DIRECTIONAL MICROPHONE ARRANGEMENT
Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a microphone for inputting speech to a hand-held device with multi-modal user interfaces. The invention is applicable to, but not limited to, a directional microphone mechanism for use in a stylus to input speech to a hand-held device.
Background of the Invention
In the field of this invention it is known that many new hand-held communication/computing devices have multimodal interfaces, combining video and audio outputs with gestural, tactile and voice inputs. The user is typically provided with the ability to switch rapidly and easily between different modes of input or output, using whichever interface is most convenient for his/her current task.
As communication devices continue to develop, it will often be convenient to provide a voice input simultaneously with tactile input and/or whilst viewing video output. For example, video telephony requires voice input whilst viewing video output, as does voice- browsing of WWW pages. It is als,o convenient to enter text data into multiple form fields of a communication or computing device using a combination of voice and tactile inputs. In this manner, a number of fields or each field on a display may be selected by touching the display. Then text can be entered onto the field of the display by
performing voice-to-text conversion, on speech enunciated into a device's microphone.
In order to view the built-in video display of a handheld device, or use its built-in touch pad/screen, the user needs to hold the device at "arm's length". This, however, positions a microphone built into the device relatively far from the user's mouth, resulting in poor quality speech reception.
A standard microphone held at arm' s length from a speaker's mouth would receive high levels of noise, relative to sound coming directly from the mouth, in many of the environments where such devices are used (e.g. vehicles, public spaces) . Even in quiet environments, arm's-length microphones tend to provide poor quality speech, as they receive relatively high levels of speech reverberation.
Strong noise and speech reverberation are annoying to a human listener, and are particularly detrimental to an automatic speech recogniser. To enable voice-input applications on multimodal hand-held devices, it is essential to provide some means of clear speech reception.
A common way of ensuring clear speech reception is to place a microphone close to the speaker's mouth. When the main device cannot be held close to the mouth, a separate microphone can be used, connected to the main unit by a wired or wireless link.
Body-worn microphones (e.g. in headsets) sit close to the mouth. Such microphones are already widely used for hands-free telephony, and may be connected to multimodal hand-held devices. However, many users would rather not carry or wear such microphones, especially if they are using voice input only occasionally.
Hand-held microphones are an alternative, which may be held as close to the mouth as needed. Tactile input to multimodal devices is often provided via a stylus. Hence, to prevent users having two extra hand-held units, it has been recognised as being convenient to integrate the microphone into the stylus .
A stylus microphone can easily be stored in/on the main unit, and can quickly be detached for use. It is particularly convenient if it has a wireless audio link to the main unit .
Previously published descriptions of stylus-mounted microphones, such as those in patents EP0622724 and W09525326, have made no reference to directionality in their microphones. As mentioned above, prior art microphones will often provide poor-quality voice reception when held at arm's length from the speaker's mouth.
However, the inventor of the present invention has recognised that the use of a stylus microphone for tactile input has the disadvantage that the microphone needs to be operable at arm's length from the user's mouth, whilst the stylus is being operated for tactile
input. However, for a clear voice input, the microphone would instead need to be held much closer to the speaker's mouth. It is therefore inconvenient to move the stylus microphone back and forth, especially when switching rapidly between voice and tactile inputs (e.g. when selecting fields and entering text into them) .
A need therefore exists for an improved microphone in a stylus arrangement wherein the abovementioned disadvantages may be alleviated.
Statement of Invention
In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a communication or computing device, as claimed in claim 1.
In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided an array microphone in a stylus, as claimed in claim 14.
In accordance with a third aspect of the invention, there is provided a method in accordance with claim 15.
Further aspects are as claimed in the dependent claims .
Brief Description of the Drawings
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 illustrates a generic microphone array arrangement in a stylus, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention; and
FIG. 2 illustrates a stylus microphone array arrangement as envisaged in use, in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
Description of Preferred Embodiments
The inventor of the present invention has recognised that, instead of placing a stylus microphone closer to the speaker's mouth, a directional microphone can be positioned within the stylus. The directional microphone may be arranged with the axis of the directional microphone substantially parallel with the axis of the stylus. This allows the microphone to pick up the speaker's voice much more strongly than sounds coming from elsewhere.
Pressure-gradient directional microphones (e.g. cardioid, hypercardioid) are small enough to fit inside typical multimodal hand-held devices. However, the inventor of the present invention believes that such microphones are currently not directional enough for clear speech reception when they are 30cm or further from the mouth, particularly in an acoustically harsh environment.
Therefore, for optimum results, the inventor of the present invention further proposes using an array microphone to provide sufficient directionality, thereby
exceeding the directionality available from a single directionally-configured microphone .
An array microphone is substantially different to a single directional microphone, as it employs multiple microphones, and the sound signals received by these microphones are processed and combined so as to reduce any signal components from unwanted sources .
However, the multiple microphones, positioned in an array form, must be spaced particular distances apart in order to perform correctly. The inventor of the present invention has recognised that many array microphone layouts are too large to fit into a typical hand-held device .
One type of array, that the inventor has recognised could provide a good performance for this type of application, uses microphones spread along a line about 5cm to 10cm in length. The array needs to be directed towards the speaker's mouth. Standard hand-held device housings are not particularly deep, in the direction towards the user's head. Hence, although such an array could provide a good performance, it is envisaged that this type of array would not be appropriate to fit inside typical hand-held housings.
The inventor does however envisage that improved single directionally-configured microphones may become available in future. These may deliver superior performance to today's microphone arrays, so may in future provide all the advantages of the invention.
A further problem with directional microphones, or indeed microphone arrays, is that their performance is reduced when they are not correctly aligned with the speaker's mouth. When a microphone is concealed within a standard- shaped device housing, the user is not aware of its alignment, if there is any, and may often hold the device in a sub-optimal orientation. When a microphone is housed in a hand-held stylus, the user is more aware of its orientation, and finds it easier to adjust the orientation when necessary.
FIG. 1 illustrates a generic example of an array microphone arrangement 100 in a stylus, in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention. The stylus microphone has a body 110 that may be used as a stylus or pen and which contains two or more microphones 111-113 in an array. The microphones receive sounds coming directly from the mouth of the stylus user 101, as well as other sounds 102.
The preferred embodiment of the present invention includes an array processor 120 that processes and combines multiple microphone output signals to generate a single array output signal 121. The direction of maximal sensitivity 130 of the microphone array is parallel to the long axis of the stylus body 110. Provided that the user' s mouth is located close to this direction of maximal sensitivity 130, the array processor 120 will reproduce the speech sounds received directly from the user 101. Concurrently, the array processor 120 substantially suppresses any sounds received from
elsewhere 102. The array microphone configuration thus provides a higher quality speech signal than any of its individual microphones in isolation.
The array processor 120 may be housed in the stylus body 110, or elsewhere. In the former case, the array output signal 121 is transmitted out of the stylus body. In the latter case, the microphone output signals are transmitted from the stylus body to the array processor 120. Preferably, signals transmitted to or from the stylus body 110 are carried on a link that does not employ a physical connection such as a cable, as a cable tends to hinder manipulation of the stylus. The particular design of this configuration will be influenced by the need for the stylus to be light and easily manipulated by the user. For example, a wireless, infra-red or ultrasonic link may be selected.
The preferred embodiment also includes a multimodal device 150, separate to the stylus body 110, which can simultaneously receive both the array output signal 121 and any positional data 140 from the stylus. The positional data 140 could, for example, be a 'pen-based' input, i.e. the position is determined by the location on the multimodal device 150 where the stylus makes contact with it. The positional data 140 could also be vpointer- based' input, i.e. determined by the stylus' location or orientation relative to the multimodal device 150.
To provide any kind of positional data 140, the stylus needs to be close to the multimodal device 150. The device also needs to be somewhat distant from the user's
head, typically at arm's length, so that the user can clearly see the stylus' position relative to the device, whilst manipulating the stylus. As a result, by providing a stylus microphone array 111, 112, 113, the stylus can be positioned distal to the user's mouth, and yet still provide good speech reception.
Although the preferred embodiment of the present invention is shown having three microphones, it is within the contemplation of the invention that any number of microphones in excess of one, in an array configuration within a stylus, can benefit from the inventive concepts herein described.
Referring now to FIG. 2, the stylus arrangement 200 of the preferred embodiment of the present invention is shown in operation. The array microphones 211-213 together with array processor 220 are housed in a stylus 210. The stylus in this configuration is an accessory to a multimodal hand-held computing/communication device
250, which has a touch-sensitive display screen 251. The array output signal is preferably transmitted to the multimodal device 250 by a wireless data link 225.
The stylus in such a configuration is preferably small enough to be stowed in, or on, or attached adjacent to, the multimodal device 250. In operation, a stylus user places the stylus tip 219 anywhere on the touch-screen display 251, whilst orienting the stylus 210 so that its direction of maximal sensitivity 230 points towards his/her mouth 200. Advantageously, this enables simultaneous tactile and spoken input to the device 250.
It is preferable for the array' s direction of maximal sensitivity to be clearly apparent when looking at the stylus, to help the user orient the stylus for optimal speech reception. The obvious example is when the stylus has a long straight body and the microphone array's direction of maximal sensitivity is arranged to be parallel to the stylus body. However, it is within the contemplation of the invention that the direction of maximal sensitivity need not be parallel to the axis of the stylus, and other ways of indicating correct orientation may be used. For example, the stylus could incorporate a light source or brightly-coloured mark that is only visible to the user when the stylus is correctly oriented with respect to the user.
It is envisaged that, in order to allow hands-free use of the stylus array microphone, the stylus could be mounted on its host device, projecting out towards the user's mouth. Preferably, in such a configuration, the host device could have a mount for this purpose, such as a well in its front surface. Preferably, the stylus would be mounted removably, and therefore could be mounted by the user temporarily, in the mount.
The inventor of the present invention envisages that new hand-held communication/computing devices with multimodal interfaces may be used for many different applications that involve voice input. For some of these applications, a stylus microphone is convenient. For others, such as voice telephony, a head-mounted microphone may be more convenient. Thus, an alternative
application, using a stylus microphone as described above, provides the means of operating the microphone in either hand-held stylus or head-mounted modes .
The "head-mountable stylus microphone" can simultaneously provide tactile/positional input and audio input to the host device. The microphone body is not physically connected to the host device, but communication is provided between them via a wireless, infra red or ultrasonic link. To allow head mounting, it is envisaged that the microphone body is shaped to attach over a user's ear, or elsewhere on the user's head. Alternatively, the user may wear a separate head-worn unit, to which the microphone body could be coupled. Notably, such a head-worn unit could also function as an earpiece (loudspeaker) for audio output from the host device. This arrangement can be considered to be a headset with a detachable boom microphone, which is useable as a stylus.
Thus, the above application, providing a microphone stylus that is capable of operating as, or with, a microphone headset, does not need to use an array-based microphone, though an array-based microphone would give better performance than a single directional microphone.
It will be understood that the array microphone in a stylus, as described above, provides at least the following advantages: (i) For a small device operable at an arm's length from the user, the inventive concepts hereinbefore described
provide higher quality speech input than a built-in microphone, due to the use of a microphone array, (ii) Various forms of body-worn microphones could provide high quality speech input to a small device operable at an arm's length from the user. However, for occasional speech input, the inventive concepts are more conveniently provided as a microphone array in a handheld device, (iii) A hand-held microphone array can be used further from the mouth than a single hand-held microphone, thanks to the speech enhancement provided by a microphone array configuration. Furthermore, in combination with its stylus shape, the hand-held device allows the stylus array microphone to provide simultaneous voice and tactile/positional inputs to its multimodal host device, (iv) A stylus array microphone can assist a user to improve the quality of his/her speech input, as it is easier for the user to align the array microphone correctly, guided, for example, by the shape of the stylus or some other visual indicator on the stylus. It is also easier for the user to bring the stylus array microphone closer to his/her mouth, if higher quality speech reception becomes necessary (e.g. owing to an increase in background noise) .
In summary, a communication or computing device has been described that incorporates a stylus for interfacing with the device. The stylus includes a directional microphone for receiving sounds from a user of the stylus, to provide audio input to the device. A microphone array in a stylus, adapted for use in the above communication or computing device, has also been described.
Generally, the inventive concepts contained herein are equally applicable to any suitable communication or computing unit. Whilst specific, and preferred, implementations of the present invention are described above, it is clear that one skilled in the art could readily apply variations and modifications of such inventive concepts .
Thus, an improved microphone in a stylus arrangement has been described wherein the abovementioned disadvantages associated with prior art arrangements have been substantially alleviated.