WO2003047145A2 - Methods and devices to minimize the optical loss when multiplexing a plurality of tunable laser sources - Google Patents

Methods and devices to minimize the optical loss when multiplexing a plurality of tunable laser sources Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2003047145A2
WO2003047145A2 PCT/US2002/037964 US0237964W WO03047145A2 WO 2003047145 A2 WO2003047145 A2 WO 2003047145A2 US 0237964 W US0237964 W US 0237964W WO 03047145 A2 WO03047145 A2 WO 03047145A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
tunable
combiner
coupler
junction
optical signal
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2002/037964
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2003047145A3 (en
Inventor
Fadi Daou
Louay Eldada
Original Assignee
E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company filed Critical E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company
Priority to EP02784617A priority Critical patent/EP1454446A2/en
Priority to US10/490,988 priority patent/US20040208419A1/en
Priority to AU2002346549A priority patent/AU2002346549A1/en
Priority to JP2003548441A priority patent/JP2005510773A/en
Priority to KR10-2004-7007889A priority patent/KR20040054800A/en
Publication of WO2003047145A2 publication Critical patent/WO2003047145A2/en
Publication of WO2003047145A3 publication Critical patent/WO2003047145A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04JMULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION
    • H04J14/00Optical multiplex systems
    • H04J14/02Wavelength-division multiplex systems
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B10/00Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
    • H04B10/25Arrangements specific to fibre transmission
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/10Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type
    • G02B6/12Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type of the integrated circuit kind
    • G02B6/12007Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type of the integrated circuit kind forming wavelength selective elements, e.g. multiplexer, demultiplexer
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/24Coupling light guides
    • G02B6/26Optical coupling means
    • G02B6/264Optical coupling means with optical elements between opposed fibre ends which perform a function other than beam splitting
    • G02B6/266Optical coupling means with optical elements between opposed fibre ends which perform a function other than beam splitting the optical element being an attenuator
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B10/00Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B10/00Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
    • H04B10/50Transmitters
    • H04B10/501Structural aspects
    • H04B10/506Multiwavelength transmitters
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B10/00Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
    • H04B10/50Transmitters
    • H04B10/564Power control
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04JMULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION
    • H04J14/00Optical multiplex systems
    • H04J14/02Wavelength-division multiplex systems
    • H04J14/0221Power control, e.g. to keep the total optical power constant
    • H04J14/02216Power control, e.g. to keep the total optical power constant by gain equalization
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/24Coupling light guides
    • G02B6/26Optical coupling means
    • G02B6/28Optical coupling means having data bus means, i.e. plural waveguides interconnected and providing an inherently bidirectional system by mixing and splitting signals
    • G02B6/293Optical coupling means having data bus means, i.e. plural waveguides interconnected and providing an inherently bidirectional system by mixing and splitting signals with wavelength selective means
    • G02B6/29331Optical coupling means having data bus means, i.e. plural waveguides interconnected and providing an inherently bidirectional system by mixing and splitting signals with wavelength selective means operating by evanescent wave coupling
    • G02B6/29332Wavelength selective couplers, i.e. based on evanescent coupling between light guides, e.g. fused fibre couplers with transverse coupling between fibres having different propagation constant wavelength dependency
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/24Coupling light guides
    • G02B6/26Optical coupling means
    • G02B6/28Optical coupling means having data bus means, i.e. plural waveguides interconnected and providing an inherently bidirectional system by mixing and splitting signals
    • G02B6/293Optical coupling means having data bus means, i.e. plural waveguides interconnected and providing an inherently bidirectional system by mixing and splitting signals with wavelength selective means
    • G02B6/29379Optical coupling means having data bus means, i.e. plural waveguides interconnected and providing an inherently bidirectional system by mixing and splitting signals with wavelength selective means characterised by the function or use of the complete device
    • G02B6/29395Optical coupling means having data bus means, i.e. plural waveguides interconnected and providing an inherently bidirectional system by mixing and splitting signals with wavelength selective means characterised by the function or use of the complete device configurable, e.g. tunable or reconfigurable
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04JMULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION
    • H04J14/00Optical multiplex systems
    • H04J14/02Wavelength-division multiplex systems
    • H04J14/0221Power control, e.g. to keep the total optical power constant
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04JMULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION
    • H04J14/00Optical multiplex systems
    • H04J14/02Wavelength-division multiplex systems
    • H04J14/0227Operation, administration, maintenance or provisioning [OAMP] of WDM networks, e.g. media access, routing or wavelength allocation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04JMULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION
    • H04J14/00Optical multiplex systems
    • H04J14/02Wavelength-division multiplex systems
    • H04J14/0278WDM optical network architectures
    • H04J14/0282WDM tree architectures
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04JMULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION
    • H04J14/00Optical multiplex systems
    • H04J14/02Wavelength-division multiplex systems
    • H04J14/0287Protection in WDM systems
    • H04J14/0293Optical channel protection
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04JMULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION
    • H04J14/00Optical multiplex systems
    • H04J14/02Wavelength-division multiplex systems
    • H04J14/0287Protection in WDM systems
    • H04J14/0297Optical equipment protection

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to methods and optical signal devices that minimize the optical loss when combining the optical signals from a plurality of laser sources, said sources being tunable or non-tunable.
  • WDM wavelength division multiplexing
  • AVG's arrayed waveguide gratings
  • Echelle gratings or arrays of thin film filters.
  • a fixed physical connection between the light source and the filter input is made as shown in Figure 1.
  • the combination of optical signals works when each optical signal is carried on a fixed pre-determined wavelength. If the wavelength of a signal were to be changed to another wavelength corresponding to a different WDM channel, said signal does not get added in the combiner and exits the transmission path. This combination method is therefore not usable with tunable lasers, where the wavelength of an optical signal can be dynamically changed.
  • Combining the optical signals of tunable lasers in a WDM system is implemented in one of the following methods:
  • an MxN optical cross connect (OXC) switch can be used to interface between the tunable lasers and the fixed multiplexer (MUX) as shown in Figure 2.
  • OXC optical cross connect
  • Scalability - M represents the number of tunable lasers used in the system
  • N is the number of accessible channels on the WDM system. Scaling either the port count or the number of accessible channels requires physical reconfiguration.
  • combining multiple tunable lasers can be accomplished using broadband (essentially wavelength independent) couplers as shown in Figure 3.
  • Output Power ⁇ ⁇ (i)/M Eq. 1 where ⁇ (i) is the optical power level of the optical signal from each source.
  • a load balancing (or optical signal power level equalization) operation is often used in addition to multiplexing in order to equalize the optical power level in all channels.
  • Said operation is done by attenuating individual channels with higher optical power to match the transmitted optical power level of the signal with the minimum power level, resulting in additional signal power loss.
  • an additional laser source is made available along with each used source, but the additional source or sources is/are not always energized. The presence of said additional sources results in a larger number of branches in combiners, thus reducing the available optical power by the factor mentioned in Eq. 1.
  • Figure 4 shows an example of a 1 :1 protected ring with a passive coupler, where one in each pair of sources is active at once.
  • two source pairs ( ⁇ 1A/ ⁇ B and ⁇ 2A/ ⁇ 2B) exist (at ⁇ 1 and ⁇ 2, respectively), and the active sources ⁇ 1A and ⁇ 2A have optical power levels of 0.8 mW and 1 mW, respectively.
  • the combiner output power is equal to 0.2 mW at ⁇ 1 and 0.25 mW at ⁇ 2.
  • ⁇ 2 would typically be further attenuated to 0.2 mW for load balancing of the channels.
  • US 5,964,677 discloses a laser diode power combiner comprising a dye laser operably coupled to an array of laser diodes for combining optical power from the laser diodes into a coherent laser beam.
  • US 5,737,459 discloses an optical multiplexer suitable for use with optically pumped amplifiers.
  • the present invention consists of attenuating the power levels of all the optical signals to essentially the power of the weakest optical signal invention and describes methods and optical signal devices that minimize the optical loss when combining the optical signals from a plurality of tunable laser sources of typically differing wavelengths.
  • One method involves combining a portion of the optical signal from each source, said portion being typically inversely proportional to the relative optical power level.
  • Another method involves adding the totality of the optical signal from each source with essentially no excess loss, or equalizing the power level of all the optical signals to the power level of the weakest signal with essentially no excess loss.
  • a dynamically balanceable combiner selected from the group , consisting of a: Y junction, X junction, multimode interference (MMl) coupler, star coupler, directional coupler, or Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), any of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable.
  • An optical signal device useful in the immediately above method comprises a dynamically balanceable combiner, said combiner being capable of multiplexing laser signals from tunable or non-tunable laser sources, and said combiner containing at least one dynamically balanceable building block element selected from the group consisting of: Y junction, X junction, multimode interference (MMl) coupler, star coupler, directional coupler and Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), any of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable.
  • MMl multimode interference
  • MZI Mach-Zehnder interferometer
  • a second method of combining a plurality of optical signals from laser sources said sources being tunable or non-tunable, attenuates the power levels of all the optical signals to essentially the power of the weakest optical signal, and achieves essentially no excess loss
  • said method comprises inputting said optical signals into a dynamically balanceable combiner selected from the group consisting of a: Y junction, X junction, MMl coupler, star coupler, directional coupler, or MZI, any of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable.
  • An optical signal device useful in the immediately above method comprises a dynamically balanceable combiner, said combiner being capable of multiplexing laser signals from tunable or non-tunable laser sources, and said combiner containing at least one dynamically balanceable building block element selected from the group consisting of: Y junction, X junction, multimode interference (MMl) coupler, star coupler, directional coupler and Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), any of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable, and said combiner being capable of attenuating the power levels of said laser signals to essentially the power of the weakest optical signal while achieving essentially no excess loss.
  • MMl multimode interference
  • MZI Mach-Zehnder interferometer
  • a dynamically balanceable combiner selected from the group consisting of a: Y junction, X junction, MMl coupler, star coupler, directional coupler, or MZI, any of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable.
  • An optical signal device useful in the immediately above method comprises a dynamically balanceable combiner, said combiner being capable of multiplexing laser signals from tunable or non-tunable laser sources, and said combiner containing at least one dynamically balanceable building block element selected from the group consisting of: Y junction, X junction, multimode interference (MMl) coupler, star coupler, directional coupler and Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), any of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable, and said combiner being capable of attenuating the power levels of said laser signals to essentially the power of the weakest optical signal.
  • MMl multimode interference
  • MZI Mach-Zehnder interferometer
  • a fourth method of combining a plurality of M optical signals from laser sources said sources being tunable or non-tunable, attenuates the power levels of all the optical signals to a level that is larger than that of the weakest optical signal divided by M and smaller than that of the weakest optical signal, wherein said method comprises inputting said optical signals into a dynamically balanceable combiner selected from the group consisting of at least one Y junction, X junction, MMl coupler, star coupler, directional coupler and MZI, each of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable.
  • a dynamically balanceable combiner selected from the group consisting of at least one Y junction, X junction, MMl coupler, star coupler, directional coupler and MZI, each of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable.
  • An optical signal device useful in the immediately above method comprises a dynamically balanceable combiner, said combiner being capable of multiplexing M laser signals from tunable or non-tunable laser sources, and said combiner containing at least one dynamically balanceable building block element selected from the group consisting of: Yjunction, X junction, multimode interference (MMl) coupler, star coupler, directional coupler and Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), any of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable, and said combiner being capable of attenuating the power levels of said M laser signals to a level that is larger than that of the weakest optical signal divided by M and smaller than that of the weakest optical signal.
  • MMl multimode interference
  • MZI Mach-Zehnder interferometer
  • Figure 1 shows fixed wavelength lasers combined using a multiplexer based on an AWG, an Echelle grating, or an array of thin film filters.
  • Figure 2 shows tunable wavelength lasers combined using an OXC and a multiplexer based on an AWG, an Echelle grating, or an array of thin film filters.
  • Figure 3 shows tunable wavelength lasers combined using a passive coupler.
  • Figure 4 shows an example of tunable wavelength lasers combined using a passive coupler, where 2 pairs of lasers are combined, each pair consisting of a main laser and a backup laser.
  • Figure 5 shows a dynamic combiner that combines 2 of 4 tunable lasers.
  • Figure 6 is an embodiment of a dynamic combiner that combines 2 of 4 tunable lasers, said combiner consisting of four 2 x 1 dynamically balanceable combiners.
  • Figure 7 is a lossless dynamic M-channel combiner.
  • Figure 8 embodiment show a tunable highly wavelength sensitive directional coupler that allows for lossless combination of two optical signals of different wavelengths, said signals entering two different input arms and exiting the same output arm.
  • Figure 8a shows a computer simulation of this device when an optical signal at 1510 nm wavelength enters the right input arm.
  • a method is described to measure and combine a percentage of the optical power from a plurality of laser sources, said percentage being larger than that in conventional designs, and the optical power of all optical signals exiting the combiner being essentially equal.
  • K is a coefficient matrix used to dynamically scale each of the input ⁇ (i) channels.
  • the use of a dynamic combiner allows to achieve a 150% efficiency improvement relative to conventional combiners.
  • FIG. 5 An example of a practical implementation of the embodiment shown in Figure 5 would be a tree of 2*1 dynamically balanceable combiners, based on inverted 1 ⁇ 2 Y-branch-based optical switches operated between the ON and the OFF state.
  • Figure 6 shows such an implementation for a 4x1 combiner.
  • Two resistive metal heaters are fabricated on the Y-branch, one in the proximity of each input arm. When no power is applied to the heaters, essentially 50% of the light in each arm exits the output arm.
  • the output ratio can be controlled between 0%/100% and 100%/0%, where the first number represents the percent of light from the "left" input arm exiting the output arm, and the second number represents the percent of light from the "right” input arm exiting the output arm.
  • the second embodiment of this invention is a method to measure and combine essentially the totality of the optical power from a plurality of laser sources operating at different and known wavelengths.
  • This method also allows to load balance all channels by equalizing the optical power of all optical signals exiting the combiner to the value of the weakest signal.
  • This method takes advantage of the fact that the carrier wavelength of each optical signal is known, and uses tunable wavelength-dependent couplers to achieve essentially lossless combining.
  • each active channel is routed essentially losslessly to the input of the combiner using switching to eliminate the inactive sources, then all the optical signals from the active sources enter the essentially lossless dynamic combiner.
  • L is a coefficient matrix used to dynamically scale each of the input ⁇ (i) channels to the optical power level of the weakest channel for load balancing.
  • Figure 8 shows a tunable highly wavelength sensitive directional coupler that allows to achieve lossless dynamic combining of two optical signals of different wavelengths.
  • Figure 8(a) shows the result of a computer simulation of this device when an optical signal at 1510 nm wavelength enters the right input arm (input is at bottom), in which case the optical signal exits the right output arm.
  • Figure 8(b) an optical signal at 1565 nm wavelength enters the left input arm of the same device, and the optical signal exits the right output arm (1510 nm light entering the left input arm would have exited the left output arm). Therefore this design achieves multiplexing with no excess loss.
  • This device can be tunable so that any two optical signals of different wavelengths entering the two different input arms exit the same output arm.
  • excess loss i.e. theoretical loss that is present by design (e.g., a balanced 50/50 or 1x2 splitter or 2x1 combiner has an excess loss of 50% or 3 dB).
  • the lossless devices described above are no-excess-loss devices, and an optical signal traversing these devices will have a propagation loss, which is typically equal to absorption loss + radiation loss + scattering loss + coupling loss - gain (not all of these components are always present, and others components might be present).
  • tunability discussed above can be achieved using any actuation means, including heat, electric field, magnetic field, pressure, or any combination thereof.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
  • Optical Integrated Circuits (AREA)
  • Optical Modulation, Optical Deflection, Nonlinear Optics, Optical Demodulation, Optical Logic Elements (AREA)
  • Semiconductor Lasers (AREA)
  • Optical Communication System (AREA)

Abstract

This invention describes methods and optical signal devices that minimize the optical loss when combining the optical signals from a plurality of laser sources of typically differing wavelengths, said sources being tunable or non-tunable.

Description

METHODS AND DEVICES TO MINIMIZE THE OPTICAL LOSS WHEN MULTIPLEXING OPTICAL SIGNALS FROM A PLURALITY OF TUNABLE LASER SOURCES FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to methods and optical signal devices that minimize the optical loss when combining the optical signals from a plurality of laser sources, said sources being tunable or non-tunable.
TECHNICAL BACKGROUND Combining N tunable lasers is implemented today either with switches and a fixed multiplexer, or with a broadband combiner, which can be a tree of N-1 2x1 combiners arranged in a binary tree with S stages (2S=N).
Combining fixed lasers in a wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) system is implemented using fixed filter functions, such as arrayed waveguide gratings (AWG's), Echelle gratings, or arrays of thin film filters. In such implementations, a fixed physical connection between the light source and the filter input is made as shown in Figure 1. In this implementation, the combination of optical signals works when each optical signal is carried on a fixed pre-determined wavelength. If the wavelength of a signal were to be changed to another wavelength corresponding to a different WDM channel, said signal does not get added in the combiner and exits the transmission path. This combination method is therefore not usable with tunable lasers, where the wavelength of an optical signal can be dynamically changed.
Combining the optical signals of tunable lasers in a WDM system is implemented in one of the following methods:
In one method referred to as OXC & Fixed filters; an MxN optical cross connect (OXC) switch can be used to interface between the tunable lasers and the fixed multiplexer (MUX) as shown in Figure 2. In the above implementation:
• Scalability - M represents the number of tunable lasers used in the system, N is the number of accessible channels on the WDM system. Scaling either the port count or the number of accessible channels requires physical reconfiguration.
• Cost - The combined cost of the MxN optical cross connect and the fixed filter device or array make this implementation costly. • Performance degradation through insertion loss, polarization dependent loss (PDL), and other parasitics.
In a second method referred to as passive couplers, combining multiple tunable lasers can be accomplished using broadband (essentially wavelength independent) couplers as shown in Figure 3. When combining M optical signals on a single physical medium without consideration to the carrier wavelength or amplitude of the signals, the resulting output power is expressed as: Output Power = Σ λ(i)/M Eq. 1 where λ(i) is the optical power level of the optical signal from each source. In the two above implementations, a load balancing (or optical signal power level equalization) operation is often used in addition to multiplexing in order to equalize the optical power level in all channels. Said operation is done by attenuating individual channels with higher optical power to match the transmitted optical power level of the signal with the minimum power level, resulting in additional signal power loss. In many system applications (such as protection switching or capacity provisioning), an additional laser source is made available along with each used source, but the additional source or sources is/are not always energized. The presence of said additional sources results in a larger number of branches in combiners, thus reducing the available optical power by the factor mentioned in Eq. 1. Figure 4 shows an example of a 1 :1 protected ring with a passive coupler, where one in each pair of sources is active at once. In this example, two source pairs (λ1A/λ B and λ2A/λ2B) exist (at λ1 and λ2, respectively), and the active sources λ1A and λ2A have optical power levels of 0.8 mW and 1 mW, respectively. In this embodiment, the combiner output power is equal to 0.2 mW at λ1 and 0.25 mW at λ2. λ2 would typically be further attenuated to 0.2 mW for load balancing of the channels.
US 5,964,677 discloses a laser diode power combiner comprising a dye laser operably coupled to an array of laser diodes for combining optical power from the laser diodes into a coherent laser beam.
US 5,737,459 discloses an optical multiplexer suitable for use with optically pumped amplifiers.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention consists of attenuating the power levels of all the optical signals to essentially the power of the weakest optical signal invention and describes methods and optical signal devices that minimize the optical loss when combining the optical signals from a plurality of tunable laser sources of typically differing wavelengths. One method involves combining a portion of the optical signal from each source, said portion being typically inversely proportional to the relative optical power level. Another method involves adding the totality of the optical signal from each source with essentially no excess loss, or equalizing the power level of all the optical signals to the power level of the weakest signal with essentially no excess loss.
One method of combining a plurality of optical signals from laser sources, said sources being tunable or non-tunable, achieves essentially no excess loss, wherein said method comprises inputting said optical signals into a dynamically balanceable combiner selected from the group , consisting of a: Y junction, X junction, multimode interference (MMl) coupler, star coupler, directional coupler, or Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), any of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable. An optical signal device useful in the immediately above method comprises a dynamically balanceable combiner, said combiner being capable of multiplexing laser signals from tunable or non-tunable laser sources, and said combiner containing at least one dynamically balanceable building block element selected from the group consisting of: Y junction, X junction, multimode interference (MMl) coupler, star coupler, directional coupler and Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), any of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable.
A second method of combining a plurality of optical signals from laser sources, said sources being tunable or non-tunable, attenuates the power levels of all the optical signals to essentially the power of the weakest optical signal, and achieves essentially no excess loss, wherein said method comprises inputting said optical signals into a dynamically balanceable combiner selected from the group consisting of a: Y junction, X junction, MMl coupler, star coupler, directional coupler, or MZI, any of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable.
An optical signal device useful in the immediately above method comprises a dynamically balanceable combiner, said combiner being capable of multiplexing laser signals from tunable or non-tunable laser sources, and said combiner containing at least one dynamically balanceable building block element selected from the group consisting of: Y junction, X junction, multimode interference (MMl) coupler, star coupler, directional coupler and Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), any of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable, and said combiner being capable of attenuating the power levels of said laser signals to essentially the power of the weakest optical signal while achieving essentially no excess loss.
A third method of combining a plurality of optical signals from laser sources, said sources being tunable or non-tunable, attenuates the power levels of all the optical signals to essentially the power of the weakest optical signal, wherein said method comprises inputting said optical signals into a dynamically balanceable combiner selected from the group consisting of a: Y junction, X junction, MMl coupler, star coupler, directional coupler, or MZI, any of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable.
An optical signal device useful in the immediately above method comprises a dynamically balanceable combiner, said combiner being capable of multiplexing laser signals from tunable or non-tunable laser sources, and said combiner containing at least one dynamically balanceable building block element selected from the group consisting of: Y junction, X junction, multimode interference (MMl) coupler, star coupler, directional coupler and Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), any of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable, and said combiner being capable of attenuating the power levels of said laser signals to essentially the power of the weakest optical signal.
A fourth method of combining a plurality of M optical signals from laser sources, said sources being tunable or non-tunable, attenuates the power levels of all the optical signals to a level that is larger than that of the weakest optical signal divided by M and smaller than that of the weakest optical signal, wherein said method comprises inputting said optical signals into a dynamically balanceable combiner selected from the group consisting of at least one Y junction, X junction, MMl coupler, star coupler, directional coupler and MZI, each of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable.
An optical signal device useful in the immediately above method comprises a dynamically balanceable combiner, said combiner being capable of multiplexing M laser signals from tunable or non-tunable laser sources, and said combiner containing at least one dynamically balanceable building block element selected from the group consisting of: Yjunction, X junction, multimode interference (MMl) coupler, star coupler, directional coupler and Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), any of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable, and said combiner being capable of attenuating the power levels of said M laser signals to a level that is larger than that of the weakest optical signal divided by M and smaller than that of the weakest optical signal.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 shows fixed wavelength lasers combined using a multiplexer based on an AWG, an Echelle grating, or an array of thin film filters.
Figure 2 shows tunable wavelength lasers combined using an OXC and a multiplexer based on an AWG, an Echelle grating, or an array of thin film filters.
Figure 3 shows tunable wavelength lasers combined using a passive coupler.
Figure 4 shows an example of tunable wavelength lasers combined using a passive coupler, where 2 pairs of lasers are combined, each pair consisting of a main laser and a backup laser.
Figure 5 shows a dynamic combiner that combines 2 of 4 tunable lasers.
Figure 6 is an embodiment of a dynamic combiner that combines 2 of 4 tunable lasers, said combiner consisting of four 2 x 1 dynamically balanceable combiners.
Figure 7 is a lossless dynamic M-channel combiner. Figure 8 embodiment show a tunable highly wavelength sensitive directional coupler that allows for lossless combination of two optical signals of different wavelengths, said signals entering two different input arms and exiting the same output arm.
Figure 8a shows a computer simulation of this device when an optical signal at 1510 nm wavelength enters the right input arm.
In Figure 8b an optical signal at 1565 nm wavelength enters the left input arm of the device in 8a. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In the first embodiment of this invention, a method is described to measure and combine a percentage of the optical power from a plurality of laser sources, said percentage being larger than that in conventional designs, and the optical power of all optical signals exiting the combiner being essentially equal.
This design is presented in Figure 5.
K is a coefficient matrix used to dynamically scale each of the input λ(i) channels. In the example of Figure 5 with 20% difference in the power level, the use of a dynamic combiner allows to achieve a 150% efficiency improvement relative to conventional combiners.
An example of a practical implementation of the embodiment shown in Figure 5 would be a tree of 2*1 dynamically balanceable combiners, based on inverted 1 χ2 Y-branch-based optical switches operated between the ON and the OFF state. Figure 6 shows such an implementation for a 4x1 combiner.
An example showing the principle of operation of a 2x1 dynamically balanceable combiner based on a 2x1 Y-branch with 2 input arms and one output arm: is where, for example, the actuation mechanism is the thermo- optic effect, where routing is achieved by applying heat to vary the refractive index of the material, and where the Y-branch is made of polymer, a material with a negative thermo-optic coefficient, meaning that the material refractive index decreases with increasing temperature. Two resistive metal heaters are fabricated on the Y-branch, one in the proximity of each input arm. When no power is applied to the heaters, essentially 50% of the light in each arm exits the output arm. When power is applied to the heater of one output arm, said arm is heated, its refractive index is decreased, and less than 50% of the light in the actuated arm exits the output arm, whereas more than 50% of the light in the non- actuated arm exits the output arm. By applying power to one heater at a time and controlling the power level, the output ratio can be controlled between 0%/100% and 100%/0%, where the first number represents the percent of light from the "left" input arm exiting the output arm, and the second number represents the percent of light from the "right" input arm exiting the output arm.
The second embodiment of this invention is a method to measure and combine essentially the totality of the optical power from a plurality of laser sources operating at different and known wavelengths. This method also allows to load balance all channels by equalizing the optical power of all optical signals exiting the combiner to the value of the weakest signal. This method takes advantage of the fact that the carrier wavelength of each optical signal is known, and uses tunable wavelength-dependent couplers to achieve essentially lossless combining. In a protection configuration, each active channel is routed essentially losslessly to the input of the combiner using switching to eliminate the inactive sources, then all the optical signals from the active sources enter the essentially lossless dynamic combiner. This novel design is presented in Figure 7.
L is a coefficient matrix used to dynamically scale each of the input λ(i) channels to the optical power level of the weakest channel for load balancing.
In the example of Figure 7 with 20% difference in the power level, the use of a lossless dynamic combiner allows to achieve a 60% efficiency improvement relative to the plain dynamic combiner of Figure 5, and a 300%) efficiency improvement relative to the conventional combiners of Figure 4.
An example of a practical implementation of the embodiment shown in Figure 7 would use a directional coupler as the tunable wavelength- dependent coupler. Figure 8 shows a tunable highly wavelength sensitive directional coupler that allows to achieve lossless dynamic combining of two optical signals of different wavelengths. Figure 8(a) shows the result of a computer simulation of this device when an optical signal at 1510 nm wavelength enters the right input arm (input is at bottom), in which case the optical signal exits the right output arm. In Figure 8(b), an optical signal at 1565 nm wavelength enters the left input arm of the same device, and the optical signal exits the right output arm (1510 nm light entering the left input arm would have exited the left output arm). Therefore this design achieves multiplexing with no excess loss. This device can be tunable so that any two optical signals of different wavelengths entering the two different input arms exit the same output arm. It should be noted that the loss discussed above is excess loss, i.e. theoretical loss that is present by design (e.g., a balanced 50/50 or 1x2 splitter or 2x1 combiner has an excess loss of 50% or 3 dB). The lossless devices described above are no-excess-loss devices, and an optical signal traversing these devices will have a propagation loss, which is typically equal to absorption loss + radiation loss + scattering loss + coupling loss - gain (not all of these components are always present, and others components might be present).
It should also be noted that the tunability discussed above can be achieved using any actuation means, including heat, electric field, magnetic field, pressure, or any combination thereof.

Claims

CLAIMSWhat is claimed is:
1. A method of combining a plurality of optical signals from laser sources, said sources being tunable or non-tunable, while achieving essentially no excess loss, wherein said method comprising inputting said optical signals into a dynamically balanceable combiner selected from the group consisting of a: Y junction, X junction, multimode interference (MMl) coupler, star coupler, directional coupler, or Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), any of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable.
2. An optical signal device containing a dynamically balanceable combiner, said combiner being capable of multiplexing laser signals from tunable or non-tunable laser sources, and said combiner containing at least one dynamically balanceable building block element selected from the group consisting of: Y junction, X junction, multimode interference (MMl) coupler, star coupler, directional coupler and Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), any of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable.
3. A method of combining a plurality of optical signals from laser sources, said sources being tunable or non-tunable, while attenuating the power levels of all the optical signals to essentially the power of the weakest optical signal, and while achieving essentially no excess loss, wherein said method comprising inputting said optical signals into a dynamically balanceable combiner selected from the group consisting of a: Y junction, X junction, MMl coupler, star coupler, directional coupler, or MZI, any of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable.
4. An optical signal device containing a dynamically balanceable combiner, said combiner being capable of multiplexing laser signals from tunable or non-tunable laser sources, and said combiner containing at least one dynamically balanceable building block element selected from the group consisting of: Y junction, X junction, multimode interference (MMl) coupler, star coupler, directional coupler and Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), any of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable, and said combiner being capable of attenuating the power levels of said laser signals to essentially the power of the weakest optical signal while achieving essentially no excess loss.
5. A method of combining a plurality of optical signals from laser sources, said sources being tunable or non-tunable, while attenuating the power levels of all the optical signals to essentially the power of the weakest optical signal, wherein said method comprising inputting said optical signals into a dynamically balanceable combiner selected from the group consisting of a: Y junction, X junction, MMl coupler, star coupler, directional coupler, or MZI, any of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable.
6. An optical signal device containing a dynamically balanceable combiner, said combiner being capable of multiplexing laser signals from tunable or non-tunable laser sources, and said combiner containing at least one dynamically balanceable building block element selected from the group consisting of: Y junction, X junction, multimode interference (MMl) coupler, star coupler, directional coupler and Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), any of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable, and said combiner being capable of attenuating the power levels of said laser signals to essentially the power of the weakest optical signal.
7. A method of combining a plurality of M optical signals from laser sources, said sources being tunable or non-tunable, while attenuating the power levels of all the optical signals to a level that is larger than that of the weakest optical signal divided by M and smaller than that of the weakest optical signal, wherein said method comprising inputting said optical signals into a dynamically balanceable combiner selected from the group consisting of at least one Y junction, X junction, MMl coupler, star coupler, directional coupler and MZI, each of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable.
8. An optical signal device containing a dynamically balanceable combiner, said combiner being capable of multiplexing M laser signals from tunable or non-tunable laser sources, and said combiner containing at least one dynamically balanceable building block element selected from the group consisting of: Y junction, X junction, multimode interference (MMl) coupler, star coupler, directional coupler and Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), any of which can be passive, tunable, or switchable, and said combiner being capable of attenuating the power levels of said M laser signals to a level that is larger than that of the weakest optical signal divided by M and smaller than that of the weakest optical signal.
PCT/US2002/037964 2001-11-26 2002-11-26 Methods and devices to minimize the optical loss when multiplexing a plurality of tunable laser sources WO2003047145A2 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP02784617A EP1454446A2 (en) 2001-11-26 2002-11-26 Methods and devices to minimize the optical loss when multiplexing a plurality of tunable laser sources
US10/490,988 US20040208419A1 (en) 2001-11-26 2002-11-26 Methods and devices to minimize the optical loss when multiplexing optical signals from a plurality of tunable laser sources
AU2002346549A AU2002346549A1 (en) 2001-11-26 2002-11-26 Methods and devices to minimize the optical loss when multiplexing a plurality of tunable laser sources
JP2003548441A JP2005510773A (en) 2001-11-26 2002-11-26 Method and apparatus for minimizing optical losses in multiplex transmission of multiple tunable laser sources
KR10-2004-7007889A KR20040054800A (en) 2001-11-26 2002-11-26 Methods and devices to minimize the optical loss when multiplexing a plurality of tunable laser sources

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US33332301P 2001-11-26 2001-11-26
US60/333,323 2001-11-26

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2003047145A2 true WO2003047145A2 (en) 2003-06-05
WO2003047145A3 WO2003047145A3 (en) 2004-02-05

Family

ID=23302296

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2002/037964 WO2003047145A2 (en) 2001-11-26 2002-11-26 Methods and devices to minimize the optical loss when multiplexing a plurality of tunable laser sources

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (2) US20040208419A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1454446A2 (en)
JP (1) JP2005510773A (en)
KR (1) KR20040054800A (en)
CN (1) CN1596518A (en)
AU (1) AU2002346549A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2003047145A2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1492380A1 (en) * 2003-06-24 2004-12-29 Alcatel Configurable optical signals processing device with broadband sources.
WO2010000307A1 (en) 2008-06-30 2010-01-07 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Apparatus and modules for an optical network

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6943881B2 (en) * 2003-06-04 2005-09-13 Tomophase Corporation Measurements of optical inhomogeneity and other properties in substances using propagation modes of light
US8498681B2 (en) * 2004-10-05 2013-07-30 Tomophase Corporation Cross-sectional mapping of spectral absorbance features
US7970458B2 (en) * 2004-10-12 2011-06-28 Tomophase Corporation Integrated disease diagnosis and treatment system
JP2008203837A (en) * 2007-01-23 2008-09-04 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Wavelength multiplexed light source and wavelength multiplexed light source system
US7706646B2 (en) * 2007-04-24 2010-04-27 Tomophase Corporation Delivering light via optical waveguide and multi-view optical probe head
US8452383B2 (en) * 2008-02-29 2013-05-28 Tomophase Corporation Temperature profile mapping and guided thermotherapy
US8467858B2 (en) * 2009-04-29 2013-06-18 Tomophase Corporation Image-guided thermotherapy based on selective tissue thermal treatment
EP2470886A4 (en) 2009-08-26 2016-11-02 Tomophase Inc Optical tissue imaging based on optical frequency domain imaging
KR101992917B1 (en) * 2016-11-30 2019-06-25 엘지디스플레이 주식회사 Substrate for display, organic light emitting display device including the same, and method of manufacturing the same

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0564043A1 (en) * 1992-04-03 1993-10-06 Koninklijke KPN N.V. Optical hybrid
EP0857996A1 (en) * 1997-02-10 1998-08-12 Lucent Technologies Inc. Crosstalk-reduced integrated digital optical switch
WO1999042893A1 (en) * 1998-02-20 1999-08-26 Corning Incorporated Tunable optical add/drop multiplexer
US6256428B1 (en) * 1999-02-19 2001-07-03 Corning Incorporated Cascading of tunable optical filter elements
WO2001078282A1 (en) * 2000-04-11 2001-10-18 Ifotec Wavelength multiplexing optical fibre transmission device

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4767170A (en) * 1985-11-20 1988-08-30 Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Optical deflector device
US4878724A (en) * 1987-07-30 1989-11-07 Trw Inc. Electrooptically tunable phase-locked laser array
EP0412220B1 (en) * 1989-08-11 1994-03-23 Hewlett-Packard Company Network transceiver
US5136669A (en) * 1991-03-15 1992-08-04 Sperry Marine Inc. Variable ratio fiber optic coupler optical signal processing element
US5764677A (en) * 1994-09-01 1998-06-09 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Laser diode power combiner
GB2293684B (en) * 1994-09-27 1998-10-14 Northern Telecom Ltd An interfermetric multiplexer
US5832155A (en) * 1995-02-07 1998-11-03 Ldt Gmbh & Co. Laser-Display-Technologie Kg Combination splitting device composed of strip waveguides and uses thereof
FR2738698B1 (en) * 1995-09-08 1997-10-17 Alcatel Nv METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EQUALIZING THE RESPECTIVE POWER LEVELS OF THE CHANNELS OF A SPECTRALLY MULTIPLEX OPTICAL SIGNAL
US5964677A (en) * 1998-07-02 1999-10-12 Speed Control, Inc. Shift mechanisms, lock assemblies and methods of adjusting a gear ratio of a transmission
US20010046363A1 (en) * 2000-03-03 2001-11-29 Purchase Ken G. Variable optical attenuators and optical shutters using a coupling layer in proximity to an optical waveguide (II)

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0564043A1 (en) * 1992-04-03 1993-10-06 Koninklijke KPN N.V. Optical hybrid
EP0857996A1 (en) * 1997-02-10 1998-08-12 Lucent Technologies Inc. Crosstalk-reduced integrated digital optical switch
WO1999042893A1 (en) * 1998-02-20 1999-08-26 Corning Incorporated Tunable optical add/drop multiplexer
US6256428B1 (en) * 1999-02-19 2001-07-03 Corning Incorporated Cascading of tunable optical filter elements
WO2001078282A1 (en) * 2000-04-11 2001-10-18 Ifotec Wavelength multiplexing optical fibre transmission device

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1492380A1 (en) * 2003-06-24 2004-12-29 Alcatel Configurable optical signals processing device with broadband sources.
FR2856860A1 (en) * 2003-06-24 2004-12-31 Cit Alcatel CONFIGURABLE OPTICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING DEVICE WITH BROADBAND SOURCES
US7286765B2 (en) 2003-06-24 2007-10-23 Alcatel Configurable optical signal processing device with wideband sources
WO2010000307A1 (en) 2008-06-30 2010-01-07 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Apparatus and modules for an optical network

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN1596518A (en) 2005-03-16
EP1454446A2 (en) 2004-09-08
WO2003047145A3 (en) 2004-02-05
JP2005510773A (en) 2005-04-21
AU2002346549A8 (en) 2003-06-10
AU2002346549A1 (en) 2003-06-10
US20040001716A1 (en) 2004-01-01
US20040208419A1 (en) 2004-10-21
KR20040054800A (en) 2004-06-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5953467A (en) Switchable optical filter
EP1013022B1 (en) Arrangement and method relating to optical transmission
US20040208419A1 (en) Methods and devices to minimize the optical loss when multiplexing optical signals from a plurality of tunable laser sources
JP3698944B2 (en) Reconfigurable merge / branch for fiber optic communication systems
JPH07140496A (en) Optical switch of wavelength selection
Ishida et al. Digitally tunable optical filters using arrayed-waveguide grating (AWG) multiplexers and optical switches
JP3643249B2 (en) Optical circuits and networks
US6205269B1 (en) Optical add/drop multiplexer
Suzuki et al. Low loss fully reconfigurable wavelength-selective optical 1/spl times/N switch based on transversal filter configuration using silica-based planar lightwave circuit
EP1299967B1 (en) Bragg grating assisted mmimi-coupler for tunable add-drop multiplexing
JP4668488B2 (en) Wavelength selective device and switch and method using the same
EP1266473B1 (en) Apparatus and method for wavelength selective switching
EP1603261A1 (en) Methods and devices to minimize the optical loss when multiplexing optical signals from a plurality of tunable laser sources
Ueda et al. Large-scale optical-switch prototypes utilizing cyclic arrayed-waveguide gratings for datacenters
JP4520700B2 (en) Signal addition for wavelength division multiplexing systems.
Augustsson Proposal of a DMUX with a Fabry-Perot all-reflection filter-based MMIMI configuration
US6574413B1 (en) Arrangement and method for the channel-dependent attenuation of the levels of a plurality of optical data channels
Soole et al. High-performance operation of monolithically-integrated multipurpose reconfigurable optical add-drop multiplexer
WO2001073490A1 (en) Optical switching system with power balancing
Fujita et al. 32-channel reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexer on a chip
Fujita et al. Metro ring node module based on polymeric planar lightwave circuits
Gauden et al. Tunable Mach-Zehnder-based add-drop multiplexer
GB2381683A (en) A re-configurable wavelength add-drop multiplexer
JPH11252046A (en) Wavelength selection element
Izhaky et al. Intelligent switches of integrated lightwave circuits with core telecommunication functions

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 10490988

Country of ref document: US

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2002784617

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2003548441

Country of ref document: JP

Ref document number: 1020047007889

Country of ref document: KR

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 20028235282

Country of ref document: CN

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2002784617

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 2002784617

Country of ref document: EP