WO2002074391A1 - Method of treatment of dredged material for beneficial use - Google Patents

Method of treatment of dredged material for beneficial use Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2002074391A1
WO2002074391A1 PCT/US2002/008109 US0208109W WO02074391A1 WO 2002074391 A1 WO2002074391 A1 WO 2002074391A1 US 0208109 W US0208109 W US 0208109W WO 02074391 A1 WO02074391 A1 WO 02074391A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
mixture
chloride
concentration
liter
lime
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2002/008109
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Sofiya Kozlova
Semyon Shimanovich
Christian Meyer
Original Assignee
The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York filed Critical The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York
Priority to US10/471,436 priority Critical patent/US8057378B2/en
Publication of WO2002074391A1 publication Critical patent/WO2002074391A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B09DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
    • B09CRECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
    • B09C1/00Reclamation of contaminated soil
    • B09C1/08Reclamation of contaminated soil chemically
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B18/00Use of agglomerated or waste materials or refuse as fillers for mortars, concrete or artificial stone; Treatment of agglomerated or waste materials or refuse, specially adapted to enhance their filling properties in mortars, concrete or artificial stone
    • C04B18/04Waste materials; Refuse
    • C04B18/0436Dredged harbour or river sludge
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02WCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
    • Y02W30/00Technologies for solid waste management
    • Y02W30/50Reuse, recycling or recovery technologies
    • Y02W30/91Use of waste materials as fillers for mortars or concrete

Definitions

  • This invention is directed to a method for the treatment of dredged material. More particularly, this invention is directed to a method to decontaminate and solidify dredged material so as to render it suitable for beneficial use.
  • the dredged material may be used as beach nourishment, which may be necessary if natural replacement of material moved along the shoreline by littoral transport is not available.
  • the gravel and sand portion of dredged material is suitable for beach nourishment, making separation and decontamination obligatory.
  • dredged material may be used as manufactured topsoil; however, only fine particles are suitable for such use, so that separation and decontamination of clay and silt is required.
  • the material when used for agricultural purposes, the material has to be suitably clean and must not contain excessive amounts of salts, which can make the material unusable for growth of most plants.
  • a more promising beneficial use for dredged material is as a filler for composite materials. However, such use requires not only effective decontamination but also solidification of the dredged material.
  • U.S. Patent No. 5,714,085 One solution to the problem of treatment of contaminated dredged material is the use of chemical substances capable of neutralizing heavy metals and other toxins, such as the chelating agents described in U.S. Patent No. 5,714,085 (herein incorporated by reference).
  • the chelating agents of U.S. Patent No. 5,714,085 remove heavy metals and certain organic contaminants such as polychlorinated biphenyls. These chelating agents are advantageous when compared to microorganisms, which can remove organic contaminants but cannot remove heavy metals and other inorganic contaminants.
  • the chelating agents of U.S. Patent No. 5,714,085 were developed only for decontamination, and not for solidification as well. Solidification of the dredged material is necessary to make it suitable as a filler for composite materials such as concrete.
  • This method results in decontamination and solidification of the dredged material and renders the material suitable as a filler for composite materials.
  • the sequential steps of adding a lime based binder and then adding a chelating agent exhibit an unexpected synergistic effect in decontaminating the dredged material while solidifying the material.
  • a further object of the invention is to provide a method suitable for the treatment of both dry and wet dredged material.
  • a further object of the invention is to provide a method for the production of a filler containing dredged material treated first with a lime-based binder and then with a chelating agent.
  • One advantage of the method of the invention is that it provides a highly decontaminated solidified dredged material which makes it suitable for use as a filler for composite materials such as concrete.
  • Figure 1 shows the particle size distribution of natural dry dredged material ("NYH dry” in Figure 1) and of dredged material after combined treatment with a lime-based binder and a chelating agent ("DMCJ" in Figure 1).
  • Figure 2 shows the cumulative particle size distribution of natural dry dredged material (NYH dry) and of dredged material after treatment with a lime- based binder and a chelating agent (DMCJ).
  • Figure 3 shows an optical microscope observation of dry dredged material at lOOx magnification.
  • Figure 4 shows an optical microscope observation of dry dredged material after treatment with a lime-based binder and a chelating agent at 1 OOx magnification.
  • the arrows mark agglomerates around oil products.
  • Figure 5 shows plots of compressive strength versus dredged material ("DM" in Figure 5) content after 7 and 28 days.
  • the method of the present invention includes at least two separate steps carried out in sequence.
  • the first of the two steps includes solidification of dredged material by treatment with a lime-based binder.
  • the binder is a pulverized quick-lime, such as CAL-MAX pulverized fine quick-lime available from Ash Grove Cement Co.
  • the pulverized quick-lime comprises at least 80% by weight of active calcium oxide, up to 1% by weight of magnesium oxide, up to 2% by weight of silica, up to 0.2 % by weight of ferric oxide, and up to 0.2 % by weight of aluminum oxide.
  • the mean diameter of the particles of the pulverized quick- lime is about 45 ⁇ m (325 mesh). All of the quicklime material passed a no. 30 sieve.
  • active calcium oxide is intended to mean calcium oxide that is capable of readily reacting with water at ambient temperature.
  • ambient temperature refers to the atmospheric temperature at the location where treatment of the dredged material takes place. Once calcium oxide has reacted with water, it is no longer "active calcium oxide.”
  • the hydration of the pulverized quick-lime results in raising the temperature of the mixture to about 212°F and greatly reduces the water content and therefore the volume of the raw dredged material.
  • This treatment solidifies the dredged material.
  • the term cooling is intended to refer to natural or passive cooling, rather than forced or active cooling.
  • the lime-based binder treatment changes the structure and texture of the dredged material. While the untreated material partly consists of clay-sand agglomerates with closed structure and similar particle size distribution as regular, but fine sand aggregate, after the lime-based binder treatment it exhibits a very fine, porous structure nearly without conglomeration. The particles are separated from each other, and if they are bound by the hydrated lime-based binder, these bonds can be broken with relative ease.
  • the lime-based binder treatment also changes the surface properties of the dredged material. The surface charge is altered, making the surface accessible to polar or charged substances such as water or superplasticizers. As side benefits, increased homogeneity and less saline material on the surface were observed.
  • the odor diminished which is an indication that volatile organics are either destroyed or bound.
  • the lime-based binder in addition to causing dehydration and solidification, also causes a rise in the pH-level, which creates the basis for very effective decontamination of the dredged material.
  • the second of the two steps of the method of the present invention includes treatment of the dredged material with a chelating agent.
  • the chelating agent is capable of chelation of and formation of coordination compounds with chemical contaminants in the dredged material.
  • the chelating agent is capable of providing one or more coordinating moieties X which encapsulate the metal M to form a coordination compound comprising the structural unit M(X) n , where n is the number of moieties X that coordinate the metal center. The number n depends on the nature of the metal.
  • Such a chelating agent has the capability of encapsulation of pollutants, such as heavy metals and polychloride biphenyls (PCB).
  • pollutants such as heavy metals and polychloride biphenyls (PCB).
  • PCB polychloride biphenyls
  • the chelating agent is one of the chelating agents described in U.S. Patent No. 5,714,085, which can remove contaminants such as heavy metals and PCB.
  • Table 1 The compositions of two exemplary chelating agents in the form of solutions are described in Table 1 :
  • Chelating agents A and B were used separately to treat the dredged material.
  • the chelating agent is present in an amount of about 3% to about 10 % by weight of the dredged material.
  • the effectiveness of each of agents A and B was evaluated in terms of the degree of efflorescence of the chlorides of sodium, potassium, and other metals.
  • Agent A was shown to be more effective than agent B: samples containing agent B showed intensive efflorescence of sodium, potassium and other chlorides, while samples containing agent A showed much lower efflorescence levels. It is believed that the ability of a chelating agent in removing metals such as sodium or potassium is a qualitative measure of its ability to decontaminate heavy metals. Accordingly, agent A is preferable as the chelating agent for the dredged material treatment described herein.
  • Treatment with a chelating agent alone does not seem to be a sufficient preparation of dredged material for further beneficial use because chelating agents generally provide for decontamination only.
  • chelating agents generally provide for decontamination only.
  • the order of the two steps described above i.e. addition of a lime-based binder and subsequent addition of a chelating agent, may not be reversed without significantly reducing the effectiveness of the decontamination and solidification.
  • the combined treatment of the present invention causes a shift to finer particle sizes, as illustrated in Figures 1 and 2.
  • This shift indicates that the surface structure is altered and that conglomerates, especially around oil products, are either destroyed or spread out.
  • the agglomerates of oil products are very small as compared to the untreated dredged material, as evidenced in Figures 3 and 4, which show microscope observations at x 100 magnification of the dredged material before treatment and after the combined treatment of the present invention, respectively.
  • dredged materials were subjected to a leaching test following the Environmental Protection Agency Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure as described in Federal Register Vol. 51, No. 216, November 1986, Rules and Regulations. Three samples were analyzed: an untreated reference sample (raw dredged material), a sample treated only with chelating agent A, and a sample which had undergone the combined treatment of the present invention. The results of the test are summarized in Table 2.
  • the data exhibit the effectiveness of the combined treatment.
  • the treatment with only chelating agent A is ineffective in reducing the amount of heavy metals detectable in a leaching test - in fact, a larger fraction of lead present in the dredged material leached out than in the untreated sample.
  • the combined treatment of the present invention considerably reduces both leachable cyanide and heavy metals.
  • the treated dredged material of the present invention may be used as a filler for concrete or mortar compositions.
  • properties of both fresh and hardened concrete obtained with both untreated and treated dredged material were tested.
  • the behavior of concrete when mixed with untreated dredged material provides reference data, which can be used to assess the effectiveness of treatment procedures.
  • the treatment of the dredged material includes the following steps.
  • the dredged material and the lime-based binder are mixed.
  • the lime- based binder is in the amount ranging from about 3% to about 75% by weight of the dredged material.
  • the hydration of the lime-based binder is accompanied by generation of heat and reduces the water content of the dredged material drastically.
  • a solid mixture is formed which is allowed to cool down to about ambient temperature and is then mixed with a chelating agent, preferably chelating agent A described above, to form a new mixture.
  • the water content of the chelating agent solution hydrates the lime-based binder, so that the new mixture remains solid.
  • the new mixture may be placed in a rotary dryer to form chips, or in a granulator to form granules.
  • the chips, granules, or combination thereof were dried to a sufficient hardness and ground in a ball mill to produce a filler comprising particles, preferably of about 10 to about 150 ⁇ m in diameter, of decontaminated and solidified dredged material.
  • the drying period is less than or equal to two weeks.
  • the filler is particularly suitable as an additive to a composite material if it is pulverized, preferably to a particle size of about 10 to about 150 ⁇ m in diameter.
  • the composite material is concrete.
  • the composite material is selected from the group consisting of cement- based concrete and polymer concrete.
  • the composite material is selected from the group consisting of cement, a mixture of cementitious materials, a mixture of cementitious materials and sand, a mixture of cementitious materials and gravel aggregate, or any combination thereof.
  • the chelating agent is administered to the mix containing the lime-based binder after the drying and cooling-off period, which leads to an unexpectedly large decrease in leachable contaminants from the concrete containing dredged material.
  • both variations of the combined treatment in accordance with the present invention are more effective in substantially reducing the amount of leachable cyanide than treatment with only chelating agent A or no treatment.
  • the concentrations of heavy metals analyzed were too low to allow comparison among the four samples.
  • the superior decontamination effect of the combined treatment of the invention relative to the treatment with a chelating agent alone is due to the deconglomeration of the dredged material upon treatment with lime-based binder. As discussed above, the dredged material after deconglomeration exhibits a very fine, porous structure.
  • This structure is more effectively treatable by the chelating agent than the structure of dredged material which has not been treated with lime-based binder, as shown in Tables 2 and 3.
  • the order in which the chelating agent and the lime-based binder are added is therefore critical in enabling the method of the invention to achieve a level of decontamination which is superior to that obtained by treatment with the chelating agent alone, which does not decontaminate dredged material effectively, or with the lime based binder alone, which only solidifies the dredged material.
  • the effect of the filler on the strength of concrete or mortar compositions was also investigated and is shown in Table 4.
  • Table 4 shows that the compressive strength of the mortar containing the filler obtained from the combined treatment of the present invention is comparable, and in some cases superior, to the mortar strength obtained with no treatment or with treatment with chelating agent A alone.
  • the combined treatment if the present invention also provides good strength characteristics.
  • Another method for the production of a composite material having solidified dredged material as a filler comprises as a first step adding untreated dredged material to a composite material to form a mixture.
  • the composite material is concrete.
  • the composite material is selected from the group consisting of cement, a mixture of cementitious materials, a mixture of cementitious materials and sand, a mixture of cementitious materials and gravel aggregate, or any combination thereof.
  • a lime-based binder and a chelating agent, preferably chelating agent A are then added in this order to the mixture.
  • the mixture is then allowed to cool to about ambient temperature.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Ceramic Engineering (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Soil Sciences (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Sludge (AREA)
  • Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)

Abstract

A method for the decontamination and solidification of dredged material is described. The method includes, in the following order, (a) adding a lime-based binder to dredged material to form a mixture; (b) letting the mixture cool to about ambient temperature; and (c) adding to the mixture a chelating agent. The order of the steps may not be reversed without affecting the effectiveness of the treatment of the dredged material. A method for producing filler containing decontaminated and solidified dredged material i s also described. The method includes treating dredged material with a lime-based binder and a chelating agent and adding the resulting mixture to concrete.

Description

METHOD OF TREATMENT OF DREDGED MATERIAL FOR BENEFICIAL USE
SPECIFICATION
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/276,445, filed March 16, 2001 , which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention.
This invention is directed to a method for the treatment of dredged material. More particularly, this invention is directed to a method to decontaminate and solidify dredged material so as to render it suitable for beneficial use.
2. Background Information
Harbors and waterways require shipping lanes to be dredged on a regular maintenance basis in order to prevent the shipping lanes from silting up. Material that is dredged out of port or harbor locations typically contains a wide range of toxic contaminants, from heavy metals to oils and pesticides. Three alternatives may be considered for management of dredged material: confined disposal, open- water disposal, and beneficial use.
Confined disposal is problematic since confined facilities must have all potential escape routes of the contaminants eliminated, including effluents during placement, surface runoff, leachates, direct uptake by plants and animals and volatilization to air. Open-water disposal is limited by the fact that the dumping of contaminated sediments in waters is not permitted under various legislative measures, including, for example, the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act. Accordingly, treatment of the contaminated dredged material for rendering it suitable for beneficial use is a most desirable alternative.
Several examples of beneficial use are available. For example, the dredged material may be used as beach nourishment, which may be necessary if natural replacement of material moved along the shoreline by littoral transport is not available. However, only the gravel and sand portion of dredged material is suitable for beach nourishment, making separation and decontamination obligatory. As a second example, dredged material may be used as manufactured topsoil; however, only fine particles are suitable for such use, so that separation and decontamination of clay and silt is required. In addition, when used for agricultural purposes, the material has to be suitably clean and must not contain excessive amounts of salts, which can make the material unusable for growth of most plants. A more promising beneficial use for dredged material is as a filler for composite materials. However, such use requires not only effective decontamination but also solidification of the dredged material.
One solution to the problem of treatment of contaminated dredged material is the use of chemical substances capable of neutralizing heavy metals and other toxins, such as the chelating agents described in U.S. Patent No. 5,714,085 (herein incorporated by reference). For example, the chelating agents of U.S. Patent No. 5,714,085 remove heavy metals and certain organic contaminants such as polychlorinated biphenyls. These chelating agents are advantageous when compared to microorganisms, which can remove organic contaminants but cannot remove heavy metals and other inorganic contaminants. However, the chelating agents of U.S. Patent No. 5,714,085 were developed only for decontamination, and not for solidification as well. Solidification of the dredged material is necessary to make it suitable as a filler for composite materials such as concrete.
None of the prior art, including U.S. Patent No. 5,714,085, provides a commercially viable method that results both in decontamination and in solidification of the dredged material that renders the material suitable as a filler for composite materials.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide a method for the treatment of dredged material, where the method comprises, in the following order: adding to dredged material a lime-based binder to form a mixture; letting the mixture cool to about room temperature; and adding a chelating agent. This method results in decontamination and solidification of the dredged material and renders the material suitable as a filler for composite materials. The sequential steps of adding a lime based binder and then adding a chelating agent exhibit an unexpected synergistic effect in decontaminating the dredged material while solidifying the material.
A further object of the invention is to provide a method suitable for the treatment of both dry and wet dredged material.
A further object of the invention is to provide a method for the production of a filler containing dredged material treated first with a lime-based binder and then with a chelating agent.
One advantage of the method of the invention is that it provides a highly decontaminated solidified dredged material which makes it suitable for use as a filler for composite materials such as concrete.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 shows the particle size distribution of natural dry dredged material ("NYH dry" in Figure 1) and of dredged material after combined treatment with a lime-based binder and a chelating agent ("DMCJ" in Figure 1).
Figure 2 shows the cumulative particle size distribution of natural dry dredged material (NYH dry) and of dredged material after treatment with a lime- based binder and a chelating agent (DMCJ).
Figure 3 shows an optical microscope observation of dry dredged material at lOOx magnification.
Figure 4 shows an optical microscope observation of dry dredged material after treatment with a lime-based binder and a chelating agent at 1 OOx magnification. The arrows mark agglomerates around oil products.
Figure 5 shows plots of compressive strength versus dredged material ("DM" in Figure 5) content after 7 and 28 days.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The method of the present invention includes at least two separate steps carried out in sequence. The first of the two steps includes solidification of dredged material by treatment with a lime-based binder. In one exemplary embodiment, the binder is a pulverized quick-lime, such as CAL-MAX pulverized fine quick-lime available from Ash Grove Cement Co. Preferably, the pulverized quick-lime comprises at least 80% by weight of active calcium oxide, up to 1% by weight of magnesium oxide, up to 2% by weight of silica, up to 0.2 % by weight of ferric oxide, and up to 0.2 % by weight of aluminum oxide. Most preferably, the mean diameter of the particles of the pulverized quick- lime is about 45 μm (325 mesh). All of the quicklime material passed a no. 30 sieve. The phrase "active calcium oxide" is intended to mean calcium oxide that is capable of readily reacting with water at ambient temperature. The term "ambient temperature" as used herein refers to the atmospheric temperature at the location where treatment of the dredged material takes place. Once calcium oxide has reacted with water, it is no longer "active calcium oxide."
The hydration of the pulverized quick-lime results in raising the temperature of the mixture to about 212°F and greatly reduces the water content and therefore the volume of the raw dredged material. This treatment solidifies the dredged material. After the dredged material has cooled to ambient temperature, it is suitable for further processing, either dried or wet. The term cooling is intended to refer to natural or passive cooling, rather than forced or active cooling.
The lime-based binder treatment changes the structure and texture of the dredged material. While the untreated material partly consists of clay-sand agglomerates with closed structure and similar particle size distribution as regular, but fine sand aggregate, after the lime-based binder treatment it exhibits a very fine, porous structure nearly without conglomeration. The particles are separated from each other, and if they are bound by the hydrated lime-based binder, these bonds can be broken with relative ease. The lime-based binder treatment also changes the surface properties of the dredged material. The surface charge is altered, making the surface accessible to polar or charged substances such as water or superplasticizers. As side benefits, increased homogeneity and less saline material on the surface were observed. The odor diminished, which is an indication that volatile organics are either destroyed or bound. The lime-based binder, in addition to causing dehydration and solidification, also causes a rise in the pH-level, which creates the basis for very effective decontamination of the dredged material.
The second of the two steps of the method of the present invention, which is subsequent to the first step, includes treatment of the dredged material with a chelating agent. Preferably, the chelating agent is capable of chelation of and formation of coordination compounds with chemical contaminants in the dredged material. For example, when the contaminant is a metal M, the chelating agent is capable of providing one or more coordinating moieties X which encapsulate the metal M to form a coordination compound comprising the structural unit M(X)n, where n is the number of moieties X that coordinate the metal center. The number n depends on the nature of the metal. Such a chelating agent has the capability of encapsulation of pollutants, such as heavy metals and polychloride biphenyls (PCB). The treatment is relatively fast, reliable, and effective. In one particularly advantageous exemplary embodiment of the invention, the chelating agent is one of the chelating agents described in U.S. Patent No. 5,714,085, which can remove contaminants such as heavy metals and PCB. The compositions of two exemplary chelating agents in the form of solutions are described in Table 1 :
Table 1. Chemical composition of exemplary solutions of chelating agents
Figure imgf000006_0001
Chelating agents A and B were used separately to treat the dredged material. In one advantageous embodiment of the invention, the chelating agent is present in an amount of about 3% to about 10 % by weight of the dredged material. The effectiveness of each of agents A and B was evaluated in terms of the degree of efflorescence of the chlorides of sodium, potassium, and other metals. Agent A was shown to be more effective than agent B: samples containing agent B showed intensive efflorescence of sodium, potassium and other chlorides, while samples containing agent A showed much lower efflorescence levels. It is believed that the ability of a chelating agent in removing metals such as sodium or potassium is a qualitative measure of its ability to decontaminate heavy metals. Accordingly, agent A is preferable as the chelating agent for the dredged material treatment described herein.
Treatment with a chelating agent alone does not seem to be a sufficient preparation of dredged material for further beneficial use because chelating agents generally provide for decontamination only. We have discovered that by first treating the dredged material with a lime-based binder and then treating the mixture of the dredged material and the lime-based binder with a chelating agent, one obtains decontamination of the dredged material to an extent greater than the effect of the chelating agent when used alone. In accordance with the present invention, the order of the two steps described above, i.e. addition of a lime-based binder and subsequent addition of a chelating agent, may not be reversed without significantly reducing the effectiveness of the decontamination and solidification.
The combined treatment of the present invention causes a shift to finer particle sizes, as illustrated in Figures 1 and 2. This shift indicates that the surface structure is altered and that conglomerates, especially around oil products, are either destroyed or spread out. In the material after treatment, the agglomerates of oil products are very small as compared to the untreated dredged material, as evidenced in Figures 3 and 4, which show microscope observations at x 100 magnification of the dredged material before treatment and after the combined treatment of the present invention, respectively. To study the effectiveness of the combined treatment of the present invention, dredged materials were subjected to a leaching test following the Environmental Protection Agency Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure as described in Federal Register Vol. 51, No. 216, November 1986, Rules and Regulations. Three samples were analyzed: an untreated reference sample (raw dredged material), a sample treated only with chelating agent A, and a sample which had undergone the combined treatment of the present invention. The results of the test are summarized in Table 2.
Figure imgf000008_0001
Figure imgf000008_0002
ND = not detectable
As can be seen from Table 2, the data exhibit the effectiveness of the combined treatment. The treatment with only chelating agent A is ineffective in reducing the amount of heavy metals detectable in a leaching test - in fact, a larger fraction of lead present in the dredged material leached out than in the untreated sample. In contrast, the combined treatment of the present invention considerably reduces both leachable cyanide and heavy metals.
The treated dredged material of the present invention may be used as a filler for concrete or mortar compositions. In order to evaluate the viability of the method of the present invention, properties of both fresh and hardened concrete obtained with both untreated and treated dredged material were tested. The behavior of concrete when mixed with untreated dredged material provides reference data, which can be used to assess the effectiveness of treatment procedures.
The treatment of the dredged material includes the following steps. The dredged material and the lime-based binder are mixed. Preferably, the lime- based binder is in the amount ranging from about 3% to about 75% by weight of the dredged material. The hydration of the lime-based binder is accompanied by generation of heat and reduces the water content of the dredged material drastically. A solid mixture is formed which is allowed to cool down to about ambient temperature and is then mixed with a chelating agent, preferably chelating agent A described above, to form a new mixture. The water content of the chelating agent solution hydrates the lime-based binder, so that the new mixture remains solid. The new mixture may be placed in a rotary dryer to form chips, or in a granulator to form granules. The chips, granules, or combination thereof were dried to a sufficient hardness and ground in a ball mill to produce a filler comprising particles, preferably of about 10 to about 150 μm in diameter, of decontaminated and solidified dredged material. In one exemplary embodiment of the invention, the drying period is less than or equal to two weeks.
The filler is particularly suitable as an additive to a composite material if it is pulverized, preferably to a particle size of about 10 to about 150 μm in diameter. In one embodiment of the invention, the composite material is concrete. Preferably, the composite material is selected from the group consisting of cement- based concrete and polymer concrete. In another embodiment of the invention, the composite material is selected from the group consisting of cement, a mixture of cementitious materials, a mixture of cementitious materials and sand, a mixture of cementitious materials and gravel aggregate, or any combination thereof.
Prior mixing of cement and the chelating agent does not strongly affect the concrete or mortar properties. In contrast, in the preferred mixing procedure, the chelating agent is administered to the mix containing the lime-based binder after the drying and cooling-off period, which leads to an unexpectedly large decrease in leachable contaminants from the concrete containing dredged material.
Leaching tests were conducted on mortar samples containing 20% dredged material. The results of the leaching tests are shown in Table 3. Referring to Table 3, Sample 23 contained untreated dredged material, sample 24 was treated with chelating agent A, and samples 21 and 22 were treated with two variations of the combined treatment, i.e. first adding the lime-based binder, and then adding the chelating agent before or after the mixture of the dredged material and the lime-based binder has cooled to about ambient temperature.
Table 3: Results of chemical analysis of mortar samples (in ppm)
Figure imgf000010_0001
ND = not detectable
As can be seen from Table 3, both variations of the combined treatment in accordance with the present invention are more effective in substantially reducing the amount of leachable cyanide than treatment with only chelating agent A or no treatment. The concentrations of heavy metals analyzed were too low to allow comparison among the four samples. Without wishing to be bound by any theory or mechanism, it is believed that the superior decontamination effect of the combined treatment of the invention relative to the treatment with a chelating agent alone is due to the deconglomeration of the dredged material upon treatment with lime-based binder. As discussed above, the dredged material after deconglomeration exhibits a very fine, porous structure. This structure is more effectively treatable by the chelating agent than the structure of dredged material which has not been treated with lime-based binder, as shown in Tables 2 and 3. The order in which the chelating agent and the lime-based binder are added is therefore critical in enabling the method of the invention to achieve a level of decontamination which is superior to that obtained by treatment with the chelating agent alone, which does not decontaminate dredged material effectively, or with the lime based binder alone, which only solidifies the dredged material. The effect of the filler on the strength of concrete or mortar compositions was also investigated and is shown in Table 4.
Table 4: Mortar strength with filler comprising treated dredged material
Figure imgf000011_0001
Table 4 shows that the compressive strength of the mortar containing the filler obtained from the combined treatment of the present invention is comparable, and in some cases superior, to the mortar strength obtained with no treatment or with treatment with chelating agent A alone. Thus, in addition to the benefit of providing superior decontamination as discussed in Table 3, the combined treatment if the present invention also provides good strength characteristics.
Another method for the production of a composite material having solidified dredged material as a filler comprises as a first step adding untreated dredged material to a composite material to form a mixture. In one embodiment of the invention, the composite material is concrete. In another embodiment of the invention, the composite material is selected from the group consisting of cement, a mixture of cementitious materials, a mixture of cementitious materials and sand, a mixture of cementitious materials and gravel aggregate, or any combination thereof. A lime-based binder and a chelating agent, preferably chelating agent A, are then added in this order to the mixture. The mixture is then allowed to cool to about ambient temperature. It should be understood that various changes and modifications to the preferred embodiments described herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention, the scope being defined by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A method for the decontamination and solidification of dredged material, comprising, in the following order:
(a) adding a lime-based binder to dredged material to form a mixture; (b) letting the mixture cool to about room temperature; and
(c) adding to the mixture a chelating agent.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the lime-based binder is pulverized quicklime.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the pulverized quick-lime comprises quick- lime particles having a mean diameter of about 45 μm.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein the pulverized quick-lime comprises active calcium oxide, magnesium oxide, silica, ferric oxide, and aluminum oxide.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the pulverized quick-lime comprises at least 80%) by weight of active calcium oxide, up to 1% by weight of magnesium oxide, up to 2% by weight of silica, up to 0.2 % by weight of ferric oxide, and up to 0.2
% by weight of aluminum oxide.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the chelating agent is a chemical composition providing chelation of and formation of coordination compounds with chemical contaminants in the dredged material.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the chelating agent comprises in solution sodium chloride, potassium chloride, potassium bromide, calcium sulfate, lithium chloride, barium chloride, magnesium chloride, strontium chloride, cobalt chloride, zinc chloride, copper chloride, tannin and pyrolignous acid.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the chelating agent comprises in solution sodium chloride in a concentration of about 44 g/liter, potassium chloride in a concentration of about 87 g/liter, potassium bromide in a concentration of about 6 g/liter, calcium sulfate in a concentration of about 8 g/liter, lithium chloride in a concentration of about 1.7 g/liter, barium chloride in a concentration of about 12 g/liter, magnesium chloride in a concentration of about 8 g/liter, strontium chloride in a concentration of about 4 g/liter, cobalt chloride in a concentration of about 8 g/liter, zinc chloride in a concentration of about 3 g/liter, copper chloride in a concentration of about 3 g/liter, tannin in a concentration of about 11 g/liter, and pyrolignous acid in a concentration saturating the solution.
9. A method for producing a filler for a composite material, comprising, in the following order:
(a) adding a lime-based binder to dredged material to form a mixture; (b) letting the mixture cool to about ambient temperature;
(c) adding a chelating agent to form a new mixture;
(d) forming from the new mixture at least one of chips, granules, and a combination thereof;
(e) drying the at least one of chips, granules, and a combination thereof formed in step (d); and
(f) grinding in a ball mill the at least one of chips, granules, and a combination thereof dried in step (e) to form the filler, the drying and the grinding being carried out at about ambient temperature.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein after the grinding step the filler comprises particles of treated dredged material having a diameter of about 10 μm to about
150 μm.
11. The method of claim 9, wherein the lime-based binder is added in the amount ranging from about 3% to about 75 %> by weight of the dredged material.
12. The method of claim 9, wherein the filler is used as an additive to a composite material.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the composite material is selected from the group consisting of cement, a mixture of cementitious materials, a mixture of cementitious materials and sand, a mixture of cementitious materials and gravel aggregate, or any combination thereof.
14. The method of claim 12, wherein the composite material is concrete.
15. The method of claim 9, wherein the lime-based binder is pulverized quick- lime.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein the pulverized quick-lime comprises quicklime particles having a mean diameter of about 45 μm.
17. The method of claim 15, wherein the pulverized quick-lime comprises active calcium oxide, magnesium oxide, silica, ferric oxide, and aluminum oxide.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein the pulverized quick-lime comprises at least 80%) by weight of active calcium oxide, up to 1%> by weight of magnesium oxide, up to 2%> by weight of silica, up to 0.2 % by weight of ferric oxide, and up to 0.2 % by weight of aluminum oxide.
19. The method of claim 9, wherein the chelating agent comprises a chemical composition for chelation of and formation of coordination compounds with chemical contaminants in the dredged material.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein the chelating agent comprises in solution sodium chloride, potassium chloride, potassium bromide, calcium sulfate, lithium chloride, barium chloride, magnesium chloride, strontium chloride, cobalt chloride, zinc chloride, copper chloride, tannin and pyrolignous acid.
21. The method of claim 20, wherein the chelating agent comprises a solution comprising sodium chloride in a concentration of about 44 g/liter, potassium chloride in a concentration of about 87 g/liter, potassium bromide in a concentration of about 6 g/liter, calcium sulfate in a concentration of about 8 g/liter, lithium chloride in a concentration of about 1.7 g/liter, barium chloride in a concentration of about 12 g/liter, magnesium chloride in a concentration of about 8 g/liter, strontium chloride in a concentration of about 4 g/liter, cobalt chloride in a concentration of about 8 g/liter, zinc chloride in a concentration of about 3 g/liter, copper chloride in a concentration of about 3 g/liter, tannin in a concentration of about 11 g/liter, and pyrolignous acid in a concentration saturating the solution.
22. A method for producing a composite material comprising solidified dredged material, comprising, in the following order:
(a) adding untreated dredged material to one of cement, a mixture of cementitious materials, a mixture of cementitious materials and sand, a mixture of cementitious materials and gravel aggregate, or any combination thereof, to form a first mixture;
(b) adding a lime-based binder to the first mixture formed in step (a) to form a second mixture;
(c) adding a chelating agent to the second mixture formed in step (b) to form a third mixture; and (d) allowing the third mixture cool to about ambient temperature.
23. The method of claim 22, wherein the lime-based binder is a pulverized quicklime.
24. The method of claim 22, wherein the chelating agent is a chemical composition for chelation of and formation of coordination compounds with chemical contaminants in the dredged material.
25. A method for producing a composite material comprising solidified dredged material, comprising, in the following order:
(a) adding untreated dredged material to one of cement, a mixture of cementitious materials, a mixture of cementitious materials and sand, a mixture of cementitious materials and gravel aggregate, or any combination thereof, to form a first mixture;
(b) adding a lime-based binder to the first mixture formed in step (a) to form a second mixture; (c) allowing the second mixture formed in step (b) cool to about ambient temperature; and
(d) adding a chelating agent to the second mixture to form a third mixture.
PCT/US2002/008109 2001-03-16 2002-03-18 Method of treatment of dredged material for beneficial use WO2002074391A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/471,436 US8057378B2 (en) 2002-03-18 2002-03-18 Method of treatment of dredged material for beneficial use

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US27644501P 2001-03-16 2001-03-16
US60/276,445 2001-03-16

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2002074391A1 true WO2002074391A1 (en) 2002-09-26

Family

ID=23056690

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2002/008109 WO2002074391A1 (en) 2001-03-16 2002-03-18 Method of treatment of dredged material for beneficial use

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2002074391A1 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2937567A1 (en) * 2008-10-28 2010-04-30 Vetech Loaded sediment e.g. fluvial or maritime sediment revaluing method for toxic particles e.g. heavy metals, involves mixing and milling sediments with lime and binder, and using processed material as material for public works
CN102824716A (en) * 2012-09-24 2012-12-19 核工业理化工程研究院 Preparation method of fire extinguishing agent for extinguishing spontaneous combustion of uranium metal
CN109133548A (en) * 2018-09-04 2019-01-04 张家港江苏科技大学产业技术研究院 A kind of miberal powder preparation method using river domestic sludge
US10837152B2 (en) 2015-09-18 2020-11-17 Ihc Holland Ie B.V. Methods and system for forming reclamation structures
CN113149510A (en) * 2021-04-01 2021-07-23 安徽理工大学 Method for modifying concrete recycled micro powder and application thereof

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5304710A (en) * 1993-02-18 1994-04-19 Envar Services, Inc. Method of detoxification and stabilization of soils contaminated with chromium ore waste
US5599137A (en) * 1995-09-13 1997-02-04 Chemtech Analysis Inc. Mobile soil treatment apparatus and method
US5782580A (en) * 1996-10-15 1998-07-21 Atlantic Richfield Company Soil remediation method
US5795285A (en) * 1995-12-01 1998-08-18 Mclaughlin; David Francis Conversion of contaminated sediments into useful products by plasma melting
US5803894A (en) * 1996-12-24 1998-09-08 Cement-Lock L.L.C. Process for preparing enviromentally stable products by the remediation of contaminated sediments and soils
US5855666A (en) * 1996-12-24 1999-01-05 Cement-Lock Group, L.L.C. Process for preparing environmentally stable products by the remediation of contaminated sediments and soils

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5304710A (en) * 1993-02-18 1994-04-19 Envar Services, Inc. Method of detoxification and stabilization of soils contaminated with chromium ore waste
US5599137A (en) * 1995-09-13 1997-02-04 Chemtech Analysis Inc. Mobile soil treatment apparatus and method
US5795285A (en) * 1995-12-01 1998-08-18 Mclaughlin; David Francis Conversion of contaminated sediments into useful products by plasma melting
US5782580A (en) * 1996-10-15 1998-07-21 Atlantic Richfield Company Soil remediation method
US5803894A (en) * 1996-12-24 1998-09-08 Cement-Lock L.L.C. Process for preparing enviromentally stable products by the remediation of contaminated sediments and soils
US5855666A (en) * 1996-12-24 1999-01-05 Cement-Lock Group, L.L.C. Process for preparing environmentally stable products by the remediation of contaminated sediments and soils

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2937567A1 (en) * 2008-10-28 2010-04-30 Vetech Loaded sediment e.g. fluvial or maritime sediment revaluing method for toxic particles e.g. heavy metals, involves mixing and milling sediments with lime and binder, and using processed material as material for public works
CN102824716A (en) * 2012-09-24 2012-12-19 核工业理化工程研究院 Preparation method of fire extinguishing agent for extinguishing spontaneous combustion of uranium metal
CN102824716B (en) * 2012-09-24 2015-05-20 核工业理化工程研究院 Preparation method of fire extinguishing agent for extinguishing spontaneous combustion of uranium metal
US10837152B2 (en) 2015-09-18 2020-11-17 Ihc Holland Ie B.V. Methods and system for forming reclamation structures
CN109133548A (en) * 2018-09-04 2019-01-04 张家港江苏科技大学产业技术研究院 A kind of miberal powder preparation method using river domestic sludge
CN113149510A (en) * 2021-04-01 2021-07-23 安徽理工大学 Method for modifying concrete recycled micro powder and application thereof
CN113149510B (en) * 2021-04-01 2022-02-08 安徽理工大学 Method for modifying concrete recycled micro powder and application thereof

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Malviya et al. Factors affecting hazardous waste solidification/stabilization: A review
Dermatas et al. Utilization of fly ash for stabilization/solidification of heavy metal contaminated soils
CN103436265B (en) A kind of contaminated soil, bed mud and mud deoxidization, degradation stablizer and preparation method thereof and using method
Yilmaz et al. Solidification/stabilization of hazardous wastes containing metals and organic contaminants
Camacho et al. Arsenic stabilization on water treatment residuals by calcium addition
Zhou et al. Sewage sludge ash-incorporated stabilisation/solidification for recycling and remediation of marine sediments
HU212633B (en) Toxic waste fixant and method for using same
Cherian et al. Engineering and environmental evaluation for utilization of recycled pulp mill fly ash as binder in sustainable road construction
Nehdi et al. Stabilization of sulphidic mine tailings for prevention of metal release and acid drainage using cementitious materials: a review
JPH02500488A (en) Method of fixing harmful substances in soil or soil-like substances
HU212614B (en) Toxic waste fixant composition and method for neutralizing toxic waste contaminated material
Yan et al. Incentive effect of bentonite and concrete admixtures on stabilization/solidification for heavy metal-polluted sediments of Xiangjiang River
US4623469A (en) Method for rendering hazardous wastes less permeable and more resistant to leaching
JP2000176493A (en) Sludge solidifying material and solidifying treatment
Dermatas et al. Stabilization/solidification (S/S) of heavy metal contaminated soils by means of a quicklime-based treatment approach
JP2004330018A (en) Solidification/insolubilization agents and solidification/insolubilization method for soil, incineration ash, coal ash and plaster board waste
Sollars et al. Cement‐based stabilization of wastes: practical and theoretical considerations
WO2002074391A1 (en) Method of treatment of dredged material for beneficial use
JP3274376B2 (en) Agglomerating agent for mud, solidifying agent using it
Banerjee et al. Management of arsenic-laden water plant sludge by stabilization
JP2017145294A (en) Agent and method for inhibiting the elution of harmful material
US8057378B2 (en) Method of treatment of dredged material for beneficial use
Millrath et al. Beneficial use of dredged material 2
JP2006290713A (en) Method of reforming slag particle group as artificial sand, and artificial sand
Abu-Qdais et al. Leachability of heavy metals from stabilized/solidified mine tailing in Russia

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 10471436

Country of ref document: US

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: JP