SUGAR-PROTEIN CONJUGATES AND THEIR FORMATION
This invention relates generally to a sugar-protein conjugate, having commercially useful functional properties. The invention also relates to a method of preparing one or more such sugar-protein conjugates.
BACKGROUND
In the manufacture of a range of foodstuffs, it is common practice to include a thickening material that raises the viscosity of the foodstuff so that it sets or at least becomes more viscous. Pectins and other vegetable gums, acacia gum, . xanthan, gelatine, halal gelatine, agar and carrageenan are examples of such thickeners. Methylcellulose thickeners are used in the pharmaceutical industry. Least cost functional formulation principles apply to products in this area, so permitting (for example) the dairy industry to sell more of a particular ingredient at a greater price if the functionality is higher. Another way of adding value arises if less material is required in order to achieve a desired effect. Products with improved functionality will be more readily accepted if they are based on widely available materials that are already accepted as foodstuffs in the food industry.
Combinations of casein and a selection of polysaccharides are known in the literature. However a glycosylation reaction without using non-toxic cross-linking reagents has only been described in a few publications. Most work in this area has been directed to the production of emulsifiers or foam stabilisers. Kato et al. (Biosci Biotech Biochem 56 (4) 567-571 (1992)) describes a conjugate of casein with dextran, or a conjugate of casein with galactomannan, which latter compound has 1.5 times improved emulsifying activity and 10 times better emulsion stability than that of casein. The material was made by heating at 60 deg C for 24 hours at a controlled humidity of 79%.
Dickinson et al. (Colloids and Surfaces 113 191-201 (1996)) describes a conjugate of bovine serum albumin (BSA), or lysozyme, or casein with high molecular weight dextran. The initially poor foaming properties of lysozyme were enhanced while those of beta-casein were reduced. The foaming properties of BSA were not
greatly affected. As the molecular weight (MW) of the dextran rose, the alteration was more pronounced. The material was made with a Maillard reaction, by heating 1 :1 dried mixtures at 60 deg C for up to 3 weeks at controlled humidity of 40%.
Shepherd et al (Food Hydrocolloids 14 281-286 (2000)) describes the preparation of a conjugate of casein using maltodextrin (Maltrin 100). The chemically modified sodium casein was prepared by dry heating a 1 :1 mixture of sodium casein and maltodextrin at 60 deg C for 23 - 120 hours at a controlled humidity of 79 %. The resulting chemically modified casein had better solubility at low pH, improved emulsifying activity and 10 times better emulsion stability than that of the unmodified casein.
Interestingly, Shepherd et al. observed a tendency for the formation of an undesirable brown colour on reaction, which is perhaps related to the Maillard reaction or to the caramelisation of sugars. They found that this tendency to brown could be abolished by the dialysis of the Maltrin 100 resulting in "pristine white powders". The tendency to brown could not be abolished by the dialysis of casein. Accordingly Shepherd et al. recommend that steps be taken to remove the low molecular weight carbohydrate material (believed to include 0.8% giucose and 2.8% maltose) from the reactants so that any industrial process would need less stringent control to prevent browning.
Courthaudon, J-L, Colas, B., Lorient, D.Covalent binding of glycosyl residues to bovine casein: effects on solubility and viscosity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (1989) Vol 37, p32-36. describes methods of binding simple carbohydrates to bovine casein. The process employed toxic cross-linking agents. Additionally, the achieved increases in viscosities were low, despite using up to 10% (w/v) casein. The increase in viscosity is inefficient given the high concentration of protein required.
Therefore a problem to be solved is to make a sugar-protein conjugate having enhanced properties over those of the raw material(s), such enhancement being for example an increase in viscosity when in solution, and to make the sugar-
protein conjugate from abundantly available raw materials in a manner which results in the sugar-protein conjugate being acceptable for use in foodstuffs.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to prepare a sugar-protein conjugate, having commercially useful viscosity properties or at least to provide the public with a useful choice.
It is to be understood that the term "sugar-protein conjugate" used throughout the specification means a sugar-protein conjugate that is obtained without using reagents that are toxic for human or animal consumption and that the sugar- protein conjugate so obtained can be consumed by humans or animals without deleterious effect.
It is also to be understood that the term "foodstuff(s)" as used throughout the specification means a non-toxic reactant(s) or product(s) that can be consumed by humans or the like without deleterious effect.
STATEMENT OF INVENTION
In a first aspect the present invention provides a method of preparing a sugar- protein conjugate comprising the step of reacting together under glycosylation conditions at a controlled relative humidity
(a) an effective amount of at least one proteinaceous foodstuff;
(b) an effective amount of one or more oligosaccharide sugars having between 3-30 sugar units and
(c) an effective amount of one or more monsaccharide(s) or one or more disaccharide(s),
wherein the reaction is conducted in the absence of further reactants intended to promote the glycosylation reaction so that the sugar-protein conjugate product is substantially devoid of materials unsuitable for use as a foodstuff and wherein the sugar- protein conjugate product has improved functional viscosity over the combined viscosity properties of the individual reactants.
Preferably, the one or more monosaccharide(s) or one or more disaccharide(s)are selected from the range of reducing sugars including fructose, glucose, ribose, deoxyribose, lactose, lactulose, maltose, galactose, and mannose.
More preferably the one or more monsaccharide(s) or one or more disaccharide(s) includes fructose and/or glucose.
Preferably, the one or more oligosaccharide sugars comprises a fructan (fructo- oligosaccharide) selected from the range including inulin (1 ,2 links), levan, (2,6 links) and graminans (mixed 1 ,2 and 2,6 links) comprising more than 2 fructose units or.sugars linked together by glycosidic bonds. Alternatively, the one or more oligosaccharide sugars comprises one or more glucan oligosaccharides selected from the range dextrin (1 ,4 links) dextran (1 ,6 links) or mixed linkages comprising more than 2 glucose units or sugars linked together by glycosidic bonds or a mixture of glucan and fructan oligosaccharide sugars.
In the above aspect, it is preferred that the proteinaceous foodstuff is selected from a casein, caseinates, a whey protein, lactalbumin, bovine serum albumin, egg albumin, and soy protein.
More preferably the proteinaceous foodstuff is selected from casein or one or more caseinates.
Preferably the effective amounts of reactants are present in a gravimetric ratio of between 1 part of proteinaceous foodstuff, between 0.5 and 5 parts of one or more oligosaccharides and between 0.01 and 2 parts of one or more monsaccharide(s) or one or more disaccharide(s). It is preferred that the effective amounts of reactants are present in a gravimetric ratio of between 1 part of caseinate, between 0.5 and 5 parts of inulin and between 0.01 and 1 part of fructose. Most preferably the gravimetric ratios of the reactants is: 1 part of sodium caseinate to 1 part of inulin, and 0.2 parts of fructose.
Preferably, the controlled relative humidity is in the range of from 40 to 100 % at the temperature of the reaction. More preferably the relative humidity is about 70 to 80 % R H, most preferably 80% relative humidity.
Preferably the method includes the further steps of preparing and storing the resulting sugar-protein conjugate as a dry material.
In another related aspect the present invention provides a sugar-protein conjugate obtained according to the methods defined above.
In a further related aspect the present invention includes a food product incorporating an effective amount of the sugar-protein conjugate obtained by the methods defined above.
In a second main aspect the present invention further provides a method of preparing a sugar- protein conjugate comprising the step of reacting together under glycosylation conditions at a controlled relative humidity
(a) an effective amount of at least one proteinaceous foodstuff; and
(b) an effective amount of one or more monsaccharide(s) or one or more disaccharide(s)
wherein the reaction is conducted in the absence of further reactants intended to promote the glycosylation reaction so that the sugar-protein conjugate product is substantially devoid of materials unsuitable for use as a foodstuff and wherein the sugar- protein conjugate product has improved viscosity over the combined viscosity properties of the individual reactants.
Preferably, the one or more monsaccharide(s) or one or more disaccharide(s) are selected from the range of reducing sugars including fructose, glucose, deoxyribose, ribose, lactose, lactulose, maltose, galactose, and mannose.
More preferably the monosaccharide is fructose and/or glucose.
Preferably, the proteinaceous foodstuff is selected from a casein, caseinates, a whey protein, lactalbumin, bovine serum albumin, egg albumen, and soy protein.
Most preferably, the proteinaceous foodstuff is a casein or caseinates.
Preferably the effective amounts of reactants are present in a gravimetric ratio of between 1 part of a proteinaceous foodstuff, and between 0.01 and 2 parts of one or more monosaccharides or dissacharides. It is preferred that the effective amounts of reactants are present in a gravimetric ratio of between 1 part of sodium caseinate, and between 0.01 and 1.0 part of fructose and/or glucose. Most preferably the gravimetric ratios of the reactants is: 1 part of sodium caseinate to 0.2 parts of fructose.
Preferably, the controlled relative humidity is in the range of from 40 to 100 % relative humidity (RH) at the temperature of the reaction. More preferably the relative humidity is about 70 to 80 % R H, most preferably 70% relative humidity.
Preferably the method includes the further steps of preparing and storing the resulting sugar-protein conjugate as a dry material.
In a further aspect of the present invention provides is a sugar-protein conjugate obtained according to the methods defined above.
In a further related aspect the present invention includes a food product incorporating an effective amount of the sugar-protein conjugate obtained by the methods defined above.
In a further aspect the present invention provides a method for manufacturing a sugar-casein conjugate the method including the steps of:
(a) mixing an effective amount of casein and/or an effective amount of a caseinate and an effective amount of at least one reactant capable of forming a conjugate with the casein and/or the caseinate in a desired ratio, and in the presence of a controlled amount of water,
(b) evaporating the resultant admixture to about 3-10% water content by weight,
(c) heated under controlled relative humidity.
Preferably the mixing step (a) is carried out in solution, more preferably an aqueous solution.
Preferably, step (b) is carried out to produce a powder.
Preferably, step (c) is carried out at temperatures of between 40 degrees to 80 degrees, more preferably at a temperature of 60 degrees.
Preferably step (c) is carried out for periods of time from between 3-120 hours, more preferably between 24 - 48 hours.
Alternatively step (c) is carried out at a temperature of 80-120 degrees for 0.1 - 3 hours.
Preferably, the caseinate is selected from sodium, calcium or potassium caseinates, most preferably the caseinate is sodium caseinate.
Preferably, the at least one reactant capable of conjugating casein and/or the caseinate is selected from one or more of the following sugars including fructose, glucose, deoxyribose, ribose, lactose, lactulose, maltose, galactose, mannose; one or more fructans (fructo-oligosaccharide) selected from the range including inulin (1 ,2 links), levan, (2,6 links) and graminans (mixed 1 ,2 and 2,6 links) comprising more than 2 fructose units or sugars linked together by glycosidic bonds; and one or more glucan oligosaccharides selected from the range dextrin (1 ,4 links) dextran (1 ,6 links) or mixed linkages comprising more than 2 glucose units or sugars linked together by glycosidic bonds or a mixture of glucan and fructan oligosaccharide sugars.
Preferably, where the at least one reactant capable of conjugating casein and/or the caseinate is selected from one or more of the sugars defined above, the effective amount of the sugars is selected so as to provide a change in the viscosity of the sugar-casein/caseinate conjugate over the individual viscosity properties of the one or more sugars and the casein/caseinate conjugate.
In a preferred embodiment preferably the effective amounts of the casein and/or a caseinate and the at least one reactant capable of conjugating casein and/or the caseinate are present in a gravimetric ratio of between 1 part of sodium caseinate, between 0.5 and 5 parts of inulin, and between 0.01 and 2 parts of fructose and/or
glucose. Most preferably, the gravimetric ratios are 1 part of sodium caseinate, 1 part of inulin, and 0.2 parts of fructose.
In the alternative, preferably the effective amounts of the casein and/or a caseinate and the at least one reactant capable of conjugating casein and/or the caseinate are present in a gravimetric ratio of between 1 part of a proteinaceous foodstuff, and between 0.01 and 2 parts of one or more monosaccharides or dissacharides. It is preferred that the effective amounts of reactants are present in a gravimetric ratio of between 1 part of a caseinate, and between 0.01 and 1.0 part of fructose and/or glucose. Most preferably the gravimetric ratios of the reactants is: 1 part of sodium caseinate to 0.2 parts of fructose.
Preferably the controlled relative humidity in step (c) of the reaction corresponds to a relative humidity of between 40 % and 100%, more preferably of between 70 % and 80 % and most preferably of about 70 %.
In a preferred embodiment an industrial scale synthesis of the substance includes the steps of:
(a) thorough mixing of a finely divided effective amount of casein and/or an effective amount of a caseinate and a finely divided effective amount of at least one reactant capable of forming a conjugate with the casein and/or the caseinate in a desired ratio, and in the presence of a controlled amount of water sufficient to solublise the sugar components of the mixture,
(b) evaporating the resultant admixture to about 3-10% water content by weight by evaporating the admixture obtained in step (a) in either a batch process or a continuous process, to create a powder
(c) heating the powder with regulation of the relative humidity to within specified limits by means of humidity sensors and water evaporators connected to process control devices, and
(d) testing the resulting viscosity of the casein/caseinate conjugate then bagging and storage as a substantially dry powder.
Steps (a) and (b) can be combined by careful control of the evaporation and heating to result in a powder of the desired water activity.
Further aspects of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description given by way of example only.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
This invention involves the conjugation/glycosylation of a protein source, such as a casein/caseinate with a combination of a monosaccharide or disaccharide and a large sugar molecule (between 3 to 30 sugar units), such as the monosaccharide fructose, with the fructan (oligosaccharide) inulin) in a dry heat-promoted reaction to completion under controlled humidity produces a more usefully modified sugar- protein conjugate product having enhanced viscosity properties.
Surprisingly, the inventors have also established that the glycosylation/conjugation of a monosaccharide or a disaccharide, with a protein source such as a casein/caseinate in a dry heat-promoted reaction under controlled humidity produces a more usefully modified sugar-protein conjugate product having enhanced viscosity properties.
The inventors sought to eliminate the need to use a chemical oxidising and reducing agent to catalyse and then stabilise a reaction involving a casein or a salt thereof in order to modify the physical properties of the casein.
The following preparations, examples and results outline some of the preferred embodiments of the present invention.
General Methods of Examples
Sample Preparation
Materials: Sodium caseinate (Alanate 180, New Zealand Dairy ingredients Ltd.); Maltodextrin (Dridex 10, NZ Starch); Inulin (Frutafit HD,) average chain length 9-12 monomers, < 10 % monomers, fructose, glucose and ribose were supplied by Sigma Chemical Company, St Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.
Sample production: Samples were prepared by dissolving the reactants in Milli-Q water according to the Tables in the Examples. Prepared solutions were frozen and subsequently freeze-dried. Freeze-dried samples were pre-equilibrated to the selected relative humidity (RH) at room temperature (-22 °C) by being placed within a desiccator maintaining a controlled RH. Various saturated salt solutions were used to achieve the specified RH (Smith, 1971 , refer Table 1 below). The actual RH was recorded using a thermohygrometer. In each case 100 ml of the saturated salt solution was placed inside a 500 ml desiccator and equilibrated at room temperature (18-22 °C) at least 24 h before introducing the samples. The dry specimens were stirred daily to encourage uniform equilibration. After 3 days the samples had equilibrated, as determined by measuring water activity of samples in a preliminary trial. Following pre-equilibration the bottled samples were capped and sealed outside with parafilm until placed in the heating desiccator. Samples were subsequently heated within a desiccator (pre-equilibrated at 80 % RH, 60 °C) for the desired time.
Alternatively freeze-dried samples from Example 2 were not pre-equilibrated but immediately placed in a temperature and humidity controlled chamber with a fan to circulate the atmosphere across the freeze-dried material.
Table 1: Equilibrium Relative Humidity of selected saturated salt solutions.
Salt RH at 22 °C
Sodium Bromide 50 %
Cupric Chloride 67 %
Barium Chloride 80 %
Viscosity property determination
Equipment: Viscosity measurements were acquired using a cone and plate Paar Physica Rheometer UDS-200 (USA).
Method of testing : Dry specimens were weighed out and Milli-Q water added to give 3 % w/v caseinate content plus any carbohydrate additive. Thus all samples
were compared at the same protein concentration. Samples were left at room temperature (18-22 °C) overnight (approximately 16 h), with intermittent stirring, to allow full hydration. Aliquots of the 3 % w/v caseinate stock solution were diluted to give conjugates at 2 % and 1% w/v caseinate. A constant volume of sample (200 μl) was pipetted onto the rheometer Peltier plate, equilibrated at 20 °C, to form a small circular shape about 1 cm diameter. The sample was left to temperature equilibrate (1 min). The probe (plate, 25 cm diameter) was then moved down onto the sample compressing it until a gap of 0.3 mm remained between the probe and the Peltier plate. Viscosities were compared at 108/s shear rate.
Soluble protein determination:
The soluble protein content of caseinate conjugates was determined pH according to a modified method of Bradford (1976) after centrifugation in buffers of different pH.
Example 1
Samples were prepared according to the reagent ratios in the Table and heated for 48 h at 60 °C, 80 % RH. The viscosity of the preparations was determined and values are the average of duplicate measurements ± standard deviation.
Sample (protein:sugar w/w)' Protein Viscosity concentration at 20 °C 108/s
(% w/v) (cP)
Caseinate 3 % 12.3 + 1.63
Caseinate/inulin 1 :1 3 % 13.8 + 0.64
Caseinate/inulin 1 :1.5 3 % 15.1 + 0.71
Caseinate/inulin 1 :2 3 % 16.7 + 1.06
Caseinate/inulin/fructose 1 :1 0.2 3 % 180.5 + 4.95
Caseinate/inulin/fructose 1 :1 0.2 2 % 101.4 + 13.6
Caseinate/inulin/fructose 1 :1 0.2 1 % 42.5 + 8.84
Caseinate/inulin/fructose 1 :2 0.2 3 % 298.0 + 4.24
Caseinate/inulin/fructose 1 2:0.2 2 % 137.5 + 0.71 Caseinate/inulin/fructose 1 2:0.2 1 % 41.8 + 3.82 Caseinate/inulin/fructose 1 5:0.2 3 % 325.0 + 4.24 Caseinate/inulin/fructose 1 5:0.2 2 % 108.0 + 14.14 Caseinate/inulin/fructose 1 5:0.2 1 % 54.9 + 2.47
As can be seen from the results the combination of the oligosaccharide inulin and •caseinate alone did not substantially improve the viscosity. However conjugates formed at 1 :1 :0.2 caseinate/inulin/fructose ratio formed highly viscous suspensions having 15x the viscosity of unmodified caseinate. The viscosity of caseinate/inulin/fructose increased linearly with protein concentration.
Example 2
Samples were prepared according to the ratios in the following Table and heated for up to 96 hours at 60 °C, 70 % RH. Samples were taken at 24, 32, 48 and 96 hours. The viscosity of the preparations was determined and values are the average of duplicate measurements ± standard deviation.
Sample (protein:sugar Viscosity at 20 °C, 108/s, of caseinate w/w)' glycoconjugates at 3 % w/v protein
(cP)
Heating time
24 h 32 h 48 h 96 h
Caseinate 11.0 + 0.71 10.6 + 0.71 11.6 + 0.92
Caseinate/maltodextrin 12.2+0.42
1 :1
Caseinate/inulin 1 :1 16.5 + 1.77
Caseinate/inulin/fructose 10.2 + 0.61 11.6 + 0.14 40.9±0.49
1:1 :0.2
Caseinate/fructose 1 :0.2 180.5 + Gelled
2.12 particles
Caseinate/glucose 1 :0.2 202.0 + Gelled Gelled
14.14 particles particles
As can be seen from the Table the preparations containing protein, and a monosaccharide reacted to form a product that made a viscous solution at 3% w/w protein concentration faster than equivalent preparations containing protein, oligosaccharide and monosaccharide. The presence of the oligosaccharide modified the reaction preventing the product from overreacting to insoluble but hydrated gelled particles. Preparations of protein and glucose monosaccharide reacted fastest forming product that after, only 48 hours, made insoluble gelled particles. Neither caseinate nor caseinate inulin nor caseinate maltodextrin products incubated for 96 hours formed 3% solutions with increased viscosity.
Example 3
Samples were prepared according to the following Tables and heated for 48 h at 60 °C, 67 % RH. The viscosity of the preparations was determined and values are the average of duplicate measurements + standard deviation.
Sample (protein:sugar w/w)' Protein concentration Viscosity at 20 °C,
(% w/v) 108/s (cP)
Caseinate 3 % 11.0 + 0.00
Caseinate/fructose 1:0.02 3 % 25.7 + 0.99
Caseinate/fructose 1:0.02 2 % 19.5 + 1.77
Caseinate/fructose 1 :0.02 1 % 14.0 + 1.34
Caseinate/fructose 1:0.04 3 % 47.3 + 1.06
Caseinate/fructose 1:0.04 2 % 34.0 + 4.95
Caseinate/fructose 1 :0.04 1 % 18.7 + 0.92
Caseinate/fructose 1 :0.2 3 % 261.5 + 16.26 ,
Caseinate/fructose 1:0.2 2 % 153.5 + 9.19
Caseinate/fructose 1 :0.2 1 % 101.4 + 3.68
Caseinate/fructose 1 :0.4 3 % 81.4 + 6.79
Caseinate/fructose 1:0.4 2 % 38.8 + 4.81
Caseinate/fructose 1 :0.4 1 % 23.3 ± 0.85
Caseinate/fructose 1 :0.8 3 % 10.7 + 0.42
As can be seen from the Table increasing ratios of the monosaccharide fructose to protein showed a marked increase in viscosity compared to that of the unmodified protein. A maximum viscosity improvement, approximately 20x that of unmodified caseinate, was observed at 1 :0.2 caseinate:fructose after which the viscosity was observed to fall. The viscosity of the caseinate/fructose conjugates increased linearly with concentration.
Example 4
Samples were prepared according to the following Tables and heated for 24 h (*) or 48 h at 60 °C, 67 % RH. The viscosity of the preparations was determined and values are the average of duplicate measurements ± standard deviation.
Sample (protein:sugarw/w)" Protein concentration Viscosity at 20 °C,
(% w/v) 108/s (cP)
Caseinate/fructose 1 :0.2 3 % 261.5 + 16.26
Caseinate/fructose 1 :0.2 2 % 153.5 + 9.19
Caseinate/fructose 1 :0.2 1 % 101.4 + 3.68
Caseinate/lactose 1 :0.2 3 % 189.0 + 7.07
Caseinate/lactose 1 :0.2 2 % 144.0 + 4.24
Caseinate/lactose 1 :0.2 1 % 66.8 + 9.40
Caseinate/glucose 1 :0.2* 3 % 303.5 + 9.19
Caseinate/glucose 1 :0.2* 2 % 190.0 + 1.41
Caseinate/glucose 1 :0.2* 1 % 98.7 + 7.50
Caseinate/glucose 1 :0.02 3 % 123.0 + 1.41
Caseinate/glucose 1 :0.02 2 % 77.6 + 7.71
Caseinate/glucose 1 :0.02 1 % 45.4 + 14.0
Caseinate/ribose 1 :0.02* 3 % 245.0 + 31.11
Caseinate/ribose 1 :0.02* 2 % 142.0 + 2.83
Caseinate/ribose 1 :0.02* 1 % 65.2 + 8.77
As can be seen from the Table the monosaccharides glucose-, fructose-, ribose- and lactose-caseinate glycoconjugates all showed significant viscosity that was
10-25x that of unmodified caseinate. Glucose at 1 :0.2 protein:sugar and ribose containing reactions proceeded faster and were stopped at 24 hours. Ribose formed viscous solutions even at protein:saccharide ratios as low as 1 :0.02.
Example 5
Samples were prepared according to the following Tables and heated at 60 °C for the times as indicated the relative humidities as indicated. The viscosity of the preparations was determined and values are the average of duplicate measurements + standard deviation.
Heating time Sample 50 % RH 67 % RH 80 % RH
(protein:sugar w/w)'
Unheated Caseinate 10.2+ 0.00 10.2+ 0.00 10.2+ 0.00 Unheated Caseinate/fructose 1 :0.2 10.1+ 0.07 10.1+ 0.07 10.1+ 0.07 24h Caseinate/fructose 1:0.2 9.36+ 0.13 10.7+ 0.28 Gelled particles
48h Caseinate/fructose 1:0.2 13.0+ 0.28 24.5+ 0.71 Gelled particles
72h Caseinate/fructose 1:0.2 21.0+ 1.48 46.1+ 3.75 Gelled particles
96 h Caseinate/fructose 1 :0.2 36.2+ 2.83 Gelled Gelled particles particles
120h Caseinate/fructose 1:0.2 31.8+ 6.86 Gelled Gelled particles particles
The results Table indicates that the viscosity of the product made by reacting fructose monosaccharide and caseinate increased up to 3x with 4-5 days heating at 50% RH. However at higher RH levels the reaction proceeded faster as a function of RH proceeding to form products that were more viscous and then would not redissolve properly.
Example 6
Samples were prepared according to the following Table and heated at 60 °C, 80 % RH, unless other
The solubility of the protein in the preparations was determined and values (mg/ml) are the average of standard deviation.
Sample (protein:sugars w/w) pH
3.0 3.6 4.0 4.6 5.
Caseinate 1.90+0.19 0.04+0.16 0.00+0.04 0.06+0.14 2.23
Caseinate/fructose (67 % RH)1:0.2 0.51+0.06 0.05+0.00 0.03+0.04 0.44±0.24 0.74
Caseinate/inulinl:l 1.87+0.14 0.03+0.00 0.01+0.04 0.18+0.21 2.23
Caseinate/inulin/fructosel : 1 :0.2 0.91+0.22 0.03+0.07 0.03±0.03 0.60+0.21 0.88
Caseinate/maltodextrinl:l 1.89±0.37 1.80+0.84 1.68+0.01 1.96±0.61 1.98
Caseinate/maltodextrin/fructosel : 1:0.2 1.94±0.07 0.27+0.02 0.08+0.07 2.10+0.66 1.95
As can be seen from the Table caseinate/fructose, and caseinate/inulin/fructose conjugates had low s
3.0-6.0. However, close to the isoelectric point of casein, pH 4.6, their solubility was greater than unm of caseinate/inulin glycoconjugates was comparable to unmodified caseinate at all pH values 3.0-6.0. glycoconjugates had high solubility at all pH values. Moreover, between pHs 3.6-4.6, solubility was co caseinate/maltodextrin conjugates than unmodified caseinate, as reported by Shepherd et al (Food Hy indicating that the products of the present invention are distinctly different.
It is to be appreciated that this invention can be applied to many of the abundant food proteins and is not limited to the materials used in the examples. For example it is envisaged that one could utilise soy proteins, casein, caseinates, whey protein, lactalbumin, bovine serum albumin, egg albumin, or soy protein, all being abundant food proteins. Caseinate was selected as a convenient example and because of its use in industrial applications.
While inulin and fructose appear to be particularly appropriate in the embodiments of the invention, other sugars may be used, such as another inulin family, with for example one or more of glucose, ribose, lactose, lactulose, maltose, galactose, and mannose.
Inulin, having a fructan structure is a selected representative of the oligosaccharides. Other molecules which could be substituted in part or completely for the inulin used in the invention may be selected from the levan family, or the graminan family or the like. Some oligosaccharides may be branched, as found in nature.
Fructose, a preferred monosaccharide, is a member of the ketose family. It is to be appreciated that other "analogues" of fructose could be substituted in part or completely for the fructose used in the invention.
Other than fructans, possibilities include fructose, glucose polymers and short glucose chains. Glucose and fructose are similarly reactive with caseins.
Some applications to which the present invention could be put include the following
'1 The invention could make known by-products of the dairy industry (or the
Soya bean industry for example) more versatile by increasing their viscosity.
2 The invention could find application as food thickening agents in the dairy industry
3 The invention could find application in the manufacture of non fat or low fat salad dressings or the like.
Finally, it will be understood that the scope of this invention as described herein is not limited to the specified embodiments. Those of skill will appreciate that various modifications, additions, known equivalents, and substitutions are possible without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention as set forth.