WO2002086459A1 - Appareil et procede pour determiner la resistivite des forages et imagerie utilisant un couplage capacitif - Google Patents

Appareil et procede pour determiner la resistivite des forages et imagerie utilisant un couplage capacitif

Info

Publication number
WO2002086459A1
WO2002086459A1 PCT/US2002/011727 US0211727W WO02086459A1 WO 2002086459 A1 WO2002086459 A1 WO 2002086459A1 US 0211727 W US0211727 W US 0211727W WO 02086459 A1 WO02086459 A1 WO 02086459A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
measure
electrode
current
formation
focusing
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2002/011727
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
WO2002086459B1 (fr
Inventor
Martin T. Evans
Andrew R. Burt
Albert Alexy
Leonty A. Tabarovsky
Original Assignee
Baker Hughes Incorporated
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US09/836,980 external-priority patent/US6714014B2/en
Priority claimed from US10/090,374 external-priority patent/US6600321B2/en
Application filed by Baker Hughes Incorporated filed Critical Baker Hughes Incorporated
Priority to EP02726746A priority Critical patent/EP1390712A4/fr
Priority to CA002444942A priority patent/CA2444942A1/fr
Priority to GB0325864A priority patent/GB2392729B/en
Publication of WO2002086459A1 publication Critical patent/WO2002086459A1/fr
Publication of WO2002086459B1 publication Critical patent/WO2002086459B1/fr
Priority to NO20034635A priority patent/NO335831B1/no

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
    • G01V3/00—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation
    • G01V3/18—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation specially adapted for well-logging
    • G01V3/20—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation specially adapted for well-logging operating with propagation of electric current
    • G01V3/24—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation specially adapted for well-logging operating with propagation of electric current using ac

Definitions

  • This invention generally relates to explorations for hydrocarbons involving electrical investigations of a borehole penetrating an earth formation. More specifically, this invention relates to highly localized borehole investigations employing the introduction and measuring of individual survey currents injected into the wall of a borehole by capacitive coupling of electrodes on a tool moved along the borehole within the earth formation.
  • a measure electrode current source or sink
  • a diffuse return electrode such as the tool body
  • a measure current flows in a circuit that connects a current source to the measure electrode, through the earth formation to the return electrode and back to the current source in the tool.
  • an antenna within the measuring instrument induces a current flow within the earth formation. The magnitude of the induced current is detected using either the same antenna or a separate receiver antenna.
  • the present invention belongs to the first category.
  • the current at the measuring electrode is maintained constant and a voltage is measured while in the second mode, the voltage of the electrode is fixed and the current flowing from the electrode is measured.
  • the current is inversely proportional to the resistivity of the earth formation being investigated.
  • the voltage measured at a monitor electrode is proportional to the resistivity of the earth formation being investigated.
  • Ohm's law teaches that if both current and voltage vary, the resistivity of the earth formation is proportional to the ratio of the voltage to the current.
  • Bir dwell (US Patent 3,365,658) teaches the use of a focused electrode for determination of the resistivity of subsurface formations.
  • a survey current is emitted from a central survey electrode into adjacent earth formations. This survey current is focused into a relatively narrow beam of current outwardly from the borehole by use of a focusing current emitted from nearby focusing electrodes located adjacent the survey electrode and on either side thereof.
  • Ajam et al (US Patent 4,122,387) discloses an apparatus wherein simultaneous logs may be made at different lateral distances through a formation from a borehole by guard electrode systems located on a sonde which is lowered into the borehole by a logging cable.
  • a single oscillator controls the frequency of two formation currents flowing through the formation at the desired different lateral depths from the borehole.
  • the armor of the logging cable acts as the current return for one of the guard electrode systems, and a cable electrode in a cable electrode assembly immediately above the logging sonde acts as the current return for the second guard electrode system.
  • Two embodiments are also disclosed for measuring reference voltages between electrodes in the cable electrode assembly and the guard electrode systems
  • the Mann patent proposes an array of small electrode buttons either mounted on a tool or a pad and each of which introduces in sequence a separately measurable survey current for an electrical investigation of the earth formation.
  • the electrode buttons are placed in a horizontal plane with circumferential spacings between electrodes and a device for sequentially exciting and measuring a survey current from the electrodes is described.
  • the Gianzero patent discloses tool mounted pads, each with a plurality of small measure electrodes from which individually measurable survey currents are injected toward the wall of the borehole.
  • the measure electrodes are arranged in an array in which the measure electrodes are so placed at intervals along at least a circumferential direction (about the borehole axis) as to inject survey currents into the borehole wall segments which overlap with each other to a predetermined extent as the tool is moved along the borehole.
  • the measure electrodes are made small to enable a detailed electrical investigation over a circumferentially contiguous segment of the borehole so as to obtain indications of the stratigraphy of the formation near the borehole wall as well as fractures and their orientations.
  • a spatially closed loop array of measure electrodes is provided around a central electrode with the array used to detect the spatial pattern of electrical energy injected by the central electrode.
  • a linear array of measure electrodes is provided to inject a flow of current into the formation over a circumferentially effectively contiguous segment of the borehole. Discrete portions of the flow of current are separably measurable so as to obtain a plurality of survey signals representative of the current density from the array and from which a detailed electrical picture of a circumferentially continuous segment of the borehole wall can be derived as the tool is moved along the borehole.
  • they are arranged in a closed loop, such as a circle, to enable direct measurements of orientations of resistivity of anomalies
  • the Dory patent discloses the use of an acoustic sensor in combination with pad mounted electrodes, the use of the acoustic sensors making it possible to fill in the gaps in the image obtained by using pad mounted electrodes due to the fact that in large diameter boreholes, the pads will necessarily not provide a complete coverage of the borehole.
  • the prior art devices being contact devices, are sensitive to the effects of borehole rugosity: the currents flowing from the electrodes depend upon good contact between the electrode and the borehole wall. If the borehole wall is irregular, the contact and the current from the electrodes is irregular, resulting in inaccurate imaging of the borehole.
  • a second drawback is the relatively shallow depth of investigation caused by the use of measure electrodes at the same potential as the pad and the resulting divergence of the measure currents.
  • the present invention is an apparatus and method for use in a borehole having a substantially nonconducting fluid therein for obtaining a resistivity parameter of an earth formation penetrated by the borehole.
  • At least one measure electrode is capacitively coupled to the earth formation through the nonconducting fluid.
  • a measure current is conveyed into the formation, and by measurements of the current in the electrode and its potential, the resistivity may be determined.
  • a plurality of measure electrodes may be used. With an array of measure electrodes, a resistivity image of the formation may be obtained.
  • the measure current is a modulated electrical current having a carrier frequency selected to have a low impedance due to the capacitive coupling.
  • An isolator is provided on the logging tool to minimize the cross-talk between the current from a current source and the measure signals. Focusing and guard electrodes may be used with the measure electrodes.
  • the logging tool may be conveyed on a wireline or form part of a bottom hole assembly conveyed on a drilling tubular.
  • the measure electrodes may be on a stabilizer, a non-rotating sleeve, or on a pad.
  • An extension device may be provided to maintain the measure electrode at a specified distance from the borehole wall.
  • a downhole processor can provide resistivity images without the necessity of having arrays of electrodes with a large number of electrodes.
  • a modification is made to enable the device to be used with water based muds.
  • the measure electrode is capacitively coupled to the source of modulated electrical current.
  • the invention also makes a provision for making multifrequency measurements.
  • frequency focusing may be used to determine formation resistivity.
  • Fig. 1 is a circuit diagram representing a formation resistivity device according to the present invention.
  • Fig.2 shows a comparison of signals representative of the measure current and the voltage for the circuit of Fig. 1 for a 1 kHz sinusoidal excitation signal.
  • Fig. 3 shows a comparison of signals representative of the measure current and the voltage for the circuit of Fig. 1 for a 10 kHz sinusoidal excitation signal.
  • Fig. 4 shows a comparison of signals representative of the measure current and the voltage for the circuit of Fig. 1 for a 10 kHz square wave excitation.
  • Fig. 5 shows a schematic illustration of a prior art imaging tool in a borehole.
  • Fig. 6 illustrates a model used for deriving the impedance of an imaging tool.
  • Figs. 7a-7f illustrate the impedance of a measure electrode at a frequency of 1 kHz.
  • Figs. 8a-8f illustrate the impedance of a measure electrode at a frequency of 10 kHz.
  • Fig. 9 shows the imaging tool of this invention suspended in a borehole.
  • Fig. 10 is a mechanical schematic view of the imaging tool.
  • Fig. 10A is a detail view of an electrode pad.
  • Fig. 11 is a schematic circuit diagram showing the principles of operation of the tool.
  • Figs. 12a and 12b shows a comparison between a prior art modulated signal and a reverse modulated signal according to the present invention.
  • Fig. 13 is a schematic circuit diagram of the tool when used with a conducting borehole fluid.
  • Fig. 14 illustrates an alternate embodiment of an electrode pad.
  • Fig. 15 (Prior art) is a schematic illustration of a drilling system.
  • Fig. 16 is a schematic illustration of the invention in which resistivity measurements are made at various azimuths
  • Fig. 17 illustrates the pads on a non-rotating sleeve used for resistivity measurements.
  • Fig. 1 is a circuit diagram illustrating the methodology of formation resistivity measuring devices.
  • a measure electrode depicted by 3 injects a measure current into a formation denoted by 7 having a resistivity R t .
  • This current is supplied by a current source 1.
  • the current from the formation returns (not shown) through a return electrode (ground) denoted by 7.
  • a voltage drop 11 across a resistor 10 in the circuit is used as an indication of the measure current.
  • This impedance includes the desired formation resistivity R t
  • this impedance is almost entirely resistive and is caused by the mud cake and any invasion of the borehole fluid into the formation.
  • the impedance between the measure electrode 3 and the formation 7 is primarily capacitive, denoted by a capacitance M c . This capacitance manifests itself in a phase shift between the measure current signal and the voltage drop from the measure electrode to ground. This is seen in Fig.
  • Fig.3 the signals 11" and 13" for a sinusoidal current of 10 kHz are shown.
  • the phase shift between the two signals is seen to be much smaller. This is due to the fact that at the higher frequency of 10 kHz, the effect of the capacitance is less than at 1 kHz. This suggests that by using higher frequencies, it would be possible to get signals indicative of the formation resistivity.
  • Fig. 4 which shows the signals 11"' and 13"' for a square wave excitation at 10 kHz.
  • both the signals rise and fall almost instantaneously: this is due to the fact that a square wave contains a lot of high frequencies that are essentially unimpeded by the capacitance of the mud.
  • the use of higher frequencies forms the basis for the present invention as described next.
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic illustration of a portion of a prior art imaging tool suitable for use with the method of the present invention. Shown is a borehole 51 that is filled with a borehole fluid (drilling mud). A mud-cake 53 is formed between the borehole fluid and the formation 55.
  • the tool comprises one or more measure electrodes 59 carried on a conducting pad 57. In the illustration, only two electrodes are shown. As discussed below, the actual number of electrodes may be much larger and they may be arranged in an array.
  • the electrodes 59 are separated from each other by insulator 61. For simplifying the illustration, additional insulation between the electrodes 59 and the pad 51 is not shown.
  • the pad functions as a guard electrode and is maintained at a potential related to the potential of the measure electrodes.
  • the current from the measure electrodes flows in current paths such as that shown by I and is prevented from diverging due to the focusing current F from the guard electrode.
  • additional focusing electrodes may be used (not shown). Focusing electrodes are known in the prior art but a specific embodiment using focused electrodes for a resistivity imaging tool is discussed below.
  • the current flowing from the measure electrode is related to the potential V and the impedance of the electrical circuit in which the measure currents flow.
  • the impedance of the mud and the mudcake is relatively small compared to the impedance of the formation.
  • the formation impedance is primarily resistive and from a knowledge of the potential V and the measure current I, the formation resistivity can be derived.
  • the size of a measure electrode is associated with the tool spatial resolution.
  • the measure electrode radius is in the range of 1 to 2 mm that creates a very large ground resistance.
  • a 2 mm measure electrode on a typical pad device has the ground resistance of 10,000 ⁇ in a 1 ⁇ -m formation or 10 M ⁇ in a 1,000 ⁇ -m formation.
  • Fig. 6 the impedance of the measure electrode is derived.
  • a model consisting of two conductive layers 103, 105 enclosed between insulating half-space at the top 101 and a perfect conductor at the bottom 107. From the upper boundary, a uniform current is injected with the surface density, J s .
  • a measure electrode of any shape may be studied by cutting out an appropriate area 109 from the injection plane.
  • the upper half-space 101 represents a borehole filled with oil-base mud.
  • the conductor 107 at the bottom is a current sink. In reality, at a certain distance, depending on the focusing conditions, current lines diverge. This provides a finite value for the measure electrode's K-factor. To simplify modeling, we introduce a.
  • S(l) is the cross-sectional area at a distance / along the current path.
  • the mud cake 103 is characterized by a conductivity ⁇ respect permittivity e, and thickness h,.
  • the formation 105 is characterized by a conductivity ⁇ 2 , permittivity € 2 and thickness h 2 .
  • the complex conductivities of the mudcake and formation are given by
  • the first term on the right hand side in eq. (5) represents the impedance of the mud cake while the second term represents the impedance of the formation.
  • the measured impedance depends primarily on the mud cake conductivity and the formation conductivity, i.e., it does not depend upon the dielectric constant of the mud cake and the formation.
  • the measured impedance may become so large that it would be virtually impossible to inject any current into the formation.
  • Eq. (5) indicates that we can reduce the mud cake impedance by increasing the frequency ⁇ . This can be done by selecting the frequency such that ⁇ x » ⁇ (6)
  • the first term depends on formation conductivity and does not include dielectric permittivity. It exactly represents the resistivity reading in the absence of mud cake. 2.
  • the second term contains only mud cake properties. Importantly, it is inversely proportional to the second power of the frequency.
  • the second term may be eliminated in two different ways.
  • the first way is to use a high frequency.
  • the second way to eliminate the second term is by combining measurements are two different frequencies. This is given by the following equation:
  • the abscissa is the formation resistivity in ⁇ m and the ordinate is the 9t(Z). Values are plotted for a frequency of 1 kHz. Three curves are shown for mud cake resistivities of 10 k ⁇ m, 100 k ⁇ m and 1000 k ⁇ m and a mud cake thickness of 0.1 mm.. As can be seen, the 3t(Z) depends not only on the formation resistivity but also on the resistivity of the mud cake.
  • Fig. 7b is similar to Fig. 7a except that the mud cake thickness is 0.5 mm. Differences between Fig. 7b and Fig. 7a show that the 9. (Z) is also dependent upon the mud cake thickness.
  • Fig. 7c is a plot of the absolute value of the electrode impedance for a mud cake thickness of 0.1 mm.
  • Fig. 7d a plot of the dual frequency impedance determined by eq. (13) for a mud cake thickness of 0.1 mm is shown. The dual frequency values were obtained using measurements at 1 kHz and 2 kHz respectively.
  • Fig. 7e shows the results of dual frequency measurements for a mud cake thickness of 0.2 mm.
  • Fig. 7f shows a plot of the ratio of 9.(Z) to S (Z).
  • Figs. 7a - 7f explain why measurements made by conventional resistivity imaging tools do not work with oil based muds: the measured impedance for audio frequency signals depends on many factors other than the formation resistivity.
  • FIGs. 8a - 8f a completely different picture emerges.
  • the figures are similar to Figs. 7a - 7f with the significant difference that the operating frequency is now 1 MHz (compared to 1 kHz in Figs. 7a - 7f).
  • the 9t(Z) is primarily dependent upon the formation resistivity except for extremely conductive formations where some dependence upon the mud cake resistivity is noted. The effect is more noticeable for a thicker mud cake (0.5 mm in Fig.8b).
  • the amplitude of the impedance (Fig. 8c) shows little variation with mud cake resistivity but does exhibit a nonlinear dependence upon the formation resistivity.
  • the dual frequency measurements show that the measured impedance is substantially independent of mud cake thickness and resistivity and further exhibits the desirable property of being linearly related to the formation resistivity.
  • the present invention takes advantage of the fact that at high frequencies ( ⁇ 1MHz or so), the effect of the mud cake and the mud impedance may be ignored for all practical purposes.
  • the dual frequency solution given by eq. (13) is a special case of multifrequency focusing.
  • measurements are made at a plurality of frequencies ⁇ , , ⁇ 2 , ⁇ 3 . . . . ⁇ m .
  • the response at multiple frequencies may be approximated by a Taylor series expansion of the form:
  • CO is ten.
  • the quantities s 0 , s 1/2 , s 3/2 are determined.
  • n is the number of terms in the Taylor series expansion. This can be any number less than or equal to m.
  • the coefficient s 32 of the ⁇ 3a term ( ⁇ being the square of A:, the wave number) is generated by the primary field and is relatively unaffected by any inhomogeneities in the medium surround the logging instrument, i.e., it is responsive primarily to the formation parameters and not to the borehole and invasion zone.
  • a processor controls the signal generator to provide a measure current at a plurality of frequencies.
  • the processor then performs a frequency focusing of the apparent conductivity at the plurality of frequencies to obtain the coefficients s 3/2 . This is then used as an estimate of the formation conductivity.
  • FIG. 9 shows an imaging tool 110 suspended in a borehole 112, that penetrates earth formations such as 113, from a suitable cable 114 that passes over a sheave 116 mounted on drilling rig 118.
  • the cable 114 includes a stress member and seven conductors for transmitting commands to the tool and for receiving data back from the tool as well as power for the tool.
  • the tool 110 is raised and lowered by draw works 120.
  • Electronic module 122 on the surface 123, transmits the required operating commands downhole and in return, receives data back which may be recorded on an archival storage medium of any desired type for concurrent or later processing.
  • the data may be transmitted in analog or digital form.
  • Data processors such as a suitable computer 124, may be provided for performing data analysis in the field in real time or the recorded data may be sent to a processing center or both for post processing of the data.
  • FIGs. 10a and 10b are schematic external views of a borehole sidewall imager system.
  • the tool 110 comprising the imager system includes resistivity arrays 126 and, optionally, a mud cell 130 and a circumferential acoustic televiewer 132.
  • Electronics modules 128 and 138 may be located at suitable locations in the system and not necessarily in the locations indicated.
  • the components may be mounted on a mandrel 134 in a conventional well known manner.
  • the outer diameter of the assembly is about 5 inches and about fifteen feet long.
  • An orientation module 136 including a magnetometer and an accelerometer or inertial guidance system may be mounted above the imaging assemblies 126 and 132.
  • the upper portion 138 of the tool 110 contains a telemetry module for sampling, digitizing and transmission of the data samples from the various components uphole to surface electronics 122 in a conventional manner. If acoustic data are acquired, they are preferably digitized, although in an alternate arrangement, the data may be retained in analog form for transmission to the surface where it is later digitized by surface electronics 122.
  • FIG. 10a shows three resistivity arrays 126 (a fourth array is hidden in this view ⁇ Referring to Figs. 10a and 10b, each array includes measure electrodes
  • vertical refers to the direction along the axis of the borehole and "horizontal” refers to a plane' perpendicular to the ve_tical.
  • the measure electrodes are rectangular in shape and oriented with the long dimension of the rectangle parallel to the tool axis.
  • Other electrode configurations are discussed below with reference to Fig. 14.
  • insulation around the measure electrodes and focusing electrodes for electrically isolating them from the body of the tool are not shown.
  • Other embodiments of the invention may be used in measurement- while- drilling (MWD), logging-while-drilling (LWD) or logging- while-tripping (LWT) operations.
  • the sensor assembly may be used on a substantially non-rotating pad as taught in U.S. Patent 6,173,793 to Thompson et al., having the same assignee as the present application and the contents of which are fully incorporated herein by reference.
  • he sensor assembly of the present invention may also be used with rotating sensors as described in Thompson. These embodiments are discussed below with reference to Figs. 15 - 17.
  • the sensor assembly may also be used on a non- rotating sleeve such as that disclosed in United States Patent 6,247,542 to Kruspe et al, the contents of which are fully incorporated here by reference.
  • each pad can be no more than about 4.0 inches wide.
  • the pads are secured to extendable arms such as 142.
  • Hydraulic or spring- loaded caliper-arm actuators (not shown) of any well-known type extend the pads and their electrodes against the borehole sidewall for resistivity measurements.
  • the extendable caliper arms 142 provide the actual measurement of the borehole diameter as is well known in the art.
  • time-division multiplexing the voltage drop and current flow is measured between a common electrode on the tool and the respective electrodes on each array to furnish a measure of the resistivity of the sidewall (or its inverse, conductivity) as a function of azimuth.
  • a source of electrical power 151 produces an electrical current that is provided to the measure electrodes.
  • the apparatus is intended for use with oil based drilling mud and the capacitor 157 depicts the capacitive coupling between a measure electrode such as 141a in Fig. 10b and the formation 113 in Fig. 9.
  • the electrical current flows through the formation that has an equivalent impedance of Z f and returns to the current source 151 through an equivalent capacitor 159 representing the coupling between the formation and the diffuse return electrode, typically the body of the tool.
  • the measurement of the voltage drop across a resistor 153 is used as an indication of the current flowing to a measure electrode.
  • the value of the resistor 153 is Ik ⁇ . The impedance of the rest of the return path in the body of the tool can be ignored.
  • a voltage detector 161 measures the voltage difference between the measure electrode and the diffuse return electrode and controls the current at the current generator to maintain a constant voltage.
  • the output of the current measuring circuit serves as a measure signal.
  • the output of the current measuring circuit 155 is used to maintain a constant current and the output of the voltage detector is used as a measure signal.
  • both the voltage detected by the voltage detector 161 and the current measured by the current measuring circuit 155 are used as measure signals.
  • the size of the measure electrode and the operating frequency is based upon several considerations.
  • One important consideration is that the impedance of the formation must be substantially resistive at the operating frequency so that the currents in the measure electrode are indicative of the formation resistivity and substantially unaffected by its dielectric constant. Based upon typical values of formation dielectric constant such as that disclosed in United States Patent 5,811,973 issued to Meyer et al, the operating frequency should be less than 4 MHz.
  • a preferred embodiment of the present invention uses a measuring current at a frequency of 1MHz.
  • the impedance (i.e., resistance) of the formation be greater than the impedance of the rest of the circuit of Fig. 11.
  • Another consideration is the desired resolution of the tool. A reasonable resolution for a useful imaging tool is approximately 3 mm. in the horizontal and vertical directions.
  • the impedance of the equivalent capacitance 159 and the body of the tool may be ignored at 1MHz since the equivalent capacitor has an enormous area comparable to the size of the tool.
  • the capacitance of 157 is a function of the dielectric constant of the borehole fluid, the area of the electrode, and the stand-off between the electrode and the borehole wall. Formation resistivities encountered in practice may range between 0.2 ⁇ -m and 20,000 ⁇ -m. As noted above and discussed below, the present invention makes use of focusing electrodes so that, in general, the effective dimensions of the formation that are sampled by an electrode are less than the actual physical size of the electrodes.
  • the individual measure electrodes 141a, 141b . . . 141n have a width of 8 mm. and a length of between 20 - 30 mm. This makes it possible to have eight electrodes on a single pad.
  • the corresponding value of the capacitance 157 is then typically between lpF and 100 pF. At the lower value, the impedance of the capacitance 107 at 1MHz is approximately 160 k ⁇ and at the higher value approximately 1.6k ⁇ .
  • the focusing electrodes 145a, 145b are of some importance as they perform a significant amount of focusing. Denoting by Fthe potential of the measure electrodes 141a, 141b. . . the electrodes 145a, 145b are maintained at a potential of V + ⁇ . The body of the pad is maintained at a voltage V ⁇ e. The pad functions as a guard electrode and prevents divergence of the measure current until the current has penetrated some distance into the formation. This makes it possible to get deeper readings.
  • a typical value of the voltage is 5 volts while typical value of ⁇ 5and c are 500 ⁇ V and 100 ⁇ V, with € being less than ⁇ .
  • the side focusing electrodes 143a, 143b are maintained at substantially N volts.
  • the device could also function if all the voltages were reversed, in which case, the voltages mentioned above as typical values would be magnitudes of voltages.
  • the current from the current source 151 in Fig. 11 will be focused down to square blocks approximately 8 mm. on the side.
  • the operating frequency of the present device is typically 1 MHz, compared to an operating frequency of 1.1 kHz for the device of the ' 431 application.
  • the measuring electrodes are preferably isolated from the electronics module by an isolator section such as 137 that is preferably between 2'6" and 15' long. Cross-talk between conductors (not shown) over such distances would be quite large at an operating frequency of 1MHz would overwhelm the measure signal(s) indicative of the formation resistivity.
  • i(t) Cos( ⁇ m t)Cos( ⁇ c t) (1) where ⁇ ) m is the modulating signal frequency (1.1 kHz) and ⁇ c is the carrier frequency (1MHz).
  • ⁇ m is the modulating signal frequency (1.1 kHz)
  • ⁇ c is the carrier frequency (1MHz).
  • Figs. 12a and 12b show a comparison between a prior art modulated signal and a reverse modulated signal according to the present invention.
  • a carrier signal
  • a reverse modulated signal is shown in Fig. 12b with a carrier signal 161' and a modulating signal 163'. This modulated signal always has a significant current flowing. The advantage of using such a reverse modulated signal is that the cross talk is substantially unaffected by the level of the modulating signal.
  • the measure signal(s) is sent through an optical fiber.
  • an optical fiber is used for the purpose, there will not be any cross talk between the current conveyed through the isolator section and the measure signal. Modulation of the current is then not necessary.
  • the principles described above are used when the measure electrodes are not part of an array of electrodes.
  • measurements indicative of the resistivity of the formation may be obtained.
  • output measurements may be processed using prior art methods, such as those used in dipmeters, to obtain information relating to the dip of formations relative to the borehole.
  • such relative dip information may be further processed to give estimates of absolute dip of the formations.
  • FIG. 13 Another embodiment of the present invention may be used with water based muds.
  • the equivalent circuit for this embodiment is shown in Fig. 13. It is identical to Fig. 11 except that the gap between the measure electrode and the formation is a conductive gap denoted by the points 209 - 211 and a return gap denoted by 219-221.
  • An additional capacitor 207 may be incorporated into the circuit.
  • the operation of the device is substantially unchanged from that used for non-conducting muds.
  • the conductive paths through the mud shunts any effect of the capacitance of the tool stand-off.
  • the resolution of the devices disclosed above is substantially equal to the dimensions of the focused current at a depth where the current from the measure electrode has the smallest dimensions. Those versed in the art would recognize that if lower resolution is acceptable, the focusing electrodes may be eliminated. In such a device, the beam of measure current is only guarded or constrained to flow substantially outward from the surface of the measure electrode, as in prior art non- focused conductive mud devices, by the pad (or guard electrode) being maintained at substantially the same voltage as the measure electrode.
  • FIG. 14 shows an arrangement in which five circular measure electrodes 303a, 303b . . . 303e are located on a pad 301. Each measure electrode is surrounded by an associated focusing electrode 305a, 305b . . . 305e with insulation 307a, 307b. .
  • the invention has further been described by reference to logging tools that are intended to be conveyed on a wireline.
  • the method of the present invention may also be used with measurement-while-drilling (MWD) tools, or logging while drilling (LWD) tools, either of which may be conveyed on a drillstring or on coiled tubing.
  • MWD measurement-while-drilling
  • LWD logging while drilling
  • FIG. 15 shows a schematic diagram of a drilling system 410 having a drilling assembly 490 shown conveyed in a borehole 426 for drilling the wellbore.
  • the drilling system 410 includes a conventional derrick 411 erected on a floor 412 which supports a rotary table 414 that is rotated by a prime mover such as an electric motor (not shown) at a desired rotational speed.
  • the drill string 420 includes a drill pipe 422 extending downward from the rotary table 414 into the borehole 426..
  • the drill bit 450 attached to the end of the drill string breaks up the geological formations when it is rotated to drill the borehole 426.
  • the drill string 420 is coupled to a drawworks 430 via a Kelly joint 421, swivel, 428 and line 429 through a pulley 423.
  • the drawworks 430 is operated to control the weight on bit, which is an important parameter that affects the rate of penetration.
  • the operation of the drawworks is well known in the art and is thus not described in detail herein.
  • a suitable drilling fluid 431 from a mud pit (source) 432 is circulated under pressure through the drill string by a mud pump 434.
  • the drilling fluid passes from the mud pump 434 into the drill string 420 via a desurger 436, fluid line 328 and Kelly joint 421.
  • the drilling fluid 431 is discharged at the borehole bottom 451 through an opening in the drill bit 450.
  • the drilling fluid 431 circulates uphole through the annular space 427 between the drill string 420 and the borehole 426 and returns to the mud pit 432 via a return line 435.
  • a sensor S t preferably placed in the line 438 provides information about the fluid flow rate.
  • a surface torque sensor S 2 and a sensor S 3 associated with the drill string 420 respectively provide information about the torque and rotational speed of the drill string.
  • a sensor (not shown) associated with line 429 is used to provide the hook load of the drill string 420.
  • the drill bit 450 is rotated by only rotating the drill pipe 452.
  • a downhole motor 455 (mud motor) is disposed in the drilling assembly 490 to rotate the drill bit 450 and the drill pipe 422 is rotated usually to supplement the rotational power, if required, and to effect changes in the drilling direction.
  • the mud motor 455 is coupled to the drill bit 450 via a drive shaft (not shown) disposed in a bearing assembly 457.
  • the mud motor rotates the drill bit 450 when the drilling fluid 431 passes through the mud motor 455 under pressure.
  • the bearing assembly 457 supports the radial and axial forces of the drill bit.
  • a stabilizer 458 coupled to the bearing assembly 457 acts as a centralizer for the lowermost portion of the mud motor assembly.
  • a drilling sensor module 459 is placed near the drill' bit 450.
  • the drilling sensor module contains sensors, circuitry and processing software and algorithms relating to the dynamic drilling parameters.
  • Such parameters preferably include bit bounce, stick-slip of the drilling assembly, backward rotation, torque, shocks, borehole and annulus pressure, acceleration measurements and other measurements of the drill bit condition.
  • the drilling sensor module processes the sensor information and transmits it to the surface control unit 440 via a suitable telemetry system 472.
  • Fig; 16 shows an embodiment of the invention in which sensors mounted on stabilizers of a drilling assembly are used to determine the resistivity of the formation.
  • One or more of the stabilizers 1033 is provided with a recess 1035 into which a sensor module 1054 is set.
  • Each sensor module 1054 has one or more measure electrodes 1056 for injecting measure currents into the formation as described above.
  • the body of the sensor module is maintained at approximately the same potential as the measure electrode to operate as a guard electrode.
  • focusing electrodes may be provided as discussed above.
  • the gap defines the capacitance 107 discussed above". If necessary, extendable arms (not shown) may be provided to keep the gap within acceptable limits. When used with a conducting borehole fluid, the size of the gap is not critical.
  • An electronics module 1052 at a suitable location is provided for processing the data acquired by the sensors 1056.
  • FIG. 17 illustrates the arrangement of the sensor pads on a non-rotating sleeve. This is similar to an arrangement of sensors taught by Thompson though other configurations could also be used. Shown are the drilling tubular 1260 with a non-rotating sleeve 1262 mounted thereon. Pads 1264 with one or more measure electrodes 1301 are attached to sleeve 1262. The mechanism for moving the pads out to contact the,,borehole, whether it be hydraulic, a spring mechanism or another mechanism is not shown. The shaft 1260 is provided with stabilizer ribs 1303 for controlling the direction of drilling.
  • Data may be acquired using the configuration of either Fig. 16 or Fig. 17 while the well is being drilled and the drillstring and the measure electrodes thereon are rotating.
  • telemetry capability is extremely limited and accordingly, much of the processing is done downhole.
  • Processing of the data in the present invention is accomplished using the methodology taught in Thompson et al.
  • the resistivity measurements are made concurrently with measurements made by an orientation ⁇ ensor (not shown) on the drilling assembly. As the resistivity sensor rotates in the borehole while it is moved along with the drill bit, it traces out a spiral path with known depths and azimuths.
  • the depths are determined either from data telemetered from the surface or by using at least two axially space apart measure electrodes to give a rate of penetration.
  • the downhole ⁇ processor uses the depth information from downhole telemetry and sums all the data within a specified depth and azimuth sampling interval to improve the S/N ratio and to reduce the amount of data to be stored.
  • a typical depth sampling interval would be one inch and a typical azimuthal sampling interval is 15° .
  • Another method of reducing the amount of data stored would be to discard redundant samples within the deptl_5and azimuth sampling interval. Further details of the processing method may be found in the teachings of Thompson et al.

Abstract

L'invention concerne un appareil pour obtenir des paramètres de résistivité de formations de terre (7). Cet appareil utilise un couplage capacitif (5) pour injecter des courants de mesure dans une formation dans une boue non conductrice. Selon un mode de réalisation, on utilise un courant électrique modulé. Par ailleurs, des mesures multifréquences peuvent être prises pour obtenir le paramètre de résistivité. Selon un mode de réalisation facultatif, la fréquence de modulation se trouve dans la plage audio-fréquences, ce qui permet d'utiliser un circuit de l'art antérieur conçu pour réduire la diaphonie. Il est possible d'effectuer des mesures sur un câble métallique ou dans une configuration de mesure de fond pendant le forage.
PCT/US2002/011727 2001-04-18 2002-04-15 Appareil et procede pour determiner la resistivite des forages et imagerie utilisant un couplage capacitif WO2002086459A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP02726746A EP1390712A4 (fr) 2001-04-18 2002-04-15 Appareil et procede pour determiner la resistivite des forages et imagerie utilisant un couplage capacitif
CA002444942A CA2444942A1 (fr) 2001-04-18 2002-04-15 Appareil et procede pour determiner la resistivite des forages et imagerie utilisant un couplage capacitif
GB0325864A GB2392729B (en) 2001-04-18 2002-04-15 An apparatus and method for wellbore resistivity determination and imaging using capacitive coupling
NO20034635A NO335831B1 (no) 2001-04-18 2003-10-17 Apparat og fremgangsmåte for bestemmelse og avbilding av borehullsresistivitet ved å anvende kapasitiv kopling

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/836,980 2001-04-18
US09/836,980 US6714014B2 (en) 2001-04-18 2001-04-18 Apparatus and method for wellbore resistivity imaging using capacitive coupling
US35324502P 2002-02-01 2002-02-01
US60/353,245 2002-02-01
US10/090,374 US6600321B2 (en) 2001-04-18 2002-03-04 Apparatus and method for wellbore resistivity determination and imaging using capacitive coupling
US10/090/374 2002-03-04

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2002086459A1 true WO2002086459A1 (fr) 2002-10-31
WO2002086459B1 WO2002086459B1 (fr) 2003-09-12

Family

ID=27376552

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2002/011727 WO2002086459A1 (fr) 2001-04-18 2002-04-15 Appareil et procede pour determiner la resistivite des forages et imagerie utilisant un couplage capacitif

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1390712A4 (fr)
CA (1) CA2444942A1 (fr)
GB (1) GB2392729B (fr)
NO (1) NO335831B1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2002086459A1 (fr)

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2391070A (en) * 2002-05-31 2004-01-28 Schlumberger Holdings System and method for evaluation of thinly laminated earth formations
GB2395016A (en) * 2002-09-16 2004-05-12 Computalog Usa Inc Method and apparatus for obtaining electrical images of a borehole wall through nonconductive mud
US6751557B1 (en) 2003-01-08 2004-06-15 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Rock classification method and apparatus
EP2388623A1 (fr) * 2010-05-18 2011-11-23 Robert Bosch GmbH Capteur capacitif
CN104122591A (zh) * 2014-06-25 2014-10-29 国家海洋局第一海洋研究所 一种海洋电法探测系统中的双频电流信号发送机
WO2015142352A1 (fr) * 2014-03-21 2015-09-24 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Appareil et procédé d'outil d'évaluation de formation électromagnétique
EP1922570A4 (fr) * 2005-08-15 2016-06-01 Baker Hughes Inc Imageur terrestre à haute résolution de la resistivite
CN106321084A (zh) * 2015-07-02 2017-01-11 中石化石油工程技术服务有限公司 一种岩性密度微球测井仪组合探头
US9921332B2 (en) 2013-08-14 2018-03-20 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Crosstalk suppression or removal for galvanic measurements
US10042076B2 (en) 2015-11-13 2018-08-07 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Resistivity imaging using combination capacitive and inductive sensors
WO2024020629A1 (fr) * 2022-07-26 2024-02-01 SensorC Pty Ltd Capteur de carbone du sol et dispositif de détection

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8614579B2 (en) * 2010-09-27 2013-12-24 Baker Hughes Incorporated Active standoff compensation in measurements with oil-based mud resistivity imaging devices
CN105680886A (zh) * 2015-06-24 2016-06-15 北京恒泰万博石油科技有限公司 适于随钻电磁波电阻率测量的双频发射调谐系统及方法

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3973181A (en) * 1974-12-19 1976-08-03 Schlumberger Technology Corporation High frequency method and apparatus for electrical investigation of subsurface earth formations surrounding a borehole containing an electrically non-conductive fluid
US5036283A (en) * 1989-02-20 1991-07-30 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and apparatus for measuring the resistivity of earth formations using anti-parallel active and passive focussing electrodes

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR1552081A (fr) * 1967-11-16 1969-01-03
SU438964A1 (ru) * 1972-09-20 1974-08-05 Научно-Исследовательская Лаборатория Физико-Химической Механики Материалов И Технологических Процессов Датчик дл скважинного прибора
US3928841A (en) * 1974-10-03 1975-12-23 Shell Oil Co Well logging system using single conductor cable

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3973181A (en) * 1974-12-19 1976-08-03 Schlumberger Technology Corporation High frequency method and apparatus for electrical investigation of subsurface earth formations surrounding a borehole containing an electrically non-conductive fluid
US5036283A (en) * 1989-02-20 1991-07-30 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and apparatus for measuring the resistivity of earth formations using anti-parallel active and passive focussing electrodes

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP1390712A4 *

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2391070A (en) * 2002-05-31 2004-01-28 Schlumberger Holdings System and method for evaluation of thinly laminated earth formations
GB2391070B (en) * 2002-05-31 2004-07-14 Schlumberger Holdings System and method for evaluation of thinly laminated earth formations
US6984983B2 (en) 2002-05-31 2006-01-10 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System and method for evaluation of thinly laminated earth formations
GB2395016A (en) * 2002-09-16 2004-05-12 Computalog Usa Inc Method and apparatus for obtaining electrical images of a borehole wall through nonconductive mud
GB2395016B (en) * 2002-09-16 2006-08-23 Computalog Usa Inc Method and apparatus for obtaining electrical images of a borehole wall through nonconductive mud
US6751557B1 (en) 2003-01-08 2004-06-15 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Rock classification method and apparatus
EP1922570A4 (fr) * 2005-08-15 2016-06-01 Baker Hughes Inc Imageur terrestre à haute résolution de la resistivite
EP2388623A1 (fr) * 2010-05-18 2011-11-23 Robert Bosch GmbH Capteur capacitif
US9921332B2 (en) 2013-08-14 2018-03-20 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Crosstalk suppression or removal for galvanic measurements
WO2015142352A1 (fr) * 2014-03-21 2015-09-24 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Appareil et procédé d'outil d'évaluation de formation électromagnétique
US9568633B2 (en) 2014-03-21 2017-02-14 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Electromagnetic formation evaluation tool apparatus and method
CN104122591A (zh) * 2014-06-25 2014-10-29 国家海洋局第一海洋研究所 一种海洋电法探测系统中的双频电流信号发送机
CN106321084A (zh) * 2015-07-02 2017-01-11 中石化石油工程技术服务有限公司 一种岩性密度微球测井仪组合探头
US10042076B2 (en) 2015-11-13 2018-08-07 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Resistivity imaging using combination capacitive and inductive sensors
WO2024020629A1 (fr) * 2022-07-26 2024-02-01 SensorC Pty Ltd Capteur de carbone du sol et dispositif de détection

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1390712A4 (fr) 2009-07-08
GB0325864D0 (en) 2003-12-10
CA2444942A1 (fr) 2002-10-31
NO335831B1 (no) 2015-03-02
NO20034635D0 (no) 2003-10-17
GB2392729B (en) 2005-04-27
EP1390712A1 (fr) 2004-02-25
NO20034635L (no) 2003-11-27
WO2002086459B1 (fr) 2003-09-12
GB2392729A (en) 2004-03-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6600321B2 (en) Apparatus and method for wellbore resistivity determination and imaging using capacitive coupling
US6714014B2 (en) Apparatus and method for wellbore resistivity imaging using capacitive coupling
US7250768B2 (en) Apparatus and method for resistivity measurements during rotational drilling
CA2476976C (fr) Appareil et methodes d'imagerie de puits perfores au moyen de boues a base d'huile
US7167006B2 (en) Method for measuring transient electromagnetic components to perform deep geosteering while drilling
US8030937B2 (en) Multiple frequency based leakage correction for imaging in oil based muds
USRE42493E1 (en) Apparatus and method for wellbore resistivity measurements in oil-based muds using capacitive coupling
US7397250B2 (en) High resolution resistivity earth imager
CA2503816C (fr) Imagerie de formations durant le forage de fluides non conductifs
WO2006037079A9 (fr) Appareil et procede d'imagerie de reseau filaire dans des boues non conductrices
US20060214664A1 (en) OBM sensor with a loop antenna
WO2002086459A1 (fr) Appareil et procede pour determiner la resistivite des forages et imagerie utilisant un couplage capacitif
WO2008033885A2 (fr) Procédé et appareil d'imagerie par résistivité dans des trous de forage remplis de fluides à faible conductivité

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CA GB ID NO

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): FR IT NL

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 0325864

Country of ref document: GB

Kind code of ref document: A

Free format text: PCT FILING DATE = 20020415

Format of ref document f/p: F

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
B Later publication of amended claims

Free format text: 20021105

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2444942

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2002726746

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2002726746

Country of ref document: EP