring precursor flux |
| US20120088370A1 (en) * | 2010-10-06 | 2012-04-12 | Lam Research Corporation | Substrate Processing System with Multiple Processing Devices Deployed in Shared Ambient Environment and Associated Methods |
| CN109563617B (en) * | 2016-08-26 | 2021-06-08 | 应用材料公司 | Low pressure lift rod cavity hardware |
| DE102017214687A1 (en) * | 2017-08-22 | 2019-02-28 | centrotherm international AG | Processing apparatus for substrates and method for operating such a treatment apparatus |
| CN114424447A (en) | 2019-07-29 | 2022-04-29 | 先进工程解决方案全球控股私人有限公司 | Multiplexed power generator output with channel offset for pulsed driving of multiple loads |
| DE102021202169A1 (en) | 2021-03-05 | 2022-09-08 | centrotherm international AG | Method for operating a substrate treatment device and substrate treatment device |
| US20260018437A1 (en) * | 2024-07-09 | 2026-01-15 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Chamber body with trench for rf transmission lines |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP0699777A1 (en) * | 1994-09-01 | 1996-03-06 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus of forming thin films |
| US6228773B1 (en) * | 1998-04-14 | 2001-05-08 | Matrix Integrated Systems, Inc. | Synchronous multiplexed near zero overhead architecture for vacuum processes |
| US20020036065A1 (en) * | 2000-08-22 | 2002-03-28 | Takayuki Yamagishi | Semiconductor processing module and apparatus |
Family Cites Families (30)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4105916A (en) * | 1977-02-28 | 1978-08-08 | Extranuclear Laboratories, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for simultaneously producing and electronically separating the chemical ionization mass spectrum and the electron impact ionization mass spectrum of the same sample material |
| JPS5421175A (en) * | 1977-07-18 | 1979-02-17 | Tokyo Ouka Kougiyou Kk | Improvement of plasma reaction processor |
| JPS5739430U (en) * | 1980-08-14 | 1982-03-03 | ||
| US4560417A (en) * | 1981-12-30 | 1985-12-24 | Technomex Development, Ltd. | Decontamination method for semiconductor wafer handling equipment |
| US4702205A (en) * | 1984-03-06 | 1987-10-27 | David Constant V | External combustion vane engine with conformable vanes |
| US4612207A (en) * | 1985-01-14 | 1986-09-16 | Xerox Corporation | Apparatus and process for the fabrication of large area thin film multilayers |
| US4638176A (en) * | 1985-08-01 | 1987-01-20 | Mullett Associates, Inc. | Uninterruptible power supply |
| US4640224A (en) * | 1985-08-05 | 1987-02-03 | Spectrum Cvd, Inc. | CVD heat source |
| US4692343A (en) * | 1985-08-05 | 1987-09-08 | Spectrum Cvd, Inc. | Plasma enhanced CVD |
| US5292393A (en) * | 1986-12-19 | 1994-03-08 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Multichamber integrated process system |
| US5138973A (en) * | 1987-07-16 | 1992-08-18 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Wafer processing apparatus having independently controllable energy sources |
| US5225771A (en) * | 1988-05-16 | 1993-07-06 | Dri Technology Corp. | Making and testing an integrated circuit using high density probe points |
| US5019233A (en) * | 1988-10-31 | 1991-05-28 | Eaton Corporation | Sputtering system |
| US5000682A (en) * | 1990-01-22 | 1991-03-19 | Semitherm | Vertical thermal processor for semiconductor wafers |
| US5310410A (en) * | 1990-04-06 | 1994-05-10 | Sputtered Films, Inc. | Method for processing semi-conductor wafers in a multiple vacuum and non-vacuum chamber apparatus |
| KR100230697B1 (en) * | 1992-02-18 | 1999-11-15 | 이노우에 쥰이치 | Reduced-pressure processing |
| US5338423A (en) * | 1992-11-06 | 1994-08-16 | Zilog, Inc. | Method of eliminating metal voiding in a titanium nitride/aluminum processing |
| CH687986A5 (en) * | 1993-05-03 | 1997-04-15 | Balzers Hochvakuum | Plasma treatment equipment and method for its operation. |
| US5647945A (en) * | 1993-08-25 | 1997-07-15 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Vacuum processing apparatus |
| JP3332053B2 (en) * | 1993-10-27 | 2002-10-07 | 清原 まさ子 | Gas supply method to chamber |
| JP3279038B2 (en) * | 1994-01-31 | 2002-04-30 | ソニー株式会社 | Plasma apparatus and plasma processing method using the same |
| DE4405427C1 (en) * | 1994-02-21 | 1995-11-02 | Hennecke Gmbh Maschf | Process and device for the production of endless polyurethane moldings |
| US5595482A (en) * | 1994-10-27 | 1997-01-21 | Parsons; Marshall F. | Airlocking system and method for feeding bulk granular material |
| JP2665202B2 (en) * | 1995-05-31 | 1997-10-22 | 九州日本電気株式会社 | Semiconductor wafer processing equipment |
| US5900105A (en) * | 1996-07-09 | 1999-05-04 | Gamma Precision Technology, Inc. | Wafer transfer system and method of using the same |
| JP3947761B2 (en) * | 1996-09-26 | 2007-07-25 | 株式会社日立国際電気 | Substrate processing apparatus, substrate transfer machine, and substrate processing method |
| US5855681A (en) * | 1996-11-18 | 1999-01-05 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Ultra high throughput wafer vacuum processing system |
| US5955383A (en) * | 1997-01-22 | 1999-09-21 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. | Method for controlling etch rate when using consumable electrodes during plasma etching |
| US6318384B1 (en) * | 1999-09-24 | 2001-11-20 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Self cleaning method of forming deep trenches in silicon substrates |
| US6227773B1 (en) * | 2000-01-03 | 2001-05-08 | The Boeing Company | Compact autofeed drill and associated drilling method and apparatus |
-
2003
- 2003-07-21 US US10/624,728 patent/US20040089227A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-07-21 WO PCT/US2003/022676 patent/WO2004010482A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2003-07-21 JP JP2004523187A patent/JP2005534174A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP0699777A1 (en) * | 1994-09-01 | 1996-03-06 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus of forming thin films |
| US6228773B1 (en) * | 1998-04-14 | 2001-05-08 | Matrix Integrated Systems, Inc. | Synchronous multiplexed near zero overhead architecture for vacuum processes |
| US20020036065A1 (en) * | 2000-08-22 | 2002-03-28 | Takayuki Yamagishi | Semiconductor processing module and apparatus |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103370768A (en) * | 2011-03-01 | 2013-10-23 | 应用材料公司 | Vacuum chambers with shared pumps |
| CN103370768B (en) * | 2011-03-01 | 2017-05-31 | 应用材料公司 | vacuum chamber with shared pump |
| US10770272B2 (en) | 2016-04-11 | 2020-09-08 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma-enhanced anneal chamber for wafer outgassing |
| US11348769B2 (en) | 2016-04-11 | 2022-05-31 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma-enhanced anneal chamber for wafer outgassing |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US20040089227A1 (en) | 2004-05-13 |
| JP2005534174A (en) | 2005-11-10 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP3486821B2 (en) | Processing apparatus and method of transporting object to be processed in processing apparatus | |
| KR100271758B1 (en) | Semiconductor device manufacturing equipment and method of driving the same | |
| JP3874610B2 (en) | Synchronously multiplexed near-zero overhead architecture for vacuum processing | |
| KR101570657B1 (en) | Twin chamber processing system with shared vaccum pump | |
| EP0935279A2 (en) | Device and method for load locking for semiconductuctor processing | |
| US20040089227A1 (en) | Dual chamber vacuum processing system | |
| US20030044742A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for processing substrates in a system having high and low pressure areas | |
| US6251192B1 (en) | Vacuum exhaust system | |
| CN100364039C (en) | Vacuum processing apparatus and substrate transfer method | |
| KR101148295B1 (en) | Evacuation of load lock enclosure | |
| JP4517595B2 (en) | Method for transporting workpieces | |
| JP2005534174A5 (en) | ||
| JP2004052759A (en) | Vacuum pump system and its control method | |
| JPH09306972A (en) | Semiconductor manufacturing equipment | |
| JPH06104178A (en) | Vacuum processing method and vacuum processing apparatus | |
| JP2001239144A (en) | Load lock type vacuum equipment | |
| JP2000232071A (en) | Substrate processing method and substrate processing apparatus | |
| US6843883B2 (en) | Vacuum processing apparatus and method for producing an object to be processed | |
| JPH08321446A (en) | Exhaust control system for processing chamber of multiple semiconductor manufacturing equipment | |
| JP2011102673A (en) | Vacuum dryer | |
| JP6743747B2 (en) | Semiconductor manufacturing equipment | |
| JPH11230034A (en) | Evacuating system and its operating method | |
| KR101208696B1 (en) | apparatus for producing semiconductor and method for controlling chamber thereof | |
| US20060169206A1 (en) | Load lock system for ion beam processing | |
| JP3470701B2 (en) | Load lock device and its operation method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): JP KR |
|
| AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2004523187 Country of ref document: JP |
|
| 122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |